Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Ban on the Sale or Distribution of Pre-Charged Appliances, 66450-66467 [E9-29560]
Download as PDF
66450
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 239 / Tuesday, December 15, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
40 CFR Part 82
[EPA–HQ–OAR–2007–0163; FRL–9091–9]
RIN 2060–AN58
Protection of Stratospheric Ozone:
Ban on the Sale or Distribution of PreCharged Appliances
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES3
SUMMARY: This final rule bans the sale
or distribution of air-conditioning and
refrigeration appliances containing
HCFC–22, HCFC–142b, or blends
containing one or both of these
substances, beginning January 1, 2010.
In addition, EPA is banning the sale or
distribution of air-conditioning and
refrigeration appliance components that
are pre-charged with HCFC–22, HCFC–
142b, or blends containing one or both
of these controlled substances as the
refrigerant. These prohibitions apply
only to appliances and components
manufactured on or after January 1,
2010.
DATES: This final rule is effective on
January 1, 2010.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
No. HQ–OAR–2007–0163. All
documents in the docket are listed on
the https://www.regulations.gov Web
site. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
e.g., CBI or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically through
https://www.regulations.gov or in hard
copy at the Air and Radiation Docket;
EPA West; Room 3334; 1301
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington,
DC 20460. The Public Reading Room is
open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The telephone number for the
Public Reading Room is (202) 566–1744,
and the telephone number for the OAR
Docket is (202) 566–1742.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Julius Banks, EPA, Stratospheric
Protection Division, Office of
Atmospheric Programs, Office of Air
and Radiation (6205J), 1200
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20460, (202) 343–9870,
banks.julius@epa.gov.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
11:13 Dec 14, 2009
Jkt 220001
Under the
Montreal Protocol on Substances that
Deplete the Ozone Layer (Protocol), as
amended, the U.S. and other
industrialized countries that are Parties
to the Protocol have agreed to limit
production and consumption of
hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFCs) and
to phase out consumption in a step-wise
fashion over time, culminating in a
complete phaseout in 2030. Title VI of
the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990
(CAAA) authorizes EPA to promulgate
regulations to manage the consumption
and production of HCFCs until the total
phaseout in 2030. EPA promulgated
final regulations establishing an
allowance tracking system for HCFCs on
January 21, 2003 (68 FR 2820). These
regulations were amended on June 17,
2004 (69 FR 34024) and July 20, 2006
(71 FR 41163). This action establishes a
ban on sale or distribution in interstate
commerce of air-conditioning and
refrigeration appliances, as well as
appliance components that are precharged with HCFC–22, HCFC–142b, or
blends containing one or both of these
controlled substances. It does not,
however, affect the sale or distribution
of appliances or components
manufactured before January 1, 2010.
Section 553(d) of the Administrative
Procedure Act (APA), 5 U.S.C. Chapter
5, generally provides that rules may not
take effect earlier than 30 days after they
are published in the Federal Register.
EPA is issuing this final rule under
section 307(d)(1) of the Clean Air Act,
which states: ‘‘The provisions of section
553 through 557 * * * of Title 5 shall
not, except as expressly provided in this
section, apply to actions to which this
subsection applies.’’ Thus, section
553(d) of the APA does not apply to this
rule. EPA is nevertheless acting
consistently with the policies
underlying APA section 553(d) in
making this rule effective on January 1,
2010. APA section 553(d) provides an
exception for any action for which the
agency provides good cause found and
published within the rule. EPA finds
that there is good cause to make this
rule effective January 1, 2010. This final
rule accompanies a second rule,
‘‘Protection of Stratospheric Ozone:
Adjustments to the Allowance System
for Controlling HCFC Production,
Import, and Export’’ (EPA Docket: EPA–
HQ–OAR–2008–0496) which contains
interrelated requirements. The effective
date of the other rule is January 1, 2010.
Having two different effective dates for
the two rules would create a
discontinuity and potentially generate
confusion among the regulated
community. The interrelated nature of
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
the two rules is discussed in Section II
of the preamble.
Table of Contents
I. General Information
A. Does This Action Apply to Me?
B. Background
II. Final Action
A. Establishing 40 CFR Part 82, Subpart I
B. Authority To Prohibit Sale or
Distribution, or Offer for Sale or
Distribution, of Specific Types of
Appliances
C. Criteria and Conditions Established
Under § 615 of CAAA
D. Defining Air-Conditioning and
Refrigeration Appliances and PreCharged Appliance Components
i. Appliance
ii. Pre-Charged Appliance Component
iii. ‘‘Manufactured’’ and Date of
‘‘Manufacture’’
E. Ban on Sale or Distribution or Offer for
Sale or Distribution in Interstate
Commerce
i. Existing Inventories of Pre-Charged
Appliances and Components
Manufactured Prior to January 1, 2010
ii. Use of Recovered and Reclaimed HCFC–
22 and HCFC–142b
iii. Sale and Distribution of Appliances and
Components Without Refrigerant
iv. Imports and Exports of Pre-Charged
Appliances and Components
v. Transhipments of Pre-Charged
Appliances and Components
vi. Existing Contracts or Plans for PreCharged Appliances and Components
F. Costs Analysis and Small Business
Economic Impacts
i. What Are the Impacts On Stratospheric
Ozone Avoided through This Final
Action?
ii. What Factors Will Influence the Costs of
Pre-Charged Appliances Charged With
Substitutes?
iii. Impacts on the General Public
iv. Implications for Other Markets
v. In the Absence of This Action, Are There
Impacts Associated With Unequal
Treatment of Stakeholders?
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory
Planning and Review
B. Paperwork Reduction Act
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of
Children From Environmental Health &
Safety Risks
H. Executive Order 13211: Actions That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use
I. The National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act
J. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions
To Address Environmental Justice in
Minority Populations and Low-Income
Populations
K. The Congressional Review Act
E:\FR\FM\15DER3.SGM
15DER3
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 239 / Tuesday, December 15, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
66451
I. General Information
A. Does This Action Apply to Me?
This final rule will affect the
following categories:
Category
NAICS code
SIC code
Contractors and Servicing ............................................
Manufacturers of air conditioners and refrigerators .....
238220
333415
1711, 7623
3585
Air-Conditioning Equipment and Supplies Merchant
Wholesalers.
Electrical and Electronic Appliance, Television, and
Radio Set Merchant Wholesalers.
Importers of air conditioners and refrigerators .............
423730
5075
423620
5064
333415
3585
This table is not intended to be
exhaustive, but rather provides a guide
for readers regarding entities likely to be
regulated by this action. This table lists
the types of entities that EPA is now
aware potentially could be regulated by
this action. Other types of entities not
listed in this table could also be
affected. To determine whether your
facility, company, business
organization, or other entity is regulated
by this action, you should carefully
examine these regulations. If you have
questions regarding the applicability of
this action to a particular entity, consult
the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES3
B. Background
In 1973 chemists Frank Sherwood
Rowland and Mario Molina at the
University of California-Irvine began
studying the impacts of
chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) in the
earth’s atmosphere. They discovered
that CFC molecules were stable enough
to migrate to the stratosphere and that
the chorine atoms contained in these
molecules could cause the breakdown of
large amounts of ozone in the
stratosphere. The Toxic Substances
Control Act (TSCA), passed in 1976,
included regulatory authority over
CFCs. EPA’s first regulatory response to
the concerns for stratospheric ozone
protection resulted in a ban on CFC
aerosol propellants (43 FR 11301; March
17, 1978 and 43 FR 11318; March 17,
1978).
EPA followed this initial regulatory
approach with an Advance Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking (ANPRM) which
discussed a freeze on the production of
certain CFCs and a system of marketable
permits to allocate CFC consumption
among industries (45 FR 66726; October
7, 1980). EPA did not act immediately
on the 1980 ANPRM and was
subsequently sued by the Natural
Resources Defense Council (NRDC v.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
11:13 Dec 14, 2009
Jkt 220001
Examples of regulated entities
Plumbing, Heating, and Air-Conditioning Contractors.
Air-Conditioning Equipment and Commercial and Industrial Refrigeration Equipment Manufacturing.
Air-conditioning (condensing unit, compressors) merchant wholesalers.
Air-conditioning (room units) merchant wholesalers.
Air-Conditioning Equipment and Commercial and Industrial Refrigeration Equipment Manufacturing.
Thomas, No. 84–3587 (D.D.C.)) for
failure to regulate CFCs further. EPA
and NRDC settled the case and agreed
that EPA would propose further
regulatory controls on CFCs, or state the
reasons for deciding not to issue a
proposal, by December 1, 1987, and
would take final action by August 1,
1988.
On January 10, 1986 (51 FR 1257),
EPA published its Stratospheric Ozone
Protection Plan. That plan described the
analytic basis for supporting
negotiations for an international
agreement to control CFCs and for
reassessing the need for additional
domestic regulations of CFCs and other
ozone-depleting substances (ODS). The
United States participated in
negotiations organized by the United
Nations Environment Programme
(UNEP) to develop an international
agreement to protect stratospheric
ozone. These negotiations, preceded by
the 1985 signing of the Vienna
Convention, resulted in the signing of
the Montreal Protocol in 1987. The
United States ratified the Montreal
Protocol on April 21, 1988. In 1988,
EPA promulgated regulations
implementing the requirements of the
Montreal Protocol through a system of
tradable allowances under section
157(b) of the Clean Air Act as amended
in 1977. This section was subsequently
modified by the 1990 Amendments and
became CAA § 615. The Senate Report
on the 1990 Amendments, Senate Rep.
No. 101–228: ‘‘Authority of the
Administrator’’ notes that this section
‘‘is intended * * * to preserve the
authority and responsibility of the
Administrator as set forth in section 157
of the existing Clean Air Act,’’ although
the Conference report to the 1990 CAAA
is silent on this matter.
Since the CAAA were passed in 1990,
EPA has promulgated regulations based
on various provisions of Title VI. For
example, EPA has promulgated a
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
production and consumption phaseout
schedule that included a revised trading
regime for class I ODS, a production and
consumption phaseout schedule and
trading regime for class II ODS,
servicing requirements for airconditioning and refrigeration
appliances, bans on nonessential
products containing or manufactured
with ODS, and labeling requirements.
Concern for ozone layer protection
remains paramount for the global
community. In an effort to further
protect human health and the
environment, the Parties to the Montreal
Protocol adjusted the Montreal
Protocol’s phaseout schedule for HCFCs
in September 2007. The Parties agreed
that industrialized countries, including
the United States, would reduce
production and consumption of HCFCs
to 75 percent below the established
baseline in 2010, to 90 percent below
the established baseline in 2015, and to
99.5 percent in 2020—allowing for only
0.5 percent production and
consumption between 2020–2030 to be
used solely for servicing existing
appliances culminating in the terminal
phaseout in 2030. In addition, the
Parties adjusted the schedule for nonindustrialized countries by agreeing to
set production and consumption
baselines based on the average values
for 2009–2010 production and
consumption, respectively; to freeze
production and consumption in 2013;
and to add stepwise reductions as
follows: 10 percent below baselines in
2015, 35 percent below in 2020, 67.5
percent below in 2025 and allowing for
a servicing tail to average no more than
2.5 percent between 2030–2040 to be
used solely for servicing existing
appliances, culminating in the terminal
phaseout in 2040.
The requirements already established
at 40 CFR 82.16(c) make it unlawful to
produce or import HCFC–22 or HCFC–
142b on or after January 1, 2010, for use
E:\FR\FM\15DER3.SGM
15DER3
66452
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 239 / Tuesday, December 15, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
in refrigeration or air-conditioning
appliances manufactured on or after that
date. The practical result of this
provision is that effective January 1,
2010, domestic manufacturers of airconditioning and refrigeration
appliances will not be able to charge
newly manufactured appliances with
newly produced or imported HCFC–22
or HCFC–142b, and thus will not be
introducing new appliances containing
these substances into interstate
commerce.
II. Final Action
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES3
EPA is establishing regulations that
ban the sale or distribution or offer for
sale or distribution in interstate
commerce of all air-conditioning and
refrigeration appliances containing
HCFC–22, HCFC–142b, or blends
containing one or both of these
controlled substances1, beginning
January 1, 2010. The prohibition
includes fully assembled appliances
that are sold pre-charged with HCFC–22
or HCFC–142b (such as window airconditioning units), as well as
appliances that are field assembled with
HCFC–22 or HCFC–142b (such as
residential split systems and
supermarket refrigeration equipment).
This prohibition extends to imported
appliances as well as U.S. manufactured
appliances that are destined for export.
EPA is also banning the sale or
distribution in interstate commerce of
appliance components that are precharged with HCFC–22 or HCFC–142b
beginning January 1, 2010. The
prohibitions do not apply to pre-charged
appliances or pre-charged appliance
components that are manufactured prior
to January 1, 2010. Pre-charged
appliances and components that have
been manufactured prior to January 1,
2010 may be sold and distributed in
interstate commerce.
Refrigeration and air-conditioning
end-uses typically use a refrigerant in a
vapor compression cycle to cool and/or
dehumidify a substance or space, like a
refrigerator cabinet, room, office
building, or warehouse. HCFC–22 is a
popular refrigerant that is commonly
used in a variety of refrigeration and airconditioning equipment including
industrial and residential applications,
most of which are field installed and
charged on-site. HCFC–22 can be used
in a large range of equipment including:
Residential Uses
• Window air-conditioning units.
• Dehumidifiers.
1 Throughout this action, where EPA refers to
HCFC–22 or HCFC–142b, it also refers to blends
containing one or both of those HCFCs.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
11:13 Dec 14, 2009
Jkt 220001
•
•
•
•
•
Central air conditioners.
Air-to-air heat pumps.
Ground-source heat pumps.
Ductless air conditioners.
Chest or upright freezers.
Commercial and Industrial Uses
• Packaged air conditioners and heat
pumps.
• Chillers.
• Retail food refrigeration.
• Cold storage warehouses.
• Industrial process refrigeration.
• Refrigerated transport.
• Public transport (e.g., buses, trains,
subway air-conditioning).
HCFC–22 is often used as a
component in refrigerant blends that
contain several chemical compounds.
HCFC–22 refrigerant blends are used in
various industrial, commercial, and
residential end uses including: Retail
food refrigeration, cold storage
warehouses, industrial process
refrigeration (IPR), and transport
refrigeration appliances. As a
refrigerant, HCFC–142b is rarely used by
itself; it is generally a component of a
refrigerant blend. For example, R–401A
(Suva® MP39), R–406A (Autofrost
GHG–X3), R–414B (Hot Shot®), Freeze12TM are all refrigerant blends
containing HCFC–22 and/or HCFC–
142b.
Readers interested in substitutes for
ODS refrigerants should review the
Significant New Alternatives Policy
(SNAP) program which evaluates and
determines whether a substitute for an
ODS in a specific end-use may be used
safely in comparison to other available
substitutes. Section 612 authorizes EPA
to identify and publish lists of
acceptable and unacceptable substitutes
for class I or class II ozone-depleting
substances. EPA has determined that a
large number of alternatives are
acceptable because they provide limited
risk to human health and the
environment. The purpose of SNAP is to
allow a safe, smooth transition away
from ODS by identifying as acceptable
substitutes for those substances or
processes that offer lower overall risks
to human health and the environment
than the ODS they replace, and by
prohibiting substitutes that provide
significantly greater risk than other
substitutes that are available. Additional
information concerning substitutes
specifically for air-conditioning and
refrigeration applications can be found
at: https://www.epa.gov/ozone/snap/
refrigerants/.
This final rule does not restrict or
prohibit the sale of appliances
containing HCFC–22 or HCFC–142b as
blowing agents in closed cell insulation
foam. However, EPA has promulgated
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
SNAP Rule 13: The use of HCFC–22 and
HCFC–142b in foams/listing of ozone
depleting substitutes in foam blowing
(72 FR 14432), finding HCFC–22 and
HCFC–142b as unacceptable substitutes
for HCFC–141b in the manufacture of
commercial refrigeration, sandwich
panels, slabstock, and other ‘‘pour
foam’’ applications.
This final rule does not affect the
servicing of air-conditioning or
refrigeration appliances manufactured
prior to January 1, 2010. Servicing is
regulated under other authorities,
notably 40 CFR part 82 subpart F (i.e.,
section 608 regulations). Service and
repair of existing equipment using
HCFC–22 or HCFC–142b is not affected
by this final rule. EPA believes it is
necessary to continue to permit the
servicing of air-conditioning and
refrigeration appliances manufactured
prior to January 1, 2010, to ensure a
smooth transition to non-ODS
alternatives.
This final rule prohibits the sale or
distribution, and the offer for sale or
distribution, in interstate commerce of
air-conditioning and refrigeration
appliances and their components
containing HCFC–22 or HCFC–142b
beginning January 1, 2010. The ban
applies to appliances and components
manufactured on or after January 1,
2010, but not to appliances or
components manufactured before that
date. This final rule, combined with the
accompanying final rule titled
‘‘Protection of Stratospheric Ozone:
Adjustments to the Allowance System
for Controlling HCFC Production,
Import, and Export’’ (EPA Docket: EPA–
HQ–OAR–2008–0496) published
elsewhere in this issue of the Federal
Register, which we refer to below as the
‘‘allocation rulemaking,’’ will have the
following effects on the sale,
distribution, and installation of airconditioning and refrigeration products
charged with HCFC–22 or HCFC–142b.
• Sale and distribution of appliances
pre-charged with HCFC–22 or HCFC–
142b is allowed for self-contained,
factory-charged appliances such as precharged window units, packaged
terminal air conditioners (PTACs), and
some commercial refrigeration units, if
manufactured before January 1, 2010.
The pre-charged appliance rule does not
prohibit sale and distribution of pre2010 inventory (i.e., stockpiled
inventories).
• Sale and distribution of appliances
pre-charged with HCFC–22 or HCFC–
142b is not allowed for self-contained,
factory-charged appliances such as precharged window units, packaged
terminal air conditioners (PTACs), and
some commercial refrigeration units, if
E:\FR\FM\15DER3.SGM
15DER3
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 239 / Tuesday, December 15, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES3
manufactured on or after January 1,
2010. This prohibition, which is
contained in the pre-charged appliance
rule, applies regardless of when the
refrigerant was produced and whether it
is virgin or reclaimed.2 Under the
allocation rule, neither stockpiled
HCFC–22 produced prior to January 1,
2010, nor new HCFC–22 produced after
that date can be used to manufacture
new appliances on or after January 1,
2010.
• Sale and distribution of appliance
components pre-charged with HCFC–22
or HCFC–142b is allowed if the
components (e.g., condensing units, line
sets, and coils that are charged with
refrigerant) were manufactured before
January 1, 2010. The pre-charged
appliance rule does not prohibit sale
and distribution of pre-2010 inventory
(i.e., stockpiled inventories).
• Pre-charged appliance components
manufactured before January 1, 2010
may be used to service appliances
manufactured before January 1, 2010,
but may not be assembled to create new
appliances unless there is no use of
virgin HCFC–22 or HCFC–142b, in the
components or otherwise. The
allocation rule prohibits use of virgin
HCFC–22 and HCFC–142b in
manufacturing new appliances.
• There is no exemption from the precharged appliance rule for the sale or
distribution of pre-charged appliances
and pre-charged components that are
charged with reclaimed HCFC–22 or
HCFC–142b refrigerant. In other words,
the provisions banning sale and
distribution apply equally regardless of
whether the appliances or components
contain virgin or reclaimed refrigerant.
• Under the allocation rule, virgin
HCFC–22 and HCFC–142b may only be
used to service existing appliances.
Virgin HCFC–22 and HCFC–142b may
not be used to manufacture new precharged appliances or appliance
components. Virgin HCFC–22 and
HCFC–142b also may not be used to
charge new appliances assembled onsite
on or after January 1, 2010, though new
appliances (not pre-charged) may be
charged with reclaimed refrigerant.
• EPA is providing an exception to
the allocation rule that allows virgin
HCFC–22 to be used in the onsite
‘‘manufacture’’ of appliances for a
particular project between January 1,
2 At 40 CFR 82.152, EPA has defined reclaim
refrigerant to mean to reprocess refrigerant to all of
the specifications in appendix A to 40 CFR part 82,
subpart F (based on ARI Standard 700–1995,
Specification for Fluorocarbons and Other
Refrigerants) that are applicable to that refrigerant
and to verify that the refrigerant meets these
specifications using the analytical methodology
prescribed in section 5 of appendix A of 40 CFR
part 82, subpart F.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
11:13 Dec 14, 2009
Jkt 220001
2010, and December 31, 2011, if the
components have been specified for use
at that project under a building permit
or contract dated before January 1, 2010.
• Under the allocation rule, HCFC–22
produced prior to January 1, 2010, may
be used until January 1, 2015, for the
manufacture of thermostatic expansion
valves (TXVs).
• The sale and distribution of used
appliances is not affected by either rule.
A. Establishing 40 CFR Part 82, Subpart
I
Today’s final rule prohibits the sale or
distribution and the offer for sale or
distribution of pre-charged appliances
and appliance components in interstate
commerce in a new subpart I to 40 CFR
part 82. The new subpart is titled Ban
on Refrigeration and Air-Conditioning
Appliances Containing HCFCs. A new
subpart is warranted since existing
subparts dealing with the phaseout of
production and consumption of
controlled substances generally apply to
bulk substances and not finished goods.
As discussed in the NPRM, EPA
considered amending subpart C, since
that subpart includes a ban on the sale
and distribution of certain products
manufactured with or containing
HCFCs, as well as air-conditioning and
refrigeration appliances containing
CFCs as the refrigerant, but those
provisions were promulgated under
CAA section 610. Given that EPA is
using different authority for these
provisions and is structuring them
somewhat differently, EPA finds that for
ease of reference, these new provisions
should be housed in a new and easily
identifiable subpart in the CFR.
B. Authority To Prohibit Sale or
Distribution, or Offer for Sale or
Distribution, of Specific Types of
Appliances
EPA proposed to establish regulations
under authority of section 615 of the
Act, to take effect January 1, 2010, that
would ban the sale or distribution or
offer for sale or distribution in interstate
commerce of all air-conditioning and
refrigeration appliances and
components containing HCFC–22 or
HCFC–142b containing one or both of
these controlled substances. EPA also
proposed to ban effective January 1,
2010, the sale or distribution or offer for
sale or distribution in interstate
commerce of all air-conditioning and
refrigeration appliances suitable for use
solely with newly-produced HCFC–22
or HCFC–142b.
Section 301(a) authorizes EPA to
promulgate regulations as are necessary
to carry out its functions under the
Clean Air Act, such as issuing
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
66453
prohibitions and standards. Further,
section 615 of the CAA states that:
If, in the Administrator’s judgment, any
substance, practice, process, or activity may
reasonably be anticipated to affect the
stratosphere, especially ozone in the
stratosphere, and such effect may reasonably
be anticipated to endanger public health or
welfare, the Administrator shall promptly
promulgate regulations respecting the control
of such substance, practice, process, or
activity, and shall submit notice of the
proposal and promulgation of such
regulation to the Congress.
For the reasons discussed below, EPA
has determined that the practice of
selling and distributing pre-charged airconditioning and refrigeration
appliances and components containing
HCFC–22 or HCFC–142b may
reasonably be anticipated to affect ozone
in the stratosphere, and such effect may
reasonably be anticipated to endanger
public health.
C. Criteria and Conditions Established
Under § 615 of CAAA
Under § 615, if in the Administrator’s
judgment, any substance, practice,
process, or activity may reasonably be
anticipated to affect the stratosphere,
especially ozone in the stratosphere,
and such effect may reasonably be
anticipated to endanger public health or
welfare, then the Administrator must
promptly promulgate regulations
respecting the control of such substance,
practice, process, or activity.
EPA proposed to conclude that,
beginning January 1, 2010, the practice
of selling and distributing pre-charged
air-conditioning and refrigeration
appliances and pre-charged appliance
components containing HCFC–22 or
HCFC–142b, as well as air-conditioning
and refrigeration appliances suitable for
use solely with newly produced HCFC–
22 or HCFC–142b may reasonably be
anticipated to affect ozone in the
stratosphere, and such effect may
reasonably be anticipated to endanger
public health. EPA sought comment on
this proposed conclusion. EPA
explained that the impacts on
stratospheric ozone resulting from
continuing these activities can be
delineated into impacts from the
continued production of HCFC–22 or
HCFC–142b for use as a refrigerant in
air-conditioning and refrigeration
appliances that cannot be initially
charged in the U.S. but could be charged
abroad and subsequently imported into
the U.S. if EPA did not take action; and
impacts from improperly servicing
equipment and/or venting controlled
substances. These impacts are discussed
in this notice.
E:\FR\FM\15DER3.SGM
15DER3
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES3
66454
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 239 / Tuesday, December 15, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
Three commenters stated that EPA
must ensure that its findings regarding
public health are well supported,
documented in the record, and clearly
meet the statutory criteria for an
endangerment finding, under section
615. These commenters did not find
EPA’s finding to be well supported and
instead said it was based on general
assumptions, incomplete analyses, and
extrapolations of calculations made by
one consultant in one brief analysis.
Other commenters found that the
Agency’s approach is an appropriate
exercise of section 615 authority as it
would fill a regulatory gap and is welltailored to the section 615
endangerment finding.
After considering the comments, EPA
is finalizing its proposed conclusion
that the practice of selling and
distributing air-conditioning and
refrigeration appliances containing
HCFC–22 or HCFC–142b may
reasonably be anticipated to affect ozone
in the stratosphere, and that such effect
may reasonably be anticipated to
endanger public health. Specific
concerns raised by commenters
regarding the ‘‘Draft Memorandum on
Costs Associated with Refrigerant
Substitution from R–22 to R–410A in
Pre-Charged Equipment Imports’’ and
the basis for estimates used in that
document are discussed in the response
to comments document available in the
docket.
In reaching our conclusion, we
considered both of the criteria contained
in section 615. The first criterion is
whether the substance, practice,
process, or activity in question may
reasonably be anticipated to affect the
stratosphere. As summarized in the
background section of this preamble, the
effects of ODS on stratospheric ozone
are well known. Further information on
the science of ozone depletion is
available in the docket. The specific
ODS addressed in this action, HCFC–22
and HCFC–142b, are class II substances
listed under section 602(b) of the Clean
Air Act. Pursuant to section 602(b),
class II substances are those substances
that are ‘‘known or may reasonably be
anticipated to cause or contribute to
harmful effects on the stratospheric
ozone layer.’’ As discussed below under
the heading ‘‘Costs Analysis and Small
Business Economic Impacts,’’ EPA has
prepared an estimate of the reduction in
HCFC emissions attributable to a ban on
pre-charged appliances. EPA estimates
that the projected emissions of HCFC–
22 between January 1, 2010 and
December 31, 2019, in the absence of a
ban on pre-charged appliances (based in
part on charge sizes and estimated leak
rates of pre-charged appliances), is
VerDate Nov<24>2008
11:13 Dec 14, 2009
Jkt 220001
approximately 4,070 ODP weighted
tons. For purposes of approximate
comparison, an assumed average of 407
ODP tons per year of averted emissions
during this time period is approximately
11 percent of the 3,810 ODP ton U.S.
compliance cap for consumption of all
HCFCs each year during 2010–2014, and
27 percent of the cap during 2015–2019.
Additionally, the avoided emissions of
4,070 ODP weighted tons is
approximately 9 percent of all HCFC
emissions projected for the United
States for this same time period. These
estimated reductions assume that
HCFCs to be used for the US market will
not be diverted to other markets in the
world.
EPA believes that a reduction in the
amount of the installed base of HCFC
appliances reduces potential emissions
and lessens the need for HCFCs for
servicing. While some of the HCFCs
used in appliances can be reclaimed and
reused, a certain amount of the HCFCs
becomes contaminated and is not
available for future use. Thus restricting
the installed base of HCFC appliances
will have the effect of reducing the
overall amount of HCFC consumption
and emissions in the US. This approach
is consistent with the previous actions
taken to restrict applications of ozonedepleting substances where suitable
substitutes exist. This action also helps
further the goals of the Montreal
Protocol, in particular the Parties’ recent
emphasis on reducing emissions of
HCFCs, as evidenced by the Parties’
agreement in September 2007 to pursue
a more aggressive HCFC production and
consumption phaseout. The result of the
rulemaking will be fewer appliances
pre-charged with HCFCs that could be
emitted either during the useful
lifetimes of the appliances via leaks or
improper servicing, or by the improper
disposal of the appliances resulting in
the release of refrigerant in the U.S.
The second criterion in section 615 is
whether ‘‘such effect’’ may reasonably
be anticipated to endanger public health
or welfare. The phrase ‘‘such effect,’’ as
used in section 615, could be read in the
context of this action to refer to (1)
stratospheric ozone depletion generally;
(2) stratospheric ozone depletion
associated with HCFCs; or (3)
stratospheric ozone depletion
attributable to the specific practice of
importing HCFC pre-charged
appliances. As indicated above, EPA
proposed to conclude that the
stratospheric ozone depletion
attributable to the specific practice of
importing HCFC pre-charged appliances
‘‘may reasonably be anticipated to
endanger’’ public health and thus is
sufficient in itself. As further discussed
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
below, EPA is finalizing this conclusion
in this action. Therefore, it is not
necessary to arrive at additional or
definitive interpretations for purposes of
this action. However, the following
discussion briefly addresses the public
health consequences of stratospheric
ozone depletion generally as well as the
stratospheric ozone depletion
attributable to the specific practice of
importing HCFC pre-charged
appliances.
The links between stratospheric ozone
depletion and skin cancer are well
established. Other public health
concerns include cataracts and immune
suppression. Since the appearance of an
ozone hole over the Antarctic in the
1980s, Americans have become aware of
the health threats posed by ozone
depletion, which decreases the
atmosphere’s ability to protect the
earth’s surface from the sun’s ultraviolet
(UV) rays. The 2006 documents
Scientific Assessment of Ozone
Depletion, prepared by the Scientific
Assessment Panel to the Montreal
Protocol, and Environmental Effects of
Ozone Depletion and its Interactions
with Climate Change, prepared by the
Environmental Effects Assessment Panel
(see https://ozone.unep.org/
Assessment_Panels), provide
comprehensive information regarding
the links between emissions of ODS,
ozone layer depletion, UV radiation,
and human health effects.
Skin cancer is the most common form
of cancer in the U.S., with more than
1,000,000 new cases diagnosed annually
(National Cancer Institute, ‘‘Common
Cancer Types,’’ at https://
www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/
commoncancers). Melanoma, the most
serious form of skin cancer, is also one
of the fastest growing types of cancer in
the U.S.; melanoma cases in this
country have more than doubled in the
past two decades, and the rise is
expected to continue (Ries, L., Eisner,
M.P., Kosary, C.L., et al, eds. SEER
Cancer Statistics Review, 1973–1999.
Vol 2003. Bethesda (MD): National
Cancer Institute; 2002.) In 2007,
invasive melanoma was expected to
strike more than 59,000 Americans and
kill more than 8,000 (National Cancer
Institute, ‘‘Melanomas,’’ at https://
www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/types/
melanoma).
Nonmelanoma skin cancers are less
deadly than melanomas. Nevertheless,
left untreated, they can spread, causing
disfigurement and more serious health
problems, and even death. There are
two primary types of nonmelanoma skin
cancers. Basal cell carcinomas are the
most common type of skin cancer
tumors. They usually appear as small,
E:\FR\FM\15DER3.SGM
15DER3
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES3
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 239 / Tuesday, December 15, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
fleshy bumps or nodules on the head
and neck, but can occur on other skin
areas. Basal cell carcinoma grows
slowly, and rarely spreads to other parts
of the body. It can, however, penetrate
to the bone and cause considerable
damage. Squamous cell carcinomas are
tumors that may appear as nodules or as
red, scaly patches. This cancer can
develop into large masses, and unlike
basal cell carcinoma, it can spread to
other parts of the body.
EPA’s analysis estimates that
approximately 1,700 total cases of
cancer (nonmelanoma and cutaneous
malignant melanoma) and
approximately 9 premature mortalities
in the United States would be avoided
by banning the sale and distribution of
pre-charged appliances beginning in
2010. More information regarding this
projection is available in a
memorandum prepared by ICF
Consulting for EPA (‘‘Avoidance of Skin
Cancer Incidences and Mortalities
Associated with a 2010 Ban on Products
Pre-Charged with R–22’’) 3 and placed in
the docket for this rulemaking. EPA
does not routinely provide projections
of this nature in developing rules under
Title VI of the CAA.
Other UV-related skin disorders
include actinic keratoses and premature
aging of the skin. Actinic keratoses are
skin growths that occur on body areas
exposed to the sun. The face, hands,
forearms, and the ‘‘V’’ of the neck are
especially susceptible to this type of
lesion. Although premalignant, actinic
keratoses are a risk factor for squamous
cell carcinoma. Chronic exposure to UV
radiation also causes premature aging,
which over time can make the skin
become thick, wrinkled, and leathery.
Cataracts are a form of eye damage in
which a loss of transparency in the lens
of the eye clouds vision. If left
untreated, cataracts can lead to
blindness. Research has shown that UV
radiation increases the likelihood of
certain cataracts. Although curable with
modern eye surgery, cataracts diminish
the eyesight of millions of Americans.
Other kinds of eye damage include
pterygium (i.e., tissue growth that can
block vision), skin cancer around the
eyes, and degeneration of the macula
(i.e., the part of the retina where visual
perception is most acute).
Based on the discussion above of the
two criteria contained in section 615,
EPA concludes that beginning January
1, 2010, the practice of selling and
distributing pre-charged airconditioning and refrigeration
3 HCFC–22 is also referred to as R–22, particularly
where it is used in refrigeration and airconditioning applications.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
11:13 Dec 14, 2009
Jkt 220001
appliances and pre-charged appliance
components containing HCFC–22 or
HCFC–142b, as well as air-conditioning
and refrigeration appliances suitable for
use solely with newly produced HCFC–
22 or HCFC–142b may reasonably be
anticipated to affect ozone in the
stratosphere, and such effect may
reasonably be anticipated to endanger
public health.
D. Defining Air-Conditioning and
Refrigeration Appliances and PreCharged Appliance Components
In the NPRM, EPA proposed that any
air-conditioning or refrigeration
appliances containing HCFC–22 or
HCFC–142b would be subject to the
proposed ban on the sale and
distribution in interstate commerce if
manufactured on or after January 1,
2010. EPA proposed that the ban
include pre-charged components for
appliances, such as line-sets and precharged compressors, because such precharged components present the same
concerns as pre-charged appliances.
i. Appliance
Section 601 of the CAA defines the
term ‘‘Appliance’’ to mean ‘‘* * * any
device which contains and uses a class
I or class II substance as a refrigerant
and which is used for household or
commercial purposes, including any air
conditioner, refrigerator, chiller, or
freezer.’’ For purposes of Subpart I, EPA
proposed to use the definition of
‘‘appliance’’ in EPA’s refrigerant
recycling and emissions reduction
regulations at 40 CFR part 82, subpart F,
which is identical to the statutory
definition.
EPA requested comment on using the
definition of appliance that appears in
subpart F to determine what would be
subject to the proposed ban. In response
to the Agency’s request, commenters
noted that they do not believe that every
air-conditioning and refrigeration
system—regardless of size, use,
application, complexity (such as an
industrial process refrigeration
system)—should be subject to the
proposed rule in the same manner.
Specifically, these commenters
suggested that the scope of the
appliances covered by the rule be
revised to clearly exclude residential,
commercial, and industrial process
refrigeration systems that are not precharged when they leave the factory, but
are designed to use HCFC–22 or HCFC–
142b. The commenters requested that
EPA clarify that ‘‘any device which
contains and uses a refrigerant’’ would
not include systems that can use
refrigerants, but are not pre-charged.
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
66455
EPA agrees with comments stating
that appliance be defined consistently
with the previously promulgated
definition of appliance at subpart F.
EPA is noting, and later discusses in
detail, that equipment (including
residential, commercial, and industrial
process refrigeration) that is not precharged with HCFC–22 or HCFC–142b
is not covered under this rulemaking.
EPA believes that consistency in these
definitions benefits the regulated
community. Failure to provide a
consistent regulatory definition would
likely lead to uncertainly in the
refrigeration and air-conditioning
supply and service sectors, countering
the Agency’s efforts to phase out use of
HCFC–22 and HCFC–142b in new
installations.
In order to provide regulatory clarity,
this final rule applies the same
definition of appliance that is found at
CAA section 601 and promulgated at 40
CFR part 82, subpart F. The definition
of appliance means any device which
contains and uses a refrigerant and
which is used for household or
commercial purposes, including any air
conditioner, refrigerator, chiller, or
freezer.
For further clarification, EPA
considers the following equipment as
appliances, some of which are typically
pre-charged with HCFC–22 or HCFC–
142b:
• Air-to-air heat pumps;
• Chest or upright freezers;
• Ductless air conditioners;
• Dehumidifiers;
• Ground-source heat pumps;
• Packaged air conditioners and heat
pumps;
• Unitary air conditioners; and
• Window air-conditioning units.
This listing is not intended to be
exhaustive, but includes appliances that
may be manufactured and shipped precharged with refrigerant.
ii. Pre-Charged Appliance Component
In the NPRM, EPA proposed to define
pre-charged appliance component as
any portion of a pre-charged appliance
including but not limited to condensers
and line sets that are charged with
refrigerant prior to sale or distribution
or offer for sale or distribution in
interstate commerce.
EPA has not previously promulgated
a definition of pre-charged appliance
component. However, in an earlier
rulemaking addressing the sales of precharged appliance components, the
Agency stated that pre-charged
components are parts of but ‘‘are clearly
not appliances’’(November 9, 1994; 59
FR 55912). Commenters noted that EPA
provides similar language on its
E:\FR\FM\15DER3.SGM
15DER3
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES3
66456
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 239 / Tuesday, December 15, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
refrigerant sales restriction factsheet,
stating that EPA considers a ‘‘part’’ to be
‘‘any component or set of components
that makes up less than an appliance.
For example, this includes line sets,
evaporators, or condensers that are not
sold as part of a set from which one can
construct a complete split system or
other appliance. EPA considers a part to
be ‘‘pre-charged’’ if it contains a CFC or
HCFC that will become part of the
operating charge of an appliance’’
(https://www.epa.gov/ozone/title6/608/
sales/sales.html).
In proposing to define pre-charged
appliance component, EPA requested
comment regarding the universe of
components that are typically
manufactured and/or shipped precharged with HCFC–22 or HCFC–142b.
EPA received comment from major
appliance and component
manufacturers identifying equipment
that is typically pre-charged with
refrigerant, specifically HCFC–22. These
manufacturers stated that components
such as evaporator coils, condenser
coils, compressors or line sets are often
shipped pre-charged with HCFC–22.
EPA received one request to add
‘‘condensing units’’ to the listed
examples of pre-charged appliance
components. The remaining comments
concerning the universe of pre-charged
appliance components concerned the
sale of inventoried components and did
not address the actual definition of precharged appliance component.
EPA has consistently stated its
interpretation that components that
make up an appliance such as
condensers, evaporators, compressors,
and line sets in themselves do not
constitute appliances. EPA considers
components (such as compressors,
condensers, and evaporators) to be
portions of the refrigerant circuitry
without which the appliance would not
be able to function in its intended
purpose. When sold charged with
refrigerants, these components present
all the same concerns as the pre-charged
appliances. However, a major appliance
component, such as a condensing unit,
is not an appliance. A condensing unit
is not an air conditioner, refrigerator,
chiller, or freezer that provides a cooling
effect, but it is certainly a component of
such equipment. In addition, it is
conceivable that major components
would have different dates of
manufacture, making the equation of
date of appliance manufacture with the
date of component manufacture difficult
if not impossible. By comparison, it is
relatively simple to determine the date
of manufacture for pre-charged
appliances where the refrigerant
circuitry is typically intact and charged,
VerDate Nov<24>2008
11:13 Dec 14, 2009
Jkt 220001
and the appliance is ready to serve its
intended purpose at the point of
manufacture (e.g., a window air
conditioner).
For further clarification, the following
are components that in themselves do
not satisfy the definition of appliance,
but are typically pre-charged with
HCFC–22 or HCFC–142b:
• Line sets;
• Condensing units;
• Compressors; and
• Coils.
This listing is not intended to be
exhaustive, but includes components
that may be manufactured and shipped
pre-charged with refrigerant.
EPA is changing the proposed
definition of pre-charged appliance
component to add compressors,
condensing units, and coils to the list of
examples of appliance components that
may be pre-charged with refrigerant as
a part of the manufacturing process
prior to the component’s sale or
distribution or offer for sale or
distribution in interstate commerce.
EPA is also changing the proposed
definition to make clear that the
definition is not limited to pre-charged
appliance components found solely in
pre-charged appliances. EPA intends the
definition to include any appliance
component that may be pre-charged
prior to sale or distribution. Therefore,
EPA is defining pre-charged appliance
component to mean any portion of an
appliance including but not limited to
condensers, compressors, line sets, and
coils, that is charged with refrigerant
prior to sale or distribution or offer for
sale or distribution in interstate
commerce.
iii. ‘‘Manufactured’’ and ‘‘Date of
Manufacture’’
EPA did not propose a definition of
‘‘manufactured’’ in the NPRM. However,
the term manufactured as it relates to
the sale or distribution of pre-charged
appliances and appliance components
was discussed in detail in the preamble
to the NPRM adjusting the allowance
system for HCFC production, import,
and export (73 FR 78680), which was
published on the same day (December
23, 2008) as the NPRM for this final precharged appliance rule. That discussion
of the term included four criteria for
when an appliance would be considered
‘‘manufactured.’’ Due to the volume of
comments concerning manufacture and
date of manufacture, EPA believes that
further explanation of EPA’s use of the
term ‘‘manufactured’’ in the context of
this action is warranted.
The vast majority of comments
received in response to the NPRM
related to the sale of inventoried
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
appliances and components that were
manufactured prior to January 1, 2010,
but would likely remain in inventories
after 2010. EPA received comment that
its understanding of the term
‘‘manufactured’’ is not consistent with
previous conventions defining a product
as ‘‘manufactured’’ when it leaves the
manufacturer’s final assembly process,
is packed for shipment, and placed into
initial inventory. Several commenters
noted that they preferred a definition of
manufactured under which, the date of
manufacture is a finite date controlled
by the manufacturer and is not
dependent on the dealer network or
purchase by the ultimate consumer.
EPA received numerous comments
from manufacturers and distributors of
pre-charged appliances and components
stating that the Agency should interpret
‘‘date of manufacture’’ for an appliance
to conform to the date of manufacture of
components, such as the date of
condenser manufacture. These
commenters recommended that EPA
define the date of manufacture in terms
of the date of manufacture displayed on
name-plate marking, but no sooner than
the date on which the assembly and
end-of-line testing of the equipment
item in question are substantially
completed or the equipment is shipped
from the factory or put into the original
equipment manufacturer’s (OEM’s)
inventory, whichever occurs first.
EPA believes that the concern
expressed in many of the comments
arises from a commingling of the
definitions of the terms ‘‘appliance’’ and
‘‘pre-charged appliance component.’’
There are several reasons why EPA does
not equate the date of component
manufacture to the date of appliance
manufacture. As previously stated,
components in themselves do not satisfy
the previously promulgated definition
of appliance, which is identical to the
statutory definition. Components likely
have distinct individual manufacture
dates and may be field installed months
or even years after their manufacture.
EPA’s reliance on the date of a
particular component’s manufacture, as
a means of determining when an
appliance was manufactured, would
lead to a patchwork approach that could
create confusion. In addition, because
components may have differing
manufacture dates, such an approach
would require the Agency to provide
makeshift determinations as to which
major component’s manufacture date
would determine the date of appliance
manufacture.
EPA is promulgating a definition in
today’s final rule stating that an
appliance is ‘‘manufactured’’ on the
date that the appliance meets four
E:\FR\FM\15DER3.SGM
15DER3
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES3
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 239 / Tuesday, December 15, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
criteria: (1) The appliance’s refrigerant
circuit is complete, (2) the appliance
can function, (3) the appliance is
charged with refrigerant, and (4) the
appliance is ready for use for its
intended purpose. Small appliances,
such as refrigerators and window airconditioners, thus are ‘‘manufactured’’
while the appliance is at a
manufacturing facility. For instance, a
small appliance (such as a residential
refrigerator) that has been pre-charged
with refrigerant by the OEM has gone
through the entire production line so
that all mechanical and electrical
procedures are complete, and is a
‘‘stand-alone’’ piece of equipment (i.e.,
it only needs to be plugged into an
electrical outlet and turned on to
function properly). For such appliances,
EPA intends to treat the date identified
on the appliance by the OEM as the date
of manufacture.
Under the definition of
‘‘manufactured’’ in today’s final rule,
appliances that are field charged or have
the refrigerant circuit completed onsite
(for example, residential split systems),
regardless of whether additional
refrigerant is added on-site or not,
would not be ‘‘manufactured’’ until
installation of all of the components and
other parts is completed and the
appliance is charged with refrigerant.
EPA will not consider such an
appliance to be ‘‘manufactured’’ unless
all four criteria of the definition are met.
For such appliances, the date of
manufacture may be determined by
invoices, contracts, or service records
indicating the date that the appliance
manufacture was completed.
For pre-charged components of
appliances, EPA considers the
component to be ‘‘manufactured’’ on the
date that the OEM has physically
completed assembly of the component,
the component is charged with
refrigerant, and the component is ready
for initial distribution or sale. EPA
intends to treat the date identified on
the pre-charged component by the OEM
or provided in documentation by the
OEM as the date of component
manufacture. While EPA did not
propose a definition of ‘‘manufactured’’
for appliance components, EPA believes
including such a definition in the final
rule is appropriate in light of the
extensive comments requesting
clarification on the date of manufacture
of both components and complete
appliances. This definition reflects the
understanding expressed by
commenters as it pertains to when
components are manufactured.
Due to the volume of comments
received concerning the date of
manufacture, including the request that
VerDate Nov<24>2008
11:13 Dec 14, 2009
Jkt 220001
the Agency promulgate a definition of
‘‘manufactured,’’ EPA is adding a
definition of ‘‘manufactured,’’ with
respect to appliances and appliance
components, at § 82.302. Manufactured,
for an appliance, means the date on
which the appliance’s refrigerant circuit
is complete, the appliance can function,
the appliance holds a refrigerant charge,
and the appliance is ready for use for its
intended purposes; for a pre-charged
appliance component, ‘‘manufactured’’
means the date that the original
equipment manufacturer has physically
completed assembly of the component,
the component is charged with
refrigerant, and the component is ready
for initial sale or distribution.
E. Ban on Sale or Distribution or Offer
for Sale or Distribution in Interstate
Commerce
In the NPRM, EPA proposed to ban
the sale and distribution, or the offer for
sale or distribution in interstate
commerce, of any appliance or
appliance component that is precharged with HCFC–22 or HCFC–142b
and is manufactured on or after January
1, 2010. In the NPRM, EPA put forth the
Agency’s interpretation, consistent with
previous actions under CAA § 610, that
the term ‘‘interstate commerce’’ applies
to the product’s entire distribution
chain up to and including the point of
sale to the ultimate consumer (73 FR
78713).
EPA has previously banned the sale or
distribution, and offer for sale or
distribution in interstate commerce, of
certain products containing or
manufactured with class II substances,
including most pressurized dispensers
and plastic foam products (58 FR
69637). EPA has also previously banned
the sale or distribution, and offer for
sale or distribution in interstate
commerce, of air-conditioning and
refrigeration appliances containing class
I substances (66 FR 57512). EPA’s
interpretation of interstate commerce for
purposes of these bans does not cover
the sale, distribution, or offer of sale or
distribution of an appliance or an
appliance component if the appliance or
component is completely manufactured,
distributed, and sold without ever
crossing State lines. To lie outside the
interpretation of interstate commerce,
the appliance or component must be
manufactured, distributed, and sold
exclusively within a particular State,
and all of the raw materials,
components, equipment, and labor that
went into the manufacturing,
distributing, selling, or offering for sale
or distribution of such a product
originated within that State as well.
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
66457
i. Existing Inventories of Pre-Charged
Appliances and Components
Manufactured Prior to January 1, 2010
In the NPRM, EPA proposed that
effective January 1, 2010, no person may
sell or distribute, or offer to sell or
distribute, in interstate commerce any
pre-charged appliance or appliance
component manufactured on or after
January 1, 2010 containing HCFC–22,
HCFC–142b, or a blend containing one
or both of these controlled substances
(73 FR 78713). It remains EPA’s intent
to ban the sale or distribution in
interstate commerce of new pre-charged
appliances and pre-charged components
containing HCFC–22 or HCFC–142b that
would be used to configure new
appliances in the field, while still
allowing the use of inventoried
components that were manufactured
prior to January 1, 2010 to service
appliances that were manufactured
prior to January 1, 2010.
EPA received numerous comments in
response to the proposal concerning the
‘‘date of manufacture’’ of an appliance
as it applies to the sale of inventoried
pre-charged appliances and
components. Overwhelmingly, the
commenters focused on the concern of
stranding stockpiled inventory that was
manufactured prior to January 1, 2010,
but not yet sold or distributed.
Commenters referenced the need to sell
pre-charged appliances and components
manufactured prior to January 1, 2010,
in order to service existing appliances
across multiple refrigeration and airconditioning sectors, and requested that
EPA define a consistent policy for the
date of manufacture that would apply to
the refrigerant, the components, and the
appliances.
Some commenters believed that the
proposed ban included existing precharged appliances and components
that were manufactured prior to but
remain in inventory as of January 1,
2010, and thus expressed concern about
creating a great deal of stranded
inventory, resulting in potentially large
economic losses for manufacturers. The
commenters requested that the final rule
clearly state that industry is permitted
to use existing inventories of precharged appliance components that
were manufactured or imported prior to
January 1, 2010 to service existing
appliances. Other commenters
suggested a sell-through for pre-2010
pre-charged appliances and appliance
components during the 2010 calendar
year.
EPA also received comment from the
Small Business Administration (SBA)
requesting that EPA interpret
‘‘manufactured’’ as ‘‘the date in which
E:\FR\FM\15DER3.SGM
15DER3
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES3
66458
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 239 / Tuesday, December 15, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
the appliance is placed in initial
inventory, where the original product
has completed all of its manufacturing
processes and is ready for sale by the
manufacturer,’’ a definition which the
SBA finds consistent with both industry
practice and the EPA final rule
Reconsideration of the 610 Nonessential
Products Ban (66 FR 57511; November
15, 2001). In the final rule, EPA
permitted the sale and distribution of
air-conditioning and refrigeration
appliances containing class I controlled
substances that were placed into initial
inventory by January 14, 2002. SBA
stated that the 2001 rule gives an
interpretation of initial inventory that is
compatible with common industry
usage as the date ‘‘that the original
product has completed all its processes
and is ready for sale by the
manufacturer.’’
EPA recognizes that air-conditioning
and refrigeration appliances containing
HCFC–22 or HCFC–142b could be
manufactured prior to January 1, 2010,
but may not have reached the ultimate
consumer by January 1, 2010. EPA
contemplated mechanisms for either a
‘‘sell-through’’ or a ‘‘grandfathering’’ of
appliances that were previously
manufactured and placed into an initial
inventory—similar to the approaches in
40 CFR part 82 subpart C, under the
Nonessential Products Ban for class I
and class II controlled substances.
However, we note that the proposed ban
would not have prohibited the sale or
distribution of any appliance or
appliance component manufactured
before January 1, 2010. Thus, in effect,
the proposed ban already contained a
‘‘sell-through’’ provision.
EPA does not intend to strand stocks
of components or make existing
appliances obsolete by not allowing
them to be serviced with replacement
components. EPA noted in the NPRM
that it did not intend to regulate the
servicing of appliances that were
manufactured prior to January 1, 2010
(73 FR 78712). EPA noted that servicing
is regulated under other authorities,
notably 40 CFR part 82, subpart F. EPA
is allowing the continued use of
recovered and reclaimed HCFC–22 to
service existing equipment, as well as
allowing the limited production and
import of virgin HCFC–22 and HCFC–
142b to service existing appliances, as
promulgated in the accompanying final
rule titled ‘‘Protection of Stratospheric
Ozone: Adjustments to the Allowance
System for Controlling HCFC
Production, Import, and Export’’ (EPA
Docket: EPA–HQ–OAR–2008–0496).
EPA believes it is necessary to continue
to permit the servicing of airconditioning and refrigeration
VerDate Nov<24>2008
11:13 Dec 14, 2009
Jkt 220001
appliances manufactured prior to
January 1, 2010, to ensure a smooth
transition to alternatives.
EPA recognizes that existing
stockpiles of replacement components
could be used to service existing
appliances, and that such service would
be likely to occur after the January 1,
2010 phaseout date. EPA intends to
allow the continued servicing of these
appliances in order to allow for a
smooth transition away from HCFC–22
and HCFC–142b. This intent is
consistent with the companion final
rule allocating allowances for the
production and consumption of HCFC–
22 and HCFC–142b after January 1,
2010, in order to service the existing
stock of appliances in residential,
commercial, and industrial refrigeration
and air-conditioning end-uses. EPA is
clarifying that pre-charged appliance
components, such as condensing units,
line sets, evaporators, and compressors
that were manufactured before January
1, 2010, may be sold for purposes of
servicing appliances manufactured
before that date. Manufacturers,
distributors, and wholesalers
maintaining stockpiles of pre-2010
components that are pre-charged with
virgin HCFC–22 or HCFC–142b can
continue to sell such components in
order to service existing appliances in
the year 2010 and beyond.
Consistent with the proposal, this
final rule does not apply the prohibition
against the sale and distribution in
interstate commerce that does not apply
to pre-charged components that were
manufactured prior to January 1, 2010.
The finalized prohibition at § 82.304
reads: ‘‘Effective January 1, 2010, no
person may sell or distribute, or offer to
sell or distribute, in interstate commerce
any product identified in § 82.306.’’
This prohibition is limited to products
listed in § 82.306, i.e., any airconditioning or refrigeration precharged appliance manufactured on or
after January 1, 2010 containing HCFC–
22 or HCFC–142b and any pre-charged
appliance component for airconditioning or refrigeration appliances
manufactured on or after January 1,
2010 containing HCFC–22 or HCFC–
142b. Hence, manufacturers and
distributors are allowed to sell or
distribute pre-charged HCFC–22 or
HCFC–142b appliances and components
that are in inventory as of January 1,
2010. There is no time limit for the sale
or distribution of such pre-charged
appliances or components.
ii. Use of Recovered and Reclaimed
HCFC–22 and HCFC–142b
In the NPRM EPA proposed that
effective January 1, 2010, no person may
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
sell or distribute, or offer to sell or
distribute, in interstate commerce any
newly-manufactured pre-charged
appliance or appliance component precharged with HCFC–22 or HCFC–142,
unless the HCFCs were previously
reclaimed. EPA defines ‘‘reclaim’’ at 40
CFR 82.152 as ‘‘to reprocess refrigerant
to all of the specifications in appendix
A to 40 CFR part 82, subpart F (based
on ARI Standard 700–1995,
Specification for Fluorocarbons and
Other Refrigerants) that are applicable to
that refrigerant and to verify that the
refrigerant meets these specifications
using the analytical methodology
prescribed in section 5 of appendix A of
40 CFR part 82, subpart F.’’ EPA limits
reclamation to entities that have sought
and have received EPA certification as
refrigerant reclaimers, and restricts the
sale of used refrigerant to a new owner
unless it has first been reclaimed by an
EPA-certified refrigerant reclaimer.
EPA also proposed to apply the ban
on sale and distribution of pre-charged
appliances to appliances manufactured
after January 1, 2010 that are not precharged but are ‘‘suitable only for use’’
with newly produced HCFC–22 or
HCFC–142b, or blends thereof. When
referring to appliances that are suitable
for use solely with newly produced
HCFC–22 or HCFC–142b, EPA meant
appliances that, according to the
manufacturer, would not be suitable for
use with recycled or reclaimed
refrigerants. Such a situation could
potentially arise if, for example,
manufacturer’s directions stated
specifically that warranties are void if
the appliance is charged with reclaimed
refrigerant. As a means of addressing
such sales, EPA had proposed a
prohibition at § 82.302(b) against the
sale and distribution in interstate
commerce of any air-conditioning or
refrigeration appliance manufactured on
or after January 1, 2010, that is suitable
only for use with newly produced
HCFC–22, HCFC–142b, or a blend
containing one or both of these
controlled substances. While the
proposal addressed suitability as it
pertains to pre-charged appliances, EPA
intended to include components in the
discussion as well.
EPA did not receive comments
specifically addressing the proposal to
apply the ban on sale and distribution
of pre-charged appliances to appliances
manufactured after January 1, 2010 that
are not pre-charged but are ‘‘suitable
only for use’’ with newly produced
HCFC–22 or HCFC–142b, or blends
thereof. However, EPA has reevaluated
the concept of ‘‘suitability’’ pertaining
to the future use of components needed
to service existing appliances
E:\FR\FM\15DER3.SGM
15DER3
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES3
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 239 / Tuesday, December 15, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
manufactured prior to 2010. Appliances
and components that were not specified
as being suitable for use only with
newly produced HCFC–22 or HCFC–
142b could still be charged with newly
produced substances, even though such
use was not promoted by the
manufacturer. Thus, the proposed ban
on appliances suitable only for use with
newly-produced or virgin HCFC–22 or
HCFC–142b would not have the effect of
ending use of newly-produced or virgin
quantities of these HCFCs in new
appliances.
As previously stated, EPA does not
intend to ban the sale and distribution
of components needed to service
existing appliances. EPA believes that a
ban on pre-charged appliances and
components based on statements by the
manufacturer that the warranty would
apply only if used with newly-produced
or virgin HCFCs could be misinterpreted
as a ban on use of components needed
to service existing appliances. Use of
newly-produced HCFCs in existing
appliances is not prohibited. In
addition, the accompanying HCFC
allocation rulemaking ‘‘Protection of
Stratospheric Ozone: Adjustments to the
Allowance System for Controlling HCFC
Production, Import, and Export’’ (EPA
Docket: EPA–HQ–OAR–2008–0496),
specifically prohibits the use of virgin
HCFC–22 or HCFC–142b in appliances
manufactured on or after January 1,
2010. EPA believes that this prohibition
provides adequate coverage against the
use of virgin HCFC–22 or HCFC–142b.
Therefore, EPA is not finalizing the
proposed supplemental ban against sale
and distribution of appliances and
components that are not pre-charged,
but suitable only for use with newly
produced or virgin HCFC–22 or HCFC–
142b at § 82.302(b).
EPA requested and received several
comments concerning the use of
reclaimed refrigerant in new precharged appliances and pre-charged
appliance components. Commenters
requested that the Agency explicitly
address its intent to allow or disallow
the use of recovered and reclaimed
HCFC–22 and HCFC–142b in order to
meet the future service demand.
Numerous commenters specifically
requested that the final rule clearly state
that un-charged components may
continue to be manufactured after
January 1, 2010, and field charged with
reclaimed refrigerant. One commenter
felt that such a regulatory measure
would promote and encourage the use
of reclaimed refrigerants, especially
considering EPA’s intent to have
reclaimed HCFC–22 reach 20% of the
total allocation to fill the shortfall in
2015. In particular, one commenter
VerDate Nov<24>2008
11:13 Dec 14, 2009
Jkt 220001
stated that any ban on reclaimed HCFC–
22 use for new or old products would
be perceived as a negative message in
the marketplace.
EPA also received numerous
comments opposing any exemption
allowing the use of recovered and
reclaimed refrigerant in newly
manufactured pre-charged appliances
and compliance components. Seven
commenters believed that it would be
impossible for EPA to enforce such a
provision, because it would be unable to
determine whether a system is charged
with virgin or recovered and reclaimed
refrigerant (since both refrigerants meet
the same purity standard, ARI 700);
therefore, the ban should be extended to
newly manufactured equipment using
recycled and reclaimed, as well as
virgin HCFC–22 or HCFC–142b.
Commenters expressed concern that the
continued proliferation of new HCFC–
22 systems after 2010 that will be
allowed to use reclaimed refrigerant
would only exacerbate shortages for
HCFC–22 service quantities by
perpetuating the introduction of new
HCFC–22 systems into the marketplace,
delaying the U.S. transition to
alternatives to ozone-depleting
substances.
EPA’s intent in proposing to exclude
appliances and components charged
with reclaimed refrigerant from the
prohibition on sale and distribution was
to focus the prohibition on the virgin
HCFCs whose use in new appliances is
banned under section 605(a). The intent
of the proposal was to make certain that
any virgin HCFC–22 or HCFC–142b
contained in pre-charged components is
only used in the service of appliances
manufactured prior to January 1, 2010.
EPA agrees with commenters that noted
the difficulty in determining whether
refrigerant that is undergoing a
production phaseout in the U.S. (e.g.,
HCFC–22) is virgin refrigerant or is used
refrigerant that has been reclaimed. This
is especially true for appliances and
components that are produced and precharged abroad and imported into the
United States. It would not be possible
for EPA to determine whether such
imported pre-charged appliances and
components were manufactured with
reclaimed refrigerant. Because many
countries that export pre-charged
appliances and components will not be
obligated to freeze HCFC consumption
until 2013, consistent with their
Montreal Protocol commitments, precharged appliances imported from those
countries could easily contain virgin
HCFCs.
In the accompanying HCFC allocation
rulemaking ‘‘Protection of Stratospheric
Ozone: Adjustments to the Allowance
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
66459
System for Controlling HCFC
Production, Import, and Export’’ (EPA
Docket: EPA–HQ–OAR–2008–0496),
EPA has achieved the 2010 step-down
in production and consumption in large
part by considering the HCFC servicing
demand for 2010–2014. In that related
rulemaking, EPA has projected the
HCFC appliance servicing demand for
2010–2014 and assumed that the total
demand will be met in part through
virgin HCFCs and in part through use of
reclaimed and recycled HCFCs. As
noted in the comments, adding new
HCFC appliances to the installed base
would cause the servicing demand to
grow, potentially resulting in increases
in the amounts of HCFC needed to
service existing appliances, and likely
hinder the growth of alternative
refrigerants that do not directly
contribute to the depletion of the ozone
layer.
EPA supports the use of components
to service appliances that were
manufactured before January 1, 2010,
but we recognize the difficulty in
determining whether pre-charged
appliances and components, especially
those being imported into the United
States, have been charged with virgin or
reclaimed HCFC–22 or HCFC–142b.
EPA is not banning the sale and
distribution of un-charged or previously
manufactured components needed to
service existing appliances
manufactured prior to January 1, 2010.
However, due to the complexities
discussed above, EPA does not believe
that components pre-charged with
reclaimed refrigerant should be
exempted from the prohibition on sale
or distribution in interstate commerce of
pre-charged appliances and components
manufactured in 2010 and beyond. This
finding does not prohibit manufacturers
from producing replacement
components needed to service existing
appliances, as long as the components
are not pre-charged with HCFC–22or
HCFC–142b, regardless if the HCFC is
reclaimed or virgin. As noted by
commenters representing manufacturers
of appliances and components, such
components can be sold or distributed
in interstate commerce without being
pre-charged. Such replacement
components can be installed into
existing appliances and charged on-site
with reclaimed or virgin HCFC–22 or
HCFC–142b.
After considering comments and in
light of the related rulemaking
‘‘Protection of Stratospheric Ozone:
Adjustments to the Allowance System
for Controlling HCFC Production,
Import, and Export’’ (EPA Docket: EPA–
HQ–OAR–2008–0496), EPA has decided
to extend the January 1, 2010
E:\FR\FM\15DER3.SGM
15DER3
66460
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 239 / Tuesday, December 15, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
prohibition to appliances that are precharged with reclaimed refrigerant. The
final rule thus does not include the
proposed text at § 82.306(d), which
stated that the prohibition would not
apply where the refrigerant was ‘‘used,
recovered and reclaimed.’’ Therefore,
EPA is prohibiting, at § 82.304, the sale
or distribution, and the offer for sale or
distribution in interstate commerce of
all appliances and components that are
pre-charged with HCFC–22 or HCFC–
142b, regardless of whether the
refrigerant is virgin or reclaimed.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES3
iii. Sale and Distribution of Appliances
and Components Without Refrigerant
Several comments asked EPA to state
explicitly that the prohibition does not
extend to appliance components that are
needed to service existing appliances
and are shipped ‘‘dry’’ or with a holding
charge of an inert gas. EPA received
comments from major U.S. appliance
manufacturers stating that there is no
technical reason why the types of
appliances and components that are
currently charged with refrigerant prior
to being sold or distributed in interstate
commerce could not be shipped ‘‘dry’’
or with a holding charge of the inert gas
nitrogen. According to comments
received by the Agency, the lone
exception is that certain TXVs must be
shipped with an HCFC in order to meet
its intended purpose. Commenters
stated that a ban on the manufacture or
sale of un-charged components would
undermine the intent behind the United
States ratifying the Copenhagen
Amendment to the Montreal Protocol in
1992. Commenters stated that the sale
and distribution of replacement
components should be allowed in order
to service existing appliances, and asked
EPA to clarify whether un-charged
components (such as condensing units)
can be installed in commercial
refrigeration systems and charged with
virgin HCFC–22 in the field as a
replacement for an existing unit.
Commenters requested an exemption
for the manufacture of TXVs containing
a ‘‘de minimis’’ charge amount of HCFC
after January 1, 2010. Allowing an
exemption for TXVs would ensure an
adequate inventory of component parts
to service equipment manufactured
prior to January 1, 2010. EPA does not
believe that it is necessary to consider
establishing a de minimis exemption
because there are reasons why TXVs are
not subject to the ban. EPA has
previously stated that the Agency does
not consider TXVs to be pre-charged
VerDate Nov<24>2008
11:13 Dec 14, 2009
Jkt 220001
appliance parts.4 EPA considers a part
to be ‘‘pre-charged’’ if it contains a class
I or class II substance that will become
part of the operating charge of an
appliance. Parts that contain CFCs or
HCFCs that will not become part of the
operating charge, such as TXVs with
bulbs containing CFCs or HCFCs, are
not considered ‘‘pre-charged’’ with
refrigerant. In this rule, EPA is finalizing
a definition of ‘‘pre-charged appliance
component’’ that includes the phrase
‘‘charged with refrigerant.’’ As defined
in section 605(a) and § 82.302,
refrigerant means ‘‘any substance
consisting in part or whole of a class I
or class II ozone-depleting substance
that is used for heat transfer purposes
and provides a cooling effect.’’ This
definition is based on the statutory
definition in section 605(a). Because the
HCFC used in the bulb is not involved
in the heat transfer cycle of the
appliance, it is not a refrigerant, and
thus the TXV is not a pre-charged
appliance component. As such, the sale
and distribution in interstate commerce
of TXVs is not governed by this
rulemaking.
However, section 605(a) of the Act
explicitly prohibits the introduction
into interstate commerce or use of any
class II substance unless such substance:
(1) Has been used, recovered, and
recycled; (2) is used and entirely
consumed (except for trace quantities)
in the production of other chemicals; or
(3) is used as a refrigerant in appliances
manufactured prior to January 1, 2020.
EPA discusses the applicability of
section 605(a) to TXVs in the
accompanying HCFC allocation
rulemaking ‘‘Protection of Stratospheric
Ozone: Adjustments to the Allowance
System for Controlling HCFC
Production, Import, and Export’’ (EPA
Docket: EPA–HQ–OAR–2008–0496).
EPA does not intend to strand existing
appliances that may be in need of
replacement components that have
historically been shipped pre-charged
with refrigerant. EPA has considered the
comments sent in response to the NPRM
stating that pre-charged components,
which do not include TXVs, can be sold
with a holding charge of an inert gas
and field charged during appliance
configuration. Taking all comments
under consideration along with the
Agency’s desire to allow the servicing of
existing appliances that have not
reached their intended end-of-life, EPA
is clarifying that the ban on sale and
distribution into interstate commerce of
pre-charged components applies only to
4 EPA
has previously stated that TXVs are not
considered pre-charged. (https://www.epa.gov/
ozone/title6/608/sales/saleshtml.)
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
components that are pre-charged with
HCFC–22 or HCFC–142b. The ban
applies regardless of whether the HCFCs
are virgin or reclaimed. Therefore,
component manufacturers, distributors,
and sellers are prohibited from selling
or distributing components (such as but
not limited to condensers and line sets)
that were manufactured on or after
January 1, 2010 and pre-charged with
either virgin or reclaimed HCFC–22 or
HCFC–142b.
This prohibition does not apply to
appliance components manufactured on
or after January 1, 2010 that are sold,
distributed, or otherwise introduced
into interstate commerce uncharged or
with a holding charge of an inert gas,
such as nitrogen. Such uncharged
components could be used as
replacement components for pre-2010
appliances in need of service and
charged with either virgin or reclaimed
HCFC–22 or HCFC–142b.
iv. Imports and Exports of Pre-Charged
Appliances and Components
Commenters stated that the proposal
would allow foreign manufacturers to
export pre-charged products to the U.S.,
and that EPA should evenly and fairly
impose the prohibition on both
domestic and foreign manufacturers.
Commenters also stated that allowing
the import of pre-charged components
could encourage the stockpiling of
foreign-made pre-charged components
that could be introduced into U.S.
interstate commerce well after domestic
manufacturers cease their production of
these components prior to January 1,
2010.
EPA received numerous comments
requesting that it allow the continued
export of un-charged and pre-charged
HCFC–22 equipment to Article 5
countries 5 after January 1, 2010.
Commenters stated that it is unrealistic
to assume that [the HCFC–22] market
share in Article 5 countries would be
replaced by non-HCFC products, and
that developing countries’ demand for
HCFC refrigerant carries with it an
implicit recognition of these countries’
need for equipment which uses HCFC
refrigerants. Further, if these countries
need to import HCFCs at least until
2020, then commenters maintain it is
reasonable to assume the need for
HCFC-using equipment will persist
until 2020 as well.
Commenters also stated that they
believe that EPA’s interpretation of
interstate commerce to include exports
5 Article 5 (A5) countries—the Montreal
Protocol’s identifying term for developing
countries, as listed in Annex 4 to Appendix C to
40 CFR 82, subpart A.
E:\FR\FM\15DER3.SGM
15DER3
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES3
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 239 / Tuesday, December 15, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
will disadvantage U.S. manufacturers
that are globally competing against
foreign manufacturers selling in Article
5 countries, resulting in possible loss of
domestic jobs, the closing of small
businesses, and probably the net export
status of the industry. Commenters
suggested that the final rule provide
relief by specifying that the Agency
would allow the export of appliances
intended for use in A5 countries if such
appliances are exported without a
refrigerant charge.
EPA is not attempting to regulate
foreign commerce through this action.
EPA is solely regulating U.S. interstate
commerce, which includes both the
domestic sale and distribution of any
appliance imported into the United
States, and the domestic sale or
distribution of any appliance intended
for ultimate export from the United
States. The prohibition on sale and
distribution applies to imported
products and products destined for
export to the same extent that it applies
to products manufactured and
distributed solely within the United
States. EPA previously discussed this
interpretation of interstate commerce in
the regulations implementing the ban on
nonessential products containing or
manufactured with a class II substance
(58 FR 69638). The sale or distribution,
or offer for sale or distribution, of
imported products or products destined
for export within the scope of this final
rule would be subject to the same
restrictions as the sale or distribution, or
offer of sale or distribution, of products
within the scope of that nonessential
products ban.
EPA is not restricting the export of
appliances that are shipped without
refrigerant or with a holding charge of
nitrogen. Thus, U.S. manufacturers are
not precluded from responding to the
demand for HCFC appliances in Article
5 countries. Similarly, this ban does not
affect the import of bulk quantities of
used HCFC–22 or HCFC–142b under the
EPA petitioning process established
under 40 CFR 82.24(c). Importers of
bulk shipments of used HCFC–22 or
HCFC–142b greater than five pounds
must still seek and obtain approval from
EPA to import on a per-shipment basis.
This rule concerns only the sale or
distribution, and offer for sale or
distribution, of pre-charged appliances
and appliance components
manufactured in 2010 and beyond. This
action is not intended to govern the sale
or distribution, or offer for sale or
distribution, of any previously owned or
used appliances that were manufactured
prior to January 1, 2010.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
11:13 Dec 14, 2009
Jkt 220001
v. Transhipments of Pre-Charged
Appliances and Components
EPA received comments stating that
the Agency had not addressed
‘‘transhipments,’’ meaning the
movement of products through the U.S.
on their way to another country. These
commenters requested that the final rule
clearly state that transhipments of
equipment pre-charged with HCFC–22
be allowed on or after January 1, 2010.
Transhipments are not destined for use
by United States entities, but are held
temporarily while awaiting shipment to
their ultimate destination. As is done
with bulk shipments of controlled class
I substances (such as CFC refrigerants),
some distributors of pre-charged
products will accept transhipments of
products that are brought into the
United States and temporarily stored in
bonded warehouses while they await
shipment out of the country.
While this action does apply to
imported products, it does not regulate
the act of import as such. Sale and
distribution in interstate commerce,
rather than import or export, are the
prohibited acts. In addition,
transhipment is a defined term, and
EPA is stating the regulatory history of
the term for purposes of clarity.
EPA has previously defined
‘‘transhipment’’ of controlled substances
(at § 82.3) and made the distinction
between a transhipment and an import
that is subsequently re-exported. The
term ‘‘transhipment’’ is defined as ‘‘the
continuous shipment of a controlled
substance, from a foreign State of origin
through the United States or its
territories, to a second foreign state of
final destination, as long as the
shipment does not enter into United
States jurisdiction. A transhipment, as it
moves through the United States or its
territories, cannot be re-packaged, sorted
or otherwise changed in condition.’’ The
first discussion of the term
‘‘transhipment’’ in the context of the
ODS phaseout program appeared in the
proposed rulemaking published in the
Federal Register on March 18, 1993 (58
FR 15014, 15044). The December 10,
1993 final rule defined ‘‘transhipment
as the continuous shipment of a
controlled substance from a foreign state
of origin through the United States or its
territories to a second foreign state of
final destination.’’ (58 FR 65018, 65064).
The clarifying phrase ‘‘as long as the
shipment does not enter into United
States jurisdiction’’ was added on May
10, 1995 (60 FR 24970, 24983). EPA
promulgated a definition of
transhipment that does not permit a
shipment to be re-packaged. The current
definition distinguishes between a
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
66461
transhipment and a shipment that is
imported, re-packaged and then
exported, by stating that a transhipment
‘‘cannot be re-packaged, sorted or
otherwise changed in condition’’ as it
moves through the United States or its
territories.
The Agency generally exempts
transhipments from its ODS regulatory
prohibitions at 40 CFR Subpart A. For
example, EPA does not apply its ODS
import prohibitions to bulk controlled
substances, such as CFC–12, that are
stored in government bonded
warehouses and otherwise meet the
definition of a transhipment. For
purposes of this final rule, EPA will not
consider transhipment of pre-charged
appliances or components as sale or
distribution in interstate commerce, as
defined at § 82.3. However, appliances
and components that have not
originated from a foreign state but are
being stored in the United States for
ultimate export are not considered
transhipments, and are covered by this
rule if sold or distributed in interstate
commerce prior to export.
vi. Existing Contracts or Plans for PreCharged Appliances and Components
EPA received comment requesting
that it provide flexibility for persons
who may be unable to comply with the
ban for reasons outside of their control.
Some commenters interpreted the
proposal as banning all sale and
distribution of pre-charged appliances
and components, even those
manufactured prior to January 1, 2010.
(As discussed elsewhere in this notice,
the proposed and final prohibitions on
sale and distribution do not apply to
appliances and components
manufactured prior to January 1, 2010.)
Commenters suggested that in order to
minimize the adverse economic effects
of the pre-charged ban that EPA make
exemptions in cases where binding
contracts are in place for the purchase
of equipment that was manufactured
prior to January 1, 2010, but that cannot
be delivered until after January 1, 2010.
Commenters also requested that EPA
exempt appliances and components
intended for construction projects that
have received building code approval of
plans that include equipment subject to
the pre-charged ban, but will not be
completed until after January 1, 2010.
Commenters requested an expansion of
§ 82.306(a) exempting new installation
projects using HCFC–22 or HCFC–142b
appliances that have completed the
bidding process or have received
building code approval prior to January
1, 2010.
These comments relate primarily to
the section 605(a) prohibition on use of
E:\FR\FM\15DER3.SGM
15DER3
66462
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 239 / Tuesday, December 15, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
virgin HCFCs in the manufacture of new
appliances. In the accompanying final
rule titled ‘‘Protection of Stratospheric
Ozone: Adjustments to the Allowance
System for Controlling HCFC
Production, Import, and Export’’ (EPA
Docket: EPA–HQ–OAR–2008–0496),
EPA is granting flexibility in limited
instances where construction has begun
but for various reasons beyond their
control (e.g.,, budget shortfalls, weather
delays, labor strikes) would not be able
to complete projects prior to January 1,
2010.
EPA recognizes that contractual
arrangements exist for construction
projects that involve air-conditioning
systems for which ‘‘manufacture’’
(including completion of the refrigerant
loop) will not occur until after
December 31, 2009. The accompanying
allocation rule establishes a
grandfathering provision which allows
HCFC–22 appliances to be
‘‘manufactured’’ onsite during calendar
year 2010, if the components are
manufactured prior to January 1, 2010,
and are specified in a building permit or
contract dated before January 1, 2010,
for use on a particular project. Given the
flexibility offered by the allocation
rulemaking, EPA does not find it
necessary to adopt a grandfathering
provision into § 82.306(a) of this final
rule.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES3
F. Costs Analysis and Small Business
Economic Impacts
(i) What Are the Impacts on
Stratospheric Ozone Avoided Through
This Final Action?
The global HCFC phaseout is already
underway, and restrictions on
production, import, and sale and
distribution of specific types of HCFC
products are already in place in the
United States and in international
markets. The United States banned the
sale and distribution of aerosols,
pressurized dispensers, and foam
products containing HCFCs in 1994, and
the European Union has banned HCFCs
for refrigerant use in new equipment
since 2001 (Regulation EC No. 2037/
2000 of the European Parliament). Many
manufacturers of pre-charged
appliances already service the European
market and other markets with nonHCFC pre-charged appliances and
components. EPA believes this should
ease the implementation of a ban on sale
and distribution in interstate commerce.
Given that retooling and other design
changes have either already occurred to
meet the European and other markets, or
will occur as a result of the global
phaseout of HCFCs, EPA believes costs
associated directly with this rulemaking
VerDate Nov<24>2008
11:13 Dec 14, 2009
Jkt 220001
are limited. As with any analysis, EPA’s
relies on a reasonable understanding of
current factors affecting costs. Should
any of these factors change, costs may
change as well. For example,
introduction of additional alternatives
appears to be accelerating based on new
submissions to EPA’s Significant New
Alternatives Policy (SNAP) program.
Availability of additional alternatives in
the air-conditioning and refrigeration
sectors may reduce costs. Alternatively,
new factors that restrict availability of
alternatives may raise costs. Based on
current conditions, EPA believes that
our assessment of costs is reasonable.
EPA estimates that that on average,
between 2006 and 2008, approximately
9.5 million pre-charged appliances,
including heat pumps, window air
conditioners, and dehumidifiers, were
imported into the United States and
sold throughout the country. This figure
includes units pre-charged with
refrigerants other than HCFC–22 or
HCFC–142b. EPA estimates that 8.4
million pre-charged appliances were
pre-charged with HCFC–22. EPA
believes this is a mature and stable
market and EPA projects that in the
absence of a restriction on sale and
distribution, as many as 11 million precharged HCFC appliances could have
been imported and made available for
sale or distribution in the U.S., on an
annual basis, during 2010–2019 using
reasonable assumptions concerning
market growth. Separate domestic
restrictions on the production and
import of HCFC–22 and HCFC–142b
would essentially preclude the domestic
manufacture and initial charging of
these appliances with virgin HCFC–22
or HCFC–142b as of January 1, 2010.
In estimating the environmental
impacts associated with continuing to
allow the sale and distribution of
HCFC–22 and HCFC–142b pre-charged
appliances in interstate commerce, EPA
considered factors such as the number
of different appliances likely to be
available, the average charge sizes for
the appliances, and the leak rates
associated with the appliances that are
likely to be serviced during their useful
lifetime. The projected additional
emission of HCFC–22 between January
1, 2010, and December 31, 2019, in the
absence of a ban on pre-charged
appliances, based on charge sizes and
leak rates is approximately 4,070 ODPweighted metric tons from these precharged appliances. By comparison, in
accordance with the Montreal Protocol
adjustments from September 2007, in
2010 the cap for consumption for the
total basket of HCFCs in the United
States will be 3,810 ODP tons annually
for the years 2010–2014 and 1,524 ODP
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
tons for the years 2015–2020. This
consumption is for the total basket of
HCFCs, with HCFC–22 and HCFC–142b
restricted to servicing the existing base
of air-conditioning and refrigeration
appliances—in particular the units that
are charged onsite, including but not
limited to, chillers and residential
unitary units.
The maximum level of consumption
of HCFCs will also include use of other
HCFCs to service and charge both
existing and newly manufactured
appliances, and in other applications
such as niche solvent or fire
suppression uses prior to 2015. EPA
received comments on the projected
number of pre-charged HCFC appliances
that could be available after January 1,
2010, and the associated amount of ODS
that would be necessary to both charge
and service these appliances during
their useful lifetimes. A few
commenters stated that EPA had not
identified or discussed the impacts of
the rule on distributors and contractors,
or small businesses and consumers.
Additionally, they indicated that EPA
failed to analyze consumer behaviors
that may be impacted by costs, and also
did not conduct a regulatory flexibility
analysis. EPA received specific
comments from representatives of
recreational boat manufacturers stating
that the NPRM will have negative
financial impacts on thousands of small
boat builders, marine product
distributors, boat dealers, and repair
facilities that may have A/C and
refrigeration units in inventory before
January 1, 2010.
EPA has addressed the concern of
small businesses that stocked (pre-2010)
inventory would be stranded under
their interpretation of the proposed
provisions. EPA is allowing the sale and
distribution of pre-charged components
(such as condensing units, line sets,
evaporator coils, and compressors) and
fully-assembled pre-charged appliances
(such as freezers and window air
conditioners) that are manufactured
prior to January 1, 2010 and may be
held in inventory as of January 1, 2010.
Stockpiled pre-charged appliance
component parts, such as condensing
units, line sets, evaporator coils, and
compressors that are manufactured
before January 1, 2010, may be used to
service existing appliances. However,
due to the use prohibitions in the
companion rule, such pre-charged
components cannot be configured to
‘‘manufacture’’ a new appliance, such as
a new residential split system, if the
‘‘manufacture’’ involves any use of
virgin HCFC–22 or HCFC–142b as a
refrigerant. Such use would include the
addition of virgin HCFC–22 or HCFC–
E:\FR\FM\15DER3.SGM
15DER3
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 239 / Tuesday, December 15, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES3
142b to complete the initial charge of
the appliance and the use of virgin
HCFC–22 or HCFC–142b in the
components that are being assembled to
create the appliance.
EPA believes that distributors of precharged appliance components will
continue to have access to HCFC–22 and
HCFC–142b components that are
needed to service appliances that were
manufactured prior to January 1, 2010.
EPA is allowing the sale of existing
inventories of pre-charged components
as well as the manufacture or import of
replacement components if they are not
charged with HCFC–22 or HCFC–142b.
In addition, this rulemaking does not
impact the manufacture, import, or
distribution of appliances or
components using SNAP-approved
alternative refrigerants, such as R–410A.
EPA has also considered the role that
future hydrofluorocarbon (HFC) controls
may have on the impacts of today’s
rulemaking. Depending on how any
future HFC controls may affect
availability and price of HCFC
alternatives, the estimated effects of this
rule may be over-stated or under-stated.
EPA believes that any future domestic
controls on the production and
consumption of HFCs, if any, would
provide for adequate time for a smooth
transition to new alternatives.
Therefore, EPA has decided to take
action based on current Clean Air Act
authority addressing HCFCs.
(ii) What Factors Will Influence the
Costs of Pre-Charged Appliances
Charged With Substitutes?
Costs to transition to another
refrigerant for equipment currently precharged with HCFC–22 can be broken
down to refrigerant costs and costs
associated with manufacturing different
equipment components. EPA has
considered the transitional costs of
moving away from pre-charged HCFC–
22 appliances and components.
The primary alternative for precharged appliances using HCFC–22 or
HCFC–142b is hydrofluorocarbon (HFC)
blend R–410A. R–410A air-conditioning
systems have been commercially
available since 1995. As such, the fixed
costs, such as the engineering redesign
of certain components of equipment or
the costs associated with converting
facility manufacturing lines in those
countries producing this equipment are
not a major consideration. EPA feels
that this is a reasonable assumption
given that non-ODS alternatives already
possess some of the current global and
U.S. market share and therefore these
costs have already been incurred to
some extent; furthermore, facilities
abroad (e.g., China, Mexico) are
VerDate Nov<24>2008
11:13 Dec 14, 2009
Jkt 220001
obligated regardless of U.S. regulations
to transition their equipment
manufacturing facilities to
accommodate substitute refrigerants for
their own domestic demand. This
transition will occur sooner than
previously planned given the decision
made by the Parties to the Montreal
Protocol in September 2007 to adjust the
phasedown of HCFC production and
import for both Article 2 (developed)
and Article 5 (developing) countries.
EPA believes that the price of the
refrigerant is a comparatively small
fraction of the total price of the airconditioning and refrigeration
appliances affected by this rule, ranging
from 1 to 3 percent of total cost. EPA
also believes that only a limited number
of appliance components will be
replaced to accommodate an alternative
refrigerant. The decision by the Parties
to the Montreal Protocol to adjust the
phaseout schedules for HCFCs was
based partly on reliable information
concerning commercially available
substitute refrigerants that has been
provided to the Parties by the technical
assessment panels the Parties sponsor.
For some applications, manufacturers
have a suite of non-ODS alternatives
from which to choose and can therefore
consider a range of price and
operational factors.
After U.S. production and import of
bulk HCFC–22 for use in new
equipment is banned on January 1 2010,
the supply of virgin HCFC–22 in the
United States will decrease and the
demand for reclaimed HCFC–22 and
alternatives is expected to increase.
Recent industry information indicates
these market shifts have been underway
for some time, as evident by the
introduction of HFC alternatives (e.g.,
R–410A.), and the recent increases in
the amounts of HCFC–22 being
reclaimed. The accompanying HCFC
allocation rule will also have the effect
of restricting the supply of virgin
HCFC–22 based on the projected
servicing demand in 2010–2014, taking
into account the amount of that demand
that can be met through recycling and
reclamation.
International markets for refrigerants
may similarly follow U.S. market trends
given the decision made by the Parties
to the Montreal Protocol in September
2007 to adjust the phasedown of HCFC
production and import for both Article
2 and Article 5 countries. With this
change, developing countries (including
China, a predominant exporter of
HCFC–22 pre-charged appliances to the
United States) are now subject to a
freeze on HCFC consumption in 2013
based on the average of 2009 and 2010
consumption levels with subsequent
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
66463
step downs in HCFC consumption from
2015 to 2040. As such, it can be
reasonably expected that similar shifts
in refrigerant pricing and overall
transitions are likely to occur in
developing countries with an increase
in the price of HCFC–22 and a drop in
the price of some ODS alternatives. For
example, some foreign companies that
produce pre-charged HCFC–22
appliances for the U.S. market have
further incentives to begin making the
long-term capital investments toward
the transition to non-ODS alternatives
sooner than they would otherwise have
done, seeing the advantage of investing
in alternatives early. This market
strategy would likely have some impact
on the economics of refrigerant pricing
because the demand created for ODS
alternatives by the U.S. market may lead
to economies of scale in the countries
producing the pre-charged equipment
for export to the United States.
(iii) Impacts on the General Public
EPA considered whether the
transition to alternative refrigerants in
pre-charged appliances would involve
differential costs. Considering that these
appliances are not retrofitted, this
would be an upstream cost occurring at
the point of manufacture, not after
consumer purchase. EPA’s evaluation,
included in the docket for this
rulemaking, examined potential
consumer impacts from differences in
refrigerant cost and differences in costs
associated with changes to certain
appliance components to accommodate
an alternative refrigerant. Generally, the
R–410A appliances are more energyefficient than their HCFC–22
counterparts, which would result in
reduction of energy usage by consumers
and thus would result in a net savings.
EPA assessed existing industry data and
applied assumptions regarding future
manufacturing and marketing trends.
Several critical limitations associated
with projecting differential refrigerant
and component prices preclude the
Agency from determining an
incremental cost estimate with
certainty.
Refrigerant prices vary widely based
on factors such as volumes purchased
and negotiation of purchasing contracts;
further, projecting prices into the future
is complicated by variability in
individual manufacturers’ business
decisions regarding when to make the
long-term capital investments to
alternative refrigerants. The more
aggressive phasedown of HCFC–22
production and import resulting from
the adjustment decision taken at the
19th Meeting of the Parties is likely to
lead to an increase in the price of
E:\FR\FM\15DER3.SGM
15DER3
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES3
66464
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 239 / Tuesday, December 15, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
HCFC–22 and a drop in the price of
R–410A. Prices of HCFC–22 will likely
increase as the stepwise reductions in
production and consumption continue.
As the global phaseout of HCFCs
continues, other international markets
may become more restrictive, further
influencing the global pricing.
Equipment charged with alternative
refrigerants such as R–410A requires
slightly different components—such as
thicker-walled copper tubing—that may
cost slightly more than the components
used in older HCFC–22 appliances. EPA
is not aware of any industry data now
available that project the likely future
differences in component costs between
equipment designed for HCFC–22 and
equipment designed for alternatives
including R–410A, whether from
manufacturers in developed countries or
developing countries. EPA estimates
that for appliances manufactured in the
United States, incremental costs
associated with component
modifications could range from zero to
10 percent of the cost of the
appliances—an estimated per-unit
difference of $5 for smaller units and
$45 for larger units. The cost differential
for manufacturers in developing
countries could be less or more, and the
degree to which any such differential
would be passed along to U.S.
consumers is unknown. Given the
caveats above, EPA estimates that the
price differential could range from $40
to $50 (with a mid-range of $42.50) for
each of the larger units (e.g., unitary air
conditioners) that would be imported
annually during the period 2010–2019,
and that the differential for the smaller
units (e.g., room air-conditioners) would
range from $2 to $5 (with a mid-range
of $3.50).
In the updated analysis included in
the docket for this rulemaking, EPA
states that on average 8.4 million
appliances pre-charged with HCFC–22
were imported into the United States
annually from 2006 to 2008. Applying
assumptions identified in the docket
concerning market growth, EPA
estimates that the market for imported
pre-charged appliances will grow to an
annual average rate of 11 million
appliances per year during the period
2010–2019. Thus, during the period
2010–2019, EPA projects that an average
of 11 million appliances per year would
be imported pre-charged with a nonozone-depleting alternative refrigerant
such as R–134a, R–407C, or R–410A.
EPA’s analysis shows that the
engineering modifications to precharged components of appliances using
R–134a or R–407C are likely to have
negligible cost. EPA has, however,
calculated the incremental cost
VerDate Nov<24>2008
11:13 Dec 14, 2009
Jkt 220001
associated with the more significant
modifications necessary for pre-charged
appliances using R–410A. EPA
estimates that these appliances will
constitute approximately 64 percent of
the pre-charged imports during this
time, or approximately 7.1 million of
the 11 million pre-charged units
imported with alternative refrigerants
on an annual basis during 2010–2019.
The annual aggregate of such impacts
would range from $40 to $50 million,
with a mid-range estimate of $45
million.
In the NPRM, EPA requested
comment regarding the assumptions on
market, growth, and factors concerning
costs, as cited in a draft memorandum
Costs Associated with Refrigerant
Substitution from R–22 to R–410A in
Pre-charged Equipment, prepared by
ICF Consulting for EPA. EPA received
comments requesting a more detailed
assessment of the State and future of the
used, recovered, and reclaimed market,
and factor those findings and costs into
its overall estimates of the impacts of
the rule on prices and the industry. EPA
notes that assumptions on the future use
of HCFCs needed in the service sector
are addressed in the accompanying final
rule titled ‘‘Protection of Stratospheric
Ozone: Adjustments to the Allowance
System for Controlling HCFC
Production, Import, and Export’’ (EPA
Docket: EPA–HQ–OAR–2008–0496).
One commenter estimated that the
increased cost of this rule related to just
imported room air-conditioners,
portable air-conditioners, and
dehumidifiers is several million dollars
per manufacturer, including upfront
costs such as redesigning of products
and retooling of factories, as well as
ongoing costs of higher cost components
and refrigerant. The components of an
R–410A unit can cost more than an
equivalent R–22 unit. One commenter
states that EPA should provide a more
detailed assessment of availability and
costs of alternative refrigerants and
factor those findings and costs into its
overall estimates on the impacts of the
rule.
EPA recognizes that in addition to
future changes in refrigerant pricing
structures, changes in costs may also
result from changes in equipment
design. In most cases, appliances
charged with common ODS alternatives
will require different components than
equipment charged with HCFC–22, such
as thicker walled copper tubing, newly
developed compressors, and other
components capable of withstanding
high pressures, all of which may cost
slightly more than the components used
in older HCFC–22. Industry expert
opinion suggests that for appliances
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
manufactured in the United States, the
added cost to manufacturers that is
likely to be reflected in the cost to
consumers resulting from the
component modifications currently may
be anywhere from zero to ten percent of
the cost of the appliances, an estimated
difference of $2 to $5 for smaller units
and $40 to $45 for larger units. EPA also
notes that this rule only regulates U.S.
interstate commerce and does not
consider the costs of retooling foreign
manufacturing plants. As previously
stated assumptions on the future use of
HCFCs needed in the service sector are
addressed in the accompanying HCFC
allocation final rule. Discussion of the
impacts on foreign markets is discussed
below.
(iv) Implications for Other Markets
EPA believes that there is an
additional impact associated with not
banning the sale and distribution in
interstate commerce of these appliances
as of January 1, 2010. EPA believes that
prolonging U.S. demand for imported
pre-charged appliances would
discourage global efforts to transition to
non-ODS technologies in manufactured
air-conditioning and refrigeration
appliances. Given the commitments of
the United States and its trading
partners to ultimately phase out HCFCs,
investment in alternative refrigerant
product lines is occurring and will
continue to occur globally. Production
capacity requires a long-term capital
investment and the choice of refrigerant
dictates some of that investment in the
form of factory tooling, design, and a
network of suppliers for components.
Without the ban contained in this
rulemaking, investment decisions
influenced by demand could foster
continued investment in HCFC-based
manufacturing rather than investment in
alternatives and would run counter to
the United States’ domestic approach to
promote smooth transitions rather than
a rush to transition at the end of the
global phaseout. EPA has initiated the
phaseout of HCFCs. However, the
phaseout regulations do not address the
sale and distribution of products that
are pre-charged with HCFCs undergoing
a phaseout. Without today’s final rule,
domestic and foreign manufacturers as
well as their distributors would face
differing requirements. Foreign
manufactured pre-charged products and
appliances could continue to enter U.S.
commerce charged with virgin HCFC–22
and HCFC–142b, thus increasing the
service need for HCFC appliances in the
United States and potentially resulting
in shortages of virgin HCFC–22 and
HCFC–142b given the restrictions on
production and consumption of these
E:\FR\FM\15DER3.SGM
15DER3
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 239 / Tuesday, December 15, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
substances in the United States. EPA
believes that this final rule supports the
phaseout of HCFC–22 and HCFC–142b
by banning all sale and distribution of
HCFC–22 and HCFC–142b pre-charged
appliances and components.
(v) In the Absence of This Action, Are
There Impacts Associated With Unequal
Treatment of Stakeholders?
The requirements established at 40
CFR 82.16(c) make it unlawful, effective
January 1, 2010, to produce or import
HCFC–22 or HCFC–142b for use in
refrigeration or air-conditioning
appliances manufactured on or after that
date. The result of this provision is that,
effective January 1, 2010, domestic airconditioning and refrigeration appliance
manufacturers will no longer have
newly manufactured or imported
HCFC–22 or HCFC–142b available to
charge their newly manufactured
appliances. EPA believes that this final
action provides more equitable
treatment of domestically manufactured
and imported appliances by holding the
equipment to the same requirements for
sale and distribution in interstate
commerce. EPA also believes that if it
had not promulgated this final rule,
domestic manufacturers would be faced
with differing treatment with regard to
sale and distribution in interstate
commerce for similar appliances based
on the location of the manufacturing
facility (i.e., domestic manufacturing
facilities as compared to manufacturing
facilities located abroad).
III. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory
Planning and Review
Under Executive Order (EO) 12866
(58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this
action is a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ because the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB)
believes that it may raise novel legal or
policy issues. Accordingly, EPA
submitted this action to OMB for review
under EO 12866 and any changes made
in response to OMB recommendations
have been documented in the docket for
this action.
B. Paperwork Reduction Act
This action does not impose any new
information collection burden. Rather,
this rule bans the sale or distribution of
air-conditioning and refrigeration
appliances containing HCFC–22 or
HCFC–142b containing one or both of
these substances, beginning January 1,
2010. However, OMB has previously
approved the information collection
requirements contained in the existing
regulations at 40 CFR part 82 under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction
Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq. and has
assigned OMB control number 2060–
0498. The OMB control numbers for
EPA’s regulations in 40 CFR are listed
in 40 CFR part 9.
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
generally requires an agency to prepare
Category
NAICS code
Examples of regulated entities
Plumbing, Heating, and Air-Conditioning Contractors.
Air-Conditioning Equipment and Commercial and Industrial Refrigeration Equipment Manufacturing.
Air-conditioning (condensing unit, compressors) merchant wholesalers.
Air-conditioning (room units) merchant wholesalers.
1711, 7623
3585
Air-Conditioning Equipment and Supplies Merchant
Wholesalers.
Electrical and Electronic Appliance, Television, and
Radio Set Merchant Wholesalers.
Importers of air conditioners and refrigerators .................
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES3
238220
333415
423730
5075
423620
5064
333415
3585
VerDate Nov<24>2008
11:13 Dec 14, 2009
Jkt 220001
Air-Conditioning Equipment and Commercial and Industrial Refrigeration Equipment Manufacturing.
New appliances entering the market
after January 1, 2010 will rely on
alternatives that have been found
acceptable under EPA’s SNAP Program.
Therefore small entities impacted by
today’s ruling (e.g., service contractors
and wholesalers) will continue to have
access to and be able to sell and
distribute appliances and components
that are pre-charged with alternatives to
HCFC–22 and HCFC–142b. Similarly,
this rulemaking does not ban the
manufacture of components that are
intended for the service of existing
HCFC–22 or HCFC–142b appliances
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4701
a regulatory flexibility analysis of any
rule subject to notice and comment
rulemaking requirements under the
Administrative Procedure Act or any
other statute unless the agency certifies
that the rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. Small entities
include small businesses, small
organizations, and small governmental
jurisdictions.
For purposes of assessing the impacts
of today’s rule on small entities, a small
entity is defined as: (1) A small business
as defined by the Small Business
Administration’s (SBA) regulations at 13
CFR 121.201; (2) a small governmental
jurisdiction that is a government of a
city, county, town, school district or
special district with a population of less
than 50,000; and (3) a small
organization that is any not-for-profit
enterprise which is independently
owned and operated and is not
dominant in its field.
After considering the economic
impacts of today’s final rule on small
entities, I certify that this action will not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
The small entities directly regulated by
this final rule include contractors and
service companies such as plumbing,
heating, and air-conditioning
contractors; manufacturers of air
conditioners and refrigerators, as well as
distributors, merchants, and wholesalers
of such equipment. This final rule will
affect the following categories:
SIC code
Contractors and Servicing ................................................
Manufacturers of air conditioners and refrigerators .........
Although this final rule will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities,
EPA nonetheless has tried to reduce the
impact of this rule on small entities.
Small entities may continue to sell and
distribute pre-charged appliances and
appliance components that were
manufactured prior to January 1, 2010.
Therefore, small entities will not be
burdened with the loss of stranded
inventories. Such inventories may be
sold indefinitely for the service of
existing appliances.
66465
Sfmt 4700
(i.e., appliances manufactured prior to
January 1, 2010). Such components can
continue to be sold and distributed in
interstate commerce as long as they are
not pre-charged with HCFC–22 or
HCFC–142b.
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
This rule does not contain a Federal
mandate that may result in expenditures
of $100 million or more for State, local,
and tribal governments, in the aggregate,
or the private sector in any one year.
The requirements already established at
§ 82.16(c) make it unlawful to produce
or import HCFC–22 or HCFC–142b on or
E:\FR\FM\15DER3.SGM
15DER3
66466
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 239 / Tuesday, December 15, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
after January 1, 2010, for use in
refrigeration or air-conditioning
appliances manufactured on or after that
date. The practical result is that
domestic manufacturers of airconditioning and refrigeration
appliances will not be able to charge
newly manufactured appliances with
virgin or imported HCFC–22 or HCFC–
142b, and thus will not be introducing
appliances containing these newly
produced substances into interstate
commerce. Thus, this rule is not subject
to the requirements of sections 202 or
205 of UMRA.
This rule is also not subject to the
requirements of section 203 of UMRA
because it contains no regulatory
requirements that might significantly or
uniquely affect small governments. As
stated above, this rule affects
manufacturers of air-conditioning and
refrigeration appliances, not small
governments.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES3
E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
Executive Order 13132, titled
‘‘Federalism’’ (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999), requires EPA to develop an
accountable process to ensure
‘‘meaningful and timely input by State
and local officials in the development of
regulatory policies that have Federalism
implications.’’ ‘‘Policies that have
Federalism implications’’ is defined in
the Executive Order to include
regulations that have ‘‘substantial direct
effects on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government.’’
This rule does not have Federalism
implications. It will not have substantial
direct effects on the States, on the
relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government, as specified in
Executive Order 13132. Today’s rule is
expected to primarily affect producers,
importers, and exporters of airconditioning and refrigeration
appliances. Thus, the requirements of
section 6 of the Executive Order do not
apply.
F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
This action does not have tribal
implications, as specified in Executive
Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9,
2000). This rule affects manufacturers of
air-conditioning and refrigeration
appliances, not tribal governments.
Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not
apply to this action.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
11:13 Dec 14, 2009
Jkt 220001
G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of
Children From Environmental Health
and Safety Risks
This action is not subject to EO 13045
(62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997) because
it is not economically significant as
defined in EO 12866. The Agency
nonetheless has reason to believe that
the environmental health or safety risk
addressed by this action may have a
disproportionate effect on children.
Depletion of stratospheric ozone results
in greater transmission of the sun’s
ultraviolet (UV) radiation to the Earth’s
surface. The following studies describe
the effects on children of excessive
exposure to UV radiation: (1)
Westerdahl J, Olsson H, Ingvar C. ‘‘At
what age do sunburn episodes play a
crucial role for the development of
malignant melanoma,’’ Eur J Cancer
1994: 30A: 1647–54; (2) Elwood JM,
Japson J. ‘‘Melanoma and sun exposure:
an overview of published studies,’’ Int
J Cancer 1997; 73:198–203; (3)
Armstrong BK, ‘‘Melanoma: childhood
or lifelong sun exposure,’’ In: Grobb JJ,
Stern RS, Mackie RM, Weinstock WA,
eds. ‘‘Epidemiology, causes and
prevention of skin diseases,’’ 1st ed.
London, England: Blackwell Science,
1997: 63–6; (4) Whieman D., Green A.
‘‘Melanoma and Sunburn,’’ Cancer
Causes Control, 1994: 5:564–72; (5)
Heenan, PJ. ‘‘Does intermittent sun
exposure cause basal cell carcinoma? A
case control study in Western
Australia,’’ Int J Cancer 1995; 60: 489–
94; (6) Gallagher, RP, Hill, GB, Bajdik,
CD, et. al. ‘‘Sunlight exposure,
pigmentary factors, and risk of
nonmelanocytic skin cancer I, Basal cell
carcinoma.’’ Arch Dermatol 1995; 131:
157–63; (7) Armstrong, DK. ‘‘How sun
exposure causes skin cancer: an
epidemiological perspective,’’
Prevention of Skin Cancer. 2004. 89–
116.
This action supports the Agency’s
efforts to reduce the potential continued
use of class II controlled substances and
the emissions of such substances. It
supplements the United States’
commitment to reduce the total basket
of HCFCs produced and imported to a
level that is 75 percent below the
respective baselines. This rule will
reduce the number of appliances
charged with HCFC–22 and HCFC–142b
that, in the absence of this rulemaking,
would continue to be sold and
distributed in interstate commerce.
Uncontrolled sale and distribution of
such appliances and components would
increase the service demand for HCFC–
22 and HCFC–142b needed for the
future service of such appliances. This
action is one of the most significant
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
remaining actions that the United States
can take to complete the overall
phaseout of ODS and further decrease
impacts on children’s health from
stratospheric ozone depletion.
H. Executive Order 13211: Actions That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use
This action is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ as defined in Executive
Order 13211 (66 FR 28355 (May 22,
2001)), because it is not likely to have
a significant adverse effect on the
supply, distribution, or use of energy.
The regulation solely impacts the sale or
distribution, or offer for sale or
distribution of pre-charged appliances.
I. The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (‘‘NTTAA’’), Public Law No.
104–113, 12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272 note)
directs EPA to use voluntary consensus
standards in its regulatory activities
unless to do so would be inconsistent
with applicable law or otherwise
impractical. Voluntary consensus
standards are technical standards (e.g.,
materials specifications, test methods,
sampling procedures, and business
practices) that are developed or adopted
by voluntary consensus standards
bodies. NTTAA directs EPA to provide
Congress, through OMB, explanations
when the Agency decides not to use
available and applicable voluntary
consensus standards. This action does
not involve technical standards.
Therefore, EPA did not consider the use
of any voluntary consensus standards.
J. Executive Order 12898: Federal
Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and
Low-Income Populations
Executive Order (EO) 12898 (59 FR
7629 (Feb. 16, 1994)) establishes Federal
executive policy on environmental
justice. Its main provision directs
Federal agencies, to the greatest extent
practicable and permitted by law, to
make environmental justice part of their
mission by identifying and addressing,
as appropriate, disproportionately high
and adverse human health or
environmental effects of their programs,
policies, and activities on minority
populations and low-income
populations in the United States.
EPA has determined that this final
rule will not have disproportionately
high and adverse human health or
environmental effects on minority or
low-income populations because it
increases the level of environmental
protection for all affected populations
E:\FR\FM\15DER3.SGM
15DER3
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 239 / Tuesday, December 15, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
without having any disproportionately
high and adverse human health or
environmental effects on any
population, including any minority or
low-income population. By restricting
the sale and distribution of appliances
charged with HCFC–22 and HCFC–
142b, emissions of these ozonedepleting substances will be avoided
lessening the adverse human health
effects for the entire population.
SUBPART I—BAN ON REFRIGERATION AND AIRCONDITIONING APPLIANCES CONTAINING HCFCS
K. The Congressional Review Act
The purpose of this subpart is to
protect stratospheric ozone by
restricting the sale and distribution of
HCFC containing appliances under
authority of section 615 of the Clean Air
Act as amended in 1990.
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this rule and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A Major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). This rule
will be effective January 1, 2010.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 82
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Air pollution control, Chemicals,
Chlorofluorocarbons, Exports,
Hydrochlorofluorocarbons, Imports,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Dated: December 7, 2009.
Lisa P. Jackson,
Administrator.
40 CFR part 82 is amended to read as
follows:
■
PART 82—PROTECTION OF
STRATOSPHERIC OZONE
1. The authority citation for part 82
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7414, 7601, 7671–
7671(q)
2. A new subpart I is added to read
as follows:
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES3
■
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:50 Dec 14, 2009
Jkt 220001
Sec.
82.300
82.302
82.304
82.306
Purpose.
Definitions.
Prohibitions.
Prohibited products.
Subpart I—Ban on Refrigeration and
Air-Conditioning Appliances
Containing HCFCs
§ 82.300
§ 82.302
Purpose.
Definitions.
As used in this subpart, the term:
Appliance means any device which
contains and uses a refrigerant and
which is used for household or
commercial purposes, including any air
conditioner, refrigerator, chiller, or
freezer.
Class I substance means any
controlled substance designated as class
I in 40 CFR part 82, appendix A to
subpart A.
Class II substance means any
controlled substance designated as class
II in 40 CFR part 82, appendix B to
subpart A.
Consumer, when used to describe a
person taking action with regard to a
product, means the ultimate purchaser,
recipient or user of a product.
Distributor, when used to describe a
person taking action with regard to a
product, means:
(1) The seller of a product to a
consumer or another distributor; or
(2) A person who sells or distributes
that product in interstate commerce,
including sale or distribution preceding
export from, or following import to, the
United States.
Hydrochlorofluorocarbon means any
substance listed as class II in 40 CFR
part 82, appendix B to subpart A.
Manufactured, for an appliance,
means the date on which the
appliance’s refrigerant circuit is
complete, the appliance can function,
the appliance holds a refrigerant charge,
and the appliance is ready for use for its
intended purposes; for a pre-charged
appliance component, ‘‘manufactured’’
means the date that the original
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
66467
equipment manufacturer has physically
completed assembly of the component,
the component is charged with
refrigerant, and the component is ready
for initial sale or distribution.
Person means any individual or legal
entity, including an individual,
corporation, partnership, association,
State, municipality, political
subdivision of a State, Indian tribe; any
agency, department, or instrumentality
of the United States; and any officer,
agent, or employee thereof.
Pre-charged appliance means any
appliance charged with refrigerant prior
to sale or distribution, or offer for sale
or distribution in interstate commerce.
Pre-charged appliance component
means any portion of an appliance
including but not limited to condensers,
compressors, line sets, and coils that is
charged with refrigerant prior to sale or
distribution or offer for sale or
distribution in interstate commerce.
Product means an item or category of
items manufactured from raw or
recycled materials which is used to
perform a function or task.
Refrigerant means, for purposes of
this subpart, any substance consisting in
part or whole of a class I or class II
ozone-depleting substance that is used
for heat transfer purposes and provides
a cooling effect.
§ 82.304
Prohibitions.
Effective January 1, 2010, no person
may sell or distribute, or offer to sell or
distribute, in interstate commerce any
product identified in § 82.306.
§ 82.306
Prohibited products.
Effective January 1, 2010, the
following products are subject to the
prohibitions specified under § 82.304—
(a) Any pre-charged appliance
manufactured on or after January 1,
2010 containing HCFC–22, HCFC–142b
or a blend containing one or both of
these controlled substances.
(b) Any pre-charged appliance
component for air-conditioning or
refrigeration appliances manufactured
on or after January 1, 2010 containing
HCFC–22, HCFC–142b, or a blend
containing one or both of these
controlled substances.
[FR Doc. E9–29560 Filed 12–14–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
E:\FR\FM\15DER3.SGM
15DER3
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 239 (Tuesday, December 15, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 66450-66467]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-29560]
[[Page 66449]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Part III
Environmental Protection Agency
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
40 CFR Part 82
Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Ban on the Sale or Distribution of
Pre-Charged Appliances; Final Rule
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 239 / Tuesday, December 15, 2009 /
Rules and Regulations
[[Page 66450]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 82
[EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0163; FRL-9091-9]
RIN 2060-AN58
Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Ban on the Sale or
Distribution of Pre-Charged Appliances
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This final rule bans the sale or distribution of air-
conditioning and refrigeration appliances containing HCFC-22, HCFC-
142b, or blends containing one or both of these substances, beginning
January 1, 2010. In addition, EPA is banning the sale or distribution
of air-conditioning and refrigeration appliance components that are
pre-charged with HCFC-22, HCFC-142b, or blends containing one or both
of these controlled substances as the refrigerant. These prohibitions
apply only to appliances and components manufactured on or after
January 1, 2010.
DATES: This final rule is effective on January 1, 2010.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID
No. HQ-OAR-2007-0163. All documents in the docket are listed on the
https://www.regulations.gov Web site. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either electronically through https://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the Air and Radiation Docket;
EPA West; Room 3334; 1301 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC
20460. The Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number
for the Public Reading Room is (202) 566-1744, and the telephone number
for the OAR Docket is (202) 566-1742.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Julius Banks, EPA, Stratospheric
Protection Division, Office of Atmospheric Programs, Office of Air and
Radiation (6205J), 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20460,
(202) 343-9870, banks.julius@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the Montreal Protocol on Substances
that Deplete the Ozone Layer (Protocol), as amended, the U.S. and other
industrialized countries that are Parties to the Protocol have agreed
to limit production and consumption of hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFCs)
and to phase out consumption in a step-wise fashion over time,
culminating in a complete phaseout in 2030. Title VI of the Clean Air
Act Amendments of 1990 (CAAA) authorizes EPA to promulgate regulations
to manage the consumption and production of HCFCs until the total
phaseout in 2030. EPA promulgated final regulations establishing an
allowance tracking system for HCFCs on January 21, 2003 (68 FR 2820).
These regulations were amended on June 17, 2004 (69 FR 34024) and July
20, 2006 (71 FR 41163). This action establishes a ban on sale or
distribution in interstate commerce of air-conditioning and
refrigeration appliances, as well as appliance components that are pre-
charged with HCFC-22, HCFC-142b, or blends containing one or both of
these controlled substances. It does not, however, affect the sale or
distribution of appliances or components manufactured before January 1,
2010.
Section 553(d) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), 5 U.S.C.
Chapter 5, generally provides that rules may not take effect earlier
than 30 days after they are published in the Federal Register. EPA is
issuing this final rule under section 307(d)(1) of the Clean Air Act,
which states: ``The provisions of section 553 through 557 * * * of
Title 5 shall not, except as expressly provided in this section, apply
to actions to which this subsection applies.'' Thus, section 553(d) of
the APA does not apply to this rule. EPA is nevertheless acting
consistently with the policies underlying APA section 553(d) in making
this rule effective on January 1, 2010. APA section 553(d) provides an
exception for any action for which the agency provides good cause found
and published within the rule. EPA finds that there is good cause to
make this rule effective January 1, 2010. This final rule accompanies a
second rule, ``Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Adjustments to the
Allowance System for Controlling HCFC Production, Import, and Export''
(EPA Docket: EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0496) which contains interrelated
requirements. The effective date of the other rule is January 1, 2010.
Having two different effective dates for the two rules would create a
discontinuity and potentially generate confusion among the regulated
community. The interrelated nature of the two rules is discussed in
Section II of the preamble.
Table of Contents
I. General Information
A. Does This Action Apply to Me?
B. Background
II. Final Action
A. Establishing 40 CFR Part 82, Subpart I
B. Authority To Prohibit Sale or Distribution, or Offer for Sale
or Distribution, of Specific Types of Appliances
C. Criteria and Conditions Established Under Sec. 615 of CAAA
D. Defining Air-Conditioning and Refrigeration Appliances and
Pre-Charged Appliance Components
i. Appliance
ii. Pre-Charged Appliance Component
iii. ``Manufactured'' and Date of ``Manufacture''
E. Ban on Sale or Distribution or Offer for Sale or Distribution
in Interstate Commerce
i. Existing Inventories of Pre-Charged Appliances and Components
Manufactured Prior to January 1, 2010
ii. Use of Recovered and Reclaimed HCFC-22 and HCFC-142b
iii. Sale and Distribution of Appliances and Components Without
Refrigerant
iv. Imports and Exports of Pre-Charged Appliances and Components
v. Transhipments of Pre-Charged Appliances and Components
vi. Existing Contracts or Plans for Pre-Charged Appliances and
Components
F. Costs Analysis and Small Business Economic Impacts
i. What Are the Impacts On Stratospheric Ozone Avoided through
This Final Action?
ii. What Factors Will Influence the Costs of Pre-Charged
Appliances Charged With Substitutes?
iii. Impacts on the General Public
iv. Implications for Other Markets
v. In the Absence of This Action, Are There Impacts Associated
With Unequal Treatment of Stakeholders?
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review
B. Paperwork Reduction Act
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With
Indian Tribal Governments
G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From
Environmental Health & Safety Risks
H. Executive Order 13211: Actions That Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use
I. The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act
J. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions To Address
Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income
Populations
K. The Congressional Review Act
[[Page 66451]]
I. General Information
A. Does This Action Apply to Me?
This final rule will affect the following categories:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Category NAICS code SIC code Examples of regulated entities
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Contractors and Servicing.................. 238220 1711, 7623 Plumbing, Heating, and Air-
Conditioning Contractors.
Manufacturers of air conditioners and 333415 3585 Air-Conditioning Equipment and
refrigerators. Commercial and Industrial
Refrigeration Equipment
Manufacturing.
Air-Conditioning Equipment and Supplies 423730 5075 Air-conditioning (condensing unit,
Merchant Wholesalers. compressors) merchant wholesalers.
Electrical and Electronic Appliance, 423620 5064 Air-conditioning (room units)
Television, and Radio Set Merchant merchant wholesalers.
Wholesalers.
Importers of air conditioners and 333415 3585 Air-Conditioning Equipment and
refrigerators. Commercial and Industrial
Refrigeration Equipment
Manufacturing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This table is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a
guide for readers regarding entities likely to be regulated by this
action. This table lists the types of entities that EPA is now aware
potentially could be regulated by this action. Other types of entities
not listed in this table could also be affected. To determine whether
your facility, company, business organization, or other entity is
regulated by this action, you should carefully examine these
regulations. If you have questions regarding the applicability of this
action to a particular entity, consult the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
B. Background
In 1973 chemists Frank Sherwood Rowland and Mario Molina at the
University of California-Irvine began studying the impacts of
chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) in the earth's atmosphere. They discovered
that CFC molecules were stable enough to migrate to the stratosphere
and that the chorine atoms contained in these molecules could cause the
breakdown of large amounts of ozone in the stratosphere. The Toxic
Substances Control Act (TSCA), passed in 1976, included regulatory
authority over CFCs. EPA's first regulatory response to the concerns
for stratospheric ozone protection resulted in a ban on CFC aerosol
propellants (43 FR 11301; March 17, 1978 and 43 FR 11318; March 17,
1978).
EPA followed this initial regulatory approach with an Advance
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPRM) which discussed a freeze on the
production of certain CFCs and a system of marketable permits to
allocate CFC consumption among industries (45 FR 66726; October 7,
1980). EPA did not act immediately on the 1980 ANPRM and was
subsequently sued by the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC v.
Thomas, No. 84-3587 (D.D.C.)) for failure to regulate CFCs further. EPA
and NRDC settled the case and agreed that EPA would propose further
regulatory controls on CFCs, or state the reasons for deciding not to
issue a proposal, by December 1, 1987, and would take final action by
August 1, 1988.
On January 10, 1986 (51 FR 1257), EPA published its Stratospheric
Ozone Protection Plan. That plan described the analytic basis for
supporting negotiations for an international agreement to control CFCs
and for reassessing the need for additional domestic regulations of
CFCs and other ozone-depleting substances (ODS). The United States
participated in negotiations organized by the United Nations
Environment Programme (UNEP) to develop an international agreement to
protect stratospheric ozone. These negotiations, preceded by the 1985
signing of the Vienna Convention, resulted in the signing of the
Montreal Protocol in 1987. The United States ratified the Montreal
Protocol on April 21, 1988. In 1988, EPA promulgated regulations
implementing the requirements of the Montreal Protocol through a system
of tradable allowances under section 157(b) of the Clean Air Act as
amended in 1977. This section was subsequently modified by the 1990
Amendments and became CAA Sec. 615. The Senate Report on the 1990
Amendments, Senate Rep. No. 101-228: ``Authority of the Administrator''
notes that this section ``is intended * * * to preserve the authority
and responsibility of the Administrator as set forth in section 157 of
the existing Clean Air Act,'' although the Conference report to the
1990 CAAA is silent on this matter.
Since the CAAA were passed in 1990, EPA has promulgated regulations
based on various provisions of Title VI. For example, EPA has
promulgated a production and consumption phaseout schedule that
included a revised trading regime for class I ODS, a production and
consumption phaseout schedule and trading regime for class II ODS,
servicing requirements for air-conditioning and refrigeration
appliances, bans on nonessential products containing or manufactured
with ODS, and labeling requirements.
Concern for ozone layer protection remains paramount for the global
community. In an effort to further protect human health and the
environment, the Parties to the Montreal Protocol adjusted the Montreal
Protocol's phaseout schedule for HCFCs in September 2007. The Parties
agreed that industrialized countries, including the United States,
would reduce production and consumption of HCFCs to 75 percent below
the established baseline in 2010, to 90 percent below the established
baseline in 2015, and to 99.5 percent in 2020--allowing for only 0.5
percent production and consumption between 2020-2030 to be used solely
for servicing existing appliances culminating in the terminal phaseout
in 2030. In addition, the Parties adjusted the schedule for non-
industrialized countries by agreeing to set production and consumption
baselines based on the average values for 2009-2010 production and
consumption, respectively; to freeze production and consumption in
2013; and to add stepwise reductions as follows: 10 percent below
baselines in 2015, 35 percent below in 2020, 67.5 percent below in 2025
and allowing for a servicing tail to average no more than 2.5 percent
between 2030-2040 to be used solely for servicing existing appliances,
culminating in the terminal phaseout in 2040.
The requirements already established at 40 CFR 82.16(c) make it
unlawful to produce or import HCFC-22 or HCFC-142b on or after January
1, 2010, for use
[[Page 66452]]
in refrigeration or air-conditioning appliances manufactured on or
after that date. The practical result of this provision is that
effective January 1, 2010, domestic manufacturers of air-conditioning
and refrigeration appliances will not be able to charge newly
manufactured appliances with newly produced or imported HCFC-22 or
HCFC-142b, and thus will not be introducing new appliances containing
these substances into interstate commerce.
II. Final Action
EPA is establishing regulations that ban the sale or distribution
or offer for sale or distribution in interstate commerce of all air-
conditioning and refrigeration appliances containing HCFC-22, HCFC-
142b, or blends containing one or both of these controlled
substances\1\, beginning January 1, 2010. The prohibition includes
fully assembled appliances that are sold pre-charged with HCFC-22 or
HCFC-142b (such as window air-conditioning units), as well as
appliances that are field assembled with HCFC-22 or HCFC-142b (such as
residential split systems and supermarket refrigeration equipment).
This prohibition extends to imported appliances as well as U.S.
manufactured appliances that are destined for export. EPA is also
banning the sale or distribution in interstate commerce of appliance
components that are pre-charged with HCFC-22 or HCFC-142b beginning
January 1, 2010. The prohibitions do not apply to pre-charged
appliances or pre-charged appliance components that are manufactured
prior to January 1, 2010. Pre-charged appliances and components that
have been manufactured prior to January 1, 2010 may be sold and
distributed in interstate commerce.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Throughout this action, where EPA refers to HCFC-22 or HCFC-
142b, it also refers to blends containing one or both of those
HCFCs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Refrigeration and air-conditioning end-uses typically use a
refrigerant in a vapor compression cycle to cool and/or dehumidify a
substance or space, like a refrigerator cabinet, room, office building,
or warehouse. HCFC-22 is a popular refrigerant that is commonly used in
a variety of refrigeration and air-conditioning equipment including
industrial and residential applications, most of which are field
installed and charged on-site. HCFC-22 can be used in a large range of
equipment including:
Residential Uses
Window air-conditioning units.
Dehumidifiers.
Central air conditioners.
Air-to-air heat pumps.
Ground-source heat pumps.
Ductless air conditioners.
Chest or upright freezers.
Commercial and Industrial Uses
Packaged air conditioners and heat pumps.
Chillers.
Retail food refrigeration.
Cold storage warehouses.
Industrial process refrigeration.
Refrigerated transport.
Public transport (e.g., buses, trains, subway air-
conditioning).
HCFC-22 is often used as a component in refrigerant blends that
contain several chemical compounds. HCFC-22 refrigerant blends are used
in various industrial, commercial, and residential end uses including:
Retail food refrigeration, cold storage warehouses, industrial process
refrigeration (IPR), and transport refrigeration appliances. As a
refrigerant, HCFC-142b is rarely used by itself; it is generally a
component of a refrigerant blend. For example, R-401A (Suva[supreg]
MP39), R-406A (Autofrost GHG-X3), R-414B (Hot Shot[supreg]), Freeze-
12TM are all refrigerant blends containing HCFC-22 and/or
HCFC-142b.
Readers interested in substitutes for ODS refrigerants should
review the Significant New Alternatives Policy (SNAP) program which
evaluates and determines whether a substitute for an ODS in a specific
end-use may be used safely in comparison to other available
substitutes. Section 612 authorizes EPA to identify and publish lists
of acceptable and unacceptable substitutes for class I or class II
ozone-depleting substances. EPA has determined that a large number of
alternatives are acceptable because they provide limited risk to human
health and the environment. The purpose of SNAP is to allow a safe,
smooth transition away from ODS by identifying as acceptable
substitutes for those substances or processes that offer lower overall
risks to human health and the environment than the ODS they replace,
and by prohibiting substitutes that provide significantly greater risk
than other substitutes that are available. Additional information
concerning substitutes specifically for air-conditioning and
refrigeration applications can be found at: https://www.epa.gov/ozone/snap/refrigerants/.
This final rule does not restrict or prohibit the sale of
appliances containing HCFC-22 or HCFC-142b as blowing agents in closed
cell insulation foam. However, EPA has promulgated SNAP Rule 13: The
use of HCFC-22 and HCFC-142b in foams/listing of ozone depleting
substitutes in foam blowing (72 FR 14432), finding HCFC-22 and HCFC-
142b as unacceptable substitutes for HCFC-141b in the manufacture of
commercial refrigeration, sandwich panels, slabstock, and other ``pour
foam'' applications.
This final rule does not affect the servicing of air-conditioning
or refrigeration appliances manufactured prior to January 1, 2010.
Servicing is regulated under other authorities, notably 40 CFR part 82
subpart F (i.e., section 608 regulations). Service and repair of
existing equipment using HCFC-22 or HCFC-142b is not affected by this
final rule. EPA believes it is necessary to continue to permit the
servicing of air-conditioning and refrigeration appliances manufactured
prior to January 1, 2010, to ensure a smooth transition to non-ODS
alternatives.
This final rule prohibits the sale or distribution, and the offer
for sale or distribution, in interstate commerce of air-conditioning
and refrigeration appliances and their components containing HCFC-22 or
HCFC-142b beginning January 1, 2010. The ban applies to appliances and
components manufactured on or after January 1, 2010, but not to
appliances or components manufactured before that date. This final
rule, combined with the accompanying final rule titled ``Protection of
Stratospheric Ozone: Adjustments to the Allowance System for
Controlling HCFC Production, Import, and Export'' (EPA Docket: EPA-HQ-
OAR-2008-0496) published elsewhere in this issue of the Federal
Register, which we refer to below as the ``allocation rulemaking,''
will have the following effects on the sale, distribution, and
installation of air-conditioning and refrigeration products charged
with HCFC-22 or HCFC-142b.
Sale and distribution of appliances pre-charged with HCFC-
22 or HCFC-142b is allowed for self-contained, factory-charged
appliances such as pre-charged window units, packaged terminal air
conditioners (PTACs), and some commercial refrigeration units, if
manufactured before January 1, 2010. The pre-charged appliance rule
does not prohibit sale and distribution of pre-2010 inventory (i.e.,
stockpiled inventories).
Sale and distribution of appliances pre-charged with HCFC-
22 or HCFC-142b is not allowed for self-contained, factory-charged
appliances such as pre-charged window units, packaged terminal air
conditioners (PTACs), and some commercial refrigeration units, if
[[Page 66453]]
manufactured on or after January 1, 2010. This prohibition, which is
contained in the pre-charged appliance rule, applies regardless of when
the refrigerant was produced and whether it is virgin or reclaimed.\2\
Under the allocation rule, neither stockpiled HCFC-22 produced prior to
January 1, 2010, nor new HCFC-22 produced after that date can be used
to manufacture new appliances on or after January 1, 2010.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ At 40 CFR 82.152, EPA has defined reclaim refrigerant to
mean to reprocess refrigerant to all of the specifications in
appendix A to 40 CFR part 82, subpart F (based on ARI Standard 700-
1995, Specification for Fluorocarbons and Other Refrigerants) that
are applicable to that refrigerant and to verify that the
refrigerant meets these specifications using the analytical
methodology prescribed in section 5 of appendix A of 40 CFR part 82,
subpart F.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sale and distribution of appliance components pre-charged
with HCFC-22 or HCFC-142b is allowed if the components (e.g.,
condensing units, line sets, and coils that are charged with
refrigerant) were manufactured before January 1, 2010. The pre-charged
appliance rule does not prohibit sale and distribution of pre-2010
inventory (i.e., stockpiled inventories).
Pre-charged appliance components manufactured before
January 1, 2010 may be used to service appliances manufactured before
January 1, 2010, but may not be assembled to create new appliances
unless there is no use of virgin HCFC-22 or HCFC-142b, in the
components or otherwise. The allocation rule prohibits use of virgin
HCFC-22 and HCFC-142b in manufacturing new appliances.
There is no exemption from the pre-charged appliance rule
for the sale or distribution of pre-charged appliances and pre-charged
components that are charged with reclaimed HCFC-22 or HCFC-142b
refrigerant. In other words, the provisions banning sale and
distribution apply equally regardless of whether the appliances or
components contain virgin or reclaimed refrigerant.
Under the allocation rule, virgin HCFC-22 and HCFC-142b
may only be used to service existing appliances. Virgin HCFC-22 and
HCFC-142b may not be used to manufacture new pre-charged appliances or
appliance components. Virgin HCFC-22 and HCFC-142b also may not be used
to charge new appliances assembled onsite on or after January 1, 2010,
though new appliances (not pre-charged) may be charged with reclaimed
refrigerant.
EPA is providing an exception to the allocation rule that
allows virgin HCFC-22 to be used in the onsite ``manufacture'' of
appliances for a particular project between January 1, 2010, and
December 31, 2011, if the components have been specified for use at
that project under a building permit or contract dated before January
1, 2010.
Under the allocation rule, HCFC-22 produced prior to
January 1, 2010, may be used until January 1, 2015, for the manufacture
of thermostatic expansion valves (TXVs).
The sale and distribution of used appliances is not
affected by either rule.
A. Establishing 40 CFR Part 82, Subpart I
Today's final rule prohibits the sale or distribution and the offer
for sale or distribution of pre-charged appliances and appliance
components in interstate commerce in a new subpart I to 40 CFR part 82.
The new subpart is titled Ban on Refrigeration and Air-Conditioning
Appliances Containing HCFCs. A new subpart is warranted since existing
subparts dealing with the phaseout of production and consumption of
controlled substances generally apply to bulk substances and not
finished goods.
As discussed in the NPRM, EPA considered amending subpart C, since
that subpart includes a ban on the sale and distribution of certain
products manufactured with or containing HCFCs, as well as air-
conditioning and refrigeration appliances containing CFCs as the
refrigerant, but those provisions were promulgated under CAA section
610. Given that EPA is using different authority for these provisions
and is structuring them somewhat differently, EPA finds that for ease
of reference, these new provisions should be housed in a new and easily
identifiable subpart in the CFR.
B. Authority To Prohibit Sale or Distribution, or Offer for Sale or
Distribution, of Specific Types of Appliances
EPA proposed to establish regulations under authority of section
615 of the Act, to take effect January 1, 2010, that would ban the sale
or distribution or offer for sale or distribution in interstate
commerce of all air-conditioning and refrigeration appliances and
components containing HCFC-22 or HCFC-142b containing one or both of
these controlled substances. EPA also proposed to ban effective January
1, 2010, the sale or distribution or offer for sale or distribution in
interstate commerce of all air-conditioning and refrigeration
appliances suitable for use solely with newly-produced HCFC-22 or HCFC-
142b.
Section 301(a) authorizes EPA to promulgate regulations as are
necessary to carry out its functions under the Clean Air Act, such as
issuing prohibitions and standards. Further, section 615 of the CAA
states that:
If, in the Administrator's judgment, any substance, practice,
process, or activity may reasonably be anticipated to affect the
stratosphere, especially ozone in the stratosphere, and such effect
may reasonably be anticipated to endanger public health or welfare,
the Administrator shall promptly promulgate regulations respecting
the control of such substance, practice, process, or activity, and
shall submit notice of the proposal and promulgation of such
regulation to the Congress.
For the reasons discussed below, EPA has determined that the
practice of selling and distributing pre-charged air-conditioning and
refrigeration appliances and components containing HCFC-22 or HCFC-142b
may reasonably be anticipated to affect ozone in the stratosphere, and
such effect may reasonably be anticipated to endanger public health.
C. Criteria and Conditions Established Under Sec. 615 of CAAA
Under Sec. 615, if in the Administrator's judgment, any substance,
practice, process, or activity may reasonably be anticipated to affect
the stratosphere, especially ozone in the stratosphere, and such effect
may reasonably be anticipated to endanger public health or welfare,
then the Administrator must promptly promulgate regulations respecting
the control of such substance, practice, process, or activity.
EPA proposed to conclude that, beginning January 1, 2010, the
practice of selling and distributing pre-charged air-conditioning and
refrigeration appliances and pre-charged appliance components
containing HCFC-22 or HCFC-142b, as well as air-conditioning and
refrigeration appliances suitable for use solely with newly produced
HCFC-22 or HCFC-142b may reasonably be anticipated to affect ozone in
the stratosphere, and such effect may reasonably be anticipated to
endanger public health. EPA sought comment on this proposed conclusion.
EPA explained that the impacts on stratospheric ozone resulting from
continuing these activities can be delineated into impacts from the
continued production of HCFC-22 or HCFC-142b for use as a refrigerant
in air-conditioning and refrigeration appliances that cannot be
initially charged in the U.S. but could be charged abroad and
subsequently imported into the U.S. if EPA did not take action; and
impacts from improperly servicing equipment and/or venting controlled
substances. These impacts are discussed in this notice.
[[Page 66454]]
Three commenters stated that EPA must ensure that its findings
regarding public health are well supported, documented in the record,
and clearly meet the statutory criteria for an endangerment finding,
under section 615. These commenters did not find EPA's finding to be
well supported and instead said it was based on general assumptions,
incomplete analyses, and extrapolations of calculations made by one
consultant in one brief analysis. Other commenters found that the
Agency's approach is an appropriate exercise of section 615 authority
as it would fill a regulatory gap and is well-tailored to the section
615 endangerment finding.
After considering the comments, EPA is finalizing its proposed
conclusion that the practice of selling and distributing air-
conditioning and refrigeration appliances containing HCFC-22 or HCFC-
142b may reasonably be anticipated to affect ozone in the stratosphere,
and that such effect may reasonably be anticipated to endanger public
health. Specific concerns raised by commenters regarding the ``Draft
Memorandum on Costs Associated with Refrigerant Substitution from R-22
to R-410A in Pre-Charged Equipment Imports'' and the basis for
estimates used in that document are discussed in the response to
comments document available in the docket.
In reaching our conclusion, we considered both of the criteria
contained in section 615. The first criterion is whether the substance,
practice, process, or activity in question may reasonably be
anticipated to affect the stratosphere. As summarized in the background
section of this preamble, the effects of ODS on stratospheric ozone are
well known. Further information on the science of ozone depletion is
available in the docket. The specific ODS addressed in this action,
HCFC-22 and HCFC-142b, are class II substances listed under section
602(b) of the Clean Air Act. Pursuant to section 602(b), class II
substances are those substances that are ``known or may reasonably be
anticipated to cause or contribute to harmful effects on the
stratospheric ozone layer.'' As discussed below under the heading
``Costs Analysis and Small Business Economic Impacts,'' EPA has
prepared an estimate of the reduction in HCFC emissions attributable to
a ban on pre-charged appliances. EPA estimates that the projected
emissions of HCFC-22 between January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2019, in
the absence of a ban on pre-charged appliances (based in part on charge
sizes and estimated leak rates of pre-charged appliances), is
approximately 4,070 ODP weighted tons. For purposes of approximate
comparison, an assumed average of 407 ODP tons per year of averted
emissions during this time period is approximately 11 percent of the
3,810 ODP ton U.S. compliance cap for consumption of all HCFCs each
year during 2010-2014, and 27 percent of the cap during 2015-2019.
Additionally, the avoided emissions of 4,070 ODP weighted tons is
approximately 9 percent of all HCFC emissions projected for the United
States for this same time period. These estimated reductions assume
that HCFCs to be used for the US market will not be diverted to other
markets in the world.
EPA believes that a reduction in the amount of the installed base
of HCFC appliances reduces potential emissions and lessens the need for
HCFCs for servicing. While some of the HCFCs used in appliances can be
reclaimed and reused, a certain amount of the HCFCs becomes
contaminated and is not available for future use. Thus restricting the
installed base of HCFC appliances will have the effect of reducing the
overall amount of HCFC consumption and emissions in the US. This
approach is consistent with the previous actions taken to restrict
applications of ozone-depleting substances where suitable substitutes
exist. This action also helps further the goals of the Montreal
Protocol, in particular the Parties' recent emphasis on reducing
emissions of HCFCs, as evidenced by the Parties' agreement in September
2007 to pursue a more aggressive HCFC production and consumption
phaseout. The result of the rulemaking will be fewer appliances pre-
charged with HCFCs that could be emitted either during the useful
lifetimes of the appliances via leaks or improper servicing, or by the
improper disposal of the appliances resulting in the release of
refrigerant in the U.S.
The second criterion in section 615 is whether ``such effect'' may
reasonably be anticipated to endanger public health or welfare. The
phrase ``such effect,'' as used in section 615, could be read in the
context of this action to refer to (1) stratospheric ozone depletion
generally; (2) stratospheric ozone depletion associated with HCFCs; or
(3) stratospheric ozone depletion attributable to the specific practice
of importing HCFC pre-charged appliances. As indicated above, EPA
proposed to conclude that the stratospheric ozone depletion
attributable to the specific practice of importing HCFC pre-charged
appliances ``may reasonably be anticipated to endanger'' public health
and thus is sufficient in itself. As further discussed below, EPA is
finalizing this conclusion in this action. Therefore, it is not
necessary to arrive at additional or definitive interpretations for
purposes of this action. However, the following discussion briefly
addresses the public health consequences of stratospheric ozone
depletion generally as well as the stratospheric ozone depletion
attributable to the specific practice of importing HCFC pre-charged
appliances.
The links between stratospheric ozone depletion and skin cancer are
well established. Other public health concerns include cataracts and
immune suppression. Since the appearance of an ozone hole over the
Antarctic in the 1980s, Americans have become aware of the health
threats posed by ozone depletion, which decreases the atmosphere's
ability to protect the earth's surface from the sun's ultraviolet (UV)
rays. The 2006 documents Scientific Assessment of Ozone Depletion,
prepared by the Scientific Assessment Panel to the Montreal Protocol,
and Environmental Effects of Ozone Depletion and its Interactions with
Climate Change, prepared by the Environmental Effects Assessment Panel
(see https://ozone.unep.org/Assessment_Panels), provide comprehensive
information regarding the links between emissions of ODS, ozone layer
depletion, UV radiation, and human health effects.
Skin cancer is the most common form of cancer in the U.S., with
more than 1,000,000 new cases diagnosed annually (National Cancer
Institute, ``Common Cancer Types,'' at https://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/commoncancers). Melanoma, the most serious form of skin
cancer, is also one of the fastest growing types of cancer in the U.S.;
melanoma cases in this country have more than doubled in the past two
decades, and the rise is expected to continue (Ries, L., Eisner, M.P.,
Kosary, C.L., et al, eds. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1973-1999. Vol
2003. Bethesda (MD): National Cancer Institute; 2002.) In 2007,
invasive melanoma was expected to strike more than 59,000 Americans and
kill more than 8,000 (National Cancer Institute, ``Melanomas,'' at
https://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/types/melanoma).
Nonmelanoma skin cancers are less deadly than melanomas.
Nevertheless, left untreated, they can spread, causing disfigurement
and more serious health problems, and even death. There are two primary
types of nonmelanoma skin cancers. Basal cell carcinomas are the most
common type of skin cancer tumors. They usually appear as small,
[[Page 66455]]
fleshy bumps or nodules on the head and neck, but can occur on other
skin areas. Basal cell carcinoma grows slowly, and rarely spreads to
other parts of the body. It can, however, penetrate to the bone and
cause considerable damage. Squamous cell carcinomas are tumors that may
appear as nodules or as red, scaly patches. This cancer can develop
into large masses, and unlike basal cell carcinoma, it can spread to
other parts of the body.
EPA's analysis estimates that approximately 1,700 total cases of
cancer (nonmelanoma and cutaneous malignant melanoma) and approximately
9 premature mortalities in the United States would be avoided by
banning the sale and distribution of pre-charged appliances beginning
in 2010. More information regarding this projection is available in a
memorandum prepared by ICF Consulting for EPA (``Avoidance of Skin
Cancer Incidences and Mortalities Associated with a 2010 Ban on
Products Pre-Charged with R-22'') \3\ and placed in the docket for this
rulemaking. EPA does not routinely provide projections of this nature
in developing rules under Title VI of the CAA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ HCFC-22 is also referred to as R-22, particularly where it
is used in refrigeration and air-conditioning applications.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Other UV-related skin disorders include actinic keratoses and
premature aging of the skin. Actinic keratoses are skin growths that
occur on body areas exposed to the sun. The face, hands, forearms, and
the ``V'' of the neck are especially susceptible to this type of
lesion. Although premalignant, actinic keratoses are a risk factor for
squamous cell carcinoma. Chronic exposure to UV radiation also causes
premature aging, which over time can make the skin become thick,
wrinkled, and leathery.
Cataracts are a form of eye damage in which a loss of transparency
in the lens of the eye clouds vision. If left untreated, cataracts can
lead to blindness. Research has shown that UV radiation increases the
likelihood of certain cataracts. Although curable with modern eye
surgery, cataracts diminish the eyesight of millions of Americans.
Other kinds of eye damage include pterygium (i.e., tissue growth that
can block vision), skin cancer around the eyes, and degeneration of the
macula (i.e., the part of the retina where visual perception is most
acute).
Based on the discussion above of the two criteria contained in
section 615, EPA concludes that beginning January 1, 2010, the practice
of selling and distributing pre-charged air-conditioning and
refrigeration appliances and pre-charged appliance components
containing HCFC-22 or HCFC-142b, as well as air-conditioning and
refrigeration appliances suitable for use solely with newly produced
HCFC-22 or HCFC-142b may reasonably be anticipated to affect ozone in
the stratosphere, and such effect may reasonably be anticipated to
endanger public health.
D. Defining Air-Conditioning and Refrigeration Appliances and Pre-
Charged Appliance Components
In the NPRM, EPA proposed that any air-conditioning or
refrigeration appliances containing HCFC-22 or HCFC-142b would be
subject to the proposed ban on the sale and distribution in interstate
commerce if manufactured on or after January 1, 2010. EPA proposed that
the ban include pre-charged components for appliances, such as line-
sets and pre-charged compressors, because such pre-charged components
present the same concerns as pre-charged appliances.
i. Appliance
Section 601 of the CAA defines the term ``Appliance'' to mean ``* *
* any device which contains and uses a class I or class II substance as
a refrigerant and which is used for household or commercial purposes,
including any air conditioner, refrigerator, chiller, or freezer.'' For
purposes of Subpart I, EPA proposed to use the definition of
``appliance'' in EPA's refrigerant recycling and emissions reduction
regulations at 40 CFR part 82, subpart F, which is identical to the
statutory definition.
EPA requested comment on using the definition of appliance that
appears in subpart F to determine what would be subject to the proposed
ban. In response to the Agency's request, commenters noted that they do
not believe that every air-conditioning and refrigeration system--
regardless of size, use, application, complexity (such as an industrial
process refrigeration system)--should be subject to the proposed rule
in the same manner. Specifically, these commenters suggested that the
scope of the appliances covered by the rule be revised to clearly
exclude residential, commercial, and industrial process refrigeration
systems that are not pre-charged when they leave the factory, but are
designed to use HCFC-22 or HCFC-142b. The commenters requested that EPA
clarify that ``any device which contains and uses a refrigerant'' would
not include systems that can use refrigerants, but are not pre-charged.
EPA agrees with comments stating that appliance be defined
consistently with the previously promulgated definition of appliance at
subpart F. EPA is noting, and later discusses in detail, that equipment
(including residential, commercial, and industrial process
refrigeration) that is not pre-charged with HCFC-22 or HCFC-142b is not
covered under this rulemaking. EPA believes that consistency in these
definitions benefits the regulated community. Failure to provide a
consistent regulatory definition would likely lead to uncertainly in
the refrigeration and air-conditioning supply and service sectors,
countering the Agency's efforts to phase out use of HCFC-22 and HCFC-
142b in new installations.
In order to provide regulatory clarity, this final rule applies the
same definition of appliance that is found at CAA section 601 and
promulgated at 40 CFR part 82, subpart F. The definition of appliance
means any device which contains and uses a refrigerant and which is
used for household or commercial purposes, including any air
conditioner, refrigerator, chiller, or freezer.
For further clarification, EPA considers the following equipment as
appliances, some of which are typically pre-charged with HCFC-22 or
HCFC-142b:
Air-to-air heat pumps;
Chest or upright freezers;
Ductless air conditioners;
Dehumidifiers;
Ground-source heat pumps;
Packaged air conditioners and heat pumps;
Unitary air conditioners; and
Window air-conditioning units.
This listing is not intended to be exhaustive, but includes
appliances that may be manufactured and shipped pre-charged with
refrigerant.
ii. Pre-Charged Appliance Component
In the NPRM, EPA proposed to define pre-charged appliance component
as any portion of a pre-charged appliance including but not limited to
condensers and line sets that are charged with refrigerant prior to
sale or distribution or offer for sale or distribution in interstate
commerce.
EPA has not previously promulgated a definition of pre-charged
appliance component. However, in an earlier rulemaking addressing the
sales of pre-charged appliance components, the Agency stated that pre-
charged components are parts of but ``are clearly not
appliances''(November 9, 1994; 59 FR 55912). Commenters noted that EPA
provides similar language on its
[[Page 66456]]
refrigerant sales restriction factsheet, stating that EPA considers a
``part'' to be ``any component or set of components that makes up less
than an appliance. For example, this includes line sets, evaporators,
or condensers that are not sold as part of a set from which one can
construct a complete split system or other appliance. EPA considers a
part to be ``pre-charged'' if it contains a CFC or HCFC that will
become part of the operating charge of an appliance'' (https://www.epa.gov/ozone/title6/608/sales/sales.html).
In proposing to define pre-charged appliance component, EPA
requested comment regarding the universe of components that are
typically manufactured and/or shipped pre-charged with HCFC-22 or HCFC-
142b. EPA received comment from major appliance and component
manufacturers identifying equipment that is typically pre-charged with
refrigerant, specifically HCFC-22. These manufacturers stated that
components such as evaporator coils, condenser coils, compressors or
line sets are often shipped pre-charged with HCFC-22. EPA received one
request to add ``condensing units'' to the listed examples of pre-
charged appliance components. The remaining comments concerning the
universe of pre-charged appliance components concerned the sale of
inventoried components and did not address the actual definition of
pre-charged appliance component.
EPA has consistently stated its interpretation that components that
make up an appliance such as condensers, evaporators, compressors, and
line sets in themselves do not constitute appliances. EPA considers
components (such as compressors, condensers, and evaporators) to be
portions of the refrigerant circuitry without which the appliance would
not be able to function in its intended purpose. When sold charged with
refrigerants, these components present all the same concerns as the
pre-charged appliances. However, a major appliance component, such as a
condensing unit, is not an appliance. A condensing unit is not an air
conditioner, refrigerator, chiller, or freezer that provides a cooling
effect, but it is certainly a component of such equipment. In addition,
it is conceivable that major components would have different dates of
manufacture, making the equation of date of appliance manufacture with
the date of component manufacture difficult if not impossible. By
comparison, it is relatively simple to determine the date of
manufacture for pre-charged appliances where the refrigerant circuitry
is typically intact and charged, and the appliance is ready to serve
its intended purpose at the point of manufacture (e.g., a window air
conditioner).
For further clarification, the following are components that in
themselves do not satisfy the definition of appliance, but are
typically pre-charged with HCFC-22 or HCFC-142b:
Line sets;
Condensing units;
Compressors; and
Coils.
This listing is not intended to be exhaustive, but includes
components that may be manufactured and shipped pre-charged with
refrigerant.
EPA is changing the proposed definition of pre-charged appliance
component to add compressors, condensing units, and coils to the list
of examples of appliance components that may be pre-charged with
refrigerant as a part of the manufacturing process prior to the
component's sale or distribution or offer for sale or distribution in
interstate commerce. EPA is also changing the proposed definition to
make clear that the definition is not limited to pre-charged appliance
components found solely in pre-charged appliances. EPA intends the
definition to include any appliance component that may be pre-charged
prior to sale or distribution. Therefore, EPA is defining pre-charged
appliance component to mean any portion of an appliance including but
not limited to condensers, compressors, line sets, and coils, that is
charged with refrigerant prior to sale or distribution or offer for
sale or distribution in interstate commerce.
iii. ``Manufactured'' and ``Date of Manufacture''
EPA did not propose a definition of ``manufactured'' in the NPRM.
However, the term manufactured as it relates to the sale or
distribution of pre-charged appliances and appliance components was
discussed in detail in the preamble to the NPRM adjusting the allowance
system for HCFC production, import, and export (73 FR 78680), which was
published on the same day (December 23, 2008) as the NPRM for this
final pre-charged appliance rule. That discussion of the term included
four criteria for when an appliance would be considered
``manufactured.'' Due to the volume of comments concerning manufacture
and date of manufacture, EPA believes that further explanation of EPA's
use of the term ``manufactured'' in the context of this action is
warranted.
The vast majority of comments received in response to the NPRM
related to the sale of inventoried appliances and components that were
manufactured prior to January 1, 2010, but would likely remain in
inventories after 2010. EPA received comment that its understanding of
the term ``manufactured'' is not consistent with previous conventions
defining a product as ``manufactured'' when it leaves the
manufacturer's final assembly process, is packed for shipment, and
placed into initial inventory. Several commenters noted that they
preferred a definition of manufactured under which, the date of
manufacture is a finite date controlled by the manufacturer and is not
dependent on the dealer network or purchase by the ultimate consumer.
EPA received numerous comments from manufacturers and distributors
of pre-charged appliances and components stating that the Agency should
interpret ``date of manufacture'' for an appliance to conform to the
date of manufacture of components, such as the date of condenser
manufacture. These commenters recommended that EPA define the date of
manufacture in terms of the date of manufacture displayed on name-plate
marking, but no sooner than the date on which the assembly and end-of-
line testing of the equipment item in question are substantially
completed or the equipment is shipped from the factory or put into the
original equipment manufacturer's (OEM's) inventory, whichever occurs
first.
EPA believes that the concern expressed in many of the comments
arises from a commingling of the definitions of the terms ``appliance''
and ``pre-charged appliance component.'' There are several reasons why
EPA does not equate the date of component manufacture to the date of
appliance manufacture. As previously stated, components in themselves
do not satisfy the previously promulgated definition of appliance,
which is identical to the statutory definition. Components likely have
distinct individual manufacture dates and may be field installed months
or even years after their manufacture. EPA's reliance on the date of a
particular component's manufacture, as a means of determining when an
appliance was manufactured, would lead to a patchwork approach that
could create confusion. In addition, because components may have
differing manufacture dates, such an approach would require the Agency
to provide makeshift determinations as to which major component's
manufacture date would determine the date of appliance manufacture.
EPA is promulgating a definition in today's final rule stating that
an appliance is ``manufactured'' on the date that the appliance meets
four
[[Page 66457]]
criteria: (1) The appliance's refrigerant circuit is complete, (2) the
appliance can function, (3) the appliance is charged with refrigerant,
and (4) the appliance is ready for use for its intended purpose. Small
appliances, such as refrigerators and window air-conditioners, thus are
``manufactured'' while the appliance is at a manufacturing facility.
For instance, a small appliance (such as a residential refrigerator)
that has been pre-charged with refrigerant by the OEM has gone through
the entire production line so that all mechanical and electrical
procedures are complete, and is a ``stand-alone'' piece of equipment
(i.e., it only needs to be plugged into an electrical outlet and turned
on to function properly). For such appliances, EPA intends to treat the
date identified on the appliance by the OEM as the date of manufacture.
Under the definition of ``manufactured'' in today's final rule,
appliances that are field charged or have the refrigerant circuit
completed onsite (for example, residential split systems), regardless
of whether additional refrigerant is added on-site or not, would not be
``manufactured'' until installation of all of the components and other
parts is completed and the appliance is charged with refrigerant. EPA
will not consider such an appliance to be ``manufactured'' unless all
four criteria of the definition are met. For such appliances, the date
of manufacture may be determined by invoices, contracts, or service
records indicating the date that the appliance manufacture was
completed.
For pre-charged components of appliances, EPA considers the
component to be ``manufactured'' on the date that the OEM has
physically completed assembly of the component, the component is
charged with refrigerant, and the component is ready for initial
distribution or sale. EPA intends to treat the date identified on the
pre-charged component by the OEM or provided in documentation by the
OEM as the date of component manufacture. While EPA did not propose a
definition of ``manufactured'' for appliance components, EPA believes
including such a definition in the final rule is appropriate in light
of the extensive comments requesting clarification on the date of
manufacture of both components and complete appliances. This definition
reflects the understanding expressed by commenters as it pertains to
when components are manufactured.
Due to the volume of comments received concerning the date of
manufacture, including the request that the Agency promulgate a
definition of ``manufactured,'' EPA is adding a definition of
``manufactured,'' with respect to appliances and appliance components,
at Sec. 82.302. Manufactured, for an appliance, means the date on
which the appliance's refrigerant circuit is complete, the appliance
can function, the appliance holds a refrigerant charge, and the
appliance is ready for use for its intended purposes; for a pre-charged
appliance component, ``manufactured'' means the date that the original
equipment manufacturer has physically completed assembly of the
component, the component is charged with refrigerant, and the component
is ready for initial sale or distribution.
E. Ban on Sale or Distribution or Offer for Sale or Distribution in
Interstate Commerce
In the NPRM, EPA proposed to ban the sale and distribution, or the
offer for sale or distribution in interstate commerce, of any appliance
or appliance component that is pre-charged with HCFC-22 or HCFC-142b
and is manufactured on or after January 1, 2010. In the NPRM, EPA put
forth the Agency's interpretation, consistent with previous actions
under CAA Sec. 610, that the term ``interstate commerce'' applies to
the product's entire distribution chain up to and including the point
of sale to the ultimate consumer (73 FR 78713).
EPA has previously banned the sale or distribution, and offer for
sale or distribution in interstate commerce, of certain products
containing or manufactured with class II substances, including most
pressurized dispensers and plastic foam products (58 FR 69637). EPA has
also previously banned the sale or distribution, and offer for sale or
distribution in interstate commerce, of air-conditioning and
refrigeration appliances containing class I substances (66 FR 57512).
EPA's interpretation of interstate commerce for purposes of these bans
does not cover the sale, distribution, or offer of sale or distribution
of an appliance or an appliance component if the appliance or component
is completely manufactured, distributed, and sold without ever crossing
State lines. To lie outside the interpretation of interstate commerce,
the appliance or component must be manufactured, distributed, and sold
exclusively within a particular State, and all of the raw materials,
components, equipment, and labor that went into the manufacturing,
distributing, selling, or offering for sale or distribution of such a
product originated within that State as well.
i. Existing Inventories of Pre-Charged Appliances and Components
Manufactured Prior to January 1, 2010
In the NPRM, EPA proposed that effective January 1, 2010, no person
may sell or distribute, or offer to sell or distribute, in interstate
commerce any pre-charged appliance or appliance component manufactured
on or after January 1, 2010 containing HCFC-22, HCFC-142b, or a blend
containing one or both of these controlled substances (73 FR 78713). It
remains EPA's intent to ban the sale or distribution in interstate
commerce of new pre-charged appliances and pre-charged components
containing HCFC-22 or HCFC-142b that would be used to configure new
appliances in the field, while still allowing the use of inventoried
components that were manufactured prior to January 1, 2010 to service
appliances that were manufactured prior to January 1, 2010.
EPA received numerous comments in response to the proposal
concerning the ``date of manufacture'' of an appliance as it applies to
the sale of inventoried pre-charged appliances and components.
Overwhelmingly, the commenters focused on the concern of stranding
stockpiled inventory that was manufactured prior to January 1, 2010,
but not yet sold or distributed. Commenters referenced the need to sell
pre-charged appliances and components manufactured prior to January 1,
2010, in order to service existing appliances across multiple
refrigeration and air-conditioning sectors, and requested that EPA
define a consistent policy for the date of manufacture that would apply
to the refrigerant, the components, and the appliances.
Some commenters believed that the proposed ban included existing
pre-charged appliances and components that were manufactured prior to
but remain in inventory as of January 1, 2010, and thus expressed
concern about creating a great deal of stranded inventory, resulting in
potentially large economic losses for manufacturers. The commenters
requested that the final rule clearly state that industry is permitted
to use existing inventories of pre-charged appliance components that
were manufactured or imported prior to January 1, 2010 to service
existing appliances. Other commenters suggested a sell-through for pre-
2010 pre-charged appliances and appliance components during the 2010
calendar year.
EPA also received comment from the Small Business Administration
(SBA) requesting that EPA interpret ``manufactured'' as ``the date in
which
[[Page 66458]]
the appliance is placed in initial inventory, where the original
product has completed all of its manufacturing processes and is ready
for sale by the manufacturer,'' a definition which the SBA finds
consistent with both industry practice and the EPA final rule
Reconsideration of the 610 Nonessential Products Ban (66 FR 57511;
November 15, 2001). In the final rule, EPA permitted the sale and
distribution of air-conditioning and refrigeration appliances
containing class I controlled substances that were placed into initial
inventory by January 14, 2002. SBA stated that the 2001 rule gives an
interpretation of initial inventory that is compatible with common
industry usage as the date ``that the original product has completed
all its processes and is ready for sale by the manufacturer.''
EPA recognizes that air-conditioning and refrigeration appliances
containing HCFC-22 or HCFC-142b could be manufactured prior to January
1, 2010, but may not have reached the ultimate consumer by January 1,
2010. EPA contemplated mechanisms for either a ``sell-through'' or a
``grandfathering'' of appliances that were previously manufactured and
placed into an initial inventory--similar to the approaches in 40 CFR
part 82 subpart C, under the Nonessential Products Ban for class I and
class II controlled substances. However, we note that the proposed ban
would not have prohibited the sale or distribution of any appliance or
appliance component manufactured before January 1, 2010. Thus, in
effect, the proposed ban already contained a ``sell-through''
provision.
EPA does not intend to strand stocks of components or make existing
appliances obsolete by not allowing them to be serviced with
replacement components. EPA noted in the NPRM that it did not intend to
regulate the servicing of appliances that were manufactured prior to
January 1, 2010 (73 FR 78712). EPA noted that servicing is regulated
under other authorities, notably 40 CFR part 82, subpart F. EPA is
allowing the continued use of recovered and reclaimed HCFC-22 to
service existing equipment, as well as allowing the limited production
and import of virgin HCFC-22 and HCFC-142b to service existing
appliances, as promulgated in the accompanying final rule titled
``Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Adjustments to the Allowance
System for Controlling HCFC Production, Import, and Export'' (EPA
Docket: EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0496). EPA believes it is necessary to continue
to permit the servicing of air-conditioning and refrigeration
appliances manufactured prior to January 1, 2010, to ensure a smooth
transition to alternatives.
EPA recognizes that existing stockpiles of replacement components
could be used to service existing appliances, and that such service
would be likely to occur after the January 1, 2010 phaseout date. EPA
intends to allow the continued servicing of these appliances in order
to allow for a smooth transition away from HCFC-22 and HCFC-142b. This
intent is consistent with the companion final rule allocating
allowances for the production and consumption of HCFC-22 and HCFC-142b
after January 1, 2010, in order to service the existing stock of
appliances in residential, commercial, and industrial refrigeration and
air-conditioning end-uses. EPA is clarifying that pre-charged appliance
components, such as condensing units, line sets, evaporators, and
compressors that were manufactured before January 1, 2010, may be sold
for purposes of servicing appliances manufactured before that date.
Manufacturers, distributors, and wholesalers maintaining stockpiles of
pre-2010 components that are pre-charged with virgin HCFC-22 or HCFC-
142b can continue to sell such components in order to service existing
appliances in the year 2010 and beyond.
Consistent with the proposal, this final rule does not apply the
prohibition against the sale and distribution in interstate commerce
that does not apply to pre-charged components that were manufactured
prior to January 1,