Patent Cooperation Treaty Task Force; Notice of Public Meeting, 65101-65102 [E9-29329]
Download as PDF
65101
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 235 / Wednesday, December 9, 2009 / Notices
China: Extension of Time Limit for the
Final Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review, 74 FR 57146
(November 4, 2009).
The Department now finds that it is
not practicable to complete the final
results of the administrative review of
folding metal tables and chairs from the
PRC within the current deadline due to
complex issues the parties have raised
related to surrogate financial statements
and market-economy purchases. We
find that additional time is needed to
complete these final results. Therefore,
in accordance with section 751(a)(3)(A)
of the Act, the Department is extending
by 14 days the time period for
completion of the final results of this
review. This extension makes these final
results due 164 days after the date on
which the preliminary results were
published, i.e., December 18, 2009.
This notice is published in
accordance with sections 751(a)(3)(A)
and 777(i) of the Act.
Dated: December 3, 2009.
John M. Andersen,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Operations.
[FR Doc. E9–29361 Filed 12–8–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
United States Patent and Trademark
Office
[Docket No.: PTO–P–2009–0041]
Patent Cooperation Treaty Task Force;
Notice of Public Meeting
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
AGENCY: United States Patent and
Trademark Office, Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of public meeting;
request for comments.
SUMMARY: This notice announces a
public meeting to solicit public
opinions on improvement of the
USPTO’s efficiency, operation and
utilization of the Patent Cooperation
Treaty (PCT).
DATES AND TIMES: The public meeting
will be held on Wednesday, January 13,
2010, from 2 p.m. to 5 p.m. Persons
interested in attending the meeting must
register by January 8, 2010.
Written comments must be submitted
by January 8, 2009.
Location: The public meeting will be
held in the South Auditorium of
Madison West, 600 Dulany Street,
Alexandria, VA 22314.
ADDRESSES: Written comments should
be sent by electronic mail message over
the Internet addressed to
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:02 Dec 08, 2009
Jkt 220001
IP.Policy@uspto.gov. Comments may
also be submitted by mail addressed to:
Mail Stop Office of International
Relations, USPTO, P.O. Box 1450,
Alexandria, VA 22313–1450, marked to
the attention of Karin Ferriter. Although
comments may be submitted by mail,
submission via e-mail to the above
address is preferable.
The written comments will be
available for public inspection on the
USPTO Web site and by appointment at
the Executive Library, located in
Madison West, Tenth Floor, 600 Dulany
Street, Alexandria, Virginia. Contact:
Elizabeth Shaw at
elizabeth.shaw2@uspto.gov or 571–272–
8494.
Because comments will be made
available for public inspection,
information that is not desired to be
made public, such as an address or
phone number, should not be included.
For Registration to Attend and/or to
Give a Presentation in the Meeting: If
you wish to attend the public meeting
and/or make an oral presentation at the
meeting, you must register by e-mail
(see ADDRESSES) by close of business on
Friday, January 8, 2010. When
registering, you must provide the
following information: (1) Your name,
title, and, if applicable, company or
organization, address, phone number,
and e-mail address and (2) if you wish
to make a presentation, the specific
topic or issue to be addressed (e.g.,
suggestions to improve the quality of an
International Search Report) and the
approximate desired length of your
presentation.
There is no fee to register for the
public meeting and registration will be
on a first-come, first-served basis. Early
registration is recommended because
seating is limited. Registration on the
day of the public meeting will be
permitted on a space-available basis
beginning at 1 p.m. on Wednesday,
January 13, 2010.
We will do our best to accommodate
all persons who wish to make a
presentation at the meeting. After
reviewing the list of speakers, we will
contact each speaker prior to the
meeting with the amount of time
available and the approximate time the
speaker’s presentation is scheduled to
begin. Speakers must then send the final
electronic copies of their presentations
in Microsoft PowerPoint, Microsoft
Word, or Adobe Portable Document
Format (PDF) to IP.Policy@uspto.gov by
Monday, January 11, 2010 so that the
presentation can be displayed in the
Auditorium.
If you need special accommodations
due to a disability, please inform the
contact person (see FOR FURTHER
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
INFORMATION CONTACT)
by Friday January
8, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Karin L. Ferriter (571) 272–9300, Office
of Intellectual Property Policy and
Enforcement, directly by phone, by email to Karin.Ferriter@uspto.gov, or by
mail addressed to: Mail Stop
International Relations, U.S. Patent and
Trademark Office, P.O. Box 1450,
Alexandria, Virginia 22313–1450.
The
United States Patent and Trademark
Office (USPTO) is establishing a PCT
Task Force to consider the perspectives
of interested parties concerned with
improving the USPTO’s activities as a
receiving Office, an International
Searching Authority (ISA), and an
International Preliminary Examination
Authority (IPEA), as well as of the PCT
System as a whole. To support the
operation of the Task Force, the USPTO
will be holding a public meeting and
inviting public comments. Further
meetings may be announced as the Task
Force develops its work.
The number of patent applications
filed in the USPTO and other Offices
has increased significantly over the last
decade. As worldwide patent protection
is increasingly requested, Patent Offices
are struggling under the burden of this
increasing workload. With 142
members, the PCT offers a
comprehensive framework with
widespread acceptance that can be used
to address this challenge. To build upon
this framework, the USPTO is
considering how PCT applications
could be included in worksharing
efforts, and other process improvements
such as allowing submission of prior art
by applicants and third parties to
further improve PCT processing.
This notice is to inform users of the
PCT and others of this opportunity to
help the USPTO in its strategy to
improve efficiencies and optimize the
usefulness of the PCT system.
The World Intellectual Property
Organization (WIPO) recently
completed a PCT user survey. The
results of this survey are posted here:
https://www.wipo.int/export/sites/www/
pct/en/activity/pct_survey_2009.pdf.
The survey respondents indicate that
the PCT system is functioning generally
well, but that there is room for
improvement in the USPTO, as well as
other Offices. Participants may wish to
provide more detailed information
regarding matters addressed in the
survey, or raise new matters such as
those items listed in the questions
below. Comments upon one or more of
the following would be helpful:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\09DEN1.SGM
09DEN1
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
65102
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 235 / Wednesday, December 9, 2009 / Notices
1. Please identify overall changes you
recommend to the PCT system.
2. Please explain why you use the
PCT system, as opposed to direct foreign
filing via the Paris Convention. What
benefits are applicants seeking by the
use of the PCT system, in addition to the
longer time to decide where to enter the
national stage?
3. The USPTO has been contracting
out the international search of
international applications that designate
the USPTO as the International
Searching Authority, so as to help the
USPTO improve the timeliness of the
international search. From the
applicant’s viewpoint, please identify
the advantages and disadvantages from
this contracting out of the international
search.
4. In addition, please explain whether
applicants have concerns with the
USPTO’s use of contractors for the
international search of PCT
applications.
5. Please explain whether you support
including PCT search and examination
results in worksharing mechanisms,
such as the Patent Prosecution Highway
(PPH).
6. Where the international search
report and written opinion of the
International Searching Authority are at
least partially negative, please explain
whether you would expect to request
international preliminary examination
under Chapter II of the PCT more often
in order to get PPH benefit at the
national phase?
7. Please explain whether you believe
the USPTO should encourage early
national stage entry when designated as
an ISA or IPEA, and implement a
system that combines the international
and national phase.
8. Please identify any changes you
recommend to improve the quality of
the work produced under the PCT
system.
9. Please explain whether delaying
the issuance of the International Search
Report until after publication of the
international application has any
significant impact on your use of the
PCT?
10. Please explain whether you
believe that the PCT would benefit from
a third-party observation system
(including submission of prior art) and/
or more efficient means for applicantsubmitted prior art.
11. Please explain your primary
reasons for choosing an ISA.
12. Please explain how the USPTO
could improve its processing as a
receiving Office.
13. Please explain how the USPTO
could improve its processing as a
designated/elected Office.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:02 Dec 08, 2009
Jkt 220001
The USPTO plans to make the
meeting available via Web cast. Web
cast information will be available on the
USPTO’s Internet Web site before the
roundtable. The written comments and
list of the meeting participants and their
associations will be posted on the
USPTO’s Internet Web site (https://
www.uspto.gov).
Dated: December 2, 2009.
David J. Kappos,
Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual
Property and Director of the United States
Patent and Trademark Office.
[FR Doc. E9–29329 Filed 12–8–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–16–P
Sunshine Act Meetings
Wednesday, December 9,
2009, 9 a.m.–12 noon.
PLACE: Hearing Room 420, Bethesda
Towers, 4330 East West Highway,
Bethesda, Maryland.
STATUS: Commission Meeting—Open to
the Public.
MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:
1. Pending Decisional Matter: (a)
Tracking Labels for Drywall Notice of
Inquiry.
2. Final Rule on Registration Cards.
A live webcast of the Meeting can be
viewed at https://www.cpsc.gov/webcast/
index.html.
For a recorded message containing the
latest agenda information, call (301)
504–7948.
CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:
Todd A. Stevenson, Office of the
Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product
Safety Commission, 4330 East West
Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814 (301)
504–7923.
TIME AND DATE:
Dated: December 2, 2009.
Todd A. Stevenson,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9–29192 Filed 12–8–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6355–01–M
CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY
COMMISSION
Sunshine Act Meetings
TIME AND DATE: Wednesday, December 9,
2009, 2:00–4 p.m.
PLACE: Hearing Room 420, Bethesda
Towers, 4330 East West Highway,
Bethesda, Maryland.
STATUS: Closed to the Public.
MATTER TO BE CONSIDERED:
Compliance Weekly Report—
Commission Briefing.
Frm 00015
Fmt 4703
Dated: December 2, 2009.
Todd A. Stevenson,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9–29193 Filed 12–8–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6355–01–M
CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY
COMMISSION
PO 00000
The staff will brief the Commission on
various compliance matters.
For a recorded message containing the
latest agenda information, call (301)
504–7948.
CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:
Todd A. Stevenson, Office of the
Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product
Safety Commission, 4330 East West
Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814 (301)
504–7923.
Sfmt 4703
COUNCIL ON ENVIRONMENTAL
QUALITY
Draft Principles and Standards
Sections of the ‘‘Economic and
Environmental Principles and
Guidelines for Water and Related Land
Resources Implementation Studies’’;
Initiation of Revision and Request for
Comments
AGENCY: Council on Environmental
Quality.
ACTION: Notice and request for
comments.
SUMMARY: Section 2031 of the Water
Resources Development Act of 2007
(Pub. L. 110–114) directs the Secretary
of the Army to revise the ‘‘Economic
and Environmental Principles and
Guidelines for Water and Related Land
Resources Implementation Studies,’’
(P&G) dated March 10, 1983, consistent
with a number of considerations
enumerated in the statute. The
Administration has initiated the
development of uniform planning
standards for the development of water
resources that would apply to water
resources development programs and
activities government-wide, to agencies
in addition to the traditional water
resources development agencies covered
under the current Principles and
Guidelines: the Army Corps of
Engineers, Bureau of Reclamation
(Interior), Natural Resources
Conservation Service (USDA), and
Tennessee Valley Authority. Therefore,
the Council on Environmental Quality
(CEQ), in coordination with the Office
of Management and Budget, has
implemented a two phase interagency
process revising the planning guidance.
The first phase focused on facilitating
interagency revisions to the ‘‘Principles
and Standards’’ (Chapter I of the
existing P&G) of Principles and
Guidelines for planning water resources
E:\FR\FM\09DEN1.SGM
09DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 235 (Wednesday, December 9, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 65101-65102]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-29329]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
United States Patent and Trademark Office
[Docket No.: PTO-P-2009-0041]
Patent Cooperation Treaty Task Force; Notice of Public Meeting
AGENCY: United States Patent and Trademark Office, Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of public meeting; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This notice announces a public meeting to solicit public
opinions on improvement of the USPTO's efficiency, operation and
utilization of the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT).
DATES AND TIMES: The public meeting will be held on Wednesday, January
13, 2010, from 2 p.m. to 5 p.m. Persons interested in attending the
meeting must register by January 8, 2010.
Written comments must be submitted by January 8, 2009.
Location: The public meeting will be held in the South Auditorium
of Madison West, 600 Dulany Street, Alexandria, VA 22314.
ADDRESSES: Written comments should be sent by electronic mail message
over the Internet addressed to IP.Policy@uspto.gov. Comments may also
be submitted by mail addressed to: Mail Stop Office of International
Relations, USPTO, P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA 22313-1450, marked to
the attention of Karin Ferriter. Although comments may be submitted by
mail, submission via e-mail to the above address is preferable.
The written comments will be available for public inspection on the
USPTO Web site and by appointment at the Executive Library, located in
Madison West, Tenth Floor, 600 Dulany Street, Alexandria, Virginia.
Contact: Elizabeth Shaw at elizabeth.shaw2@uspto.gov or 571-272-8494.
Because comments will be made available for public inspection,
information that is not desired to be made public, such as an address
or phone number, should not be included.
For Registration to Attend and/or to Give a Presentation in the
Meeting: If you wish to attend the public meeting and/or make an oral
presentation at the meeting, you must register by e-mail (see
ADDRESSES) by close of business on Friday, January 8, 2010. When
registering, you must provide the following information: (1) Your name,
title, and, if applicable, company or organization, address, phone
number, and e-mail address and (2) if you wish to make a presentation,
the specific topic or issue to be addressed (e.g., suggestions to
improve the quality of an International Search Report) and the
approximate desired length of your presentation.
There is no fee to register for the public meeting and registration
will be on a first-come, first-served basis. Early registration is
recommended because seating is limited. Registration on the day of the
public meeting will be permitted on a space-available basis beginning
at 1 p.m. on Wednesday, January 13, 2010.
We will do our best to accommodate all persons who wish to make a
presentation at the meeting. After reviewing the list of speakers, we
will contact each speaker prior to the meeting with the amount of time
available and the approximate time the speaker's presentation is
scheduled to begin. Speakers must then send the final electronic copies
of their presentations in Microsoft PowerPoint, Microsoft Word, or
Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) to IP.Policy@uspto.gov by Monday,
January 11, 2010 so that the presentation can be displayed in the
Auditorium.
If you need special accommodations due to a disability, please
inform the contact person (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT) by
Friday January 8, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karin L. Ferriter (571) 272-9300,
Office of Intellectual Property Policy and Enforcement, directly by
phone, by e-mail to Karin.Ferriter@uspto.gov, or by mail addressed to:
Mail Stop International Relations, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office,
P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Patent and Trademark
Office (USPTO) is establishing a PCT Task Force to consider the
perspectives of interested parties concerned with improving the USPTO's
activities as a receiving Office, an International Searching Authority
(ISA), and an International Preliminary Examination Authority (IPEA),
as well as of the PCT System as a whole. To support the operation of
the Task Force, the USPTO will be holding a public meeting and inviting
public comments. Further meetings may be announced as the Task Force
develops its work.
The number of patent applications filed in the USPTO and other
Offices has increased significantly over the last decade. As worldwide
patent protection is increasingly requested, Patent Offices are
struggling under the burden of this increasing workload. With 142
members, the PCT offers a comprehensive framework with widespread
acceptance that can be used to address this challenge. To build upon
this framework, the USPTO is considering how PCT applications could be
included in worksharing efforts, and other process improvements such as
allowing submission of prior art by applicants and third parties to
further improve PCT processing.
This notice is to inform users of the PCT and others of this
opportunity to help the USPTO in its strategy to improve efficiencies
and optimize the usefulness of the PCT system.
The World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) recently
completed a PCT user survey. The results of this survey are posted
here: https://www.wipo.int/export/sites/www/pct/en/activity/pct_survey_2009.pdf. The survey respondents indicate that the PCT system
is functioning generally well, but that there is room for improvement
in the USPTO, as well as other Offices. Participants may wish to
provide more detailed information regarding matters addressed in the
survey, or raise new matters such as those items listed in the
questions below. Comments upon one or more of the following would be
helpful:
[[Page 65102]]
1. Please identify overall changes you recommend to the PCT system.
2. Please explain why you use the PCT system, as opposed to direct
foreign filing via the Paris Convention. What benefits are applicants
seeking by the use of the PCT system, in addition to the longer time to
decide where to enter the national stage?
3. The USPTO has been contracting out the international search of
international applications that designate the USPTO as the
International Searching Authority, so as to help the USPTO improve the
timeliness of the international search. From the applicant's viewpoint,
please identify the advantages and disadvantages from this contracting
out of the international search.
4. In addition, please explain whether applicants have concerns
with the USPTO's use of contractors for the international search of PCT
applications.
5. Please explain whether you support including PCT search and
examination results in worksharing mechanisms, such as the Patent
Prosecution Highway (PPH).
6. Where the international search report and written opinion of the
International Searching Authority are at least partially negative,
please explain whether you would expect to request international
preliminary examination under Chapter II of the PCT more often in order
to get PPH benefit at the national phase?
7. Please explain whether you believe the USPTO should encourage
early national stage entry when designated as an ISA or IPEA, and
implement a system that combines the international and national phase.
8. Please identify any changes you recommend to improve the quality
of the work produced under the PCT system.
9. Please explain whether delaying the issuance of the
International Search Report until after publication of the
international application has any significant impact on your use of the
PCT?
10. Please explain whether you believe that the PCT would benefit
from a third-party observation system (including submission of prior
art) and/or more efficient means for applicant-submitted prior art.
11. Please explain your primary reasons for choosing an ISA.
12. Please explain how the USPTO could improve its processing as a
receiving Office.
13. Please explain how the USPTO could improve its processing as a
designated/elected Office.
The USPTO plans to make the meeting available via Web cast. Web
cast information will be available on the USPTO's Internet Web site
before the roundtable. The written comments and list of the meeting
participants and their associations will be posted on the USPTO's
Internet Web site (https://www.uspto.gov).
Dated: December 2, 2009.
David J. Kappos,
Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of
the United States Patent and Trademark Office.
[FR Doc. E9-29329 Filed 12-8-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-16-P