Notice of Final Federal Agency Actions on Proposed Highway in California, 65201-65202 [E9-29348]
Download as PDF
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 235 / Wednesday, December 9, 2009 / Notices
The following is the text of a letter
that the City of Mission submitted on
November 2, 2009, to the Department,
providing its initial input to this review
process.
Begin text.
My letter today is in response to a
teleconference held on October 20
between yourself and persons
representing various interests of the City
of Mission concerning the status update,
requested by the Department of State on
the Presidential Permit issued to the
City of Mission in 1978 for the
construction of an international
vehicular and railroad bridge.
Our City has actively pursued over
the last several years progress on the
Mission International Bridge. We have
built partnerships with stakeholders,
pursued funding options, and identified
future strategies. Following is a
summary of the recent activities we
have undertaken:
• Developed and submitted a
Congressional Appropriations Request
for a study to support the Railroad
Bridge Project.
• A Project Engineer—L&G Engineers
of Mercedes to conduct a feasibility
study for the rail bridge has been
identified.
• The Governor of Tamp., the city
officials of Reynosa, Tamp, and Ramiro
Garza Cantu, Owner of Grupo San Juan,
have been contacted. These entities will
be submitting letters of support within
the next thirty days. We will forward
them as soon as we receive them.
• Hidalgo County Officials as well as
the County’s Railroad District have been
contacted and are supporting the Rail
Project. In fact the County Railroad
District has plans for additional Rail
Systems within and outside the County
to support the project. Public and
private local and regional entities will
also be submitting letters of support for
this project.
• City Officials along with the
Mission Economic Development
Corporation have met with the Kansas
City Rail Systems in Kansas City to
discuss not only the new Railroad
Bridge in Mission but also the NorthSouth Rail running out of the Valley and
connecting with the Kansas City System
owned by the Texas-Mexico Railways.
The local international port of entry
projects currently in process include the
Anzalduas International Bridge and the
Donna International Bridge. The
Anzalduas Bridge is scheduled to open
in December 2009 for vehicular traffic
and the Donna International Bridge
Project is still under construction with
a yet to be defined completion date. It
is important to note that neither bridge
has a railroad bridge permit and that in
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:02 Dec 08, 2009
Jkt 220001
fact Mission Bridge is the only
permitted Railroad Bridge from
Brownsville to Laredo and beyond. It is
critical to the continued economic
growth of South Texas including in
particular Cameron, Hidalgo, and Starr
Counties and the U.S. economy as a
whole to have railroad access for the
transport of goods across the MexicoTexas border. It is also important to
alleviate congestion at the Texas Mexico
Railroad Bridge in Laredo and the B&M
Rail Bridge in Brownsville.
Our City as mentioned above has
contacted Eugenio Hernandez Flores,
Governor of the State of Tamaulipas, the
city officials of Reynosa, Tamp., as well
as Ramiro Garza Cantu, Owner of Grupo
San Juan, a business conglomerate that
deals with urban development,
industrial parks, agriculture, cattle and
energy businesses. Grupo San Juan
presently owns 16,000 acres across the
Mission Permitted Crossing Site. They
have all expressed interest. These
entities have all shown support for the
Mission Railroad Bridge Project. These
entities will be submitting letters of
support within the next thirty days. We
will forward them as soon as we receive
them.
The Governor is interested in a new
rail connection for the State of
Tamaulipas and is aware of the
potential of the Madero site. Mr. Garza
Cantu and I have visited on numerous
occasions about the potential of
connecting rail to his existing and
sizeable industrial parks, which are
home to a large number of maquiladoras
employing thousands in Reynosa. The
Anzalduas International Bridge, which
does not allow rail, empties into Mr.
Garza Cantu’s Villa Florida Industrial
Park, but he recognizes that any rail that
may connect to the U.S. side would
need to be coordinated with our
Mission/Madero permitted site. The
Mission/Madero site affords both
vehicular and rail capacity as a
possibility for the continued growth of
his master plan and the west side of
Reynosa.
As I enter my twelfth year of service
as Mayor of the City of Mission, I take
satisfaction in knowing that the
Anzalduas crossing will soon be open
and my attention is again focused on a
Mission International Bridge which was
my top priority as I began my tenure as
Mayor in 1998. With the dynamic
growth in our region both in the United
States and Mexico, I am confident that
the Mission/Madero permitted site
continues to be in the interest of both
countries.
Respectfully, Norberto ‘‘Beto’’ Salinas,
Mayor.
PO 00000
Frm 00114
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
65201
Dated: December 4, 2009.
Alex Lee,
Director, Office of Mexican Affairs,
Department of State.
[FR Doc. E9–29344 Filed 12–8–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–29–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Highway Administration
Notice of Final Federal Agency Actions
on Proposed Highway in California
AGENCY: Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of Limitation on Claims
for Judicial Review of Actions by the
California Department of Transportation
(Caltrans), pursuant to 23 U.S.C. 327.
SUMMARY: The FHWA, on behalf of
Caltrans, is issuing this notice to
announce actions taken by Caltrans that
are final within the meaning of 23
U.S.C. 139(l)(1). The actions relate to a
proposed highway project, the State
Route 160 Antioch Bridge Seismic
Retrofit Project, with end points in the
city of Antioch in Contra Costa County,
and on Sherman Island in Sacramento
County, State of California. Those
actions grant licenses, permits, and
approvals for the project.
DATES: By this notice, the FHWA, on
behalf of Caltrans, is advising the public
of final agency actions subject to 23
U.S.C. 139(l)(1). A claim seeking
judicial review of the Federal agency
actions on the highway project will be
barred unless the claim is filed on or
before June 7, 2010. If the Federal law
that authorizes judicial review of a
claim provides a time period of less
than 180 days for filing such claim, then
that shorter time period still applies.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
Caltrans: Melanie Brent, Chief, Office of
Environmental Analysis, 510–286–5231,
melanie_brent@dot.ca.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Effective
July 1, 2007, the Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA) assigned, and
the California Department of
Transportation (Caltrans) assumed,
environmental responsibilities for this
project pursuant to 23 U.S.C. 327.
Notice is hereby given that the Caltrans
has taken final agency actions subject to
23 U.S.C. 139(l)(1) by issuing licenses,
permits, and approvals for the Antioch
Bridge Seismic Retrofit Project with end
points in the city of Antioch in Contra
Costa County, and on Sherman Island in
Sacramento County, State of California.
The project adds additional bracing and
isolation bearings and makes other
improvements to the approximately 1.8
E:\FR\FM\09DEN1.SGM
09DEN1
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
65202
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 235 / Wednesday, December 9, 2009 / Notices
mile concrete structure, which spans the
Sacramento River. The purpose of the
project is to increase the ability of the
bridge to withstand a major earthquake.
The actions by the Federal agencies, and
the laws under which such actions were
taken, are described in the
Environmental Assessment (EA) for the
project, approved on 2 September 2009,
in the Finding of No Significant Impact
(FONSI) issued on 2 September 2009,
and in other documents in the FHWA
project records. The EA, FONSI, and
other project records are available by
contacting Caltrans at the addresses
provided above. The Caltrans EA and
FONSI can be viewed and downloaded
from the project Web site at https://
www.dot.ca.gov/dist4/documents/
antioch/antiochbridgeseismic
retrofitprojectfinalenvironmental
document.pdf.
This notice applies to all Federal
agency decisions as of the issuance date
of this notice and all laws under which
such actions were taken, including but
not limited to:
1. General: National Environmental
Policy Act (NEPA) [42 U.S.C. 4321–
4351]; Federal Aid-Highway Act [23
U.S.C. 109].
2. Land: Landscape and Scenic
Enhancement (Wildflowers) [23 U.S.C.
219].
3. Air: Clean Air Act 42 U.S.C. 7401–
7671(q).
4. Wildlife: Endangered Species Act
[16 U.S.C. 1531–1544 and section 1536],
Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act [16
U.S.C. 661–667(d)], Migratory Bird
Treaty Act [16 U.S.C. 703–712].
5. Historic and Cultural Resources:
Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act of 1966, as amended
[16 U.S.C. 470(aa)–11]; Archeological
Resources Protection Act of 1977 [16
U.S.C. 470(aa)–11] ; Archeological and
Historic Preservation Act [16 U.S.C.
469–469(c)].
6. Social and Economic: Civil Rights
Act of 1964 [42 U.S.C. 2000(d)–
2000(d)(1)]; American Indian Religious
Freedom Act [42 U.S.C. 1996]; Farmland
Protection Policy Act (FPPA) [7 U.S.C.
4201–4209].
7. Hazardous Materials:
Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation, and Liability
Act (CERCLA), 42 U.S.C. 9601–9675;
Superfund Amendments and
Reauthorization Act of 1986 (SARA);
Resource Conservation and Recovery
Act (RCRA), 42 U.S.C. 6901–6992 (k).
8. Executive Orders: E.O. 11990
Protection of Wetlands; E.O. 11988
Floodplain Management; E.O. 12898
Federal Actions to Address
Environmental Justice in Minority
Populations and Low Income
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:02 Dec 08, 2009
Jkt 220001
Populations; E.O. 11593 Protection and
Enhancement of Cultural Resources;
E.O. 13007 Indian Sacred Sites; E.O.
13287 Preserve America; E.O. 13175
Consultation and Coordination with
Indian Tribal Governments; E.O. 11514
Protection and Enhancement of
Environmental Quality; E.O. 13112
Invasive Species.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Program Number 20.205, Highway Planning
and Construction. The regulations
implementing Executive Order 12372
regarding intergovernmental consultation on
Federal programs and activities apply to this
program.)
Authority: 23 U.S.C. 139(l)(1).
Issued on: December 2, 2009.
Karen A. Bobo,
Director, Local Programs, Federal Highway
Administration, Sacramento, California.
[FR Doc. E9–29348 Filed 12–8–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–RY–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Highway Administration
Notice of Final Federal Agency Actions
on Proposed Highway in California
AGENCY: Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of Limitation on Claims
for Judicial Review of Actions by the
California Department of Transportation
(Caltrans), pursuant to 23 U.S.C. 327.
SUMMARY: The FHWA, on behalf of
Caltrans, is issuing this notice to
announce actions taken by Caltrans that
are final within the meaning of 23
U.S.C. 39(l)(1). The actions relate to a
proposed highway project, the Interstate
80 Eastbound Truck Scales Relocation
Project, in Cordelia in Solano County,
State of California. Those actions grant
licenses, permits, and approvals for the
project.
DATES: By this notice, the FHWA, on
behalf of Caltrans, is advising the public
of final agency actions subject to 23
U.S.C. 139(l)(1). A claim seeking
judicial review of the Federal agency
actions on the highway project will be
barred unless the claim is filed on or
before June 7, 2010. If the Federal law
that authorizes judicial review of a
claim provides a time period of less
than 180 days for filing such claim, then
that shorter time period still applies.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
Caltrans: Melanie Brent, Chief, Office of
Environmental Analysis, 510–286–5231,
melanie_brent@dot.ca.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Effective
July 1, 2007, the Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA) assigned, and
PO 00000
Frm 00115
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
the California Department of
Transportation (Caltrans) assumed,
environmental responsibilities for this
project pursuant to 23 U.S.C. 327.
Notice is hereby given that the Caltrans
has taken final agency actions subject to
23 U.S.C. 139(l)(1) by issuing licenses,
permits, and approvals for the following
highway project in the State of
California: Interstate 80 (I–80)
Eastbound Truck Scales Relocation
Project in Cordelia in Solano County,
State of California. The project
constructs a larger truck scale facility
approximately 2,500 feet to the east of
the current facility. Associated on- and
off-ramps would be constructed, and,
upon completion of the project, the
existing facility would be demolished.
The purpose of the project is to reduce
congestion in that section of I–80 and to
increase the efficiency of truck weighing
and inspection operations. The actions
by the Federal agencies, and the laws
under which such actions were taken,
are described in the Environmental
Assessment (EA) for the project,
approved on 16 October 2009, in the
Finding of No Significant Impact
(FONSI) issued on 16 October 2009, and
in other documents in the FHWA
project records. The EA, FONSI, and
other project records are available by
contacting Caltrans at the addresses
provided above. The Caltrans EA and
FONSI can be viewed and downloaded
from the project Web site at https://
www.sta.dst.ca.us/projectstruckscales.html.
This notice applies to all Federal
agency decisions as of the issuance date
of this notice and all laws under which
such actions were taken, including but
not limited to:
1. General: National Environmental
Policy Act (NEPA) [42 U.S.C. 4321–
4351]; Federal Aid-Highway Act [23
U.S.C. 109].
2. Land: Landscape and Scenic
Enhancement (Wildflowers) [23 U.S.C.
219].
3. Air: Clean Air Act 42 U.S.C. 7401–
7671(q).
4. Wildlife: Endangered Species Act
[16 U.S.C. 1531–1544 and section 1536],
Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act [16
U.S.C. 661–667(d)], Migratory Bird
Treaty Act [16 U.S.C. 703–712].
5. Section 4(f) of the U.S. Department
of Transportation Act of 1966 [49 U.S.C.
303].
6. Historic and Cultural Resources:
Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act of 1966, as amended
[16 U.S.C. 470(aa)–11]; Archeological
Resources Protection Act of 1977 [16
U.S.C. 470(aa)–11]; Archeological and
Historic Preservation Act [16 U.S.C.
469–469(c)]; Native American Grave
E:\FR\FM\09DEN1.SGM
09DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 235 (Wednesday, December 9, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 65201-65202]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-29348]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Highway Administration
Notice of Final Federal Agency Actions on Proposed Highway in
California
AGENCY: Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of Limitation on Claims for Judicial Review of Actions
by the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), pursuant to
23 U.S.C. 327.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The FHWA, on behalf of Caltrans, is issuing this notice to
announce actions taken by Caltrans that are final within the meaning of
23 U.S.C. 139(l)(1). The actions relate to a proposed highway project,
the State Route 160 Antioch Bridge Seismic Retrofit Project, with end
points in the city of Antioch in Contra Costa County, and on Sherman
Island in Sacramento County, State of California. Those actions grant
licenses, permits, and approvals for the project.
DATES: By this notice, the FHWA, on behalf of Caltrans, is advising the
public of final agency actions subject to 23 U.S.C. 139(l)(1). A claim
seeking judicial review of the Federal agency actions on the highway
project will be barred unless the claim is filed on or before June 7,
2010. If the Federal law that authorizes judicial review of a claim
provides a time period of less than 180 days for filing such claim,
then that shorter time period still applies.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For Caltrans: Melanie Brent, Chief,
Office of Environmental Analysis, 510-286-5231, melanie_brent@dot.ca.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Effective July 1, 2007, the Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA) assigned, and the California Department of
Transportation (Caltrans) assumed, environmental responsibilities for
this project pursuant to 23 U.S.C. 327. Notice is hereby given that the
Caltrans has taken final agency actions subject to 23 U.S.C. 139(l)(1)
by issuing licenses, permits, and approvals for the Antioch Bridge
Seismic Retrofit Project with end points in the city of Antioch in
Contra Costa County, and on Sherman Island in Sacramento County, State
of California. The project adds additional bracing and isolation
bearings and makes other improvements to the approximately 1.8
[[Page 65202]]
mile concrete structure, which spans the Sacramento River. The purpose
of the project is to increase the ability of the bridge to withstand a
major earthquake. The actions by the Federal agencies, and the laws
under which such actions were taken, are described in the Environmental
Assessment (EA) for the project, approved on 2 September 2009, in the
Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) issued on 2 September 2009,
and in other documents in the FHWA project records. The EA, FONSI, and
other project records are available by contacting Caltrans at the
addresses provided above. The Caltrans EA and FONSI can be viewed and
downloaded from the project Web site at https://www.dot.ca.gov/dist4/documents/antioch/antiochbridgeseismicretrofitprojectfinalenvironmentaldocument.pdf.
This notice applies to all Federal agency decisions as of the
issuance date of this notice and all laws under which such actions were
taken, including but not limited to:
1. General: National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) [42 U.S.C.
4321-4351]; Federal Aid-Highway Act [23 U.S.C. 109].
2. Land: Landscape and Scenic Enhancement (Wildflowers) [23 U.S.C.
219].
3. Air: Clean Air Act 42 U.S.C. 7401-7671(q).
4. Wildlife: Endangered Species Act [16 U.S.C. 1531-1544 and
section 1536], Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act [16 U.S.C. 661-
667(d)], Migratory Bird Treaty Act [16 U.S.C. 703-712].
5. Historic and Cultural Resources: Section 106 of the National
Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended [16 U.S.C. 470(aa)-11];
Archeological Resources Protection Act of 1977 [16 U.S.C. 470(aa)-11] ;
Archeological and Historic Preservation Act [16 U.S.C. 469-469(c)].
6. Social and Economic: Civil Rights Act of 1964 [42 U.S.C.
2000(d)-2000(d)(1)]; American Indian Religious Freedom Act [42 U.S.C.
1996]; Farmland Protection Policy Act (FPPA) [7 U.S.C. 4201-4209].
7. Hazardous Materials: Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), 42 U.S.C. 9601-9675;
Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986 (SARA); Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), 42 U.S.C. 6901-6992 (k).
8. Executive Orders: E.O. 11990 Protection of Wetlands; E.O. 11988
Floodplain Management; E.O. 12898 Federal Actions to Address
Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low Income
Populations; E.O. 11593 Protection and Enhancement of Cultural
Resources; E.O. 13007 Indian Sacred Sites; E.O. 13287 Preserve America;
E.O. 13175 Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments; E.O. 11514 Protection and Enhancement of Environmental
Quality; E.O. 13112 Invasive Species.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Number 20.205,
Highway Planning and Construction. The regulations implementing
Executive Order 12372 regarding intergovernmental consultation on
Federal programs and activities apply to this program.)
Authority: 23 U.S.C. 139(l)(1).
Issued on: December 2, 2009.
Karen A. Bobo,
Director, Local Programs, Federal Highway Administration, Sacramento,
California.
[FR Doc. E9-29348 Filed 12-8-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-RY-P