Revisions to the California State Implementation Plan, San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District, 1715-1716 [2010-352]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 8 / Wednesday, January 13, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
1715
EPA-APPROVED MISSISSIPPI REGULATIONS—Continued
State citation
APC–S–3
Section
Section
Section
Section
Section
1
2
3
4
5
State effective
date
Title/subject
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
...........................................................................
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2010–348 Filed 1–12–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R09–OAR–2009–0474; FRL–9100–1]
Revisions to the California State
Implementation Plan, San Joaquin
Valley Unified Air Pollution Control
District
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
EPA is finalizing approval of
revisions to the San Joaquin Valley
Unified Air Pollution Control District
(SJVAPCD) portion of the California
SUMMARY:
Local agency
SJVAPCD ......................................................
4307
We proposed to approve these rules
because we determined that they
complied with the relevant CAA
requirements. Our proposed action
contains more information on the rules
and our evaluation.
II. Public Comments and EPA
Responses
EPA’s proposed action provided a 30day public comment period. During this
period, we received no comments.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
8/27/05
Rule No.
4306
III. EPA Action
Since publication of the proposed
action, we identified two minor issues
regarding Rule 4307 that do not change
our assessment that the submitted rule
complies with the relevant CAA
requirements. Nonetheless, revisions to
14:41 Jan 12, 2010
5/31/72, 37 FR 10875.
5/31/72, 37 FR 10875.
11/13/89, 54 FR 47211.
5/31/72, 37 FR 10875.
11/13/89, 54 FR 47211.
Jkt 220001
7/10/06, 71 FR 38773.
State Implementation Plan (SIP). These
revisions were proposed in the Federal
Register on August 14, 2009 and
concern oxides of nitrogen (NOX) and
particulate matter (PM) emissions from
boilers of various capacities. We are
approving local rules that regulate these
emission sources under the Clean Air
Act as amended in 1990 (CAA or the
Act).
DATES: Effective Date: This rule is
effective on February 12, 2010.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established docket
number EPA–R09–OAR–2009–0474 for
this action. The index to the docket is
available electronically at https://
www.regulations.gov and in hard copy
at EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street,
San Francisco, California. While all
documents in the docket are listed in
the index, some information may be
publicly available only at the hard copy
location (e.g., copyrighted material), and
SJVAPCD ......................................................
VerDate Nov<24>2008
2/4/72
2/4/72
6/3/88
2/4/72
6/3/88
Regulations for the Prevention of Significant Deterioration of Air Quality
All ...............................
*
Explanation
Regulations for the Prevention of Air Pollution Emergency Episodes
General .............................................................
Definitions .........................................................
Episode Criteria ................................................
Emission Control Action Programs ...................
Emergency Orders ............................................
APC–S–5
EPA approval date
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Idalia Perez, EPA Region IX, (415) 972–
3248, perez.idalia@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us’’
and ‘‘our’’ refer to EPA.
Table of Contents
I. Proposed Action
II. Public Comments and EPA Responses
III. EPA Action
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Proposed Action
On August 14, 2009 (74 FR 41104),
EPA proposed to approve the following
rules into the California SIP.
Rule title
Adopted
Boilers, Steam Generators and Process Heaters—
Phase 3.
Boilers, Steam Generators and Process Heaters—2.0
MMbtu/hr to 5.0 MMbtu/hr.
these provisions should be made when
the Rule is next revised.
We have identified the possibility that
some units that are subject to Rule 4307
do not need exemptions from basic
emission limits during start-up and
shutdown periods as long as they are
maintained and operated appropriately.
For example, we believe that heater
treaters which rely only on low-NOX
burners for compliance are capable of
consistent compliance with the Rule’s
basic emission limits during these
periods. As a result, Section 5.4 should
be revised to remove the start-up and
shutdown exemption period for such
devices.
Currently Section 6.1.4 requires
recordkeeping only if the start-up and
PO 00000
some may not be publicly available in
either location (e.g., CBI). To inspect the
hard copy materials, please schedule an
appointment during normal business
hours with the contact listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
Frm 00019
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Submitted
10/16/08
03/17/09
10/16/08
03/17/09
shut-down event exceeds the limitations
of the duration of such events in Section
5.4.1 or 5.4.2. EPA recommends that
Section 6.1.4 of Rule 4307 be revised to
require records that specify the duration
of all start-up and shut-down periods (at
least for units located at Title V
facilities). EPA notes that the limited
applicability of the current version of
6.1.4 may not be appropriate in other
rules, particularly those where periodic
or continuous monitoring is required.
No comments were submitted that
change our assessment that the
submitted rules comply with the
relevant CAA requirements. Therefore,
as authorized in section 110(k)(3) of the
Act, EPA is fully approving these rules
into the California SIP.
E:\FR\FM\13JAR1.SGM
13JAR1
1716
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 8 / Wednesday, January 13, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
IV. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the
Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the
provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k);
40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP
submissions, EPA’s role is to approve
State choices, provided that they meet
the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this action merely
approves State law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose
additional requirements beyond those
imposed by State law. For that reason,
this action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993);
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act;
and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, these rules do not have
Tribal implications as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,
November 9, 2000), because the SIP is
not approved to apply in Indian country
located in the State, and EPA notes that
it will not impose substantial direct
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:41 Jan 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
costs on Tribal governments or preempt
Tribal law.
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this action and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean
Air Act, petitions for judicial review of
this action must be filed in the United
States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit by March 15, 2010.
Filing a petition for reconsideration by
the Administrator of this final rule does
not affect the finality of this action for
the purposes of judicial review nor does
it extend the time within which a
petition for judicial review may be filed,
and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. This action may
not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements (see section
307(b)(2)).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Dated: November 23, 2009.
Laura Yoshii,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.
Part 52, Chapter I, Title 40 of the Code
of Federal Regulations is amended as
follows:
■
PART 52—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for Part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart F—California
2. Section 52.220, is amended by
adding paragraphs (c)(363)(i)(A)(3) and
(4) to read as follows:
■
§ 52.220
*
Identification of plan.
*
*
(c) * * *
(363) * * *
PO 00000
Frm 00020
*
Fmt 4700
*
Sfmt 4700
(i) * * *
(A) * * *
(3) Rule 4306, ‘‘Boilers, Steam
Generators and Process Heaters—Phase
3, ’’ adopted on October 16, 2008.
(4) Rule 4307, ‘‘Boilers, Steam
Generators and Process Heaters—2.0
MMbtu/hr to 5.0 MMbtu/hr,’’ adopted
on October 16, 2008.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2010–352 Filed 1–12–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R09–OAR–2009–0024; FRL–9097–2]
Revisions to the California State
Implementation Plan, San Joaquin
Valley Unified Air Pollution Control
District
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
SUMMARY: EPA is finalizing a limited
approval and limited disapproval of
revisions to the San Joaquin Valley
Unified Air Pollution Control District
(SJVUAPCD) portion of the California
State Implementation Plan (SIP). This
action was proposed in the Federal
Register on August 19, 2009, and
concerns a local fee rule that applies to
major sources of volatile organic
compound and nitrogen oxide
emissions in the San Joaquin Valley
ozone nonattainment area. Under
authority of the Clean Air Act as
amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act), this
action simultaneously approves a local
rule that regulates these emission
sources and directs California to correct
rule deficiencies.
DATES: Effective Date: This rule is
effective on February 12, 2010.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established docket
number EPA–R09–OAR–2009–0024 for
this action. The index to the docket is
available electronically at https://
www.regulations.gov and in hard copy
at EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street,
San Francisco, California. While all
documents in the docket are listed in
the index, some information may be
publicly available only at the hard copy
location (e.g., copyrighted material), and
some may not be publicly available in
either location (e.g., CBI). To inspect the
hard copy materials, please schedule an
appointment during normal business
hours with the contact listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
E:\FR\FM\13JAR1.SGM
13JAR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 8 (Wednesday, January 13, 2010)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 1715-1716]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-352]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R09-OAR-2009-0474; FRL-9100-1]
Revisions to the California State Implementation Plan, San
Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is finalizing approval of revisions to the San Joaquin
Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District (SJVAPCD) portion of the
California State Implementation Plan (SIP). These revisions were
proposed in the Federal Register on August 14, 2009 and concern oxides
of nitrogen (NOX) and particulate matter (PM) emissions from
boilers of various capacities. We are approving local rules that
regulate these emission sources under the Clean Air Act as amended in
1990 (CAA or the Act).
DATES: Effective Date: This rule is effective on February 12, 2010.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established docket number EPA-R09-OAR-2009-0474 for
this action. The index to the docket is available electronically at
https://www.regulations.gov and in hard copy at EPA Region IX, 75
Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, California. While all documents in the
docket are listed in the index, some information may be publicly
available only at the hard copy location (e.g., copyrighted material),
and some may not be publicly available in either location (e.g., CBI).
To inspect the hard copy materials, please schedule an appointment
during normal business hours with the contact listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Idalia Perez, EPA Region IX, (415)
972-3248, perez.idalia@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ``we,'' ``us'' and
``our'' refer to EPA.
Table of Contents
I. Proposed Action
II. Public Comments and EPA Responses
III. EPA Action
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Proposed Action
On August 14, 2009 (74 FR 41104), EPA proposed to approve the
following rules into the California SIP.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Local agency Rule No. Rule title Adopted Submitted
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SJVAPCD................................... 4306 Boilers, Steam Generators and 10/16/08 03/17/09
Process Heaters--Phase 3.
SJVAPCD................................... 4307 Boilers, Steam Generators and 10/16/08 03/17/09
Process Heaters--2.0 MMbtu/
hr to 5.0 MMbtu/hr.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
We proposed to approve these rules because we determined that they
complied with the relevant CAA requirements. Our proposed action
contains more information on the rules and our evaluation.
II. Public Comments and EPA Responses
EPA's proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period.
During this period, we received no comments.
III. EPA Action
Since publication of the proposed action, we identified two minor
issues regarding Rule 4307 that do not change our assessment that the
submitted rule complies with the relevant CAA requirements.
Nonetheless, revisions to these provisions should be made when the Rule
is next revised.
We have identified the possibility that some units that are subject
to Rule 4307 do not need exemptions from basic emission limits during
start-up and shutdown periods as long as they are maintained and
operated appropriately. For example, we believe that heater treaters
which rely only on low-NOX burners for compliance are
capable of consistent compliance with the Rule's basic emission limits
during these periods. As a result, Section 5.4 should be revised to
remove the start-up and shutdown exemption period for such devices.
Currently Section 6.1.4 requires recordkeeping only if the start-up
and shut-down event exceeds the limitations of the duration of such
events in Section 5.4.1 or 5.4.2. EPA recommends that Section 6.1.4 of
Rule 4307 be revised to require records that specify the duration of
all start-up and shut-down periods (at least for units located at Title
V facilities). EPA notes that the limited applicability of the current
version of 6.1.4 may not be appropriate in other rules, particularly
those where periodic or continuous monitoring is required.
No comments were submitted that change our assessment that the
submitted rules comply with the relevant CAA requirements. Therefore,
as authorized in section 110(k)(3) of the Act, EPA is fully approving
these rules into the California SIP.
[[Page 1716]]
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and
applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve State
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this action merely approves State law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those
imposed by State law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Clean Air Act; and
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, these rules do not have Tribal implications as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000),
because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in
the State, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct
costs on Tribal governments or preempt Tribal law.
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by March 15, 2010. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of
judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for
judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in
proceedings to enforce its requirements (see section 307(b)(2)).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone,
Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: November 23, 2009.
Laura Yoshii,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.
0
Part 52, Chapter I, Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is
amended as follows:
PART 52--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for Part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart F--California
0
2. Section 52.220, is amended by adding paragraphs (c)(363)(i)(A)(3)
and (4) to read as follows:
Sec. 52.220 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(363) * * *
(i) * * *
(A) * * *
(3) Rule 4306, ``Boilers, Steam Generators and Process Heaters--
Phase 3, '' adopted on October 16, 2008.
(4) Rule 4307, ``Boilers, Steam Generators and Process Heaters--2.0
MMbtu/hr to 5.0 MMbtu/hr,'' adopted on October 16, 2008.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2010-352 Filed 1-12-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P