Takes of Marine Mammals Incidental to Specified Activities; Antioch Bridge Seismic Retrofit Project, California, 67856-67861 [E9-30179]
Download as PDF
67856
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 243 / Monday, December 21, 2009 / Notices
www.export.gov.
https://www.buyusa.gov/northdakota
Project Officer for Nigeria
Mr. Chamberlain Eke, Commercial
Specialist, U.S. Commercial Service
Lagos, Ph: +234–1–4603400/Fax:
+234–1–2610544, E-mail:
Chamberlain.eke@mail.doc.gov https://
www.buyusa.gov/nigeria
Alternate Contacts for Nigeria
Mr. Larry Farris, Commercial Counselor,
U.S. Commercial Service Lagos,
Ph: +234–1–4603400/Fax: +234–1–
2610544, E-mail:
Larry.farris@mail.doc.gov https://
www.buyusa.gov/nigeria
Mr. Christopher Becker, Commercial
Officer, U.S. Commercial Service
Lagos,
Ph: +234–1–4603400/Fax: +234–1–
2610544, E-mail:
Christopher.becker@mail.doc.gov
https://www.buyusa.gov/nigeria
Sean Timmins,
Global Trade Programs, Commercial Service
Trade Missions Program.
[FR Doc. E9–30325 Filed 12–18–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–FP–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
RIN 0648–XS24
Takes of Marine Mammals Incidental to
Specified Activities; Antioch Bridge
Seismic Retrofit Project, California
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice; proposed incidental
harassment authorization; request for
comments.
SUMMARY: NMFS has received an
application from the California
Department of Transportation (Caltrans)
for an Incidental Harassment
Authorization (IHA) to take marine
mammals, by harassment, incidental to
the Antioch Bridge Seismic Retrofit
Project. Pursuant to the Marine Mammal
Protection Act (MMPA), NMFS is
requesting comments on its proposal to
issue an IHA to Caltrans to incidentally
harass, by Level B Harassment only, 10
harbor seals (Phoca vitulina) and 10
California sea lions (Zalophus
californianus) during the specified
activity.
DATES: Comments and information must
be received no later than January 20,
2010.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:14 Dec 18, 2009
Jkt 220001
Comments on the
application should be addressed to
Michael Payne, Chief, Permits,
Conservation and Education Division,
Office of Protected Resources, National
Marine Fisheries Service, 1315 EastWest Highway, Silver Spring, MD
20910–3225. The mailbox address for
providing email comments is PR1.0648–
XS24@noaa.gov. NMFS is not
responsible for e-mail comments sent to
addresses other than the one provided
here. Comments sent via e-mail,
including all attachments, must not
exceed a 10–megabyte file size.
Instructions: All comments received
are a part of the public record and will
generally be posted to https://
www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/permits/
incidental.htm without change. All
Personal Identifying Information (for
example, name, address, etc.)
voluntarily submitted by the commenter
may be publicly accessible. Do not
submit Confidential Business
Information or otherwise sensitive or
protected information.
A copy of the application containing
a list of the references used in this
document may be obtained by writing to
the address specified above, telephoning
the contact listed below (see FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT), or
visiting the internet at: https://
www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/permits/
incidental.htm. Documents cited in this
notice may also be viewed, by
appointment, during regular business
hours, at the aforementioned address.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jaclyn Daly, Office of Protected
Resources, NMFS, (301) 713–2289, ext
151.
ADDRESSES:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Sections 101(a)(5)(A) and (D) of the
MMPA (16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.) direct
the Secretary of Commerce to allow,
upon request, the incidental, but not
intentional, taking of small numbers of
marine mammals by U.S. citizens who
engage in a specified activity (other than
commercial fishing) within a specified
geographical region if certain findings
are made and either regulations are
issued or, if the taking is limited to
harassment, a notice of a proposed
authorization is provided to the public
for review.
Authorization for incidental takings
shall be granted if NMFS finds that the
taking will have a negligible impact on
the species or stock(s), will not have an
unmitigable adverse impact on the
availability of the species or stock(s) for
subsistence uses (where relevant), and if
the permissible methods of taking and
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
requirements pertaining to the
mitigation, monitoring and reporting of
such takings are set forth. NMFS has
defined ‘‘negligible impact’’ in 50 CFR
216.103 as ‘‘...an impact resulting from
the specified activity that cannot be
reasonably expected to, and is not
reasonably likely to, adversely affect the
species or stock through effects on
annual rates of recruitment or survival.’’
Section 101(a)(5)(D) of the MMPA
established an expedited process by
which citizens of the United States can
apply for an authorization to
incidentally take small numbers of
marine mammals by harassment.
Section 101(a)(5)(D) establishes a 45–
day time limit for NMFS review of an
application followed by a 30–day public
notice and comment period on any
proposed authorizations for the
incidental harassment of marine
mammals. Within 45 days of the close
of the comment period, NMFS must
either issue or deny the authorization.
Except with respect to certain
activities not pertinent here, the MMPA
defines ‘‘harassment’’ as: any act of
pursuit, torment, or annoyance which (i)
has the potential to injure a marine
mammal or marine mammal stock in the
wild [Level A harassment]; or (ii) has
the potential to disturb a marine
mammal or marine mammal stock in the
wild by causing disruption of behavioral
patterns, including, but not limited to,
migration, breathing, nursing, breeding,
feeding, or sheltering [Level B
harassment].
Summary of Request
On May 5, 2009, NMFS received an
application from Caltrans for the taking,
by Level B harassment, of marine
mammals incidental to retrofitting the
Antioch Bridge, located 5.4 miles east of
the confluence of the Sacramento and
San Joaquin Rivers. To access shallow
water piers, a temporary support trestle
would be installed using a pile driver
hammer. Because pile driving has the
potential to result in behavioral
harassment to marine mammals located
in the action area, an authorization
under section 101(a)(5)(D) of the MMPA
is warranted.
Description of the Specified Activity
The Antioch Bridge, completed in
1978, was designed based on seismic
standards that the Caltrans established
in 1971. After the Loma Prieta in 1989,
Caltrans implemented the Seismic
Retrofit Program. After the Northridge
Earthquake of 1994, Caltrans
implemented Phase Two of the Program,
which required seven state-owned toll
bridges, including the Antioch Bridge,
to be retrofitted. The Antioch Seismic
E:\FR\FM\21DEN1.SGM
21DEN1
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 243 / Monday, December 21, 2009 / Notices
Retrofit Project would provide a seismic
upgrade of the Antioch Bridge; the
upgrade would meet the current
requirements.
The Antioch Bridge is 9,437–ft long,
accommodates one lane of traffic in
either direction, and includes narrow
accommodation for bicyclists and
pedestrians. Proposed retrofit elements
to the bridge include installation of steel
bracings; replacement of the existing
elastometric bearings with isolation
bearings; and removal of the existing
curtain walls and retrofit of all the
columns within the slab span structure.
To accomplish this, a temporary trestle
would be built to allow access to the
piers in shallow water (out to Pier 11).
The temporary marine trestle would be
constructed from the south shore of the
San Joaquin River; out approximately
910–ft into the river along the west side
of the existing bridge structure. This is
where water depths are less than 10–ft
below mean lower-low water (MLLW)
and are too shallow to be accessed by
barge. The trestle will be 25 ft wide with
piles spaced 25–ft apart. It will be
constructed using approximately 160
24–in steel hollow shell piles which
will be installed with a vibratory
hammer. Vibrating a single 24–in pile
into place requires, at the most, ten
minutes of noise generating vibration. In
addition, Caltrans will ‘‘proof’’ or test
one pile per day using an impact
hammer to ensure the pile can sustain
the required load. Proofing the piles
would require approximately 20 blows
per day, generating sound pressure for
about one minute per day. The entire
project is expected to take 2.5 years to
complete; however, installation of the
temporary piles is expected to take
approximately 4 months and is planned
for August 1- November 1, 2010. At the
completion of the project, the trestle and
all piles would be removed. All pile
driving would be conducted during
daylight hours only.
Some components of the project, (e.g.,
creation of access roads; installation of
bracings) would not involve in-water
work and therefore are not expected to
harass marine mammals. In-air noise
from these activities is not a concern in
this case as pinnipeds are not known to
haul-out near the bridge (see Affected
Environment). Therefore, NMFS has
preliminary determined that these
specified activities do not warrant an
authorization and they will not be
discussed further.
Action Area
The Antioch Bridge project area
includes Caltrans right-of-way (ROW)
and temporary construction easements.
This area covers approximately 62 acres
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:14 Dec 18, 2009
Jkt 220001
(ac), including 7.5 ac on the south shore
of the San Joaquin River in Contra Costa
County, 21 ac of the San Joaquin River,
and 33.5 ac on Sherman Island in
Sacramento County. On the south side
of the river, vegetation is primarily park
landscaping, with weedy ruderal
vegetation under the existing bridge. A
small fringe wetland is found along the
San Joaquin River around the bridge.
The San Joaquin River is relatively
shallow on the south side, with depths
of less than 10–ft out to Pier 11. The
main channel extends between Piers 12
and 20, with deep water passage
between Piers 19 and 20, near the
northern shore. On the north side of the
river, Sherman Island supports irrigated
pasture and irrigated crops, as well as
an area of ruderal vegetation in fallow
fields. Mayberry Slough and an
irrigation canal cross the area in the
vicinity of Piers 39 and 40, and Pier 32,
respectively. The waters around the
bridge are not heavily used by marine
mammals but do provide some foraging
habitat for certain pinniped species.
Description of Marine Mammals in the
Area of the Specified Activity
The project area lies outside the range
of most marine mammal species. The
Guadalupe fur seal (Arctocephalus
townsendi), northern elephant seal
(Mirounga angustirostris), northern furseal (Callorhinus ursinus), and northern
(Stellar) sea lion (Eumetopias jubatus)
have distributions that extend
northward along the California coast but
their ranges do not extend into the bays
and estuaries of the Delta. There have
been two documented occurrences of
humpback whales (Megaptera
novaeangliae) traveling up the
Sacramento River, but these occurrences
do not represent the normal behavior
patterns of the species. Occurrences of
humpback whales have never been
documented and are not anticipated at
the bridge location.
The only marine mammal species
which may be affected by the project are
the California sea lion and Pacific
harbor seal. Both species have been
known to sporadically venture into
estuaries and rivers in search of food,
and the California Department of Fish
and Game (CDFG) indicates that the
ranges of these two species encompasses
the region of the Delta in which the
project occurs.
California Sea Lion
The California sea lion is the most
abundant marine mammal in California
with an estimated population of 50,000
along the entire California coast and
islands. The entire US population has
been estimated at 238,000 in 2005, and
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
67857
growing at a rate of approximately 6.52
% annually between 1975 and 2005
(NMFS, 2007). The California stock of
sea lions is not listed as depleted under
the MMPA or threatened or endangered
under the MMPA.
California sea lions exhibit seasonal
migration patterns organized around
their breeding patterns. The sea lions
breed in rookeries in the Channel
Islands and Mexico from May through
August. Females tend to remain close to
the rookeries throughout the year, while
males migrate north after the breeding
season in the late summer, and then
migrate back south to the breeding
grounds in the spring (CDFG, 1990).
Sea lions feed on fish and
cephalopods, including Pacific whiting,
rockfish, anchovy, hake, flat-fish, small
sharks, squid, and octopus. Sea lions are
often solitary feeders; however they also
hunt in groups which can vary in size
according to the abundance of prey.
Within the action area; sea lions are
often solitary.
Main breeding rookeries are found in
the Channel Islands. Males haul out on
Farallon Island and Ano Nuevo Island
throughout the year. Sea lions can be
found at sea from the surf zone out to
near shore and pelagic waters. On land,
the sea lions are found resting and
breeding in groups of various sizes, and
haul out on rocky surfaces and
outcroppings and beaches, as well as
manmade structures such as jetties and
buoys. Sea lions prefer haulout sites and
rookeries near abundant food supplies,
with easy access to water; although sea
lions occasionally travel up rivers and
bays in search of food.
No known haulout sites occur in the
vicinity of the bridge. During the
designated August 1 to November 30
work window for installing the
temporary marine trestle, California sea
lions will likely be absent during
August, as they are still in the breeding
season and will be located further south,
in the Channel Islands (CDFG 1990).
Beginning in September, the likelihood
of sea lions foraging in the San Joaquin
River Delta increases, as males are
beginning to return from the Channel
Island rookeries at this time (CDFG
1990).
Harbor Seals
Harbor seals are the most widely
distributed pinniped species, occurring
on both sides of the northern Pacific and
Atlantic Ocean (NMFS 2005). The
Pacific harbor seal ranges from Baja
Mexico to the Aleutian Islands, and
occurs along the entire length of the
California coast. Harbor seal
populations in California were
estimated at 34,233 in 2005, and have
E:\FR\FM\21DEN1.SGM
21DEN1
67858
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 243 / Monday, December 21, 2009 / Notices
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
been growing at an estimated rate of 3.5
% from 1982 to 1995 (NMFS 2005).
Harbor seals are not listed as depleted
under the MMPA or threatened or
endangered under the MMPA.
The breeding season lasts from March
through June each year, with peak births
occurring between April and May.
Females give birth to one pup each year,
and mate again shortly after weaning.
Harbor seals are not territorial on land,
but do maintain spacing between
individuals in haul outs.
Harbor seals feed on fish, crustaceans
and some cephalopods. Foraging occurs
in shallow littoral waters, and common
prey items include flounder, sole, hake,
codfish, sculpin, anchovy and herring.
Harbor seals are typically solitary while
foraging, although small groups have
been observed. Seals spotted within the
action area are usually solitary.
Unlike California sea lions, harbor
seals are rarely found in pelagic waters
and typically stay within the tidal and
intertidal zones. On land, harbor seals
haul out on rocky outcrops, mudflats,
sandbars and sandy beaches with
unrestricted access to water and with
minimal human presence. Harbor seals
are non-migratory, but will make short
to-moderate distance journeys for
feeding and breeding needs, including
venturing into estuaries and rivers
(CDFG 2005).
The area of the Delta where the
project occurs falls within the limits of
the range of harbor seals; however, no
known haulout sites have been
identified in the vicinity of the bridge.
Potential occurrences of harbor seals
would be limited to individuals in
search of food upstream into the San
Joaquin River.
Potential Effects on Marine Mammals
Sound is a physical phenomenon
consisting of minute vibrations that
travel through a medium, such as air or
water. Sound levels are compared to a
reference sound pressure to identify the
medium. For air and water, these
reference pressures are ‘‘re 20 microPa’’
and ‘‘re 1 microPa’’, respectively. Sound
is generally characterized by several
variables, including frequency and
sound level. Frequency describes the
sound’s pitch and is measured in hertz
(Hz) or kilohertz (kHz), while sound
level describes the sound’s loudness
and is measured in decibels (dB). Sound
level increases or decreases
exponentially with each dB of change.
For example, 10–dB yields a sound level
10 times more intense than 1 dB, while
a 20 dB level equates to 100 times more
intense, and a 30 dB level is 1,000 times
more intense. However, it should be
noted that humans perceive a 10 dB
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:14 Dec 18, 2009
Jkt 220001
increase in sound level as only a
doubling of sound loudness, and a 10
dB decrease in sound level as a halving
of sound loudness.
Marine mammals use sound for vital
life functions, and introducing sound
into their environment could be
disrupting to those behaviors. Sound
(hearing and vocalization/ echolocation)
serves 4 main functions for marine
mammals. These functions include (1)
providing information about their
environment; (2) communication; (3)
enabling remote detection of prey; and
(4) enabling detection of predators.
Noise from pile driving may affect
marine mammals at a level which could
cause behavioral harassment. The
distances to which these sounds are
audible depend on source levels,
ambient noise levels, and sensitivity of
the receptor (Richardson et al. 1995).
Mitigation measures (see Mitigation
section) and the low source level of
vibratory pile driving (the main method
used to install piles) are expected to
prevent injurious exposure.
Pinnipeds produce a wide range of
hearing social signals, most occurring at
relatively low frequencies (Southall et
al., 2007), suggesting hearing is keenest
at these frequencies. Pinnipeds
communicate acoustically both on land
and in the water suggesting they possess
amphibious hearing and have difference
hearing capabilities dependant upon the
media (air or water). Based on numerous
studies, as summarized in Southall et al.
(2007), pinnipeds are more sensitive to
a broader range of sound frequencies in
water than in air. In-water, pinnipeds
can hear frequencies from 75 Hz to
75kHz. In-air, the lower limit remains at
75 Hz but the highest audible
frequencies are only around 30kHz
(Southall, et al., 2007).
Hearing Impairment
Temporary or permanent hearing
impairment is a possibility when marine
mammals are exposed to very loud
sounds. Hearing impairment is
measured in two forms: temporary
threshold shift and permanent threshold
shift. Relationships between TTS and
PTS thresholds have not been studied in
marine mammals, but are assumed to be
similar to those in humans and other
terrestrial mammals. There is no
empirical data for onset of PTS in any
marine mammal, and therefore, PTSonset must be estimated from TTS-onset
measurements and from the rate of TTS
growth with increasing exposure levels
above the level eliciting TTS-onset. PTS
is presumed to be likely if the threshold
is reduced by ≥ 40 dB (i.e., 40 dB of
TTS). Due to proposed mitigation
measures and source levels, NMFS does
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
not expect that marine mammals will be
exposed to levels that could elicit PTS
and therefore it will not be discussed
further.
Temporary Threshold Shift (TTS)
TTS is the mildest form of hearing
impairment that can occur during
exposure to a loud sound (Kryter, 1985).
While experiencing TTS, the hearing
threshold rises and a sound must be
louder in order to be heard. TTS can last
from minutes or hours to (in cases of
strong TTS) days. For sound exposures
at or somewhat above the TTS-onset
threshold, hearing sensitivity recovers
rapidly after exposure to the noise ends.
Few data on sound levels and durations
necessary to elicit mild TTS have been
obtained for marine mammals. Southall
et al. (2007) considers a 6 dB TTS (i.e.,
baseline thresholds are elevated by 6
dB) sufficient to be recognized as an
unequivocal deviation and thus a
sufficient definition of TTS-onset.
Because it is non-injurious, NMFS
considers TTS Level B harassment that
is mediated by physiological effects on
the auditory system; however, NMFS
does not consider onset TTS to be the
lowest level at which Level B
harassment may occur.
Sound exposures that elicit TTS in
pinnipeds underwater have been
measured in harbor seals, California sea
lions, and northern elephant seals from
broadband or octaveband (OBN) nonpulse noise ranging from approximately
12 minutes to several hours (Kastak and
Schusterman, 1996; Finneran et al.,
2003; Kastak et al., 1999; Kastak et al.,
2005). Collectively, Kastak et al. (2005)
analyzed these data to indicate that in
the harbor seal, a TTS of ca. 6 dB
occurred with 25 minute exposure to 2.5
kHz OBN with SPL of 152 dB re:1
microPa; the California sea lion showed
TTS-onset at 174 dB re: 1 microPa (as
summarized in Southall et al., 2007).
Underwater TTS experiments involving
exposure to pulse noise is limited to a
single study. Finneran et al. (2003)
found no measurable TTS when two
California sea lions were exposed to
sounds up to 183 dB re: 1 microPa
(peak-to-peak).
Behavioral Impacts
The source of underwater noise
during construction would be pile
driving to construct the temporary work
trestle. There are limited data available
on the effects of non-pulse noise on
pinnipeds in-water; however, field and
captive studies to date collectively
suggest that pinnipeds do not strongly
react to exposures between 90–140 dB
re: 1 microPa. Jacobs and Terhune
(2002) observed wild harbor seal
E:\FR\FM\21DEN1.SGM
21DEN1
67859
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 243 / Monday, December 21, 2009 / Notices
reactions to acoustic harassment devices
(ADH) around nine sites. Seals came
within 44 m of the active ADH and
failed to demonstrate any behavioral
response when received SPLs were
estimated at 120–130 dB re: 1 microPa.
In a captive study, a group of seals were
collectively subjected to non-pulse
sounds (e.g., vibratory pile driving) at 8–
16 kHz (Kastelein, 2006). Exposures
between 80–107 dB re: 1 microPa did
not induce strong behavioral responses;
however, a single observation at 100–
110 dB re: 1 microPa indicated an
avoidance response at this level. The
group returned to baseline conditions
following exposure (i.e., no long term
impact). Southall et al. (2007) notes
contextual differences between these
two studies noting that the captive
animals were not reinforced with food
for remaining in the noise fields,
whereas free-ranging subjects may have
been more tolerant of exposures because
of motivation to return to a safe location
or approach enclosures holding prey
items. Southall et al. (2007) reviewed
relevant data from studies involving
pinnipeds exposed to pulse noise (e.g.,
impact pile driving) and concluded that
exposures to 150 to 180 dB re: 1
microPa generally have limited
potential to induce avoidance behavior.
Seals and sea lions exposed to
threshold level sounds (120 dB for nonpulse; 160 dB for pulse) may elicit
temporary avoidance behavior around
the bridge, which may affect movement
of seals under the bridge or temporarily
inhibit them from foraging near the
bridge. However, limiting pile driving to
one to hours per day would allow for
minimal disruption of harbor seal
foraging or use of dispersal habitat. Very
few sea lions use the South Bay for
foraging and no known sea lion haulouts exist in the South Bay; therefore,
impacts are expected to be equally
minimal than those of harbor seals.
Based on these studies, NMFS has
preliminarily determined that seals and
sea lions exposed to threshold level
sounds (120 dB for non-pulse; 160 dB
for pulse) may elicit temporary
pinniped avoidance behavior. The most
likely impact to pinnipeds from the pile
installation would be temporary
disruption of feeding patterns as
individual sea lions or harbor seals pass
through the area in pursuit of food.
However, limiting pile driving to one to
two hours per day would allow for
minimal disruption of foraging or use of
dispersal habitat. No haulouts exist and
no pupping or breeding is known to
occur on land near the bridge; therefore,
no impacts to reproduction or
interruption of mom/pup bonding or
nursing are anticipated. Temporary
hearing loss is possible for those
pinnipeds that enter into zone of Level
B harassment, but permanent hearing
loss or other harm is not anticipated due
to monitoring and mitigation efforts, as
described below) and low source level
of pile driving.
Estimated Take by Incidental
Harassment
NMFS typically uses threshold sound
levels to estimate takes and establish
appropriate mitigation. Current NMFS
practice regarding exposure of marine
mammals to anthropogenic noise is that
in order to avoid injury of marine
mammals (e.g., PTS), cetaceans and
pinnipeds should not be exposed to
impulsive sounds of 180 and 190 dB
rms or above, respectively. This level is
considered precautionary as it is likely
that more intense sounds would be
required before injury would actually
occur (Southall et al., 2007). As such,
Caltrans has proposed safety zones
based on hydroacoustical modeling for
the pile sizes and type of hammers used
for the Dumbarton Bridge project and
water depth. The model simulates
spherical spreading and uses a
transmission constant of 15. Potential
for behavioral harassment (Level B) is
considered to have occurred when
marine mammals are exposed to sounds
at or above 160dB rms for impulse
sounds (e.g., impact pile driving) and
120dB rms for non-pulse noise (e.g.,
vibratory pile driving), but below the
aforementioned thresholds. These levels
are considered precautionary. Estimated
distances to NMFS’ current harassment
threshold levels from pile driving
during the proposed action are outlined
in Table 1 below.
TABLE 1: UNDERWATER DISTANCES TO NMFS HARASSMENT THRESHOLD LEVELS DURING PILE DRIVING.
Sound Levels (rms)
Pile Type
Hammer Type
190 dB
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
24‘‘ steel
24‘‘ steel
For the impact portion of the trestle
pile installation, a source level of 194
dB RMS at 35–ft was used to calculate
NMFS level harassment distances.
Based on this source level, models
estimated that pile installation for the
Project could generate sound levels
above 190 dB that would extend out
about 55–ft from the pile. The
calculated distance for sounds above
160 dB (Level B harassment) is
approximately 3,300–ft. For the
vibratory portion of the trestle pile
installation, a source level of 166 dB
RMS at 35–ft is assumed; therefore,
sound levels above 190 dB would not be
reached during the installation of piles
by vibratory hammer. The calculated
distance for sounds above 120 dB (Level
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:14 Dec 18, 2009
Jkt 220001
120 dB
16.8 m (55 ft)
n/a
Impact
Vibratory
160 dB
1,000 m (3,280 ft)
n/a
n/a
16.4 km (10.2 miles)
B harassment threshold for non-impulse
sounds) would be around 10.2 miles.
Current NMFS practice regarding inair exposure of pinnipeds to noise
generated from human activity is that
the onset of Level B harassment for
harbor seals and all other pinnipeds is
90 dBrms and 100 dB rms re: 20 micoPa,
respectively. In-air noise calculations
from pile driving for the Dumbarton
Bridge project, which uses the same size
and type of piles and hammers, predict
that noise levels will be reduced to
approximately 83 dB rms re: 20 microPa
at 800m. Harbor seals or California sea
lions are not known to haul-out
anywhere near the Antioch Bridge;
therefore, in-air noise is not considered
to contribute to harassment for this
project.
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
It is difficult to estimate the number
of California sea lions and Pacific harbor
seals that could be affected by the
installation of piles for the temporary
marine trestle, as pinnipeds only
sporadically venture into the project
area in pursuit of food. Due to the
project location lying at the extreme
margins of these species’ ranges, the
number of individual pinnipeds
expected to be encountered is very low.
Through consultation with NMFS’
Southeast Regional Office, Caltrans
requests the take of 10 California seal
lions. These individuals would most
likely be adult males, as the females and
pups tend to remain close to the
breeding rookeries. Similarly, Caltrans
requests, and NMFS’ proposes,
authorization to take 10 individual
E:\FR\FM\21DEN1.SGM
21DEN1
67860
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 243 / Monday, December 21, 2009 / Notices
harbor seals incidental to pile driving
activities; also likely males in pursuit of
food.
Proposed Mitigation
Caltrans has proposed mitigation both
in their application and supplemental
communication to reduce impact to
environmental resources. Measures set
in place to protect birds and fish (e.g.,
using the vibratory hammer at all times
except for load bearing tests) also
protect marine mammals. The following
proposed mitigation measures are
designed to eliminate potential for
injury and reduce Level B harassment of
marine mammals.
Establishment of safety and zones and
shut down requirements
Vibratory pile driving does not elicit
source levels at or above NMFS’
harassment threshold for Level A
harassment, therefore, no required shut
down zones would be established for
vibratory pile driving. The isopleth for
the Level A harassment threshold (190
dB) is modeled to be within 55 ft (16.8
m) of the impact pile hammer (see Table
1); however, Caltrans has proposed to
delay impact pile driving should a
marine mammal come within or
approach 100 ft (30 m) of the pile being
driven; further reducing the risk of
Level A harassment.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
Limited use of impact hammer
As a result of Section 7 consultation
discussions with NMFS, Caltrans has
agreed to drive all temporary piles with
a vibratory hammer, to reduce impacts
to listed fish, with the exception of one
pile per day being ‘‘proofed’’ with an
impact hammer. Proofing requires
approximately 20–40 blows per pile
which equates to approximately 15–20
seconds of impact hammering per day.
This action would also serve to reduce
impacts to marine mammals.
Soft start to pile driving activities
A ‘‘soft start’’ technique would be
used at the beginning of each pile
installation to allow any marine
mammal that may be in the immediate
area to leave before impact piling
reaches full energy. The soft start
requires contractors to initiate noise
from vibratory hammers for 15 seconds
at reduced energy followed by 1–minute
waiting period. The procedure would be
repeated two additional times. Due to
the short duration of impact pile driving
(20 seconds), the traditional ramp-up
requirement for impact pile driving does
not apply as it would actually increase
the duration of noise emitted into the
environment and monitoring should
effectively detect marine mammals
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:14 Dec 18, 2009
Jkt 220001
within or near the proposed impact pile
driving shut down of 100 ft (30 m). If
any marine mammal is sighted within or
approaching this shut down zone prior
to pile-driving, Caltrans would delay
pile-driving until the animal has moved
outside and on a path away from such
zone or after 15 minutes have elapsed
since the last sighting of the marine
mammal.
Marine Mammal Monitoring
Safety zone monitoring would be
conducted during all active pile driving.
Monitoring of the 100 ft (30 m) safety
zone would be conducted by qualified,
NMFS approved marine mammal
observers (MMOs). Impact pile driving
would not begin until the 100 ft safety
zone is clear of marine mammals and
would be stopped in the event that
marine mammals enter the safety zone.
For all pile driving, MMOs would begin
monitoring at least 30 minutes prior to
the commencement of pile driving and
could conduct monitoring from small
boats, as observation from a higher
vantage point may not be practical.
MMOs would remain 50 yards from
swimming pinnipeds in accordance
with NMFS marine mammal viewing
guidelines (https://swr.nmfs.noaa.gov/
psd/rookeryhaulouts/
CASEALVIEWBROCHURE.pdf). This
would prevent additional harassment to
pinnipeds from the vessel. If a land
based monitoring point can be found,
MMOs would be stationed here.
Observations would be made with
binoculars during daylight hours. Data
on all observed marine mammals would
be recorded and include information
such as species, numbers, time of
observation, location, and behavior.
Acoustic Monitoring
Monitors would be present to conduct
hydro-acoustic monitoring, in order to
empirically establish the 190 dB RMS
(impulse) safety zone and behavioral
harassment zones. Field measurements
of sound pressure levels would be
recorded and analyzed. A more detailed
marine mammal monitoring plan and
hydro-acoustic monitoring plan would
be made by the monitoring contractor
prior to the start of the Antioch Bridge
seismic retrofit.
Reporting
NMFS would be notified 2 weeks
prior to the initiation of proposed work.
Weekly monitoring reports would be
sent to NMFS and include information
such as species, numbers, time of
observation, location, and behavior.
Additionally, the report would include
an assessment of the number of
California sea lions and harbor seals that
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
may have been harassed as a result of
pile driving activity, based on direct
observation of sea lions and harbor seals
observed passing through the area.
Should the acoustic monitoring reveal
noise level isopleths different than those
described here, a modification to the
safety zone reflecting those data would
occur.
Preliminary Determination
Based on the analysis contained
herein of the likely effects of the
specified activity on marine mammals
and their habitat, and taking into
consideration the implementation of the
mitigation and monitoring measures,
NMFS preliminarily finds that pile
driving associated with the Anitoch
Bridge Seismic Retrofit Project would
result in the incidental take of small
numbers of marine mammals, by Level
B harassment only, and that the total
taking would have a negligible impact
on the affected species or stocks. No
subsistence hunting of marine mammals
occurs in the region; therefore, no
impact on the availability of a species or
stock for subsistence use would occur.
Endangered Species Act (ESA)
On January 26, 2009, NMFS received
a request from Caltrans’ to initiate
consultation under section 7 of the ESA
on its proposed Antioch Bridge Seismic
Retrofit Project. NMFS concluded
consultation on this action on July 13,
2009 and issued an incidental take
statement authorizing the take of listed
steelhead and green sturgeon. No ESAlisted marine mammal species occur
within the action area; therefore, none
would be affected.
National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA)
NOAA Administrative Order Series
216–6, May 20, 1999 (NAO), identifies
issuance of IHAs as a type of Federal
action that may be categorically
excluded from preparation of an
environmental assessment or
environmental impact statement. In
determining whether a categorical
exclusion (CE) is appropriate for a given
IHA, NMFS must consider: (1) factors
listed in Section 5.05b of the NAO
regarding prior analysis for the ‘‘same’’
action; (2) context and intensity of
impacts, as defined in 40 CFR 1508.27;
and (3) factors listed in Section 5.05c of
the NAO regarding exceptions to CEs.
NMFS has prepared, supplemented, or
adopted numerous EAs leading to
Findings of No Significant Impact
(FONSIs) for pile driving activities
similar to the proposed activity,
including ones for Caltrans’ projects
which involved driving larger piles in
E:\FR\FM\21DEN1.SGM
21DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 243 / Monday, December 21, 2009 / Notices
the northern section of the Bay where
pinniped and cetacean species are more
abundant. Based on these previous
NEPA analyses and the analysis
contained within this notice, NMFS has
determined that issuance of a one-year
IHA to Caltrans for the taking, by Level
B harassment only, incidental to the
Antioch Bridge Seismic Retrofit project
does not have the potential to result in
any significant changes to the human
environment. Therefore, the issuance of
an IHA to Caltrans for the specified
activity falls under the category of those
actions which can be categorically
excluded from the need to prepare an
Environmental Assessment or
Environmental Impact Statement.
Dated: December 14, 2009.
Helen M. Golde,
Deputy Director, Office of Protected
Resources, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. E9–30179 Filed 12–18–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–S
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Navy
Notice of Public Hearings for the Draft
Environmental Impact Statement/
Overseas Environmental Impact
Statement for the Gulf of Alaska Navy
Training Activities; Correction
AGENCY:
ACTION:
Department of Navy, DoD.
Notice; correction.
SUMMARY: The Department of the Navy
published a document in the Federal
Register (74 FR 65761) of December 11,
2009, concerning public hearings on a
Draft Environmental Impact Statement/
Overseas Environmental Impact
Statement for the Gulf of Alaska Navy
Training Activities. The document
contained an incorrect date.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Naval Facilities Engineering Command
Northwest, Attention: Mrs. Amy Burt,
Gulf of Alaska Navy Training Activities
EIS/OEIS Project Manager, 1101 Tautog
Circle, Suite 203, Silverdale, WA
98315–1101; or https://
www.GulfofAlaskaNavyEIS.com.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
Correction
In the Federal Register (74 FR 65761)
of December 11, 2009, on page 65762, in
the first column, correct the fifth
paragraph to read:
5. Tuesday, January 12, 2010, at Orca
´
Adventure Lodge Meeting Room & Cafe,
2500 Orca Road, Cordova, Alaska.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:14 Dec 18, 2009
Jkt 220001
Dated: December 15, 2009.
T. M. Cruz,
Lieutenant Commander, Office of the Judge
Advocate General, U.S. Navy, Alternate
Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. E9–30318 Filed 12–18–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3810–FF–P
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Notice of Proposed Information
Collection Requests
Department of Education.
SUMMARY: The Acting Director,
Information Collection Clearance
Division, Regulatory Information
Management Services, Office of
Management, invites comments on the
proposed information collection
requests as required by the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Interested persons are invited to
submit comments on or before February
19, 2010.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section
3506 of the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35) requires
that the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) provide interested
Federal agencies and the public an early
opportunity to comment on information
collection requests. OMB may amend or
waive the requirement for public
consultation to the extent that public
participation in the approval process
would defeat the purpose of the
information collection, violate State or
Federal law, or substantially interfere
with any agency’s ability to perform its
statutory obligations. The Acting
Director, Information Collection
Clearance Division, Regulatory
Information Management Services,
Office of Management, publishes that
notice containing proposed information
collection requests prior to submission
of these requests to OMB. Each
proposed information collection,
grouped by office, contains the
following: (1) Type of review requested,
e.g. new, revision, extension, existing or
reinstatement; (2) Title; (3) Summary of
the collection; (4) Description of the
need for, and proposed use of, the
information; (5) Respondents and
frequency of collection; and (6)
Reporting and/or Recordkeeping
burden. OMB invites public comment.
The Department of Education is
especially interested in public comment
addressing the following issues: (1) Is
this collection necessary to the proper
functions of the Department; (2) will
this information be processed and used
in a timely manner; (3) is the estimate
of burden accurate; (4) how might the
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
67861
Department enhance the quality, utility,
and clarity of the information to be
collected; and (5) how might the
Department minimize the burden of this
collection on the respondents, including
through the use of information
technology.
Dated: December 15, 2009.
James Hyler,
Acting Director, Information Collection
Clearance Division, Regulatory Information
Management Services, Office of Management.
Office of Postsecondary Education
Type of Review: New.
Title: IEPS Fulbright-Hays Group
Projects Abroad Customer Surveys.
Frequency: On occasion.
Affected Public: Individuals or
households.
Reporting and Recordkeeping Hour
Burden:
Responses: 1,829.
Burden Hours: 809.
Abstract: The purpose of this
evaluation is to assess the impact of the
Group Projects Abroad (GPA) program
in enhancing the foreign language
capacity of the United States. Three
surveys will be conducted: a survey of
GPA Project Directors; a survey of 2002–
2008 GPA alumni; and a survey of 2009
alumni. Results from the three surveys
will inform the writing of a final report
determining the impact of the GPA
program.
Requests for copies of the proposed
information collection request may be
accessed from https://edicsweb.ed.gov,
by selecting the ‘‘Browse Pending
Collections’’ link and by clicking on
link number 4182. When you access the
information collection, click on
‘‘Download Attachments’’ to view.
Written requests for information should
be addressed to U.S. Department of
Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW.,
LBJ, Washington, DC 20202–4537.
Requests may also be electronically
mailed to ICDocketMgr@ed.gov or faxed
to 202–401–0920. Please specify the
complete title of the information
collection when making your request.
Comments regarding burden and/or
the collection activity requirements
should be electronically mailed to
ICDocketMgr@ed.gov 202–401–0526.
Individuals who use a
telecommunications device for the deaf
(TDD) may call the Federal Information
Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–800–877–
8339.
[FR Doc. E9–30276 Filed 12–18–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
E:\FR\FM\21DEN1.SGM
21DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 243 (Monday, December 21, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 67856-67861]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-30179]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
RIN 0648-XS24
Takes of Marine Mammals Incidental to Specified Activities;
Antioch Bridge Seismic Retrofit Project, California
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Notice; proposed incidental harassment authorization; request
for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NMFS has received an application from the California
Department of Transportation (Caltrans) for an Incidental Harassment
Authorization (IHA) to take marine mammals, by harassment, incidental
to the Antioch Bridge Seismic Retrofit Project. Pursuant to the Marine
Mammal Protection Act (MMPA), NMFS is requesting comments on its
proposal to issue an IHA to Caltrans to incidentally harass, by Level B
Harassment only, 10 harbor seals (Phoca vitulina) and 10 California sea
lions (Zalophus californianus) during the specified activity.
DATES: Comments and information must be received no later than January
20, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Comments on the application should be addressed to Michael
Payne, Chief, Permits, Conservation and Education Division, Office of
Protected Resources, National Marine Fisheries Service, 1315 East-West
Highway, Silver Spring, MD 20910-3225. The mailbox address for
providing email comments is PR1.0648-XS24@noaa.gov. NMFS is not
responsible for e-mail comments sent to addresses other than the one
provided here. Comments sent via e-mail, including all attachments,
must not exceed a 10-megabyte file size.
Instructions: All comments received are a part of the public record
and will generally be posted to https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/permits/incidental.htm without change. All Personal Identifying Information
(for example, name, address, etc.) voluntarily submitted by the
commenter may be publicly accessible. Do not submit Confidential
Business Information or otherwise sensitive or protected information.
A copy of the application containing a list of the references used
in this document may be obtained by writing to the address specified
above, telephoning the contact listed below (see FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT), or visiting the internet at: https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/permits/incidental.htm. Documents cited in this
notice may also be viewed, by appointment, during regular business
hours, at the aforementioned address.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jaclyn Daly, Office of Protected
Resources, NMFS, (301) 713-2289, ext 151.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Sections 101(a)(5)(A) and (D) of the MMPA (16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.)
direct the Secretary of Commerce to allow, upon request, the
incidental, but not intentional, taking of small numbers of marine
mammals by U.S. citizens who engage in a specified activity (other than
commercial fishing) within a specified geographical region if certain
findings are made and either regulations are issued or, if the taking
is limited to harassment, a notice of a proposed authorization is
provided to the public for review.
Authorization for incidental takings shall be granted if NMFS finds
that the taking will have a negligible impact on the species or
stock(s), will not have an unmitigable adverse impact on the
availability of the species or stock(s) for subsistence uses (where
relevant), and if the permissible methods of taking and requirements
pertaining to the mitigation, monitoring and reporting of such takings
are set forth. NMFS has defined ``negligible impact'' in 50 CFR 216.103
as ``...an impact resulting from the specified activity that cannot be
reasonably expected to, and is not reasonably likely to, adversely
affect the species or stock through effects on annual rates of
recruitment or survival.''
Section 101(a)(5)(D) of the MMPA established an expedited process
by which citizens of the United States can apply for an authorization
to incidentally take small numbers of marine mammals by harassment.
Section 101(a)(5)(D) establishes a 45-day time limit for NMFS review of
an application followed by a 30-day public notice and comment period on
any proposed authorizations for the incidental harassment of marine
mammals. Within 45 days of the close of the comment period, NMFS must
either issue or deny the authorization.
Except with respect to certain activities not pertinent here, the
MMPA defines ``harassment'' as: any act of pursuit, torment, or
annoyance which (i) has the potential to injure a marine mammal or
marine mammal stock in the wild [Level A harassment]; or (ii) has the
potential to disturb a marine mammal or marine mammal stock in the wild
by causing disruption of behavioral patterns, including, but not
limited to, migration, breathing, nursing, breeding, feeding, or
sheltering [Level B harassment].
Summary of Request
On May 5, 2009, NMFS received an application from Caltrans for the
taking, by Level B harassment, of marine mammals incidental to
retrofitting the Antioch Bridge, located 5.4 miles east of the
confluence of the Sacramento and San Joaquin Rivers. To access shallow
water piers, a temporary support trestle would be installed using a
pile driver hammer. Because pile driving has the potential to result in
behavioral harassment to marine mammals located in the action area, an
authorization under section 101(a)(5)(D) of the MMPA is warranted.
Description of the Specified Activity
The Antioch Bridge, completed in 1978, was designed based on
seismic standards that the Caltrans established in 1971. After the Loma
Prieta in 1989, Caltrans implemented the Seismic Retrofit Program.
After the Northridge Earthquake of 1994, Caltrans implemented Phase Two
of the Program, which required seven state-owned toll bridges,
including the Antioch Bridge, to be retrofitted. The Antioch Seismic
[[Page 67857]]
Retrofit Project would provide a seismic upgrade of the Antioch Bridge;
the upgrade would meet the current requirements.
The Antioch Bridge is 9,437-ft long, accommodates one lane of
traffic in either direction, and includes narrow accommodation for
bicyclists and pedestrians. Proposed retrofit elements to the bridge
include installation of steel bracings; replacement of the existing
elastometric bearings with isolation bearings; and removal of the
existing curtain walls and retrofit of all the columns within the slab
span structure. To accomplish this, a temporary trestle would be built
to allow access to the piers in shallow water (out to Pier 11). The
temporary marine trestle would be constructed from the south shore of
the San Joaquin River; out approximately 910-ft into the river along
the west side of the existing bridge structure. This is where water
depths are less than 10-ft below mean lower-low water (MLLW) and are
too shallow to be accessed by barge. The trestle will be 25 ft wide
with piles spaced 25-ft apart. It will be constructed using
approximately 160 24-in steel hollow shell piles which will be
installed with a vibratory hammer. Vibrating a single 24-in pile into
place requires, at the most, ten minutes of noise generating vibration.
In addition, Caltrans will ``proof'' or test one pile per day using an
impact hammer to ensure the pile can sustain the required load.
Proofing the piles would require approximately 20 blows per day,
generating sound pressure for about one minute per day. The entire
project is expected to take 2.5 years to complete; however,
installation of the temporary piles is expected to take approximately 4
months and is planned for August 1- November 1, 2010. At the completion
of the project, the trestle and all piles would be removed. All pile
driving would be conducted during daylight hours only.
Some components of the project, (e.g., creation of access roads;
installation of bracings) would not involve in-water work and therefore
are not expected to harass marine mammals. In-air noise from these
activities is not a concern in this case as pinnipeds are not known to
haul-out near the bridge (see Affected Environment). Therefore, NMFS
has preliminary determined that these specified activities do not
warrant an authorization and they will not be discussed further.
Action Area
The Antioch Bridge project area includes Caltrans right-of-way
(ROW) and temporary construction easements. This area covers
approximately 62 acres (ac), including 7.5 ac on the south shore of the
San Joaquin River in Contra Costa County, 21 ac of the San Joaquin
River, and 33.5 ac on Sherman Island in Sacramento County. On the south
side of the river, vegetation is primarily park landscaping, with weedy
ruderal vegetation under the existing bridge. A small fringe wetland is
found along the San Joaquin River around the bridge.
The San Joaquin River is relatively shallow on the south side, with
depths of less than 10-ft out to Pier 11. The main channel extends
between Piers 12 and 20, with deep water passage between Piers 19 and
20, near the northern shore. On the north side of the river, Sherman
Island supports irrigated pasture and irrigated crops, as well as an
area of ruderal vegetation in fallow fields. Mayberry Slough and an
irrigation canal cross the area in the vicinity of Piers 39 and 40, and
Pier 32, respectively. The waters around the bridge are not heavily
used by marine mammals but do provide some foraging habitat for certain
pinniped species.
Description of Marine Mammals in the Area of the Specified Activity
The project area lies outside the range of most marine mammal
species. The Guadalupe fur seal (Arctocephalus townsendi), northern
elephant seal (Mirounga angustirostris), northern fur-seal (Callorhinus
ursinus), and northern (Stellar) sea lion (Eumetopias jubatus) have
distributions that extend northward along the California coast but
their ranges do not extend into the bays and estuaries of the Delta.
There have been two documented occurrences of humpback whales
(Megaptera novaeangliae) traveling up the Sacramento River, but these
occurrences do not represent the normal behavior patterns of the
species. Occurrences of humpback whales have never been documented and
are not anticipated at the bridge location.
The only marine mammal species which may be affected by the project
are the California sea lion and Pacific harbor seal. Both species have
been known to sporadically venture into estuaries and rivers in search
of food, and the California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG)
indicates that the ranges of these two species encompasses the region
of the Delta in which the project occurs.
California Sea Lion
The California sea lion is the most abundant marine mammal in
California with an estimated population of 50,000 along the entire
California coast and islands. The entire US population has been
estimated at 238,000 in 2005, and growing at a rate of approximately
6.52 % annually between 1975 and 2005 (NMFS, 2007). The California
stock of sea lions is not listed as depleted under the MMPA or
threatened or endangered under the MMPA.
California sea lions exhibit seasonal migration patterns organized
around their breeding patterns. The sea lions breed in rookeries in the
Channel Islands and Mexico from May through August. Females tend to
remain close to the rookeries throughout the year, while males migrate
north after the breeding season in the late summer, and then migrate
back south to the breeding grounds in the spring (CDFG, 1990).
Sea lions feed on fish and cephalopods, including Pacific whiting,
rockfish, anchovy, hake, flat-fish, small sharks, squid, and octopus.
Sea lions are often solitary feeders; however they also hunt in groups
which can vary in size according to the abundance of prey. Within the
action area; sea lions are often solitary.
Main breeding rookeries are found in the Channel Islands. Males
haul out on Farallon Island and Ano Nuevo Island throughout the year.
Sea lions can be found at sea from the surf zone out to near shore and
pelagic waters. On land, the sea lions are found resting and breeding
in groups of various sizes, and haul out on rocky surfaces and
outcroppings and beaches, as well as manmade structures such as jetties
and buoys. Sea lions prefer haulout sites and rookeries near abundant
food supplies, with easy access to water; although sea lions
occasionally travel up rivers and bays in search of food.
No known haulout sites occur in the vicinity of the bridge. During
the designated August 1 to November 30 work window for installing the
temporary marine trestle, California sea lions will likely be absent
during August, as they are still in the breeding season and will be
located further south, in the Channel Islands (CDFG 1990). Beginning in
September, the likelihood of sea lions foraging in the San Joaquin
River Delta increases, as males are beginning to return from the
Channel Island rookeries at this time (CDFG 1990).
Harbor Seals
Harbor seals are the most widely distributed pinniped species,
occurring on both sides of the northern Pacific and Atlantic Ocean
(NMFS 2005). The Pacific harbor seal ranges from Baja Mexico to the
Aleutian Islands, and occurs along the entire length of the California
coast. Harbor seal populations in California were estimated at 34,233
in 2005, and have
[[Page 67858]]
been growing at an estimated rate of 3.5 % from 1982 to 1995 (NMFS
2005). Harbor seals are not listed as depleted under the MMPA or
threatened or endangered under the MMPA.
The breeding season lasts from March through June each year, with
peak births occurring between April and May. Females give birth to one
pup each year, and mate again shortly after weaning. Harbor seals are
not territorial on land, but do maintain spacing between individuals in
haul outs.
Harbor seals feed on fish, crustaceans and some cephalopods.
Foraging occurs in shallow littoral waters, and common prey items
include flounder, sole, hake, codfish, sculpin, anchovy and herring.
Harbor seals are typically solitary while foraging, although small
groups have been observed. Seals spotted within the action area are
usually solitary.
Unlike California sea lions, harbor seals are rarely found in
pelagic waters and typically stay within the tidal and intertidal
zones. On land, harbor seals haul out on rocky outcrops, mudflats,
sandbars and sandy beaches with unrestricted access to water and with
minimal human presence. Harbor seals are non-migratory, but will make
short to-moderate distance journeys for feeding and breeding needs,
including venturing into estuaries and rivers (CDFG 2005).
The area of the Delta where the project occurs falls within the
limits of the range of harbor seals; however, no known haulout sites
have been identified in the vicinity of the bridge. Potential
occurrences of harbor seals would be limited to individuals in search
of food upstream into the San Joaquin River.
Potential Effects on Marine Mammals
Sound is a physical phenomenon consisting of minute vibrations that
travel through a medium, such as air or water. Sound levels are
compared to a reference sound pressure to identify the medium. For air
and water, these reference pressures are ``re 20 microPa'' and ``re 1
microPa'', respectively. Sound is generally characterized by several
variables, including frequency and sound level. Frequency describes the
sound's pitch and is measured in hertz (Hz) or kilohertz (kHz), while
sound level describes the sound's loudness and is measured in decibels
(dB). Sound level increases or decreases exponentially with each dB of
change. For example, 10-dB yields a sound level 10 times more intense
than 1 dB, while a 20 dB level equates to 100 times more intense, and a
30 dB level is 1,000 times more intense. However, it should be noted
that humans perceive a 10 dB increase in sound level as only a doubling
of sound loudness, and a 10 dB decrease in sound level as a halving of
sound loudness.
Marine mammals use sound for vital life functions, and introducing
sound into their environment could be disrupting to those behaviors.
Sound (hearing and vocalization/ echolocation) serves 4 main functions
for marine mammals. These functions include (1) providing information
about their environment; (2) communication; (3) enabling remote
detection of prey; and (4) enabling detection of predators. Noise from
pile driving may affect marine mammals at a level which could cause
behavioral harassment. The distances to which these sounds are audible
depend on source levels, ambient noise levels, and sensitivity of the
receptor (Richardson et al. 1995). Mitigation measures (see Mitigation
section) and the low source level of vibratory pile driving (the main
method used to install piles) are expected to prevent injurious
exposure.
Pinnipeds produce a wide range of hearing social signals, most
occurring at relatively low frequencies (Southall et al., 2007),
suggesting hearing is keenest at these frequencies. Pinnipeds
communicate acoustically both on land and in the water suggesting they
possess amphibious hearing and have difference hearing capabilities
dependant upon the media (air or water). Based on numerous studies, as
summarized in Southall et al. (2007), pinnipeds are more sensitive to a
broader range of sound frequencies in water than in air. In-water,
pinnipeds can hear frequencies from 75 Hz to 75kHz. In-air, the lower
limit remains at 75 Hz but the highest audible frequencies are only
around 30kHz (Southall, et al., 2007).
Hearing Impairment
Temporary or permanent hearing impairment is a possibility when
marine mammals are exposed to very loud sounds. Hearing impairment is
measured in two forms: temporary threshold shift and permanent
threshold shift. Relationships between TTS and PTS thresholds have not
been studied in marine mammals, but are assumed to be similar to those
in humans and other terrestrial mammals. There is no empirical data for
onset of PTS in any marine mammal, and therefore, PTS- onset must be
estimated from TTS-onset measurements and from the rate of TTS growth
with increasing exposure levels above the level eliciting TTS-onset.
PTS is presumed to be likely if the threshold is reduced by [gteqt] 40
dB (i.e., 40 dB of TTS). Due to proposed mitigation measures and source
levels, NMFS does not expect that marine mammals will be exposed to
levels that could elicit PTS and therefore it will not be discussed
further.
Temporary Threshold Shift (TTS)
TTS is the mildest form of hearing impairment that can occur during
exposure to a loud sound (Kryter, 1985). While experiencing TTS, the
hearing threshold rises and a sound must be louder in order to be
heard. TTS can last from minutes or hours to (in cases of strong TTS)
days. For sound exposures at or somewhat above the TTS-onset threshold,
hearing sensitivity recovers rapidly after exposure to the noise ends.
Few data on sound levels and durations necessary to elicit mild TTS
have been obtained for marine mammals. Southall et al. (2007) considers
a 6 dB TTS (i.e., baseline thresholds are elevated by 6 dB) sufficient
to be recognized as an unequivocal deviation and thus a sufficient
definition of TTS-onset. Because it is non-injurious, NMFS considers
TTS Level B harassment that is mediated by physiological effects on the
auditory system; however, NMFS does not consider onset TTS to be the
lowest level at which Level B harassment may occur.
Sound exposures that elicit TTS in pinnipeds underwater have been
measured in harbor seals, California sea lions, and northern elephant
seals from broadband or octaveband (OBN) non-pulse noise ranging from
approximately 12 minutes to several hours (Kastak and Schusterman,
1996; Finneran et al., 2003; Kastak et al., 1999; Kastak et al., 2005).
Collectively, Kastak et al. (2005) analyzed these data to indicate that
in the harbor seal, a TTS of ca. 6 dB occurred with 25 minute exposure
to 2.5 kHz OBN with SPL of 152 dB re:1 microPa; the California sea lion
showed TTS-onset at 174 dB re: 1 microPa (as summarized in Southall et
al., 2007). Underwater TTS experiments involving exposure to pulse
noise is limited to a single study. Finneran et al. (2003) found no
measurable TTS when two California sea lions were exposed to sounds up
to 183 dB re: 1 microPa (peak-to-peak).
Behavioral Impacts
The source of underwater noise during construction would be pile
driving to construct the temporary work trestle. There are limited data
available on the effects of non-pulse noise on pinnipeds in-water;
however, field and captive studies to date collectively suggest that
pinnipeds do not strongly react to exposures between 90-140 dB re: 1
microPa. Jacobs and Terhune (2002) observed wild harbor seal
[[Page 67859]]
reactions to acoustic harassment devices (ADH) around nine sites. Seals
came within 44 m of the active ADH and failed to demonstrate any
behavioral response when received SPLs were estimated at 120-130 dB re:
1 microPa. In a captive study, a group of seals were collectively
subjected to non-pulse sounds (e.g., vibratory pile driving) at 8-16
kHz (Kastelein, 2006). Exposures between 80-107 dB re: 1 microPa did
not induce strong behavioral responses; however, a single observation
at 100-110 dB re: 1 microPa indicated an avoidance response at this
level. The group returned to baseline conditions following exposure
(i.e., no long term impact). Southall et al. (2007) notes contextual
differences between these two studies noting that the captive animals
were not reinforced with food for remaining in the noise fields,
whereas free-ranging subjects may have been more tolerant of exposures
because of motivation to return to a safe location or approach
enclosures holding prey items. Southall et al. (2007) reviewed relevant
data from studies involving pinnipeds exposed to pulse noise (e.g.,
impact pile driving) and concluded that exposures to 150 to 180 dB re:
1 microPa generally have limited potential to induce avoidance
behavior.
Seals and sea lions exposed to threshold level sounds (120 dB for
non-pulse; 160 dB for pulse) may elicit temporary avoidance behavior
around the bridge, which may affect movement of seals under the bridge
or temporarily inhibit them from foraging near the bridge. However,
limiting pile driving to one to hours per day would allow for minimal
disruption of harbor seal foraging or use of dispersal habitat. Very
few sea lions use the South Bay for foraging and no known sea lion
haul-outs exist in the South Bay; therefore, impacts are expected to be
equally minimal than those of harbor seals.
Based on these studies, NMFS has preliminarily determined that
seals and sea lions exposed to threshold level sounds (120 dB for non-
pulse; 160 dB for pulse) may elicit temporary pinniped avoidance
behavior. The most likely impact to pinnipeds from the pile
installation would be temporary disruption of feeding patterns as
individual sea lions or harbor seals pass through the area in pursuit
of food. However, limiting pile driving to one to two hours per day
would allow for minimal disruption of foraging or use of dispersal
habitat. No haulouts exist and no pupping or breeding is known to occur
on land near the bridge; therefore, no impacts to reproduction or
interruption of mom/pup bonding or nursing are anticipated. Temporary
hearing loss is possible for those pinnipeds that enter into zone of
Level B harassment, but permanent hearing loss or other harm is not
anticipated due to monitoring and mitigation efforts, as described
below) and low source level of pile driving.
Estimated Take by Incidental Harassment
NMFS typically uses threshold sound levels to estimate takes and
establish appropriate mitigation. Current NMFS practice regarding
exposure of marine mammals to anthropogenic noise is that in order to
avoid injury of marine mammals (e.g., PTS), cetaceans and pinnipeds
should not be exposed to impulsive sounds of 180 and 190 dB rms or
above, respectively. This level is considered precautionary as it is
likely that more intense sounds would be required before injury would
actually occur (Southall et al., 2007). As such, Caltrans has proposed
safety zones based on hydroacoustical modeling for the pile sizes and
type of hammers used for the Dumbarton Bridge project and water depth.
The model simulates spherical spreading and uses a transmission
constant of 15. Potential for behavioral harassment (Level B) is
considered to have occurred when marine mammals are exposed to sounds
at or above 160dB rms for impulse sounds (e.g., impact pile driving)
and 120dB rms for non-pulse noise (e.g., vibratory pile driving), but
below the aforementioned thresholds. These levels are considered
precautionary. Estimated distances to NMFS' current harassment
threshold levels from pile driving during the proposed action are
outlined in Table 1 below.
Table 1: Underwater distances to NMFS harassment threshold levels during pile driving.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sound Levels (rms)
Pile Type Hammer Type -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
190 dB 160 dB 120 dB
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
24`` steel Impact 16.8 m (55 ft) 1,000 m (3,280 ft) n/a
24`` steel Vibratory n/a n/a 16.4 km (10.2 miles)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the impact portion of the trestle pile installation, a source
level of 194 dB RMS at 35-ft was used to calculate NMFS level
harassment distances. Based on this source level, models estimated that
pile installation for the Project could generate sound levels above 190
dB that would extend out about 55-ft from the pile. The calculated
distance for sounds above 160 dB (Level B harassment) is approximately
3,300-ft. For the vibratory portion of the trestle pile installation, a
source level of 166 dB RMS at 35-ft is assumed; therefore, sound levels
above 190 dB would not be reached during the installation of piles by
vibratory hammer. The calculated distance for sounds above 120 dB
(Level B harassment threshold for non-impulse sounds) would be around
10.2 miles.
Current NMFS practice regarding in-air exposure of pinnipeds to
noise generated from human activity is that the onset of Level B
harassment for harbor seals and all other pinnipeds is 90 dBrms
and 100 dB rms re: 20 micoPa, respectively. In-air noise
calculations from pile driving for the Dumbarton Bridge project, which
uses the same size and type of piles and hammers, predict that noise
levels will be reduced to approximately 83 dB rms re: 20
microPa at 800m. Harbor seals or California sea lions are not known to
haul-out anywhere near the Antioch Bridge; therefore, in-air noise is
not considered to contribute to harassment for this project.
It is difficult to estimate the number of California sea lions and
Pacific harbor seals that could be affected by the installation of
piles for the temporary marine trestle, as pinnipeds only sporadically
venture into the project area in pursuit of food. Due to the project
location lying at the extreme margins of these species' ranges, the
number of individual pinnipeds expected to be encountered is very low.
Through consultation with NMFS' Southeast Regional Office, Caltrans
requests the take of 10 California seal lions. These individuals would
most likely be adult males, as the females and pups tend to remain
close to the breeding rookeries. Similarly, Caltrans requests, and
NMFS' proposes, authorization to take 10 individual
[[Page 67860]]
harbor seals incidental to pile driving activities; also likely males
in pursuit of food.
Proposed Mitigation
Caltrans has proposed mitigation both in their application and
supplemental communication to reduce impact to environmental resources.
Measures set in place to protect birds and fish (e.g., using the
vibratory hammer at all times except for load bearing tests) also
protect marine mammals. The following proposed mitigation measures are
designed to eliminate potential for injury and reduce Level B
harassment of marine mammals.
Establishment of safety and zones and shut down requirements
Vibratory pile driving does not elicit source levels at or above
NMFS' harassment threshold for Level A harassment, therefore, no
required shut down zones would be established for vibratory pile
driving. The isopleth for the Level A harassment threshold (190 dB) is
modeled to be within 55 ft (16.8 m) of the impact pile hammer (see
Table 1); however, Caltrans has proposed to delay impact pile driving
should a marine mammal come within or approach 100 ft (30 m) of the
pile being driven; further reducing the risk of Level A harassment.
Limited use of impact hammer
As a result of Section 7 consultation discussions with NMFS,
Caltrans has agreed to drive all temporary piles with a vibratory
hammer, to reduce impacts to listed fish, with the exception of one
pile per day being ``proofed'' with an impact hammer. Proofing requires
approximately 20-40 blows per pile which equates to approximately 15-20
seconds of impact hammering per day. This action would also serve to
reduce impacts to marine mammals.
Soft start to pile driving activities
A ``soft start'' technique would be used at the beginning of each
pile installation to allow any marine mammal that may be in the
immediate area to leave before impact piling reaches full energy. The
soft start requires contractors to initiate noise from vibratory
hammers for 15 seconds at reduced energy followed by 1-minute waiting
period. The procedure would be repeated two additional times. Due to
the short duration of impact pile driving (20 seconds), the traditional
ramp-up requirement for impact pile driving does not apply as it would
actually increase the duration of noise emitted into the environment
and monitoring should effectively detect marine mammals within or near
the proposed impact pile driving shut down of 100 ft (30 m). If any
marine mammal is sighted within or approaching this shut down zone
prior to pile-driving, Caltrans would delay pile-driving until the
animal has moved outside and on a path away from such zone or after 15
minutes have elapsed since the last sighting of the marine mammal.
Marine Mammal Monitoring
Safety zone monitoring would be conducted during all active pile
driving. Monitoring of the 100 ft (30 m) safety zone would be conducted
by qualified, NMFS approved marine mammal observers (MMOs). Impact pile
driving would not begin until the 100 ft safety zone is clear of marine
mammals and would be stopped in the event that marine mammals enter the
safety zone. For all pile driving, MMOs would begin monitoring at least
30 minutes prior to the commencement of pile driving and could conduct
monitoring from small boats, as observation from a higher vantage point
may not be practical. MMOs would remain 50 yards from swimming
pinnipeds in accordance with NMFS marine mammal viewing guidelines
(https://swr.nmfs.noaa.gov/psd/rookeryhaulouts/CASEALVIEWBROCHURE.pdf).
This would prevent additional harassment to pinnipeds from the vessel.
If a land based monitoring point can be found, MMOs would be stationed
here. Observations would be made with binoculars during daylight hours.
Data on all observed marine mammals would be recorded and include
information such as species, numbers, time of observation, location,
and behavior.
Acoustic Monitoring
Monitors would be present to conduct hydro-acoustic monitoring, in
order to empirically establish the 190 dB RMS (impulse) safety zone and
behavioral harassment zones. Field measurements of sound pressure
levels would be recorded and analyzed. A more detailed marine mammal
monitoring plan and hydro-acoustic monitoring plan would be made by the
monitoring contractor prior to the start of the Antioch Bridge seismic
retrofit.
Reporting
NMFS would be notified 2 weeks prior to the initiation of proposed
work. Weekly monitoring reports would be sent to NMFS and include
information such as species, numbers, time of observation, location,
and behavior. Additionally, the report would include an assessment of
the number of California sea lions and harbor seals that may have been
harassed as a result of pile driving activity, based on direct
observation of sea lions and harbor seals observed passing through the
area. Should the acoustic monitoring reveal noise level isopleths
different than those described here, a modification to the safety zone
reflecting those data would occur.
Preliminary Determination
Based on the analysis contained herein of the likely effects of the
specified activity on marine mammals and their habitat, and taking into
consideration the implementation of the mitigation and monitoring
measures, NMFS preliminarily finds that pile driving associated with
the Anitoch Bridge Seismic Retrofit Project would result in the
incidental take of small numbers of marine mammals, by Level B
harassment only, and that the total taking would have a negligible
impact on the affected species or stocks. No subsistence hunting of
marine mammals occurs in the region; therefore, no impact on the
availability of a species or stock for subsistence use would occur.
Endangered Species Act (ESA)
On January 26, 2009, NMFS received a request from Caltrans' to
initiate consultation under section 7 of the ESA on its proposed
Antioch Bridge Seismic Retrofit Project. NMFS concluded consultation on
this action on July 13, 2009 and issued an incidental take statement
authorizing the take of listed steelhead and green sturgeon. No ESA-
listed marine mammal species occur within the action area; therefore,
none would be affected.
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
NOAA Administrative Order Series 216-6, May 20, 1999 (NAO),
identifies issuance of IHAs as a type of Federal action that may be
categorically excluded from preparation of an environmental assessment
or environmental impact statement. In determining whether a categorical
exclusion (CE) is appropriate for a given IHA, NMFS must consider: (1)
factors listed in Section 5.05b of the NAO regarding prior analysis for
the ``same'' action; (2) context and intensity of impacts, as defined
in 40 CFR 1508.27; and (3) factors listed in Section 5.05c of the NAO
regarding exceptions to CEs. NMFS has prepared, supplemented, or
adopted numerous EAs leading to Findings of No Significant Impact
(FONSIs) for pile driving activities similar to the proposed activity,
including ones for Caltrans' projects which involved driving larger
piles in
[[Page 67861]]
the northern section of the Bay where pinniped and cetacean species are
more abundant. Based on these previous NEPA analyses and the analysis
contained within this notice, NMFS has determined that issuance of a
one-year IHA to Caltrans for the taking, by Level B harassment only,
incidental to the Antioch Bridge Seismic Retrofit project does not have
the potential to result in any significant changes to the human
environment. Therefore, the issuance of an IHA to Caltrans for the
specified activity falls under the category of those actions which can
be categorically excluded from the need to prepare an Environmental
Assessment or Environmental Impact Statement.
Dated: December 14, 2009.
Helen M. Golde,
Deputy Director, Office of Protected Resources, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. E9-30179 Filed 12-18-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S