, 64304-64316 [X09-161207]
Download as PDF
64304
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 233 / Monday, December 7, 2009 / The Regulatory Plan
12866, and to develop regulations that
maximize aggregate net benefits to
society while minimizing the economic
and paperwork burdens imposed on
persons and businesses subject to those
regulations.
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
(TREAS)
Statement of Regulatory Priorities
The primary missions of the
Department of the Treasury are:
• To promote prosperous and stable
American and world economies,
including promoting domestic
economic growth and maintaining our
Nation’s leadership in global
economic issues, supervising national
banks and thrift institutions, and
helping to bring residents of
distressed communities into the
economic mainstream.
• To manage the Government’s finances
by protecting the revenue and
collecting the correct amount of
revenue under the Internal Revenue
Code, overseeing customs revenue
functions, financing the Federal
Government and managing its fiscal
operations, and producing our
Nation’s coins and currency.
• To safeguard the U.S. and
international financial systems from
those who would use these systems
for illegal purposes or to compromise
U.S. national security interests, while
keeping them free and open to
legitimate users.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
Consistent with these missions, most
regulations of the Department and its
constituent bureaus are promulgated to
interpret and implement the laws as
enacted by the Congress and signed by
the President. It is the policy of the
Department to comply with
requirements to issue a notice of
proposed rulemaking and carefully
consider public comments before
adopting a final rule. Also, in particular
cases, the Department invites interested
parties to submit views on rulemaking
projects while a proposed rule is being
developed.
In response to the events of
September 11, 2001, the President
signed the USA PATRIOT Act of 2001
into law on October 26, 2001. Since
then, the Department has accorded the
highest priority to developing and
issuing regulations to implement the
provisions in this historic legislation
that target money laundering and
terrorist financing. These efforts, which
will continue during the coming year,
are reflected in the regulatory priorities
of the Financial Crimes Enforcement
Network (FinCEN).
To the extent permitted by law, it is
the policy of the Department to adhere
to the regulatory philosophy and
principles set forth in Executive Order
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:10 Dec 04, 2009
Jkt 220001
Emergency Economic Stabilization Act
On October 3, 2008, the President
signed the Emergency Economic
Stabilization Act of 2008 (EESA) (Pub.
L. 110-334). Section 101(a) of EESA
authorizes the Secretary of the Treasury
to establish a Troubled Asset Relief
Program (TARP) to ‘‘purchase, and to
make and fund commitments to
purchase, troubled assets from any
financial institution, on such terms and
conditions as are determined by the
Secretary, and in accordance with this
Act and policies and procedures
developed and published by the
Secretary.’’
EESA provides authority to issue
regulations and guidance to implement
the program. Regulations and guidance
required by EESA include conflicts of
interest, executive compensation, and
tax guidance. The Secretary is also
charged with establishing a program
that will guarantee principal of, and
interest on, troubled assets originated or
issued prior to March 14, 2008.
The Department has issued guidance
and regulations and will continue to
provide program information through
the next year. Regulatory actions taken
to date include the following:
• Executive compensation. In October
2008, the Department issued an
interim final rule that set forth
executive compensation guidelines
for the TARP Capital Purchase
Program (73 FR 62205). Related tax
guidance on executive compensation
was announced in IRS Notice 200894. In addition, among other EESA tax
guidance, the IRS issued interim
guidance regarding loss corporation
and ownership changes in Notice
2008-100, providing that any shares of
stock owned by the Department of the
Treasury under the Capital Purchase
Program will not be considered to
cause Treasury’s ownership in such
corporation to increase. On June 15,
2009, the Department issued a revised
interim final rule that sets forth
executive compensation guidelines
for all TARP program participants (74
FR 28394), implementing
amendments to the executive
compensation provisions of EESA
made by the American Recovery and
Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Pub. L.1115). Public comments on the revised
interim final rule regarding executive
PO 00000
Frm 00164
Fmt 1260
Sfmt 1260
compensation were due by August 14,
2009 and will be considered as part of
the process of issuing a final rule on
this subject.
• Insurance program for trouble assets.
On October 14, 2008, the Department
released a request for public input on
an insurance program for troubled
assets.
• Conflicts of interest. On January 21,
2009, the Department issued an
interim final rule providing guidance
on conflicts of interest pursuant to
section 108 of EESA (74 FR 3431).
Comments on the interim final rule,
which were due by March 23, 2009,
will be considered as part of the
process of issuing a final rule.
During Fiscal Year 2010, the
Department will continue implementing
the EESA authorities to restore capital
flows to the consumers and businesses
that form the core of the nation’s
economy.
Terrorism Risk Insurance Program
Office
The Terrorism Risk Insurance Act of
2002 (TRIA) was signed into law on
November 26, 2002. The law, which was
enacted as a consequence of the events
of September 11, 2001, established a
temporary Federal reinsurance program
under which the Federal Government
shares the risk of losses associated with
certain types of terrorist acts with
commercial property and casualty
insurers. The Act, originally scheduled
to expire on December 31, 2005, was
extended to December 31, 2007 by the
Terrorism Risk Insurance Extension Act
of 2005 (TRIEA). The Act has since been
extended to December 31, 2014, by the
Terrorism Risk Insurance Program
Reauthorization Act of 2007 (TRIPRA).
The Office of the Assistant Secretary
for Financial Institutions is responsible
for developing and promulgating
regulations implementing TRIA, as
extended and amended by TRIEA and
TRIPRA. The Terrorism Risk Insurance
Program Office, which is part of the
Office of the Assistant Secretary for
Financial Institutions, is responsible for
operational implementation of TRIA.
The purposes of this legislation are to
address market disruptions, ensure the
continued widespread availability and
affordability of commercial property
and casualty insurance for terrorism
risk, and to allow for a transition period
for the private markets to stabilize and
build capacity while preserving State
insurance regulation and consumer
protections.
E:\FR\FM\07DER5.SGM
07DER5
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 233 / Monday, December 7, 2009 / The Regulatory Plan
Over the past year, the Office of the
Assistant Secretary has issued proposed
rules implementing changes authorized
by TRIA as revised by TRIPRA. The
following regulations should be
published by December 31, 2009:
• Recoupment of Federal Share of
Compensation for Insured Losses.
This final rule would implement and
establish requirements for
determining amounts to be recouped
and for procedures insurers are to use
for collecting terrorism policy
surcharges and remitting them to the
Treasury.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
• Cap on Annual Liability and Pro Rata
Share of Insured Losses. This final
rule would establish, for purposes of
the $100 billion cap on annual
liability, how Treasury will determine
whether aggregate insured losses will
exceed $100 billion and, if so, how
Treasury will determine the pro rata
share of insured losses to be paid by
each insurer that incurs insured losses
under the Program.
During 2010, Treasury will continue
the ongoing work of implementing TRIA
and carrying out revised operations as a
result of the TRIPRA related regulation
changes.
Customs Revenue Functions
On November 25, 2002, the President
signed the Homeland Security Act of
2002 (the Act), establishing the
Department of Homeland Security
(DHS). The Act transferred the United
States Customs Service from the
Department of the Treasury to the DHS,
where it is was known as the Bureau of
Customs and Border Protection (CBP).
Effective March 31, 2007, DHS changed
the name of the Bureau of Customs and
Border Protection to U.S. Customs and
Border Protection (CBP) pursuant to
section 872(a)(2) of the Act (6 USC
452(a)(2)) in a Federal Register notice
(72 FR 20131) published on April 23,
2007. Notwithstanding the transfer of
the Customs Service to DHS, the Act
provides that the Secretary of the
Treasury retains sole legal authority
over the customs revenue functions. The
Act also authorizes the Secretary of the
Treasury to delegate any of the retained
authority over customs revenue
functions to the Secretary of Homeland
Security. By Treasury Department Order
No. 100-16, the Secretary of the
Treasury delegated to the Secretary of
Homeland Security authority to
prescribe regulations pertaining to the
customs revenue functions. This Order
further provided that the Secretary of
the Treasury retained the sole authority
to approve any such regulations
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:10 Dec 04, 2009
Jkt 220001
concerning import quotas or trade bans,
user fees, marking, labeling, copyright
and trademark enforcement, and the
completion of entry or substance of
entry summary including duty
assessment and collection,
classification, valuation, application of
the U.S. Harmonized Schedules,
eligibility or requirements for
preferential trade programs and the
establishment of recordkeeping
requirements relating thereto.
During the past fiscal year, among the
Treasury-retained CBP customs-revenue
function regulations issued was an
interim rule to amend the regulatory
provisions relating to the requirement
under the United States-Bahrain FTA
(BFTA) that a good must be ‘‘imported
directly’’ from Bahrain to the United
States or from the United States to
Bahrain to qualify for preferential tariff
treatment. The change removed the
condition that a good passing through
the territory of an intermediate country
must remain under the control of the
customs authority of the intermediate
country. CBP plans to finalize this
rulemaking in the upcoming fiscal year.
In addition, during the past fiscal
year, CBP amended the regulations on
an interim basis to implement certain
provisions of the Tom Lantos Block
Burmese JADE (Junta’s Anti-Democratic
Efforts) Act of 2008 (Public Law 110286) (the ‘‘JADE Act’’) and Presidential
Proclamation 8294 of September 26,
2008, which includes new Additional
U.S. Note 4 to Chapter 71 of the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States (‘‘HTSUS’’). The interim
amendments prohibit the importation of
Burmese-covered articles of jadeite,
rubies and articles of jewelry containing
jadeite or rubies, and sets forth
restrictions for the importation of nonBurmese covered articles of jadeite,
rubies and articles of jewelry containing
jadeite or rubies.
As a result of last year’s ‘‘Farm Bill’’
legislation, CBP implemented interim
regulations on the Softwood Lumber Act
of 2008, which prescribed special entry
requirements as well as an importer
declaration program applicable to
certain softwood lumber (SWL) and
SWL products exported from any
country into the United States; CBP
plans to finalize the interim rule in the
upcoming fiscal year.
During fiscal year 2010, CBP and
Treasury plan to give priority to the
following regulatory matters involving
the customs revenue functions not
delegated to DHS:
PO 00000
Frm 00165
Fmt 1260
Sfmt 1260
64305
• Trade Act of 2002’s preferential trade
benefit provisions. Treasury and CBP
plan to finalize several interim
regulations that implement the trade
benefit provisions of the Trade Act of
2002 including the Caribbean Basin
Economic Recovery Act and the
African Growth and Opportunity Act.
• Free Trade Agreements. Treasury and
CBP also plan to finalize interim
regulations this fiscal year to
implement the preferential tariff
treatment provisions of the United
States-Singapore Free Trade
Agreement Implementation Act and
the Dominican Republic-Central
America-United States Free Trade
Agreement (also known as ‘‘CAFTADR’’) Implementation Act. Treasury
and CBP expect to issue interim
regulations implementing the United
States-Australia Free Trade
Agreement Implementation Act, the
United States-Oman Free Trade
Agreement Implementation Act, and
the United States-Peru Free Trade
Agreement Implementation Act.
• Country of Origin of Textile and
Apparel Products. Treasury and CBP
also plan to publish a final rule
adopting an interim rule that was
published on the Country of Origin of
Textile and Apparel Products, which
implemented the changes brought
about, in part, by the expiration of the
Agreement on Textile and Clothing
and the resulting elimination of
quotas on the entry of textile and
apparel products from World Trade
Organizations (WTO) members.
• North American Free Trade
Agreement country of origin rules.
Treasury and CBP are determining
how to proceed regarding a proposal
which was published in July 2008
seeking public comment regarding
uniform rules governing the
determination of the country of origin
of imported merchandise. The
proposal attracted considerable
interest from the trading community.
If finalized, the proposed
amendments would extend the
application of the North American
Free Trade Agreement country of
origin rules to all trade.
• Customs Modernization provisions of
the North American Free Trade
Implementation Act (Customs Mod
Act). Treasury and CBP also plan to
continue moving forward with
amendments to improve its regulatory
procedures began under the authority
granted by the Customs Mod Act.
These efforts, in accordance with the
principles of Executive Order 12866,
E:\FR\FM\07DER5.SGM
07DER5
64306
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 233 / Monday, December 7, 2009 / The Regulatory Plan
eligible development activities and to
have involved and will continue to
involve significant input from the
make equity investments in CDFIs.
importing public. CBP will also
• New Markets Tax Credit (NMTC)
continue to test new programs to see
Program. Through the NMTC
if they work before proceeding with
Program, the CDFI Fund will provide
proposed rulemaking to establish
allocations of tax credits to qualified
permanently the programs. Consistent
community development entities
with this practice, we expect to
(CDEs). The CDEs in turn provide tax
finalize a proposal to establish
credits to private sector investors in
permanently the remote location filing
exchange for their investment dollars;
program, which has been a test
investment proceeds received by the
program under the Customs Mod Act.
CDEs are be used to make loans and
This rule would allow remote location
equity investments in low-income
filing of electronic entries of
communities. The Fund administers
merchandise from a location other
the NMTC Program in coordination
than where the merchandise will
with the Office of Tax Policy and the
arrive. In addition, Treasury and CBP
Internal Revenue Service.
plan to finalize a proposal which was
• Financial Education and Counseling
published in August 2008 regarding
(FEC) Pilot Program. Through the FEC
the electronic payment and refund of
Pilot Program, the CDFI Fund will
quarterly harbor maintenance fees.
The rule would provide the trade with
provide grants to eligible
expanded electronic payment/refund
organizations to provide a range of
options for quarterly harbor
financial education and counseling
maintenance fees and would
services to prospective homebuyers.
modernize and enhance CBP’s port
The Fund will administer the FEC
use fee collection efforts.
Program in coordination with the
Office of Financial Education.
Community Development Financial
• Capital Magnet Fund (CMF). Through
Institutions Fund
the Capital Magnet Fund, the CDFI
The Community Development
Fund will provide competitively
Financial Institutions Fund (Fund) was
awarded grants to CDFIs and qualified
established by the Community
nonprofit housing organizations to
Development Banking and Financial
finance affordable housing and related
Institutions Act of 1994 (12 U.S.C. 4701
community development projects. In
et seq.). The primary purpose of the
FY 2010, the Fund expects to draft
Fund is to promote economic
and publish regulations to govern the
revitalization and community
application process, award selection,
development through the following
and compliance components of the
programs: the Community Development
CMF.
Financial Institutions (CDFI) Program,
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
the Bank Enterprise Award (BEA)
Program, the Native American CDFI
Assistance (NACA) Program, and the
New Markets Tax Credit (NMTC)
Program. In addition the Fund
administers the Financial Education and
Counseling Pilot Program (FEC) and the
Capital Magnet Fund (CMF).
In fiscal year (FY) 2010, subject to
funding availability, the Fund will
provide awards through the following
programs:
• Native American CDFI Assistance
(NACA) Program. Through the NACA
Program, the Fund will provide
technical assistance grants and
financial assistance awards to
promote the development of CDFIs
that serve Native American, Alaska
Native, and Native Hawaiian
communities.
• Bank Enterprise Award (BEA)
Program. Through the BEA Program,
the Fund will provide financial
incentives to encourage insured
depository institutions to engage in
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:10 Dec 04, 2009
Jkt 220001
Financial Crimes Enforcement Network
As chief administrator of the Bank
Secrecy Act (BSA), FinCEN’s
regulations constitute the core of the
Department’s anti-money laundering
and counter-terrorism financing
programmatic efforts. FinCEN’s
responsibilities and objectives are
linked to, and flow from, that role. In
fulfilling this role, FinCEN seeks to
enhance U.S. national security by
making the financial system
increasingly resistant to abuse by money
launderers, terrorists and their financial
supporters, and other perpetrators of
crime.
The Secretary of the Treasury,
through FinCEN, is authorized by the
BSA to issue regulations requiring
financial institutions to file reports and
keep records that are determined to
have a high degree of usefulness in
criminal, tax, or regulatory matters, or in
the conduct of intelligence or counterintelligence activities to protect against
international terrorism. Those
PO 00000
Frm 00166
Fmt 1260
Sfmt 1260
regulations also require designated
financial institutions to establish antimoney laundering programs and
compliance procedures. To implement
and realize its mission, FinCEN has
established regulatory objectives and
priorities to safeguard the financial
system from the abuses of financial
crime, including terrorist financing,
money laundering, and other illicit
activity. These objectives and priorities
include: (1) issuing, interpreting, and
enforcing compliance with regulations
implementing the BSA; (2) supporting,
working with, and, as appropriate,
overseeing compliance examination
functions delegated to other Federal
regulators; (3) managing the collection,
processing, storage, and dissemination
of data related to the BSA; (4)
maintaining a Government-wide access
service to that same data, and for
network users with overlapping
interests; (5) conducting analysis in
support of policymakers, law
enforcement, regulatory and intelligence
agencies, and the financial sector; and
(6) coordinating with and collaborating
on anti-terrorism and anti-money
laundering initiatives with domestic law
enforcement and intelligence agencies,
as well as foreign financial intelligence
units.
During fiscal year 2009, FinCEN
issued, or plans to issue, the following
regulatory actions:
• Currency Transaction Reporting
Exemptions. FinCEN published a
Final Rule that simplifies the existing
currency transaction reporting (CTR)
exemption regulatory requirements.
The amendments were recommended
by the Government Accountability
Office in GAO-08-355. By simplifying
the regulatory requirements regarding
CTR exemptions, FinCEN believes
that more depository institutions will
avail themselves of the exemptions.
The rule was finalized with an
effective date of January 5, 2009.
• Administrative Rulings. Prior to the
end of the fiscal year, FinCEN will
issue a final technical rule change to
update the Bank Secrecy Act
provisions to reflect that
Administrative Rulings are published
on the FinCEN Web site, rather than
in the Federal Register.
• Reorganization of BSA Rules. On
October 23, 2008, FinCEN issued a
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to redesignate and reorganize the BSA
regulations in a new chapter within
the Code of Federal Regulations. The
re-designation and reorganization of
the regulations in a new chapter is not
E:\FR\FM\07DER5.SGM
07DER5
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 233 / Monday, December 7, 2009 / The Regulatory Plan
intended to alter regulatory
requirements. The regulations will be
organized in a more consistent and
intuitive structure that more easily
allows financial institutions to
identify their specific regulatory
requirements under the BSA. The new
chapter will replace 31 CFR Part 103.
• Money Services Businesses. On May
12, 2009, FinCEN issued a Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking addressing
definitional thresholds for Money
Services Businesses (MSBs),
incorporating previously issued
Administrative Rules and guidance
with regard to MSBs, and addressing
the issue of foreign-located MSBs.
• Confidentiality of Suspicious Activity
Reports. On March 3, 2009, FinCEN
issued a Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking clarifying the nondisclosure provisions with respect to
the existing regulations pertaining to
the confidentiality of suspicious
activity reports (SARs). In conjunction
with this notice, FinCEN issued for
comment two guidance documents,
SAR Sharing with Affiliates for
depository institutions and SAR
Sharing with Affiliates for securities
and futures industry entities, to solicit
comment permitting certain financial
institutions to share SARs with their
U.S. affiliates that are also subject to
SAR reporting requirements.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
• Mutual Funds. On June 5, 2009,
FinCEN issued a Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking addressing the definition
of financial institution in the BSA’s
implementing regulations to include
open-end investment companies
(mutual funds). Despite the fact that
mutual funds are already required to
comply with anti-money laundering
and customer identification program
requirements, file SARs, comply with
due diligence obligations pursuant to
rules implementing section 312 of the
USA PATRIOT Act, and perform
other BSA compliance functions, a
mutual fund is not designated as a
‘financial institution’ under the BSA
implementing regulations. The
proposed rule would address
obligations to file Currency
Transaction Reports for cash
transactions over $10,000 in lieu of
current obligations to file Form 8300s.
• Non-Bank Residential Mortgage
Lenders and Originators. On July 21,
2009, FinCEN issued an Advance
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
(ANPRM) to solicit public comment
on a wide range of questions
pertaining to the possible application
of anti-money laundering (AML)
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:10 Dec 04, 2009
Jkt 220001
program and suspicious activity
report regulations to a specific sub-set
of loan and finance companies, i.e.,
non-bank residential mortgage lenders
and originators
• Expansion of Special Information
Sharing Procedures (pursuant to
section 314(a) of the BSA). Prior to the
end of the fiscal year, FinCEN will
issue a Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking to amend the BSA
regulations to allow certain foreign
law enforcement agencies, State and
local law enforcement agencies, and
FinCEN itself to submit requests for
information to financial institutions.
• Withdrawal of Proposed Rules. On
October 30, 2008, FinCEN withdrew
the proposed rules (issued in 2002
and 2003) for investment advisers,
commodity trading advisors, and
unregistered investment companies.
The proposed rules were withdrawn
to eliminate uncertainty associated
with the existence of out-of-date
proposed rules, and to allow FinCEN
to issue new notices of proposed
rulemaking at a later date that take
into account industry regulatory
developments with respect to
investment advisers, commodity
trading advisors, and unregistered
investment companies since 2003.
• Renewal of Existing Rules. FinCEN
renewed without change the
information collections associated
with the existing regulations requiring
money services businesses, mutual
funds, operators of credit card
systems, dealers in precious metals,
precious stones, or jewels, and certain
insurance companies to develop and
implement written anti-money
laundering programs. Also, FinCEN
renewed without change the
information collections associated
with the existing regulations requiring
futures commission merchants,
introducing brokers in commodities,
banks, savings associations, credit
unions, certain non-federally
regulated banks, mutual funds, and
securities broker-dealers to develop
and implement customer
identification programs.
• Administrative Rulings and Written
Guidance. FinCEN issued 10
Administrative Rulings and written
guidance pieces (as of August 2009)
interpreting the BSA and providing
clarity to regulated industries.
FinCEN’s regulatory priorities for
fiscal year 2010 include finalizing the
proposed initiatives mentioned above,
as well as the following projects:
PO 00000
Frm 00167
Fmt 1260
Sfmt 1260
64307
• Anti-Money Laundering Programs.
Pursuant to section 352 of the USA
PATRIOT Act, certain financial
institutions are required to establish
AML programs. Continued from fiscal
year 2009, FinCEN will propose a
rulemaking to require state-chartered
credit unions and other depository
institutions without a federal
functional regulator to implement
AML programs. With the added
information from the ANPRM
regarding non-bank residential
mortgage lenders or originators,
FinCEN will research and analyze
issues regarding potential regulation
of the loan and finance industry, and
may issue proposed rulemaking with
regard to non-bank residential
mortgage lenders and originators.
Finally, FinCEN also will continue to
consider regulatory options regarding
certain corporate and trust service
providers.
• Regulatory Framework for Stored
Value. The Credit Card
Accountability, Responsibility, and
Disclosure Act (CARD Act) of 2009
(Section 503) requires FinCEN to
issue a final rule ‘‘regarding issuance,
sale, redemption, or international
transport of stored value’’ by midFebruary 2010. This act has imposed
a timetable to activities that were
already underway. Just prior to the
enactment of the CARD Act, FinCEN
issued a Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking clarifying the
applicability of BSA regulations with
respect to MSB activities. As part of
this Notice of Proposed Rulemaking,
FinCEN solicited comment on the
treatment of stored value as money
transmission under FinCEN’s
regulations. In the accelerated
rulemaking environment resulting
from the CARD Act, FinCEN is
consulting with law enforcement and
other regulators with the intent to
issue a Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking and then a Final Rule to
meet the established deadline. FBAR
Requirements. FinCEN will work with
the IRS and other pertinent offices
within the Department of the Treasury
to issue a Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking with regard to revising
the regulations governing the filing of
Reports of Foreign Bank and Financial
Accounts (FBARs). Among other
things, FinCEN and the IRS will seek
comments regarding when a person
with signature authority over, but no
financial interest in, a foreign
financial account should be relieved
of filing an FBAR for the account, and
when an interest in a foreign entity
E:\FR\FM\07DER5.SGM
07DER5
64308
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 233 / Monday, December 7, 2009 / The Regulatory Plan
(e.g., a corporation, partnership, trust
or estate) should be subject to FBAR
reporting.
Other Requirements. FinCEN will
continue to consider regulatory action
in conjunction with the feasibility study
prepared pursuant to the Intelligence
Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of
2004 concerning the issue of obtaining
information about certain cross-border
funds transfers and transmittals of
funds. FinCEN also will continue to
issue proposed and final rules pursuant
to Section 311 of the USA PATRIOT
Act, as appropriate. Finally, FinCEN
expects to propose various technical
and other regulatory amendments in
conjunction with its ongoing,
comprehensive review of existing
regulations to enhance regulatory
efficiency.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
Internal Revenue Service
The Internal Revenue Service (IRS),
working with the Office of the Assistant
Secretary (Tax Policy), promulgates
regulations that interpret and
implement the Internal Revenue Code
and related tax statutes. The purpose of
these regulations is to carry out the tax
policy determined by Congress in a fair,
impartial, and reasonable manner,
taking into account the intent of
Congress, the realities of relevant
transactions, the need for the
Government to administer the rules and
monitor compliance, and the overall
integrity of the Federal tax system. The
goal is to make the regulations practical
and as clear and simple as possible.
Most IRS regulations interpret tax
statutes to resolve ambiguities or fill
gaps in the tax statutes. This includes
interpreting particular words, applying
rules to broad classes of circumstances,
and resolving apparent and potential
conflicts between various statutory
provisions.
During fiscal year 2010, the IRS will
accord priority to the following
regulatory projects:
• Deduction and Capitalization of Costs
for Tangible Assets. Section 162 of the
Internal Revenue Code allows a
current deduction for ordinary and
necessary expenses paid or incurred
in carrying on any trade or business.
Under section 263(a) of the Code, no
immediate deduction is allowed for
amounts paid out for new buildings or
for permanent improvements or
betterments made to increase the
value of any property or estate. Those
expenditures are capital expenditures
that generally may be recovered only
in future taxable years, as the property
is used in the taxpayer’s trade or
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:10 Dec 04, 2009
Jkt 220001
business. It often is not clear whether
an amount paid to acquire, produce,
or improve property is a deductible
expense or a capital expenditure.
Although existing regulations provide
that a deductible repair expense is an
expenditure that does not materially
add to the value of the property or
appreciably prolong its life, the IRS
and Treasury believe that additional
clarification is needed to reduce
uncertainty and controversy in this
area. In August 2006, the IRS and
Treasury issued proposed regulations
in this area and received numerous
comments. In March 2008, the IRS
and Treasury withdrew the 2006
proposed regulations and issued new
proposed regulations, which have
generated relatively few comments.
The IRS and Treasury intend to
finalize those regulations.
• Arbitrage Investment Restrictions on
Tax-Exempt Bonds. The arbitrage
investment restrictions on tax-exempt
bonds under section 148 generally
limit issuers from investing bond
proceeds higher-yielding investments.
Treasury and the IRS plan to issue
proposed regulations to address
selected current issues involving the
arbitrage restrictions, including
clarification of the issue price
definition used in the computation of
bond yield, clarification and
simplification of the rules regarding
modifications and terminations of
qualified hedging transactions,
guidance on the treatment of working
capital financing, and selected other
issues.
• Tax Credit Bonds. Tax credit bonds
are bonds in which the holder
receives a federal tax credit in lieu of
some or all of the interest on the
bond. The American Recovery and
Reinvestment Act of 2009 created a
number of new types of tax credit
bonds and modified the law as it
concerned several existing types of
tax credit bonds. The IRS and
Treasury intend to provide guidance
on numerous legal issues concerning
tax credit bonds and to develop clear
guidelines for the IRS Tax Exempt
Bond enforcement program.
• Build America Bonds. Treasury and
the IRS plan to issue proposed
regulations to provide guidance on
interpretative issues that have arisen
in implementing the broad new Build
America Bond program in section
54AA under the American Recovery
and Reinvestment Act of 2009.
• Private Activity Bonds. Treasury and
the IRS to issue final regulations on
PO 00000
Frm 00168
Fmt 1260
Sfmt 1260
allocation and accounting rules for
application of the private business
restrictions on tax-exempt
governmental bonds under section
141. These regulations will include
guidance on public-private
partnerships and mixed use
arrangements in which projects are
used in part by State and local
governments and in part by private
businesses. These regulations will
finalize 2006 proposed regulations
with modifications in consideration of
the public comments.
• Guidance on the Tax Treatment of
Distressed Debt. Recent events in the
financial markets have highlighted a
number of unresolved tax issues
relating to the amount, character, and
timing of income, expense, gain, or
loss on distressed debt. In addition,
the tax treatment of distressed debt,
including distressed debt that has
been modified, may affect the
qualification of certain entities for tax
purposes or result in additional taxes
on the investors in such entities, such
as regulated investment companies,
real estate investment trusts, and real
estate mortgage investment conduits.
During fiscal year 2009, Congress,
Treasury, and the IRS have addressed
some of these issues through statutory
changes and published guidance.
Treasury and the IRS plan to address
more of these issues in published
guidance.
• Classification of Series LLCs and Cell
Companies. Series LLCs were first
introduced in Delaware in 1996, and
since then, series LLC statutes have
been adopted in several other states.
These statutes typically permit the
entity to segregate assets and
liabilities and to associate certain
members with specified assets and
liabilities. In the insurance and
foreign arena, similar entities are
sometimes referred to as cell
companies. In Notice 2008-19, the IRS
requested comments on when a cell of
a protected cell company should be
treated as a separate insurance
company for federal income tax
purposes. The IRS also requested
comments on similar segregated
arrangements, such as series LLCs that
do not involve insurance. It is likely
that, over time, the use of series LLCs
and cell companies will increase.
Accordingly, it is important to
provide timely guidance to clarify the
classification and other tax treatment
of this new form of organization.
Guidance has been requested on the
federal tax classification of these
domestic and foreign entities. The IRS
E:\FR\FM\07DER5.SGM
07DER5
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 233 / Monday, December 7, 2009 / The Regulatory Plan
and Treasury intend to issue guidance
that will address the characterization
of domestic and foreign series and
cells for federal tax purposes.
• Elective Deferral of Certain Business
Discharge of Indebtedness Income. In
the recent economic downturn, many
business taxpayers realized income as
a result of modifying the terms of
their outstanding indebtedness or
refinancing on terms subjecting them
to less risk of default. The American
Recovery and Reinvestment Act of
2009 includes a special relief
provision allowing for the elective
deferral of certain discharge of
indebtedness income realized in 2009
and 2010. The provision, section
108(i) of the Code, is complicated and
many of the details will have to be
supplied through regulatory guidance.
This guidance will have to be
provided expeditiously so taxpayers
will be able to evaluate the benefits of
electing deferral. Treasury and the IRS
recently issued Revenue Procedure
2009-37 that prescribes the procedure
for making the election. The IRS and
Treasury intend to issue additional
guidance on such issues as the types
of indebtedness eligible for the relief,
acceleration of deferred amounts, the
operation of the provision in the
context of flow-through entities, the
treatment of the discharge for the
purpose of computing earnings and
profits, and the operation of a
provision of the statute deferring
original issue discount deductions
with respect to related refinancings.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
• Rules under the Pension Protection
Act of 2006 and Other RetirementRelated Guidance. Significant new
rules regarding the funding of
qualified defined benefit pension
plans were enacted as part of the
Pension Protection Act of 2006 (PPA).
The IRS and Treasury prioritized the
various pieces of guidance required to
comply with those rules. The IRS and
Treasury intend to issue additional
guidance on the provisions of the PPA
related to funding. In addition, the
IRS and Treasury will be issuing
various items of administrative
guidance that facilitate or enhance
retirement savings and security.
• Withholding on Government
Payments for Property and Services.
Section 3402(t) was added to the
Internal Revenue Code by the Tax
Increase Prevention and
Reconciliation Act of 2005 (TIPRA).
Section 3402(t) requires all Federal,
State and local Government entities
(except for certain small State entities)
to deduct and withhold an income tax
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:10 Dec 04, 2009
Jkt 220001
equal to 3 percent from all payments
(with certain enumerated exceptions)
the Government entity makes for
property or services. Section 3402(t)
will be effective with respect to
payments made after December 31,
2011. On March 11, 2008, the IRS
issued Notice 2008-38 soliciting
public comments regarding guidance
to be provided to Federal, State and
local governments required to
withhold under section 3402(t). After
considering the many comments, the
IRS and Treasury issued a Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking, which was
published in the Federal Register on
December 4, 2008. A hearing on the
proposed regulations was held on
April 16, 2009, and the IRS has
received 168 comments from
stakeholders on the proposed
regulations. The IRS and Treasury are
considering the comments and intend
to issue final regulations.
• Information Reporting of Basis by
Brokers and Others. Section 403 of
the Energy Improvement and
Extension Act of 2008 (Pub. L. No.
110-343) enacted on October 3, 2008,
amended section 6045 to require
brokers to report both the basis and
gross proceeds of securities sold by
customers. Form 1099-B is used for
this purpose. Basis reporting generally
will be required for stock acquired
after December 31, 2010. Basis
reporting will be required for debt
securities, such as bonds, acquired
after December 31, 2012. The
legislation also imposed basis
reporting requirements on others in
certain circumstances. The IRS and
Treasury intend to issue proposed and
final regulations under to address
these new reporting requirements.
• Information Reporting Concerning
Payment Card Transactions. Section
6050W was added to the Internal
Revenue Code by the Housing
Assistance Tax Act of 2008, enacted
on July 30, 2008. Section 6050W
requires information returns to be
made for each calendar year
beginning after December 31, 2010, by
merchant-acquiring entities and thirdparty settlement organizations with
respect to payment card transactions
and third-party payment network
transactions occurring in that
calendar year. Certain payment card
transactions subject to information
reporting under section 6050W are
subject to backup withholding if the
payee has not provided a valid
taxpayer identification number (TIN).
Announcement 2009-6, 2009-9 IRB
643 (Feb. 6, 2009), advised section
PO 00000
Frm 00169
Fmt 1260
Sfmt 1260
64309
6050W filers that they may participate
in the TIN matching program under
the procedures established in Rev.
Proc. 2003-9, 2003-1 C.B. 516, which
permits program participants to verify
the payee TINs required to be
reported on information returns and
payee statements. Notice 2009-19,
2009-10 IRB 660 (Feb. 20, 2009),
requested public comments regarding
guidance to be provided to payment
settlement entities and other affected
persons concerning the new
requirements under section 6050W.
The IRS and Treasury intend to issue
proposed and final regulations under
sections 6050W to address these
requirements.
• Withholding Tax and the Role of
Financial Intermediaries. In 1997 the
IRS and Treasury issued regulations
under the section 1441 provisions for
withholding tax on certain items of
portfolio investment income from
U.S. sources. The qualified
intermediary (QI) system was a key
element. In October 2008 the IRS
issued Announcement 2008-98
concerning proposed amendments to
the qualified intermediary agreements
and rules to address early notice of
failures of internal controls,
evaluation of risk that foreign
accounts may be subject to control by
U.S. persons, and association of a U.S.
auditor to the oversight of QI
performance. The IRS and Treasury
intend to issue regulations to address
these various areas of compliance
involving the withholding taxes on
portfolio investment income.
• Foreign Bank Account Reporting
(FBAR). In May 2009 the Treasury
issued budget proposals for Fiscal
Year 2010 which included proposed
legislation to address FBAR related
issues. In August 2009, the IRS and
Treasury issued Notice 2009-62
providing an extension until June 30,
2010 to file FBARs for 2008 and
earlier calendar years, pending the
preparation of further guidance. The
IRS and Treasury intend to issue
regulations to address these FBAR
issues.
Office of the Comptroller of the
Currency
The Office of the Comptroller of the
Currency (OCC) was created by
Congress to charter national banks, to
oversee a nationwide system of banking
institutions, and to assure that national
banks are safe and sound, competitive
and profitable, and capable of serving in
the best possible manner the banking
needs of their customers.
E:\FR\FM\07DER5.SGM
07DER5
64310
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 233 / Monday, December 7, 2009 / The Regulatory Plan
The OCC seeks to assure a banking
system in which national banks soundly
manage their risks, maintain the ability
to compete effectively with other
providers of financial services, meet the
needs of their communities for credit
and financial services, comply with
laws and regulations, and provide fair
access to financial services and fair
treatment of their customers.
Significant rules issued during fiscal
year 2009 include:
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
• Fair Credit Reporting, Accuracy and
Integrity of Information Furnished to
Consumer Reporting Agencies (12
CFR Part 41). The banking agencies,1
the National Credit Union
Administration (NCUA), and the
Federal Trade Commission (FTC)
issued a joint final rule to implement
section 312 of the FACT Act. Section
312 requires the issuance of
guidelines regarding the accuracy and
integrity of information entities
furnish to a consumer reporting
agency (CRA). Section 312 also
requires the issuance of regulations
requiring entities that furnish
information to a CRA to establish
reasonable policies and procedures
for the implementation of the
guidelines. In addition, section 312
requires jointly prescribed regulations
that identify the circumstances under
which a furnisher of information to a
CRA shall be required to investigate a
dispute concerning the accuracy of
information contained in a consumer
report based on the consumer’s direct
request to the furnisher. A final rule
was issued on July 1, 2009 (74 FR
31484).
• Risk-Based Capital Guidelines;
Capital Adequacy Guidelines; Capital
Maintenance; Capital – Residential
Mortgage Loans Modified Pursuant to
the Home Affordable Program (12
CFR Part 3). In order to support and
facilitate the timely implementation
of the Home Affordable Program
(Program) announced by the U.S.
Department of Treasury and to
promote the stability of banking
organizations and the financial
system, the banking agencies issued
an interim final rule providing that a
residential mortgage loan (whether a
first-lien or a second-lien loan)
modified under the Program will
retain the risk weight assigned to the
loan prior to the modification, so long
as the loan continues to meet other
1 Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, Board
of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Federal
Deposit Insurance Corporation, and Office of Thrift
Supervision.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:10 Dec 04, 2009
Jkt 220001
relevant supervisory criteria. The rule
minimizes disincentives to bank
participation in the Program that
could otherwise result from agencies’
regulatory capital regulations. The
banking agencies believe that this
treatment is appropriate in light of the
overall important public policy
objectives of promoting sustainable
loan modifications for at-risk
homeowners that balance the interests
of borrowers, servicers, and investors.
Joint agency action is essential to
ensure that the regulatory capital
consequences of participation in the
Program are the same for all
commercial banks and thrifts. An
interim final rule was issued on June
30, 2009. (74 FR 31160).
• Registration of Mortgage Loan
Originators (12 CFR Part 34). The
banking agencies, the NCUA, and
Farm Credit Administration (FCA)
proposed amendments to their rules
to implement the S.A.F.E. Mortgage
Licensing Act of 2008, Title V of the
Housing and Economic Recovery Act
of 2008, P.L. 110-289. These
amendments require an employee of a
depository institution, an employee of
a depository institution subsidiary
regulated by a Federal banking
agency, or an employee of an
institution regulated by the FCA that
engages in the business of a mortgage
loan originator to register with the
Nationwide Mortgage Licensing
System and Registry (NMLSR) and to
obtain a unique identifier. These
amendments also provide that these
institutions must require their
employees who act as mortgage loan
originators to comply with this Act’s
registration and unique identifier
requirements and must adopt and
follow written policies and
procedures to assure compliance with
these requirements. A notice of
proposed rulemaking was issued on
June 9, 2009 (74 FR 27386). The OCC
has included this rulemaking project
in the Regulatory Plan (1557-AD23).
• Risk-Based Capital Guidelines —
Money Market Mutual Funds (12 CFR
Part 3). On September 19, 2008, the
Board of Governors of the Federal
Reserve System adopted the AssetBacked Commercial Paper Money
Market Mutual Fund Liquidity
Facility (the ‘‘AMLF’’ or ‘‘ABCP
Lending Facility’’) which enables
depository institutions and bank
holding companies to borrow from the
Federal Reserve Bank of Boston on a
nonrecourse basis if they use the
proceeds of the loan to purchase
certain asset-backed commercial
PO 00000
Frm 00170
Fmt 1260
Sfmt 1260
paper (ABCP) from money market
mutual funds. The purpose of this
action was to reduce strains being
experienced by money market mutual
funds. To facilitate national bank
participation in the program, the OCC
adopted on September 19, 2008,2 on
an interim final basis, an exemption
from its risk-based capital guidelines
for ABCP held by a national bank as
a result of its participation in this
program. The AMLF was set to expire
on January 30, 2009. However, to
encourage the stability of money
market mutual funds, the program has
been extended. This rule finalizes the
risk-based capital exemption and
extends the risk-based capital
exemption to ABCP purchased
beyond the original January 30, 2009
date. This final rule applies the riskbased capital exemption to any ABCP
purchased as a result of a national
bank’s participation in the facility.
The risk-based capital exemption will
continue to apply if the AMLF has not
expired. A final rule was issued on
March 27, 2009 (74 FR 13336).
• Minimum Capital Ratios; Capital
Adequacy Guidelines; Capital
Maintenance; Capital: Deduction of
Goodwill Net of Associated Deferred
Tax Liability (12 CFR Part 3). The
banking agencies issued a final rule to
allow their institutions to elect to
reduce the amount of goodwill that a
bank must deduct from tier 1 capital
by the amount of any deferred tax
liability associated with that goodwill.
This treatment is currently permitted
only in the case of goodwill acquired
in a nontaxable purchase business
combination. This change effectively
reduces the amount of goodwill that
a bank must deduct from tier 1 capital
and reflects a bank’s maximum
effective exposure to loss in the event
that such goodwill is impaired or
derecognized for financial reporting
purposes. A final rule was issued on
December 30, 2008 (74 FR 79602).
• Standards Governing the Release of a
Suspicious Activity Report (12 CFR
Part 4). The OCC proposed to revise
its regulations governing the release of
non-public OCC information set forth
in 12 CFR part 4, subpart C. The
proposal would clarify that the OCC’s
decision to release a suspicious
activity report (SAR) will be governed
by the standards set forth in proposed
amendments to the OCC’s SAR
regulation, 12 CFR 21.11(k), that are
part of a separate, but simultaneously
issued, rulemaking. A notice of
2
73 FR 55704 (September 26, 2008).
E:\FR\FM\07DER5.SGM
07DER5
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 233 / Monday, December 7, 2009 / The Regulatory Plan
proposed rulemaking was published
on March 9, 2009 (74 FR 10136).
• Confidentiality of Suspicious Activity
Reports (12 CFR Part 21). The OCC
proposed to amend its regulations
implementing the Bank Secrecy Act
governing the confidentiality of a
suspicious activity report (SAR) to:
clarify the scope of the statutory
prohibition on the disclosure by a
national bank of a SAR; address the
statutory prohibition on the
disclosure by the government of a
SAR as that prohibition applies to the
OCC’s standards governing the
disclosure of SARs; clarify that the
exclusive standard applicable to the
disclosure of a SAR, or any
information that would reveal the
existence of a SAR, by the OCC is ‘‘to
fulfill official duties consistent with
the purposes of the BSA’’; and modify
the safe harbor provision in its rules
to include changes made by the USA
PATRIOT Act. This proposal is based
upon a similar proposal issued
simultaneously by the Financial
Crimes Enforcement Network
(FinCEN). A notice of proposed
rulemaking was published on March
9, 2009 (74 FR 10130).
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
• Community and Economic
Development Entities, Community
Development Projects, and Other
Public Welfare Investments (12 CFR
Part 24). The OCC adopted without
change the interim final rule, issued
on August 11, 2008, which
implemented the statutory change to
national banks’ community
development investment authority
made in the Housing and Economic
Recovery Act of 2008 (HERA). The
OCC also revised Appendix 1 to part
24, the CD-1 National Bank
Community Development (Part 24)
Investments Form, to make technical
changes that are consistent with the
HERA provision and the revised
regulation. Section 2503 of the HERA
revised the community development
investment authority in section
24(Eleventh) to restore a national
bank’s authority to make investments
designed primarily to promote the
public welfare. A final rule was
published on April 7, 2009 (74 FR
15657).
• Community Reinvestment Act
Regulations (12 CFR Part 25). On
August 14, 2008, the Higher
Education Opportunity Act (HEOA)
was enacted into law. Section 1031 of
the HEOA revised the Community
Reinvestment Act (CRA) to require the
banking agencies, when evaluating a
bank’s record of meeting community
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:10 Dec 04, 2009
Jkt 220001
credit needs, to consider, as a factor,
low-cost education loans provided by
the bank to low-income borrowers.
The banking agencies issued a
proposal that would implement
section 1031 of the HEOA. In
addition, the proposal would
incorporate into the banking agencies’
rules statutory language that allows
them to consider as a factor when
evaluating a bank’s record of meeting
community credit needs capital
investment, loan participation, and
other ventures undertaken by
nonminority- and nonwomen-owned
financial institutions in cooperation
with minority- and women-owned
financial institutions and low-income
credit unions. A notice of proposed
rulemaking was published on June 30,
2009 (74 FR 31209).
The OCC’s regulatory priorities for
fiscal year 2010 include the following:
• Risk-Based Capital Guidelines;
Capital Adequacy Guidelines; Capital
Maintenance: Regulatory Capital;
Impact of Modifications to Generally
Accepted Accounting Principles;
Consolidation of Asset-Backed
Commercial Paper Programs; and
Other Related Issues (12 CFR Part 3).
The banking agencies issued a notice
of proposed rulemaking to: (i) modify
their general risk-based capital
standards and advanced risk-based
capital adequacy frameworks to
eliminate the exclusion of certain
consolidated asset-backed commercial
paper programs from risk-weighted
assets; and (ii) provide a reservation
of authority in their general risk-based
capital standards to permit the
agencies’ to require banking
organizations to treat structures that
are not consolidated under accounting
standards as if they were consolidated
for risk-based capital purposes
commensurate with the risk
relationship of the banking
organization to the structure. The
banking agencies also requested
comment on the effect on regulatory
capital requirements of the
consolidation of assets required by the
Financial Accounting Standard
Board’s (FASB) recent issuance of
Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 166, Accounting for
Transfers of Financial Assets, an
Amendment of FASB Statement No.
140 and Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 167,
Amendments to FASB Interpretation
No. 46(R). A notice of proposed
rulemaking was published on
September 15, 2009 (74 FR 47138).
PO 00000
Frm 00171
Fmt 1260
Sfmt 1260
64311
• Risk-Based Capital Guidelines;
Capital Adequacy Guidelines; Capital
Maintenance: Basel II Standardized
Approach (12 CFR Part 3). As part of
the banking agencies’ ongoing efforts
to develop and refine the capital
standards to enhance their risk
sensitivity and ensure the safety and
soundness of the banking system, they
issued a notice of proposed
rulemaking to amend various
provisions of the capital rules on July
29, 2008, at 73 FR 43982. The changes
involve amending the current capital
rules for those banks that will not be
subject to the advanced internal
ratings-based approaches. Work on a
final rule is underway.
• Risk-Based Capital Standards: Market
Risk (12 CFR Part 3). The banking
agencies plan to issue a second notice
of proposed rulemaking to amend the
market risk capital requirements for
national banks. The banking agencies
issued a notice of proposed
rulemaking on September 25, 2006
(71 FR 55958). The rule would make
the current market risk capital
requirements generally more risk
sensitive with respect to the capital
treatment of trading activities in
banks and bank holding companies.
• Interagency Proposal for Model
Privacy Form under Gramm-LeachBliley Act (12 CFR Part 40). The
banking agencies, along with the
NCUA, FTC, the Commodity Futures
Trading Commission, and the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC), issued a joint notice of
proposed rulemaking pursuant to
section 728 of the Financial Services
Regulatory Relief Act of 2006 (Pub. L.
109-351) on March 29, 2007 (72 FR
14940). Specifically, a safe harbor
model privacy form was proposed
that financial institutions may use to
provide the disclosures under the
privacy rules. After further consumer
testing of this model form, the SEC
published for comment in the Federal
Register a report analyzing this testing
on April 20, 2009. 74 FR 17925. The
final rule will be published in
November 2009.
Office of Thrift Supervision
As the primary Federal regulator of
the thrift industry, the Office of Thrift
Supervision (OTS) has established
regulatory objectives and priorities to
supervise thrift institutions effectively
and efficiently. These objectives include
maintaining and enhancing the safety
and soundness of the thrift industry; a
flexible, responsive regulatory structure
that enables savings associations to
E:\FR\FM\07DER5.SGM
07DER5
64312
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 233 / Monday, December 7, 2009 / The Regulatory Plan
provide credit and other financial
services to their communities,
particularly housing mortgage credit;
and a risk-focused, timely approach to
supervision.
OTS, the Office of the Comptroller of
the Currency (OCC), the Board of
Governors of the Federal Reserve
System (FRB), and the Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation (FDIC)
(collectively, the banking agencies)
continue to work together on regulations
where they share the responsibility to
implement statutory requirements. For
example, the banking agencies are
working jointly on several rules to
update capital standards to maintain
and improve consistency in agency
rules. These rules implement revisions
to the International Convergence of
Capital Management and Capital
Standards: A Revised Framework (Basel
II Framework) and include:
• Risk-Based Capital Guidelines:
Implementation of Revised Basel
Capital Accord. The final Basel II
Advanced Approaches rule was
published by the banking agencies on
December 7, 2007 and became
effective April 1, 2008. The OTS, in
conjunction with the other banking
agencies, is working on implementing
the Advanced Approaches rule first
for core banking organizations. This is
an institution-specific and multi-year
process of evaluating each
organization’s readiness and
qualification to move forward into
transitional capital floors.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
• Risk-Based Capital Standards: Market
Risk. On September 25, 2006, the
Agencies issued an NPRM on Market
Risk. In this rule, OTS proposed to
require savings associations to
measure and hold capital to cover
their exposure to market risk. The
Agencies did not finalize the 2006
NPRM. Subsequently, the Basel
Committee directed international
revisions which were completed in
July 2009. At that time the Agencies
began drafting a new NPR, based
upon the international revisions as
well as on the comments received in
2006. The new NPRM should be
issued in 2010.
• Risk-Based Capital Standards:
Standardized Approach. The banking
agencies issued an NPRM
implementing the Standardized
Approach to credit risk and
approaches to operational risk that are
contained in the Basel II Framework.
73 FR 43982 (July 29, 2008). Banking
organizations would be able to elect to
adopt these proposed revisions or
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:10 Dec 04, 2009
Jkt 220001
remain subject to the agencies’
existing risk-based capital rules,
unless the banking organization uses
the Advanced Capital Adequacy
Framework described above. The
comment period closed October 27,
2008 and the proposal is still pending
final action by the banking agencies.
• Risk-Based Capital Guidelines:
Impact of Modifications to Generally
Accepted Accounting Principles;
Consolidation of Asset-Backed
Commercial Paper Programs. The
banking agencies are proposing to
modify its general risk-based capital
standards and advanced risk-based
capital adequacy framework to
eliminate the exclusion of certain
consolidated asset-backed commercial
paper programs from risk-weighted
assets; and permit the banking
agencies to require banking
organizations to treat structures that
are not consolidated under accounting
standards as if they were consolidated
for risk-based capital purposes
commensurate with the risk
relationship of the banking
organization to the structure. The
agencies issued an NPRM on
September 15, 2009 (74 FR 47138).
Significant proposed rules issued
during fiscal year 2009 include:
• S.A.F.E. Mortgage Licensing. On June
9, 2009, the banking agencies and the
Farm Credit Administration (FCA)
issued a joint NPRM proposing to
amend their rules to implement the
Secure and Fair Enforcement for
Mortgage Licensing Act (the S.A.F.E.
Act). These amendments require an
employee of a depository institution,
an employee of a depository
institution subsidiary regulated by a
Federal banking agency, or an
employee of an institution regulated
by the FCA that engages in the
business of a mortgage loan originator
to register with the Nationwide
Mortgage Licensing System and
Registry and to obtain a unique
identifier. These amendments also
provide that these institutions must
require their employees who act as
mortgage loan originators to comply
with this Act’s registration and
unique identifier requirements and
must adopt and follow written
policies and procedures to assure
compliance with these requirements.
The comment period on this proposal
closed on July 9, 2009, and comments
are being reviewed in preparation for
drafting a final rule in 2010.
Significant final rules issued during
fiscal year 2009 include:
PO 00000
Frm 00172
Fmt 1260
Sfmt 1260
• OTS, FRB and NCUA issued a final
rule on January 29, 2009 (74 FR 5498)
to prohibit certain unfair or deceptive
acts or practices in the areas of credit
cards and overdrafts and proposed
clarifications to that final rule on May
5, 2009 (84 FR 20804). The comment
period closed on July 30, 2009 and, in
accordance with the statute, the
agencies may issue further
clarifications at a later date.
• OTS anticipates implementing section
728 of the Financial Services
Regulatory Relief Act by amending its
privacy rules under the Gramm-Leach
Bliley Act to include a safe harbor
model privacy form. The banking
agencies, NCUA, FTC, Commodity
Futures Trading Commission (FTC),
and SEC expect to issue final
amendments to their rules requiring
initial and annual privacy notices to
their customers. And, pursuant to
Section 728 of the Financial Services
Regulatory Relief Act of 2006, the
agencies are adopting a model privacy
form that financial institutions may
rely on as a safe harbor to provide
disclosures under the privacy rules.
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade
Bureau
The Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and
Trade Bureau (TTB) issues regulations
to enforce the Federal laws relating to
alcohol, tobacco, firearms, and
ammunition taxes and relating to
commerce involving alcohol beverages.
TTB’s mission and regulations are
designed to:
1) Regulate with regard to the issuance
of permits and authorizations to
operate in the alcohol and tobacco
industries;
2) Assure the collection of all alcohol,
tobacco, and firearms and
ammunition taxes, and obtain a high
level of voluntary compliance with all
laws governing those industries; and
3) Suppress commercial bribery,
consumer deception, and other
prohibited practices in the alcohol
beverage industry.
TTB plans to pursue one significant
regulatory action during FY 2010. In
2007, the Department approved the
publication of a notice of proposed
rulemaking soliciting comments on a
proposal to require a serving facts
statement on alcohol beverage labels.
The proposed statement would include
information about the serving size, the
number of servings per container, and
per-serving information on calories and
grams of carbohydrates, fat, and protein.
The proposed rule would also require
E:\FR\FM\07DER5.SGM
07DER5
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 233 / Monday, December 7, 2009 / The Regulatory Plan
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
information about alcohol content. This
regulatory action was initiated under
section 105(e) of the Federal Alcohol
Administration Act, 27 U.S.C. 205(e),
which confers on the Secretary of the
Treasury authority to promulgate
regulations for the labeling of alcoholic
beverages, including regulations that
prohibit consumer deception and the
use of misleading statements on labels
and that ensure that such labels provide
the consumer with adequate
information as to the identity and
quality of the product. TTB received
and reviewed approximately 800
comments on the serving facts proposal
and plans to put forward for Department
approval a final rule on this matter in
FY 2010.
In addition to the regulatory action
described above, in FY 2010 TTB plans
to give priority to the following
regulatory matters:
exports (Part 27 - Importation of
Distilled Spirits, Wine and Beer; Part
28 - Exportation of Alcohol; and Part
41 - Exportation of Tobacco Products
and Cigarette Papers and Tubes), as
well as regulations addressing the
American Viticultural Area program
(Part 9) and TTB procedures (Part 70).
• Modernization of title 27, Code of
Federal Regulations. TTB will
continue to pursue its multi-year
program of modernizing its
regulations in title 27 of the Code of
Federal Regulations. This program
involves updating and revising the
regulations to be more clear, current,
and concise, with an emphasis on the
application of plain language
principles. TTB laid the groundwork
for this program in 2002 when it
started to recodify its regulations in
order to present them in a more
logical sequence. In FY 2005, TTB
evaluated all of the 36 CFR parts in
title 27 and prioritized them as
‘‘high,’’ ‘‘medium,’’ or ‘‘low’’ in terms
of the need for complete revision or
regulation modernization. TTB
determined importance based on
industry member numbers, revenue
collected, and enforcement and
compliance issues identified through
field audits and permit qualifications,
statutory changes, significant industry
innovations, and other factors. The 10
parts of title 27, Code of Federal
Regulations, that TTB ranked as
‘‘high’’ include the five parts directing
operation of the major taxpayers
under the Internal Revenue Code of
1986: Part 19 - Distilled Spirits Plants;
Part 24 - Wine; Part 25 - Beer; Part 40
- Manufacture of Tobacco Products
and Cigarette Papers and Tubes; and
Part 53 - Manufacturers Excise Taxes
- Firearms and Ammunition. These
five parts represent nearly all the tax
revenue that TTB collects, which is
expected to be approximately $22
billion in FY 2010. The remaining five
parts rated ‘‘high’’ consist of
regulations covering imports and
• Allergen Labeling. In FY 2006 TTB
published interim regulations setting
forth standards for voluntary allergen
labeling of alcohol beverages. These
regulatory changes were an outgrowth
of changes made to the Federal Food,
Drug and Cosmetic Act by the Food
Allergen Labeling and Consumer
Protection Act of 2004. At the same
time, TTB published a proposal to
make those interim requirements
mandatory. In FY 2010 TTB intends
to continue its review of mandatory
allergen labeling with a view to
preparing a final rule document that
would take effect on the same date as
the serving facts regulatory changes
discussed above.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:10 Dec 04, 2009
Jkt 220001
To date, related to the modernization
plan, TTB has published notices of
proposed rulemaking to revise Part 19
and to amend Part 9 and has reviewed
the public comments received in
response to those notices, and TTB
anticipates that in FY 2010 it will
forward to the Department final rules
for both parts for publication
approval. In FY 2010, TTB plans to
put forward to the Department for
publication approval an advance
notice for proposed rulemaking for
the revision of the beer regulations in
Part 25.
• Multi-Region Appellations for
Imported Wine. TTB will put forward
for Departmental publication approval
a proposal to amend its wine labeling
regulations to allow the labeling of
imported wines with multi-region
appellations of origin. The proposed
regulatory change would provide
labeling treatment for imported wines
that is similar to what is currently
available for domestic wines, which
may be labeled with a multi-state or
multi-county appellation of origin.
• Other wine labeling issues. In FY 2010
TTB will continue to act on petitions
for the establishment of new
American viticultural areas (AVAs)
and for the modification of the
boundaries of existing AVAs. TTB
also will seek Departmental
publication approval of a number of
other wine labeling rulemaking
documents for public comment in FY
2010. These initiatives include a
clarification of the approval process
PO 00000
Frm 00173
Fmt 1260
Sfmt 1260
64313
for the use of American grape varietal
names on labels and an updating of
the list of approved American grape
varietal names. We also plan
regulatory action on petitions seeking
to adopt new label designation
standards for wines now generally
described as ‘‘wine with natural
flavors,’’ and to limit the use of
American appellations to wines
produced entirely from U.S. grapes.
• Specially Denatured and Completely
Denatured Alcohol Formulas. TTB
will submit for publication approval
by the Department a proposal to
reclassify some specially denatured
alcohol (SDA) formulas as completely
denatured alcohol (CDA) for which
formula submission to TTB is not
required. The proposed regulatory
changes would also allow other SDA
formulas to be used without the
submission of article formulas. These
changes would allow TTB to shift its
SDA-dedicated resources from the
current front-end pre-market formula
control approach to a post-market
assessment of actual compliance with
SDA regulations.
• Special (Occupational) Tax Repeal.
TTB published in FY 2009 a
temporary rule, together with a
contemporaneous notice of proposed
rulemaking that amended the TTB
regulations in response to the
statutory repeal of the special
(occupational) taxes on producers and
marketers of alcoholic beverages. In
FY 2010 TTB intends to put forward
for Departmental approval a
document that adopts those
temporary amendments as a final rule.
• Alternation of Brewery Premises. In
FY 2010 TTB will forward to the
Department for publication approval a
notice of proposed rulemaking to
amend the TTB regulations to set
forth specific standards for the
approval and operation of alternating
proprietorships at the same brewery
premises. The proposed regulations
will include standards for alternation
agreements between host and tenant
brewers as well as rules for
recordkeeping and segregation of
products made by different brewers.
• Determination of Tax on Large Cigars.
TTB will forward to the Department
for publication approval a notice of
proposed rulemaking that clarifies the
rules for determining the amount of
tax that is due on large cigars, which
is based on their sale price. The
proposed regulatory changes will
include specific standards for
determining the tax on large cigars
E:\FR\FM\07DER5.SGM
07DER5
64314
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 233 / Monday, December 7, 2009 / The Regulatory Plan
that are provided at no cost in
connection with a sale.
• Time For Payment of Tax on Alcohol
Beverages. In FY 2010 TTB will
forward to the Department for
publication approval a temporary
rule, together with a
contemporaneous notice of proposed
rulemaking, to reflect statutory
standards for the deferred payment of
taxes on alcohol beverages in the
month of September and for quarterly
payment of tax by small producers of
alcohol beverages.
• Classification of Tobacco Products. In
FY 2010 TTB will continue its review
of standards for the classification of
different tobacco products. In FY 2007
TTB published a notice of proposed
rulemaking to set standards for
distinguishing between cigars and
cigarettes and, after a review of the
public comments received in response
to that proposal, TTB determined that
further review was necessary with a
view to possible publication of new
proposals for further comment. In
addition, TTB will consider the
possibility of proposing standards to
distinguish between pipe tobacco and
roll-your-own tobacco.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
• CHIPRA Tobacco Product and
Processed Tobacco Implementation.
In FY 2009 TTB published two
temporary rules, together with a
contemporaneous notice of proposed
rulemaking in each case, to
implement changes to the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986 made by the
Children’s Health Insurance Program
Reauthorization Act of 2009
(CHIPRA). The changes included
tobacco product tax rate increases,
changes to the bases for the denial,
suspension, or revocation of permits
for tobacco manufacturers and
importers, permit and related
requirements for manufacturers and
importers of processed tobacco, and
an expansion of the definition of rollyour-own tobacco. TTB anticipates
that in FY 2010 it will forward to the
Department for publication approval
final rules regarding these two
regulatory initiatives.
Bureau of the Public Debt
The Bureau of the Public Debt (BPD)
has responsibility for borrowing the
money needed to operate the Federal
Government and accounting for the
resulting debt, regulating the primary
and secondary Treasury securities
markets, and ensuring that reliable
systems and processes are in place for
buying and transferring Treasury
securities.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:10 Dec 04, 2009
Jkt 220001
BPD administers regulations: (1)
Governing transactions in Government
securities by Government securities
brokers and dealers under the
Government Securities Act of 1986
(GSA), as amended; (2) Implementing
Treasury’s borrowing authority,
including rules governing the sale and
issue of savings bonds, marketable
Treasury securities, and State and local
Government securities; (3) Setting out
the terms and conditions by which
Treasury may redeem (buy back)
outstanding, unmatured marketable
Treasury securities through debt
buyback operations; (4) Governing
securities held in Treasury’s retail
systems; and (5) Governing the
acceptability and valuation of all
collateral pledged to secure deposits of
public monies and other financial
interests of the Federal Government.
Treasury’s GSA rules govern financial
responsibility, the protection of
customer funds and securities, record
keeping, reporting, audit, and large
position reporting for all government
securities brokers and dealers, including
financial institutions.
Treasury maintains regulations
governing two retail systems for
purchasing and holding Treasury
securities: Legacy Treasury Direct, in
which investors can purchase, manage,
and hold marketable Treasury securities
in book-entry form, and TreasuryDirect,
in which investors may purchase,
manage, and hold savings bonds,
marketable Treasury securities, and
certificates of indebtedness in an
Internet-based system.
During fiscal year 2010, BPD will
accord priority to the following
regulatory projects:
• Savings Bond Issuing and Paying
Agent Regulations. BPD plans to issue
a final rule amending the savings
bond issuing regulations to equalize
the fee structure between definitive
and electronic bonds, and amending
the savings bond paying agent
regulations to replace the EZ Direct
system with the EZ Clear system.
• TreasuryDirect. BPD plans to issue a
final rule revising the TreasuryDirect
regulations to support enhancements
to the system, primarily to implement
a reinvestment option and to revise
the purchase process.
• Marketable Treasury bills, notes,
bonds, and non-marketable savings
bonds. BPD plans to amend the
regulations to remove certain
evidentiary requirements for deceased
owner cases.
PO 00000
Frm 00174
Fmt 1260
Sfmt 1260
Financial Management Service
The Financial Management Service
(FMS) issues regulations to improve the
quality of Government financial
management and to administer its
payments, collections, debt collection,
and Government-wide accounting
programs. For fiscal year 2010, FMS’s
regulatory plan includes the following
priorities:
• Federal Government Participation in
the Automated Clearing House. FMS
is proposing to amend our regulation
at 31 CFR part 210 governing the use
of the Automated Clearing House
(ACH) system by Federal agencies.
The proposed amendments will
adopt, with some exceptions, the ACH
Rules developed by NACHA – The
Electronic Payments Association
(NACHA) as the rules governing the
use of the ACH Network by Federal
agencies.
We are issuing this proposed rule to
address changes that NACHA has
made to the ACH Rules since the
publication of NACHA’s 2007 ACH
Rules book. These changes include
new requirements to identify all
international payment transactions
using a new Standard Entry Class
Code and to include certain
information in the ACH record
sufficient to allow the receiving
financial institution to identity the
parties to the transaction and to allow
the Office of Foreign Assets Control
(OFAC) screening.
In addition, we are proposing (1) to
streamline the process for reclaiming
post-death benefit payments from
financial institutions; (2) to require
financial institutions to provide
limited account-related customer
information related to the reclamation
of post-death benefit payments as
permitted under the Payment
Transactions Integrity Act of 2008;
and (3) to modify our previous
guidance regarding the requirement
that non-vendor payments be
delivered to a deposit account in the
name of the recipient.
• Debt Collection Authorities Under the
Debt Collection Improvement Act.
FMS is amending its regulation at 31
CFR part 285 governing the
centralized offset of federal payments,
including tax refund payments, to
collect nontax debts owed to the
United States. The amendments
remove the time limitation on the
collection of nontax debts by
centralized offset, consistent with a
change in the statute on which it is
based. The statutory change, enacted
E:\FR\FM\07DER5.SGM
07DER5
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 233 / Monday, December 7, 2009 / The Regulatory Plan
as part of the Food, Conservation and
Energy Act of 2008, allows for the use
of centralized offset of federal
payments, including federal salary
payments, to collect nontax debts
owed to the United States irrespective
of the amount of time the debt has
been outstanding.
Domestic Finance – Office of the Fiscal
Assistant Secretary (OFAS)
The Office of the Fiscal Assistant
Secretary develops policy for and
oversees the operations of the financial
infrastructure of the federal government,
including payments, collections, cash
management, financing, central
accounting, and delinquent debt
collection.
• Anti-Garnishment. In FY 2010,
Treasury plans to promulgate a joint
rule, with Federal benefit agencies, to
give better force and effect to various
benefit agency statutes that exempt
Federal benefits from garnishment.
Typically, upon receipt of a
garnishment order from a State court,
financial institutions will completely
freeze an account as they perform due
diligence in complying with the
order. The joint rule will address this
practice of account freezes to ensure
that benefit recipients have access to
a certain amount of lifeline funds
while garnishment orders or other
legal processes are resolved or
adjudicated, and will provide
financial institutions with specific
administrative instructions to carry
out upon receipt of a garnishment
order. The joint rule will apply to
financial institutions, but is not
expected to have specific provisions
for consumers, States, debt collectors,
or banking regulators. However, the
banking regulators would enforce the
policy in cases of non-compliance by
means of their general authorities.
This proposed regulation will be a
new part in Title 31 jointly controlled
by Treasury and the Federal benefit
agencies.
Agency Contact:
PL 110–343; 122 Stat 3765
None
Program Compliance Officer
Office of Financial Stability
Department of the Treasury
1500 Pennsylvania Avenue NW.
Washington, DC 20220
Phone: 202 622–2000
Email: tarp.compliance@do.treas.gov
Abstract:
RIN: 1505–AC05
CFR Citation:
31 CFR 31
Legal Deadline:
This rule provides guidance on
conflicts of interest pursuant to section
108 of the Emergency Economic
Stabilization Act of 2008 (EESA), which
was enacted on October 3, 2008.
Statement of Need:
TREAS—DO
131. TARP STANDARDS FOR
COMPENSATION AND CORPORATE
GOVERNANCE
This rulemaking is necessary to revise
the interim conflicts of interest rule
issued in January 2009 based on public
comments received. This January 2009
interim rule addressed conflicts that
may arise during the selection of
individuals or entities seeking a
contract or financial agency agreement
with the Treasury, particularly those
involved in the acquisition, valuation,
management, and disposition of
troubled assets.
Priority:
Summary of Legal Basis:
Abstract:
This rule is issued pursuant to section
108 of the Emergency Economic
Stabilization Act of 2008 (EESA), which
was enacted on October 3, 2008.
Section 108 of EESA authorizes the
Secretary to issue regulations or
guidelines necessary to address and
manage or to prohibit conflicts of
interest that may arise in connection
with the administration and execution
of the EESA authorities.
This interim final rule, promulgated
pursuant to sections 101(a)(1),
101(c)(5), and 111(b) of the Emergency
Economic Stabilization Act of 2008,
Division A of Public Law 110-343
(EESA), as amended, provides further
guidance on the executive
compensation provisions applicable to
participants in the Troubled Assets
Relief Program (TARP).
Economically Significant. Major under
5 USC 801.
Legal Authority:
PL 110–343; PL 111–5
CFR Citation:
31 CFR 30
Legal Deadline:
None
Statement of Need:
Alternatives:
Not applicable.
Anticipated Cost and Benefits:
Not applicable.
Risks:
Not applicable.
Timetable:
Action
Date
FR Cite
01/21/09 74 FR 3431
01/21/09
EESA provided immediate authority
and facilities that the Secretary of the
Treasury could use to restore liquidity
and stability to the financial system.
The rule is necessary to establish
standards for executive compensation
practices at firms receiving TARP
assistance, in order to fully protect the
interests of taxpayers and mandate
compensation practices that maximize
the value of the firm for shareholders.
Summary of Legal Basis:
130. EMERGENCY ECONOMIC
STABILIZATION ACT; CONFLICTS OF
INTEREST
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required:
No
Section 111 of EESA, as amended,
provides that certain entities that
receive financial assistance from
Treasury under the TARP will be
subject to specified executive
compensation and corporate
governance standards to be established
by the Secretary.
Priority:
Government Levels Affected:
Alternatives:
Other Significant
None
Not yet determined.
FINAL RULE STAGE
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
Legal Authority:
Interim Final Rule
Interim Final Rule
Effective
Interim Final Rule
Comment Period
End
Final Rule
TREAS—Departmental Offices (DO)
64315
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:10 Dec 04, 2009
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00175
03/23/09
12/00/09
Fmt 1260
Sfmt 1260
E:\FR\FM\07DER5.SGM
07DER5
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 233 / Monday, December 7, 2009 / The Regulatory Plan
64316
CFR Citation:
requirements, S.A.F.E. Mortgage
Licensing Act, title V of the Housing
and Economic Recovery Act of 2008
(Pub. L. 110-289, 122 Stat. 2654 (2008)),
and the OCC’s general rulemaking
authority in 12 U.S.C. 93a.
12 CFR 34
Alternatives:
Legal Deadline:
Not yet determined.
Other, Statutory, July 29, 2009,
Implement Registration System.
Anticipated Cost and Benefits:
Anticipated Cost and Benefits:
Legal Authority:
Not yet determined.
12 USC 1 et seq; 12 USC 29; 12 USC
93a; 12 USC 371; 12 USC 1701j–3; 12
USC 1828(o); 12 USC 3331 et seq
Risks:
Not yet determined.
Timetable:
Action
Date
Interim Final Rule
Interim Final Rule
Effective
Interim Final Rule
Comment Period
End
Final Rule
FR Cite
06/15/09 74 FR 28394
06/15/09
08/14/09
Implement system for registering
employees as mortgage loan originators
with the Nationwide Mortgage
Licensing System and Registry.
12/00/09
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required:
These regulations implement the
Federal registration requirement
imposed by the S.A.F.E. Mortgage
Licensing Act, title V of the Housing
and Economic Recovery Act of 2008
(Pub. L. 110-289, 122 Stat. 2654 (2008))
with respect to national banks and their
operating subsidiaries. They are being
issued by the OCC, FRB, FDIC, OTS,
NCUA, and Farm Credit Administration
(the Agencies).
Government Levels Affected:
None
Agency Contact:
Stephen Tackney
Attorney–Advisor
Department of the Treasury
1500 Pennsylvania Avenue NW.
Washington, DC 20220
Phone: 202 622–1773
Risks:
Not yet determined.
Timetable:
Abstract:
No
Not yet determined.
Action
Date
NPRM
NPRM Comment
Period End
Final Action
FR Cite
06/09/09 74 FR 27386
07/09/09
12/00/09
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required:
Undetermined
Government Levels Affected:
Undetermined
Statement of Need:
Agency Contact:
132. S.A.F.E. MORTGAGE LICENSING
ACT
The S.A.F.E. Act requires the Agencies
to develop and maintain a system for
registering employees of depository
institutions and their subsidiaries
regulated by a Federal Banking Agency
or employees of institutions regulated
by the Farm Credit Administration as
registered loan originators with the
Nationwide Mortgage Licensing System
and Registry. The Agencies determined
the best method for implementing this
requirement was through a rulemaking.
Priority:
Summary of Legal Basis:
Related RIN: Related to 1550–AC33
Economically Significant. Major under
5 USC 801.
This rulemaking is based on the
requirements of the S.A.F.E. Act’s
RIN: 1557–AD23
RIN: 1505–AC09
TREAS—Comptroller of the Currency
(OCC)
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
FINAL RULE STAGE
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:10 Dec 04, 2009
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00176
Fmt 1260
Sfmt 1260
Heidi M. Thomas
Special Counsel
Department of the Treasury
Comptroller of the Currency
Legislative and Regulatory Activities
Division
250 E Street SW.
Washington, DC 20219
Phone: 202 874–5090
Fax: 202 874–4889
Email: heidi.thomas@occ.treas.gov
BILLING CODE 4810–25–S
E:\FR\FM\07DER5.SGM
07DER5
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 233 (Monday, December 7, 2009)]
[Unknown Section]
[Pages 64304-64316]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X09-161207]
[[Page 64304]]
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY (TREAS)
Statement of Regulatory Priorities
The primary missions of the Department of the Treasury are:
To promote prosperous and stable American and world economies,
including promoting domestic economic growth and
maintaining our Nation's leadership in global economic
issues, supervising national banks and thrift institutions,
and helping to bring residents of distressed communities
into the economic mainstream.
To manage the Government's finances by protecting the revenue
and collecting the correct amount of revenue under the
Internal Revenue Code, overseeing customs revenue
functions, financing the Federal Government and managing
its fiscal operations, and producing our Nation's coins and
currency.
To safeguard the U.S. and international financial systems from
those who would use these systems for illegal purposes or
to compromise U.S. national security interests, while
keeping them free and open to legitimate users.
Consistent with these missions, most regulations of the Department and
its constituent bureaus are promulgated to interpret and implement the
laws as enacted by the Congress and signed by the President. It is the
policy of the Department to comply with requirements to issue a notice
of proposed rulemaking and carefully consider public comments before
adopting a final rule. Also, in particular cases, the Department
invites interested parties to submit views on rulemaking projects while
a proposed rule is being developed.
In response to the events of September 11, 2001, the President signed
the USA PATRIOT Act of 2001 into law on October 26, 2001. Since then,
the Department has accorded the highest priority to developing and
issuing regulations to implement the provisions in this historic
legislation that target money laundering and terrorist financing. These
efforts, which will continue during the coming year, are reflected in
the regulatory priorities of the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network
(FinCEN).
To the extent permitted by law, it is the policy of the Department to
adhere to the regulatory philosophy and principles set forth in
Executive Order 12866, and to develop regulations that maximize
aggregate net benefits to society while minimizing the economic and
paperwork burdens imposed on persons and businesses subject to those
regulations.
Emergency Economic Stabilization Act
On October 3, 2008, the President signed the Emergency Economic
Stabilization Act of 2008 (EESA) (Pub. L. 110-334). Section 101(a) of
EESA authorizes the Secretary of the Treasury to establish a Troubled
Asset Relief Program (TARP) to ``purchase, and to make and fund
commitments to purchase, troubled assets from any financial
institution, on such terms and conditions as are determined by the
Secretary, and in accordance with this Act and policies and procedures
developed and published by the Secretary.''
EESA provides authority to issue regulations and guidance to implement
the program. Regulations and guidance required by EESA include
conflicts of interest, executive compensation, and tax guidance. The
Secretary is also charged with establishing a program that will
guarantee principal of, and interest on, troubled assets originated or
issued prior to March 14, 2008.
The Department has issued guidance and regulations and will continue to
provide program information through the next year. Regulatory actions
taken to date include the following:
Executive compensation. In October 2008, the Department issued
an interim final rule that set forth executive compensation
guidelines for the TARP Capital Purchase Program (73 FR
62205). Related tax guidance on executive compensation was
announced in IRS Notice 2008-94. In addition, among other
EESA tax guidance, the IRS issued interim guidance
regarding loss corporation and ownership changes in Notice
2008-100, providing that any shares of stock owned by the
Department of the Treasury under the Capital Purchase
Program will not be considered to cause Treasury's
ownership in such corporation to increase. On June 15,
2009, the Department issued a revised interim final rule
that sets forth executive compensation guidelines for all
TARP program participants (74 FR 28394), implementing
amendments to the executive compensation provisions of EESA
made by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009
(Pub. L.111-5). Public comments on the revised interim
final rule regarding executive compensation were due by
August 14, 2009 and will be considered as part of the
process of issuing a final rule on this subject.
Insurance program for trouble assets. On October 14, 2008, the
Department released a request for public input on an
insurance program for troubled assets.
Conflicts of interest. On January 21, 2009, the Department
issued an interim final rule providing guidance on
conflicts of interest pursuant to section 108 of EESA (74
FR 3431). Comments on the interim final rule, which were
due by March 23, 2009, will be considered as part of the
process of issuing a final rule.
During Fiscal Year 2010, the Department will continue implementing the
EESA authorities to restore capital flows to the consumers and
businesses that form the core of the nation's economy.
Terrorism Risk Insurance Program Office
The Terrorism Risk Insurance Act of 2002 (TRIA) was signed into law on
November 26, 2002. The law, which was enacted as a consequence of the
events of September 11, 2001, established a temporary Federal
reinsurance program under which the Federal Government shares the risk
of losses associated with certain types of terrorist acts with
commercial property and casualty insurers. The Act, originally
scheduled to expire on December 31, 2005, was extended to December 31,
2007 by the Terrorism Risk Insurance Extension Act of 2005 (TRIEA). The
Act has since been extended to December 31, 2014, by the Terrorism Risk
Insurance Program Reauthorization Act of 2007 (TRIPRA).
The Office of the Assistant Secretary for Financial Institutions is
responsible for developing and promulgating regulations implementing
TRIA, as extended and amended by TRIEA and TRIPRA. The Terrorism Risk
Insurance Program Office, which is part of the Office of the Assistant
Secretary for Financial Institutions, is responsible for operational
implementation of TRIA. The purposes of this legislation are to address
market disruptions, ensure the continued widespread availability and
affordability of commercial property and casualty insurance for
terrorism risk, and to allow for a transition period for the private
markets to stabilize and build capacity while preserving State
insurance regulation and consumer protections.
[[Page 64305]]
Over the past year, the Office of the Assistant Secretary has issued
proposed rules implementing changes authorized by TRIA as revised by
TRIPRA. The following regulations should be published by December 31,
2009:
Recoupment of Federal Share of Compensation for Insured
Losses. This final rule would implement and establish
requirements for determining amounts to be recouped and for
procedures insurers are to use for collecting terrorism
policy surcharges and remitting them to the Treasury.
Cap on Annual Liability and Pro Rata Share of Insured Losses.
This final rule would establish, for purposes of the $100
billion cap on annual liability, how Treasury will
determine whether aggregate insured losses will exceed $100
billion and, if so, how Treasury will determine the pro
rata share of insured losses to be paid by each insurer
that incurs insured losses under the Program.
During 2010, Treasury will continue the ongoing work of implementing
TRIA and carrying out revised operations as a result of the TRIPRA
related regulation changes.
Customs Revenue Functions
On November 25, 2002, the President signed the Homeland Security Act of
2002 (the Act), establishing the Department of Homeland Security (DHS).
The Act transferred the United States Customs Service from the
Department of the Treasury to the DHS, where it is was known as the
Bureau of Customs and Border Protection (CBP). Effective March 31,
2007, DHS changed the name of the Bureau of Customs and Border
Protection to U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) pursuant to
section 872(a)(2) of the Act (6 USC 452(a)(2)) in a Federal Register
notice (72 FR 20131) published on April 23, 2007. Notwithstanding the
transfer of the Customs Service to DHS, the Act provides that the
Secretary of the Treasury retains sole legal authority over the customs
revenue functions. The Act also authorizes the Secretary of the
Treasury to delegate any of the retained authority over customs revenue
functions to the Secretary of Homeland Security. By Treasury Department
Order No. 100-16, the Secretary of the Treasury delegated to the
Secretary of Homeland Security authority to prescribe regulations
pertaining to the customs revenue functions. This Order further
provided that the Secretary of the Treasury retained the sole authority
to approve any such regulations concerning import quotas or trade bans,
user fees, marking, labeling, copyright and trademark enforcement, and
the completion of entry or substance of entry summary including duty
assessment and collection, classification, valuation, application of
the U.S. Harmonized Schedules, eligibility or requirements for
preferential trade programs and the establishment of recordkeeping
requirements relating thereto.
During the past fiscal year, among the Treasury-retained CBP customs-
revenue function regulations issued was an interim rule to amend the
regulatory provisions relating to the requirement under the United
States-Bahrain FTA (BFTA) that a good must be ``imported directly''
from Bahrain to the United States or from the United States to Bahrain
to qualify for preferential tariff treatment. The change removed the
condition that a good passing through the territory of an intermediate
country must remain under the control of the customs authority of the
intermediate country. CBP plans to finalize this rulemaking in the
upcoming fiscal year.
In addition, during the past fiscal year, CBP amended the regulations
on an interim basis to implement certain provisions of the Tom Lantos
Block Burmese JADE (Junta's Anti-Democratic Efforts) Act of 2008
(Public Law 110-286) (the ``JADE Act'') and Presidential Proclamation
8294 of September 26, 2008, which includes new Additional U.S. Note 4
to Chapter 71 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States
(``HTSUS''). The interim amendments prohibit the importation of
Burmese-covered articles of jadeite, rubies and articles of jewelry
containing jadeite or rubies, and sets forth restrictions for the
importation of non-Burmese covered articles of jadeite, rubies and
articles of jewelry containing jadeite or rubies.
As a result of last year's ``Farm Bill'' legislation, CBP implemented
interim regulations on the Softwood Lumber Act of 2008, which
prescribed special entry requirements as well as an importer
declaration program applicable to certain softwood lumber (SWL) and SWL
products exported from any country into the United States; CBP plans to
finalize the interim rule in the upcoming fiscal year.
During fiscal year 2010, CBP and Treasury plan to give priority to the
following regulatory matters involving the customs revenue functions
not delegated to DHS:
Trade Act of 2002's preferential trade benefit provisions.
Treasury and CBP plan to finalize several interim
regulations that implement the trade benefit provisions of
the Trade Act of 2002 including the Caribbean Basin
Economic Recovery Act and the African Growth and
Opportunity Act.
Free Trade Agreements. Treasury and CBP also plan to finalize
interim regulations this fiscal year to implement the
preferential tariff treatment provisions of the United
States-Singapore Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act
and the Dominican Republic-Central America-United States
Free Trade Agreement (also known as ``CAFTA-DR'')
Implementation Act. Treasury and CBP expect to issue
interim regulations implementing the United States-
Australia Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act, the
United States-Oman Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act,
and the United States-Peru Free Trade Agreement
Implementation Act.
Country of Origin of Textile and Apparel Products. Treasury
and CBP also plan to publish a final rule adopting an
interim rule that was published on the Country of Origin of
Textile and Apparel Products, which implemented the changes
brought about, in part, by the expiration of the Agreement
on Textile and Clothing and the resulting elimination of
quotas on the entry of textile and apparel products from
World Trade Organizations (WTO) members.
North American Free Trade Agreement country of origin rules.
Treasury and CBP are determining how to proceed regarding a
proposal which was published in July 2008 seeking public
comment regarding uniform rules governing the determination
of the country of origin of imported merchandise. The
proposal attracted considerable interest from the trading
community. If finalized, the proposed amendments would
extend the application of the North American Free Trade
Agreement country of origin rules to all trade.
Customs Modernization provisions of the North American Free
Trade Implementation Act (Customs Mod Act). Treasury and
CBP also plan to continue moving forward with amendments to
improve its regulatory procedures began under the authority
granted by the Customs Mod Act. These efforts, in
accordance with the principles of Executive Order 12866,
[[Page 64306]]
have involved and will continue to involve significant
input from the importing public. CBP will also continue to
test new programs to see if they work before proceeding
with proposed rulemaking to establish permanently the
programs. Consistent with this practice, we expect to
finalize a proposal to establish permanently the remote
location filing program, which has been a test program
under the Customs Mod Act. This rule would allow remote
location filing of electronic entries of merchandise from a
location other than where the merchandise will arrive. In
addition, Treasury and CBP plan to finalize a proposal
which was published in August 2008 regarding the electronic
payment and refund of quarterly harbor maintenance fees.
The rule would provide the trade with expanded electronic
payment/refund options for quarterly harbor maintenance
fees and would modernize and enhance CBP's port use fee
collection efforts.
Community Development Financial Institutions Fund
The Community Development Financial Institutions Fund (Fund) was
established by the Community Development Banking and Financial
Institutions Act of 1994 (12 U.S.C. 4701 et seq.). The primary purpose
of the Fund is to promote economic revitalization and community
development through the following programs: the Community Development
Financial Institutions (CDFI) Program, the Bank Enterprise Award (BEA)
Program, the Native American CDFI Assistance (NACA) Program, and the
New Markets Tax Credit (NMTC) Program. In addition the Fund administers
the Financial Education and Counseling Pilot Program (FEC) and the
Capital Magnet Fund (CMF).
In fiscal year (FY) 2010, subject to funding availability, the Fund
will provide awards through the following programs:
Native American CDFI Assistance (NACA) Program. Through the
NACA Program, the Fund will provide technical assistance
grants and financial assistance awards to promote the
development of CDFIs that serve Native American, Alaska
Native, and Native Hawaiian communities.
Bank Enterprise Award (BEA) Program. Through the BEA Program,
the Fund will provide financial incentives to encourage
insured depository institutions to engage in eligible
development activities and to make equity investments in
CDFIs.
New Markets Tax Credit (NMTC) Program. Through the NMTC
Program, the CDFI Fund will provide allocations of tax
credits to qualified community development entities (CDEs).
The CDEs in turn provide tax credits to private sector
investors in exchange for their investment dollars;
investment proceeds received by the CDEs are be used to
make loans and equity investments in low-income
communities. The Fund administers the NMTC Program in
coordination with the Office of Tax Policy and the Internal
Revenue Service.
Financial Education and Counseling (FEC) Pilot Program.
Through the FEC Pilot Program, the CDFI Fund will provide
grants to eligible organizations to provide a range of
financial education and counseling services to prospective
homebuyers. The Fund will administer the FEC Program in
coordination with the Office of Financial Education.
Capital Magnet Fund (CMF). Through the Capital Magnet Fund,
the CDFI Fund will provide competitively awarded grants to
CDFIs and qualified nonprofit housing organizations to
finance affordable housing and related community
development projects. In FY 2010, the Fund expects to draft
and publish regulations to govern the application process,
award selection, and compliance components of the CMF.
Financial Crimes Enforcement Network
As chief administrator of the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA), FinCEN's
regulations constitute the core of the Department's anti-money
laundering and counter-terrorism financing programmatic efforts.
FinCEN's responsibilities and objectives are linked to, and flow from,
that role. In fulfilling this role, FinCEN seeks to enhance U.S.
national security by making the financial system increasingly resistant
to abuse by money launderers, terrorists and their financial
supporters, and other perpetrators of crime.
The Secretary of the Treasury, through FinCEN, is authorized by the BSA
to issue regulations requiring financial institutions to file reports
and keep records that are determined to have a high degree of
usefulness in criminal, tax, or regulatory matters, or in the conduct
of intelligence or counter-intelligence activities to protect against
international terrorism. Those regulations also require designated
financial institutions to establish anti-money laundering programs and
compliance procedures. To implement and realize its mission, FinCEN has
established regulatory objectives and priorities to safeguard the
financial system from the abuses of financial crime, including
terrorist financing, money laundering, and other illicit activity.
These objectives and priorities include: (1) issuing, interpreting, and
enforcing compliance with regulations implementing the BSA; (2)
supporting, working with, and, as appropriate, overseeing compliance
examination functions delegated to other Federal regulators; (3)
managing the collection, processing, storage, and dissemination of data
related to the BSA; (4) maintaining a Government-wide access service to
that same data, and for network users with overlapping interests; (5)
conducting analysis in support of policymakers, law enforcement,
regulatory and intelligence agencies, and the financial sector; and (6)
coordinating with and collaborating on anti-terrorism and anti-money
laundering initiatives with domestic law enforcement and intelligence
agencies, as well as foreign financial intelligence units.
During fiscal year 2009, FinCEN issued, or plans to issue, the
following regulatory actions:
Currency Transaction Reporting Exemptions. FinCEN published a
Final Rule that simplifies the existing currency
transaction reporting (CTR) exemption regulatory
requirements. The amendments were recommended by the
Government Accountability Office in GAO-08-355. By
simplifying the regulatory requirements regarding CTR
exemptions, FinCEN believes that more depository
institutions will avail themselves of the exemptions. The
rule was finalized with an effective date of January 5,
2009.
Administrative Rulings. Prior to the end of the fiscal year,
FinCEN will issue a final technical rule change to update
the Bank Secrecy Act provisions to reflect that
Administrative Rulings are published on the FinCEN Web
site, rather than in the Federal Register.
Reorganization of BSA Rules. On October 23, 2008, FinCEN
issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to re-designate and
reorganize the BSA regulations in a new chapter within the
Code of Federal Regulations. The re-designation and
reorganization of the regulations in a new chapter is not
[[Page 64307]]
intended to alter regulatory requirements. The regulations
will be organized in a more consistent and intuitive
structure that more easily allows financial institutions to
identify their specific regulatory requirements under the
BSA. The new chapter will replace 31 CFR Part 103.
Money Services Businesses. On May 12, 2009, FinCEN issued a
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking addressing definitional
thresholds for Money Services Businesses (MSBs),
incorporating previously issued Administrative Rules and
guidance with regard to MSBs, and addressing the issue of
foreign-located MSBs.
Confidentiality of Suspicious Activity Reports. On March 3,
2009, FinCEN issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
clarifying the non-disclosure provisions with respect to
the existing regulations pertaining to the confidentiality
of suspicious activity reports (SARs). In conjunction with
this notice, FinCEN issued for comment two guidance
documents, SAR Sharing with Affiliates for depository
institutions and SAR Sharing with Affiliates for securities
and futures industry entities, to solicit comment
permitting certain financial institutions to share SARs
with their U.S. affiliates that are also subject to SAR
reporting requirements.
Mutual Funds. On June 5, 2009, FinCEN issued a Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking addressing the definition of financial
institution in the BSA's implementing regulations to
include open-end investment companies (mutual funds).
Despite the fact that mutual funds are already required to
comply with anti-money laundering and customer
identification program requirements, file SARs, comply with
due diligence obligations pursuant to rules implementing
section 312 of the USA PATRIOT Act, and perform other BSA
compliance functions, a mutual fund is not designated as a
`financial institution' under the BSA implementing
regulations. The proposed rule would address obligations to
file Currency Transaction Reports for cash transactions
over $10,000 in lieu of current obligations to file Form
8300s.
Non-Bank Residential Mortgage Lenders and Originators. On July
21, 2009, FinCEN issued an Advance Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking (ANPRM) to solicit public comment on a wide
range of questions pertaining to the possible application
of anti-money laundering (AML) program and suspicious
activity report regulations to a specific sub-set of loan
and finance companies, i.e., non-bank residential mortgage
lenders and originators
Expansion of Special Information Sharing Procedures (pursuant
to section 314(a) of the BSA). Prior to the end of the
fiscal year, FinCEN will issue a Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking to amend the BSA regulations to allow certain
foreign law enforcement agencies, State and local law
enforcement agencies, and FinCEN itself to submit requests
for information to financial institutions.
Withdrawal of Proposed Rules. On October 30, 2008, FinCEN
withdrew the proposed rules (issued in 2002 and 2003) for
investment advisers, commodity trading advisors, and
unregistered investment companies. The proposed rules were
withdrawn to eliminate uncertainty associated with the
existence of out-of-date proposed rules, and to allow
FinCEN to issue new notices of proposed rulemaking at a
later date that take into account industry regulatory
developments with respect to investment advisers, commodity
trading advisors, and unregistered investment companies
since 2003.
Renewal of Existing Rules. FinCEN renewed without change the
information collections associated with the existing
regulations requiring money services businesses, mutual
funds, operators of credit card systems, dealers in
precious metals, precious stones, or jewels, and certain
insurance companies to develop and implement written anti-
money laundering programs. Also, FinCEN renewed without
change the information collections associated with the
existing regulations requiring futures commission
merchants, introducing brokers in commodities, banks,
savings associations, credit unions, certain non-federally
regulated banks, mutual funds, and securities broker-
dealers to develop and implement customer identification
programs.
Administrative Rulings and Written Guidance. FinCEN issued 10
Administrative Rulings and written guidance pieces (as of
August 2009) interpreting the BSA and providing clarity to
regulated industries.
FinCEN's regulatory priorities for fiscal year 2010 include finalizing
the proposed initiatives mentioned above, as well as the following
projects:
Anti-Money Laundering Programs. Pursuant to section 352 of the
USA PATRIOT Act, certain financial institutions are
required to establish AML programs. Continued from fiscal
year 2009, FinCEN will propose a rulemaking to require
state-chartered credit unions and other depository
institutions without a federal functional regulator to
implement AML programs. With the added information from the
ANPRM regarding non-bank residential mortgage lenders or
originators, FinCEN will research and analyze issues
regarding potential regulation of the loan and finance
industry, and may issue proposed rulemaking with regard to
non-bank residential mortgage lenders and originators.
Finally, FinCEN also will continue to consider regulatory
options regarding certain corporate and trust service
providers.
Regulatory Framework for Stored Value. The Credit Card
Accountability, Responsibility, and Disclosure Act (CARD
Act) of 2009 (Section 503) requires FinCEN to issue a final
rule ``regarding issuance, sale, redemption, or
international transport of stored value'' by mid-February
2010. This act has imposed a timetable to activities that
were already underway. Just prior to the enactment of the
CARD Act, FinCEN issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
clarifying the applicability of BSA regulations with
respect to MSB activities. As part of this Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking, FinCEN solicited comment on the
treatment of stored value as money transmission under
FinCEN's regulations. In the accelerated rulemaking
environment resulting from the CARD Act, FinCEN is
consulting with law enforcement and other regulators with
the intent to issue a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and
then a Final Rule to meet the established deadline. FBAR
Requirements. FinCEN will work with the IRS and other
pertinent offices within the Department of the Treasury to
issue a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking with regard to
revising the regulations governing the filing of Reports of
Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts (FBARs). Among other
things, FinCEN and the IRS will seek comments regarding
when a person with signature authority over, but no
financial interest in, a foreign financial account should
be relieved of filing an FBAR for the account, and when an
interest in a foreign entity
[[Page 64308]]
(e.g., a corporation, partnership, trust or estate) should
be subject to FBAR reporting.
Other Requirements. FinCEN will continue to consider regulatory action
in conjunction with the feasibility study prepared pursuant to the
Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004 concerning the
issue of obtaining information about certain cross-border funds
transfers and transmittals of funds. FinCEN also will continue to issue
proposed and final rules pursuant to Section 311 of the USA PATRIOT
Act, as appropriate. Finally, FinCEN expects to propose various
technical and other regulatory amendments in conjunction with its
ongoing, comprehensive review of existing regulations to enhance
regulatory efficiency.
Internal Revenue Service
The Internal Revenue Service (IRS), working with the Office of the
Assistant Secretary (Tax Policy), promulgates regulations that
interpret and implement the Internal Revenue Code and related tax
statutes. The purpose of these regulations is to carry out the tax
policy determined by Congress in a fair, impartial, and reasonable
manner, taking into account the intent of Congress, the realities of
relevant transactions, the need for the Government to administer the
rules and monitor compliance, and the overall integrity of the Federal
tax system. The goal is to make the regulations practical and as clear
and simple as possible.
Most IRS regulations interpret tax statutes to resolve ambiguities or
fill gaps in the tax statutes. This includes interpreting particular
words, applying rules to broad classes of circumstances, and resolving
apparent and potential conflicts between various statutory provisions.
During fiscal year 2010, the IRS will accord priority to the following
regulatory projects:
Deduction and Capitalization of Costs for Tangible Assets.
Section 162 of the Internal Revenue Code allows a current
deduction for ordinary and necessary expenses paid or
incurred in carrying on any trade or business. Under
section 263(a) of the Code, no immediate deduction is
allowed for amounts paid out for new buildings or for
permanent improvements or betterments made to increase the
value of any property or estate. Those expenditures are
capital expenditures that generally may be recovered only
in future taxable years, as the property is used in the
taxpayer's trade or business. It often is not clear whether
an amount paid to acquire, produce, or improve property is
a deductible expense or a capital expenditure. Although
existing regulations provide that a deductible repair
expense is an expenditure that does not materially add to
the value of the property or appreciably prolong its life,
the IRS and Treasury believe that additional clarification
is needed to reduce uncertainty and controversy in this
area. In August 2006, the IRS and Treasury issued proposed
regulations in this area and received numerous comments. In
March 2008, the IRS and Treasury withdrew the 2006 proposed
regulations and issued new proposed regulations, which have
generated relatively few comments. The IRS and Treasury
intend to finalize those regulations.
Arbitrage Investment Restrictions on Tax-Exempt Bonds. The
arbitrage investment restrictions on tax-exempt bonds under
section 148 generally limit issuers from investing bond
proceeds higher-yielding investments. Treasury and the IRS
plan to issue proposed regulations to address selected
current issues involving the arbitrage restrictions,
including clarification of the issue price definition used
in the computation of bond yield, clarification and
simplification of the rules regarding modifications and
terminations of qualified hedging transactions, guidance on
the treatment of working capital financing, and selected
other issues.
Tax Credit Bonds. Tax credit bonds are bonds in which the
holder receives a federal tax credit in lieu of some or all
of the interest on the bond. The American Recovery and
Reinvestment Act of 2009 created a number of new types of
tax credit bonds and modified the law as it concerned
several existing types of tax credit bonds. The IRS and
Treasury intend to provide guidance on numerous legal
issues concerning tax credit bonds and to develop clear
guidelines for the IRS Tax Exempt Bond enforcement program.
Build America Bonds. Treasury and the IRS plan to issue
proposed regulations to provide guidance on interpretative
issues that have arisen in implementing the broad new Build
America Bond program in section 54AA under the American
Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009.
Private Activity Bonds. Treasury and the IRS to issue final
regulations on allocation and accounting rules for
application of the private business restrictions on tax-
exempt governmental bonds under section 141. These
regulations will include guidance on public-private
partnerships and mixed use arrangements in which projects
are used in part by State and local governments and in part
by private businesses. These regulations will finalize 2006
proposed regulations with modifications in consideration of
the public comments.
Guidance on the Tax Treatment of Distressed Debt. Recent
events in the financial markets have highlighted a number
of unresolved tax issues relating to the amount, character,
and timing of income, expense, gain, or loss on distressed
debt. In addition, the tax treatment of distressed debt,
including distressed debt that has been modified, may
affect the qualification of certain entities for tax
purposes or result in additional taxes on the investors in
such entities, such as regulated investment companies, real
estate investment trusts, and real estate mortgage
investment conduits. During fiscal year 2009, Congress,
Treasury, and the IRS have addressed some of these issues
through statutory changes and published guidance. Treasury
and the IRS plan to address more of these issues in
published guidance.
Classification of Series LLCs and Cell Companies. Series LLCs
were first introduced in Delaware in 1996, and since then,
series LLC statutes have been adopted in several other
states. These statutes typically permit the entity to
segregate assets and liabilities and to associate certain
members with specified assets and liabilities. In the
insurance and foreign arena, similar entities are sometimes
referred to as cell companies. In Notice 2008-19, the IRS
requested comments on when a cell of a protected cell
company should be treated as a separate insurance company
for federal income tax purposes. The IRS also requested
comments on similar segregated arrangements, such as series
LLCs that do not involve insurance. It is likely that, over
time, the use of series LLCs and cell companies will
increase. Accordingly, it is important to provide timely
guidance to clarify the classification and other tax
treatment of this new form of organization. Guidance has
been requested on the federal tax classification of these
domestic and foreign entities. The IRS
[[Page 64309]]
and Treasury intend to issue guidance that will address the
characterization of domestic and foreign series and cells
for federal tax purposes.
Elective Deferral of Certain Business Discharge of
Indebtedness Income. In the recent economic downturn, many
business taxpayers realized income as a result of modifying
the terms of their outstanding indebtedness or refinancing
on terms subjecting them to less risk of default. The
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 includes a
special relief provision allowing for the elective deferral
of certain discharge of indebtedness income realized in
2009 and 2010. The provision, section 108(i) of the Code,
is complicated and many of the details will have to be
supplied through regulatory guidance. This guidance will
have to be provided expeditiously so taxpayers will be able
to evaluate the benefits of electing deferral. Treasury and
the IRS recently issued Revenue Procedure 2009-37 that
prescribes the procedure for making the election. The IRS
and Treasury intend to issue additional guidance on such
issues as the types of indebtedness eligible for the
relief, acceleration of deferred amounts, the operation of
the provision in the context of flow-through entities, the
treatment of the discharge for the purpose of computing
earnings and profits, and the operation of a provision of
the statute deferring original issue discount deductions
with respect to related refinancings.
Rules under the Pension Protection Act of 2006 and Other
Retirement-Related Guidance. Significant new rules
regarding the funding of qualified defined benefit pension
plans were enacted as part of the Pension Protection Act of
2006 (PPA). The IRS and Treasury prioritized the various
pieces of guidance required to comply with those rules. The
IRS and Treasury intend to issue additional guidance on the
provisions of the PPA related to funding. In addition, the
IRS and Treasury will be issuing various items of
administrative guidance that facilitate or enhance
retirement savings and security.
Withholding on Government Payments for Property and Services.
Section 3402(t) was added to the Internal Revenue Code by
the Tax Increase Prevention and Reconciliation Act of 2005
(TIPRA). Section 3402(t) requires all Federal, State and
local Government entities (except for certain small State
entities) to deduct and withhold an income tax equal to 3
percent from all payments (with certain enumerated
exceptions) the Government entity makes for property or
services. Section 3402(t) will be effective with respect to
payments made after December 31, 2011. On March 11, 2008,
the IRS issued Notice 2008-38 soliciting public comments
regarding guidance to be provided to Federal, State and
local governments required to withhold under section
3402(t). After considering the many comments, the IRS and
Treasury issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, which was
published in the Federal Register on December 4, 2008. A
hearing on the proposed regulations was held on April 16,
2009, and the IRS has received 168 comments from
stakeholders on the proposed regulations. The IRS and
Treasury are considering the comments and intend to issue
final regulations.
Information Reporting of Basis by Brokers and Others. Section
403 of the Energy Improvement and Extension Act of 2008
(Pub. L. No. 110-343) enacted on October 3, 2008, amended
section 6045 to require brokers to report both the basis
and gross proceeds of securities sold by customers. Form
1099-B is used for this purpose. Basis reporting generally
will be required for stock acquired after December 31,
2010. Basis reporting will be required for debt securities,
such as bonds, acquired after December 31, 2012. The
legislation also imposed basis reporting requirements on
others in certain circumstances. The IRS and Treasury
intend to issue proposed and final regulations under to
address these new reporting requirements.
Information Reporting Concerning Payment Card Transactions.
Section 6050W was added to the Internal Revenue Code by the
Housing Assistance Tax Act of 2008, enacted on July 30,
2008. Section 6050W requires information returns to be made
for each calendar year beginning after December 31, 2010,
by merchant-acquiring entities and third-party settlement
organizations with respect to payment card transactions and
third-party payment network transactions occurring in that
calendar year. Certain payment card transactions subject to
information reporting under section 6050W are subject to
backup withholding if the payee has not provided a valid
taxpayer identification number (TIN). Announcement 2009-6,
2009-9 IRB 643 (Feb. 6, 2009), advised section 6050W filers
that they may participate in the TIN matching program under
the procedures established in Rev. Proc. 2003-9, 2003-1
C.B. 516, which permits program participants to verify the
payee TINs required to be reported on information returns
and payee statements. Notice 2009-19, 2009-10 IRB 660 (Feb.
20, 2009), requested public comments regarding guidance to
be provided to payment settlement entities and other
affected persons concerning the new requirements under
section 6050W. The IRS and Treasury intend to issue
proposed and final regulations under sections 6050W to
address these requirements.
Withholding Tax and the Role of Financial Intermediaries. In
1997 the IRS and Treasury issued regulations under the
section 1441 provisions for withholding tax on certain
items of portfolio investment income from U.S. sources. The
qualified intermediary (QI) system was a key element. In
October 2008 the IRS issued Announcement 2008-98 concerning
proposed amendments to the qualified intermediary
agreements and rules to address early notice of failures of
internal controls, evaluation of risk that foreign accounts
may be subject to control by U.S. persons, and association
of a U.S. auditor to the oversight of QI performance. The
IRS and Treasury intend to issue regulations to address
these various areas of compliance involving the withholding
taxes on portfolio investment income.
Foreign Bank Account Reporting (FBAR). In May 2009 the
Treasury issued budget proposals for Fiscal Year 2010 which
included proposed legislation to address FBAR related
issues. In August 2009, the IRS and Treasury issued Notice
2009-62 providing an extension until June 30, 2010 to file
FBARs for 2008 and earlier calendar years, pending the
preparation of further guidance. The IRS and Treasury
intend to issue regulations to address these FBAR issues.
Office of the Comptroller of the Currency
The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) was created by
Congress to charter national banks, to oversee a nationwide system of
banking institutions, and to assure that national banks are safe and
sound, competitive and profitable, and capable of serving in the best
possible manner the banking needs of their customers.
[[Page 64310]]
The OCC seeks to assure a banking system in which national banks
soundly manage their risks, maintain the ability to compete effectively
with other providers of financial services, meet the needs of their
communities for credit and financial services, comply with laws and
regulations, and provide fair access to financial services and fair
treatment of their customers.
Significant rules issued during fiscal year 2009 include:
Fair Credit Reporting, Accuracy and Integrity of Information
Furnished to Consumer Reporting Agencies (12 CFR Part 41).
The banking agencies,\1\ the National Credit Union
Administration (NCUA), and the Federal Trade Commission
(FTC) issued a joint final rule to implement section 312 of
the FACT Act. Section 312 requires the issuance of
guidelines regarding the accuracy and integrity of
information entities furnish to a consumer reporting agency
(CRA). Section 312 also requires the issuance of
regulations requiring entities that furnish information to
a CRA to establish reasonable policies and procedures for
the implementation of the guidelines. In addition, section
312 requires jointly prescribed regulations that identify
the circumstances under which a furnisher of information to
a CRA shall be required to investigate a dispute concerning
the accuracy of information contained in a consumer report
based on the consumer's direct request to the furnisher. A
final rule was issued on July 1, 2009 (74 FR 31484).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, Board of Governors of
the Federal Reserve System, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, and
Office of Thrift Supervision.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Risk-Based Capital Guidelines; Capital Adequacy Guidelines;
Capital Maintenance; Capital - Residential Mortgage Loans
Modified Pursuant to the Home Affordable Program (12 CFR
Part 3). In order to support and facilitate the timely
implementation of the Home Affordable Program (Program)
announced by the U.S. Department of Treasury and to promote
the stability of banking organizations and the financial
system, the banking agencies issued an interim final rule
providing that a residential mortgage loan (whether a
first-lien or a second-lien loan) modified under the
Program will retain the risk weight assigned to the loan
prior to the modification, so long as the loan continues to
meet other relevant supervisory criteria. The rule
minimizes disincentives to bank participation in the
Program that could otherwise result from agencies'
regulatory capital regulations. The banking agencies
believe that this treatment is appropriate in light of the
overall important public policy objectives of promoting
sustainable loan modifications for at-risk homeowners that
balance the interests of borrowers, servicers, and
investors. Joint agency action is essential to ensure that
the regulatory capital consequences of participation in the
Program are the same for all commercial banks and thrifts.
An interim final rule was issued on June 30, 2009. (74 FR
31160).
Registration of Mortgage Loan Originators (12 CFR Part 34).
The banking agencies, the NCUA, and Farm Credit
Administration (FCA) proposed amendments to their rules to
implement the S.A.F.E. Mortgage Licensing Act of 2008,
Title V of the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008,
P.L. 110-289. These amendments require an employee of a
depository institution, an employee of a depository
institution subsidiary regulated by a Federal banking
agency, or an employee of an institution regulated by the
FCA that engages in the business of a mortgage loan
originator to register with the Nationwide Mortgage
Licensing System and Registry (NMLSR) and to obtain a
unique identifier. These amendments also provide that these
institutions must require their employees who act as
mortgage loan originators to comply with this Act's
registration and unique identifier requirements and must
adopt and follow written policies and procedures to assure
compliance with these requirements. A notice of proposed
rulemaking was issued on June 9, 2009 (74 FR 27386). The
OCC has included this rulemaking project in the Regulatory
Plan (1557-AD23).
Risk-Based Capital Guidelines -- Money Market Mutual Funds (12
CFR Part 3). On September 19, 2008, the Board of Governors
of the Federal Reserve System adopted the Asset-Backed
Commercial Paper Money Market Mutual Fund Liquidity
Facility (the ``AMLF'' or ``ABCP Lending Facility'') which
enables depository institutions and bank holding companies
to borrow from the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston on a
nonrecourse basis if they use the proceeds of the loan to
purchase certain asset-backed commercial paper (ABCP) from
money market mutual funds. The purpose of this action was
to reduce strains being experienced by money market mutual
funds. To facilitate national bank participation in the
program, the OCC adopted on September 19, 2008,\2\ on an
interim final basis, an exemption from its risk-based
capital guidelines for ABCP held by a national bank as a
result of its participation in this program. The AMLF was
set to expire on January 30, 2009. However, to encourage
the stability of money market mutual funds, the program has
been extended. This rule finalizes the risk-based capital
exemption and extends the risk-based capital exemption to
ABCP purchased beyond the original January 30, 2009 date.
This final rule applies the risk-based capital exemption to
any ABCP purchased as a result of a national bank's
participation in the facility. The risk-based capital
exemption will continue to apply if the AMLF has not
expired. A final rule was issued on March 27, 2009 (74 FR
13336).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ 73 FR 55704 (September 26, 2008).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Minimum Capital Ratios; Capital Adequacy Guidelines; Capital
Maintenance; Capital: Deduction of Goodwill Net of
Associated Deferred Tax Liability (12 CFR Part 3). The
banking agencies issued a final rule to allow their
institutions to elect to reduce the amount of goodwill that
a bank must deduct from tier 1 capital by the amount of any
deferred tax liability associated with that goodwill. This
treatment is currently permitted only in the case of
goodwill acquired in a nontaxable purchase business
combination. This change effectively reduces the amount of
goodwill that a bank must deduct from tier 1 capital and
reflects a bank's maximum effective exposure to loss in the
event that such goodwill is impaired or derecognized for
financial reporting purposes. A final rule was issued on
December 30, 2008 (74 FR 79602).
Standards Governing the Release of a Suspicious Activity
Report (12 CFR Part 4). The OCC proposed to revise its
regulations governing the release of non-public OCC
information set forth in 12 CFR part 4, subpart C. The
proposal would clarify that the OCC's decision to release a
suspicious activity report (SAR) will be governed by the
standards set forth in proposed amendments to the OCC's SAR
regulation, 12 CFR 21.11(k), that are part of a separate,
but simultaneously issued, rulemaking. A notice of
[[Page 64311]]
proposed rulemaking was published on March 9, 2009 (74 FR
10136).
Confidentiality of Suspicious Activity Reports (12 CFR Part
21). The OCC proposed to amend its regulations implementing
the Bank Secrecy Act governing the confidentiality of a
suspicious activity report (SAR) to: clarify the scope of
the statutory prohibition on the disclosure by a national
bank of a SAR; address the statutory prohibition on the
disclosure by the government of a SAR as that prohibition
applies to the OCC's standards governing the disclosure of
SARs; clarify that the exclusive standard applicable to the
disclosure of a SAR, or any information that would reveal
the existence of a SAR, by the OCC is ``to fulfill official
duties consistent with the purposes of the BSA''; and
modify the safe harbor provision in its rules to include
changes made by the USA PATRIOT Act. This proposal is based
upon a similar proposal issued simultaneously by the
Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN). A notice of
proposed rulemaking was published on March 9, 2009 (74 FR
10130).
Community and Economic Development Entities, Community
Development Projects, and Other Public Welfare Investments
(12 CFR Part 24). The OCC adopted without change the
interim final rule, issued on August 11, 2008, which
implemented the statutory change to national banks'
community development investment authority made in the
Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008 (HERA). The OCC
also revised Appendix 1 to part 24, the CD-1 National Bank
Community Development (Part 24) Investments Form, to make
technical changes that are consistent with the HERA
provision and the revised regulation. Section 2503 of the
HERA revised the community development investment authority
in section 24(Eleventh) to restore a national bank's
authority to make investments designed primarily to promote
the public welfare. A final rule was published on April 7,
2009 (74 FR 15657).
Community Reinvestment Act Regulations (12 CFR Part 25). On
August 14, 2008, the Higher Education Opportunity Act
(HEOA) was enacted into law. Section 1031 of the HEOA
revised the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) to require the
banking agencies, when evaluating a bank's record of
meeting community credit needs, to consider, as a factor,
low-cost education loans provided by the bank to low-income
borrowers. The banking agencies issued a proposal that
would implement section 1031 of the HEOA. In addition, the
proposal would incorporate into the banking agencies' rules
statutory language that allows them to consider as a factor
when evaluating a bank's record of meeting community credit
needs capital investment, loan participation, and other
ventures undertaken by nonminority- and nonwomen-owned
financial institutions in cooperation with minority- and
women-owned financial institutions and low-income credit
unions. A notice of proposed rulemaking was published on
June 30, 2009 (74 FR 31209).
The OCC's regulatory priorities for fiscal year 2010 include the
following:
Risk-Based Capital Guidelines; Capital Adequacy Guidelines;
Capital Maintenance: Regulatory Capital; Impact of
Modifications to Generally Accepted Accounting Principles;
Consolidation of Asset-Backed Commercial Paper Programs;
and Other Related Issues (12 CFR Part 3). The banking
agencies issued a notice of proposed rulemaking to: (i)
modify their general risk-based capital standards and
advanced risk-based capital adequacy frameworks to
eliminate the exclusion of certain consolidated asset-
backed commercial paper programs from risk-weighted assets;
and (ii) provide a reservation of authority in their
general risk-based capital standards to permit the
agencies' to require banking organizations to treat
structures that are not consolidated under accounting
standards as if they were consolidated for risk-based
capital purposes commensurate with the risk relationship of
the banking organization to the structure. The banking
agencies also requested comment on the effect on regulatory
capital requirements of the consolidation of assets
required by the Financial Accounting Standard Board's
(FASB) recent issuance of Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 166, Accounting for Transfers of Financial
Assets, an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 140 and
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 167,
Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R). A notice of
proposed rulemaking was published on September 15, 2009 (74
FR 47138).
Risk-Based Capital Guidelines; Capital Adequacy Guidelines;
Capital Maintenance: Basel II Standardized Approach (12 CFR
Part 3). As part of the banking agencies' ongoing efforts
to develop and refine the capital standards to enhance
their risk sensitivity and ensure the safety and soundness
of the banking system, they issued a notice of proposed
rulemaking to amend various provisions of the capital rules
on July 29, 2008, at 73 FR 43982. The changes involve
amending the current capital rules for those banks that
will not be subject to the advanced internal ratings-based
approaches. Work on a final rule is underway.
Risk-Based Capital Standards: Market Risk (12 CFR Part 3). The
banking agencies plan to issue a second notice of proposed
rulemaking to amend the market risk capital requirements
for national banks. The banking agencies issued a notice of
proposed rulemaking on September 25, 2006 (71 FR 55958).
The rule would make the current market risk capital
requirements generally more risk sensitive with respect to
the capital treatment of trading activities in banks and
bank holding companies.
Interagency Proposal for Model Privacy Form under Gramm-Leach-
Bliley Act (12 CFR Part 40). The banking agencies, along
with the NCUA, FTC, the Commodity Futures Trading
Commission, and the Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC), issued a joint notice of proposed rulemaking
pursuant to section 728 of the Financial Services
Regulatory Relief Act of 2006 (Pub. L. 109-351) on March
29, 2007 (72 FR 14940). Specifically, a safe harbor model
privacy form was proposed that financial institutions may
use to provide the disclosures under the privacy rules.
After further consumer testing of this model form, the SEC
published for comment in the Federal Register a report
analyzing this testing on April 20, 2009. 74 FR 17925. The
final rule will be published in November 2009.
Office of Thrift Supervision
As the primary Federal regulator of the thrift industry, the Office of
Thrift Supervision (OTS) has established regulatory objectives and
priorities to supervise thrift institutions effectively and
efficiently. These objectives include maintaining and enhancing the
safety and soundness of the thrift industry; a flexible, responsive
regulatory structure that enables savings associations to
[[Page 64312]]
provide credit and other financial services to their communities,
particularly housing mortgage credit; and a risk-focused, timely
approach to supervision.
OTS, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), the Board of
Governors of the Federal Reserve System (FRB), and the Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation (FDIC) (collectively, the banking agencies)
continue to work together on regulations where they share the
responsibility to implement statutory requirements. For example, the
banking agencies are working jointly on several rules to update capital
standards to maintain and improve consistency in agency rules. The