Kenai National Wildlife Refuge, Soldotna, AK, 1404-1405 [2010-220]
Download as PDF
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
1404
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 6 / Monday, January 11, 2010 / Notices
of the information collection; and (4)
ways to minimize the information
collection burden on respondents, such
as use of automated means of collection
of the information. A summary of the
public comments will accompany the
BLM’s submission of the information
collection requests to OMB.
Before including your address, phone
number, email address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment–including your
personal identifying information–may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
The following information is provided
for the information collection:
Title: Road Use Fees Paid Report.
OMB Control Number: 1004–0102.
Summary: Most purchasers of timber
from BLM-managed lands use both
Federal and private roads to haul the
timber. In such instances, the timber
sale contract with the BLM requires the
purchaser to pay private landowners for
the use and/or maintenance of their
roads. These fees represent the BLM’s
share of road construction and
maintenance costs under reciprocal
right-of-way agreements between the
BLM and private landowners. See 43
U.S.C. 1762; 43 CFR subpart 2812. This
information collection is a report that
timber sale purchasers submit to the
BLM to show that they have paid the
fees required by their timber sale
contracts. The BLM uses the report to
ensure compliance with the timber sale
contract, and to amortize road
construction and maintenance costs
among several road users.
Frequency of Collection: On occasion.
Description of Respondents: Timber
sale purchasers that haul timber
purchased from the BLM over privately
owned roads that are included in
reciprocal right-of-way agreements.
Total Annual Responses: 40.
Response Time: 20 minutes.
Total Annual Burden Hours for
Respondents: 13 hours.
Jean Sonneman,
Acting Information Collection Clearance
Officer, Bureau of Land Management.
[FR Doc. 2010–253 Filed 1–8–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–84–P
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:06 Jan 08, 2010
Jkt 220001
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
statutes relating to the administration of
the National Park System.
National Park Service
Dated: November 25, 2009.
Ken Salazar,
Secretary of the Interior.
Denali National Park and Preserve
Aircraft Overflights Advisory Council
National Park Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of renewal.
AGENCY:
[FR Doc. 2010–231 Filed 1–8–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–PF–P
SUMMARY: The Secretary of the Interior
is giving notice of the renewal of the
Denali National Park and Preserve
Aircraft Overflights Advisory Council to
offer recommendations, alternatives and
possible solutions to management of offroad vehicles at Big Cypress National
Preserve.
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Miriam Valentine, Denali Park and
Preserve, 240 W. 5th Avenue,
Anchorage, Alaska 99501, 907–644–
3611.
AGENCY: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability: record of
decision.
The
Denali National Park and Preserve
Aircraft Overflights Advisory Council
has been established in accordance with
the Denali National Park and Preserve’s
2006 Backcountry Management Plan
and EIS. The plan concluded that air
travel is an important means of access
for backcountry users, and that scenic
air tours are an important means for
other park visitors to access and enjoy
Mount McKinley and adjoining scenic
peaks and glaciers. However, the
cumulative impact of these tours, plus
the additional aircraft traffic, must be
mitigated to protect park resource
values and the quality of the visitor
experience. The plan calls for an aircraft
overflights advisory group that will
develop voluntary measures for assuring
the safety of passengers, pilots, and
mountaineers, and for achieving
standards that represent desired future
resource conditions at Denali. The
National Park Service needs the advice
of this group to develop effective
mitigation measures that will be
acceptable to stakeholders. The Council
is composed of individuals that
represent a broad range of interests,
including air taxi operators, commercial
aviation, local landowners, the State of
Alaska, the Federal Aviation
Administration, climbers and other park
users, and the environmental
community.
Certification: I hereby certify that the
renewal of the Denali National Park and
Preserve Aircraft Overflights Advisory
Council is necessary and in the public
interest in connection with the
performance of duties imposed on the
Department of the Interior by the Act of
August 25, 1916, (39 Stat. 535), as
amended, 16 U.S.C. 1 et seq., and other
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00072
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS–R7–R–2009–N250; 70133–1265–0000–
S3]
Kenai National Wildlife Refuge,
Soldotna, AK
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (Service), announce the
availability of the record of decision
(ROD) for the final environmental
impact statement (EIS) for Kenai
National Wildlife Refuge (NWR,
Refuge). The Refuge is located within
the Kenai Peninsula Borough, Alaska.
We completed a thorough analysis of
the environmental, social, and economic
considerations and presented it in our
final EIS, which we released to the
public on September 18, 2009.
DATES: The Regional Director of the
Alaska Region, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, signed the ROD on January 4,
2010.
ADDRESSES: You may view or obtain
copies of the ROD/final EIS on paper or
CD–ROM by any of the following
methods:
Agency Web Site: Download a copy of
the document(s) at https://
alaska.fws.gov/nwr/planning/
kenpol.htm.
E-mail: fw7_kenai_planning@fws.gov.
Include ‘‘Kenai ROD’’ in the subject line
of the message.
Mail: Refuge Manager, Kenai National
Wildlife Refuge, P.O. Box 2139,
Soldotna, AK 99669–2139.
In-Person Viewing or Pickup: Call
Peter Wikoff, Planning Team Leader at
(907) 786–3357 to make an appointment
during regular business hours at U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service, 1011 East
Tudor Rd., MS–231, Anchorage, AK
99503; fax: (907) 786–3965.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT:
Refuge Manager at the address or phone
number above.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Introduction
With this notice, we finalize the CCP
process for Kenai NWR. We released the
E:\FR\FM\11JAN1.SGM
11JAN1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 6 / Monday, January 11, 2010 / Notices
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
draft CCP/draft EIS to the public,
announcing and requesting comments
in a notice of availability in the Federal
Register on May 8, 2008 (73 FR 26140).
We announced the availability of the
final CCP/EIS in the Federal Register on
August 27, 2009 (74 FR 43718).
In accordance with National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) (40
CFR 1506.6(b)) requirements, this notice
announces the availability of the ROD
for the final EIS and CCP for Kenai
NWR. We completed a thorough
analysis of the environmental, social,
and economic considerations, which we
included in the final CCP/EIS. The ROD
documents our selection of Alternative
E, the Preferred Alternative, in the CCP,
with modifications. The CCP will guide
us in managing and administering Kenai
Refuge for the next 15 years. Alternative
E, as we described in the final EIS/ROD,
is the foundation for the CCP, with
modifications.
The Kenai Refuge Comprehensive
Conservation Plan provides
management guidance that conserves
Refuge resources and facilitates
compatible fish and wildlife-dependent
public use activities during the next 15
years. The following is a summary of the
ROD for the Refuge’s Final CCP/EIS.
We have selected Alternative E, the
Preferred Alterative, with modifications,
as the Comprehensive Conservation
Plan for Kenai Refuge. Alternative E
addresses key issues and concerns
identified during the planning process
and will best achieve the purposes of
the Refuge as well as the mission of the
National Wildlife Refuge System. This
decision adopts the management goals
and objectives (Chapter 2) and the
stipulations and mitigation measures
identified in Alternative E.
Implementation of Alternative E, as
modified, will occur over the next 15
years, depending on future staffing
levels and funding.
Modifications to Alternative E
With consideration to comments from
the State of Alaska, the management
direction provided by Alternative E will
be modified as follows:
• We will alter the opening date of
seasonally closed lakes from September
30 to September 10, to coincide with
that of the Alaska Board of Game’s
Kenai Controlled Use Area in Game
Management Unit 15A, when Refuge
regulations are updated. These lakes
will then remain open for public use
until May 1 (approximately when the
ice melts) each spring.
• Under current regulations, the
operation of aircraft between May 1 and
September 30 on any lake where nesting
trumpeter swans and/or their broods are
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:06 Jan 08, 2010
Jkt 220001
present is prohibited. Over the next
several years, we will examine swan
brood survey data and other information
to determine if swan abundance has
increased to the point this restriction
has created a de facto closure of so
many lakes as to significantly impact
access to the refuge back-country. We
will evaluate our current closure
regulations in light of these findings.
Factors We Considered in
Decisionmaking
We based our decision on a thorough
analysis of the environmental, social,
and economic considerations we
presented in the Final CCP/EIS. We
reviewed and considered the impacts
identified in Chapter 4 of the Draft and
Final CCP/EIS; relevant issues,
concerns, and opportunities; input we
received throughout the planning
process, including the results of various
studies and surveys, advice from
technical experts, and public comments
on the Draft and Final CCP/EIS; and
other factors, including refuge purposes
and relevant laws, regulations, and
policies. The Final EIS/CCP addresses a
variety of needs, including protection of
fish and wildlife populations and their
habitats and providing opportunities for
fish and wildlife-dependent recreation,
subsistence, and other public uses. The
combination of these components in
Alternative E contributes significantly to
achieving refuge purposes and goals.
Alternative E also strengthens the
monitoring of fish, wildlife, habitat, and
public uses on the Refuge to provide
means to better respond to changing
conditions in the surrounding
landscape.
The adoption of Alternative E, as
modified, is effective immediately.
Dated: January 4, 2010.
Geoffrey L. Haskett,
Regional Director, U.S. Fish & Wildlife
Service, Anchorage, Alaska.
[FR Doc. 2010–220 Filed 1–8–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
National Park Service, Interior.
Notice of availability of the
Record of Decision for the General
Management Plan/Environmental
Impact Statement for the Jefferson
National Expansion Memorial, Missouri.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: Pursuant to Section 102(2)(C)
of the National Environmental Policy
Act of 1969, 42 U.S.C. 4332(2)(C), the
National Park Service (NPS) announces
the availability of a Record of Decision
PO 00000
Frm 00073
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
1405
(ROD) for the General Management
Plan/Environmental Impact Statement
(GMP/EIS) for the Jefferson National
Expansion Memorial (Memorial),
Missouri. On November 23, the NPS
Midwest Region regional director
approved the ROD for the final GMP/
EIS. As soon as practicable, the NPS
will begin to implement the preferred
alternative.
The NPS will implement the preferred
alternative as described in the final
GMP/EIS issued on October 23, 2009,
with one alteration to the proposed
boundary in East St. Louis, Illinois.
Alternative 3 (Program Expansion), the
preferred alternative, will revitalize the
Memorial by expanded programming,
facilities, and partnerships. The NPS
will capitalize on multiple
opportunities to expand visitor
experience throughout the Memorial.
In order to gain the widest breadth of
ideas for expanding interpretation,
education opportunities, and visitor
amenities at the Memorial, a design
competition, akin to the 1947
competition, will be initiated by the
NPS in close coordination with
partners. Project funding will not come
all at once but rather will most likely be
provided by partners, donations, and
other non-Federal and Federal sources.
Private funding will be required in order
to fully implement the winning entry of
the design competition.
The NPS will use the design
competition to seek opportunities to
enhance existing entrances to the
Memorial on the north and south, as
well as to capitalize on the primary axis
between the Old Courthouse and the
Gateway Arch with new entrances on
the west and east and by establishing a
new east portal linking East St. Louis to
the Gateway Arch grounds by water
taxi. A new external and internal visitor
transportation system will be designed
as part of the competition. The ultimate
configuration and use of the south end
of the Memorial will be determined by
the results of the design competition.
Similarly, the design competition will
vet ideas for the configuration and use
of that portion of the Memorial in East
St. Louis. While the entrants will be
asked to respect the recent
developments at Malcolm Martin
Memorial Park, the NPS and the Metro
East Park and Recreation District will
entertain designs that integrate the
established functions into a cohesive
vision for the Memorial.
While the design solutions might
include the development of aboveground structures within a portion of
the designated Design Competition
Overlay, the NPS will not allow the
implementation of a project that would
E:\FR\FM\11JAN1.SGM
11JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 6 (Monday, January 11, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1404-1405]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-220]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS-R7-R-2009-N250; 70133-1265-0000-S3]
Kenai National Wildlife Refuge, Soldotna, AK
AGENCY: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability: record of decision.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), announce the
availability of the record of decision (ROD) for the final
environmental impact statement (EIS) for Kenai National Wildlife Refuge
(NWR, Refuge). The Refuge is located within the Kenai Peninsula
Borough, Alaska. We completed a thorough analysis of the environmental,
social, and economic considerations and presented it in our final EIS,
which we released to the public on September 18, 2009.
DATES: The Regional Director of the Alaska Region, U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, signed the ROD on January 4, 2010.
ADDRESSES: You may view or obtain copies of the ROD/final EIS on paper
or CD-ROM by any of the following methods:
Agency Web Site: Download a copy of the document(s) at https://alaska.fws.gov/nwr/planning/kenpol.htm.
E-mail: fw7_kenai_planning@fws.gov. Include ``Kenai ROD'' in the
subject line of the message.
Mail: Refuge Manager, Kenai National Wildlife Refuge, P.O. Box
2139, Soldotna, AK 99669-2139.
In-Person Viewing or Pickup: Call Peter Wikoff, Planning Team
Leader at (907) 786-3357 to make an appointment during regular business
hours at U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 1011 East Tudor Rd., MS-231,
Anchorage, AK 99503; fax: (907) 786-3965.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT: Refuge Manager at the address or
phone number above.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Introduction
With this notice, we finalize the CCP process for Kenai NWR. We
released the
[[Page 1405]]
draft CCP/draft EIS to the public, announcing and requesting comments
in a notice of availability in the Federal Register on May 8, 2008 (73
FR 26140). We announced the availability of the final CCP/EIS in the
Federal Register on August 27, 2009 (74 FR 43718).
In accordance with National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) (40 CFR
1506.6(b)) requirements, this notice announces the availability of the
ROD for the final EIS and CCP for Kenai NWR. We completed a thorough
analysis of the environmental, social, and economic considerations,
which we included in the final CCP/EIS. The ROD documents our selection
of Alternative E, the Preferred Alternative, in the CCP, with
modifications. The CCP will guide us in managing and administering
Kenai Refuge for the next 15 years. Alternative E, as we described in
the final EIS/ROD, is the foundation for the CCP, with modifications.
The Kenai Refuge Comprehensive Conservation Plan provides
management guidance that conserves Refuge resources and facilitates
compatible fish and wildlife-dependent public use activities during the
next 15 years. The following is a summary of the ROD for the Refuge's
Final CCP/EIS.
We have selected Alternative E, the Preferred Alterative, with
modifications, as the Comprehensive Conservation Plan for Kenai Refuge.
Alternative E addresses key issues and concerns identified during the
planning process and will best achieve the purposes of the Refuge as
well as the mission of the National Wildlife Refuge System. This
decision adopts the management goals and objectives (Chapter 2) and the
stipulations and mitigation measures identified in Alternative E.
Implementation of Alternative E, as modified, will occur over the next
15 years, depending on future staffing levels and funding.
Modifications to Alternative E
With consideration to comments from the State of Alaska, the
management direction provided by Alternative E will be modified as
follows:
We will alter the opening date of seasonally closed lakes
from September 30 to September 10, to coincide with that of the Alaska
Board of Game's Kenai Controlled Use Area in Game Management Unit 15A,
when Refuge regulations are updated. These lakes will then remain open
for public use until May 1 (approximately when the ice melts) each
spring.
Under current regulations, the operation of aircraft
between May 1 and September 30 on any lake where nesting trumpeter
swans and/or their broods are present is prohibited. Over the next
several years, we will examine swan brood survey data and other
information to determine if swan abundance has increased to the point
this restriction has created a de facto closure of so many lakes as to
significantly impact access to the refuge back-country. We will
evaluate our current closure regulations in light of these findings.
Factors We Considered in Decisionmaking
We based our decision on a thorough analysis of the environmental,
social, and economic considerations we presented in the Final CCP/EIS.
We reviewed and considered the impacts identified in Chapter 4 of the
Draft and Final CCP/EIS; relevant issues, concerns, and opportunities;
input we received throughout the planning process, including the
results of various studies and surveys, advice from technical experts,
and public comments on the Draft and Final CCP/EIS; and other factors,
including refuge purposes and relevant laws, regulations, and policies.
The Final EIS/CCP addresses a variety of needs, including protection of
fish and wildlife populations and their habitats and providing
opportunities for fish and wildlife-dependent recreation, subsistence,
and other public uses. The combination of these components in
Alternative E contributes significantly to achieving refuge purposes
and goals. Alternative E also strengthens the monitoring of fish,
wildlife, habitat, and public uses on the Refuge to provide means to
better respond to changing conditions in the surrounding landscape.
The adoption of Alternative E, as modified, is effective
immediately.
Dated: January 4, 2010.
Geoffrey L. Haskett,
Regional Director, U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, Anchorage, Alaska.
[FR Doc. 2010-220 Filed 1-8-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P