Ernest F. Hollings ACE Basin National Wildlife Refuge, Charleston, Beaufort, Colleton, and Hampton Counties, SC, 66672-66673 [E9-29869]
Download as PDF
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
66672
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 240 / Wednesday, December 16, 2009 / Notices
In addition to the Daisy Town
buildings, the exterior of the Chapman
cabin in the ‘‘Society Hill’’ portion of
the District will be restored to the early
20th century period of significance and
retained for interpretive purposes, the
exterior of the Spence cabin in
‘‘Millionaire’s Row’’ will also be
restored and its interior rehabilitated for
public rental and day use. The gravel
pathway from the Appalachian
Clubhouse to Jakes Creek Cemetery will
be restored. Historic plantings that are
not invasive would be retained
throughout the District. To provide
access and circulation, existing parking
areas will be reconfigured and
resurfaced, and a new day use parking
area will be constructed.
Altogether, 30 buildings identified as
contributing to the District’s
significance will be removed. Buildings
slated for removal include the
Wonderland Hotel Annex, 26 cabins,
and 3 garages. The remains of the
structurally failed Wonderland Hotel
were removed in December 2006.
The preserved buildings and cultural
landscape features, along with wayside
exhibits and other interpretive media,
will be used to enhance visitor
understanding of the history and
development of the Elkmont vacation
community, its architecture, and the
area’s important cultural and natural
resources.
To increase species diversity, improve
and increase wildlife habitat, and
provide soil stabilization within the
District, the NPS will restore native
plant communities in suitable areas,
including the sites where buildings have
been removed. Removal of buildings
within the Little River floodplain would
allow for gradual succession to native
communities.
The selected alternative will not
generate wastewater discharge above the
permitted allowable level from the
sewage treatment plant or contribute
nonpoint runoff into the Little River or
its tributaries. No additional structures
or activities within the 100-year
floodplain are proposed.
The approved plan enhances
opportunities for visitors to interact
with and appreciate the historic
district’s resources while providing for
the preservation or adaptive use of the
park’s resources when implemented.
The Record of Decision includes a
description of the project’s background,
a statement of the decision made,
synopses of other alternatives
considered, the basis for the decision,
findings on impairment of park
resources and values, a description of
the environmentally preferred
alternative, a listing of measures to
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:18 Dec 15, 2009
Jkt 220001
minimize environmental harm, and an
overview of public involvement in the
decision-making process.
DATES: The ROD was signed by the
Regional Director, NPS, Southeast
Region, on June 30, 2009.
ADDRESSES: Copies of the ROD are
available from the Superintendent,
Great Smoky Mountains National Park,
107 Park Headquarters Road,
Gatlinburg, Tennessee 37738; telephone:
865–436–1201.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The NPS
evaluated six other alternatives for the
treatment and management of the
District in the GMPA/EIS. These
alternatives are described in full in the
FEIS/GMPA. Among the alternatives
considered, the selected alternative best
protects the diversity of park resources
while also maintaining a range of
quality visitor experiences, meets NPS
purposes and goals for the Elkmont
Historic District of Great Smoky
Mountains National Park, and meets
National Environmental Policy Act
goals. The selected alternative will not
result in the impairment of park
resources and will allow the NPS to
conserve park resources and provide for
their enjoyment by visitors.
Authority: The authority for publishing
this notice is 40 CFR 1506.6 (b).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Contact the Superintendent, Great
Smoky Mountains National Park, at the
address and telephone number shown
above. An electronic copy of the
document is available on the Internet at
https://parkplanning.nps.gov/.
The responsible official for this FEIS
is the Regional Director, Southeast
Region, National Park Service, 100
Alabama Street, SW., 1924 Building,
Atlanta, Georgia 30303.
Dated: October 5, 2009.
David Vela,
Regional Director, Southeast Region.
[FR Doc. E9–29853 Filed 12–15–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–70–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS–R4–R–2009–N186; 40136–1265–0000–
S3]
Ernest F. Hollings ACE Basin National
Wildlife Refuge, Charleston, Beaufort,
Colleton, and Hampton Counties, SC
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability: Final
comprehensive conservation plan and
finding of no significant impact.
PO 00000
Frm 00059
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (Service), announce the
availability of our final comprehensive
conservation plan (CCP) and finding of
no significant impact (FONSI) for the
environmental assessment for Ernest F.
Hollings ACE Basin National Wildlife
Refuge (ACE Basin NWR). In the final
CCP, we describe how we will manage
this refuge for the next 15 years.
ADDRESSES: You may obtain a copy of
the CCP by writing to: Mr. Van Fischer,
Refuge Planner, South Carolina
Lowcountry Refuge Complex, 5801
Highway 17 North, Awendaw, SC
29429. You may also access and
download the document from the
Service’s Web site: https://
southeast.fws.gov/planning.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Van Fischer; telephone: 843/928–3264;
E-mail: van_fischer@fws.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Introduction
With this notice, we finalize the CCP
process for ACE Basin NWR. We started
this process through a notice in the
Federal Register on January 3, 2007 (72
FR 141). For more about the process, see
that notice. ACE Basin NWR was
established on September 20, 1990, and
was renamed the Ernest F. Hollings ACE
Basin National Wildlife Refuge on May
16, 2005. The refuge is a partner in the
ACE Basin Task Force, a coalition
consisting of the Service, the South
Carolina Department of Natural
Resources, Ducks Unlimited, The
Nature Conservancy, The Low Country
Open Land Trust, Mead Westvaco, and
private landowners of the ACE Basin
system. The refuge’s two separate units
(Edisto and Combahee) are further
broken down into subunits, with the
Edisto Unit containing the Barrelville,
Grove, and Jehossee subunits; and the
Combahee Unit containing the Bonny
Hall, Combahee Fields, and Yemassee
subunits. The refuge is divided into 9
management units or compartments,
ranging in size from 350 to 3,355 acres.
Compartment boundaries are
established along geographic features
that can be easily identified on the
ground (i.e., rivers, roads, and trails).
We announce our decision and the
availability of the final CCP and FONSI
for ACE Basin NWR in accordance with
the National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA) [40 CFR 1506.6(b)]
requirements. We completed a thorough
analysis of impacts on the human
environment, which we included in the
Draft Comprehensive Conservation Plan
and Environmental Assessment (Draft
CCP/EA). The CCP will guide us in
managing and administering ACE Basin
E:\FR\FM\16DEN1.SGM
16DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 240 / Wednesday, December 16, 2009 / Notices
NWR for the next 15 years. Alternative
C is the foundation for the CCP.
The compatibility determinations for
upland game hunting, fishing/boating,
wildlife observation and photography,
environmental education and
interpretation, bicycling, research,
exotic and nuisance wildlife control,
forest management—commercial timber
harvest, and cooperative farming are
also available in the CCP.
Background
The National Wildlife Refuge System
Administration Act of 1966 (16 U.S.C.
668dd–668ee) (Administration Act), as
amended by the National Wildlife
Refuge System Improvement Act of
1997, requires us to develop a CCP for
each national wildlife refuge. The
purpose for developing a CCP is to
provide refuge managers with a 15-year
plan for achieving refuge purposes and
contributing toward the mission of the
National Wildlife Refuge System,
consistent with sound principles of fish
and wildlife management, conservation,
legal mandates, and our policies. In
addition to outlining broad management
direction on conserving wildlife and
their habitats, CCPs identify wildlifedependent recreational opportunities
available to the public, including
opportunities for hunting, fishing,
wildlife observation, wildlife
photography, and environmental
education and interpretation. We will
review and update the CCP at least
every 15 years in accordance with the
Administration Act.
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
Comments
Approximately 120 copies of the Draft
CCP/EA were made available for a 30day public review period as announced
in the Federal Register May 4, 2009 (74
FR 20495). Written comments were
received from local citizens and the
South Carolina Department of Natural
Resources.
Selected Alternative
After considering the comments we
received, we have selected Alternative C
for implementation. Our primary focus
under Alternative C will be to increase
overall wildlife and habitat diversity.
Although waterfowl will remain a focus
of management, wetland habitat
manipulations will also consider the
needs of multiple species, such as
marsh and wading birds. We will more
actively manage upland forests and
fields for neotropical migratory birds.
Landscape level consideration of habitat
management will include a diversity of
open fields, upland and wetland forests,
and additional wetlands. Upland
loblolly pine plantations (e.g., relic
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:18 Dec 15, 2009
Jkt 220001
industrial forests) will be heavily
thinned to encourage multi-strata
vegetation composition and hardwood
interspersion. More xeric loblolly pine
plantations will be converted to longleaf
pine savannas and subjected to frequent
growing season prescribed fires to favor
warm season grasses and forbs and the
potential reintroduction of red-cockaded
woodpeckers in the ACE Basin Project
Area. Multiple species consideration
will include species and habitats
identified by the South Atlantic
Migratory Bird Initiative and the State’s
Strategic Conservation Plan.
This alternative will expand our
monitoring of migratory neotropical and
breeding songbirds and other resident
species. Monitoring efforts will be
increased with the assistance of
additional staff, trained volunteers, and
academic researchers. Greater effort will
be made to recruit academic researchers
to the refuge to study and monitor
refuge resources.
Hunting and fishing will continue to
be allowed on the refuge. However,
hunting will be managed with a greater
focus on achieving biological needs of
the refuge, such as deer population
management and feral hog elimination.
Education and interpretation will
continue, but with additional education
and outreach efforts aimed at the
importance of landscape ecology and
diversity. A much broader effort will be
made with outreach to nearby
developing urban communities and a
growing human population.
The refuge will be staffed the same as
the 2008 staffing model to enhance all
refuge services and management
programs. We will place greater
emphasis on recruiting and training
volunteers, and expanding workercamper opportunities to facilitate
maintenance programs and other refuge
goals and objectives. We will actively
seek funding for research needs. We will
place greater emphasis on developing
and maintaining active partnerships,
including seeking grants to assist the
refuge in reaching primary objectives.
Alternative C is considered to be the
most effective for meeting the purposes
of the refuge by conserving, restoring,
and managing the refuge’s habitats and
wildlife, while optimizing wildlifedependent public uses. Alternative C
will best achieve national, ecosystem,
and refuge-specific goals and objectives
and it positively addresses significant
issues and concerns expressed by the
public.
Authority: This notice is published under
the authority of the National Wildlife Refuge
System Improvement Act of 1997, Public
Law 105–57.
PO 00000
Frm 00060
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
66673
Dated: September 30, 2009.
Jacquelyn B. Parrish,
Acting Regional Director.
[FR Doc. E9–29869 Filed 12–15–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS–R4–R–2009–N172; 40136–1265–0000–
S3]
Mandalay National Wildlife Refuge,
Terrebonne Parish, LA
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability: Final
comprehensive conservation plan and
finding of no significant impact.
SUMMARY: We, the Fish and Wildlife
Service (Service), announce the
availability of our final comprehensive
conservation plan (CCP) and finding of
no significant impact (FONSI) for the
environmental assessment for Mandalay
National Wildlife Refuge (NWR). In the
final CCP, we describe how we will
manage this refuge for the next 15 years.
ADDRESSES: You may obtain a copy of
the CCP by writing to: Mr. Paul
Yakupzack, Refuge Manager, Mandalay
NWR, 3599 Bayou Black Drive, Houma,
LA 70360. You may also access and
download the document from the
Service’s Web site: https://
southeast.fws.gov/planning.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Paul Yakupzack; telephone: 985/853–
1078; fax: 985/853–1079; e-mail:
paul_yakupzack@fws.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Introduction
With this notice, we finalize the CCP
process for Mandalay NWR. We started
this process through a notice in the
Federal Register on March 19, 2007 (72
FR 12811). For more about the process,
see that notice. .
Mandalay NWR, approximately 5
miles west of Houma, Louisiana, was
established on May 2, 1996, with the
purchase of 4,416 acres under the
authority of the Migratory Bird
Conservation Act of 1929 and the
Endangered Species Act of 1973. The
refuge, predominately freshwater marsh
and cypress-tupelo swamp, provides
excellent habitat for waterfowl, wading
birds, and neotropical migratory
songbirds.
We announce our decision and the
availability of the final CCP and FONSI
for Mandalay NWR in accordance with
the National Environmental Policy Act
E:\FR\FM\16DEN1.SGM
16DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 240 (Wednesday, December 16, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 66672-66673]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-29869]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS-R4-R-2009-N186; 40136-1265-0000-S3]
Ernest F. Hollings ACE Basin National Wildlife Refuge,
Charleston, Beaufort, Colleton, and Hampton Counties, SC
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability: Final comprehensive conservation plan
and finding of no significant impact.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), announce the
availability of our final comprehensive conservation plan (CCP) and
finding of no significant impact (FONSI) for the environmental
assessment for Ernest F. Hollings ACE Basin National Wildlife Refuge
(ACE Basin NWR). In the final CCP, we describe how we will manage this
refuge for the next 15 years.
ADDRESSES: You may obtain a copy of the CCP by writing to: Mr. Van
Fischer, Refuge Planner, South Carolina Lowcountry Refuge Complex, 5801
Highway 17 North, Awendaw, SC 29429. You may also access and download
the document from the Service's Web site: https://southeast.fws.gov/planning.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Van Fischer; telephone: 843/928-
3264; E-mail: van_fischer@fws.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Introduction
With this notice, we finalize the CCP process for ACE Basin NWR. We
started this process through a notice in the Federal Register on
January 3, 2007 (72 FR 141). For more about the process, see that
notice. ACE Basin NWR was established on September 20, 1990, and was
renamed the Ernest F. Hollings ACE Basin National Wildlife Refuge on
May 16, 2005. The refuge is a partner in the ACE Basin Task Force, a
coalition consisting of the Service, the South Carolina Department of
Natural Resources, Ducks Unlimited, The Nature Conservancy, The Low
Country Open Land Trust, Mead Westvaco, and private landowners of the
ACE Basin system. The refuge's two separate units (Edisto and Combahee)
are further broken down into subunits, with the Edisto Unit containing
the Barrelville, Grove, and Jehossee subunits; and the Combahee Unit
containing the Bonny Hall, Combahee Fields, and Yemassee subunits. The
refuge is divided into 9 management units or compartments, ranging in
size from 350 to 3,355 acres. Compartment boundaries are established
along geographic features that can be easily identified on the ground
(i.e., rivers, roads, and trails).
We announce our decision and the availability of the final CCP and
FONSI for ACE Basin NWR in accordance with the National Environmental
Policy Act (NEPA) [40 CFR 1506.6(b)] requirements. We completed a
thorough analysis of impacts on the human environment, which we
included in the Draft Comprehensive Conservation Plan and Environmental
Assessment (Draft CCP/EA). The CCP will guide us in managing and
administering ACE Basin
[[Page 66673]]
NWR for the next 15 years. Alternative C is the foundation for the CCP.
The compatibility determinations for upland game hunting, fishing/
boating, wildlife observation and photography, environmental education
and interpretation, bicycling, research, exotic and nuisance wildlife
control, forest management--commercial timber harvest, and cooperative
farming are also available in the CCP.
Background
The National Wildlife Refuge System Administration Act of 1966 (16
U.S.C. 668dd-668ee) (Administration Act), as amended by the National
Wildlife Refuge System Improvement Act of 1997, requires us to develop
a CCP for each national wildlife refuge. The purpose for developing a
CCP is to provide refuge managers with a 15-year plan for achieving
refuge purposes and contributing toward the mission of the National
Wildlife Refuge System, consistent with sound principles of fish and
wildlife management, conservation, legal mandates, and our policies. In
addition to outlining broad management direction on conserving wildlife
and their habitats, CCPs identify wildlife-dependent recreational
opportunities available to the public, including opportunities for
hunting, fishing, wildlife observation, wildlife photography, and
environmental education and interpretation. We will review and update
the CCP at least every 15 years in accordance with the Administration
Act.
Comments
Approximately 120 copies of the Draft CCP/EA were made available
for a 30-day public review period as announced in the Federal Register
May 4, 2009 (74 FR 20495). Written comments were received from local
citizens and the South Carolina Department of Natural Resources.
Selected Alternative
After considering the comments we received, we have selected
Alternative C for implementation. Our primary focus under Alternative C
will be to increase overall wildlife and habitat diversity. Although
waterfowl will remain a focus of management, wetland habitat
manipulations will also consider the needs of multiple species, such as
marsh and wading birds. We will more actively manage upland forests and
fields for neotropical migratory birds. Landscape level consideration
of habitat management will include a diversity of open fields, upland
and wetland forests, and additional wetlands. Upland loblolly pine
plantations (e.g., relic industrial forests) will be heavily thinned to
encourage multi-strata vegetation composition and hardwood
interspersion. More xeric loblolly pine plantations will be converted
to longleaf pine savannas and subjected to frequent growing season
prescribed fires to favor warm season grasses and forbs and the
potential reintroduction of red-cockaded woodpeckers in the ACE Basin
Project Area. Multiple species consideration will include species and
habitats identified by the South Atlantic Migratory Bird Initiative and
the State's Strategic Conservation Plan.
This alternative will expand our monitoring of migratory
neotropical and breeding songbirds and other resident species.
Monitoring efforts will be increased with the assistance of additional
staff, trained volunteers, and academic researchers. Greater effort
will be made to recruit academic researchers to the refuge to study and
monitor refuge resources.
Hunting and fishing will continue to be allowed on the refuge.
However, hunting will be managed with a greater focus on achieving
biological needs of the refuge, such as deer population management and
feral hog elimination. Education and interpretation will continue, but
with additional education and outreach efforts aimed at the importance
of landscape ecology and diversity. A much broader effort will be made
with outreach to nearby developing urban communities and a growing
human population.
The refuge will be staffed the same as the 2008 staffing model to
enhance all refuge services and management programs. We will place
greater emphasis on recruiting and training volunteers, and expanding
worker-camper opportunities to facilitate maintenance programs and
other refuge goals and objectives. We will actively seek funding for
research needs. We will place greater emphasis on developing and
maintaining active partnerships, including seeking grants to assist the
refuge in reaching primary objectives.
Alternative C is considered to be the most effective for meeting
the purposes of the refuge by conserving, restoring, and managing the
refuge's habitats and wildlife, while optimizing wildlife-dependent
public uses. Alternative C will best achieve national, ecosystem, and
refuge-specific goals and objectives and it positively addresses
significant issues and concerns expressed by the public.
Authority: This notice is published under the authority of the
National Wildlife Refuge System Improvement Act of 1997, Public Law
105-57.
Dated: September 30, 2009.
Jacquelyn B. Parrish,
Acting Regional Director.
[FR Doc. E9-29869 Filed 12-15-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P