FY 2010 Special Diabetes Program for Indians Community-Directed Grant Program, 1389-1395 [2010-149]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 6 / Monday, January 11, 2010 / Notices
the 2010–2011 academic year. These
priorities will remain in effect until
superseded. Applicants for health and
allied health professions not on the
above priority list will be considered
pending the availability of funds and
dependent upon the availability of
qualified applicants in the priority
areas.
Dated: December 29, 2009.
Yvette Roubideaux,
Director, Indian Health Service.
[FR Doc. E9–31374 Filed 1–8–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4165–16–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Indian Health Service
FY 2010 Special Diabetes Program for
Indians Community-Directed Grant
Program
Announcement Type: New/
Competing Continuation.
Funding Opportunity Number: HHS–
2010–IHS–SDPI–0003.
Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance Number: 93.237.
Key Dates
Application Deadline: February 19,
2010.
Review Date: March 17–19, 2010.
Earliest Anticipated Start Date: April
1, 2010.
Other information: This
announcement will be open throughout
Fiscal Year (FY) 2010 based on existing
budget cycles. Refer to application
instructions for additional details. This
current announcement targets grantees
that currently operate under a budget
cycle that begins on April 1.
I. Funding Opportunity Description
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
Statutory Authority
The Indian Health Service (IHS) is
accepting grant applications for the FY
2010 Special Diabetes Program for
Indians (SDPI) Community-Directed
grant program. This competitive grant
announcement is open to all existing
SDPI grantees that have an active grant
in place and are in compliance with the
previous terms and conditions of the
grant. This program is authorized under
H.R. 6331 ‘‘Medicare Improvement for
Patients and Providers Act of 2008’’
(Section 303 of Pub. L. 110–275) and the
Snyder Act, 25 U.S.C. 13. The program
is described in the Catalog of Federal
Domestic Assistance (CDFA) under
93.237.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:06 Jan 08, 2010
Jkt 220001
Overview
The SDPI seeks to support diabetes
treatment and prevention activities for
American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN)
communities. Grantees will implement
programs based on identified diabetesrelated community needs. Activities
will be targeted to reduce the risk of
diabetes in at-risk individuals, provide
services that target those with new onset
diabetes, provide high quality care to
those with diagnosed diabetes, and/or
reduce the complications of diabetes.
The purpose of the FY 2010 SDPI
Community-Directed grant program is to
support diabetes treatment and
prevention programs that have a
program plan which integrates at least
one IHS Diabetes Best Practice and that
have a program evaluation plan in place
which includes tracking outcome
measures.
This is not an application for
continued funding as was previously
available for Community-Directed grant
programs.
Background
Diabetes Among American Indian/
Alaska Native Communities
During the past 50 years, type 2
diabetes has become a major public
health issue in many AI/AN
communities, and it is increasingly
recognized that AI/AN populations have
a disproportionate burden of diabetes
(Ghodes, 1995). In 2006, 16.1% of AI/
ANs aged 20 years or older had
diagnosed diabetes (unpublished IHS
Diabetes Program Statistics, 2006)
compared to 7.8% for the non-Hispanic
white population (CDC, 2007). In
addition, AI/AN people have higher
rates of diabetes-related morbidity and
mortality than in the general U.S.
population (Carter, 1996; Harris, 1995;
Gilliland, 1997). Strategies to address
the prevention and treatment of diabetes
in AI/AN communities are urgently
needed.
Under the Balanced Budget Act of
1997, Congress authorized the IHS to
administer the SDPI grant program.
SDPI grants are programmatically
directed by the IHS Division of Diabetes
Treatment and Prevention (DDTP).
Special Diabetes Program for Indians
The SDPI is a $150 million per year
grant program. Over 330 programs have
received SDPI Community-Directed
grants annually since 1998. In addition,
66 demonstration projects have been
funded annually since 2004 to address
prevention of type 2 diabetes or
cardiovascular disease risk reduction. A
Congressional re-authorization in 2008
extended the SDPI through FY 2011.
PO 00000
Frm 00057
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
1389
II. Award Information
Type of Awards
Grants.
Estimated Funds Available
The total amount of funding
identified for FY 2010 SDPI
Community-Directed grant program is
$104.8 million. Funds available to each
IHS Area and to urban Indian health
programs have been determined through
Tribal consultation. Within each area,
local Tribal consultation guided IHS
decision-making on how much funding
is available per eligible applicant. FY
2010 SDPI funding remains unchanged
from FY 2009, per Tribal consultation.
All awards issued under this
announcement are subject to the
availability of funds. In the absence of
funding, the agency is under no
obligation to make awards funded under
this announcement.
Anticipated Number of Awards
Approximately 50 awards will be
issued for Budget Cycle III. Applications
will be accepted from grantees whose
current SDPI FY 2009 grants end on
March 31, 2009. Additionally, Budget
Cycle II grantees that were deemed
ineligible due to incomplete
applications or that possessed
delinquent OMB A–133 financial audits
can resubmit applications under the
timelines for Budget Cycle III.
Project Period
The project period for grants made
under this announcement is 24 months,
subject to the availability of funds.
III. Eligibility Information
1. Eligible Applicants
Eligible applicants include the
following:
• Federally-recognized Tribes
operating an Indian health program
operated pursuant to a contract, grant,
cooperative agreement, or compact with
the IHS pursuant to the Indian SelfDetermination and Education
Assistance Act (ISDEAA), (Pub. L. 93–
638).
• Tribal organizations operating an
Indian health program operated
pursuant to a contract, grant,
cooperative agreement, or compact with
the IHS pursuant to the ISDEAA, (Pub.
L. 93–638).
• Urban Indian health programs that
operate a Title V Urban Indian Health
Program: This includes programs
currently under a grant or contract with
the IHS under Title V of the Indian
Health Care Improvement Act, (Pub. L.
93–437).
E:\FR\FM\11JAN1.SGM
11JAN1
1390
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 6 / Monday, January 11, 2010 / Notices
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
• Indian Health Service facilities
(refer to paragraph 3 below in this
Section).
Current SDPI grantees are eligible to
apply for competing continuation
funding under this announcement and
must demonstrate that they have
complied with previous terms and
conditions of the SDPI grant in order to
receive funding under this
announcement.
Non-profit Tribal organizations and
national or regional health boards are
not eligible, consistent with past Tribal
consultation. Applicants that do not
meet these eligibility requirements will
have their applications returned without
further consideration.
Under this announcement, only one
SDPI Community-Directed diabetes
grant will be awarded per entity. If a
Tribe submits an application, their local
IHS facility cannot apply; if the Tribe
does not submit an application, the IHS
facility can apply. Tribes that are
awarded grant funds may sub-contract
with local IHS facilities to provide
specific clinical services. In this case,
the Tribe would be the primary SDPI
grantee and the Federal entity would
have a sub-contract within the Tribe’s
SDPI grant.
grantees) must submit copies of selected
application forms and documents for
each of their sub-grantees. (See Section
IV, Subsection 2 for specifics.) All subgrantees must meet the eligibility
requirements noted in Subsection 1
above.
IV. Application and Submission
Information
2. Cost Sharing or Matching
Collaborative Arrangements
Tribes are encouraged to collaborate
with any appropriate local entities
including IHS facilities. If a Tribe seeks
to provide specific clinical or support
services, it may implement a subcontract with these entities in order to
transfer funds. The amount of SDPI
funding that the Tribe receives remains
the same. The Tribe, as the primary
grantee, arranges with the entity to
provide specified services that support
the program’s plan. The entity may
request direct costs only.
When a Tribe sub-contracts with the
local IHS facility, application
requirements for collaborative
arrangements include:
• A signed Memorandum of
Agreement (MOA) must be submitted
with the SDPI application. The MOA
must include the scope of work assigned
to the sub-contracting IHS facility.
• The IHS Area Director and the
Tribal Chairperson must give signed
approval of the MOA.
• The Tribe’s application must
include additional SF–424 and SF–
424A forms that are completed by the
IHS facility which includes a budget
narrative and a face page that is signed
by the Chief Executive Officer (CEO).
B. Documentation of Support
2. Content and Form of Application
Submission
Mandatory documents for all
applicants include:
• Application forms:
Æ SF–424.
Æ SF–424A.
Æ SF–424B.
Æ Key Contacts Form.
• Budget Narrative.
• Project Narrative.
• Tribal Resolution or Tribal Letter of
Support (Tribal Organizations only).
• Letter of Support from
Organization’s Board of Directors (Title
V Urban Indian Health Programs only).
• 501(c)(3) Certificate (Title V Urban
Indian Health Programs only).
• CEO Letters of Support (IHS
facilities only).
• 2008 and 2009 IHS Diabetes Care
and Outcomes Audit Report.
• Biographical sketches for all Key
Personnel.
• Disclosure of Lobbying Activities
(SF–LLL) (if applicable).
• Documentation of OMB A–133
required Financial Audit for FY 2007
and FY 2008. Acceptable forms of
documentation include:
Æ E-mail confirmation from Federal
Audit Clearinghouse (FAC) that audits
were submitted; or
Æ Face sheets from audit reports.
These can be found on the FAC Web
site: https://harvester.census.gov/fac/
dissem/accessoptions.html?submit=
Retrieve+Records.
Applications With Sub-Grants
Programs that submit one application
on behalf of multiple organizations (sub-
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:06 Jan 08, 2010
Jkt 220001
The FY 2010 Special Diabetes
Program for Indians (SDPI) CommunityDirected grant program does not require
matching funds or cost sharing.
3. Other Requirements
A. Program Coordinator
Provide information about the SDPI
Program Coordinator on the ‘‘Key
Contacts Form’’ which is included in the
application package. The Program
Coordinator must meet the following
requirements:
• Have relevant health care education
and/or experience.
• Have experience with program
management and grants program
management, including skills in
program coordination, budgeting,
reporting and supervision of staff.
• Have a working knowledge of
diabetes.
Tribal Organizations
Existing SDPI grantees must submit a
current, signed and dated Tribal
resolution or Tribal letter of support
from all Indian Tribe(s) served by the
project. Applications from each Tribal
organization must include specific
resolutions or letters of support from all
Tribes affected by the proposed project
activities.
If the Tribal resolution or Tribal letter
of support is not submitted with the
application, it must be received in the
Division of Grants Operations (DGO)
prior to the objective review date, March
17, 2010.
Title V
Urban Indian Health Programs
Urban Indian health programs must
submit a letter of support from the
organization’s board of directors. Urban
Indian health programs are non-profit
organizations and must also submit a
copy of the 501(c)(3) Certificate. All
letters of support must be included in
the application or submitted to the DGO
prior to the objective review date, March
17, 2010.
IHS Hospitals or Clinics
IHS facilities must submit a letter of
support from the CEO.
The documentation must be received
in the DGO prior to the objective review
date, March 17, 2010.
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
1. Obtaining Application Materials
The application package and
instructions may be found at https://
www.Grants.gov.
Mandatory Documents for Programs
That Proposed Sub-Grantees
The primary grantee for applications
that propose sub-grantees must submit
all of the mandatory documents listed
above. In addition, they must submit the
following documents for each subgrantee:
• SF–424, SF–424A, SF–424B and
Key Contacts Form.
• Project Narrative.
• Budget Narrative.
• 2008 and 2009 IHS Diabetes Care
and Outcomes Audit Reports.
A separate budget is required for each
sub-grantee, but the primary grantee’s
application must reflect the total budget
for the entire cost of the project.
Mandatory Documents for Programs
That Propose Sub-Contracts With Local
IHS Facilities
Programs that propose sub-contracts
with IHS facilities to provide clinical
E:\FR\FM\11JAN1.SGM
11JAN1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 6 / Monday, January 11, 2010 / Notices
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
services must submit the documents
noted below for the sub-contractor:
• MOA that is signed by the primary
grantee, the sub-contractor, the IHS Area
Director and the Tribal Chairperson.
• SF–424 and SF–424A forms
completed by the IHS facility (in
addition to the primary applicant’s SF–
424 forms).
A separate budget is required for the
sub-contract, but the primary grantee’s
application must reflect the total budget
for the entire cost of the project.
Public Policy Requirements: All
Federal-wide public policies apply to
IHS grants with the exception of the
Discrimination Policy.
Requirements for Project and Budget
Narratives
A. Project Narrative: This narrative
should be a separate Word document
that is no longer than 13–17 pages (see
page limitations for each Part noted
below) with consecutively numbered
pages. Be sure to place all responses and
required information in the correct
section or they will not be considered or
scored. If the narrative exceeds the page
limit, only the first 13–17 pages will be
reviewed. There are three parts to the
narrative: Part A—Program Information;
Part B—Program Planning and
Evaluation; and Part C—Program
Report. A sample project narrative and
template are available in the application
instructions. See below for additional
details about what must be included in
the narrative.
Part A: Program Information (no more
than 4 pages)
Section 1: Community Needs
Assessment
A1.1 Describe the burden of diabetes
in your community. Include estimates of
the number of people diagnosed with
diabetes and the total number of people.
Describe how you calculated these
estimates.
A1.2 Briefly describe the top
diabetes-related health issues in your
community.
A1.3 Briefly describe the unique
challenges your program experiences
related to prevention and treatment of
diabetes.
Section 2: Leadership Support
A2.1 Question: Has at least one
organization administrator or Tribal
leader agreed to be actively involved in
your program’s work? (Yes or No).
A2.2 Provide the name and role or
position that this leader holds.
A2.3 Describe how this leader will
be involved with your program.
Section 3: Personnel
Using the table format that is in the
application instructions, provide the
following information for each person
who will be paid with SDPI funds:
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:06 Jan 08, 2010
Jkt 220001
A3.1 Name.
A3.2 Title.
A3.3 Brief description of tasks/
activities.
A3.4 Is this person already on staff
with your SDPI or diabetes program?
A3.5 What percent FTE of this
person’s salary will be paid using SDPI
funds?
Section 4: Diabetes Audit Review
Obtain copies of your local IHS
Diabetes Care and Outcomes Audit
Reports for 2008 and 2009. Review and
compare the results for these two years.
Work with your local audit coordinator
or Area Diabetes Consultant (ADC) if
you need help.
A4.1 Provide a list of results for
three to five items/elements (e.g., A1c,
eye exam, education, etc.) that improved
from 2008 to 2009.
A4.2 Provide a list of three to five
items/elements that need to be
improved.
A4.3 Describe how your program
will address these three to five items/
elements that need to be improved or
describe how your program will work
with your local health care facility to
address these areas.
Section 5: Collaboration
A5.1 Describe existing partnerships
and collaborations that your program
has in place.
A5.2 Describe new partnerships and
collaboration that your program is
planning to implement.
Part B: Program Planning and
Evaluation (no more than 3 pages, with
2 pages for each additional Best
Practice)
Section 1: Overview
Each 2009 IHS Diabetes Best Practice
includes two specific measures that are
called ‘‘key measures.’’ Programs may
track additional measures based on local
priorities. A list of all Best Practices is
located in the application instructions.
This list provides a short description of
the contents and key measures for each
Best Practice.
B1.1 List which IHS Diabetes Best
Practice(s) your program will implement
in order to address the needs that were
identified in your community
assessment.
Section 2: Program Planning
Provide the information requested
below separately for each Best Practice
that will be implemented:
B2.1 Target Population: What
population will you target?
B2.2 Goal: Describe the goal that
your program wants to achieve as a
result of implementing the selected Best
Practice.
B2.3 Objectives/Measures: List the
objective(s) your program will work to
accomplish, with at least one measure
PO 00000
Frm 00059
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
1391
identified for each objective. Be sure to
include the two key measures for your
selected Best Practice and use the
SMART format (see application
instructions for additional information).
Also, indicate how frequently your
program will review data for each
measure. (Choose from the following
options: weekly, twice a month,
monthly, every other month, or
quarterly).
B2.4 Activities: List the activities
that your program will do to meet the
selected Best Practice objectives. These
could be events you will organize,
services you will offer, materials you
will develop and implement, or other
activities.
Section 3: Evaluation
B3.1 Describe how your program
will track activities for the selected Best
Practice(s).
B3.2 Describe how your program
will collect and track data on all
measures (listed in Section 2 above) for
the selected Best Practice(s).
B3.3 Describe how your program
will collect stories about individual
participants, community events,
program staff, and other aspects of your
program.
Part C: Program Report (no more than
4 pages)
Section 1: Major Accomplishments
and Activities
C1.1 Describe three major
accomplishments that your SDPI
program achieved in the past 12
months.
C1.2 Describe three to five major
accomplishments that your SDPI
program has achieved since it began.
C1.3 Describe one story that
exemplifies a major program
accomplishment from the past year.
C1.4 Describe your SDPI program’s
primary activities during the past 12
months.
C1.5 Describe your SDPI program’s
primary activities since it began.
Section 2: Challenges
C2.1 Describe the two or three
biggest challenges that your SDPI
program encountered in the past 12
months.
C2.2 Describe how your SDPI
program addressed these challenges.
C2.3 Indicate if you successfully
addressed these challenges. (If so, why;
if not, why not.)
Section 3: Dissemination
C3.1 Describe three to five major
lessons that your SDPI program has
learned since it began.
C3.2 Describe how your SDPI
program has shared the lessons that you
have learned with other diabetes
programs.
C3.3 Describe materials or products
your SDPI program has developed.
E:\FR\FM\11JAN1.SGM
11JAN1
1392
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 6 / Monday, January 11, 2010 / Notices
Section 4: Other Information
C4.1 Provide any additional
information about your SDPI program.
B. Budget Narrative (no more than 4
pages)
The budget narrative should explain
why each budget item on the SF–424A
is necessary and relevant to the
proposed project.
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
3. Submission Dates and Times
Applications are to be submitted
electronically through Grants.gov by
February 19, 2010 at 12 midnight
Eastern Standard Time (EST). Any
application received after the
application deadline will not be
accepted for processing, and it will be
returned to the applicant(s) without
further consideration for funding.
If technical challenges arise and the
applicants need help with the electronic
application process, contact Grants.gov
Customer Support via e-mail to
support@grants.gov or at (800) 518–
4726. Customer Support is available to
address questions 24 hours a day, 7 days
a week (except on Federal holidays). If
problems persist, contact Tammy
Bagley, Senior Grants Policy Analyst,
IHS Division of Grants Policy (DGP)
(tammy.bagley@ihs.gov) at (301) 443–
5204 to describe the difficulties being
experienced. Be sure to contact Ms.
Bagley at least ten days prior to the
application deadline.
Please do not contact the DGP until
you have received a Grants.gov tracking
number. In the event you are not able
to obtain a tracking number, call the
DGP as soon as possible.
If an applicant needs to submit a
paper application instead of submitting
electronically via Grants.gov, prior
approval must be requested and
obtained (see page 16 for additional
information). The waiver must be
documented in writing (e-mails are
acceptable), before submitting a paper
application. After a waiver is received,
the application package must be
downloaded by the applicant from
Grants.gov. Once completed and
printed, the original application and
two copies must be sent to Denise E.
Clark, Division of Grants Operations
(DGO) (denise.clark@ihs.gov), 801
Thompson Avenue, TMP, Suite 360,
Rockville, MD 20852. Paper
applications that are submitted without
a waiver will be returned to the
applicant without review or further
consideration.
4. Intergovernmental Review
Executive Order 12372 requiring
intergovernmental review is not
applicable to this program.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:06 Jan 08, 2010
Jkt 220001
5. Funding Restrictions
A. Pre-award costs are allowable
pending prior approval from the
awarding agency. However, in
accordance with 45 CFR Part 74 and 92,
pre-award costs are incurred at the
applicant’s risk. The awarding office is
under no obligation to reimburse such
costs if for any reason the applicant
does not receive an award or if the
award is less than anticipated.
B. The available funds are inclusive of
direct and appropriate indirect costs
(see Section VI, Subsection 3).
C. Only one grant will be awarded per
applicant.
6. Electronic Submission Requirements
Use the https://www.Grants.gov Web
site to submit an application
electronically; select the ‘‘Apply for
Grants’’ link on the homepage.
Download a copy of the application
package, complete it offline, and then
upload and submit the application via
the Grants.gov Web site. Electronic
copies of the application may not be
submitted as attachments to e-mail
messages addressed to IHS employees or
offices.
Applicants that receive a waiver to
submit paper application documents
must follow the rules and timelines that
are noted below. The applicant must
seek assistance at least ten days prior to
the application deadline.
Applicants that do not adhere to the
timelines for Central Contractor Registry
(CCR) and/or Grants.gov registration
and/or request timely assistance with
technical issues will not be considered
for a waiver to submit a paper
application.
Please be aware of the following:
• Paper applications are not the
preferred method for submitting
applications.
• If you have problems electronically
submitting your application on-line,
contact Grants.gov Customer Support
via e-mail to support@grants.gov or at
(800) 518–4726. Customer Support is
available to address questions 24 hours
a day, 7 days a week (except on Federal
holidays). If problems persist, contact
Tammy Bagley, Senior Grants Policy
Analyst, DGP, at (301) 443–5204.
• Upon contacting Grants.gov, obtain
a tracking number as proof of contact.
The tracking number is helpful if there
are technical issues that cannot be
resolved and a waiver to submit a paper
application must be obtained.
• If it is determined that a waiver is
needed, the applicant must submit a
request in writing (e-mails are
acceptable) to michelle.bulls@ihs.gov
that includes a justification for the need
PO 00000
Frm 00060
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
to deviate from the standard electronic
submission process. If the waiver is
approved, the application package must
be downloaded by the applicant from
Grants.gov. Once completed and
printed, it should be sent directly to the
DGO by the deadline date of February
19, 2010 (see Section IV, Subsection 3
for details).
• Upon entering the Grants.gov site,
there is information that outlines the
requirements to the applicant regarding
electronic submission of an application
through Grants.gov, as well as the hours
of operation.
• Applicants are strongly encouraged
not to wait until the deadline date to
begin the application process through
Grants.gov as the registration process for
CCR and Grants.gov could take up to
fifteen working days.
• In order to use Grants.gov, the
applicant must have a Dun and
Bradstreet (DUNS) Number and register
in the Central Contractor Registration
(CCR). A minimum of ten working days
should be allowed to complete CCR
registration. See Subsection 8 below for
more information.
• All documents must be submitted
electronically, including all information
typically included on the SF–424 and
all necessary assurances and
certifications.
• Please use the optional attachment
feature in Grants.gov to attach
additional documentation that may be
requested by IHS.
• The application must comply with
any page limitation requirements
described in the Funding
Announcement.
• After you electronically submit
your application, you will receive an
automatic acknowledgment from
Grants.gov that contains a Grants.gov
tracking number. The DGO will
download your application from
Grants.gov and provide necessary copies
to the DDTP. Neither the DGO nor the
DDTP will notify applicants that the
application has been received.
• You may access the electronic
application package and instructions for
this Funding Opportunity
Announcement on https://
www.Grants.gov.
• You may search for the application
package on Grants.gov either with the
CFDA number or the Funding
Opportunity Number. Both numbers are
identified in the heading of this
announcement.
• The applicant must provide the
Funding Opportunity Number: HHS–
2010–IHS–SDPI–0002.
E:\FR\FM\11JAN1.SGM
11JAN1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 6 / Monday, January 11, 2010 / Notices
DUNS Number
Applicants are required to have a
DUNS number to apply for a grant or
cooperative agreement from the Federal
Government. The DUNS number is a
nine-digit identification number, which
uniquely identifies business entities.
Many organizations may already have a
DUNS number. Obtaining a DUNS
number is easy and there is no charge.
To obtain a DUNS number or to find out
if your organization already has a DUNS
number, access https://fedgov.dnb.com/
webform.
Applicants must also be registered
with the CCR. A DUNS number is
required before an applicant can
complete their CCR registration.
Registration with the CCR is free of
charge. Applicants may register online
at https://www.ccr.gov. More detailed
information regarding the DUNS, CCR,
and Grants.gov processes can be found
at: https://www.Grants.gov.
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
V. Application Review Information
1. Criteria
Criteria that will be used to evaluate
the application are divided into three
categories. They include:
• Project Narrative.
The project narrative is divided into
three parts: Part A—Program
Information; Part B—Program Planning/
Evaluation; and Part C—Project Report.
Required information includes topics
such as: community needs assessment,
leadership support, use of Diabetes
Audit results, selected Best Practice(s),
overall evaluation plan and project
accomplishments. For each Best
Practice that will be implemented,
address: target population, goal,
objectives/measures, review of key
measures, and activities (see Section IV,
Part B, Section 2).
• Budget Narrative.
The budget narrative provides
additional explanation to support the
information provided on the SF–424A
form. Budget categories to address
include: personnel, fringe benefits,
travel, equipment and supplies,
contractual/consultant and
constructions/alterations/renovations.
In addition to a line item budget,
provide a brief justification of each
budget item and how they support
project objectives.
• Key Contacts Form.
This form seeks to obtain contact
information about only one person: the
project’s SDPI Program Coordinator.
Scoring of Applications
Points will be assigned in each
category adding up to a total of 100. A
minimum score of 60 points is required
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:06 Jan 08, 2010
Jkt 220001
for funding. Points will be assigned as
follows:
• Project Narrative: A total of 90
possible points are available for this
information. It is divided into two parts:
Program Information (20 possible
points); Program Planning/Evaluation
(60 possible points); and Program
Report (10 possible points).
• Budget Narrative: A total of 10
possible points are available for this
information.
2. Review and Selection Process
Each application will be prescreened
by DGO staff for eligibility and
completeness as outlined in this
Funding Opportunity Announcement.
Applications from entities that do not
meet eligibility criteria or that are
incomplete will not be reviewed.
Applicants will be notified by the DGO
that their application did not meet
minimum requirements.
After being prescreened by the DGO,
applications will be reviewed by an
Objective Review Committee (ORC) and
assigned a score. The ORC is an
objective review group that will be
convened by the DDTP in consultation
with the DGP as required by Department
of Health and Human Services (HHS)
Grants Policy.
To obtain a minimum score for
funding, applicants must address all
program requirements and provide all
required documentation. Applicants
that receive less than a minimum score
will be informed via e-mail of their
application’s deficiencies. (see Section 6
below for application revision
guidance). A summary statement
outlining the weaknesses of the
application will be provided to these
applicants. The summary statement will
be sent to the Authorized Organizational
Representative (AOR) that is identified
on the face page of the application.
Review of Applications With SubGrants
When an application is submitted on
behalf of multiple organizations (subgrantees), the review score will be a
combined score that is based on
information provided by all of these
organizations.
Programmatic Requirements
Funded applicants (grantees) must
meet the following programmatic
requirements:
A. Implement an IHS Diabetes Best
Practice
Grantees must implement
recommended services and activities
from at least one 2009 IHS Diabetes Best
Practice. They should implement
recommendations based on program
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
1393
need, strengths, and resources. Program
activities, services and key measures
from the selected Best Practice(s) must
be documented in the project narrative
(see Section IV, Part B, Section 2).
B. Implement Program and Evaluation
Plans
Grantees must follow the plans
submitted with their application when
implementing each selected Best
Practice and their evaluation processes.
A minimum evaluation requirement is
to monitor the key measures over time.
Programs may track additional measures
based on local priorities.
C. Participate in Training and Peer-toPeer Learning Sessions
Grantees must participate in SDPI
training sessions and peer-to-peer
learning activities. Training sessions
will be primarily conference calls or
combined WebEx/conference calls.
Grantees will be expected to:
• Participate in interactive discussion
during conference calls.
• Share activities, tools and results.
• Share problems encountered and
how barriers are broken down.
• Share materials presented at
conferences and meetings.
• Participate and share in other
relevant activities.
Sessions, which will be led by DDTP,
DGO, or their agents, will address
clinical and other topics. Topics will
include: program planning and
evaluation, enhancing accountability
through data management, and
improvement of principles and
processes. Grantees will integrate
information and ideas in order to
enhance effectiveness. Anticipated
outcomes from participating in the
learning sessions are improved
communication and sharing among
grantees, increased use of data for
improvement, and enhanced
accountability.
Application Revisions
If an application does not receive a
minimum score for funding from the
ORC, the applicant will be informed via
a summary statement that will be sent
to the AOR via e-mail. The applicant
then has two opportunities to submit
revisions to their application. Before
application revisions can be submitted,
the AOR must have received a summary
statement from the previous review that
outlines the weaknesses of the initial
application.
A. Revision to Initial Application
Applicants will have five business
days from the date that the summary
statement is sent via e-mail to submit
hard copies of their application
revisions. Along with the revised
application documents, applicants must
E:\FR\FM\11JAN1.SGM
11JAN1
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
1394
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 6 / Monday, January 11, 2010 / Notices
prepare and submit an Introduction of
not more than three pages that
summarizes the substantial additions,
deletions, and changes. The
Introduction must also include
responses to the criticism and issues
raised in the summary statement.
The Introduction and revised
application documents must be mailed
directly to the DGO to the attention of
Denise Clark, Lead Grants Management
Specialist (denise.clark@ihs.gov) at:
Division of Grants Operations, 801
Thompson Avenue, TMP, Suite 360,
Rockville, MD 20852.
Technical assistance will be available
to applicants as they prepare
resubmission documentation.
An Ad Hoc Review Committee will be
convened specifically to review the
initial application revisions. If the
revised application receives the
minimum score for funding or above,
the applicant will be informed via a
Notice of Award (NoA). If the Review
Committee determines that the
application with revisions still does not
receive a fundable score, the applicant
will be informed of their application’s
deficiencies via a second summary
statement that will be e-mailed to the
AOR.
B. Second Application Revision
Applicants will have five business
days from the date that the second
summary statement is sent via e-mail to
submit hard copies of their application
revisions. Along with the revised
application documents, applicants must
prepare and submit an Introduction of
not more than three pages that
summarizes the substantial additions,
deletions, and changes. The
Introduction must also include
responses to the criticism and issues
raised in the summary statement.
The Introduction and revised
application documents must, again, be
mailed directly to the DGO to the
attention of Denise Clark, Lead Grants
Management Specialist
(denise.clark@ihs.gov) at: Division of
Grants Operations, 801 Thompson
Avenue, TMP, Suite 360, Rockville, MD
20852.
A second Ad Hoc Review Committee
will be convened to review the second
application revisions. If the application
with revisions receives the minimum
score for funding or above, the applicant
will be informed via a Notice of Award
(NoA).
If the Review Committee determines
that the application with revisions still
does not receive a fundable score,
applicants will be informed in writing
of their application’s deficiencies. No
further resubmissions will be allowed.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:06 Jan 08, 2010
Jkt 220001
7. Anticipated Announcement and
Award Dates
Grantees that receive a fundable score
will be notified of their approval for
funding via the NoA. (See application
instructions for key dates for other
budget cycles.)
VI. Award Administration Information
1. Award Notices
The NoA will be prepared by DGO
and sent via postal mail to each
applicant that is approved for funding
under this announcement. This
document will be sent to the person
who is listed on the SF–424 as the AOR.
The NoA will be signed by the Grants
Management Officer. The NoA is the
authorizing document for which funds
are dispersed to the approved entities.
The NoA serves as the official
notification of the grant award and
reflects the amount of Federal funds
awarded, the purpose of the grant, the
terms and conditions of the award, the
effective date of the award, and the
budget/project period. The NoA is the
legally binding document. Applicants
who are disapproved based on the ORC
score will receive a copy of the
summary statement which identifies the
weaknesses and strengths of the
application submitted. The AOR serves
as the business point of contact for all
business aspects of the award.
The anticipated NoA date for all
applicants that score well in the ORC
review for Cycle III is April 1, 2010.
2. Administrative Requirements
Grants are administered in accordance
with the following regulations, policies,
and Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) cost principles:
A. The criteria as outlined in this
Funding Opportunity Announcement.
B. Administrative Regulations for
Grants:
• 45 CFR Part 92—Uniform
Administrative Requirements for Grants
and Cooperative Agreements to State,
Local and Tribal Governments.
• 45 CFR Part 74—Uniform
Administrative Requirements for
Awards and Subawards to Institutions
of Higher Education, Hospitals, Other
Non-Profit Organizations, and
Commercial Organizations.
C. Grants Policy:
• HHS Grants Policy Statement,
Revised 01/2007.
D. Cost Principles:
• OMB Circular A–87—State, Local,
and Indian Tribal Governments (Title 2
Part 225).
• OMB Circular A–122—Non-Profit
Organizations (Title 2 Part 230).
E. Audit Requirements
PO 00000
Frm 00062
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
• OMB Circular A–133—Audits of
States, Local Governments, and NonProfit Organizations.
3. Indirect Costs
This section applies to all grant
recipients that request reimbursement of
indirect costs in their grant application.
In accordance with HHS Grants Policy
Statement, Part II–27, IHS requires
applicants to obtain a current indirect
cost rate agreement prior to award. The
rate agreement must be prepared in
accordance with the applicable cost
principles and guidance as provided by
the cognizant agency or office. A current
rate covers the applicable grant
activities under the current award’s
budget period. If the current rate is not
on file with the DGO at the time of
award, the indirect cost portion of the
budget will be restricted. The
restrictions remain in place until the
current rate is provided to the DGO.
Generally, indirect costs rates for IHS
grantees are negotiated with the HHS
Division of Cost Allocation https://
rates.psc.gov/and the Department of the
Interior (National Business Center) at
https://www.aqd.nbc.gov/indirect/
indirect.asp. If your organization has
questions regarding the indirect cost
policy, please contact the DGO at (301)
443–5204.
4. Reporting Requirements
The DDTP and the DGO have
requirements for progress reports and
financial reports based on the terms and
conditions of this grant as noted below.
A. Progress Reports
Program progress reports are required
semi-annually. These reports must
include at a minimum: reporting of Best
Practice measures; and a brief
comparison of actual accomplishments
to the goals established for the budget
period or provide sound justification for
the lack of progress.
B. Financial Status Reports
Annual financial status reports are
required until the end of the project
period. Reports must be submitted
annually no later than 30 days after the
end of each specified reporting period.
The final financial status report is due
within 90 days after the end of the 24
month project period. Standard Form
269 (long form for those reporting
program income; short form for all
others) will be used for financial
reporting.
Grantees are responsible and
accountable for accurate reporting of the
Progress Reports and Financial Status
Reports (FSR). According to SF–269
instructions, the final SF–269 must be
E:\FR\FM\11JAN1.SGM
11JAN1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 6 / Monday, January 11, 2010 / Notices
verified from the grantee records to
support the information outlined in the
FSR.
Failure to submit required reports
within the time allowed may result in
suspension or termination of an active
grant, withholding of additional awards
for the project, or other enforcement
actions such as withholding of
payments or converting to the
reimbursement method of payment.
Continued failure to submit required
reports may result in one or both of the
following: (1) The imposition of special
award provisions; and (2) the nonfunding or non-award of other eligible
projects or activities. This applies
whether the delinquency is attributable
to the failure of the grantee organization
or the individual responsible for
preparation of the reports.
C. FY 2007 and FY 2008 Single Audit
Reports (OMB A–133)
Applicants who have an active SDPI
grant are required to be up-to-date in the
submission of required audit reports.
These are the annual financial audit
reports required by OMB A–133, audits
of State, local governments, and nonprofit organizations that are submitted.
Documentation of (or proof of
submission) of current FY 2007 and FY
2008 Financial Audit Reports is
mandatory. Acceptable forms of
documentation include: e-mail
confirmation from FAC that audits were
submitted; or face sheets from audit
reports. Face sheets can be found on the
FAC Web site: https://harvester.census.
gov/fac/dissem/accessoptions.html?
submit=Retrieve+Records.
Telecommunication for the hearing
impaired is available at: TTY (301) 443–
6394.
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
VII. Agency Contacts
• For Grants Budget Management,
contact:
• Denise Clark, Lead Grants
Management Specialist, DGO
(denise.clark@ihs.gov), Division of
Grants Operations, 801 Thompson
Avenue, TMP, Suite 360, Rockville, MD
20852. (301) 443–5204.
• For Grants.gov electronic
application process, contact:
• Tammy Bagley, Grants Policy, DGP
(tammy.bagley@ihs.gov), (301) 443–
5204. Grants Policy Web site: https://
www.ihs.gov/NonMedicalPrograms/
gogp/index.cfm?module=gogp_funding.
• For programmatic questions,
contact:
• Merle Mike, Program Assistant,
DDTP (merle.mike@ihs.gov), (505) 248–
4182.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:06 Jan 08, 2010
Jkt 220001
• Lorraine Valdez, Deputy Director,
DDTP (s.lorraine.valdez@ihs.gov), (505)
248–4182.
• Area Diabetes Consultants Web site:
https://www.ihs.gov/MedicalPrograms/
diabetes/index.cfm?module=peopleADC
Directory.
Dated: December 22, 2009.
Yvette Roubideaux,
Director, Indian Health Service.
[FR Doc. 2010–149 Filed 1–8–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4165–16–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2009–N–0606]
General and Plastic Surgery Devices
Panel of the Medical Devices Advisory
Committee; Amendment of Notice
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is announcing an
amendment to the notice of a meeting of
the General and Plastic Surgery Devices
Panel of the Medical Devices Advisory
Committee. This meeting was
announced in the Federal Register of
November 17, 2009 (74 FR 59194). The
amendment is being made to reflect a
change in the Contact Person and
Procedure portions of the document,
and to provide notice of the availability
of a docket for public comment. There
are no other changes.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Margaret McCabe-Janicki, Center for
Devices and Radiological Health, Food
and Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., White Oak 66, rm.
1535, Silver Spring, MD 20993, 301–
796–7029, or FDA Advisory Committee
Information Line, 1–800–741–8138
(301–443–0572 in the Washington, DC
area), code 3014512519. Please call the
Information Line for up-to-date
information on this meeting.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In FR Doc.
E9–27491, appearing on page 59194, in
the Federal Register of Tuesday,
November 17, 2009, the following
corrections are made:
1. On page 59194, in the second
column, under Contact Person, the first
six lines ‘‘Peter L. Hudson, Center for
Devices and Radiological Health, Food
and Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., White Oak 66, rm.
3618, Silver Spring, MD 20993, 301–
796–6440 or FDA Advisory’’ are
removed and replaced with ‘‘Margaret
PO 00000
Frm 00063
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
1395
McCabe-Janicki, Center for Devices and
Radiological Health, Food and Drug
Administration, 10903 New Hampshire
Avenue., White Oak 66, rm. 1535, Silver
Spring, MD 20993, 301–796–7029, or
FDA Advisory’’.
2. On page 59194, in the third
column, a Comments portion is added
before the Agenda portion of the
document to read: ‘‘Comments: FDA is
opening a docket for public comment on
this document. The docket number is
FDA–2009–N–0606. The docket will
open for public comment on January 11,
2010. The docket will close on March
19, 2010. Interested persons may submit
electronic or written comments
regarding this document. Submit
electronic comments to https://
www.regulations.gov. Submit written
comments to the Division of Dockets
Management, Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm.
1061, Rockville, MD 20852. Submit a
single copy of electronic comments or
two paper copies of any mailed
comments, except that individuals may
submit one paper copy. Comments are
to be identified with the docket number
found in brackets in the heading of this
document. Received comments may be
seen in the Division of Dockets
Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m.,
Monday through Friday.’’
3. On pages 59194 and 59195,
beginning on page 59194 in the third
column, under Procedure, the year
‘‘2009’’ is changed to read ‘‘2010’’
everywhere that it appears.
This notice is issued under the
Federal Advisory Committee Act (5
U.S.C. app. 2) and 21 CFR part 14,
relating to the advisory committees.
Dated: January 5, 2010.
David Dorsey,
Acting Deputy Commissioner for Policy,
Planning and Budget.
[FR Doc. 2010–172 Filed 1–8–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–S
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2009–N–0664]
Cardiovascular and Renal Drugs
Advisory Committee; Notice of Meeting
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
This notice announces a forthcoming
meeting of a public advisory committee
of the Food and Drug Administration
(FDA). The meeting will be open to the
public.
E:\FR\FM\11JAN1.SGM
11JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 6 (Monday, January 11, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1389-1395]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-149]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Indian Health Service
FY 2010 Special Diabetes Program for Indians Community-Directed
Grant Program
Announcement Type: New/Competing Continuation.
Funding Opportunity Number: HHS-2010-IHS-SDPI-0003.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number: 93.237.
Key Dates
Application Deadline: February 19, 2010.
Review Date: March 17-19, 2010.
Earliest Anticipated Start Date: April 1, 2010.
Other information: This announcement will be open throughout Fiscal
Year (FY) 2010 based on existing budget cycles. Refer to application
instructions for additional details. This current announcement targets
grantees that currently operate under a budget cycle that begins on
April 1.
I. Funding Opportunity Description
Statutory Authority
The Indian Health Service (IHS) is accepting grant applications for
the FY 2010 Special Diabetes Program for Indians (SDPI) Community-
Directed grant program. This competitive grant announcement is open to
all existing SDPI grantees that have an active grant in place and are
in compliance with the previous terms and conditions of the grant. This
program is authorized under H.R. 6331 ``Medicare Improvement for
Patients and Providers Act of 2008'' (Section 303 of Pub. L. 110-275)
and the Snyder Act, 25 U.S.C. 13. The program is described in the
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CDFA) under 93.237.
Overview
The SDPI seeks to support diabetes treatment and prevention
activities for American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) communities.
Grantees will implement programs based on identified diabetes-related
community needs. Activities will be targeted to reduce the risk of
diabetes in at-risk individuals, provide services that target those
with new onset diabetes, provide high quality care to those with
diagnosed diabetes, and/or reduce the complications of diabetes.
The purpose of the FY 2010 SDPI Community-Directed grant program is
to support diabetes treatment and prevention programs that have a
program plan which integrates at least one IHS Diabetes Best Practice
and that have a program evaluation plan in place which includes
tracking outcome measures.
This is not an application for continued funding as was previously
available for Community-Directed grant programs.
Background
Diabetes Among American Indian/Alaska Native Communities
During the past 50 years, type 2 diabetes has become a major public
health issue in many AI/AN communities, and it is increasingly
recognized that AI/AN populations have a disproportionate burden of
diabetes (Ghodes, 1995). In 2006, 16.1% of AI/ANs aged 20 years or
older had diagnosed diabetes (unpublished IHS Diabetes Program
Statistics, 2006) compared to 7.8% for the non-Hispanic white
population (CDC, 2007). In addition, AI/AN people have higher rates of
diabetes-related morbidity and mortality than in the general U.S.
population (Carter, 1996; Harris, 1995; Gilliland, 1997). Strategies to
address the prevention and treatment of diabetes in AI/AN communities
are urgently needed.
Under the Balanced Budget Act of 1997, Congress authorized the IHS
to administer the SDPI grant program. SDPI grants are programmatically
directed by the IHS Division of Diabetes Treatment and Prevention
(DDTP).
Special Diabetes Program for Indians
The SDPI is a $150 million per year grant program. Over 330
programs have received SDPI Community-Directed grants annually since
1998. In addition, 66 demonstration projects have been funded annually
since 2004 to address prevention of type 2 diabetes or cardiovascular
disease risk reduction. A Congressional re-authorization in 2008
extended the SDPI through FY 2011.
II. Award Information
Type of Awards
Grants.
Estimated Funds Available
The total amount of funding identified for FY 2010 SDPI Community-
Directed grant program is $104.8 million. Funds available to each IHS
Area and to urban Indian health programs have been determined through
Tribal consultation. Within each area, local Tribal consultation guided
IHS decision-making on how much funding is available per eligible
applicant. FY 2010 SDPI funding remains unchanged from FY 2009, per
Tribal consultation. All awards issued under this announcement are
subject to the availability of funds. In the absence of funding, the
agency is under no obligation to make awards funded under this
announcement.
Anticipated Number of Awards
Approximately 50 awards will be issued for Budget Cycle III.
Applications will be accepted from grantees whose current SDPI FY 2009
grants end on March 31, 2009. Additionally, Budget Cycle II grantees
that were deemed ineligible due to incomplete applications or that
possessed delinquent OMB A-133 financial audits can resubmit
applications under the timelines for Budget Cycle III.
Project Period
The project period for grants made under this announcement is 24
months, subject to the availability of funds.
III. Eligibility Information
1. Eligible Applicants
Eligible applicants include the following:
Federally-recognized Tribes operating an Indian health
program operated pursuant to a contract, grant, cooperative agreement,
or compact with the IHS pursuant to the Indian Self-Determination and
Education Assistance Act (ISDEAA), (Pub. L. 93-638).
Tribal organizations operating an Indian health program
operated pursuant to a contract, grant, cooperative agreement, or
compact with the IHS pursuant to the ISDEAA, (Pub. L. 93-638).
Urban Indian health programs that operate a Title V Urban
Indian Health Program: This includes programs currently under a grant
or contract with the IHS under Title V of the Indian Health Care
Improvement Act, (Pub. L. 93-437).
[[Page 1390]]
Indian Health Service facilities (refer to paragraph 3
below in this Section).
Current SDPI grantees are eligible to apply for competing
continuation funding under this announcement and must demonstrate that
they have complied with previous terms and conditions of the SDPI grant
in order to receive funding under this announcement.
Non-profit Tribal organizations and national or regional health
boards are not eligible, consistent with past Tribal consultation.
Applicants that do not meet these eligibility requirements will have
their applications returned without further consideration.
Under this announcement, only one SDPI Community-Directed diabetes
grant will be awarded per entity. If a Tribe submits an application,
their local IHS facility cannot apply; if the Tribe does not submit an
application, the IHS facility can apply. Tribes that are awarded grant
funds may sub-contract with local IHS facilities to provide specific
clinical services. In this case, the Tribe would be the primary SDPI
grantee and the Federal entity would have a sub-contract within the
Tribe's SDPI grant.
Collaborative Arrangements
Tribes are encouraged to collaborate with any appropriate local
entities including IHS facilities. If a Tribe seeks to provide specific
clinical or support services, it may implement a sub-contract with
these entities in order to transfer funds. The amount of SDPI funding
that the Tribe receives remains the same. The Tribe, as the primary
grantee, arranges with the entity to provide specified services that
support the program's plan. The entity may request direct costs only.
When a Tribe sub-contracts with the local IHS facility, application
requirements for collaborative arrangements include:
A signed Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) must be submitted
with the SDPI application. The MOA must include the scope of work
assigned to the sub-contracting IHS facility.
The IHS Area Director and the Tribal Chairperson must give
signed approval of the MOA.
The Tribe's application must include additional SF-424 and
SF-424A forms that are completed by the IHS facility which includes a
budget narrative and a face page that is signed by the Chief Executive
Officer (CEO).
Applications With Sub-Grants
Programs that submit one application on behalf of multiple
organizations (sub-grantees) must submit copies of selected application
forms and documents for each of their sub-grantees. (See Section IV,
Subsection 2 for specifics.) All sub-grantees must meet the eligibility
requirements noted in Subsection 1 above.
2. Cost Sharing or Matching
The FY 2010 Special Diabetes Program for Indians (SDPI) Community-
Directed grant program does not require matching funds or cost sharing.
3. Other Requirements
A. Program Coordinator
Provide information about the SDPI Program Coordinator on the ``Key
Contacts Form'' which is included in the application package. The
Program Coordinator must meet the following requirements:
Have relevant health care education and/or experience.
Have experience with program management and grants program
management, including skills in program coordination, budgeting,
reporting and supervision of staff.
Have a working knowledge of diabetes.
B. Documentation of Support
Tribal Organizations
Existing SDPI grantees must submit a current, signed and dated
Tribal resolution or Tribal letter of support from all Indian Tribe(s)
served by the project. Applications from each Tribal organization must
include specific resolutions or letters of support from all Tribes
affected by the proposed project activities.
If the Tribal resolution or Tribal letter of support is not
submitted with the application, it must be received in the Division of
Grants Operations (DGO) prior to the objective review date, March 17,
2010.
Title V Urban Indian Health Programs
Urban Indian health programs must submit a letter of support from
the organization's board of directors. Urban Indian health programs are
non-profit organizations and must also submit a copy of the 501(c)(3)
Certificate. All letters of support must be included in the application
or submitted to the DGO prior to the objective review date, March 17,
2010.
IHS Hospitals or Clinics
IHS facilities must submit a letter of support from the CEO.
The documentation must be received in the DGO prior to the
objective review date, March 17, 2010.
IV. Application and Submission Information
1. Obtaining Application Materials
The application package and instructions may be found at https://www.Grants.gov.
2. Content and Form of Application Submission
Mandatory documents for all applicants include:
Application forms:
[cir] SF-424.
[cir] SF-424A.
[cir] SF-424B.
[cir] Key Contacts Form.
Budget Narrative.
Project Narrative.
Tribal Resolution or Tribal Letter of Support (Tribal
Organizations only).
Letter of Support from Organization's Board of Directors
(Title V Urban Indian Health Programs only).
501(c)(3) Certificate (Title V Urban Indian Health
Programs only).
CEO Letters of Support (IHS facilities only).
2008 and 2009 IHS Diabetes Care and Outcomes Audit Report.
Biographical sketches for all Key Personnel.
Disclosure of Lobbying Activities (SF-LLL) (if
applicable).
Documentation of OMB A-133 required Financial Audit for FY
2007 and FY 2008. Acceptable forms of documentation include:
[cir] E-mail confirmation from Federal Audit Clearinghouse (FAC)
that audits were submitted; or
[cir] Face sheets from audit reports. These can be found on the FAC
Web site: https://harvester.census.gov/fac/dissem/
accessoptions.html?submit=Retrieve+Records.
Mandatory Documents for Programs That Proposed Sub-Grantees
The primary grantee for applications that propose sub-grantees must
submit all of the mandatory documents listed above. In addition, they
must submit the following documents for each sub-grantee:
SF-424, SF-424A, SF-424B and Key Contacts Form.
Project Narrative.
Budget Narrative.
2008 and 2009 IHS Diabetes Care and Outcomes Audit
Reports.
A separate budget is required for each sub-grantee, but the primary
grantee's application must reflect the total budget for the entire cost
of the project.
Mandatory Documents for Programs That Propose Sub-Contracts With Local
IHS Facilities
Programs that propose sub-contracts with IHS facilities to provide
clinical
[[Page 1391]]
services must submit the documents noted below for the sub-contractor:
MOA that is signed by the primary grantee, the sub-
contractor, the IHS Area Director and the Tribal Chairperson.
SF-424 and SF-424A forms completed by the IHS facility (in
addition to the primary applicant's SF-424 forms).
A separate budget is required for the sub-contract, but the primary
grantee's application must reflect the total budget for the entire cost
of the project.
Public Policy Requirements: All Federal-wide public policies apply
to IHS grants with the exception of the Discrimination Policy.
Requirements for Project and Budget Narratives
A. Project Narrative: This narrative should be a separate Word
document that is no longer than 13-17 pages (see page limitations for
each Part noted below) with consecutively numbered pages. Be sure to
place all responses and required information in the correct section or
they will not be considered or scored. If the narrative exceeds the
page limit, only the first 13-17 pages will be reviewed. There are
three parts to the narrative: Part A--Program Information; Part B--
Program Planning and Evaluation; and Part C--Program Report. A sample
project narrative and template are available in the application
instructions. See below for additional details about what must be
included in the narrative.
Part A: Program Information (no more than 4 pages)
Section 1: Community Needs Assessment
A1.1 Describe the burden of diabetes in your community. Include
estimates of the number of people diagnosed with diabetes and the total
number of people. Describe how you calculated these estimates.
A1.2 Briefly describe the top diabetes-related health issues in
your community.
A1.3 Briefly describe the unique challenges your program
experiences related to prevention and treatment of diabetes.
Section 2: Leadership Support
A2.1 Question: Has at least one organization administrator or
Tribal leader agreed to be actively involved in your program's work?
(Yes or No).
A2.2 Provide the name and role or position that this leader holds.
A2.3 Describe how this leader will be involved with your program.
Section 3: Personnel
Using the table format that is in the application instructions,
provide the following information for each person who will be paid with
SDPI funds:
A3.1 Name.
A3.2 Title.
A3.3 Brief description of tasks/activities.
A3.4 Is this person already on staff with your SDPI or diabetes
program?
A3.5 What percent FTE of this person's salary will be paid using
SDPI funds?
Section 4: Diabetes Audit Review
Obtain copies of your local IHS Diabetes Care and Outcomes Audit
Reports for 2008 and 2009. Review and compare the results for these two
years. Work with your local audit coordinator or Area Diabetes
Consultant (ADC) if you need help.
A4.1 Provide a list of results for three to five items/elements
(e.g., A1c, eye exam, education, etc.) that improved from 2008 to 2009.
A4.2 Provide a list of three to five items/elements that need to be
improved.
A4.3 Describe how your program will address these three to five
items/elements that need to be improved or describe how your program
will work with your local health care facility to address these areas.
Section 5: Collaboration
A5.1 Describe existing partnerships and collaborations that your
program has in place.
A5.2 Describe new partnerships and collaboration that your program
is planning to implement.
Part B: Program Planning and Evaluation (no more than 3 pages, with
2 pages for each additional Best Practice)
Section 1: Overview
Each 2009 IHS Diabetes Best Practice includes two specific measures
that are called ``key measures.'' Programs may track additional
measures based on local priorities. A list of all Best Practices is
located in the application instructions. This list provides a short
description of the contents and key measures for each Best Practice.
B1.1 List which IHS Diabetes Best Practice(s) your program will
implement in order to address the needs that were identified in your
community assessment.
Section 2: Program Planning
Provide the information requested below separately for each Best
Practice that will be implemented:
B2.1 Target Population: What population will you target?
B2.2 Goal: Describe the goal that your program wants to achieve as
a result of implementing the selected Best Practice.
B2.3 Objectives/Measures: List the objective(s) your program will
work to accomplish, with at least one measure identified for each
objective. Be sure to include the two key measures for your selected
Best Practice and use the SMART format (see application instructions
for additional information). Also, indicate how frequently your program
will review data for each measure. (Choose from the following options:
weekly, twice a month, monthly, every other month, or quarterly).
B2.4 Activities: List the activities that your program will do to
meet the selected Best Practice objectives. These could be events you
will organize, services you will offer, materials you will develop and
implement, or other activities.
Section 3: Evaluation
B3.1 Describe how your program will track activities for the
selected Best Practice(s).
B3.2 Describe how your program will collect and track data on all
measures (listed in Section 2 above) for the selected Best Practice(s).
B3.3 Describe how your program will collect stories about
individual participants, community events, program staff, and other
aspects of your program.
Part C: Program Report (no more than 4 pages)
Section 1: Major Accomplishments and Activities
C1.1 Describe three major accomplishments that your SDPI program
achieved in the past 12 months.
C1.2 Describe three to five major accomplishments that your SDPI
program has achieved since it began.
C1.3 Describe one story that exemplifies a major program
accomplishment from the past year.
C1.4 Describe your SDPI program's primary activities during the
past 12 months.
C1.5 Describe your SDPI program's primary activities since it
began.
Section 2: Challenges
C2.1 Describe the two or three biggest challenges that your SDPI
program encountered in the past 12 months.
C2.2 Describe how your SDPI program addressed these challenges.
C2.3 Indicate if you successfully addressed these challenges. (If
so, why; if not, why not.)
Section 3: Dissemination
C3.1 Describe three to five major lessons that your SDPI program
has learned since it began.
C3.2 Describe how your SDPI program has shared the lessons that you
have learned with other diabetes programs.
C3.3 Describe materials or products your SDPI program has
developed.
[[Page 1392]]
Section 4: Other Information
C4.1 Provide any additional information about your SDPI program.
B. Budget Narrative (no more than 4 pages)
The budget narrative should explain why each budget item on the SF-
424A is necessary and relevant to the proposed project.
3. Submission Dates and Times
Applications are to be submitted electronically through Grants.gov
by February 19, 2010 at 12 midnight Eastern Standard Time (EST). Any
application received after the application deadline will not be
accepted for processing, and it will be returned to the applicant(s)
without further consideration for funding.
If technical challenges arise and the applicants need help with the
electronic application process, contact Grants.gov Customer Support via
e-mail to support@grants.gov or at (800) 518-4726. Customer Support is
available to address questions 24 hours a day, 7 days a week (except on
Federal holidays). If problems persist, contact Tammy Bagley, Senior
Grants Policy Analyst, IHS Division of Grants Policy (DGP)
(tammy.bagley@ihs.gov) at (301) 443-5204 to describe the difficulties
being experienced. Be sure to contact Ms. Bagley at least ten days
prior to the application deadline.
Please do not contact the DGP until you have received a Grants.gov
tracking number. In the event you are not able to obtain a tracking
number, call the DGP as soon as possible.
If an applicant needs to submit a paper application instead of
submitting electronically via Grants.gov, prior approval must be
requested and obtained (see page 16 for additional information). The
waiver must be documented in writing (e-mails are acceptable), before
submitting a paper application. After a waiver is received, the
application package must be downloaded by the applicant from
Grants.gov. Once completed and printed, the original application and
two copies must be sent to Denise E. Clark, Division of Grants
Operations (DGO) (denise.clark@ihs.gov), 801 Thompson Avenue, TMP,
Suite 360, Rockville, MD 20852. Paper applications that are submitted
without a waiver will be returned to the applicant without review or
further consideration.
4. Intergovernmental Review
Executive Order 12372 requiring intergovernmental review is not
applicable to this program.
5. Funding Restrictions
A. Pre-award costs are allowable pending prior approval from the
awarding agency. However, in accordance with 45 CFR Part 74 and 92,
pre-award costs are incurred at the applicant's risk. The awarding
office is under no obligation to reimburse such costs if for any reason
the applicant does not receive an award or if the award is less than
anticipated.
B. The available funds are inclusive of direct and appropriate
indirect costs (see Section VI, Subsection 3).
C. Only one grant will be awarded per applicant.
6. Electronic Submission Requirements
Use the https://www.Grants.gov Web site to submit an application
electronically; select the ``Apply for Grants'' link on the homepage.
Download a copy of the application package, complete it offline, and
then upload and submit the application via the Grants.gov Web site.
Electronic copies of the application may not be submitted as
attachments to e-mail messages addressed to IHS employees or offices.
Applicants that receive a waiver to submit paper application
documents must follow the rules and timelines that are noted below. The
applicant must seek assistance at least ten days prior to the
application deadline.
Applicants that do not adhere to the timelines for Central
Contractor Registry (CCR) and/or Grants.gov registration and/or request
timely assistance with technical issues will not be considered for a
waiver to submit a paper application.
Please be aware of the following:
Paper applications are not the preferred method for
submitting applications.
If you have problems electronically submitting your
application on-line, contact Grants.gov Customer Support via e-mail to
support@grants.gov or at (800) 518-4726. Customer Support is available
to address questions 24 hours a day, 7 days a week (except on Federal
holidays). If problems persist, contact Tammy Bagley, Senior Grants
Policy Analyst, DGP, at (301) 443-5204.
Upon contacting Grants.gov, obtain a tracking number as
proof of contact. The tracking number is helpful if there are technical
issues that cannot be resolved and a waiver to submit a paper
application must be obtained.
If it is determined that a waiver is needed, the applicant
must submit a request in writing (e-mails are acceptable) to
michelle.bulls@ihs.gov that includes a justification for the need to
deviate from the standard electronic submission process. If the waiver
is approved, the application package must be downloaded by the
applicant from Grants.gov. Once completed and printed, it should be
sent directly to the DGO by the deadline date of February 19, 2010 (see
Section IV, Subsection 3 for details).
Upon entering the Grants.gov site, there is information
that outlines the requirements to the applicant regarding electronic
submission of an application through Grants.gov, as well as the hours
of operation.
Applicants are strongly encouraged not to wait until the
deadline date to begin the application process through Grants.gov as
the registration process for CCR and Grants.gov could take up to
fifteen working days.
In order to use Grants.gov, the applicant must have a Dun
and Bradstreet (DUNS) Number and register in the Central Contractor
Registration (CCR). A minimum of ten working days should be allowed to
complete CCR registration. See Subsection 8 below for more information.
All documents must be submitted electronically, including
all information typically included on the SF-424 and all necessary
assurances and certifications.
Please use the optional attachment feature in Grants.gov
to attach additional documentation that may be requested by IHS.
The application must comply with any page limitation
requirements described in the Funding Announcement.
After you electronically submit your application, you will
receive an automatic acknowledgment from Grants.gov that contains a
Grants.gov tracking number. The DGO will download your application from
Grants.gov and provide necessary copies to the DDTP. Neither the DGO
nor the DDTP will notify applicants that the application has been
received.
You may access the electronic application package and
instructions for this Funding Opportunity Announcement on https://www.Grants.gov.
You may search for the application package on Grants.gov
either with the CFDA number or the Funding Opportunity Number. Both
numbers are identified in the heading of this announcement.
The applicant must provide the Funding Opportunity Number:
HHS-2010-IHS-SDPI-0002.
[[Page 1393]]
DUNS Number
Applicants are required to have a DUNS number to apply for a grant
or cooperative agreement from the Federal Government. The DUNS number
is a nine-digit identification number, which uniquely identifies
business entities. Many organizations may already have a DUNS number.
Obtaining a DUNS number is easy and there is no charge. To obtain a
DUNS number or to find out if your organization already has a DUNS
number, access https://fedgov.dnb.com/webform.
Applicants must also be registered with the CCR. A DUNS number is
required before an applicant can complete their CCR registration.
Registration with the CCR is free of charge. Applicants may register
online at https://www.ccr.gov. More detailed information regarding the
DUNS, CCR, and Grants.gov processes can be found at: https://www.Grants.gov.
V. Application Review Information
1. Criteria
Criteria that will be used to evaluate the application are divided
into three categories. They include:
Project Narrative.
The project narrative is divided into three parts: Part A--Program
Information; Part B--Program Planning/Evaluation; and Part C--Project
Report. Required information includes topics such as: community needs
assessment, leadership support, use of Diabetes Audit results, selected
Best Practice(s), overall evaluation plan and project accomplishments.
For each Best Practice that will be implemented, address: target
population, goal, objectives/measures, review of key measures, and
activities (see Section IV, Part B, Section 2).
Budget Narrative.
The budget narrative provides additional explanation to support the
information provided on the SF-424A form. Budget categories to address
include: personnel, fringe benefits, travel, equipment and supplies,
contractual/consultant and constructions/alterations/renovations. In
addition to a line item budget, provide a brief justification of each
budget item and how they support project objectives.
Key Contacts Form.
This form seeks to obtain contact information about only one
person: the project's SDPI Program Coordinator.
Scoring of Applications
Points will be assigned in each category adding up to a total of
100. A minimum score of 60 points is required for funding. Points will
be assigned as follows:
Project Narrative: A total of 90 possible points are
available for this information. It is divided into two parts: Program
Information (20 possible points); Program Planning/Evaluation (60
possible points); and Program Report (10 possible points).
Budget Narrative: A total of 10 possible points are
available for this information.
2. Review and Selection Process
Each application will be prescreened by DGO staff for eligibility
and completeness as outlined in this Funding Opportunity Announcement.
Applications from entities that do not meet eligibility criteria or
that are incomplete will not be reviewed. Applicants will be notified
by the DGO that their application did not meet minimum requirements.
After being prescreened by the DGO, applications will be reviewed
by an Objective Review Committee (ORC) and assigned a score. The ORC is
an objective review group that will be convened by the DDTP in
consultation with the DGP as required by Department of Health and Human
Services (HHS) Grants Policy.
To obtain a minimum score for funding, applicants must address all
program requirements and provide all required documentation. Applicants
that receive less than a minimum score will be informed via e-mail of
their application's deficiencies. (see Section 6 below for application
revision guidance). A summary statement outlining the weaknesses of the
application will be provided to these applicants. The summary statement
will be sent to the Authorized Organizational Representative (AOR) that
is identified on the face page of the application.
Review of Applications With Sub-Grants
When an application is submitted on behalf of multiple
organizations (sub-grantees), the review score will be a combined score
that is based on information provided by all of these organizations.
Programmatic Requirements
Funded applicants (grantees) must meet the following programmatic
requirements:
A. Implement an IHS Diabetes Best Practice
Grantees must implement recommended services and activities from at
least one 2009 IHS Diabetes Best Practice. They should implement
recommendations based on program need, strengths, and resources.
Program activities, services and key measures from the selected Best
Practice(s) must be documented in the project narrative (see Section
IV, Part B, Section 2).
B. Implement Program and Evaluation Plans
Grantees must follow the plans submitted with their application
when implementing each selected Best Practice and their evaluation
processes. A minimum evaluation requirement is to monitor the key
measures over time. Programs may track additional measures based on
local priorities.
C. Participate in Training and Peer-to-Peer Learning Sessions
Grantees must participate in SDPI training sessions and peer-to-
peer learning activities. Training sessions will be primarily
conference calls or combined WebEx/conference calls. Grantees will be
expected to:
Participate in interactive discussion during conference
calls.
Share activities, tools and results.
Share problems encountered and how barriers are broken
down.
Share materials presented at conferences and meetings.
Participate and share in other relevant activities.
Sessions, which will be led by DDTP, DGO, or their agents, will address
clinical and other topics. Topics will include: program planning and
evaluation, enhancing accountability through data management, and
improvement of principles and processes. Grantees will integrate
information and ideas in order to enhance effectiveness. Anticipated
outcomes from participating in the learning sessions are improved
communication and sharing among grantees, increased use of data for
improvement, and enhanced accountability.
Application Revisions
If an application does not receive a minimum score for funding from
the ORC, the applicant will be informed via a summary statement that
will be sent to the AOR via e-mail. The applicant then has two
opportunities to submit revisions to their application. Before
application revisions can be submitted, the AOR must have received a
summary statement from the previous review that outlines the weaknesses
of the initial application.
A. Revision to Initial Application
Applicants will have five business days from the date that the
summary statement is sent via e-mail to submit hard copies of their
application revisions. Along with the revised application documents,
applicants must
[[Page 1394]]
prepare and submit an Introduction of not more than three pages that
summarizes the substantial additions, deletions, and changes. The
Introduction must also include responses to the criticism and issues
raised in the summary statement.
The Introduction and revised application documents must be mailed
directly to the DGO to the attention of Denise Clark, Lead Grants
Management Specialist (denise.clark@ihs.gov) at: Division of Grants
Operations, 801 Thompson Avenue, TMP, Suite 360, Rockville, MD 20852.
Technical assistance will be available to applicants as they
prepare resubmission documentation.
An Ad Hoc Review Committee will be convened specifically to review
the initial application revisions. If the revised application receives
the minimum score for funding or above, the applicant will be informed
via a Notice of Award (NoA). If the Review Committee determines that
the application with revisions still does not receive a fundable score,
the applicant will be informed of their application's deficiencies via
a second summary statement that will be e-mailed to the AOR.
B. Second Application Revision
Applicants will have five business days from the date that the
second summary statement is sent via e-mail to submit hard copies of
their application revisions. Along with the revised application
documents, applicants must prepare and submit an Introduction of not
more than three pages that summarizes the substantial additions,
deletions, and changes. The Introduction must also include responses to
the criticism and issues raised in the summary statement.
The Introduction and revised application documents must, again, be
mailed directly to the DGO to the attention of Denise Clark, Lead
Grants Management Specialist (denise.clark@ihs.gov) at: Division of
Grants Operations, 801 Thompson Avenue, TMP, Suite 360, Rockville, MD
20852.
A second Ad Hoc Review Committee will be convened to review the
second application revisions. If the application with revisions
receives the minimum score for funding or above, the applicant will be
informed via a Notice of Award (NoA).
If the Review Committee determines that the application with
revisions still does not receive a fundable score, applicants will be
informed in writing of their application's deficiencies. No further
resubmissions will be allowed.
7. Anticipated Announcement and Award Dates
Grantees that receive a fundable score will be notified of their
approval for funding via the NoA. (See application instructions for key
dates for other budget cycles.)
VI. Award Administration Information
1. Award Notices
The NoA will be prepared by DGO and sent via postal mail to each
applicant that is approved for funding under this announcement. This
document will be sent to the person who is listed on the SF-424 as the
AOR. The NoA will be signed by the Grants Management Officer. The NoA
is the authorizing document for which funds are dispersed to the
approved entities. The NoA serves as the official notification of the
grant award and reflects the amount of Federal funds awarded, the
purpose of the grant, the terms and conditions of the award, the
effective date of the award, and the budget/project period. The NoA is
the legally binding document. Applicants who are disapproved based on
the ORC score will receive a copy of the summary statement which
identifies the weaknesses and strengths of the application submitted.
The AOR serves as the business point of contact for all business
aspects of the award.
The anticipated NoA date for all applicants that score well in the
ORC review for Cycle III is April 1, 2010.
2. Administrative Requirements
Grants are administered in accordance with the following
regulations, policies, and Office of Management and Budget (OMB) cost
principles:
A. The criteria as outlined in this Funding Opportunity
Announcement.
B. Administrative Regulations for Grants:
45 CFR Part 92--Uniform Administrative Requirements for
Grants and Cooperative Agreements to State, Local and Tribal
Governments.
45 CFR Part 74--Uniform Administrative Requirements for
Awards and Subawards to Institutions of Higher Education, Hospitals,
Other Non-Profit Organizations, and Commercial Organizations.
C. Grants Policy:
HHS Grants Policy Statement, Revised 01/2007.
D. Cost Principles:
OMB Circular A-87--State, Local, and Indian Tribal
Governments (Title 2 Part 225).
OMB Circular A-122--Non-Profit Organizations (Title 2 Part
230).
E. Audit Requirements
OMB Circular A-133--Audits of States, Local Governments,
and Non-Profit Organizations.
3. Indirect Costs
This section applies to all grant recipients that request
reimbursement of indirect costs in their grant application. In
accordance with HHS Grants Policy Statement, Part II-27, IHS requires
applicants to obtain a current indirect cost rate agreement prior to
award. The rate agreement must be prepared in accordance with the
applicable cost principles and guidance as provided by the cognizant
agency or office. A current rate covers the applicable grant activities
under the current award's budget period. If the current rate is not on
file with the DGO at the time of award, the indirect cost portion of
the budget will be restricted. The restrictions remain in place until
the current rate is provided to the DGO.
Generally, indirect costs rates for IHS grantees are negotiated
with the HHS Division of Cost Allocation https://rates.psc.gov/and the
Department of the Interior (National Business Center) at https://www.aqd.nbc.gov/indirect/indirect.asp. If your organization has
questions regarding the indirect cost policy, please contact the DGO at
(301) 443-5204.
4. Reporting Requirements
The DDTP and the DGO have requirements for progress reports and
financial reports based on the terms and conditions of this grant as
noted below.
A. Progress Reports
Program progress reports are required semi-annually. These reports
must include at a minimum: reporting of Best Practice measures; and a
brief comparison of actual accomplishments to the goals established for
the budget period or provide sound justification for the lack of
progress.
B. Financial Status Reports
Annual financial status reports are required until the end of the
project period. Reports must be submitted annually no later than 30
days after the end of each specified reporting period. The final
financial status report is due within 90 days after the end of the 24
month project period. Standard Form 269 (long form for those reporting
program income; short form for all others) will be used for financial
reporting.
Grantees are responsible and accountable for accurate reporting of
the Progress Reports and Financial Status Reports (FSR). According to
SF-269 instructions, the final SF-269 must be
[[Page 1395]]
verified from the grantee records to support the information outlined
in the FSR.
Failure to submit required reports within the time allowed may
result in suspension or termination of an active grant, withholding of
additional awards for the project, or other enforcement actions such as
withholding of payments or converting to the reimbursement method of
payment. Continued failure to submit required reports may result in one
or both of the following: (1) The imposition of special award
provisions; and (2) the non-funding or non-award of other eligible
projects or activities. This applies whether the delinquency is
attributable to the failure of the grantee organization or the
individual responsible for preparation of the reports.
C. FY 2007 and FY 2008 Single Audit Reports (OMB A-133)
Applicants who have an active SDPI grant are required to be up-to-
date in the submission of required audit reports. These are the annual
financial audit reports required by OMB A-133, audits of State, local
governments, and non-profit organizations that are submitted.
Documentation of (or proof of submission) of current FY 2007 and FY
2008 Financial Audit Reports is mandatory. Acceptable forms of
documentation include: e-mail confirmation from FAC that audits were
submitted; or face sheets from audit reports. Face sheets can be found
on the FAC Web site: https://harvester.census.gov/fac/dissem/
accessoptions.html?submit=Retrieve+Records.
Telecommunication for the hearing impaired is available at: TTY
(301) 443-6394.
VII. Agency Contacts
For Grants Budget Management, contact:
Denise Clark, Lead Grants Management Specialist, DGO
(denise.clark@ihs.gov), Division of Grants Operations, 801 Thompson
Avenue, TMP, Suite 360, Rockville, MD 20852. (301) 443-5204.
For Grants.gov electronic application process, contact:
Tammy Bagley, Grants Policy, DGP (tammy.bagley@ihs.gov),
(301) 443-5204. Grants Policy Web site: https://www.ihs.gov/NonMedicalPrograms/gogp/index.cfm?module=gogp_funding.
For programmatic questions, contact:
Merle Mike, Program Assistant, DDTP (merle.mike@ihs.gov),
(505) 248-4182.
Lorraine Valdez, Deputy Director, DDTP
(s.lorraine.valdez@ihs.gov), (505) 248-4182.
Area Diabetes Consultants Web site: https://www.ihs.gov/MedicalPrograms/diabetes/index.cfm?module=peopleADCDirectory.
Dated: December 22, 2009.
Yvette Roubideaux,
Director, Indian Health Service.
[FR Doc. 2010-149 Filed 1-8-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4165-16-P