Pesticide Tolerance Crop Grouping Program II; Revision to General Tolerance Regulations, 807-816 [E10-31397]
Download as PDF
807
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 3 / Wednesday, January 6, 2010 / Proposed Rules
PART 147—SAFETY ZONES
1. The authority citation for part 147
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 14 U.S.C. 85; 43 U.S.C. 1333;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
2. Add § 147.T17–001 to read as
follows:
§ 147.T17.001 Safety Zone; FRONTIER
DISCOVERER, Outer Continental Shelf
Drillship, Chukchi and Beaufort Sea,
Alaska.
(a) Description. The FRONTIER
DISCOVERER will be engaged in
exploratory drilling operations at
various locations in the Chukchi and
Beaufort Sea from July 1, 2010 through
October 31, 2010. The DRILLSHIP will
be anchored while conducting
exploratory drilling operations with the
center point of the vessel located at the
coordinates listed in Table 1. These
coordinates are based upon [NAD 83]
UTM Zone 3.
TABLE 1—PROSPECT LOCATIONS
Prospect
Area
Burger .................................
Burger .................................
Burger .................................
Crackerjack .........................
SW Shoebill ........................
Sivulliq .................................
Torpedo ...............................
Posey .................................
Posey .................................
Posey .................................
Karo ....................................
Karo ....................................
Flaxman Is ..........................
Flaxman Is ..........................
The area within 500 meters (1,640.4
feet) from each point on the outer edge
of the vessel while anchored on location
is a safety zone.
(b) Regulation. No vessel may enter or
remain in this safety zone except the
following:
(1) An attending vessel; or
(2) A vessel authorized by the
Commander, Seventeenth Coast Guard
District.
Dated: December 17, 2009.
C.C. Colvin,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander,
Seventeenth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. E9–31351 Filed 1–5–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2006–0766; FRL–8801–2]
RIN 2070–AJ28
Pesticide Tolerance Crop Grouping
Program II; Revision to General
Tolerance Regulations
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
SUMMARY: EPA is proposing revisions to
its pesticide tolerance crop grouping
regulations, which allow establishment
of tolerances for multiple related crops,
based on data from a representative set
of crops. The present revision would
create a new crop group for oilseeds,
expand existing crop groups by adding
new commodities, establish new crop
subgroups, and revise the representative
crops in some groups. EPA expects
VerDate Nov<24>2008
20:33 Jan 05, 2010
Jkt 220001
Block
6764
6714
6912
6864
7007
6658
6610
Lease No.
OCS–Y–2280
OCS–Y–2267
OCS–Y–2321
OCS–Y–2111
OCS–Y–2142
OCS–Y–1805
OCS–Y–1941
............
............
............
............
............
............
............
these revisions to promote greater use of
crop groupings for tolerance-setting
purposes and, in particular, will assist
in making available lower risk
pesticides for minor crops both
domestically and in countries that
export food to the United States. This is
the second in a series of planned crop
group updates expected to be proposed
over the next several years. EPA is also
proposing to delete 40 CFR 180.1(h)
which addresses when tolerances apply
to post-harvest uses.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before March 8, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by docket identification (ID)
number EPA–HQ–OPP–2006–0766, by
one of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line
instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail: Office of Pesticide Programs
(OPP) Regulatory Public Docket (7502P),
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington,
DC 20460–0001.
• Delivery: OPP Regulatory Public
Docket (7502P), Environmental
Protection Agency, Rm. S–4400, One
Potomac Yard (South Bldg.), 2777 S.
Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. Deliveries
are only accepted during the Docket
Facility’s normal hours of operation
(8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through
Friday, excluding legal holidays).
Special arrangements should be made
for deliveries of boxed information. The
Docket Facility telephone number is
(703) 305–5805.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
docket ID number EPA–HQ–OPP–20060766. EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the docket
without change and may be made
available on-line at https://
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Latitude
N71°18′17.2739″
N71°20′13.9640″
N71°10′24.0292″
N71°13′58.9211″
N71°04′24.4163″
N70°23′29.5814″
N70°27′01.6193″
Longitude
W163°12′45.9891″
W163°12′21.7460″
W163°28′18.5219″
W166°14′10.7889″
W167°13′38.0886″
W145°58′52.5284″
W145°49′32.0650″
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through regulations.gov or email. The regulations.gov website is an
‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which
means EPA will not know your identity
or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment.
If you send an e-mail comment directly
to EPA without going through
regulations.gov, your e-mail address
will be automatically captured and
included as part of the comment that is
placed in the docket and made available
on the Internet. If you submit an
electronic comment, EPA recommends
that you include your name and other
contact information in the body of your
comment and with any disk or CD-ROM
you submit. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties
and cannot contact you for clarification,
EPA may not be able to consider your
comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form
of encryption, and be free of any defects
or viruses.
Docket: All documents in the docket
are listed in the docket index available
at https://www.regulations.gov. Although
listed in the index, some information is
not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy
form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either in the
electronic docket at https://
E:\FR\FM\06JAP1.SGM
06JAP1
808
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 3 / Wednesday, January 6, 2010 / Proposed Rules
www.regulations.gov, or, if only
available in hard copy, at the OPP
Regulatory Public Docket in Rm. S–
4400, One Potomac Yard (South Bldg.),
2777 S. Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. The
hours of operation of this Docket
Facility are from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The Docket Facility telephone
number is (703) 305–5805.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
´
Rame Cromwell, Field and External
Affairs Division, Office of Pesticide
Programs, Environmental Protection
Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC 20460–0001; telephone
number: (703) 308-9068; fax number:
(703) 305-5884; e-mail address:
cromwell.rame@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS
A. Does this Action Apply to Me?
You may be potentially affected by
this action if you are an agricultural
producer, food manufacturer.
Potentially affected entities may
include, but are not limited to: Crop
production (NAICS code 111), e.g.,
agricultural workers; greenhouse,
nursery, and floriculture workers;
farmers.
Animal production (NAICS code 112),
e.g., cattle ranchers and farmers, dairy
cattle farmers, livestock farmers.
Food manufacturing (NAICS code
311), e.g., agricultural workers; farmers;
greenhouse, nursery, and floriculture
workers; ranchers; pesticide applicators.
Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS code
32532), e.g., agricultural workers;
commercial applicators; farmers;
greenhouse, nursery, and floriculture
workers; residential users.
This listing is not intended to be
exhaustive, but rather provides a guide
for readers regarding entities likely to be
affected by this action. Other types of
entities not listed in this unit could also
be affected. The North American
Industrial Classification System
(NAICS) codes have been provided to
assist you and others in determining
whether this action might apply to
certain entities. If you have any
questions regarding the applicability of
this action to a particular entity, consult
the person listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT.
B. What Should I Consider as I Prepare
My Comments for EPA?
1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this
information to EPA through
regulations.gov or e-mail. Clearly mark
the part or all of the information that
you claim to be CBI. For CBI
information in a disk or CD-ROM that
VerDate Nov<24>2008
20:33 Jan 05, 2010
Jkt 220001
you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the
disk or CD-ROM as CBI and then
identify electronically within the disk or
CD-ROM the specific information that is
claimed as CBI. In addition to one
complete version of the comment that
includes information claimed as CBI, a
copy of the comment that does not
contain the information claimed as CBI
must be submitted for inclusion in the
public docket. Information so marked
will not be disclosed except in
accordance with procedures set forth in
40 CFR part 2.
2. Tips for preparing your comments.
When submitting comments, remember
to:
i. Identify the document by docket ID
number and other identifying
information (subject heading, Federal
Register date and page number).
ii. Follow directions. The Agency may
ask you to respond to specific questions
or organize comments by referencing a
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) part
or section number.
iii. Explain why you agree or disagree;
suggest alternatives and substitute
language for your requested changes.
iv. Describe any assumptions and
provide any technical information and/
or data that you used.
v. If you estimate potential costs or
burdens, explain how you arrived at
your estimate in sufficient detail to
allow for it to be reproduced.
vi. Provide specific examples to
illustrate your concerns and suggest
alternatives.
vii. Explain your views as clearly as
possible, avoiding the use of profanity
or personal threats.
viii. Make sure to submit your
comments by the comment period
deadline identified.
II. Background
A. Tolerance-Setting Requirements and
Petition from Inter-regional Research
Project Number 4 Program to Expand
the Existing Crop Grouping System
EPA is authorized to establish
maximum residue limits or ‘‘tolerances’’
for pesticide chemical residues in food
under section 408 of the Federal Food,
Drug and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA) (21
U.S.C. 346a). EPA establishes pesticide
tolerances only after determining that
aggregate exposure to the pesticide is
safe. The U.S. Food and Drug
Administration and the U.S. Department
of Agriculture together enforce
compliance with tolerance limits.
Traditionally, tolerances are
established for a specific pesticide/
commodity combination. However,
under EPA’s crop grouping regulation
(40 CFR 180.41) a single tolerance may
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
be established that applies to a group of
related commodities. For example, the
citrus crop group covers 11 different
citrus fruits including oranges,
grapefruit, lemons, and limes among
others. Crop group tolerances may be
established based on residue data only
on designated representative
commodities within the group.
Representative commodities are selected
based on EPA’s determination that they
are likely to bear the maximum level of
residue that could occur on any crop
within the group. Once the group
tolerance is established, the tolerance
level applies to all agricultural
commodities within the group. It is also
possible to request a crop group
tolerance with a particular member of
the crop excluded. An example of
exclusion to a crop group would be a
tolerance for the Stone Fruit group 12,
except peach. In this crop group,
residue data for cherry and plum are
used to establish a group tolerance for
the stone fruit group, except peach.
Exclusions are requested when
variations in residue levels within a
group for a particular pesticide make a
crop group tolerance otherwise
inappropriate. See 40 CFR 180.40(h).
This proposed rule is the second in a
series of planned crop group revisions
expected to be completed over the next
several years. Specific information
regarding the history of the crop group
regulations, the previous amendments
to the regulations and the process for
revising crop groups can be found in the
Federal Register of December 7, 2007
(72 FR 69150). Specific information
regarding how the Agency implements
crop group revisions can be found in the
40 CFR 180.40(j).
Today’s proposal is based upon four
petitions developed by the International
Crop Groupings Consulting Committee
(ICGCC) workgroup and submitted to
EPA by a nation-wide cooperative effort
called the Inter-regional Research
Project Number 4 (IR-4). These petitions
and the monographs supporting them
have been included in the docket for the
proposed rule. EPA expects that a series
of additional petitions seeking
amendments and changes to the crop
groupings regulations (40 CFR 180.41)
will originate from the ICGCC
workgroup over the next few years.
B. International Considerations
1. NAFTA partner involvement in this
proposal. EPA’s Chemistry Science
Advisory Council (ChemSAC), an
internal Agency peer review committee,
provided a detailed analysis for each
proposed crop group to Canada’s Pest
Management Regulatory Agency
(PMRA), IR-4, and the government of
E:\FR\FM\06JAP1.SGM
06JAP1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 3 / Wednesday, January 6, 2010 / Proposed Rules
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Mexico for their review and comment
and invited these parties to participate
in the ChemSAC meeting to finalize the
recommendation of the petitions. PMRA
has indicated that it will in parallel with
the United States (U.S.) effort and under
the authority of Canada’s Pest Control
Products (PCP) Act (2002) establish
equivalent crop groups. Once the new or
updated crop groups become effective in
the United States, Mexico will have
them as a reference for the
establishment of maximum residue
limits in Mexico.
EPA will provide a ‘‘reviewer’s guide’’
describing the crop grouping
amendments and explaining how to
express the changes to the crop group in
the Federal Register to IR-4 and PMRA
in support of implementation and to
inform the regulatory community.
2. Relationship of this proposal to
Codex activities. The delegations of the
United States and Canada to the Codex
Committee on Pesticide Residues
(CCPR) continued efforts in 2009 to
harmonize the NAFTA crop groups and
representative commodities with those
being developed by Codex as part of
their revision of the Codex
Classification of Foods and Feeds.
Canada, the United States, and IR-4 are
working closely with the chair of the
Codex group (Netherlands and the
United States) to coordinate the U.S.
crop group revisions with the revised
crop groups going into Codex. The goals
are to expand the crops in each group
to include numerous minor crops, to
minimize differences within and among
the United States and Codex groups,
and to develop representative
commodities for each group that will be
acceptable on an international basis. To
date, CCPR has advanced eight crop
groups in the adoption process.
C. Specific Revisions—Phasing out Preexisting Crop Groups
This section explains the revisions to
the crop group regulations in the first
final rule dated December 7, 2007 (72
FR 69150) and should be used for
guidance.
EPA has amended the generic crop
group regulations to include an explicit
scheme for how revised crop groups
will be organized in the regulations.
In brief, the regulations now specify
that when a crop group is amended in
a manner that expands or contracts its
coverage of commodities, EPA will: (1)
Retain the pre-existing crop group in 40
CFR 180.41; (2) insert the revised crop
group immediately after the pre-existing
crop group in 40 CFR 180.41; and (3)
title the revised crop group in a way that
clearly differentiates it from the preexisting crop group. The revised crop
VerDate Nov<24>2008
20:33 Jan 05, 2010
Jkt 220001
group will retain roughly the same name
and number as the pre-existing group
except that the number will be followed
by a hyphen and the final two digits of
the year it is established. Where
additions to a crop group make the preexisting crop group name misleading,
EPA will amend the name as well as the
number. For example, today EPA is
proposing to revise Crop Group 8:
Fruiting Vegetables Group (Except
Cucurbits). The revised group will be
titled Crop Group 8-09: Fruiting
Vegetable Group.
Tolerances established for revised
crop groups will include the new
number (and new name, if applicable)
so that it is apparent on the face of the
tolerance regulation what commodities
are covered. Similarly, it will be clear
what tolerances for pre-existing crop
groups are covered since these existing
tolerance regulations use the preexisting crop group names.
Although EPA will initially retain
pre-existing crop groups that have been
superseded by revised crop groups, EPA
will not establish new tolerances under
the pre-existing groups. Further, EPA
plans to eventually convert tolerances
for any pre-existing crop groups to
tolerances with the coverage of the
revised crop group. This conversion will
be effected both through the registration
review process and in the course of
establishing new tolerances for a
pesticide. To this end, EPA requests that
petitioners for tolerances address this
issue in their petitions. For example,
assuming EPA adopts the amendment to
Crop Group 8: Fruiting Vegetables
(Except Cucurbits.), any tolerance
petition for a pesticide that has a Group
8 tolerance should include a request
that the Group 8 tolerance be amended
to a Group 8-09 tolerance, since the
representative commodities are
equivalent. When all crop group
tolerances for a superseded crop group
have been revised or removed, EPA will
remove the superseded group from
§ 180.41.
III. Specific Proposed Revisions
A. Crop Group 8-09 Fruiting Vegetables
Group
EPA is proposing to revise the fruiting
vegetables crop group in the following
manner.
1. Change name. EPA proposes to
change the pre-existing name Crop
Group 8, Fruiting Vegetables (Except
Cucurbits) by dropping the
parenthetical ‘‘(Except Cucurbits).’’ The
term ‘‘Except Cucurbits’’ is not
necessary in the group name because
cucurbits are not included in the listed
commodities for the group; this
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
809
parenthetical has not been used for
establishing tolerances for this fruiting
vegetables group since 2002, and
cucurbits have their own crop group
specifically labeled the ‘‘Crop Group 9:
Cucurbits Vegetable Group,’’ 40 CFR
180.41(c)(10).
2. Add commodities. EPA proposes to
amend the existing Crop Group 8 by
expanding it from 6 to 21 commodities.
The existing crop group consists of the
following six commodities: (1) Eggplant,
Solanum melongena; (2) Ground cherry,
Physalis spp.; (3) Pepino, Solanum
muricatum; (4) Pepper, Capsicum spp.,
includes bell pepper, chili pepper,
cooking pepper, pimento, sweet pepper;
(5) Tomatillo, Physalis ixocarpo; (6)
Tomato, Lycopersicum esculentum.
EPA proposes to expand Crop Group
8-09 to include 15 commodities as
follows: (1) African eggplant, Solanum
macrocarpon L.; (2) Bush tomato,
Solanum centrale J.M. Black; (3)
Cocona, Solanum sessiliflorum Dunal;
(4) Currant tomato, Lycopersicon
pimpinellifolium (L.) Mill.; (5) Garden
huckleberry, Solanum scabrum Mill.;
(6) Goji berry, Lycium barbarum L.; (7)
Martynia, Proboscidea louisianica
(Mill.) Thell.; (8) Naranjilla, Solanum
quitoense Lam.; (9) Okra, Abelmoschus
esculentus (L.) Moench; (10) Pea
eggplant, Solanum torvum Sw.; (11)
Pepper, nonbell, Capsicum Chinese
Jacq., C. annuum L. var. annuum , C.
frutescens L., C. baccatum L., C.
pubescens Ruiz & Pav., Capsicum spp.;
(12) Roselle, Hibiscus sabdariffa L.; (13)
Scarlet eggplant, Solanum aethiopicum
L.; (14) Sunberry, Solanum retroflexum
Dunal; (15) Tree tomato, Solanum
betaceum Cav.; including cultivars,
varieties and/or hybrids of these
commodities.
Commodities are being added to this
crop group based on similarities and
characteristics of Solanaceae or the
Nightshade plant family which includes
most of the fruiting vegetable group.
These added crops have similar cultural
practices, edible food portions,
geographical locations, pest problems,
established tolerances and similar
exposure to residue levels.
Additionally, increased demand for
these fruiting vegetables by U.S. growers
and consumers has led to increased
production of these commodities in the
United States and this increased
production has led to heightened
demand for pesticides for a wide range
of fruiting vegetables. Expanding the
crop group will facilitate pesticide
availability for fruiting vegetables.
Increasing the variety of available
pesticides for a crop enables U.S.
growers to develop integrated pest
E:\FR\FM\06JAP1.SGM
06JAP1
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS
810
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 3 / Wednesday, January 6, 2010 / Proposed Rules
management programs (IPM), which can
minimize pest resistance.
3. Change the names of representative
commodities. EPA proposes to change
the name of the representative
commodity for the crop group ‘‘one
cultivar of non-bell pepper’’ by deleting
the hyphen from the term non-bell
pepper. This change merely adopts
current commodity vocabulary
designations.
4. Create crop subgroups. EPA
proposes to add three crop subgroups to
the revised crop group. The subgroups
are:
i. Subgroup 8-09A. Tomato subgroup.
Representative commodity. Tomato,
standard size and one cultivar of small
tomato. Eleven commodities are
included in this subgroup: Bush tomato;
Cocona; Currant tomato; Garden
huckleberry; Goji berry; Groundcherry;
Naranjilla; Sunberry; Tomatillo;
Tomato; Tree tomato; including
cultivars, varieties and/or hybrids of
these commodities.
ii. Subgroup 8-09B. Pepper/Eggplant
subgroup. Representative commodities.
Bell pepper and one cultivar of nonbell
pepper. Ten commodities are included
in this subgroup: African eggplant; Bell
pepper; Eggplant; Martynia; Nonbell
pepper; Okra; Pea eggplant; Pepino;
Roselle; Scarlet eggplant; including
cultivars, varieties and/or hybrids of
these commodities.
iii. Subgroup 8-09C. Nonbell Pepper/
Eggplant subgroup. Representative
commodities. One cultivar of small
nonbell pepper or one cultivar of small
eggplant. Nine commodities are
included in this subgroup: African
eggplant; Martynia; Eggplant; Nonbell
pepper; Okra; Pea eggplant; Pepino;
Roselle; Scarlet eggplant; including
cultivars, varieties and/or hybrids of
these commodities.
The creation of these subgroups and
the choice of representative
commodities for these subgroups are
based on similarities in pest pressures,
cultural practices, and the edible
portion of the commodity. EPA has also
determined that residue data on the
designated representative crops will
provide adequate information on
residue levels in crops and subgroups.
Subgroups will provide flexibility in
the establishment of crop group
tolerances which can be important for
international harmonization. Tomatoes
and peppers are the most commonly
grown fruiting vegetable in the world
and are increasing in popularity. They
are used in various ethnic cuisines and
per capita consumption has also
increased.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
20:33 Jan 05, 2010
Jkt 220001
B. Crop Group 10-09 Citrus Fruit Group
EPA is proposing to revise and
expand the citrus crop group. EPA will
retain pre-existing Crop Group 10 and
title the revised group as Crop Group
10-09.
1. Add commodities. Crop Group 10
currently contains the following 12
commodities: (1) Calamondin, Citrus
mitis x Citrofortunella mitis; (2) Citrus
citron, Citrus medica; (3) Citrus hybrids,
Citrus spp. includes chironja, tangelo,
tangor; (4) Grapefruit, Citrus paradisi;
(5) Kumquat, Fortunella spp.; (6)
Lemon, Citrus jambhiri, Citrus limon;
(7) Lime, Citrus aurantiifolia; (8)
Mandarin (tangerine), Citrus reticulata;
(9) Orange, sour, Citrus aurantium; (10)
Orange, sweet, Citrus sinensis; (11)
Pummelo, Citrus grandis, Citrus
maxima; (12) Satsuma mandarin, Citrus
unshiu.
EPA proposes to expand Crop Group
10-09 to include 16 commodities as
follows: (1) Australian desert lime,
Eremocitrus glauca (Lindl.) Swingle; (2)
Australian finger lime, Microcitrus
australasica (F. Muell.) Swingle; (3)
Australian round lime, Microcitrus
australis (A. Cunn. ex Mudie) Swingle;
(4) Brown River finger lime, Microcitrus
papuana Winters; (5) Japanese summer
grapefruit, Citrus natsudaidai Hayata;
(6) Mediterranean Mandarin, Citrus
deliciosa Ten; (7) Mount White lime,
Microcitrus garrowayae (F. M. Bailey)
Swingle; (8) New Guinea wild lime,
Microcitrus warburgiana (F. M. Bailey)
Tanaka; (9) Russell River lime,
Microcitrus inodora (F. M. Bailey)
Swingle; (10) Sweet lime, Citrus limetta
Risso; (11) Tachibana orange, Citrus
tachibana (Makino) Tanaka; (12) Tahiti
Lime, Citrus latifolia (Yu. Tanaka)
Tanaka; (13) Tangerine (Mandarin),
Citrus reticulata Blanco; (14) Tangor,
Citrus nobilis lour. (15) Trifoliate
orange, Poncirus trifoliata (L.) Raf.; (16)
Uniq fruit, Citrus aurantium Tangelo
group; including cultivars, varieties
and/or hybrids of these.
The proposed addition of crops to this
crop group is based on similarities and
characteristics of the Rutaceae plant
family. These added crops are all citrus
fruits, have similar cultural practices,
edible food portions, residue levels,
geographical locations, pest problems
and established tolerances.
2. Change the crop group name. EPA
proposes to change the name of ‘‘Crop
Group 10: Citrus Fruits Group (Citrus
spp., Fortunella spp.)’’ to ‘‘Crop Group
10-09: Citrus Fruit Group’’. The name
change reflects the addition of the new
commodities to the group in that it
includes commodities other than
Fortunella spp.
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
3. Create new subgroups. EPA
proposes to add three new subgroups to
revised Crop Group 10-09 as follows:
i. Orange Subgroup 10-09A.
Representative commodities. Orange or
Tangerine/Mandarin. Twelve
commodities are included in this
subgroup: Calamondin; Citron; Citrus
hybrids; Mediterranean Mandarin;
Orange, sour; Orange, sweet; Satsuma
mandarin; Tachibana orange; Tangelo;
Tangerine (Mandarin); Tangor; Trifoliate
orange; including cultivars, varieties
and/or hybrids of these.
ii. Lemon/Lime Subgroup 10-09B.
Representative commodities. Lemon or
Lime. Twelve commodities are included
in this subgroup: Australian desert lime;
Australian finger lime; Australian round
lime; Brown River finger lime;
Kumquat; Lemon; Lime; Mount White
lime; New Guinea wild lime; Russell
River lime; Sweet lime; Tahiti Lime;
including cultivars, varieties and/or
hybrids of these.
iii. Grapefruit Subgroup 10-09C.
Representative commodity. Grapefruit.
Five commodities are included in this
subgroup: Grapefruit; Japanese summer
grapefruit; Pummelo; Tangelo; Uniq
fruit; including cultivars, varieties and/
or hybrids of these.
The creation of these subgroups and
the choice of representative
commodities for these subgroups are
based on similarities in pest pressures,
cultural practices, the edible portion of
the commodity, and the geographic
locations where these crops are grown.
EPA has also determined that residue
data on the designated representative
crops will provide adequate information
on residue levels in crops in the
subgroup. The subgroups provide
flexibility in the establishment of crop
group tolerances which can be
important for international
harmonization.
4. Revise the representative
commodities. EPA proposes to revise
the representative crops for Crop Group
10-09 as follows: ‘‘Sweet orange, lemon
and grapefruit’’ will be changed to
‘‘Orange or tangerine/mandarin, lemon
or lime and grapefruit.’’ This change
reflects the broader range of
commodities in this group.
C. Crop Group 11-09: Pome Fruit Group
EPA is proposing to revise and
expand the pome fruit crop. EPA will
retain pre-existing Pome Fruit Crop
Group 11 and title the revised group as
Crop Group 11-09: Pome Fruit Group.
Add commodities. Crop Group 11
currently contains the following seven
commodities: (1) Apple, Malus
domestica Borkh; (2) Crabapple, Malus
spp.; (3) Loquat, Eriobotrya japonica
E:\FR\FM\06JAP1.SGM
06JAP1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 3 / Wednesday, January 6, 2010 / Proposed Rules
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS
(Thunb.) Lindl.; (4) Mayhaw, Crataegus
spp.; (5) Pear, Pyrus communis L.; (6)
Pear, oriental, Pyrus communis L.; (7)
Quince, Cydonia oblonga Mill.;
EPA proposes to expand Crop Group
11 to include five commodities as
follows: (1) Azarole, Crataegus azarolus
L.; (2) Medlar, Mespilus germanica L.;
(4) Pear, Asian, Pyrus pyrifolia (Burm f.)
Nakai var. culta (Makino) Nakai; (5)
Tejocote, Crataegus mexicana DC;
including varieties, cultivars and/or
hybrids of these.
The proposed addition of crops to this
crop group is based on similarities and
characteristics of the Pome Fruit Crop
Group 11 as well as a comparison of
pome fruits, their cultural practices,
edible food portions, residue levels,
geographical locations, pest problems,
and established tolerances.
D. New Crop Group 20 Oilseed Group
EPA proposes to add a new crop
group, entitled Oilseed Group as Crop
Group 20. Oilseed group will include
those crops from which oil is extracted
from their seed and used to produce
edible or inedible oils as well highprotein livestock meal.
1. Commodities in group and
representative commodities. EPA
proposes to include 32 commodities in
Crop Group 20: (1) Borage, Borago
officinalis L.; (2) Calendula, Calendula
officinalis L.; (3) Castor oil plant,
Ricinus communis L.; (4) Chinese
tallowtree, Triadica sebifera (L.) Small;
(5) Cottonseed, Gossypium spp.; (6)
Crambe, Crambe hispanica L., Crambe
abyssinica Hochst. ex R.E. Fr.; (7)
Cuphea, Cuphea hyssopifolia Kunth; (8)
Echium, Echium plantagineum L.; (9)
Euphorbia, Euphorbia esula L.; (10)
Evening primrose, Oenothera biennis L.;
(11) Flax seed, Linum usitatissimum L.;
(12) Gold of pleasure, Camelina sativa
(L.) Crantz; (13) Hare’s ear mustard,
Conringia orientalis (L.) Dumort.; (14)
Jojoba, Simmondsia chinensis (Link)
C.K. Schneid.; (15) Lesquerella,
Lesquerella recurvata (Engelm. ex A.
Gray) S. Watson; (16) Lunaria, Lunaria
annua L.; (17) Meadowfoam,
Limnanthes alba Hartw. ex Benth.; (18)
Milkweed, Asclepias spp. L.; (19)
Mustard seed, Brassica hirta Moench,
Sinapis alba L. subsp. alba; (20) Niger
seed, Guizotia abyssinica (L.f.) Cass.;
(21) Oil radish, Raphanus sativus L. var.
oleiformis Pers.; (22) Poppy seed,
Papaver somniferum L. subsp.
somniferum; (23) Rapeseed, Brassica
spp.; Brassica napus L.; (24) Rose hip,
Rosa rubiginosa L.; (25) Safflower,
Carthamus tinctorious L.; (26) Sesame,
Sesamum indicum L.; Sesamum
radiatum Schumach. & Thonn.; (27)
Stokes aster, Stokesia laevis (Hill)
VerDate Nov<24>2008
20:33 Jan 05, 2010
Jkt 220001
Greene; (28) Sunflower, Helianthus
annuus L.; (29) Sweet rocket, Hesperis
matronalis L.; (30) Tallowwood,
Ximenia americana L.; (31) Tea oil
plant, Camellia oleifera C. Abel; (32)
Vernonia, Vernonia galamensis (Cass.)
Less. The representative commodities
proposed for this group are cottonseed,
rapeseed (canola varieties only), and
sunflower.
Oilseed Crop Group 20 is proposed
based on similarities in cultural
practices, edible food portions, livestock
feed items, residue levels, geographical
locations, and pest problems. The
Oilseed crop group should facilitate the
approval in the United States of
additional pesticides for these crops and
both domestic and foreign tolerances,
increasing opportunities for producers
to grow new high value alternative
minor crops, including potential biofuel
crops. The proposed representative
commodities were chosen based on the
scope of their production and economic
importance as well as on the similarities
in cultural practices, pest problems, and
commercial production. These three
representative commodities account for
greater than 95% of the harvested acres
for the entire Oilseed crop group.
2. Create crop subgroups. EPA
proposes to add three crop subgroups
for Crop Group 20. The subgroups are:
i. Rapeseed Subgroup 20A.
Representative commodity: Rapeseed,
canola varieties only. The 17
commodities proposed for inclusion in
this subgroup are: Borage; Crambe;
Cuphea; Echium; Flax seed; Gold of
pleasure; Hare’s ear mustard;
Lesquerella; Lunaria; Meadowfoam;
Milkweed; Mustard seed; Oil radish;
Poppy seed; Rapeseed; Sesame; Sweet
rocket.
ii. Sunflower Subgroup 20B.
Representative commodity: Sunflower,
seed. The 14 commodities proposed for
inclusion in this subgroup are:
Calendula; Castor oil plant; Chinese
tallowtree; Euphorbia; Evening
primrose; Jojoba; Niger seed; Rose hip;
Safflower; Stokes aster; Sunflower;
Tallowwood; Tea oil plant; Vernonia.
iii. Cottonseed Subgroup 20C.
Representative commodity: Cottonseed.
The one commodity proposed for
inclusion in this subgroup is:
Cottonseed.
The creation of these subgroups and
the choice of representative
commodities for these subgroups are
based on similarities in pest pressures,
cultural practices, the edible portion of
the commodity, and the geographic
locations where these crops are grown.
EPA has also determined that residue
data on the designated representative
crops will provide adequate information
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
811
on residue levels in crops and subgroup.
The subgroups provide flexibility in the
establishment of crop group tolerances
which can be important for
international harmonization.
E. Amendment to Definitions and
Interpretations
EPA proposes to revise the
commodity definition in 40 CFR
180.1(g) for Citrus Group as follows:
Tangerines = Tangerine (mandarin or
mandarin orange), Clementine,
Mediterranean mandarin, Satsuma mandarin,
Tangelo, Tangor, cultivars and varieties.
F. Amendment to 40 CFR 180.1(h)
EPA proposes to delete 40 CFR
180.1(h) that reads: ‘‘Unless otherwise
specified, tolerances and exemptions
established under the regulations in this
part apply to residues from only
preharvest application of the chemical.’’
EPA is proposing to delete this
provision for two reasons. First, EPA
believes that use information should
generally be avoided in the tolerance
listings because such information is
difficult to enforce and is more
completely addressed through other
means, such as pesticide labels. Second,
removal of § 180.1(h) will not result in
any increased exposure under existing
tolerance due to expansion of postharvest uses cannot be expanded absent
pre-market approval by EPA under the
Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and
Rodenticide Act, 7 U.S.C. 136 et seq.,
and the FFDCA, as appropriate.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
A. Executive Order 12866
Under Executive Order 12866,
entitled Regulatory Planning and
Review (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993),
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) has designated this proposed
rule as a not-significant regulatory
action under section 3(f) of the
Executive Order.
This action is one in a series of
planned crop group updates. EPA
prepared an analysis of the potential
costs and benefits related to its pesticide
tolerance crop grouping regulations for
the first crop grouping final rule
published December 7, 2007 (72 FR
69150). This analysis is contained in
‘‘Economic Analysis of the Expansion of
the Crop Grouping Program.’’ A copy of
the analysis is available in the docket
and is briefly summarized here.
This is a burden-reducing regulation.
Crop grouping has saved money by
allowing the results of pesticide
exposure studies for one crop to be
applied to other, similar crops. This
E:\FR\FM\06JAP1.SGM
06JAP1
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS
812
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 3 / Wednesday, January 6, 2010 / Proposed Rules
action proposes to expand certain
existing crop groups and to add one new
crop group. Crop groupings will assist
in making available lower risk
pesticides for minor crops both
domestically and in countries that
export food to the U.S. Minor crop and
specialty crop producers will benefit
because lower registration costs will
encourage pesticide manufacturers to
register more pesticides for use on
minor and/or specialty crops, providing
these growers with additional lower-risk
pesticide options. The increased
coverage of tolerances to imported
commodities may result in a larger
supply of imported and domestically
produced specialty produce at
potentially lower costs and treated with
lower-risk pesticides which also benefit
consumers. EPA believes that data from
representative crops will not
underestimate the public exposure to
pesticide residues through the
consumption of treated crops. EPA and
the IR-4 Project, will more efficiently
use resources as a result of the rule. EPA
will conserve resources if, as expected,
new or expanded crop groups result in
fewer emergency pesticide use requests
from specialty crop growers. Further,
new and expanded crop groups will
likely reduce the number of separate
risk assessments and tolerance
rulemakings that EPA will have to
conduct. Further benefits come from
international harmonization of crop
classification and nomenclature,
harmonized commodity import and
export standards and increased
potential for resource sharing between
EPA and pesticide regulatory agencies
in other countries. Revisions to the crop
grouping program will result in no
appreciable costs or negative impacts to
consumers, minor crop producers,
specialty crop producers, pesticide
registrants, the environment, or human
health. No crop group tolerance for a
pesticide can be established unless EPA
determines that it is safe.
An example of the benefits of group
groupings can be shown through of the
impact of changes to Crop Group 3 in
a prior rulemaking (72 FR 69150,
December 7, 2007). That rulemaking
expanded Crop Group 3, Bulb
Vegetables from 7 to 25 crops, an
increase of 18 from the original crop
group. Prior to the expansion of the
subgroup, adding tolerances for the 18
new crops would have required 18 field
trials at a cost of approximately $5.4
million (assuming $300,000 per field
trial), whereas after promulgation of the
expanded group these 18 new crops
could obtain coverage under a Crop
Group 3 tolerance with no field trials in
VerDate Nov<24>2008
20:33 Jan 05, 2010
Jkt 220001
addition to those required on the
representative commodities (which did
not change with the expansion of the
group). Fewer field trials means a
greater likelihood that these
commodities will obtain tolerance
coverage under the FFDCA, aiding
growers, and the administrative costs of
both the IR-4 testing process and the
EPA review process will be reduced.
The benefits of the rule proposed
today can be shown through the
example of the impact of changes to
Crop Group 3 in a prior rulemaking (72
FR 69150, December 7, 2007). That
rulemaking expanded Crop Group 3,
Bulb Vegetables from 7 to 25 crops, an
increase of 18 from the original crop
group. Prior to the expansion of the
subgroup, adding tolerances for the 18
new crops would have required 18 field
trials at a cost of approximately $5.4
million (assuming $300,000 per field
trial), whereas after promulgation of the
expanded group these 18 new crops
could obtain coverage under a Crop
Group 3 tolerance with no field trials in
addition to those required on the
representative commodities (which did
not change with the expansion of the
group). Fewer field trials means a
greater likelihood that these
commodities will obtain tolerance
coverage under the FFDCA, aiding
growers, and the administrative costs of
both the IR-4 testing process and the
EPA reviewprocess will be reduced.
B. Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not contain any new
information collection requirements that
would need approval by OMB under the
provisions of the Paper Reduction Act
(PRA), 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq. However,
the proposed rule, when adopted as a
final rule, is expected to reduce
mandatory paperwork due to a
reduction in required studies. The final
rule will have the effect of reducing the
number of residue chemistry studies
because fewer representative crops
would need to be tested under a crop
grouping scheme, than would otherwise
be required.
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act
Pursuant to section 605(b) of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), 5
U.S.C. 601 et seq., the Agency hereby
certifies that this proposed rule, when
adopted as final, will not have a
significant adverse economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
This proposed ruledoes not have any
direct adverse impacts on small
businesses, small non-profit
organizations, or small local
governments. For purposes of assessing
the impacts of today’s proposed rule on
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
small entities, small entity is defined as:
(1) A small business according to the
small business size standards
established by the Small Business
Administration (SBA); (2) a small
governmental jurisdiction that is a
government of a city, county, town,
school district or special district with a
population of less than 50,000; and (3)
a small organization that is any not-forprofit enterprise which is independently
owned andoperated and is not dominant
in its field.
In determining whether a rule has a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities, the
impact of concern is any significant
adverse economic impact on small
entities, since the primarypurpose of the
regulatory flexibility analyses is to
identify and addressregulatory
alternatives ‘‘which minimize any
significant economicimpact of the
proposed rule on small entities’’ (5
U.S.C. sections 603 and604). Thus, an
agency may certify that a rule will not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities if
the rule relieves a regulatory burden, or
otherwise has positive economic effects
on all of the small entities subject to the
rule.
This proposed rule provides
regulatory relief and regulatory
flexibility. The new or expanded crop
groups ease the process for pesticide
manufacturers to obtain pesticide
tolerances on greater numbers of crops.
Pesticides will be more widely available
to growers for use on crops, particularly
specialty crops.
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Under Title II of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA)
(Public Law 104–4), EPA has
determined that this proposed rule does
not contain a Federal mandate that may
result in expenditures of $100 million or
more for State, local, and tribal
governments, in the aggregate,or the
private sector in any 1 year.
Accordingly, this rule is not subject to
the requirements of sections 202, 203,
204, and 205 of UMRA.
E. Executive Order 13132
Pursuant to Executive Order 13132,
entitled Federalism (64 FR 43255,
August 10, 1999), EPA has determined
that this proposed rule does not have
federalism implications, because it will
not have substantial direct effects on the
states, on the relationship between the
national government and the states, or
on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government, as specified in the
E:\FR\FM\06JAP1.SGM
06JAP1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 3 / Wednesday, January 6, 2010 / Proposed Rules
Order. Thus, Executive Order 13132
does not apply to this proposed rule.
I. National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act
F. Executive Order 13175
As required by Executive Order
13175, entitled Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments (65 FR 67249, November
6, 2000), EPA has determined that this
proposed rule does not have tribal
implications because it will not have
any affect on tribal governments, on the
relationship between the Federal
government andthe Indian tribes, or on
the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
government and Indian tribes, as
specified in the Order. Thus, Executive
Order 13175 does not apply to this
proposed rule.
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (NTTAA), (15 U.S.C. 272
note) directs EPA to use voluntary
consensus standards in its regulatory
activities unless to do so would be
inconsistent with applicable law or
impractical. Voluntary consensus
standards are technical standards (e.g.,
materials specifications, test methods,
and sampling procedures) that are
developed or adopted by voluntary
consensus standards bodies. This
proposed rule does not impose any
technical standards that would require
EPA to consider any voluntary
consensus standards.
G. Executive Order 13045
Executive Order 13045, entitled
Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997) does
not apply to this proposed rule because
this action is not designated as an
economically significant regulatory
action as defined by Executive Order
12866 (see Unit IV.A.), nor does it
establish an environmental standard, or
otherwise have a disproportionate effect
on children.
J. Executive Order 12898
H. Executive Order 13211
This proposed rule is not subject to
Executive Order 13211, entitledActions
Concerning Regulations that
Significantly Affect Energy
Supply,Distribution, or Use (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001) because it is not
designated as a regulatory action as
defined by Executive Order 12866 (see
Unit IV.A.), nor is it likely to have any
adverse effect on the supply,
distribution, or use of energy.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
Under Executive Order 12898,
entitled Federal Actions to Address
Environmental Justice in Minority
Populations and Low-Income
Populations (59 FR 7629, February 16,
1994), the Agency has not considered
environmental justice-related issues
because this proposed rule does not
have an adverse impact on the
environmental and health conditions in
low-income and minority communities.
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities.
Dated: December 22, 2009.
Stephen A. Owens,
Assistant Administrator for Prevention,
Pesticides and Toxic Substances.
Therefore, it is proposed that 40 CFR
chapter I be amended as follows:
813
PART 180—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 180
would continue to read as follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q). 346a and 371.
2. Section 180.41 is amended as
follows:
a. By redesignating paragraphs (c)(10)
– (c)(22) as paragraphs (c)(11) – (c)(23),
respectively, and by adding a new
paragraph (c)(10).
b. By redesignating newly
redesignated paragraphs (c)(13) – (c)(23)
as paragraphs (c)(14) – (c)(24),
respectively, and by adding a new
paragraph (c)(13).
c. By redesignating newly
redesignated paragraphs (c)(15) – (c)(24)
as paragraphs (c)(16) – (c)(25),
respectively, and by adding new
paragraph (c)(15). and
d. By redesignating newly
redesignated paragraph (c)(25) as
paragraph (c)(26), and by adding a new
paragraph (c)(25).
The amendments read as follows:
§ 180.41
Crop group tables.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) *
*
*
(10) Crop Group 8-09. Fruiting
Vegetable Group.
(i) Representative commodities.
Tomato (standard size) and one cultivar
of small tomato; bell pepper and one
cultivar of nonbell pepper; and one
cultivar of small nonbell pepper or one
cultivar of small eggplant.
(ii) Commodities. The following is a
list of all commodities included in the
Crop Group 8-09.
TABLE 1—CROP GROUP 8-09: FRUITING VEGETABLE GROUP
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Commodities
Related crop subgroups
African eggplant, Solanum macrocarpon L .........................................................................................................................
Bush tomato, Solanum centrale J.M. Black ........................................................................................................................
Cocona, Solanum sessiliflorum Dunal .................................................................................................................................
Currant tomato, Lycopersicon pimpinellifolium (L.) Mill. ......................................................................................................
Eggplant, Solanum melongena L. .......................................................................................................................................
Garden huckleberry, Solanum scabrum Mill .......................................................................................................................
Goji berry, Lycium barbarum L. ...........................................................................................................................................
Groundcherry, Physalis alkekengi L., P. grisea (Waterf.) M. Martinez, P. peruvian L., P. pubescens L. ..........................
Martynia, Proboscidea louisianica (Mill.) Thell. ...................................................................................................................
Naranjilla, Solanum quitoense Lam .....................................................................................................................................
Okra, Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench ......................................................................................................................
Pea eggplant, Solanum torvum Sw. ....................................................................................................................................
Pepino, Solanum muricatum Aiton ......................................................................................................................................
Pepper, bell, Capsicum annuum L. var. annuum, Capsicum spp. ......................................................................................
Pepper, nonbell, Capsicum chinese Jacq., C. annuum L. var. annuum, C. frutescens L., C. baccatum L., C.
pubescens Ruiz & Pav., Capsicum spp ..........................................................................................................................
Roselle, Hibiscus sabdariffa L. ............................................................................................................................................
Scarlet eggplant, Solanum aethiopicum L. ..........................................................................................................................
Sunberry, Solanum retroflexum Dunal ................................................................................................................................
VerDate Nov<24>2008
20:33 Jan 05, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\06JAP1.SGM
06JAP1
8-09B, 8-09C
8-09A
8-09A
8-09A
8-09B, 8-09C
8-09A
8-09A
8-09A
8-09B, 8-09C
8-09A
8-09B, 8-09C
8-09B, 8-09C
8-09B, 8-09C
8-09B
8-09B, 8-08C
8-09B, 8-09C
8-09B, 8-09C
8-09A
814
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 3 / Wednesday, January 6, 2010 / Proposed Rules
TABLE 1—CROP GROUP 8-09: FRUITING VEGETABLE GROUP—Continued
Commodities
Related crop subgroups
Tomatillo, Physalis philadelphica Lam. ...............................................................................................................................
Tomato, Solanum lycopersicon L., Solanum lycopersicum L. var. lycopersicum ...............................................................
Tree tomato, Solanum betaceum Cav. ...............................................................................................................................
Cultivars, varieties and/or hybrids of these. ........................................................................................................................
(iii) Table. The following Table 2
identifies the crop subgroups for Crop
Group 8-09, specifies the representative
commodities for each subgroup and lists
8-09A
8-09A
8-09A
all the commodities included in each
subgroup.
TABLE 2—CROP GROUP 8-09: SUBGROUP LISTING
Representative commodities
Commodities
Crop Subgroup 8-09A. Tomato subgroup.
Tomato (Standard size and one cultivar of small tomato). ......................
Crop Subgroup 8-09B Pepper/Eggplant subgroup.
Bell pepper and one cultivar of nonbell pepper. ......................................
Crop Subgroup 8-09C Nonbell pepper/Eggplant subgroup.
One cultivar small nonbell pepper or one cultivar of small eggplant. ......
*
*
*
*
*
(13) Crop Group 10-09. Citrus Fruit
Group.
Bush tomato; Cocona; Currant tomato; Garden huckleberry; Goji berry;
Groundcherry; Naranjilla; Sunberry; Tomatillo; Tomato; Tree tomato;
cultivars, varieties, and/or hybrids of these.
African eggplant; Bell pepper; Eggplant; Martynia; Nonbell pepper;
Okra; Pea eggplant; Pepino; Roselle, Scarlet eggplant; cultivars, varieties, and/or hybrids of these.
African eggplant; Eggplant; Martynia; Nonbell pepper; Okra; Pea eggplant; Pepino; Roselle, Scarlet eggplant; cultivars, varieties, and/or
hybrids of these.
(i) Representative commodities.
Orange or Tangerine/Mandarin, Lemon
or Lime, and Grapefruit
(ii) Commodities. The following is a
list of all the commodities in Crop
Group 10:
TABLE 1—CROP GROUP 10-09: CITRUS FRUIT GROUP
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Commodities
Related crop subgroups
Australian desert lime, Eremocitrus glauca (Lindl.) Swingle ...............................................................................................
Australian finger lime, Microcitrus australasica (F. Muell.) Swingle ....................................................................................
Australian round lime, Microcitrus australis (A. Cunn. ex Mudie) Swingle .........................................................................
Brown River finger lime, Microcitrus papuana Winters .......................................................................................................
Calamondin, Citrofortunella microcarpa (Bunge) Wijnands ................................................................................................
Citron, Citrus medica L ........................................................................................................................................................
Citrus hybrids, Citrus spp. Eremocitrus spp., Fortunella spp., Microcitrus spp., and Poncirus spp. ..................................
Grapefruit, Citrus paradisi Macfad. ......................................................................................................................................
Japanese summer grapefruit, Citrus natsudaidai Hayata ...................................................................................................
Kumquat, Fortunella spp. ....................................................................................................................................................
Lemon, Citrus limon (L.) Burm. f. ........................................................................................................................................
Lime, Citrus aurantiifolia (Christm.) Swingle .......................................................................................................................
Mediterranean Mandarin, Citrus deliciosa Ten. ..................................................................................................................
Mount White lime, Microcitrus garrowayae (F. M. Bailey) Swingle .....................................................................................
New Guinea wild lime, Microcitrus warburgiana (F. M. Bailey) Tanaka .............................................................................
Orange, sour, Citrus aurantium L. .......................................................................................................................................
Orange, sweet, Citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck ........................................................................................................................
Pummelo, Citrus maxima (Burm .) Merr. .............................................................................................................................
Russell River lime, Microcitrus inodora (F.M. Bailey) Swingle ............................................................................................
Satsuma mandarin, Citrus unshiu Marcow. ........................................................................................................................
Sweet lime, Citrus limetta Risso ..........................................................................................................................................
Tachibana orange, Citrus tachibana (Makino) Tanaka .......................................................................................................
Tahiti Lime, Citrus latifolia (Yu. Tanaka) Tanaka ................................................................................................................
Tangelo, Citrus x tangelo J.W. Ingram & H.E. Moore .........................................................................................................
Tangerine (Mandarin), Citrus reticulata Blanco ...................................................................................................................
Tangor, Citrus nobilis Lour. .................................................................................................................................................
Trifoliate orange, Poncirus trifoliata (L.) Raf. ......................................................................................................................
Uniq fruit, Citrus aurantium Tangelo group .........................................................................................................................
Cultivars, varieties and/or hybrids of these..
VerDate Nov<24>2008
20:33 Jan 05, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\06JAP1.SGM
06JAP1
10-09B
10-09B
10-09B
10-09B
10-09A
10-09A
10-09A
10-09C
10-09C
10-09B
10-09B
10-09B
10-09A
10-09B
10-09B
10-09A
10-09A
10-09C
10-09B
10-09A
10-09B
10-09A
10-09B
10-09A, 10-09C
10-09A
10-09A
10-09A
10-09C
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 3 / Wednesday, January 6, 2010 / Proposed Rules
(iii) Table. The following Table 2
identifies the crop subgroups for Crop
Group 10-09, specifies the
representative commodities for each
815
subgroup and lists all the commodities
included in each subgroup.
TABLE 2—CROP GROUP 10-09: SUBGROUP LISTING
Representative commodities
Commodities
Crop Subgroup 10-09A. Orange subgroup.
Orange or tangerine/mandarin .................................................................
Crop Subgroup 10-09B. Lemon/Lime subgroup.
Lemon or lime ...........................................................................................
Crop Subgroup 10-09C. Grapefruit subgroup.
Grapefruit ..................................................................................................
*
*
*
*
*
(15) Crop Group 11-09. Pome Fruit
Group.
(i) Representative commodities. Apple
and Pear.
(ii) Commodities. The following is a
list of all the commodities in Crop
Group 11-09.
TABLE 1—CROP GROUP 11-09: POME
FRUIT GROUP—COMMODITIES
Apple, Malus domestica Borkh
Azarole, Crataegus azarolus L.
Crabapple, Malus sylvestris (L.) Mill., Malus
prunifolia (Willd.) Borkh.
Loquat, Eriobotrya japonica (Thunb.) Lindl.
Calamondin; Citron; Citrus hybrids; Mediterranean Mandarin; Orange,
sour; Orange, sweet; Satsuma mandarin; Tachibana orange; Tangerine (Mandarin); Tangelo, Tangor; Trifoliate orange; cultivars, varieties, and/or hybrids of these.
Australian desert lime; Australian finger-lime; Australian round lime;
Brown River finger lime; Kumquat; Lemon; Lime; Mount White Lime;
New Guinea wild lime; Russell River Lime; Sweet lime; Tahiti Lime;
cultivars, varieties, and/or hybrids of these varieties.
Grapefruit; Japanese summer grapefruit; Pummelo; Tangelo; Uniq fruit;
cultivars, varieties, and/or hybrids of these.
TABLE 1—CROP GROUP 11-09: POME
FRUIT
GROUP—COMMODITIES—
Continued
Mayhaw, Crataegus aestivalis (Walter) Torr.
& A. Gray, C. opaca Hook. & Arn., and C.
rufula Sarg.
Medlar, Mespilus germanica L.
Pear, Pyrus communis L
Pear, Asian, Pyrus pyrifolia (Burm. f.) Nakai
var. culta (Makino) Nakai
Quince, Cydonia oblonga Mill
Quince, Chinese, Chaenomeles speciosa
(Sweet) Nakai, Pseudocydonia sinensis
(Thouin) C.K. Schneid.
Quince, Japanese, Chaenomeles japonica
(Thunb.) Lindl. ex Spach
TABLE 1—CROP GROUP 11-09: POME
FRUIT
GROUP—COMMODITIES—
Continued
Tejocote, Crataegus mexicana DC.
Cultivars, varieties and/or hybrids of these.
*
*
*
*
*
(25) Crop Group 20. Oilseed Group.
(i) Representative commodities.
Rapeseed (canola varieties only);
sunflower, seed and cottonseed.
(ii) Table. The following Table 1 lists
all the commodities listed in Crop
Group 20 and identifies the related crop
subgroups and includes cultivars and/or
varieties of these commodities.
TABLE 1—CROP GROUP 20: OILSEED GROUP
Related crop subgroups
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Commodities
Borage, Borago officinalis L. .........................................................................................................................................................
Calendula, Calendula officinalis L. ................................................................................................................................................
Castor oil plant, Ricinus communis L. ...........................................................................................................................................
Chinese tallowtree, Triadica sebifera (L.) Small ...........................................................................................................................
Cottonseed, Gossypium spp. L. ....................................................................................................................................................
Crambe, Crambe hispanica L.; Crambe abyssinica Hochst. ex R.E. Fr. ......................................................................................
Cuphea, Cuphea hyssopifolia Kunth .............................................................................................................................................
Echium, Echium plantagineum L. ..................................................................................................................................................
Euphorbia, Euphorbia esula L. ......................................................................................................................................................
Evening primrose, Oenothera biennis L. .......................................................................................................................................
Flax seed, Linum usitatissimum L. ................................................................................................................................................
Gold of pleasure, Camelina sativa (L.) Crantz ..............................................................................................................................
Hare’s ear mustard, Conringia orientalis (L.) Dumort. ..................................................................................................................
Jojoba, Simmondsia chinensis (Link) C.K. Schneid. .....................................................................................................................
Lesquerella, Lesquerella recurvata (Engelm. ex A. Gray) S. Watson ..........................................................................................
Lunaria, Lunaria annua L. .............................................................................................................................................................
Meadowfoam, Limnanthes alba Hartw. ex Benth. ........................................................................................................................
Milkweed, Asclepias spp. L. ..........................................................................................................................................................
Mustard seed, Brassica hirta Moench, Sinapis alba L. subsp. alba .............................................................................................
Niger seed, Guizotia abyssinica (L.f.) Cass. .................................................................................................................................
Oil radish, Raphanus sativus L. var. oleiformis Pers ....................................................................................................................
Poppy seed, Papaver somniferum L. subsp. Somniferum ............................................................................................................
Rapeseed, Brassica spp.; Brassica napus L. ...............................................................................................................................
Rose hip, Rosa rubiginosa L. ........................................................................................................................................................
Safflower, Carthamus tinctorious L. ..............................................................................................................................................
Sesame, Sesamum indicum L.; Sesamum radiatum Schumach. & Thonn. .................................................................................
Stokes aster, Stokesia laevis (Hill) Greene ...................................................................................................................................
Sunflower, Helianthus annuus L. ...................................................................................................................................................
VerDate Nov<24>2008
20:33 Jan 05, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\06JAP1.SGM
06JAP1
20A
20B
20B
20B
20C
20A
20A
20A
20B
20B
20A
20A
20A
20B
20A
20A
20A
20A
20A
20B
20A
20A
20A
20B
20B
20A
20B
20B
816
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 3 / Wednesday, January 6, 2010 / Proposed Rules
TABLE 1—CROP GROUP 20: OILSEED GROUP—Continued
Related crop subgroups
Commodities
Sweet rocket, Hesperis matronalis L. ............................................................................................................................................
Tallowwood, Ximenia americana L. ...............................................................................................................................................
Tea oil plant, Camellia oleifera C. Abel .........................................................................................................................................
Vernonia, Vernonia galamensis (Cass.) Less. ..............................................................................................................................
Cultivars, varieties, and/or hybrids of these. .................................................................................................................................
(iii) Table. The following Table 2
identifies the crop subgroups for Crop
Group 20, specifies the representative
commodities for each subgroup and lists
20A
20B
20B
20B
all the commodities included in each
subgroup.
TABLE 2—CROP GROUP 20 SUBGROUP LISTING
Representative commodities
Commodities
Crop Subgroup 20A. Rapeseed subgroup.
Rapeseed, canola varieties only. .............................................................
Crop Subgroup 20B. Sunflower subgroup.
Sunflower, seed. .......................................................................................
Crop Subgroup 20C. Cottonseed Subgroup.
Cottonseed. ..............................................................................................
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. E10–31397 Filed 01–05–10; 8:45
am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–S
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 320
[EPA–HQ–SFUND–2009–0265; FRL–9100–5]
RIN 2050–AG56
Identification of Additional Classes of
Facilities for Development of Financial
Responsibility Requirements Under
CERCLA Section 108(b)
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Advance notice of proposed
rulemaking (ANPRM).
SUMMARY: Section 108(b) of the
Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation, and Liability
Act (CERCLA) of 1980, as amended,
establishes certain regulatory authorities
concerning financial responsibility
requirements. Specifically, the statutory
language addresses the promulgation of
regulations that require classes of
facilities to establish and maintain
evidence of financial responsibility
consistent with the degree and duration
of risk associated with the production,
transportation, treatment, storage, or
VerDate Nov<24>2008
20:33 Jan 05, 2010
Jkt 220001
Borage, Crambe, Cuphea, Echium, Flax seed, Gold of pleasure, Hare’s
ear mustard, Lesquerella, Lunaria, Meadowfoam, Milkweed, Mustard
seed, Oil radish, Poppy seed, Rapeseed, Sesame, Sweet rocket,
cultivars, varieties, and/or hybrids of these.
Calendula, Castor oil plant, Chinese tallowtree, Euphorbia, Evening
primrose, Jojoba, Niger seed, Rose hip, Safflower, Stokes aster,
Sunflower, Tallowwood, Tea oil plant, Vernonia, cultivars, varieties,
and/or hybrids of these.
Cottonseed, cultivars, varieties, and/or hybrids of these.
disposal of hazardous substances. In a
July 28, 2009, Federal Register notice,
the Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA or the Agency) identified classes
of facilities within the Hardrock Mining
industry as those for which the Agency
will first develop financial
responsibility requirements under
CERCLA Section 108(b). In that notice,
EPA also stated its belief that additional
classes of facilities—that is, other than
those in the Hardrock Mining industry,
also may warrant the development of
financial responsibility requirements
under CERCLA Section 108(b), and
stated that EPA would publish a Federal
Register notice, by December 2009,
identifying additional classes of
facilities it plans to evaluate regarding
the development of financial
responsibility requirements. As a result
of examining available data and
information, the Agency is identifying
the classes of facilities within three
industries—that is, the Chemical
Manufacturing industry (NAICS 325),
the Petroleum and Coal Products
Manufacturing industry (NAICS 324),
and the Electric Power Generation,
Transmission, and Distribution industry
(NAICS 2211), as those for which the
Agency plans to develop, as necessary,
a proposed regulation identifying
appropriate financial responsibility
requirements under CERCLA Section
108(b). EPA will carefully examine
specific activities, practices, and
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
processes involving hazardous
substances at these facilities, as well as
Federal and State authorities, policies,
and practices to determine the risks
posed by these classes of facilities and
whether requirements under CERCLA
Section 108(b) will effectively reduce
these risks.
In addition, this Federal Register
notice identifies the Waste Management
and Remediation Services industry
(NAICS 562), the Wood Product
Manufacturing industry (NAICS 321),
the Fabricated Metal Product
Manufacturing (NAICS 332) industry,
and the Electronics and Electrical
Equipment Manufacturing industry
(NAICS 334 and 335), as well as
facilities engaged in the recycling of
materials containing CERCLA hazardous
substances—as requiring further study
before EPA begins the regulatory
development process. In identifying
classes of facilities within these
industries in this notice, the Agency
does not intend to indicate that other
classes in other industry sectors are no
longer being considered.
DATES: Submit comments on or before
February 5, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–
SFUND–2009–0834, by one of the
following methods:
• Electronic docket at:
www.regulations.gov: Follow the on-line
instructions for submitting comments.
E:\FR\FM\06JAP1.SGM
06JAP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 3 (Wednesday, January 6, 2010)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 807-816]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E10-31397]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[EPA-HQ-OPP-2006-0766; FRL-8801-2]
RIN 2070-AJ28
Pesticide Tolerance Crop Grouping Program II; Revision to General
Tolerance Regulations
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is proposing revisions to its pesticide tolerance crop
grouping regulations, which allow establishment of tolerances for
multiple related crops, based on data from a representative set of
crops. The present revision would create a new crop group for oilseeds,
expand existing crop groups by adding new commodities, establish new
crop subgroups, and revise the representative crops in some groups. EPA
expects these revisions to promote greater use of crop groupings for
tolerance-setting purposes and, in particular, will assist in making
available lower risk pesticides for minor crops both domestically and
in countries that export food to the United States. This is the second
in a series of planned crop group updates expected to be proposed over
the next several years. EPA is also proposing to delete 40 CFR 180.1(h)
which addresses when tolerances apply to post-harvest uses.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before March 8, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by docket identification
(ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2006-0766, by one of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the on-line instructions for submitting comments.
Mail: Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP) Regulatory Public
Docket (7502P), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001.
Delivery: OPP Regulatory Public Docket (7502P),
Environmental Protection Agency, Rm. S-4400, One Potomac Yard (South
Bldg.), 2777 S. Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. Deliveries are only
accepted during the Docket Facility's normal hours of operation (8:30
a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays).
Special arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed
information. The Docket Facility telephone number is (703) 305-5805.
Instructions: Direct your comments to docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-
2006-0766. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the docket without change and may be made available on-line at
https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through regulations.gov or e-
mail. The regulations.gov website is an ``anonymous access'' system,
which means EPA will not know your identity or contact information
unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an e-
mail comment directly to EPA without going through regulations.gov,
your e-mail address will be automatically captured and included as part
of the comment that is placed in the docket and made available on the
Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you
include your name and other contact information in the body of your
comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for
clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic
files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses.
Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the docket index
available at https://www.regulations.gov. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet
and will be publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly
available docket materials are available either in the electronic
docket at https://
[[Page 808]]
www.regulations.gov, or, if only available in hard copy, at the OPP
Regulatory Public Docket in Rm. S-4400, One Potomac Yard (South Bldg.),
2777 S. Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. The hours of operation of this
Docket Facility are from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday,
excluding legal holidays. The Docket Facility telephone number is (703)
305-5805.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ram[eacute] Cromwell, Field and
External Affairs Division, Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-
0001; telephone number: (703) 308-9068; fax number: (703) 305-5884; e-
mail address: cromwell.rame@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this Action Apply to Me?
You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an
agricultural producer, food manufacturer. Potentially affected entities
may include, but are not limited to: Crop production (NAICS code 111),
e.g., agricultural workers; greenhouse, nursery, and floriculture
workers; farmers.
Animal production (NAICS code 112), e.g., cattle ranchers and
farmers, dairy cattle farmers, livestock farmers.
Food manufacturing (NAICS code 311), e.g., agricultural workers;
farmers; greenhouse, nursery, and floriculture workers; ranchers;
pesticide applicators.
Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS code 32532), e.g., agricultural
workers; commercial applicators; farmers; greenhouse, nursery, and
floriculture workers; residential users.
This listing is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides
a guide for readers regarding entities likely to be affected by this
action. Other types of entities not listed in this unit could also be
affected. The North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS)
codes have been provided to assist you and others in determining
whether this action might apply to certain entities. If you have any
questions regarding the applicability of this action to a particular
entity, consult the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.
B. What Should I Consider as I Prepare My Comments for EPA?
1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this information to EPA through
regulations.gov or e-mail. Clearly mark the part or all of the
information that you claim to be CBI. For CBI information in a disk or
CD-ROM that you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the disk or CD-ROM as
CBI and then identify electronically within the disk or CD-ROM the
specific information that is claimed as CBI. In addition to one
complete version of the comment that includes information claimed as
CBI, a copy of the comment that does not contain the information
claimed as CBI must be submitted for inclusion in the public docket.
Information so marked will not be disclosed except in accordance with
procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2.
2. Tips for preparing your comments. When submitting comments,
remember to:
i. Identify the document by docket ID number and other identifying
information (subject heading, Federal Register date and page number).
ii. Follow directions. The Agency may ask you to respond to
specific questions or organize comments by referencing a Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR) part or section number.
iii. Explain why you agree or disagree; suggest alternatives and
substitute language for your requested changes.
iv. Describe any assumptions and provide any technical information
and/or data that you used.
v. If you estimate potential costs or burdens, explain how you
arrived at your estimate in sufficient detail to allow for it to be
reproduced.
vi. Provide specific examples to illustrate your concerns and
suggest alternatives.
vii. Explain your views as clearly as possible, avoiding the use of
profanity or personal threats.
viii. Make sure to submit your comments by the comment period
deadline identified.
II. Background
A. Tolerance-Setting Requirements and Petition from Inter-regional
Research Project Number 4 Program to Expand the Existing Crop Grouping
System
EPA is authorized to establish maximum residue limits or
``tolerances'' for pesticide chemical residues in food under section
408 of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA) (21 U.S.C.
346a). EPA establishes pesticide tolerances only after determining that
aggregate exposure to the pesticide is safe. The U.S. Food and Drug
Administration and the U.S. Department of Agriculture together enforce
compliance with tolerance limits.
Traditionally, tolerances are established for a specific pesticide/
commodity combination. However, under EPA's crop grouping regulation
(40 CFR 180.41) a single tolerance may be established that applies to a
group of related commodities. For example, the citrus crop group covers
11 different citrus fruits including oranges, grapefruit, lemons, and
limes among others. Crop group tolerances may be established based on
residue data only on designated representative commodities within the
group. Representative commodities are selected based on EPA's
determination that they are likely to bear the maximum level of residue
that could occur on any crop within the group. Once the group tolerance
is established, the tolerance level applies to all agricultural
commodities within the group. It is also possible to request a crop
group tolerance with a particular member of the crop excluded. An
example of exclusion to a crop group would be a tolerance for the Stone
Fruit group 12, except peach. In this crop group, residue data for
cherry and plum are used to establish a group tolerance for the stone
fruit group, except peach. Exclusions are requested when variations in
residue levels within a group for a particular pesticide make a crop
group tolerance otherwise inappropriate. See 40 CFR 180.40(h).
This proposed rule is the second in a series of planned crop group
revisions expected to be completed over the next several years.
Specific information regarding the history of the crop group
regulations, the previous amendments to the regulations and the process
for revising crop groups can be found in the Federal Register of
December 7, 2007 (72 FR 69150). Specific information regarding how the
Agency implements crop group revisions can be found in the 40 CFR
180.40(j).
Today's proposal is based upon four petitions developed by the
International Crop Groupings Consulting Committee (ICGCC) workgroup and
submitted to EPA by a nation-wide cooperative effort called the Inter-
regional Research Project Number 4 (IR-4). These petitions and the
monographs supporting them have been included in the docket for the
proposed rule. EPA expects that a series of additional petitions
seeking amendments and changes to the crop groupings regulations (40
CFR 180.41) will originate from the ICGCC workgroup over the next few
years.
B. International Considerations
1. NAFTA partner involvement in this proposal. EPA's Chemistry
Science Advisory Council (ChemSAC), an internal Agency peer review
committee, provided a detailed analysis for each proposed crop group to
Canada's Pest Management Regulatory Agency (PMRA), IR-4, and the
government of
[[Page 809]]
Mexico for their review and comment and invited these parties to
participate in the ChemSAC meeting to finalize the recommendation of
the petitions. PMRA has indicated that it will in parallel with the
United States (U.S.) effort and under the authority of Canada's Pest
Control Products (PCP) Act (2002) establish equivalent crop groups.
Once the new or updated crop groups become effective in the United
States, Mexico will have them as a reference for the establishment of
maximum residue limits in Mexico.
EPA will provide a ``reviewer's guide'' describing the crop
grouping amendments and explaining how to express the changes to the
crop group in the Federal Register to IR-4 and PMRA in support of
implementation and to inform the regulatory community.
2. Relationship of this proposal to Codex activities. The
delegations of the United States and Canada to the Codex Committee on
Pesticide Residues (CCPR) continued efforts in 2009 to harmonize the
NAFTA crop groups and representative commodities with those being
developed by Codex as part of their revision of the Codex
Classification of Foods and Feeds. Canada, the United States, and IR-4
are working closely with the chair of the Codex group (Netherlands and
the United States) to coordinate the U.S. crop group revisions with the
revised crop groups going into Codex. The goals are to expand the crops
in each group to include numerous minor crops, to minimize differences
within and among the United States and Codex groups, and to develop
representative commodities for each group that will be acceptable on an
international basis. To date, CCPR has advanced eight crop groups in
the adoption process.
C. Specific Revisions--Phasing out Pre-existing Crop Groups
This section explains the revisions to the crop group regulations
in the first final rule dated December 7, 2007 (72 FR 69150) and should
be used for guidance.
EPA has amended the generic crop group regulations to include an
explicit scheme for how revised crop groups will be organized in the
regulations.
In brief, the regulations now specify that when a crop group is
amended in a manner that expands or contracts its coverage of
commodities, EPA will: (1) Retain the pre-existing crop group in 40 CFR
180.41; (2) insert the revised crop group immediately after the pre-
existing crop group in 40 CFR 180.41; and (3) title the revised crop
group in a way that clearly differentiates it from the pre-existing
crop group. The revised crop group will retain roughly the same name
and number as the pre-existing group except that the number will be
followed by a hyphen and the final two digits of the year it is
established. Where additions to a crop group make the pre-existing crop
group name misleading, EPA will amend the name as well as the number.
For example, today EPA is proposing to revise Crop Group 8: Fruiting
Vegetables Group (Except Cucurbits). The revised group will be titled
Crop Group 8-09: Fruiting Vegetable Group.
Tolerances established for revised crop groups will include the new
number (and new name, if applicable) so that it is apparent on the face
of the tolerance regulation what commodities are covered. Similarly, it
will be clear what tolerances for pre-existing crop groups are covered
since these existing tolerance regulations use the pre-existing crop
group names.
Although EPA will initially retain pre-existing crop groups that
have been superseded by revised crop groups, EPA will not establish new
tolerances under the pre-existing groups. Further, EPA plans to
eventually convert tolerances for any pre-existing crop groups to
tolerances with the coverage of the revised crop group. This conversion
will be effected both through the registration review process and in
the course of establishing new tolerances for a pesticide. To this end,
EPA requests that petitioners for tolerances address this issue in
their petitions. For example, assuming EPA adopts the amendment to Crop
Group 8: Fruiting Vegetables (Except Cucurbits.), any tolerance
petition for a pesticide that has a Group 8 tolerance should include a
request that the Group 8 tolerance be amended to a Group 8-09
tolerance, since the representative commodities are equivalent. When
all crop group tolerances for a superseded crop group have been revised
or removed, EPA will remove the superseded group from Sec. 180.41.
III. Specific Proposed Revisions
A. Crop Group 8-09 Fruiting Vegetables Group
EPA is proposing to revise the fruiting vegetables crop group in
the following manner.
1. Change name. EPA proposes to change the pre-existing name Crop
Group 8, Fruiting Vegetables (Except Cucurbits) by dropping the
parenthetical ``(Except Cucurbits).'' The term ``Except Cucurbits'' is
not necessary in the group name because cucurbits are not included in
the listed commodities for the group; this parenthetical has not been
used for establishing tolerances for this fruiting vegetables group
since 2002, and cucurbits have their own crop group specifically
labeled the ``Crop Group 9: Cucurbits Vegetable Group,'' 40 CFR
180.41(c)(10).
2. Add commodities. EPA proposes to amend the existing Crop Group 8
by expanding it from 6 to 21 commodities. The existing crop group
consists of the following six commodities: (1) Eggplant, Solanum
melongena; (2) Ground cherry, Physalis spp.; (3) Pepino, Solanum
muricatum; (4) Pepper, Capsicum spp., includes bell pepper, chili
pepper, cooking pepper, pimento, sweet pepper; (5) Tomatillo, Physalis
ixocarpo; (6) Tomato, Lycopersicum esculentum.
EPA proposes to expand Crop Group 8-09 to include 15 commodities as
follows: (1) African eggplant, Solanum macrocarpon L.; (2) Bush tomato,
Solanum centrale J.M. Black; (3) Cocona, Solanum sessiliflorum Dunal;
(4) Currant tomato, Lycopersicon pimpinellifolium (L.) Mill.; (5)
Garden huckleberry, Solanum scabrum Mill.; (6) Goji berry, Lycium
barbarum L.; (7) Martynia, Proboscidea louisianica (Mill.) Thell.; (8)
Naranjilla, Solanum quitoense Lam.; (9) Okra, Abelmoschus esculentus
(L.) Moench; (10) Pea eggplant, Solanum torvum Sw.; (11) Pepper,
nonbell, Capsicum Chinese Jacq., C. annuum L. var. annuum , C.
frutescens L., C. baccatum L., C. pubescens Ruiz & Pav., Capsicum spp.;
(12) Roselle, Hibiscus sabdariffa L.; (13) Scarlet eggplant, Solanum
aethiopicum L.; (14) Sunberry, Solanum retroflexum Dunal; (15) Tree
tomato, Solanum betaceum Cav.; including cultivars, varieties and/or
hybrids of these commodities.
Commodities are being added to this crop group based on
similarities and characteristics of Solanaceae or the Nightshade plant
family which includes most of the fruiting vegetable group. These added
crops have similar cultural practices, edible food portions,
geographical locations, pest problems, established tolerances and
similar exposure to residue levels.
Additionally, increased demand for these fruiting vegetables by
U.S. growers and consumers has led to increased production of these
commodities in the United States and this increased production has led
to heightened demand for pesticides for a wide range of fruiting
vegetables. Expanding the crop group will facilitate pesticide
availability for fruiting vegetables. Increasing the variety of
available pesticides for a crop enables U.S. growers to develop
integrated pest
[[Page 810]]
management programs (IPM), which can minimize pest resistance.
3. Change the names of representative commodities. EPA proposes to
change the name of the representative commodity for the crop group
``one cultivar of non-bell pepper'' by deleting the hyphen from the
term non-bell pepper. This change merely adopts current commodity
vocabulary designations.
4. Create crop subgroups. EPA proposes to add three crop subgroups
to the revised crop group. The subgroups are:
i. Subgroup 8-09A. Tomato subgroup. Representative commodity.
Tomato, standard size and one cultivar of small tomato. Eleven
commodities are included in this subgroup: Bush tomato; Cocona; Currant
tomato; Garden huckleberry; Goji berry; Groundcherry; Naranjilla;
Sunberry; Tomatillo; Tomato; Tree tomato; including cultivars,
varieties and/or hybrids of these commodities.
ii. Subgroup 8-09B. Pepper/Eggplant subgroup. Representative
commodities. Bell pepper and one cultivar of nonbell pepper. Ten
commodities are included in this subgroup: African eggplant; Bell
pepper; Eggplant; Martynia; Nonbell pepper; Okra; Pea eggplant; Pepino;
Roselle; Scarlet eggplant; including cultivars, varieties and/or
hybrids of these commodities.
iii. Subgroup 8-09C. Nonbell Pepper/Eggplant subgroup.
Representative commodities. One cultivar of small nonbell pepper or one
cultivar of small eggplant. Nine commodities are included in this
subgroup: African eggplant; Martynia; Eggplant; Nonbell pepper; Okra;
Pea eggplant; Pepino; Roselle; Scarlet eggplant; including cultivars,
varieties and/or hybrids of these commodities.
The creation of these subgroups and the choice of representative
commodities for these subgroups are based on similarities in pest
pressures, cultural practices, and the edible portion of the commodity.
EPA has also determined that residue data on the designated
representative crops will provide adequate information on residue
levels in crops and subgroups.
Subgroups will provide flexibility in the establishment of crop
group tolerances which can be important for international
harmonization. Tomatoes and peppers are the most commonly grown
fruiting vegetable in the world and are increasing in popularity. They
are used in various ethnic cuisines and per capita consumption has also
increased.
B. Crop Group 10-09 Citrus Fruit Group
EPA is proposing to revise and expand the citrus crop group. EPA
will retain pre-existing Crop Group 10 and title the revised group as
Crop Group 10-09.
1. Add commodities. Crop Group 10 currently contains the following
12 commodities: (1) Calamondin, Citrus mitis x Citrofortunella mitis;
(2) Citrus citron, Citrus medica; (3) Citrus hybrids, Citrus spp.
includes chironja, tangelo, tangor; (4) Grapefruit, Citrus paradisi;
(5) Kumquat, Fortunella spp.; (6) Lemon, Citrus jambhiri, Citrus limon;
(7) Lime, Citrus aurantiifolia; (8) Mandarin (tangerine), Citrus
reticulata; (9) Orange, sour, Citrus aurantium; (10) Orange, sweet,
Citrus sinensis; (11) Pummelo, Citrus grandis, Citrus maxima; (12)
Satsuma mandarin, Citrus unshiu.
EPA proposes to expand Crop Group 10-09 to include 16 commodities
as follows: (1) Australian desert lime, Eremocitrus glauca (Lindl.)
Swingle; (2) Australian finger lime, Microcitrus australasica (F.
Muell.) Swingle; (3) Australian round lime, Microcitrus australis (A.
Cunn. ex Mudie) Swingle; (4) Brown River finger lime, Microcitrus
papuana Winters; (5) Japanese summer grapefruit, Citrus natsudaidai
Hayata; (6) Mediterranean Mandarin, Citrus deliciosa Ten; (7) Mount
White lime, Microcitrus garrowayae (F. M. Bailey) Swingle; (8) New
Guinea wild lime, Microcitrus warburgiana (F. M. Bailey) Tanaka; (9)
Russell River lime, Microcitrus inodora (F. M. Bailey) Swingle; (10)
Sweet lime, Citrus limetta Risso; (11) Tachibana orange, Citrus
tachibana (Makino) Tanaka; (12) Tahiti Lime, Citrus latifolia (Yu.
Tanaka) Tanaka; (13) Tangerine (Mandarin), Citrus reticulata Blanco;
(14) Tangor, Citrus nobilis lour. (15) Trifoliate orange, Poncirus
trifoliata (L.) Raf.; (16) Uniq fruit, Citrus aurantium Tangelo group;
including cultivars, varieties and/or hybrids of these.
The proposed addition of crops to this crop group is based on
similarities and characteristics of the Rutaceae plant family. These
added crops are all citrus fruits, have similar cultural practices,
edible food portions, residue levels, geographical locations, pest
problems and established tolerances.
2. Change the crop group name. EPA proposes to change the name of
``Crop Group 10: Citrus Fruits Group (Citrus spp., Fortunella spp.)''
to ``Crop Group 10-09: Citrus Fruit Group''. The name change reflects
the addition of the new commodities to the group in that it includes
commodities other than Fortunella spp.
3. Create new subgroups. EPA proposes to add three new subgroups to
revised Crop Group 10-09 as follows:
i. Orange Subgroup 10-09A. Representative commodities. Orange or
Tangerine/Mandarin. Twelve commodities are included in this subgroup:
Calamondin; Citron; Citrus hybrids; Mediterranean Mandarin; Orange,
sour; Orange, sweet; Satsuma mandarin; Tachibana orange; Tangelo;
Tangerine (Mandarin); Tangor; Trifoliate orange; including cultivars,
varieties and/or hybrids of these.
ii. Lemon/Lime Subgroup 10-09B. Representative commodities. Lemon
or Lime. Twelve commodities are included in this subgroup: Australian
desert lime; Australian finger lime; Australian round lime; Brown River
finger lime; Kumquat; Lemon; Lime; Mount White lime; New Guinea wild
lime; Russell River lime; Sweet lime; Tahiti Lime; including cultivars,
varieties and/or hybrids of these.
iii. Grapefruit Subgroup 10-09C. Representative commodity.
Grapefruit. Five commodities are included in this subgroup: Grapefruit;
Japanese summer grapefruit; Pummelo; Tangelo; Uniq fruit; including
cultivars, varieties and/or hybrids of these.
The creation of these subgroups and the choice of representative
commodities for these subgroups are based on similarities in pest
pressures, cultural practices, the edible portion of the commodity, and
the geographic locations where these crops are grown. EPA has also
determined that residue data on the designated representative crops
will provide adequate information on residue levels in crops in the
subgroup. The subgroups provide flexibility in the establishment of
crop group tolerances which can be important for international
harmonization.
4. Revise the representative commodities. EPA proposes to revise
the representative crops for Crop Group 10-09 as follows: ``Sweet
orange, lemon and grapefruit'' will be changed to ``Orange or
tangerine/mandarin, lemon or lime and grapefruit.'' This change
reflects the broader range of commodities in this group.
C. Crop Group 11-09: Pome Fruit Group
EPA is proposing to revise and expand the pome fruit crop. EPA will
retain pre-existing Pome Fruit Crop Group 11 and title the revised
group as Crop Group 11-09: Pome Fruit Group.
Add commodities. Crop Group 11 currently contains the following
seven commodities: (1) Apple, Malus domestica Borkh; (2) Crabapple,
Malus spp.; (3) Loquat, Eriobotrya japonica
[[Page 811]]
(Thunb.) Lindl.; (4) Mayhaw, Crataegus spp.; (5) Pear, Pyrus communis
L.; (6) Pear, oriental, Pyrus communis L.; (7) Quince, Cydonia oblonga
Mill.;
EPA proposes to expand Crop Group 11 to include five commodities as
follows: (1) Azarole, Crataegus azarolus L.; (2) Medlar, Mespilus
germanica L.; (4) Pear, Asian, Pyrus pyrifolia (Burm f.) Nakai var.
culta (Makino) Nakai; (5) Tejocote, Crataegus mexicana DC; including
varieties, cultivars and/or hybrids of these.
The proposed addition of crops to this crop group is based on
similarities and characteristics of the Pome Fruit Crop Group 11 as
well as a comparison of pome fruits, their cultural practices, edible
food portions, residue levels, geographical locations, pest problems,
and established tolerances.
D. New Crop Group 20 Oilseed Group
EPA proposes to add a new crop group, entitled Oilseed Group as
Crop Group 20. Oilseed group will include those crops from which oil is
extracted from their seed and used to produce edible or inedible oils
as well high-protein livestock meal.
1. Commodities in group and representative commodities. EPA
proposes to include 32 commodities in Crop Group 20: (1) Borage, Borago
officinalis L.; (2) Calendula, Calendula officinalis L.; (3) Castor oil
plant, Ricinus communis L.; (4) Chinese tallowtree, Triadica sebifera
(L.) Small; (5) Cottonseed, Gossypium spp.; (6) Crambe, Crambe
hispanica L., Crambe abyssinica Hochst. ex R.E. Fr.; (7) Cuphea, Cuphea
hyssopifolia Kunth; (8) Echium, Echium plantagineum L.; (9) Euphorbia,
Euphorbia esula L.; (10) Evening primrose, Oenothera biennis L.; (11)
Flax seed, Linum usitatissimum L.; (12) Gold of pleasure, Camelina
sativa (L.) Crantz; (13) Hare's ear mustard, Conringia orientalis (L.)
Dumort.; (14) Jojoba, Simmondsia chinensis (Link) C.K. Schneid.; (15)
Lesquerella, Lesquerella recurvata (Engelm. ex A. Gray) S. Watson; (16)
Lunaria, Lunaria annua L.; (17) Meadowfoam, Limnanthes alba Hartw. ex
Benth.; (18) Milkweed, Asclepias spp. L.; (19) Mustard seed, Brassica
hirta Moench, Sinapis alba L. subsp. alba; (20) Niger seed, Guizotia
abyssinica (L.f.) Cass.; (21) Oil radish, Raphanus sativus L. var.
oleiformis Pers.; (22) Poppy seed, Papaver somniferum L. subsp.
somniferum; (23) Rapeseed, Brassica spp.; Brassica napus L.; (24) Rose
hip, Rosa rubiginosa L.; (25) Safflower, Carthamus tinctorious L.; (26)
Sesame, Sesamum indicum L.; Sesamum radiatum Schumach. & Thonn.; (27)
Stokes aster, Stokesia laevis (Hill) Greene; (28) Sunflower, Helianthus
annuus L.; (29) Sweet rocket, Hesperis matronalis L.; (30) Tallowwood,
Ximenia americana L.; (31) Tea oil plant, Camellia oleifera C. Abel;
(32) Vernonia, Vernonia galamensis (Cass.) Less. The representative
commodities proposed for this group are cottonseed, rapeseed (canola
varieties only), and sunflower.
Oilseed Crop Group 20 is proposed based on similarities in cultural
practices, edible food portions, livestock feed items, residue levels,
geographical locations, and pest problems. The Oilseed crop group
should facilitate the approval in the United States of additional
pesticides for these crops and both domestic and foreign tolerances,
increasing opportunities for producers to grow new high value
alternative minor crops, including potential biofuel crops. The
proposed representative commodities were chosen based on the scope of
their production and economic importance as well as on the similarities
in cultural practices, pest problems, and commercial production. These
three representative commodities account for greater than 95% of the
harvested acres for the entire Oilseed crop group.
2. Create crop subgroups. EPA proposes to add three crop subgroups
for Crop Group 20. The subgroups are:
i. Rapeseed Subgroup 20A. Representative commodity: Rapeseed,
canola varieties only. The 17 commodities proposed for inclusion in
this subgroup are: Borage; Crambe; Cuphea; Echium; Flax seed; Gold of
pleasure; Hare's ear mustard; Lesquerella; Lunaria; Meadowfoam;
Milkweed; Mustard seed; Oil radish; Poppy seed; Rapeseed; Sesame; Sweet
rocket.
ii. Sunflower Subgroup 20B. Representative commodity: Sunflower,
seed. The 14 commodities proposed for inclusion in this subgroup are:
Calendula; Castor oil plant; Chinese tallowtree; Euphorbia; Evening
primrose; Jojoba; Niger seed; Rose hip; Safflower; Stokes aster;
Sunflower; Tallowwood; Tea oil plant; Vernonia.
iii. Cottonseed Subgroup 20C. Representative commodity: Cottonseed.
The one commodity proposed for inclusion in this subgroup is:
Cottonseed.
The creation of these subgroups and the choice of representative
commodities for these subgroups are based on similarities in pest
pressures, cultural practices, the edible portion of the commodity, and
the geographic locations where these crops are grown. EPA has also
determined that residue data on the designated representative crops
will provide adequate information on residue levels in crops and
subgroup. The subgroups provide flexibility in the establishment of
crop group tolerances which can be important for international
harmonization.
E. Amendment to Definitions and Interpretations
EPA proposes to revise the commodity definition in 40 CFR 180.1(g)
for Citrus Group as follows:
Tangerines = Tangerine (mandarin or mandarin orange), Clementine,
Mediterranean mandarin, Satsuma mandarin, Tangelo, Tangor, cultivars
and varieties.
F. Amendment to 40 CFR 180.1(h)
EPA proposes to delete 40 CFR 180.1(h) that reads: ``Unless
otherwise specified, tolerances and exemptions established under the
regulations in this part apply to residues from only preharvest
application of the chemical.'' EPA is proposing to delete this
provision for two reasons. First, EPA believes that use information
should generally be avoided in the tolerance listings because such
information is difficult to enforce and is more completely addressed
through other means, such as pesticide labels. Second, removal of Sec.
180.1(h) will not result in any increased exposure under existing
tolerance due to expansion of post-harvest uses cannot be expanded
absent pre-market approval by EPA under the Federal Insecticide,
Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act, 7 U.S.C. 136 et seq., and the FFDCA, as
appropriate.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
A. Executive Order 12866
Under Executive Order 12866, entitled Regulatory Planning and
Review (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) has designated this proposed rule as a not-significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of the Executive Order.
This action is one in a series of planned crop group updates. EPA
prepared an analysis of the potential costs and benefits related to its
pesticide tolerance crop grouping regulations for the first crop
grouping final rule published December 7, 2007 (72 FR 69150). This
analysis is contained in ``Economic Analysis of the Expansion of the
Crop Grouping Program.'' A copy of the analysis is available in the
docket and is briefly summarized here.
This is a burden-reducing regulation. Crop grouping has saved money
by allowing the results of pesticide exposure studies for one crop to
be applied to other, similar crops. This
[[Page 812]]
action proposes to expand certain existing crop groups and to add one
new crop group. Crop groupings will assist in making available lower
risk pesticides for minor crops both domestically and in countries that
export food to the U.S. Minor crop and specialty crop producers will
benefit because lower registration costs will encourage pesticide
manufacturers to register more pesticides for use on minor and/or
specialty crops, providing these growers with additional lower-risk
pesticide options. The increased coverage of tolerances to imported
commodities may result in a larger supply of imported and domestically
produced specialty produce at potentially lower costs and treated with
lower-risk pesticides which also benefit consumers. EPA believes that
data from representative crops will not underestimate the public
exposure to pesticide residues through the consumption of treated
crops. EPA and the IR-4 Project, will more efficiently use resources as
a result of the rule. EPA will conserve resources if, as expected, new
or expanded crop groups result in fewer emergency pesticide use
requests from specialty crop growers. Further, new and expanded crop
groups will likely reduce the number of separate risk assessments and
tolerance rulemakings that EPA will have to conduct. Further benefits
come from international harmonization of crop classification and
nomenclature, harmonized commodity import and export standards and
increased potential for resource sharing between EPA and pesticide
regulatory agencies in other countries. Revisions to the crop grouping
program will result in no appreciable costs or negative impacts to
consumers, minor crop producers, specialty crop producers, pesticide
registrants, the environment, or human health. No crop group tolerance
for a pesticide can be established unless EPA determines that it is
safe.
An example of the benefits of group groupings can be shown through
of the impact of changes to Crop Group 3 in a prior rulemaking (72 FR
69150, December 7, 2007). That rulemaking expanded Crop Group 3, Bulb
Vegetables from 7 to 25 crops, an increase of 18 from the original crop
group. Prior to the expansion of the subgroup, adding tolerances for
the 18 new crops would have required 18 field trials at a cost of
approximately $5.4 million (assuming $300,000 per field trial), whereas
after promulgation of the expanded group these 18 new crops could
obtain coverage under a Crop Group 3 tolerance with no field trials in
addition to those required on the representative commodities (which did
not change with the expansion of the group). Fewer field trials means a
greater likelihood that these commodities will obtain tolerance
coverage under the FFDCA, aiding growers, and the administrative costs
of both the IR-4 testing process and the EPA review process will be
reduced.
The benefits of the rule proposed today can be shown through the
example of the impact of changes to Crop Group 3 in a prior rulemaking
(72 FR 69150, December 7, 2007). That rulemaking expanded Crop Group 3,
Bulb Vegetables from 7 to 25 crops, an increase of 18 from the original
crop group. Prior to the expansion of the subgroup, adding tolerances
for the 18 new crops would have required 18 field trials at a cost of
approximately $5.4 million (assuming $300,000 per field trial), whereas
after promulgation of the expanded group these 18 new crops could
obtain coverage under a Crop Group 3 tolerance with no field trials in
addition to those required on the representative commodities (which did
not change with the expansion of the group). Fewer field trials means a
greater likelihood that these commodities will obtain tolerance
coverage under the FFDCA, aiding growers, and the administrative costs
of both the IR-4 testing process and the EPA reviewprocess will be
reduced.
B. Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not contain any new information collection
requirements that would need approval by OMB under the provisions of
the Paper Reduction Act (PRA), 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq. However, the
proposed rule, when adopted as a final rule, is expected to reduce
mandatory paperwork due to a reduction in required studies. The final
rule will have the effect of reducing the number of residue chemistry
studies because fewer representative crops would need to be tested
under a crop grouping scheme, than would otherwise be required.
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act
Pursuant to section 605(b) of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA),
5 U.S.C. 601 et seq., the Agency hereby certifies that this proposed
rule, when adopted as final, will not have a significant adverse
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. This
proposed ruledoes not have any direct adverse impacts on small
businesses, small non-profit organizations, or small local governments.
For purposes of assessing the impacts of today's proposed rule on small
entities, small entity is defined as: (1) A small business according to
the small business size standards established by the Small Business
Administration (SBA); (2) a small governmental jurisdiction that is a
government of a city, county, town, school district or special district
with a population of less than 50,000; and (3) a small organization
that is any not-for-profit enterprise which is independently owned
andoperated and is not dominant in its field.
In determining whether a rule has a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities, the impact of concern is any
significant adverse economic impact on small entities, since the
primarypurpose of the regulatory flexibility analyses is to identify
and addressregulatory alternatives ``which minimize any significant
economicimpact of the proposed rule on small entities'' (5 U.S.C.
sections 603 and604). Thus, an agency may certify that a rule will not
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities if the rule relieves a regulatory burden, or otherwise has
positive economic effects on all of the small entities subject to the
rule.
This proposed rule provides regulatory relief and regulatory
flexibility. The new or expanded crop groups ease the process for
pesticide manufacturers to obtain pesticide tolerances on greater
numbers of crops. Pesticides will be more widely available to growers
for use on crops, particularly specialty crops.
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Under Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA)
(Public Law 104-4), EPA has determined that this proposed rule does not
contain a Federal mandate that may result in expenditures of $100
million or more for State, local, and tribal governments, in the
aggregate,or the private sector in any 1 year. Accordingly, this rule
is not subject to the requirements of sections 202, 203, 204, and 205
of UMRA.
E. Executive Order 13132
Pursuant to Executive Order 13132, entitled Federalism (64 FR
43255, August 10, 1999), EPA has determined that this proposed rule
does not have federalism implications, because it will not have
substantial direct effects on the states, on the relationship between
the national government and the states, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government, as
specified in the
[[Page 813]]
Order. Thus, Executive Order 13132 does not apply to this proposed
rule.
F. Executive Order 13175
As required by Executive Order 13175, entitled Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments (65 FR 67249, November 6,
2000), EPA has determined that this proposed rule does not have tribal
implications because it will not have any affect on tribal governments,
on the relationship between the Federal government andthe Indian
tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between
the Federal government and Indian tribes, as specified in the Order.
Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not apply to this proposed rule.
G. Executive Order 13045
Executive Order 13045, entitled Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks (62 FR 19885, April 23,
1997) does not apply to this proposed rule because this action is not
designated as an economically significant regulatory action as defined
by Executive Order 12866 (see Unit IV.A.), nor does it establish an
environmental standard, or otherwise have a disproportionate effect on
children.
H. Executive Order 13211
This proposed rule is not subject to Executive Order 13211,
entitledActions Concerning Regulations that Significantly Affect Energy
Supply,Distribution, or Use (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001) because it is
not designated as a regulatory action as defined by Executive Order
12866 (see Unit IV.A.), nor is it likely to have any adverse effect on
the supply, distribution, or use of energy.
I. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act
Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (NTTAA), (15 U.S.C. 272 note) directs EPA to use voluntary
consensus standards in its regulatory activities unless to do so would
be inconsistent with applicable law or impractical. Voluntary consensus
standards are technical standards (e.g., materials specifications, test
methods, and sampling procedures) that are developed or adopted by
voluntary consensus standards bodies. This proposed rule does not
impose any technical standards that would require EPA to consider any
voluntary consensus standards.
J. Executive Order 12898
Under Executive Order 12898, entitled Federal Actions to Address
Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income
Populations (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994), the Agency has not
considered environmental justice-related issues because this proposed
rule does not have an adverse impact on the environmental and health
conditions in low-income and minority communities.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities.
Dated: December 22, 2009.
Stephen A. Owens,
Assistant Administrator for Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic
Substances.
Therefore, it is proposed that 40 CFR chapter I be amended as
follows:
PART 180--[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 180 would continue to read as
follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q). 346a and 371.
2. Section 180.41 is amended as follows:
a. By redesignating paragraphs (c)(10) - (c)(22) as paragraphs
(c)(11) - (c)(23), respectively, and by adding a new paragraph (c)(10).
b. By redesignating newly redesignated paragraphs (c)(13) - (c)(23)
as paragraphs (c)(14) - (c)(24), respectively, and by adding a new
paragraph (c)(13).
c. By redesignating newly redesignated paragraphs (c)(15) - (c)(24)
as paragraphs (c)(16) - (c)(25), respectively, and by adding new
paragraph (c)(15). and
d. By redesignating newly redesignated paragraph (c)(25) as
paragraph (c)(26), and by adding a new paragraph (c)(25).
The amendments read as follows:
Sec. 180.41 Crop group tables.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(10) Crop Group 8-09. Fruiting Vegetable Group.
(i) Representative commodities. Tomato (standard size) and one
cultivar of small tomato; bell pepper and one cultivar of nonbell
pepper; and one cultivar of small nonbell pepper or one cultivar of
small eggplant.
(ii) Commodities. The following is a list of all commodities
included in the Crop Group 8-09.
Table 1--Crop Group 8-09: Fruiting Vegetable Group
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commodities Related crop subgroups
------------------------------------------------------------------------
African eggplant, Solanum macrocarpon L........ 8-09B, 8-09C
Bush tomato, Solanum centrale J.M. Black....... 8-09A
Cocona, Solanum sessiliflorum Dunal............ 8-09A
Currant tomato, Lycopersicon pimpinellifolium 8-09A
(L.) Mill.....................................
Eggplant, Solanum melongena L.................. 8-09B, 8-09C
Garden huckleberry, Solanum scabrum Mill....... 8-09A
Goji berry, Lycium barbarum L.................. 8-09A
Groundcherry, Physalis alkekengi L., P. grisea 8-09A
(Waterf.) M. Martinez, P. peruvian L., P.
pubescens L...................................
Martynia, Proboscidea louisianica (Mill.) 8-09B, 8-09C
Thell.........................................
Naranjilla, Solanum quitoense Lam.............. 8-09A
Okra, Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench....... 8-09B, 8-09C
Pea eggplant, Solanum torvum Sw................ 8-09B, 8-09C
Pepino, Solanum muricatum Aiton................ 8-09B, 8-09C
Pepper, bell, Capsicum annuum L. var. annuum, 8-09B
Capsicum spp..................................
Pepper, nonbell, Capsicum chinese Jacq., C. 8-09B, 8-08C
annuum L. var. annuum, C. frutescens L., C.
baccatum L., C. pubescens Ruiz & Pav.,
Capsicum spp..................................
Roselle, Hibiscus sabdariffa L................. 8-09B, 8-09C
Scarlet eggplant, Solanum aethiopicum L........ 8-09B, 8-09C
Sunberry, Solanum retroflexum Dunal............ 8-09A
[[Page 814]]
Tomatillo, Physalis philadelphica Lam.......... 8-09A
Tomato, Solanum lycopersicon L., Solanum 8-09A
lycopersicum L. var. lycopersicum.............
Tree tomato, Solanum betaceum Cav.............. 8-09A
Cultivars, varieties and/or hybrids of these... .......................
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(iii) Table. The following Table 2 identifies the crop subgroups
for Crop Group 8-09, specifies the representative commodities for each
subgroup and lists all the commodities included in each subgroup.
Table 2--Crop Group 8-09: Subgroup Listing
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Representative commodities Commodities
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Crop Subgroup 8-09A. Tomato subgroup...
Tomato (Standard size and one cultivar Bush tomato; Cocona; Currant
of small tomato).. tomato; Garden huckleberry;
Goji berry; Groundcherry;
Naranjilla; Sunberry;
Tomatillo; Tomato; Tree
tomato; cultivars, varieties,
and/or hybrids of these.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Crop Subgroup 8-09B Pepper/Eggplant
subgroup.
Bell pepper and one cultivar of nonbell African eggplant; Bell pepper;
pepper.. Eggplant; Martynia; Nonbell
pepper; Okra; Pea eggplant;
Pepino; Roselle, Scarlet
eggplant; cultivars,
varieties, and/or hybrids of
these.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Crop Subgroup 8-09C Nonbell pepper/
Eggplant subgroup.
One cultivar small nonbell pepper or African eggplant; Eggplant;
one cultivar of small eggplant.. Martynia; Nonbell pepper;
Okra; Pea eggplant; Pepino;
Roselle, Scarlet eggplant;
cultivars, varieties, and/or
hybrids of these.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
(13) Crop Group 10-09. Citrus Fruit Group.
(i) Representative commodities. Orange or Tangerine/Mandarin, Lemon
or Lime, and Grapefruit
(ii) Commodities. The following is a list of all the commodities in
Crop Group 10:
Table 1--Crop Group 10-09: Citrus Fruit Group
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commodities Related crop subgroups
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Australian desert lime, Eremocitrus glauca 10-09B
(Lindl.) Swingle..............................
Australian finger lime, Microcitrus 10-09B
australasica (F. Muell.) Swingle..............
Australian round lime, Microcitrus australis 10-09B
(A. Cunn. ex Mudie) Swingle...................
Brown River finger lime, Microcitrus papuana 10-09B
Winters.......................................
Calamondin, Citrofortunella microcarpa (Bunge) 10-09A
Wijnands......................................
Citron, Citrus medica L........................ 10-09A
Citrus hybrids, Citrus spp. Eremocitrus spp., 10-09A
Fortunella spp., Microcitrus spp., and
Poncirus spp..................................
Grapefruit, Citrus paradisi Macfad............. 10-09C
Japanese summer grapefruit, Citrus natsudaidai 10-09C
Hayata........................................
Kumquat, Fortunella spp........................ 10-09B
Lemon, Citrus limon (L.) Burm. f............... 10-09B
Lime, Citrus aurantiifolia (Christm.) Swingle.. 10-09B
Mediterranean Mandarin, Citrus deliciosa Ten... 10-09A
Mount White lime, Microcitrus garrowayae (F. M. 10-09B
Bailey) Swingle...............................
New Guinea wild lime, Microcitrus warburgiana 10-09B
(F. M. Bailey) Tanaka.........................
Orange, sour, Citrus aurantium L............... 10-09A
Orange, sweet, Citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck..... 10-09A
Pummelo, Citrus maxima (Burm .) Merr........... 10-09C
Russell River lime, Microcitrus inodora (F.M. 10-09B
Bailey) Swingle...............................
Satsuma mandarin, Citrus unshiu Marcow......... 10-09A
Sweet lime, Citrus limetta Risso............... 10-09B
Tachibana orange, Citrus tachibana (Makino) 10-09A
Tanaka........................................
Tahiti Lime, Citrus latifolia (Yu. Tanaka) 10-09B
Tanaka........................................
Tangelo, Citrus x tangelo J.W. Ingram & H.E. 10-09A, 10-09C
Moore.........................................
Tangerine (Mandarin), Citrus reticulata Blanco. 10-09A
Tangor, Citrus nobilis Lour.................... 10-09A
Trifoliate orange, Poncirus trifoliata (L.) 10-09A
Raf...........................................
Uniq fruit, Citrus aurantium Tangelo group..... 10-09C
Cultivars, varieties and/or hybrids of these...
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 815]]
(iii) Table. The following Table 2 identifies the crop subgroups
for Crop Group 10-09, specifies the representative commodities for each
subgroup and lists all the commodities included in each subgroup.
Table 2--Crop Group 10-09: Subgroup Listing
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Representative commodities Commodities
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Crop Subgroup 10-09A. Orange subgroup..
Orange or tangerine/mandarin........... Calamondin; Citron; Citrus
hybrids; Mediterranean
Mandarin; Orange, sour;
Orange, sweet; Satsuma
mandarin; Tachibana orange;
Tangerine (Mandarin); Tangelo,
Tangor; Trifoliate orange;
cultivars, varieties, and/or
hybrids of these.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Crop Subgroup 10-09B. Lemon/Lime
subgroup.
Lemon or lime.......................... Australian desert lime;
Australian finger-lime;
Australian round lime; Brown
River finger lime; Kumquat;
Lemon; Lime; Mount White Lime;
New Guinea wild lime; Russell
River Lime; Sweet lime; Tahiti
Lime; cultivars, varieties,
and/or hybrids of these
varieties.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Crop Subgroup 10-09C. Grapefruit
subgroup.
Grapefruit............................. Grapefruit; Japanese summer
grapefruit; Pummelo; Tangelo;
Uniq fruit; cultivars,
varieties, and/or hybrids of
these.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
(15) Crop Group 11-09. Pome Fruit Group.
(i) Representative commodities. Apple and Pear.
(ii) Commodities. The following is a list of all the commodities in
Crop Group 11-09.
Table 1--Crop Group 11-09: Pome Fruit Group--Commodities
Apple, Malus domestica Borkh
Azarole, Crataegus azarolus L.
Crabapple, Malus sylvestris (L.) Mill., Malus prunifolia (Willd.) Borkh.
Loquat, Eriobotrya japonica (Thunb.) Lindl.
Mayhaw, Crataegus aestivalis (Walter) Torr. & A. Gray, C. opaca Hook. &
Arn., and C. rufula Sarg.
Medlar, Mespilus germanica L.
Pear, Pyrus communis L
Pear, Asian, Pyrus pyrifolia (Burm. f.) Nakai var. culta (Makino) Nakai
Quince, Cydonia oblonga Mill
Quince, Chinese, Chaenomeles speciosa (Sweet) Nakai, Pseudocydonia
sinensis (Thouin) C.K. Schneid.
Quince, Japanese, Chaenomeles japonica (Thunb.) Lindl. ex Spach
Tejocote, Crataegus mexicana DC.
Cultivars, varieties and/or hybrids of these.
* * * * *
(25) Crop Group 20. Oilseed Group.
(i) Representative commodities. Rapeseed (canola varieties only);
sunflower, seed and cottonseed.
(ii) Table. The following Table 1 lists all the commodities listed
in Crop Group 20 and identifies the related crop subgroups and includes
cultivars and/or varieties of these commodities.
Table 1--Crop Group 20: Oilseed Group
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Related crop
Commodities subgroups
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Borage, Borago officinalis L......................... 20A
Calendula, Calendula officinalis L................... 20B
Castor oil plant, Ricinus communis L................. 20B
Chinese tallowtree, Triadica sebifera (L.) Small..... 20B
Cottonseed, Gossypium spp. L......................... 20C
Crambe, Crambe hispanica L.; Crambe abyssinica 20A
Hochst. ex R.E. Fr..................................
Cuphea, Cuphea hyssopifolia Kunth.................... 20A
Echium, Echium plantagineum L........................ 20A
Euphorbia, Euphorbia esula L......................... 20B
Evening primrose, Oenothera biennis L................ 20B
Flax seed, Linum usitatissimum L..................... 20A
Gold of pleasure, Camelina sativa (L.) Crantz........ 20A
Hare's ear mustard, Conringia orientalis (L.) Dumort. 20A
Jojoba, Simmondsia chinensis (Link) C.K. Schneid..... 20B
Lesquerella, Lesquerella recurvata (Engelm. ex A. 20A
Gray) S. Watson.....................................
Lunaria, Lunaria annua L............................. 20A
Meadowfoam, Limnanthes alba Hartw. ex Benth.......... 20A
Milkweed, Asclepias spp. L........................... 20A
Mustard seed, Brassica hirta Moench, Sinapis alba L. 20A
subsp. alba.........................................
Niger seed, Guizotia abyssinica (L.f.) Cass.......... 20B
Oil radish, Raphanus sativus L. var. oleiformis Pers. 20A
Poppy seed, Papaver somniferum L. subsp. Somniferum.. 20A
Rapeseed, Brassica spp.; Brassica napus L............ 20A
Rose hip, Rosa rubiginosa L.......................... 20B
Safflower, Carthamus tinctorious L................... 20B
Sesame, Sesamum indicum L.; Sesamum radiatum 20A
Schumach. & Thonn...................................
Stokes aster, Stokesia laevis (Hill) Greene.......... 20B
Sunflower, Helianthus annuus L....................... 20B
[[Page 816]]
Sweet rocket, Hesperis matronalis L.................. 20A
Tallowwood, Ximenia americana L...................... 20B
Tea oil plant, Camellia oleifera C. Abel............. 20B
Vernonia, Vernonia galamensis (Cass.) Less........... 20B
Cultivars, varieties, and/or hybrids of these........ .................
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(iii) Table. The following Table 2 identifies the crop subgroups
for Crop Group 20, specifies the representative commodities for each
subgroup and lists all the commodities included in each subgroup.
Table 2--Crop Group 20 Subgroup Listing
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Representative commodities Commodities
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Crop Subgroup 20A. Rapeseed subgroup...
Rapeseed, canola varieties only........ Borage, Crambe, Cuphea, Echium,
Flax seed, Gold of pleasure,
Hare's ear mustard,
Lesquerella, Lunaria,
Meadowfoam, Milkweed, Mustard
seed, Oil radish, Poppy seed,
Rapeseed, Sesame, Sweet
rocket, cultivars, varieties,
and/or hybrids of these.
Crop Subgroup 20B. Sunflower subgroup..
Sunflower, seed........................ Calendula, Castor oil plant,
Chinese tallowtree, Euphorbia,
Evening primrose, Jojoba,
Niger seed, Rose hip,
Safflower, Stokes aster,
Sunflower, Tallowwood, Tea oil
plant, Vernonia, cultivars,
varieties, and/or hybrids of
these.
Crop Subgroup 20C. Cottonseed Subgroup.
Cottonseed............................. Cottonseed, cultivars,
varieties, and/or hybrids of
these.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
[FR Doc. E10-31397 Filed 01-05-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-S