Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection; Comment Request, 68427-68430 [E9-30573]
Download as PDF
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with NOTICES_PART 1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 246 / Thursday, December 24, 2009 / Notices
to make EPA’s comments on EISs
available to the public. Accordingly,
after March 31, 2010, EPA will
discontinue the publication of this
notice of availability of EPA comments
in the Federal Register.
EIS No. 20090438, Draft EIS, NPS, NY,
Roosevelt-Vanderbilt National
Historic Sites, General Management
Plan, Implementation, Hyde Park, NY,
Comment Period Ends: 02/22/2010,
Contact: Marjorie Smith, 339–223–
0131.
EIS No. 20090439, Final EIS, FHWA,
ME, Aroostook County Transport
Study, Route I–161 Connector, To
Identify Transportation Corridors that
will Improve Mobility and Efficiency
within Northeastern Aroostook
County and other portions of the U.S.
and Canada, U.S. Army COE Section
404 Permit, Endangered Species Act,
NPDES and Section 10 River and
Harbors Act, Caribou, Aroostook
County, ME, Wait Period Ends: 01/25/
2010, Contact: Mark Hasselmann,
207–622–8355.
EIS No. 20090440, Final EIS, USFS, CO,
Vail Ski Area’s 2007 Improvement
Project, Proposed On-Mountain
Restaurant from the top of Vail
Mountain to Mid Vail, Special-UsePermit, Eagle/Holy Cross Ranger
District, White River National Forest,
Eagle County, CO, Wait Period Ends:
01/25/2010, Contact: Don Dressler,
970–945–3212.
EIS No. 20090441, Final Supplement,
FHWA, TN, Shelby Avenue/
Demonbreun Street (Gateway
Boulevard Corridor, from I–65 North
[I–24 West] to I–40 West in
Downtown Nashville, To Address
Transportation needs in the Study
Area. Davidson County, TN, Wait
Period Ends: 01/25/2010, Contact:
Charles J. O’Neill, 615–781–5770.
EIS No. 20090442, Draft EIS, USACE,
00, Sabine-Neches Waterway Channel
Improvement Project, Proposed Ocean
Dredged Material Disposal Site
Designation, Southeast Texas and
Southwest Louisiana, Comment
Period Ends: 02/10/2010, Contact:
Janelle Stokes, 409–766–3039.
EIS No. 20090443, Final EIS, FHWA,
DC, ADOPTION—Department of
Homeland Security Headquarters at
the St. Elizabeths West Campus, To
Consolidate Federal Office Space on a
Secure Site, Washington, DC, Contact:
Jack VanDop, 703–404–6282. The U.S.
Department of Transportation’s,
Federal Highway Administration
(DOT/FHWA) has ADOPTED the U.S.
General Services Administration FEIS
#20080452, filed on 10/31/2008.
DOT/FHWA was a Cooperating
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:40 Dec 23, 2009
Jkt 220001
Agency for the above project.
Recirculation of the FEIS is not
necessary under 40 CFR 1506.3(c).
EIS No. 20090444, Final EIS, USA, NM,
White Sands Missile Range (WSMR),
Development and Implementation of
Range-Wide Mission and Major
Capabilities, NM, Wait Period Ends:
01/25/2010, Contact: Jennifer Shore,
703–602–4238.
EIS No. 20090445, Draft EIS, USFS, ID,
Boise National Forest Project,
Proposed Amendments to the Land
and Resource Management Plan,
Wildlife Conservation Strategy (WCS)
Phase 1: Forested Biological
Community, Located within Portions
of Ada, Boise, Elmore, Gem, and
Valley Counties, ID, Comment Period
Ends: 03/24/2010, Contact: Cyd
Weiland, 208–373–4135.
EIS No. 20090446, Final EIS, USFS, VT,
Jarbidge Ranger District Rangeland
Management Project, Proposed
Reauthorizing Grazing on 21 Existing
Grazing Allotments, Humboldt
Toiyabe National Forest, Elko County,
NV, Wait Period Ends: 12/25/2009,
Contact: Vernon Keller, 775–355–
5356.
EIS No. 20090447, Final EIS, USACE,
AL, Foley Land Cut Portion of the
Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, Proposed
Construction of Residential,
Commercial and Marine
Development, Gulf Shores and Orange
Beach, Baldwin County, AL, Wait
Period Ends: 01/25/2010, Contact:
Linda Brown, 251–694–3786.
Amended Notices
EIS No. 20090424, Draft EIS, USN, AK,
Gulf of Alaska Navy Training
Activities, Proposal to Support and
Conduct Current, Emerging, and
Future Training Activities,
Implementation, Gulf of Alaska, AK,
Comment Period Ends: 01/25/2010,
Contact: Amy Burt, 360–396–0924.
Revision to FR Notice Published
12/11/2009: Correction to Contact
Telephone Number.
EIS No. 20090433, Final EIS, USFS, CA,
Lassen National Forest, Motorized
Travel Management Plan,
Implementation, Butte, Lassen,
Modoc, Plumas, Shasta, Siskiyou,
Tehama Counties, CA, Wait Period
Ends: 01/19/2010, Contact:
Christopher O’Brien, 530–252–6698.
Revision to FR Notice Published
12/18/2009: Correction to Contact
Telephone Number.
EIS No. 20090435, Draft EIS, APHIS, 00,
Glyphsate-Tolerant Alfalfa Events
J101 and J163: Request for No
regulated Status, Implementation,
United States, Comment Period Ends:
02/16/2010, Contact: Cindy Eck, 301–
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
68427
734–0667. Revision to FR Notice
Published 12/18/2009: Correction to
Contact Telephone Number.
Dated: December 21, 2009.
Pearl E. Young,
NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal
Activities.
[FR Doc. E9–30588 Filed 12–23–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
REVIEW COMMISSION
Sunshine Notice
December 17, 2009.
TIME AND DATE: 10 a.m., Thursday,
January 7, 2010.
PLACE: The Richard V. Backley Hearing
Room, 9th Floor, 601 New Jersey
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC.
STATUS: Open.
MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: The
Commission will consider and act upon
the following in open session: Secretary
of Labor v. Cumberland Coal Resources,
LP, Docket Nos. PENN 2008–51–R, et
seq. (Issues include whether an order
issued to the operator under 30 CFR
75.363(a) (requiring that hazardous
conditions be corrected or posted)
should be amended to allege a violation
of 30 CFR 75.360(b) (requiring that the
person conducting a preshift
examination identify hazardous
conditions).)
Any person attending this meeting
who requires special accessibility
features and/or auxiliary aids, such as
sign language interpreters, must inform
the Commission in advance of those
needs. Subject to 29 CFR 2706.150(a)(3)
and 2706.160(d).
CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFO: Jean
Ellen, (202) 434–9950/(202) 708–9300
for TDD Relay/1–800–877–8339 for toll
free.
Jean H. Ellen,
Chief Docket Clerk.
[FR Doc. E9–30591 Filed 12–22–09; 11:15
am]
BILLING CODE 6735–01–P
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Proposed Collection;
Comment Request
AGENCY: Federal Trade Commission
(‘‘FTC’’ or ‘‘Commission’’).
ACTION: Notice.
SUMMARY: The information collection
requirements described below will be
E:\FR\FM\24DEN1.SGM
24DEN1
68428
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 246 / Thursday, December 24, 2009 / Notices
submitted to the Office of Management
and Budget (‘‘OMB’’) for review, as
required by the Paperwork Reduction
Act (‘‘PRA’’). The FTC is seeking public
comments on its proposal to extend
through May 31, 2013, the current PRA
clearance for information collection
requirements contained in its Contact
Lens Rule. Those clearances expire on
May 31, 2010.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before February 22, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Interested parties are
invited to submit written comments
electronically or in paper form, by
following the instructions in the
Request for Comments to 60-Day Notice
part of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
section below. Comments in electronic
form should be submitted by using the
following Web link: (https://
public.commentworks.com/ftc/
contactlensrulepra) (and following the
instructions on the web-based form).
Comments in paper form should be
mailed or delivered to the following
address: Federal Trade Commission,
Office of the Secretary, Room H–135
(Annex J), 600 Pennsylvania Avenue,
NW, Washington, DC 20580, in the
manner detailed in the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section below.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for copies of the collection
of information and supporting
documentation should be addressed to
Karen Jagielski, Attorney, Division of
Advertising Practices, Bureau of
Consumer Protection, Federal Trade
Commission, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue,
NW., NJ– 3212, Washington, DC 20580,
(202) 326–2509.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with NOTICES_PART 1
Proposed Information Collection
Activities
Under the PRA, 44 U.S.C. 3501-3521,
federal agencies must obtain approval
from OMB for each collection of
information they conduct or sponsor.
‘‘Collection of information’’ means
agency requests or requirements that
members of the public submit reports,
keep records, or provide information to
a third party. 44 U.S.C. § 3502(3), 5 CFR
§ 1320.3 (c). Because the number of
entities affected by the Commission’s
requests will exceed ten, the
Commission plans to seek OMB
clearance under the PRA. As required
by § 3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA, the
Commission is providing this
opportunity for public comment before
requesting that OMB extend the existing
paperwork clearance for the information
collection requirements associated with
the Commission’s regulations under the
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:40 Dec 23, 2009
Jkt 220001
Contact Lens Rule (‘‘the Rule’’), 16 CFR
part 315.
The Rule was promulgated by the FTC
pursuant to the Fairness to Contact Lens
Consumers Act (‘‘FCLCA’’), Pub. L. 108–
164 (December 6, 2003), which was
enacted to enable consumers to
purchase contact lenses from the seller
of their choice. The Rule became
effective on August 2, 2004. As
mandated by the FCLCA, the Rule
requires the release and verification of
contact lens prescriptions and contains
recordkeeping requirements applying to
both prescribers and sellers of contact
lenses.
Specifically, the Rule requires that
prescribers provide a copy of the
prescription to the consumer upon the
completion of a contact lens fitting and
verify or provide prescriptions to
authorized third parties. The Rule also
mandates that a contact lens seller may
sell contact lenses only in accordance
with a prescription that the seller either:
(a) Has received from the patient
orprescriber; or (b) has verified through
direct communication with the
prescriber. In addition, the Rule
imposes recordkeeping requirements on
contact lens prescribers and sellers. For
example, the Rule requires prescribers
to document in their patients’ records
the medical reasons for setting a contact
lens prescription expiration date of less
than one year. The Rule requires contact
lens sellers to maintain records for three
years of all direct communications
involved in obtaining verification of a
contact lens prescription, as well as
prescriptions, or copies thereof, which
they receive directly from customers or
prescribers.
The information retained under the
Rule’s recordkeeping requirements is
used by the Commission to substantiate
compliance with the Rule and may also
provide a basis for the Commission to
bring an enforcement action. Without
the required records, it would be
difficult either to ensure that entities are
complying with the Rule’s requirements
or to bring enforcement actions based on
violations of the Rule.
Commission staff estimates the
paperwork burden of the FCLCA and
Rule based on its knowledge of the eye
care industry. Staff believes there will
be some burden on individual
prescribers to provide contact lens
prescriptions, although it involves
merely writing a few items of
information onto a slip of paper and
handing it to the patient, or perhaps
mailing or faxing it to a third party. In
addition, there will be some
recordkeeping burden on contact lens
sellers—including retaining
prescriptions or records of ‘‘direct
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
communications’’—pertaining to each
sale of contact lenses to consumers who
received their original prescription from
a third party prescriber.
Request for Comments to 60-Day Notice
The FTC invites comments on: (1)
whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(2) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate
of the burden of the proposed collection
of information, including the validity of
the methodology and assumptions used;
(3) ways to enhance the quality, utility,
and clarity of the information to be
collected; and (4) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on those who are to respond, including
through the use of appropriate
automated, electronic, mechanical, or
other technological collection
techniques or other forms of information
technology, e.g., permitting electronic
submission of responses. All comments
should be filed as prescribed below, and
must be received on or before February
22, 2010.
Because comments will be made
public, they should not include any
sensitive personal information, such as
an individual’s Social Security Number;
date of birth; driver’s license number or
other state identification number, or
foreign country equivalent; passport
number; financial account number; or
credit or debit card number. Comments
also should not include any sensitive
health information, such as medical
records or other individually
identifiable health information. In
addition, comments should not include
any ’’[t]rade secret or any commercial or
financial information which is obtained
from any person and which is privileged
or confidential. . .,‘‘ as provided in
Section 6(f) of the Federal Trade
Commission Act (’’FTC Act‘‘), 15 U.S.C.
46(f), and FTC Rule 4.10(a)(2), 16 CFR
4.10(a)(2). Comments containing
material for which confidential
treatment is requested must be filed in
paper form, must be clearly labeled
‘‘Confidential,’’ and must comply with
FTC Rule 4.9(c), 16 CFR 4.9(c).1
Because paper mail addressed to the
FTC is subject to delay due to
heightened security screening, please
1The comment must be accompanied by an
explicit request for confidential treatment,
including the factual and legal basis for the request,
and must identify the specific portions of the
comment to be withheld from the public record.
The request will be granted or denied by the
Commission’s General Counsel, consistent with
applicable law and the public interest. See FTC
Rule 4.9(c), 16 CPR 4.9(c).
E:\FR\FM\24DEN1.SGM
24DEN1
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with NOTICES_PART 1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 246 / Thursday, December 24, 2009 / Notices
consider submitting your comments in
electronic form. Comments filed in
electronic form should be submitted by
using the following web link: (https://
public.commentworks.com/ftc/
contactlensrulepra) (and following the
instructions on the web-based form). To
ensure that the Commission considers
an electronic comment, you must file it
on the web-based form at the web link:
(https://public.commentworks.com/ftc/
contactlensrulepra). If this Notice
appears at (https://www.regulations.gov/
search/index.jsp), you may also file an
electronic comment through that
website. The Commission will consider
all comments that regulations.gov
forwards to it. You may also visit the
FTC Website at (https://www.ftc.gov) to
read the Notice and the news release
describing it.
A comment filed in paper form
should include the ‘‘Contact Lens Rule:
FTC File No. P054510’’ reference both
in the text and on the envelope, and
should be mailed or delivered to the
following address: Federal Trade
Commission, Office of the Secretary,
Room H-135 (Annex J), 600
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington,
DC 20580. The FTC is requesting that
any comment filed in paper form be sent
by courier or overnight service, if
possible, because U.S. postal mail in the
Washington area and at the Commission
is subject to delay due to heightened
security precautions.
The FTC Act and other laws the
Commission administers permit the
collection of public comments to
consider and use in this proceeding as
appropriate. The Commission will
consider all timely and responsive
public comments that it receives,
whether filed in paper or electronic
form. Comments received will be
available to the public on the FTC
Website, to the extent practicable, at
(https://www.ftc.gov/os/
publiccomments.shtm). As a matter of
discretion, the Commission makes every
effort to remove home contact
information for individuals from the
public comments it receives before
placing those comments on the FTC
Website. More information, including
routine uses permitted by the Privacy
Act, may be found in the FTC’s privacy
policy, at (https://www.ftc.gov/ftc/
privacy.shtm).
Burden Statement
Estimated total annual hours burden:
850,000 hours (rounded to the nearest
thousand).
Based upon staff knowledge of the
industry, this figure is derived by
adding approximately 567,000
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:40 Dec 23, 2009
Jkt 220001
disclosure hours for contact lens
prescribers to approximately 283,000
recordkeeping hours for contact lens
sellers, for a combined industry total of
850,000 hours. This is slightly lower
than the estimates previously submitted
to OMB (the similar figure was 950,000
hours in 2006); and is due to a drop in
the estimated number of contact lens
wearers from 36 million (2006) to 34
million (2008).
No provisions in the Rule have been
amended since staff’s prior submission
to OMB. The Rules disclosure and
recordkeeping requirements, therefore,
remain the same. As noted above, the
number of contact lens wearers in the
United States is estimated to be
approximately 34 million.2 Therefore,
assuming an annual contact lens exam
for each contact lens wearer, 34 million
people would receive a copy of their
prescription each year under the Rule.
At an estimated one minute per
prescription, the annual time spent by
prescribers complying with the
disclosure requirement would be a
maximum of 567,000 hours. [(34 million
× 1 minute)/60 minutes = 566,667
hours]
As required by the FCLCA, the Rule
also imposes two recordkeeping
requirements. First, prescribers must
document the specific medical reasons
for setting a contact lens prescription
expiration date shorter than the one year
minimum established by the FCLCA.
This burden is likely to be nil because
the requirement applies only in cases
when the prescriber invokes the medical
judgment exception, which is expected
to occur infrequently, and prescribers
are likely to record this information in
the ordinary course of business as part
of their patients’ medical records. The
OMB regulation that implements the
PRA defines ‘‘burden’’ to exclude any
effort that would be expended
regardless of a regulatory requirement. 5
CFR 1320.3(B)(3)(2).
Second, the Rule requires contact lens
sellers to maintain certain documents
relating to contact lens sales. As noted
above, a seller may sell contact lenses
only in accordance with a prescription
that the seller either (a) has received
from the patient or prescriber, or (b) has
verified through direct communication
with the prescriber. The FCLCA requires
sellers to retain prescriptions and
records of communications with
2See
Contact Lenses, Frequently Asked
Questions, November, 2009, available at (https://
www.allaboutvision.com/faq/contactlens.htm.) See
also Nichols, J. ‘‘Annual Report: Contact Lenses
2008,’’ Contact Lens Spectrum, Jan. 2009, available
at (https://www.clspectrum.com/
article.aspx?article=102473).
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
68429
prescribers relating to prescription
verification for three years.
Staff believes that the burden of
complying with this requirement is low.
Sellers who seek verification of contact
lens prescriptions must retain one or
two records for each contact lens sale:
Either the relevant prescription itself, or
the verification request and any
response from the prescriber. Staff
estimates that such recordkeeping will
entail a maximum of five minutes per
sale, including time spent preparing a
file and actually filing the record(s).
Staff also believes that, based on its
knowledge of the industry, this burden
will fall primarily on mail order and
Internet-based sellers of contact lenses,
as they are the entities in the industry
most reliant on obtaining or verifying
contact lens prescriptions. Based on
conversations with the industry, staff
estimates that these entities currently
account for approximately 10% of sales
in the contact lens market3 and, by
extension, that approximately 3.4
million consumers—10% of the 34
million contact lens wearers in the
United States—purchase their lenses
from them.
At an estimated five minutes per sale
to each of 3.4 million consumers,
contact lens sellers will spend a total of
283,300 burden hours complying with
the recordkeeping requirement. [(3.4
million × 5 minutes)/60 minutes =
283,333.3 hours] This estimate likely
overstates the actual burden, however,
because it includes the time spent by
sellers who already keep records
pertaining to contact lens sales in the
ordinary course of business. In addition,
the estimate may overstate the time
spent by sellers to the extent that
records (e.g., verification requests) are
generated and stored automatically and
electronically, which staff understands
is the case for some larger online sellers.
Estimated labor costs: $32,317,001
(rounded to the nearest thousand).
Commission staff derived labor costs
by applying appropriate hourly cost
figures to the burden hours described
above. Staff estimates, based on its
knowledge of the industry, that
optometrists account for approximately
75% of prescribers. Consequently, for
simplicity, staff will focus on their
average hourly wage in estimating
prescribers’ labor cost burden.
3The FTC’s February 2005 study, ‘‘The Strength
of Competition in the Rx Sale of Contact Lenses: An
FTC Study,’’ cites various data that, averaged
together, suggests that approximately 10% of
contact lens sales are by online and mail-order
sellers. The report is available online at (https://
www.ftc.gov/reports/contactlens/
050214contactlensrpt.pdf).
E:\FR\FM\24DEN1.SGM
24DEN1
68430
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 246 / Thursday, December 24, 2009 / Notices
According to Bureau of Labor
Statistics from May 2008, salaried
optometrists earn an average wage of
$50.58 per hour and general office
clerical personnel earn an average of
$12.90 per hour.4
With these categories of personnel,
respectively, likely to perform the brunt
of the disclosure (for optometrists) and
recordkeeping (for office clerks) aspects
of the Rule, estimated total labor cost
attributable to the Rule would be
approximately $32.8 million. [($50.58 ×
566,666.7 hours) + ($12.90 × 283,333.3
hours) = $32,317,001]
The contact lens market is a
multibillion dollar market; one recent
survey estimates that contact lens sales
totaled $2.37 billion from Jan 1, 2006 to
Dec 31, 2006.5 Thus, the total labor cost
burden estimate of $32.3 million
represents approximately 1.5% of the
overall market.
Estimated annual non-labor cost
burden: $0 or minimal.
Staff believes that the Rule’s
disclosure and recordkeeping
requirements impose negligible capital
or other non-labor costs, as the affected
entities are likely to have the necessary
supplies and/or equipment already (e.g.,
prescription pads, patients’ medical
charts, facsimile machines and paper,
telephones, and recordkeeping facilities
such as filing cabinets or other storage).
Willard Tom,
General Counsel
[FR Doc. E9–30573 Filed 12–23–09: 8:45 am]
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
[Docket No. FR–5280–N–50]
Federal Property Suitable as Facilities
To Assist the Homeless
AGENCY: Office of the Assistant
Secretary for Community Planning and
Development, HUD.
ACTION: Notice.
SUMMARY: This Notice identifies
unutilized, underutilized, excess, and
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with NOTICES_PART 1
and median worker hourly wages for
optometrists and general office clerks are drawn
from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS)
Occupational Employment and Statistics Survey,
May 2008, based on BLS-sampled data it collected
over a 3-year period. See (https://www.bls.gov/
news.release/pdf/ocwage.pdf) (Table 1).
5The Vision Council of America and Jobson
Optical Research have conducted large scale
continuous consumer research under the name
VisionWatch, which reports on the vision care
industry. The basis for this statistic is on file with
the Federal Trade Commission.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:40 Dec 23, 2009
Jkt 220001
Dated: December 17, 2009.
Mark R. Johnston,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Special Needs.
[FR Doc. E9–30412 Filed 12–23–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210–67–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree
Under the Comprehensive
Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act
BILLING CODE: 6750–01–S
4Mean
surplus Federal property reviewed by
HUD for suitability for possible use to
assist the homeless.
DATES: Effective Date: December 24,
2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kathy Ezzell, Department of Housing
and Urban Development, 451 Seventh
Street, SW., Room 7262, Washington,
DC 20410; telephone (202) 708–1234;
TTY number for the hearing- and
speech-impaired (202) 708–2565 (these
telephone numbers are not toll-free), or
call the toll-free Title V information line
at 800–927–7588.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In
accordance with the December 12, 1988
court order in National Coalition for the
Homeless v. Veterans Administration,
No. 88–2503–OG (D.D.C.), HUD
publishes a Notice, on a weekly basis,
identifying unutilized, underutilized,
excess and surplus Federal buildings
and real property that HUD has
reviewed for suitability for use to assist
the homeless. Today’s Notice is for the
purpose of announcing that no
additional properties have been
determined suitable or unsuitable this
week.
Notice is hereby given that on
December 18, 2009, a proposed Consent
Decree in United States v. Newell
Holdings Delaware, Inc. and Rock
Springs Enterprises, Inc., Civil Action
No. 5:07-cv-164, was lodged with the
United States District Court for the
Northern District of West Virginia. In a
civil action filed on December 18, 2007,
under Section 107(a) of the
Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation and Liability
Act (‘‘CERCLA’’), 42 U.S.C. 9607(a), the
United States sought recovery of
response costs from Newell Holdings
Delaware, Inc. (‘‘Newell Holdings’’) and
Rock Springs Enterprises, Inc. (‘‘Rock
Springs’’) in connection with the Eighth
and Plutus Streets Pottery Site in
Chester, West Virginia (‘‘the Site’’). The
proposed Consent Decree, lodged on
December 18, 2009, resolves the liability
of the defendant Newell Holdings for
response costs incurred and to be
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
incurred by the United States in
connection with the Site, and requires
Newell Holdings to pay $800,000 in
response costs in accordance with the
terms of the Decree. Defendant Rock
Springs is not a party to the Consent
Decree.
The Department of Justice will receive
comments relating to the proposed
Consent Decree for a period of thirty
(30) days from the date of this
publication. Please address comments to
the Assistant Attorney General,
Environment and Natural Resources
Division, by e-mail to pubcommentees.enrd@usdoj.gov or regular mail to
P.O. Box 7611, U.S. Department of
Justice, Washington, D.C. 20044–7611,
and refer to United States v. Newell
Holdings Delaware, Inc. and Rock
Springs Enterprises, Inc., D.J. Ref. 90–
11–3–09297.
The Consent Decree may be examined
at the Office of the United States
Attorney for the Northern District of
West Virginia, U.S. Courthouse and
Federal building, 1125 Chapline Street,
Wheeling, WV 26003 and at U.S. EPA
Region III, 1650 Arch Street,
Philadelphia, PA 19103. During the
public comment period, the Consent
Decree may also be examined on the
following Department of Justice Web
site, https://www.usdoj.gov/enrd/
consent_decrees.html. A copy of the
Consent Decree may also be obtained by
mail from the Consent Decree Library,
P.O. Box 7611, U.S. Department of
Justice, Washington, DC 20044–7611 or
by faxing or e-mailing a request to Tonia
Fleetwood (tonia.fleetwood@usdoj.gov),
fax no. (202) 514–0097, phone
confirmation number (202) 514–1547.
When requesting a copy from the
Consent Decree Library, please enclose
a check in the amount of $6.00 (25 cents
per page reproduction cost) payable to
the U.S. Treasury or, if by e-mail or fax,
forward a check in that amount to the
Consent Decree Library at the address
above.
Maureen Katz,
Assistant Chief, Environmental Enforcement
Section, Environment and Natural Resources
Division.
[FR Doc. E9–30581 Filed 12–23–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–15–P
SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
Reporting and Recordkeeping
Requirements Under OMB Review
Small Business Administration.
Notice of Reporting
Requirements Submitted for OMB
Review.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
E:\FR\FM\24DEN1.SGM
24DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 246 (Thursday, December 24, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 68427-68430]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-30573]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection;
Comment Request
AGENCY: Federal Trade Commission (``FTC'' or ``Commission'').
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The information collection requirements described below will
be
[[Page 68428]]
submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (``OMB'') for review,
as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act (``PRA''). The FTC is
seeking public comments on its proposal to extend through May 31, 2013,
the current PRA clearance for information collection requirements
contained in its Contact Lens Rule. Those clearances expire on May 31,
2010.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before February 22, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Interested parties are invited to submit written comments
electronically or in paper form, by following the instructions in the
Request for Comments to 60-Day Notice part of the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section below. Comments in electronic form should be
submitted by using the following Web link: (https://public.commentworks.com/ftc/contactlensrulepra) (and following the
instructions on the web-based form). Comments in paper form should be
mailed or delivered to the following address: Federal Trade Commission,
Office of the Secretary, Room H-135 (Annex J), 600 Pennsylvania Avenue,
NW, Washington, DC 20580, in the manner detailed in the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section below.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for copies of the collection of information and supporting
documentation should be addressed to Karen Jagielski, Attorney,
Division of Advertising Practices, Bureau of Consumer Protection,
Federal Trade Commission, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., NJ- 3212,
Washington, DC 20580, (202) 326-2509.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Proposed Information Collection Activities
Under the PRA, 44 U.S.C. 3501-3521, federal agencies must obtain
approval from OMB for each collection of information they conduct or
sponsor. ``Collection of information'' means agency requests or
requirements that members of the public submit reports, keep records,
or provide information to a third party. 44 U.S.C. Sec. 3502(3), 5 CFR
Sec. 1320.3 (c). Because the number of entities affected by the
Commission's requests will exceed ten, the Commission plans to seek OMB
clearance under the PRA. As required by Sec. 3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA,
the Commission is providing this opportunity for public comment before
requesting that OMB extend the existing paperwork clearance for the
information collection requirements associated with the Commission's
regulations under the Contact Lens Rule (``the Rule''), 16 CFR part
315.
The Rule was promulgated by the FTC pursuant to the Fairness to
Contact Lens Consumers Act (``FCLCA''), Pub. L. 108-164 (December 6,
2003), which was enacted to enable consumers to purchase contact lenses
from the seller of their choice. The Rule became effective on August 2,
2004. As mandated by the FCLCA, the Rule requires the release and
verification of contact lens prescriptions and contains recordkeeping
requirements applying to both prescribers and sellers of contact
lenses.
Specifically, the Rule requires that prescribers provide a copy of
the prescription to the consumer upon the completion of a contact lens
fitting and verify or provide prescriptions to authorized third
parties. The Rule also mandates that a contact lens seller may sell
contact lenses only in accordance with a prescription that the seller
either: (a) Has received from the patient orprescriber; or (b) has
verified through direct communication with the prescriber. In addition,
the Rule imposes recordkeeping requirements on contact lens prescribers
and sellers. For example, the Rule requires prescribers to document in
their patients' records the medical reasons for setting a contact lens
prescription expiration date of less than one year. The Rule requires
contact lens sellers to maintain records for three years of all direct
communications involved in obtaining verification of a contact lens
prescription, as well as prescriptions, or copies thereof, which they
receive directly from customers or prescribers.
The information retained under the Rule's recordkeeping
requirements is used by the Commission to substantiate compliance with
the Rule and may also provide a basis for the Commission to bring an
enforcement action. Without the required records, it would be difficult
either to ensure that entities are complying with the Rule's
requirements or to bring enforcement actions based on violations of the
Rule.
Commission staff estimates the paperwork burden of the FCLCA and
Rule based on its knowledge of the eye care industry. Staff believes
there will be some burden on individual prescribers to provide contact
lens prescriptions, although it involves merely writing a few items of
information onto a slip of paper and handing it to the patient, or
perhaps mailing or faxing it to a third party. In addition, there will
be some recordkeeping burden on contact lens sellers--including
retaining prescriptions or records of ``direct communications''--
pertaining to each sale of contact lenses to consumers who received
their original prescription from a third party prescriber.
Request for Comments to 60-Day Notice
The FTC invites comments on: (1) whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of
the agency, including whether the information will have practical
utility; (2) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (3) ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (4) ways
to minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who
are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic
submission of responses. All comments should be filed as prescribed
below, and must be received on or before February 22, 2010.
Because comments will be made public, they should not include any
sensitive personal information, such as an individual's Social Security
Number; date of birth; driver's license number or other state
identification number, or foreign country equivalent; passport number;
financial account number; or credit or debit card number. Comments also
should not include any sensitive health information, such as medical
records or other individually identifiable health information. In
addition, comments should not include any ''[t]rade secret or any
commercial or financial information which is obtained from any person
and which is privileged or confidential. . .,`` as provided in Section
6(f) of the Federal Trade Commission Act (''FTC Act``), 15 U.S.C.
46(f), and FTC Rule 4.10(a)(2), 16 CFR 4.10(a)(2). Comments containing
material for which confidential treatment is requested must be filed in
paper form, must be clearly labeled ``Confidential,'' and must comply
with FTC Rule 4.9(c), 16 CFR 4.9(c).\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\The comment must be accompanied by an explicit request for
confidential treatment, including the factual and legal basis for
the request, and must identify the specific portions of the comment
to be withheld from the public record. The request will be granted
or denied by the Commission's General Counsel, consistent with
applicable law and the public interest. See FTC Rule 4.9(c), 16 CPR
4.9(c).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Because paper mail addressed to the FTC is subject to delay due to
heightened security screening, please
[[Page 68429]]
consider submitting your comments in electronic form. Comments filed in
electronic form should be submitted by using the following web link:
(https://public.commentworks.com/ftc/contactlensrulepra) (and following
the instructions on the web-based form). To ensure that the Commission
considers an electronic comment, you must file it on the web-based form
at the web link: (https://public.commentworks.com/ftc/contactlensrulepra). If this Notice appears at (https://www.regulations.gov/search/index.jsp), you may also file an electronic
comment through that website. The Commission will consider all comments
that regulations.gov forwards to it. You may also visit the FTC Website
at (https://www.ftc.gov) to read the Notice and the news release
describing it.
A comment filed in paper form should include the ``Contact Lens
Rule: FTC File No. P054510'' reference both in the text and on the
envelope, and should be mailed or delivered to the following address:
Federal Trade Commission, Office of the Secretary, Room H-135 (Annex
J), 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20580. The FTC is
requesting that any comment filed in paper form be sent by courier or
overnight service, if possible, because U.S. postal mail in the
Washington area and at the Commission is subject to delay due to
heightened security precautions.
The FTC Act and other laws the Commission administers permit the
collection of public comments to consider and use in this proceeding as
appropriate. The Commission will consider all timely and responsive
public comments that it receives, whether filed in paper or electronic
form. Comments received will be available to the public on the FTC
Website, to the extent practicable, at (https://www.ftc.gov/os/publiccomments.shtm). As a matter of discretion, the Commission makes
every effort to remove home contact information for individuals from
the public comments it receives before placing those comments on the
FTC Website. More information, including routine uses permitted by the
Privacy Act, may be found in the FTC's privacy policy, at (https://www.ftc.gov/ftc/privacy.shtm).
Burden Statement
Estimated total annual hours burden: 850,000 hours (rounded to the
nearest thousand).
Based upon staff knowledge of the industry, this figure is derived
by adding approximately 567,000 disclosure hours for contact lens
prescribers to approximately 283,000 recordkeeping hours for contact
lens sellers, for a combined industry total of 850,000 hours. This is
slightly lower than the estimates previously submitted to OMB (the
similar figure was 950,000 hours in 2006); and is due to a drop in the
estimated number of contact lens wearers from 36 million (2006) to 34
million (2008).
No provisions in the Rule have been amended since staff's prior
submission to OMB. The Rules disclosure and recordkeeping requirements,
therefore, remain the same. As noted above, the number of contact lens
wearers in the United States is estimated to be approximately 34
million.\2\ Therefore, assuming an annual contact lens exam for each
contact lens wearer, 34 million people would receive a copy of their
prescription each year under the Rule. At an estimated one minute per
prescription, the annual time spent by prescribers complying with the
disclosure requirement would be a maximum of 567,000 hours. [(34
million x 1 minute)/60 minutes = 566,667 hours]
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\See Contact Lenses, Frequently Asked Questions, November,
2009, available at (https://www.allaboutvision.com/faq/contactlens.htm.) See also Nichols, J. ``Annual Report: Contact
Lenses 2008,'' Contact Lens Spectrum, Jan. 2009, available at
(https://www.clspectrum.com/article.aspx?article=102473).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As required by the FCLCA, the Rule also imposes two recordkeeping
requirements. First, prescribers must document the specific medical
reasons for setting a contact lens prescription expiration date shorter
than the one year minimum established by the FCLCA. This burden is
likely to be nil because the requirement applies only in cases when the
prescriber invokes the medical judgment exception, which is expected to
occur infrequently, and prescribers are likely to record this
information in the ordinary course of business as part of their
patients' medical records. The OMB regulation that implements the PRA
defines ``burden'' to exclude any effort that would be expended
regardless of a regulatory requirement. 5 CFR 1320.3(B)(3)(2).
Second, the Rule requires contact lens sellers to maintain certain
documents relating to contact lens sales. As noted above, a seller may
sell contact lenses only in accordance with a prescription that the
seller either (a) has received from the patient or prescriber, or (b)
has verified through direct communication with the prescriber. The
FCLCA requires sellers to retain prescriptions and records of
communications with prescribers relating to prescription verification
for three years.
Staff believes that the burden of complying with this requirement
is low. Sellers who seek verification of contact lens prescriptions
must retain one or two records for each contact lens sale: Either the
relevant prescription itself, or the verification request and any
response from the prescriber. Staff estimates that such recordkeeping
will entail a maximum of five minutes per sale, including time spent
preparing a file and actually filing the record(s).
Staff also believes that, based on its knowledge of the industry,
this burden will fall primarily on mail order and Internet-based
sellers of contact lenses, as they are the entities in the industry
most reliant on obtaining or verifying contact lens prescriptions.
Based on conversations with the industry, staff estimates that these
entities currently account for approximately 10% of sales in the
contact lens market\3\ and, by extension, that approximately 3.4
million consumers--10% of the 34 million contact lens wearers in the
United States--purchase their lenses from them.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\The FTC's February 2005 study, ``The Strength of Competition
in the Rx Sale of Contact Lenses: An FTC Study,'' cites various data
that, averaged together, suggests that approximately 10% of contact
lens sales are by online and mail-order sellers. The report is
available online at (https://www.ftc.gov/reports/contactlens/050214contactlensrpt.pdf).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
At an estimated five minutes per sale to each of 3.4 million
consumers, contact lens sellers will spend a total of 283,300 burden
hours complying with the recordkeeping requirement. [(3.4 million x 5
minutes)/60 minutes = 283,333.3 hours] This estimate likely overstates
the actual burden, however, because it includes the time spent by
sellers who already keep records pertaining to contact lens sales in
the ordinary course of business. In addition, the estimate may
overstate the time spent by sellers to the extent that records (e.g.,
verification requests) are generated and stored automatically and
electronically, which staff understands is the case for some larger
online sellers.
Estimated labor costs: $32,317,001 (rounded to the nearest
thousand).
Commission staff derived labor costs by applying appropriate hourly
cost figures to the burden hours described above. Staff estimates,
based on its knowledge of the industry, that optometrists account for
approximately 75% of prescribers. Consequently, for simplicity, staff
will focus on their average hourly wage in estimating prescribers'
labor cost burden.
[[Page 68430]]
According to Bureau of Labor Statistics from May 2008, salaried
optometrists earn an average wage of $50.58 per hour and general office
clerical personnel earn an average of $12.90 per hour.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\Mean and median worker hourly wages for optometrists and
general office clerks are drawn from the Bureau of Labor Statistics
(BLS) Occupational Employment and Statistics Survey, May 2008, based
on BLS-sampled data it collected over a 3-year period. See (https://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/ocwage.pdf) (Table 1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
With these categories of personnel, respectively, likely to perform
the brunt of the disclosure (for optometrists) and recordkeeping (for
office clerks) aspects of the Rule, estimated total labor cost
attributable to the Rule would be approximately $32.8 million. [($50.58
x 566,666.7 hours) + ($12.90 x 283,333.3 hours) = $32,317,001]
The contact lens market is a multibillion dollar market; one recent
survey estimates that contact lens sales totaled $2.37 billion from Jan
1, 2006 to Dec 31, 2006.\5\ Thus, the total labor cost burden estimate
of $32.3 million represents approximately 1.5% of the overall market.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\The Vision Council of America and Jobson Optical Research
have conducted large scale continuous consumer research under the
name VisionWatch, which reports on the vision care industry. The
basis for this statistic is on file with the Federal Trade
Commission.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Estimated annual non-labor cost burden: $0 or minimal.
Staff believes that the Rule's disclosure and recordkeeping
requirements impose negligible capital or other non-labor costs, as the
affected entities are likely to have the necessary supplies and/or
equipment already (e.g., prescription pads, patients' medical charts,
facsimile machines and paper, telephones, and recordkeeping facilities
such as filing cabinets or other storage).
Willard Tom,
General Counsel
[FR Doc. E9-30573 Filed 12-23-09: 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE: 6750-01-S