Bend/Ft. Rock Ranger District; Deschutes National Forest; Deschutes County, OR; Ogden Landscape Vegetation Management Project EIS, 69325-69326 [E9-30744]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 250 / Thursday, December 31, 2009 / Notices
action: (1) Effects to Big Game Habitat
and (2) Mechanical Equipment in the
IRA. An alternative responding to these
issues would be included in the
analysis. Additional alternatives may be
included to respond to the scoping
issues and other resource values.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
Public Involvement and Scoping
The public is encouraged to take part
in the process and to visit with Forest
Service officials at any time during the
analysis and prior to the decision. The
Forest Service has sought and will
continue seeking information,
comments, and assistance from Federal,
State, and local agencies, Tribal
governments, and other individuals or
organizations that may be interested in,
or affected by, the proposed action. It is
expected that formal consultation with
the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service will
occur for this project regarding the
potential impacts to endangered species.
This input will be used in preparation
of the draft and final EIS. The scoping
process includes:
1. Identifying potential issues.
2. Identifying major issues to be
analyzed in depth.
3. Identifying alternatives to the
proposed action.
4. Exploring additional alternatives
that will be derived from issues
recognized during scoping activities.
5. Identifying potential environmental
effects of this proposal (i.e., direct,
indirect, and cumulative effects and
connected actions).
Estimated Dates for Filing
The draft EIS is expected to be filed
with the Environmental Protection
agency (EPA) and to be available for
public review in February 2010. At that
time EPA will publish a Notice of
Availability of the draft EIS in the
Federal Register. The comment period
on the draft EIS will be 45 days from the
date the EPA publishes the Notice of
Availability in the Federal Register. It is
very important that those interested in
the management of this area participate
at that time.
The final EIS is scheduled to be
completed in April 2010. In the final
EIS, the Forest Service is required to
respond to comments and responses
received during the comment period
that pertain to the environmental
consequences discussed in the draft EIS
and to applicable laws, regulations, and
policies considered in making a
decision regarding the proposal.
Reviewer’s Obligations
It is important that reviewers provide
their comments at such times and in
such a way that they are useful to the
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:06 Dec 30, 2009
Jkt 220001
Agency’s preparation of the EIS.
Therefore, comments should be
provided prior to the close of the
comment period and should clearly
articulate the reviewer’s concerns and
contentions. The submission of timely
and specific comments can affect a
reviewer’s ability to participate in
subsequent administrative review or
judicial review. Comments received in
response to this solicitation, including
names and addresses of those who
comment, will be part of the public
record for this proposed action.
Comments submitted anonymously will
be accepted and considered; however,
anonymous comments will not provide
the respondent with standing to
participate in subsequent administrative
review or judicial review.
Responsible Official
Paul Bradford, Forest Supervisor of
the Kootenai National Forest, 31374
U.S. Highway 2, Libby, MT 59923-3022,
is the Responsible Official for this
project. The Responsible Official
decides if the proposed project will be
implemented, and documents the
decision and reasons for the decision in
the Record of Decision. The
responsibility for preparing the DEIS
and FEIS is delegated to Mike Herrin,
District Ranger, Three Rivers Ranger
District.
Dated: December 18, 2009.
C. Quinn Carver,
Acting for Forest Supervisor Paul Bradford,
Kootenai National Forest.
[FR Doc. E9–30740 Filed 12–30–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–11–M
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Bend/Ft. Rock Ranger District;
Deschutes National Forest; Deschutes
County, OR; Ogden Landscape
Vegetation Management Project EIS
Forest Service, USDA.
Notice of intent to prepare an
environmental impact statement.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The USDA, Forest Service,
will prepare an environmental impact
statement (EIS) on a proposed action to
promote development of large tree
structural conditions and to improve
forest health and fuel conditions within
the 26,500-acre Ogden Landscape
planning area. The planning area is
located to the west of and adjacent to
the Newberry National Volcanic
Monument and to private lands to the
east of State Highway 97, south of Forest
road 9735 and north of Forest road 22.
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
69325
The planning area is all within public
lands managed by the Deschutes
National Forest. An analysis has been
initiated that takes a landscape
approach to managing the vegetation to
meet objectives for resilient forest, fuels
and fire behavior, and wildlife habitat.
Methods that would be used to reduce
tree density and hazardous fuels are:
Non-commercial and commercial
thinning, mechanical shrub treatment,
and prescribed burning. The alternatives
will include the proposed action, no
action, and, if necessary, additional
alternatives that respond to issues
generated through the scoping process.
The agency will give notice of the full
environmental analysis and decisionmaking process so interested and
affected public may participate and
contribute to the final decision.
DATES: Comments concerning the scope
of the analysis must be received by 30
days following the date that this notice
appears in the Federal Register.
ADDRESSES: Send written comments to
Shane Jeffries, District Ranger, BendFort Rock Ranger District, Red Oaks
Square, 1230 NE. Third Street Suite
A–262, Bend, Oregon 97701.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Beth
Peer, Environmental Coordinator, BendFort Rock Ranger District, Red Oaks
Square, 1230 NE. Third Street Suite A–
262, Bend, Oregon 97701, phone (541)
383–4769.
Responsible Official: The responsible
official is John Allen, Forest Supervisor,
Deschutes National Forest, 1001 SW.
Emkay Dr., Bend, OR 97701.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background. This Central Oregon
landscape is a priority for restoration.
There are many high-value areas within
and adjacent to the project area: Paulina
Creek which bisects the planning area
from east to west is eligible for the
National Wild and Scenic Rivers
System; popular sites such as McKay,
Ogden, and Prairie Campgrounds and
the Peter Skeen Ogden National Scenic
Trail provide diverse opportunities for
recreation; and the primary access into
and out of Newberry Crater and the
Newberry National Monument passes
through the project area. The project
area also provides habitat for goshawk
and other Management Indicator
Species. High fuel loads and the
presence of ladder of fuels puts these
areas at risk to a large scale wildfire.
The amount of late and old structure
ponderosa pine is far below the historic
range of variability. A majority of the
planning area is second-growth
ponderosa pine, which has grown in
following historic logging in the 1920s
to 1940s. Portions of the area have been
E:\FR\FM\31DEN1.SGM
31DEN1
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
69326
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 250 / Thursday, December 31, 2009 / Notices
thinned dating from the 1960s to as
recently as 2009. In thinned and
unthinned areas, tree growth is
increasing stand density relative to
stocking capacity of the site. Densities
are affecting tree diameter growth and
creating conditions favorable for
mountain pine beetle attack. In some
cases, lodgepole has been established
and is adversely affecting the growth of
ponderosa pine. There are also areas of
pure lodgepole pine that are either
mature stands, or have been regenerated
in the recent past. Mixed conifer stands
are a smaller component of the
landscape and are primarily ponderosa
pine with a mix of lodgepole pine and
white fir.
Purpose and Need. The general
purpose of entering the project area is to
move the area towards a more resilient
landscape and provide a diversity of
habitats closer to what historically
occurred. There is a need to reduce
forest vegetation density and fuels to
increase resilience to insects, disease,
and stand-replacing fire, and to increase
the proportion of LOS ponderosa pine.
Currently, values associated with the
landscape are susceptible to a widescale disturbance. The Deschutes
National Forest Land and Resource
Management Plan supports proactive
maintenance and enhancing the vigor of
the forest in preventing a stand
replacement event rather than waiting.
There is a need to contribute to the
local and regional economies by
providing timber and other wood fiber
products and associated jobs. The
Deschutes National Forest Land and
Resource Management Plan supports
management of timber resources and
recognizes the value in a way that is
consistent with other resource
objectives, environmental constraints,
and economic efficiency.
Proposed Action. The Forest Service
proposes to implement activities across
approximately 14,600 acres within the
Ogden Landscape. Treatments
(commercial and non-commercial
thinning) will provide a diversity of
habitat structures that are more in line
with historical conditions. Thinning
will maintain large trees that are present
and encourage the development of late
and old structure characteristics in
stands where not currently present.
Shrub mowing will reduce surface and
ladder fuels and allow fire to be used as
an ecological restoration tool. Prescribed
fire will be applied in the firedependent ecosystems to reduce fuels,
maintain habitat, and allow fire to
perform its natural ecological function.
Treatments are designed to address the
objectives for each stand type and are
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:06 Dec 30, 2009
Jkt 220001
strategically located across the area to
break up fuel continuity.
Issues. Preliminary issues include the
potential effect of the proposed action
on cultural resources, developed and
dispersed recreation, noxious weeds, air
quality, and wildlife habitat.
Comment. Public comments regarding
this proposal are requested in order to
assist in identifying issues, determine
how to best manage the resources, and
to focus the analysis. Comments
received to this notice, including names
and addresses of those who comment,
will be considered part of the public
record on this proposed action and will
be available for public inspection.
Comments submitted anonymously will
be accepted and considered; however,
those who submit anonymous
comments will not have standing to
appeal the subsequent decision in
accordance with 36 CFR parts 215 and
217. Additionally, pursuant to 7 CFR
1.27(d), any person may request the
agency to withhold a submission from
the public record by showing how the
Freedom of Information Act (FOIA)
permits such confidentiality. Persons
requesting such confidentiality should
be aware that, under FOIA,
confidentiality may be granted in only
very limited circumstances, such as to
protect trade secrets. The Forest Service
will inform the requester of the agency’s
decision regarding the request for
confidentiality, and where the request is
denied, the agency will return the
submission and notify the requester that
the comments may be resubmitted with
or without name and address within a
specified number of days.
A draft EIS will be filed with the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
and available for public review by
October 2010. The EPA will publish a
Notice of Availability (NOA) of the draft
EIS in the Federal Register. The final
EIS is scheduled to be available
February 2011.
The comment period on the draft EIS
will be 45 days from the date the EPA
publishes the notice of availability in
the Federal Register.
The Forest Service believes, at this
early stage, it is important to give
reviewers notice of several court rulings
related to public participation in the
environmental review process. First,
reviewers of a draft EIS must structure
their participation in the environmental
review of the proposal so that it is
meaningful and alerts an agency to the
reviewer’s position and contentions
[Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp.
v. NRDC, 435 U.S. 519, 553 (1978)].
Also, environmental objections that
could be raised at the draft EIS stage but
that are not raised until after completion
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
of the final EIS may be waived or
dismissed by the courts [City of Angoon
v. Harris, 490 F. Supp. 1334, 1338 (E.D.
Wis. 1980)]. Because of these court
rulings, it is very important that those
interested in this proposed action
participate by the close of the 45-day
comment period so that substantive
comments and objections are made
available to the Forest Service at a time
when it can meaningfully consider them
and respond to them in the final EIS.
To assist the Forest Service in
identifying and considering issues and
concerns on the proposed action,
comments on the draft EIS should be as
specific as possible. It is also helpful if
comments refer to specific pages or
chapters of the draft statement.
Comments may also address the
adequacy of the draft EIS of the merits
of the alternatives formulated and
discussed in the statement. Reviewers
may wish to refer to the Council on
Environmental Quality Regulations for
implementing the procedural provisions
of the National Environmental Policy
Act at 40 CFR 1503.3 in addressing
these points.
In the final EIS, the Forest Service is
required to respond to substantive
comments received during the comment
period for the draft EIS. The Forest
Service is the lead agency and the
responsible official is the Forest
Supervisor, Deschutes National Forest.
The responsible official will decide
where and whether or not to apply
natural fuels treatments, thin stands,
and reforest group cuts. The responsible
official will also decide how to mitigate
impacts of these actions and will
determine when and how monitoring of
effects will take place.
The Ogden Landscape Vegetation
Management decision and the reasons
for the decision will be documented in
the record of decision, which will be
subject to Forest Service Appeal
Regulations (35 CFR Part 215).
Dated: December 18, 2009.
John Allen,
Forest Supervisor, Deschutes National Forest.
[FR Doc. E9–30744 Filed 12–30–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–11–M
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Klamath National Forest, CA, Johnny
O’Neil Late-Successional Reserve
(LSR) Habitat Restoration and Fuel
Reduction Project
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\31DEN1.SGM
Forest Service, USDA.
31DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 250 (Thursday, December 31, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 69325-69326]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-30744]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Bend/Ft. Rock Ranger District; Deschutes National Forest;
Deschutes County, OR; Ogden Landscape Vegetation Management Project EIS
AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact statement.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The USDA, Forest Service, will prepare an environmental impact
statement (EIS) on a proposed action to promote development of large
tree structural conditions and to improve forest health and fuel
conditions within the 26,500-acre Ogden Landscape planning area. The
planning area is located to the west of and adjacent to the Newberry
National Volcanic Monument and to private lands to the east of State
Highway 97, south of Forest road 9735 and north of Forest road 22. The
planning area is all within public lands managed by the Deschutes
National Forest. An analysis has been initiated that takes a landscape
approach to managing the vegetation to meet objectives for resilient
forest, fuels and fire behavior, and wildlife habitat. Methods that
would be used to reduce tree density and hazardous fuels are: Non-
commercial and commercial thinning, mechanical shrub treatment, and
prescribed burning. The alternatives will include the proposed action,
no action, and, if necessary, additional alternatives that respond to
issues generated through the scoping process. The agency will give
notice of the full environmental analysis and decision-making process
so interested and affected public may participate and contribute to the
final decision.
DATES: Comments concerning the scope of the analysis must be received
by 30 days following the date that this notice appears in the Federal
Register.
ADDRESSES: Send written comments to Shane Jeffries, District Ranger,
Bend-Fort Rock Ranger District, Red Oaks Square, 1230 NE. Third Street
Suite A-262, Bend, Oregon 97701.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Beth Peer, Environmental Coordinator,
Bend-Fort Rock Ranger District, Red Oaks Square, 1230 NE. Third Street
Suite A-262, Bend, Oregon 97701, phone (541) 383-4769.
Responsible Official: The responsible official is John Allen,
Forest Supervisor, Deschutes National Forest, 1001 SW. Emkay Dr., Bend,
OR 97701.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background. This Central Oregon landscape is
a priority for restoration. There are many high-value areas within and
adjacent to the project area: Paulina Creek which bisects the planning
area from east to west is eligible for the National Wild and Scenic
Rivers System; popular sites such as McKay, Ogden, and Prairie
Campgrounds and the Peter Skeen Ogden National Scenic Trail provide
diverse opportunities for recreation; and the primary access into and
out of Newberry Crater and the Newberry National Monument passes
through the project area. The project area also provides habitat for
goshawk and other Management Indicator Species. High fuel loads and the
presence of ladder of fuels puts these areas at risk to a large scale
wildfire.
The amount of late and old structure ponderosa pine is far below
the historic range of variability. A majority of the planning area is
second-growth ponderosa pine, which has grown in following historic
logging in the 1920s to 1940s. Portions of the area have been
[[Page 69326]]
thinned dating from the 1960s to as recently as 2009. In thinned and
unthinned areas, tree growth is increasing stand density relative to
stocking capacity of the site. Densities are affecting tree diameter
growth and creating conditions favorable for mountain pine beetle
attack. In some cases, lodgepole has been established and is adversely
affecting the growth of ponderosa pine. There are also areas of pure
lodgepole pine that are either mature stands, or have been regenerated
in the recent past. Mixed conifer stands are a smaller component of the
landscape and are primarily ponderosa pine with a mix of lodgepole pine
and white fir.
Purpose and Need. The general purpose of entering the project area
is to move the area towards a more resilient landscape and provide a
diversity of habitats closer to what historically occurred. There is a
need to reduce forest vegetation density and fuels to increase
resilience to insects, disease, and stand-replacing fire, and to
increase the proportion of LOS ponderosa pine. Currently, values
associated with the landscape are susceptible to a wide-scale
disturbance. The Deschutes National Forest Land and Resource Management
Plan supports proactive maintenance and enhancing the vigor of the
forest in preventing a stand replacement event rather than waiting.
There is a need to contribute to the local and regional economies
by providing timber and other wood fiber products and associated jobs.
The Deschutes National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan
supports management of timber resources and recognizes the value in a
way that is consistent with other resource objectives, environmental
constraints, and economic efficiency.
Proposed Action. The Forest Service proposes to implement
activities across approximately 14,600 acres within the Ogden
Landscape. Treatments (commercial and non-commercial thinning) will
provide a diversity of habitat structures that are more in line with
historical conditions. Thinning will maintain large trees that are
present and encourage the development of late and old structure
characteristics in stands where not currently present. Shrub mowing
will reduce surface and ladder fuels and allow fire to be used as an
ecological restoration tool. Prescribed fire will be applied in the
fire-dependent ecosystems to reduce fuels, maintain habitat, and allow
fire to perform its natural ecological function. Treatments are
designed to address the objectives for each stand type and are
strategically located across the area to break up fuel continuity.
Issues. Preliminary issues include the potential effect of the
proposed action on cultural resources, developed and dispersed
recreation, noxious weeds, air quality, and wildlife habitat.
Comment. Public comments regarding this proposal are requested in
order to assist in identifying issues, determine how to best manage the
resources, and to focus the analysis. Comments received to this notice,
including names and addresses of those who comment, will be considered
part of the public record on this proposed action and will be available
for public inspection. Comments submitted anonymously will be accepted
and considered; however, those who submit anonymous comments will not
have standing to appeal the subsequent decision in accordance with 36
CFR parts 215 and 217. Additionally, pursuant to 7 CFR 1.27(d), any
person may request the agency to withhold a submission from the public
record by showing how the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) permits
such confidentiality. Persons requesting such confidentiality should be
aware that, under FOIA, confidentiality may be granted in only very
limited circumstances, such as to protect trade secrets. The Forest
Service will inform the requester of the agency's decision regarding
the request for confidentiality, and where the request is denied, the
agency will return the submission and notify the requester that the
comments may be resubmitted with or without name and address within a
specified number of days.
A draft EIS will be filed with the Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) and available for public review by October 2010. The EPA will
publish a Notice of Availability (NOA) of the draft EIS in the Federal
Register. The final EIS is scheduled to be available February 2011.
The comment period on the draft EIS will be 45 days from the date
the EPA publishes the notice of availability in the Federal Register.
The Forest Service believes, at this early stage, it is important
to give reviewers notice of several court rulings related to public
participation in the environmental review process. First, reviewers of
a draft EIS must structure their participation in the environmental
review of the proposal so that it is meaningful and alerts an agency to
the reviewer's position and contentions [Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power
Corp. v. NRDC, 435 U.S. 519, 553 (1978)]. Also, environmental
objections that could be raised at the draft EIS stage but that are not
raised until after completion of the final EIS may be waived or
dismissed by the courts [City of Angoon v. Harris, 490 F. Supp. 1334,
1338 (E.D. Wis. 1980)]. Because of these court rulings, it is very
important that those interested in this proposed action participate by
the close of the 45-day comment period so that substantive comments and
objections are made available to the Forest Service at a time when it
can meaningfully consider them and respond to them in the final EIS.
To assist the Forest Service in identifying and considering issues
and concerns on the proposed action, comments on the draft EIS should
be as specific as possible. It is also helpful if comments refer to
specific pages or chapters of the draft statement. Comments may also
address the adequacy of the draft EIS of the merits of the alternatives
formulated and discussed in the statement. Reviewers may wish to refer
to the Council on Environmental Quality Regulations for implementing
the procedural provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act at
40 CFR 1503.3 in addressing these points.
In the final EIS, the Forest Service is required to respond to
substantive comments received during the comment period for the draft
EIS. The Forest Service is the lead agency and the responsible official
is the Forest Supervisor, Deschutes National Forest. The responsible
official will decide where and whether or not to apply natural fuels
treatments, thin stands, and reforest group cuts. The responsible
official will also decide how to mitigate impacts of these actions and
will determine when and how monitoring of effects will take place.
The Ogden Landscape Vegetation Management decision and the reasons
for the decision will be documented in the record of decision, which
will be subject to Forest Service Appeal Regulations (35 CFR Part 215).
Dated: December 18, 2009.
John Allen,
Forest Supervisor, Deschutes National Forest.
[FR Doc. E9-30744 Filed 12-30-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M