Airworthiness Directives; Empresa Brasileira de Aeronautica S.A. (EMBRAER) Model ERJ 170 Airplanes, and Model ERJ 190-100 LR, -100 IGW, -100 STD, -200 STD, -200 LR, and -200 IGW Airplanes, 69262-69264 [E9-30705]
Download as PDF
69262
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 250 / Thursday, December 31, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
ANM–116, Transport Airplane Directorate,
FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057–3356; telephone (425)
227–1175; fax (425) 227–1149. Before using
any approved AMOC on any airplane to
which the AMOC applies, notify your
principal maintenance inspector (PMI) or
principal avionics inspector (PAI), as
appropriate, or lacking a principal inspector,
your local Flight Standards District Office.
The AMOC approval letter must specifically
reference this AD.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement
in this AD to obtain corrective actions from
a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective
actions are considered FAA-approved if they
are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required
to assure the product is airworthy before it
is returned to service.
(3) Reporting Requirements: For any
reporting requirement in this AD, under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) has
approved the information collection
requirements and has assigned OMB Control
Number 2120–0056.
Related Information
(h) Refer to MCAI European Aviation
Safety Agency Airworthiness Directive 2009–
0113, dated May 27, 2009; and Airbus
Mandatory Service Bulletin A380–57–8016,
dated May 11, 2009; for related information.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
Material Incorporated by Reference
(i) You must use Airbus Mandatory Service
Bulletin A380–57–8016, dated May 11, 2009,
to do the actions required by this AD, unless
the AD specifies otherwise.
(1) The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference of
this service information under 5 U.S.C.
552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Airbus SAS—EANA
(Airworthiness Office); 1 Rond Point Maurice
Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France;
telephone +33 562 110 253; Fax +33 562 110
307; e-mail account.airworthA380@airbus.com; Internet https://
www.airbus.com.
(3) You may review copies of the service
information at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call
425–227–1221 or 425–227–1152.
(4) You may also review copies of the
service information that is incorporated by
reference at the National Archives and
Records Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call 202–741–6030, or go
to: https://www.archives.gov/federal_register/
code_of_federal_regulations/
ibr_locations.html.
Issued in Renton, Washington on
December 16, 2009.
Stephen P. Boyd,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E9–30700 Filed 12–30–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:48 Dec 30, 2009
Jkt 220001
[Docket No. FAA–2009–0412; Directorate
Identifier 2009–NM–022–AD; Amendment
39–16154; AD 2009–26–15]
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kenny Kaulia, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057–3356; telephone
(425) 227–2848; fax (425) 227–1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
RIN 2120–AA64
Discussion
Airworthiness Directives; Empresa
Brasileira de Aeronautica S.A.
(EMBRAER) Model ERJ 170 Airplanes,
and Model ERJ 190–100 LR, –100 IGW,
–100 STD, –200 STD, –200 LR, and
–200 IGW Airplanes
We issued a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an AD that would
apply to the specified products. That
NPRM was published in the Federal
Register on May 5, 2009 (74 FR 20659).
That NPRM proposed to correct an
unsafe condition for the specified
products. The mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI)
2008–10–04 states:
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
AGENCY: Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
SUMMARY: We are adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This AD results
from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI)
originated by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct
an unsafe condition on an aviation
product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as:
It has been found the possibility of some
aluminum fasteners having been installed
instead of titanium ones at bulkhead 1 of the
LH (left-hand) and RH (right-hand) pylons of
some [Embraer ERJ 170 and] Embraer ERJ 190
aircraft models. * * *
*
*
*
*
*
The unsafe condition for Model 170
airplanes is structural damage in the
case of bird impact in the region of
bulkhead 1 of the pylons, which could
adversely affect continued safe flight
and landing. The unsafe condition for
Model 190 airplanes is damage to the
hydraulic lines and electrical generator
power cables in the case of bird impact
in the region of bulkhead 1 of the
pylons, which might lead to presence of
fire without indication to the flightcrew.
We are issuing this AD to require
actions to correct the unsafe condition
on these products.
DATES: This AD becomes effective
February 4, 2010.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of certain publications listed in this AD
as of February 4, 2010.
ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD
docket on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov or in person at the
U.S. Department of Transportation,
Docket Operations, M–30, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC.
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
It has been found the possibility of some
aluminum fasteners having been installed
instead of titanium ones at bulkhead 1 of the
LH and RH pylons of some Embraer ERJ 170
aircraft models. The structural integrity of the
region where these fasteners are installed
may be affected in case of bird impact.
*
*
*
*
*
MCAI 2008–09–02 states:
It has been found the possibility of some
aluminum fasteners having been installed
instead of titanium ones at bulkhead 1 of the
LH (left-hand) and RH (right-hand) pylons of
some Embraer ERJ 190 aircraft models. In the
case of a bird strike in the pylon bulkhead
1 equipped with aluminum fasteners there is
the possibility where the impact may affect
some equipments installed in the region after
the bulkhead 1. Damages to the hydraulic
lines and electrical generator power cables
may lead to presence of fire in the region,
without indication to the flight crew.
*
*
*
*
*
The unsafe condition for Model 170
airplanes is structural damage in the
case of bird impact in the region of
bulkhead 1 of the pylons, which could
adversely affect continued safe flight
and landing. The unsafe condition for
Model 190 airplanes is damage to the
hydraulic lines and electrical generator
power cables in the case of bird impact
in the region of bulkhead 1 of the
pylons, which might lead to presence of
fire without indication to the flightcrew.
Corrective actions include inspecting for
the presence of aluminum fasteners at
pylon bulkhead 1, and replacing all
aluminum fasteners with titanium
fasteners. You may obtain further
information by examining the MCAI in
the AD docket.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to
participate in developing this AD. We
considered the comment received from
Embraer, the manufacturer.
E:\FR\FM\31DER1.SGM
31DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 250 / Thursday, December 31, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
Support for AD on Model ERJ 190
Airplanes
Embraer supports the AD on Model
ERJ 190 airplanes due to the system
design characteristics of that model.
Embraer states that a bird strike could
lead to hydraulic fluid leakage
associated with damage to the electrical
generator power cables, a situation that
would be favorable to fire in a section
of the airplane that is not equipped with
fire detection or suppression systems.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
Request To Exclude Model ERJ 170
Airplanes
Embraer does not agree that an unsafe
condition exists for Model ERJ 170
airplanes. Embraer states that, unlike
Model ERJ 190 airplanes, Model ERJ 170
airplanes do not have hydraulic system
or electrical generator power cables
passing through the pylon forward
position, where the aluminum fasteners
were installed. The fuel system is
installed behind two reinforced
structural frames. Embraer states that in
the event of a bird strike, the fuel system
would unlikely be reached by any part
of a bird with sufficient energy to cause
any damage. Embraer states that this
situation is extremely improbable.
From this comment we infer that
Embraer is requesting that we remove
Model ERJ 170 airplanes from the
applicability of the NPRM. We do not
agree. The subject unsafe condition
exists for the affected Model ERJ 170
airplanes. We consulted with the issuer
ˆ
of the MCAI, Agencia Nacional de
Aviacao Civil (ANAC). ANAC states that
¸˜
the structure in this region does not
have sufficient residual strength for
continued safe flight in case of bird
impact. We concur with ANAC that an
unsafe condition exists for the affected
ERJ 170 aircraft models due to the
aluminum fasteners installed in the
subject area. The purpose of this AD is
to ensure that the affected structure has
sufficient residual strength for
continued safe flight and landing of the
airplane following a bird strike, which
the manufacturer has not demonstrated.
We have not changed the AD in this
regard. However, we have clarified the
unsafe condition for the Model ERJ 170
airplanes in the Summary, Discussion,
and paragraph (e) of this AD.
Request To Exclude Model ERJ 190–ECJ
Airplanes
Embraer requests that we remove
Model ERJ 190–ECJ airplanes from the
applicability of the NPRM because the
model is not included in the effectivity
of Embraer Service Bulletin 190–54–
0008, dated December 21, 2007.
We agree to remove Model ERJ 190–
ECJ from the applicability of this AD.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:48 Dec 30, 2009
Jkt 220001
We have confirmed with the
manufacturer that this model does not
have aluminum fasteners installed in
the subject location. Therefore, we have
removed that model from paragraph (c)
of this AD.
Conclusion
We reviewed the available data,
including the comment received, and
determined that air safety and the
public interest require adopting the AD
with the change described previously.
We determined that this change will not
increase the economic burden on any
operator or increase the scope of the AD.
Differences Between This AD and the
MCAI or Service Information
We have reviewed the MCAI and
related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But
we might have found it necessary to use
different words from those in the MCAI
to ensure the AD is clear for U.S.
operators and is enforceable. In making
these changes, we do not intend to differ
substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related
service information.
We might also have required different
actions in this AD from those in the
MCAI in order to follow our FAA
policies. Any such differences are
highlighted in a NOTE within the AD.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD will affect
20 products of U.S. registry. We also
estimate that it will take about 2 workhours per product to comply with the
basic requirements of this AD. The
average labor rate is $80 per work-hour.
Based on these figures, we estimate the
cost of this AD to the U.S. operators to
be $3,200, or $160 per product.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
69263
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this AD will not
have federalism implications under
Executive Order 13132. This AD will
not have a substantial direct effect on
the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify this AD:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation
of the estimated costs to comply with
this AD and placed it in the AD docket.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Operations office between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains the NPRM, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The street address for
the Docket Operations office (telephone
(800) 647–5527) is in the ADDRESSES
section. Comments will be available in
the AD docket shortly after receipt.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as
follows:
■
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new AD:
■
2009–26–15 Empresa Brasileira de
Aeronautica S.A. (EMBRAER):
Amendment 39–16154. Docket No.
FAA–2009–0412; Directorate Identifier
2009–NM–022–AD.
E:\FR\FM\31DER1.SGM
31DER1
69264
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 250 / Thursday, December 31, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
Effective Date
(a) This airworthiness directive (AD)
becomes effective February 4, 2010.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to EMBRAER Model
ERJ 170–100 LR, –100 STD, –100 SE, –100
SU, –200 LR, –200 STD, and –200 SU
airplanes, certificated in any category, serial
numbers 17000156 through 17000169
inclusive; and Model ERJ 190–100 LR, –100
IGW, –100 STD, –200 STD, –200 LR, and
–200 IGW airplanes, certificated in any
category, serial numbers 19000047 through
19000089 inclusive.
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 54: Nacelles/Pylons.
Reason
(e) Brazilian Airworthiness Directive 2008–
09–02, effective September 30, 2008, states:
It has been found the possibility of some
aluminum fasteners having been installed
instead of titanium ones at bulkhead 1 of the
LH (left-hand) and RH (right-hand) pylons of
some Embraer ERJ 190 aircraft models. In the
case of a bird strike in the pylon bulkhead
1 equipped with aluminum fasteners there is
the possibility where the impact may affect
some equipments installed in the region after
the bulkhead 1. Damages to the hydraulic
lines and electrical generator power cables
may lead to presence of fire in the region,
without indication to the flight crew.
*
*
*
*
*
Brazilian Airworthiness Directive 2008–10–
04, effective November 10, 2008, states:
It has been found the possibility of some
aluminum fasteners having been installed
instead of titanium ones at bulkhead 1 of the
LH and RH pylons of some Embraer ERJ 170
aircraft models. The structural integrity of the
region where these fasteners are installed
may be affected in case of bird impact.
*
*
*
*
*
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
The unsafe condition for Model 170 airplanes
is structural damage in the case of bird
impact in the region of bulkhead 1 of the
pylons, which could adversely affect
continued safe flight and landing. The unsafe
condition for Model 190 airplanes is damage
to the hydraulic lines and electrical generator
power cables in the case of bird impact in the
region of bulkhead 1 of the pylons, which
might lead to presence of fire without
indication to the flight crew. Corrective
actions include inspecting for the presence of
aluminum fasteners at pylon bulkhead 1, and
replacing all aluminum fasteners with
titanium fasteners.
Actions and Compliance
(f) Unless already done, do the following
actions.
(1) Within 5,000 flight cycles after the
effective date of this AD: Inspect the fasteners
in bulkhead 1 of the left- and right-hand
pylons for the presence of aluminum
fasteners, in accordance with Part I of the
Accomplishment Instructions of Embraer
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:48 Dec 30, 2009
Jkt 220001
Service Bulletin 170–54–0007 or 190–54–
0008, both dated December 21, 2007; as
applicable. If no aluminum fastener is found,
this AD requires no further action.
(2) If any aluminum fastener is found,
before further flight after the inspection
required by paragraph (f)(1) of this AD:
Replace any aluminum fastener with a
titanium fastener in accordance with Part II
of the Accomplishment Instructions of
Embraer Service Bulletin 170–54–0007 or
190–54–0008, both dated December 21, 2007;
as applicable.
FAA AD Differences
Note 1: This AD differs from the MCAI
and/or service information as follows: No
differences.
Other FAA AD Provisions
(g) The following provisions also apply to
this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, International
Branch, ANM–116, Transport Airplane
Directorate, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
Send information to ATTN: Kenny Kaulia,
Aerospace Engineer, International Branch,
ANM–116, Transport Airplane Directorate,
FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057–3356; telephone (425)
227–2848; fax (425) 227–1149. Before using
any approved AMOC on any airplane to
which the AMOC applies, notify your
principal maintenance inspector (PMI) or
principal avionics inspector (PAI), as
appropriate, or lacking a principal inspector,
your local Flight Standards District Office.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement
in this AD to obtain corrective actions from
a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective
actions are considered FAA-approved if they
are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required
to assure the product is airworthy before it
is returned to service.
(3) Reporting Requirements: For any
reporting requirement in this AD, under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) has
approved the information collection
requirements and has assigned OMB Control
Number 2120–0056.
Related Information
(h) Refer to MCAI Brazilian Airworthiness
Directive 2008–09–02, effective September
30, 2008; MCAI Brazilian Airworthiness
Directive 2008–10–04, effective November
10, 2008; and Embraer Service Bulletins 170–
54–0007 and 190–54–0008, both dated
December 21, 2007; for related information.
Material Incorporated by Reference
(i) You must use Embraer Service Bulletin
170–54–0007, dated December 21, 2007; or
Embraer Service Bulletin 190–54–0008, dated
December 21, 2007; as applicable; to do the
actions required by this AD, unless the AD
specifies otherwise.
(1) The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference of
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
this service information under 5 U.S.C.
552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Empresa Brasileira de
Aeronautica S.A. (EMBRAER), Technical
Publications Section (PC 060), Av. Brigadeiro
˜
Faria Lima, 2170—Putim—12227–901 Sao
Jose dos Campos—SP—BRASIL; telephone:
+55 12 3927–5852 or +55 12 3309–0732; fax:
+55 12 3927–7546; e-mail:
distrib@embraer.com.br; Internet: https://
www.flyembraer.com.
(3) You may review copies of the service
information at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call
425–227–1221 or 425–227–1152.
(4) You may also review copies of the
service information that is incorporated by
reference at the National Archives and
Records Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call 202–741–6030, or go
to: https://www.archives.gov/federal_register/
code_of_federal_regulations/
ibr_locations.html.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on
December 16, 2009.
Stephen P. Boyd,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E9–30705 Filed 12–30–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2009–1210; Directorate
Identifier 2009–NM–165–AD; Amendment
39–16148; AD 2008–10–09 R1]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing
Company Model 737–100, –200, –200C,
–300, –400, and –500 Series Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule; request for
comments.
SUMMARY: The FAA is revising an
existing airworthiness directive (AD),
which applies to all Model 737–100,
–200, –200C, –300, –400, and –500
series airplanes. That AD currently
requires revising the FAA-approved
maintenance program to incorporate
new airworthiness limitations (AWLs)
for fuel tank systems to satisfy Special
Federal Aviation Regulation No. 88
requirements. That AD also requires an
initial inspection to phase in certain
repetitive AWL inspections, and repair
if necessary. This AD clarifies the
intended effect of the AD on spare and
E:\FR\FM\31DER1.SGM
31DER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 250 (Thursday, December 31, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 69262-69264]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-30705]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2009-0412; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-022-AD;
Amendment 39-16154; AD 2009-26-15]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Empresa Brasileira de Aeronautica S.A.
(EMBRAER) Model ERJ 170 Airplanes, and Model ERJ 190-100 LR, -100 IGW,
-100 STD, -200 STD, -200 LR, and -200 IGW Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This AD results from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an
aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as:
It has been found the possibility of some aluminum fasteners
having been installed instead of titanium ones at bulkhead 1 of the
LH (left-hand) and RH (right-hand) pylons of some [Embraer ERJ 170
and] Embraer ERJ 190 aircraft models. * * *
* * * * *
The unsafe condition for Model 170 airplanes is structural damage in
the case of bird impact in the region of bulkhead 1 of the pylons,
which could adversely affect continued safe flight and landing. The
unsafe condition for Model 190 airplanes is damage to the hydraulic
lines and electrical generator power cables in the case of bird impact
in the region of bulkhead 1 of the pylons, which might lead to presence
of fire without indication to the flightcrew. We are issuing this AD to
require actions to correct the unsafe condition on these products.
DATES: This AD becomes effective February 4, 2010.
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of certain publications listed in this AD as of February 4,
2010.
ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov or in person at the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kenny Kaulia, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425)
227-2848; fax (425) 227-1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an AD that would apply to the specified products.
That NPRM was published in the Federal Register on May 5, 2009 (74 FR
20659). That NPRM proposed to correct an unsafe condition for the
specified products. The mandatory continuing airworthiness information
(MCAI) 2008-10-04 states:
It has been found the possibility of some aluminum fasteners
having been installed instead of titanium ones at bulkhead 1 of the
LH and RH pylons of some Embraer ERJ 170 aircraft models. The
structural integrity of the region where these fasteners are
installed may be affected in case of bird impact.
* * * * *
MCAI 2008-09-02 states:
It has been found the possibility of some aluminum fasteners
having been installed instead of titanium ones at bulkhead 1 of the
LH (left-hand) and RH (right-hand) pylons of some Embraer ERJ 190
aircraft models. In the case of a bird strike in the pylon bulkhead
1 equipped with aluminum fasteners there is the possibility where
the impact may affect some equipments installed in the region after
the bulkhead 1. Damages to the hydraulic lines and electrical
generator power cables may lead to presence of fire in the region,
without indication to the flight crew.
* * * * *
The unsafe condition for Model 170 airplanes is structural damage in
the case of bird impact in the region of bulkhead 1 of the pylons,
which could adversely affect continued safe flight and landing. The
unsafe condition for Model 190 airplanes is damage to the hydraulic
lines and electrical generator power cables in the case of bird impact
in the region of bulkhead 1 of the pylons, which might lead to presence
of fire without indication to the flightcrew. Corrective actions
include inspecting for the presence of aluminum fasteners at pylon
bulkhead 1, and replacing all aluminum fasteners with titanium
fasteners. You may obtain further information by examining the MCAI in
the AD docket.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. We considered the comment received from Embraer, the
manufacturer.
[[Page 69263]]
Support for AD on Model ERJ 190 Airplanes
Embraer supports the AD on Model ERJ 190 airplanes due to the
system design characteristics of that model. Embraer states that a bird
strike could lead to hydraulic fluid leakage associated with damage to
the electrical generator power cables, a situation that would be
favorable to fire in a section of the airplane that is not equipped
with fire detection or suppression systems.
Request To Exclude Model ERJ 170 Airplanes
Embraer does not agree that an unsafe condition exists for Model
ERJ 170 airplanes. Embraer states that, unlike Model ERJ 190 airplanes,
Model ERJ 170 airplanes do not have hydraulic system or electrical
generator power cables passing through the pylon forward position,
where the aluminum fasteners were installed. The fuel system is
installed behind two reinforced structural frames. Embraer states that
in the event of a bird strike, the fuel system would unlikely be
reached by any part of a bird with sufficient energy to cause any
damage. Embraer states that this situation is extremely improbable.
From this comment we infer that Embraer is requesting that we
remove Model ERJ 170 airplanes from the applicability of the NPRM. We
do not agree. The subject unsafe condition exists for the affected
Model ERJ 170 airplanes. We consulted with the issuer of the MCAI,
Ag[ecirc]ncia Nacional de Avia[ccedil][atilde]o Civil (ANAC). ANAC
states that the structure in this region does not have sufficient
residual strength for continued safe flight in case of bird impact. We
concur with ANAC that an unsafe condition exists for the affected ERJ
170 aircraft models due to the aluminum fasteners installed in the
subject area. The purpose of this AD is to ensure that the affected
structure has sufficient residual strength for continued safe flight
and landing of the airplane following a bird strike, which the
manufacturer has not demonstrated. We have not changed the AD in this
regard. However, we have clarified the unsafe condition for the Model
ERJ 170 airplanes in the Summary, Discussion, and paragraph (e) of this
AD.
Request To Exclude Model ERJ 190-ECJ Airplanes
Embraer requests that we remove Model ERJ 190-ECJ airplanes from
the applicability of the NPRM because the model is not included in the
effectivity of Embraer Service Bulletin 190-54-0008, dated December 21,
2007.
We agree to remove Model ERJ 190-ECJ from the applicability of this
AD. We have confirmed with the manufacturer that this model does not
have aluminum fasteners installed in the subject location. Therefore,
we have removed that model from paragraph (c) of this AD.
Conclusion
We reviewed the available data, including the comment received, and
determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting the
AD with the change described previously. We determined that this change
will not increase the economic burden on any operator or increase the
scope of the AD.
Differences Between This AD and the MCAI or Service Information
We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it
necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the
AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these
changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related service information.
We might also have required different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow our FAA policies. Any such differences
are highlighted in a NOTE within the AD.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD will affect 20 products of U.S. registry.
We also estimate that it will take about 2 work-hours per product to
comply with the basic requirements of this AD. The average labor rate
is $80 per work-hour. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of
this AD to the U.S. operators to be $3,200, or $160 per product.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this AD:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this AD and placed it in the AD docket.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains the NPRM, the regulatory evaluation,
any comments received, and other information. The street address for
the Docket Operations office (telephone (800) 647-5527) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
0
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new AD:
2009-26-15 Empresa Brasileira de Aeronautica S.A. (EMBRAER):
Amendment 39-16154. Docket No. FAA-2009-0412; Directorate Identifier
2009-NM-022-AD.
[[Page 69264]]
Effective Date
(a) This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes effective February
4, 2010.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to EMBRAER Model ERJ 170-100 LR, -100 STD, -
100 SE, -100 SU, -200 LR, -200 STD, and -200 SU airplanes,
certificated in any category, serial numbers 17000156 through
17000169 inclusive; and Model ERJ 190-100 LR, -100 IGW, -100 STD, -
200 STD, -200 LR, and -200 IGW airplanes, certificated in any
category, serial numbers 19000047 through 19000089 inclusive.
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 54:
Nacelles/Pylons.
Reason
(e) Brazilian Airworthiness Directive 2008-09-02, effective
September 30, 2008, states:
It has been found the possibility of some aluminum fasteners
having been installed instead of titanium ones at bulkhead 1 of the
LH (left-hand) and RH (right-hand) pylons of some Embraer ERJ 190
aircraft models. In the case of a bird strike in the pylon bulkhead
1 equipped with aluminum fasteners there is the possibility where
the impact may affect some equipments installed in the region after
the bulkhead 1. Damages to the hydraulic lines and electrical
generator power cables may lead to presence of fire in the region,
without indication to the flight crew.
* * * * *
Brazilian Airworthiness Directive 2008-10-04, effective November 10,
2008, states:
It has been found the possibility of some aluminum fasteners
having been installed instead of titanium ones at bulkhead 1 of the
LH and RH pylons of some Embraer ERJ 170 aircraft models. The
structural integrity of the region where these fasteners are
installed may be affected in case of bird impact.
* * * * *
The unsafe condition for Model 170 airplanes is structural damage in
the case of bird impact in the region of bulkhead 1 of the pylons,
which could adversely affect continued safe flight and landing. The
unsafe condition for Model 190 airplanes is damage to the hydraulic
lines and electrical generator power cables in the case of bird
impact in the region of bulkhead 1 of the pylons, which might lead
to presence of fire without indication to the flight crew.
Corrective actions include inspecting for the presence of aluminum
fasteners at pylon bulkhead 1, and replacing all aluminum fasteners
with titanium fasteners.
Actions and Compliance
(f) Unless already done, do the following actions.
(1) Within 5,000 flight cycles after the effective date of this
AD: Inspect the fasteners in bulkhead 1 of the left- and right-hand
pylons for the presence of aluminum fasteners, in accordance with
Part I of the Accomplishment Instructions of Embraer Service
Bulletin 170-54-0007 or 190-54-0008, both dated December 21, 2007;
as applicable. If no aluminum fastener is found, this AD requires no
further action.
(2) If any aluminum fastener is found, before further flight
after the inspection required by paragraph (f)(1) of this AD:
Replace any aluminum fastener with a titanium fastener in accordance
with Part II of the Accomplishment Instructions of Embraer Service
Bulletin 170-54-0007 or 190-54-0008, both dated December 21, 2007;
as applicable.
FAA AD Differences
Note 1: This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service information
as follows: No differences.
Other FAA AD Provisions
(g) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using
the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to ATTN:
Kenny Kaulia, Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, ANM-116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425) 227-2848; fax (425) 227-1149.
Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC
applies, notify your principal maintenance inspector (PMI) or
principal avionics inspector (PAI), as appropriate, or lacking a
principal inspector, your local Flight Standards District Office.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
(3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in
this AD, under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has
approved the information collection requirements and has assigned
OMB Control Number 2120-0056.
Related Information
(h) Refer to MCAI Brazilian Airworthiness Directive 2008-09-02,
effective September 30, 2008; MCAI Brazilian Airworthiness Directive
2008-10-04, effective November 10, 2008; and Embraer Service
Bulletins 170-54-0007 and 190-54-0008, both dated December 21, 2007;
for related information.
Material Incorporated by Reference
(i) You must use Embraer Service Bulletin 170-54-0007, dated
December 21, 2007; or Embraer Service Bulletin 190-54-0008, dated
December 21, 2007; as applicable; to do the actions required by this
AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of this service information under 5
U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Empresa Brasileira de Aeronautica S.A. (EMBRAER), Technical
Publications Section (PC 060), Av. Brigadeiro Faria Lima, 2170--
Putim--12227-901 S[atilde]o Jose dos Campos--SP--BRASIL; telephone:
+55 12 3927-5852 or +55 12 3309-0732; fax: +55 12 3927-7546; e-mail:
distrib@embraer.com.br; Internet: https://www.flyembraer.com.
(3) You may review copies of the service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the availability of this material at
the FAA, call 425-227-1221 or 425-227-1152.
(4) You may also review copies of the service information that
is incorporated by reference at the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: https://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on December 16, 2009.
Stephen P. Boyd,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. E9-30705 Filed 12-30-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P