Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree Under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, 69147-69148 [E9-30960]
Download as PDF
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 249 / Wednesday, December 30, 2009 / Notices
investigation. No petitions for review
were filed.
EST is the last remaining respondent
in this investigation. The investigation
has been terminated with respect to all
other respondents based on consent
order and default.
Section 337(g)(1) and Commission
Rule 210.16(c) authorize the
Commission to order relief against a
respondent found in default unless,
after consideration of the public-interest
factors, it finds that such relief should
not issue. UneMed has declared,
pursuant to Commission Rule
210.16(c)(2), that it does not seek a
general exclusion order.
In conjunction with the final
disposition of this investigation,
therefore, the Commission may: (1)
Issue an order that could result in the
exclusion of articles manufactured or
imported by any or all of the defaulting
respondents; and/or (2) issue one or
more cease and desist orders that could
result in any or all of the defaulting
respondents being required to cease and
desist from engaging in unfair acts in
the importation and sale of such
articles. Accordingly, the Commission is
interested in receiving written
submissions that address the form of
remedy, if any, that should be ordered.
If a party seeks exclusion of an article
from entry into the United States for
purposes other than entry for
consumption, the party should so
indicate and provide information
establishing that activities involving
other types of entry either are adversely
affecting it or likely to do so. For
background, see In the Matter of Certain
Devices for Connecting Computers via
Telephone Lines, Inv. No. 337–TA–360,
USITC Pub. No. 2843 (December 1994)
(Commission Opinion).
If the Commission contemplates some
form of remedy, it must consider the
effects of that remedy upon the public
interest. The factors the Commission
will consider include the effect that an
exclusion order and/or cease and desist
orders would have on (1) the public
health and welfare, (2) competitive
conditions in the U.S. economy, (3) U.S.
production of articles that are like or
directly competitive with those that are
subject to investigation, and (4) U.S.
consumers. The Commission is
therefore interested in receiving written
submissions that address the
aforementioned public interest factors
in the context of this investigation.
If the Commission orders some form
of remedy, the U.S. Trade
Representative, as delegated by the
President, has 60 days to approve or
disapprove the Commission’s action.
See Presidential Memorandum of July
VerDate Nov<24>2008
19:01 Dec 29, 2009
Jkt 220001
21, 2005, 70 FR 43251 (July 26, 2005).
During this period, the subject articles
would be entitled to enter the United
States under bond, in an amount
determined by the Commission and
prescribed by the Secretary of the
Treasury. The Commission is therefore
interested in receiving submissions
concerning the amount of the bond that
should be imposed if a remedy is
ordered.
Written Submissions: The parties to
the investigation, interested government
agencies, and any other interested
parties, are encouraged to file written
submissions on the issues of remedy,
the public interest, and bonding.
Complainants and the Commission
investigative attorney are also requested
to submit proposed remedial orders for
the Commission’s consideration.
Complainants are further requested to
state the dates that any relevant
intellectual property rights terminate
and the HTSUS numbers under which
the accused products are imported. The
written submissions and proposed
remedial orders must be filed no later
than close of business on January 6,
2010. Reply submissions must be filed
no later than the close of business on
January 18, 2010. No further
submissions on these issues will be
permitted unless otherwise ordered by
the Commission.
Persons filing written submissions
must file the original document and 12
true copies thereof with the Office of the
Secretary on or before the
aforementioned deadlines. Any person
desiring to submit a document to the
Commission in confidence must request
confidential treatment unless the
information has already been granted
such treatment during the proceedings.
All such requests should be directed to
the Secretary of the Commission and
must include a full statement of the
reasons why the Commission should
grant such treatment. See 19 CFR 201.6.
Documents for which confidential
treatment by the Commission is sought
will be treated accordingly. All
nonconfidential written submissions
will be available for public inspection at
the Office of the Secretary.
The authority for the Commission’s
determination is contained in section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in
section 210.16 and 210.42–46 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure (19 CFR 210.16; 210.42–46).
By order of the Commission.
PO 00000
Frm 00087
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
69147
Issued: December 23, 2009.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E9–30952 Filed 12–29–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree
Under the Comprehensive
Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act
Notice is hereby given that on
December 22, 2009, a proposed Consent
Decree in United States v. Ausimont
Industries, Inc., et al., Civil Action No.
1:09–cv–12169, was filed with the
United States District Court for the
District of Massachusetts, Eastern
Division.
In this action, the United States
sought injunctive relief for remedial
cleanup, recovery of response costs, and
damages for injuries to natural resources
against 49 defendants (‘‘Settling
Defendants), relating to the Sutton
Brook Disposal Area Superfund Site in
Tewksbury, Massachusetts (‘‘Site’’),
pursuant to Sections 106 and 107 of the
Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation, and Liability
Act (‘‘CERCLA’’), 42 U.S.C. 9606 and
9607(a). The Commonwealth of
Massachusetts (‘‘Commonwealth’’) has
asserted parallel claims under CERCLA
and related State provisions, and is a coplaintiff to the proposed Consent
Decree.
To resolve the United States’
injunctive relief claim under Section
106 of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. 9606, the
proposed Consent Decree requires 20
Settling Defendants to perform the
Remedial Design/Remedial Action set
forth in the Record of Decision for the
Site (‘‘Performing Settling Defendants’’).
This remedial cleanup includes
construction of a multi-layer,
impermeable cap over the area of the
Site that was a former landfill;
construction of a groundwater pump
and treatment system to collect and treat
contaminated groundwater; long-term
monitoring; and implementation of
restrictions on future uses of the Site.
The total estimated cost of the remedial
cleanup for the Site is approximately
$30 million ($29.98 million).
To resolve the United States’ claims
for cost recovery and damages for
injuries to natural resources under
Section 107 of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. 9607,
the Consent Decree requires Settling
Defendants to reimburse the United
States for all future response costs, and
costs incurred to oversee the remedy, as
set forth in the Consent Decree. Settling
E:\FR\FM\30DEN1.SGM
30DEN1
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
69148
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 249 / Wednesday, December 30, 2009 / Notices
Defendants will also reimburse the
Commonwealth for all future response
costs, costs incurred to oversee the
remedy, and $512,000 in past response
costs. In addition, Settling Defendants
will pay $825,000 to the U.S.
Department of Interior, which includes
$62,752 in assessment costs, to be used
to fund restoration projects in
connection with the Site for natural
resources under the Federal and/or joint
Federal and State trusteeship. Settling
Defendants will also pay $825,000 to the
Commonwealth, which includes
$44,270 in assessment costs, to be used
to fund restoration projects in
connection with the Site for natural
resources under the Commonwealth’s
trusteeship.
Beside the 20 Performing Settling
Defendants, the proposed Consent
Decree includes six Cashout Settling
Defendants and 23 De Minimis Settling
Defendants, each of whom will pay its
respective allocated share of
responsibility for the Site
contamination, including standard
premiums, into a trust to be used by the
Performing Settling Defendants to pay
for the remedial cleanup, response
costs, and damages for injuries to
natural resources. In exchange for the
payments to be made and work to be
performed, the Settling Defendants will
receive contribution protection and a
covenant not to sue under Sections 106
and 107 of CERCLA for remedial
cleanup, response costs, and natural
resources damages relating to the Site,
subject to certain reservation of rights.
The Department of Justice will receive
for a period of thirty (30) days from the
date of this publication comments
relating to the Consent Decree.
Comments should be addressed to the
Assistant Attorney General,
Environment and Natural Resources
Division, and either e-mailed to
pubcomment-ees.enrd@usdoj.gov or
mailed to P.O. Box 7611, U.S.
Department of Justice, Washington, DC
20044–7611, and should refer to either:
United States v. Ausimont Industries,
Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 1:09–cv–
12169, D.J. Ref. 90–11–2–07854/1 and
90–11–2–07854/2. The Consent Decree
may be examined at the Office of the
United States Attorney for the District of
Massachusetts, One Courthouse Way,
Suite 9200, Boston, Massachusetts, and
at U.S. EPA Region 1, 5 Post Office
Square—Suite 100, Boston,
Massachusetts. During the public
comment period, the Consent Decrees
may also be examined on the following
Department of Justice Web site, https://
www.usdoj.gov/enrd/
Consent_Decrees.html. A copy of the
Consent Decrees may also be obtained
VerDate Nov<24>2008
19:01 Dec 29, 2009
Jkt 220001
by mail from the Consent Decree
Library, P.O. Box 7611, U.S. Department
of Justice, Washington, DC 20044–7611
or by faxing or e-mailing a request to
Tonia Fleetwood
(tonia.fleetwood@usdoj.gov), fax no.
(202) 514–0097, phone confirmation
number (202) 514–1547. In requesting a
copy from the Consent Decree Library,
please enclose a check, payable to the
U.S. Treasury, in the amount of $112.75
(25 cents per page reproduction cost),
or, if by e-mail or fax, forward a check
in the applicable amount to the Consent
Decree Library at the stated address. In
requesting a copy exclusive of exhibits
and signature pages, please enclose a
check, payable to the U.S. Treasury, in
the amount of $18 (25 cents per page
reproduction cost).
Maureen Katz,
Assistant Chief, Environmental Enforcement
Section, Environment and Natural Resources
Division.
[FR Doc. E9–30960 Filed 12–29–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employee Benefits Security
Administration
Proposed Extension of Information
Collection; Comment Request; Petition
for Finding Under Section 3(40) of
ERISA
AGENCY: Employee Benefits Security
Administration, Department of Labor.
ACTION: Notice.
SUMMARY: The Department of Labor (the
Department), in accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA)
(44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)), provides the
general public and Federal agencies
with an opportunity to comment on
proposed and continuing collections of
information. This program helps the
Department assess the impact of its
information collection requirements and
minimize the reporting burden on the
public. It also helps the public
understand the Department’s
information collection requirements and
provide the requested data in the
desired format. Currently, the Employee
Benefits Security Administration
(EBSA) is soliciting comments on the
proposed extension of the information
collections contained in regulations
pertaining to the Department’s
procedures to making a finding under
section 3(40) of the Employee
Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
(ERISA) as to whether an employee
benefit plan is established and
maintained pursuant to one or more
PO 00000
Frm 00088
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
collective bargaining agreements. A
copy of the information collection
request (ICR) can be obtained by
contacting the office shown in the
ADDRESSES section of this notice or at
https://www.RegInfo.gov.
DATES: Written comments must be
submitted to the office shown in the
ADDRESSES section on or before March 1,
2010.
ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments
to G. Christopher Cosby, Office of Policy
and Research, Employee Benefits
Security Administration, U.S.
Department of Labor, 200 Constitution
Avenue, NW., Room N–5647,
Washington, DC 20210. Telephone:
(202) 693–8410; Fax: (202) 219–4745.
These are not toll-free numbers.
Comments may also be submitted
electronically to the following Internet
e-mail address: ebsa.opr@dol.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Rules codified beginning at 29 CFR
2570.150 set forth an administrative
procedure (‘‘procedural rules’’) for
obtaining a determination by the
Department as to whether a particular
employee benefit plan is established or
maintained under or pursuant to one or
more collective bargaining agreements
for purposes of section 3(40) of ERISA.
These procedural rules concern specific
criteria set forth in 29 CFR 2510.3–40
(‘‘criteria rules’’), which, if met,
constitute a finding by the Department
that a plan is collectively bargained.
Plans that meet the requirements of the
criteria rules are not subject to state law.
Among other requirements, the
procedural rules require submission of a
petition and affidavits by parties seeking
a finding. The Department has obtained
approval from the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB), under OMB Control
No. 1210–0119, for the information
collections contained in its rules for a
finding under section 3(40). This
approval is currently scheduled to
expire on April 30, 2010.
II. Current Actions
This notice requests comments on an
extension of OMB’s approval of the
information collections included in 29
CFR 2510.3–40. After considering
comments received in response to this
notice, the Department intends to
submit an ICR to OMB for continuing
approval of the information collection
contained in 29 CFR 2510.3–40. No
change to the existing ICR is proposed
or made at this time. An agency may not
conduct or sponsor, and a person is not
required to respond to, an information
collection unless it displays a valid
E:\FR\FM\30DEN1.SGM
30DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 249 (Wednesday, December 30, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 69147-69148]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-30960]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree Under the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act
Notice is hereby given that on December 22, 2009, a proposed
Consent Decree in United States v. Ausimont Industries, Inc., et al.,
Civil Action No. 1:09-cv-12169, was filed with the United States
District Court for the District of Massachusetts, Eastern Division.
In this action, the United States sought injunctive relief for
remedial cleanup, recovery of response costs, and damages for injuries
to natural resources against 49 defendants (``Settling Defendants),
relating to the Sutton Brook Disposal Area Superfund Site in Tewksbury,
Massachusetts (``Site''), pursuant to Sections 106 and 107 of the
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act
(``CERCLA''), 42 U.S.C. 9606 and 9607(a). The Commonwealth of
Massachusetts (``Commonwealth'') has asserted parallel claims under
CERCLA and related State provisions, and is a co-plaintiff to the
proposed Consent Decree.
To resolve the United States' injunctive relief claim under Section
106 of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. 9606, the proposed Consent Decree requires 20
Settling Defendants to perform the Remedial Design/Remedial Action set
forth in the Record of Decision for the Site (``Performing Settling
Defendants''). This remedial cleanup includes construction of a multi-
layer, impermeable cap over the area of the Site that was a former
landfill; construction of a groundwater pump and treatment system to
collect and treat contaminated groundwater; long-term monitoring; and
implementation of restrictions on future uses of the Site. The total
estimated cost of the remedial cleanup for the Site is approximately
$30 million ($29.98 million).
To resolve the United States' claims for cost recovery and damages
for injuries to natural resources under Section 107 of CERCLA, 42
U.S.C. 9607, the Consent Decree requires Settling Defendants to
reimburse the United States for all future response costs, and costs
incurred to oversee the remedy, as set forth in the Consent Decree.
Settling
[[Page 69148]]
Defendants will also reimburse the Commonwealth for all future response
costs, costs incurred to oversee the remedy, and $512,000 in past
response costs. In addition, Settling Defendants will pay $825,000 to
the U.S. Department of Interior, which includes $62,752 in assessment
costs, to be used to fund restoration projects in connection with the
Site for natural resources under the Federal and/or joint Federal and
State trusteeship. Settling Defendants will also pay $825,000 to the
Commonwealth, which includes $44,270 in assessment costs, to be used to
fund restoration projects in connection with the Site for natural
resources under the Commonwealth's trusteeship.
Beside the 20 Performing Settling Defendants, the proposed Consent
Decree includes six Cashout Settling Defendants and 23 De Minimis
Settling Defendants, each of whom will pay its respective allocated
share of responsibility for the Site contamination, including standard
premiums, into a trust to be used by the Performing Settling Defendants
to pay for the remedial cleanup, response costs, and damages for
injuries to natural resources. In exchange for the payments to be made
and work to be performed, the Settling Defendants will receive
contribution protection and a covenant not to sue under Sections 106
and 107 of CERCLA for remedial cleanup, response costs, and natural
resources damages relating to the Site, subject to certain reservation
of rights.
The Department of Justice will receive for a period of thirty (30)
days from the date of this publication comments relating to the Consent
Decree. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant Attorney General,
Environment and Natural Resources Division, and either e-mailed to
pubcomment-ees.enrd@usdoj.gov or mailed to P.O. Box 7611, U.S.
Department of Justice, Washington, DC 20044-7611, and should refer to
either: United States v. Ausimont Industries, Inc., et al., Civil
Action No. 1:09-cv-12169, D.J. Ref. 90-11-2-07854/1 and 90-11-2-07854/
2. The Consent Decree may be examined at the Office of the United
States Attorney for the District of Massachusetts, One Courthouse Way,
Suite 9200, Boston, Massachusetts, and at U.S. EPA Region 1, 5 Post
Office Square--Suite 100, Boston, Massachusetts. During the public
comment period, the Consent Decrees may also be examined on the
following Department of Justice Web site, https://www.usdoj.gov/enrd/Consent_Decrees.html. A copy of the Consent Decrees may also be
obtained by mail from the Consent Decree Library, P.O. Box 7611, U.S.
Department of Justice, Washington, DC 20044-7611 or by faxing or e-
mailing a request to Tonia Fleetwood (tonia.fleetwood@usdoj.gov), fax
no. (202) 514-0097, phone confirmation number (202) 514-1547. In
requesting a copy from the Consent Decree Library, please enclose a
check, payable to the U.S. Treasury, in the amount of $112.75 (25 cents
per page reproduction cost), or, if by e-mail or fax, forward a check
in the applicable amount to the Consent Decree Library at the stated
address. In requesting a copy exclusive of exhibits and signature
pages, please enclose a check, payable to the U.S. Treasury, in the
amount of $18 (25 cents per page reproduction cost).
Maureen Katz,
Assistant Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and
Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. E9-30960 Filed 12-29-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-15-P