Hazardous Materials: Incorporation of Special Permits Into Regulations, 68004-68015 [E9-30280]
Download as PDF
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with PROPOSALS_PART 1
68004
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 244 / Tuesday, December 22, 2009 / Proposed Rules
dismissal of the appeal as to any claim
subject to the new ground of rejection:
(1) Reopen prosecution. Submit an
amendment of the claims subject to a
new ground of rejection or new
evidence relating to the new ground of
rejection or both, and request that the
matter be reconsidered by the examiner.
The application or reexamination
proceeding on appeal will be remanded
to the examiner. A new ground of
rejection by the Board is binding on the
examiner unless, in the opinion of the
examiner, the amendment or new
evidence overcomes the new ground of
rejection. In the event the examiner
maintains the new ground of rejection,
appellant may again appeal to the
Board.
(2) Request for rehearing. Submit a
request for rehearing pursuant to § 41.52
of this subpart relying on the Record.
(e) Recommendation. In its opinion in
support of its decision, the Board may
include a recommendation, explicitly
designated as such, of how a claim on
appeal may be amended to overcome a
specific rejection. When the Board
makes a recommendation, appellant
may file an amendment or take other
action consistent with the
recommendation. An amendment or
other action, otherwise complying with
statutory patentability requirements,
will overcome the specific rejection. An
examiner, however, upon return of the
application or reexamination
proceeding to the jurisdiction of the
examiner, may enter a new ground of
rejection of a claim amended in
conformity with a recommendation,
when appropriate.
(f) Request for briefing and
information. The Board may enter an
order requiring appellant to brief
matters or supply information or both
that the Board believes would assist in
deciding the appeal. Appellant will be
given a non-extendable time period
within which to respond to the order.
Failure of appellant to timely respond to
the order may result in dismissal of the
appeal in whole or in part.
(g) Extension of time to take action. A
request for an extension of time to
respond to a request for briefing and
information under paragraph (f) of this
section is not authorized. A request for
an extension of time to respond to Board
action under paragraphs (b) and (d) of
this section shall be presented under the
provisions of § 1.136(b) of this title for
extensions of time to reply for patent
applications and § 1.550(c) of this title
for extensions of time to reply for ex
parte reexamination proceedings.
15. Revise § 41.52 to read as follows:
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:53 Dec 21, 2009
Jkt 220001
§ 41.52
Rehearing.
(a) Request for rehearing authorized.
An appellant may file a single request
for rehearing.
(b) Time for filing request for
rehearing. Any request for rehearing
must be filed within two months from
the date of the decision mailed by the
Board.
(c) Extension of time to file request for
rehearing. Extensions of time under
§ 1.136(a) of this title for patent
applications are not applicable to the
time period set forth in this section. See
§ 1.136(b) of this title for extensions of
time to reply for patent applications and
§ 1.550(c) of this title for extensions of
time to reply for ex parte reexamination
proceedings.
(d) Content of request for rehearing. A
request for rehearing must contain,
under appropriate headings and in the
order indicated, the following items:
(1) [Reserved.]
(2) [Reserved.]
(3) [Reserved.]
(4) Argument—see paragraph (f) of
this section.
(e) [Reserved.]
(f) Argument. A request for rehearing
shall state with particularity the points
believed to have been misapprehended
or overlooked by the Board. A general
restatement of the case will not be
considered an argument that the Board
has misapprehended or overlooked a
point. A new argument cannot be made
in a request for rehearing, except:
(1) New ground of rejection.
Appellant may respond to a new ground
of rejection entered pursuant to
§ 41.50(d)(2) of this subpart.
(2) Recent legal development.
Appellant may rely on and call the
Board’s attention to a recent court or
Board opinion which is relevant to an
issue decided in the appeal.
(g) No amendment or new evidence.
No amendment or new evidence may
accompany a request for rehearing.
(h) Decision on rehearing. A decision
will be rendered on a request for
rehearing. The decision on rehearing is
deemed to incorporate the underlying
decision sought to be reheard except for
those portions of the underlying
decision specifically modified on
rehearing. A decision on rehearing is
final for purposes of judicial review,
except when otherwise noted in the
decision on rehearing.
16. Revise § 41.54 to read as follows:
§ 41.54
Action following decision.
After a decision by the Board and
subject to appellant’s right to seek
judicial review, the application or
reexamination proceeding will be
returned to the jurisdiction of the
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
examiner for such further action as may
be appropriate consistent with the
decision by the Board.
17. Add § 41.56 to read as follows:
§ 41.56
Sanctions.
(a) Imposition of sanctions. The
Director may impose a sanction against
an appellant for misconduct, including:
(1) Failure to comply with an order
entered in the appeal or an applicable
rule.
(2) Advancing or maintaining a
misleading or frivolous request for relief
or argument.
(3) Engaging in dilatory tactics.
(b) Nature of sanction. Sanctions may
include entry of:
(1) An order declining to enter a
docket notice.
(2) An order holding certain facts to
have been established in the appeal.
(3) An order expunging a paper or
precluding an appellant from filing a
paper.
(4) An order precluding an appellant
from presenting or contesting a
particular issue.
(5) An order excluding evidence.
(6) [Reserved.]
(7) An order holding an application
on appeal to be abandoned or a
reexamination proceeding terminated.
(8) An order dismissing an appeal.
(9) An order denying an oral hearing.
(10) An order terminating an oral
hearing.
Dated: December 14, 2009.
David J. Kappos,
Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual
Property and Director of the United States
Patent and Trademark Office.
[FR Doc. E9–30402 Filed 12–21–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
49 CFR Parts 105, 107, 171, 173, 174,
176, 177, and 179
[Docket No. PHMSA–2009–0289 (HM–233A)]
RIN 2137–AE39
Hazardous Materials: Incorporation of
Special Permits Into Regulations
AGENCY: Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety Administration
(PHMSA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
SUMMARY: The Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety Administration is
proposing to amend the Hazardous
E:\FR\FM\22DEP1.SGM
22DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 244 / Tuesday, December 22, 2009 / Proposed Rules
Materials Regulations to incorporate
provisions contained in certain widely
used or longstanding special permits
that have an established safety record.
Special permits allow a company or
individual to package or ship a
hazardous material in a manner that
varies from the regulations so long as an
equivalent level of safety is maintained.
The proposed revisions are intended to
provide wider access to the regulatory
flexibility offered in special permits and
eliminate the need for numerous
renewal requests, thus reducing
paperwork burdens and facilitating
commerce while maintaining an
appropriate level of safety.
DATES: Written comments should be
submitted on or before February 22,
2010.
You may submit comments
identified by the docket number
(PHMSA–2009–0289 (HM–233A) by any
of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
online instructions for submitting
comments.
• Fax: 1–202–493–2251.
• Mail: Docket Operations, U.S.
Department of Transportation, West
Building, Ground Floor, Room W12–
140, Routing Symbol M–30, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC
20590.
• Hand Delivery: To Docket
Operations, Room W12–140 on the
ground floor of the West Building, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington,
DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
Instructions: All submissions must
include the agency name and docket
number for this notice at the beginning
of the comment. All comments received
will be posted without change to the
Federal Docket Management System
(FDMS), including any personal
information.
Docket: For access to the dockets to
read background documents or
comments received, go to https://
www.regulations.gov or DOT’s Docket
Operations Office (see ADDRESSES).
Privacy Act: Anyone is able to search
the electronic form of any written
communications and comments
received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the
document (or signing the document, if
submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may
review DOT’s complete Privacy Act
Statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (Volume
65, Number 70; Pages 19477–78).
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with PROPOSALS_PART 1
ADDRESSES:
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:53 Dec 21, 2009
Jkt 220001
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Eileen Edmonson or Dirk Der Kinderen,
Office of Hazardous Materials
Standards, (202) 366–8553, or Diane
LaValle, Office of Hazardous Materials
Special Permits and Approvals, (202)
366–4535, Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety Administration
(PHMSA), 1200 New Jersey Avenue,
SE., Washington, DC 20590.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration (PHMSA) is
proposing to amend the Hazardous
Materials Regulations (HMR; 49 CFR
Parts 171–180) to incorporate certain
requirements based on existing special
permits (SPs) issued by PHMSA under
49 CFR Part 107, Subpart B (§§ 107.101
to 107.127). A special permit sets forth
alternative requirements—or a
variance—to the requirements in the
HMR in a way that achieves a safety
level at least equal to the safety level
required under the regulations or that is
consistent with the public interest.
Congress expressly authorized DOT to
issue these variances in the Hazardous
Materials Transportation Act of 1975.
The HMR generally are performance
oriented regulations, which provides the
regulated community with a certain
amount of flexibility in meeting safety
requirements. Even so, however, not
every transportation situation can be
anticipated and built into the
regulations. Innovation is a strength of
our economy and the hazardous
materials community is particularly
strong at developing new materials and
technologies and innovative ways of
moving materials. Special permits
enable the hazardous materials industry
to quickly and safely integrate new
products and technologies into the
production and transportation stream.
Thus, special permits provide a
mechanism for testing new
technologies, promoting increased
transportation efficiency and
productivity, and ensuring global
competitiveness. A special permit must
achieve at least an equivalent level of
safety as the HMR. Implementation of
new technologies and operational
techniques may enhance safety because
the approved operations or activities
achieve a greater level of safety than
currently required under the
regulations. Special permits also reduce
the volume and complexity of the HMR
by addressing unique or infrequent
transportation situations that would be
difficult to accommodate in regulations
intended for use by a wide range of
shippers and carriers.
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
68005
PHMSA conducts ongoing reviews of
special permits to identify widely used
and longstanding special permits with
an established safety record for
conversion into regulations of broader
applicability. Converting these special
permits into regulations reduces
paperwork burdens and facilitates
commerce while maintaining an
acceptable level of safety. Additionally,
adoption of special permits as rules of
general applicability provides wider
access to the benefits and regulatory
flexibility of the provisions granted in
the special permits. Factors that
influence whether or not a specific
special permit is a candidate for
regulatory action include the safety
record for hazardous materials
transported under a special permit;
broad application of a special permit;
suitability of provisions in the special
permit for incorporation into the HMR;
rulemaking activity in related areas; and
agency priorities.
Several of the special permits
addressed in this notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) have hundreds of
party status grantees. Party status is
granted to a person who wishes to offer
for transport or transport a hazardous
material in the same manner as the
original applicant. Several special
permits addressed in this NPRM
provide for the manufacture, marking,
sale and use of certain packagings for
transportation of hazardous materials.
These manufacturing special permits are
issued to the packaging manufacturer
and provide for use of the packagings by
hundreds and possibly thousands of
distributors and users.
The amendments proposed in this
NPRM will eliminate the need for
approximately 510 current grantees to
reapply for renewal of 44 special
permits every four years and for PHMSA
to process the renewal applications.
These amendments also apply to any
special permits this agency issues
during the development of this
rulemaking or its final rule whose
provisions are identical in every respect
to those described in the rulemakings
issued under this docket. To emphasize
this, we will preface the description of
the affected special permits with the
wording ‘‘include’’ or ‘‘includes’’ to
clarify that additional special permits
other than those specifically listed in
this rulemaking may be incorporated
under these proposed revisions.
Incorporation of the special permits
into the HMR also eliminates a
significant paperwork burden. Unless
otherwise excepted by this agency, a
copy of each special permit must be
maintained at each facility where a
packaging is manufactured under a
E:\FR\FM\22DEP1.SGM
22DEP1
68006
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 244 / Tuesday, December 22, 2009 / Proposed Rules
special permit, at each facility where a
package is offered or re-offered for
transportation under a special permit
carried on board each cargo vessel or
aircraft, and in some cases must be
carried aboard each transport vehicle
used to transport a hazardous material
under a special permit.
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with PROPOSALS_PART 1
II. Overview of Proposed Amendments
We identified several special permits
for incorporation into this NPRM. A
more detailed discussion of
amendments to the HMR based on
incorporation of provisions from these
special permits appears in the
‘‘Summary Review’’ portion of this
preamble. The proposed revisions
include the following:
• Authorize vessel transportation for
salvage cylinders containing damaged or
leaking packagings under § 173.3.
• Allow liquid contents in quantities
greater than 10% of the capacity in a
mechanical displacement meter prover
to the extent that draining of the meter
prover is impracticable.
• Authorize the transport of waste
Division 4.2, Packing Group I material,
Division 5.2 (organic peroxide) material,
and Division 6.1, Packing Group I
(Hazard Zone A) material in lab packs
under § 173.12.
• Allow the use of alternative outer
packagings for waste lab packs and
require use of UN standard steel or
plastic drums (at the PG I performance
level) for the transportation of Division
4.2, Packing Group I material and
Division 6.1, Packing Group I, Hazard
Zone A material in lab packs under
§ 173.12.
• Except hazardous waste materials,
packaged in lab packs and meeting
additional conditions, from certain
segregation and marking requirements
under § 173.12.
• Allow variation in the packing
method for packagings prepared in
accordance with § 173.13.
• Authorize, for certain hazardous
materials, external visual inspection of
the rupture disc in a non-reclosing
pressure relief device of a rail tank car
without requiring removal of the
rupture disc.
• Authorize the transportation of
certain specially designed radiation
detectors containing a Division 2.2 (nonflammable gas) material under a new
section § 173.310.
• Allow a greater gross weight
limitation for packages used for the
transport of aerosols for purposes of
recycling or disposal.
• Allow rail tank cars to exceed the
maximum capacity and gross weight on
rail limitations upon approval from the
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:53 Dec 21, 2009
Jkt 220001
Federal Railroad Administration (FRA)
under § 179.13.
• Eliminate several requirements for
submitting duplicate copies of
applications for special permit, party
status, or renewal when the applications
are submitted electronically.
• Require certification of
understanding of a special permit for
persons submitting an application for
party status to a special permit.
III. Summary Review of Proposed
Amendments
The following are detailed summary
discussions of proposed amendments to
the HMR based on several special
permits we have identified as suitable
for incorporation into the HMR.
A. Salvage Cylinders
In accordance with § 173.3(d) of the
HMR, damaged or leaking cylinders
containing Division 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 3, 6.1,
or Class 8 materials may be overpacked
in a salvage cylinder and transported by
motor vehicle for repair or disposal. In
this NPRM, we are proposing to permit
salvage cylinders to be transported by
vessel, consistent with the provisions of
DOT–SP 14168.
B. Meter Provers
A mechanical displacement meter
prover (meter prover) is a mechanical
device, permanently mounted on a truck
or trailer, consisting of a piping system
that is used to calibrate the accuracy
and performance of meters that measure
the quantity of product being pumped
or transferred at facilities such as
drilling locations, refineries, tank farms
and loading racks. Section 173.5a(b)
excepts meter provers from specification
packaging requirements in Part 178 of
the HMR provided the meter provers
conform to certain conditions. In a final
rule published January 24, 2005 under
Docket No. RSPA–03–16370 (HM–233)
(70 FR 3302), the Research and Special
Programs Administration (RSPA), the
predecessor agency to PHMSA,
incorporated several special permits
concerning meter provers into § 173.5a.
As provided by § 173.5a(b), a meter
prover is excepted from the
specification packaging requirements
when, among other criteria, the liquid
content of the meter prover does not
exceed 10% of capacity (see
§ 173.5a(b)(2)(i)). PHMSA subsequently
issued a special permit to allow
transport of meter provers containing
flammable liquids in quantities greater
than 10% capacity when conditions
make draining of the liquid
impracticable. This special permit was
based on information that (1) facilities
or equipment used to drain and reinject
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
the meter provers may not be readily
available while in the field; (2)
alternatives such as using DOT
specification cargo tanks as meter
provers or accompanying a meter prover
with DOT specification cargo tanks
filled with liquids drained from the
meter prover are cost prohibitive; and
(3) there is a record of safe
transportation of meter provers under
provisions from special permits
previously adopted into the HMR.
Therefore, in this NPRM, we propose to
allow meter provers to retain flammable
liquid contents in quantities greater
than 10% of capacity to the extent that
draining the contents to 10% or less is
impracticable. The affected special
permits include DOT–SP 14405.
We also propose to revise § 173.5a,
paragraph (b)(iv), to change the wording
‘‘maximum service pressure’’ to the
acronym ‘‘MAWP’’ for maximum
allowable working pressure for
consistency with use of the wording in
other provisions within the HMR. In
addition, we are proposing to add a
definition for ‘‘Mechanical
displacement meter prover’’ in § 171.8.
As proposed, the definition reads:
Mechanical displacement meter prover
means a mechanical device used in the
oilfield service industry consisting of a
pipe assembly that is used to calibrate
the accuracy and performance of meters
that measure the quantities of a product
being pumped or transferred at facilities
such as drilling locations, refineries,
tank farms, and loading racks.
C. Lab Packs
Section 173.12 of the HMR excepts
certain waste materials from
specification packaging requirements
when transported in packagings (‘‘lab
packs’’) that conform to the
requirements specified in paragraph (b)
of the section. Currently, the outer
packaging of the lab packs must be a UN
1A2 or UN 1B2 metal drum, a UN 1D
plywood drum, a UN 1G fiber drum, or
a UN 1H2 plastic drum tested to the
Packing Group III performance level. In
this NPRM, we propose to allow the use
of a UN 4G fiberboard box made of at
least 500 psig burst strength fiberboard
that is tested and marked to at least the
Packing Group II performance level as
an alternative outer packaging for a lab
pack. The affected special permits
include DOT–SP 10791, 12927, 13285,
13937, 14510, and 14817. We also
propose to allow the use of a UN11G
fiberboard intermediate bulk container
(IBC) and a UN 11HH2 composite IBC
(with a flexible plastic inner receptacle
for solids loaded or discharged by
gravity) as alternative outer packaging
for a lab pack. The affected special
E:\FR\FM\22DEP1.SGM
22DEP1
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with PROPOSALS_PART 1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 244 / Tuesday, December 22, 2009 / Proposed Rules
permits include DOT–SP 12296, 12668,
12682, 12749, and 12826.
Section 173.12 also excepts certain
hazardous materials packaged in lab
packs in conformance with paragraph
(b) of this section from segregation
requirements in Parts 174, 176, and 177
of the HMR provided the materials
conform to limited segregation
conditions in paragraph (e). In this
NPRM, we are proposing to except
certain additional hazardous waste
materials in lab packs and non-bulk
packagings from segregation and
overpack marking requirements
consistent with the provisions of DOT–
SP 13192. We first issued DOT–SP
13192 in 2001 to consolidate earlier
special permits that allowed different
combinations of incompatible materials,
including waste materials, to be
transported together on the same
transport vehicle. The waste materials
are subject to safety control measures
designed to mitigate the risks presented
by these materials, such as quantity
limitations, additional packaging, and
segregation requirements. Revised
editions of this special permit have
authorized the transport of additional
hazardous materials not currently
authorized for transport under § 173.12.
These hazardous materials include
Division 5.2 (organic peroxide) material,
Division 4.2 Packing Group I material
(subject to more stringent outer
packaging requirements), and Division
6.1 Packing Group I, Hazard Zone A
material (for purposes of exception from
segregation requirements only). It has
been our experience with DOT–SP
13192 that when certain incompatible
hazardous materials are properly
packaged in lab packs and other
authorized non-bulk packages, the
possibility of these materials
commingling in an incident is greatly
reduced, if not eliminated, because of
the integrity of the packagings and, for
liquids, because of the requirement to
include a sufficient amount of
chemically compatible absorbent
material to absorb the contents.
Thus, in this NPRM, we propose to
authorize the transport of Division 5.2
(organic peroxide) material and Division
4.2 Packing Group I material in lab
packs, and authorize transport of waste
Division 6.1 Packing Group I, Hazard
Zone A material with other waste
materials if packaged in accordance
with § 173.226(c) of the HMR and
further packaged in an overpack of a UN
steel or plastic drum at the Packing
Group I performance level. We also
propose to make several conforming
amendments to segregration
requirements in Parts 174, 176, and 177
to clarify the requirements do not apply
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:53 Dec 21, 2009
Jkt 220001
to Division 6.1 Packing Group I, Hazard
Zone A material transported in
conformance with § 173.12(e).
D. Excepted Packaging
Section 173.13 provides conditions
for transport of hazardous materials in
non-specification packaging. Currently,
in § 173.13, for packaging of liquids, a
liquid must be placed in an inner
packaging which is then placed in a
hermetically sealed barrier bag that is
wrapped in chemically compatible
absorbent material and then placed in a
metal can. PHMSA has issued a number
of special permits that allow an
alternative configuration in which the
inner packaging for liquids is first
wrapped in absorbent material and then
placed in a hermetically sealed barrier
bag which is then placed in a metal can.
In this NPRM, we propose to
incorporate this alternative method of
packing inner packagings for liquids
into § 173.13. The affected special
permits include DOT–SP 7891, 8249,
9168, 10672, 10962, 10977, 11248,
12401, 13355.
E. Visual Inspection of Rail Tank Cars
Section 173.31 outlines requirements
for the use of rail tank cars transporting
hazardous materials. Paragraph (d) of
this section requires an offeror to
perform an external visual inspection of
a rail tank car containing a hazardous
material or a residue of a hazardous
material prior to offering it for
transportation. As a part of the
examination, paragraph (d)(1)(vi)
requires a careful inspection of the
rupture (frangible) disc in non-reclosing
pressure relief devices for corrosion or
damage that may alter the intended
operation of the device. Under special
permits DOT–SP 11761 and 11864, the
rupture disc is not required to be
removed prior to visual inspection if the
tank car contains residue of a Class 8
(corrosive), Packing Group II or III
material with no subsidiary hazard or
the residue of Class 9 molten sulfur. The
HMR define ‘‘residue’’ to mean the
hazardous material remaining in a
packaging after its contents have been
unloaded to the maximum extent
possible (see § 171.8). PHMSA has
interpreted ‘‘unloaded to the maximum
extent possible’’ to mean that the
hazardous material has ceased to flow
out of the packaging’s unloading device.
Operations under these special permits
have demonstrated these materials are
present in the tank car in insufficient
quantity and physical form to present a
risk from a release of the material
through a tank car pressure relief device
due to the failure of a rupture disc
during transportation.
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
68007
Based on the safety record of use of
the special permits, in this NPRM, we
propose to revise paragraph (d)(1)(vi) to
exclude inspection of the underside of
the rupture disc on rail tank cars
containing residue of a Class 8
(corrosive), PG II or III material with no
subsidiary hazard or containing the
residue of a Class 9 elevated
temperature material.
F. Radiation Detectors
Radiation detectors are used for
measuring the intensity of ionizing
radiation. The devices typically contain
a gas filled tube or ion chamber where
radiation converts the gas into ions and
the rate at which these ions are
collected (on oppositely charged
electrodes in the device) is measured as
electric current. These radiation
detectors are often used as integral parts
of medical test equipment, such as a
dose calibrator. The HMR require that
the pressurized gas contained in these
devices be transported in DOT
specification cylinders or nonspecification containers meeting the
requirements prescribed in § 173.302 or
§ 173.306 of the HMR.
In this NPRM, we propose to
authorize in new § 173.310 the
transportation of radiation detectors
(also described as radiation sensors,
electron tube devices, and ionization
chambers) containing a gas, specifically,
certain Division 2.2 (non-flammable)
compressed gases contained in electron
tubes that are non-DOT specification,
metal, single trip, inside containers that
may or may not be hermetically sealed
or equipped with a pressure relief
device, based on the use of several
special permits. The inside metal
containers must be welded and
designed to prevent fragmentation upon
impact. The electron tubes may have up
to a maximum design pressure of 4.83
MPa (700 psig), and up to a maximum
water capacity of 355 fluid ounces (641
cubic inches), and must have a burst
pressure of not less than three times the
design pressure if equipped with a
pressure relief device, and not less than
four times the design pressure if not
equipped with a pressure relief device.
Also, each radiation detector must be
placed in a strong outer packaging
capable of withstanding a minimum
drop test of 1.2 meter (4 feet) without
breaking the device or rupturing the
outer packaging, or if shipped as part of
equipment, that the equipment provide
equivalent protection. In addition, each
shipment of these devices must be
accompanied by emergency response
information that must identify those
receptacles not fitted with a pressure
relief device, and provide guidance on
E:\FR\FM\22DEP1.SGM
22DEP1
68008
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 244 / Tuesday, December 22, 2009 / Proposed Rules
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with PROPOSALS_PART 1
how to manage all the detectors if they
are exposed to fire. When transported in
conformance with these conditions, we
propose to except radiation detectors
from the specification packaging in this
subchapter and, except when
transported by air, from labeling and
placarding requirements of this
subchapter. The safety record for
shipments made in accordance with
several special permits is outstanding;
therefore, PHMSA has determined the
exceptions they contain demonstrate an
acceptable level of safety and are
candidates for inclusion into the HMR.
The affected special permits include
DOT–SP 9030, 9940, 10407, 12131,
12415, 13026, 13109 and 13244.
G. Aerosols for Recycling or Disposal
Section 173.306 provides exceptions
from the requirements of the HMR for
transport of limited quantities of
compressed gases including limited
quantities contained in aerosol
containers. Conditions for exception
from requirements include a 30 kg (66
pound) gross weight limitation for outer
packagings. Under a special permit,
PHMSA authorized the transport of
limited quantities of certain Division 2.1
(flammable) and Division 2.2 (nonflammable) gases in aerosol containers
packaged in strong outer packagings
with gross weights of up to 500 kg
(1,100 pounds). PHMSA allowed the
increase in gross weight for the purpose
of packaging discarded empty, partially
used, and full aerosol containers to be
transported to a recycling or disposal
facility. As part of the conditions for the
special permit, each aerosol container
must be fitted with a cap to protect the
valve stem or the valve stem must be
removed. Based on the safe record of
transportation of these aerosol
containers under this special permit;
and based on the fact that some limited
quantity materials reclassed as ORM–D
material, as authorized under § 173.306,
are not subject to the 30 kg (66 pound)
gross weight limitation when unitized
in packages and offered for
transportation in accordance with
§ 173.156 of the HMR, in this NPRM, we
propose in § 173.306(k) to authorize the
highway transport of aerosol containers
conforming to § 173.306 in strong outer
packagings not to exceed 500 kg (1,100
pounds) when transported for the
purpose of recycling or disposal. The
affected special permits include DOT–
SP 12842.
H. Rail Tank Car Gross Weight
Limitation
Section 179.13 sets limitations on rail
tank car capacity and gross weight.
Currently, this section limits rail tank
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:53 Dec 21, 2009
Jkt 220001
cars to a maximum capacity of 34,500
gallons (130,597 L) and a gross weight
of 263,000 pounds (119,295 kg). PHMSA
granted several special permits to allow
tank cars to transport up to 286,000
pounds (129,727 kg) gross weight on rail
subject to certain conditions. We
propose to revise this section to provide
rail carriers with relief from the rail tank
car capacity and gross weight
limitations subject to review of an
approval application submitted to the
Associate Administrator for Safety,
FRA. Providing for an approval process
will expedite movement of rail tank cars
by simplifying regulatory procedures
and eliminating the time constraints
associated with the mandatory comment
period required for special permit
applications. The affected special
permits include DOT–SP 11241, 11654,
11803, 12423, 12561, 12613, 12768,
12858, 12903, 13856, 13936, 14004,
14038, 14442, 14505, 14520, 14570, and
14619.
I. Revisions to Procedures
Procedures for serving documents in
PHMSA proceedings are established in
49 CFR Part 105. In accordance with
these procedures, a non-resident of the
United States must designate an agent
and file the designation with PHMSA.
In this NPRM, we propose to add the
phrase ‘‘agent for service of process’’ as
a synonym for the word ‘‘agent’’ in
paragraph (b) of § 105.40(b) to clarify
that this term includes an agent for
service of process as this phrase is used
elsewhere in PHMSA’s procedural
regulations in 49 CFR Parts 105, 106,
and 107. In addition, in this NPRM we
propose to revise the definition for
‘‘Special Permit’’ in 49 CFR Part 107 to
permit the Associate Administrator of
Hazardous Materials Safety to delegate
signature authority at the Office Director
level. We are proposing the same
revision to the definition for ‘‘Special
Permit’’ in § 171.8.
As provided in § 107.105, an
application for a special permit must be
submitted in duplicate no matter the
method of submission, whether mail,
fax, or e-mail. We propose to revise
paragraph (a)(1) of this section to clarify
that a duplicate copy of the application
for a special permit is not required
when the application is submitted
electronically by e-mail. We also
propose to revise paragraph (a)(2) to
require an e-mail address if available
and the DOT registration number if
applicable. Finally, we are revising the
format of paragraph (a) for greater ease
of understanding of the application
requirements for special permits.
Application requirements for party
status to a special permit are set forth in
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
§ 107.107. We propose to revise
paragraph (b)(1) of this section to clarify
that a duplicate copy of the application
for party status is not required when the
application is submitted electronically
by e-mail and to revise paragraph (b)(3)
to require an e-mail address if available
and the DOT registration number if
applicable. In addition, in paragraph
(b)(3), we propose to require an
applicant for party status to provide a
justification of the need for party status
to the special permit and to certify that
the applicant has read and understands
the provisions of the special permit for
party status. Finally, we are revising the
format of paragraph (a) to make it easier
to understand the application
requirements.
Application procedures for renewal of
a special permit are set forth in
§ 107.109. We propose to revise
paragraph (a)(1) to state that a duplicate
copy of an application to renew a
special permit is not required when the
application is submitted electronically.
IV. Rulemaking Analyses and Notices
A. Statutory/Legal Authority for This
Rulemaking
This NPRM is published under the
authority of 49 U.S.C. 5103(b) which
authorizes the Secretary to prescribe
regulations for the safe transportation,
including security, of hazardous
material in intrastate, interstate, and
foreign commerce. 49 U.S.C. 5117(a)
authorizes the Secretary of
Transportation to issue a special permit
from a regulation prescribed in 5103(b),
5104, 5110, or 5112 of the Federal
Hazardous Materials Transportation
Law to a person transporting, or causing
to be transported, hazardous material in
a way that achieves a safety level at least
equal to the safety level required under
the law, or consistent with the public
interest, if a required safety level does
not exist. If adopted as proposed, the
final rule would amend the regulations
incorporating provision from certain
widely used and longstanding special
permits that have established a history
of safety and which may, therefore, be
converted into the regulations for
general use.
B. Executive Order 12866 and DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures
This proposed rule is not considered
a significant regulatory action under
section 3(f) and was not reviewed by the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB). The proposed rule is not
considered a significant rule under the
Regulatory Policies and Procedures
order issued by the Department of
Transportation [44 FR 11034].
E:\FR\FM\22DEP1.SGM
22DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 244 / Tuesday, December 22, 2009 / Proposed Rules
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with PROPOSALS_PART 1
In this notice, we propose to amend
the HMR to incorporate alternatives this
agency has permitted under widely used
and longstanding special permits with
established safety records we have
determined meet the safety criteria for
inclusion in the HMR. Incorporation of
these special permits into regulations of
general applicability will provide
shippers and carriers with additional
flexibility to comply with established
safety requirements, thereby reducing
transportation costs and increasing
productivity. In addition, the proposals
in this NPRM will reduce the paperwork
burden on industry and this agency
resulting from continued renewals of
special permits. Taken together, the
provisions of this proposed rule will
promote the continued safe
transportation of hazardous materials
while reducing transportation costs for
the industry and administrative costs for
the agency.
C. Executive Order 13132
This proposed rule was analyzed in
accordance with the principles and
criteria contained in Executive Order
13132 (‘‘Federalism’’). This proposed
rule would preempt state, local and
Indian tribe requirements but does not
propose any regulation that has
substantial direct effects on the states,
the relationship between the national
government and the states, or the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of governments. Therefore, the
consultation and funding requirements
of Executive Order 13132 do not apply.
Federal hazardous material
transportation law, 49 U.S.C. 5101–
5128, contains an express preemption
provision (49 U.S.C. 5125(b))
preempting state, local and Indian tribe
requirements on certain covered
subjects. Covered subjects are:
(1) The designation, description, and
classification of hazardous materials;
(2) The packing, repacking, handling,
labeling, marking, and placarding of
hazardous materials;
(3) The preparation, execution, and
use of shipping documents related to
hazardous materials and requirements
related to the number, contents, and
placement of those documents;
(4) The written notification,
recording, and reporting of the
unintentional release in transportation
of hazardous materials; or
(5) The design, manufacture,
fabrication, marking, maintenance,
reconditioning, repair, or testing of a
packaging or container represented,
marked, certified, or sold as qualified
for use in transporting hazardous
materials.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:53 Dec 21, 2009
Jkt 220001
This final rule addresses covered
subject items (2), (3), and (5) and would
preempt any State, local, or Indian tribe
requirements not meeting the
‘‘substantively the same’’ standard.
Federal hazardous materials
transportation law provides at 49 U.S.C.
5125(b)(2) that if PHMSA issues a
regulation concerning any of the
covered subjects, PHMSA must
determine and publish in the Federal
Register the effective date of Federal
preemption. The effective date may not
be earlier than the 90th day following
the date of issuance of the proposed rule
and not later than two years after the
date of issuance. PHMSA proposes the
effective date of federal preemption be
90 days from publication of a final rule
in this matter in the Federal Register.
D. Executive Order 13175
This proposed rule was analyzed in
accordance with the principles and
criteria contained in Executive Order
13175 (‘‘Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments’’).
Because this proposed rule does not
have tribal implications and does not
impose substantial direct compliance
costs on Indian tribal governments, the
funding and consultation requirements
of Executive Order 13175 do not apply.
E. Regulatory Flexibility Act, Executive
Order 13272, and DOT Procedures and
Policies
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.) requires an agency to
review regulations to assess their impact
on small entities. An agency must
conduct a regulatory flexibility analysis
unless it determines and certifies that a
rule is not expected to have a significant
impact on a substantial number of small
entities. This proposed rule incorporates
into the HMR certain widely used
special permits. Incorporation of these
special permits into regulations of
general applicability will provide
shippers and carriers with additional
flexibility to comply with established
safety requirements, thereby reducing
transportation costs and increasing
productivity. Therefore, I certify this
rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
This proposed rule has been
developed in accordance with Executive
Order 13272 (‘‘Proper Consideration of
Small Entities in Agency Rulemaking’’)
and DOT’s procedures and policies to
promote compliance with the
Regulatory Flexibility Act to ensure that
potential impacts of draft rules on small
entities are properly considered.
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
68009
F. Paperwork Reduction Act
PHMSA has an approved information
collection under OMB Control Number
2137–0051, ‘‘Rulemaking, Special
Permits, and Preemption
Requirements.’’ This NPRM may result
in a decrease in the annual burden and
costs under this information collection
due to proposed changes to incorporate
provisions contained in certain widely
used or longstanding special permits
that have an established safety record.
Under the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995, no person is required to
respond to an information collection
unless it has been approved by OMB
and displays a valid OMB control
number. Section 1320.8(d), title 5, Code
of Federal Regulations requires that
PHMSA provide interested members of
the public and affected agencies an
opportunity to comment on information
and recordkeeping requests.
This notice identifies a revised
information collection request that
PHMSA will submit to OMB for
approval based on the requirements in
this proposed rule. PHMSA has
developed burden estimates to reflect
changes in this proposed rule. PHMSA
estimates that the information collection
and recordkeeping burden as proposed
in this rule would be as follows:
OMB Control No. 2137–0051:
Net Decrease in Annual Number of
Respondents: 520.
Net Decrease in Annual Responses:
55.
Net Decrease in Annual Burden
Hours: 560.
Net Decrease in Annual Burden Costs:
$22,400.
PHMSA specifically requests
comments on the information collection
and recordkeeping burdens associated
with developing, implementing, and
maintaining these requirements for
approval under this proposed rule.
Requests for a copy of this
information collection should be
directed to Deborah Boothe or T. Glenn
Foster, Office of Hazardous Materials
Standards (PHH–11), Pipeline and
Hazardous Materials Safety
Administration, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590–
0001, Telephone (202) 366–8553.
Address written comments to the
Dockets Unit as identified in the
ADDRESSES section of this rulemaking.
We must receive comments regarding
information collection burdens prior to
the close of the comment period
identified in the DATES section of this
rulemaking. In addition, you may
submit comments specifically related to
the information collection burden to the
PHMSA Desk Officer, Office of
E:\FR\FM\22DEP1.SGM
22DEP1
68010
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 244 / Tuesday, December 22, 2009 / Proposed Rules
Management and Budget, at fax number
202–395–6974.
G. Regulation Identifier Number (RIN)
A regulation identifier number (RIN)
is assigned to each regulatory action
listed in the Unified Agenda of Federal
Regulations. The Regulatory Information
Service Center publishes the Unified
Agenda in April and October of each
year. The RIN contained in the heading
of this document may be used to crossreference this action with the Unified
Agenda.
H. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995
This proposed rule does not impose
unfunded mandates under the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995. It does not result in costs of
$141.3 million or more to either state,
local or tribal governments, in the
aggregate, or to the private sector, and
is the least burdensome alternative that
achieves the objective of the rule.
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with PROPOSALS_PART 1
I. Environmental Assessment
The National Environmental Policy
Act of 1969 (NEPA), as amended (42
U.S.C. 4321–4347), requires Federal
agencies to consider the consequences
of major Federal actions and to prepare
a detailed statement on actions that
significantly affect the quality of the
human environment.
The hazardous materials regulatory
system is a risk management system that
is prevention-oriented and focused on
identifying a hazard and reducing the
probability and quantity of a hazardous
materials release. Hazardous materials
are categorized by hazard analysis and
experience into hazard classes and
packing groups. The regulations require
each shipper to class a material in
accordance with these hazard classes
and packing groups; the process of
classifying a hazardous material is itself
a form of hazard analysis. Further, the
regulations require the shipper to
communicate the material’s hazards by
identifying the hazard class, packing
group, and proper shipping name on
shipping papers and with labels on
packages and placards on transport
vehicles. Thus, the shipping paper,
labels, and placards communicate the
most significant findings of the
shipper’s hazard analysis. A hazardous
material is assigned to one of three
packing groups based upon its degree of
hazard, from a high hazard Packing
Group I material to a low hazard
Packing Group III material. The quality,
damage resistance, and performance
standards for the packagings authorized
for the hazardous materials in each
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:53 Dec 21, 2009
Jkt 220001
packing group are appropriate for the
hazards of the material transported.
Hazardous materials are transported
by aircraft, vessel, rail, and highway.
The potential for environmental damage
or contamination exists when packages
of hazardous materials are involved in
transportation accidents. The need for
hazardous materials to support essential
services means transportation of highly
hazardous materials is unavoidable.
However, these shipments frequently
move through densely populated or
environmentally sensitive areas where
the consequences of an incident could
be loss of life, serious injury, or
significant environmental damage. The
ecosystems that could be affected by a
hazardous materials release during
transportation include atmospheric,
aquatic, terrestrial, and vegetal
resources (for example, wildlife
habitats). The adverse environmental
impacts associated with releases of most
hazardous materials are short-term
impacts that can be greatly reduced or
eliminated through prompt clean-up of
the accident scene.
There are no significant
environmental impacts associated with
the proposals in this NPRM. We are
proposing clarifications and changes to
certain HMR requirements to include
methods for packaging, describing, and
transporting hazardous materials that
are currently permitted under widely
used special permits with established
safety records for inclusion in the HMR.
The process through which safety
permits are issued requires the
applicant to demonstrate that the
alternative transportation method or
packaging proposed provides an
equivalent level of safety as that
provided in the HMR. Implicit in this
process is that the special permit must
provide an equivalent level of
environmental protection as that
provided in the HMR. Thus,
incorporation of the special permits as
regulations of general applicability
maintains the existing environmental
protections built into the HMR.
J. Privacy Act
Anyone is able to search the
electronic form of all comments
received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the
comment (or signing the comment, if
submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may
review DOT’s complete Privacy Act
Statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (Volume
65, Number 70, pages 19477–78), or at
https://www.regulations.gov.
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
List of Subjects
49 CFR Part 105
Administrative practice and
procedure, Hazardous materials
transportation.
49 CFR Part 107
Administrative practice and
procedure, Hazardous materials
transportation, Packaging and
containers, Penalties, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
49 CFR Part 171
Exports, Hazardous materials
transportation, Hazardous waste,
Imports, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
49 CFR Part 173
Hazardous materials transportation,
Packaging and containers, Radioactive
materials, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Uranium.
49 CFR Part 174
Hazardous materials transportation,
Radioactive materials, Rail carriers,
Railroad safety, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
49 CFR Part 176
Hazardous materials transportation,
Maritime carriers, Radioactive materials,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
49 CFR Part 177
Hazardous materials transportation,
Motor carriers, Radioactive materials,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
49 CFR Part 179
Hazardous materials transportation,
Railroad safety, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
In consideration of the foregoing, we
propose to amend 49 CFR Chapter I as
follows:
PART 105—HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
PROGRAM DEFINITIONS AND
GENERAL PROCEDURES
1. The authority citation for part 105
is revised to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 5101–5128; 49 CFR
1.53.
§ 105.40
[Amended]
2. In § 105.40, paragraph (b),
introductory paragraph, after the word
‘‘agent’’, add the words and punctuation
‘‘, also known as ‘‘agent for service of
process’’.’’
E:\FR\FM\22DEP1.SGM
22DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 244 / Tuesday, December 22, 2009 / Proposed Rules
PART 107—HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
PROGRAM PROCEDURES
3. The authority citation for part 107
is revised to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 5101–5128, 44701;
Pub. L. 101–410 section 4 (28 U.S.C. 2461
note); Pub. L. 104–121 sections 212–213;
Pub. L. 104–134 section 31001; 49 CFR 1.45,
1.53.
4. In § 107.1, revise the definition of
‘‘Special permit’’ to read as follows:
§ 107.1
Definitions.
*
*
*
*
*
Special permit means a document
issued by the Associate Administrator,
or other designated Department official,
under the authority of 49 U.S.C. 5117
permitting a person to perform a
function that is not otherwise permitted
under subchapters A or C of this
chapter, or other regulations issued
under 49 U.S.C. 5101 et seq. (e.g.,
Federal Motor Carrier Safety routing
requirements). The terms ‘‘special
permit’’ and ‘‘exemption’’ have the same
meaning for purposes of subchapters A
or C of this chapter or other regulations
issued under 49 U.S.C. 5101 through
5128.
*
*
*
*
*
5. In § 107.105, revise paragraph (a) to
read as follows:
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with PROPOSALS_PART 1
§ 107.105
Application for special permit.
(a) General. Each application for a
special permit or modification of a
special permit must be written in
English and submitted for timely
consideration, at least 120 days before
the requested effective date and must—
(1)(i) Be submitted in duplicate to:
Associate Administrator for Hazardous
Materials Safety (Attention: Special
Permits, PHH–31), Pipeline and
Hazardous Materials Safety
Administration, U.S. Department of
Transportation, East Building, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington,
DC 20590–0001;
(ii) Be submitted in duplicate with
any attached supporting documentation
by facsimile (fax) to: (202) 366–3753 or
(202) 366–3308; or
(iii) Be submitted by electronic mail
(e-mail) to: Specialpermits@dot.gov.
Electronic submissions need not be
submitted in duplicate;
(2) State the name, street and mailing
addresses, e-mail address (if available),
US DOT Registration number (if
applicable), and telephone number of
the applicant. If the applicant is not an
individual, also state the name, street
and mailing addresses, e-mail address
(if available), and telephone number of
an individual designated as an agent of
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:53 Dec 21, 2009
Jkt 220001
the applicant for all purposes related to
the application;
(3) Include a designation of agent of
service for process in accordance with
§ 105.40 of this part if the applicant is
not a resident of the United States; and
(4) For a manufacturing special
permit, include a statement of the name
and street address of each facility when
manufacturing under the special permit
will occur.
*
*
*
*
*
6. In § 107.107, revise paragraphs
(b)(1), (3), (4), and (5) to read as follows:
§ 107.107
Application for party status.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(1)(i) Be submitted in duplicate to:
Associate Administrator for Hazardous
Materials Safety (Attention: Special
Permits, PHH–31), Pipeline and
Hazardous Materials Safety
Administration, U.S. Department of
Transportation, East Building, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington,
DC 20590–0001;
(ii) Be submitted in duplicate with
any attached supporting documentation
by facsimile (fax) to: (202) 366–3753 or
(202) 366–3308; or
(iii) Be submitted by electronic mail
(e-mail) to: Specialpermits@dot.gov.
Electronic submissions need not be
submitted in duplicate;
(2) * * *
(3) State the name, street and mailing
addresses, e-mail address (if available),
US DOT Registration number (if
applicable), and telephone number of
the applicant. If the applicant is not an
individual, also state the name, street
and mailing addresses, e-mail address
(if available), and telephone number of
an individual designated as an agent of
the applicant for all purposes related to
the application. In addition, each
applicant must state why party status to
the special permit is needed and must
submit a certification of understanding
of the provisions of the special permit
to which party status is being requested;
(4) Include a designation of agent of
service for process in accordance with
§ 105.40 of this part if the applicant is
not a resident of the United States; and
(5) For a Class 1 material that is
forbidden for transportation by aircraft
except under a special permit (see
Columns 9A and 9B in the table in 49
CFR 172.101), include a certification by
the applicant for party status to a special
permit to transport such Class 1
material, on passenger-carrying or cargoonly aircraft with a maximum
certificated takeoff weight of less than
12,500 pounds, that no person within
the categories listed in 18 U.S.C. 842(i)
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
68011
will participate in the transportation of
the Class 1 material.
*
*
*
*
*
7. Revise § 107.109 to read as follows:
§ 107.109
Application for renewal.
(a) Each application for renewal of a
special permit or renewal of party status
to a special permit must—
(1)(i) Be submitted in duplicate to:
Associate Administrator for Hazardous
Materials Safety (Attention: Special
Permits, PHH–31), Pipeline and
Hazardous Materials Safety
Administration, U.S. Department of
Transportation, East Building, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington,
DC 20590–0001;
(ii) Be submitted in duplicate with
any attached supporting documentation
by facsimile (fax) to: (202) 366–3753 or
(202) 366–3308; or
(iii) Be submitted by electronic mail
(e-mail) to: Specialpermits@dot.gov.
Electronic submissions need not be
submitted in duplicate;
(2) Identify by number the special
permit for which renewal is requested;
(3) State the name, street and mailing
addresses, e-mail address (if available),
US DOT Registration number (if
applicable), and telephone number of
the applicant. If the applicant is not an
individual, also state the name, street
and mailing addresses, e-mail address
(if available), and telephone number of
an individual designated as an agent of
the applicant for all purposes related to
the application. In addition, each
applicant for renewal of party status
must state why party status to the
special permit is needed and must
submit a certification of understanding
of the provisions of the special permit
to which party status is being requested;
(4) Include either a certification by the
applicant that the original application,
as it may have been updated by any
application for renewal, remains
accurate and complete; or include an
amendment to the previously submitted
application as is necessary to update
and assure the accuracy and
completeness of the application, with
certification by the applicant that the
application as amended is accurate and
complete; and
(5) Include a statement describing all
relevant shipping and incident
experience of which the applicant is
aware in connection with the special
permit since its issuance or most recent
renewal. If the applicant is aware of no
incidents, the applicant must so certify.
When known to the applicant, the
statement should indicate the
approximate number of shipments made
or packages shipped, as the case may be,
and number of shipments or packages
E:\FR\FM\22DEP1.SGM
22DEP1
68012
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 244 / Tuesday, December 22, 2009 / Proposed Rules
involved in any loss of contents,
including loss by venting other than as
authorized in subchapter C; and
(6) When a Class 1 material is
forbidden for transportation by aircraft,
except under a special permit (see
Columns 9A and 9B in the table in 49
CFR 172.101), include a certification by
the applicant for renewal of party status
to a special permit to transport such
Class 1 material, on passenger-carrying
or cargo-only aircraft with a maximum
certificated takeoff weight of less than
12,500 pounds, that no person within
the categories listed in 18 U.S.C. 842(i)
will participate in the transportation of
the Class 1 material.
(b) If at least 60 days before an
existing special permit expires the
grantee files an application for renewal
that is complete and conforms to the
requirements of this section, the special
permit will not expire until final
administrative action on the application
for renewal has been taken.
PART 171—GENERAL INFORMATION,
REGULATIONS, AND DEFINITIONS
8. The citation for part 171 continues
to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 5101–5128, 44701; 49
CFR 1.45 and 1.53; Pub. L. 101–410, section
4 (28 U.S.C. 2461 Note); Pub. L. 104–134
section 31001.
9. In § 171.8, add a new definition for
‘‘Mechanical displacement meter
prover’’ and revise the definition for
‘‘Special permit’’ to read as follows:
§ 171.8
Definitions and abbreviations.
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with PROPOSALS_PART 1
*
*
*
*
*
Mechanical displacement meter
prover means a mechanical device used
in the oilfield service industry
consisting of a pipe assembly that is
used to calibrate the accuracy and
performance of meters that measure the
quantities of a product being pumped or
transferred at facilities such as drilling
locations, refineries, tank farms, and
loading racks.
*
*
*
*
*
Special permit means a document
issued by the Associate Administrator,
or other designated Department official,
under the authority of 49 U.S.C. 5117
permitting a person to perform a
function that is not otherwise permitted
under subchapters A or C of this
chapter, or other regulations issued
under 49 U.S.C. 5101 et seq. (e.g.,
Federal Motor Carrier Safety routing
requirements). The terms ‘‘special
permit’’ and ‘‘exemption’’ have the same
meaning for purposes of subchapters A
or C of this chapter or other regulations
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:53 Dec 21, 2009
Jkt 220001
issued under 49 U.S.C. 5101 through
5128.
*
*
*
*
*
PART 173—SHIPPERS—GENERAL
REQUIREMENTS FOR SHIPMENTS
AND PACKAGINGS
10. The authority citation for part 173
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 5101–5128, 44701; 49
CFR 1.45, 1.53.
11. In § 173.3, revise paragraph (d)(6)
to read as follows:
§ 173.3
Packaging and exceptions.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(6) Transportation is authorized by
motor vehicle and vessel only.
*
*
*
*
*
12. In § 173.5a, revise paragraph (b) to
read as follows:
§ 173.5a Oilfield service vehicles and
mechanical displacement meter provers.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Mechanical displacement meter
provers. (1) A mechanical displacement
meter prover, as defined in § 171.8 of
this subchapter, permanently mounted
on a truck chassis or trailer and
transported by motor vehicle is
excepted from the specification
packaging requirements in part 178 of
this subchapter provided it—
(i) Contains only the residue of a
Division 2.1 (flammable gas) or Class 3
(flammable liquid) material. For liquids,
the meter prover must be drained to not
exceed 10% of its capacity or, to the
extent that draining of the meter prover
is impracticable, to the maximum extent
practicable. For gases, the meter prover
must not exceed 25% of the marked
pressure rating;
(ii) Has a water capacity of 3,785 L
(1,000 gallons) or less;
(iii) Is designed and constructed in
accordance with chapters II, III, IV, V
and VI of ASME Standard B31.4 (IBR,
see § 171.7 of this subchapter);
(iv) Is marked with the MAWP
determined from the pipe component
with the lowest pressure rating; and
(v) Is equipped with rear-end
protection as prescribed in § 178.337–
10(c) of this subchapter and 49 CFR
393.86 of the Federal Motor Carrier
Safety Regulations.
(2) The description on the shipping
paper for a meter prover containing the
residue of a hazardous material must
include the phrase ‘‘RESIDUE: LAST
CONTAINED * * * ’’ before the basic
description.
(3) Periodic test and inspection. (i)
Each meter prover must be externally
visually inspected once a year. The
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
external visual inspection must include
at a minimum: checking for leakage,
defective fittings and welds, defective
closures, significant dents and other
defects or abnormalities which indicate
a potential or actual weakness that
could render the meter prover unsafe for
transportation; and
(ii) Each meter prover must be
pressure tested once every 5 years at not
less than 75% of design pressure. The
pressure must be held for a period of
time sufficiently long to assure
detection of leaks, but in no case less
than 5 minutes.
(4) In addition to the training
requirements in subpart H, the person
who performs the visual inspection or
pressure test and/or signs the inspection
report must have the knowledge and
ability to perform them as required by
this section.
(5) A meter prover that fails the
periodic test and inspection must be
rejected and removed from hazardous
materials service unless the meter
prover is adequately repaired, and
thereafter, a successful test is conducted
in accordance with the requirements of
this section.
(6) Prior to any repair work, the meter
prover must be emptied of any
hazardous material. A meter prover
containing flammable lading must be
purged.
(7) Each meter prover successfully
completing the external visual
inspection and the pressure test must be
marked with the test date (month/year),
and the type of test or inspection as
follows:
(i) V for external visual inspection;
and
(ii) P for pressure test.
The marking must be on the side of
a tank or the largest piping component
in letters 32 mm (1.25 inches) high on
a contrasting background.
(8) The owner must retain a record of
the most recent external visual
inspection and pressure test until the
next test or inspection of the same type
is successfully completed. The test or
inspection report must include the
following:
(i) Serial number or other meter
prover identifier;
(ii) Type of test or inspection
performed;
(iii) Test date (month/year);
(iv) Location of defects found, if any,
and method used to repair each defect;
(v) Name and address of person
performing the test or inspection;
(vi) Disposition statement, such as
‘‘Meter Prover returned to service’’ or
‘‘Meter Prover removed from service’’.
13. In § 173.12, revise paragraphs (b)
and (e), redesignate paragraph (f) as new
E:\FR\FM\22DEP1.SGM
22DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 244 / Tuesday, December 22, 2009 / Proposed Rules
paragraph (g), and add new paragraph
(f) to read as follows:
§ 173.12 Exceptions for shipment of waste
materials.
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with PROPOSALS_PART 1
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Lab packs. (1) Waste materials
prohibited by paragraph (b)(3) of this
section are not authorized for transport
in packages authorized by this
paragraph (b). Waste materials classed
as Class or Division 3, 4.1, 4.2, 4.3, 5.1,
5.2, 6.1, 8, or 9 are excepted from the
specification packaging requirements of
this subchapter for combination
packagings if packaged in accordance
with this paragraph (b) and transported
for disposal or recovery by highway, rail
or cargo vessel. In addition, a generic
description from the § 172.101
Hazardous Materials Table may be used
in place of specific chemical names,
when two or more chemically
compatible waste materials in the same
hazard class are packaged in the same
outside packaging.
(2) Combination packaging
requirements:
(i) Inner packagings. The inner
packagings must be either glass, not
exceeding 4 L (1 gallon) rated capacity,
or metal or plastic, not exceeding 20 L
(5.3 gallons) rated capacity. Inner
packagings containing liquid must be
surrounded by a chemically compatible
absorbent material in sufficient quantity
to absorb the total liquid contents.
(ii) Outer packaging. Each outer
packaging may contain only one class of
waste material. The following outer
packagings are authorized except that
Division 4.2 Packing Group I materials
must be packaged using UN standard
steel or plastic drums tested and marked
to the Packing Group I performance
level for liquids or solids; and bromine
pentafluoride and bromine trifluoride
may not be packaged using UN 4G
fiberboard boxes:
(A) A UN 1A2 or UN 1B2 metal drum,
a UN 1D plywood drum, a UN 1G fiber
drum, or a UN 1H2 plastic drum, tested
and marked to at least the Packing
Group III performance level for liquids
or solids;
(B) At a minimum, a double-walled
UN 4G fiberboard box made out of 500
pound burst-strength fiberboard fitted
with a polyethylene liner at least 3 mils
(0.12 inches) thick and when filled
during testing to 95 percent capacity
with a solid material, successfully
passes the tests prescribed in §§ 178.603
(drop) and 178.606 (stacking), and is
capable of passing the tests prescribed
in § 178.608 (vibration) to at least the
Packing Group II performance level for
liquids or solids; or
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:53 Dec 21, 2009
Jkt 220001
(C) A UN 11G fiberboard intermediate
bulk container (IBC) or a UN 11HH2
composite IBC, fitted with a
polyethylene liner at least 6 mils (0.24
inches) thick, that successfully passes
the tests prescribed in Subpart O of Part
178 and § 178.603 to at least the Packing
Group II performance level for liquids or
solids; a UN 11HH2 is composed of
multiple layers of encapsulated
corrugated fiberboard between inner
and outer layers of woven coated
polypropylene.
(iii) The gross weight of each
completed combination package may
not exceed 205 kg (452 lbs).
(3) Prohibited materials. The
following waste materials may not be
packaged or described under the
provisions of this paragraph (b): a
material poisonous-by-inhalation, a
Division 6.1 Packing Group I material,
chloric acid, and oleum (fuming sulfuric
acid).
*
*
*
*
*
(e) Segregation requirements. Waste
materials packaged according to
paragraph (b) of this section and
transported in conformance with this
paragraph (e) are not subject to the
segregation requirements in
§§ 174.81(d), 176.83(b), and 177.848(d)
if blocked and braced in such a manner
that they are separated from
incompatible materials by a minimum
horizontal distance of 1.2 m (4 feet) and
the packages are loaded at least 100 mm
(4 inches) off the floor of the freight
container, unit load device, transport
vehicle, or rail car. The following
conditions specific to incompatible
materials also apply:
(1) The freight container, unit load
device, transport vehicle, or rail car may
not contain any Class 1 explosives,
Class 7 radioactive material, or
uncontainerized hazardous materials;
(2) Waste cyanides and waste acids.
For waste cyanides stored, loaded, and
transported with waste acids:
(i) The cyanide or a cyanide mixture
may not exceed 2 kg (4.4 pounds) net
weight per inner packaging and may not
exceed 10 kg (22 pounds) net weight per
outer packaging; a cyanide solution may
not exceed 2 L (0.6 gallon) per inner
packaging and may not exceed 10 L (3.0
gallons) per outer packaging; and
(ii) The acids must be packaged in lab
packs in accordance paragraph (b) of
this section or in single packagings
authorized for the acid in Column (8B)
of the § 172.101 Hazardous Materials
Table of this subchapter not to exceed
208 L (55 gallons) capacity.
(3) Waste Division 4.2 materials and
waste Class 8 liquids. For waste
Division 4.2 materials stored, loaded,
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
68013
and transported with waste Class 8
liquids:
(i) The Division 4.2 material may not
exceed 2 kg (4.4 pounds) net weight per
inner packaging and may not exceed 10
kg (22 pounds) net weight per outer
packaging; and
(ii) The Class 8 liquid must be
packaged in lab packs in accordance
with paragraph (b) of this section or in
single packagings authorized for the
material in Column (8B) of the § 172.101
Hazardous Materials Table of this
subchapter not to exceed 208 L (55
gallons) capacity.
(4) Waste Division 6.1 Packing Group
I, Hazard Zone A material and waste
Class 3, Class 8 liquids, or Division 4.1,
4.2, 4.3, 5.1 and 5.2 materials. For waste
Division 6.1 Packing Group I, Hazard
Zone A material stored, loaded, and
transported with waste Class 8 liquids,
or Division 4.2, 4.3, 5.1 and 5.2
materials:
(i) The Division 6.1 Packing Group I,
Hazard Zone A material must be
packaged in accordance with
§ 173.226(c) of this subchapter and
overpacked in a UN standard steel or
plastic drum meeting the Packing Group
I performance level;
(ii) The Class 8 liquid must be
packaged in lab packs in accordance
with paragraph (b) of this section or in
single packagings authorized for the
material in Column (8B) of the § 172.101
Hazardous Materials Table of this
subchapter not to exceed 208 L (55
gallons) capacity.
(iii) The Division 4.2 material may not
exceed 2 kg (4.4 pounds) net weight per
inner packaging and may not exceed 10
kg (22 pounds) net weight per outer
packaging;
(iv) The Division 5.1 materials may
not exceed 2 kg (4.4 pounds) net weight
per inner packaging and may not exceed
10 kg (22 pounds) net weight per outer
packaging. The aggregate net weight per
freight container, unit load device,
transport vehicle, or rail car may not
exceed 100 kg (220 pounds);
(v) The Division 5.2 material may not
exceed 1 kg (2.2 pounds) net weight per
inner packaging and may not exceed 5
kg (11 pounds) net weight per outer
packaging. Organic Peroxide, Type B
material may not exceed 0.5 kg (1.1
pounds) net weight per inner packaging
and may not exceed 2.5 kg (5.5 pounds)
net weight per outer packaging. The
aggregate net weight per freight
container, unit load device, transport
vehicle, or rail car may not exceed 50
kg (110 pounds).
(f) Additional exceptions. Lab packs
conforming to the requirements of this
section are not subject to the following:
E:\FR\FM\22DEP1.SGM
22DEP1
68014
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 244 / Tuesday, December 22, 2009 / Proposed Rules
(1) The overpack marking and
labeling requirements in § 173.25(a)(2)
of this subchapter when secured to a
pallet with shrink-wrap or stretch-wrap
except that labels representative of each
Hazard Class or Division in the
overpack must be visibly displayed on
two opposing sides.
(2) The restrictions for overpacks
containing Class 8, Packing Group I
material and Division 5.1, Packing
Group I material in § 173.25(a)(5) of this
subchapter. These waste materials may
be overpacked with other materials.
(g) Household waste. Household
waste, as defined in § 171.8 of this
subchapter, is not subject to the
requirements of this subchapter when
transported in accordance with
applicable state, local, or tribal
requirements.
14. In § 173.13, revise paragraph
(c)(1)(ii) to read as follows:
§ 173.13 Exceptions for Class 3, Division
4.1, 4.2, 4.3, 5.1, 6.1, and Classes 8 and 9
materials.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(1) * * *
(ii) The inner packaging must be
placed in a hermetically sealed barrier
bag which is impervious to the lading,
and then wrapped in a non-reactive
absorbent material in sufficient quantity
to completely absorb the contents of the
inner packaging. Alternatively, the inner
packaging may first be wrapped in a
non-reactive absorbent material and
then placed in the hermetically sealed
barrier bag. The combination of inner
packaging, absorbent material, and bag
must be placed in a snugly fitting metal
can.
*
*
*
*
*
15. In § 173.31, revise paragraph
(d)(1)(vi) to read as follows:
§ 173.31
Use of tank cars.
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with PROPOSALS_PART 1
*
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(1) * * *
(vi) The pressure relief device,
including a careful inspection of the
rupture disc in non-reclosing pressure
relief devices, for corrosion or damage
that may alter the intended operation of
the device. The rupture disc is not
required to be removed prior to visual
inspection if the tank car contains the
residue, as defined in § 171.8 of this
subchapter, of a Class 8, PG II or PG III
material with no subsidiary hazard or
the residue of a Class 9 elevated
temperature material;
*
*
*
*
*
16. In § 173.306, redesignate
paragraph (k) as paragraph (l) and add
new paragraph (k) to read as follows:
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:53 Dec 21, 2009
Jkt 220001
§ 173.306 Limited quantities of
compressed gases.
*
*
*
*
*
(k) Aerosols for recycling or disposal.
Aerosols, as defined in § 171.8 of this
subchapter, containing a limited
quantity which conforms to the
provisions of paragraph (a)(3), (a)(5),
(b)(1), (b)(2), or (b)(3) of this section are
not subject to the 30 kg (66 pounds)
gross weight limitation for strong outer
packaging when transported by motor
vehicle for purposes of recycling or
disposal under the following conditions:
(1) The strong outer packaging must
not exceed a gross weight of 500 kg
(1,100 pounds);
(2) Each aerosol container must be
secured with a cap to protect the valve
stem or the valve stem must be
removed; and
(3) The packaging must be offered for
transportation or transported by—
(i) Private or contract motor carrier; or
(ii) Common carrier in a motor vehicle
under exclusive use for such service.
(l) For additional exceptions, also see
§ 173.307.
17. Add new § 173.310 to read as
follows:
§ 173.310 Exceptions for radiation
detectors.
Radiation detectors, radiation sensors,
electron tube devices, or ionization
chambers, herein referred to as
‘‘radiation detectors,’’ that contain only
Division 2.2 gases, are excepted from
the specification packaging in this
subchapter and, except when
transported by air, from labeling and
placarding requirements of this
subchapter when designed, packaged,
and transported as follows:
(a) Radiation detectors must be singletrip, hermetically sealed, welded metal
inside containers that will not fragment
upon impact.
(b) Radiation detectors must not have
a design pressure exceeding 4.83 MPa
(700 psig) and a maximum capacity
exceeding 355 fluid ounces (641 cubic
inches). They must be designed and
fabricated with a burst pressure of not
less than three times the design pressure
if the radiation detector is equipped
with a pressure relief device, and not
less than four times the design pressure
if the detector is not equipped with a
pressure relief device.
(c) Radiation detectors must be
shipped in a strong outer packaging
capable of withstanding a drop test of at
least 1.2 meters (4 feet) without
breakage of the radiation detector or
rupture of the outer packaging. If the
radiation detector is shipped as part of
other equipment, the equipment must
be packaged in strong outer packaging
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
or the equipment itself must provide an
equivalent level of protection.
(d) Emergency response information
accompanying each shipment and
available from each emergency response
telephone number for radiation
detectors must identify those
receptacles that are not fitted with a
pressure relief device and provide
appropriate guidance for exposure to
fire.
PART 174—CARRIAGE BY RAIL
18. The authority citation for part 174
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 5101–5128; 49 CFR
1.53.
19. In § 174.81, revise paragraph (c) to
read as follows:
§ 174.81 Segregation of hazardous
materials.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Except as provided in § 173.12(e)
of this subchapter, cyanides, cyanide
mixtures or solutions may not be stored,
loaded and transported with acids;
Division 4.2 materials may not be
stored, loaded and transported with
Class 8 liquids; and Division 6.1
Packing Group I, Hazard Zone A
material may not be stored, loaded and
transported with Class 3 material, Class
8 liquids, and Division 4.1, 4.2, 4.3, 5.1
or 5.2 material.
*
*
*
*
*
PART 176—CARRIAGE BY VESSEL
20. The authority citation for part 176
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 5101–5128; 49 CFR
1.53.
21. In § 176.83, revise paragraph
(a)(11) to read as follows:
§ 176.83
Segregation.
(a) * * *
(11) Certain exceptions from
segregation for waste cyanides or waste
cyanide mixtures or solutions
transported with acids; waste Division
4.2 materials transported with Class 8
liquids; and waste Division 6.1 Packing
Group I, Hazard Zone A material
transported with waste Class 3 material,
Class 8 liquids, and Division 4.1, 4.2,
4.3, 5.1 or 5.2 material.
*
*
*
*
*
PART 177—CARRIAGE BY PUBLIC
HIGHWAY
22. The authority citation for part 177
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 5101–5128; 49 CFR
1.53.
E:\FR\FM\22DEP1.SGM
22DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 244 / Tuesday, December 22, 2009 / Proposed Rules
23. In § 177.848, revise paragraph (c)
to read as follows:
§ 177.848 Segregation of hazardous
materials.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) In addition to the provisions of
paragraph (d) of this section and except
as provided in § 173.12(e) of this
subchapter, cyanides, cyanide mixtures
or solutions may not be stored, loaded
and transported with acids; Division 4.2
materials may not be stored, loaded and
transported with Class 8 liquids; and
Division 6.1 Packing Group I, Hazard
Zone A material may not be stored,
loaded and transported with Class 3
material, Class 8 liquids, and Division
4.1, 4.2, 4.3, 5.1 or 5.2 material.
*
*
*
*
*
PART 179—SPECIFICATIONS FOR
TANK CARS
24. The authority citation for part 179
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 5101–5128; 49 CFR
1.53.
25. Revise § 179.13 to read as follows:
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with PROPOSALS_PART 1
§ 179.13 Tank car capacity and gross
weight limitation.
Except as provided in this section,
tank cars, built after November 30, 1970,
or any existing tank cars that are
converted, may not exceed 34,500
gallons (130,597 L) capacity or 263,000
pounds (119,295 kg) gross weight on
rail.
(a) For other than tank cars containing
poisonous-by-inhalation material, a tank
car may be loaded to a gross weight on
rail of up to 286,000 pounds (129,727
kg) upon approval by the Associate
Administrator for Safety, Federal
Railroad Administration (FRA). Tank
cars must conform to the conditions of
the approval and must be operated only
under controlled interchange conditions
agreed to by participating railroads.
(b) Tank cars containing poisonousby-inhalation material meeting the
applicable authorized tank car
specifications listed in § 173.244(a)(2) or
(3), or § 173.314(c) or (d) may have a
gross weight on rail of up to 286,000
pounds (129,727 kg). Tank cars
exceeding 263,000 pounds and up to
286,000 pounds gross weight on rail
must meet the requirements of AAR
Standard S–286, Free/Unrestricted
Interchange for 286,000 lb Gross Rail
Load Cars (IBR; see § 171.7 of this
subchapter). Any increase in weight
above 263,000 pounds may not be used
to increase the quantity of the contents
of the tank car.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:53 Dec 21, 2009
Jkt 220001
Issued in Washington, DC, on December 7,
2009 under authority delegated in 49 CFR
part 1.
Magdy El-Sibaie,
Acting Associate Administrator for
Hazardous Materials Safety, Pipeline and
Hazardous Materials Safety Administration.
[FR Doc. E9–30280 Filed 12–21–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–60–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 648
[Docket No. 0912081429–91430–01]
RIN 0648–XS55
Magnuson-Stevens Act Provisions;
Fisheries of the Northeastern United
States; Northeast Multispecies
Fishery; 2010 Sector Operations Plans
and Contracts, and Allocation of
Northeast Multispecies Annual Catch
Entitlements
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for
comments.
SUMMARY: Amendment 13 to the
Northeast (NE) Multispecies Fishery
Management Plan (FMP) established a
process for the formation of sectors and
for annual NMFS Northeast Regional
Administrator approval of proposed
sector operations. Proposed Amendment
16, currently under NMFS review, with
an expected implementation date of
May 1, 2010, if approved, would
significantly revise sector allocation
management measures and expand
sector management by authorizing up to
19 sectors for fishing year (FY) 2010.
Representatives from 17 sectors have
submitted operations plans and sector
contracts, and requested an allocation of
stocks regulated under the FMP for FY
2010 at this time, in order to be timely
considered for approval on a parallel
track with the review of Amendment 16.
NMFS received sector operations plans
and contracts from the Northeast
Fishery Sectors II through XIII, the
Sustainable Harvest Sector, the Tri-State
Sector, the Northeast Coastal
Communities Sector, the Georges Bank
(GB) Cod Fixed Gear Sector, and the
Port Clyde Community Groundfish
Sector. The intention of this action is to
provide interested parties an
opportunity to comment on the
proposed 17 sector agreements for FY
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
68015
2010 prior to final approval or
disapproval of the operations plans.
Because the approval and operation of
these sector proposals are conditional
on approval of proposed Amendment 16
measures, final action regarding the
approval of these proposals will not be
made unless and until a final decision
on Amendment 16 has been made.
DATES: Written comments must be
received on or before January 21, 2010.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by 0648–XS55, by any one of
the following methods:
• Electronic Submissions: Submit all
electronic public comments via the
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov.
• Fax: (978) 281–9135, Attn: William
Whitmore.
• Mail: Paper, disk, or CD–ROM
comments should be sent to Patricia A.
Kurkul, Regional Administrator,
National Marine Fisheries Service, 55
Great Republic Drive, Gloucester, MA
01930. Mark the outside of the
envelope: ‘‘Comments on 2010 Sector
Operations Plans and Contracts.’’
Instructions: All comments received
are part of the public record and will
generally be posted to https://
www.regulations.gov without change.
No comments will be posted for public
viewing until after the comment period
has closed. All Personal Identifying
Information (for example, name,
address, etc.) voluntarily submitted by
the commenter may be publicly
accessible. Do not submit Confidential
Business Information or otherwise
sensitive or protected information.
NMFS will accept anonymous
comments (enter N/A in the required
fields, if you wish to remain
anonymous). You may submit
attachments to electronic comments in
Microsoft Word, Excel, WordPerfect, or
Adobe PDF file formats only.
Copies of the sector operations plans
and contracts and supplemental
environmental assessments (EA) are
available from the NMFS NE Regional
Office at the mailing address specified
above. An Initial Regulatory Flexibility
Analysis (IRFA) was prepared for this
proposed rule and is comprised of the
EAs, and the preamble and the
Classification sections of this proposed
rule.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
William Whitmore, Sector Policy
Analyst, phone (978) 281–9182, fax
(978) 281–9135.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: NMFS
announces that the Administrator, NE
Region, NMFS (Regional Administrator),
has made a preliminary determination
that 17 sector operations plans and
E:\FR\FM\22DEP1.SGM
22DEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 244 (Tuesday, December 22, 2009)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 68004-68015]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-30280]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
49 CFR Parts 105, 107, 171, 173, 174, 176, 177, and 179
[Docket No. PHMSA-2009-0289 (HM-233A)]
RIN 2137-AE39
Hazardous Materials: Incorporation of Special Permits Into
Regulations
AGENCY: Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA),
DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration is
proposing to amend the Hazardous
[[Page 68005]]
Materials Regulations to incorporate provisions contained in certain
widely used or longstanding special permits that have an established
safety record. Special permits allow a company or individual to package
or ship a hazardous material in a manner that varies from the
regulations so long as an equivalent level of safety is maintained. The
proposed revisions are intended to provide wider access to the
regulatory flexibility offered in special permits and eliminate the
need for numerous renewal requests, thus reducing paperwork burdens and
facilitating commerce while maintaining an appropriate level of safety.
DATES: Written comments should be submitted on or before February 22,
2010.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by the docket number
(PHMSA-2009-0289 (HM-233A) by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting
comments.
Fax: 1-202-493-2251.
Mail: Docket Operations, U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building, Ground Floor, Room W12-140, Routing
Symbol M-30, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: To Docket Operations, Room W12-140 on the
ground floor of the West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
Instructions: All submissions must include the agency name and
docket number for this notice at the beginning of the comment. All
comments received will be posted without change to the Federal Docket
Management System (FDMS), including any personal information.
Docket: For access to the dockets to read background documents or
comments received, go to https://www.regulations.gov or DOT's Docket
Operations Office (see ADDRESSES).
Privacy Act: Anyone is able to search the electronic form of any
written communications and comments received into any of our dockets by
the name of the individual submitting the document (or signing the
document, if submitted on behalf of an association, business, labor
union, etc.). You may review DOT's complete Privacy Act Statement in
the Federal Register published on April 11, 2000 (Volume 65, Number 70;
Pages 19477-78).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eileen Edmonson or Dirk Der Kinderen,
Office of Hazardous Materials Standards, (202) 366-8553, or Diane
LaValle, Office of Hazardous Materials Special Permits and Approvals,
(202) 366-4535, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
(PHMSA), 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA)
is proposing to amend the Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMR; 49 CFR
Parts 171-180) to incorporate certain requirements based on existing
special permits (SPs) issued by PHMSA under 49 CFR Part 107, Subpart B
(Sec. Sec. 107.101 to 107.127). A special permit sets forth
alternative requirements--or a variance--to the requirements in the HMR
in a way that achieves a safety level at least equal to the safety
level required under the regulations or that is consistent with the
public interest. Congress expressly authorized DOT to issue these
variances in the Hazardous Materials Transportation Act of 1975.
The HMR generally are performance oriented regulations, which
provides the regulated community with a certain amount of flexibility
in meeting safety requirements. Even so, however, not every
transportation situation can be anticipated and built into the
regulations. Innovation is a strength of our economy and the hazardous
materials community is particularly strong at developing new materials
and technologies and innovative ways of moving materials. Special
permits enable the hazardous materials industry to quickly and safely
integrate new products and technologies into the production and
transportation stream. Thus, special permits provide a mechanism for
testing new technologies, promoting increased transportation efficiency
and productivity, and ensuring global competitiveness. A special permit
must achieve at least an equivalent level of safety as the HMR.
Implementation of new technologies and operational techniques may
enhance safety because the approved operations or activities achieve a
greater level of safety than currently required under the regulations.
Special permits also reduce the volume and complexity of the HMR by
addressing unique or infrequent transportation situations that would be
difficult to accommodate in regulations intended for use by a wide
range of shippers and carriers.
PHMSA conducts ongoing reviews of special permits to identify
widely used and longstanding special permits with an established safety
record for conversion into regulations of broader applicability.
Converting these special permits into regulations reduces paperwork
burdens and facilitates commerce while maintaining an acceptable level
of safety. Additionally, adoption of special permits as rules of
general applicability provides wider access to the benefits and
regulatory flexibility of the provisions granted in the special
permits. Factors that influence whether or not a specific special
permit is a candidate for regulatory action include the safety record
for hazardous materials transported under a special permit; broad
application of a special permit; suitability of provisions in the
special permit for incorporation into the HMR; rulemaking activity in
related areas; and agency priorities.
Several of the special permits addressed in this notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) have hundreds of party status grantees. Party status
is granted to a person who wishes to offer for transport or transport a
hazardous material in the same manner as the original applicant.
Several special permits addressed in this NPRM provide for the
manufacture, marking, sale and use of certain packagings for
transportation of hazardous materials. These manufacturing special
permits are issued to the packaging manufacturer and provide for use of
the packagings by hundreds and possibly thousands of distributors and
users.
The amendments proposed in this NPRM will eliminate the need for
approximately 510 current grantees to reapply for renewal of 44 special
permits every four years and for PHMSA to process the renewal
applications. These amendments also apply to any special permits this
agency issues during the development of this rulemaking or its final
rule whose provisions are identical in every respect to those described
in the rulemakings issued under this docket. To emphasize this, we will
preface the description of the affected special permits with the
wording ``include'' or ``includes'' to clarify that additional special
permits other than those specifically listed in this rulemaking may be
incorporated under these proposed revisions.
Incorporation of the special permits into the HMR also eliminates a
significant paperwork burden. Unless otherwise excepted by this agency,
a copy of each special permit must be maintained at each facility where
a packaging is manufactured under a
[[Page 68006]]
special permit, at each facility where a package is offered or re-
offered for transportation under a special permit carried on board each
cargo vessel or aircraft, and in some cases must be carried aboard each
transport vehicle used to transport a hazardous material under a
special permit.
II. Overview of Proposed Amendments
We identified several special permits for incorporation into this
NPRM. A more detailed discussion of amendments to the HMR based on
incorporation of provisions from these special permits appears in the
``Summary Review'' portion of this preamble. The proposed revisions
include the following:
Authorize vessel transportation for salvage cylinders
containing damaged or leaking packagings under Sec. 173.3.
Allow liquid contents in quantities greater than 10% of
the capacity in a mechanical displacement meter prover to the extent
that draining of the meter prover is impracticable.
Authorize the transport of waste Division 4.2, Packing
Group I material, Division 5.2 (organic peroxide) material, and
Division 6.1, Packing Group I (Hazard Zone A) material in lab packs
under Sec. 173.12.
Allow the use of alternative outer packagings for waste
lab packs and require use of UN standard steel or plastic drums (at the
PG I performance level) for the transportation of Division 4.2, Packing
Group I material and Division 6.1, Packing Group I, Hazard Zone A
material in lab packs under Sec. 173.12.
Except hazardous waste materials, packaged in lab packs
and meeting additional conditions, from certain segregation and marking
requirements under Sec. 173.12.
Allow variation in the packing method for packagings
prepared in accordance with Sec. 173.13.
Authorize, for certain hazardous materials, external
visual inspection of the rupture disc in a non-reclosing pressure
relief device of a rail tank car without requiring removal of the
rupture disc.
Authorize the transportation of certain specially designed
radiation detectors containing a Division 2.2 (non-flammable gas)
material under a new section Sec. 173.310.
Allow a greater gross weight limitation for packages used
for the transport of aerosols for purposes of recycling or disposal.
Allow rail tank cars to exceed the maximum capacity and
gross weight on rail limitations upon approval from the Federal
Railroad Administration (FRA) under Sec. 179.13.
Eliminate several requirements for submitting duplicate
copies of applications for special permit, party status, or renewal
when the applications are submitted electronically.
Require certification of understanding of a special permit
for persons submitting an application for party status to a special
permit.
III. Summary Review of Proposed Amendments
The following are detailed summary discussions of proposed
amendments to the HMR based on several special permits we have
identified as suitable for incorporation into the HMR.
A. Salvage Cylinders
In accordance with Sec. 173.3(d) of the HMR, damaged or leaking
cylinders containing Division 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 3, 6.1, or Class 8
materials may be overpacked in a salvage cylinder and transported by
motor vehicle for repair or disposal. In this NPRM, we are proposing to
permit salvage cylinders to be transported by vessel, consistent with
the provisions of DOT-SP 14168.
B. Meter Provers
A mechanical displacement meter prover (meter prover) is a
mechanical device, permanently mounted on a truck or trailer,
consisting of a piping system that is used to calibrate the accuracy
and performance of meters that measure the quantity of product being
pumped or transferred at facilities such as drilling locations,
refineries, tank farms and loading racks. Section 173.5a(b) excepts
meter provers from specification packaging requirements in Part 178 of
the HMR provided the meter provers conform to certain conditions. In a
final rule published January 24, 2005 under Docket No. RSPA-03-16370
(HM-233) (70 FR 3302), the Research and Special Programs Administration
(RSPA), the predecessor agency to PHMSA, incorporated several special
permits concerning meter provers into Sec. 173.5a. As provided by
Sec. 173.5a(b), a meter prover is excepted from the specification
packaging requirements when, among other criteria, the liquid content
of the meter prover does not exceed 10% of capacity (see Sec.
173.5a(b)(2)(i)). PHMSA subsequently issued a special permit to allow
transport of meter provers containing flammable liquids in quantities
greater than 10% capacity when conditions make draining of the liquid
impracticable. This special permit was based on information that (1)
facilities or equipment used to drain and reinject the meter provers
may not be readily available while in the field; (2) alternatives such
as using DOT specification cargo tanks as meter provers or accompanying
a meter prover with DOT specification cargo tanks filled with liquids
drained from the meter prover are cost prohibitive; and (3) there is a
record of safe transportation of meter provers under provisions from
special permits previously adopted into the HMR. Therefore, in this
NPRM, we propose to allow meter provers to retain flammable liquid
contents in quantities greater than 10% of capacity to the extent that
draining the contents to 10% or less is impracticable. The affected
special permits include DOT-SP 14405.
We also propose to revise Sec. 173.5a, paragraph (b)(iv), to
change the wording ``maximum service pressure'' to the acronym ``MAWP''
for maximum allowable working pressure for consistency with use of the
wording in other provisions within the HMR. In addition, we are
proposing to add a definition for ``Mechanical displacement meter
prover'' in Sec. 171.8. As proposed, the definition reads: Mechanical
displacement meter prover means a mechanical device used in the
oilfield service industry consisting of a pipe assembly that is used to
calibrate the accuracy and performance of meters that measure the
quantities of a product being pumped or transferred at facilities such
as drilling locations, refineries, tank farms, and loading racks.
C. Lab Packs
Section 173.12 of the HMR excepts certain waste materials from
specification packaging requirements when transported in packagings
(``lab packs'') that conform to the requirements specified in paragraph
(b) of the section. Currently, the outer packaging of the lab packs
must be a UN 1A2 or UN 1B2 metal drum, a UN 1D plywood drum, a UN 1G
fiber drum, or a UN 1H2 plastic drum tested to the Packing Group III
performance level. In this NPRM, we propose to allow the use of a UN 4G
fiberboard box made of at least 500 psig burst strength fiberboard that
is tested and marked to at least the Packing Group II performance level
as an alternative outer packaging for a lab pack. The affected special
permits include DOT-SP 10791, 12927, 13285, 13937, 14510, and 14817. We
also propose to allow the use of a UN11G fiberboard intermediate bulk
container (IBC) and a UN 11HH2 composite IBC (with a flexible plastic
inner receptacle for solids loaded or discharged by gravity) as
alternative outer packaging for a lab pack. The affected special
[[Page 68007]]
permits include DOT-SP 12296, 12668, 12682, 12749, and 12826.
Section 173.12 also excepts certain hazardous materials packaged in
lab packs in conformance with paragraph (b) of this section from
segregation requirements in Parts 174, 176, and 177 of the HMR provided
the materials conform to limited segregation conditions in paragraph
(e). In this NPRM, we are proposing to except certain additional
hazardous waste materials in lab packs and non-bulk packagings from
segregation and overpack marking requirements consistent with the
provisions of DOT-SP 13192. We first issued DOT-SP 13192 in 2001 to
consolidate earlier special permits that allowed different combinations
of incompatible materials, including waste materials, to be transported
together on the same transport vehicle. The waste materials are subject
to safety control measures designed to mitigate the risks presented by
these materials, such as quantity limitations, additional packaging,
and segregation requirements. Revised editions of this special permit
have authorized the transport of additional hazardous materials not
currently authorized for transport under Sec. 173.12. These hazardous
materials include Division 5.2 (organic peroxide) material, Division
4.2 Packing Group I material (subject to more stringent outer packaging
requirements), and Division 6.1 Packing Group I, Hazard Zone A material
(for purposes of exception from segregation requirements only). It has
been our experience with DOT-SP 13192 that when certain incompatible
hazardous materials are properly packaged in lab packs and other
authorized non-bulk packages, the possibility of these materials
commingling in an incident is greatly reduced, if not eliminated,
because of the integrity of the packagings and, for liquids, because of
the requirement to include a sufficient amount of chemically compatible
absorbent material to absorb the contents.
Thus, in this NPRM, we propose to authorize the transport of
Division 5.2 (organic peroxide) material and Division 4.2 Packing Group
I material in lab packs, and authorize transport of waste Division 6.1
Packing Group I, Hazard Zone A material with other waste materials if
packaged in accordance with Sec. 173.226(c) of the HMR and further
packaged in an overpack of a UN steel or plastic drum at the Packing
Group I performance level. We also propose to make several conforming
amendments to segregration requirements in Parts 174, 176, and 177 to
clarify the requirements do not apply to Division 6.1 Packing Group I,
Hazard Zone A material transported in conformance with Sec. 173.12(e).
D. Excepted Packaging
Section 173.13 provides conditions for transport of hazardous
materials in non-specification packaging. Currently, in Sec. 173.13,
for packaging of liquids, a liquid must be placed in an inner packaging
which is then placed in a hermetically sealed barrier bag that is
wrapped in chemically compatible absorbent material and then placed in
a metal can. PHMSA has issued a number of special permits that allow an
alternative configuration in which the inner packaging for liquids is
first wrapped in absorbent material and then placed in a hermetically
sealed barrier bag which is then placed in a metal can. In this NPRM,
we propose to incorporate this alternative method of packing inner
packagings for liquids into Sec. 173.13. The affected special permits
include DOT-SP 7891, 8249, 9168, 10672, 10962, 10977, 11248, 12401,
13355.
E. Visual Inspection of Rail Tank Cars
Section 173.31 outlines requirements for the use of rail tank cars
transporting hazardous materials. Paragraph (d) of this section
requires an offeror to perform an external visual inspection of a rail
tank car containing a hazardous material or a residue of a hazardous
material prior to offering it for transportation. As a part of the
examination, paragraph (d)(1)(vi) requires a careful inspection of the
rupture (frangible) disc in non-reclosing pressure relief devices for
corrosion or damage that may alter the intended operation of the
device. Under special permits DOT-SP 11761 and 11864, the rupture disc
is not required to be removed prior to visual inspection if the tank
car contains residue of a Class 8 (corrosive), Packing Group II or III
material with no subsidiary hazard or the residue of Class 9 molten
sulfur. The HMR define ``residue'' to mean the hazardous material
remaining in a packaging after its contents have been unloaded to the
maximum extent possible (see Sec. 171.8). PHMSA has interpreted
``unloaded to the maximum extent possible'' to mean that the hazardous
material has ceased to flow out of the packaging's unloading device.
Operations under these special permits have demonstrated these
materials are present in the tank car in insufficient quantity and
physical form to present a risk from a release of the material through
a tank car pressure relief device due to the failure of a rupture disc
during transportation.
Based on the safety record of use of the special permits, in this
NPRM, we propose to revise paragraph (d)(1)(vi) to exclude inspection
of the underside of the rupture disc on rail tank cars containing
residue of a Class 8 (corrosive), PG II or III material with no
subsidiary hazard or containing the residue of a Class 9 elevated
temperature material.
F. Radiation Detectors
Radiation detectors are used for measuring the intensity of
ionizing radiation. The devices typically contain a gas filled tube or
ion chamber where radiation converts the gas into ions and the rate at
which these ions are collected (on oppositely charged electrodes in the
device) is measured as electric current. These radiation detectors are
often used as integral parts of medical test equipment, such as a dose
calibrator. The HMR require that the pressurized gas contained in these
devices be transported in DOT specification cylinders or non-
specification containers meeting the requirements prescribed in Sec.
173.302 or Sec. 173.306 of the HMR.
In this NPRM, we propose to authorize in new Sec. 173.310 the
transportation of radiation detectors (also described as radiation
sensors, electron tube devices, and ionization chambers) containing a
gas, specifically, certain Division 2.2 (non-flammable) compressed
gases contained in electron tubes that are non-DOT specification,
metal, single trip, inside containers that may or may not be
hermetically sealed or equipped with a pressure relief device, based on
the use of several special permits. The inside metal containers must be
welded and designed to prevent fragmentation upon impact. The electron
tubes may have up to a maximum design pressure of 4.83 MPa (700 psig),
and up to a maximum water capacity of 355 fluid ounces (641 cubic
inches), and must have a burst pressure of not less than three times
the design pressure if equipped with a pressure relief device, and not
less than four times the design pressure if not equipped with a
pressure relief device. Also, each radiation detector must be placed in
a strong outer packaging capable of withstanding a minimum drop test of
1.2 meter (4 feet) without breaking the device or rupturing the outer
packaging, or if shipped as part of equipment, that the equipment
provide equivalent protection. In addition, each shipment of these
devices must be accompanied by emergency response information that must
identify those receptacles not fitted with a pressure relief device,
and provide guidance on
[[Page 68008]]
how to manage all the detectors if they are exposed to fire. When
transported in conformance with these conditions, we propose to except
radiation detectors from the specification packaging in this subchapter
and, except when transported by air, from labeling and placarding
requirements of this subchapter. The safety record for shipments made
in accordance with several special permits is outstanding; therefore,
PHMSA has determined the exceptions they contain demonstrate an
acceptable level of safety and are candidates for inclusion into the
HMR. The affected special permits include DOT-SP 9030, 9940, 10407,
12131, 12415, 13026, 13109 and 13244.
G. Aerosols for Recycling or Disposal
Section 173.306 provides exceptions from the requirements of the
HMR for transport of limited quantities of compressed gases including
limited quantities contained in aerosol containers. Conditions for
exception from requirements include a 30 kg (66 pound) gross weight
limitation for outer packagings. Under a special permit, PHMSA
authorized the transport of limited quantities of certain Division 2.1
(flammable) and Division 2.2 (non-flammable) gases in aerosol
containers packaged in strong outer packagings with gross weights of up
to 500 kg (1,100 pounds). PHMSA allowed the increase in gross weight
for the purpose of packaging discarded empty, partially used, and full
aerosol containers to be transported to a recycling or disposal
facility. As part of the conditions for the special permit, each
aerosol container must be fitted with a cap to protect the valve stem
or the valve stem must be removed. Based on the safe record of
transportation of these aerosol containers under this special permit;
and based on the fact that some limited quantity materials reclassed as
ORM-D material, as authorized under Sec. 173.306, are not subject to
the 30 kg (66 pound) gross weight limitation when unitized in packages
and offered for transportation in accordance with Sec. 173.156 of the
HMR, in this NPRM, we propose in Sec. 173.306(k) to authorize the
highway transport of aerosol containers conforming to Sec. 173.306 in
strong outer packagings not to exceed 500 kg (1,100 pounds) when
transported for the purpose of recycling or disposal. The affected
special permits include DOT-SP 12842.
H. Rail Tank Car Gross Weight Limitation
Section 179.13 sets limitations on rail tank car capacity and gross
weight. Currently, this section limits rail tank cars to a maximum
capacity of 34,500 gallons (130,597 L) and a gross weight of 263,000
pounds (119,295 kg). PHMSA granted several special permits to allow
tank cars to transport up to 286,000 pounds (129,727 kg) gross weight
on rail subject to certain conditions. We propose to revise this
section to provide rail carriers with relief from the rail tank car
capacity and gross weight limitations subject to review of an approval
application submitted to the Associate Administrator for Safety, FRA.
Providing for an approval process will expedite movement of rail tank
cars by simplifying regulatory procedures and eliminating the time
constraints associated with the mandatory comment period required for
special permit applications. The affected special permits include DOT-
SP 11241, 11654, 11803, 12423, 12561, 12613, 12768, 12858, 12903,
13856, 13936, 14004, 14038, 14442, 14505, 14520, 14570, and 14619.
I. Revisions to Procedures
Procedures for serving documents in PHMSA proceedings are
established in 49 CFR Part 105. In accordance with these procedures, a
non-resident of the United States must designate an agent and file the
designation with PHMSA. In this NPRM, we propose to add the phrase
``agent for service of process'' as a synonym for the word ``agent'' in
paragraph (b) of Sec. 105.40(b) to clarify that this term includes an
agent for service of process as this phrase is used elsewhere in
PHMSA's procedural regulations in 49 CFR Parts 105, 106, and 107. In
addition, in this NPRM we propose to revise the definition for
``Special Permit'' in 49 CFR Part 107 to permit the Associate
Administrator of Hazardous Materials Safety to delegate signature
authority at the Office Director level. We are proposing the same
revision to the definition for ``Special Permit'' in Sec. 171.8.
As provided in Sec. 107.105, an application for a special permit
must be submitted in duplicate no matter the method of submission,
whether mail, fax, or e-mail. We propose to revise paragraph (a)(1) of
this section to clarify that a duplicate copy of the application for a
special permit is not required when the application is submitted
electronically by e-mail. We also propose to revise paragraph (a)(2) to
require an e-mail address if available and the DOT registration number
if applicable. Finally, we are revising the format of paragraph (a) for
greater ease of understanding of the application requirements for
special permits.
Application requirements for party status to a special permit are
set forth in Sec. 107.107. We propose to revise paragraph (b)(1) of
this section to clarify that a duplicate copy of the application for
party status is not required when the application is submitted
electronically by e-mail and to revise paragraph (b)(3) to require an
e-mail address if available and the DOT registration number if
applicable. In addition, in paragraph (b)(3), we propose to require an
applicant for party status to provide a justification of the need for
party status to the special permit and to certify that the applicant
has read and understands the provisions of the special permit for party
status. Finally, we are revising the format of paragraph (a) to make it
easier to understand the application requirements.
Application procedures for renewal of a special permit are set
forth in Sec. 107.109. We propose to revise paragraph (a)(1) to state
that a duplicate copy of an application to renew a special permit is
not required when the application is submitted electronically.
IV. Rulemaking Analyses and Notices
A. Statutory/Legal Authority for This Rulemaking
This NPRM is published under the authority of 49 U.S.C. 5103(b)
which authorizes the Secretary to prescribe regulations for the safe
transportation, including security, of hazardous material in
intrastate, interstate, and foreign commerce. 49 U.S.C. 5117(a)
authorizes the Secretary of Transportation to issue a special permit
from a regulation prescribed in 5103(b), 5104, 5110, or 5112 of the
Federal Hazardous Materials Transportation Law to a person
transporting, or causing to be transported, hazardous material in a way
that achieves a safety level at least equal to the safety level
required under the law, or consistent with the public interest, if a
required safety level does not exist. If adopted as proposed, the final
rule would amend the regulations incorporating provision from certain
widely used and longstanding special permits that have established a
history of safety and which may, therefore, be converted into the
regulations for general use.
B. Executive Order 12866 and DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
This proposed rule is not considered a significant regulatory
action under section 3(f) and was not reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB). The proposed rule is not considered a
significant rule under the Regulatory Policies and Procedures order
issued by the Department of Transportation [44 FR 11034].
[[Page 68009]]
In this notice, we propose to amend the HMR to incorporate
alternatives this agency has permitted under widely used and
longstanding special permits with established safety records we have
determined meet the safety criteria for inclusion in the HMR.
Incorporation of these special permits into regulations of general
applicability will provide shippers and carriers with additional
flexibility to comply with established safety requirements, thereby
reducing transportation costs and increasing productivity. In addition,
the proposals in this NPRM will reduce the paperwork burden on industry
and this agency resulting from continued renewals of special permits.
Taken together, the provisions of this proposed rule will promote the
continued safe transportation of hazardous materials while reducing
transportation costs for the industry and administrative costs for the
agency.
C. Executive Order 13132
This proposed rule was analyzed in accordance with the principles
and criteria contained in Executive Order 13132 (``Federalism''). This
proposed rule would preempt state, local and Indian tribe requirements
but does not propose any regulation that has substantial direct effects
on the states, the relationship between the national government and the
states, or the distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of governments. Therefore, the consultation and funding
requirements of Executive Order 13132 do not apply. Federal hazardous
material transportation law, 49 U.S.C. 5101-5128, contains an express
preemption provision (49 U.S.C. 5125(b)) preempting state, local and
Indian tribe requirements on certain covered subjects. Covered subjects
are:
(1) The designation, description, and classification of hazardous
materials;
(2) The packing, repacking, handling, labeling, marking, and
placarding of hazardous materials;
(3) The preparation, execution, and use of shipping documents
related to hazardous materials and requirements related to the number,
contents, and placement of those documents;
(4) The written notification, recording, and reporting of the
unintentional release in transportation of hazardous materials; or
(5) The design, manufacture, fabrication, marking, maintenance,
reconditioning, repair, or testing of a packaging or container
represented, marked, certified, or sold as qualified for use in
transporting hazardous materials.
This final rule addresses covered subject items (2), (3), and (5)
and would preempt any State, local, or Indian tribe requirements not
meeting the ``substantively the same'' standard. Federal hazardous
materials transportation law provides at 49 U.S.C. 5125(b)(2) that if
PHMSA issues a regulation concerning any of the covered subjects, PHMSA
must determine and publish in the Federal Register the effective date
of Federal preemption. The effective date may not be earlier than the
90th day following the date of issuance of the proposed rule and not
later than two years after the date of issuance. PHMSA proposes the
effective date of federal preemption be 90 days from publication of a
final rule in this matter in the Federal Register.
D. Executive Order 13175
This proposed rule was analyzed in accordance with the principles
and criteria contained in Executive Order 13175 (``Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments''). Because this proposed
rule does not have tribal implications and does not impose substantial
direct compliance costs on Indian tribal governments, the funding and
consultation requirements of Executive Order 13175 do not apply.
E. Regulatory Flexibility Act, Executive Order 13272, and DOT
Procedures and Policies
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) requires an
agency to review regulations to assess their impact on small entities.
An agency must conduct a regulatory flexibility analysis unless it
determines and certifies that a rule is not expected to have a
significant impact on a substantial number of small entities. This
proposed rule incorporates into the HMR certain widely used special
permits. Incorporation of these special permits into regulations of
general applicability will provide shippers and carriers with
additional flexibility to comply with established safety requirements,
thereby reducing transportation costs and increasing productivity.
Therefore, I certify this rule will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities.
This proposed rule has been developed in accordance with Executive
Order 13272 (``Proper Consideration of Small Entities in Agency
Rulemaking'') and DOT's procedures and policies to promote compliance
with the Regulatory Flexibility Act to ensure that potential impacts of
draft rules on small entities are properly considered.
F. Paperwork Reduction Act
PHMSA has an approved information collection under OMB Control
Number 2137-0051, ``Rulemaking, Special Permits, and Preemption
Requirements.'' This NPRM may result in a decrease in the annual burden
and costs under this information collection due to proposed changes to
incorporate provisions contained in certain widely used or longstanding
special permits that have an established safety record.
Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, no person is required to
respond to an information collection unless it has been approved by OMB
and displays a valid OMB control number. Section 1320.8(d), title 5,
Code of Federal Regulations requires that PHMSA provide interested
members of the public and affected agencies an opportunity to comment
on information and recordkeeping requests.
This notice identifies a revised information collection request
that PHMSA will submit to OMB for approval based on the requirements in
this proposed rule. PHMSA has developed burden estimates to reflect
changes in this proposed rule. PHMSA estimates that the information
collection and recordkeeping burden as proposed in this rule would be
as follows:
OMB Control No. 2137-0051:
Net Decrease in Annual Number of Respondents: 520.
Net Decrease in Annual Responses: 55.
Net Decrease in Annual Burden Hours: 560.
Net Decrease in Annual Burden Costs: $22,400.
PHMSA specifically requests comments on the information collection
and recordkeeping burdens associated with developing, implementing, and
maintaining these requirements for approval under this proposed rule.
Requests for a copy of this information collection should be
directed to Deborah Boothe or T. Glenn Foster, Office of Hazardous
Materials Standards (PHH-11), Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety
Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001,
Telephone (202) 366-8553.
Address written comments to the Dockets Unit as identified in the
ADDRESSES section of this rulemaking. We must receive comments
regarding information collection burdens prior to the close of the
comment period identified in the DATES section of this rulemaking. In
addition, you may submit comments specifically related to the
information collection burden to the PHMSA Desk Officer, Office of
[[Page 68010]]
Management and Budget, at fax number 202-395-6974.
G. Regulation Identifier Number (RIN)
A regulation identifier number (RIN) is assigned to each regulatory
action listed in the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulations. The
Regulatory Information Service Center publishes the Unified Agenda in
April and October of each year. The RIN contained in the heading of
this document may be used to cross-reference this action with the
Unified Agenda.
H. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
This proposed rule does not impose unfunded mandates under the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995. It does not result in costs of
$141.3 million or more to either state, local or tribal governments, in
the aggregate, or to the private sector, and is the least burdensome
alternative that achieves the objective of the rule.
I. Environmental Assessment
The National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA), as amended
(42 U.S.C. 4321-4347), requires Federal agencies to consider the
consequences of major Federal actions and to prepare a detailed
statement on actions that significantly affect the quality of the human
environment.
The hazardous materials regulatory system is a risk management
system that is prevention-oriented and focused on identifying a hazard
and reducing the probability and quantity of a hazardous materials
release. Hazardous materials are categorized by hazard analysis and
experience into hazard classes and packing groups. The regulations
require each shipper to class a material in accordance with these
hazard classes and packing groups; the process of classifying a
hazardous material is itself a form of hazard analysis. Further, the
regulations require the shipper to communicate the material's hazards
by identifying the hazard class, packing group, and proper shipping
name on shipping papers and with labels on packages and placards on
transport vehicles. Thus, the shipping paper, labels, and placards
communicate the most significant findings of the shipper's hazard
analysis. A hazardous material is assigned to one of three packing
groups based upon its degree of hazard, from a high hazard Packing
Group I material to a low hazard Packing Group III material. The
quality, damage resistance, and performance standards for the
packagings authorized for the hazardous materials in each packing group
are appropriate for the hazards of the material transported.
Hazardous materials are transported by aircraft, vessel, rail, and
highway. The potential for environmental damage or contamination exists
when packages of hazardous materials are involved in transportation
accidents. The need for hazardous materials to support essential
services means transportation of highly hazardous materials is
unavoidable. However, these shipments frequently move through densely
populated or environmentally sensitive areas where the consequences of
an incident could be loss of life, serious injury, or significant
environmental damage. The ecosystems that could be affected by a
hazardous materials release during transportation include atmospheric,
aquatic, terrestrial, and vegetal resources (for example, wildlife
habitats). The adverse environmental impacts associated with releases
of most hazardous materials are short-term impacts that can be greatly
reduced or eliminated through prompt clean-up of the accident scene.
There are no significant environmental impacts associated with the
proposals in this NPRM. We are proposing clarifications and changes to
certain HMR requirements to include methods for packaging, describing,
and transporting hazardous materials that are currently permitted under
widely used special permits with established safety records for
inclusion in the HMR. The process through which safety permits are
issued requires the applicant to demonstrate that the alternative
transportation method or packaging proposed provides an equivalent
level of safety as that provided in the HMR. Implicit in this process
is that the special permit must provide an equivalent level of
environmental protection as that provided in the HMR. Thus,
incorporation of the special permits as regulations of general
applicability maintains the existing environmental protections built
into the HMR.
J. Privacy Act
Anyone is able to search the electronic form of all comments
received into any of our dockets by the name of the individual
submitting the comment (or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf
of an association, business, labor union, etc.). You may review DOT's
complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal Register published on
April 11, 2000 (Volume 65, Number 70, pages 19477-78), or at https://www.regulations.gov.
List of Subjects
49 CFR Part 105
Administrative practice and procedure, Hazardous materials
transportation.
49 CFR Part 107
Administrative practice and procedure, Hazardous materials
transportation, Packaging and containers, Penalties, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
49 CFR Part 171
Exports, Hazardous materials transportation, Hazardous waste,
Imports, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
49 CFR Part 173
Hazardous materials transportation, Packaging and containers,
Radioactive materials, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements,
Uranium.
49 CFR Part 174
Hazardous materials transportation, Radioactive materials, Rail
carriers, Railroad safety, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
49 CFR Part 176
Hazardous materials transportation, Maritime carriers, Radioactive
materials, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
49 CFR Part 177
Hazardous materials transportation, Motor carriers, Radioactive
materials, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
49 CFR Part 179
Hazardous materials transportation, Railroad safety, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
In consideration of the foregoing, we propose to amend 49 CFR
Chapter I as follows:
PART 105--HAZARDOUS MATERIALS PROGRAM DEFINITIONS AND GENERAL
PROCEDURES
1. The authority citation for part 105 is revised to read as
follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 5101-5128; 49 CFR 1.53.
Sec. 105.40 [Amended]
2. In Sec. 105.40, paragraph (b), introductory paragraph, after
the word ``agent'', add the words and punctuation ``, also known as
``agent for service of process''.''
[[Page 68011]]
PART 107--HAZARDOUS MATERIALS PROGRAM PROCEDURES
3. The authority citation for part 107 is revised to read as
follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 5101-5128, 44701; Pub. L. 101-410 section
4 (28 U.S.C. 2461 note); Pub. L. 104-121 sections 212-213; Pub. L.
104-134 section 31001; 49 CFR 1.45, 1.53.
4. In Sec. 107.1, revise the definition of ``Special permit'' to
read as follows:
Sec. 107.1 Definitions.
* * * * *
Special permit means a document issued by the Associate
Administrator, or other designated Department official, under the
authority of 49 U.S.C. 5117 permitting a person to perform a function
that is not otherwise permitted under subchapters A or C of this
chapter, or other regulations issued under 49 U.S.C. 5101 et seq.
(e.g., Federal Motor Carrier Safety routing requirements). The terms
``special permit'' and ``exemption'' have the same meaning for purposes
of subchapters A or C of this chapter or other regulations issued under
49 U.S.C. 5101 through 5128.
* * * * *
5. In Sec. 107.105, revise paragraph (a) to read as follows:
Sec. 107.105 Application for special permit.
(a) General. Each application for a special permit or modification
of a special permit must be written in English and submitted for timely
consideration, at least 120 days before the requested effective date
and must--
(1)(i) Be submitted in duplicate to: Associate Administrator for
Hazardous Materials Safety (Attention: Special Permits, PHH-31),
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, U.S. Department
of Transportation, East Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590-0001;
(ii) Be submitted in duplicate with any attached supporting
documentation by facsimile (fax) to: (202) 366-3753 or (202) 366-3308;
or
(iii) Be submitted by electronic mail (e-mail) to:
Specialpermits@dot.gov. Electronic submissions need not be submitted in
duplicate;
(2) State the name, street and mailing addresses, e-mail address
(if available), US DOT Registration number (if applicable), and
telephone number of the applicant. If the applicant is not an
individual, also state the name, street and mailing addresses, e-mail
address (if available), and telephone number of an individual
designated as an agent of the applicant for all purposes related to the
application;
(3) Include a designation of agent of service for process in
accordance with Sec. 105.40 of this part if the applicant is not a
resident of the United States; and
(4) For a manufacturing special permit, include a statement of the
name and street address of each facility when manufacturing under the
special permit will occur.
* * * * *
6. In Sec. 107.107, revise paragraphs (b)(1), (3), (4), and (5) to
read as follows:
Sec. 107.107 Application for party status.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(1)(i) Be submitted in duplicate to: Associate Administrator for
Hazardous Materials Safety (Attention: Special Permits, PHH-31),
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, U.S. Department
of Transportation, East Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590-0001;
(ii) Be submitted in duplicate with any attached supporting
documentation by facsimile (fax) to: (202) 366-3753 or (202) 366-3308;
or
(iii) Be submitted by electronic mail (e-mail) to:
Specialpermits@dot.gov. Electronic submissions need not be submitted in
duplicate;
(2) * * *
(3) State the name, street and mailing addresses, e-mail address
(if available), US DOT Registration number (if applicable), and
telephone number of the applicant. If the applicant is not an
individual, also state the name, street and mailing addresses, e-mail
address (if available), and telephone number of an individual
designated as an agent of the applicant for all purposes related to the
application. In addition, each applicant must state why party status to
the special permit is needed and must submit a certification of
understanding of the provisions of the special permit to which party
status is being requested;
(4) Include a designation of agent of service for process in
accordance with Sec. 105.40 of this part if the applicant is not a
resident of the United States; and
(5) For a Class 1 material that is forbidden for transportation by
aircraft except under a special permit (see Columns 9A and 9B in the
table in 49 CFR 172.101), include a certification by the applicant for
party status to a special permit to transport such Class 1 material, on
passenger-carrying or cargo-only aircraft with a maximum certificated
takeoff weight of less than 12,500 pounds, that no person within the
categories listed in 18 U.S.C. 842(i) will participate in the
transportation of the Class 1 material.
* * * * *
7. Revise Sec. 107.109 to read as follows:
Sec. 107.109 Application for renewal.
(a) Each application for renewal of a special permit or renewal of
party status to a special permit must--
(1)(i) Be submitted in duplicate to: Associate Administrator for
Hazardous Materials Safety (Attention: Special Permits, PHH-31),
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, U.S. Department
of Transportation, East Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590-0001;
(ii) Be submitted in duplicate with any attached supporting
documentation by facsimile (fax) to: (202) 366-3753 or (202) 366-3308;
or
(iii) Be submitted by electronic mail (e-mail) to:
Specialpermits@dot.gov. Electronic submissions need not be submitted in
duplicate;
(2) Identify by number the special permit for which renewal is
requested;
(3) State the name, street and mailing addresses, e-mail address
(if available), US DOT Registration number (if applicable), and
telephone number of the applicant. If the applicant is not an
individual, also state the name, street and mailing addresses, e-mail
address (if available), and telephone number of an individual
designated as an agent of the applicant for all purposes related to the
application. In addition, each applicant for renewal of party status
must state why party status to the special permit is needed and must
submit a certification of understanding of the provisions of the
special permit to which party status is being requested;
(4) Include either a certification by the applicant that the
original application, as it may have been updated by any application
for renewal, remains accurate and complete; or include an amendment to
the previously submitted application as is necessary to update and
assure the accuracy and completeness of the application, with
certification by the applicant that the application as amended is
accurate and complete; and
(5) Include a statement describing all relevant shipping and
incident experience of which the applicant is aware in connection with
the special permit since its issuance or most recent renewal. If the
applicant is aware of no incidents, the applicant must so certify. When
known to the applicant, the statement should indicate the approximate
number of shipments made or packages shipped, as the case may be, and
number of shipments or packages
[[Page 68012]]
involved in any loss of contents, including loss by venting other than
as authorized in subchapter C; and
(6) When a Class 1 material is forbidden for transportation by
aircraft, except under a special permit (see Columns 9A and 9B in the
table in 49 CFR 172.101), include a certification by the applicant for
renewal of party status to a special permit to transport such Class 1
material, on passenger-carrying or cargo-only aircraft with a maximum
certificated takeoff weight of less than 12,500 pounds, that no person
within the categories listed in 18 U.S.C. 842(i) will participate in
the transportation of the Class 1 material.
(b) If at least 60 days before an existing special permit expires
the grantee files an application for renewal that is complete and
conforms to the requirements of this section, the special permit will
not expire until final administrative action on the application for
renewal has been taken.
PART 171--GENERAL INFORMATION, REGULATIONS, AND DEFINITIONS
8. The citation for part 171 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 5101-5128, 44701; 49 CFR 1.45 and 1.53;
Pub. L. 101-410, section 4 (28 U.S.C. 2461 Note); Pub. L. 104-134
section 31001.
9. In Sec. 171.8, add a new definition for ``Mechanical
displacement meter prover'' and revise the definition for ``Special
permit'' to read as follows:
Sec. 171.8 Definitions and abbreviations.
* * * * *
Mechanical displacement meter prover means a mechanical device used
in the oilfield service industry consisting of a pipe assembly that is
used to calibrate the accuracy and performance of meters that measure
the quantities of a product being pumped or transferred at facilities
such as drilling locations, refineries, tank farms, and loading racks.
* * * * *
Special permit means a document issued by the Associate
Administrator, or other designated Department official, under the
authority of 49 U.S.C. 5117 permitting a person to perform a function
that is not otherwise permitted under subchapters A or C of this
chapter, or other regulations issued under 49 U.S.C. 5101 et seq.
(e.g., Federal Motor Carrier Safety routing requirements). The terms
``special permit'' and ``exemption'' have the same meaning for purposes
of subchapters A or C of this chapter or other regulations issued under
49 U.S.C. 5101 through 5128.
* * * * *
PART 173--SHIPPERS--GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR SHIPMENTS AND
PACKAGINGS
10. The authority citation for part 173 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 5101-5128, 44701; 49 CFR 1.45, 1.53.
11. In Sec. 173.3, revise paragraph (d)(6) to read as follows:
Sec. 173.3 Packaging and exceptions.
* * * * *
(d) * * *
(6) Transportation is authorized by motor vehicle and vessel only.
* * * * *
12. In Sec. 173.5a, revise paragraph (b) to read as follows:
Sec. 173.5a Oilfield service vehicles and mechanical displacement
meter provers.
* * * * *
(b) Mechanical displacement meter provers. (1) A mechanical
displacement meter prover, as defined in Sec. 171.8 of this
subchapter, permanently mounted on a truck chassis or trailer and
transported by motor vehicle is excepted from the specification
packaging requirements in part 178 of this subchapter provided it--
(i) Contains only the residue of a Division 2.1 (flammable gas) or
Class 3 (flammable liquid) material. For liquids, the meter prover must
be drained to not exceed 10% of its capacity or, to the extent that
draining of the meter prover is impracticable, to the maximum extent
practicable. For gases, the meter prover must not exceed 25% of the
marked pressure rating;
(ii) Has a water capacity of 3,785 L (1,000 gallons) or less;
(iii) Is designed and constructed in accordance with chapters II,
III, IV, V and VI of ASME Standard B31.4 (IBR, see Sec. 171.7 of this
subchapter);
(iv) Is marked with the MAWP determined from the pipe component
with the lowest pressure rating; and
(v) Is equipped with rear-end protection as prescribed in Sec.
178.337-10(c) of this subchapter and 49 CFR 393.86 of the Federal Motor
Carrier Safety Regulations.
(2) The description on the shipping paper for a meter prover
containing the residue of a hazardous material must include the phrase
``RESIDUE: LAST CONTAINED * * * '' before the basic description.
(3) Periodic test and inspection. (i) Each meter prover must be
externally visually inspected once a year. The external visual
inspection must include at a minimum: checking for leakage, defective
fittings and welds, defective closures, significant dents and other
defects or abnormalities which indicate a potential or actual weakness
that could render the meter prover unsafe for transportation; and
(ii) Each meter prover must be pressure tested once every 5 years
at not less than 75% of design pressure. The pressure must be held for
a period of time sufficiently long to assure detection of leaks, but in
no case less than 5 minutes.
(4) In addition to the training requirements in subpart H, the
person who performs the visual inspection or pressure test and/or signs
the inspection report must have the knowledge and ability to perform
them as required by this section.
(5) A meter prover that fails the periodic test and inspection must
be rejected and removed from hazardous materials service unless the
meter prover is adequately repaired, and thereafter, a successful test
is conducted in accordance with the requirements of this section.
(6) Prior to any repair work, the meter prover must be emptied of
any hazardous material. A meter prover containing flammable lading must
be purged.
(7) Each meter prover successfully completing the external visual
inspection and the pressure test must be marked with the test date
(month/year), and the type of test or inspection as follows:
(i) V for external visual inspection; and
(ii) P for pressure test.
The marking must be on the side of a tank or the largest piping
component in letters 32 mm (1.25 inches) high on a contrasting
background.
(8) The owner must retain a record of the most recent external
visual inspection and pressure test until the next test or inspection
of the same type is successfully completed. The test or inspection
report must include the following:
(i) Serial number or other meter prover identifier;
(ii) Type of test or inspection performed;
(iii) Test date (month/year);
(iv) Location of defects found, if any, and method used to repair
each defect;
(v) Name and address of person performing the test or inspection;
(vi) Disposition statement, such as ``Meter Prover returned to
service'' or ``Meter Prover removed from service''.
13. In Sec. 173.12, revise paragraphs (b) and (e), redesignate
paragraph (f) as new
[[Page 68013]]
paragraph (g), and add new paragraph (f) to read as follows:
Sec. 173.12 Exceptions for shipment of waste materials.
* * * * *
(b) Lab packs. (1) Waste materials prohibited by paragraph (b)(3)
of this section are not authorized for transport in packages authorized
by this paragraph (b). Waste materials classed as Class or Division 3,
4.1, 4.2, 4.3, 5.1, 5.2, 6.1, 8, or 9 are excepted from the
specification packaging requirements of this subchapter for combination
packagings if packaged in accordance with this paragraph (b) and
transported for disposal or recovery by highway, rail or cargo vessel.
In addition, a generic description from the Sec. 172.101 Hazardous
Materials Table may be used in place of specific chemical names, when
two or more chemically compatible waste materials in the same hazard
class are packaged in the same outside packaging.
(2) Combination packaging requirements:
(i) Inner packagings. The inner packagings must be either glass,
not exceeding 4 L (1 gallon) rated capacity, or metal or plastic, not
exceeding 20 L (5.3 gallons) rated capacity. Inner packagings
containing liquid must be surrounded by a chemically compatible
absorbent material in sufficient quantity to absorb the total liquid
contents.
(ii) Outer packaging. Each outer packaging may contain only one
class of waste material. The following outer packagings are authorized
except that Division 4.2 Packing Group I materials must be packaged
using UN standard steel or plastic drums tested and marked to the
Packing Group I performance level for liquids or solids; and bromine
pentafluoride and bromine trifluoride may not be packaged using UN 4G
fiberboard boxes:
(A) A UN 1A2 or UN 1B2 metal drum, a UN 1D plywood drum, a UN 1G
fiber drum, or a UN 1H2 plastic drum, tested and marked to at least the
Packing Group III performance level for liquids or solids;
(B) At a minimum, a double-walled UN 4G fiberboard box made out of
500 pound burst-strength fiberboard fitted with a polyethylene liner at
least 3 mils (0.12 inches) thick and when filled during testing to 95
percent capacity with a solid material, successfully passes the tests
prescribed in Sec. Sec. 178.603 (drop) and 178.606 (stacking), and is
capable of passing the tests prescribed in Sec. 178.608 (vibration) to
at least the Packing Group II performance level for liquids or solids;
or
(C) A UN 11G fiberboard intermediate bulk container (IBC) or a UN
11HH2 composite IBC, fitted with a polyethylene liner at least 6 mils
(0.24 inches) thick, that successfully passes the tests prescribed in
Subpart O of Part 178 and Sec. 178.603 to at least the Packing Group
II performance level for liquids or solids; a UN 11HH2 is composed of
multiple layers of encapsulated corrugated fiberboard between inner and
outer layers of woven coated polypropylene.
(iii) The gross weight of each completed combination package may
not exceed 205 kg (452 lbs).
(3) Prohibited materials. The following waste materials may not be
packaged or described under the provisions of this paragraph (b): a
material poisonous-by-inhalation, a Division 6.1 Packing Group I
material, chloric acid, and oleum (fuming sulfuric acid).
* * * * *
(e) Segregation requirements. Waste materials packaged according to
paragraph (b) of this section and transported in conformance with this
paragraph (e) are not subject to the segregation requirements in
Sec. Sec. 174.81(d), 176.83(b), and 177.848(d) if blocked and braced
in such a manner that they are separated from incompatible materials by
a minimum horizontal distance of 1.2 m (4 feet) and the packages are
loaded at least 100 mm (4 inches) off the floor of the freight
container, unit load device, transport vehicle, or rail car. The
following conditions specific to incompatible materials also apply:
(1) The freight container, unit load device, transport vehicle, or
rail car may not contain any Class 1 explosives, Class 7 radioactive
material, or uncontainerized hazardous materials;
(2) Waste cyanides and waste acids. For waste cyanides stored,
loaded, and transported with waste acids:
(i) The cyanide or a cyanide mixture may not exceed 2 kg (4.4
pounds) net weight per inner packaging and may not exceed 10 kg (22
pounds) net weight per outer packaging; a cyanide solution may not
exceed 2 L (0.6 gallon) per inner packaging and may not exceed 10 L
(3.0 gallons) per outer packaging; and
(ii) The acids must be packaged in lab packs in accordance
paragraph (b) of this section or in single packagings authorized for
the acid in Column (8B) of the Sec. 172.101 Hazardous Materials Table
of this subchapter not to exceed 208 L (55 gallons) capacity.
(3) Waste Division 4.2 materials and waste Class 8 liquids. For
waste Division 4.2 materials stored, loaded, and transported with waste
Class 8 liquids:
(i) The Division 4.2 material may not exceed 2 kg (4.4 pounds) net
weight per inner packaging and may not exceed 10 kg (22 pounds) net
weight per outer packaging; and
(ii) The Class 8 liquid must be packaged in lab packs in accordance
with paragraph (b) of this section or in single packagings authorized
for the material in Column (8B) of the Sec. 172.101 Hazardous
Materials Table of this subchapter not to exceed 208 L (55 gallons)
capacity.
(4) Waste Division 6.1 Packing Group I, Hazard Zone A material and
waste Class 3, Class 8 liquids, or Division 4.1, 4.2, 4.3, 5.1 and 5.2
materials. For waste Division 6.1 Packing Group I, Hazard Zone A
material stored, loaded, and transported with waste Class 8 liquids, or
Division 4.2, 4.3, 5.1 and 5.2 materials:
(i) The Division 6.1 Packing Group I, Hazard Zone A material must
be packaged in accordance with Sec. 173.226(c) of this subchapter and
overpacked in a UN standard steel or plastic drum meeting the Packing
Group I performance level;
(ii) The Class 8 liquid must be packaged in lab packs in accordance
with paragraph (b) of this section or in single packagings authorized
for the material in Column (8B) of the Sec. 172.101 Hazardous
Materials Table of this subchapter not to exceed 208 L (55 gallons)
capacity.
(iii) The Division 4.2 material may not exceed 2 kg (4.4 pounds)
net weight per inner packaging and may not exceed 10 kg (22 pounds) net
weight per outer packaging;
(iv) The Division 5.1 materials may not exceed 2 kg (4.4 pounds)
net weig