Native American Housing Assistance and Self-Determination Reauthorization Act of 2008: Notice of Final List of Negotiated Rulemaking Committee Members, 423-425 [E9-31302]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 2 / Tuesday, January 5, 2010 / Notices
source of illumination that is composed
of a wick surrounded by wax. CBP
concluded that the wax objects, on their
own, were unable to provide
illumination. CBP’s historical position
is that the essential character of a candle
is imparted by both the wick and the
wax components. None of the wax
objects have a wick and are unable to
provide its user with light. Therefore,
CBP held that the wax objects do not
have the essential character of a candle.
In addition, CBP also held that the
wax forms are not unassembled candles
because unassembled goods must be
imported with the requisite number of
parts. None of the rulings indicate that
the wax objects were being imported
with an equal number of wicks.
Therefore, CBP has concluded that
classification by application of GRI 2(a)
in heading 3406, HTSUS is
inappropriate.
Finally, CBP’s prior decisions held
that classification by application of GRI
3(a) is inappropriate because the wax
objects are not prima facie classifiable
in two or more headings of the HTSUS.
In order for classification by application
of GRI 3(a) to be appropriate the goods
cannot be classifiable by application of
GRIs 1 or 2 and the good must be prima
facie classifiable in two or more
headings. As indicated above, CBP has
held that heading 3406, HTSUS, does
not describe the imported products. As
a result, the wax articles are not prima
facie classifiable in any other heading,
except heading 9602, HTSUS.
Comments
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS
Pursuant to section 175.21(a), CBP
regulations (19 CFR 175.21(a)), before
making a determination on this matter,
CBP invites written comments on the
petition from interested parties.
The domestic interested party petition
concerning the tariff classification of
wax objects, as well as all comments
received in response to this notice, will
be available for public inspection on the
docket at https://www.regulations.gov.
Please note that any submitted
comments that CBP receives by mail
will be posted on the above-referenced
docket for the public’s convenience.
Authority: This notice is published in
accordance with section 175.21(a), CBP
Regulations (19 CFR 175.21(a)) and 19 U.S.C.
1516.
Dated: December 29, 2009.
Jayson P. Ahern,
Acting Commissioner, U.S. Customs and
Border Protection.
[FR Doc. E9–31352 Filed 1–4–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111–14–P
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:41 Jan 04, 2010
Jkt 220001
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
[Docket No. FR–5369–N–01]
Notice of Availability: HUD Real Estate
Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA)
Handbook
AGENCY: Office of the Assistant
Secretary for Housing—Federal Housing
Commissioner, HUD.
ACTION: Notice.
Through today’s Federal
Register notice, HUD announces the
availability on its Web site of the
revised special information booklet
(Booklet) pursuant to the Real Estate
Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA)
requirement in 12 U.S.C. § 2604. The
Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act of
1974 (RESPA) (12 U.S.C. 2601–2617),
establishes the process for disclosing
settlement costs in the financing or
refinancing of a home, and helps protect
consumers from unethical practices by
settlement service providers during the
home-buying and loan process. Under
RESPA, lenders and mortgage brokers
are required to give borrowers this
Booklet within three days of the
borrower’s applying for a mortgage loan.
The Booklet provides information
designed to assist individuals seeking to
buy a home to become familiar with the
home-buying process. As a result, the
Booklet provides information regarding
the purchase contract, how to use a
Good Faith Estimate to shop for the best
loan, required settlement services to
close the loan, and the HUD–1
Settlement Statement. It also provides
information regarding interest rates,
points, balloon payments, prepayment
penalties and how they can affect
mortgage payments. The Booklet also
discusses how to resolve loan servicing
problems that will help avoid actions
that could lead to foreclosure.
The Booklet is currently available on
the HUD Web site at: https://www.hud.
gov/utilities/intercept.cfm?https://
portal.hud.gov/portal/page/portal/HUD/
documents/Settlement%20Booklet
%20December%2015%20REVISED.pdf.
It is also currently the top link at https://
www.hud.gov/respa.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The
Office of RESPA and Interstate Land
Sales, U.S. Department of Housing and
Urban Development, 451 Seventh Street,
SW., Room 9158, Washington, DC
20410; telephone number 202–708–0502
(this is not a toll-free number). Persons
with hearing or speech impairments
may access this number via TTY by
calling the toll-free Federal Information
Relay Service at 800–877–8339.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00088
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
423
Dated: December 29, 2009.
David H. Stevens,
Assistant Secretary for Housing—Federal
Housing Commissioner.
[FR Doc. E9–31304 Filed 1–4–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210–67–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
[Docket No. FR–5275–N–04]
Native American Housing Assistance
and Self-Determination
Reauthorization Act of 2008: Notice of
Final List of Negotiated Rulemaking
Committee Members
AGENCY: Office of the Assistant
Secretary for Public and Indian
Housing, HUD.
ACTION: Notice.
SUMMARY: On September 23, 2009, HUD
published a Federal Register notice
establishing the negotiated rulemaking
committee that will work with HUD to
develop regulatory changes to programs
authorized under the Native American
Housing Assistance and SelfDetermination Act of 1996. Changes to
these programs were made by the Native
American Housing Assistance and SelfDetermination Reauthorization Act of
2008, which also directs that HUD
undertake negotiated rulemaking to
implement the statutory revisions. The
September 23, 2009, notice also
announced the names and affiliations of
the committee’s proposed members and
requested public comment on the
committee and its proposed
membership. Today’s notice announces
the final list of committee members.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Rodger Boyd, Deputy Assistant
Secretary for Native American
Programs, Office of Public and Indian
Housing, Department of Housing and
Urban Development, 451 Seventh Street,
SW., Room 4126, Washington, DC
20410, telephone number 202–401–7914
(this is not a toll-free number). Hearingor speech-impaired individuals may
access this number via TTY by calling
the toll-free Federal Information Relay
Service at 1–800–877–8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The Native American Housing
Assistance and Self-Determination Act
of 1996 (25 U.S.C. 4101 et seq.)
(NAHASDA) changed the way that
housing assistance is provided to Native
Americans. NAHASDA eliminated
several separate assistance programs
and replaced them with a single block
E:\FR\FM\05JAN1.SGM
05JAN1
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS
424
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 2 / Tuesday, January 5, 2010 / Notices
grant program, known as the Indian
Housing Block Grant (IHBG) program. In
addition, Title VI of NAHASDA
authorizes federal guarantees for the
financing of certain tribal activities
(Title VI Loan Guarantee Program). The
regulations governing the IHBG and
Title VI Loan Guarantee programs are
located in part 1000 of HUD’s
regulations in title 24 of the Code of
Federal Regulations. In accordance with
section 106 of NAHASDA, HUD
developed the regulations with active
tribal participation and using the
procedures of the Negotiated
Rulemaking Act of 1996 (5 U.S.C. 561–
570).
The Native American Housing
Assistance and Self-Determination
Reauthorization Act of 2008 (Pub. L.
110–411, approved October 14, 2008)
(NAHASDA Reauthorization)
reauthorizes NAHASDA through
September 30, 2013, and makes a
number of amendments to the statutory
requirements governing the IHBG and
Title VI Loan Guarantee programs. The
NAHASDA Reauthorization amends
section 106 of NAHASDA to provide
that HUD shall ‘‘initiate a negotiated
rulemaking in accordance with this
section by not later than 90 days after
enactment of the [2008 Reauthorization
Act].’’
On January 12, 2009 (74 FR 1227),
HUD published a notice in the Federal
Register announcing the initiation of the
negotiated rulemaking required by the
NAHASDA Reauthorization. On March
2, 2009 (74 FR 9100), HUD published a
notice in the Federal Register that
commenced the negotiated rulemaking
process by soliciting nominations for
membership on the negotiated
rulemaking committee. The notice
provided that the negotiated rulemaking
committee must consist of
representatives of interests that are
potentially affected by the rulemaking,
such as tribally designated housing
entities, elected officials of tribal
governments, and HUD representatives.
The notice explained that there was no
requirement that each potentially
affected organization or entity
necessarily have its own representation
on the committee. However, HUD noted
that the committee, as a whole, must
reflect a geographically diverse crosssection of small, medium, and large
Indian tribes. The March 2, 2009, notice
was followed by a September 23, 2009,
notice published in the Federal Register
(74 FR 48584) that listed the proposed
members of the NAHASDA
Reauthorization negotiated rulemaking
committee.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:41 Jan 04, 2010
Jkt 220001
II. Discussion of Public Comments
The public comment period for the
September 23, 2009, notice ended on
October 23, 2009. HUD received 10
public comments. A number of
commenters objected that there was no
representative of a particular tribe or too
few representatives of a category of
tribes on the proposed committee.
Another commenter found HUD’s
description of the scope of the subject
rule and the interests affected to be
insufficiently detailed, and also
questioned why HUD is proposing that
the committee have a total of 26
members, including HUD. One
commenter objected to the inclusion of
a particular individual on the
committee, while others objected that a
particular individual was not included.
Finally, HUD received requests from
tribes requesting that their nominees,
who were included in the proposed
committee, be replaced with
representatives of the same tribes.
HUD appreciates the interest of the
commenters in the composition of the
NAHASDA Reauthorization negotiated
rulemaking committee. HUD regrets it is
unable to include a representative of
every tribe or group of tribes on the
committee. In order to ensure that the
negotiated rulemaking process is
workable, the Negotiated Rulemaking
Act directs agencies to limit committee
composition to no more than 25
members, unless the agency determines
that such number cannot achieve the
desired balance of interests. (See 5
U.S.C. 565(b).) The Negotiated
Rulemaking Act’s preference for
limiting committees to workable
numbers of members means that not
every tribe can have its own
representative and not every interested
and qualified individual can be a
member. HUD has determined that
allocating all 25 seats to tribal members,
and increasing the committee size by
two members to accommodate HUD’s
representatives, maximizes tribal
representation. This committee size and
allocation are sufficient to satisfactorily
achieve the balance of interests, with
respect to size and geographical
location, that HUD strives to achieve
through this committee, while also
ensuring that the negotiated rulemaking
process remains workable. Although
committee membership is limited,
committee meetings are open to the
public, and HUD welcomes the
participation of individuals beyond
those who are members of the
committee. HUD also notes that, as it
has stated in prior notices, affected
interests include those of tribally
designated housing entities, tribal
PO 00000
Frm 00089
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
governments, and tribes of different
sizes and geographic locations, and are
similar to those involved in previous
NAHASDA negotiated rulemaking,
which also addressed the distribution of
block grant funding for Indian housing
and federal guarantees for financing
certain tribal activities. Accordingly,
HUD proposed a committee whose
membership is diverse and that
approximates membership from prior
NAHASDA negotiated rulemaking
committees. Finally, in cases where a
tribe or group of tribes requested that its
representative be replaced with a
substitute, HUD has honored the
request.
III. First Committee Meeting
HUD intends to announce the date
and location of the first meeting of the
NAHASDA Reauthorization negotiated
rulemaking committee in a future
Federal Register notice.
IV. Final Membership of the Negotiated
Rulemaking Committee
Following is the final list of tribal
negotiated rulemaking committee
members. In making the selections for
membership on the negotiated
rulemaking committee, HUD’s goal was
to establish a committee whose
membership reflects a balanced
representation of Indian tribes. In
addition to the tribal members of the
committee, there will be two HUD
representatives: Sandra B. Henriquez,
Assistant Secretary for Public and
Indian Housing, and Rodger J. Boyd,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Native
American Programs.
The final list of NAHASDA negotiated
rulemaking committee members is as
follows:
Steven Angasan, King Salmon Tribe,
Naknek, Alaska.
Carol Gore, President/CEO, Cook Inlet
Housing Authority, Anchorage,
Alaska.
Blake Kazama, President, Tlingit-Haida
Regional Housing Authority, Juneau,
Alaska.
Marty Shuravloff, Executive Director,
Kodiak Island Housing Authority,
Kodiak, Alaska.
Retha Herne, Executive Director,
Akwesasne Housing Authority,
Hogansburg, New York.
Ray DePerry, Housing Director, Red Cliff
Chippewa Housing Authority,
Bayfield, Wisconsin.
Robert Durant, Executive Director,
White Earth Reservation Housing
Authority, Waubun, Minnesota.
Leon Jacobs, Lumbee Tribe of North
Carolina, Mystic, Connecticut.
E:\FR\FM\05JAN1.SGM
05JAN1
425
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 2 / Tuesday, January 5, 2010 / Notices
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS
Susan Wicker, Executive Housing
Director, Poarch Band of Creek
Indians, Atmore, Alabama.
Jason Adams, Executive Director, Salish
Kootenai Housing Authority, Pablo,
Montana.
Lafe Haugen, Executive Director,
Northern Cheyenne Tribal Housing
Authority, Lame Deer, Montana.
Rebecca Phelps, Development
Specialist, Turtle Mountain Housing
Authority, Belcourt, North Dakota.
S. Jack Sawyers, Paiute Indian Tribe of
Utah, Cedar City, Utah.
Marguarite Becenti, Member, Board of
Commissioners, Umatilla Reservation
Housing Authority, Pendleton,
Oregon.
Henry Cagey, The Honorable Chairman,
Lummi Nation, Bellingham,
Washington.
Larry Coyle, Executive Director, Cowlitz
Indian Tribal Housing, Chehalis,
Washington.
Karin Foster, Legal Counsel, Yakama
Nation Housing Authority,
Toppenish, Washington.
Marvin Jones, Manager, Housing
Oversight, Cherokee Nation,
Tahlequah, Oklahoma.
Thomas McGeisey, Executive Director,
Seminole Nation Housing Authority,
Wewoka, Oklahoma.
Shawna Pickup, Housing
Director/Secretary, Eastern Shawnee
Tribe of Oklahoma, Wyandotte,
Oklahoma.
Russell Sossamon, Executive Director,
Choctaw Nation Housing Authority,
Hugo, Oklahoma.
Ervin Keeswood, Member, Navajo
Housing Authority Board of
Commissioners, Window Rock,
Arizona.
Judith Marasco, Executive Director,
Yurok Indian Housing Authority,
Klamath, California.
Alvin Moyle, The Honorable Chairman,
Fallon Business Council, Fallon
Paiute-Shoshone Tribe, Fallon,
Nevada.
Darlene Tooley, Executive Director,
Northern Circle Indian Housing
Authority, Ukiah, California.
Dated: December 24, 2009.
Sandra B. Henriquez,
Assistant Secretary for Public and Indian
Housing.
[FR Doc. E9–31302 Filed 1–4–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210–67–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[LLWO320000L1320000.PP]
Extension of Approved Information
Collection, OMB Control Number 1004–
0073
AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management,
Interior.
ACTION: 60-day notice and request for
comments.
SUMMARY: In compliance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the
Bureau of Land Management (BLM)
announces its intention to request that
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) extend approval for the
paperwork requirements in 43 CFR parts
3400 through 3500, which cover leasing
or developing Federal coal. The BLM
uses the information to determine if the
applicant is qualified to hold a Federal
coal lease. The Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) previously approved
this information collection activity
under the control number 1004–0073.
DATES: You must submit your comments
to the BLM at the address below on or
before March 8, 2010. The BLM is not
obligated to consider any comments
postmarked or received after the above
date.
ADDRESSES: You may mail comments to:
U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau
of Land Management, Mail Stop 401–
LS, 1849 C St., NW., Washington, DC
20240, Attention: 1004–0073. You may
also comment by e-mail at:
Jean_Sonneman@blm.gov. Comments
will be available for public review at the
L Street address during regular business
hours (7:45 a.m. to 4:15 p.m.), Monday
through Friday, excluding Federal
holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: You
may contact John A. Lewis, Division of
Solid Minerals at (202) 912–7116
(Commercial or FTS). Persons who use
a telecommunication device for the deaf
(TDD) may call the Federal Information
Relay Service (FIRS) on 1–800–877–
8339, 24 hours a day, seven days a
week, to contact Mr. Lewis. You may
also contact Mr. Lewis to obtain a copy,
at no cost, of the regulations and forms
that require this collection of
information.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: OMB
regulations at 5 CFR part 1320, which
implement provisions of the Paperwork
Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501–3521),
require that interested members of the
public and affected agencies be
provided an opportunity to comment on
information collection and
recordkeeping activities (see 5 CFR
1320.8(d) and 1320.12(a)). This notice
identifies information collections that
are contained in 43 CFR parts 3400
through 3500, which cover leasing and
the development of Federal coal. The
BLM will request that the OMB approve
this information collection activity for a
3-year term.
Comments are invited on: (1) The
need for the collection of information
for the performance of the functions of
the agency; (2) the accuracy of the
agency’s burden estimates; (3) ways to
enhance the quality, utility, and clarity
of the information collection; and (4)
ways to minimize the information
collection burden on respondents, such
as use of automated means of collection
of the information. A summary of the
public comments will accompany the
BLM’s submission of the information
collection requests to OMB.
The following information is provided
for the information collection:
Title: Coal Management (43 CFR
3400–3500).
Forms:
• Form 3400–12; Coal Lease.
• Form 3440–1; License to Mine.
OMB Control Number: 1004–0073.
Abstract: This notice pertains to
information collections that cover the
leasing and development of Federal
coal. The BLM determines if the
applicant to lease is qualified to hold a
lease or develop Federal coal. The
information collections covered by this
notice are found at 43 CFR parts 3400
through 3500; and in the form listed
above.
Frequency: On occasion.
Estimated Number and Description of
Respondents: Approximately 1235
applicants to hold a coal lease or
develop Federal coal.
Estimated Reporting and
Recordkeeping ‘‘Hour’’ Burden: The
currently approved annual reporting
burden for this collection is 21,022
hours. The following chart details the
individual components and respective
hour burden estimates of this
information collection request:
Estimated
number of
responses
Regulation 43 CFR
Type of application
3410 ...........................
3410 ...........................
Application for an exploration license .........................................................................................
Issuance and termination of an exploration license ....................................................................
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:41 Jan 04, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00090
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\05JAN1.SGM
05JAN1
Estimated
hours per
response
10
5
36
12
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 2 (Tuesday, January 5, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 423-425]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-31302]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
[Docket No. FR-5275-N-04]
Native American Housing Assistance and Self-Determination
Reauthorization Act of 2008: Notice of Final List of Negotiated
Rulemaking Committee Members
AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Public and Indian
Housing, HUD.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: On September 23, 2009, HUD published a Federal Register notice
establishing the negotiated rulemaking committee that will work with
HUD to develop regulatory changes to programs authorized under the
Native American Housing Assistance and Self-Determination Act of 1996.
Changes to these programs were made by the Native American Housing
Assistance and Self-Determination Reauthorization Act of 2008, which
also directs that HUD undertake negotiated rulemaking to implement the
statutory revisions. The September 23, 2009, notice also announced the
names and affiliations of the committee's proposed members and
requested public comment on the committee and its proposed membership.
Today's notice announces the final list of committee members.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rodger Boyd, Deputy Assistant
Secretary for Native American Programs, Office of Public and Indian
Housing, Department of Housing and Urban Development, 451 Seventh
Street, SW., Room 4126, Washington, DC 20410, telephone number 202-401-
7914 (this is not a toll-free number). Hearing- or speech-impaired
individuals may access this number via TTY by calling the toll-free
Federal Information Relay Service at 1-800-877-8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The Native American Housing Assistance and Self-Determination Act
of 1996 (25 U.S.C. 4101 et seq.) (NAHASDA) changed the way that housing
assistance is provided to Native Americans. NAHASDA eliminated several
separate assistance programs and replaced them with a single block
[[Page 424]]
grant program, known as the Indian Housing Block Grant (IHBG) program.
In addition, Title VI of NAHASDA authorizes federal guarantees for the
financing of certain tribal activities (Title VI Loan Guarantee
Program). The regulations governing the IHBG and Title VI Loan
Guarantee programs are located in part 1000 of HUD's regulations in
title 24 of the Code of Federal Regulations. In accordance with section
106 of NAHASDA, HUD developed the regulations with active tribal
participation and using the procedures of the Negotiated Rulemaking Act
of 1996 (5 U.S.C. 561-570).
The Native American Housing Assistance and Self-Determination
Reauthorization Act of 2008 (Pub. L. 110-411, approved October 14,
2008) (NAHASDA Reauthorization) reauthorizes NAHASDA through September
30, 2013, and makes a number of amendments to the statutory
requirements governing the IHBG and Title VI Loan Guarantee programs.
The NAHASDA Reauthorization amends section 106 of NAHASDA to provide
that HUD shall ``initiate a negotiated rulemaking in accordance with
this section by not later than 90 days after enactment of the [2008
Reauthorization Act].''
On January 12, 2009 (74 FR 1227), HUD published a notice in the
Federal Register announcing the initiation of the negotiated rulemaking
required by the NAHASDA Reauthorization. On March 2, 2009 (74 FR 9100),
HUD published a notice in the Federal Register that commenced the
negotiated rulemaking process by soliciting nominations for membership
on the negotiated rulemaking committee. The notice provided that the
negotiated rulemaking committee must consist of representatives of
interests that are potentially affected by the rulemaking, such as
tribally designated housing entities, elected officials of tribal
governments, and HUD representatives. The notice explained that there
was no requirement that each potentially affected organization or
entity necessarily have its own representation on the committee.
However, HUD noted that the committee, as a whole, must reflect a
geographically diverse cross-section of small, medium, and large Indian
tribes. The March 2, 2009, notice was followed by a September 23, 2009,
notice published in the Federal Register (74 FR 48584) that listed the
proposed members of the NAHASDA Reauthorization negotiated rulemaking
committee.
II. Discussion of Public Comments
The public comment period for the September 23, 2009, notice ended
on October 23, 2009. HUD received 10 public comments. A number of
commenters objected that there was no representative of a particular
tribe or too few representatives of a category of tribes on the
proposed committee. Another commenter found HUD's description of the
scope of the subject rule and the interests affected to be
insufficiently detailed, and also questioned why HUD is proposing that
the committee have a total of 26 members, including HUD. One commenter
objected to the inclusion of a particular individual on the committee,
while others objected that a particular individual was not included.
Finally, HUD received requests from tribes requesting that their
nominees, who were included in the proposed committee, be replaced with
representatives of the same tribes.
HUD appreciates the interest of the commenters in the composition
of the NAHASDA Reauthorization negotiated rulemaking committee. HUD
regrets it is unable to include a representative of every tribe or
group of tribes on the committee. In order to ensure that the
negotiated rulemaking process is workable, the Negotiated Rulemaking
Act directs agencies to limit committee composition to no more than 25
members, unless the agency determines that such number cannot achieve
the desired balance of interests. (See 5 U.S.C. 565(b).) The Negotiated
Rulemaking Act's preference for limiting committees to workable numbers
of members means that not every tribe can have its own representative
and not every interested and qualified individual can be a member. HUD
has determined that allocating all 25 seats to tribal members, and
increasing the committee size by two members to accommodate HUD's
representatives, maximizes tribal representation. This committee size
and allocation are sufficient to satisfactorily achieve the balance of
interests, with respect to size and geographical location, that HUD
strives to achieve through this committee, while also ensuring that the
negotiated rulemaking process remains workable. Although committee
membership is limited, committee meetings are open to the public, and
HUD welcomes the participation of individuals beyond those who are
members of the committee. HUD also notes that, as it has stated in
prior notices, affected interests include those of tribally designated
housing entities, tribal governments, and tribes of different sizes and
geographic locations, and are similar to those involved in previous
NAHASDA negotiated rulemaking, which also addressed the distribution of
block grant funding for Indian housing and federal guarantees for
financing certain tribal activities. Accordingly, HUD proposed a
committee whose membership is diverse and that approximates membership
from prior NAHASDA negotiated rulemaking committees. Finally, in cases
where a tribe or group of tribes requested that its representative be
replaced with a substitute, HUD has honored the request.
III. First Committee Meeting
HUD intends to announce the date and location of the first meeting
of the NAHASDA Reauthorization negotiated rulemaking committee in a
future Federal Register notice.
IV. Final Membership of the Negotiated Rulemaking Committee
Following is the final list of tribal negotiated rulemaking
committee members. In making the selections for membership on the
negotiated rulemaking committee, HUD's goal was to establish a
committee whose membership reflects a balanced representation of Indian
tribes. In addition to the tribal members of the committee, there will
be two HUD representatives: Sandra B. Henriquez, Assistant Secretary
for Public and Indian Housing, and Rodger J. Boyd, Deputy Assistant
Secretary for Native American Programs.
The final list of NAHASDA negotiated rulemaking committee members
is as follows:
Steven Angasan, King Salmon Tribe, Naknek, Alaska.
Carol Gore, President/CEO, Cook Inlet Housing Authority, Anchorage,
Alaska.
Blake Kazama, President, Tlingit-Haida Regional Housing Authority,
Juneau, Alaska.
Marty Shuravloff, Executive Director, Kodiak Island Housing Authority,
Kodiak, Alaska.
Retha Herne, Executive Director, Akwesasne Housing Authority,
Hogansburg, New York.
Ray DePerry, Housing Director, Red Cliff Chippewa Housing Authority,
Bayfield, Wisconsin.
Robert Durant, Executive Director, White Earth Reservation Housing
Authority, Waubun, Minnesota.
Leon Jacobs, Lumbee Tribe of North Carolina, Mystic, Connecticut.
[[Page 425]]
Susan Wicker, Executive Housing Director, Poarch Band of Creek Indians,
Atmore, Alabama.
Jason Adams, Executive Director, Salish Kootenai Housing Authority,
Pablo, Montana.
Lafe Haugen, Executive Director, Northern Cheyenne Tribal Housing
Authority, Lame Deer, Montana.
Rebecca Phelps, Development Specialist, Turtle Mountain Housing
Authority, Belcourt, North Dakota.
S. Jack Sawyers, Paiute Indian Tribe of Utah, Cedar City, Utah.
Marguarite Becenti, Member, Board of Commissioners, Umatilla
Reservation Housing Authority, Pendleton, Oregon.
Henry Cagey, The Honorable Chairman, Lummi Nation, Bellingham,
Washington.
Larry Coyle, Executive Director, Cowlitz Indian Tribal Housing,
Chehalis, Washington.
Karin Foster, Legal Counsel, Yakama Nation Housing Authority,
Toppenish, Washington.
Marvin Jones, Manager, Housing Oversight, Cherokee Nation, Tahlequah,
Oklahoma.
Thomas McGeisey, Executive Director, Seminole Nation Housing Authority,
Wewoka, Oklahoma.
Shawna Pickup, Housing Director/Secretary, Eastern Shawnee Tribe of
Oklahoma, Wyandotte, Oklahoma.
Russell Sossamon, Executive Director, Choctaw Nation Housing Authority,
Hugo, Oklahoma.
Ervin Keeswood, Member, Navajo Housing Authority Board of
Commissioners, Window Rock, Arizona.
Judith Marasco, Executive Director, Yurok Indian Housing Authority,
Klamath, California.
Alvin Moyle, The Honorable Chairman, Fallon Business Council, Fallon
Paiute-Shoshone Tribe, Fallon, Nevada.
Darlene Tooley, Executive Director, Northern Circle Indian Housing
Authority, Ukiah, California.
Dated: December 24, 2009.
Sandra B. Henriquez,
Assistant Secretary for Public and Indian Housing.
[FR Doc. E9-31302 Filed 1-4-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210-67-P