Notice of Final Federal Agency Actions on Proposed Highways in the State of Utah-Geneva Road EIS and SR-262, Montezuma Creek to Aneth, 65834-65835 [E9-29579]
Download as PDF
65834
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 237 / Friday, December 11, 2009 / Notices
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Council of Environmental Quality
Regulations (40 CFR parts 1500–1508).
The Tier 1 FEIS discusses the
recommended alternative for the Placer
Parkway Project between State Route
(SR) 70/99, in southeastern Sutter
County, and SR 65, in southwestern
Placer County, California; describes the
potential environmental and
socioeconomic effects of the project and
a framework for mitigation; and
addresses comments received on the
Tier 1 Draft Environmental Impact
Statement (DEIS) circulated in June
2007 and the Partially Revised Tier 1
DEIS circulated in January 2009.
DATES: Any comments regarding the
Tier 1 FEIS must be received on or
before January 11, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Copies are available for
public inspection and review on the
project Web site at https://
www.pctpa.net/placerparkway/
index.htm and at the following
locations:
Placer County Transportation Planning
Agency 299 Nevada Street, Auburn,
CA
Placer County Planning Department
3091 County Center Drive, Auburn,
CA
Placer County Public Works Department
3091 County Center Drive, Auburn,
CA
Placer County Library 350 Nevada
Street, Auburn, CA
Placer County Library, Loomis 6050
Library Drive, Loomis, CA
Sutter County Library, Main Branch
7504 Forbes Avenue, Yuba City, CA
Sutter County Library, Pleasant Grove
Branch 3093 Howsley Road, Pleasant
Grove, CA
Sutter County Library, Browns Branch
1248 Pacific Avenue, Rio Oso, CA
Sacramento County Public Library 828 I
Street, Sacramento, CA
California State University 6000 J Street,
Sacramento, CA
Sutter County Planning Department
1130 Civic Center Blvd., Yuba City,
CA
Sacramento County Planning
Department, 827 7th Street, Room
230, Sacramento, CA
Roseville Public Library—Downtown
225 Taylor Street, Roseville CA
Roseville Public Library—Maidu 1530
Maidu Drive, Roseville CA
Rocklin Library 5400 Fifth Street,
Rocklin, CA
Lincoln Library 590 Fifth Street,
Lincoln, CA
Sierra College Library 5000 Rocklin
Road, Rocklin, CA
Sacramento County Library, North
Natomas, 2500 New Market Drive,
Sacramento, CA
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:33 Dec 10, 2009
Jkt 220001
Sacramento County Library, North
Highlands—Antelope 4235 Antelope
Road, Antelope, CA
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gary
Sweeten,, North Team Leader, Local
Agency Programs, FWHA California
Division, 650 Capitol Mall, Suite 4–100,
Sacramento, CA 95814 or via e-mail at
gary.sweeten@dot.gov or Ms. Celia
McAdam, Executive Director, 299
Nevada St., Auburn, California 95603,
or via e-mail to pctpa@pctpa.net.
This
proposed federal action is to preserve a
corridor for the future construction of
Placer Parkway, a new east-west
roadway linking State Route (SR) 70/99
in Sutter County east to SR 65 in Placer
County. Specifically, the action being
considered and evaluated is to select
and preserve a 500 to 1,000 foot-wide
corridor in the project study area,
within which the future four- or six-lane
Placer Parkway may be constructed.
Five or six interchanges were proposed,
depending on the corridor alignment
alternative. The Placer Parkway project
is intended to reduce anticipated
congestion on both the local and
regional transportation system and to
advance economic development goals in
south Sutter County and southwestern
Placer County.
Five corridor action alternatives and a
no-action alternative were evaluated
during the preparation of the Tier 1 EIS.
Although the Parkway would be
designed and construction-level impacts
analyzed during the preparation of the
Tier 2 EIS, for the purpose of the Tier
1 EIS, several assumptions have been
made about potential design and
configuration concepts. These
assumptions would be subject to further
development and refinement, and
specific decisions about the design of
the roadway would be made during the
Tier 2 EIS process.
The Final Tier 1 EIS includes
responses to the comments received on
the Tier 1 Draft and Partially Revised
Draft EIS/EIR and identifies Alternative
5 as the preferred corridor. The Parkway
to be constructed in this corridor would
be a high-speed, limited access
roadway. Conceptually, interchanges
would be located at SR 70/99 (at onehalf mile north of Riego Road or at
Sankey Road), one or two locations to be
determined in southern Sutter County,
Fiddyment Road, Foothills Boulevard,
and SR 65 at Whitney Ranch Parkway.
Access would be restricted for the 7mile segment between Pleasant Grove
Road and Fiddyment Road.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00103
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Issued On: December 2, 2009.
Karen Bobo,
Director, Local Agency Programs, Federal
Highway Administration, Sacramento, CA.
[FR Doc. E9–29187 Filed 12–10–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Highway Administration
Notice of Final Federal Agency Actions
on Proposed Highways in the State of
Utah—Geneva Road EIS and SR–262,
Montezuma Creek to Aneth
AGENCY: Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of limitation on claims
for judicial review of actions by FHWA.
SUMMARY: This notice announces actions
taken by the FHWA that are final within
the meaning of 23 U.S.C. 139(l)(1). The
actions relate to various proposed
highway projects in the State of Utah.
Those actions grant approvals for the
projects.
DATES: By this notice, the FHWA is
advising the public of final agency
actions subject to 23 U.S.C. 139(l)(1). A
claim seeking judicial review of the
Federal agency actions on any of the
listed highway projects will be barred
unless the claim is filed on or before
June 9, 2010. If the Federal law that
authorizes judicial review of a claim
provides a time period of less than 180
days for filing such claim, then that
shorter time period still applies.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
FHWA: Mr. Edward Woolford,
Environmental Program Manager,
Federal Highway Administration, 2520
West 4700 South, Suite 9A, Salt Lake
City, Utah 84118; telephone: (801) 963–
0182; e-mail:
Edward.Woolford@DOT.gov. The FHWA
Utah Division Office’s normal business
hours are 7:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.
(Mountain Standard Time). For UDOT:
Ms. Rebecca Stromness, Environmental
Program Manager, Utah Department of
Transportation, 4501 South 2700 West,
Box 148450, Salt Lake City, Utah
84118–8450; telephone: (801) 965–4327;
e-mail: Rstromness@utah.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is
hereby given that the FHWA has taken
final agency action by issuing approval
for the highway projects in the State of
Utah that are listed below. The action by
the Federal agency on a project, and the
laws under which such actions were
taken, are described in the documented
environmental impact statement (EIS)
issued in connection with the projects,
and in other project records. The FEIS,
E:\FR\FM\11DEN1.SGM
11DEN1
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 237 / Friday, December 11, 2009 / Notices
Record of Decision (ROD), and other
project records for the listed projects are
available by contacting the FHWA or the
Utah Department of Transportation at
the addresses provided above. For some
of the projects, the FEIS, ROD and
documents also can be viewed and
downloaded electronically as specified
below. This notice applies to all Federal
agency decisions as of the issuance date
of this notice and all laws under which
such actions were taken, including but
not limited to:
1. General: National Environmental
Policy Act (NEPA) [42 U.S.C. 4321–
4347]; Federal-Aid Highway Act
(FAHA) [23 U.S.C. 109 and 23 U.S.C.
128].
2. Air: Clean Air Act (CAA) [42 U.S.C.
7401–7671(q)].
3. Land: Section 4(f) of the
Department of Transportation Act of
1966 (4f) [49 U.S.C. 303].
4. Wildlife: Endangered Species Act
(ESA) [16 U.S.C. 1531–1544 and Section
1536]; Migratory Bird Treaty Act
(MBTA) [16 U.S.C. 703–712].
5. Historic and Cultural Resources:
Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act of 1966, as amended
(106) [16 U.S.C. 470(f) et seq.];
Archeological Resources Protection Act
of 1977 (ARPA) [16 U.S.C. 470(aa)–
470(ll)]; Archeological and Historic
Preservation Act (AHPA) [16 U.S.C.
469–469(c)].
6. Social and Economic: Civil Rights
Act of 1964 (Civil Rights) [42 U.S.C.
2000(d) et seq.
7. Wetlands and Water Resources:
Clean Water Act (Section 401, Section
319) [33 U.S.C. 1251–1377]; Rivers and
Harbors Act of 1899 (RHA) [33 U.S.C.
401–406]; Wetlands Mitigation (Sections
103 and 133) [23 U.S.C. 103(b)(6)(M)
and 133(b)(11)].
8. Executive Orders: E.O. 11990
Protection of Wetlands; E.O. 11988
Floodplain Management; E.O. 11514
Protection and Enhancement of
Environmental Quality; E.O. 12898,
Federal Actions to Address
Environmental Justice in Minority
Populations and Low Income
Populations.
The projects subject to this notice are:
Geneva Road. Project location: Utah
County, Utah; Provo Center Street north
through Utah County, including the
cities of Orem, Vineyard, and Lindon to
State Street (SR–89) in Pleasant Grove.
Project reference number: FHWA–UT–
EIS–08–01–F. Project type: The project
will include roadway improvements to
add travel lanes in order to meet LOS D
in year 2030, intersection
improvements, cross-section
improvements, improvements to the
horizontal alignment at 400 North, and
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:33 Dec 10, 2009
Jkt 220001
sidewalk, trail, and shoulder
improvements. Final agency action(s)
taken under: NEPA, FAHA, CAA, 4f,
106, ESA, MBTA, ARPA, AHPA, Civil
Rights, E.O. 11990, E.O. 11514, E.O.
12898. FHWA NEPA documents: FEIS
approved on August 18, 2009; ROD
issued on October 13, 2009, both
available at https://www.udot.utah.gov/
geneva.
SR–262, Montezuma Creek to Aneth.
Project location: San Juan County, Utah;
SR–262, Montezuma Creek to Aneth.
Project reference number: FHWA–UT–
EIS–08–02–D. Project type: The project
proposes safety improvements to 8.5
miles of State Route (SR) 162 (formally
numbered SR–262) by improving
roadway deficiencies and reducing
potential conflicts with pedestrians and
animals through improvements and
realignment of the SR–162/SR–262
intersection and highway widening
between the cities of Montezuma and
Aneth, Utah. Final agency action(s)
taken under: NEPA, FAHA, CAA, 4f,
106, ESA, MBTA, ARPA, AHPA, Civil
Rights, E.O. 11990, E.O. 11514, E.O.
12898. FHWA NEPA documents: FEIS
approved on June 2, 2009; ROD issued
on August 25, 2009, available at https://
www.udot.utah.gov/sr-262/.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Program Number 20.205, Highway Planning
and Construction. The regulations
implementing Executive Order 12372
regarding intergovernmental consultation on
Federal programs and activities apply to this
program.)
Authority: 23 U.S.C. § 139(l)(1).
Issued on: December 3, 2009.
James C. Christian,
Division Administrator, Salt Lake City.
[FR Doc. E9–29579 Filed 12–10–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–RY–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Surface Transportation Board
[STB Finance Docket No. 35327]
Blacklands Railroad, Inc.—Lease and
Operation Exemption—Rusk County
Rural Rail District
Blacklands Railroad, Inc. (BLR), a
Class III rail carrier, has filed a verified
notice of exemption under 49 CFR
1150.41 to lease from Rusk County
Rural Rail District (RCRRD), and to
operate, a 15.69-mile line of railroad
extending between milepost 0.59 near
Overton, TX, and milepost 16.28 near
Henderson, TX.1
1 Union Pacific Railroad Company (UP) has
obtained Board authority to abandon this line of
railroad in Union Pacific Railroad Company—
PO 00000
Frm 00104
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
65835
The transaction is expected to be
consummated on or shortly after
December 28, 2009, when RCRRD
acquires the line from UP.
BLR certifies that its projected annual
revenues as a result of this transaction
will not result in BLR becoming a Class
II or Class I rail carrier. BLR further
certifies that its projected annual
revenues as a result of this transaction
will not exceed $5 million. BLR states
that its lease agreement with RCRRD
will not contain a provision prohibiting
BLR from interchanging traffic with a
third party.
This transaction is related to a
concurrently filed verified notice of
exemption in STB Finance Docket No.
35330, Rusk County Rural Rail
District—Acquisition Exemption—
Union Pacific Railroad Company. In
that proceeding, RCRRD seeks to acquire
from UP the 15.69 miles of rail line that
BLR seeks to lease and operate in this
proceeding.
Pursuant to the Consolidated
Appropriations Act, 2008, Public Law
110–161, § 193, 121 Stat. 1844 (2007),
nothing in this decision authorizes the
following activities at any solid waste
rail transfer facility: Collecting, storing,
or transferring solid waste outside of its
original shipping container; or
separating or processing solid waste
(including baling, crushing, compacting,
and shredding). The term ‘‘solid waste’’
is defined in section 1004 of the Solid
Waste Disposal Act, 42 U.S.C. 6903.
If the verified notice contains false or
misleading information, the exemption
is void ab initio. Petitions to revoke the
exemption under 49 U.S.C. 10502(d)
may be filed at any time. The filing of
a petition to revoke will not
automatically stay the effectiveness of
the exemption. Stay petitions must be
filed no later than December 18, 2009 (at
least 7 days before the exemption
becomes effective).
An original and 10 copies of all
pleadings, referring to STB Finance
Docket No. 35327, must be filed with
the Surface Transportation Board, 395 E
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20423–
0001. In addition, one copy of each
pleading must be served on Karl Morell,
Of Counsel, Ball Janik LLP, Suite 225,
1455 F Street, NW., Washington, DC
20005.
Board decisions and notices are
available on our Web site at https://
www.stb.dot.gov.
Abandonment—in Rusk County, TX, STB Docket
No. AB–33 (Sub-No. 275) (STB served Sept. 11,
2009), but has not consummated the abandonment.
In lieu of abandonment, UP has agreed to sell the
right-of-way, track, and track structures to RCRRD
for continued rail service. In turn, BLR will lease
the line from RCRRD and operate it.
E:\FR\FM\11DEN1.SGM
11DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 237 (Friday, December 11, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 65834-65835]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-29579]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Highway Administration
Notice of Final Federal Agency Actions on Proposed Highways in
the State of Utah--Geneva Road EIS and SR-262, Montezuma Creek to Aneth
AGENCY: Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of limitation on claims for judicial review of actions
by FHWA.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This notice announces actions taken by the FHWA that are final
within the meaning of 23 U.S.C. 139(l)(1). The actions relate to
various proposed highway projects in the State of Utah. Those actions
grant approvals for the projects.
DATES: By this notice, the FHWA is advising the public of final agency
actions subject to 23 U.S.C. 139(l)(1). A claim seeking judicial review
of the Federal agency actions on any of the listed highway projects
will be barred unless the claim is filed on or before June 9, 2010. If
the Federal law that authorizes judicial review of a claim provides a
time period of less than 180 days for filing such claim, then that
shorter time period still applies.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For FHWA: Mr. Edward Woolford,
Environmental Program Manager, Federal Highway Administration, 2520
West 4700 South, Suite 9A, Salt Lake City, Utah 84118; telephone: (801)
963-0182; e-mail: Edward.Woolford@DOT.gov. The FHWA Utah Division
Office's normal business hours are 7:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. (Mountain
Standard Time). For UDOT: Ms. Rebecca Stromness, Environmental Program
Manager, Utah Department of Transportation, 4501 South 2700 West, Box
148450, Salt Lake City, Utah 84118-8450; telephone: (801) 965-4327; e-
mail: Rstromness@utah.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that the FHWA has
taken final agency action by issuing approval for the highway projects
in the State of Utah that are listed below. The action by the Federal
agency on a project, and the laws under which such actions were taken,
are described in the documented environmental impact statement (EIS)
issued in connection with the projects, and in other project records.
The FEIS,
[[Page 65835]]
Record of Decision (ROD), and other project records for the listed
projects are available by contacting the FHWA or the Utah Department of
Transportation at the addresses provided above. For some of the
projects, the FEIS, ROD and documents also can be viewed and downloaded
electronically as specified below. This notice applies to all Federal
agency decisions as of the issuance date of this notice and all laws
under which such actions were taken, including but not limited to:
1. General: National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) [42 U.S.C.
4321-4347]; Federal-Aid Highway Act (FAHA) [23 U.S.C. 109 and 23 U.S.C.
128].
2. Air: Clean Air Act (CAA) [42 U.S.C. 7401-7671(q)].
3. Land: Section 4(f) of the Department of Transportation Act of
1966 (4f) [49 U.S.C. 303].
4. Wildlife: Endangered Species Act (ESA) [16 U.S.C. 1531-1544 and
Section 1536]; Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) [16 U.S.C. 703-712].
5. Historic and Cultural Resources: Section 106 of the National
Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended (106) [16 U.S.C. 470(f)
et seq.]; Archeological Resources Protection Act of 1977 (ARPA) [16
U.S.C. 470(aa)-470(ll)]; Archeological and Historic Preservation Act
(AHPA) [16 U.S.C. 469-469(c)].
6. Social and Economic: Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Civil Rights) [42
U.S.C. 2000(d) et seq.
7. Wetlands and Water Resources: Clean Water Act (Section 401,
Section 319) [33 U.S.C. 1251-1377]; Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899
(RHA) [33 U.S.C. 401-406]; Wetlands Mitigation (Sections 103 and 133)
[23 U.S.C. 103(b)(6)(M) and 133(b)(11)].
8. Executive Orders: E.O. 11990 Protection of Wetlands; E.O. 11988
Floodplain Management; E.O. 11514 Protection and Enhancement of
Environmental Quality; E.O. 12898, Federal Actions to Address
Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low Income
Populations.
The projects subject to this notice are:
Geneva Road. Project location: Utah County, Utah; Provo Center
Street north through Utah County, including the cities of Orem,
Vineyard, and Lindon to State Street (SR-89) in Pleasant Grove. Project
reference number: FHWA-UT-EIS-08-01-F. Project type: The project will
include roadway improvements to add travel lanes in order to meet LOS D
in year 2030, intersection improvements, cross-section improvements,
improvements to the horizontal alignment at 400 North, and sidewalk,
trail, and shoulder improvements. Final agency action(s) taken under:
NEPA, FAHA, CAA, 4f, 106, ESA, MBTA, ARPA, AHPA, Civil Rights, E.O.
11990, E.O. 11514, E.O. 12898. FHWA NEPA documents: FEIS approved on
August 18, 2009; ROD issued on October 13, 2009, both available at
https://www.udot.utah.gov/geneva.
SR-262, Montezuma Creek to Aneth. Project location: San Juan
County, Utah; SR-262, Montezuma Creek to Aneth. Project reference
number: FHWA-UT-EIS-08-02-D. Project type: The project proposes safety
improvements to 8.5 miles of State Route (SR) 162 (formally numbered
SR-262) by improving roadway deficiencies and reducing potential
conflicts with pedestrians and animals through improvements and
realignment of the SR-162/SR-262 intersection and highway widening
between the cities of Montezuma and Aneth, Utah. Final agency action(s)
taken under: NEPA, FAHA, CAA, 4f, 106, ESA, MBTA, ARPA, AHPA, Civil
Rights, E.O. 11990, E.O. 11514, E.O. 12898. FHWA NEPA documents: FEIS
approved on June 2, 2009; ROD issued on August 25, 2009, available at
https://www.udot.utah.gov/sr-262/.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Number 20.205,
Highway Planning and Construction. The regulations implementing
Executive Order 12372 regarding intergovernmental consultation on
Federal programs and activities apply to this program.)
Authority: 23 U.S.C. Sec. 139(l)(1).
Issued on: December 3, 2009.
James C. Christian,
Division Administrator, Salt Lake City.
[FR Doc. E9-29579 Filed 12-10-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-RY-P