National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research (NIDRR)-Disability and Rehabilitation Research Projects and Centers Program-Rehabilitation Research and Training Centers (RRTCs)-Individual-Level Characteristics Related to Employment Among Individuals With Disabilities, 67186-67189 [E9-30188]
Download as PDF
67186
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 242 / Friday, December 18, 2009 / Notices
which you are submitting your
application; and
(2) The Application Control Center
will mail to you a notification of receipt
of your grant application. If you do not
receive this grant notification within 15
business days from the application
deadline date, you should call the U.S.
Department of Education Application
Control Center at (202) 245–6288.
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with NOTICES
V. Application Review Information
Selection Criteria: The selection
criteria for this competition are from 34
CFR 263.6 and are listed in the
application package.
VI. Award Administration Information
1. Award Notices: If your application
is successful, we notify your U.S.
Representative and U.S. Senators and
send you a Grant Award Notification
(GAN). We may notify you informally,
also.
If your application is not evaluated or
not selected for funding, we notify you.
2. Administrative and National Policy
Requirements: We identify
administrative and national policy
requirements in the application package
and reference these and other
requirements in the Applicable
Regulations section of this notice.
We reference the regulations outlining
the terms and conditions of an award in
the Applicable Regulations section of
this notice and include these and other
specific conditions in the GAN. The
GAN also incorporates your approved
application as part of your binding
commitments under the grant.
3. Reporting: At the end of your
project period, you must submit a final
performance report, including financial
information, as directed by the
Secretary. If you receive a multi-year
award, you must submit an annual
performance report that provides the
most current performance and financial
expenditure information as directed by
the Secretary under 34 CFR 75.118. The
Secretary may also require more
frequent performance reports under 34
CFR 75.720(c). For specific
requirements on reporting, please go to
https://www.ed.gov/fund/grant/apply/
appforms/appforms.html.
4. Performance Measures: The
Secretary has established the following
key performance measures for assessing
the effectiveness of the Professional
Development program: (1) The
percentage of participants in
administrator preparation projects who
become principals, vice principals, or
other school administrators in LEAs that
enroll five percent or more American
Indian and Alaska Native students; (2)
the percentage of participants in teacher
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:33 Dec 17, 2009
Jkt 220001
preparation projects who become
teachers in LEAs that enroll five percent
or more American Indian and Alaska
Native students; (3) the percentage of
program participants who meet the
definition of ‘‘Highly Qualified’’ in
section 9101(23) of the ESEA; (4) the
percentage of program participants who
complete their service requirement on
schedule; (5) the cost per individual
who successfully completes an
administrator preparation program,
takes a position in an LEA with a
significant American Indian and Alaska
Native student population, and
completes the service requirement in
that LEA; and (6) the cost per individual
who successfully completes a teacher
preparation program, takes a position in
an LEA with a significant American
Indian and Alaska Native student
population, and completes the service
requirement in that LEA.
We encourage applicants to
demonstrate a strong capacity to provide
reliable data on these measures in their
responses to the selection criteria
‘‘Quality of project services’’ and
‘‘Quality of the project evaluation.’’
All grantees will be expected to
submit, as part of their performance
report, information with respect to these
performance measures.
VII. Agency Contact
For further information contact: Lana
Shaughnessy, U.S. Department of
Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW.,
room 3E231, Washington, DC 20202–
6335. Telephone: (202) 205–2528 mail
to: or by e-mail:
Lana.Shaughnessy@ed.gov.
If you use a TDD, call the Federal
Relay Service, toll free, at 1–800–877–
8339.
VIII. Other Information
Accessible Format: Individuals with
disabilities can obtain this document
and a copy of the application package in
an accessible format (e.g. braille, large
print, audiotape, or computer diskette)
on request to the program contact
person listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT in section VII of
this notice.
Electronic Access to This Document:
You can view this document, as well as
all other documents of this Department
published in the Federal Register, in
text or Adobe Portable Document
Format (PDF) on the Internet at the
following site: https://www.ed.gov/news/
fedregister. To use PDF you must have
Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is
available free at this site.
Note: The official version of this document
is the document published in the Federal
Register.
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Free Internet access to the official
edition of the Federal Register and the
Code of Federal Regulations is available
on GPO Access at: https://
www.gpoaccess.gov/nara/.
Dated:December 15, 2009.
´
Thelma Melendez de Santa Ana,
Assistant Secretary for Elementary and
Secondary Education.
[FR Doc. E9–30201 Filed 12–17–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
National Institute on Disability and
Rehabilitation Research (NIDRR)—
Disability and Rehabilitation Research
Projects and Centers Program—
Rehabilitation Research and Training
Centers (RRTCs)—Individual-Level
Characteristics Related to Employment
Among Individuals With Disabilities
AGENCY: Office of Special Education and
Rehabilitative Services, Department of
Education.
ACTION: Notice of proposed priority.
Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance (CFDA) Number: 84.133B–1.
SUMMARY: The Assistant Secretary for
Special Education and Rehabilitative
Services proposes a funding priority for
the Disability and Rehabilitation
Research Projects and Centers Program
administered by NIDRR. Specifically,
this notice proposes a priority for an
RRTC. The Assistant Secretary may use
this priority for competitions in fiscal
year (FY) 2010 and later years. We take
this action to focus research attention on
areas of national need. We intend this
priority to improve rehabilitation
services and outcomes for individuals
with disabilities.
DATES: We must receive your comments
on or before January 19, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Address all comments about
this notice to Donna Nangle, U.S.
Department of Education, 400 Maryland
Avenue, SW., room 6029, Potomac
Center Plaza (PCP), Washington, DC
20202–2700.
If you prefer to send your comments
by e-mail, use the following address:
donna.nangle@ed.gov. You must
include the term ‘‘Proposed Priority for
an RRTC on Individual-Level
Characteristics Related to Employment
Among Individuals with Disabilities’’ in
the subject line of your electronic
message.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Donna Nangle. Telephone: (202) 245–
7462 or by e-mail:
donna.nangle@ed.gov.
E:\FR\FM\18DEN1.SGM
18DEN1
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 242 / Friday, December 18, 2009 / Notices
If you use a telecommunications
device for the deaf (TDD), call the
Federal Relay Service (FRS), toll free, at
1–800–877–8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
notice of proposed priority is in concert
with NIDRR’s Final Long-Range Plan for
FY 2005–2009 (Plan). The Plan, which
was published in the Federal Register
on February 15, 2006 (71 FR 8165), can
be accessed on the Internet at the
following site: https://www.ed.gov/
about/offices/list/osers/nidrr/
policy.html.
Through the implementation of the
Plan, NIDRR seeks to: (1) Improve the
quality and utility of disability and
rehabilitation research; (2) foster an
exchange of expertise, information, and
training to facilitate the advancement of
knowledge and understanding of the
unique needs of traditionally
underserved populations; (3) determine
best strategies and programs to improve
rehabilitation outcomes for underserved
populations; (4) identify research gaps;
(5) identify mechanisms of integrating
research and practice; and (6)
disseminate findings.
This notice proposes a priority that
NIDRR intends to use for RRTC
competitions in FY 2010 and possibly
later years. However, nothing precludes
NIDRR from publishing additional
priorities, if needed. Furthermore,
NIDRR is under no obligation to make
an award for this priority. The decision
to make an award will be based on the
quality of applications received and
available funding.
Invitation to Comment: We invite you
to submit comments regarding this
notice. To ensure that your comments
have maximum effect in developing the
notice of final priority, we urge you to
clearly identify the specific topic that
each comment addresses.
We invite you to assist us in
complying with the specific
requirements of Executive Order 12866
and its overall requirement of reducing
regulatory burden that might result from
this proposed priority. Please let us
know of any further ways we could
reduce potential costs or increase
potential benefits while preserving the
effective and efficient administration of
the program.
During and after the comment period,
you may inspect all public comments
about this notice in room 6029, 550 12th
Street, SW., PCP, Washington, DC
between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:00
p.m., Washington, DC, time, Monday
through Friday of each week except
Federal holidays.
Assistance to Individuals with
Disabilities in Reviewing the
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:33 Dec 17, 2009
Jkt 220001
Rulemaking Record: On request we will
provide an appropriate accommodation
or auxiliary aid to an individual with a
disability who needs assistance to
review the comments or other
documents in the public rulemaking
record for this notice. If you want to
schedule an appointment for this type of
accommodation or auxiliary aid, please
contact the person listed under FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
Purpose of Program: The purpose of
the RRTC program is to improve the
effectiveness of services authorized
under the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as
amended, through advanced research,
training, technical assistance, and
dissemination activities in general
problem areas, as specified by NIDRR.
Such activities are designed to benefit
rehabilitation service providers,
individuals with disabilities, and the
family members or other authorized
representatives of individuals with
disabilities. In addition, NIDRR intends
to require all RRTC applicants to meet
the requirements of the General
Rehabilitation Research and Training
Centers (RRTC) Requirements priority
that it published in a notice of final
priorities in the Federal Register on
February 1, 2008 (72 FR 6132).
Additional information on the RRTC
program can be found at: https://
www.ed.gov/rschstat/research/pubs/resprogram.html#RRTC.
67187
Applicable Program Regulations: 34
CFR part 350.
Proposed Priority
This notice contains one proposed
priority.
Individual-Level Characteristics
Related to Employment Among
Individuals with Disabilities
Background: Individuals with
disabilities experience lower rates of
employment than those without
disabilities, and the disparity in
employment rates is seen across all
sociodemographic groups (Steinmetz,
2006; U.S. Census Bureau, 2006; U.S.
Department of Labor, 2009). This
disparity in employment outcomes also
extends to other aspects of employment,
such as monthly earnings and hourly
wages (Ozawa & Yeo, 2006).
Individuals with disabilities are a
heterogeneous group and employmentrelated outcomes for people with
disabilities appear to be associated with
individual-level characteristics, such as
severity of disability and
sociodemographic characteristics (Crisp,
2005; Ozawa & Yeo, 2006). Many
studies of individual-level
characteristics and employment-related
outcomes of individuals with
disabilities have been based on samples
of individuals with a specific disabling
condition such as spinal cord injury,
making it difficult to generalize findings
Statutory and Regulatory Requirements across disability types (Krause, 2003;
Krause & Terza, 2006; Phillips &
of RRTCs
Stuifbergen, 2006; Walker et al., 2006).
RRTCs must—
In the few studies that have used
• Carry out coordinated advanced
samples of individuals with a variety of
programs of rehabilitation research;
disabilities, disparities in employment
• Provide training, including
outcomes across subpopulations of
graduate, pre-service, and in-service
individuals with disabilities appear to
training, to help rehabilitation
be defined by the characteristics of the
personnel more effectively provide
individual’s disability or
rehabilitation services to individuals
sociodemographic group. For example,
with disabilities;
the likelihood of poor employment
• Provide technical assistance to
outcomes tends to increase with severity
individuals with disabilities, their
of disability (Crisp, 2005; Meade et al.,
representatives, providers, and other
2004; Ozawa & Yeo, 2006; Phillips &
interested parties;
Stuifbergen, 2006; Walker et al., 2006).
• Disseminate informational materials In addition, poorer employment
to individuals with disabilities, their
outcomes are associated with being a
representatives, providers, and other
member of a minority race or ethnic
interested parties; and
group or being less well educated
• Serve as centers of national
(Crisp, 2005; Krause & Terza, 2006;
excellence in rehabilitation research for Ozawa & Yeo, 2006; Randolph &
individuals with disabilities, their
Andresen, 2004).
representatives, providers, and other
More systematic analyses of crossinterested parties.
disability data are needed to examine
Applicants for RRTC grants must also the associations among disability and
demonstrate in their applications how
sociodemographic characteristics and
they will address, in whole or in part,
employment-related outcomes in order
the needs of individuals with
to identify those subpopulations of
disabilities from minority backgrounds.
individuals with disabilities who are
most at risk for poor employment
Program Authority: 29 U.S.C. 762(g) and
outcomes. In addition, there is a need
764(b)(2).
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\18DEN1.SGM
18DEN1
67188
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 242 / Friday, December 18, 2009 / Notices
for further information about the
barriers to, and facilitators of,
employment for specific
subpopulations, which can be used to
design interventions to improve the
employment outcomes of members of
these specific subpopulations.
References:
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with NOTICES
Crisp, R. (2005). Key factors related to
vocational outcome: Trends for six disability
groups. Journal of Rehabilitation, 71, 30–37.
Krause, J. S. (2003). Years to employment
after spinal cord injury. Archives of Physical
Medicine & Rehabilitation, 84, 1282–1289.
Krause, J., Terza, J. (2006). Injury and
demographic factors predictive of disparities
in earnings after spinal cord injury. Archives
of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 87,
1318–1326.
Meade, M., A.L., Njeri, J.M., & Hess, D.
(2004). Race, employment, and spinal cord
injury. Archives of Physical Medicine and
Rehabilitation, 85, 1782–1792.
Ozawa, M.N., & Yeo, Y., H. (2006). Work
status and work performance of people with
disabilities. Journal of Disability Policy
Studies, 17, 180–190.
Phillips, L., & Stuifbergen, A. (2006).
Predicting continued employment in persons
with multiple sclerosis. Journal of
Rehabilitation, 72, 35–43.
Randolph, D.W., & Andresen, E.M. (2004).
Disability, gender, and unemployment
relationships in the United States from the
behavioral risk factor surveillance system.
Disability & Society, 19, 403–414.
Steinmetz, E. (2006). Americans With
Disabilities: 2002. Household Economic
Studies Current Population Reports P70–107
Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau. See
https://www.census.gov/hhes/www/disability/
sipp/disable02.html.
U.S. Census Bureau (2006). American
Community Survey table B1802: Selected
Economic Characteristics for the Civilian
Noninstitutionalized Population By
Disability Status. Washington, DC: U.S.
Census Bureau. See https://factfinder.census.
gov/servlet/STTable?_bm=y&-qr_name=ACS_
2006_EST_G00_S1802&-geo_id=01000US&ds_name=ACS_2006_EST_G00_&-_lang=
en&-format=&-CONTEXT=st.
U.S. Department of Labor (2009). Labor
force statistics from the current population
survey. See https://www.bls.gov/cps/
cpsdisability.htm.
Walker, W., Marwitz, J., Kreutzer, J., Hart,
T., & Novack, T. (2006). Occupational
categories and return to work after traumatic
brain injury: A multicenter study. Archives
of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 87,
1576–1582.
Proposed Priority: The Assistant
Secretary for Special Education and
Rehabilitative Services proposes a
priority for a Rehabilitation Research
and Training Center (RRTC) on
Individual-Level Characteristics Related
to Employment Among Individuals with
Disabilities. This RRTC must identify
subpopulations of individuals with
disabilities who are at risk of poor
employment outcomes, and document
the barriers to, and facilitators of,
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:33 Dec 17, 2009
Jkt 220001
employment that these subgroups
experience. This new knowledge is
intended to serve as a foundation for
future interventions research that will
target those who are most at risk of poor
employment outcomes. The RRTC must
be designed to contribute to the
following outcomes:
(a) A synthesis of available knowledge
about employment disparities among
subpopulations of individuals with
disabilities. The RRTC must contribute
to this outcome by conducting a review
and synthesis of existing research on
individual-level characteristics related
to successful and poor employment
outcomes among individuals with
disabilities. Such individual-level
characteristics may include, but are not
limited to the following: disabling
condition, severity of disability, age,
gender, race, ethnicity, socioeconomic
status, education level, and urban/rural
status. Successful and poor employment
outcomes may be measured by the
following indicators: an individual’s
employment status (e.g., employed,
unemployed, underemployed), income,
and job retention or promotion. The
RRTC must complete this activity by the
end of the first year of the grant.
(b) New knowledge about the
individual-level characteristics that are
most strongly associated with
employment-related outcome variables
among individuals with disabilities. The
RRTC must contribute to this outcome
by conducting research on the extent to
which employment of individuals with
disabilities is related to individual-level
characteristics. This research must
include, but is not limited to,
multivariate analyses of existing
national datasets. Analyses of existing
data must examine possible variations
of employment, including full- or parttime work, self-employment, and
industry sector. The RRTC must
complete this activity by the end of the
second year of the grant.
(c) New knowledge of the
employment experiences of individuals
who are at risk of poor employment
outcomes. The RRTC must contribute to
this outcome by collecting and
analyzing information from members of
subpopulations identified under
paragraphs (a) and (b) of this priority.
The RRTC must collect individual-level
data about the barriers to, and
facilitators of, employment that
members of these subpopulations have
experienced (e.g., the availability of
transportation to and from work, social
support, workplace accommodations,
and employer practices).
(d) Increased incorporation of
disability and employment research
findings into practice or policy. The
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
RRTC must contribute to this outcome
by:
(1) Collaborating with stakeholder
groups to develop, evaluate, or
implement strategies to promote
utilization of the RRTC’s research
findings.
(2) Conducting training and
dissemination activities to facilitate the
utilization of the RRTC’s research
findings by individuals with
disabilities, employers, policymakers,
and State vocational rehabilitation
agencies.
In addition, this RRTC must
collaborate with relevant Rehabilitation
Services Administration grantees, such
as the 10 regional Technical Assistance
and Continuing Education projects.
Types of Priorities: When inviting
applications for a competition using one
or more priorities, we designate the type
of each priority as absolute, competitive
preference, or invitational through a
notice the Federal Register. The effect
of each type of priority follows:
Absolute priority: Under an absolute
priority, we consider only applications
that meet the priority (34 CFR
75.105(c)(3)).
Competitive preference priority:
Under a competitive preference priority,
we give competitive preference to an
application by (1) awarding additional
points, depending on the extent to
which the application meets the priority
(34 CFR 75.105(c)(2)(i)); or (2) selecting
an application that meets the priority
over an application of comparable merit
that does not meet the priority (34 CFR
75.105(c)(2)(ii)).
Invitational priority: Under an
invitational priority, we are particularly
interested in applications that meet the
priority. However, we do not give an
application that meets the priority a
preference over other applications (34
CFR 75.105(c)(1)).
Final Priority: We will announce the
final priority in a notice in the Federal
Register. We will determine the final
priority after considering responses to
this notice and other information
available to the Department. This notice
does not preclude us from proposing
additional priorities, requirements,
definitions, or selection criteria, subject
to meeting applicable rulemaking
requirements.
Note: This notice does not solicit
applications. In any year in which we choose
to use this priority, we invite applications
through a notice in the Federal Register.
Executive Order 12866: This notice
has been reviewed in accordance with
Executive Order 12866. Under the terms
of the order, we have assessed the
potential costs and benefits of this
proposed regulatory action.
E:\FR\FM\18DEN1.SGM
18DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 242 / Friday, December 18, 2009 / Notices
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with NOTICES
The potential costs associated with
this proposed regulatory action are
those resulting from statutory
requirements and those we have
determined as necessary for
administering this program effectively
and efficiently.
In assessing the potential costs and
benefits—both quantitative and
qualitative—of this proposed regulatory
action, we have determined that the
benefits of the proposed priority justify
the costs.
Discussion of Costs and Benefits: The
benefits of the Disability and
Rehabilitation Research Projects and
Centers Programs have been well
established over the years in that similar
projects have been completed
successfully. This proposed priority will
generate new knowledge through
research and development.
Another benefit of this proposed
priority is that the establishment of a
new RRTC will improve the lives of
individuals with disabilities. The new
RRTC will disseminate and promote the
use of new information that will
improve the options for individuals
with disabilities to obtain, retain, and
advance in employment.
Intergovernmental Review: This
program is not subject to Executive
Order 12372 and the regulations in 34
CFR part 79.
Accessible Format: Individuals with
disabilities can obtain this document in
an accessible format (e.g., braille, large
print, audiotape, or computer diskette)
on request to the program contact
person listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT.
Electronic Access to This Document:
You can view this document, as well as
all other documents of this Department
published in the Federal Register, in
text or Adobe Portable Document
Format (PDF) on the Internet at the
following site: https://www.ed.gov/news/
fedregister.
To use PDF you must have Adobe
Acrobat Reader, which is available free
at this site.
Note: The official version of this document
is the document published in the Federal
Register. Free Internet access to the official
edition of the Federal Register and the Code
of Federal Regulations is available on GPO
Access at: https://www.gpoaccess.gov/nara/
index.html.
Dated: December 15, 2009.
Alexa Posny,
Assistant Secretary for Special Education and
Rehabilitative Services.
[FR Doc. E9–30188 Filed 12–17–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:33 Dec 17, 2009
Jkt 220001
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Notice of Modifications to the
Preferred Alternatives for Tank Waste
Treatment and Disposal of Off Site
Waste in the Draft Tank Closure and
Waste Management Environmental
Impact Statement for the Hanford Site,
Richland, WA
Department of Energy.
Modification of Preferred
Alternatives.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of
Energy (DOE) is modifying its preferred
alternatives for tank waste treatment
and also for disposal of off-site waste in
the Draft Tank Closure and Waste
Management Environmental Impact
Statement for the Hanford Site,
Richland, Washington (Draft EIS, DOE/
EIS–00391), made available for public
comment on October 30, 2009 (74 FR
56194). This Draft EIS has been
prepared in accordance with the
National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA) and its implementing
regulations. The public comment period
for the Draft EIS extends to March 19,
2010.
In this Draft EIS, DOE analyzed, as a
reasonable alternative, treating and
sending waste from specific tanks to the
Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP), in
Carlsbad, New Mexico, as mixed
transuranic (TRU) waste. DOE is now
expressing its preference that no
Hanford tank wastes would be shipped
to WIPP. These wastes would be
retrieved and treated in the Waste
Treatment Plant (WTP) being
constructed at Hanford. The State of
Washington Department of Ecology
(Ecology), a cooperating agency on the
EIS, has revised its Foreword to the
Draft EIS in response to this
modification to the preferred alternative
for tank waste. That revision can be
found under SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION.
In addition, consistent with DOE’s
preference regarding receipt at Hanford
of off-site low-level radioactive waste
(LLW) and low-level mixed waste
(MLLW), DOE would not ship GreaterThan-Class-C (GTCC) LLW to Hanford at
least until the WTP is operational (DOE
is analyzing disposal of GTCC LLW in
a separate EIS).
ADDRESSES: The Draft EIS is available
electronically through, and written
comments can be submitted at,
TC&WMEIS@saic.com, or by faxing to
(1–888) 785–2865. Paper copies may be
obtained by request to the EIS website
or by contacting: Mary Beth Burandt,
Document Manager, TC & WM EIS
comments, Office of River Protection,
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
67189
P.O. Box 1178, Richland, Washington
99352.
The Draft EIS is also available at
DOE’s NEPA Web site at https://
www.gc.energy.gov/nepa.
Written comments may be mailed to
the document manager at the address
above. Further, DOE will accept oral as
well as written comments on the Draft
EIS during public hearings to be
announced soon in the Federal Register
and local media.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
further information on the Draft EIS,
contact Ms. Burandt at the address
above or by telephone, at (1–888) 829–
6347. For further information on DOE’s
NEPA process, contact: Carol M.
Borgstrom, Director, Office of NEPA
Policy and Compliance, Office of
General Counsel, U.S. Department of
Energy, Washington, DC 20585–0103,
Telephone: (202) 586–4600, or leave a
message at (800) 472–2756.
Further information on the Draft EIS
is also available through the Hanford
Web site at: https://www.hanford.gov/
orp.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Draft
Tank Closure and Waste Management
Environmental Impact Statement has
been prepared in accordance with NEPA
and its implementing regulations. The
Draft EIS analyzes alternatives for
proposed actions in three major areas
related to the cleanup of the Hanford
Site. These are: (1) Retrieving and
treating radioactive waste from 177
underground storage tanks at Hanford
and closure of the 149 single-shell
tanks; (2) decommissioning of the Fast
Flux Test Facility, a nuclear test reactor,
and its auxiliary facilities; and (3)
continued and expanded solid waste
management operations on site,
including the disposal of Hanford’s
LLW and MLLW, and limited volumes
of LLW and MLLW from other DOE
sites. The Draft EIS also analyzes no
action alternatives for each of the three
types of proposed actions as required
under NEPA for use as a basis for
comparison of the alternatives.
In the Draft EIS, DOE narrowed its
range of preferred alternatives to five
(Section S.7.1 of the Summary and
Section 2.12 of the main volume). Three
of these alternatives contain options for
treating the waste from specific tanks as
mixed TRU waste (approximately 3
million gallons) that would be prepared
as necessary and shipped to WIPP for
disposal. Based on further
consideration, DOE has concluded that
its preference is to manage the waste
from these tanks by treating it through
the WTP currently under construction
as either high-level waste or low-activity
E:\FR\FM\18DEN1.SGM
18DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 242 (Friday, December 18, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 67186-67189]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-30188]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research
(NIDRR)--Disability and Rehabilitation Research Projects and Centers
Program--Rehabilitation Research and Training Centers (RRTCs)--
Individual-Level Characteristics Related to Employment Among
Individuals With Disabilities
AGENCY: Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services,
Department of Education.
ACTION: Notice of proposed priority.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) Number: 84.133B-1.
SUMMARY: The Assistant Secretary for Special Education and
Rehabilitative Services proposes a funding priority for the Disability
and Rehabilitation Research Projects and Centers Program administered
by NIDRR. Specifically, this notice proposes a priority for an RRTC.
The Assistant Secretary may use this priority for competitions in
fiscal year (FY) 2010 and later years. We take this action to focus
research attention on areas of national need. We intend this priority
to improve rehabilitation services and outcomes for individuals with
disabilities.
DATES: We must receive your comments on or before January 19, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Address all comments about this notice to Donna Nangle, U.S.
Department of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW., room 6029, Potomac
Center Plaza (PCP), Washington, DC 20202-2700.
If you prefer to send your comments by e-mail, use the following
address: donna.nangle@ed.gov. You must include the term ``Proposed
Priority for an RRTC on Individual-Level Characteristics Related to
Employment Among Individuals with Disabilities'' in the subject line of
your electronic message.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Donna Nangle. Telephone: (202) 245-
7462 or by e-mail: donna.nangle@ed.gov.
[[Page 67187]]
If you use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD), call the
Federal Relay Service (FRS), toll free, at 1-800-877-8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice of proposed priority is in
concert with NIDRR's Final Long-Range Plan for FY 2005-2009 (Plan). The
Plan, which was published in the Federal Register on February 15, 2006
(71 FR 8165), can be accessed on the Internet at the following site:
https://www.ed.gov/about/offices/list/osers/nidrr/policy.html.
Through the implementation of the Plan, NIDRR seeks to: (1) Improve
the quality and utility of disability and rehabilitation research; (2)
foster an exchange of expertise, information, and training to
facilitate the advancement of knowledge and understanding of the unique
needs of traditionally underserved populations; (3) determine best
strategies and programs to improve rehabilitation outcomes for
underserved populations; (4) identify research gaps; (5) identify
mechanisms of integrating research and practice; and (6) disseminate
findings.
This notice proposes a priority that NIDRR intends to use for RRTC
competitions in FY 2010 and possibly later years. However, nothing
precludes NIDRR from publishing additional priorities, if needed.
Furthermore, NIDRR is under no obligation to make an award for this
priority. The decision to make an award will be based on the quality of
applications received and available funding.
Invitation to Comment: We invite you to submit comments regarding
this notice. To ensure that your comments have maximum effect in
developing the notice of final priority, we urge you to clearly
identify the specific topic that each comment addresses.
We invite you to assist us in complying with the specific
requirements of Executive Order 12866 and its overall requirement of
reducing regulatory burden that might result from this proposed
priority. Please let us know of any further ways we could reduce
potential costs or increase potential benefits while preserving the
effective and efficient administration of the program.
During and after the comment period, you may inspect all public
comments about this notice in room 6029, 550 12th Street, SW., PCP,
Washington, DC between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:00 p.m.,
Washington, DC, time, Monday through Friday of each week except Federal
holidays.
Assistance to Individuals with Disabilities in Reviewing the
Rulemaking Record: On request we will provide an appropriate
accommodation or auxiliary aid to an individual with a disability who
needs assistance to review the comments or other documents in the
public rulemaking record for this notice. If you want to schedule an
appointment for this type of accommodation or auxiliary aid, please
contact the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
Purpose of Program: The purpose of the RRTC program is to improve
the effectiveness of services authorized under the Rehabilitation Act
of 1973, as amended, through advanced research, training, technical
assistance, and dissemination activities in general problem areas, as
specified by NIDRR. Such activities are designed to benefit
rehabilitation service providers, individuals with disabilities, and
the family members or other authorized representatives of individuals
with disabilities. In addition, NIDRR intends to require all RRTC
applicants to meet the requirements of the General Rehabilitation
Research and Training Centers (RRTC) Requirements priority that it
published in a notice of final priorities in the Federal Register on
February 1, 2008 (72 FR 6132). Additional information on the RRTC
program can be found at: https://www.ed.gov/rschstat/research/pubs/res-program.html#RRTC.
Statutory and Regulatory Requirements of RRTCs
RRTCs must--
Carry out coordinated advanced programs of rehabilitation
research;
Provide training, including graduate, pre-service, and in-
service training, to help rehabilitation personnel more effectively
provide rehabilitation services to individuals with disabilities;
Provide technical assistance to individuals with
disabilities, their representatives, providers, and other interested
parties;
Disseminate informational materials to individuals with
disabilities, their representatives, providers, and other interested
parties; and
Serve as centers of national excellence in rehabilitation
research for individuals with disabilities, their representatives,
providers, and other interested parties.
Applicants for RRTC grants must also demonstrate in their
applications how they will address, in whole or in part, the needs of
individuals with disabilities from minority backgrounds.
Program Authority: 29 U.S.C. 762(g) and 764(b)(2).
Applicable Program Regulations: 34 CFR part 350.
Proposed Priority
This notice contains one proposed priority.
Individual-Level Characteristics Related to Employment Among
Individuals with Disabilities
Background: Individuals with disabilities experience lower rates of
employment than those without disabilities, and the disparity in
employment rates is seen across all sociodemographic groups (Steinmetz,
2006; U.S. Census Bureau, 2006; U.S. Department of Labor, 2009). This
disparity in employment outcomes also extends to other aspects of
employment, such as monthly earnings and hourly wages (Ozawa & Yeo,
2006).
Individuals with disabilities are a heterogeneous group and
employment-related outcomes for people with disabilities appear to be
associated with individual-level characteristics, such as severity of
disability and sociodemographic characteristics (Crisp, 2005; Ozawa &
Yeo, 2006). Many studies of individual-level characteristics and
employment-related outcomes of individuals with disabilities have been
based on samples of individuals with a specific disabling condition
such as spinal cord injury, making it difficult to generalize findings
across disability types (Krause, 2003; Krause & Terza, 2006; Phillips &
Stuifbergen, 2006; Walker et al., 2006). In the few studies that have
used samples of individuals with a variety of disabilities, disparities
in employment outcomes across subpopulations of individuals with
disabilities appear to be defined by the characteristics of the
individual's disability or sociodemographic group. For example, the
likelihood of poor employment outcomes tends to increase with severity
of disability (Crisp, 2005; Meade et al., 2004; Ozawa & Yeo, 2006;
Phillips & Stuifbergen, 2006; Walker et al., 2006). In addition, poorer
employment outcomes are associated with being a member of a minority
race or ethnic group or being less well educated (Crisp, 2005; Krause &
Terza, 2006; Ozawa & Yeo, 2006; Randolph & Andresen, 2004).
More systematic analyses of cross-disability data are needed to
examine the associations among disability and sociodemographic
characteristics and employment-related outcomes in order to identify
those subpopulations of individuals with disabilities who are most at
risk for poor employment outcomes. In addition, there is a need
[[Page 67188]]
for further information about the barriers to, and facilitators of,
employment for specific subpopulations, which can be used to design
interventions to improve the employment outcomes of members of these
specific subpopulations.
References:
Crisp, R. (2005). Key factors related to vocational outcome:
Trends for six disability groups. Journal of Rehabilitation, 71, 30-
37.
Krause, J. S. (2003). Years to employment after spinal cord
injury. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 84, 1282-
1289.
Krause, J., Terza, J. (2006). Injury and demographic factors
predictive of disparities in earnings after spinal cord injury.
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 87, 1318-1326.
Meade, M., A.L., Njeri, J.M., & Hess, D. (2004). Race,
employment, and spinal cord injury. Archives of Physical Medicine
and Rehabilitation, 85, 1782-1792.
Ozawa, M.N., & Yeo, Y., H. (2006). Work status and work
performance of people with disabilities. Journal of Disability
Policy Studies, 17, 180-190.
Phillips, L., & Stuifbergen, A. (2006). Predicting continued
employment in persons with multiple sclerosis. Journal of
Rehabilitation, 72, 35-43.
Randolph, D.W., & Andresen, E.M. (2004). Disability, gender, and
unemployment relationships in the United States from the behavioral
risk factor surveillance system. Disability & Society, 19, 403-414.
Steinmetz, E. (2006). Americans With Disabilities: 2002.
Household Economic Studies Current Population Reports P70-107
Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau. See https://www.census.gov/hhes/www/disability/sipp/disable02.html.
U.S. Census Bureau (2006). American Community Survey table
B1802: Selected Economic Characteristics for the Civilian
Noninstitutionalized Population By Disability Status. Washington,
DC: U.S. Census Bureau. See https://factfinder.census.gov/servlet/STTable?_bm=y&-qr_name=ACS_2006_EST_G00_S1802&-geo_id=01000US&-ds_name=ACS_2006_EST_G00_&-_lang=en&-format=&-CONTEXT=st.
U.S. Department of Labor (2009). Labor force statistics from the
current population survey. See https://www.bls.gov/cps/cpsdisability.htm.
Walker, W., Marwitz, J., Kreutzer, J., Hart, T., & Novack, T.
(2006). Occupational categories and return to work after traumatic
brain injury: A multicenter study. Archives of Physical Medicine and
Rehabilitation, 87, 1576-1582.
Proposed Priority: The Assistant Secretary for Special Education
and Rehabilitative Services proposes a priority for a Rehabilitation
Research and Training Center (RRTC) on Individual-Level Characteristics
Related to Employment Among Individuals with Disabilities. This RRTC
must identify subpopulations of individuals with disabilities who are
at risk of poor employment outcomes, and document the barriers to, and
facilitators of, employment that these subgroups experience. This new
knowledge is intended to serve as a foundation for future interventions
research that will target those who are most at risk of poor employment
outcomes. The RRTC must be designed to contribute to the following
outcomes:
(a) A synthesis of available knowledge about employment disparities
among subpopulations of individuals with disabilities. The RRTC must
contribute to this outcome by conducting a review and synthesis of
existing research on individual-level characteristics related to
successful and poor employment outcomes among individuals with
disabilities. Such individual-level characteristics may include, but
are not limited to the following: disabling condition, severity of
disability, age, gender, race, ethnicity, socioeconomic status,
education level, and urban/rural status. Successful and poor employment
outcomes may be measured by the following indicators: an individual's
employment status (e.g., employed, unemployed, underemployed), income,
and job retention or promotion. The RRTC must complete this activity by
the end of the first year of the grant.
(b) New knowledge about the individual-level characteristics that
are most strongly associated with employment-related outcome variables
among individuals with disabilities. The RRTC must contribute to this
outcome by conducting research on the extent to which employment of
individuals with disabilities is related to individual-level
characteristics. This research must include, but is not limited to,
multivariate analyses of existing national datasets. Analyses of
existing data must examine possible variations of employment, including
full- or part-time work, self-employment, and industry sector. The RRTC
must complete this activity by the end of the second year of the grant.
(c) New knowledge of the employment experiences of individuals who
are at risk of poor employment outcomes. The RRTC must contribute to
this outcome by collecting and analyzing information from members of
subpopulations identified under paragraphs (a) and (b) of this
priority. The RRTC must collect individual-level data about the
barriers to, and facilitators of, employment that members of these
subpopulations have experienced (e.g., the availability of
transportation to and from work, social support, workplace
accommodations, and employer practices).
(d) Increased incorporation of disability and employment research
findings into practice or policy. The RRTC must contribute to this
outcome by:
(1) Collaborating with stakeholder groups to develop, evaluate, or
implement strategies to promote utilization of the RRTC's research
findings.
(2) Conducting training and dissemination activities to facilitate
the utilization of the RRTC's research findings by individuals with
disabilities, employers, policymakers, and State vocational
rehabilitation agencies.
In addition, this RRTC must collaborate with relevant
Rehabilitation Services Administration grantees, such as the 10
regional Technical Assistance and Continuing Education projects.
Types of Priorities: When inviting applications for a competition
using one or more priorities, we designate the type of each priority as
absolute, competitive preference, or invitational through a notice the
Federal Register. The effect of each type of priority follows:
Absolute priority: Under an absolute priority, we consider only
applications that meet the priority (34 CFR 75.105(c)(3)).
Competitive preference priority: Under a competitive preference
priority, we give competitive preference to an application by (1)
awarding additional points, depending on the extent to which the
application meets the priority (34 CFR 75.105(c)(2)(i)); or (2)
selecting an application that meets the priority over an application of
comparable merit that does not meet the priority (34 CFR
75.105(c)(2)(ii)).
Invitational priority: Under an invitational priority, we are
particularly interested in applications that meet the priority.
However, we do not give an application that meets the priority a
preference over other applications (34 CFR 75.105(c)(1)).
Final Priority: We will announce the final priority in a notice in
the Federal Register. We will determine the final priority after
considering responses to this notice and other information available to
the Department. This notice does not preclude us from proposing
additional priorities, requirements, definitions, or selection
criteria, subject to meeting applicable rulemaking requirements.
Note: This notice does not solicit applications. In any year in
which we choose to use this priority, we invite applications through
a notice in the Federal Register.
Executive Order 12866: This notice has been reviewed in accordance
with Executive Order 12866. Under the terms of the order, we have
assessed the potential costs and benefits of this proposed regulatory
action.
[[Page 67189]]
The potential costs associated with this proposed regulatory action
are those resulting from statutory requirements and those we have
determined as necessary for administering this program effectively and
efficiently.
In assessing the potential costs and benefits--both quantitative
and qualitative--of this proposed regulatory action, we have determined
that the benefits of the proposed priority justify the costs.
Discussion of Costs and Benefits: The benefits of the Disability
and Rehabilitation Research Projects and Centers Programs have been
well established over the years in that similar projects have been
completed successfully. This proposed priority will generate new
knowledge through research and development.
Another benefit of this proposed priority is that the establishment
of a new RRTC will improve the lives of individuals with disabilities.
The new RRTC will disseminate and promote the use of new information
that will improve the options for individuals with disabilities to
obtain, retain, and advance in employment.
Intergovernmental Review: This program is not subject to Executive
Order 12372 and the regulations in 34 CFR part 79.
Accessible Format: Individuals with disabilities can obtain this
document in an accessible format (e.g., braille, large print,
audiotape, or computer diskette) on request to the program contact
person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
Electronic Access to This Document: You can view this document, as
well as all other documents of this Department published in the Federal
Register, in text or Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) on the
Internet at the following site: https://www.ed.gov/news/fedregister.
To use PDF you must have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is available
free at this site.
Note: The official version of this document is the document
published in the Federal Register. Free Internet access to the
official edition of the Federal Register and the Code of Federal
Regulations is available on GPO Access at: https://www.gpoaccess.gov/nara/.
Dated: December 15, 2009.
Alexa Posny,
Assistant Secretary for Special Education and Rehabilitative Services.
[FR Doc. E9-30188 Filed 12-17-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000-01-P