Domestic Licensing of Production and Utilization Facilities, 68498 [E9-30739]

Download as PDF 68498 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 247 / Monday, December 28, 2009 / Rules and Regulations Administrator, which may include, but are not limited to, data from NASS, Cooperative Extension Service, Agricultural Marketing Service, crop insurance, and NAP. (b) NAMP may be adjusted by the FSA State committee, in accordance with instructions issued by the Deputy Administrator and as specified in § 760.641, to recognize average quality loss factors that are reflected in the market by county or part of a county. (c) With respect to a crop for which an eligible participant on a farm receives assistance under NAP, the NAMP will not exceed the price of the crop established under NAP. (d) To the extent practicable, the NAMP will be established on a harvested basis without the inclusion of transportation, storage, processing, marketing, or other post-harvest expenses, as determined by FSA. (e) NAMP may be adjusted by the FSA State committee, as authorized by The Deputy Administrator, to reflect regional variations in price consistent with those prices established under the FCIA or NAP. erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES § 760.641 Adjustments made to NAMP to reflect loss of quality. (a) The Deputy Administrator will authorize FSA county committees, with FSA State committee concurrence, to adjust NAMP for a county or part of a county: (1) To reflect the average quality discounts applied to the local or regional market price of a crop due to a reduction in the intrinsic characteristics of the production resulting from adverse weather, as determined annually by the State office of the FSA; or (2) To account for a crop for which the value is reduced due to excess moisture resulting from a disaster related condition. (3) For adjustments specified in paragraphs (a)(1) and (a)(2) of this section, an adjustment factor that represents the regional or local price received for the crop in the county will be calculated by the FSA State committee. The adjustment factor will be based on the average actual market price compared to NAMP. (b) For adjustments made under paragraph (a) of this section, participants must provide verifiable evidence of actual or appraised production, clearly indicating an average loss of value caused by poor quality or excessive moisture that meets or exceeds the quality adjustment for the county or part of a county established in paragraph (a)(3) of this section to be eligible to receive the VerDate Nov<24>2008 10:44 Dec 24, 2009 Jkt 220001 quality-adjusted NAMP as part of their SURE payment calculation. In order to be considered at all for the purpose of quality adjustments, the verifiable evidence of production must itself detail the extent of the quality loss for a specific quantity. With regard to test evidence, in addition to meeting all the requirements of this section, tests must have been completed by January 1 of the year following harvest. § 760.650 Calculating SURE. (a) Subject to the provision of this subpart, SURE payments for crop losses in crop year 2008 and subsequent crop years will be calculated as the amount equal to 60 percent of the difference between: (1) The SURE guarantee, as specified in § 760.631, 760.633 or 760.634 of this subpart, and (2) The total farm revenue, as specified in § 760.635. (b) In addition to the other provisions of this subpart and subpart B of this part, SURE payments may be adjusted downward as necessary to insure compliance with the payment limitations in subpart B and to insure that payments do not exceed the maximum amount specified in § 760.108(a)(1) or (b)(1) or otherwise exceed the perceived intent of 19 U.S.C. 2497(j). Such adjustments can include, but are not limited to, adjustments to insure that there is no duplication of benefits as specified in § 760.108(c). Signed in Washington, DC, December 18, 2009. Jonathan W. Coppess, Administrator, Farm Service Agency. [FR Doc. E9–30632 Filed 12–22–09; 4:15 pm] BILLING CODE 3410–05–P NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 10 CFR Part 50 Domestic Licensing of Production and Utilization Facilities CFR Correction In Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Parts 1 to 50, revised as of January 1, 2009, on page 913, in § 50.72, reinstate the text of footnote 1 to read as follows: 1 Other requirements for immediate notification of the NRC by licensed operating nuclear power reactors are contained elsewhere in this chapter, in particular §§ 20.1906, 20.2202, 50.36, 72.216, and 73.71. [FR Doc. E9–30739 Filed 12–24–09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 1505–01–D PO 00000 Frm 00022 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM 12 CFR Part 203 [Regulation C; Docket No. 1379] Home Mortgage Disclosure AGENCY: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. ACTION: Final rule; staff commentary. SUMMARY: The Board is publishing a final rule amending the staff commentary that interprets the requirements of Regulation C (Home Mortgage Disclosure) to reflect no change in the asset-size exemption threshold for depository institutions based on the annual percentage change in the Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers (CPIW). The exemption threshold remains $39 million. The CPIW decreased by 0.98 percent during the twelve-month period ending in November 2009, but this change is too small to warrant any reduction in the exemption threshold pursuant to Regulation C. Therefore, depository institutions with assets of $39 million or less as of December 31, 2009 are exempt from collecting data in 2010. DATES: Effective January 1, 2010. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John C. Wood, Counsel, Division of Consumer and Community Affairs, at (202) 452–3667; for users of Telecommunications Device for the Deaf (TDD) only, contact (202) 263–4869. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (HMDA; 12 U.S.C. 2801 et seq.) requires most mortgage lenders located in metropolitan areas to collect data about their housing-related lending activity. Annually, lenders must report those data to their federal supervisory agencies and make the data available to the public. The Board’s Regulation C (12 CFR part 203) implements HMDA. Prior to 1997, HMDA exempted depository institutions with assets totaling $10 million or less, as of the preceding year-end. Provisions of the Economic Growth and Regulatory Paperwork Reduction Act of 1996 (codified at 12 U.S.C. 2808(b)) amended HMDA to expand the exemption for small depository institutions. The statutory amendment increased the asset-size exemption threshold by requiring a one-time adjustment of the $10 million figure based on the percentage by which the CPIW for 1996 exceeded the CPIW for 1975, and it provided for annual adjustments thereafter based on the annual percentage increase in the CPIW. The E:\FR\FM\28DER1.SGM 28DER1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 247 (Monday, December 28, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 68498]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-30739]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

10 CFR Part 50


Domestic Licensing of Production and Utilization Facilities

CFR Correction

    In Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Parts 1 to 50, 
revised as of January 1, 2009, on page 913, in Sec.  50.72, reinstate 
the text of footnote 1 to read as follows:

    \1\ Other requirements for immediate notification of the NRC by 
licensed operating nuclear power reactors are contained elsewhere in 
this chapter, in particular Sec. Sec.  20.1906, 20.2202, 50.36, 
72.216, and 73.71.
[FR Doc. E9-30739 Filed 12-24-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D