Adequacy Status of Motor Vehicle Budget in Submitted Subsequent NO2, 66963 [E9-30048]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 241 / Thursday, December 17, 2009 / Notices
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[EPA–R09–OAR–2009–0853; FRL–9093–2]
Adequacy Status of Motor Vehicle
Budget in Submitted Subsequent NO2
Maintenance Plan for the South Coast
Area for Transportation Conformity
Purposes; California
conformity Web site: https://
www.epa.gov/otaq/stateresources/
transconf/adequacy.htm.
The adequate 2002 and 2020 motor
vehicle emissions budgets (calculated
for a winter season day) are provided in
the following table:
ADEQUATE MOTOR VEHICLE
EMISSIONS BUDGET
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of Adequacy.
AGENCY:
In this notice, EPA is
notifying the public that the Agency has
found that the nitrogen dioxide (NO2)
motor vehicle emissions budgets in the
subsequent NO2 maintenance plan
portion of the 2007 South Coast State
Implementation Plan (SIP) are adequate
for transportation conformity purposes.
The 2007 South Coast SIP was
submitted to EPA on November 28, 2007
by the California Air Resources Board as
a revision to the California state
implementation plan. CARB corrected
the NO2 motor vehicle emissions
budgets from the 2007 South Coast SIP
by letter dated May 1, 2009. As a result
of our finding, the Southern California
Association of Governments and the
U.S. Department of Transportation must
use the NO2 motor vehicle emissions
budgets from the submitted subsequent
NO2 maintenance plan for future
transportation conformity
determinations.
DATES: This finding is effective January
4, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Wienke Tax, U.S. EPA, Region IX, Air
Division AIR–2, 75 Hawthorne Street,
San Francisco, CA 94105–3901; (415)
947–4192 or tax.wienke@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document, whenever
‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean
EPA.
Today’s notice is simply an
announcement of a finding that we have
already made. EPA Region IX sent a
letter to the California Air Resources
Board on November 20, 2009 stating
that the 2002 and 2020 motor vehicle
emissions budgets for NO2 in the
submitted 2007 AQMP are adequate.
The budgets correspond to the South
Coast NO2 maintenance area, which
generally includes Orange County, the
southwestern two-thirds of Los Angeles
County, southwestern San Bernardino
County, and western Riverside County.
Receipt of these motor vehicle
emissions budgets was announced on
EPA’s transportation conformity Web
site, and no comments were submitted.
The finding is available at EPA’s
SUMMARY:
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with NOTICES_PART 1
(In tons per day)
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:19 Dec 16, 2009
Jkt 220001
Budget Year
2002 and 2020
NO2 motor vehicle emissions
budgets
680 tons per day (winter
season)
Transportation conformity is required
by Clean Air Act section 176(c). EPA’s
conformity rule requires that
transportation plans, transportation
improvement programs, and projects
conform to state air quality
implementation plans (SIPs) and
establishes the criteria and procedures
for determining whether or not they do
conform. Conformity to a SIP means that
transportation activities will not
produce new air quality violations,
worsen existing violations, or delay
timely attainment of the national
ambient air quality standards.
The criteria by which we determine
whether a SIP’s motor vehicle emissions
budgets are adequate for conformity
purposes are outlined in 40 CFR
93.118(e)(4). We have described our
process for determining the adequacy of
submitted SIP budgets in our July 1,
2004, preamble starting at 69 FR 40038,
and we used the information in these
resources while making our adequacy
determination. Please note that an
adequacy review is separate from EPA’s
completeness review, and should not be
used to prejudge EPA’s ultimate
approval action for the SIP. Even if we
find a budget adequate, the SIP could
later be disapproved.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: December 2, 2009.
Laura Yoshii,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.
[FR Doc. E9–30048 Filed 12–16–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
66963
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[FRL–9093–1; Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–ORD–
2009–0115]
Draft Toxicological Review of 1,1,2,2Tetrachloroethane: In Support of
Summary Information on the
Integrated Risk Information System
(IRIS)
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of peer-review workshop.
SUMMARY: EPA is announcing that
Eastern Research Group, Inc. (ERG), an
EPA contractor for external scientific
peer review, will convene an
independent panel of experts and
organize and conduct an external peerreview workshop to review the external
review draft document titled,
‘‘Toxicological Review of 1,1,2,2Tetrachloroethane: In Support of
Summary Information on the Integrated
Risk Information System (IRIS)’’ (EPA/
635/R–09/001). The draft document was
prepared by the National Center for
Environmental Assessment (NCEA)
within EPA’s Office of Research and
Development. EPA previously
announced the 60-day public comment
period (ending November 23, 2009) for
the draft document in the Federal
Register on September 24, 2009 (74 FR
48731). EPA will consider public
comments and recommendations from
the expert panel workshop as EPA
finalizes the draft document.
The public comment period and the
external peer-review workshop are
separate processes that provide
opportunities for all interested parties to
comment on the document. EPA intends
to forward public comments submitted
in accordance with the September 24,
2009, Federal Register notice (74 FR
48731) to ERG, for consideration by the
external peer-review panel prior to the
workshop.
EPA is releasing this draft document
solely for the purpose of predissemination peer review under
applicable information quality
guidelines. This document has not been
formally disseminated by EPA. It does
not represent and should not be
construed to represent any Agency
policy or determination.
ERG invites the public to register to
attend this workshop as observers. In
addition, ERG invites the public to give
oral and/or provide written comments at
the workshop regarding the draft
document under review. Space is
limited, and reservations will be
accepted on a first-come, first-served
basis. The draft document and EPA’s
E:\FR\FM\17DEN1.SGM
17DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 241 (Thursday, December 17, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 66963]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-30048]
[[Page 66963]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[EPA-R09-OAR-2009-0853; FRL-9093-2]
Adequacy Status of Motor Vehicle Budget in Submitted Subsequent
NO2 Maintenance Plan for the South Coast Area for Transportation
Conformity Purposes; California
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of Adequacy.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In this notice, EPA is notifying the public that the Agency
has found that the nitrogen dioxide (NO2) motor vehicle
emissions budgets in the subsequent NO2 maintenance plan
portion of the 2007 South Coast State Implementation Plan (SIP) are
adequate for transportation conformity purposes. The 2007 South Coast
SIP was submitted to EPA on November 28, 2007 by the California Air
Resources Board as a revision to the California state implementation
plan. CARB corrected the NO2 motor vehicle emissions budgets
from the 2007 South Coast SIP by letter dated May 1, 2009. As a result
of our finding, the Southern California Association of Governments and
the U.S. Department of Transportation must use the NO2 motor
vehicle emissions budgets from the submitted subsequent NO2
maintenance plan for future transportation conformity determinations.
DATES: This finding is effective January 4, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Wienke Tax, U.S. EPA, Region IX, Air
Division AIR-2, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA 94105-3901;
(415) 947-4192 or tax.wienke@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, whenever ``we,''
``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean EPA.
Today's notice is simply an announcement of a finding that we have
already made. EPA Region IX sent a letter to the California Air
Resources Board on November 20, 2009 stating that the 2002 and 2020
motor vehicle emissions budgets for NO2 in the submitted
2007 AQMP are adequate. The budgets correspond to the South Coast
NO2 maintenance area, which generally includes Orange
County, the southwestern two-thirds of Los Angeles County, southwestern
San Bernardino County, and western Riverside County. Receipt of these
motor vehicle emissions budgets was announced on EPA's transportation
conformity Web site, and no comments were submitted. The finding is
available at EPA's conformity Web site: https://www.epa.gov/otaq/stateresources/transconf/adequacy.htm.
The adequate 2002 and 2020 motor vehicle emissions budgets
(calculated for a winter season day) are provided in the following
table:
Adequate Motor Vehicle Emissions Budget
(In tons per day)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NO2 motor vehicle emissions
Budget Year budgets
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2002 and 2020.......................... 680 tons per day (winter
season)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Transportation conformity is required by Clean Air Act section
176(c). EPA's conformity rule requires that transportation plans,
transportation improvement programs, and projects conform to state air
quality implementation plans (SIPs) and establishes the criteria and
procedures for determining whether or not they do conform. Conformity
to a SIP means that transportation activities will not produce new air
quality violations, worsen existing violations, or delay timely
attainment of the national ambient air quality standards.
The criteria by which we determine whether a SIP's motor vehicle
emissions budgets are adequate for conformity purposes are outlined in
40 CFR 93.118(e)(4). We have described our process for determining the
adequacy of submitted SIP budgets in our July 1, 2004, preamble
starting at 69 FR 40038, and we used the information in these resources
while making our adequacy determination. Please note that an adequacy
review is separate from EPA's completeness review, and should not be
used to prejudge EPA's ultimate approval action for the SIP. Even if we
find a budget adequate, the SIP could later be disapproved.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: December 2, 2009.
Laura Yoshii,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.
[FR Doc. E9-30048 Filed 12-16-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P