Anthony Macrie-Continuance in Control Exemption-New Jersey Seashore Lines, Inc., 65832-65833 [E9-29499]
Download as PDF
65832
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 237 / Friday, December 11, 2009 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Surface Transportation Board
[STB Finance Docket No. 35330]
Rusk County Rural Rail District—
Acquisition Exemption—Union Pacific
Railroad Company
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Rusk County Rural Rail District
(RCRRD), a noncarrier, has filed a
verified notice of exemption under 49
CFR 1150.31 to acquire from Union
Pacific Railroad Company (UP) a 15.69mile line of railroad beginning at
milepost 0.59 near Overton, TX, and
ending at milepost 16.28 near
Henderson, TX.1
RCRRD anticipates that the
transaction will be consummated on or
after December 28, 2009.
RCRRD certifies that its projected
annual revenues as a result of this
transaction will not exceed $5 million
and will not result in the creation of a
Class II or Class I rail carrier.
This transaction is related to a
concurrently filed verified notice of
exemption in STB Finance Docket No.
35327, Blacklands Railroad, Inc.—Lease
and Operation Exemption—Rusk
County Rural Rail District. In that
proceeding, Blacklands Railroad, Inc.
(BLR) seeks to lease from RCRRD and
operate the 15.69 miles of rail line that
RCRRD seeks to acquire in this
proceeding. According to RCRRD, on
the date that RCRRD acquires the line,
BLR will assume responsibility for
operating the line pursuant to a lease
agreement between RCRRD and BLR.
RCRRD states that it has reached an
agreement with UP on the principal
terms of the transaction but they have
not yet finalized it. RCRRD anticipates
finalizing the agreement before the
effective date of the notice. RCRRD also
states that the proposed acquisition of
the line will not involve any provision
or agreement between UP and RCRRD
that would limit future interchange with
a third-party connecting carrier, as the
line only connects with UP at Overton,
TX.
Pursuant to the Consolidated
Appropriations Act, 2008, Public Law
110–161, § 193, 121 Stat. 1844 (2007),
nothing in this decision authorizes the
following activities at any solid waste
rail transfer facility: collecting, storing,
or transferring solid waste outside of its
1 UP has obtained Board authority to abandon this
line of railroad in Union Pacific Railroad
Company—Abandonment—in Rusk County, TX,
STB Docket No. AB–33 (Sub-No. 275) (STB served
Sept. 11, 2009), but has not consummated the
abandonment. In lieu of abandonment, UP has
agreed to sell the right-of-way, track, and track
structures to RCRRD for continued rail service.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:33 Dec 10, 2009
Jkt 220001
original shipping container; or
separating or processing solid waste
(including baling, crushing, compacting,
and shredding). The term ‘‘solid waste’’
is defined in section 1004 of the Solid
Waste Disposal Act, 42 U.S.C. 6903.
If the verified notice contains false or
misleading information, the exemption
is void ab initio. Petitions to revoke the
exemption under 49 U.S.C. 10502(d)
may be filed at any time. The filing of
a petition to revoke will not
automatically stay the effectiveness of
the exemption. Stay petitions must be
filed no later than December 18, 2009 (at
least 7 days before the exemption
becomes effective).
An original and 10 copies of all
pleadings, referring to STB Finance
Docket No. 35330, must be filed with
the Surface Transportation Board, 395 E
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20423–
0001. In addition, one copy of each
pleading must be served on Robert A.
Wimbish, Baker & Miller PLLC, 2401
Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Suite 300,
Washington, DC 20037.
Board decisions and notices are
available on our website at https://
www.stb.dot.gov.
Decided: December 7, 2009.
By the Board, Rachel D. Campbell,
Director, Office of Proceedings.
Kulunie L. Cannon,
Clearance Clerk.
[FR Doc. E9–29513 Filed 12–10–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Surface Transportation Board
[STB Finance Docket No. 35296]
Anthony Macrie—Continuance in
Control Exemption—New Jersey
Seashore Lines, Inc.
Anthony Macrie (Macrie), a
noncarrier, has filed a verified notice of
exemption to continue in control of
New Jersey Seashore Lines, Inc. (NJSL),
upon NJSL’s becoming a Class III rail
carrier.
This transaction is related to a
concurrently filed verified notice of
exemption for NJSL to operate
approximately 13 miles of rail line
owned by Clayton Sand Company,
between milepost 66.0 at Lakehurst,
Borough of Lakehurst, in Ocean County,
NJ, and milepost 79.0 at Woodmansie,
Woodland Township, in Burlington
County, NJ.1 See STB Finance Docket
No. 35297, New Jersey Seashore Lines,
1 Macrie states that the involved line is a segment
of rail line originally known as the Central Railroad
Company of New Jersey’s Southern Division.
PO 00000
Frm 00101
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Inc.—Operation Exemption—Clayton
Sand Company.2
The parties may consummate the
transaction on or after December 24,
2009.
Macrie owns 100 percent of the
common stock of NJSL and also owns
100 percent of the common stock of
Cape May Seashore Lines, Inc. (CMSL),
an existing Class III rail carrier that
obtained authority in Cape May
Seashore Lines, Inc.—Modified Rail
Certificate, STB Finance Docket No.
34112 (STB served Nov. 19, 2001).
The parties represent that: (1) The rail
line to be operated by NJSL does not
connect with any other railroads in the
corporate family; (2) the transaction is
not part of a series of anticipated
transactions that would connect the rail
lines with any other railroad in the
corporate family; 3 and (3) the
transaction does not involve a Class I
rail carrier. Therefore, the transaction is
exempt from the prior approval
requirements of 49 U.S.C. 11323. See 49
CFR 1180.2(d)(2).
Under 49 U.S.C. 10502(g), the Board
may not use its exemption authority to
relieve a rail carrier of its statutory
obligation to protect the interests of its
employees. Section 11326(c), however,
does not provide for labor protection for
transactions under sections 11324 and
11325 that involve only Class III rail
carriers. Accordingly, the Board may not
impose labor protective conditions here
because all of the carriers involved are
Class III carriers.
If the verified notice contains false or
misleading information, the exemption
is void ab initio. Petitions to revoke the
exemption under 49 U.S.C. 10502(d)
may be filed at any time. The filing of
a petition to revoke will not
automatically stay the effectiveness of
the exemption. Stay petitions must be
filed no later than December 18, 2009 (at
least 7 days before the exemption
becomes effective).
An original and 10 copies of all
pleadings, referring to STB Finance
Docket No. 35296, must be filed with
the Surface Transportation Board, 395 E
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20423–
0001. In addition, one copy of each
pleading must be served on John D.
2 By decision served on September 25, 2009, the
Board held publication of this notice in abeyance
because it is directly related to the notice in STB
Finance Docket No. 35297 which was also held in
abeyance. In a decision served today in STB
Finance Docket No. 35297, the Board is publishing
the notice that had been held in abeyance. Thus,
this notice is also no longer being held in abeyance.
3 Macrie states that, although CMSL and NJSL
will both operate in the State of New Jersey, the
lines of the two carriers are at least 50 miles apart
at the closest point.
E:\FR\FM\11DEN1.SGM
11DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 237 / Friday, December 11, 2009 / Notices
Heffner, 1750 K Street, NW., Suite 200,
Washington, DC 20006.
Board decisions and notices are
available on our Web site at https://
www.stb.dot.gov.
Decided: December 7, 2009.
By the Board, Rachel D. Campbell,
Director, Office of Proceedings.
Kulunie L. Cannon,
Clearance Clerk.
[FR Doc. E9–29499 Filed 12–10–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Highway Administration
Environmental Impact Statement:
Wayne and Oakland Counties, MI
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
AGENCY: Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA), U.S. DOT.
ACTION: Notice of availability (NOA) of
the Final Environmental Impact
Statement (FEIS) for the Detroit
Intermodal Freight Terminal (DIFT) and
Section 4(f) Evaluation.
SUMMARY: This notice announces the
availability of the Final Environmental
Impact Statement (FEIS) and Section
4(f) Evaluation for the DIFT. This action
is pursuant to the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of
1969, 42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq, as amended
and the Council on Environmental
Quality Regulations (40 CFR Parts 1500–
1508). The FEIS identifies the Preferred
Alternative to enhance the intermodal
freight terminal at the LivernoisJunction Yard in Detroit, Michigan;
describes the environmental impacts of
the proposed project and proposed
mitigation; and addresses comments
received on the Draft Environmental
Impact Statement and Section 4(f)
Evaluation issued in April 15, 2005.
DATES: Any comments must be received
on or before January 29, 2010. The FEIS
waiting period ends 49 days after the
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
publishes the DIFT’s NOA in the
Federal Register (currently scheduled to
be published on December 11th).
ADDRESSES:
1. Document Availability: Copies of
the FEIS are available for public
inspection and review at the following
locations:
• Ferndale Public Library, 222 E. Nine
Mile, Ferndale, MI.
• Henry Ford Centennial Library, 16301
Michigan Ave., Dearborn, MI.
• Detroit Public Library, 5201
Woodward Ave., Detroit, MI.
• Bowen Branch of the Detroit Public
Library, 3648 W. Vernor, Detroit, MI.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:33 Dec 10, 2009
Jkt 220001
• MDOT Detroit Transportation Service
Center, 1400 Howard St., Detroit, MI.
• MDOT Oakland Transportation
Service Center, 2300 Dixie Hwy.,
Waterford, MI.
• MDOT Region Office, 18101 W. Nine
Mile Rd., Southfield, MI.
• MDOT Bureau of Transportation
Planning, 425 Ottawa St., Lansing, MI.
The document also may be viewed
and commented on at https://
www.michigan.gov/mdot/0,1607,7–151–
9621_11058_26215—,00.html.
Copies of the FEIS may be requested
from Bob Parsons (Public Involvement
and Hearings Officer) at the Michigan
Department of Transportation, 425 W.
Ottawa Street, P.O. Box 30050, Lansing,
MI 48909 or by calling (517) 373–9534.
2. Comments: Send any comments on
the FEIS to the Michigan Department of
Transportation, c/o Bob Parsons (Public
Involvement and Hearings Officer), 425
W. Ottawa Street, P.O. Box 30050,
Lansing, MI 48909; Fax: (517) 373–9255;
or e-mail: parsonsb@michigan.gov.
Information regarding this proposed
action is available in alternative formats
upon request.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Donald Cameron, Planning & Program
Development Manager, at FHWA
Michigan Division, 315 W. Allegan
Street, Room 201; Lansing, MI 48933; by
phone at (517) 702–1826, or e-mail at
Donald.Cameron@dot.gov. David
Williams, Environmental Program
Manager, FHWA Michigan Division, 315
W. Allegan Street, Room 201; Lansing,
MI 48933; by phone at (517) 702–1820;
or e-mail at David.Williams@dot.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The DEIS
for the DIFT was approved in April
2005. Since more than three years has
passed since the signing of the DEIS, a
re-evaluation of the DIES was done in
accordance with 23 CFR 771.129. This
FEIS reflect the comments received
during the public hearing process and
updated data in all critical areas.
The goal of the project is to provide
and/or improve regional intermodal
facilities, owned and/or operated by the
one or more of the DIFT Rail Related
participants—Grand Trunk Western
Railroad, Inc. (CN); Canadian Pacific
Railway Company (CP); CSX
Transportation, Inc. (CSX); Norfolk
Southern Railway company (NS); and
the Michigan Department of
Transportation (MDOT)—with sufficient
capacity and interconnectivity to
provide for existing and future
intermodal demand and to reduce time,
monetary costs, and congestion to the
support the economic competitiveness
of Southeastern Michigan. This will be
done by providing necessary intermodal
PO 00000
Frm 00102
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
65833
terminal capacity and improving the
related rail and highway infrastructure
within Wayne and Oakland counties.
The Detroit Intermodal Freight
terminal Project Pre-Development Plan
Agreement was established to further
refine the understandings and
intentions of the DIFT Rail Related
Participants.
Purpose and Need for the Project: The
purpose of the DIFT is to enhance
intermodal operations and economic
competitiveness of Southeast Michigan
by improving freight transportation
opportunities and efficiencies for
business, industry, and the military. The
need to enhance intermodal operations
results from Detroit’s need for greater
intermodal capacity and improved
connectivity.
Preferred Alternative: The Preferred
Alternative involves consolidating
intermodal operations of the CSX, NS,
and CP railroads at the LivernoisJunction Yard in Southwest Detroit and
improving external connectors to benefit
all Class I railroads, including CN.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq, as
amended and the Council on Environmental
Quality Regulations (40 CFR Parts 1500–
1508) 23 CFR 771.117; and 23 U.S.C.
139(1)(1).
Issued on: December 1, 2009.
James J. Steele,
Division Administrator, Lansing, Michigan.
[FR Doc. E9–29189 Filed 12–10–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Highway Administration
Tier 1 Final Environmental Impact
Statement (FEIS) for the Placer
Parkway Corridor Preservation Project
December 2009.
AGENCY: United States Department of
Transportation, Federal Highway
Administration.
ACTION: Notice of Availability (NOA) of
the Tier 1 Final Environmental Impact
Statement (FEIS) for the Placer Parkway
Corridor Preservation Project and a
Section 4(f) Evaluation.
SUMMARY: The Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA) is issuing this
notice to advise the public of the
availability of a Tier 1 FEIS and Section
4(f) Evaluation for the Placer Parkway
Corridor Preservation Project, a
proposed transportation corridor in
western Placer and eastern Sutter
Counties, California. This action is
pursuant to the National Environmental
Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969, 42 U.S.C.
4321 et seq., as amended and the
E:\FR\FM\11DEN1.SGM
11DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 237 (Friday, December 11, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 65832-65833]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-29499]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Surface Transportation Board
[STB Finance Docket No. 35296]
Anthony Macrie--Continuance in Control Exemption--New Jersey
Seashore Lines, Inc.
Anthony Macrie (Macrie), a noncarrier, has filed a verified notice
of exemption to continue in control of New Jersey Seashore Lines, Inc.
(NJSL), upon NJSL's becoming a Class III rail carrier.
This transaction is related to a concurrently filed verified notice
of exemption for NJSL to operate approximately 13 miles of rail line
owned by Clayton Sand Company, between milepost 66.0 at Lakehurst,
Borough of Lakehurst, in Ocean County, NJ, and milepost 79.0 at
Woodmansie, Woodland Township, in Burlington County, NJ.\1\ See STB
Finance Docket No. 35297, New Jersey Seashore Lines, Inc.--Operation
Exemption--Clayton Sand Company.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Macrie states that the involved line is a segment of rail
line originally known as the Central Railroad Company of New
Jersey's Southern Division.
\2\ By decision served on September 25, 2009, the Board held
publication of this notice in abeyance because it is directly
related to the notice in STB Finance Docket No. 35297 which was also
held in abeyance. In a decision served today in STB Finance Docket
No. 35297, the Board is publishing the notice that had been held in
abeyance. Thus, this notice is also no longer being held in
abeyance.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The parties may consummate the transaction on or after December 24,
2009.
Macrie owns 100 percent of the common stock of NJSL and also owns
100 percent of the common stock of Cape May Seashore Lines, Inc.
(CMSL), an existing Class III rail carrier that obtained authority in
Cape May Seashore Lines, Inc.--Modified Rail Certificate, STB Finance
Docket No. 34112 (STB served Nov. 19, 2001).
The parties represent that: (1) The rail line to be operated by
NJSL does not connect with any other railroads in the corporate family;
(2) the transaction is not part of a series of anticipated transactions
that would connect the rail lines with any other railroad in the
corporate family; \3\ and (3) the transaction does not involve a Class
I rail carrier. Therefore, the transaction is exempt from the prior
approval requirements of 49 U.S.C. 11323. See 49 CFR 1180.2(d)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ Macrie states that, although CMSL and NJSL will both operate
in the State of New Jersey, the lines of the two carriers are at
least 50 miles apart at the closest point.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Under 49 U.S.C. 10502(g), the Board may not use its exemption
authority to relieve a rail carrier of its statutory obligation to
protect the interests of its employees. Section 11326(c), however, does
not provide for labor protection for transactions under sections 11324
and 11325 that involve only Class III rail carriers. Accordingly, the
Board may not impose labor protective conditions here because all of
the carriers involved are Class III carriers.
If the verified notice contains false or misleading information,
the exemption is void ab initio. Petitions to revoke the exemption
under 49 U.S.C. 10502(d) may be filed at any time. The filing of a
petition to revoke will not automatically stay the effectiveness of the
exemption. Stay petitions must be filed no later than December 18, 2009
(at least 7 days before the exemption becomes effective).
An original and 10 copies of all pleadings, referring to STB
Finance Docket No. 35296, must be filed with the Surface Transportation
Board, 395 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20423-0001. In addition, one
copy of each pleading must be served on John D.
[[Page 65833]]
Heffner, 1750 K Street, NW., Suite 200, Washington, DC 20006.
Board decisions and notices are available on our Web site at https://www.stb.dot.gov.
Decided: December 7, 2009.
By the Board, Rachel D. Campbell, Director, Office of
Proceedings.
Kulunie L. Cannon,
Clearance Clerk.
[FR Doc. E9-29499 Filed 12-10-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-01-P