Fisheries of the Caribbean, Gulf of Mexico, and South Atlantic; Reef Fish Fishery of the Gulf of Mexico; Amendment 29 Supplement, 65500-65503 [E9-29478]
Download as PDF
65500
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 236 / Thursday, December 10, 2009 / Proposed Rules
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 622
[Docket No. 090206140–91419–04]
RIN 0648–AX39
Fisheries of the Caribbean, Gulf of
Mexico, and South Atlantic; Reef Fish
Fishery of the Gulf of Mexico;
Amendment 29 Supplement
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for
comments.
SUMMARY: NMFS issues this proposed
rule to supplement the regulations
implementing Amendment 29 to the
Fishery Management Plan for Reef Fish
Resources of the Gulf of Mexico (FMP),
as prepared and submitted by the Gulf
of Mexico Fishery Management Council
(Council). Amendment 29 established a
multi-species individual fishing quota
(IFQ) program for the grouper and
tilefish component of the commercial
sector of the reef fish fishery in the Gulf
of Mexico (Gulf) exclusive economic
zone. This proposed rule would remove
several measures constraining harvest of
shallow-water grouper species that were
inadvertently not removed in the final
rule for Amendment 29, further clarify
existing criteria for approval of new
landing locations for both the red
snapper IFQ program and grouper and
tilefish IFQ program, and provide a
definition of ‘‘offloading’’ in the
codified text for IFQ participants. This
proposed rule also discusses two
options considered by the Council.
NMFS is seeking comment on one of
these options, which would give IFQ
fishermen the option to provide a
headcount of the fish on board at the
time of landing. The intent of this
proposed rule is to enhance IFQ
program enforcement capabilities,
reduce confusion for IFQ participants
offloading their fish, and allow for more
efficient functioning of the IFQ
programs for red snapper and groupers
and tilefishes.
DATES: Written comments on this
proposed rule must be received no later
than 5 p.m., eastern time, on January 11,
2010.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by ‘‘0648–AX39,’’ by any one
of the following methods:
• Electronic Submissions: Submit all
electronic public comments via the
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:17 Dec 09, 2009
Jkt 220001
Federal e-Rulemaking Portal https://
www.regulations.gov
• Fax: 727–824–5308, Attn: Susan
Gerhart.
• Mail: Susan Gerhart, Southeast
Regional Office, NMFS, 263 13th
Avenue South, St. Petersburg, FL 33701
Instructions: No comments will be
posted for public viewing until after the
comment period has closed. All
comments received are a part of the
public record and will generally be
posted to https://www.regulations.gov
without change. All Personal Identifying
Information (for example, name,
address, etc.) voluntarily submitted by
the commenter may be publicly
accessible. Do not submit Confidential
Business Information or otherwise
sensitive or protected information.
To submit comments through the
Federal e-Rulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov, enter ‘‘NOAANMFS–2008–0223’’ in the keyword
search, then select ‘‘Send a Comment or
Submission.’’ NMFS will accept
anonymous comments (enter N/A in the
required fields, if you wish to remain
anonymous). You may submit
attachments to electronic comments in
Microsoft Word, Excel, WordPerfect, or
Adobe PDF file formats only.
Copies of Amendment 29, which
includes a final environmental impact
statement (FEIS), an initial regulatory
flexibility analysis, and a regulatory
impact review (RIR) may be obtained
from the Gulf of Mexico Fishery
Management Council, 2203 North Lois
Avenue, Suite 1100, Tampa, FL 33607;
telephone 813–348–1630; fax 813–348–
1711; e-mail
gulfcouncil@gulfcouncil.org; or may be
downloaded from the Council’s website
at https://www.gulfcouncil.org/.
Copies of the final regulatory
flexibility analysis (FRFA), and record
of decision may be obtained from Susan
Gerhart, Southeast Regional Office,
NMFS, 263 13th Avenue South, St.
Petersburg, FL 33701.
Written comments regarding the
burden-hour estimate or other aspects of
the collection-of-information
requirement contained in this proposed
rule may be submitted to Richard
Malinowski, Southeast Regional Office,
NMFS, and by e-mail to
DavidlRostker@omb.eop.gov, or by fax
to 202–395–7285.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Susan Gerhart, telephone: 727–824–
5305.
The reef
fish fishery of the Gulf of Mexico is
managed under the FMP. The FMP was
prepared by the Council and is
implemented through regulations at 50
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
CFR part 622 under the authority of the
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act
(Magnuson-Stevens Act).
Background
On July 2, 2009, NMFS approved
Amendment 29. Amendment 29 created
an IFQ program for the grouper and
tilefish component of the commercial
sector of the Gulf reef fish fishery. A
final rule implementing the amendment
published on August 31, 2009 (74 FR
44732). This proposed rule includes
three administrative measures that were
not included in the final rule for
Amendment 29. These administrative
measures would allow for more efficient
functioning of the grouper and tilefish
IFQ program, reduce confusion among
IFQ participants that are offloading their
fish, and further enhance enforcement
capabilities of the red snapper IFQ
program and the IFQ program for
groupers and tilefishes, as intended by
the Council. This proposed rule also
discusses two options considered by the
Council at the October 2009 Council
meeting. NMFS specifically invites
comments in this proposed rulemaking
on one of these options, namely a
provision that would allow fishermen to
provide a headcount of the fish on board
at the time of landing.
Management Measures Contained in
This Proposed Rule
Remove measures that constrain
commercial harvest
Amendment 29 states, ‘‘Approval and
implementation of the IFQ program will
result in the elimination of existing
management measures intended to
constrain commercial harvest, such as
grouper trip limits.’’ However, the trip
limit and accountability measures
(AMs) implemented in May 2009,
through the final rule for Amendment
30B to the FMP (74 FR 17603, April 18,
2009), were inadvertently not removed
in the final rule for Amendment 29.
This proposed rule would remove the
trip limit and AMs implemented
through Amendment 30B to the FMP
that constrain commercial harvest.
IFQ programs are intended to
eliminate the need for trip limits so
fishermen have the flexibility to fish
when and where they want, thereby
promoting safety at sea and reducing
economic hardship. In the current
regulations, the trip limit is defined as
follows: if 80 percent of either the gag
or the red grouper quota is reached, and
100 percent of the quota is projected to
be reached prior to the end of the
fishing year, a 200–lb (90.7–kg) trip
limit will be implemented for the
E:\FR\FM\10DEP1.SGM
10DEP1
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 236 / Thursday, December 10, 2009 / Proposed Rules
applicable species. This proposed rule
would remove this trip limit as it is no
longer needed to constrain commercial
harvest with the implementation of the
grouper and tilefish IFQ program. Under
the IFQ program, the rate of harvest
would be controlled by the availability
of individual fishing quotas.
The Magnuson-Stevens Act, reauthorized in 2006, requires that annual
catch limits (ACLs) and AMs for stocks
that are undergoing overfishing or are
overfished be implemented by the end
of 2010. The National Standard 1
guidelines define AMs as management
controls to prevent ACLs, including
sector ACLs, from being exceeded, and
to correct or mitigate overages of the
ACL if they occur. The AMs
implemented through Amendment 30B
that constrain commercial harvest state:
if 100 percent of any one of the three
quotas (gag, red grouper, or shallowwater grouper) is reached, the entire
shallow-water grouper sector of the
commercial fishery will close for the
remainder of the fishing year. The
grouper and tilefish IFQ program was
designed to act as an AM, in and of
itself, by constraining harvest to
individual fishing quotas. The IFQ
program also requires any overage (as
much as 10 percent of allocation
remaining on the shareholder’s last trip)
to be deducted from the shareholder’s
allocation the subsequent fishing year.
This provision acts as an AM by
mitigating overages after they occur.
Because the IFQ program itself acts as
an AM and there are other AMs inherent
in the IFQ program, the AMs included
in Amendment 30B that constrain
commercial harvest would be removed
through this rulemaking.
The FEIS, FRFA, and RIR conducted
for Amendment 29 adequately analyzed
the impacts of the management
measures proposed in this rule.
Regulatory provisions in this rule were
either inadvertently not included in the
proposed and final rules for
Amendment 29, or they provide greater
specificity for provisions previously
implemented through Amendment 29.
The supporting regulatory analyses for
Amendment 29 either specifically
addressed the impacts of these
measures, or analyzed associated
impacts assuming these measures would
also be implemented. Because no
additional analysis is necessary to
support the measures currently
proposed, no such analysis was
prepared.
Clarify landing location criteria
NMFS Office for Law Enforcement
must approve landing locations prior to
landing or offloading red snapper,
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:17 Dec 09, 2009
Jkt 220001
groupers, or tilefishes. Proposed landing
locations may be submitted at any time;
however, new landing locations are
approved only at the end of each
calendar-year quarter. To have a landing
location approved by the end of the
calendar-year quarter, it must be
submitted at least 45 days before the
end of the calendar-year quarter.
Current regulations state that landing
locations must be publicly accessible by
land and water, and a street address
must be provided for a landing location.
If there is no street address on record,
then Global Positioning System
coordinates must be provided.
To assist law enforcement in
determining eligibility of landing
locations submitted for review, more
specific criteria would be established to
provide greater clarification for the
requirement that landing locations must
be publicly accessible. These criteria
would include, but are not limited to
the following: the site must be
accessible for vehicles via public roads;
the site must be accessible for vessels
via navigable waters; and no other
condition may impede free and
immediate access to the landing
location, such as locked gates, guard
dogs, or any other physical barrier. Any
participant submitting a landing
location request would be required to
fill out a form on the IFQ website at
ifq.sero.nmfs.noaa.gov. The form would
include a series of questions regarding
the landing location and its
accessability. NMFS Office for Law
Enforcement would include this form in
their review to approve or disapprove
proposed sites. Approved landing
locations are posted on the IFQ website
listed above.
Define offloading
The current regulations define
‘‘landing’’ specifically for the red
snapper IFQ program and the IFQ
program for groupers and tilefishes,
however, ‘‘offloading’’ has not yet been
defined in the regulations for IFQ
participants. For the purposes of the red
snapper IFQ program and the IFQ
program for groupers and tilefishes,
‘‘landing’’ is defined as arriving at a
dock, berth, beach, seawall, or ramp.
This proposed rule would provide a
definition of ‘‘offloading’’ for IFQ
participants in the codified text. For the
purposes of the red snapper IFQ
program and the IFQ program for
groupers and tilefishes, ‘‘offloading’’
would be defined as removing IFQ fish
from a vessel.
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
65501
Options considered by the Council
Provide a headcount as a means to
estimate the IFQ fish onboard
Some fishermen who operate in the
red snapper IFQ program and the IFQ
program for groupers and tilefishes
trailer their fish to the dealer. When IFQ
fish are offloaded to a vehicle for
transportation to a dealer or are trailered
to a dealer, a transaction approval code
must accompany those fish. The
implementing regulations for
Amendment 29 specify that an accurate
weight must be submitted to complete a
landing transaction to determine that
the fisherman has sufficient allocation
to cover the amount of fish landed.
Therefore, the fishermen must have onsite capability to weigh their fish and
connect electronically to the online IFQ
system to complete the transaction and
obtain a transaction approval code to
transport these fish. At the October 2009
Council meeting, the Council voted to
seek public comment on a provision
that would give fishermen the option to
provide a headcount of the fish on board
at the time of landing, in lieu of
reporting the weight. Reporting the
weight of IFQ fish landed is considered
to be an important component of
monitoring the IFQ program and
preventing overages. NMFS’ preliminary
determination is that providing a
headcount instead of the weight at the
time of landing would not allow for
adequate monitoring and enforcement of
the IFQ program. If fishermen were to
provide a headcount at the time of
landing, they would still need to
connect electronically to the online IFQ
system and obtain a transaction
approval code (using the headcount) to
transport those fish to the dealer. When
they offload their fish at the dealer
location, the accurate weight would
then need to be updated under the same
transaction approval code (replacing the
headcount) to complete that transaction.
NMFS invites comments on this option,
particularly whether fishermen would
find this option to provide a headcount
at the time of landing beneficial to their
business plans.
Extend the offloading window
The current allowable time period to
offload red snapper, groupers, and
tilefishes is from 6 a.m. to 6 p.m. At the
October 2009 Council meeting, the
Council voted to consider an option that
would extend the allowable time period
to offload fish by four hours. Therefore,
the offloading window would be
between 6 a.m. and 10 p.m. Extending
the offloading window could potentially
give fishermen greater flexibility for
when they may offload their fish.
E:\FR\FM\10DEP1.SGM
10DEP1
65502
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 236 / Thursday, December 10, 2009 / Proposed Rules
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS
However, Amendment 29 specifically
states that the allowable time period to
offload IFQ fish is between 6 a.m. and
6 p.m. Therefore, the Council would
need to address this option in a plan
amendment if it is to be implemented in
the future.
Classification
Pursuant to section 304(b)(1)(A) of the
Magnuson-Stevens Act, the NMFS
Assistant Administrator has determined
that this proposed rule is consistent
with Amendment 29, other provisions
of the Magnuson-Stevens Act, and other
applicable law, subject to further
consideration after public comment.
This proposed rule has been
determined to be not significant for
purposes of Executive Order 12866.
NMFS prepared an FEIS for
Amendment 29. A notice of availability
for the FEIS was published on May 8,
2009 (74 FR 21684).
NMFS prepared a FRFA, as required
by section 604 of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, for Amendment 29. A
copy of the full analysis is available
from NMFS (see ADDRESSES). Two of the
measures contained in this proposed
rule, namely the measure to remove the
trip limit and AMs that constrain
commercial harvest and the measure to
clarify existing landing location criteria,
are measures inherent in an IFQ
program. Providing a definition of the
term ‘‘offloading’’ for IFQ participants is
further clarification of an existing IFQ
component. Because the FRFA prepared
for Amendment 29 analyzed the
economic conditions that would exist
assuming these measures were already
included in the IFQ program for Gulf
groupers and tilefishes, no new
economic analysis has been conducted
for those measures in this proposed
rule.
This proposed rule contains a
collection-of-information requirement
subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act
(PRA). This requirement has been
submitted to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) for approval. Public
reporting burden for the ‘‘Landing
Location Criteria Form’’ is estimated to
average 5 minutes per response,
including the time for reviewing
instructions, searching existing data
sources, gathering and maintaining the
data needed, and completing and
reviewing the collection of information.
Public comment is sought regarding:
whether this proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
the accuracy of the burden estimate;
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:17 Dec 09, 2009
Jkt 220001
clarity of the information to be
collected; and ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information,
including through the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology. Send comments
regarding the burden estimate or any
other aspect of the collection-ofinformation requirement, including
suggestions for reducing the burden, to
NMFS and to the OMB (see ADDRESSES).
Notwithstanding any other provision
of law, no person is required to respond
to, nor shall a person be subject to a
penalty for failure to comply with, a
collection of information subject to the
requirements of the PRA unless that
collection of information displays a
currently valid OMB control number.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 622
Fisheries, Fishing, Puerto Rico,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Virgin Islands.
Dated: December 4, 2009.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, 50 CFR part 622 is proposed
to be amended as follows:
PART 622—FISHERIES OF THE
CARIBBEAN, GULF, AND SOUTH
ATLANTIC
1. The authority citation for part 622
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
2. In § 622.16, a sentence is added
after the heading in paragraph (c)(3)(ii)
and paragraphs (c)(3)(v)(A) and (B) are
revised to read as follows:
§ 622.16 Gulf red snapper individual
fishing quota (IFQ) program.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(3) * * *
(ii) * * * For the purpose of this
paragraph, offloading means to remove
IFQ red snapper from a vessel. * * *
*
*
*
*
*
(v) * * *
(A) Landing locations must have a
street address. If there is no street
address on record for a particular
landing location, global positioning
system (GPS) coordinates for an
identifiable geographic location must be
provided.
(B) Landing locations must be
publicly accessible by land and water,
and must satisfy the following criteria:
(1) Vehicles must have access to the
site via public roads;
(2) Vessels must have access to the
site via navigable waters;
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(3) No other condition may impede
free and immediate access to the site by
an authorized law enforcement officer.
Examples of such conditions include,
but are not limited to: a locked gate,
fence, wall, or other barrier preventing
24–hour access to the site; a gated
community entry point; a guard animal;
a posted sign restricting access to the
site; or any other physical deterrent.
*
*
*
*
*
3. In § 622.20, a sentence is added
after the heading in paragraph (c)(3)(ii)
and paragraphs (c)(3)(v)(A) and (B) are
revised to read as follows:
§ 622.20 Individual fishing quota (IFQ)
program for Gulf groupers and tilefishes.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(3) * * *
(ii) * * * For the purpose of this
paragraph, offloading means to remove
IFQ groupers and tilefishes from a
vessel. * * *
*
*
*
*
*
(v) * * *
(A) Landing locations must have a
street address. If there is no street
address on record for a particular
landing location, global positioning
system (GPS) coordinates for an
identifiable geographic location must be
provided.
(B) Landing locations must be
publicly accessible by land and water,
and must satisfy the following criteria:
(1) Vehicles must have access to the
site via public roads;
(2) Vessels must have access to the
site via navigable waters;
(3) No other condition may impede
free and immediate access to the site by
an authorized law enforcement officer.
Examples of such conditions include,
but are not limited to: a locked gate,
fence, wall, or other barrier preventing
24–hour access to the site; a gated
community entry point; a guard animal;
a posted sign restricting access to the
site; or any other physical deterrent.
*
*
*
*
*
§ 622.44 [Amended]
4. In § 622.44, paragraph (h) is
removed.
5. In § 622.49, paragraphs (a)(3)(i),
(a)(4)(i), and (a)(5)(i) are revised to read
as follows:
§ 622.49
Accountability measures.
(a) * * *
(3) * * *
(i) Commercial fishery. If SWG
commercial landings exceed the
applicable ACL as specified in this
paragraph (a)(3)(i), the AA will file a
notification with the Office of the
Federal Register, at or near the
E:\FR\FM\10DEP1.SGM
10DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 236 / Thursday, December 10, 2009 / Proposed Rules
beginning of the following fishing year,
to maintain the SWG commercial quota
for that following year at the level of the
prior year’s quota. The applicable
commercial ACLs for SWG, in gutted
weight, are 7.99 million lb (3.62 million
kg) for 2010, and 8.04 million lb (3.65
million kg) for 2011 and subsequent
fishing years.
*
*
*
*
*
(4) * * *
(i) Commercial fishery. If gag
commercial landings exceed the
applicable ACL as specified in this
paragraph (a)(4)(i), the AA will file a
notification with the Office of the
Federal Register, at or near the
beginning of the following fishing year,
to maintain the gag commercial quota
for that following year at the level of the
prior year’s quota. The applicable
commercial ACLs for gag, in gutted
weight, are 1.71 million lb (0.78 million
kg) for 2010, and 1.76 million lb (0.80
million kg) for 2011 and subsequent
fishing years.
*
*
*
*
*
(5) * * *
(i) Commercial fishery. If red grouper
commercial landings exceed the ACL,
5.87 million lb (2.66 million kg) gutted
weight, the AA will file a notification
with the Office of the Federal Register,
at or near the beginning of the following
fishing year, to maintain the red grouper
commercial quota for that following
year at the level of the prior year’s
quota.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. E9–29478 Filed 12–9–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 679
[Docket No. 070718366–7372–01]
RIN 0648–AV32
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Fisheries of the Exclusive Economic
Zone off Alaska; Maximum Retainable
Amounts for Non-American Fisheries
Act Trawl Catcher/Processors
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; withdrawal.
SUMMARY: NMFS withdraws the
proposed rule to revise accounting
regulations for maximum retainable
amounts of selected groundfish species
caught by trawl catcher/processors that
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:17 Dec 09, 2009
Jkt 220001
are not eligible under the American
Fisheries Act to participate in directed
fishing for pollock (February 13, 2009).
Thus, the current maximum retainable
amounts accounting regulations remain
in effect for the following species:
yellowfin sole, rock sole, flathead sole,
‘‘other flatfish,’’ arrowtooth flounder,
Pacific cod, and Atka mackerel in the
Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands
management area and for Pacific ocean
perch in the Aleutian Islands.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jeff
Hartman, 907–586–7442
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
NMFS manages the groundfish
fisheries in the exclusive economic zone
of the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands
Management Area (BSAI) under the
Fishery Management Plan for
Groundfish of the Bering Sea and
Aleutian Islands Area (FMP), which was
prepared by the North Pacific Fishery
Management Council (Council)
pursuant to the Magnuson-Stevens
Fishery Conservation and Management
Act (Magnuson-Stevens Act), 16 U.S.C.
1801 et seq. Regulations implementing
the FMP appear at 50 CFR part 679.
General regulations that pertain to U.S.
fisheries appear at subpart H of 50 CFR
part 600.
Maximum retainable amounts (MRAs)
assist in limiting catch of a species
within its annual total allowable catch
(TAC). Once the TAC for a species is
reached, retention of that species
becomes prohibited and all catch of that
species must be discarded. NMFS closes
a species to directed fishing before the
entire TAC is taken to leave sufficient
amounts of the TAC available for
incidental catch. The amount of the
TAC remaining available for incidental
catch is managed by a species-specific
MRA. The MRA is the maximum round
weight of a species closed to directed
fishing that may be retained onboard a
vessel. MRAs are calculated as a
percentage of the weight of catch of each
species open to directed fishing (the
basis species) that is retained onboard
the vessel. If the MRA for a species is
35 percent, then the round weight of the
retained incidental species must be no
more than 35 percent of the round
weight of basis species. Directed fishing
is defined in 50 CFR part 679 as ‘‘any
fishing activity that results in the
retention of an amount of a species or
species group onboard a vessel that is
greater than the MRA for that species or
species group.’’ Table 11 to 50 CFR part
679 lists each incidental catch and basis
species and the MRA of each incidental
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
65503
catch species as a percentage of each
basis species.
Current regulations at § 679.20(e)
require, with one exception for pollock,
that the MRAs apply at any time during
a fishing trip. This MRA accounting
period is known as ‘‘instantaneous,’’
because the MRA may not be exceeded
at any point in time during the fishing
trip. The exception to this requirement,
implemented in 2004 to reduce
regulatory discards of pollock, allows
the MRA for pollock retained by nonAmerican Fisheries Act (AFA) vessels to
apply at the end of each offload rather
than at any time during the trip.
Regulatory discards of a species occur
when regulations prohibit retention of
some portion of the catch for a species
that is closed to directed fishing.
The amount and rate of groundfish
discards resulting from the non-AFA
trawl catcher/processor (C/P) sector
have been a continuing issue with the
Council. These vessels have among the
highest groundfish discard (and lowest
retention) amounts and rates compared
with other processing sectors
participating in the BSAI groundfish
fisheries.
At the October 2005 Council meeting,
the non-AFA trawl C/P sector proposed
a way to further reduce its regulatory
discards. Sector representatives noted
that substantial portions of groundfish
discard in the BSAI are regulatory
discards. They testified that increasing
the MRA accounting and calculation
interval from ‘‘instantaneous’’ to a onetime calculation at the time of offload
would allow more time to accumulate
species open to directed fishing to use
as a basis for the MRA, i.e., for retaining
catch of species closed to directed
fishing. The sector predicted that
additional time to accumulate basis
species would reduce the amount of
regulatory discards, particularly in
situations when relatively high rates of
incidentally caught species were taken
early in a fishing trip.
The Council took the sector’s proposal
under consideration because of the
multi-species nature of the sector’s
fisheries and its longstanding
difficulties in reducing discards. The
action was also intended to provide an
opportunity for non-AFA trawl C/Ps to
minimize bycatch and so would be
consistent with National Standard 9 of
the Magnuson Stevens Act. National
Standard 9 requires that conservation
and management measures minimize
bycatch and, to the extent bycatch
cannot be avoided, minimize the
mortality of such bycatch.
Although the Council’s action
provided relief from the
‘‘instantaneous’’ accounting interval, the
E:\FR\FM\10DEP1.SGM
10DEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 236 (Thursday, December 10, 2009)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 65500-65503]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-29478]
[[Page 65500]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Part 622
[Docket No. 090206140-91419-04]
RIN 0648-AX39
Fisheries of the Caribbean, Gulf of Mexico, and South Atlantic;
Reef Fish Fishery of the Gulf of Mexico; Amendment 29 Supplement
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NMFS issues this proposed rule to supplement the regulations
implementing Amendment 29 to the Fishery Management Plan for Reef Fish
Resources of the Gulf of Mexico (FMP), as prepared and submitted by the
Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council (Council). Amendment 29
established a multi-species individual fishing quota (IFQ) program for
the grouper and tilefish component of the commercial sector of the reef
fish fishery in the Gulf of Mexico (Gulf) exclusive economic zone. This
proposed rule would remove several measures constraining harvest of
shallow-water grouper species that were inadvertently not removed in
the final rule for Amendment 29, further clarify existing criteria for
approval of new landing locations for both the red snapper IFQ program
and grouper and tilefish IFQ program, and provide a definition of
``offloading'' in the codified text for IFQ participants. This proposed
rule also discusses two options considered by the Council. NMFS is
seeking comment on one of these options, which would give IFQ fishermen
the option to provide a headcount of the fish on board at the time of
landing. The intent of this proposed rule is to enhance IFQ program
enforcement capabilities, reduce confusion for IFQ participants
offloading their fish, and allow for more efficient functioning of the
IFQ programs for red snapper and groupers and tilefishes.
DATES: Written comments on this proposed rule must be received no
later than 5 p.m., eastern time, on January 11, 2010.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by ``0648-AX39,'' by
any one of the following methods:
Electronic Submissions: Submit all electronic public
comments via the Federal e-Rulemaking Portal https://www.regulations.gov
Fax: 727-824-5308, Attn: Susan Gerhart.
Mail: Susan Gerhart, Southeast Regional Office, NMFS, 263
13th Avenue South, St. Petersburg, FL 33701
Instructions: No comments will be posted for public viewing until
after the comment period has closed. All comments received are a part
of the public record and will generally be posted to https://www.regulations.gov without change. All Personal Identifying
Information (for example, name, address, etc.) voluntarily submitted by
the commenter may be publicly accessible. Do not submit Confidential
Business Information or otherwise sensitive or protected information.
To submit comments through the Federal e-Rulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov, enter ``NOAA-NMFS-2008-0223'' in the keyword
search, then select ``Send a Comment or Submission.'' NMFS will accept
anonymous comments (enter N/A in the required fields, if you wish to
remain anonymous). You may submit attachments to electronic comments in
Microsoft Word, Excel, WordPerfect, or Adobe PDF file formats only.
Copies of Amendment 29, which includes a final environmental impact
statement (FEIS), an initial regulatory flexibility analysis, and a
regulatory impact review (RIR) may be obtained from the Gulf of Mexico
Fishery Management Council, 2203 North Lois Avenue, Suite 1100, Tampa,
FL 33607; telephone 813-348-1630; fax 813-348-1711; e-mail
gulfcouncil@gulfcouncil.org; or may be downloaded from the Council's
website at https://www.gulfcouncil.org/.
Copies of the final regulatory flexibility analysis (FRFA), and
record of decision may be obtained from Susan Gerhart, Southeast
Regional Office, NMFS, 263 13th Avenue South, St. Petersburg, FL 33701.
Written comments regarding the burden-hour estimate or other
aspects of the collection-of-information requirement contained in this
proposed rule may be submitted to Richard Malinowski, Southeast
Regional Office, NMFS, and by e-mail to David_Rostker@omb.eop.gov, or
by fax to 202-395-7285.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Susan Gerhart, telephone: 727-824-
5305.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The reef fish fishery of the Gulf of Mexico
is managed under the FMP. The FMP was prepared by the Council and is
implemented through regulations at 50 CFR part 622 under the authority
of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act
(Magnuson-Stevens Act).
Background
On July 2, 2009, NMFS approved Amendment 29. Amendment 29 created
an IFQ program for the grouper and tilefish component of the commercial
sector of the Gulf reef fish fishery. A final rule implementing the
amendment published on August 31, 2009 (74 FR 44732). This proposed
rule includes three administrative measures that were not included in
the final rule for Amendment 29. These administrative measures would
allow for more efficient functioning of the grouper and tilefish IFQ
program, reduce confusion among IFQ participants that are offloading
their fish, and further enhance enforcement capabilities of the red
snapper IFQ program and the IFQ program for groupers and tilefishes, as
intended by the Council. This proposed rule also discusses two options
considered by the Council at the October 2009 Council meeting. NMFS
specifically invites comments in this proposed rulemaking on one of
these options, namely a provision that would allow fishermen to provide
a headcount of the fish on board at the time of landing.
Management Measures Contained in This Proposed Rule
Remove measures that constrain commercial harvest
Amendment 29 states, ``Approval and implementation of the IFQ
program will result in the elimination of existing management measures
intended to constrain commercial harvest, such as grouper trip
limits.'' However, the trip limit and accountability measures (AMs)
implemented in May 2009, through the final rule for Amendment 30B to
the FMP (74 FR 17603, April 18, 2009), were inadvertently not removed
in the final rule for Amendment 29. This proposed rule would remove the
trip limit and AMs implemented through Amendment 30B to the FMP that
constrain commercial harvest.
IFQ programs are intended to eliminate the need for trip limits so
fishermen have the flexibility to fish when and where they want,
thereby promoting safety at sea and reducing economic hardship. In the
current regulations, the trip limit is defined as follows: if 80
percent of either the gag or the red grouper quota is reached, and 100
percent of the quota is projected to be reached prior to the end of the
fishing year, a 200-lb (90.7-kg) trip limit will be implemented for the
[[Page 65501]]
applicable species. This proposed rule would remove this trip limit as
it is no longer needed to constrain commercial harvest with the
implementation of the grouper and tilefish IFQ program. Under the IFQ
program, the rate of harvest would be controlled by the availability of
individual fishing quotas.
The Magnuson-Stevens Act, re-authorized in 2006, requires that
annual catch limits (ACLs) and AMs for stocks that are undergoing
overfishing or are overfished be implemented by the end of 2010. The
National Standard 1 guidelines define AMs as management controls to
prevent ACLs, including sector ACLs, from being exceeded, and to
correct or mitigate overages of the ACL if they occur. The AMs
implemented through Amendment 30B that constrain commercial harvest
state: if 100 percent of any one of the three quotas (gag, red grouper,
or shallow-water grouper) is reached, the entire shallow-water grouper
sector of the commercial fishery will close for the remainder of the
fishing year. The grouper and tilefish IFQ program was designed to act
as an AM, in and of itself, by constraining harvest to individual
fishing quotas. The IFQ program also requires any overage (as much as
10 percent of allocation remaining on the shareholder's last trip) to
be deducted from the shareholder's allocation the subsequent fishing
year. This provision acts as an AM by mitigating overages after they
occur. Because the IFQ program itself acts as an AM and there are other
AMs inherent in the IFQ program, the AMs included in Amendment 30B that
constrain commercial harvest would be removed through this rulemaking.
The FEIS, FRFA, and RIR conducted for Amendment 29 adequately
analyzed the impacts of the management measures proposed in this rule.
Regulatory provisions in this rule were either inadvertently not
included in the proposed and final rules for Amendment 29, or they
provide greater specificity for provisions previously implemented
through Amendment 29. The supporting regulatory analyses for Amendment
29 either specifically addressed the impacts of these measures, or
analyzed associated impacts assuming these measures would also be
implemented. Because no additional analysis is necessary to support the
measures currently proposed, no such analysis was prepared.
Clarify landing location criteria
NMFS Office for Law Enforcement must approve landing locations
prior to landing or offloading red snapper, groupers, or tilefishes.
Proposed landing locations may be submitted at any time; however, new
landing locations are approved only at the end of each calendar-year
quarter. To have a landing location approved by the end of the
calendar-year quarter, it must be submitted at least 45 days before the
end of the calendar-year quarter. Current regulations state that
landing locations must be publicly accessible by land and water, and a
street address must be provided for a landing location. If there is no
street address on record, then Global Positioning System coordinates
must be provided.
To assist law enforcement in determining eligibility of landing
locations submitted for review, more specific criteria would be
established to provide greater clarification for the requirement that
landing locations must be publicly accessible. These criteria would
include, but are not limited to the following: the site must be
accessible for vehicles via public roads; the site must be accessible
for vessels via navigable waters; and no other condition may impede
free and immediate access to the landing location, such as locked
gates, guard dogs, or any other physical barrier. Any participant
submitting a landing location request would be required to fill out a
form on the IFQ website at ifq.sero.nmfs.noaa.gov. The form would
include a series of questions regarding the landing location and its
accessability. NMFS Office for Law Enforcement would include this form
in their review to approve or disapprove proposed sites. Approved
landing locations are posted on the IFQ website listed above.
Define offloading
The current regulations define ``landing'' specifically for the red
snapper IFQ program and the IFQ program for groupers and tilefishes,
however, ``offloading'' has not yet been defined in the regulations for
IFQ participants. For the purposes of the red snapper IFQ program and
the IFQ program for groupers and tilefishes, ``landing'' is defined as
arriving at a dock, berth, beach, seawall, or ramp. This proposed rule
would provide a definition of ``offloading'' for IFQ participants in
the codified text. For the purposes of the red snapper IFQ program and
the IFQ program for groupers and tilefishes, ``offloading'' would be
defined as removing IFQ fish from a vessel.
Options considered by the Council
Provide a headcount as a means to estimate the IFQ fish onboard
Some fishermen who operate in the red snapper IFQ program and the
IFQ program for groupers and tilefishes trailer their fish to the
dealer. When IFQ fish are offloaded to a vehicle for transportation to
a dealer or are trailered to a dealer, a transaction approval code must
accompany those fish. The implementing regulations for Amendment 29
specify that an accurate weight must be submitted to complete a landing
transaction to determine that the fisherman has sufficient allocation
to cover the amount of fish landed. Therefore, the fishermen must have
on-site capability to weigh their fish and connect electronically to
the online IFQ system to complete the transaction and obtain a
transaction approval code to transport these fish. At the October 2009
Council meeting, the Council voted to seek public comment on a
provision that would give fishermen the option to provide a headcount
of the fish on board at the time of landing, in lieu of reporting the
weight. Reporting the weight of IFQ fish landed is considered to be an
important component of monitoring the IFQ program and preventing
overages. NMFS' preliminary determination is that providing a headcount
instead of the weight at the time of landing would not allow for
adequate monitoring and enforcement of the IFQ program. If fishermen
were to provide a headcount at the time of landing, they would still
need to connect electronically to the online IFQ system and obtain a
transaction approval code (using the headcount) to transport those fish
to the dealer. When they offload their fish at the dealer location, the
accurate weight would then need to be updated under the same
transaction approval code (replacing the headcount) to complete that
transaction. NMFS invites comments on this option, particularly whether
fishermen would find this option to provide a headcount at the time of
landing beneficial to their business plans.
Extend the offloading window
The current allowable time period to offload red snapper, groupers,
and tilefishes is from 6 a.m. to 6 p.m. At the October 2009 Council
meeting, the Council voted to consider an option that would extend the
allowable time period to offload fish by four hours. Therefore, the
offloading window would be between 6 a.m. and 10 p.m. Extending the
offloading window could potentially give fishermen greater flexibility
for when they may offload their fish.
[[Page 65502]]
However, Amendment 29 specifically states that the allowable time
period to offload IFQ fish is between 6 a.m. and 6 p.m. Therefore, the
Council would need to address this option in a plan amendment if it is
to be implemented in the future.
Classification
Pursuant to section 304(b)(1)(A) of the Magnuson-Stevens Act, the
NMFS Assistant Administrator has determined that this proposed rule is
consistent with Amendment 29, other provisions of the Magnuson-Stevens
Act, and other applicable law, subject to further consideration after
public comment.
This proposed rule has been determined to be not significant for
purposes of Executive Order 12866.
NMFS prepared an FEIS for Amendment 29. A notice of availability
for the FEIS was published on May 8, 2009 (74 FR 21684).
NMFS prepared a FRFA, as required by section 604 of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, for Amendment 29. A copy of the full analysis is
available from NMFS (see ADDRESSES). Two of the measures contained in
this proposed rule, namely the measure to remove the trip limit and AMs
that constrain commercial harvest and the measure to clarify existing
landing location criteria, are measures inherent in an IFQ program.
Providing a definition of the term ``offloading'' for IFQ participants
is further clarification of an existing IFQ component. Because the FRFA
prepared for Amendment 29 analyzed the economic conditions that would
exist assuming these measures were already included in the IFQ program
for Gulf groupers and tilefishes, no new economic analysis has been
conducted for those measures in this proposed rule.
This proposed rule contains a collection-of-information requirement
subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA). This requirement has been
submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for approval.
Public reporting burden for the ``Landing Location Criteria Form'' is
estimated to average 5 minutes per response, including the time for
reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and
maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the
collection of information.
Public comment is sought regarding: whether this proposed
collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of the agency, including whether the information will
have practical utility; the accuracy of the burden estimate; ways to
enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be
collected; and ways to minimize the burden of the collection of
information, including through the use of automated collection
techniques or other forms of information technology. Send comments
regarding the burden estimate or any other aspect of the collection-of-
information requirement, including suggestions for reducing the burden,
to NMFS and to the OMB (see ADDRESSES).
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person is required
to respond to, nor shall a person be subject to a penalty for failure
to comply with, a collection of information subject to the requirements
of the PRA unless that collection of information displays a currently
valid OMB control number.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 622
Fisheries, Fishing, Puerto Rico, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Virgin Islands.
Dated: December 4, 2009.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
For the reasons set out in the preamble, 50 CFR part 622 is
proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 622--FISHERIES OF THE CARIBBEAN, GULF, AND SOUTH ATLANTIC
1. The authority citation for part 622 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
2. In Sec. 622.16, a sentence is added after the heading in
paragraph (c)(3)(ii) and paragraphs (c)(3)(v)(A) and (B) are revised to
read as follows:
Sec. 622.16 Gulf red snapper individual fishing quota (IFQ) program.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(3) * * *
(ii) * * * For the purpose of this paragraph, offloading means to
remove IFQ red snapper from a vessel. * * *
* * * * *
(v) * * *
(A) Landing locations must have a street address. If there is no
street address on record for a particular landing location, global
positioning system (GPS) coordinates for an identifiable geographic
location must be provided.
(B) Landing locations must be publicly accessible by land and
water, and must satisfy the following criteria:
(1) Vehicles must have access to the site via public roads;
(2) Vessels must have access to the site via navigable waters;
(3) No other condition may impede free and immediate access to the
site by an authorized law enforcement officer. Examples of such
conditions include, but are not limited to: a locked gate, fence, wall,
or other barrier preventing 24-hour access to the site; a gated
community entry point; a guard animal; a posted sign restricting access
to the site; or any other physical deterrent.
* * * * *
3. In Sec. 622.20, a sentence is added after the heading in
paragraph (c)(3)(ii) and paragraphs (c)(3)(v)(A) and (B) are revised to
read as follows:
Sec. 622.20 Individual fishing quota (IFQ) program for Gulf groupers
and tilefishes.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(3) * * *
(ii) * * * For the purpose of this paragraph, offloading means to
remove IFQ groupers and tilefishes from a vessel. * * *
* * * * *
(v) * * *
(A) Landing locations must have a street address. If there is no
street address on record for a particular landing location, global
positioning system (GPS) coordinates for an identifiable geographic
location must be provided.
(B) Landing locations must be publicly accessible by land and
water, and must satisfy the following criteria:
(1) Vehicles must have access to the site via public roads;
(2) Vessels must have access to the site via navigable waters;
(3) No other condition may impede free and immediate access to the
site by an authorized law enforcement officer. Examples of such
conditions include, but are not limited to: a locked gate, fence, wall,
or other barrier preventing 24-hour access to the site; a gated
community entry point; a guard animal; a posted sign restricting access
to the site; or any other physical deterrent.
* * * * *
Sec. 622.44 [Amended]
4. In Sec. 622.44, paragraph (h) is removed.
5. In Sec. 622.49, paragraphs (a)(3)(i), (a)(4)(i), and (a)(5)(i)
are revised to read as follows:
Sec. 622.49 Accountability measures.
(a) * * *
(3) * * *
(i) Commercial fishery. If SWG commercial landings exceed the
applicable ACL as specified in this paragraph (a)(3)(i), the AA will
file a notification with the Office of the Federal Register, at or near
the
[[Page 65503]]
beginning of the following fishing year, to maintain the SWG commercial
quota for that following year at the level of the prior year's quota.
The applicable commercial ACLs for SWG, in gutted weight, are 7.99
million lb (3.62 million kg) for 2010, and 8.04 million lb (3.65
million kg) for 2011 and subsequent fishing years.
* * * * *
(4) * * *
(i) Commercial fishery. If gag commercial landings exceed the
applicable ACL as specified in this paragraph (a)(4)(i), the AA will
file a notification with the Office of the Federal Register, at or near
the beginning of the following fishing year, to maintain the gag
commercial quota for that following year at the level of the prior
year's quota. The applicable commercial ACLs for gag, in gutted weight,
are 1.71 million lb (0.78 million kg) for 2010, and 1.76 million lb
(0.80 million kg) for 2011 and subsequent fishing years.
* * * * *
(5) * * *
(i) Commercial fishery. If red grouper commercial landings exceed
the ACL, 5.87 million lb (2.66 million kg) gutted weight, the AA will
file a notification with the Office of the Federal Register, at or near
the beginning of the following fishing year, to maintain the red
grouper commercial quota for that following year at the level of the
prior year's quota.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. E9-29478 Filed 12-9-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S