Airworthiness Directives; Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation (Sikorsky) Model S-92A Helicopters, 65496-65497 [E9-29430]
Download as PDF
65496
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 236 / Thursday, December 10, 2009 / Proposed Rules
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs
for this AD, if requested using the procedures
found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to
ATTN: Doug Rudolph, Aerospace Engineer,
FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust,
Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri 64106;
telephone: (816) 329–4059; fax: (816) 329–
4090. Before using any approved AMOC on
any airplane to which the AMOC applies,
notify your appropriate principal inspector
(PI) in the FAA Flight Standards District
Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local
FSDO.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement
in this AD to obtain corrective actions from
a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective
actions are considered FAA-approved if they
are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required
to assure the product is airworthy before it
is returned to service.
(3) Reporting Requirements: For any
reporting requirement in this AD, under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) has
approved the information collection
requirements and has assigned OMB Control
Number 2120–0056.
Related Information
(h) Refer to MCAI European Aviation
Safety Agency (EASA) AD No. 2009–0249,
dated November 20, 2009, PILATUS
AIRCRAFT LTD. Temporary Revision No. 11
to PC–12/47E Pilot’s Operating Handbook,
Report No. 02277, dated March 18, 2009;
Honeywell International Inc. Service Bulletin
KSG 7200–34–09, Revision 0, dated
September 24, 2009; and PILATUS
AIRCRAFT LTD. PILATUS PC–12 Service
Bulletin No: 34–022, dated October 5, 2009,
for related information.
Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on
December 4, 2009.
William Timberlake,
Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E9–29457 Filed 12–9–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2009–1088; Directorate
Identifier 2008–SW–76–AD]
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Sikorsky
Aircraft Corporation (Sikorsky) Model
S–92A Helicopters
AGENCY: Federal Aviation
Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
SUMMARY: This document proposes
adopting a new airworthiness directive
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:17 Dec 09, 2009
Jkt 220001
(AD) for the Sikorsky Model S–92A
helicopters. The AD would require
revising the Rotorcraft Flight Manual
(RFM), Operating Limitations section, to
make it clear to operators that this
model helicopter was not certificated to
the standards that allow for the carriage
of human external cargo. This proposal
is prompted by a mistake in the RFM,
which allows ‘‘Class D’’ rotorcraft load
combinations for human external cargo
load (HEC) operations for this model.
The Model S–92A RFM does not
include the required one-engine
inoperative (OEI) hover performance
and procedures. The actions specified
by the proposed AD are intended to
correct the Limitations section of the
RFM to prevent HEC operations, which
could result in injury or loss of life.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before February 8, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Use one of the following
addresses to submit comments on this
proposed AD:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
You may get the service information
identified in this proposed AD from
Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation, Attn:
Manager, Commercial Technical
Support, mailstop s581a, 6900 Main
Street, Stratford, CT, telephone (203)
383–4866, e-mail address
tsslibrary@sikorsky.com, or at https://
www.sikorsky.com.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John
Coffey, Flight Test Engineer, Boston
Aircraft Certification Office, 12 New
England Executive Park, Burlington, MA
01803, telephone (781) 238–7173, fax
(781) 238–7170.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to submit any written
data, views, or arguments regarding this
proposed AD. Send your comments to
the address listed under the caption
ADDRESSES. Include the docket number
‘‘FAA–2009–1088, Directorate Identifier
2008–SW–76–AD’’ at the beginning of
your comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of the proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend the
proposed AD in light of those
comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact with FAA
personnel concerning this proposed
rulemaking. Using the search function
of our docket Web site, you can find and
read the comments to any of our
dockets, including the name of the
individual who sent or signed the
comment. You may review the DOT’s
complete Privacy Act Statement in the
Federal Register published on April 11,
2000.
Examining the Docket
You may examine the docket that
contains the proposed AD, any
comments, and other information in
person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
The Docket Operations office (telephone
(800) 647–5527) is located in Room
W12–140 on the ground floor of the
West Building at the street address
stated in the ADDRESSES section.
Comments will be available in the AD
docket shortly after receipt.
Discussion
This document proposes adopting a
new AD for the Sikorsky Model S–92A
helicopters. The AD would require
revising the RFM SA S92A–RFM–003,
Part 1, Section 1, Operating Limitations,
Types of Operation, by removing the
statement ‘‘RESCUE HOIST: Category
‘A’ only External load operations with
Class ‘D’ external loads.’’ The AD would
require replacing that statement with
‘‘HOIST: Class D external loads
PROHIBITED.’’ Also, the AD would
require revising the RFM by removing
all instances of the terms ‘‘RESCUE
HOIST’’ and replacing them with the
term ‘‘HOIST.’’ This proposal is
prompted by a review of the RFM, in
which a mistake was discovered. The
RFM states that ‘‘Class D’’ external loads
are approved for external load
operations for this model. However, the
Model S–92A does not comply with the
requirements of 14 CFR 29.865(c)(6)
because, for HEC applications requiring
use of Category A rotorcraft, that
rotorcraft must have OEI hover
performance and procedures in the RFM
for the weights, altitudes and
temperatures for which that external
load approval is requested. The Model
E:\FR\FM\10DEP1.SGM
10DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 236 / Thursday, December 10, 2009 / Proposed Rules
S–92A RFM does not contain that
information. For conducting external
load operations under 14 CFR 133, the
FAA has defined HEC to be a rotorcraftload combination ‘‘Class D’’ operation.
The actions in the proposed AD are
intended to correct this mistake and to
prevent HEC operation in
noncompliance with the requirements,
which could result in injury or loss of
life.
This unsafe condition is likely to exist
or develop on other helicopters of the
same type design. Therefore, the
proposed AD would require revising the
RFM SA S92A–RFM–003 in accordance
with the statements in the previous
paragraph.
We estimate that this proposed AD
would affect 65 helicopters of U.S.
registry. Correcting the wording in the
RFM would take a minimal amount of
time resulting in minimal cost.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this
proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order
13132. Additionally, this proposed AD
would not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify that the proposed regulation:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
Section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701,
‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:17 Dec 09, 2009
Jkt 220001
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
65497
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Safety.
33 CFR Part 117
The Proposed Amendment
RIN 1625–AA09
Accordingly, pursuant to the
authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the Federal Aviation
Administration proposes to amend part
39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations
(14 CFR part 39) as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. Section 39.13 is amended by
adding a new airworthiness directive to
read as follows:
Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation: Docket No.
FAA–2009–1088; Directorate Identifier
2008–SW–76–AD.
Applicability: Model S–92A helicopters,
certificated in any category.
Compliance: Required within 90 days,
unless accomplished previously.
To correct a mistake in the Rotorcraft
Flight Manual (RFM) to prevent human
external cargo (HEC) operations, which could
result in injury or loss of life, do the
following:
(a) Revise the RFM SA S92A–RFM–003,
Part 1, Section 1, Operating Limitations,
Types of Operation, by removing the
statement ‘‘RESCUE HOIST: Category ‘A’
only External load operations with Class ‘D’
external loads.’’ Replace that statement with
‘‘HOIST: Class D external loads
PROHIBITED.’’ Also, throughout the entire
RFM, remove the term ‘‘RESCUE HOIST,’’
and replace it with the term ‘‘HOIST.’’ These
revisions may be made by inserting a copy
of this AD into the RFM, by making the
changes in pen and ink, or by inserting a
copy of the Sikorsky RFM revision
containing these requirements into the RFM.
(b) To request a different method of
compliance or a different compliance time
for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR
39.19. Contact the Manager, Boston Aircraft
Certification Office, FAA, ATTN: John
Coffey, Flight Test Engineer, 12 New England
Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803,
telephone (781) 238–7173, fax (781) 238–
7170, for information about previously
approved alternative methods of compliance.
Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on October 23,
2009.
Mark R. Schilling,
Acting Manager, Rotorcraft Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E9–29430 Filed 12–9–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
[Docket No. USCG–2009–0839]
Drawbridge Operation Regulation;
Bullards Ferry Bridge, Coquille River,
Bandon, OR
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to
temporarily modify the drawbridge
operation regulation for the U.S.
Highway 101 Bullards Ferry Bridge that
crosses over the Coquille River at mile
3.5 near Bandon, Oregon so that the
vertical lift span would not need to
open for ten months while the bridge is
being painted. The proposed rule is
necessary to ensure that the painting
operation will not be disrupted by
bridge openings. The bridge has not had
to be opened for a vessel in seven years.
DATES: Comments and related material
must reach the Coast Guard on or before
February 8, 2010.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by the Coast Guard docket
number USCG–2009–0839 using any
one of the following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202–493–2251.
(3) Mail: Docket Management Facility
(M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590–
0001.
(4) Hand delivery: Same as mail
address above, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. The telephone number
is 202–366–9329.
To avoid duplication, please use only
one of these methods. See the ‘‘Public
Participation and Request for
Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
below for instructions on submitting
comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this proposed
rule, call Austin Pratt, Chief, Bridge
Section, Waterways Management
Branch, Thirteenth Coast Guard District,
telephone 206–220–7282, e-mail
address william.a.pratt@uscg.mil. If you
have questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, call Renee V.
Wright, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone 202–366–9826.
E:\FR\FM\10DEP1.SGM
10DEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 236 (Thursday, December 10, 2009)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 65496-65497]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-29430]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2009-1088; Directorate Identifier 2008-SW-76-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation
(Sikorsky) Model S-92A Helicopters
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document proposes adopting a new airworthiness directive
(AD) for the Sikorsky Model S-92A helicopters. The AD would require
revising the Rotorcraft Flight Manual (RFM), Operating Limitations
section, to make it clear to operators that this model helicopter was
not certificated to the standards that allow for the carriage of human
external cargo. This proposal is prompted by a mistake in the RFM,
which allows ``Class D'' rotorcraft load combinations for human
external cargo load (HEC) operations for this model. The Model S-92A
RFM does not include the required one-engine inoperative (OEI) hover
performance and procedures. The actions specified by the proposed AD
are intended to correct the Limitations section of the RFM to prevent
HEC operations, which could result in injury or loss of life.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before February 8, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Use one of the following addresses to submit comments on
this proposed AD:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: 202-493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
You may get the service information identified in this proposed AD
from Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation, Attn: Manager, Commercial Technical
Support, mailstop s581a, 6900 Main Street, Stratford, CT, telephone
(203) 383-4866, e-mail address tsslibrary@sikorsky.com, or at https://www.sikorsky.com.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Coffey, Flight Test Engineer,
Boston Aircraft Certification Office, 12 New England Executive Park,
Burlington, MA 01803, telephone (781) 238-7173, fax (781) 238-7170.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to submit any written data, views, or arguments
regarding this proposed AD. Send your comments to the address listed
under the caption ADDRESSES. Include the docket number ``FAA-2009-1088,
Directorate Identifier 2008-SW-76-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend the
proposed AD in light of those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact
with FAA personnel concerning this proposed rulemaking. Using the
search function of our docket Web site, you can find and read the
comments to any of our dockets, including the name of the individual
who sent or signed the comment. You may review the DOT's complete
Privacy Act Statement in the Federal Register published on April 11,
2000.
Examining the Docket
You may examine the docket that contains the proposed AD, any
comments, and other information in person at the Docket Operations
office between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The Docket Operations office (telephone (800) 647-5527) is
located in Room W12-140 on the ground floor of the West Building at the
street address stated in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be
available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.
Discussion
This document proposes adopting a new AD for the Sikorsky Model S-
92A helicopters. The AD would require revising the RFM SA S92A-RFM-003,
Part 1, Section 1, Operating Limitations, Types of Operation, by
removing the statement ``RESCUE HOIST: Category `A' only External load
operations with Class `D' external loads.'' The AD would require
replacing that statement with ``HOIST: Class D external loads
PROHIBITED.'' Also, the AD would require revising the RFM by removing
all instances of the terms ``RESCUE HOIST'' and replacing them with the
term ``HOIST.'' This proposal is prompted by a review of the RFM, in
which a mistake was discovered. The RFM states that ``Class D''
external loads are approved for external load operations for this
model. However, the Model S-92A does not comply with the requirements
of 14 CFR 29.865(c)(6) because, for HEC applications requiring use of
Category A rotorcraft, that rotorcraft must have OEI hover performance
and procedures in the RFM for the weights, altitudes and temperatures
for which that external load approval is requested. The Model
[[Page 65497]]
S-92A RFM does not contain that information. For conducting external
load operations under 14 CFR 133, the FAA has defined HEC to be a
rotorcraft-load combination ``Class D'' operation. The actions in the
proposed AD are intended to correct this mistake and to prevent HEC
operation in noncompliance with the requirements, which could result in
injury or loss of life.
This unsafe condition is likely to exist or develop on other
helicopters of the same type design. Therefore, the proposed AD would
require revising the RFM SA S92A-RFM-003 in accordance with the
statements in the previous paragraph.
We estimate that this proposed AD would affect 65 helicopters of
U.S. registry. Correcting the wording in the RFM would take a minimal
amount of time resulting in minimal cost.
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. Additionally, this proposed
AD would not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that the proposed
regulation:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, Section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration proposes to amend
part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as
follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding a new airworthiness directive
to read as follows:
Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation: Docket No. FAA-2009-1088; Directorate
Identifier 2008-SW-76-AD.
Applicability: Model S-92A helicopters, certificated in any
category.
Compliance: Required within 90 days, unless accomplished
previously.
To correct a mistake in the Rotorcraft Flight Manual (RFM) to
prevent human external cargo (HEC) operations, which could result in
injury or loss of life, do the following:
(a) Revise the RFM SA S92A-RFM-003, Part 1, Section 1, Operating
Limitations, Types of Operation, by removing the statement ``RESCUE
HOIST: Category `A' only External load operations with Class `D'
external loads.'' Replace that statement with ``HOIST: Class D
external loads PROHIBITED.'' Also, throughout the entire RFM, remove
the term ``RESCUE HOIST,'' and replace it with the term ``HOIST.''
These revisions may be made by inserting a copy of this AD into the
RFM, by making the changes in pen and ink, or by inserting a copy of
the Sikorsky RFM revision containing these requirements into the
RFM.
(b) To request a different method of compliance or a different
compliance time for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR 39.19.
Contact the Manager, Boston Aircraft Certification Office, FAA,
ATTN: John Coffey, Flight Test Engineer, 12 New England Executive
Park, Burlington, MA 01803, telephone (781) 238-7173, fax (781) 238-
7170, for information about previously approved alternative methods
of compliance.
Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on October 23, 2009.
Mark R. Schilling,
Acting Manager, Rotorcraft Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E9-29430 Filed 12-9-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P