Energy Conservation Program for Consumer Products: Notice of Petition for Waiver of Electrolux Home Products, Inc. From the Department of Energy Residential Refrigerator and Refrigerator-Freezer Test Procedure, and Modification of Interim Waiver, 66344-66348 [E9-29787]
Download as PDF
66344
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 239 / Tuesday, December 15, 2009 / Notices
(Heater Watts at 85% RH) + A10 *
(Heater Watts at 95% RH)
Samsung requests that DOE prescribe
an alternate test procedure, whereby the
test procedure were modified to
calculate the energy of the unit by
testing the unit with the anti-sweat
heaters in the ‘‘on’’ position as equal to
the energy of the unit tested with the
anti-sweat heaters in the ‘‘off’’ position
plus the Anti-Sweat Heater Power times
1.3, similar to those prescribed within
waivers granted to GE 3 and Whirlpool 4,
to allow Samsung to accurately evaluate
the energy consumption for the
following Samsung refrigerator-freezer
models:
RB19*AC**
RB21*AC**
RF19*AC**
RF21*AC**
RF26*AF**
RFG23*AC**
RFG29*AC**
RFM28*AA**
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with NOTICES
Conclusion
On the grounds that current test
methods for refrigerator-freezers will
result in inaccurate evaluation of energy
consumption, Samsung requests that,
until a final rule prescribing a test
method for adaptive anti-sweat heater
technologies, a waiver is granted for
Samsung refrigerator-freezer models
which utilize adaptive anti-sweat heater
technologies. By granting Samsung the
requested waiver and interim waiver,
DOE will ensure that advancements in
technologies are not hindered by
regulations, and that similar products
are tested in similar manners.
Affected Persons
Primarily affected persons in the
refrigerator-freezer category include
BSH Home Appliances Corp. (BoschSiemens Hausgerate GmbH), Electrolux
Home Products, Equator, Fisher &
Paykel Appliances Inc., GE Appliances,
Gorenje USA, Haier America Trading,
L.L.C., Heartland Appliances, Inc.,
Kelon Electrical Holdings Co., Ltd.,
Liebherr Hausgerate, LG Electronics
Inc., Northland Corporation, Sanyo
Fisher Company, Sears, Sub-Zero
Freezer Company, ULine, Viking Range,
W. C. Wood Company, and Whirlpool
Corporation. The Association of Home
Appliance Manufacturers is also
generally interested in energy efficiency
requirements for appliances, including
refrigerator-freezers. Samsung will
notify all these entities as required by
the Department’s rules and provide
them with a version of this Petition.
3 73
4 74
FR 10425
FR 20695
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:23 Dec 14, 2009
Jkt 220001
Sincerely,
Michael Moss
Senior Manager
[FR Doc. E9–29778 Filed 12–14–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Case No. RF–010]
Energy Conservation Program for
Consumer Products: Notice of Petition
for Waiver of Electrolux Home
Products, Inc. From the Department of
Energy Residential Refrigerator and
Refrigerator-Freezer Test Procedure,
and Modification of Interim Waiver
AGENCY: Office of Energy Efficiency and
Renewable Energy, Department of
Energy.
ACTION: Notice of petition for waiver,
notice of modification of interim waiver,
and request for comments.
SUMMARY: This notice announces receipt
of and publishes the Electrolux Home
Products, Inc. (Electrolux) Petition for
Waiver (hereafter, ‘‘Petition’’) from parts
of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)
test procedure for determining the
energy consumption of electric
refrigerators and refrigerator-freezers.
Today’s notice also modifies an interim
waiver of the test procedures applicable
to residential refrigerator-freezers by
extending it to additional Electrolux
basic models. Through this document,
DOE is soliciting comments with respect
to the Electrolux Petition.
DATES: DOE will accept comments, data,
and information with respect to the
Electrolux Petition until, but no later
than January 14, 2010.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by case number ‘‘RF–010,’’ by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• E-mail:
AS_Waiver_Requests@ee.doe.gov
Include either the case number [Case
No. RF–010], and/or ‘‘Electrolux
Petition’’ in the subject line of the
message.
• Mail: Ms. Brenda Edwards, U.S.
Department of Energy, Building
Technologies Program, Mailstop EE–2J/
1000 Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20585–0121.
Telephone: (202) 586–2945. Please
submit one signed original paper copy.
• Hand Delivery/Courier: Ms. Brenda
Edwards, U.S. Department of Energy,
Building Technologies Program, 950
L’Enfant Plaza, SW., Suite 600,
Washington, DC 20024. Please submit
one signed original paper copy.
PO 00000
Frm 00073
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name and case
number for this proceeding. Submit
electronic comments in WordPerfect,
Microsoft Word, Portable Document
Format (PDF), or text (American
Standard Code for Information
Interchange (ASCII)) file format and
avoid the use of special characters or
any form of encryption. Wherever
possible, include the electronic
signature of the author. DOE does not
accept telefacsimiles (faxes).
Any person submitting written
comments must also send a copy of
such comments to the petitioner,
pursuant to 10 CFR 431.401(d). The
contact information for the petitioner is:
Ms. Sheila A. Millar, Keller and
Heckman, LLP, 1001 G Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20001. Telephone:
(202) 434–4100.
E-mail: millar@khlaw.com.
According to 10 CFR 1004.11, any
person submitting information that he
or she believes to be confidential and
exempt by law from public disclosure
should submit two copies to DOE: One
copy of the document including all the
information believed to be confidential,
and one copy of the document with the
information believed to be confidential
deleted. DOE will make its own
determination about the confidential
status of the information and treat it
according to its determination.
Docket: For access to the docket to
review the background documents
relevant to this matter, you may visit the
U.S. Department of Energy, 950 L’Enfant
Plaza, SW, (Resource Room of the
Building Technologies Program),
Washington, DC 20024; (202) 586–2945,
between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Available documents include the
following items: (1) This notice; (2)
public comments received; (3) the
Petition for Waiver and Application for
Interim Waiver; and (4) prior DOE
rulemakings regarding similar central
air conditioning and heat pump
equipment. Please call Ms. Brenda
Edwards at the above telephone number
for additional information regarding
visiting the Resource Room.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr.
Michael G. Raymond, U.S. Department
of Energy, Building Technologies
Program, Mail Stop EE–2J, Forrestal
Building, 1000 Independence Avenue,
SW., Washington, DC 20585–0121.
Telephone: (202) 586–9611. E-mail:
Michael.Raymond@ee.doe.gov.
Ms. Francine Pinto or Mr. Michael
Kido, U.S. Department of Energy, Office
of the General Counsel, Mail Stop GC–
71, Forrestal Building, 1000
E:\FR\FM\15DEN1.SGM
15DEN1
66345
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 239 / Tuesday, December 15, 2009 / Notices
Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20585–0103.
Telephone: (202) 586–8145. E-mail:
Francine.Pinto@hq.doe.gov or
Michael.Kido@hq.doe.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
On November 6, 2008, Electrolux filed
a Petition for Waiver and Application
for Interim Waiver from the test
procedure applicable to residential
electric refrigerators and refrigeratorfreezers set forth in 10 CFR Part 430,
subpart B, appendix A1. The products
covered by the petition employ adaptive
anti-sweat heaters, which detect and
respond to temperature and humidity
EI28BS36IW
EI28BS51IS
EI23BC51IB
E23BC78IPS
FGHB2846LM
FGHB2869LP
FGHN2879LF
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with NOTICES
II. Petition for Waiver of Test Procedure
and Modified Interim Waiver
On July 13, 2009, Electrolux informed
DOE that after it filed its Petition for
EI28BS36IB
EI23BC36IW
EI23BC51IS
FGHB2844LP
FGHN2844LP
FGHB2869LE
FPHB2899LF
DOE notes that Electrolux’s July 2009
petition to extend its Interim Waiver
and Petition for Waiver also contains an
alternate test procedure that addresses
the treatment of products equipped with
adaptive anti-sweat heaters. The
alternate test procedure submitted in the
July 2009 petition is identical to the one
contained in Electrolux’s November 6,
2008 Petition. Accordingly, for the same
reasons cited in its grant of the
November 2008 interim waiver
request—i.e. similarity between the type
of products covered by the Electrolux
petitions and the type addressed in a
waiver previously granted to General
Electric Company—DOE is extending
that interim waiver to cover the new
products addressed in Electrolux’s July
2009 petition. See also 74 FR 26854
(citing 72 FR 10425 (Feb. 27, 2008)).
III. Alternate Test Procedure
During the duration of the interim
waiver, Electrolux shall be required to
test the products listed above according
to the test procedures for electric
refrigerator-freezers prescribed by DOE
at 10 CFR Part 430, Appendix A1,
except that, for the Electrolux products
listed above only:
(A) The following definition is added
at the end of Section 1:
1.13 ‘‘Variable anti-sweat heater
control’’ means an anti-sweat heater
where power supplied to the device is
determined by an operating condition
variable(s) and/or ambient condition
variable(s).
(B) Section 2.2 is revised to read as
follows:
VerDate Nov<24>2008
conditions, and then activate adaptive
heaters as needed to evaporate excess
moisture. DOE granted Electrolux’s
Application for Interim Waiver on
March 3, 2009. On June 4, 2009, DOE
published Electrolux’s Petition for
Waiver for residential refrigeratorfreezers with adaptive anti-sweat
heaters in the Federal Register. 74 FR
26853. Following a March 24, 2009,
request from Electrolux, the June 4,
2009, Federal Register notice also
expanded the Interim Waiver to cover
four additional models.
17:23 Dec 14, 2009
Jkt 220001
EI28BS36IS
EI23BC36IB
E23BC58JSS
FGHB2844LE
FGHN2844LE
FGHB2879LF
FPHN2899LF
EI28BS51IW
EI23BC36IS
E23BC58JPS
FGHB2844LM
FGHN2844LM
FGHN2869LP
2.2 Operational conditions. The
electric refrigerator or electric
refrigerator-freezer shall be installed and
its operating conditions maintained in
accordance with HRF–1–1979, section
7.2 through section 7.4.3.3. except that
the vertical ambient temperature
gradient at locations 10 inches (25.4 cm)
out from the centers of the two sides of
the unit being tested is to be maintained
during the test. Unless shields or baffles
obstruct the area, the gradient is to be
maintained from 2 inches (5.1 cm)
above the floor or supporting platform
to a height one foot (30.5 cm) above the
unit under test. Defrost controls are to
be operative. The anti-sweat heater
switch is to be ‘‘off’’ during one test and
‘‘on’’ during the second test. In the case
of an electric refrigerator-freezer
equipped with variable anti-sweat
heater control, the ‘‘on’’ test will be the
result of the calculation described in
6.2.3. Other exceptions are noted in 2.3,
2.4, and 5.1 below.
(C) New section 6.2.3 is inserted after
section 6.2.2.2.
6.2.3 Variable anti-sweat heater
control test. The energy consumption of
an electric refrigerator-freezer with a
variable anti-sweat heater control in the
‘‘on’’ position (Eon), expressed in
kilowatt-hours per day, shall be
calculated equivalent to:
EON = E + (Correction Factor)
Where E is determined by 6.2.1.1, 6.2.1.2,
6.2.2.1, or 6.2.2.2, whichever is appropriate,
with the anti-sweat heater switch in the ‘‘off’’
position.
PO 00000
Frm 00074
Fmt 4703
Waiver in November 2008, it developed
additional basic models with adaptive
anti-sweat heater technology. Electrolux
asserted that these new products are
identical in function and operation to
the basic models listed in Electrolux’s
November 2008 petition with respect to
the properties that made those products
eligible for a waiver. Therefore,
Electrolux requested that DOE add these
models to the list of basic models for
which the interim waiver was granted.
In addition, Electrolux requested that
DOE grant a new Waiver for these
additional basic models. The following
additional products are covered by the
July 2009 waiver request:
Sfmt 4703
EI28BS51IB
EI23BC51IW
E23BC78ISS
FGHB2844LF
FGHN2844LF
FGHN2869LE
Correction Factor = (Anti-sweat Heater
Power × System-loss Factor) × (24
hrs/1 day) × (1 kW/1000 W)
Where:
Anti-sweat Heater Power
= A1 * (Heater Watts at 5%RH)
+ A2 * (Heater Watts at 15%RH)
+ A3 * (Heater Watts at 25%RH)
+ A4 * (Heater Watts at 35%RH)
+ A5 * (Heater Watts at 45%RH)
+ A6 * (Heater Watts at 55%RH)
+ A7 * (Heater Watts at 65%RH)
+ A8 * (Heater Watts at 75%RH)
+ A9 * (Heater Watts at 85%RH)
+ A10 * (Heater Watts at 95%RH)
Where A1–A10 are from the following table:
A1
A2
A3
A4
A5
=
=
=
=
=
0.034
0.211
0.204
0.166
0.126
A6 = 0.119
A7 = 0.069
A8 = 0.047
A9 = 0.008
A10 = 0.015
Heater Watts at a specific relative
humidity = the nominal watts used by
all heaters at that specific relative
humidity, 72 °F ambient, and DOE
reference temperatures of fresh food
(FF) average temperature of 45 °F and
freezer (FZ) average temperature of 5 °F.
System-loss Factor = 1.3
IV. Summary and Request for
Comments
The Department has reviewed
Electrolux’s Petition and its request to
extend its Interim Waiver to additional
models. The list of additional models
does not reflect any changes to the
models listed in Electrolux’s November
E:\FR\FM\15DEN1.SGM
15DEN1
66346
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 239 / Tuesday, December 15, 2009 / Notices
2008 Petition with respect to the
properties making them eligible for a
waiver, which involved the accuracy of
the test procedure as applied to this new
technology. Given that the modified list
does not change in any way the basis for
granting the interim waiver, DOE finds
that it is appropriate that the Interim
Waiver granted on March 3 and
extended on June 4, 2009, apply to the
additional models listed in this Petition.
Accordingly, DOE extends these prior
grants of Interim Waivers to the models
listed in this Petition.
Through today’s notice, DOE
announces receipt of Electrolux’s
Petition for Waiver from certain parts of
the test procedure that apply to
additional basic models of refrigerators
and refrigerator-freezers with variable
anti-sweat heater controls and adaptive
heaters manufactured by Electrolux.
DOE is publishing Electrolux’s Petition
for Waiver in its entirety pursuant to 10
CFR 430.27(b)(1)(iv). The Petition
contains no confidential information.
The Petition includes a suggested
alternate test procedure and calculation
methodology to determine the energy
consumption of Electrolux’s specified
refrigerators and refrigerator-freezers
with adaptive anti-sweat heaters. DOE is
interested in receiving comments from
interested parties on all aspects of the
Petition, including the suggested
alternate test procedure and calculation
methodology. Pursuant to 10 CFR
430.27(b)(1)(iv), any person submitting
written comments to DOE must also
send a copy of such comments to the
petitioner, whose contact information is
included in the ADDRESSES section
above.
Re: Petition for Waiver and Application
for Interim Waiver from the
Department of Energy Residential
Refrigerator and Refrigerator-Freezer
Test Procedures by Electrolux Home
Products, Inc.
Dear Secretary Zoi:
On behalf of our client, Electrolux
Home Products, Inc. (‘‘Electrolux’’), we
respectfully submit this Petition for
Waiver and Application for Interim
Waiver requesting exemption by the
Department of Energy from certain parts
of the test procedure for determining
refrigerator-freezer energy consumption
under 10 C.F.R. § 430.27. The requested
waiver will allow Electrolux to test its
refrigerator-freezer to the amended
procedure set out by this petition.
This petition for waiver contains no
confidential business information and
may be released pursuant to Freedom
of Information Act requests.
Via Overnight Delivery
I. Petition for Waiver
Electrolux seeks the Department’s
approval of this proposed amendment to
the refrigerator test procedure to be
assured of properly calculating the
energy consumption and properly
labeling its new refrigerator. On
February 27, 2008 and May 5, 2009, the
Department granted Petitions for Waiver
filed respectively by General Electric
Corporation (‘‘GE’’) and Whirlpool
Corporation (‘‘Whirlpool’’) to establish a
new methodology to calculate the
energy consumption of a refrigeratorfreezer when such a product contains
adaptive anti-sweat heaters.1
Electrolux has developed its own
adaptive anti-sweat system that uses a
humidity sensor to operate the antisweat heaters. On November 6, 2008,
Electrolux filed a Petition for Waiver
and Application for Interim Waiver
from the test procedure applicable to
residential electric refrigerators and
refrigerator-freezers. Having determined
that Electrolux is seeking a waiver
similar to the one granted to GE, and
that the Electrolux Petition is likely to
be granted, the Department on March 3,
2009, granted Electrolux an Interim
Waiver, which was expanded on June 4,
2009, to cover four additional models.2
The Honorable Catherine Zoi
Assistant Secretary
Office of Energy Efficiency and
Renewable Energy
U.S. Department of Energy
Mail Station EE–10
Forrestal Building
1000 Independence Avenue, SW
Washington, DC 20585–0121
1 Decision and Order Granting a Waiver to the
General Electric Company From the Department of
Energy Residential Refrigerator and RefrigeratorFreezer Test Procedure (Case No. RF–007), 73 Fed.
Reg. 10,425; Energy Conservation Program for
Consumer Products: Decision and Order Granting a
Waiver to Whirlpool Corporation From the
Department of Energy Residential Refrigerator and
Refrigerator-Freezer Test Procedure, 74 Fed. Reg.
20,695.
2 See Publication of the Petition for Waiver and
Notice of Granting the Application for Interim
Waiver of Electrolux From the Department of
Issued in Washington, DC, on December 8,
2009.
Cathy Zoi,
Assistant Secretary, Energy Efficiency and
Renewable Energy.
Writer’s Direct Access
Sheila A. Millar
(202) 434–4143
millar@khlaw.com
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with NOTICES
July 13, 2009
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:23 Dec 14, 2009
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00075
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Department regulations make clear
that once a waiver has been granted, the
Department must take steps to
incorporate the new procedure and
eliminate the need for continuing
waivers:
Within one year of the granting of any
waiver, the Department of Energy will
publish in the Federal Register a notice
of proposed rulemaking to amend its
regulations so as to eliminate any need
for the continuation of such waiver. As
soon thereafter as practicable, the
Department of Energy will publish in
the Federal Register a final rule. Such
waiver will terminate on the effective
date of such final rule.3
In the interim, however, Electrolux is
developing and planning to shortly
introduce into the marketplace new
models that use the identical adaptive
anti-sweat system addressed by the
March 3, 2009 Interim Waiver.
Accordingly, Electrolux is filing this
Petition for Waiver and Application for
Interim Waiver to address these new
models.
The Department’s regulations provide
that the Assistant Secretary will grant a
petition for waiver upon ‘‘determination
that the basic model for which the
waiver was requested contains a design
characteristic which either prevents
testing of the basic model according to
the prescribed test procedures, or the
prescribed test procedures may evaluate
the basic model in a manner so
unrepresentative of its true energy
consumption characteristics as to
provide materially inaccurate
comparative data.’’ 4
Electrolux respectfully submits that
sufficient grounds exist for the Assistant
Secretary to grant this Petition on both
points. First, the refrigerator energy test
procedure does not allow the energy
used by Electrolux’s new refrigerator to
be accurately calculated. The new
refrigerator contains adaptive anti-sweat
heaters (i.e., anti-sweat heaters that
respond to humidity conditions found
in consumers’ homes). Since the test
conditions specified by the test
procedure neither define required
humidity conditions nor otherwise take
ambient humidity conditions into
account in calculating energy
consumption, the adaptive feature of
Electrolux’s new refrigerator models
cannot be properly tested.
Second, testing Electrolux’s new
refrigerator models according to the test
procedure would provide results that do
Energy Residential Refrigerator and RefrigeratorFreezer Test Procedures, 74 Fed. Reg. 26,853 (June
4, 2009).
3 10 CFR § 430.27(m).
4 10 CFR § 430.27(l).
E:\FR\FM\15DEN1.SGM
15DEN1
66347
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 239 / Tuesday, December 15, 2009 / Notices
not accurately measure the energy used
by the new refrigerator.
A. The Refrigerator Energy Test
Procedure
The test procedure for calculating
energy consumption specifies that the
test chamber must be maintained at 90°
Fahrenheit (‘‘F’’).5 This ambient
temperature is not typical of conditions
in most consumers’ homes. Rather, it is
intended to simulate the heat load of a
refrigerator in a 70 °F ambient with
typical usage by the consumer. But the
test procedure does not specify test
chamber humidity conditions. Sweat
occurs on refrigerators when specific
areas on the unit are below the local
dew point. Higher relative humidity
levels result in an increase of the dew
EI28BS36IW
EI28BS51IS
EI23BC51IB
E23BC78IPS
FGHB2846LM
FGHB2869LP
FGHN2879LF
point. Sweat has been addressed by
installing anti-sweat heaters on
mullions and other locations where
sweat accumulates. Previous anti-sweat
heaters operated at a fixed amount of
power, and turned on or off regardless
of the humidity or amount of sweat on
the unit.
B. Electrolux’s Proposed Modifications
The circumstances of this petition are
similar to those in the Department’s
earlier decisions granting waiver
petitions, including the 2001 waiver
granted in In the Matter of Electrolux
Home Appliances.6 The test procedure
at issue in Electrolux’s 2001 waiver
request was originally developed when
simple mechanical defrost timers were
the norm. Accordingly, Electrolux
EI28BS36IB
EI23BC36IW
EI23BC51IS
FGHB2844LP
FGHN2844LP
FGHB2869LE
FPHB2899LF
As with the models covered by the
prior petition, Electrolux proposes to
run the energy-consumption test with
the anti-sweat heater switch in the ‘‘off’’
position and then, because the test
chamber is not humidity-controlled, to
add to that result the kilowatt hours per
day derived by calculating the energy
used when the anti-sweat heater is in
the ‘‘on’’ position. This contribution
will be calculated by the same method
that was proposed by GE and Whirlpool
EI28BS36IS
EI23BC36IB
E23BC58JSS
FGHB2844LE
FGHN2844LE
FGHB2879LF
FPHN2899LF
sought a test procedure waiver to
accommodate its advanced defrost
timer. The Assistant Secretary, in
granting the waiver, acknowledged the
role of technology advances in
evaluating the need for test procedure
waivers. With this current petition,
Electrolux again seeks to change how it
tests its new models to take into account
advances in sensing technology, i.e.,
sensors that detect temperature and
humidity conditions and interact with
controls to vary the effective wattage of
anti-sweat heaters to evaporate excess
sweat.
The Electrolux models, with the antisweat technology, subject to this
Petition are:
EI28BS51IW
EI23BC36IS
E23BC58JPS
FGHB2844LM
FGHN2844LM
FGHN2869LP
in their Petitions for Waiver.7 The
objective of the proposed approach is to
simulate the average energy used by the
adaptive anti-sweat heaters as activated
in typical consumer households across
the United States.
In formulating its Petition, GE
conducted research to determine the
average humidity level experienced
across the United States. The result of
this research was that GE was able to
determine the probability that any U.S.
household would experience certain
humidity conditions during any month
of the year. This data was consolidated
into 10 bands each representing a 10%
range of relative humidity. In submitting
this Petition, Electrolux is confirming
the validity of using such bands to
represent the average humidity
experienced across the United States
and will adopt the same population
weighting as proposed by GE. The bands
proposed by GE are as follows:
% Relative humidity
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with NOTICES
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Probability
(percent)
...............................................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................................
Since system losses are involved with
operating anti-sweat heaters, Electrolux
proposes to include in the calculation a
factor to account for such energy. This
additional energy includes the electrical
energy required to operate the antisweat heater control and related
5 10
CFR Part 430, Subpart B, App. A1.
of the Application for Interim Waiver
and Publishing of the Petition for Waiver of
Electrolux Home Products from the DOE
Refrigerator and Refrigerator-Freezer Test
6 Granting
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:23 Dec 14, 2009
Jkt 220001
EI28BS51IB
EI23BC51IW
E23BC78ISS
FGHB2844LF
FGHN2844LF
FGHN2869LE
0–10
10–20
20–30
30–40
40–50
50–60
60–70
70–60
80–90
90–100
3.4
21.1
20.4
16.6
12.6
11.9
6.9
4.7
0.8
1.5
Constant
designation
A1
A2
A3
A4
A5
A6
A7
A8
A9
A10
components, and the additional energy
required to increase compressor run
time to remove heat introduced into the
refrigerator compartments by the antisweat heater. Based on Electrolux’s
experience, this ‘‘System-loss Factor’’ is
1.3. Simply stated, the Correction Factor
that Electrolux proposes to add to the
energy-consumption test results
obtained with the anti-sweat heater
switch in the ‘‘off’’ position is
calculated as follows:
Procedure (Case No. RF–005), 66 Fed. Reg. 40,689
(Aug. 3, 2001).
7 Publication of the Petition for Waiver of General
Electric Company From the Department of Energy
Refrigerator and Refrigerator/Freezer Test
Procedures, 72 Fed. Reg. 19,189 (Apr. 17, 2007);
Publication of the Petition for Waiver of Whirlpool
Corporation From the Department of Energy
Refrigerator and Refrigerator/Freezer Test
Procedures, 73 Fed. Reg. 39,684 (July 10, 2008).
PO 00000
Frm 00076
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\15DEN1.SGM
15DEN1
66348
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 239 / Tuesday, December 15, 2009 / Notices
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with NOTICES
Correction Factor = (Anti-sweat Heater
Power μ System-loss Factor) μ (24
hours/1 day) μ (1 kW/1000 W)
Continue by calculating the national
average power in watts used by the antisweat heaters. This is done by totaling
the product of constants A1–A10
multiplied by the respective heater
watts used by a refrigerator operating in
the median percent relative humidity
for that band and the following standard
refrigerator conditions:
• ambient temperature of 72 °F;
• fresh food (FF) average temperature
of 45 °F; and
• freezer (FZ) average temperature of
5 °F.
Anti-sweat Heater Power = A1 * (Heater
Watts at 5% RH) + A2 *
(Heater Watts at 15% RH) + A3 *
(Heater Watts at 25% RH) + A4 *
(Heater Watts at 35% RH) + A5 *
(Heater Watts at 45% RH) + A6 *
(Heater Watts at 55% RH) + A7 *
(Heater Watts at 65% RH) + A8 *
(Heater Watts at 75% RH) + A9 *
(Heater Watts at 85% RH) + A10 *
(Heater Watts at 95% RH)
As explained above, bands A1–A10
were selected as representative of
humidity conditions in all U.S.
households. Utilizing such weighed
bands will allow the calculation of the
national average energy consumption
for each product.
Based on the above, Electrolux
proposes to test its new models as if the
test procedure were modified to
calculate the energy of the unit with the
anti-sweat heaters in the on position as
equal to the energy of the unit tested
with the anti-sweat heaters in the off
position plus the Anti-Sweat Heater
Power times the System Loss Factor
(expressed in KWH/YR).
II. Application for Interim Waiver
Pursuant to Department regulations,
the Assistant Secretary will grant an
Interim Waiver ‘‘if it is determined that
the applicant will experience economic
hardship if the Application for Interim
Waiver is denied, if it appears likely
that the Petition for Waiver will be
granted, and/or the Assistant Secretary
determines that it would be desirable for
public policy reasons to grant
immediate relief pending a
determination on the Petition for
Waiver.’’ 8
Although Electrolux would not
experience economic hardship without
a waiver of the test procedures—indeed,
the alternate test procedure imposes an
energy penalty—the DOE letter granting
the Electrolux Interim Waiver
recognized that:
8 10
CFR. § 430.27(g).
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:23 Dec 14, 2009
* * * public policy would favor
granting Electrolux an Interim Waiver,
pending determination of the Petition
for Waiver. On February 27, 2008, DOE
granted the General Electric Company
(‘‘GE’’) a waiver from the refrigeratorfreezer test procedure because it takes
neither ambient humidity nor adaptive
technology into account. 73 FR 10425.
The test procedure would not accurately
represent the energy consumption of
refrigerator-freezers containing relative
humidity sensors and adaptive control
anti-sweat heaters. This argument is
equally applicable to Electrolux, which
has products containing similar relative
humidity sensors and anti-sweat
heaters. Electrolux is seeking a very
similar waiver to the one DOE granted
to GE, with the same alternate test
procedure, and it is very likely
Electrolux’s Petition for Waiver will be
granted.
As Electrolux noted in its November 6,
2008, Petition for Waiver and
Application for Interim Waiver, the
Company could have designed its
adaptive anti-sweat system so that the
anti-sweat heaters showed no impact
during energy testing. However, like GE
and Whirlpool Corporation, Electrolux
is following the intent of the regulations
to more accurately represent the energy
consumed by the new refrigerators
when used in the home. Moreover, the
adaptive anti-sweat system in the
Electrolux models referenced above is
identical or similar to those addressed
by the March 3, 2009 Interim Waiver
granted to Electrolux by the Department,
and June 4, 2009, Federal Register
notice.9 Accordingly, Electrolux
respectfully submits that sufficient
grounds exist for the Assistant Secretary
to grant the Electrolux Application for
Interim Waiver.
III. Conclusion
Electrolux urges the Assistant
Secretary to grant its Petition for Waiver
and Application for Interim Waiver to
allow Electrolux to test its new
refrigerator models as noted above.
Granting Electrolux’s Petition for
Waiver will encourage the introduction
of advanced technologies while
providing proper consideration of
energy consumption.
IV. Affected Persons
Primarily affected persons in the
refrigerator-freezer category include
BSH Home Appliances Corp. (BoschSiemens Hausgerate GmbH), Equator,
Fisher & Paykel Appliances Inc., GE
Appliances, Haier America Trading,
L.L.C., Heartland Appliances, Inc.,
9 See
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
supra note 2.
Frm 00077
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Liebherr Hausgerate, LG Electronics
Inc., Northland Corporation, Samsung
Electronics America, Inc., Sanyo Fisher
Company, Sears, Sub-Zero Freezer
Company, U-Line, Viking Range, W. C.
Wood Company, and Whirlpool
Corporation. The Association of Home
Appliance Manufacturers is also
generally interested in energy efficiency
requirements for appliances. Electrolux
will notify all these entities as required
by the Department’s rules and provide
them with a version of this Petition.
Sincerely,
Sheila A. Millar
cc: Michael Raymond, DOE Office of Energy
Efficiency and Renewable Energy
[FR Doc. E9–29787 Filed 12–14–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Environmental Management SiteSpecific Advisory Board, Portsmouth
Department of Energy (DOE).
Notice of open meeting.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: This notice announces a
meeting of the Environmental
Management Site-Specific Advisory
Board (EM SSAB), Portsmouth. The
Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub.
L. 92–463, 86 Stat. 770) requires that
public notice of this meeting be
announced in the Federal Register.
DATES: Thursday, January 7, 2010, 6
p.m.
ADDRESSES: Ohio State University,
South Center Auditorium, 1864 Shyville
Road, Piketon, Ohio 45661.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joel
Bradburne, Deputy Designated Federal
Officer, Department of Energy,
Portsmouth/Paducah Project Office, Post
Office Box 700, Piketon, Ohio 45661,
(740) 897–3822,
Joel.Bradburne@lex.doe.gov.
Purpose of
the Board: The purpose of the Board is
to make recommendations to DOE in the
areas of environmental restoration,
waste management and related
activities.
Tentative Agenda:
• Call to Order, Introductions, Review
of Agenda
• Approval of November Minutes
• Deputy Designated Federal Officer’s
Comments
• Federal Coordinator’s Comments
• Liaisons’ Comments
• Administrative Issues—Actions:
Æ Subcommittee Updates
Æ Request an End Use Study for
Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\15DEN1.SGM
15DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 239 (Tuesday, December 15, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 66344-66348]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-29787]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Case No. RF-010]
Energy Conservation Program for Consumer Products: Notice of
Petition for Waiver of Electrolux Home Products, Inc. From the
Department of Energy Residential Refrigerator and Refrigerator-Freezer
Test Procedure, and Modification of Interim Waiver
AGENCY: Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Department of
Energy.
ACTION: Notice of petition for waiver, notice of modification of
interim waiver, and request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This notice announces receipt of and publishes the Electrolux
Home Products, Inc. (Electrolux) Petition for Waiver (hereafter,
``Petition'') from parts of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) test
procedure for determining the energy consumption of electric
refrigerators and refrigerator-freezers. Today's notice also modifies
an interim waiver of the test procedures applicable to residential
refrigerator-freezers by extending it to additional Electrolux basic
models. Through this document, DOE is soliciting comments with respect
to the Electrolux Petition.
DATES: DOE will accept comments, data, and information with respect to
the Electrolux Petition until, but no later than January 14, 2010.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by case number ``RF-
010,'' by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
E-mail: AS_Waiver_Requests@ee.doe.gov Include either the
case number [Case No. RF-010], and/or ``Electrolux Petition'' in the
subject line of the message.
Mail: Ms. Brenda Edwards, U.S. Department of Energy,
Building Technologies Program, Mailstop EE-2J/1000 Independence Avenue,
SW., Washington, DC 20585-0121. Telephone: (202) 586-2945. Please
submit one signed original paper copy.
Hand Delivery/Courier: Ms. Brenda Edwards, U.S. Department
of Energy, Building Technologies Program, 950 L'Enfant Plaza, SW.,
Suite 600, Washington, DC 20024. Please submit one signed original
paper copy.
Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name
and case number for this proceeding. Submit electronic comments in
WordPerfect, Microsoft Word, Portable Document Format (PDF), or text
(American Standard Code for Information Interchange (ASCII)) file
format and avoid the use of special characters or any form of
encryption. Wherever possible, include the electronic signature of the
author. DOE does not accept telefacsimiles (faxes).
Any person submitting written comments must also send a copy of
such comments to the petitioner, pursuant to 10 CFR 431.401(d). The
contact information for the petitioner is: Ms. Sheila A. Millar, Keller
and Heckman, LLP, 1001 G Street, NW., Washington, DC 20001. Telephone:
(202) 434-4100.
E-mail: millar@khlaw.com.
According to 10 CFR 1004.11, any person submitting information that
he or she believes to be confidential and exempt by law from public
disclosure should submit two copies to DOE: One copy of the document
including all the information believed to be confidential, and one copy
of the document with the information believed to be confidential
deleted. DOE will make its own determination about the confidential
status of the information and treat it according to its determination.
Docket: For access to the docket to review the background documents
relevant to this matter, you may visit the U.S. Department of Energy,
950 L'Enfant Plaza, SW, (Resource Room of the Building Technologies
Program), Washington, DC 20024; (202) 586-2945, between 9 a.m. and 4
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Available
documents include the following items: (1) This notice; (2) public
comments received; (3) the Petition for Waiver and Application for
Interim Waiver; and (4) prior DOE rulemakings regarding similar central
air conditioning and heat pump equipment. Please call Ms. Brenda
Edwards at the above telephone number for additional information
regarding visiting the Resource Room.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Michael G. Raymond, U.S.
Department of Energy, Building Technologies Program, Mail Stop EE-2J,
Forrestal Building, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC
20585-0121. Telephone: (202) 586-9611. E-mail:
Michael.Raymond@ee.doe.gov.
Ms. Francine Pinto or Mr. Michael Kido, U.S. Department of Energy,
Office of the General Counsel, Mail Stop GC-71, Forrestal Building,
1000
[[Page 66345]]
Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20585-0103. Telephone: (202)
586-8145. E-mail: Francine.Pinto@hq.doe.gov or Michael.Kido@hq.doe.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
On November 6, 2008, Electrolux filed a Petition for Waiver and
Application for Interim Waiver from the test procedure applicable to
residential electric refrigerators and refrigerator-freezers set forth
in 10 CFR Part 430, subpart B, appendix A1. The products covered by the
petition employ adaptive anti-sweat heaters, which detect and respond
to temperature and humidity conditions, and then activate adaptive
heaters as needed to evaporate excess moisture. DOE granted
Electrolux's Application for Interim Waiver on March 3, 2009. On June
4, 2009, DOE published Electrolux's Petition for Waiver for residential
refrigerator-freezers with adaptive anti-sweat heaters in the Federal
Register. 74 FR 26853. Following a March 24, 2009, request from
Electrolux, the June 4, 2009, Federal Register notice also expanded the
Interim Waiver to cover four additional models.
II. Petition for Waiver of Test Procedure and Modified Interim Waiver
On July 13, 2009, Electrolux informed DOE that after it filed its
Petition for Waiver in November 2008, it developed additional basic
models with adaptive anti-sweat heater technology. Electrolux asserted
that these new products are identical in function and operation to the
basic models listed in Electrolux's November 2008 petition with respect
to the properties that made those products eligible for a waiver.
Therefore, Electrolux requested that DOE add these models to the list
of basic models for which the interim waiver was granted. In addition,
Electrolux requested that DOE grant a new Waiver for these additional
basic models. The following additional products are covered by the July
2009 waiver request:
EI28BS36IW EI28BS36IB EI28BS36IS EI28BS51IW EI28BS51IB
EI28BS51IS EI23BC36IW EI23BC36IB EI23BC36IS EI23BC51IW
EI23BC51IB EI23BC51IS E23BC58JSS E23BC58JPS E23BC78ISS
E23BC78IPS FGHB2844LP FGHB2844LE FGHB2844LM FGHB2844LF
FGHB2846LM FGHN2844LP FGHN2844LE FGHN2844LM FGHN2844LF
FGHB2869LP FGHB2869LE FGHB2879LF FGHN2869LP FGHN2869LE
FGHN2879LF FPHB2899LF FPHN2899LF ..................... ....................
DOE notes that Electrolux's July 2009 petition to extend its
Interim Waiver and Petition for Waiver also contains an alternate test
procedure that addresses the treatment of products equipped with
adaptive anti-sweat heaters. The alternate test procedure submitted in
the July 2009 petition is identical to the one contained in
Electrolux's November 6, 2008 Petition. Accordingly, for the same
reasons cited in its grant of the November 2008 interim waiver
request--i.e. similarity between the type of products covered by the
Electrolux petitions and the type addressed in a waiver previously
granted to General Electric Company--DOE is extending that interim
waiver to cover the new products addressed in Electrolux's July 2009
petition. See also 74 FR 26854 (citing 72 FR 10425 (Feb. 27, 2008)).
III. Alternate Test Procedure
During the duration of the interim waiver, Electrolux shall be
required to test the products listed above according to the test
procedures for electric refrigerator-freezers prescribed by DOE at 10
CFR Part 430, Appendix A1, except that, for the Electrolux products
listed above only:
(A) The following definition is added at the end of Section 1:
1.13 ``Variable anti-sweat heater control'' means an anti-sweat
heater where power supplied to the device is determined by an operating
condition variable(s) and/or ambient condition variable(s).
(B) Section 2.2 is revised to read as follows:
2.2 Operational conditions. The electric refrigerator or electric
refrigerator-freezer shall be installed and its operating conditions
maintained in accordance with HRF-1-1979, section 7.2 through section
7.4.3.3. except that the vertical ambient temperature gradient at
locations 10 inches (25.4 cm) out from the centers of the two sides of
the unit being tested is to be maintained during the test. Unless
shields or baffles obstruct the area, the gradient is to be maintained
from 2 inches (5.1 cm) above the floor or supporting platform to a
height one foot (30.5 cm) above the unit under test. Defrost controls
are to be operative. The anti-sweat heater switch is to be ``off''
during one test and ``on'' during the second test. In the case of an
electric refrigerator-freezer equipped with variable anti-sweat heater
control, the ``on'' test will be the result of the calculation
described in 6.2.3. Other exceptions are noted in 2.3, 2.4, and 5.1
below.
(C) New section 6.2.3 is inserted after section 6.2.2.2.
6.2.3 Variable anti-sweat heater control test. The energy
consumption of an electric refrigerator-freezer with a variable anti-
sweat heater control in the ``on'' position (Eon), expressed
in kilowatt-hours per day, shall be calculated equivalent to:
EON = E + (Correction Factor)
Where E is determined by 6.2.1.1, 6.2.1.2, 6.2.2.1, or 6.2.2.2,
whichever is appropriate, with the anti-sweat heater switch in the
``off'' position.
Correction Factor = (Anti-sweat Heater Power x System-loss Factor) x
(24 hrs/1 day) x (1 kW/1000 W)
Where:
Anti-sweat Heater Power
= A1 * (Heater Watts at 5%RH)
+ A2 * (Heater Watts at 15%RH)
+ A3 * (Heater Watts at 25%RH)
+ A4 * (Heater Watts at 35%RH)
+ A5 * (Heater Watts at 45%RH)
+ A6 * (Heater Watts at 55%RH)
+ A7 * (Heater Watts at 65%RH)
+ A8 * (Heater Watts at 75%RH)
+ A9 * (Heater Watts at 85%RH)
+ A10 * (Heater Watts at 95%RH)
Where A1-A10 are from the following table:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------
A1 = 0.034 A6 = 0.119
A2 = 0.211 A7 = 0.069
A3 = 0.204 A8 = 0.047
A4 = 0.166 A9 = 0.008
A5 = 0.126 A10 = 0.015
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Heater Watts at a specific relative humidity = the nominal watts used
by all heaters at that specific relative humidity, 72 [deg]F ambient,
and DOE reference temperatures of fresh food (FF) average temperature
of 45 [deg]F and freezer (FZ) average temperature of 5 [deg]F.
System-loss Factor = 1.3
IV. Summary and Request for Comments
The Department has reviewed Electrolux's Petition and its request
to extend its Interim Waiver to additional models. The list of
additional models does not reflect any changes to the models listed in
Electrolux's November
[[Page 66346]]
2008 Petition with respect to the properties making them eligible for a
waiver, which involved the accuracy of the test procedure as applied to
this new technology. Given that the modified list does not change in
any way the basis for granting the interim waiver, DOE finds that it is
appropriate that the Interim Waiver granted on March 3 and extended on
June 4, 2009, apply to the additional models listed in this Petition.
Accordingly, DOE extends these prior grants of Interim Waivers to the
models listed in this Petition.
Through today's notice, DOE announces receipt of Electrolux's
Petition for Waiver from certain parts of the test procedure that apply
to additional basic models of refrigerators and refrigerator-freezers
with variable anti-sweat heater controls and adaptive heaters
manufactured by Electrolux. DOE is publishing Electrolux's Petition for
Waiver in its entirety pursuant to 10 CFR 430.27(b)(1)(iv). The
Petition contains no confidential information. The Petition includes a
suggested alternate test procedure and calculation methodology to
determine the energy consumption of Electrolux's specified
refrigerators and refrigerator-freezers with adaptive anti-sweat
heaters. DOE is interested in receiving comments from interested
parties on all aspects of the Petition, including the suggested
alternate test procedure and calculation methodology. Pursuant to 10
CFR 430.27(b)(1)(iv), any person submitting written comments to DOE
must also send a copy of such comments to the petitioner, whose contact
information is included in the ADDRESSES section above.
Issued in Washington, DC, on December 8, 2009.
Cathy Zoi,
Assistant Secretary, Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.
Writer's Direct Access
Sheila A. Millar
(202) 434-4143
millar@khlaw.com
July 13, 2009
Via Overnight Delivery
The Honorable Catherine Zoi
Assistant Secretary
Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy
U.S. Department of Energy
Mail Station EE-10
Forrestal Building
1000 Independence Avenue, SW
Washington, DC 20585-0121
Re: Petition for Waiver and Application for Interim Waiver from the
Department of Energy Residential Refrigerator and Refrigerator-Freezer
Test Procedures by Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Dear Secretary Zoi:
On behalf of our client, Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
(``Electrolux''), we respectfully submit this Petition for Waiver and
Application for Interim Waiver requesting exemption by the Department
of Energy from certain parts of the test procedure for determining
refrigerator-freezer energy consumption under 10 C.F.R. Sec. 430.27.
The requested waiver will allow Electrolux to test its refrigerator-
freezer to the amended procedure set out by this petition.
This petition for waiver contains no confidential business
information and may be released pursuant to Freedom of Information Act
requests.
I. Petition for Waiver
Electrolux seeks the Department's approval of this proposed
amendment to the refrigerator test procedure to be assured of properly
calculating the energy consumption and properly labeling its new
refrigerator. On February 27, 2008 and May 5, 2009, the Department
granted Petitions for Waiver filed respectively by General Electric
Corporation (``GE'') and Whirlpool Corporation (``Whirlpool'') to
establish a new methodology to calculate the energy consumption of a
refrigerator-freezer when such a product contains adaptive anti-sweat
heaters.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Decision and Order Granting a Waiver to the General Electric
Company From the Department of Energy Residential Refrigerator and
Refrigerator-Freezer Test Procedure (Case No. RF-007), 73 Fed. Reg.
10,425; Energy Conservation Program for Consumer Products: Decision
and Order Granting a Waiver to Whirlpool Corporation From the
Department of Energy Residential Refrigerator and Refrigerator-
Freezer Test Procedure, 74 Fed. Reg. 20,695.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Electrolux has developed its own adaptive anti-sweat system that
uses a humidity sensor to operate the anti-sweat heaters. On November
6, 2008, Electrolux filed a Petition for Waiver and Application for
Interim Waiver from the test procedure applicable to residential
electric refrigerators and refrigerator-freezers. Having determined
that Electrolux is seeking a waiver similar to the one granted to GE,
and that the Electrolux Petition is likely to be granted, the
Department on March 3, 2009, granted Electrolux an Interim Waiver,
which was expanded on June 4, 2009, to cover four additional models.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ See Publication of the Petition for Waiver and Notice of
Granting the Application for Interim Waiver of Electrolux From the
Department of Energy Residential Refrigerator and Refrigerator-
Freezer Test Procedures, 74 Fed. Reg. 26,853 (June 4, 2009).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Department regulations make clear that once a waiver has been
granted, the Department must take steps to incorporate the new
procedure and eliminate the need for continuing waivers:
Within one year of the granting of any waiver, the Department of Energy
will publish in the Federal Register a notice of proposed rulemaking to
amend its regulations so as to eliminate any need for the continuation
of such waiver. As soon thereafter as practicable, the Department of
Energy will publish in the Federal Register a final rule. Such waiver
will terminate on the effective date of such final rule.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ 10 CFR Sec. 430.27(m).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In the interim, however, Electrolux is developing and planning to
shortly introduce into the marketplace new models that use the
identical adaptive anti-sweat system addressed by the March 3, 2009
Interim Waiver. Accordingly, Electrolux is filing this Petition for
Waiver and Application for Interim Waiver to address these new models.
The Department's regulations provide that the Assistant Secretary
will grant a petition for waiver upon ``determination that the basic
model for which the waiver was requested contains a design
characteristic which either prevents testing of the basic model
according to the prescribed test procedures, or the prescribed test
procedures may evaluate the basic model in a manner so unrepresentative
of its true energy consumption characteristics as to provide materially
inaccurate comparative data.'' \4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ 10 CFR Sec. 430.27(l).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Electrolux respectfully submits that sufficient grounds exist for
the Assistant Secretary to grant this Petition on both points. First,
the refrigerator energy test procedure does not allow the energy used
by Electrolux's new refrigerator to be accurately calculated. The new
refrigerator contains adaptive anti-sweat heaters (i.e., anti-sweat
heaters that respond to humidity conditions found in consumers' homes).
Since the test conditions specified by the test procedure neither
define required humidity conditions nor otherwise take ambient humidity
conditions into account in calculating energy consumption, the adaptive
feature of Electrolux's new refrigerator models cannot be properly
tested.
Second, testing Electrolux's new refrigerator models according to
the test procedure would provide results that do
[[Page 66347]]
not accurately measure the energy used by the new refrigerator.
A. The Refrigerator Energy Test Procedure
The test procedure for calculating energy consumption specifies
that the test chamber must be maintained at 90[deg] Fahrenheit
(``F'').\5\ This ambient temperature is not typical of conditions in
most consumers' homes. Rather, it is intended to simulate the heat load
of a refrigerator in a 70 [deg]F ambient with typical usage by the
consumer. But the test procedure does not specify test chamber humidity
conditions. Sweat occurs on refrigerators when specific areas on the
unit are below the local dew point. Higher relative humidity levels
result in an increase of the dew point. Sweat has been addressed by
installing anti-sweat heaters on mullions and other locations where
sweat accumulates. Previous anti-sweat heaters operated at a fixed
amount of power, and turned on or off regardless of the humidity or
amount of sweat on the unit.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ 10 CFR Part 430, Subpart B, App. A1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Electrolux's Proposed Modifications
The circumstances of this petition are similar to those in the
Department's earlier decisions granting waiver petitions, including the
2001 waiver granted in In the Matter of Electrolux Home Appliances.\6\
The test procedure at issue in Electrolux's 2001 waiver request was
originally developed when simple mechanical defrost timers were the
norm. Accordingly, Electrolux sought a test procedure waiver to
accommodate its advanced defrost timer. The Assistant Secretary, in
granting the waiver, acknowledged the role of technology advances in
evaluating the need for test procedure waivers. With this current
petition, Electrolux again seeks to change how it tests its new models
to take into account advances in sensing technology, i.e., sensors that
detect temperature and humidity conditions and interact with controls
to vary the effective wattage of anti-sweat heaters to evaporate excess
sweat.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ Granting of the Application for Interim Waiver and
Publishing of the Petition for Waiver of Electrolux Home Products
from the DOE Refrigerator and Refrigerator-Freezer Test Procedure
(Case No. RF-005), 66 Fed. Reg. 40,689 (Aug. 3, 2001).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Electrolux models, with the anti-sweat technology, subject to
this Petition are:
EI28BS36IW EI28BS36IB EI28BS36IS EI28BS51IW EI28BS51IB
EI28BS51IS EI23BC36IW EI23BC36IB EI23BC36IS EI23BC51IW
EI23BC51IB EI23BC51IS E23BC58JSS E23BC58JPS E23BC78ISS
E23BC78IPS FGHB2844LP FGHB2844LE FGHB2844LM FGHB2844LF
FGHB2846LM FGHN2844LP FGHN2844LE FGHN2844LM FGHN2844LF
FGHB2869LP FGHB2869LE FGHB2879LF FGHN2869LP FGHN2869LE
FGHN2879LF FPHB2899LF FPHN2899LF ..................... ....................
As with the models covered by the prior petition, Electrolux
proposes to run the energy-consumption test with the anti-sweat heater
switch in the ``off'' position and then, because the test chamber is
not humidity-controlled, to add to that result the kilowatt hours per
day derived by calculating the energy used when the anti-sweat heater
is in the ``on'' position. This contribution will be calculated by the
same method that was proposed by GE and Whirlpool in their Petitions
for Waiver.\7\ The objective of the proposed approach is to simulate
the average energy used by the adaptive anti-sweat heaters as activated
in typical consumer households across the United States.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ Publication of the Petition for Waiver of General Electric
Company From the Department of Energy Refrigerator and Refrigerator/
Freezer Test Procedures, 72 Fed. Reg. 19,189 (Apr. 17, 2007);
Publication of the Petition for Waiver of Whirlpool Corporation From
the Department of Energy Refrigerator and Refrigerator/Freezer Test
Procedures, 73 Fed. Reg. 39,684 (July 10, 2008).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In formulating its Petition, GE conducted research to determine the
average humidity level experienced across the United States. The result
of this research was that GE was able to determine the probability that
any U.S. household would experience certain humidity conditions during
any month of the year. This data was consolidated into 10 bands each
representing a 10% range of relative humidity. In submitting this
Petition, Electrolux is confirming the validity of using such bands to
represent the average humidity experienced across the United States and
will adopt the same population weighting as proposed by GE. The bands
proposed by GE are as follows:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% Relative humidity Probability Constant
(percent) designation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1..................................................... 0-10 3.4 A1
2..................................................... 10-20 21.1 A2
3..................................................... 20-30 20.4 A3
4..................................................... 30-40 16.6 A4
5..................................................... 40-50 12.6 A5
6..................................................... 50-60 11.9 A6
7..................................................... 60-70 6.9 A7
8..................................................... 70-60 4.7 A8
9..................................................... 80-90 0.8 A9
10..................................................... 90-100 1.5 A10
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Since system losses are involved with operating anti-sweat heaters,
Electrolux proposes to include in the calculation a factor to account
for such energy. This additional energy includes the electrical energy
required to operate the anti-sweat heater control and related
components, and the additional energy required to increase compressor
run time to remove heat introduced into the refrigerator compartments
by the anti-sweat heater. Based on Electrolux's experience, this
``System-loss Factor'' is 1.3. Simply stated, the Correction Factor
that Electrolux proposes to add to the energy-consumption test results
obtained with the anti-sweat heater switch in the ``off'' position is
calculated as follows:
[[Page 66348]]
Correction Factor = (Anti-sweat Heater Power x System-loss Factor) x
(24 hours/1 day) x (1 kW/1000 W)
Continue by calculating the national average power in watts used by
the anti-sweat heaters. This is done by totaling the product of
constants A1-A10 multiplied by the respective heater watts used by a
refrigerator operating in the median percent relative humidity for that
band and the following standard refrigerator conditions:
ambient temperature of 72 [deg]F;
fresh food (FF) average temperature of 45 [deg]F; and
freezer (FZ) average temperature of 5 [deg]F.
Anti-sweat Heater Power = A1 * (Heater Watts at 5% RH) + A2 *
(Heater Watts at 15% RH) + A3 * (Heater Watts at 25% RH) + A4 *
(Heater Watts at 35% RH) + A5 * (Heater Watts at 45% RH) + A6 *
(Heater Watts at 55% RH) + A7 * (Heater Watts at 65% RH) + A8 *
(Heater Watts at 75% RH) + A9 * (Heater Watts at 85% RH) + A10 *
(Heater Watts at 95% RH)
As explained above, bands A1-A10 were selected as representative of
humidity conditions in all U.S. households. Utilizing such weighed
bands will allow the calculation of the national average energy
consumption for each product.
Based on the above, Electrolux proposes to test its new models as
if the test procedure were modified to calculate the energy of the unit
with the anti-sweat heaters in the on position as equal to the energy
of the unit tested with the anti-sweat heaters in the off position plus
the Anti-Sweat Heater Power times the System Loss Factor (expressed in
KWH/YR).
II. Application for Interim Waiver
Pursuant to Department regulations, the Assistant Secretary will
grant an Interim Waiver ``if it is determined that the applicant will
experience economic hardship if the Application for Interim Waiver is
denied, if it appears likely that the Petition for Waiver will be
granted, and/or the Assistant Secretary determines that it would be
desirable for public policy reasons to grant immediate relief pending a
determination on the Petition for Waiver.'' \8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ 10 CFR. Sec. 430.27(g).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Although Electrolux would not experience economic hardship without
a waiver of the test procedures--indeed, the alternate test procedure
imposes an energy penalty--the DOE letter granting the Electrolux
Interim Waiver recognized that:
* * * public policy would favor granting Electrolux an Interim
Waiver, pending determination of the Petition for Waiver. On February
27, 2008, DOE granted the General Electric Company (``GE'') a waiver
from the refrigerator-freezer test procedure because it takes neither
ambient humidity nor adaptive technology into account. 73 FR 10425. The
test procedure would not accurately represent the energy consumption of
refrigerator-freezers containing relative humidity sensors and adaptive
control anti-sweat heaters. This argument is equally applicable to
Electrolux, which has products containing similar relative humidity
sensors and anti-sweat heaters. Electrolux is seeking a very similar
waiver to the one DOE granted to GE, with the same alternate test
procedure, and it is very likely Electrolux's Petition for Waiver will
be granted.
As Electrolux noted in its November 6, 2008, Petition for Waiver and
Application for Interim Waiver, the Company could have designed its
adaptive anti-sweat system so that the anti-sweat heaters showed no
impact during energy testing. However, like GE and Whirlpool
Corporation, Electrolux is following the intent of the regulations to
more accurately represent the energy consumed by the new refrigerators
when used in the home. Moreover, the adaptive anti-sweat system in the
Electrolux models referenced above is identical or similar to those
addressed by the March 3, 2009 Interim Waiver granted to Electrolux by
the Department, and June 4, 2009, Federal Register notice.\9\
Accordingly, Electrolux respectfully submits that sufficient grounds
exist for the Assistant Secretary to grant the Electrolux Application
for Interim Waiver.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ See supra note 2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
III. Conclusion
Electrolux urges the Assistant Secretary to grant its Petition for
Waiver and Application for Interim Waiver to allow Electrolux to test
its new refrigerator models as noted above. Granting Electrolux's
Petition for Waiver will encourage the introduction of advanced
technologies while providing proper consideration of energy
consumption.
IV. Affected Persons
Primarily affected persons in the refrigerator-freezer category
include BSH Home Appliances Corp. (Bosch-Siemens Hausgerate GmbH),
Equator, Fisher & Paykel Appliances Inc., GE Appliances, Haier America
Trading, L.L.C., Heartland Appliances, Inc., Liebherr Hausgerate, LG
Electronics Inc., Northland Corporation, Samsung Electronics America,
Inc., Sanyo Fisher Company, Sears, Sub-Zero Freezer Company, U-Line,
Viking Range, W. C. Wood Company, and Whirlpool Corporation. The
Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers is also generally
interested in energy efficiency requirements for appliances. Electrolux
will notify all these entities as required by the Department's rules
and provide them with a version of this Petition.
Sincerely,
Sheila A. Millar
cc: Michael Raymond, DOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable
Energy
[FR Doc. E9-29787 Filed 12-14-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P