Revisions to the California State Implementation Plan, San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District, 1715-1716 [2010-352]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 8 / Wednesday, January 13, 2010 / Rules and Regulations 1715 EPA-APPROVED MISSISSIPPI REGULATIONS—Continued State citation APC–S–3 Section Section Section Section Section 1 2 3 4 5 State effective date Title/subject .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... ........................................................................... * * * * [FR Doc. 2010–348 Filed 1–12–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [EPA–R09–OAR–2009–0474; FRL–9100–1] Revisions to the California State Implementation Plan, San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Final rule. EPA is finalizing approval of revisions to the San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District (SJVAPCD) portion of the California SUMMARY: Local agency SJVAPCD ...................................................... 4307 We proposed to approve these rules because we determined that they complied with the relevant CAA requirements. Our proposed action contains more information on the rules and our evaluation. II. Public Comments and EPA Responses EPA’s proposed action provided a 30day public comment period. During this period, we received no comments. erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES 8/27/05 Rule No. 4306 III. EPA Action Since publication of the proposed action, we identified two minor issues regarding Rule 4307 that do not change our assessment that the submitted rule complies with the relevant CAA requirements. Nonetheless, revisions to 14:41 Jan 12, 2010 5/31/72, 37 FR 10875. 5/31/72, 37 FR 10875. 11/13/89, 54 FR 47211. 5/31/72, 37 FR 10875. 11/13/89, 54 FR 47211. Jkt 220001 7/10/06, 71 FR 38773. State Implementation Plan (SIP). These revisions were proposed in the Federal Register on August 14, 2009 and concern oxides of nitrogen (NOX) and particulate matter (PM) emissions from boilers of various capacities. We are approving local rules that regulate these emission sources under the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act). DATES: Effective Date: This rule is effective on February 12, 2010. ADDRESSES: EPA has established docket number EPA–R09–OAR–2009–0474 for this action. The index to the docket is available electronically at https:// www.regulations.gov and in hard copy at EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, California. While all documents in the docket are listed in the index, some information may be publicly available only at the hard copy location (e.g., copyrighted material), and SJVAPCD ...................................................... VerDate Nov<24>2008 2/4/72 2/4/72 6/3/88 2/4/72 6/3/88 Regulations for the Prevention of Significant Deterioration of Air Quality All ............................... * Explanation Regulations for the Prevention of Air Pollution Emergency Episodes General ............................................................. Definitions ......................................................... Episode Criteria ................................................ Emission Control Action Programs ................... Emergency Orders ............................................ APC–S–5 EPA approval date FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Idalia Perez, EPA Region IX, (415) 972– 3248, perez.idalia@epa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us’’ and ‘‘our’’ refer to EPA. Table of Contents I. Proposed Action II. Public Comments and EPA Responses III. EPA Action IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews I. Proposed Action On August 14, 2009 (74 FR 41104), EPA proposed to approve the following rules into the California SIP. Rule title Adopted Boilers, Steam Generators and Process Heaters— Phase 3. Boilers, Steam Generators and Process Heaters—2.0 MMbtu/hr to 5.0 MMbtu/hr. these provisions should be made when the Rule is next revised. We have identified the possibility that some units that are subject to Rule 4307 do not need exemptions from basic emission limits during start-up and shutdown periods as long as they are maintained and operated appropriately. For example, we believe that heater treaters which rely only on low-NOX burners for compliance are capable of consistent compliance with the Rule’s basic emission limits during these periods. As a result, Section 5.4 should be revised to remove the start-up and shutdown exemption period for such devices. Currently Section 6.1.4 requires recordkeeping only if the start-up and PO 00000 some may not be publicly available in either location (e.g., CBI). To inspect the hard copy materials, please schedule an appointment during normal business hours with the contact listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Frm 00019 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 Submitted 10/16/08 03/17/09 10/16/08 03/17/09 shut-down event exceeds the limitations of the duration of such events in Section 5.4.1 or 5.4.2. EPA recommends that Section 6.1.4 of Rule 4307 be revised to require records that specify the duration of all start-up and shut-down periods (at least for units located at Title V facilities). EPA notes that the limited applicability of the current version of 6.1.4 may not be appropriate in other rules, particularly those where periodic or continuous monitoring is required. No comments were submitted that change our assessment that the submitted rules comply with the relevant CAA requirements. Therefore, as authorized in section 110(k)(3) of the Act, EPA is fully approving these rules into the California SIP. E:\FR\FM\13JAR1.SGM 13JAR1 1716 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 8 / Wednesday, January 13, 2010 / Rules and Regulations erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA’s role is to approve State choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. Accordingly, this action merely approves State law as meeting Federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by State law. For that reason, this action: • Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993); • Does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); • Is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.); • Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); • Does not have Federalism implications as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999); • Is not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); • Is not a significant regulatory action subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); • Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act; and • Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). In addition, these rules do not have Tribal implications as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in the State, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct VerDate Nov<24>2008 14:41 Jan 12, 2010 Jkt 220001 costs on Tribal governments or preempt Tribal law. The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal Register. This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by March 15, 2010. Filing a petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its requirements (see section 307(b)(2)). List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. Dated: November 23, 2009. Laura Yoshii, Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX. Part 52, Chapter I, Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended as follows: ■ PART 52—[AMENDED] 1. The authority citation for Part 52 continues to read as follows: ■ Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Subpart F—California 2. Section 52.220, is amended by adding paragraphs (c)(363)(i)(A)(3) and (4) to read as follows: ■ § 52.220 * Identification of plan. * * (c) * * * (363) * * * PO 00000 Frm 00020 * Fmt 4700 * Sfmt 4700 (i) * * * (A) * * * (3) Rule 4306, ‘‘Boilers, Steam Generators and Process Heaters—Phase 3, ’’ adopted on October 16, 2008. (4) Rule 4307, ‘‘Boilers, Steam Generators and Process Heaters—2.0 MMbtu/hr to 5.0 MMbtu/hr,’’ adopted on October 16, 2008. * * * * * [FR Doc. 2010–352 Filed 1–12–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [EPA–R09–OAR–2009–0024; FRL–9097–2] Revisions to the California State Implementation Plan, San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Final rule. SUMMARY: EPA is finalizing a limited approval and limited disapproval of revisions to the San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District (SJVUAPCD) portion of the California State Implementation Plan (SIP). This action was proposed in the Federal Register on August 19, 2009, and concerns a local fee rule that applies to major sources of volatile organic compound and nitrogen oxide emissions in the San Joaquin Valley ozone nonattainment area. Under authority of the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act), this action simultaneously approves a local rule that regulates these emission sources and directs California to correct rule deficiencies. DATES: Effective Date: This rule is effective on February 12, 2010. ADDRESSES: EPA has established docket number EPA–R09–OAR–2009–0024 for this action. The index to the docket is available electronically at https:// www.regulations.gov and in hard copy at EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, California. While all documents in the docket are listed in the index, some information may be publicly available only at the hard copy location (e.g., copyrighted material), and some may not be publicly available in either location (e.g., CBI). To inspect the hard copy materials, please schedule an appointment during normal business hours with the contact listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. E:\FR\FM\13JAR1.SGM 13JAR1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 8 (Wednesday, January 13, 2010)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 1715-1716]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-352]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R09-OAR-2009-0474; FRL-9100-1]


Revisions to the California State Implementation Plan, San 
Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is finalizing approval of revisions to the San Joaquin 
Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District (SJVAPCD) portion of the 
California State Implementation Plan (SIP). These revisions were 
proposed in the Federal Register on August 14, 2009 and concern oxides 
of nitrogen (NOX) and particulate matter (PM) emissions from 
boilers of various capacities. We are approving local rules that 
regulate these emission sources under the Clean Air Act as amended in 
1990 (CAA or the Act).

DATES: Effective Date: This rule is effective on February 12, 2010.

ADDRESSES: EPA has established docket number EPA-R09-OAR-2009-0474 for 
this action. The index to the docket is available electronically at 
https://www.regulations.gov and in hard copy at EPA Region IX, 75 
Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, California. While all documents in the 
docket are listed in the index, some information may be publicly 
available only at the hard copy location (e.g., copyrighted material), 
and some may not be publicly available in either location (e.g., CBI). 
To inspect the hard copy materials, please schedule an appointment 
during normal business hours with the contact listed in the FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT section.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Idalia Perez, EPA Region IX, (415) 
972-3248, perez.idalia@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ``we,'' ``us'' and 
``our'' refer to EPA.

Table of Contents

I. Proposed Action
II. Public Comments and EPA Responses
III. EPA Action
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

I. Proposed Action

    On August 14, 2009 (74 FR 41104), EPA proposed to approve the 
following rules into the California SIP.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Local agency                   Rule No.             Rule title             Adopted     Submitted
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SJVAPCD...................................         4306  Boilers, Steam Generators and     10/16/08     03/17/09
                                                          Process Heaters--Phase 3.
SJVAPCD...................................         4307  Boilers, Steam Generators and     10/16/08     03/17/09
                                                          Process Heaters--2.0 MMbtu/
                                                          hr to 5.0 MMbtu/hr.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We proposed to approve these rules because we determined that they 
complied with the relevant CAA requirements. Our proposed action 
contains more information on the rules and our evaluation.

II. Public Comments and EPA Responses

    EPA's proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period. 
During this period, we received no comments.

III. EPA Action

    Since publication of the proposed action, we identified two minor 
issues regarding Rule 4307 that do not change our assessment that the 
submitted rule complies with the relevant CAA requirements. 
Nonetheless, revisions to these provisions should be made when the Rule 
is next revised.
    We have identified the possibility that some units that are subject 
to Rule 4307 do not need exemptions from basic emission limits during 
start-up and shutdown periods as long as they are maintained and 
operated appropriately. For example, we believe that heater treaters 
which rely only on low-NOX burners for compliance are 
capable of consistent compliance with the Rule's basic emission limits 
during these periods. As a result, Section 5.4 should be revised to 
remove the start-up and shutdown exemption period for such devices.
    Currently Section 6.1.4 requires recordkeeping only if the start-up 
and shut-down event exceeds the limitations of the duration of such 
events in Section 5.4.1 or 5.4.2. EPA recommends that Section 6.1.4 of 
Rule 4307 be revised to require records that specify the duration of 
all start-up and shut-down periods (at least for units located at Title 
V facilities). EPA notes that the limited applicability of the current 
version of 6.1.4 may not be appropriate in other rules, particularly 
those where periodic or continuous monitoring is required.
    No comments were submitted that change our assessment that the 
submitted rules comply with the relevant CAA requirements. Therefore, 
as authorized in section 110(k)(3) of the Act, EPA is fully approving 
these rules into the California SIP.

[[Page 1716]]

IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a 
SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and 
applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). 
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve State 
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. 
Accordingly, this action merely approves State law as meeting Federal 
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those 
imposed by State law. For that reason, this action:
     Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to 
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order 
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
     Does not impose an information collection burden under the 
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     Is certified as not having a significant economic impact 
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory 
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or 
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded 
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     Does not have Federalism implications as specified in 
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     Is not an economically significant regulatory action based 
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 
19885, April 23, 1997);
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to 
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the 
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent 
with the Clean Air Act; and
     Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to 
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental 
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under 
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    In addition, these rules do not have Tribal implications as 
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), 
because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in 
the State, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct 
costs on Tribal governments or preempt Tribal law.
    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the 
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally 
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating 
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, 
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the 
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and 
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of 
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior 
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot 
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal 
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 
804(2).
    Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for 
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court 
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by March 15, 2010. Filing a 
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule 
does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of 
judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for 
judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness 
of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in 
proceedings to enforce its requirements (see section 307(b)(2)).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by 
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, 
Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

    Dated: November 23, 2009.
Laura Yoshii,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.


0
Part 52, Chapter I, Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is 
amended as follows:

PART 52--[AMENDED]

0
1. The authority citation for Part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart F--California

0
2. Section 52.220, is amended by adding paragraphs (c)(363)(i)(A)(3) 
and (4) to read as follows:


Sec.  52.220  Identification of plan.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *
    (363) * * *
    (i) * * *
    (A) * * *
    (3) Rule 4306, ``Boilers, Steam Generators and Process Heaters--
Phase 3, '' adopted on October 16, 2008.
    (4) Rule 4307, ``Boilers, Steam Generators and Process Heaters--2.0 
MMbtu/hr to 5.0 MMbtu/hr,'' adopted on October 16, 2008.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2010-352 Filed 1-12-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.