Cedric Fernando, M.D.; Confirmatory Order (Effective Immediately), 64755-64757 [E9-29201]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 234 / Tuesday, December 8, 2009 / Notices
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[IA–09–012]
Cedric Fernando, M.D.; Confirmatory
Order (Effective Immediately)
I
Cedric Fernando, M.D., is a licensed
physician who provides physician
services to Nuclear Fuel Services, Inc.
(NFS or Licensee) and is the Medical
Review Officer for NFS. The Licensee is
the holder of Special Nuclear Materials
License No. SNM–124 issued by the
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC
or Commission) pursuant to 10 CFR part
70 on July 2, 1999. The license
authorizes the operation of the NFS
facility in accordance with the
conditions specified therein. The
facility is located on the Licensee’s site
in Erwin, Tennessee.
This Confirmatory Order is the result
of an agreement reached during an
Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)
mediation session conducted on May
15, 2009.
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
II
On October 21, 2008, the NRC’s Office
of Investigations (OI) initiated a review
of an October 2007 incident that
occurred at the Licensee’s facility in
which the hearing test portion of a
medical examination was not
administered to two security officers.
Dr. Cedric Fernando was providing
physician services for a contractor to
NFS at the time, and was involved in
certifying that security officers were
medically qualified per medical
standards.
Based on the evidence developed
during the investigation, the NRC staff
identified two apparent violations of 10
CFR 70.10, as summarized below:
(1) On October 19, 2007, Dr. Fernando
signed two Security Medical
Examination forms certifying that the
named security officers were medically
qualified per medical standards when,
in fact, the security officers had not
been administered the hearing test
portion of the medical examination.
(2) Dr. Fernando submitted to the NFS
security office the signed but
incomplete Security Medical
Examination forms indicating that the
two security officers were medically
qualified per medical standards when,
in fact, the security officers had not
been administered the hearing test
portion of the medical examination.
III
On May 15, 2009, the NRC and Dr.
Fernando met in an ADR session
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:16 Dec 07, 2009
Jkt 220001
mediated by a professional mediator,
which was arranged through Cornell
University’s Institute on Conflict
Resolution. ADR is a process in which
a neutral mediator with no decisionmaking authority assists the parties in
reaching an agreement or resolving any
differences regarding their dispute. This
confirmatory order is issued pursuant to
the agreement reached during the ADR
process. The elements of the agreement
consist of the following:
(1) Dr. Fernando admits that he signed
the two incomplete Security Medical
Examination forms and allowed them to
be submitted to NFS’s security office.
He stated that he made a mistake in
signing the forms, and denies that he
engaged in any deliberate misconduct.
On the day in question, the hearing test
technician was unexpectedly absent and
no backup was available. Dr. Fernando
completed the remaining portions of the
physical exams, including an
examination of their ears. Dr. Fernando
stated that, at the time of the physical
exam, he had no reason to believe that
either individual had any hearing
problems. Dr. Fernando signed the
forms and instructed his assistant to
notify the NFS security office that the
individuals needed to return to
complete the tests. Dr. Fernando’s
assistant repeatedly attempted to
reschedule the tests, but was
unsuccessful. In February 2008, upon
discovering that the hearing tests had
not been performed, Dr. Fernando
instructed his assistant to immediately
schedule the hearing tests. The hearing
tests were completed on or about the
next day, and both individuals had
impeccable hearing.
(2) At the ADR session, Dr. Fernando
expressed and re-emphasized his
commitment and willingness to comply
with all NRC regulations, including
providing complete and accurate
information. To this end, Dr. Fernando
agrees and is committed to the actions
set forth in Section V below:
(3) In consideration of Dr. Fernando’s
commitments as set forth in Section V,
NRC agrees not to pursue action with
respect to Dr. Fernando for those
matters referred to in Section II above,
with the exception of the NRC’s
confirmation of completion of the
actions discussed in the Confirmatory
Order.
(4) Dr. Fernando agrees that the
elements discussed in Section V will be
incorporated into a Confirmatory Order,
and agrees to waive the right to request
a hearing regarding all or any part of
this Confirmatory Order.
PO 00000
Frm 00096
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
64755
IV
Since Dr. Fernando agreed to take the
actions as set forth in Section V, the
NRC has concluded its concerns can be
resolved through issuance of this Order.
I find that Dr. Fernando’s
commitments as set forth in Section V
are acceptable and necessary and
conclude that with these commitments
the public health and safety and
common defense and security are
reasonably assured. In view of the
foregoing, I have determined that public
health and safety require that Dr.
Fernando’s commitments be confirmed
by this Order. Based on the above and
Dr. Fernando’s consent, this Order is
immediately effective upon issuance.
V
Accordingly, pursuant to Sections 51,
53, 161b, 161i, 161o, 182 and 186 of the
Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended,
and the Commission’s regulations in 10
CFR 2.202 and 10 CFR part 70, It is
hereby ordered, effective immediately,
that:
(1) Dr. Fernando will ensure that an
independent assessment (such as an
NFS ‘‘Tap Root’’ investigation) is
conducted into the circumstances that
led to the incident, to identify root and
contributing causes. The NRC
acknowledges corrective actions and
enhancements completed by Dr.
Fernando regarding the training of staff
and the development of a process to
ensure that all medical-related testing
and examinations would be completed
prior to the authorizing signatures of a
Certified Medical Assistant and the
attending Physician.
(2) Based on the above assessment, Dr.
Fernando will develop lessons learned,
and if indicated, implement additional
corrective actions from the assessment.
(3) Dr. Fernando and a physician
engaged in NRC-regulated activities will
meet at least quarterly to review unique
or noteworthy issues relevant to
compliance with NRC regulations. In
addition, Dr. Fernando will initiate a
one time, mutual review of processes
and procedures with his Babcock and
Wilcox Nuclear Owners Group (B&W
NOG) counterpart.
(4) Dr. Fernando will take a course
certified for continuing medical
education credit that addresses best
practices for administrative office
procedures and record keeping.
(5) Dr. Fernando will communicate
lessons learned and experiences as a
result of this incident to an appropriate
audience (e.g., industry peers, NFS
Safety Culture Oversight Group).
(6) Dr. Fernando agrees that actions
listed in Section V.1–5 above will begin
E:\FR\FM\08DEN1.SGM
08DEN1
64756
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 234 / Tuesday, December 8, 2009 / Notices
within 30 days of the NRC’s issuance of
the Confirmatory Order, and will be
completed no later than one year from
the NRC’s issuance of a Confirmatory
Order.
(7) Upon completion of all of the
actions identified in Section V.1–6
above, Dr. Fernando will submit a letter
within 30 days to the NRC advising of
their completion. The letter will include
details so as to allow the NRC to
confirm completion of such activities.
The Regional Administrator, NRC
Region II, may relax or rescind, in
writing, any of the above conditions
upon a showing by Dr. Fernando of
good cause.
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
VI
Any person adversely affected by this
Confirmatory Order, other than Dr.
Fernando, may request a hearing within
20 days of its publication in the Federal
Register. Where good cause is shown,
consideration will be given to extending
the time to request a hearing. A request
for extension of time must be directed
to the Director, Office of Enforcement,
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Washington, DC 20555–0001, and
include a statement of good cause for
the extension.
If a person other than Dr. Fernando
requests a hearing, that person shall set
forth with particularity the manner in
which his interest is adversely affected
by this Order and shall address the
criteria set forth in 10 CFR 2.309(d) and
(f).
If a hearing is requested by a person
whose interest is adversely affected, the
Commission will issue an Order
designating the time and place of any
hearing. If a hearing is held, the issue to
be considered at such hearing shall be
whether this Confirmatory Order should
be sustained.
All documents filed in NRC
adjudicatory proceedings, including a
request for hearing, a petition for leave
to intervene, any motion or other
document filed in the proceeding prior
to the submission of a request for
hearing or petition to intervene, and
documents filed by interested
governmental entities participating
under 10 CFR 2.315(c), must be filed in
accordance with the NRC E-Filing rule,
(72 FR 49139, Aug. 28, 2007). The EFiling process requires participants to
submit and serve all adjudicatory
documents over the Internet, or in some
cases to mail copies on electronic
storage media. Participants may not
submit paper copies of their filings
unless they seek an exemption in
accordance with the procedures
described below.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:16 Dec 07, 2009
Jkt 220001
To comply with the procedural
requirements of E-Filing, at least ten
(10) days prior to the filing deadline, the
participant should contact the Office of
the Secretary by e-mail at
hearing.docket@nrc.gov, or by telephone
at (301) 415–1677, to request (1) a
digital ID certificate, which allows the
participant (or its counsel or
representative) to digitally sign
documents and access the E-Submittal
server for any proceeding in which it is
participating; and (2) advise the
Secretary that the participant will be
submitting a request or petition for
hearing (even in instances in which the
participant, or its counsel or
representative, already holds an NRCissued digital ID certificate). Based upon
this information, the Secretary will
establish an electronic docket for the
hearing in this proceeding if the
Secretary has not already established an
electronic docket.
Information about applying for a
digital ID certificate is available on
NRC’s public Web site at https://
www.nrc.gov/site-help/e-submittals/
apply-certificates.html. System
requirements for accessing the ESubmittal server are detailed in NRC’s
‘‘Guidance for Electronic Submission,’’
which is available on the agency’s
public Web site at https://www.nrc.gov/
site-help/e-submittals.html. Participants
may attempt to use other software not
listed on the Web site, but should note
that the NRC’s E-Filing system does not
support unlisted software, and the NRC
Help Desk will not be able to offer
assistance in using unlisted software.
If a participant is electronically
submitting a document to the NRC in
accordance with the E-Filing rule, the
participant must file the document
using the NRC’s on-line, Web-based
submission form. In order to serve
documents through EIE, users will be
required to install a Web browser plugin from the NRC Web site. Further
information on the Web-based
submission form, including the
installation of the Web browser plug-in,
is available on the NRC’s public Web
site at https://www.nrc.gov/site-help/esubmittals.html.
Once a participant has obtained a
digital ID certificate and a docket has
been created, the participant can then
submit a request for hearing or petition
for leave to intervene. Submissions
should be in Portable Document Format
(PDF) in accordance with NRC guidance
available on the NRC public Web site at
https://www.nrc.gov/site-help/esubmittals.html. A filing is considered
complete at the time the documents are
submitted through the NRC’s E-Filing
system. To be timely, an electronic
PO 00000
Frm 00097
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
filing must be submitted to the E-Filing
system no later than 11:59 p.m. Eastern
Time on the due date. Upon receipt of
a transmission, the E-Filing system
time-stamps the document and sends
the submitter an e-mail notice
confirming receipt of the document. The
E-Filing system also distributes an email notice that provides access to the
document to the NRC Office of the
General Counsel and any others who
have advised the Office of the Secretary
that they wish to participate in the
proceeding, so that the filer need not
serve the documents on those
participants separately. Therefore,
applicants and other participants (or
their counsel or representative) must
apply for and receive a digital ID
certificate before a hearing request/
petition to intervene is filed so that they
can obtain access to the document via
the E-Filing system.
A person filing electronically using
the agency’s adjudicatory E-Filing
system may seek assistance by
contacting the NRC Meta-System Help
Desk through the ‘‘Contact Us’’ link
located on the NRC Web site at https://
www.nrc.gov/site-help/esubmittals.html, by e-mail at
MSHD.Resource@nrc.gov, or by a tollfree call at (866) 672–7640. The NRC
Meta-System Help Desk is available
between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern
Time, Monday through Friday,
excluding government holidays.
Participants who believe that they
have a good cause for not submitting
documents electronically must file an
exemption request, in accordance with
10 CFR 2.302(g), with their initial paper
filing requesting authorization to
continue to submit documents in paper
format. Such filings must be submitted
by: (1) First class mail addressed to the
Office of the Secretary of the
Commission, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission, Washington, DC 20555–
0001, Attention: Rulemaking and
Adjudications Staff; or (2) courier,
express mail, or expedited delivery
service to the Office of the Secretary,
Sixteenth Floor, One White Flint North,
11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville,
Maryland 20852, Attention: Rulemaking
and Adjudications Staff. Participants
filing a document in this manner are
responsible for serving the document on
all other participants. Filing is
considered complete by first-class mail
as of the time of deposit in the mail, or
by courier, express mail, or expedited
delivery service upon depositing the
document with the provider of the
service. A presiding officer, having
granted an exemption request from
using E-Filing, may require a participant
or party to use E-Filing if the presiding
E:\FR\FM\08DEN1.SGM
08DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 234 / Tuesday, December 8, 2009 / Notices
officer subsequently determines that the
reason for granting the exemption from
use of E-Filing no longer exists.
Documents submitted in adjudicatory
proceedings will appear in NRC’s
electronic hearing docket which is
available to the public at https://
ehd.nrc.gov/EHD_Proceeding/home.asp,
unless excluded pursuant to an order of
the Commission, or the presiding
officer. Participants are requested not to
include personal privacy information,
such as social security numbers, home
addresses, or home phone numbers in
their filings, unless an NRC regulation
or other law requires submission of such
information. With respect to
copyrighted works, except for limited
excerpts that serve the purpose of the
adjudicatory filings and would
constitute a Fair Use application,
participants are requested not to include
copyrighted materials in their
submission.
VII
In the absence of any request for
hearing, or written approval of an
extension of time in which to request a
hearing, the provisions specified in
Section V above shall be final 20 days
from the date this Order is published in
the Federal Register without further
order or proceedings. If an extension of
time for requesting a hearing has been
approved, the provisions specified in
Section V shall be final when the
extension expires if a hearing request
has not been received. A request for
hearing shall not stay the immediate
effectiveness of this order.
Dated this 23rd day of November 2009.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Victor M. McCree,
Deputy Regional Administrator for
Operations.
[FR Doc. E9–29201 Filed 12–7–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[NRC–2009–0526; IA–08–036]
In the Matter of Cedric Fernando, M.D.;
Confirmatory Order (Effective
Immediately)
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
I
Cedric Fernando, M.D., is a licensed
physician who provides physician
services to Nuclear Fuel Services, Inc.
(NFS or Licensee) and is the Medical
Review Officer (MRO) for NFS. The
Licensee is the holder of Special
Nuclear Materials License No. SNM–124
issued by the Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC or Commission)
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:16 Dec 07, 2009
Jkt 220001
pursuant to 10 CFR Part 70 on July 2,
1999. The license authorizes the
operation of the NFS facility in
accordance with the conditions
specified therein. The facility is located
on the Licensee’s site in Erwin,
Tennessee.
This Confirmatory Order is the result
of an agreement reached during an
Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)
mediation session conducted on May
14, 2009.
II
An incident occurred at the Licensee’s
facility in March 2006, in which an NFS
senior executive violated the NFS
Fitness-For-Duty (FFD) policy and
regulatory requirements. As the Medical
Review Officer for NFS at the time, Dr.
Cedric Fernando reviewed the
circumstances of the FFD incident and
was involved in a subsequent
determination as to whether the former
NFS senior executive was fit to return
to duty.
On April 20, 2006, the NRC’s Office
of Investigations (OI) initiated a review
of the March 2006 FFD incident. Based
on the evidence developed during the
investigation, the NRC staff identified
three apparent violations of 10 CFR
70.10, as summarized below:
(1) On April 5, 2006, Dr. Fernando
provided materially incomplete
information to a contract professional
retained by NFS to perform a
determination of fitness for duty of the
NFS senior executive.
(2) Dr. Fernando’s failure to provide
the contract professional this material
information caused NFS to fail to make
an informed determination that the NFS
senior executive was fit to safely and
competently perform his duties and
responsibilities before being returned to
duty.
(3) On or about April 5, 2006, Dr.
Fernando provided materially
inaccurate information to NFS that the
NFS senior executive had entered a
substance abuse rehabilitation program,
when in fact he had not done so.
Dr. Fernando disagrees that any of the
identified apparent violations occurred.
III
On May 14, 2009, the NRC and Dr.
Fernando met in an ADR session
mediated by a professional mediator,
which was arranged through Cornell
University’s Institute on Conflict
Resolution. ADR is a process in which
a neutral mediator with no decisionmaking authority assists the parties in
reaching an agreement or resolving any
differences regarding their dispute. This
confirmatory order is issued pursuant to
the agreement reached during the ADR
PO 00000
Frm 00098
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
64757
process. The elements of the agreement
consist of the following:
(1) Dr. Fernando disagrees with the
facts on which the Agency based its
preliminary conclusion that he violated
10 CFR 70.10 and denies any
misconduct. At the ADR meeting, Dr.
Fernando elaborated on the
circumstances concerning his
involvement in the referral of the NFS
senior executive. Dr. Fernando
emphasized that his actions at the time
were consistent with the roles and
responsibilities of an MRO providing
services to an NRC licensee, his current
work processes and practices, and were
consistent with general medical
practice. Dr. Fernando stated that his
actions did not violate any NRC
requirements, circumvent a thorough
assessment of the NFS senior
executive’s fitness to return to duty
because the contract professional had
the information that he allegedly failed
to provide, or mislead NFS regarding
the treatment that the NFS senior
executive received.
(2) At the ADR session, Dr. Fernando
expressed and re-emphasized his
commitment and willingness to comply
with all NRC regulations. To this end,
Dr. Fernando agrees and is committed to
the actions set forth in Section V below.
(3) In consideration of the above, NRC
agrees not to pursue action with respect
to Dr. Fernando for those matters
referred to in Section II above, with the
exception of NRC’s confirmation of
completion of the actions discussed in
the Confirmatory Order.
(4) Dr. Fernando agrees that the
elements discussed in Section V will be
incorporated into a Confirmatory Order,
and agrees to waive the right to request
a hearing regarding all or any part of
this Confirmatory Order.
IV
Since Dr. Fernando agrees to take the
actions as set forth in Section V, the
NRC has concluded that its concerns
can be resolved through issuance of this
Order.
I find that Dr. Fernando’s
commitments as set forth in Section V
are acceptable and necessary and
conclude that with these commitments
the public health and safety and
common defense and security are
reasonably assured. In view of the
foregoing, I have determined that public
health and safety require that Dr.
Fernando’s commitments be confirmed
by this Order. Based on the above and
Dr. Fernando’s consent, this Order is
immediately effective upon issuance.
E:\FR\FM\08DEN1.SGM
08DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 234 (Tuesday, December 8, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 64755-64757]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-29201]
[[Page 64755]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[IA-09-012]
Cedric Fernando, M.D.; Confirmatory Order (Effective Immediately)
I
Cedric Fernando, M.D., is a licensed physician who provides
physician services to Nuclear Fuel Services, Inc. (NFS or Licensee) and
is the Medical Review Officer for NFS. The Licensee is the holder of
Special Nuclear Materials License No. SNM-124 issued by the Nuclear
Regulatory Commission (NRC or Commission) pursuant to 10 CFR part 70 on
July 2, 1999. The license authorizes the operation of the NFS facility
in accordance with the conditions specified therein. The facility is
located on the Licensee's site in Erwin, Tennessee.
This Confirmatory Order is the result of an agreement reached
during an Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) mediation session
conducted on May 15, 2009.
II
On October 21, 2008, the NRC's Office of Investigations (OI)
initiated a review of an October 2007 incident that occurred at the
Licensee's facility in which the hearing test portion of a medical
examination was not administered to two security officers. Dr. Cedric
Fernando was providing physician services for a contractor to NFS at
the time, and was involved in certifying that security officers were
medically qualified per medical standards.
Based on the evidence developed during the investigation, the NRC
staff identified two apparent violations of 10 CFR 70.10, as summarized
below:
(1) On October 19, 2007, Dr. Fernando signed two Security Medical
Examination forms certifying that the named security officers were
medically qualified per medical standards when, in fact, the security
officers had not been administered the hearing test portion of the
medical examination.
(2) Dr. Fernando submitted to the NFS security office the signed
but incomplete Security Medical Examination forms indicating that the
two security officers were medically qualified per medical standards
when, in fact, the security officers had not been administered the
hearing test portion of the medical examination.
III
On May 15, 2009, the NRC and Dr. Fernando met in an ADR session
mediated by a professional mediator, which was arranged through Cornell
University's Institute on Conflict Resolution. ADR is a process in
which a neutral mediator with no decision-making authority assists the
parties in reaching an agreement or resolving any differences regarding
their dispute. This confirmatory order is issued pursuant to the
agreement reached during the ADR process. The elements of the agreement
consist of the following:
(1) Dr. Fernando admits that he signed the two incomplete Security
Medical Examination forms and allowed them to be submitted to NFS's
security office. He stated that he made a mistake in signing the forms,
and denies that he engaged in any deliberate misconduct. On the day in
question, the hearing test technician was unexpectedly absent and no
backup was available. Dr. Fernando completed the remaining portions of
the physical exams, including an examination of their ears. Dr.
Fernando stated that, at the time of the physical exam, he had no
reason to believe that either individual had any hearing problems. Dr.
Fernando signed the forms and instructed his assistant to notify the
NFS security office that the individuals needed to return to complete
the tests. Dr. Fernando's assistant repeatedly attempted to reschedule
the tests, but was unsuccessful. In February 2008, upon discovering
that the hearing tests had not been performed, Dr. Fernando instructed
his assistant to immediately schedule the hearing tests. The hearing
tests were completed on or about the next day, and both individuals had
impeccable hearing.
(2) At the ADR session, Dr. Fernando expressed and re-emphasized
his commitment and willingness to comply with all NRC regulations,
including providing complete and accurate information. To this end, Dr.
Fernando agrees and is committed to the actions set forth in Section V
below:
(3) In consideration of Dr. Fernando's commitments as set forth in
Section V, NRC agrees not to pursue action with respect to Dr. Fernando
for those matters referred to in Section II above, with the exception
of the NRC's confirmation of completion of the actions discussed in the
Confirmatory Order.
(4) Dr. Fernando agrees that the elements discussed in Section V
will be incorporated into a Confirmatory Order, and agrees to waive the
right to request a hearing regarding all or any part of this
Confirmatory Order.
IV
Since Dr. Fernando agreed to take the actions as set forth in
Section V, the NRC has concluded its concerns can be resolved through
issuance of this Order.
I find that Dr. Fernando's commitments as set forth in Section V
are acceptable and necessary and conclude that with these commitments
the public health and safety and common defense and security are
reasonably assured. In view of the foregoing, I have determined that
public health and safety require that Dr. Fernando's commitments be
confirmed by this Order. Based on the above and Dr. Fernando's consent,
this Order is immediately effective upon issuance.
V
Accordingly, pursuant to Sections 51, 53, 161b, 161i, 161o, 182 and
186 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, and the Commission's
regulations in 10 CFR 2.202 and 10 CFR part 70, It is hereby ordered,
effective immediately, that:
(1) Dr. Fernando will ensure that an independent assessment (such
as an NFS ``Tap Root'' investigation) is conducted into the
circumstances that led to the incident, to identify root and
contributing causes. The NRC acknowledges corrective actions and
enhancements completed by Dr. Fernando regarding the training of staff
and the development of a process to ensure that all medical-related
testing and examinations would be completed prior to the authorizing
signatures of a Certified Medical Assistant and the attending
Physician.
(2) Based on the above assessment, Dr. Fernando will develop
lessons learned, and if indicated, implement additional corrective
actions from the assessment.
(3) Dr. Fernando and a physician engaged in NRC-regulated
activities will meet at least quarterly to review unique or noteworthy
issues relevant to compliance with NRC regulations. In addition, Dr.
Fernando will initiate a one time, mutual review of processes and
procedures with his Babcock and Wilcox Nuclear Owners Group (B&W NOG)
counterpart.
(4) Dr. Fernando will take a course certified for continuing
medical education credit that addresses best practices for
administrative office procedures and record keeping.
(5) Dr. Fernando will communicate lessons learned and experiences
as a result of this incident to an appropriate audience (e.g., industry
peers, NFS Safety Culture Oversight Group).
(6) Dr. Fernando agrees that actions listed in Section V.1-5 above
will begin
[[Page 64756]]
within 30 days of the NRC's issuance of the Confirmatory Order, and
will be completed no later than one year from the NRC's issuance of a
Confirmatory Order.
(7) Upon completion of all of the actions identified in Section
V.1-6 above, Dr. Fernando will submit a letter within 30 days to the
NRC advising of their completion. The letter will include details so as
to allow the NRC to confirm completion of such activities.
The Regional Administrator, NRC Region II, may relax or rescind, in
writing, any of the above conditions upon a showing by Dr. Fernando of
good cause.
VI
Any person adversely affected by this Confirmatory Order, other
than Dr. Fernando, may request a hearing within 20 days of its
publication in the Federal Register. Where good cause is shown,
consideration will be given to extending the time to request a hearing.
A request for extension of time must be directed to the Director,
Office of Enforcement, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington,
DC 20555-0001, and include a statement of good cause for the extension.
If a person other than Dr. Fernando requests a hearing, that person
shall set forth with particularity the manner in which his interest is
adversely affected by this Order and shall address the criteria set
forth in 10 CFR 2.309(d) and (f).
If a hearing is requested by a person whose interest is adversely
affected, the Commission will issue an Order designating the time and
place of any hearing. If a hearing is held, the issue to be considered
at such hearing shall be whether this Confirmatory Order should be
sustained.
All documents filed in NRC adjudicatory proceedings, including a
request for hearing, a petition for leave to intervene, any motion or
other document filed in the proceeding prior to the submission of a
request for hearing or petition to intervene, and documents filed by
interested governmental entities participating under 10 CFR 2.315(c),
must be filed in accordance with the NRC E-Filing rule, (72 FR 49139,
Aug. 28, 2007). The E-Filing process requires participants to submit
and serve all adjudicatory documents over the Internet, or in some
cases to mail copies on electronic storage media. Participants may not
submit paper copies of their filings unless they seek an exemption in
accordance with the procedures described below.
To comply with the procedural requirements of E-Filing, at least
ten (10) days prior to the filing deadline, the participant should
contact the Office of the Secretary by e-mail at
hearing.docket@nrc.gov, or by telephone at (301) 415-1677, to request
(1) a digital ID certificate, which allows the participant (or its
counsel or representative) to digitally sign documents and access the
E-Submittal server for any proceeding in which it is participating; and
(2) advise the Secretary that the participant will be submitting a
request or petition for hearing (even in instances in which the
participant, or its counsel or representative, already holds an NRC-
issued digital ID certificate). Based upon this information, the
Secretary will establish an electronic docket for the hearing in this
proceeding if the Secretary has not already established an electronic
docket.
Information about applying for a digital ID certificate is
available on NRC's public Web site at https://www.nrc.gov/site-help/e-submittals/apply-certificates.html. System requirements for accessing
the E-Submittal server are detailed in NRC's ``Guidance for Electronic
Submission,'' which is available on the agency's public Web site at
https://www.nrc.gov/site-help/e-submittals.html. Participants may
attempt to use other software not listed on the Web site, but should
note that the NRC's E-Filing system does not support unlisted software,
and the NRC Help Desk will not be able to offer assistance in using
unlisted software.
If a participant is electronically submitting a document to the NRC
in accordance with the E-Filing rule, the participant must file the
document using the NRC's on-line, Web-based submission form. In order
to serve documents through EIE, users will be required to install a Web
browser plug-in from the NRC Web site. Further information on the Web-
based submission form, including the installation of the Web browser
plug-in, is available on the NRC's public Web site at https://www.nrc.gov/site-help/e-submittals.html.
Once a participant has obtained a digital ID certificate and a
docket has been created, the participant can then submit a request for
hearing or petition for leave to intervene. Submissions should be in
Portable Document Format (PDF) in accordance with NRC guidance
available on the NRC public Web site at https://www.nrc.gov/site-help/e-submittals.html. A filing is considered complete at the time the
documents are submitted through the NRC's E-Filing system. To be
timely, an electronic filing must be submitted to the E-Filing system
no later than 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on the due date. Upon receipt of
a transmission, the E-Filing system time-stamps the document and sends
the submitter an e-mail notice confirming receipt of the document. The
E-Filing system also distributes an e-mail notice that provides access
to the document to the NRC Office of the General Counsel and any others
who have advised the Office of the Secretary that they wish to
participate in the proceeding, so that the filer need not serve the
documents on those participants separately. Therefore, applicants and
other participants (or their counsel or representative) must apply for
and receive a digital ID certificate before a hearing request/petition
to intervene is filed so that they can obtain access to the document
via the E-Filing system.
A person filing electronically using the agency's adjudicatory E-
Filing system may seek assistance by contacting the NRC Meta-System
Help Desk through the ``Contact Us'' link located on the NRC Web site
at https://www.nrc.gov/site-help/e-submittals.html, by e-mail at
MSHD.Resource@nrc.gov, or by a toll-free call at (866) 672-7640. The
NRC Meta-System Help Desk is available between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m.,
Eastern Time, Monday through Friday, excluding government holidays.
Participants who believe that they have a good cause for not
submitting documents electronically must file an exemption request, in
accordance with 10 CFR 2.302(g), with their initial paper filing
requesting authorization to continue to submit documents in paper
format. Such filings must be submitted by: (1) First class mail
addressed to the Office of the Secretary of the Commission, U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001, Attention:
Rulemaking and Adjudications Staff; or (2) courier, express mail, or
expedited delivery service to the Office of the Secretary, Sixteenth
Floor, One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland
20852, Attention: Rulemaking and Adjudications Staff. Participants
filing a document in this manner are responsible for serving the
document on all other participants. Filing is considered complete by
first-class mail as of the time of deposit in the mail, or by courier,
express mail, or expedited delivery service upon depositing the
document with the provider of the service. A presiding officer, having
granted an exemption request from using E-Filing, may require a
participant or party to use E-Filing if the presiding
[[Page 64757]]
officer subsequently determines that the reason for granting the
exemption from use of E-Filing no longer exists.
Documents submitted in adjudicatory proceedings will appear in
NRC's electronic hearing docket which is available to the public at
https://ehd.nrc.gov/EHD_Proceeding/home.asp, unless excluded pursuant
to an order of the Commission, or the presiding officer. Participants
are requested not to include personal privacy information, such as
social security numbers, home addresses, or home phone numbers in their
filings, unless an NRC regulation or other law requires submission of
such information. With respect to copyrighted works, except for limited
excerpts that serve the purpose of the adjudicatory filings and would
constitute a Fair Use application, participants are requested not to
include copyrighted materials in their submission.
VII
In the absence of any request for hearing, or written approval of
an extension of time in which to request a hearing, the provisions
specified in Section V above shall be final 20 days from the date this
Order is published in the Federal Register without further order or
proceedings. If an extension of time for requesting a hearing has been
approved, the provisions specified in Section V shall be final when the
extension expires if a hearing request has not been received. A request
for hearing shall not stay the immediate effectiveness of this order.
Dated this 23rd day of November 2009.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Victor M. McCree,
Deputy Regional Administrator for Operations.
[FR Doc. E9-29201 Filed 12-7-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P