Approval and Promulgation of Maintenance Plan for Carbon Monoxide; State of Arizona; Tucson Air Planning Area, 67819-67821 [E9-30134]
Download as PDF
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 243 / Monday, December 21, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
Canada Post—United States Postal service
Contractual Bilateral Agreement for
Inbound Competitive Services (MC2009–
8 and CP2009–9)
International Money Transfer Service
International Ancillary Services
Special Services
Premium Forwarding Service
Negotiated Service Agreements
Domestic
Express Mail Contract 1 (MC2008–5)
Express Mail Contract 2 (MC2009–3 and
CP2009–4)
Express Mail Contract 3 (MC2009–15 and
CP2009–21)
Express Mail Contract 4 (MC2009–34 and
CP2009–45)
Express Mail Contract 5 (MC2010–5 and
CP2010–5)
Express Mail & Priority Mail Contract 1
(MC2009–6 and CP2009–7)
Express Mail & Priority Mail Contract 2
(MC2009–12 and CP2009–14)
Express Mail & Priority Mail Contract 3
(MC2009–13 and CP2009–17)
Express Mail & Priority Mail Contract 4
(MC2009–17 and CP2009–24)
Express Mail & Priority Mail Contract 5
(MC2009–18 and CP2009–25)
Express Mail & Priority Mail Contract 6
(MC2009–31 and CP2009–42)
Express Mail & Priority Mail Contract 7
(MC2009–32 and CP2009–43)
Express Mail & Priority Mail Contract 8
(MC2009–33 and CP2009–44)
Parcel Select & Parcel Return Service
Contract 1 (MC2009–11 and CP2009–13)
Parcel Select & Parcel Return Service
Contract 2 (MC2009–40 and CP2009–61)
Parcel Return Service Contract 1 (MC2009–
1 and CP2009–2)
Priority Mail Contract 1 (MC2008–8 and
CP2008–26)
Priority Mail Contract 2 (MC2009–2 and
CP2009–3)
Priority Mail Contract 3 (MC2009–4 and
CP2009–5)
Priority Mail Contract 4 (MC2009–5 and
CP2009–6)
Priority Mail Contract 5 (MC2009–21 and
CP2009–26)
Priority Mail Contract 6 (MC2009–25 and
CP2009–30)
Priority Mail Contract 7 (MC2009–25 and
CP2009–31)
Priority Mail Contract 8 (MC2009–25 and
CP2009–32)
Priority Mail Contract 9 (MC2009–25 and
CP2009–33)
Priority Mail Contract 10 (MC2009–25 and
CP2009–34)
Priority Mail Contract 11 (MC2009–27 and
CP2009–37)
Priority Mail Contract 12 (MC2009–28 and
CP2009–38)
Priority Mail Contract 13 (MC2009–29 and
CP2009–39)
Priority Mail Contract 14 (MC2009–30 and
CP2009–40)
Priority Mail Contract 15 (MC2009–35 and
CP2009–54)
Priority Mail Contract 16 (MC2009–36 and
CP2009–55)
Priority Mail Contract 17 (MC2009–37 and
CP2009–56)
Priority Mail Contract 18 (MC2009–42 and
CP2009–63)
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:17 Dec 18, 2009
Jkt 220001
Priority Mail Contract 19 (MC2010–1 and
CP2010–1)
Priority Mail Contract 20 (MC2010–2 and
CP2010–2)
Priority Mail Contract 21 (MC2010–3 and
CP2010–3)
Priority Mail Contract 22 (MC2010–4 and
CP2010–4)
Priority Mail Contract 23 (MC2010–9 and
CP2010–9)
Outbound International
Direct Entry Parcels Contracts
Direct Entry Parcels 1 (MC2009–26 and
CP2009–36)
Global Direct Contracts (MC2009–9,
CP2009–10, and CP2009–11)
Global Expedited Package Services (GEPS)
Contracts
GEPS 1 (CP2008–5, CP2008–11, CP2008–
12, and CP2008–13, CP2008–18,
CP2008–19, CP2008–20, CP2008–21,
CP2008–22, CP2008–23, and CP2008–24)
Global Expedited Package Services 2
(CP2009–50)
Global Plus Contracts
Global Plus 1 (CP2008–8, CP2008–46 and
CP2009–47)
Global Plus 2 (MC2008–7, CP2008–48 and
CP2008–49)
Inbound International
Inbound Direct Entry Contracts with
Foreign Postal Administrations
Inbound Direct Entry Contracts with
Foreign Postal Administrations
(MC2008–6, CP2008–14 and MC2008–
15)
Inbound Direct Entry Contracts with
Foreign Postal Administrations 1
(MC2008–6 and CP2009–62)
International Business Reply Service
Competitive Contract 1 (MC2009–14 and
CP2009–20)
Competitive Product Descriptions
Express Mail
[Reserved for Group Description]
Express Mail
[Reserved for Product Description]
Outbound International Expedited Services
[Reserved for Product Description]
Inbound International Expedited Services
[Reserved for Product Description]
Priority
[Reserved for Product Description]
Priority Mail
[Reserved for Product Description]
Outbound Priority Mail International
[Reserved for Product Description]
Inbound Air Parcel Post
[Reserved for Product Description]
Parcel Select
[Reserved for Group Description]
Parcel Return Service
[Reserved for Group Description]
International
[Reserved for Group Description]
International Priority Airlift (IPA)
[Reserved for Product Description]
International Surface Airlift (ISAL)
[Reserved for Product Description]
International Direct Sacks—M-Bags
[Reserved for Product Description]
Global Customized Shipping Services
[Reserved for Product Description]
International Money Transfer Service
[Reserved for Product Description]
Inbound Surface Parcel Post (at non-UPU
rates)
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
67819
[Reserved for Product Description]
International Ancillary Services
[Reserved for Product Description]
International Certificate of Mailing
[Reserved for Product Description]
International Registered Mail
[Reserved for Product Description]
International Return Receipt
[Reserved for Product Description]
International Restricted Delivery
[Reserved for Product Description]
International Insurance
[Reserved for Product Description]
Negotiated Service Agreements
[Reserved for Group Description]
Domestic
[Reserved for Product Description]
Outbound International
[Reserved for Group Description]
Part C—Glossary of Terms and Conditions
[Reserved]
Part D—Country Price Lists for International
Mail [Reserved]
[FR Doc. E9–30230 Filed 12–18–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710–FW–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R09–OAR–2008–0379; FRL–8982–4]
Approval and Promulgation of
Maintenance Plan for Carbon
Monoxide; State of Arizona; Tucson
Air Planning Area
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Clean Air Act,
EPA is approving two revisions to the
Arizona State Implementation Plan.
These revisions include the 2008
Revision to the Carbon Monoxide
Limited Maintenance Plan for the
Tucson Air Planning Area, submitted on
July 10, 2008, and a statutory provision,
submitted on June 22, 2009, that
extends the life of the State’s vehicle
emissions inspection program through
the end of 2016. EPA is taking this
action pursuant to those provisions of
the Clean Air Act that obligate the
Agency to take action on submittals of
revisions to state implementation plans.
The effect of this action is to make
certain commitments related to
maintenance of the carbon monoxide
standard in the Tucson Air Planning
Area Federally enforceable as part of the
Arizona State Implementation Plan.
DATES: Effective Date: This rule is
effective on January 20, 2010.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established docket
number EPA–R09–OAR–2008–0379 for
this action. The index to the docket is
E:\FR\FM\21DER1.SGM
21DER1
67820
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 243 / Monday, December 21, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
available electronically at https://
www.regulations.gov and in hard copy
at EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street,
San Francisco, California. While all
documents in the docket are listed in
the index, some information may be
publicly available only at the hard copy
location (e.g., copyrighted material), and
some may not be publicly available in
either location (e.g., CBI). To inspect the
hard copy materials, please schedule an
appointment during normal business
hours with the contact listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Marty Robin, Air Planning Office (AIR–
2), EPA Region IX, (415) 972–3961,
robin.marty@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us’’
and ‘‘our’’ refer to EPA.
Table of Contents
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
I. Proposed Action
II. Public Comment
III. Final Action
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Proposed Action
On August 5, 2009 (74 FR 39007),
EPA proposed to approve, under the
Clean Air Act (CAA or ‘‘Act’’), two
revisions to the Arizona State
Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted by
the Arizona Department of
Environmental Quality (ADEQ). First,
we proposed to approve the 2008
Revision to the Carbon Monoxide
Limited Maintenance Plan for the
Tucson Air Planning Area (for 2010)
(‘‘2008 CO Maintenance Plan’’),
submitted by ADEQ on July 10, 2008.
Second, we proposed to approve a
statutory provision that was submitted
by ADEQ on June 22, 2009 that extends
the life of the State’s vehicle emissions
inspection (VEI) program through the
end of 2016.
We proposed approval of the 2008 CO
Maintenance Plan because we
concluded that it includes an acceptable
update of the various elements of the
initial EPA-approved 1996 CO
Maintenance Plan for the Tucson Air
Planning Area (TAPA) (including
emissions inventory, assurance of
adequate monitoring and verification of
continued attainment, and contingency
provisions), and essentially carries
forward all of the control measures and
contingency provisions relied upon in
the earlier plan.
We also concluded that the TAPA, a
former nonclassifiable CO
nonattainment area, continues to qualify
for the Limited Maintenance Plan (LMP)
option and that therefore the 2008 CO
Maintenance Plan adequately
demonstrates maintenance of the CO
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:17 Dec 18, 2009
Jkt 220001
NAAQS through documentation of
monitoring data showing maximum CO
levels less than 85% of the NAAQS and
continuation of existing control
measures. We believed the 2008 CO
Maintenance Plan to be sufficient to
provide for maintenance of the CO
NAAQS in the TAPA over the second
10-year maintenance period and to
thereby satisfy the requirements for
such a plan under CAA section 175A(b).
Based on our finding that the 2008 CO
Maintenance Plan qualifies as an LMP,
we proposed to approve the 2008 CO
Maintenance Plan for transportation
conformity purposes.
In connection with the 2008 CO
Maintenance Plan, we proposed to
approve a statutory provision, Arizona
Revised Statutes (ARS) section 41–
3017.01, that extends the life of the
State’s VEI program (applicable to the
TAPA and Phoenix metropolitan areas)
until the end of 2016, and that was
submitted to EPA as a revision to the
Arizona SIP on June 22, 2009, based on
our expectation that the Arizona
Legislature will extend the VEI program
beyond 2016. The VEI program is one of
the control measures relied upon by the
2008 CO Maintenance Plan.
Please refer to our August 5, 2009
proposed rule for more information on
our evaluation and decision.
II. Public Comment
EPA’s proposed action provided a 30day public comment period. During this
period, we received no comments.
III. Final Action
Under sections 110(k) and 175A of the
CAA and for the reasons set forth above
and in our proposed rule, EPA is
approving two revisions of the Arizona
SIP submitted by ADEQ. The first,
submitted on July 10, 2008, includes the
2008 CO Maintenance Plan for the
Tucson Air Planning Area, and the
second, submitted on June 22, 2009,
includes a statutory provision (ARS
section 41–3017.01) extending the life of
the VEI program through the end of
2016. Our approval makes the
commitments in the maintenance plan,
such as the commitment to continue to
maintain a monitoring network in
accordance with EPA requirements and
to implement the contingency
provisions, federally enforceable.
We are also approving the 2008 CO
Maintenance Plan as an LMP, and under
our LMP policy, such an approval
means that the Pima Association of
Governments (PAG), the Federal
Highway Administration, and the
Federal Transit Administration will not
be required to satisfy the regional
emissions analysis for CO under 40 CFR
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
93.118 and/or 40 CFR 93.119 in
determining conformity of
transportation plans and programs in
the Tucson Air Planning Area.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the
Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the
provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k);
40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP
submissions, EPA’s role is to approve
State choices, provided that they meet
the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this action merely
approves State law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose
additional requirements beyond those
imposed by State law. For that reason,
this action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993);
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act;
and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have
Tribal implications as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,
E:\FR\FM\21DER1.SGM
21DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 243 / Monday, December 21, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
November 9, 2000), because the SIP is
not approved to apply in Indian country
located in the State, and EPA notes that
it will not impose substantial direct
costs on Tribal governments or preempt
Tribal law.
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this action and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean
Air Act, petitions for judicial review of
this action must be filed in the United
States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit by February 19,
2010. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of
this final rule does not affect the finality
of this rule for the purposes of judicial
review nor does it extend the time
within which a petition for judicial
review may be filed, and shall not
postpone the effectiveness of such rule
or action. This action may not be
challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference,
Intergovernmental relations, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: October 14, 2009.
Laura Yoshii,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.
Part 52, chapter I, title 40 of the Code
of Federal Regulations is amended as
follows:
■
PART 52—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for Part 52
continues to read as follows:
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart D—Arizona
2. Section 52.120 is amended by
adding paragraphs (c)(143) and (c)(144)
to read as follows:
■
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:17 Dec 18, 2009
Jkt 220001
§ 52.120
Identification of plan.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(143) The 2008 Revision to the Carbon
Monoxide Limited Maintenance Plan for
the Tucson Air Planning Area (for
2010), adopted by the Pima Association
of Governments on June 26, 2008, and
adopted and submitted by the Arizona
Department of Environmental Quality
on July 10, 2008, excluding appendix D.
(144) Appendix D (Revised) (‘‘Letter
from Arizona Department of
Environmental Quality re: Vehicle
Emissions Inspection Program (VEIP),
Revised to include supporting
documents authorizing the VEIP from
2009 to 2017 (Chapter 171, Senate Bill
1531 from the 48th Regular Session of
the Arizona Legislature and Arizona
Revised Statute text A.R.S. 41–
3017.01’’), adopted as a Supplement to
the Carbon Monoxide Limited
Maintenance Plan for the Tucson Air
Planning Area (for 2010) by the Pima
Association of Governments on May 28,
2009, and adopted and submitted by the
Arizona Department of Environmental
Quality on June 22, 2009.
[FR Doc. E9–30134 Filed 12–18–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R09–OAR–2009–0818; FRL–9087–3]
Revisions to the California State
Implementation Plan, South Coast Air
Quality Management District
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
SUMMARY: EPA is taking direct final
action to approve revisions to the South
Coast Air Quality Management District
portion of the California State
Implementation Plan (SIP). These
revisions concern volatile organic
compound (VOC) emissions from the
application of adhesives and sealants,
cleaning and degassing of storage tanks
and pipelines, and coating operations of
metal containers, closures, and coils.
We are approving local rules that
regulate these emission sources under
the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990
(CAA or the Act).
DATES: This rule is effective on February
19, 2010 without further notice, unless
EPA receives adverse comments by
January 20, 2010. If we receive such
comments, we will publish a timely
withdrawal in the Federal Register to
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
67821
notify the public that this direct final
rule will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments,
identified by docket number [EPA–R09–
OAR–2009–0818], by one of the
following methods:
1. Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
on-line instructions.
2. E-mail: steckel.andrew@epa.gov.
3. Mail or deliver: Andrew Steckel
(Air-4), U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street,
San Francisco, CA 94105–3901.
Instructions: All comments will be
included in the public docket without
change and may be made available
online at https://www.regulations.gov,
including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes
Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Information that
you consider CBI or otherwise protected
should be clearly identified as such and
should not be submitted through
https://www.regulations.gov or e-mail.
https://www.regulations.gov is an
‘‘anonymous access’’ system, and EPA
will not know your identity or contact
information unless you provide it in the
body of your comment. If you send email directly to EPA, your e-mail
address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the public
comment. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties
and cannot contact you for clarification,
EPA may not be able to consider your
comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form
of encryption, and be free of any defects
or viruses.
Docket: The index to the docket for
this action is available electronically at
https://www.regulations.gov and in hard
copy at EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne
Street, San Francisco, California. While
all documents in the docket are listed in
the index, some information may be
publicly available only at the hard copy
location (e.g., copyrighted material), and
some may not be publicly available in
either location (e.g., CBI). To inspect the
hard copy materials, please schedule an
appointment during normal business
hours with the contact listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Nicole Law, EPA Region IX, (415) 947–
4126, law.nicole@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us’’
and ‘‘our’’ refer to EPA.
Table of Contents
I. The State’s Submittal
A. What Rules Did the State Submit?
E:\FR\FM\21DER1.SGM
21DER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 243 (Monday, December 21, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 67819-67821]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-30134]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R09-OAR-2008-0379; FRL-8982-4]
Approval and Promulgation of Maintenance Plan for Carbon
Monoxide; State of Arizona; Tucson Air Planning Area
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Clean Air Act, EPA is approving two revisions
to the Arizona State Implementation Plan. These revisions include the
2008 Revision to the Carbon Monoxide Limited Maintenance Plan for the
Tucson Air Planning Area, submitted on July 10, 2008, and a statutory
provision, submitted on June 22, 2009, that extends the life of the
State's vehicle emissions inspection program through the end of 2016.
EPA is taking this action pursuant to those provisions of the Clean Air
Act that obligate the Agency to take action on submittals of revisions
to state implementation plans. The effect of this action is to make
certain commitments related to maintenance of the carbon monoxide
standard in the Tucson Air Planning Area Federally enforceable as part
of the Arizona State Implementation Plan.
DATES: Effective Date: This rule is effective on January 20, 2010.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established docket number EPA-R09-OAR-2008-0379 for
this action. The index to the docket is
[[Page 67820]]
available electronically at https://www.regulations.gov and in hard copy
at EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, California. While
all documents in the docket are listed in the index, some information
may be publicly available only at the hard copy location (e.g.,
copyrighted material), and some may not be publicly available in either
location (e.g., CBI). To inspect the hard copy materials, please
schedule an appointment during normal business hours with the contact
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marty Robin, Air Planning Office (AIR-
2), EPA Region IX, (415) 972-3961, robin.marty@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ``we,'' ``us'' and
``our'' refer to EPA.
Table of Contents
I. Proposed Action
II. Public Comment
III. Final Action
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Proposed Action
On August 5, 2009 (74 FR 39007), EPA proposed to approve, under the
Clean Air Act (CAA or ``Act''), two revisions to the Arizona State
Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted by the Arizona Department of
Environmental Quality (ADEQ). First, we proposed to approve the 2008
Revision to the Carbon Monoxide Limited Maintenance Plan for the Tucson
Air Planning Area (for 2010) (``2008 CO Maintenance Plan''), submitted
by ADEQ on July 10, 2008. Second, we proposed to approve a statutory
provision that was submitted by ADEQ on June 22, 2009 that extends the
life of the State's vehicle emissions inspection (VEI) program through
the end of 2016.
We proposed approval of the 2008 CO Maintenance Plan because we
concluded that it includes an acceptable update of the various elements
of the initial EPA-approved 1996 CO Maintenance Plan for the Tucson Air
Planning Area (TAPA) (including emissions inventory, assurance of
adequate monitoring and verification of continued attainment, and
contingency provisions), and essentially carries forward all of the
control measures and contingency provisions relied upon in the earlier
plan.
We also concluded that the TAPA, a former nonclassifiable CO
nonattainment area, continues to qualify for the Limited Maintenance
Plan (LMP) option and that therefore the 2008 CO Maintenance Plan
adequately demonstrates maintenance of the CO NAAQS through
documentation of monitoring data showing maximum CO levels less than
85% of the NAAQS and continuation of existing control measures. We
believed the 2008 CO Maintenance Plan to be sufficient to provide for
maintenance of the CO NAAQS in the TAPA over the second 10-year
maintenance period and to thereby satisfy the requirements for such a
plan under CAA section 175A(b). Based on our finding that the 2008 CO
Maintenance Plan qualifies as an LMP, we proposed to approve the 2008
CO Maintenance Plan for transportation conformity purposes.
In connection with the 2008 CO Maintenance Plan, we proposed to
approve a statutory provision, Arizona Revised Statutes (ARS) section
41-3017.01, that extends the life of the State's VEI program
(applicable to the TAPA and Phoenix metropolitan areas) until the end
of 2016, and that was submitted to EPA as a revision to the Arizona SIP
on June 22, 2009, based on our expectation that the Arizona Legislature
will extend the VEI program beyond 2016. The VEI program is one of the
control measures relied upon by the 2008 CO Maintenance Plan.
Please refer to our August 5, 2009 proposed rule for more
information on our evaluation and decision.
II. Public Comment
EPA's proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period.
During this period, we received no comments.
III. Final Action
Under sections 110(k) and 175A of the CAA and for the reasons set
forth above and in our proposed rule, EPA is approving two revisions of
the Arizona SIP submitted by ADEQ. The first, submitted on July 10,
2008, includes the 2008 CO Maintenance Plan for the Tucson Air Planning
Area, and the second, submitted on June 22, 2009, includes a statutory
provision (ARS section 41-3017.01) extending the life of the VEI
program through the end of 2016. Our approval makes the commitments in
the maintenance plan, such as the commitment to continue to maintain a
monitoring network in accordance with EPA requirements and to implement
the contingency provisions, federally enforceable.
We are also approving the 2008 CO Maintenance Plan as an LMP, and
under our LMP policy, such an approval means that the Pima Association
of Governments (PAG), the Federal Highway Administration, and the
Federal Transit Administration will not be required to satisfy the
regional emissions analysis for CO under 40 CFR 93.118 and/or 40 CFR
93.119 in determining conformity of transportation plans and programs
in the Tucson Air Planning Area.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and
applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve State
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this action merely approves State law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those
imposed by State law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Clean Air Act; and
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have Tribal implications as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,
[[Page 67821]]
November 9, 2000), because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian
country located in the State, and EPA notes that it will not impose
substantial direct costs on Tribal governments or preempt Tribal law.
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by February 19, 2010. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial
review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial
review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such
rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings
to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: October 14, 2009.
Laura Yoshii,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.
0
Part 52, chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is
amended as follows:
PART 52--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for Part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart D--Arizona
0
2. Section 52.120 is amended by adding paragraphs (c)(143) and (c)(144)
to read as follows:
Sec. 52.120 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(143) The 2008 Revision to the Carbon Monoxide Limited Maintenance
Plan for the Tucson Air Planning Area (for 2010), adopted by the Pima
Association of Governments on June 26, 2008, and adopted and submitted
by the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality on July 10, 2008,
excluding appendix D. (144) Appendix D (Revised) (``Letter from Arizona
Department of Environmental Quality re: Vehicle Emissions Inspection
Program (VEIP), Revised to include supporting documents authorizing the
VEIP from 2009 to 2017 (Chapter 171, Senate Bill 1531 from the 48th
Regular Session of the Arizona Legislature and Arizona Revised Statute
text A.R.S. 41-3017.01''), adopted as a Supplement to the Carbon
Monoxide Limited Maintenance Plan for the Tucson Air Planning Area (for
2010) by the Pima Association of Governments on May 28, 2009, and
adopted and submitted by the Arizona Department of Environmental
Quality on June 22, 2009.
[FR Doc. E9-30134 Filed 12-18-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P