Pacific Gas and Electric Company; Notice of Application Accepted for Filing, Soliciting Motions To Intervene and Protests, Ready for Environmental Analysis, Soliciting Comments, Recommendations, Preliminary Terms and Conditions, and Preliminary Fishway Prescriptions, and Intent To Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement, 65106-65109 [E9-29282]
Download as PDF
65106
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 235 / Wednesday, December 9, 2009 / Notices
efficiency and water conservation
standards.
We have prepared a page of
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
related to this certification grace period,
which is available at https://
www.gc.doe.gov/documents/
Frequently_Asked_Questions.pdf.
In response to this notice,
manufacturers may file required
certification reports and compliance
statements either by mail or electronic
filing.
Electronic filing is preferred. To file
electronically, go to our FAQ at https://
www.gc.doe.gov/documents/
Frequently_Asked_Questions.pdf for
instructions.
Paper filings should be submitted to:
Appliance Standards Program (EE–2J),
U.S. Department of Energy, 1000
Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20585–0121.
Issued in Washington, DC, on December 4,
2009.
Scott Blake Harris,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. E9–29356 Filed 12–8–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
[Project No. 2106–059]
Pacific Gas and Electric Company;
Notice of Application Accepted for
Filing, Soliciting Motions To Intervene
and Protests, Ready for Environmental
Analysis, Soliciting Comments,
Recommendations, Preliminary Terms
and Conditions, and Preliminary
Fishway Prescriptions, and Intent To
Prepare an Environmental Impact
Statement
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
December 1, 2009.
Take notice that the following
hydroelectric application has been filed
with the Commission and is available
for public inspection.
a. Type of Application: New Major
License.
b. Project No.: 2106–059.
c. Date Filed: July 16, 2009.
d. Applicant: Pacific Gas and Electric
Company (PG&E).
e. Name of Project: McCloud-Pit
Hydroelectric Project.
f. Location: The existing project is
located on the McCloud and Pit Rivers
in Shasta County, California. The
project occupies lands of the United
States, managed by the United States
Department of Agriculture—Forest
Service and the United States
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:02 Dec 08, 2009
Jkt 220001
Department of Interior—Bureau of Land
Management.
g. Filed Pursuant to: Federal Power
Act 16 USC 791 (a)–825(r).
h. Applicant Contact: Randal S.
Livingston, Vice President—Power
Generation, Pacific Gas and Electric
Company, P.O. Box 770000, Mail Code
N11E, San Francisco, CA 94177–0001;
Telephone (415) 973–7000.
i. FERC Contact: Emily Carter at (202)
502–6512 or emily.carter@ferc.gov.
j. Deadline for filing motions to
intervene and protests, comments,
recommendations, preliminary terms
and conditions, and preliminary
fishway prescriptions is 60 days from
the issuance of this notice; reply
comments are due 105 days from the
issuance date of this notice.
The Commission’s Rules of Practice
require all intervenors filing documents
with the Commission to serve a copy of
that document on each person on the
official service list for the project.
Further, if an intervenor files comments
or documents with the Commission
relating to the merits of an issue that
may affect the responsibilities of a
particular resource agency, they also
must serve a copy of the document on
that resource agency.
Motions to intervene, protests,
comments, recommendations,
preliminary terms and conditions, and
preliminary fishway prescriptions may
be filed electronically via the Internet.
See 18 C.F.R. 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the
instructions on the Commission’s Web
site (https://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/
ferconline.asp) under the ‘‘eFiling’’ link.
For a simpler method of submitting text
only comments, click on ‘‘Quick
Comment.’’ For assistance, please
contact FERC Online Support at
FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov; call tollfree at (866) 208–3676; or, for TTY,
contact (202) 502–8659. Although the
Commission strongly encourages
electronic filing, documents also may be
paper-filed. To paper-file, mail an
original and eight copies to: Kimberly D.
Bose, Secretary, Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
k. Cooperating Agencies: We are
asking federal, state, local, and tribal
agencies with jurisdiction and/or
special expertise with respect to
environmental issues to cooperate with
us in the preparation of the
environmental document. Agencies who
would like to request cooperating status
should follow the instructions in item l
below.
l. Deadline for filing requests for
cooperating agency status: February 1,
2010.
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
m. This application has been accepted
for filing and is now is ready for
environmental analysis.
n. Project Description: The existing
McCloud-Pit Project consists of three
existing developments (James B. Black,
Pit 6, and Pit 7), which collectively
include two storage reservoirs (McCloud
and Iron Canyon), two regulating
reservoirs (Pit 6 and Pit 7), one afterbay
(Pit 7), two tunnels, three powerhouses
(James B. Black, Pit 6, and Pit 7), and
associated equipment and transmission
facilities. The project has an installed
capacity of 368 megawatts (MW),
produces an average annual generation
of 1,542 gigawatt-hours (GWh), and
occupies 3,707.6 acres of land.
Approximately 1,651.4 of these acres are
federally owned, with 1,621.9 managed
by the Shasta-Trinity National Forest
and 29.5 managed by the U.S. Bureau of
Land Management. In addition to the
existing facilities, PG&E is proposing to
construct two generation additions
consisting of powerhouses at the base of
McCloud dam (5–8 MW) and at the base
of Pit 7 Afterbay dam (10 MW).
The project involves the transfer of
water from the McCloud River basin to
the Lower Pit River basin via a tunnel
from the McCloud reservoir to Iron
Canyon reservoir. Iron Canyon reservoir
is on Iron Canyon creak, a tributary of
the Pit River. Water flows from Iron
Canyon reservoir via a tunnel to the
James B. Black powerhouse. Although
the project diverts water from the
McCloud River basin to the Lower Pit
River basin, both basins drain to Shasta
Lake.
James B. Black Development
McCloud Dam and McCloud Reservoir
McCloud dam is a 241-foot-high, 630foot-long earth and rock filled dam
located on the McCloud River and
impounds McCloud reservoir. The
McCloud reservoir has a surface area of
520 acres and a maximum storage
capacity of approximately 35,234 acrefeet (af). The spillway [elevation 2,696.0
feet National Geodetic Vertical Datum
(NGVD)] is on the south side of the dam.
The reservoir has a normal maximum
water surface elevation of 2,680 feet.
The dam is equipped with three radial
gates measuring 27 feet by 24.5 feet,
discharging into a spillway that returns
spillage flows to the McCloud River
below the dam. The dam also has a 12foot diameter diversion/outlet tunnel
that runs under the dam to supply a 24inch Howell-Bunger valve for releasing
instream flows to the McCloud River, as
well as an 84-inch diameter butterfly
valve for emergency use to control
reservoir levels. Controls for the
E:\FR\FM\09DEN1.SGM
09DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 235 / Wednesday, December 9, 2009 / Notices
diversion/outlet tunnel are located at
the intake within McCloud reservoir.
McCloud Tunnel
A 7.2-mile-long tunnel and a 563-footlong pipeline at Hawkins Creek crossing
hydraulically link McCloud reservoir
and Iron Canyon reservoir. An intake
tower within McCloud reservoir collects
water for the McCloud tunnel, which is
approximately 17 feet in diameter and
heads easterly to Iron Canyon reservoir.
The differential in water surface
elevations between the two reservoirs
controls the amount of water drafted
through the tunnel.
Iron Canyon Dam and Reservoir
An earth-filled dam 214-feet-high and
1,130-feet-long impounds Iron Canyon
reservoir. The reservoir has a maximum
storage capacity of 24,241 af with an
approximate 500-acre surface area. The
dam has a slide gate leading to a 48-inch
diameter pipe for instream flow releases
to Iron Canyon Creek. Normal maximum
water surface elevation within the
reservoir is 2,664 feet NGVD. When the
water surface of Iron Canyon reservoir is
lowered, water flows through the
McCloud tunnel from McCloud
reservoir to Iron Canyon reservoir.
Iron Canyon Tunnel and Penstock
Iron Canyon reservoir is connected to
James B. Black powerhouse via the 2.9mile long, 18-foot diameter Iron Canyon
Tunnel, an associated 1,194-foot-long,
11.5-foot diameter pipeline at the
Willow Spring Creek crossing, and a
5,467-foot-long, 11.5-foot diameter steel
penstock. The penstock bifurcates
before James B. Black powerhouse to
deliver water flow to the two turbine
generator units. The tunnel and
penstock have a total flow capacity of
2,000 cfs.
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
James B. Black Powerhouse
James B. Black powerhouse is located
on the northwest bank of the Pit River,
approximately 0.5 miles upstream of the
Pit 5 Project powerhouse (FERC Project
No. 233). The powerhouse is a threelevel, reinforced concrete structure
containing two vertical shaft impulse
turbines rated at 104,000 hp each. They
operate at a normal maximum gross
head of 1,226 feet. Two vertical axis
outdoor generators, Unit 1 rated at 94.8
megavolt-ampere (MVA) and Unit 2
rated at 92.6 MVA, are connected to a
three phase, 86 MVA transformer bank.
Their combined maximum capacity is
172 MW. Average annual generation
within the past 25 years at the station
is 656.3 GWh.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:02 Dec 08, 2009
Jkt 220001
Transmission
Transmission lines (230 kilovolt [kV])
extend approximately 0.5 mile from the
transformer bank in the switchyard
adjacent to the James B. Black
powerhouse to the switchyard adjacent
to the Pit 5 powerhouse.
Pit 6 Development
Pit 6 Dam and Reservoir
Pit 6 dam and reservoir are located on
the Pit River downstream of James B.
Black powerhouse. The 183-foot-high,
560-foot-long concrete gravity Pit 6 dam
has a crest elevation of 1,432 feet NGVD.
The top of the dam contains a trash
rake, motors for two 42-foot-high by 49foot-long slide gates and a control
building. The control building houses a
hydraulic system for two low-level,
eight-foot diameter outlets at the base of
the dam. The Pit 6 reservoir has a
maximum storage capacity of
approximately 15,619 af and a
maximum surface area of approximately
268 acres. The normal maximum water
surface elevation within the reservoir is
1,425 feet NGVD. The reservoir serves as
the forebay for the Pit 6 powerhouse.
Two 18-foot diameter steel penstocks
with a total flow capacity of 6,470 cfs
extend 602 feet from the dam to the
turbines in the powerhouse located at
the base of the dam.
Pit 6 Powerhouse
Pit 6 powerhouse is located along the
east bank of the Pit River at the base of
Pit 6 dam. The powerhouse is a fourlevel reinforced concrete structure, three
levels of which are below grade. The
structure contains two vertical shaft,
Francis reaction turbines, rated at
53,000 hp each and operating at a
normal maximum gross head of 155 feet.
There are two outdoor vertical axis
generators, rated at 44 MVA each, with
each unit connected to a three-phase 44
MVA transformer bank that steps up
plant output to 230 kV. The maximum
generator capacity is 80 MW. Average
annual generation over the last 25 years
is 373.8 GWh.
Transmission
Transmission lines extend
approximately 3.3 miles from the
switchyard adjacent to the Pit 6
powerhouse to the Applicant’s
interconnected transmission system.
Pit 7 Development
Pit 7 Dam and Reservoir
Pit 7 dam and reservoir are located on
the Pit River downstream of Pit 6
powerhouse. The Pit 7 dam is a 228foot-high and 770-foot-long concrete
gravity dam. The top of the dam
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
65107
contains a trash rake, motors for two 49foot by 42-foot slide gates at the crest of
the dam, and a control building. The
control building houses hydraulic
controls for two eight-foot in diameter,
low-level outlets at the base of the dam.
The Pit 7 reservoir has a maximum
storage capacity of 34,611 af and a
surface area of approximately 471 acres
at a normal maximum water surface
elevation of 1,270 feet NGVD. As with
Pit 6, the Pit 7 reservoir serves at the
forebay for the Pit 7 powerhouse. Two
penstocks, 15 feet in diameter, extend
572 feet from the dam to the turbines in
the powerhouse, located at the base of
the dam. Total flow capacity within the
penstocks is 7,440 cfs.
Pit 7 Powerhouse
Pit 7 powerhouse is located along the
east bank of the Pit River at the base of
Pit 7 dam. The powerhouse consists of
a four-level, reinforced concrete
structure, three levels of which are
below grade. The powerhouse contains
two vertical-shaft reaction turbines that
are rated at 70,000 hp each and operate
at a normal maximum gross head of 205
feet. Two vertical axis generators are
rated at 52.2 (Unit 2) and 62.1 MVA
(Unit 1), respectively. Their maximum
combined capacity is 112 MW. Each
unit is connected to a three-phase, 58
MVA transformer bank that steps up
plant output to 230 kV. The average
annual generation over the last 25 years
is 512 GWh.
Transmission
Transmission lines extend
approximately 3.5 miles from the
switchyard adjacent to the Pit 7
powerhouse to the Applicant’s
interconnected transmission system.
Pit 7 Afterbay
Pit 7 afterbay has a surface area of
approximately 69 acres at a normal
‘‘maximum’’ water surface elevation of
1,067 feet NGVD (maximum water
surface of Shasta Lake). The afterbay
dam is a 30-foot-high, steel-reinforced,
rock-fill structure, including a variable
width concrete gravity weir section. Pit
7 afterbay serves to attenuate changes in
the water flow from Pit 7 dam and
powerhouse before entering Shasta
Lake.
Proposed Facilities
McCloud Development
PG&E proposes to construct a
powerhouse located at the base of
McCloud dam. Generation output from
the proposed powerhouse would be
connected to a new transmission line
that would be routed from the proposed
powerhouse to connect to an existing
E:\FR\FM\09DEN1.SGM
09DEN1
65108
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 235 / Wednesday, December 9, 2009 / Notices
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
substation located approximately 14
miles to the north, in the town of
McCloud, California. McCloud
Development would use water stored in
McCloud Reservoir and released into
the Lower McCloud River to meet
instream flow requirements and no new
impoundments are proposed. With a
flow range of 150 cfs to 400 cfs, the
turbine and generator set would have an
installed capacity of about 5 to 8 MW.
The proposed McCloud Development
would have an average range of annual
energy production of 30 to 40 GWh and
average monthly generation would be
approximately 2.5 to 3.3 GWh. PG&E
proposes to base the final size of the
unit, powerhouse hydraulic capacity,
and average annual energy production
on instream flow requirements included
in the new project license.
The proposed powerhouse would be
positioned to the south of the current
outlet works control building and would
be a reinforced concrete-and-block
masonry structure designed to enclose
and protect the electro-mechanical
generation equipment, withstand area
snow loads, and prevent possible
vandalism. It would be accessed via the
existing project road that connects to
Forest Road 38N11. The powerhouse
would be equipped with a single
vertical-axis Francis turbine. The
turbine, which would have a discharge
diameter of approximately 54 inches,
would operate at about 450 revolutions
per minute. The direct-coupled
synchronous generator rating would
range from 5,600 to 7,500 kW.
The proposed transmission line route
from the powerhouse would follow
Forest Road 38N11 and then county
roads to the existing substation
approximately 14 miles north in the
town of McCloud.
Pit 7 Afterbay Development
PG&E proposes to construct at Pit 7
Afterbay Development, including a
powerhouse located on the west side of
Pit 7 Afterbay dam at the regulating
weir. Generation output from the
proposed powerhouse would be
connected to a new transmission line
that would be routed from the
powerhouse to connect to the
switchyard located approximately 1.6
miles to the east at Pit 7 powerhouse.
The proposed facilities would have no
meaningful storage and would operate
in a run-of-the-river mode. The available
flows for energy production would be
dictated by the operation of the
upstream Pit 7 powerhouse.
The proposed Pit 7 Afterbay
powerhouse would use water released
upstream from Pit 7 powerhouse and
dam and no new impoundments are
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:02 Dec 08, 2009
Jkt 220001
proposed. The proposed powerhouse
would be configured for two horizontalaxis synchronous generating units, each
rated at 5,500 kW and housed in an
approximately 30-foot-wide x 110-footlong intake approach bay. Each of the
generating bays would have a design
flow of 2,500 cfs. The upstream entrance
to each intake bay would include a
trashrack to stop large debris from
entering the unit. Two radial gates
approximately 26-foot-wide by 52-foothigh would be constructed upstream of
the unit to regulate flow and for
dewatering the turbine pit. A roller gate
would be constructed at the
downstream end of each bay or the
tailrace to prevent backwatering during
maintenance. A combination of ramps,
walkways, and ladders would be used
in each bay to allow for maintenance
access and support the gate operator
mechanism. A 20-foot-wide bypass flow
bay, which would house a radial gate
and operator, would be built in the first
phase of construction. The bypass flow
bay would be used to pass river flows
during the second phase of construction
and during times of non-generation. The
bypass flow bay also would require a
walkway to allow maintenance and
operation access and support the gate
operator mechanism. A new access road
would be constructed to access the
powerhouse for construction, operation,
and maintenance. The access road
would extend between Fenders Ferry
Road and the afterbay, just west of
Fenders Ferry Bridge. Based on a flow
range of 2,500 cfs to 5,000 cfs, the 2-unit
powerhouse would accommodate
turbine and generator sets capable of an
installed capacity of about 5 MW each
for a total of 10 MW. The average
monthly generation from this proposed
powerhouse would be approximately
4.2 GWh.
The proposed powerhouse substation
would be fenced and located on the
ground near the control house, but
above the maximum anticipated flood
and tailwater levels. Substation
equipment would include a step-up
substation to transform energy for the
transmission line. Powerhouse controls
and switchgear would be installed in a
separate building located on the right
bank of the river, positioned above the
maximum anticipated water level and
inside the substation fence. The
building would house the required
equipment for control and protection of
the generation units and would be
equipped with electric heating and
cooling. The transmission line would be
a 1.6-mile-long, 34.5-kV, wooden-pole
line connecting the proposed
powerhouse to a new 34.5- to 230-kV
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
transformer, positioned at or near the
existing 230-kV Pit 7 switchyard. A new
230-kV circuit breaker and disconnect
switch would be connected by a short
span to the main bus of the existing Pit
7 switchyard.
o. A copy of the application is
available for review at the Commission
in the Public Reference Room or may be
viewed on the Commission’s Web site at
https://www.ferc.gov using the
‘‘eLibrary’’ link. Enter the docket
number excluding the last three digits in
the docket number field to access the
document. For assistance, contact FERC
Online Support. A copy is also available
for inspection and reproduction at the
address in item h above.
Register online at https://
www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/
esubscription.asp to be notified via email of new filings and issuances
related to this or other pending projects.
For assistance, contact FERC Online
Support.
p. Anyone may submit comments, a
protest, or a motion to intervene in
accordance with the requirements of
Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR
385.210, .211, .214. In determining the
appropriate action to take, the
Commission will consider all protests or
other comments filed, but only those
who file a motion to intervene in
accordance with the Commission’s
Rules may become a party to the
proceeding. Any comments, protests, or
motions to intervene must be received
on or before the specified comment date
for the particular application.
All filings must (1) bear in all capital
letters the title ‘‘PROTEST,’’ ‘‘MOTION
TO INTERVENE,’’ ‘‘COMMENTS,’’
‘‘REPLY COMMENTS,’’
‘‘RECOMMENDATIONS,’’
‘‘PRELIMINARY TERMS AND
CONDITIONS,’’ ‘‘PRELIMINARY
FISHWAY PRESCRIPTIONS,’’ or
‘‘COOPERATING AGENCY;’’ (2) set
forth in the heading the name of the
applicant and the project number of the
application to which the filing
responds; (3) furnish the name, address,
and telephone number of the person
protesting or intervening; and (4)
otherwise comply with the requirements
of 18 CFR 385.2001 through 385.2005.
All comments, recommendations, terms
and conditions or prescriptions must set
forth their evidentiary basis and
otherwise comply with the requirements
of 18 CFR 4.34(b). Agencies may obtain
copies of the application directly from
the applicant. A copy of any protest or
motion to intervene must be served
upon each representative of the
applicant specified in the particular
application. A copy of all other filings
in reference to this application must be
E:\FR\FM\09DEN1.SGM
09DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 235 / Wednesday, December 9, 2009 / Notices
accompanied by proof of service on all
persons listed in the service list
prepared by the Commission in this
proceeding, in accordance with 18 CFR
4.34(b) and 385.2010.
q. Procedural Schedule (supersedes
Procedural Schedule notice dated July
29, 2009): The application will be
processed according to the following
revised Hydro Licensing Schedule.
Revisions to the schedule may be made
as appropriate.
Milestone
Target date
Filing of recommendations, preliminary terms and conditions, and preliminary fishway
prescriptions.
Commission issues Draft EIS ...
Comments on Draft EIS ...........
Modified Terms and Conditions
Commission Issues Final EIS ...
02/01/2010
09/13/2010
11/12/2010
01/11/2011
04/11/2011
r. Final amendments to the
application must be filed with the
Commission no later than 30 days from
the issuance date of this notice.
s. A license applicant must file, no
later than 60 days following the date of
issuance of the notice of acceptance and
ready for environmental analysis
provided for in § 5.22: (1) a copy of the
water quality certification; (2) a copy of
the request for certification, including
proof of the date on which the certifying
agency received the request; or (3)
evidence of waiver of water quality
certification.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9–29282 Filed 12–8–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
[Docket Nos. CP10–22–000; PF09–3–000]
Magnum Gas Storage, LLC, Magnum
Solutions, LLC; Notice of Application
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
December 2, 2009.
Take notice that on November 17,
2009, Magnum Gas Storage, LLC (MGS)
and Magnum Solutions, LLC (MS), 2150
South 1300 East, Suite 500, Salt Lake
City, Utah 84106, filed an application in
Docket No. CP10–22–000, pursuant to
Section 7(c) of the Natural Gas Act
(NGA) as amended and Parts 157 and
284 of the Commission’s regulations
requesting: (1) A certificate of public
convenience and necessity authorizing
MGS to construct and operate a highdeliverability, multi-cycle salt cavern
natural gas storage facility and
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:02 Dec 08, 2009
Jkt 220001
connecting header pipeline to be located
in Millard, Juab and Utah Counties,
Utah; (2) a limited-jurisdiction
certificate of public convenience and
necessity authorizing MS to construct
and operate cavern leaching facilities;
(3) a blanket certificate pursuant to Part
284, Subpart G of the Commission’s
regulations permitting MGS to provide
open-access natural gas storage services;
(4) blanket certificates pursuant to Part
157 of the Commission’s regulations
permitting MGS and MS to construct
and operate facilities and; (5)
authorization for MGS to provide the
proposed storage services, including
interruptible wheeling services, at
market-based rates. Additionally, MGS
seeks approval of its pro forma tariff and
waiver of certain Commission
regulations, all as more fully set forth in
the application which is on file with the
Commission and open for public
inspection.
The proposed project would be
capable of injecting up to 0.3 Bcf of gas
per day and withdrawing up to 0.5 Bcf
per day and will be capable of cycling
its inventory from nine to twelve times
annually. The underground storage
facility would consist of four salt
caverns with a combined total working
gas storage capacity of 42 Bcf. Surface
facilities would occupy a 2,050 acre site
and include, among other things, 18,800
hp of compression, gas handling and
dehydration facilities, storage tanks, pig
launchers and receivers, brine storage
ponds, and water supply lines. The
project would also include a 61.5 milelong, 36-inch-diameter header pipeline
that would extend to points of
interconnection with Kern River Gas
Transmission Co. (Kern River) and
Questar Pipeline Co. (Questar) near
Goshen, Utah.
Any questions concerning this
application should be directed to David
K. Detton, Managing Director, Magnum
Gas Storage, LLC and Magnum
Solutions, LLC, 2150 South 1300 East,
Suite 500, Salt Lake City, Utah 84106,
801 990–2973 (phone), 801 990–2974
(fax) or via e-mail at
dave@westernenergyhub.com.
Pursuant to section 157.9 of the
Commission’s rules, 18 CFR 157.9,
within 90 days of this Notice the
Commission staff will either complete
its environmental assessment (EA) and
place it into the Commission’s public
record (eLibrary) for this proceeding; or
issue a Notice of Schedule for
Environmental Review. If a Notice of
Schedule for Environmental Review is
issued, it will indicate, among other
milestones, the anticipated date for the
Commission staff’s issuance of the final
environmental impact statement (FEIS)
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
65109
or EA for this proposal. The filing of the
EA in the Commission’s public record
for this proceeding or the issuance of a
Notice of Schedule for Environmental
Review will serve to notify federal and
state agencies of the timing for the
completion of all necessary reviews, and
the subsequent need to complete all
federal authorizations within 90 days of
the date of issuance of the Commission
staff’s FEIS or EA.
This filing is available for review at
the Commission in the Public Reference
Room or may be viewed on the
Commission’s Web site at https://
www.ferc.gov using the ‘‘e-Library’’ link.
Enter the docket number excluding the
last three digits in the docket number
field to access the document. For
assistance, contact FERC at
FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov or call
toll-free, (866) 208–3676, or for TTY,
(202) 502–8659.
On December 22, 2008, the
Commission staff granted MGS’s request
to utilize the Pre-Filing Process and
assigned Docket No. PF09–3 to staff
activities involved with the MGS
project. Now as of the filing the
November 17, 2009 application, the PreFiling Process for this project has ended.
From this time forward, this proceeding
will be conducted in Docket No. CP10–
22–000, as noted in the caption of this
Notice.
There are two ways to become
involved in the Commission’s review of
this project. First, any person wishing to
obtain legal status by becoming a party
to the proceedings for this project
should, on or before the comment date
stated below file with the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888
First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426,
a motion to intervene in accordance
with the requirements of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure (18 CFR 385.214 or 385.211)
and the Regulations under the NGA (18
CFR 157.10). A person obtaining party
status will be placed on the service list
maintained by the Secretary of the
Commission and will receive copies of
all documents filed by the applicant and
by all other parties. A party must submit
14 copies of filings made in the
proceeding with the Commission and
must mail a copy to the applicant and
to every other party. Only parties to the
proceeding can ask for court review of
Commission orders in the proceeding.
However, a person does not have to
intervene in order to have comments
considered. The second way to
participate is by filing with the
Secretary of the Commission, as soon as
possible, an original and two copies of
comments in support of or in opposition
to this project. The Commission will
E:\FR\FM\09DEN1.SGM
09DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 235 (Wednesday, December 9, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 65106-65109]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-29282]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Project No. 2106-059]
Pacific Gas and Electric Company; Notice of Application Accepted
for Filing, Soliciting Motions To Intervene and Protests, Ready for
Environmental Analysis, Soliciting Comments, Recommendations,
Preliminary Terms and Conditions, and Preliminary Fishway
Prescriptions, and Intent To Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement
December 1, 2009.
Take notice that the following hydroelectric application has been
filed with the Commission and is available for public inspection.
a. Type of Application: New Major License.
b. Project No.: 2106-059.
c. Date Filed: July 16, 2009.
d. Applicant: Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E).
e. Name of Project: McCloud-Pit Hydroelectric Project.
f. Location: The existing project is located on the McCloud and Pit
Rivers in Shasta County, California. The project occupies lands of the
United States, managed by the United States Department of Agriculture--
Forest Service and the United States Department of Interior--Bureau of
Land Management.
g. Filed Pursuant to: Federal Power Act 16 USC 791 (a)-825(r).
h. Applicant Contact: Randal S. Livingston, Vice President--Power
Generation, Pacific Gas and Electric Company, P.O. Box 770000, Mail
Code N11E, San Francisco, CA 94177-0001; Telephone (415) 973-7000.
i. FERC Contact: Emily Carter at (202) 502-6512 or
emily.carter@ferc.gov.
j. Deadline for filing motions to intervene and protests, comments,
recommendations, preliminary terms and conditions, and preliminary
fishway prescriptions is 60 days from the issuance of this notice;
reply comments are due 105 days from the issuance date of this notice.
The Commission's Rules of Practice require all intervenors filing
documents with the Commission to serve a copy of that document on each
person on the official service list for the project. Further, if an
intervenor files comments or documents with the Commission relating to
the merits of an issue that may affect the responsibilities of a
particular resource agency, they also must serve a copy of the document
on that resource agency.
Motions to intervene, protests, comments, recommendations,
preliminary terms and conditions, and preliminary fishway prescriptions
may be filed electronically via the Internet. See 18 C.F.R.
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web site
(https://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/ferconline.asp) under the ``eFiling''
link. For a simpler method of submitting text only comments, click on
``Quick Comment.'' For assistance, please contact FERC Online Support
at FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov; call toll-free at (866) 208-3676; or,
for TTY, contact (202) 502-8659. Although the Commission strongly
encourages electronic filing, documents also may be paper-filed. To
paper-file, mail an original and eight copies to: Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20426.
k. Cooperating Agencies: We are asking federal, state, local, and
tribal agencies with jurisdiction and/or special expertise with respect
to environmental issues to cooperate with us in the preparation of the
environmental document. Agencies who would like to request cooperating
status should follow the instructions in item l below.
l. Deadline for filing requests for cooperating agency status:
February 1, 2010.
m. This application has been accepted for filing and is now is
ready for environmental analysis.
n. Project Description: The existing McCloud-Pit Project consists
of three existing developments (James B. Black, Pit 6, and Pit 7),
which collectively include two storage reservoirs (McCloud and Iron
Canyon), two regulating reservoirs (Pit 6 and Pit 7), one afterbay (Pit
7), two tunnels, three powerhouses (James B. Black, Pit 6, and Pit 7),
and associated equipment and transmission facilities. The project has
an installed capacity of 368 megawatts (MW), produces an average annual
generation of 1,542 gigawatt-hours (GWh), and occupies 3,707.6 acres of
land. Approximately 1,651.4 of these acres are federally owned, with
1,621.9 managed by the Shasta-Trinity National Forest and 29.5 managed
by the U.S. Bureau of Land Management. In addition to the existing
facilities, PG&E is proposing to construct two generation additions
consisting of powerhouses at the base of McCloud dam (5-8 MW) and at
the base of Pit 7 Afterbay dam (10 MW).
The project involves the transfer of water from the McCloud River
basin to the Lower Pit River basin via a tunnel from the McCloud
reservoir to Iron Canyon reservoir. Iron Canyon reservoir is on Iron
Canyon creak, a tributary of the Pit River. Water flows from Iron
Canyon reservoir via a tunnel to the James B. Black powerhouse.
Although the project diverts water from the McCloud River basin to the
Lower Pit River basin, both basins drain to Shasta Lake.
James B. Black Development
McCloud Dam and McCloud Reservoir
McCloud dam is a 241-foot-high, 630-foot-long earth and rock filled
dam located on the McCloud River and impounds McCloud reservoir. The
McCloud reservoir has a surface area of 520 acres and a maximum storage
capacity of approximately 35,234 acre-feet (af). The spillway
[elevation 2,696.0 feet National Geodetic Vertical Datum (NGVD)] is on
the south side of the dam. The reservoir has a normal maximum water
surface elevation of 2,680 feet. The dam is equipped with three radial
gates measuring 27 feet by 24.5 feet, discharging into a spillway that
returns spillage flows to the McCloud River below the dam. The dam also
has a 12-foot diameter diversion/outlet tunnel that runs under the dam
to supply a 24-inch Howell-Bunger valve for releasing instream flows to
the McCloud River, as well as an 84-inch diameter butterfly valve for
emergency use to control reservoir levels. Controls for the
[[Page 65107]]
diversion/outlet tunnel are located at the intake within McCloud
reservoir.
McCloud Tunnel
A 7.2-mile-long tunnel and a 563-foot-long pipeline at Hawkins
Creek crossing hydraulically link McCloud reservoir and Iron Canyon
reservoir. An intake tower within McCloud reservoir collects water for
the McCloud tunnel, which is approximately 17 feet in diameter and
heads easterly to Iron Canyon reservoir. The differential in water
surface elevations between the two reservoirs controls the amount of
water drafted through the tunnel.
Iron Canyon Dam and Reservoir
An earth-filled dam 214-feet-high and 1,130-feet-long impounds Iron
Canyon reservoir. The reservoir has a maximum storage capacity of
24,241 af with an approximate 500-acre surface area. The dam has a
slide gate leading to a 48-inch diameter pipe for instream flow
releases to Iron Canyon Creek. Normal maximum water surface elevation
within the reservoir is 2,664 feet NGVD. When the water surface of Iron
Canyon reservoir is lowered, water flows through the McCloud tunnel
from McCloud reservoir to Iron Canyon reservoir.
Iron Canyon Tunnel and Penstock
Iron Canyon reservoir is connected to James B. Black powerhouse via
the 2.9-mile long, 18-foot diameter Iron Canyon Tunnel, an associated
1,194-foot-long, 11.5-foot diameter pipeline at the Willow Spring Creek
crossing, and a 5,467-foot-long, 11.5-foot diameter steel penstock. The
penstock bifurcates before James B. Black powerhouse to deliver water
flow to the two turbine generator units. The tunnel and penstock have a
total flow capacity of 2,000 cfs.
James B. Black Powerhouse
James B. Black powerhouse is located on the northwest bank of the
Pit River, approximately 0.5 miles upstream of the Pit 5 Project
powerhouse (FERC Project No. 233). The powerhouse is a three-level,
reinforced concrete structure containing two vertical shaft impulse
turbines rated at 104,000 hp each. They operate at a normal maximum
gross head of 1,226 feet. Two vertical axis outdoor generators, Unit 1
rated at 94.8 megavolt-ampere (MVA) and Unit 2 rated at 92.6 MVA, are
connected to a three phase, 86 MVA transformer bank. Their combined
maximum capacity is 172 MW. Average annual generation within the past
25 years at the station is 656.3 GWh.
Transmission
Transmission lines (230 kilovolt [kV]) extend approximately 0.5
mile from the transformer bank in the switchyard adjacent to the James
B. Black powerhouse to the switchyard adjacent to the Pit 5 powerhouse.
Pit 6 Development
Pit 6 Dam and Reservoir
Pit 6 dam and reservoir are located on the Pit River downstream of
James B. Black powerhouse. The 183-foot-high, 560-foot-long concrete
gravity Pit 6 dam has a crest elevation of 1,432 feet NGVD. The top of
the dam contains a trash rake, motors for two 42-foot-high by 49-foot-
long slide gates and a control building. The control building houses a
hydraulic system for two low-level, eight-foot diameter outlets at the
base of the dam. The Pit 6 reservoir has a maximum storage capacity of
approximately 15,619 af and a maximum surface area of approximately 268
acres. The normal maximum water surface elevation within the reservoir
is 1,425 feet NGVD. The reservoir serves as the forebay for the Pit 6
powerhouse. Two 18-foot diameter steel penstocks with a total flow
capacity of 6,470 cfs extend 602 feet from the dam to the turbines in
the powerhouse located at the base of the dam.
Pit 6 Powerhouse
Pit 6 powerhouse is located along the east bank of the Pit River at
the base of Pit 6 dam. The powerhouse is a four-level reinforced
concrete structure, three levels of which are below grade. The
structure contains two vertical shaft, Francis reaction turbines, rated
at 53,000 hp each and operating at a normal maximum gross head of 155
feet. There are two outdoor vertical axis generators, rated at 44 MVA
each, with each unit connected to a three-phase 44 MVA transformer bank
that steps up plant output to 230 kV. The maximum generator capacity is
80 MW. Average annual generation over the last 25 years is 373.8 GWh.
Transmission
Transmission lines extend approximately 3.3 miles from the
switchyard adjacent to the Pit 6 powerhouse to the Applicant's
interconnected transmission system.
Pit 7 Development
Pit 7 Dam and Reservoir
Pit 7 dam and reservoir are located on the Pit River downstream of
Pit 6 powerhouse. The Pit 7 dam is a 228-foot-high and 770-foot-long
concrete gravity dam. The top of the dam contains a trash rake, motors
for two 49-foot by 42-foot slide gates at the crest of the dam, and a
control building. The control building houses hydraulic controls for
two eight-foot in diameter, low-level outlets at the base of the dam.
The Pit 7 reservoir has a maximum storage capacity of 34,611 af and a
surface area of approximately 471 acres at a normal maximum water
surface elevation of 1,270 feet NGVD. As with Pit 6, the Pit 7
reservoir serves at the forebay for the Pit 7 powerhouse. Two
penstocks, 15 feet in diameter, extend 572 feet from the dam to the
turbines in the powerhouse, located at the base of the dam. Total flow
capacity within the penstocks is 7,440 cfs.
Pit 7 Powerhouse
Pit 7 powerhouse is located along the east bank of the Pit River at
the base of Pit 7 dam. The powerhouse consists of a four-level,
reinforced concrete structure, three levels of which are below grade.
The powerhouse contains two vertical-shaft reaction turbines that are
rated at 70,000 hp each and operate at a normal maximum gross head of
205 feet. Two vertical axis generators are rated at 52.2 (Unit 2) and
62.1 MVA (Unit 1), respectively. Their maximum combined capacity is 112
MW. Each unit is connected to a three-phase, 58 MVA transformer bank
that steps up plant output to 230 kV. The average annual generation
over the last 25 years is 512 GWh.
Transmission
Transmission lines extend approximately 3.5 miles from the
switchyard adjacent to the Pit 7 powerhouse to the Applicant's
interconnected transmission system.
Pit 7 Afterbay
Pit 7 afterbay has a surface area of approximately 69 acres at a
normal ``maximum'' water surface elevation of 1,067 feet NGVD (maximum
water surface of Shasta Lake). The afterbay dam is a 30-foot-high,
steel-reinforced, rock-fill structure, including a variable width
concrete gravity weir section. Pit 7 afterbay serves to attenuate
changes in the water flow from Pit 7 dam and powerhouse before entering
Shasta Lake.
Proposed Facilities
McCloud Development
PG&E proposes to construct a powerhouse located at the base of
McCloud dam. Generation output from the proposed powerhouse would be
connected to a new transmission line that would be routed from the
proposed powerhouse to connect to an existing
[[Page 65108]]
substation located approximately 14 miles to the north, in the town of
McCloud, California. McCloud Development would use water stored in
McCloud Reservoir and released into the Lower McCloud River to meet
instream flow requirements and no new impoundments are proposed. With a
flow range of 150 cfs to 400 cfs, the turbine and generator set would
have an installed capacity of about 5 to 8 MW. The proposed McCloud
Development would have an average range of annual energy production of
30 to 40 GWh and average monthly generation would be approximately 2.5
to 3.3 GWh. PG&E proposes to base the final size of the unit,
powerhouse hydraulic capacity, and average annual energy production on
instream flow requirements included in the new project license.
The proposed powerhouse would be positioned to the south of the
current outlet works control building and would be a reinforced
concrete-and-block masonry structure designed to enclose and protect
the electro-mechanical generation equipment, withstand area snow loads,
and prevent possible vandalism. It would be accessed via the existing
project road that connects to Forest Road 38N11. The powerhouse would
be equipped with a single vertical-axis Francis turbine. The turbine,
which would have a discharge diameter of approximately 54 inches, would
operate at about 450 revolutions per minute. The direct-coupled
synchronous generator rating would range from 5,600 to 7,500 kW.
The proposed transmission line route from the powerhouse would
follow Forest Road 38N11 and then county roads to the existing
substation approximately 14 miles north in the town of McCloud.
Pit 7 Afterbay Development
PG&E proposes to construct at Pit 7 Afterbay Development, including
a powerhouse located on the west side of Pit 7 Afterbay dam at the
regulating weir. Generation output from the proposed powerhouse would
be connected to a new transmission line that would be routed from the
powerhouse to connect to the switchyard located approximately 1.6 miles
to the east at Pit 7 powerhouse. The proposed facilities would have no
meaningful storage and would operate in a run-of-the-river mode. The
available flows for energy production would be dictated by the
operation of the upstream Pit 7 powerhouse.
The proposed Pit 7 Afterbay powerhouse would use water released
upstream from Pit 7 powerhouse and dam and no new impoundments are
proposed. The proposed powerhouse would be configured for two
horizontal-axis synchronous generating units, each rated at 5,500 kW
and housed in an approximately 30-foot-wide x 110-foot-long intake
approach bay. Each of the generating bays would have a design flow of
2,500 cfs. The upstream entrance to each intake bay would include a
trashrack to stop large debris from entering the unit. Two radial gates
approximately 26-foot-wide by 52-foot-high would be constructed
upstream of the unit to regulate flow and for dewatering the turbine
pit. A roller gate would be constructed at the downstream end of each
bay or the tailrace to prevent backwatering during maintenance. A
combination of ramps, walkways, and ladders would be used in each bay
to allow for maintenance access and support the gate operator
mechanism. A 20-foot-wide bypass flow bay, which would house a radial
gate and operator, would be built in the first phase of construction.
The bypass flow bay would be used to pass river flows during the second
phase of construction and during times of non-generation. The bypass
flow bay also would require a walkway to allow maintenance and
operation access and support the gate operator mechanism. A new access
road would be constructed to access the powerhouse for construction,
operation, and maintenance. The access road would extend between
Fenders Ferry Road and the afterbay, just west of Fenders Ferry Bridge.
Based on a flow range of 2,500 cfs to 5,000 cfs, the 2-unit powerhouse
would accommodate turbine and generator sets capable of an installed
capacity of about 5 MW each for a total of 10 MW. The average monthly
generation from this proposed powerhouse would be approximately 4.2
GWh.
The proposed powerhouse substation would be fenced and located on
the ground near the control house, but above the maximum anticipated
flood and tailwater levels. Substation equipment would include a step-
up substation to transform energy for the transmission line. Powerhouse
controls and switchgear would be installed in a separate building
located on the right bank of the river, positioned above the maximum
anticipated water level and inside the substation fence. The building
would house the required equipment for control and protection of the
generation units and would be equipped with electric heating and
cooling. The transmission line would be a 1.6-mile-long, 34.5-kV,
wooden-pole line connecting the proposed powerhouse to a new 34.5- to
230-kV transformer, positioned at or near the existing 230-kV Pit 7
switchyard. A new 230-kV circuit breaker and disconnect switch would be
connected by a short span to the main bus of the existing Pit 7
switchyard.
o. A copy of the application is available for review at the
Commission in the Public Reference Room or may be viewed on the
Commission's Web site at https://www.ferc.gov using the ``eLibrary''
link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three digits in the
docket number field to access the document. For assistance, contact
FERC Online Support. A copy is also available for inspection and
reproduction at the address in item h above.
Register online at https://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/esubscription.asp to be notified via e-mail of new filings and
issuances related to this or other pending projects. For assistance,
contact FERC Online Support.
p. Anyone may submit comments, a protest, or a motion to intervene
in accordance with the requirements of Rules of Practice and Procedure,
18 CFR 385.210, .211, .214. In determining the appropriate action to
take, the Commission will consider all protests or other comments
filed, but only those who file a motion to intervene in accordance with
the Commission's Rules may become a party to the proceeding. Any
comments, protests, or motions to intervene must be received on or
before the specified comment date for the particular application.
All filings must (1) bear in all capital letters the title
``PROTEST,'' ``MOTION TO INTERVENE,'' ``COMMENTS,'' ``REPLY COMMENTS,''
``RECOMMENDATIONS,'' ``PRELIMINARY TERMS AND CONDITIONS,''
``PRELIMINARY FISHWAY PRESCRIPTIONS,'' or ``COOPERATING AGENCY;'' (2)
set forth in the heading the name of the applicant and the project
number of the application to which the filing responds; (3) furnish the
name, address, and telephone number of the person protesting or
intervening; and (4) otherwise comply with the requirements of 18 CFR
385.2001 through 385.2005. All comments, recommendations, terms and
conditions or prescriptions must set forth their evidentiary basis and
otherwise comply with the requirements of 18 CFR 4.34(b). Agencies may
obtain copies of the application directly from the applicant. A copy of
any protest or motion to intervene must be served upon each
representative of the applicant specified in the particular
application. A copy of all other filings in reference to this
application must be
[[Page 65109]]
accompanied by proof of service on all persons listed in the service
list prepared by the Commission in this proceeding, in accordance with
18 CFR 4.34(b) and 385.2010.
q. Procedural Schedule (supersedes Procedural Schedule notice dated
July 29, 2009): The application will be processed according to the
following revised Hydro Licensing Schedule. Revisions to the schedule
may be made as appropriate.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Milestone Target date
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Filing of recommendations, preliminary 02/01/2010
terms and conditions, and preliminary
fishway prescriptions.
Commission issues Draft EIS............... 09/13/2010
Comments on Draft EIS..................... 11/12/2010
Modified Terms and Conditions............. 01/11/2011
Commission Issues Final EIS............... 04/11/2011
------------------------------------------------------------------------
r. Final amendments to the application must be filed with the
Commission no later than 30 days from the issuance date of this notice.
s. A license applicant must file, no later than 60 days following
the date of issuance of the notice of acceptance and ready for
environmental analysis provided for in Sec. 5.22: (1) a copy of the
water quality certification; (2) a copy of the request for
certification, including proof of the date on which the certifying
agency received the request; or (3) evidence of waiver of water quality
certification.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-29282 Filed 12-8-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P