National Oil and Hazardous Substance Pollution Contingency Plan; National Priorities List, 64615-64619 [E9-29081]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 234 / Tuesday, December 8, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with RULES
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have concluded this action is one of a
category of actions which do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule is categorically
excluded, under figure 2–1, paragraph
(34)(g), of the Instruction. This rule
involves establishing a temporary safety
zone. An environmental checklist and
categorical exclusion determination are
available where indicated under
ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
■ For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR Part 165 as follows:
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:57 Dec 07, 2009
Jkt 220001
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for Part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C
Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6 and 160.5;
Pub. L. 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department
of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Add temporary § 165.T13–123, to
read as follows:
■
§ 165.T13–123 Safety Zone; Chimes and
Lights Fireworks Display, Port Orchard,
WA.
(a) Safety Zone. The following area is
designated a safety zone: Port Orchard
Bay, WA
(i) Location. All waters of Sinclair
Inlet extending out to a 500’ radius from
the fireworks launch site located north
of the town of Port Orchard at Radar
Site ‘‘C’’ at 47°32′45″ N, 122°38′02″ W
(NAD 1983).
(ii) Effective time and date. 5 p.m. to
8 p.m. on December 5, 2009.
(b) Regulations. In accordance with
the general regulations in Section
165.23 of this part, no person or vessel
may enter or remain in this zone unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port or
Designated Representative.
(c) Enforcement Period. This section
is effective from 5 p.m. to 8 p.m. on
December 5, 2009. If the need for the
termination of the safety zone occurs
before the scheduled termination time,
the Captain of the Port will cease
enforcement of this section and will
announce that fact via Broadcast Notice
to Mariners.
Dated: November 13, 2009.
Suzanne E. Englebert,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port, Puget Sound.
[FR Doc. E9–29124 Filed 12–7–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 300
[EPA–HQ–SFUND–1990–0011; FRL–9089–8]
National Oil and Hazardous Substance
Pollution Contingency Plan; National
Priorities List
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct Final Notice of Deletion
of the Kerr-McGee (Reed-Keppler Park)
(RKP) Superfund Site from the National
Priorities List.
SUMMARY: EPA, Region 5 is publishing a
direct final Notice of Deletion of the
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
64615
Kerr-McGee Reed-Keppler Park
Superfund Site (Site), located in West
Chicago, Illinois, from the National
Priorities List (NPL). The NPL,
promulgated pursuant to Section 105 of
the Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation, and Liability
Act (CERCLA) of 1980, as amended, is
an appendix to the National Oil and
Hazardous Substances Pollution
Contingency Plan (NCP). This direct
final deletion is being published by EPA
with the concurrence of the State of
Illinois, through the Illinois
Environmental Protection Agency
(IEPA), because EPA has determined
that all appropriate response actions
under CERCLA have been completed.
However, this deletion does not
preclude future actions under
Superfund.
DATES: This direct final deletion is
effective February 8, 2010 unless EPA
receives adverse comments by January
7, 2010. If adverse comments are
received, EPA will publish a timely
withdrawal of the direct final deletion
in the Federal Register informing the
public that the deletion will not take
effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID no. EPA–HQ–
SFUND–1990–0011, by one of the
following methods:
• E-mail: Timothy Fischer, Remedial
Project Manager, at
timothy.fischer@epa.gov or Janet Pope,
Community Involvement Coordinator, at
pope.janet@epa.gov.
• Fax: Gladys Beard at (312) 886–
4071.
• Mail: Timothy Fischer, Remedial
Project Manager, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency (SR–6J), 77 W.
Jackson Blvd., Chicago, IL 60604, (312)
886–5787, or Janet Pope, Community
Involvement Coordinator, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (SI–
7J), 77 W. Jackson Blvd., Chicago, IL
60604, (312) 353–0628 or 1–800–621–
8431.
• Hand delivery: Janet Pope,
Community Involvement Coordinator,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
(SI–7J), 77 West Jackson Blvd., Chicago,
IL 60604. Such deliveries are only
accepted during the docket’s normal
hours of operation, and special
arrangements should be made for
deliveries of boxed information. The
normal business hours are Monday
through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID no. EPA–HQ–SFUND–1990–
0011. EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change and may be
made available online at https://
E:\FR\FM\08DER1.SGM
08DER1
64616
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 234 / Tuesday, December 8, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with RULES
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through https://
www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The
https://www.regulations.gov Web site is
an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which
means EPA will not know your identity
or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment.
If you send an e-mail comment directly
to EPA without going through https://
www.regulations.gov, your e-mail
address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the comment
that is placed in the public docket and
made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA
recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment.
Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses.
Docket
All documents in the docket are listed
in the https://www.regulations.gov index.
Although listed in the index, some
information may not be publicly
available, e.g., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, will be publicly
available only in the hard copy. Publicly
available docket materials are available
either electronically at https://
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at:
U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency—Region 5, 77 W. Jackson
Blvd., Chicago, IL 60604, Hours:
Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to
4:30 p.m., excluding Federal holidays.
West Chicago Public Library, 118 W.
Washington St., West Chicago, IL
60185, Phone: (630) 231–1552, Hours:
Monday through Thursday, 9 a.m. to
9 p.m.; Friday and Saturday, 9 a.m. to
5 p.m.; and Sundays until May, 1 p.m.
to 5 p.m.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Timothy Fischer, Remedial Project
Manager, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency (SR–6J), 77 W. Jackson Blvd.,
Chicago, IL 60604, (312) 886–4737,
fischer.timothy@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:57 Dec 07, 2009
Jkt 220001
Table of Contents
I. Introduction
II. NPL Deletion Criteria
III. Deletion Procedures
IV. Basis for Site Deletion
V. Deletion Action
I. Introduction
EPA Region 5 is publishing this direct
final Notice of Deletion of the KerrMcGee Reed-Keppler Park (RKP)
Superfund Site from the NPL. The NPL
constitutes Appendix B of 40 CFR part
300, which is the NCP, which EPA
promulgated pursuant to Section 105 of
the CERCLA of 1980, as amended. EPA
maintains the NPL as the list of sites
that appear to present a significant risk
to public health, welfare, or the
environment. Sites on the NPL may be
the subject of remedial actions financed
by the Hazardous Substance Superfund
(Fund). As described in 300.425(e)(3) of
the NCP, sites deleted from the NPL
remain eligible for Fund-financed
remedial actions if future conditions
warrant such actions.
Because EPA considers this action to
be noncontroversial and routine, this
action will be effective February 8, 2010
unless EPA receives adverse comments
by January 7, 2010. Along with this
direct final Notice of Deletion, EPA is
co-publishing a Notice of Intent to
Delete in the ‘‘Proposed Rules’’ section
of the Federal Register. If adverse
comments are received within the 30day public comment period on this
deletion action, EPA will publish a
timely withdrawal of this direct final
Notice of Deletion before the effective
date of the deletion, and the deletion
will not take effect. EPA will, as
appropriate, prepare a response to
comments and continue with the
deletion process on the basis of the
Notice of Intent to Delete and the
comments already received. There will
be no additional opportunity to
comment.
Section II of this document explains
the criteria for deleting sites from the
NPL. Section III discusses procedures
that EPA is using for this action. Section
IV discusses the RKP Site and
demonstrates how it meets the deletion
criteria. Section V discusses EPA’s
action to delete the Site from the NPL
unless adverse comments are received
during the public comment period.
II. NPL Deletion Criteria
The NCP establishes the criteria that
EPA uses to delete sites from the NPL.
In accordance with 40 CFR 300.425(e),
sites may be deleted from the NPL
where no further response is
appropriate. In making such a
determination pursuant to 40 CFR
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
300.425(e), EPA will consider, in
consultation with the State, whether any
of the following criteria have been met:
i. Responsible parties or other persons
have implemented all appropriate
response actions required;
ii. All appropriate Fund-financed
response under CERCLA has been
implemented, and no further response
action by responsible parties is
appropriate; or
iii. The remedial investigation has
shown that the release poses no
significant threat to public health or the
environment and, therefore, the taking
of remedial measures is not appropriate.
Pursuant to CERCLA Section 121(c)
and the NCP, EPA conducts five-year
reviews to ensure the continued
protectiveness of remedial actions
where hazardous substances, pollutants,
or contaminants remain at a site above
levels that allow for unlimited use and
unrestricted exposure. EPA conducts
such five-year reviews even if a site is
deleted from the NPL. EPA may initiate
further action to ensure continued
protectiveness at a deleted site if new
information becomes available that
indicates it is appropriate. Whenever
there is a significant release from a site
deleted from the NPL, the deleted site
may be restored to the NPL without
application of the hazard ranking
system.
III. Deletion Procedures
The following procedures apply to
deletion of the Site:
(1) EPA consulted with the State of
Illinois prior to developing this direct
final Notice of Deletion and the Notice
of Intent to Delete co-published today in
the ‘‘Proposed Rules’’ section of the
Federal Register.
(2) EPA has provided the State 30
working days for review of this notice
and the parallel Notice of Intent to
Delete prior to their publication today,
and the State, through the Illinois
Environmental Protection Agency, has
concurred on the deletion of the Site
from the NPL.
(3) Concurrently with the publication
of this direct final Notice of Deletion, a
notice of the availability of the parallel
Notice of Intent to Delete is being
published in a major local newspaper,
The Daily Herald. The newspaper notice
announces the 30-day public comment
period concerning the Notice of Intent
to Delete the Site from the NPL.
(4) EPA placed copies of documents
supporting the proposed deletion in the
deletion docket and made these items
available for public inspection and
copying at the Site information
repositories identified above.
E:\FR\FM\08DER1.SGM
08DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 234 / Tuesday, December 8, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
(5) If adverse comments are received
within the 30-day public comment
period on this deletion action, EPA will
publish a timely notice of withdrawal of
this direct final Notice of Deletion
before its effective date and will prepare
a response to comments and continue
with the deletion process on the basis of
the Notice of Intent to Delete and the
comments already received.
Deletion of a site from the NPL does
not itself create, alter, or revoke any
individual’s rights or obligations.
Deletion of a site from the NPL does not
in any way alter EPA’s right to take
enforcement actions, as appropriate.
The NPL is designed primarily for
informational purposes and to assist
EPA management. Section 300.425(e)(3)
of the NCP states that the deletion of a
site from the NPL does not preclude
eligibility for future response actions,
should future conditions warrant such
actions.
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with RULES
IV. Basis for Site Deletion
The following information provides
EPA’s rationale for deleting the Site
from the NPL.
Early site investigations at the RKP
Site found elevated levels of radioactive
thorium in site soils. A removal action
was conducted at the RKP Site, and a
Final Report for the RKP Site removal
action was submitted and approved by
EPA in April 2002. This report
documented that all cleanup criteria for
soils at the RKP Site had been
successfully achieved.
In September 2002, EPA issued a
Record of Decision (ROD) for the RKP
Site which called for No Further Action,
along with associated groundwater
monitoring for total uranium at the site.
A five-year review was completed on
August 13, 2007, and the review
concluded that the site remedy was
protective of human health and the
environment.
On January 28, 2008, EPA agreed that
the remedial objective for uranium in
groundwater had been achieved, based
upon five groundwater sampling events
between June 2006 and December 2007.
On March 18, 2008, the responsible
parties completed abandonment of all
site monitoring wells. The Site has now
achieved all remedial objectives.
Site Location
The Kerr-McGee Reed-Keppler Park
Site is a 100-acre community park
located in the northwestern portion of
West Chicago, DuPage County, Illinois,
about 30 miles west of Chicago, Illinois.
The Kerr-McGee Reed-Keppler Park Site
is located north of National Street and
west of Arbor Avenue. The majority of
the Kerr-McGee Reed-Keppler Park Site
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:57 Dec 07, 2009
Jkt 220001
is owned by the City of West Chicago,
and is leased to and operated by the
West Chicago Park District (Park
District) for use as a public recreation
area. The park is used for a variety of
activities including tennis, volleyball,
soccer, and baseball/softball. The land
use within one mile of the site is
primarily residential. The Park District’s
Family Aquatic Center is also located in
the northeast section of the ReedKeppler Park.
Site History
In the early 1900’s, the RKP Site was
mined as a quarry to provide rock and
embankment material for construction
of the Chicago, Wheaton and Western
Railway (now the Illinois Prairie Path
embankment owned by Commonwealth
Edison). This old quarry area was left as
a topographic low area and was
subsequently used for solid waste
(household and commercial garbage)
disposal from as early as 1939 until
1973. Among the solid wastes found at
the RKP Site were thorium mill tailings
and other process wastes generated at
the West Chicago Rare Earths Facility
(REF), operated in West Chicago by
Lindsay Light and Chemical Company,
and its successors, from 1934 until
1973. In 1967, Kerr-McGee Chemical
Corporation purchased the REF and
maintained operations until the facility
was closed in 1973.
Several site investigations were
conducted, and in 1996, EPA
determined that the level of
contamination in the surface soils at the
RKP Site warranted a time-critical
removal action and that removal
decision was documented in an Action
Memorandum. The Action
Memorandum reported that the median
level of soil contamination, based upon
soil samples collected at the RKP Site,
was 286 picoCuries per gram (pCi/g) of
total radium, with the maximum
exceeding 15,000 pCi/g. The Action
Memorandum concluded that
contaminated soil should be removed
until a cleanup criterion of 5 pCi/g of
total radium (radium-226 + radium-228)
over background was achieved. The
background concentration for the RKP
Site was determined to be 2.2 pCi/g,
thereby establishing the cleanup
criterion for the RKP Site at 7.2 pCi/g.
The Action Memorandum, along with
an Action Criteria Document that
explained the radiation cleanup level,
formed the basis for EPA’s Unilateral
Administrative Order (UAO), which was
issued to Kerr-McGee Chemical
Corporation and the City of West
Chicago, Illinois, requiring removal
activities at the RKP Site to address the
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
64617
radioactive contamination and protect
human health and the environment.
A total of 114,652 loose cubic yards
of contaminated soil and debris were
removed from the RKP Site between
April 1997 and October 1999. The
contaminated material was then
shipped to the REF to be physically
separated. All contaminated material
was then shipped to a Nuclear
Regulatory Commission (NRC) licensed
disposal Site in Utah by rail. Final
restoration activities for the RKP Site
were completed in November 2000. A
Final Report for the RKP removal action
was submitted to EPA in April 2002,
which confirmed that the removal
action met all of the requirements and
cleanup criteria specified in the Action
Memorandum and the Action Criterion
Document for the RKP Site.
Remedial Investigation and Feasibility
Study (RI/FS)
After the completion of the soil
removal action at RKP, EPA determined
that all action necessary to protect
human health and the environment had
been taken with respect to the soils at
the RKP Site. Due to an exceedance of
the drinking water standard for uranium
in one monitoring well at the site, EPA
required monitoring of nine wells at the
site. The EPA monitored these wells
until sufficient data was collected to
insure that all groundwater
concentrations were decreasing and that
the drinking water standard for uranium
had been attained in all the site wells.
Groundwater data were collected in
1994 and 1997 at the RKP Site as part
of investigation efforts at the site.
Concentrations of total dissolved
uranium, elevated above background,
were detected in wells 4 and 5 in
October 1994. Wells 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5
were subsequently abandoned or
removed from the site during excavation
of contaminated soil.
Kerr-McGee installed five new
monitoring wells (1–5) at the RKP Site
in November 1997. Monitoring wells
7–9 were also subsequently installed to
replace some of the original Site wells
that had been removed as part of site
excavation activities.
In August 2001, additional
groundwater samples were collected
from the nine RKP monitoring wells to
determine if residual groundwater
contamination levels achieved the
remedial objective following completion
of the removal action at the RKP Site.
One well (RKP–5) exhibited
concentrations of total uranium in
exceedance of the drinking water
standard for total uranium in 40 CFR
141. This standard, also known as the
Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL), is
E:\FR\FM\08DER1.SGM
08DER1
64618
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 234 / Tuesday, December 8, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with RULES
30 micrograms per liter (μg/L) for total
uranium. This corresponds to a
radioactivity level of about 27
picoCuries per liter (pCi/L). The
concentration of uranium in RKP–5 in
August 2001 was 37.1 pCi/L. All of the
other RKP monitoring wells were in
compliance with the MCL.
EPA cleanups conducted under
CERCLA are legally required to comply
with all Applicable or Relevant and
Appropriate Requirements (ARARs).
The MCLs in the Safe Drinking Water
Act are considered an ARAR for all
CERCLA sites that overlie aquifers that
are used, or may be reasonably
anticipated to be used, as a drinking
water source in the future. EPA
promulgated the MCL for total uranium
in 65 FR 76708, National Primary
Drinking Water Regulations, on
December 7, 2000. The State of Illinois
has designated the groundwater aquifer
underlying the RKP site and the City of
West Chicago as Class I—Potential
Potable Groundwater Resource in
accordance with 35 Illinois
Administrative Code (IAC) Part 620
Subpart B, Groundwater Classification
for Class I Designation and IAC Part 620
Subpart D, State of Illinois Groundwater
Quality Standards.
Due to the exceedance of the drinking
water standard for uranium in
monitoring well RKP–5, EPA required
monitoring of the nine site wells until
sufficient data was collected to insure
that all groundwater concentrations
were decreasing and that the drinking
water standard for uranium in 40 CFR
Part 141 (30 μg/L or 27 pCi/L) had been
attained in all site wells.
Record of Decision Findings
In September 2002, EPA issued a
Record of Decision ROD for the RKP
Site which selected No Further Action,
along with associated groundwater
monitoring for total uranium at the RKP
Site. Due to the exceedance of the
drinking water standard for uranium at
monitoring well RKP–5, at the RKP Site,
however, EPA required monitoring of
the nine site wells until sufficient data
was collected to insure that all
groundwater concentrations were
decreasing and that the drinking water
standard for uranium in 40 CFR Part 141
(30 μg/L or 27 pCi/L) had been attained
in all site wells. When EPA issued the
ROD, EPA did not expect that active
treatment of the groundwater
underlying the RKP Site would be
required because:
(1) The removal action conducted
from 1997 to 2000 by Kerr-McGee
removed the source of uranium
contamination (the radioactively
contaminated subsurface soils below the
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:57 Dec 07, 2009
Jkt 220001
water table at RKP Site). Therefore,
there was no continuing source of
uranium in the subsurface soil to be
released to groundwater and cause the
concentrations in groundwater to
increase.
(2) Only one of the nine wells at the
RKP Site (RKP–5) exhibited
groundwater contamination above the
MCL drinking water standard for
uranium (30 μg/L or 27 pCi/L). Six of
the nine RKP monitoring wells were
located in areas that were considered
downgradient from the former quarry
and landfill areas at the site. RKP–5 was
also sampled in January 1998 and the
concentration of uranium in the well at
that time was 7.43 pCi/L, which was
below the MCL. RKP–5 was in
compliance with the MCL when it was
sampled in 1998 and the result in
August 2001 was only marginally above
the MCL. Consequently, there was a
high probability that the 37.1 pCi/L
result was an isolated sample result that
would diminish within a reasonable
time. In fact, beginning in December
1997, a total of 15 samples have been
collected from the nine RKP
groundwater wells, and the 37.1 pCi/L
result from RKP–5 in August 2001 was
the only exceedance of the MCL in the
data set.
(3) Although EPA considered the
shallow aquifer underlying and
surrounding the area of the RKP site a
potential drinking water source, the City
of West Chicago prohibited the use of
the groundwater by residents and
required its residents to abandon
groundwater wells in the City of West
Chicago. In addition, the City of West
Chicago obtained its drinking water
from nine municipal wells, two of
which were in the vicinity of the RKP
Site. These wells are screened in a deep
aquifer system, which is separated from
the shallow aquifer by a Silurian
dolomite and Maquoketa shale layer
that inhibits the vertical flow of
groundwater from the upper aquifer to
the underlying formation. Therefore, it
was extremely unlikely that
contaminants in the upper aquifer could
migrate to the draw down zones of the
City wells. Shallow groundwater in the
vicinity of the RKP Site is not used as
a drinking water source. There were no
known conduits between the shallow
and deep aquifers, and no site related
contaminants have been detected in any
of the nine City wells above background
concentrations. Consequently, there was
no reason to believe that a complete
pathway to human receptors existed,
nor was one expected to form given the
City of West Chicago’s ordinance
prohibiting the use of groundwater in
the area.
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Groundwater monitoring was
conducted at the RKP Site from June
2006 until December 2007, when it was
demonstrated that the MCL had been
achieved, and maintained, for three
consecutive sampling events. On
January 28, 2008, EPA agreed that the
remedial objective for uranium in
groundwater had been achieved and
that monitoring well abandonment
could take place at the RKP Site. On
March 18, 2008, Tronox (formerly KerrMcGee) completed abandonment of all
RKP Site wells.
Cleanup Goals
Groundwater monitoring was
performed at the RKP Site five times
between June 2006 and December 2007.
The groundwater remedial objective was
to monitor ‘‘to insure that future
concentrations of uranium in the RKP
Site groundwater meet the MCL
drinking water standard of 30 μg/L, or
27 pCi/L. It was decided that monitoring
would continue until it has been
demonstrated that the MCLs have been
achieved, and maintained, for three
consecutive sampling events.’’ There
were five sampling events conducted
between June 2006 and December 2007
and none of the sample results exceeded
the uranium concentration remedial
goal of 30μg/L. For this reason, EPA
declared all response actions complete
for the RKP Site. The monitoring wells
were subsequently abandoned in March
2008, and there are no remaining
physical remnants of the response
action at the RKP Site left on site.
Operation and Maintenance
There are no remaining operation and
maintenance requirements for the RKP
Site. All response activities are
complete and all physical remnants
have been removed.
Five-Year Review
One five-year review was completed
for the RKP Site on August 13, 2007.
The five-year review concluded that the
site remedy was protective of human
health and the environment. The fiveyear review recommended that some
maintenance be conducted on site
monitoring wells if groundwater
monitoring was to be conducted into the
future. This recommendation was no
longer a concern after the remedial
objective for uranium in groundwater
was achieved within one and a half
years of the beginning of monitoring in
2006. All RKP monitoring wells have
since been abandoned. No more fiveyear reviews will be conducted at the
site.
E:\FR\FM\08DER1.SGM
08DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 234 / Tuesday, December 8, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
Community Involvement
PART 300—[AMENDED]
Public participation activities have
been satisfied as required in CERCLA
Section 113(k), 42 U.S.C. 9613(k), and
CERCLA section 117, 42 U.S.C. 9617.
Documents in the deletion docket which
EPA relied on for recommendation of
the deletion of this site from the NPL are
available to the public in the
information repositories and at
www.regulations.gov.
■
Determination That the Site Meets the
Criteria for Deletion in the NCP
The NCP (40 CFR 300.425(e)) states
that a site may be deleted from the NPL
when no further response action is
appropriate. EPA, in consultation with
the State of Illinois, has determined that
the responsible parties have
implemented all response actions
required, and no further response action
by responsible parties is appropriate.
EPA, with concurrence from State of
Illinois through the Illinois
Environmental Protection Agency, has
determined that all appropriate
response actions under CERCLA have
been completed. Therefore, EPA is
deleting the Site from the NPL.
Because EPA considers this action to
be noncontroversial and routine, EPA is
taking it without prior publication. This
action will be effective February 8, 2010
unless EPA receives adverse comments
by January 7, 2010. If adverse comments
are received within the 30-day public
comment period, EPA will publish a
timely withdrawal of this direct final
Notice of Deletion before the effective
date of the deletion, and it will not take
effect. EPA will prepare a response to
comments and continue with the
deletion process on the basis of the
notice of intent to delete and the
comments already received. There will
be no additional opportunity to
comment.
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with RULES
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 300
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Chemicals, Hazardous
waste, Hazardous substances,
Intergovernmental relations, Penalties,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Superfund, Water
pollution control, Water supply.
Dated: November 20, 2009.
Bharat Mathur,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5.
For the reasons set out in this
document, 40 CFR part 300 is amended
as follows:
■
14:57 Dec 07, 2009
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1321(c)(2); 42 U.S.C.
9601–9657; E.O. 12777, 56 FR 54757, 3 CFR,
1991 Comp., p. 351; E.O. 12580, 52 FR 2923;
3 CFR, 1987 Comp., p. 193.
Appendix B—[Amended]
2. Table 1 of Appendix B to part 300
is amended by removing ‘‘Kerr-McGee
(Reed Keppler Park)’’, ‘‘West Chicago’’,
‘‘IL’’.
■
[FR Doc. E9–29081 Filed 12–7–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS
AFFAIRS
48 CFR Parts 802, 804, 808, 809, 810,
813, 815, 817, 819, 828, and 852
RIN 2900–AM92
V. Deletion Action
VerDate Nov<24>2008
1. The authority citation for part 300
continues to read as follows:
Jkt 220001
VA Acquisition Regulation: Supporting
Veteran-Owned and Service-Disabled
Veteran-Owned Small Businesses
Department of Veterans Affairs.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: This document implements
portions of the Veterans Benefits, Health
Care, and Information Technology Act
of 2006 (the Act) and Executive Order
13360, providing opportunities for
service-disabled veteran-owned small
businesses (SDVOSB) to increase their
Federal contracting and subcontracting.
The Act and the Executive Order
authorize the Department of Veterans
Affairs (VA) to establish special
methods for contracting with SDVOSBs
and veteran-owned small businesses
(VOSB). Under this final rule, a VA
contracting officer may restrict
competition to contracting with
SDVOSBs or VOSBs under certain
conditions. Likewise, sole source
contracts with SDVOSBs or VOSBs are
permissible under certain conditions.
This final rule implements these special
acquisition methods as a change to the
VA Acquisition Regulation (VAAR).
This document additionally amends
SDVOSB/VOSB, Small Business Status
Protests, where VA provided that VA
would utilize the U.S. Small Business
Administration (SBA) to consider and
decide SDVOSB and VOSB status
protests. This requires VA and SBA to
execute an interagency agreement
pursuant to the Economy Act.
Negotiations of this interagency
agreement have not yet been finalized.
Therefore, VA has amended these
regulations with an interim rule to
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
64619
provide that VA’s Executive Director,
Office of Small and Disadvantaged
Business Utilization (OSDBU) shall
consider and decide SDVOSB and
VOSB status protests, and provides
procedures there for, until such time as
the interagency agreement is executed
by the agencies. VA hereby solicits
comments on this regulatory
amendment only.
DATES: January 7, 2010. Comment date:
Comments on the amendments
regarding section 819.307, only, must be
received on or before January 7, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Arita Tillman, Acquisition Policy
Division (001AL–P1A), Office of
Acquisition and Logistics, Department
of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Ave.,
NW., Washington, DC 20420, telephone
(202) 461–6859, or e-mail
Arita.Tillman@va.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On August
20, 2008, VA published in the Federal
Register (73 FR 49141–49155) a
proposed rule to revise the VAAR to
implement portions of Public Law 109–
461, the Veterans Benefits, Health Care
and Information Technology Act of
2006, and Executive Order 13360,
providing opportunities for SDVOSBs
and VOSBs to increase their federal
contracting and subcontracting.
Comments were solicited concerning
the proposal for 60 days, ending October
20, 2008. VA received 97 comments,
many of which were groups of identical
responses in form letters. Most
commenters raised more than one issue.
The issues raised in the comments are
discussed below.
1. SDVOSB and VOSB Verification
Comment: Several comments were
received regarding the validity of VA’s
Vendor Information Pages (VIP)
database registration process, expressing
concern for ‘‘pass through’’ business
relationships and the potential for other
fraudulent actions.
Response: The regulations governing
the verification of VOSB status, which
are in 38 CFR Part 74, are not the subject
of this rulemaking. Accordingly, we will
not make any changes based upon the
comments. In the past, vendors could
register themselves in the VA vendor
database and self certify the accuracy of
the information provided. However,
section 502 of Public Law 109–461
requires VA to maintain a database of
SDVOSBs and VOSBs and that VA
verify that status. Section 74.2 sets out
the eligibility requirements for VIP
verification, and 38 CFR 74.3 sets out
the criteria for a VOSB. Further, this
final rule under section 802.101,
Definitions, prescribes that SDVOSBs
E:\FR\FM\08DER1.SGM
08DER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 234 (Tuesday, December 8, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 64615-64619]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-29081]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 300
[EPA-HQ-SFUND-1990-0011; FRL-9089-8]
National Oil and Hazardous Substance Pollution Contingency Plan;
National Priorities List
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct Final Notice of Deletion of the Kerr-McGee (Reed-Keppler
Park) (RKP) Superfund Site from the National Priorities List.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA, Region 5 is publishing a direct final Notice of Deletion
of the Kerr-McGee Reed-Keppler Park Superfund Site (Site), located in
West Chicago, Illinois, from the National Priorities List (NPL). The
NPL, promulgated pursuant to Section 105 of the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) of
1980, as amended, is an appendix to the National Oil and Hazardous
Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP). This direct final deletion
is being published by EPA with the concurrence of the State of
Illinois, through the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (IEPA),
because EPA has determined that all appropriate response actions under
CERCLA have been completed. However, this deletion does not preclude
future actions under Superfund.
DATES: This direct final deletion is effective February 8, 2010 unless
EPA receives adverse comments by January 7, 2010. If adverse comments
are received, EPA will publish a timely withdrawal of the direct final
deletion in the Federal Register informing the public that the deletion
will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID no. EPA-HQ-
SFUND-1990-0011, by one of the following methods:
E-mail: Timothy Fischer, Remedial Project Manager, at
timothy.fischer@epa.gov or Janet Pope, Community Involvement
Coordinator, at pope.janet@epa.gov.
Fax: Gladys Beard at (312) 886-4071.
Mail: Timothy Fischer, Remedial Project Manager, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (SR-6J), 77 W. Jackson Blvd., Chicago,
IL 60604, (312) 886-5787, or Janet Pope, Community Involvement
Coordinator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (SI-7J), 77 W.
Jackson Blvd., Chicago, IL 60604, (312) 353-0628 or 1-800-621-8431.
Hand delivery: Janet Pope, Community Involvement
Coordinator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (SI-7J), 77 West
Jackson Blvd., Chicago, IL 60604. Such deliveries are only accepted
during the docket's normal hours of operation, and special arrangements
should be made for deliveries of boxed information. The normal business
hours are Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.
Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID no. EPA-HQ-SFUND-
1990-0011. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the public docket without change and may be made available online at
https://
[[Page 64616]]
www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided,
unless the comment includes information claimed to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you consider to
be CBI or otherwise protected through https://www.regulations.gov or e-
mail. The https://www.regulations.gov Web site is an ``anonymous
access'' system, which means EPA will not know your identity or contact
information unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you
send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without going through https://www.regulations.gov, your e-mail address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the comment that is placed in the public docket
and made available on the Internet. If you submit an electronic
comment, EPA recommends that you include your name and other contact
information in the body of your comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you
submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties
and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA may not be able to
consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid the use of special
characters, any form of encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses.
Docket
All documents in the docket are listed in the https://www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information may not be publicly available, e.g., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material, will be publicly available only
in the hard copy. Publicly available docket materials are available
either electronically at https://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at:
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency--Region 5, 77 W. Jackson Blvd.,
Chicago, IL 60604, Hours: Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30
p.m., excluding Federal holidays.
West Chicago Public Library, 118 W. Washington St., West Chicago, IL
60185, Phone: (630) 231-1552, Hours: Monday through Thursday, 9 a.m. to
9 p.m.; Friday and Saturday, 9 a.m. to 5 p.m.; and Sundays until May, 1
p.m. to 5 p.m.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Timothy Fischer, Remedial Project
Manager, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (SR-6J), 77 W. Jackson
Blvd., Chicago, IL 60604, (312) 886-4737, fischer.timothy@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Introduction
II. NPL Deletion Criteria
III. Deletion Procedures
IV. Basis for Site Deletion
V. Deletion Action
I. Introduction
EPA Region 5 is publishing this direct final Notice of Deletion of
the Kerr-McGee Reed-Keppler Park (RKP) Superfund Site from the NPL. The
NPL constitutes Appendix B of 40 CFR part 300, which is the NCP, which
EPA promulgated pursuant to Section 105 of the CERCLA of 1980, as
amended. EPA maintains the NPL as the list of sites that appear to
present a significant risk to public health, welfare, or the
environment. Sites on the NPL may be the subject of remedial actions
financed by the Hazardous Substance Superfund (Fund). As described in
300.425(e)(3) of the NCP, sites deleted from the NPL remain eligible
for Fund-financed remedial actions if future conditions warrant such
actions.
Because EPA considers this action to be noncontroversial and
routine, this action will be effective February 8, 2010 unless EPA
receives adverse comments by January 7, 2010. Along with this direct
final Notice of Deletion, EPA is co-publishing a Notice of Intent to
Delete in the ``Proposed Rules'' section of the Federal Register. If
adverse comments are received within the 30-day public comment period
on this deletion action, EPA will publish a timely withdrawal of this
direct final Notice of Deletion before the effective date of the
deletion, and the deletion will not take effect. EPA will, as
appropriate, prepare a response to comments and continue with the
deletion process on the basis of the Notice of Intent to Delete and the
comments already received. There will be no additional opportunity to
comment.
Section II of this document explains the criteria for deleting
sites from the NPL. Section III discusses procedures that EPA is using
for this action. Section IV discusses the RKP Site and demonstrates how
it meets the deletion criteria. Section V discusses EPA's action to
delete the Site from the NPL unless adverse comments are received
during the public comment period.
II. NPL Deletion Criteria
The NCP establishes the criteria that EPA uses to delete sites from
the NPL. In accordance with 40 CFR 300.425(e), sites may be deleted
from the NPL where no further response is appropriate. In making such a
determination pursuant to 40 CFR 300.425(e), EPA will consider, in
consultation with the State, whether any of the following criteria have
been met:
i. Responsible parties or other persons have implemented all
appropriate response actions required;
ii. All appropriate Fund-financed response under CERCLA has been
implemented, and no further response action by responsible parties is
appropriate; or
iii. The remedial investigation has shown that the release poses no
significant threat to public health or the environment and, therefore,
the taking of remedial measures is not appropriate.
Pursuant to CERCLA Section 121(c) and the NCP, EPA conducts five-
year reviews to ensure the continued protectiveness of remedial actions
where hazardous substances, pollutants, or contaminants remain at a
site above levels that allow for unlimited use and unrestricted
exposure. EPA conducts such five-year reviews even if a site is deleted
from the NPL. EPA may initiate further action to ensure continued
protectiveness at a deleted site if new information becomes available
that indicates it is appropriate. Whenever there is a significant
release from a site deleted from the NPL, the deleted site may be
restored to the NPL without application of the hazard ranking system.
III. Deletion Procedures
The following procedures apply to deletion of the Site:
(1) EPA consulted with the State of Illinois prior to developing
this direct final Notice of Deletion and the Notice of Intent to Delete
co-published today in the ``Proposed Rules'' section of the Federal
Register.
(2) EPA has provided the State 30 working days for review of this
notice and the parallel Notice of Intent to Delete prior to their
publication today, and the State, through the Illinois Environmental
Protection Agency, has concurred on the deletion of the Site from the
NPL.
(3) Concurrently with the publication of this direct final Notice
of Deletion, a notice of the availability of the parallel Notice of
Intent to Delete is being published in a major local newspaper, The
Daily Herald. The newspaper notice announces the 30-day public comment
period concerning the Notice of Intent to Delete the Site from the NPL.
(4) EPA placed copies of documents supporting the proposed deletion
in the deletion docket and made these items available for public
inspection and copying at the Site information repositories identified
above.
[[Page 64617]]
(5) If adverse comments are received within the 30-day public
comment period on this deletion action, EPA will publish a timely
notice of withdrawal of this direct final Notice of Deletion before its
effective date and will prepare a response to comments and continue
with the deletion process on the basis of the Notice of Intent to
Delete and the comments already received.
Deletion of a site from the NPL does not itself create, alter, or
revoke any individual's rights or obligations. Deletion of a site from
the NPL does not in any way alter EPA's right to take enforcement
actions, as appropriate. The NPL is designed primarily for
informational purposes and to assist EPA management. Section
300.425(e)(3) of the NCP states that the deletion of a site from the
NPL does not preclude eligibility for future response actions, should
future conditions warrant such actions.
IV. Basis for Site Deletion
The following information provides EPA's rationale for deleting the
Site from the NPL.
Early site investigations at the RKP Site found elevated levels of
radioactive thorium in site soils. A removal action was conducted at
the RKP Site, and a Final Report for the RKP Site removal action was
submitted and approved by EPA in April 2002. This report documented
that all cleanup criteria for soils at the RKP Site had been
successfully achieved.
In September 2002, EPA issued a Record of Decision (ROD) for the
RKP Site which called for No Further Action, along with associated
groundwater monitoring for total uranium at the site.
A five-year review was completed on August 13, 2007, and the review
concluded that the site remedy was protective of human health and the
environment.
On January 28, 2008, EPA agreed that the remedial objective for
uranium in groundwater had been achieved, based upon five groundwater
sampling events between June 2006 and December 2007. On March 18, 2008,
the responsible parties completed abandonment of all site monitoring
wells. The Site has now achieved all remedial objectives.
Site Location
The Kerr-McGee Reed-Keppler Park Site is a 100-acre community park
located in the northwestern portion of West Chicago, DuPage County,
Illinois, about 30 miles west of Chicago, Illinois. The Kerr-McGee
Reed-Keppler Park Site is located north of National Street and west of
Arbor Avenue. The majority of the Kerr-McGee Reed-Keppler Park Site is
owned by the City of West Chicago, and is leased to and operated by the
West Chicago Park District (Park District) for use as a public
recreation area. The park is used for a variety of activities including
tennis, volleyball, soccer, and baseball/softball. The land use within
one mile of the site is primarily residential. The Park District's
Family Aquatic Center is also located in the northeast section of the
Reed-Keppler Park.
Site History
In the early 1900's, the RKP Site was mined as a quarry to provide
rock and embankment material for construction of the Chicago, Wheaton
and Western Railway (now the Illinois Prairie Path embankment owned by
Commonwealth Edison). This old quarry area was left as a topographic
low area and was subsequently used for solid waste (household and
commercial garbage) disposal from as early as 1939 until 1973. Among
the solid wastes found at the RKP Site were thorium mill tailings and
other process wastes generated at the West Chicago Rare Earths Facility
(REF), operated in West Chicago by Lindsay Light and Chemical Company,
and its successors, from 1934 until 1973. In 1967, Kerr-McGee Chemical
Corporation purchased the REF and maintained operations until the
facility was closed in 1973.
Several site investigations were conducted, and in 1996, EPA
determined that the level of contamination in the surface soils at the
RKP Site warranted a time-critical removal action and that removal
decision was documented in an Action Memorandum. The Action Memorandum
reported that the median level of soil contamination, based upon soil
samples collected at the RKP Site, was 286 picoCuries per gram (pCi/g)
of total radium, with the maximum exceeding 15,000 pCi/g. The Action
Memorandum concluded that contaminated soil should be removed until a
cleanup criterion of 5 pCi/g of total radium (radium-226 + radium-228)
over background was achieved. The background concentration for the RKP
Site was determined to be 2.2 pCi/g, thereby establishing the cleanup
criterion for the RKP Site at 7.2 pCi/g. The Action Memorandum, along
with an Action Criteria Document that explained the radiation cleanup
level, formed the basis for EPA's Unilateral Administrative Order
(UAO), which was issued to Kerr-McGee Chemical Corporation and the City
of West Chicago, Illinois, requiring removal activities at the RKP Site
to address the radioactive contamination and protect human health and
the environment.
A total of 114,652 loose cubic yards of contaminated soil and
debris were removed from the RKP Site between April 1997 and October
1999. The contaminated material was then shipped to the REF to be
physically separated. All contaminated material was then shipped to a
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) licensed disposal Site in Utah by
rail. Final restoration activities for the RKP Site were completed in
November 2000. A Final Report for the RKP removal action was submitted
to EPA in April 2002, which confirmed that the removal action met all
of the requirements and cleanup criteria specified in the Action
Memorandum and the Action Criterion Document for the RKP Site.
Remedial Investigation and Feasibility Study (RI/FS)
After the completion of the soil removal action at RKP, EPA
determined that all action necessary to protect human health and the
environment had been taken with respect to the soils at the RKP Site.
Due to an exceedance of the drinking water standard for uranium in one
monitoring well at the site, EPA required monitoring of nine wells at
the site. The EPA monitored these wells until sufficient data was
collected to insure that all groundwater concentrations were decreasing
and that the drinking water standard for uranium had been attained in
all the site wells.
Groundwater data were collected in 1994 and 1997 at the RKP Site as
part of investigation efforts at the site. Concentrations of total
dissolved uranium, elevated above background, were detected in wells 4
and 5 in October 1994. Wells 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 were subsequently
abandoned or removed from the site during excavation of contaminated
soil.
Kerr-McGee installed five new monitoring wells (1-5) at the RKP
Site in November 1997. Monitoring wells 7-9 were also subsequently
installed to replace some of the original Site wells that had been
removed as part of site excavation activities.
In August 2001, additional groundwater samples were collected from
the nine RKP monitoring wells to determine if residual groundwater
contamination levels achieved the remedial objective following
completion of the removal action at the RKP Site. One well (RKP-5)
exhibited concentrations of total uranium in exceedance of the drinking
water standard for total uranium in 40 CFR 141. This standard, also
known as the Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL), is
[[Page 64618]]
30 micrograms per liter ([mu]g/L) for total uranium. This corresponds
to a radioactivity level of about 27 picoCuries per liter (pCi/L). The
concentration of uranium in RKP-5 in August 2001 was 37.1 pCi/L. All of
the other RKP monitoring wells were in compliance with the MCL.
EPA cleanups conducted under CERCLA are legally required to comply
with all Applicable or Relevant and Appropriate Requirements (ARARs).
The MCLs in the Safe Drinking Water Act are considered an ARAR for all
CERCLA sites that overlie aquifers that are used, or may be reasonably
anticipated to be used, as a drinking water source in the future. EPA
promulgated the MCL for total uranium in 65 FR 76708, National Primary
Drinking Water Regulations, on December 7, 2000. The State of Illinois
has designated the groundwater aquifer underlying the RKP site and the
City of West Chicago as Class I--Potential Potable Groundwater Resource
in accordance with 35 Illinois Administrative Code (IAC) Part 620
Subpart B, Groundwater Classification for Class I Designation and IAC
Part 620 Subpart D, State of Illinois Groundwater Quality Standards.
Due to the exceedance of the drinking water standard for uranium in
monitoring well RKP-5, EPA required monitoring of the nine site wells
until sufficient data was collected to insure that all groundwater
concentrations were decreasing and that the drinking water standard for
uranium in 40 CFR Part 141 (30 [mu]g/L or 27 pCi/L) had been attained
in all site wells.
Record of Decision Findings
In September 2002, EPA issued a Record of Decision ROD for the RKP
Site which selected No Further Action, along with associated
groundwater monitoring for total uranium at the RKP Site. Due to the
exceedance of the drinking water standard for uranium at monitoring
well RKP-5, at the RKP Site, however, EPA required monitoring of the
nine site wells until sufficient data was collected to insure that all
groundwater concentrations were decreasing and that the drinking water
standard for uranium in 40 CFR Part 141 (30 [mu]g/L or 27 pCi/L) had
been attained in all site wells. When EPA issued the ROD, EPA did not
expect that active treatment of the groundwater underlying the RKP Site
would be required because:
(1) The removal action conducted from 1997 to 2000 by Kerr-McGee
removed the source of uranium contamination (the radioactively
contaminated subsurface soils below the water table at RKP Site).
Therefore, there was no continuing source of uranium in the subsurface
soil to be released to groundwater and cause the concentrations in
groundwater to increase.
(2) Only one of the nine wells at the RKP Site (RKP-5) exhibited
groundwater contamination above the MCL drinking water standard for
uranium (30 [mu]g/L or 27 pCi/L). Six of the nine RKP monitoring wells
were located in areas that were considered downgradient from the former
quarry and landfill areas at the site. RKP-5 was also sampled in
January 1998 and the concentration of uranium in the well at that time
was 7.43 pCi/L, which was below the MCL. RKP-5 was in compliance with
the MCL when it was sampled in 1998 and the result in August 2001 was
only marginally above the MCL. Consequently, there was a high
probability that the 37.1 pCi/L result was an isolated sample result
that would diminish within a reasonable time. In fact, beginning in
December 1997, a total of 15 samples have been collected from the nine
RKP groundwater wells, and the 37.1 pCi/L result from RKP-5 in August
2001 was the only exceedance of the MCL in the data set.
(3) Although EPA considered the shallow aquifer underlying and
surrounding the area of the RKP site a potential drinking water source,
the City of West Chicago prohibited the use of the groundwater by
residents and required its residents to abandon groundwater wells in
the City of West Chicago. In addition, the City of West Chicago
obtained its drinking water from nine municipal wells, two of which
were in the vicinity of the RKP Site. These wells are screened in a
deep aquifer system, which is separated from the shallow aquifer by a
Silurian dolomite and Maquoketa shale layer that inhibits the vertical
flow of groundwater from the upper aquifer to the underlying formation.
Therefore, it was extremely unlikely that contaminants in the upper
aquifer could migrate to the draw down zones of the City wells. Shallow
groundwater in the vicinity of the RKP Site is not used as a drinking
water source. There were no known conduits between the shallow and deep
aquifers, and no site related contaminants have been detected in any of
the nine City wells above background concentrations. Consequently,
there was no reason to believe that a complete pathway to human
receptors existed, nor was one expected to form given the City of West
Chicago's ordinance prohibiting the use of groundwater in the area.
Groundwater monitoring was conducted at the RKP Site from June 2006
until December 2007, when it was demonstrated that the MCL had been
achieved, and maintained, for three consecutive sampling events. On
January 28, 2008, EPA agreed that the remedial objective for uranium in
groundwater had been achieved and that monitoring well abandonment
could take place at the RKP Site. On March 18, 2008, Tronox (formerly
Kerr-McGee) completed abandonment of all RKP Site wells.
Cleanup Goals
Groundwater monitoring was performed at the RKP Site five times
between June 2006 and December 2007. The groundwater remedial objective
was to monitor ``to insure that future concentrations of uranium in the
RKP Site groundwater meet the MCL drinking water standard of 30 [mu]g/
L, or 27 pCi/L. It was decided that monitoring would continue until it
has been demonstrated that the MCLs have been achieved, and maintained,
for three consecutive sampling events.'' There were five sampling
events conducted between June 2006 and December 2007 and none of the
sample results exceeded the uranium concentration remedial goal of
30[mu]g/L. For this reason, EPA declared all response actions complete
for the RKP Site. The monitoring wells were subsequently abandoned in
March 2008, and there are no remaining physical remnants of the
response action at the RKP Site left on site.
Operation and Maintenance
There are no remaining operation and maintenance requirements for
the RKP Site. All response activities are complete and all physical
remnants have been removed.
Five-Year Review
One five-year review was completed for the RKP Site on August 13,
2007. The five-year review concluded that the site remedy was
protective of human health and the environment. The five-year review
recommended that some maintenance be conducted on site monitoring wells
if groundwater monitoring was to be conducted into the future. This
recommendation was no longer a concern after the remedial objective for
uranium in groundwater was achieved within one and a half years of the
beginning of monitoring in 2006. All RKP monitoring wells have since
been abandoned. No more five-year reviews will be conducted at the
site.
[[Page 64619]]
Community Involvement
Public participation activities have been satisfied as required in
CERCLA Section 113(k), 42 U.S.C. 9613(k), and CERCLA section 117, 42
U.S.C. 9617. Documents in the deletion docket which EPA relied on for
recommendation of the deletion of this site from the NPL are available
to the public in the information repositories and at
www.regulations.gov.
Determination That the Site Meets the Criteria for Deletion in the NCP
The NCP (40 CFR 300.425(e)) states that a site may be deleted from
the NPL when no further response action is appropriate. EPA, in
consultation with the State of Illinois, has determined that the
responsible parties have implemented all response actions required, and
no further response action by responsible parties is appropriate.
V. Deletion Action
EPA, with concurrence from State of Illinois through the Illinois
Environmental Protection Agency, has determined that all appropriate
response actions under CERCLA have been completed. Therefore, EPA is
deleting the Site from the NPL.
Because EPA considers this action to be noncontroversial and
routine, EPA is taking it without prior publication. This action will
be effective February 8, 2010 unless EPA receives adverse comments by
January 7, 2010. If adverse comments are received within the 30-day
public comment period, EPA will publish a timely withdrawal of this
direct final Notice of Deletion before the effective date of the
deletion, and it will not take effect. EPA will prepare a response to
comments and continue with the deletion process on the basis of the
notice of intent to delete and the comments already received. There
will be no additional opportunity to comment.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 300
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Chemicals,
Hazardous waste, Hazardous substances, Intergovernmental relations,
Penalties, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Superfund, Water
pollution control, Water supply.
Dated: November 20, 2009.
Bharat Mathur,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5.
0
For the reasons set out in this document, 40 CFR part 300 is amended as
follows:
PART 300--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 300 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1321(c)(2); 42 U.S.C. 9601-9657; E.O.
12777, 56 FR 54757, 3 CFR, 1991 Comp., p. 351; E.O. 12580, 52 FR
2923; 3 CFR, 1987 Comp., p. 193.
Appendix B--[Amended]
0
2. Table 1 of Appendix B to part 300 is amended by removing ``Kerr-
McGee (Reed Keppler Park)'', ``West Chicago'', ``IL''.
[FR Doc. E9-29081 Filed 12-7-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P