Safety Zone; Chimes and Lights Fireworks Display, Port Orchard, WA, 64613-64615 [E9-29124]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 234 / Tuesday, December 8, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
Signed: December 1, 2009.
John J. Manfreda,
Administrator.
Approved: December 1, 2009.
Timothy E. Skud,
Deputy Assistant Secretary (Tax, Trade, and
Tariff Policy).
[FR Doc. E9–29217 Filed 12–3–09; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 4810–31–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[Docket No. USCG–2009–0764]
Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Gulf
Intracoastal Waterway, Dunedin, FL
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of temporary deviation
from regulations.
AGENCY:
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with RULES
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Commander, Seventh
Coast Guard District, has issued a
temporary deviation from the regulation
governing the operation of the Dunedin
Causeway bridge across the Gulf
Intracoastal Waterway, mile 141.9, at
Dunedin, FL. The deviation is necessary
to facilitate rehabilitation of the bascule
leaves of the bridge. This deviation
allows the bridge to conduct single leaf
operations while repairs are conducted
with a three hour notice for double leaf
operations.
DATES: This deviation is effective from
7 a.m. on September 8, 2009 through 6
p.m. on February 28, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Documents mentioned in
this preamble as being available in the
docket are part of docket USCG–2009–
0764 and are available online by going
to https://www.regulations.gov, inserting
USCG–2009–0764 in the ‘‘Keyword’’
box and then clicking ‘‘Search’’. They
are also available for inspection or
copying at the Docket Management
Facility (M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call or
e-mail Mr. Gene Stratton, Bridge
Branch, Seventh Coast Guard district;
telephone 305–415–6740, e-mail
allen.e.stratton@uscg.mil. If you have
questions on viewing the docket, call
Renee V. Wright, Program Manager,
Docket Operations, telephone 202–366–
9826.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:57 Dec 07, 2009
Coastal
Marine Construction, INC, on behalf of
Pinellas County, FL, has requested a
deviation to the regulations of the
Dunedin Causeway bridge, mile 141.9,
across the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway as
required by 33 CFR 117.5: Except as
otherwise authorized or required by this
part, drawbridges must open promptly
and fully for the passage of vessels
when a request or signal to open is
given in accordance with this subpart.
To facilitate the repair of the bascule
leaves, one leaf will be required to
remain in the closed position upon
signal from a vessel, except with a three
hour notification for an opening
requiring both leaves. This deviation
effectively reduces the horizontal
clearance of 91 feet by half for vessels
requiring an opening. The Mean High
Water clearance in the closed position
remains 24 feet. Vessels not requiring an
opening may pass at any time. This
action will affect a limited number of
vessels as the ability to use the full 91
foot horizontal clearance is available
with a three hour notification. This
action is necessary to allow Coastal
Marine Construction, INC to conduct
necessary repairs the bascule leaves
safely and efficiently.
In accordance with 33 CFR 117.35(e),
the drawbridge must return to its regular
operating schedule immediately at the
end of the designated time period. This
deviation from the operating regulations
is authorized under 33 CFR 117.35.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Jkt 220001
Dated: November 6, 2009.
Scott A. Buschman,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard Commander,
Seventh Coast Guard District, Acting.
[FR Doc. E9–29126 Filed 12–7–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2009–0989]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Chimes and Lights
Fireworks Display, Port Orchard, WA
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary safety zone on
the waters of Port Orchard, WA during
the Chimes and Lights fireworks
display. This action is necessary to
provide for the safety of recreational and
commercial boaters in the area during
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
64613
the fireworks show on December 5,
2009. Entry into, transit through,
mooring, or anchoring within this safety
zone is prohibited unless authorized by
the Captain of the Port, Puget Sound or
Designated Representative.
DATES: This rule is effective from 5 p.m.
to 8 p.m., December 5, 2009.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this
preamble as being available in the
docket are part of docket USCG–2009–
0989 and are available online by going
to https://www.regulations.gov, inserting
USCG–2009–0989 in the ‘‘Keyword’’
box, and then clicking ‘‘Search.’’ They
are also available for inspection or
copying at the Docket Management
Facility (M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this temporary
rule, call or e-mail ENS Ashley M.
Wanzer, Sector Seattle Waterways
Management Division, Coast Guard;
telephone (206) 217–6175, e-mail
SectorSeattleWWM@uscg.mil. If you
have questions on viewing the docket,
call Renee V. Wright, Program Manager,
Docket Operations, telephone 202–366–
9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
The Coast Guard is issuing this
temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment
pursuant to authority under section 4(a)
of the Administrative Procedure Act
(APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision
authorizes an agency to issue a rule
without prior notice and opportunity to
comment when the agency for good
cause finds that those procedures are
‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest.’’ Under U.S.C.
553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that
good cause exists for not publishing a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because it is
contrary to the public interest to delay
the effective date of this rule. Delaying
the effective date by first publishing an
NPRM would be contrary to the safety
zone’s intended objective since
immediate action is necessary to ensure
the safety of vessels and spectators
gathering in the vicinity of the fireworks
launching barge and display sites.
Hazards include premature detonations,
dangerous detonations, dangerous
projectiles and falling or burning debris.
Additionally, the zone should have
negligible impact on vessel transits due
to the fact that vessels will be limited
E:\FR\FM\08DER1.SGM
08DER1
64614
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 234 / Tuesday, December 8, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
from the area for only three hours and
vessels can still transit in the majority
of Puget Sound during the event.
Accordingly, under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B),
the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for not publishing an NPRM.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for
making this rule effective less than 30
days after publication in the Federal
Register because immediate action is
necessary to ensure the safety of vessels
and spectators gathering in the vicinity
of the fireworks launching barge and
display sites. For this reason, following
normal rulemaking procedures in this
case would be impracticable and
contrary to the public interest.
Background and Purpose
The Coast Guard is establishing a
temporary safety zone to allow for a safe
fireworks display. This event may result
in a number of vessels congregating near
fireworks launching barge and site. The
safety zone is needed to protect
watercraft and their occupants from
safety hazards associated with fireworks
displays. The Captain of the Port, Puget
Sound may be assisted by other federal
and local agencies in the enforcement of
this safety zone.
Discussion of Rule
The Coast Guard is establishing a
safety zone on the specified waters of
Port Orchard, WA. The safety zone will
encompass all waters of Sinclair Inlet
extending out to a 500’ radius from the
fireworks launch site located north of
the town of Port Orchard at Radar Site
‘‘C’’ at 47°32′45″ N, 122°38′02″ W (NAD
1983). This rule, for safety concerns,
will control vessels and personnel
movements in a safety zone. Entry into
this zone is prohibited unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port,
Puget Sound or Designated
Representative. The Captain of the Port,
Puget Sound may be assisted by other
federal and local agencies in the
enforcement of this safety zone.
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with RULES
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or
executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
Order. The Office of Management and
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:57 Dec 07, 2009
Jkt 220001
Budget has not reviewed it under that
Order.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this rule would have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
This temporary rule will affect the
following entities, some of which may
be small entities: the owners or
operators of vessels intending to transit
a portion of the Puget Sound while this
rule is enforced. The safety zone will
not have significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities
for the following reasons. This
temporary rule will be in effect for no
more than 3 hours when vessel traffic
volume is low. Traffic will be allowed
to pass through the zone with the
permission of the Captain of the Port or
Designated Representative, and if safe to
do so.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we offer to assist small entities in
understanding the rule so that they can
better evaluate its effects on them and
participate in the rulemaking process.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call
1–888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247).
The Coast Guard will not retaliate
against small entities that question or
complain about this rule or any policy
or action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection
of information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520).
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this rule under that Order and have
determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 or more in any one year.
Though this rule will not result in such
an expenditure, we do discuss the
effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not effect a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not create an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
E:\FR\FM\08DER1.SGM
08DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 234 / Tuesday, December 8, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with RULES
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have concluded this action is one of a
category of actions which do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule is categorically
excluded, under figure 2–1, paragraph
(34)(g), of the Instruction. This rule
involves establishing a temporary safety
zone. An environmental checklist and
categorical exclusion determination are
available where indicated under
ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
■ For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR Part 165 as follows:
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:57 Dec 07, 2009
Jkt 220001
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for Part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C
Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6 and 160.5;
Pub. L. 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department
of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Add temporary § 165.T13–123, to
read as follows:
■
§ 165.T13–123 Safety Zone; Chimes and
Lights Fireworks Display, Port Orchard,
WA.
(a) Safety Zone. The following area is
designated a safety zone: Port Orchard
Bay, WA
(i) Location. All waters of Sinclair
Inlet extending out to a 500’ radius from
the fireworks launch site located north
of the town of Port Orchard at Radar
Site ‘‘C’’ at 47°32′45″ N, 122°38′02″ W
(NAD 1983).
(ii) Effective time and date. 5 p.m. to
8 p.m. on December 5, 2009.
(b) Regulations. In accordance with
the general regulations in Section
165.23 of this part, no person or vessel
may enter or remain in this zone unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port or
Designated Representative.
(c) Enforcement Period. This section
is effective from 5 p.m. to 8 p.m. on
December 5, 2009. If the need for the
termination of the safety zone occurs
before the scheduled termination time,
the Captain of the Port will cease
enforcement of this section and will
announce that fact via Broadcast Notice
to Mariners.
Dated: November 13, 2009.
Suzanne E. Englebert,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port, Puget Sound.
[FR Doc. E9–29124 Filed 12–7–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 300
[EPA–HQ–SFUND–1990–0011; FRL–9089–8]
National Oil and Hazardous Substance
Pollution Contingency Plan; National
Priorities List
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct Final Notice of Deletion
of the Kerr-McGee (Reed-Keppler Park)
(RKP) Superfund Site from the National
Priorities List.
SUMMARY: EPA, Region 5 is publishing a
direct final Notice of Deletion of the
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
64615
Kerr-McGee Reed-Keppler Park
Superfund Site (Site), located in West
Chicago, Illinois, from the National
Priorities List (NPL). The NPL,
promulgated pursuant to Section 105 of
the Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation, and Liability
Act (CERCLA) of 1980, as amended, is
an appendix to the National Oil and
Hazardous Substances Pollution
Contingency Plan (NCP). This direct
final deletion is being published by EPA
with the concurrence of the State of
Illinois, through the Illinois
Environmental Protection Agency
(IEPA), because EPA has determined
that all appropriate response actions
under CERCLA have been completed.
However, this deletion does not
preclude future actions under
Superfund.
DATES: This direct final deletion is
effective February 8, 2010 unless EPA
receives adverse comments by January
7, 2010. If adverse comments are
received, EPA will publish a timely
withdrawal of the direct final deletion
in the Federal Register informing the
public that the deletion will not take
effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID no. EPA–HQ–
SFUND–1990–0011, by one of the
following methods:
• E-mail: Timothy Fischer, Remedial
Project Manager, at
timothy.fischer@epa.gov or Janet Pope,
Community Involvement Coordinator, at
pope.janet@epa.gov.
• Fax: Gladys Beard at (312) 886–
4071.
• Mail: Timothy Fischer, Remedial
Project Manager, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency (SR–6J), 77 W.
Jackson Blvd., Chicago, IL 60604, (312)
886–5787, or Janet Pope, Community
Involvement Coordinator, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (SI–
7J), 77 W. Jackson Blvd., Chicago, IL
60604, (312) 353–0628 or 1–800–621–
8431.
• Hand delivery: Janet Pope,
Community Involvement Coordinator,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
(SI–7J), 77 West Jackson Blvd., Chicago,
IL 60604. Such deliveries are only
accepted during the docket’s normal
hours of operation, and special
arrangements should be made for
deliveries of boxed information. The
normal business hours are Monday
through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID no. EPA–HQ–SFUND–1990–
0011. EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change and may be
made available online at https://
E:\FR\FM\08DER1.SGM
08DER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 234 (Tuesday, December 8, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 64613-64615]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-29124]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG-2009-0989]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; Chimes and Lights Fireworks Display, Port Orchard,
WA
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone on the
waters of Port Orchard, WA during the Chimes and Lights fireworks
display. This action is necessary to provide for the safety of
recreational and commercial boaters in the area during the fireworks
show on December 5, 2009. Entry into, transit through, mooring, or
anchoring within this safety zone is prohibited unless authorized by
the Captain of the Port, Puget Sound or Designated Representative.
DATES: This rule is effective from 5 p.m. to 8 p.m., December 5, 2009.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this preamble as being available in
the docket are part of docket USCG-2009-0989 and are available online
by going to https://www.regulations.gov, inserting USCG-2009-0989 in the
``Keyword'' box, and then clicking ``Search.'' They are also available
for inspection or copying at the Docket Management Facility (M-30),
U.S. Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this
temporary rule, call or e-mail ENS Ashley M. Wanzer, Sector Seattle
Waterways Management Division, Coast Guard; telephone (206) 217-6175,
e-mail SectorSeattleWWM@uscg.mil. If you have questions on viewing the
docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program Manager, Docket Operations,
telephone 202-366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section
4(a) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.'' Under U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because it is contrary to the public interest
to delay the effective date of this rule. Delaying the effective date
by first publishing an NPRM would be contrary to the safety zone's
intended objective since immediate action is necessary to ensure the
safety of vessels and spectators gathering in the vicinity of the
fireworks launching barge and display sites. Hazards include premature
detonations, dangerous detonations, dangerous projectiles and falling
or burning debris. Additionally, the zone should have negligible impact
on vessel transits due to the fact that vessels will be limited
[[Page 64614]]
from the area for only three hours and vessels can still transit in the
majority of Puget Sound during the event. Accordingly, under 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good cause exists for not
publishing an NPRM.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register because immediate action is
necessary to ensure the safety of vessels and spectators gathering in
the vicinity of the fireworks launching barge and display sites. For
this reason, following normal rulemaking procedures in this case would
be impracticable and contrary to the public interest.
Background and Purpose
The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone to allow
for a safe fireworks display. This event may result in a number of
vessels congregating near fireworks launching barge and site. The
safety zone is needed to protect watercraft and their occupants from
safety hazards associated with fireworks displays. The Captain of the
Port, Puget Sound may be assisted by other federal and local agencies
in the enforcement of this safety zone.
Discussion of Rule
The Coast Guard is establishing a safety zone on the specified
waters of Port Orchard, WA. The safety zone will encompass all waters
of Sinclair Inlet extending out to a 500' radius from the fireworks
launch site located north of the town of Port Orchard at Radar Site
``C'' at 47[deg]32'45'' N, 122[deg]38'02'' W (NAD 1983). This rule, for
safety concerns, will control vessels and personnel movements in a
safety zone. Entry into this zone is prohibited unless authorized by
the Captain of the Port, Puget Sound or Designated Representative. The
Captain of the Port, Puget Sound may be assisted by other federal and
local agencies in the enforcement of this safety zone.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section
6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
This temporary rule will affect the following entities, some of
which may be small entities: the owners or operators of vessels
intending to transit a portion of the Puget Sound while this rule is
enforced. The safety zone will not have significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities for the following reasons. This
temporary rule will be in effect for no more than 3 hours when vessel
traffic volume is low. Traffic will be allowed to pass through the zone
with the permission of the Captain of the Port or Designated
Representative, and if safe to do so.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we offer to assist small
entities in understanding the rule so that they can better evaluate its
effects on them and participate in the rulemaking process.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for
federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any
one year. Though this rule will not result in such an expenditure, we
do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not effect a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
[[Page 64615]]
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ``significant energy action'' under that
order because it is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to have a significant adverse
effect on the supply, distribution, or use of energy. The Administrator
of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs has not designated
it as a significant energy action. Therefore, it does not require a
Statement of Energy Effects under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have concluded
this action is one of a category of actions which do not individually
or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment.
This rule is categorically excluded, under figure 2-1, paragraph
(34)(g), of the Instruction. This rule involves establishing a
temporary safety zone. An environmental checklist and categorical
exclusion determination are available where indicated under ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
0
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR Part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for Part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C Chapter 701, 3306,
3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6 and 160.5;
Pub. L. 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.
0
2. Add temporary Sec. 165.T13-123, to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T13-123 Safety Zone; Chimes and Lights Fireworks Display,
Port Orchard, WA.
(a) Safety Zone. The following area is designated a safety zone:
Port Orchard Bay, WA
(i) Location. All waters of Sinclair Inlet extending out to a 500'
radius from the fireworks launch site located north of the town of Port
Orchard at Radar Site ``C'' at 47[deg]32'45'' N, 122[deg]38'02'' W (NAD
1983).
(ii) Effective time and date. 5 p.m. to 8 p.m. on December 5, 2009.
(b) Regulations. In accordance with the general regulations in
Section 165.23 of this part, no person or vessel may enter or remain in
this zone unless authorized by the Captain of the Port or Designated
Representative.
(c) Enforcement Period. This section is effective from 5 p.m. to 8
p.m. on December 5, 2009. If the need for the termination of the safety
zone occurs before the scheduled termination time, the Captain of the
Port will cease enforcement of this section and will announce that fact
via Broadcast Notice to Mariners.
Dated: November 13, 2009.
Suzanne E. Englebert,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port, Puget Sound.
[FR Doc. E9-29124 Filed 12-7-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P