Revisions to the California State Implementation Plan, Ventura County Air Pollution Control District, 1284-1285 [2010-153]
Download as PDF
1284
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 6 / Monday, January 11, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
Priority Mail
[Reserved for Product Description]
Outbound Priority Mail International
[Reserved for Product Description]
Inbound Air Parcel Post
[Reserved for Product Description]
Parcel Select
[Reserved for Group Description]
Parcel Return Service
[Reserved for Group Description]
International
[Reserved for Group Description]
International Priority Airlift (IPA)
[Reserved for Product Description]
International Surface Airlift (ISAL)
[Reserved for Prduct Description]
International Direct Sacks—M–
Bags
[Reserved for Product Description]
Global Customized Shipping Services
[Reserved for Product Description]
International Money Transfer Service
[Reserved for Product Description]
Inbound Surface Parcel Post (at
non-UPU rates)
[Reserved for Product Description]
International Ancillary Services
[Reserved for Product Description]
International Certificate of Mailing
[Reserved for Product Description]
International Registered Mail
[Reserved for Product Description]
International Return Receipt
[Reserved for Product Description]
International Restricted Delivery
[Reserved for Product Description]
International Insurance
[Reserved for Product Description]
Negotiated Service Agreements
[Reserved for Group Description]
Domestic
[Reserved for Product Description]
Outbound International
[Reserved for Group Description]
Part C—Glossary of Terms and Conditions [Reserved]
Part D—Country Price Lists for International Mail [Reserved]
[FR Doc. 2010–178 Filed 01–08–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710–FW–S
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R09–OAR–2008–0341; FRL–9094–1]
Revisions to the California State
Implementation Plan, Ventura County
Air Pollution Control District
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
EPA is finalizing approval of
revisions to the Ventura County Air
Pollution Control District (VCAPCD)
portion of the California State
Implementation Plan (SIP). These
revisions were proposed in the Federal
Register on November 19, 2008 and
concern the permitting of new or
modified sources. We are approving
local rules that regulate these
procedures under the Clean Air Act as
amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act).
SUMMARY:
DATES: Effective Date: This rule is
effective on February 10, 2010.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established docket
number EPA–R09–OAR–2008–0341 for
this action. The index to the docket is
available electronically at https://
www.regulations.gov and in hard copy
at EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street,
San Francisco, California. While all
documents in the docket are listed in
the index, some information may be
publicly available only at the hard copy
location (e.g., copyrighted material), and
some may not be publicly available in
either location (e.g., CBI). To inspect the
hard copy materials, please schedule an
appointment during normal business
hours with the contact listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Laura Yannayon, EPA Region IX, (415)
972–3534, yannayon.laura@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us’’
and ‘‘our’’ refer to EPA.
Table of Contents
I. Proposed Action
II. Public Comments and EPA Responses
III. EPA Action
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Proposed Action
On November 19, 2008 (73 FR 69593),
EPA proposed to approve the following
rules into the California SIP.
TABLE 1—SUBMITTED RULES
Local agency
VCAPCD
VCAPCD
VCAPCD
VCAPCD
VCAPCD
VCAPCD
VCAPCD
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
Rule No.
26
26.1
26.2
26.3
26.4
26.5
26.6
Rule title
New
New
New
New
New
New
New
Source
Source
Source
Source
Source
Source
Source
We proposed to approve these rules
because we determined that they
complied with the relevant CAA
requirements. Our proposed action
contains more information on the rule
and our evaluation.
Amended or revised
Review—General ................................................
Review—Definitions ............................................
Review—Requirements .......................................
Review—Exemptions ..........................................
Review—Emissions Banking ..............................
Review—Essential Public Service Bank .............
Review—Calculations .........................................
II. Public Comments and EPA
Responses
EPA’s proposed action provided a 30day public comment period. We did not
receive any comments on the proposed
action.
03/14/06
11/14/06
03/14/06
03/14/06
03/14/06
03/14/06
03/14/06
Amended .............
Revised ...............
Revised ...............
Revised ...............
Revised ...............
Revised ...............
Revised ...............
cprice-sewell on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with RULES
No comments were submitted that
change our assessment that the
18:55 Jan 08, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
06/16/06
05/08/07
06/16/06
06/16/06
06/16/06
06/16/06
06/16/06
submitted rules comply with the
relevant CAA requirements. Therefore,
as authorized in section 110(k)(3) of the
CAA, EPA is fully approving VCAPCD
Rules 26, 26.1, 26.2, 26.3, 26.4, 26.5,
and 26.6 into the California SIP.
III. EPA Action
VerDate Nov<24>2008
Submitted
E:\FR\FM\11JAR1.SGM
11JAR1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 6 / Monday, January 11, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
cprice-sewell on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with RULES
IV. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the
Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the
provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k);
40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP
submissions, EPA’s role is to approve
State choices, provided that they meet
the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this action merely
approves State law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose
additional requirements beyond those
imposed by State law. For that reason,
this action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993);
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act;
and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have
tribal implications as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,
November 9, 2000), because the SIP is
not approved to apply in Indian country
located in the State, and EPA notes that
it will not impose substantial direct
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:08 Jan 08, 2010
Jkt 220001
costs on tribal governments or preempt
tribal law.
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this action and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean
Air Act, petitions for judicial review of
this action must be filed in the United
States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit by March 12, 2010.
Filing a petition for reconsideration by
the Administrator of this final rule does
not affect the finality of this action for
the purposes of judicial review nor does
it extend the time within which a
petition for judicial review may be filed,
and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. This action may
not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements (see section
307(b)(2)).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Particulate matter, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: November 23, 2009.
Laura Yoshii,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.
Part 52, chapter I, title 40 of the Code
of Federal Regulations is amended as
follows:
■
PART 52—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart F—California
2. Section 52.220 is amended by
adding paragraphs (c)(345)(i)(C)(2) and
(c)(350)(i)(E)to read as follows:
■
§ 52.220
*
Identification of plan.
*
*
(c) * * *
(345) * * *
PO 00000
Frm 00017
*
Fmt 4700
*
Sfmt 4700
1285
(i) * * *
(C) Ventura County Air Pollution
Control District.
(2) Rule 26, ‘‘New Source Review—
General,’’ Rule 26.2, ‘‘New Source
Review—Requirements,’’ Rule 26.3,
‘‘New Source Review—Exemptions,’’
Rule 26.4, ‘‘New Source Review—
Emissions Banking,’’ Rule 26.5, ‘‘New
Source Review—Essential Public
Service Bank,’’ and Rule 26.6, ‘‘New
Source Review—Calculations,’’
originally adopted on October 22, 1991
and now revised on March 14, 2006.
*
*
*
*
*
(350) * * *
(i) * * *
(E) Ventura County Air Pollution
Control District.
(1) Rule 26.1, ‘‘New Source Review—
Definitions,’’ originally adopted on
October 22, 1991 and now revised on
November 14, 2006.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2010–153 Filed 1–8–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 25
[IB Docket No. 07–101; FCC 09–64]
Vehicle–Mounted Earth Stations
(VMES)
AGENCY: Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Final Rule; announcement of
effective date.
SUMMARY: In this document, the
Commission announces that the Office
of Management and Budget (OMB) has
approved, for a period of three years, the
information collection requirements
associated with Sections 25.132(b)(3),
25.226(a)(6), (b), (c), (d)(1), and (d)(3) of
the Commission’s rules, and that these
rules will take effect as of the date of
this notice. On November 4, 2009, the
Commission published the summary
document of the Report and Order, In
the Matter of Amendment of Parts 2 and
25 of the Commission’s Rules to
Allocate Spectrum and Adopt Service
Rules and Procedures to Govern the Use
of Vehicle–Mounted Earth Stations in
Certain Frequency Bands Allocated to
the Fixed–Satellite Service, IB Docket
No. 07–101, FCC 09–64, at 74 FR 57092.
The Report and Order stated that the
Commission will publish a notice in the
Federal Register announcing when OMB
approval for the rule sections which
contain information collection
requirements has been received and
E:\FR\FM\11JAR1.SGM
11JAR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 6 (Monday, January 11, 2010)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 1284-1285]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-153]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R09-OAR-2008-0341; FRL-9094-1]
Revisions to the California State Implementation Plan, Ventura
County Air Pollution Control District
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is finalizing approval of revisions to the Ventura County
Air Pollution Control District (VCAPCD) portion of the California State
Implementation Plan (SIP). These revisions were proposed in the Federal
Register on November 19, 2008 and concern the permitting of new or
modified sources. We are approving local rules that regulate these
procedures under the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act).
DATES: Effective Date: This rule is effective on February 10, 2010.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established docket number EPA-R09-OAR-2008-0341 for
this action. The index to the docket is available electronically at
https://www.regulations.gov and in hard copy at EPA Region IX, 75
Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, California. While all documents in the
docket are listed in the index, some information may be publicly
available only at the hard copy location (e.g., copyrighted material),
and some may not be publicly available in either location (e.g., CBI).
To inspect the hard copy materials, please schedule an appointment
during normal business hours with the contact listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Laura Yannayon, EPA Region IX, (415)
972-3534, yannayon.laura@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ``we,'' ``us'' and
``our'' refer to EPA.
Table of Contents
I. Proposed Action
II. Public Comments and EPA Responses
III. EPA Action
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Proposed Action
On November 19, 2008 (73 FR 69593), EPA proposed to approve the
following rules into the California SIP.
Table 1--Submitted Rules
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Local agency Rule No. Rule title Amended or revised Submitted
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
VCAPCD...................... 26 New Source Review-- 03/14/06 Amended................. 06/16/06
General.
VCAPCD...................... 26.1 New Source Review-- 11/14/06 Revised................. 05/08/07
Definitions.
VCAPCD...................... 26.2 New Source Review-- 03/14/06 Revised................. 06/16/06
Requirements.
VCAPCD...................... 26.3 New Source Review-- 03/14/06 Revised................. 06/16/06
Exemptions.
VCAPCD...................... 26.4 New Source Review-- 03/14/06 Revised................. 06/16/06
Emissions Banking.
VCAPCD...................... 26.5 New Source Review-- 03/14/06 Revised................. 06/16/06
Essential Public
Service Bank.
VCAPCD...................... 26.6 New Source Review-- 03/14/06 Revised................. 06/16/06
Calculations.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
We proposed to approve these rules because we determined that they
complied with the relevant CAA requirements. Our proposed action
contains more information on the rule and our evaluation.
II. Public Comments and EPA Responses
EPA's proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period. We
did not receive any comments on the proposed action.
III. EPA Action
No comments were submitted that change our assessment that the
submitted rules comply with the relevant CAA requirements. Therefore,
as authorized in section 110(k)(3) of the CAA, EPA is fully approving
VCAPCD Rules 26, 26.1, 26.2, 26.3, 26.4, 26.5, and 26.6 into the
California SIP.
[[Page 1285]]
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and
applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve State
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this action merely approves State law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those
imposed by State law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Clean Air Act; and
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have tribal implications as specified
by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), because the
SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in the State,
and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct costs on
tribal governments or preempt tribal law.
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by March 12, 2010. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of
judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for
judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in
proceedings to enforce its requirements (see section 307(b)(2)).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Particulate matter, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: November 23, 2009.
Laura Yoshii,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.
0
Part 52, chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is
amended as follows:
PART 52--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart F--California
0
2. Section 52.220 is amended by adding paragraphs (c)(345)(i)(C)(2) and
(c)(350)(i)(E)to read as follows:
Sec. 52.220 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(345) * * *
(i) * * *
(C) Ventura County Air Pollution Control District.
(2) Rule 26, ``New Source Review--General,'' Rule 26.2, ``New
Source Review--Requirements,'' Rule 26.3, ``New Source Review--
Exemptions,'' Rule 26.4, ``New Source Review--Emissions Banking,'' Rule
26.5, ``New Source Review--Essential Public Service Bank,'' and Rule
26.6, ``New Source Review--Calculations,'' originally adopted on
October 22, 1991 and now revised on March 14, 2006.
* * * * *
(350) * * *
(i) * * *
(E) Ventura County Air Pollution Control District.
(1) Rule 26.1, ``New Source Review--Definitions,'' originally
adopted on October 22, 1991 and now revised on November 14, 2006.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2010-153 Filed 1-8-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P