Gensym Corporation, a Subsidiary of Versata Enterprises, Inc.; Burlington, MA; Notice of Revised Determination on Remand, 454-455 [E9-31387]
Download as PDF
454
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 2 / Tuesday, January 5, 2010 / Notices
Signed at Washington, DC, this 30th day of
December 2009.
Jane Oates,
Assistant Secretary for Employment and
Training.
[FR Doc. E9–31262 Filed 1–4–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
Request for Certification of
Compliance—Rural Industrialization
Loan and Grant Program
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS
AGENCY: Employment and Training
Administration, Labor.
ACTION: Notice.
SUMMARY: The Employment and
Training Administration is issuing this
notice to announce the receipt of a
‘‘Certification of Non-Relocation and
Market and Capacity Information
Report’’ (Form 4279–2) for the
following:
Applicant/Location: Frazier & Frazier
Industries, Inc./Coolidge, Texas.
Principal Product/Purpose: The loan,
guarantee, or grant application is to
refinance an existing loan to preserve
current employment and to create
additional working capital for new jobs,
machinery, and equipment. The NAICS
industry code for this enterprise is:
331111 Iron and Steel Mills.
DATES: All interested parties may submit
comments in writing no later than
January 19, 2010. Copies of adverse
comments received will be forwarded to
the applicant noted above.
ADDRESSES: Address all comments
concerning this notice to Anthony D.
Dais, U.S. Department of Labor,
Employment and Training
Administration, 200 Constitution
Avenue, NW., Room S–4231,
Washington, DC 20210; or e-mail
Dais.Anthony@dol.gov; or transmit via
fax (202) 693–3015 (this is not a toll-free
number).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Anthony D. Dais, at telephone number
(202) 693–2784 (this is not a toll-free
number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section
188 of the Consolidated Farm and Rural
Development Act of 1972, as established
under 29 CFR Part 75, authorizes the
United States Department of Agriculture
to make or guarantee loans or grants to
finance industrial and business
activities in rural areas. The Secretary of
Labor must review the application for
financial assistance for the purpose of
certifying to the Secretary of Agriculture
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:41 Jan 04, 2010
Jkt 220001
that the assistance is not calculated, or
likely, to result in: (a) A transfer of any
employment or business activity from
one area to another by the loan
applicant’s business operation; or, (b) an
increase in the production of goods,
materials, services, or facilities in an
area where there is not sufficient
demand to employ the efficient capacity
of existing competitive enterprises
unless the financial assistance will not
have an adverse impact on existing
competitive enterprises in the area. The
Employment and Training
Administration within the Department
of Labor is responsible for the review
and certification process. Comments
should address the two bases for
certification and, if possible, provide
data to assist in the analysis of these
issues.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 30th day of
December 2009.
Jane Oates,
Assistant Secretary for Employment and
Training.
[FR Doc. E9–31261 Filed 1–4–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–64,591]
Gensym Corporation, a Subsidiary of
Versata Enterprises, Inc.; Burlington,
MA; Notice of Revised Determination
on Remand
On August 25, 2009, the U.S. Court of
International Trade (USCIT) remanded
to the U.S. Department of Labor
(Department) for further review Former
Employees of Gensym Corporation v.
United States Secretary of Labor, Court
No. 09–00240.
The group eligibility requirements for
directly-impacted (primary) workers
under Section 222(a) the Trade Act of
1974, as amended, can be satisfied in
either of two ways:
Under Section 222(a)(2)(A), the
following criteria must be satisfied:
A. A significant number or proportion
of the workers in such workers’ firm, or
an appropriate subdivision of the firm,
have become totally or partially
separated, or are threatened to become
totally or partially separated;
B. The sales or production, or both, of
such firm or subdivision have decreased
absolutely; and
C. Increased imports of articles like or
directly competitive with articles
produced by such firm or subdivision
have contributed importantly to such
workers’ separation or threat of
PO 00000
Frm 00119
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
separation and to the decline in sales or
production of such firm or subdivision;
or
Under Section 222(a)(2)(B), the
following criteria must be satisfied:
A. A significant number or proportion
of the workers in such workers’ firm, or
an appropriate subdivision of the firm,
have become totally or partially
separated, or are threatened to become
totally or partially separated;
B. There has been a shift in
production by such workers’ firm or
subdivision to a foreign country of
articles like or directly competitive with
articles which are produced by such
firm or subdivision; and
C. One of the following must be
satisfied:
1. The country to which the workers’
firm has shifted production of the
articles is a party to a free trade
agreement with the United States;
2. The country to which the workers’
firm has shifted production of the
articles is a beneficiary country under
the Andean Trade Preference Act,
African Growth and Opportunity Act, or
the Caribbean Basin Economic Recovery
Act; or
3. There has been or is likely to be an
increase in imports of articles that are
like or directly competitive with articles
which are or were produced by such
firm or subdivision.
On December 2, 2008, a State
Workforce Office filed a petition for
Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) and
Alternative Trade Adjustment
Assistance (ATAA) on behalf of workers
and former workers of Gensym
Corporation, a subsidiary of Versata
Enterprises, Inc., Burlington,
Massachusetts (Gensym-MA).
The initial investigation revealed that,
during the relevant period, a significant
number or proportion of workers at
Gensym-MA was totally or partially
separated from employment, the subject
worker group performed information
technology sales, consulting, and
support services, and Gensym
Corporation, a subsidiary of Versata
Enterprises, Inc. (Gensym), did not
produce an article within the meaning
of Section 222(a)(2) of the Trade Act of
1974, as amended (the Trade Act).
The Department issued a Negative
Determination Regarding Eligibility to
Apply for Worker Adjustment
Assistance and Alternative Trade
Adjustment Assistance on February 4,
2009. The Department’s Notice of
Determination was published in the
Federal Register on March 3, 2009 (74
FR 9283).
By application dated February 20,
2009, the Division of Career Services,
Trade Program Manager, Massachusetts,
E:\FR\FM\05JAN1.SGM
05JAN1
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 2 / Tuesday, January 5, 2010 / Notices
requested administrative
reconsideration of the Department’s
negative determination. The request for
reconsideration alleged that Gensym
produced software and that there may
have been a shift of production to at
least one foreign country.
The Department issued a Notice of
Affirmative Determination Regarding
Application of Reconsideration on
March 2, 2009. The Department’s Notice
of Determination was published in the
Federal Register on March 11, 2009 (74
FR 10616).
The reconsideration determination
stated that Gensym did not produce
software during the relevant period (the
date one year prior to the petition date
through the petition date). The
Department concluded that because no
production took place at Gensym during
the relevant period, there could not
have been a shift of production by
Gensym to a foreign country during the
relevant period and that the subject
worker group could not have supported
such domestic production during the
relevant period.
The Department’s Notice of Negative
Determination of Reconsideration was
issued on April 21, 2009. The
Department’s Notice of determination
was published in the Federal Register
on April 30, 2009 (74 FR 19997).
In the Complaint, the Plaintiff asserts
that ‘‘new releases’’ of existing software
were produced during the relevant
period, and provided a copy of a
Gensym news release (‘‘Gensym
Announces Release of Gensym G2 8.3
R2,’’ Austin, Texas, March 20, 2008).
In order to determine whether the
subject workers meet the TAA group
eligibility requirements, the Department
must first determine whether or not an
article was produced at the subject firm,
then determine whether the subject
workers are adversely impacted by
increased imports of articles like or
directly competitive with those
produced by the subject firm or by a
shift in production abroad of articles
like or directly competitive with articles
produced by the subject firm.
In order for a worker group to qualify
for TAA as primary workers, they must
either be (1) engaged in domestic
production, or (2) in support of an
affiliated domestic production facility.
Where the workers support production,
the facility that they support must be
import-impacted or have shifted
production pursuant to Section
222(a)(2)(B).
The requirement that the firm
employing the subject workers produce
an article domestically was stated in the
Notice of Revised Determination on
Remand for Lands’ End, A Subsidiary of
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:41 Jan 04, 2010
Jkt 220001
Sears Roebuck and Company, Business
Outfitters CAD Operations, Dodgeville,
Wisconsin, TA–W–56,688 (issued on
March 24, 2006, published at 71 FR
18357). The determination also stated
that articles can be either tangible or
intangible. Software code, software
enhancements/updates, software
‘‘patches’’ and new releases of existing
software are considered articles, for
purposes of the Trade Act.
During the remand investigation, the
Department sought from Gensym
information regarding the software
releases identified in Plaintiff’s support
documentation (‘‘Gensym Announces
Release of Gensym G2 8.3 R2’’ news
release). Based on information
submitted during the course of the
remand investigation, the Department
also sought information from Gensym
regarding articles (software updates/
enhancements) produced at its Austin,
Texas facility during the relevant period
and the relationship between GensymMA and the Austin, Texas facility.
The Department had requested that
Plaintiff’s counsel provide new and
additional information that Plaintiff
indicated was relevant to the remand
investigation, but did not receive any
such information. Therefore, the remand
determination is based solely on new
information provided by Gensym.
During the remand investigation,
Gensym confirmed that the firm did
produce updates/enhancements for
existing software products. Gensym also
provided new information that revealed
that production of software updates/
enhancements was shifted abroad and
that the shift was followed by increased
imports of articles like or directly
competitive with those produced by
Gensym.
Based on the new information
provided by Gensym during the remand
investigation, the Department
determines that the criteria set forth in
Section 222(a)(2)(B) has been satisfied.
In accordance with Section 246 the
Trade Act of 1974 (26 U.S.C. 2813), as
amended, the Department herein
presents the results of its investigation
regarding certification of eligibility to
apply for ATAA.
The Department has determined in
the immediate case that the group
eligibility requirements of Section 246
have been met.
A significant number of workers at
Gensym-MA are age 50 or over and
possess skills that are not easily
transferable. Competitive conditions
within the industry are adverse.
Conclusion
After careful review of the facts
generated through the remand
PO 00000
Frm 00120
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
455
investigation, I determine that a shift of
production to a foreign country by
Gensym of articles like or directly
competitive with software updates/
enhancements, followed by increased
imports of articles like or directly
competitive with those produced by
Gensym, contributed to the total or
partial separation of a significant
number or proportion of workers at
Gensym Corporation, Burlington,
Massachusetts.
In accordance with the provisions of
the Act, I make the following
certification:
All workers of Gensym Corporation, a
subsidiary of Versata Enterprises, Inc.,
Burlington, Massachusetts, who became
totally or partially separated from
employment on or after December 2, 2007,
through two years from the issuance of this
revised determination, are eligible to apply
for Trade Adjustment Assistance under
Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, and are
eligible to apply for alternative trade
adjustment assistance under Section 246 of
the Trade Act of 1974.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 23rd day of
December 2009.
Richard Church,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9–31387 Filed 1–4–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
Copyright Royalty Board
[Docket No. 2010–1 CRB Cable Rate]
Adjustment of Cable Statutory License
Royalty Rates
AGENCY: Copyright Royalty Board,
Library of Congress.
ACTION: Notice announcing
commencement of proceeding with
request for Petitions to Participate.
SUMMARY: The Copyright Royalty Judges
are announcing the commencement of
the proceeding to adjust the rates for the
cable statutory license. The Copyright
Royalty Judges also are announcing the
date by which a party who wishes to
participate in the rate adjustment
proceeding must file its Petition to
Participate and the accompanying $150
filing fee.
DATES: Petitions to Participate and the
filing fee are due no later than February
4, 2010.
ADDRESSES: An original, five copies, and
an electronic copy in Portable
Document Format (PDF) on a CD of the
Petition to Participate, along with the
$150 filing fee, may be delivered to the
Copyright Royalty Board by either mail
E:\FR\FM\05JAN1.SGM
05JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 2 (Tuesday, January 5, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 454-455]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-31387]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training Administration
[TA-W-64,591]
Gensym Corporation, a Subsidiary of Versata Enterprises, Inc.;
Burlington, MA; Notice of Revised Determination on Remand
On August 25, 2009, the U.S. Court of International Trade (USCIT)
remanded to the U.S. Department of Labor (Department) for further
review Former Employees of Gensym Corporation v. United States
Secretary of Labor, Court No. 09-00240.
The group eligibility requirements for directly-impacted (primary)
workers under Section 222(a) the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, can be
satisfied in either of two ways:
Under Section 222(a)(2)(A), the following criteria must be
satisfied:
A. A significant number or proportion of the workers in such
workers' firm, or an appropriate subdivision of the firm, have become
totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or
partially separated;
B. The sales or production, or both, of such firm or subdivision
have decreased absolutely; and
C. Increased imports of articles like or directly competitive with
articles produced by such firm or subdivision have contributed
importantly to such workers' separation or threat of separation and to
the decline in sales or production of such firm or subdivision; or
Under Section 222(a)(2)(B), the following criteria must be
satisfied:
A. A significant number or proportion of the workers in such
workers' firm, or an appropriate subdivision of the firm, have become
totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or
partially separated;
B. There has been a shift in production by such workers' firm or
subdivision to a foreign country of articles like or directly
competitive with articles which are produced by such firm or
subdivision; and
C. One of the following must be satisfied:
1. The country to which the workers' firm has shifted production of
the articles is a party to a free trade agreement with the United
States;
2. The country to which the workers' firm has shifted production of
the articles is a beneficiary country under the Andean Trade Preference
Act, African Growth and Opportunity Act, or the Caribbean Basin
Economic Recovery Act; or
3. There has been or is likely to be an increase in imports of
articles that are like or directly competitive with articles which are
or were produced by such firm or subdivision.
On December 2, 2008, a State Workforce Office filed a petition for
Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) and Alternative Trade Adjustment
Assistance (ATAA) on behalf of workers and former workers of Gensym
Corporation, a subsidiary of Versata Enterprises, Inc., Burlington,
Massachusetts (Gensym-MA).
The initial investigation revealed that, during the relevant
period, a significant number or proportion of workers at Gensym-MA was
totally or partially separated from employment, the subject worker
group performed information technology sales, consulting, and support
services, and Gensym Corporation, a subsidiary of Versata Enterprises,
Inc. (Gensym), did not produce an article within the meaning of Section
222(a)(2) of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (the Trade Act).
The Department issued a Negative Determination Regarding
Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative
Trade Adjustment Assistance on February 4, 2009. The Department's
Notice of Determination was published in the Federal Register on March
3, 2009 (74 FR 9283).
By application dated February 20, 2009, the Division of Career
Services, Trade Program Manager, Massachusetts,
[[Page 455]]
requested administrative reconsideration of the Department's negative
determination. The request for reconsideration alleged that Gensym
produced software and that there may have been a shift of production to
at least one foreign country.
The Department issued a Notice of Affirmative Determination
Regarding Application of Reconsideration on March 2, 2009. The
Department's Notice of Determination was published in the Federal
Register on March 11, 2009 (74 FR 10616).
The reconsideration determination stated that Gensym did not
produce software during the relevant period (the date one year prior to
the petition date through the petition date). The Department concluded
that because no production took place at Gensym during the relevant
period, there could not have been a shift of production by Gensym to a
foreign country during the relevant period and that the subject worker
group could not have supported such domestic production during the
relevant period.
The Department's Notice of Negative Determination of
Reconsideration was issued on April 21, 2009. The Department's Notice
of determination was published in the Federal Register on April 30,
2009 (74 FR 19997).
In the Complaint, the Plaintiff asserts that ``new releases'' of
existing software were produced during the relevant period, and
provided a copy of a Gensym news release (``Gensym Announces Release of
Gensym G2 8.3 R2,'' Austin, Texas, March 20, 2008).
In order to determine whether the subject workers meet the TAA
group eligibility requirements, the Department must first determine
whether or not an article was produced at the subject firm, then
determine whether the subject workers are adversely impacted by
increased imports of articles like or directly competitive with those
produced by the subject firm or by a shift in production abroad of
articles like or directly competitive with articles produced by the
subject firm.
In order for a worker group to qualify for TAA as primary workers,
they must either be (1) engaged in domestic production, or (2) in
support of an affiliated domestic production facility. Where the
workers support production, the facility that they support must be
import-impacted or have shifted production pursuant to Section
222(a)(2)(B).
The requirement that the firm employing the subject workers produce
an article domestically was stated in the Notice of Revised
Determination on Remand for Lands' End, A Subsidiary of Sears Roebuck
and Company, Business Outfitters CAD Operations, Dodgeville, Wisconsin,
TA-W-56,688 (issued on March 24, 2006, published at 71 FR 18357). The
determination also stated that articles can be either tangible or
intangible. Software code, software enhancements/updates, software
``patches'' and new releases of existing software are considered
articles, for purposes of the Trade Act.
During the remand investigation, the Department sought from Gensym
information regarding the software releases identified in Plaintiff's
support documentation (``Gensym Announces Release of Gensym G2 8.3 R2''
news release). Based on information submitted during the course of the
remand investigation, the Department also sought information from
Gensym regarding articles (software updates/enhancements) produced at
its Austin, Texas facility during the relevant period and the
relationship between Gensym-MA and the Austin, Texas facility.
The Department had requested that Plaintiff's counsel provide new
and additional information that Plaintiff indicated was relevant to the
remand investigation, but did not receive any such information.
Therefore, the remand determination is based solely on new information
provided by Gensym.
During the remand investigation, Gensym confirmed that the firm did
produce updates/enhancements for existing software products. Gensym
also provided new information that revealed that production of software
updates/enhancements was shifted abroad and that the shift was followed
by increased imports of articles like or directly competitive with
those produced by Gensym.
Based on the new information provided by Gensym during the remand
investigation, the Department determines that the criteria set forth in
Section 222(a)(2)(B) has been satisfied.
In accordance with Section 246 the Trade Act of 1974 (26 U.S.C.
2813), as amended, the Department herein presents the results of its
investigation regarding certification of eligibility to apply for ATAA.
The Department has determined in the immediate case that the group
eligibility requirements of Section 246 have been met.
A significant number of workers at Gensym-MA are age 50 or over and
possess skills that are not easily transferable. Competitive conditions
within the industry are adverse.
Conclusion
After careful review of the facts generated through the remand
investigation, I determine that a shift of production to a foreign
country by Gensym of articles like or directly competitive with
software updates/enhancements, followed by increased imports of
articles like or directly competitive with those produced by Gensym,
contributed to the total or partial separation of a significant number
or proportion of workers at Gensym Corporation, Burlington,
Massachusetts.
In accordance with the provisions of the Act, I make the following
certification:
All workers of Gensym Corporation, a subsidiary of Versata
Enterprises, Inc., Burlington, Massachusetts, who became totally or
partially separated from employment on or after December 2, 2007,
through two years from the issuance of this revised determination,
are eligible to apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance under Section
223 of the Trade Act of 1974, and are eligible to apply for
alternative trade adjustment assistance under Section 246 of the
Trade Act of 1974.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 23rd day of December 2009.
Richard Church,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-31387 Filed 1-4-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P