, 64264-64282 [X09-141207]
Download as PDF
64264
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 233 / Monday, December 7, 2009 / The Regulatory Plan
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR (DOL)
Statement of Regulatory and
Deregulatory Priorities
Executive Summary
The Department of Labor’s (DOL)
mission is to protect workers by
improving working conditions,
advancing opportunities for
employment, protecting retirement and
health care benefits, helping employers
find workers, and strengthening
collective bargaining. Secretary of Labor
Hilda L. Solis’ vision is that the work of
the Labor Department will ensure there
are good jobs for everyone.
To achieve this broad vision, the
Secretary has established a series of 12
specific strategic outcomes, which span
across all of the Department’s agencies.
These outcomes are:
• Increasing workers’ incomes and
narrowing wage and income
inequality.
• Securing safe and healthy workplaces,
wages and overtime, particularly in
high-risk industries.
• Assuring skills and knowledge that
prepare workers to succeed in a
knowledge-based economy, including
in high-growth and emerging industry
sectors like ‘‘green’’ jobs.
• Breaking down barriers to fair and
diverse work places so that every
worker’s contribution is respected.
• Improving health benefits and
retirement security for all workers.
• Providing work place flexibility for
family and personal care-giving.
• Facilitating return to work for workers
experiencing work place injuries or
illnesses who are able to work and
sufficient income and medical care for
those who are unable to work.
• Income support when work is
impossible or unavailable.
• Helping workers who are in low-wage
jobs or out of the labor market find a
path into middle class jobs.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
• Ensuring workers have a voice in the
work place.
• Assuring that global markets are
governed by fair market rules that
protect vulnerable people, including
women and children, and provide
workers a fair share of their
productivity and voice in their work
lives.
• Helping middle-class families remain
in the middle class.
Critical to this vision is ensuring these
outcomes achieve good jobs for
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:10 Dec 04, 2009
Jkt 220001
everyone. This includes vulnerable
workers, workers in traditionally less
safe industry sectors, farmworkers,
health care workers and seniors, and
those facing barriers to good
employment.
The Secretary has directed each
agency to ensure that all priority
regulatory projects support achievement
of one or more of the strategic outcomes
that support the good jobs for everyone
vision. The DOL Fall 2009 Regulatory
Plan reflects this direction.
Openness and Transparency
Using regulatory changes to produce
greater openness and transparency is an
integral part of a Department-wide
compliance strategy. These efforts will
not only enhance DOL agencies’
enforcement tool set, but will encourage
greater levels of compliance by the
regulated community and enhance
awareness among workers of their rights
and benefits.
The Department’s commitment to
achieving greater openness and
transparency is exemplified in its
Regulatory Plan and Agenda. Several
proposals from the Employee Benefits
Security Administration expand
disclosure requirements, substantially
enhancing the availability of
information to pension plan participants
and beneficiaries and employers, and
strengthening the retirement security of
America’s workers. These rulemakings
are:
• Fiduciary Requirements for Disclosure
in Participant-Directed Individual
Account Plans, which would increase
transparency between individual
account pension plans and their
participants and beneficiaries by
ensuring that participants and
beneficiaries are provided the
information they need, including
information about fees and expenses,
to make informed investment
decisions.
• Amendment of Standards Applicable
to General Statutory Exemption for
Services, which would require service
providers to disclose to plan
fiduciaries services, fees,
compensation and conflicts of interest
information.
• Annual Funding Notice for Defined
Benefit Plans, which would require
defined benefit plan administrators to
provide all participants, beneficiaries
and other parties with detailed
information regarding their plan’s
funding status.
• Periodic Pension Benefits Statements,
which would require pension plans to
PO 00000
Frm 00124
Fmt 1260
Sfmt 1260
provide participants and certain
beneficiaries with periodic benefit
statements.
• Multiemployer Plan Information
Made Available on Request, which
would require pension plan
administrators to provide copies of
financial and actuarial reports to
participants and beneficiaries, unions
and contributing employers on
request.
Several other Labor Department
agencies will also be proposing
regulatory projects that will foster
greater openness and transparency.
These include:
• The Mine Safety and Health
Administration’s proposed regulation
on Notification of Legal Identity,
which aims to require mine operators
to provide increased identification
information, would allow the agency
to better target the most egregious and
persistent violators and deter future
violations.
• The Office of Labor-Management
Standards’ proposed regulations on
Notification of Employee Rights
Under Federal Labor Laws, which
would implement Executive Order
13496 and require all Government
contracting agencies to include a
contract clause requiring contractors
to inform workers of their rights
under Federal labor laws.
• The Wage and Hour Division’s
rulemaking, Records to be Kept by
Employers Under the Fair Labor
Standards Act, which would update
decades old recordkeeping regulations
in order to enhance the transparency
and disclosure to workers as to how
their wages are computed and to
allow for new workplace practices
such as telework and flexiplace
arrangements.
• The Occupational Safety and Health
Administration’s modification of its
Hazard Communication Standard,
which would adopt standardized
labeling requirements and order of
information for safety data sheets.
• The Occupational Safety and Health
Administration’s Occupational Injury
and Illness Recording and Reporting
Requirements rule, which would
propose the collection of additional
data to help employers and workers
track injuries at individual
workplaces, improve the Nation’s
occupational injury and illness
information data, and assist the
agency in its enforcement of the safety
and health workplace requirements.
E:\FR\FM\07DER5.SGM
07DER5
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 233 / Monday, December 7, 2009 / The Regulatory Plan
The Department’s Regulatory Priorities
The Department of Labor’s (DOL)
2009 Regulatory Plan highlights the
most noteworthy and significant
regulatory projects that will be
undertaken by its regulatory agencies:
the Employment Standards
Administration (ESA), Mine Safety and
Health Administration (MSHA),
Occupational Safety and Health
Administration (OSHA), Employee
Benefits Security Administration
(EBSA), and Employment and Training
Administration (ETA). The initiatives
and priorities in the regulatory plan
represent those that are essential to the
fulfillment of the Secretary’s vision for
the Department and America’s
workforce.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
Employment and Training
Administration
ETA is charged with assuring our
Nation’s workers have the skills and
knowledge that will prepare them to
succeed in a knowledge-based economy,
including high-growth and emerging
industry sectors such as ‘‘green jobs.’’
For those workers who are in low-wage
jobs or out of the labor market, ETA
programs will help them find a path to
self-sufficiency and good, middle class
jobs. And for those who are unable to
work, or for whom work is unavailable,
ETA programs provide income support
and a path to self-sufficiency. ETA is
playing a pivotal role in the
implementation of the American
Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009
(Recovery Act) to jumpstart our
economy, create or save millions of jobs,
and make a down payment on
addressing long-neglected challenges so
our country can thrive. Through these
efforts and others, ETA is transforming
the way it provides services to all
workers.
ETA is highlighting four regulatory
priorities that reflect the Secretary’s
vision to advance good jobs for everyone
with measurable and substantial
outcomes. These are:
• The Trade Adjustment Assistance
(TAA) for Workers Program
Regulations propose to implement
changes to the TAA program that
arose when the program was reauthorized and expanded in the
Recovery Act. The Recovery Act
amended the certification criteria,
expanded the types of workers who
may be certified, and expanded the
available program benefits. The TAA
regulations will help provide
opportunities for participants to
acquire skills and knowledge needed
to become, or remain, employable in
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:10 Dec 04, 2009
Jkt 220001
the middle-class jobs market. The
TAA regulations will also help
provide guidance on supplying
participants with income support for
times when work is impossible or
unavailable. The overarching
outcomes for the completion of the
TAA regulations are to help middleclass families remain middle class
and help workers who are out of the
labor market find a path into the
middle class.
• The Trade Adjustment Assistance:
Merit Staffing of State Administration
and Allocation of Training Funds to
States Regulation proposes that
personnel carrying out the worker
adjustment assistance provisions of
the TAA program must be State
employees covered by the merit
system of personnel administration
and addresses how the Department
distributes TAA training funds to the
States. It will be finalized after the
public comments on the regulation
have been analyzed and considered.
The Allocation of Training Funds
portion of this regulation explains, for
the first time, the new formula that
the Department uses to allocate
training funds to the States.
• The Temporary Agricultural
Employment of H-2A Aliens in the
United States regulatory revisions set
forth the requirements for using
temporary foreign agricultural
workers and establish wages and
working conditions to cover both U.S.
and foreign agricultural workers. The
H-2A program assists in achieving the
Secretary’s goal to increase workers’
incomes and narrow wage and income
inequality by protecting the wages
and working conditions of both
American workers and foreign
nationals working in the United
States.
• The YouthBuild Program regulation
proposes to implement the
YouthBuild Transfer Act of 2006,
which transferred the YouthBuild
program from the Department of
Housing and Urban Development to
DOL, and amended certain program
features to emphasize skill training
and connections to the public
workforce system. The YouthBuild
regulations will help achieve the
Secretary’s goals by assuring
participants gain the skills and
knowledge that will prepare them to
succeed in a knowledge-based
economy, including in high-growth
and emerging industry sectors like
‘‘green jobs.’’
PO 00000
Frm 00125
Fmt 1260
Sfmt 1260
64265
In addition, the proposed
amendments to regulations for equal
employment opportunity (EEO) in
apprenticeship and training are a
critical second phase of regulatory
updates to modernize the National
Apprenticeship System. The first phase
was completed in October 2008 with the
publication of a final rule updating
regulations for Apprenticeship Programs
and Labor Standards for Registration.
The existing companion EEO
regulations for apprenticeship were
promulgated over 30 years ago.
Proposed amendments to these
regulations will help achieve the
Secretary’s goal of a fair and diverse
workplace free of discrimination and
harassment by reflecting current EEO
law.
Finally, the Department proposes
amendments to the temporary nonagricultural foreign worker (H-2B
Worker) regulations. As part of its
statutory responsibility as an advisor to
the Department of Homeland Security,
the Department certifies that there is not
sufficient U.S. worker(s) able, available,
willing and qualified at the time of an
application for a visa, and that the
employment of the alien will not
adversely affect the wages and working
conditions of similarly employed U.S.
workers. The Department currently
administers such certification through
an attestation-based program. The
regulatory review of the H-2B program
will assist in achieving the Secretary’s
goal to increase workers’ incomes and
narrow wage and income inequality by
protecting the wages and working
conditions of both American workers
and foreign nationals working in the
United States.
Employee Benefits Security
Administration
The Employee Benefits Security
Administration is responsible for
administering and enforcing the
fiduciary, reporting and disclosure, and
health coverage provisions of Title I of
the Employee Retirement Income
Security Act of 1974 (ERISA). This
includes recent amendments and
additions to ERISA enacted in the
Pension Protection Act of 2006, as well
as new COBRA Continuation Coverage
Provisions under the Recovery Act.
EBSA’s regulatory plan initiatives are
intended to improve health benefits and
retirement security for workers in every
type of job at every income level.
Health Benefits for Workers
EBSA will issue guidance
implementing the Genetic Information
Nondiscrimination Act of 2008 (GINA)
E:\FR\FM\07DER5.SGM
07DER5
64266
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 233 / Monday, December 7, 2009 / The Regulatory Plan
amendments to ERISA. Generally, GINA
prohibits group health plans from
discriminating in health coverage based
on genetic information and from
collecting genetic information. This
rulemaking helps ensure that workers
will have access to high quality health
coverage, free from discrimination based
on a genetic predisposition towards a
disease. This is a joint rulemaking with
the Departments of Health and Human
Services and the Treasury.
EBSA also will be providing guidance
regarding the Paul Wellstone and Pete
Domenici Mental Health Parity and
Addiction Equity Act of 2008
(MHPAEA) amendments to ERISA.
MHPAEA creates parity for mental
health and substance use disorder
benefits under group health plans by
mandating that any financial
requirements and treatment limitations
applicable to mental health and
substance abuse disorder benefits to be
no more restrictive than predominant
requirements or limitations applied to
substantially all medical and surgical
benefits covered by a plan. EBSA’s
MHPAEA guidance will help ensure the
desired outcome of affording workers
access to reliable and high quality
health benefits.
EBSA also will issue guidance
clarifying the circumstances under
which health care arrangements
established or maintained by state or
local governments for the benefit of nongovernmental employees do not
constitute an employee welfare benefit
plan for purposes of ERISA. Such
clarification is intended to remove
perceived impediments to state and
local government efforts to improve
access to and opportunities for quality
and affordable health care coverage for
vulnerable, uninsured populations. The
clarifications provided by this
regulation also will reduce uncertainty
and, therefore, potential regulatory and
litigation costs for both plan sponsors
and state and local governments
concerning the scope of ERISA
regulation.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
Retirement Security for Workers
EBSA will propose amendments to its
regulations to clarify the circumstances
under which a person will be
considered a fiduciary when providing
investment advice to employee benefit
plans and their participants and
beneficiaries of such plans. EBSA also
will explore steps it can take by
regulation, or otherwise, to encourage
the offering of lifetime annuities or
similar lifetime benefits distribution
options for participants and
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:10 Dec 04, 2009
Jkt 220001
beneficiaries of defined contribution
plans. These initiatives are intended to
assure retirement security for workers in
all jobs regardless of income level by
ensuring that financial advisers and
similar persons are required to meet
ERISA’s strict standards of fiduciary
responsibility and helping to ensure that
participants and beneficiaries have the
benefit of their plan savings throughout
retirement.
Occupational Safety and Health
Administration
The Secretary’s vision for workers
requires securing a safe and healthy
workplace. OSHA’s regulatory program
is designed to help workers and
employers identify hazards in the
workplace, prevent the occurrence of
injuries and adverse health effects, and
communicate with the regulated
community regarding hazards and how
to effectively control them.
Longstanding health hazards such as
silica and beryllium and emerging
hazards such as food flavorings
containing diacetyl and airborne
infectious diseases place American
workers at risk of serious disease and
death and are initiatives on OSHA’s
regulatory agenda. OSHA’s regulatory
program demonstrates a renewed
commitment to worker health by
addressing health hazards and the
prevention of construction injuries and
fatalities.
First, OSHA is proposing to address
worker exposures to crystalline silica
through the promulgation and
enforcement of a comprehensive health
standard. Exposure to silica causes
silicosis, a debilitating respiratory
disease, and may cause cancer, other
chronic respiratory diseases, and renal
and autoimmune disease as well. Over
2 million workers are exposed to
crystalline silica in general industry,
construction, and maritime industries
and workers are often exposed to levels
that exceed current OSHA permissible
limits, which is frequent in the
construction industry where workers are
exposed at levels that exceed current
limits by several fold. It has been
estimated that between 3,500 and 7,000
new cases of silicosis arise each year in
the U.S., and that 1,746 workers died of
silicosis between 1996 and 2005.
Reducing these hazardous exposures
through promulgation and enforcement
of a comprehensive health standard
supports both the Secretary’s vision and
will contribute to OSHA’s goal of
reducing occupational fatalities and
illnesses. As a part of the Secretary’s
strategy for securing safe and healthy
PO 00000
Frm 00126
Fmt 1260
Sfmt 1260
workplaces, the Mine Safety and Health
Administration will also be undertaking
regulatory action related to silica
utilizing information provided by
OSHA.
OSHA’s second health initiative
would revise its Hazard Communication
Standard (HCS) to make it consistent
with a globally harmonized approach to
hazard communication. The HCS covers
over 945,000 hazardous chemical
products in seven million American
workplaces and gives workers the ‘‘right
to know’’ about chemical hazards they
are exposed to. OSHA and other Federal
agencies have participated in long-term
international negotiations to develop the
Globally Harmonized System of
Classification and Labeling of Chemicals
(GHS). Revising the HCS to be
consistent with the GHS is expected to
significantly improve the
communication of hazards to workers in
American workplaces, reducing
exposures to hazardous chemicals, and
reducing occupational illnesses and
fatalities.
Workers in construction suffer the
most fatalities of any industry. In 2008,
OSHA estimated that crane-related
accidents in construction cause over 80
fatalities a year. Therefore, OSHA’s
major construction initiative is an
update of the 1971 Cranes and Derricks
Standards. Completion of this standard
will contribute to a reduction in
occupational injuries and fatalities,
which helps achieve the Secretary’s
outcome goal of securing safe and
healthy workplaces in high-risk
industries. The Agency is currently
evaluating the public comments and
planning to issue a final rule in July
2010.
Mine Safety and Health Administration
MSHA’s regulatory projects support
the Secretary’s vision by protecting the
health and safety of the Nation’s miners.
Despite the agency’s past efforts, miners
face safety and health hazards daily at
levels unknown in most other
occupations. While the Federal Mine
Safety and Health Act of 1977 (Mine
Act) places primary responsibility for
preventing unsafe and unhealthful
working conditions in mines on the
operators, the collective commitment of
miners, mine operators, and government
is needed to ensure safe workplaces.
The agency’s proposed regulatory
actions exemplify a commitment to
protecting the most vulnerable
populations while assuring broad-based
compliance. Health hazards are
pervasive in both coal and
metal/nonmetal mines (including
E:\FR\FM\07DER5.SGM
07DER5
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 233 / Monday, December 7, 2009 / The Regulatory Plan
surface and underground mines) and
large and small mines.
Recent data from the National
Institute for Occupational Safety and
Health indicate increased prevalence of
coal workers pneumoconiosis (CWP)
‘‘clusters’’ in several geographical areas,
particularly in the Southern
Appalachian Region. MSHA plans to
publish a notice of proposed rulemaking
to address continued risk to coal miners
from exposure to respirable coal mine
dust.
On January 16, 2009, MSHA and
NIOSH published a proposed rule that
would revise requirements for the
approval of coal mine personal dust
sampling devices. The proposed rule
would also establish performance-based
and other requirements for approval of
the continuous personal dust monitor
(CPDM) and revise requirements for the
existing sampler. As a part of the
agency’s efforts in this area, MSHA
plans to publish a Request for
Information on the use of the CPDM to
measure a miner’s exposure to
respirable coal mine dust. The CPDM
represents advanced technology and the
RFI will solicit information from the
public to help the Agency determine
how to best use the technology to assess
coal miners’ dust exposures. MSHA is
also considering a rulemaking to
address ways in which mine operators
can improve protections in their dust
control plans, emphasizing that the
burden of compliance is on the mine
operator, rather than relying exclusively
on enforcement interventions.
These regulatory actions are a part of
MSHA’s Comprehensive Black Lung
Reduction Strategy for reducing miners’
exposure to respirable dust. This
strategy includes enhanced
enforcement, education and training,
and health outreach and collaboration.
As a part of the Secretary’s strategy for
securing safe and healthy workplaces,
both MSHA and OSHA will be
undertaking regulatory action related to
silica. Overexposure to crystalline silica
can result in some miners developing
silicosis, an irreversible but preventable
lung disease which ultimately may be
fatal. Both the coal mine and
metal/nonmetal formulas are designed
to limit exposures to 0.1 mg/m3 (100 μg)
of silica. MSHA plans to follow the
recommendation of the Secretary of
Labor’s Advisory Committee on the
Elimination of Pneumoconiosis Among
Coal Mine Workers, NIOSH, and other
industry groups by publishing a
proposed rule to address the exposure
limit for respirable crystalline silica. To
assure consistency within the
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:10 Dec 04, 2009
Jkt 220001
Department, MSHA intends to use
OSHA’s work on the health effects of
occupational exposure to silica and
OSHA’s risk assessment, adapting it as
necessary for the mining industry.
MSHA is placing an emphasis on
routinely evaluating the success of
existing enforcement and regulatory
strategies and plans to issue an Advance
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
(ANPRM) on dams in metal and
nonmetal mines. Mining operations
regularly find it necessary to construct
dams to dispose of large volumes of
mine waste from processing operations,
or to provide water supply, sediment
control, or water treatment. The failure
of these structures can have a
devastating effect on both the mine and
nearby communities. MSHA evaluated
its existing requirements for metal and
nonmetal dams and has determined that
the current standards do not provide
sufficient guidance to determine what is
needed to effectively design and
construct dams with high or significant
hazard potential. The ANPRM will
solicit information on proper design,
construction and other safety issues for
impoundments at metal and nonmetal
mines whose failure could cause loss of
life or significant property damage.
Employment Standards Administration
ESA’s Wage and Hour Division
enforces several statutes that establish
minimum labor standards and protect
the Nation’s workers, including the Fair
Labor Standards Act (FLSA), the
Migrant and Seasonal Agricultural
Worker Protection Act, the Family and
Medical Leave Act (FMLA), the Service
Contract Act, the Davis-Bacon and
Related Acts, the Employee Polygraph
Protection Act, and certain provisions of
the Immigration and Nationality Act.
The regulatory initiatives required to
implement these statutory workplace
protections represent an important
aspect of the Division’s work and affect
over 130 million workers across all
sectors of the economy.
Updating the child labor regulations
issued under the FLSA will help meet
the challenge of ensuring good jobs for
the Nation’s working youth, by
balancing their educational needs with
job-related experiences that are safe,
healthy, and fair. This will enhance
young workers’ opportunities to gain the
skills to find and hold good jobs with
the potential to increase their earnings
over time.
The Wage and Hour Division will
review the implementation of the new
military family leave amendments to the
Family and Medical Leave Act that were
PO 00000
Frm 00127
Fmt 1260
Sfmt 1260
64267
included in the National Defense
Authorization Act for FY 2008, as well
as other provisions of the FMLA
regulations that were revised and
implemented in January 2009. This
regulatory initiative assists in achieving
the Secretary’s goal of workplace
flexibility for family and personal caregiving and, particularly through the job
protection and the maintenance of
health benefits provisions, helps
middle-class families remain in the
middle class.
The Wage and Hour Division also
intends to initiate rulemaking to update
the recordkeeping regulation issued
under the Fair Labor Standards Act.
Consistent with the Secretary’s strategic
vision, this proposal will foster more
openness and transparency by
demonstrating employers’ compliance
with minimum wage and overtime
requirements to workers. In turn, this
will better ensure compliance by
regulated entities and assist the
Department with its enforcement efforts.
ESA’s Office of Federal Contract
Compliance Programs (OFCCP) is
charged with assuring that the door to
opportunity is open to every American
regardless of race, color, religion, sex,
national origin, veteran status, or
disability. OFCCP enforces Executive
Order 11246, as amended, and selected
provisions of the Vietnam Era Veterans’
Readjustment Assistance Act of 1974
(VEVRAA), and Section 503 of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended
(Section 503). Regulations issued under
the Executive Order and the two acts
govern the nondiscrimination and
affirmative action obligations for
Federal contractors and subcontractors.
OFCCP’s enforcement of these statutory
obligations contributes to achieving
several of the Secretary’s desired
outcomes, including increasing workers’
incomes and narrowing wage and
income inequality, breaking down
barriers to fair and diverse work places
so that every worker’s contribution is
respected and helping workers who are
in low-wage jobs or out of the labor
market find a path into middle-class
jobs.
OFCCP is highlighting three
regulatory initiatives that reflect the
Secretary’s vision of good jobs for
everyone. The Evaluation of
Recruitment and Placement Results
under Section 503 ANPRM will invite
the public to provide input on how the
Department can strengthen affirmative
action requirements by requiring
Federal contractors and subcontractors
to conduct more substantive analyses
and monitoring of their recruitment and
E:\FR\FM\07DER5.SGM
07DER5
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
64268
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 233 / Monday, December 7, 2009 / The Regulatory Plan
placement efforts targeted to individuals
with disabilities.
The Evaluation of Recruitment and
Placement Results under VEVRRA
NPRM will propose to revise provisions
in the regulations to strengthen
compliance with affirmative action
requirements, including the
establishment of outreach, recruitment,
and placement goals for the
employment and advancement of
covered veterans. This effort will help
support the creation of good jobs for
veterans, especially those returning
from recent service in Iraq and
Afghanistan. Through this initiative,
OFCCP will help servicemen and
women successfully transition into
civilian life.
The Construction Contractor
Affirmative Action Requirements
proposed rule would revise the
regulations implementing the
affirmative action requirements of
Executive Order 11246 that are
applicable to federal and federallyassisted construction contractors. The
initiative would update regulatory
provisions that set forth the actions
construction contractors are required to
take to implement their affirmative
action obligations.
ESA’s Office of Labor-Management
Standards (OLMS) administers and
enforces most provisions of the LaborManagement Reporting and Disclosure
Act of 1959 (LMRDA). The LMRDA
requires unions, employers, laborrelations consultants, and others to file
financial disclosure reports, which are
publicly available. The LMRDA
includes provisions protecting union
member rights to participate in their
union’s governance, to run for office and
fully exercise their union citizenship, as
well as procedural safeguards to ensure
free and fair union elections.
OLMS intends to publish a Request
for Information regarding the use of
Internet voting in union officer elections
conducted under the LMRDA to better
inform the agency in administering its
obligation under the union democracy
provisions of the Act to ensure that the
voting right of each union member is
protected. OLMS also will propose a
regulatory initiative to better implement
the public disclosure objectives of the
LMRDA regarding employer-consultant
agreements to persuade employees
concerning their rights to organize and
bargain collectively. Under LMRDA
section 203 an employer must report
any agreement or arrangement with a
third party consultant to persuade
employees as to their collective
bargaining rights or to obtain certain
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:10 Dec 04, 2009
Jkt 220001
information concerning the activities of
employees or a labor organization in
connection with a labor dispute
involving the employer. The consultant,
also, is required to report concerning
such an agreement or arrangement with
an employer. An exemption to these
reporting requirements is set forth in
LMRDA section 203(c), which provides,
in part, that employers and consultants
are not required to file a report by
reason of the consultant’s giving or
agreeing to give ‘‘advice’’ to the
employer. The Department believes that
current policy concerning the scope of
the ‘‘advice exemption’’ is over-broad
and that a narrower construction would
better allow for the employer and
consultant reporting intended by the
LMRDA. Regulatory action is needed to
provide workers with information
critical to their effective participation in
the workplace. When workers or union
members have more information about
what arrangements have been made by
their employer to persuade them
whether or not to join a union, this
information helps them make more
informed choices and acts to level the
labor-management relations playing
field. Both initiatives support the
Secretary’s vision of good jobs for
everyone by advancing the goal to
ensure that workers and union members
have a voice in the workplace.
ESA’s Office of Workers’
Compensation Programs (OWCP)
administers four major disability
compensation programs that provide
wage replacement benefits, medical
treatment, vocational rehabilitation and
other benefits (such as survivors
benefits) to certain workers who
experience work-related injury or
occupational disease. The Federal
Employees’ Compensation Act (FECA)
provides workers’ compensation
benefits to federal workers for
employment related injuries and
occupational diseases as well as
survivor benefits for a covered
employee’s employment-related death.
The Longshore and Harbor Workers’
Compensation Act (LHWCA) provides
vocational rehabilitation, medical
benefits, and financial compensation to
covered maritime workers who incurred
occupational injuries or illnesses as a
result of exposure to their employment.
The LHWCA provides similar coverage
for employees covered by the Defense
Base Act (DBA).
These programs serve to advance the
Secretary’s vision of good jobs for
everyone by securing the desired
outcomes of facilitating return to work
for workers experiencing workplace
PO 00000
Frm 00128
Fmt 1260
Sfmt 1260
injuries or illnesses who are able to
work and sufficient income and medical
care for those who are unable to work;
providing income support when work is
impossible or unavailable; and
providing compensation to eligible
survivors after the death of a covered
worker, thereby helping middle class
families remain in the middle class.
OWCP plans to update its regulations
governing administration of claims
under the FECA. The regulations will be
revised to reflect changes already in
place since the regulations were
comprehensively updated ten years ago
and to incorporate new procedures that
will enhance OWCP’s ability to
administer FECA. Among other benefits,
changes to the regulations will facilitate
the return to work of injured workers
who are able to work, will enhance
OWCP’s ability to efficiently provide
sufficient income and medical care for
those who are unable to work, and will
foster greater openness and
transparency by better explaining the
increased automation of the medical
billing process.
In addition, OWCP will modernize
the provision of compensation for
employees situated overseas who are
neither citizens nor residents of the
United States to reflect current realities
in regard to such employees. The
regulations will also be revised to reflect
a recent statutory change to the FECA
moving the three-day waiting period
before qualifying for wage-loss
compensation for employees of the
Postal Service. These revisions will
increase the transparency of program
operations and improve program
implementation with efficiency
providing better service in a more
timely fashion.
OWCP plans to issue regulations
under the LHWCA to clarify the
application of the waiver provisions of
the DBA, by explaining the DOL
procedures for reviewing and granting a
waiver. These rules will facilitate return
to work for employees experiencing
workplace injuries or illnesses who are
able to work and sufficient income and
medical care for those who are unable
to work.
E:\FR\FM\07DER5.SGM
07DER5
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 233 / Monday, December 7, 2009 / The Regulatory Plan
None
disability retired list, for a serious
injury or illness.’’ The NDAA
amendment to FMLA also permits an
eligible employee to take up to 12
workweeks of FMLA leave for ‘‘any
qualifying exigency (as the Secretary [of
Labor] shall, by regulation, determine)
arising out of the fact that the spouse,
or a son, daughter, or parent of the
employee is on active duty (or has been
notified of an impending call or order
to active duty) in the Armed Forces in
support of a contingency operation.’’
Regulations implementing these
amendments were published November
17, 2008, and took effect January 16,
2009 (73 FR 67934). The Department
is reviewing the implementation of
these new military family leave
amendments and other revisions of the
current regulations.
Abstract:
Summary of Legal Basis:
DOL—Employment Standards
Administration (ESA)
PROPOSED RULE STAGE
92. ∑ THE FAMILY AND MEDICAL
LEAVE ACT OF 1993, AS AMENDED
Priority:
Economically Significant. Major status
under 5 USC 801 is undetermined.
Legal Authority:
29 USC 2654
CFR Citation:
29 CFR 825
Legal Deadline:
The Department of Labor continues to
review the implementation of the new
military family leave amendments to
the Family and Medical Leave Act
included in the National Defense
Authorization Act for FY 2008, and
other revisions of the current
regulations implemented in January
2009.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
Statement of Need:
The FMLA requires covered employers
to grant eligible employees up to 12
workweeks of unpaid, job-protected
leave a year for specified family and
medical reasons, and to maintain group
health benefits during the leave as if
the employees continued to work
instead of taking leave. When an
eligible employee returns from FMLA
leave, the employer must restore the
employee to the same or an equivalent
job with equivalent pay, benefits, and
other conditions of employment. FMLA
makes it unlawful for an employer to
interfere with, restrain, or deny the
exercise of any right provided by the
FMLA. In addition, section 585(a) of
the National Defense Authorization Act
for FY 2008 (NDAA), Public Law 110181, amended the FMLA effective
January 28, 2008, to permit an eligible
employee who is the ‘‘spouse, son,
daughter, parent, or next of kin of a
covered servicemember’’ to take up to
a total of 26 workweeks of leave during
a single 12-month period to care for
the covered servicemember, defined as
‘‘a member of the Armed Forces,
including a member of the National
Guard or Reserves, who is undergoing
medical treatment, recuperation, or
therapy, is otherwise in outpatient
status, or is otherwise on the temporary
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:10 Dec 04, 2009
Jkt 220001
64269
Agency Contact:
Richard M. Brennan
Director, Division of Interpretations and
Regulatory Analysis, Wage and Hour
Division
Department of Labor
200 Constitution Avenue NW.
FP Building
Room S–3502
Washington, DC 20210
Phone: 202 693–0051
Fax: 202 693–1387
RIN: 1215–AB76
DOL—ESA
93. ∑ RECORDS TO BE KEPT BY
EMPLOYERS UNDER THE FAIR
LABOR STANDARDS ACT
Priority:
Other Significant. Major status under 5
USC 801 is undetermined.
These regulations are authorized by
section 404 of the Family and Medical
Leave Act, 29 U.S.C. 2654.
Legal Authority:
29 USC 211(c)
CFR Citation:
Alternatives:
29 CFR 516
After completing a review of the
implementation of the new military
family leave amendments and other
revisions of the regulations
implemented in January 2009,
regulatory alternatives will be
developed for notice-and-comment
rulemaking.
Legal Deadline:
Anticipated Cost and Benefits:
Preliminary estimates of the anticipated
costs and benefits of this initiative will
be determined once regulatory
alternatives are developed.
Risks:
This rulemaking action does not
directly affect risks to public health,
safety, or the environment.
Timetable:
Action
Date
NPRM
FR Cite
11/00/10
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required:
Undetermined
Government Levels Affected:
Local, State, Tribal
Federalism:
Undetermined
PO 00000
Frm 00129
Fmt 1260
Sfmt 1260
None
Abstract:
The Department of Labor proposes to
update the recordkeeping regulations
under the Fair Labor Standards Act in
order to enhance the transparency and
disclosure to workers of how their pay
is computed, and to modernize other
recordkeeping requirements for
employees under ‘‘telework’’ and
‘‘flexiplace’’ arrangements.
Statement of Need:
The recordkeeping regulation issued
under the Fair Labor Standards Act
(FLSA), 29 CFR part 516, specifies the
scope and manner of records covered
employers must keep that demonstrate
compliance with minimum wage,
overtime, and child labor requirements
under the FLSA, or the records to be
kept that confirm particular exemptions
from some of the Act’s requirements
may apply. This proposal intends to
update the recordkeeping requirements
to foster more openness and
transparency in demonstrating
employers’ compliance with applicable
requirements to their workers, to better
ensure compliance by regulated entities
and to assist in enforcement. In
addition, the proposal intends to
modernize the requirements, consistent
with the increasing emphasis on flexiplace and telecommuting, to allow for
E:\FR\FM\07DER5.SGM
07DER5
64270
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 233 / Monday, December 7, 2009 / The Regulatory Plan
automated or electronic recordkeeping
systems instead of the mandatory
manual preparation of ‘‘homeworker’’
handbooks currently required for all
work that an employee may perform in
the home.
DOL—ESA
Summary of Legal Basis:
Priority:
Other Significant. Major status under 5
USC 801 is undetermined.
These regulations are authorized by
section 11 of the Fair Labor Standards
Act, 29 U.S.C. 211.
Alternatives:
Preliminary estimates of anticipated
costs and benefits of this regulatory
initiative have not been determined at
this time and will be determined at a
later date as appropriate.
Risks:
This action does not affect public
health, safety, or the environment.
Timetable:
NPRM
FR Cite
08/00/10
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required:
Undetermined
Government Levels Affected:
Local, State, Tribal
Federalism:
Undetermined
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
Agency Contact:
Richard M. Brennan
Director, Division of Interpretations and
Regulatory Analysis, Wage and Hour
Division
Department of Labor
200 Constitution Avenue NW.
FP Building
Room S–3502
Washington, DC 20210
Phone: 202 693–0051
Fax: 202 693–1387
RIN: 1215–AB78
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:10 Dec 04, 2009
Jkt 220001
Statement of Need:
The Department of Labor is proposing
a regulatory initiative to better
implement the public disclosure
objectives of the Labor-Management
Reporting and Disclosure Act (LMRDA)
regarding employer-consultant
agreements to persuade employees
concerning their rights to organize and
bargain collectively. Under LMRDA
section 203 an employer must report
any agreement or arrangement with a
third party consultant to persuade
employees as to their collective
bargaining rights or to obtain certain
information concerning the activities of
employees or a labor organization in
connection with a labor dispute
involving the employer. The consultant,
also, is required to report concerning
such an agreement or arrangement with
an employer. Statutory exceptions to
these reporting requirements are set
forth in LMRDA section 203(c), which
provides, in part, that employers and
consultants are not required to file a
report by reason of the consultant’s
giving or agreeing to give ‘‘advice’’ to
the employer. The Department believes
that its current policy concerning the
scope of the ‘‘advice exception’’ is overbroad and that a narrower construction
Frm 00130
Fmt 1260
Sfmt 1260
This proposed rulemaking is authorized
under U.S.C. §§ 433 and 438 and
applies to regulations at 29 CFR Part
405 and 29 CFR Part 406.
Alternatives will be developed and
considered in the course of notice and
comment rulemaking.
Abstract:
The Department intends to publish
notice and comment rulemaking
seeking consideration of a revised
interpretation of Section 203(c) of the
Labor-Management Reporting and
Disclosure Act (LMRDA). That statutory
provision creates an ‘‘advice’’
exemption from reporting requirements
that apply to employers and other
persons in connection with persuading
employees about the right to organize
and bargain collectively. A proposed
revised interpretation would narrow the
scope of the advice exemption.
PO 00000
Summary of Legal Basis:
Alternatives:
Legal Deadline:
None
Anticipated Cost and Benefits:
Date
Legal Authority:
29 USC 433; 29 USC 438
CFR Citation:
29 CFR 405; 29 CFR 406
Alternatives will be developed in
considering proposed revisions to the
current recordkeeping requirements.
The public will be invited to provide
comments on the proposed revisions
and possible alternatives.
Action
94. ∑ INTERPRETATION OF THE
‘‘ADVICE’’ EXEMPTION OF SECTION
203(C) OF THE
LABOR–MANAGEMENT REPORTING
AND DISCLOSURE ACT
would better allow for the employer
and consultant reporting intended by
the LMRDA. Regulatory action is
needed to provide workers with
information critical to their effective
participation in the workplace.
Anticipated Cost and Benefits:
Anticipated costs and benefits of this
proposed regulatory initiative have not
been assessed and will be determined
at a later date, as appropriate.
Risks:
This action does not affect public
health, safety, or the environment.
Timetable:
Action
Date
NPRM
FR Cite
11/00/10
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required:
Yes
Small Entities Affected:
Businesses
Government Levels Affected:
None
URL For More Information:
www.olms.dol.gov
URL For Public Comments:
www.regulations.gov
Agency Contact:
Andrew R. Davis
Chief, Division of Interpretations and
Standards, Office of Labor–Management
Standards
Department of Labor
Employment Standards Administration
200 Constitution Avenue NW.
FP Building
Room N–5609
Washington, DC 20210
Phone: 202 693–0123
Fax: 202 693–1340
Email: davis.andrew@dol.gov
RIN: 1215–AB79
E:\FR\FM\07DER5.SGM
07DER5
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 233 / Monday, December 7, 2009 / The Regulatory Plan
are safe, healthy, and fair for the
Nation’s working youth, while
balancing their educational needs with
job-related experiences that are safe.
Updated child labor regulations that
better address the safety needs of
today’s workplaces will ensure our
young workers have permissible job
opportunities that are safe, enhancing
their opportunity to gain the skills to
find and hold good jobs with the
potential to increase their earnings over
time. Ensuring safe and reasonable
work hours for working youth will also
ensure that top priority is given to their
education, consistent with the purposes
of the statute.
DOL—ESA
FINAL RULE STAGE
95. CHILD LABOR REGULATIONS,
ORDERS, AND STATEMENTS OF
INTERPRETATION
Priority:
Other Significant
Legal Authority:
29 USC 203(l); 29 USC 212; 29 USC
213(c)
CFR Citation:
Action
Date
NPRM
NPRM Comment
Period End
Final Action
FR Cite
04/17/07 72 FR 19337
07/16/07
04/00/10
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required:
Undetermined
Small Entities Affected:
Businesses, Governmental Jurisdictions
Government Levels Affected:
Local, State
None
Abstract:
The Department of Labor continues to
review the Fair Labor Standards Act
child labor provisions to ensure that
the implementing regulations provide
job opportunities for working youth
that are healthy and safe and not
detrimental to their education, as
required by the statute (29 U.S.C.
sections 203(l), 212(c), 213(c), and
216(e)). This proposed rule will update
the regulations to reflect statutory
amendments enacted in 2004, and will
propose, among other updates,
revisions to address several
recommendations of the National
Institute for Occupational Safety and
Health (NIOSH) in its 2002 report to
the Department of Labor on the child
labor Hazardous Occupations Orders
(HOs) (available at
https://www.youthrules.dol.gov/
resources.htm).
Statement of Need:
The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA)
requires the Secretary of Labor to issue
regulations on the employment of
minors between 14 and 16 years of age,
ensuring that the periods and
conditions of their employment do not
interfere with their schooling, health,
or well-being, and to designate
occupations that are particularly
hazardous for minors 16 and 17 years
of age. Child Labor Regulation No. 3
sets forth the permissible industries
and occupations in which 14- and 15year-olds may be employed, specifies
the number of hours in a day and in
a week, and time periods within a day,
that such minors may be employed.
Updating the child labor regulations
issued under the FLSA will help meet
the challenge of ensuring good jobs that
15:10 Dec 04, 2009
Jkt 220001
Agency Contact:
These regulations are issued pursuant
to sections 3(1), 11, 12, and 13 of the
Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C.
203(1), 211, 121, and 213.
Legal Deadline:
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
Timetable:
Summary of Legal Basis:
29 CFR 570
VerDate Nov<24>2008
64271
Richard M. Brennan
Director, Division of Interpretations and
Regulatory Analysis, Wage and Hour
Division
Department of Labor
200 Constitution Avenue NW.
FP Building
Room S–3502
Washington, DC 20210
Phone: 202 693–0051
Fax: 202 693–1387
Alternatives:
When developing regulatory
alternatives in the analysis of
recommendations of the National
Institute for Occupational Safety and
Health in its 2002 report to the
Department on the child labor
hazardous occupations orders and other
proposals, the Department has focused
on assuring healthy, safe, and fair
workplaces for young workers that are
not detrimental to their education, as
required by the statute. Some of the
regulatory alternatives were developed
based on recent legislative
amendments.
Anticipated Cost and Benefits:
Preliminary estimates of the anticipated
costs and benefits of this rulemaking
initiative indicated it was not
economically significant. Benefits to the
public, including employers and
workers, will include safer working
conditions and the avoidance of
injuries and lost productivity involving
young workers.
RIN: 1215–AB57
DOL—Employment and Training
Administration (ETA)
PROPOSED RULE STAGE
96. YOUTHBUILD PROGRAM
REGULATION
Priority:
Other Significant
Legal Authority:
PL 109–281
CFR Citation:
Not Yet Determined
Risks:
Legal Deadline:
The Department’s child labor
regulations, by ensuring that
permissible job opportunities for
working youth are safe and healthy and
not detrimental to their education,
produce positive benefits by reducing
health-related and lost-productivity
costs employers might otherwise incur
from higher accident and injury rates
to young and inexperienced workers.
Because of the limited nature of the
regulatory revisions contemplated
under this initiative, a detailed
assessment of the magnitude of risk
was not prepared.
None
PO 00000
Frm 00131
Fmt 1260
Sfmt 1260
Abstract:
The YouthBuild Transfer Act of 2006,
Public Law 109-281, enacted on
September 22, 2006, transfers oversight
and administration of the YouthBuild
program from the U.S. Department of
Housing and Urban Development
(HUD) to the U.S. Department of Labor
(DOL). The YouthBuild program model
targets are high school dropouts,
adjudicated youth, youth aging out of
foster care, and other at-risk youth
populations. The program model
E:\FR\FM\07DER5.SGM
07DER5
64272
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 233 / Monday, December 7, 2009 / The Regulatory Plan
balances in-school learning, geared
toward a high school diploma or GED,
and construction skills training, geared
toward a career placement for the
youth. DOL intends to develop
regulations in response to the
legislation and to guide the program
implementation and management.
incorporation of public comments to
the NPRM.
Statement of Need:
The YouthBuild Transfer Act of 2006
(Transfer Act), PL 109-281, transfers the
YouthBuild program from the HUD to
the DOL. The transfer incorporates
technical modifications and amends
certain program features. The
Employment and Training
Administration is proposing new
regulations which will govern its
administration of the YouthBuild
program.
The Transfer Act maintains all the
goals of the YouthBuild program as
originally developed under HUD,
including supporting the development
of affordable housing, but shifts the
emphasis to skills training for youth
participants. The Transfer Act makes
the YouthBuild program consistent
with the job training, education, and
employment goals under the Workforce
Investment Act, PL 105-220, as
amended. This includes authorizing
DOL to apply the common performance
measures developed for Federal youth
activities employment and training
programs. The Transfer Act authorizes
education and workforce investment,
such as occupational skills training,
internships, and job shadowing, as well
as community service and peercentered activities. In addition, the
Transfer Act allows for greater
coordination of the YouthBuild
program with the workforce investment
system, including local workforce
investment boards, and One-Stop
Career Centers, and their partner
programs. These strengthened
connections will enhance the job
training and employment opportunities
available to participating at-risk youth.
Risks:
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
Summary of Legal Basis:
These regulations are authorized by
Public Law 109-281, The YouthBuild
Transfer Act of 2006, to implement
changes to the amendments to subtitle
D of Title I of the Workfoce Investment
Act of 1998 as amended (WIA).
Alternatives:
The public will be afforded an
opportunity to provide comments on
the YouthBuild program changes when
the Department publishes the NPRM in
the Federal Register. A Final Rule will
be issued after analysis and
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:10 Dec 04, 2009
Jkt 220001
Anticipated Cost and Benefits:
Preliminary estimates of the anticipated
costs of this regulatory action have not
been determined at this time and will
be determined at a later date.
those benefits and services. It also
requires reports on the program’s
effectiveness. The Act amends section
248 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C.
2320) and requires that the Secretary
issue regulations to carry out these
provisions.
Statement of Need:
This action does not affect public
health, safety, or the environment.
Timetable:
Action
Date
NPRM
06/00/10
FR Cite
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required:
No
Government Levels Affected:
None
Agency Contact:
Grace A. Kilbane
Administrator, Office of Workforce
Investment
Department of Labor
Employment and Training Administration
200 Constitution Avenue NW.
FP Building, Room S–4231
Washington, DC 20210
Phone: 202 693–3980
Email: kilbane.grace@dol.gov
RIN: 1205–AB49
The Trade and Globalization
Adjustment Assistance Act of 2009
(TGAAA) is the portion of the
American Recovery and Reinvestment
Act of 2009 (Recovery Act) (Pub. L. No.
111-5, Div. B, Title I, Subtitle I) that
reauthorized and substantially amended
the Trade Adjustment Assistance for
Workers (TAA) program. Significant
program changes enacted in the
TGAAA include amending the
certification criteria to expand the types
of workers who may be certified and
expanding the available program
benefits. This proposed rule is
important because it will update the
program’s regulations to be in concert
with the notable program changes
wrought by the TGAAA.
Summary of Legal Basis:
These regulations are authorized by
sections 248 of the Trade Act (19 U.S.C.
2320), as amended by the TGAAA.
Alternatives:
DOL—ETA
97. TRADE ADJUSTMENT
ASSISTANCE FOR WORKERS
PROGRAM; REGULATIONS
Priority:
Other Significant
The public will be afforded an
opportunity to provide comments on
the proposed regulatory changes when
the Department publishes the NPRM in
the Federal Register. A final rule will
be issued after analysis of, and
response to, public comments.
Anticipated Cost and Benefits:
Legal Authority:
19 USC 2320; Secretary’s Order 3–2007,
72 FR 15907
CFR Citation:
Preliminary estimates of the anticipated
costs of this regulatory action have not
been determined at this time and will
be determined at a later date.
20 CFR 617, 618, 665, 671; 29 CFR 90
Timetable:
Legal Deadline:
Action
Date
None
NPRM
12/00/10
Abstract:
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required:
The Trade and Globalization Assistance
Act of 2009 (Act), Div. B, Title I,
Subtitle I of the American Recovery
and Reinvestment Act of 2009,
reauthorizes the Trade Adjustment
Assistance for Workers program. More
specifically, the law amends the criteria
for certification of worker groups as
eligible to apply for benefits and
services and substantially expands
PO 00000
Frm 00132
Fmt 1260
Sfmt 1260
No
Small Entities Affected:
No
Government Levels Affected:
Federal
E:\FR\FM\07DER5.SGM
07DER5
FR Cite
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 233 / Monday, December 7, 2009 / The Regulatory Plan
Agency Contact:
Erin Fitzgerald
Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance
Department of Labor
Employment and Training Administration
200 Constitution Avenue NW.
Room C–5311, FP Building
Washingon, DC 20210
Phone: 202 693–3500
Fax: 202 693–3149
Email: fitzgerald.erin@dol.gov
RIN: 1205–AB57
DOL—ETA
98. ∑ EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
OPPORTUNITY IN APPRENTICESHIP
AND TRAINING, AMENDMENT OF
REGULATIONS
Priority:
Other Significant
Legal Authority:
Sec. 1, 50 Stat. 664, as amended (29
USC 50; 40 USC 276c; 5 USC 301);
Reorganization Plan No. 14 of 1950, 64
Stat. 1267 (5 USC App. P. 534)
CFR Citation:
29 CFR 30 (Revision)
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
Legal Deadline:
None
Abstract:
Revisions to the equal opportunity
regulatory framework for the National
Apprenticeship Act are a critical
element in the Department’s vision to
promote and expand registered
apprenticeship opportunities in the
21st century while continuing to
safeguard the welfare and safety of
apprentices. In October 2008, the
Agency issued a Final rule updating
regulations for Apprenticeship
Programs and Labor Standards for
Registration. These regulations, codified
at Title 29 Code of Federal Regulations
(CFR) part 29, had not been updated
since first promulgated in 1977. The
companion regulations, 29 CFR part 30,
Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO)
in Apprenticeship and Training, have
not been amended since first
promulgated in 1978.
The Agency now proposes to update
29 CFR part 30 to ensure that the
National Registered Apprenticeship
System is consistent and in alignment
with changes in Affirmative Action
regulations and EEO laws and court
cases that have occurred over the past
three decades [e.g. Americans with
Disabilities Act (ADA) and the Age
Discrimination in Employment Act
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:10 Dec 04, 2009
Jkt 220001
(ADEA)], and recent revisions to Title
29 CFR part 29. This second phase of
regulatory updates will ensure that
Registered Apprenticeship is positioned
to continue to provide economic
opportunity for millions of Americans
while keeping pace with these new
requirements.
Statement of Need:
Federal regulations for Equal
Employment Opportunity (EEO) in
Apprenticeship and Training have not
been updated since first promulgated in
1978. Updates to these regulations are
necessary to ensure that DOL regulatory
requirements governing the National
Registered Apprenticeship System are
consistent with the current state of EEO
law, including affirmative action, the
passage of, for example, the Americans
with Disabilities Act (ADA) and the
Age Discrimination in Employment Act
(ADEA), and recent revisions to Title
29 CFR part 29, regulations for
Apprenticeship Programs and Labor
Standards for Registration.
Summary of Legal Basis:
These regulations are authorized by the
National Apprenticeship Act of 1937
(29 U.S.C. 50) and the Copeland Act
(40 U.S.C. 276c). These regulations will
set forth policies and procedures to
promote equality of opportunity in
apprenticeship programs registered
with the U.S. Department of Labor or
in State Apprenticeship Agencies
recognized by the U.S. Department of
Labor.
Alternatives:
The public will be afforded an
opportunity to provide comments on
the proposed amendment to
Apprenticeship EEO regulations when
the Department publishes a Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) in the
Federal Register. A Final Rule will be
issued after analysis and incorporation
of public comments to the NRPM.
Anticipated Cost and Benefits:
Preliminary estimates of anticipated
costs and benefits of this regulatory
action have not been determined at this
time. The Department will explore
options for conducting a cost-benefit
analysis for this regulatory action, if
necessary.
Timetable:
Action
Date
NPRM
01/00/11
FR Cite
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required:
No
PO 00000
Frm 00133
Fmt 1260
Sfmt 1260
64273
Small Entities Affected:
No
Government Levels Affected:
Federal, State, Tribal
Federalism:
This action may have federalism
implications as defined in EO 13132.
Agency Contact:
John V. Ladd
Office of Apprenticeship
Department of Labor
Employment and Training Administration
200 Constitution Avenue NW
Room N5311
FP Building
Washington, DC 20210
Phone: 202 693–2796
Fax: 202 693–3799
Email: ladd.john@dol.gov
RIN: 1205–AB59
DOL—ETA
FINAL RULE STAGE
99. TEMPORARY AGRICULTURAL
EMPLOYMENT OF H–2A ALIENS IN
THE UNITED STATES
Priority:
Other Significant
Legal Authority:
8 USC 1101(a)(15)(H)(ii)(a); 8 USC 1188
CFR Citation:
20 CFR 655
Legal Deadline:
None
Abstract:
The Department of Labor (the
Department of DOL) proposes to amend
its regulations governing the
certification of temporary employment
of nonimmigrant workers in temporary
or seasonal agricultural employment
and the enforcement of the contractual
obligations applicable to employers of
such nonimmigrant workers. This
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking would
reexamine the process by which
employers obtain a temporary labor
certification from the Department for
use in petitioning the Department of
Homeland Security (DHS) to employ a
nonimmigrant worker in H-2A status.
Statement of Need:
The Department has determined for a
variety of reasons that a new
E:\FR\FM\07DER5.SGM
07DER5
64274
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 233 / Monday, December 7, 2009 / The Regulatory Plan
families’ ability to meet necessary costs
is an important concern.
In addition, the Department’s
experience under the program since
January 2009 demonstrates that the
policy goals of the 2008 Final Rule
have not been met. One of the clear
goals of the 2008 Final Rule was to
increase the use of the H-2A program
and to make the program easier and
more affordable to use for the average
employer. However, applications have
actually decreased since the
implementation of the new program.
Not only has usage not increased under
the program revisions, there has
actually been a reversal of an existing
multi-year trend toward increased
program use. While factors other than
the regulatory changes may play a role
in this decrease, the Department can
not justify the significant decrease in
worker protections if the prior rules’
goal of increasing program use is not
being accomplished.
Alternatives:
Action
The Department believes that there are
insufficient worker protections in the
attestation-based model in which
employers merely confirm, and do not
actually demonstrate, that they have
performed an adequate test of the U.S.
labor market. Even in the first year of
the attestation model, it has come to
the Department’s attention that
employers, either from a lack of
understanding or otherwise, are
attesting to compliance with program
obligations with which they have not
complied. Such non-compliance
appears to be sufficiently substantial
and widespread for the Department to
revisit the use of attestations, even with
the use of back-end integrity measures
for demonstrated non-compliance.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
rulemaking effort is necessary for the
H-2A program. The Department
believes that the policy underpinnings
of the 2008 Final Rule, e.g.,
streamlining the H-2A regulatory
process to defer many determinations
of program compliance until after an
application has been fully adjudicated,
do not provide an adequate level of
protection for either U.S. or foreign
workers.
NPRM
NPRM Comment
Period End
NPRM Comment
Period Extended
Final Rule
Final Rule Effective
Notice of Proposed
Suspension
Comment Period End
Notice of Final
Suspension
NPRM
NPRM Comment
Period End
NPRM Comment
Period Extended
Final Rule
The Department has also determined
that the area in which agricultural
workers are most vulnerable — wages
— has been adversely impacted to a
far more significant extent than
anticipated by the 2008 Final Rule. The
shift from the AEWR as calculated
under the 1987 Rule to the AEWR of
the 2008 Final Rule resulted in a
substantial reduction of farmworker
wages in a number of labor categories,
and the obvious effects of that
reduction on the workers’ and their
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required:
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:10 Dec 04, 2009
Jkt 220001
Summary of Legal Basis:
These proposed regulations are
authorized under Section
101(a)(15)(H)(ii)(a) of the Immigration
and Nationality Act, as amended. 8
U.S.C. 1101(a)(15)(H)(ii)(a); see also 8
U.S.C. 1184(c)(1) and 1188.
The Department took into account both
the regulations promulgated in 1987, as
well as the significant reworking of the
regulations in the 2008 Final Rule, in
order to arrive at a balance between the
worker protections of the 1987 Rule
and the program integrity measures of
the 2008 Final Rule.
Anticipated Cost and Benefits:
Preliminary estimates of the anticipated
monetized costs of this proposed
regulatory action are $10.56 million in
2009 to $18.07 million in 2018. A final
estimate of costs and benefits will be
prepared at the Final Rule stage in
response to public comments.
Timetable:
Date
02/13/08 73 FR 8538
03/31/08
04/14/08 73 FR 16243
12/18/08 73 FR 77110
01/17/09
03/17/09 74 FR 11408
03/27/09
05/29/09 74 FR 25972
09/04/09 74 FR 45905
10/05/09
10/20/09 74 FR 50929
02/00/10
No
Small Entities Affected:
Businesses
Government Levels Affected:
Federal, State
PO 00000
Frm 00134
FR Cite
Fmt 1260
Sfmt 1260
Agency Contact:
Dr. William L. Carlson
Administrator, Office of Foreign Labor
Certification
Department of Labor
Employment and Training Administration
FP Building
Room C–4312
200 Constitution Avenue NW.
Washington, DC 20210
Phone: 202 693–3010
Email: carlson.william@dol.gov
RIN: 1205–AB55
DOL—Employee Benefits Security
Administration (EBSA)
PRERULE STAGE
100. ∑ LIFETIME INCOME OPTIONS
FOR PARTICIPANTS AND
BENEFICIARIES IN RETIREMENT
PLANS
Priority:
Other Significant. Major status under 5
USC 801 is undetermined.
Unfunded Mandates:
Undetermined
Legal Authority:
29 USC 1135; ERISA sec 505
CFR Citation:
Not Yet Determined
Legal Deadline:
None
Abstract:
This initiative will explore what steps,
if any, that the Department could or
should take, by regulation or otherwise,
to enhance the retirement security of
American workers by facilitating access
to and use of lifetime income or income
arrangements designed to provide a
stream of income after retirement.
Statement of Need:
With a continuing trend away from
defined benefit plans to defined
contribution plans, employees are not
only increasingly responsible for the
adequacy of their retirement savings,
but also for ensuring that their savings
last throughout their retirement.
Employees may benefit from access to
and use of lifetime income or other
arrangements that will reduce the risk
of running out of funds during the
retirement years. However, both access
to and use of such arrangements in
defined contribution plans is limited.
E:\FR\FM\07DER5.SGM
07DER5
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 233 / Monday, December 7, 2009 / The Regulatory Plan
The Department, taking into
consideration recommendations of the
ERISA Advisory Council and others,
intends to explore what steps, if any,
it could or should take, by regulation
or otherwise, to enhance the retirement
security of workers by increasing access
to and use of such arrangements.
and nature of the regulatory guidance
needed by the public.
DOL—EBSA
Summary of Legal Basis:
Priority:
Section 505 of ERISA provides that the
Secretary may prescribe such
regulations as she finds necessary and
appropriate to carry out the provisions
of title I of the Act.
Alternatives:
Alternatives will be considered
following a determination of the scope
and nature of the regulatory guidance
needed by the public.
64275
PROPOSED RULE STAGE
101. ∑ DEFINITION OF ‘‘FIDUCIARY’’
— INVESTMENT ADVICE
Economically Significant. Major under
5 USC 801.
Anticipated Cost and Benefits:
Preliminary estimates of the anticipated
costs and benefits will be developed,
as appropriate, following a
determination regarding the alternatives
to be considered.
Timetable:
Action
Date
Unfunded Mandates:
NPRM
06/00/10
Undetermined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required:
Legal Authority:
Undetermined
29 USC 1002; ERISA sec 3(21); 29 USC
1135; ERISA sec 505
FR Cite
Government Levels Affected:
CFR Citation:
Undetermined
29 CFR 2510.3–21(c)
Federalism:
Legal Deadline:
Undetermined
Anticipated Cost and Benefits:
None
Agency Contact:
Preliminary estimates of the anticipated
costs and benefits will be developed,
as appropriate, following a
determination regarding the alternatives
to be considered.
Abstract:
Jeffrey J. Turner
Chief, Division of Regulations, Office of
Regulations and Interpretations
Department of Labor
Employee Benefits Security
Administration
200 Constitution Avenue NW.
FP Building
Rm N–5655
Washington, DC 20210
Phone: 202 693–8500
Timetable:
Action
Date
RFI
FR Cite
01/00/10
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required:
Undetermined
Statement of Need:
Government Levels Affected:
Undetermined
Federalism:
Undetermined
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
Agency Contact:
Jeffrey J. Turner
Chief, Division of Regulations, Office of
Regulations and Interpretations
Department of Labor
Employee Benefits Security
Administration
200 Constitution Avenue NW.
FP Building
Rm N–5655
Washington, DC 20210
Phone: 202 693–8500
RIN: 1210–AB33
This rulemaking would amend the
regulatory definition of the term
‘‘fiduciary’’ set forth at 29 CFR 2510.321 (c) to more broadly define as
employee benefit plan fiduciaries
persons who render investment advice
to plans for a fee within the meaning
of section 3(21) of ERISA. The
amendment would take into account
current practices of investment advisers
and the expectations of plan officials
and participants who receive
investment advice.
This rulemaking is needed to bring the
definition of ‘‘fiduciary’’ into line with
investment advice practices and to
recast the current regulation to better
reflect relationships between
investment advisers and their employee
benefit plan clients. The current
regulation may inappropriately limit
the types of investment advice
relationships that should give rise to
fiduciary duties on the part of the
investment adviser.
Summary of Legal Basis:
Alternatives will be considered
following a determination of the scope
15:10 Dec 04, 2009
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00135
Fmt 1260
Sfmt 1260
DOL—EBSA
102. ∑ HEALTH CARE
ARRANGEMENTS ESTABLISHED BY
STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS
FOR NON–GOVERNMENTAL
EMPLOYEES
Priority:
Other Significant. Major status under 5
USC 801 is undetermined.
Unfunded Mandates:
Undetermined
Legal Authority:
29 USC 1135; ERISA sec 505
Section 505 of ERISA provides that the
Secretary may prescribe such
regulations as she finds necessary and
appropriate to carry out the provisions
of title I of the Act. Regulation 29 CFR
2510.3-21(c) defines the term fiduciary
for certain purposes under section 3(21)
of ERISA.
Alternatives:
VerDate Nov<24>2008
RIN: 1210–AB32
CFR Citation:
29 CFR 2510.3–1
Legal Deadline:
None
Abstract:
Department of Labor regulation 29
C.F.R. 2510.3-1 clarifies the definition
of the terms ‘‘employee welfare benefit
plan’’ and ‘‘welfare plan’’ for purposes
E:\FR\FM\07DER5.SGM
07DER5
64276
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 233 / Monday, December 7, 2009 / The Regulatory Plan
of title I of the Employee Retirement
Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA)
by identifying certain practices which
do not constitute employee welfare
benefit plans. This rulemaking would
amend that regulation to clarify the
circumstances under which health care
arrangements established or maintained
by state or local governments for the
benefit of non-governmental employees
do not constitute an employee welfare
benefit plan for purposes of section 3(1)
of ERISA and 29 CFR 2510.3-1.
Agency Contact:
Jeffrey J. Turner
Chief, Division of Regulations, Office of
Regulations and Interpretations
Department of Labor
Employee Benefits Security
Administration
200 Constitution Avenue NW.
FP Building
Rm N–5655
Washington, DC 20210
Phone: 202 693–8500
RIN: 1210–AB34
Statement of Need:
Questions have been raised regarding
the extent to which health care reform
efforts on the part of state and local
governments result in the creation of
ERISA-covered employee welfare
benefit plans or otherwise implicate
ERISA. This regulation is needed to
provide certainty to both governmental
bodies and employers concerning the
application of ERISA to such efforts.
DOL—EBSA
Summary of Legal Basis:
Legal Authority:
29 USC 1182; 29 USC 1191b(d); 29 USC
1132
Section 505 of ERISA provides that the
Secretary may prescribe such
regulations as she finds necessary and
appropriate to carry out the provisions
of title I of the Act. Regulation 29 CFR
2510.3-1 clarifies definitions of the
terms ‘‘employee welfare benefit plan’’
and ‘‘welfare plan’’ for purposes of title
I of ERISA.
Alternatives:
Alternatives will be considered
following a determination of the scope
and nature of the regulatory guidance
needed by the public.
Anticipated Cost and Benefits:
Preliminary estimates of the anticipated
costs and benefits will be developed,
as appropriate, following a
determination regarding the alternatives
to be considered.
Timetable:
Action
Date
NPRM
09/00/10
FR Cite
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required:
Undetermined
Government Levels Affected:
Undetermined
Federalism:
Undetermined
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:10 Dec 04, 2009
Jkt 220001
FINAL RULE STAGE
regulations as may be necessary or
appropriate to carry out the provisions
of part 7 of ERISA. In addition, GINA
section 101(f) requires the Secretary to
issue regulations to carry out GINA’s
amendments.
Alternatives:
Alternatives will be considered
following a determination of the scope
and nature of the regulatory guidance
needed by the public.
Anticipated Cost and Benefits:
Preliminary estimates of the anticipated
costs and benefits will be developed,
as appropriate, following a
determination regarding the alternatives
to be considered.
Timetable:
103. GENETIC INFORMATION
NONDISCRIMINATION
Priority:
Other Significant
CFR Citation:
Not Yet Determined
Legal Deadline:
Final, Statutory, May 21, 2009, As per
GINA section 101(f)(1).
Abstract:
Pursuant to ERISA sections 702, 733(d),
and 502, as amended by the Genetic
Information Nondiscrimination Act of
2008 (GINA) (Pub. L. 110-233) enacted
May 21, 2008, the Department is
developing regulatory guidance.
Regulatory guidance will provide
clarification regarding GINA’s
prohibition against discrimination in
group premiums based on genetic
information, its limitations on genetic
testing, its prohibition on collection of
genetic information, and its new civil
monetary penalties under ERISA.
Statement of Need:
GINA section 101(f)(1) requires the
Secretary to issue regulations to carry
out its statutory provisions no later
than May 21, 2009.
Summary of Legal Basis:
Section 505 of ERISA provides that the
Secretary may prescribe such
regulations as she considers necessary
and appropriate to carry out the
provisions of title I of ERISA. Section
734 of ERISA provides that the
Secretary may promulgate such
PO 00000
Frm 00136
Fmt 1260
Sfmt 1260
Action
Date
Request for
Information
Request for
Information
Comment Period
End
Interim Final Rule
Interim Final Rule
Effective
Interim Final Rule
Comment Period
End
FR Cite
10/10/08 73 FR 60208
12/09/08
10/07/09 74 FR 51664
12/07/09
01/05/10
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required:
Undetermined
Government Levels Affected:
None
Agency Contact:
Amy J. Turner
Senior Advisor
Department of Labor
Employee Benefits Security
Administration
200 Constitution Avenue NW.
FP Building
Room N–5653
Washington, DC 20210
Phone: 202 693–8335
Fax: 202 219–1942
RIN: 1210–AB27
DOL—EBSA
104. MENTAL HEALTH PARITY AND
ADDICTION EQUITY ACT
Priority:
Other Significant. Major status under 5
USC 801 is undetermined.
Unfunded Mandates:
Undetermined
E:\FR\FM\07DER5.SGM
07DER5
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 233 / Monday, December 7, 2009 / The Regulatory Plan
Undetermined
fail. Impoundment failures could
endanger lives and cause property
damage. MSHA will issue an advance
notice of proposed rulemaking to solicit
information relative to proper design,
construction, operation, maintenance,
and other safety issues for
impoundments at metal and nonmetal
mines whose failure could cause loss
of life or significant property damage.
Government Levels Affected:
Statement of Need:
None
Mining operations regularly find it
necessary to construct dams to dispose
of large volumes of mine waste (tailings
or slurry) from processing operations,
or to provide water supply, sediment
control, or water treatment.
Impoundments are structures that are
used to impound water, sediment, or
slurry or any combination of materials.
Dams that form impoundments must be
designed to be stable under the various
conditions they will be subjected to,
including runoff from rainfall, seepage,
and possibly earthquake shaking. The
failure of these structures can have a
devastating effect on both the mine and
nearby communities.
Legal Authority:
Action
29 USC 1185a
Request for
Information
Comment Period
End
Interim Final Rule
CFR Citation:
Not Yet Determined
Legal Deadline:
Final, Statutory, October 8, 2009, as per
MHPAEA section 512(d).
Abstract:
Pursuant to ERISA section 712, as
amended by the Paul Wellstone and
Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity
and Addiction Equity Act of 2008
(MHPAEA) (Pub. L. 110-343) enacted
on October 8, 2008, the Department is
developing regulatory guidance.
Statement of Need:
In response to a Request for
Information in April 2008, over 400
comment letters were received raising
questions regarding compliance with
the federal parity provisions. This
regulation is needed to provide
clarifications to participants,
beneficiaries, health care providers,
employment-based health plans, health
insurance issuers, third-party
administrators, brokers, underwriters,
and other plan service providers
regarding such provisions.
64277
Date
FR Cite
05/28/09
04/00/10
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required:
Federalism:
Undetermined
Agency Contact:
Amy J. Turner
Senior Advisor
Department of Labor
Employee Benefits Security
Administration
200 Constitution Avenue NW.
FP Building
Room N–5653
Washington, DC 20210
Phone: 202 693–8335
Fax: 202 219–1942
Alternatives:
Legal Authority:
Every two years since 1980, a report
has been prepared by the Federal
Emergency Management Agency
(FEMA) and sent to Congress on the
status of dam safety in the U.S. These
reports are required by a 1979
Presidential Memorandum which
directed the Federal agencies
responsible for dams to adopt and
implement the Federal Guidelines for
Dam Safety. MSHA has been criticized
in these biennial reports for its lack of
regulation of metal and nonmetal dams.
MSHA’s Metal and Nonmetal standards
do not provide sufficient guidance to
determine what is needed to effectively
design and construct dams with high
or significant hazard potential. The
Metal and Nonmetal standards need to
more effectively address requirements
for dam design, construction, operation
and maintenance.
Alternatives will be considered
following a determination of the scope
and nature of the regulatory guidance
needed by the public.
30 USC 811; 30 USC 812
Summary of Legal Basis:
CFR Citation:
Anticipated Cost and Benefits:
Legal Deadline:
Preliminary estimates of the anticipated
costs and benefits will be developed,
as appropriate, following a
determination regarding the alternatives
to be considered.
None
Promulgation of this regulation is
authorized by the Federal Mine Safety
and Health Act of 1977 as amended by
the Mine Improvement and New
Emergency Response Act of 2006.
Abstract:
Alternatives:
Water, sediment, and slurry
impoundments for metal and nonmetal
mining and milling operations are
located throughout the country. Some
of these impoundments would impact
homes, well-traveled roads, and other
important infrastructure if they were to
MSHA is considering amendments,
revisions, and additions to existing
standards.
Summary of Legal Basis:
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
Section 505 of ERISA provides that the
Secretary may prescribe such
regulations as she finds necessary and
appropriate to carry out the provisions
of title I of the Act. Section 734 of
ERISA provides that the Secretary may
prescribe regulations necessary or
appropriate to carry out the provisions
of ERISA Part 7. MHPAEA created new
federal parity provisions in ERISA
section 712 and provides, in section
512(d), that the Secretary shall issue
regulations to carry out the provisions
of MHPAEA.
Timetable:
Action
Request for
Information
VerDate Nov<24>2008
Date
FR Cite
04/28/09 74 FR 19155
15:10 Dec 04, 2009
Jkt 220001
Related RIN: Related to 0938–AP65,
Related to 1545–BI70
RIN: 1210–AB30
DOL—Mine Safety and Health
Administration (MSHA)
PRERULE STAGE
105. ∑ METAL AND NONMETAL
IMPOUNDMENTS
Priority:
Other Significant
Unfunded Mandates:
Undetermined
30 CFR 56; 30 CFR 57
PO 00000
Frm 00137
Fmt 1260
Sfmt 1260
Anticipated Cost and Benefits:
MSHA will develop a preliminary
regulatory economic analysis to
E:\FR\FM\07DER5.SGM
07DER5
64278
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 233 / Monday, December 7, 2009 / The Regulatory Plan
accompany any proposed rule that may
be developed.
Risks:
The failure of impoundments can have
a devastating affect on both the mine
and nearby communities by causing
loss of life and property damage.
Timetable:
Action
Date
ANPRM
FR Cite
06/00/10
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required:
Undetermined
Small Entities Affected:
Businesses
Government Levels Affected:
None
Agency Contact:
Patricia W. Silvey
Director, Office of Standards, Regulations,
and Variances
Department of Labor
Mine Safety and Health Administration
1100 Wilson Boulevard
Room 2350
Arlington, VA 22209–3939
Phone: 202 693–9440
Fax: 202 693–9441
Email: silvey.patricia@dol.gov
RIN: 1219–AB70
DOL—MSHA
PROPOSED RULE STAGE
106. RESPIRABLE CRYSTALLINE
SILICA STANDARD
an MRE equivalent concentration. The
metal and nonmetal mining industry
standard is based on the 1973
American Conference of Governmental
Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH)
Threshold Limit Values formula: 10
mg/m3 divided by the percentage of
quartz plus 2. Overexposure to
crystalline silica can result in some
miners developing silicosis, an
irreversible but preventable lung
disease, which ultimately may be fatal.
Both formulas are designed to limit
exposures to 0.1 mg/m3 (100ug) of
silica. The Secretary of Labor’s
Advisory Committee on the Elimination
of Pneumoconiosis Among Coal Mine
Workers made several
recommendations related to reducing
exposure to silica. NIOSH recommends
a 50 ug/m3 exposure limit for
respirable crystalline silica, and ACGIH
recommends a 25 ug/m3 exposure
limit. MSHA will publish a proposed
rule to address miners’ exposure to
respirable crystalline silica.
Statement of Need:
MSHA standards are outdated; current
regulations may not protect workers
from developing silicosis. Evidence
indicates that miners continue to
develop silicosis. MSHA’s proposed
regulatory action exemplifies the
agency’s commitment to protecting the
most vulnerable populations while
assuring broad-based compliance.
MSHA will regulate to eliminate or
reduce the hazards with the broadest
and most serious consequences based
on sound science. MSHA intends to use
OSHA’s work on the health effects and
risk assessment, adapting it as
necessary for the mining industry.
studies have shown that exposure to
respirable crystalline silica presents
potential health risks to miners. These
potential adverse health effects include
simple silicosis, progressive massive
fibrosis (lung scarring). Evidence
indicates that exposure to silica may
cause cancer. MSHA believes that the
health evidence forms a reasonable
basis for reducing miners’ exposure to
respirable crystalline silica.
Timetable:
Action
Date
NPRM
04/00/11
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required:
Undetermined
Small Entities Affected:
Businesses, Governmental Jurisdictions
Government Levels Affected:
Local, State
URL For More Information:
www.msha.gov/regsinfo.htm
URL For Public Comments:
www.regulations.gov
Agency Contact:
Patricia W. Silvey
Director, Office of Standards, Regulations,
and Variances
Department of Labor
Mine Safety and Health Administration
1100 Wilson Boulevard
Room 2350
Arlington, VA 22209–3939
Phone: 202 693–9440
Fax: 202 693–9441
Email: silvey.patricia@dol.gov
Summary of Legal Basis:
Other Significant
Legal Authority:
RIN: 1219–AB36
Promulgation of this standard is
authorized by sections 101 and 103 of
the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act
of 1977.
Priority:
DOL—MSHA
Alternatives:
30 USC 811; 30 USC 813
107. OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE TO
COAL MINE DUST (LOWERING
EXPOSURE)
None
This rulemaking would amend and
improve health protection from that
afforded by the existing standard.
MSHA will consider alternative
methods of addressing miners’
exposure based on the capabilities of
the sampling and analytical methods.
Abstract:
Anticipated Cost and Benefits:
30 USC 811; 30 USC 812
Current standards limit exposures to
quartz (crystalline silica) in respirable
dust. The coal mining industry
standard is based on the formula
10mg/m3 divided by the percentage of
quartz where the quartz percent is
greater than 5.0 percent calculated as
MSHA will prepare estimates of the
anticipated costs and benefits
associated with the proposed rule.
CFR Citation:
CFR Citation:
30 CFR 56 to 57; 30 CFR 70 to 72;
30 CFR 90
Legal Deadline:
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
FR Cite
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:10 Dec 04, 2009
Jkt 220001
Risks:
For over 70 years, toxicology
information and epidemiological
PO 00000
Frm 00138
Fmt 1260
Sfmt 1260
Priority:
Other Significant
Unfunded Mandates:
Undetermined
Legal Authority:
30 CFR 70; 30 CFR 71; 30 CFR 75; 30
CFR 90
Legal Deadline:
None
E:\FR\FM\07DER5.SGM
07DER5
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 233 / Monday, December 7, 2009 / The Regulatory Plan
Abstract:
Alternatives:
The Federal Coal Mine Health and
Safety Act of 1969 established the first
comprehensive respirable dust
standards for coal mines. These
standards were designed to reduce the
incidence of coal workers’
pneumoconiosis (black lung) and
silicosis and eventually eliminate these
diseases. While significant progress has
been made toward improving the health
conditions in our Nation’s coal mines,
miners continue to be at risk of
developing occupational lung disease,
according to the National Institute for
Occupational Safety and Health
(NIOSH). In September 1995, NIOSH
issued a Criteria Document in which
it recommended that the respirable coal
mine dust permissible exposure limit
(PEL) be cut in half. In February 1996,
the Secretary of Labor convened a
Federal Advisory Committee on the
Elimination of Pneumoconiosis Among
Coal Miners (Advisory Committee) to
assess the adequacy of MSHA’s current
program and standards to control
respirable dust in underground and
surface coal mines, as well as other
ways to eliminate black lung and
silicosis among coal miners. The
Committee represented the labor,
industry and academic communities.
The Committee submitted its report to
the Secretary of Labor in November
1996, with the majority of the
recommendations unanimously
supported by the Committee members.
The Committee recommended a
number of actions to reduce miners’
exposure to respirable coal mine dust.
MSHA will publish a proposed rule to
address miners’ exposure to respirable
coal mine dust.
MSHA is considering amendments,
revisions, and additions to existing
standards.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
Statement of Need:
Comprehensive respirable dust
standards for coal mines were designed
to reduce the incidence, and eventually
eliminate, CWP and silicosis. While
significant progress has been made
toward improving the health conditions
in our Nation’s coal mines, miners
remain at risk of developing
occupational lung disease, according to
NIOSH. Recent NIOSH data indicates
increased prevalence of CWP ‘‘clusters’’
in several geographical areas,
particularly in the Southern
Appalachian Region.
Summary of Legal Basis:
Promulgation of this regulation is
authorized by the Federal Mine Safety
and Health Act of 1977 as amended by
the Mine Improvement and New
Emergency Response Act of 2006.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:10 Dec 04, 2009
Jkt 220001
64279
DOL—Occupational Safety and Health
Administration (OSHA)
PRERULE STAGE
Anticipated Cost and Benefits:
MSHA will develop a preliminary
regulatory economic analysis to
accompany the proposed rule.
Risks:
Respirable coal dust is one of the most
serious occupational hazards in the
mining industry. Occupational
exposure to excessive levels of
respirable coal mine dust can cause
workers’ pneumoconiosis and silicosis,
which are potentially disabling and can
cause death. MSHA is pursuing both
regulatory and nonregulatory actions to
eliminate these diseases through the
control of coal mine respirable dust
levels in mines and reduction of
miners’ exposure. MSHA will develop
a risk assessment to accompany the
proposed rule.
Timetable:
Action
Date
NPRM
FR Cite
09/00/10
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required:
Undetermined
Small Entities Affected:
Businesses
Government Levels Affected:
None
Additional Information:
1219-AB14 (Verification of
Underground Coal Mine Operators’
Dust Control Plans and Compliance
Sampling for Respirable Dust) and
1219-AB18 (Determination of
Concentration of Respirable Coal Mine
Dust) have been integrated.
Agency Contact:
Patricia W. Silvey
Director, Office of Standards, Regulations,
and Variances
Department of Labor
Mine Safety and Health Administration
1100 Wilson Boulevard
Room 2350
Arlington, VA 22209–3939
Phone: 202 693–9440
Fax: 202 693–9441
Email: silvey.patricia@dol.gov
Related RIN: Related to 1219–AA81,
Related to 1219–AB14, Related to
1219–AB18
RIN: 1219–AB64
PO 00000
Frm 00139
Fmt 1260
Sfmt 1260
108. OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE TO
CRYSTALLINE SILICA
Priority:
Economically Significant. Major under
5 USC 801.
Unfunded Mandates:
This action may affect State, local or
tribal governments.
Legal Authority:
29 USC 655(b); 29 USC 657
CFR Citation:
29 CFR 1910; 29 CFR 1915; 29 CFR
1917; 29 CFR 1918; 29 CFR 1926
Legal Deadline:
None
Abstract:
Crystalline silica is a significant
component of the earth’s crust, and
many workers in a wide range of
industries are exposed to it, usually in
the form of respirable quartz or, less
frequently, cristobalite. Chronic
silicosis is a uniquely occupational
disease resulting from exposure of
employees over long periods of time
(10 years or more). Exposure to high
levels of respirable crystalline silica
causes acute or accelerated forms of
silicosis that are ultimately fatal. The
current OSHA permissible exposure
limit (PEL) for general industry is based
on a formula recommended by the
American Conference of Governmental
Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH) in 1971
(PEL=10mg/cubic meter/(% silica + 2),
as respirable dust). The current PEL for
construction and maritime (derived
from ACGIH’s 1962 Threshold Limit
Value) is based on particle counting
technology, which is considered
obsolete. NIOSH and ACGIH
recommend 50μg/m3 and 25μg/m3
exposure limits, respectively, for
respirable crystalline silica.
Both industry and worker groups have
recognized that a comprehensive
standard for crystalline silica is needed
to provide for exposure monitoring,
medical surveillance, and worker
training. The American Society for
Testing and Materials (ASTM) has
published a recommended standard for
addressing the hazards of crystalline
silica. The Building Construction
Trades Department of the AFL-CIO has
E:\FR\FM\07DER5.SGM
07DER5
64280
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 233 / Monday, December 7, 2009 / The Regulatory Plan
also developed a recommended
comprehensive program standard.
These standards include provisions for
methods of compliance, exposure
monitoring, training, and medical
surveillance.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
Statement of Need:
Workers are exposed to crystalline
silica dust in general industry,
construction, and maritime industries.
Industries that could be particularly
affected by a standard for crystalline
silica include: Foundries, industries
that have abrasive blasting operations,
paint manufacture, glass and concrete
product manufacture, brick making,
china and pottery manufacture,
manufacture of plumbing fixtures, and
many construction activities including
highway repair, masonry, concrete
work, rock drilling, and tuckpointing.
The seriousness of the health hazards
associated with silica exposure is
demonstrated by the fatalities and
disabling illnesses that continue to
occur; between 1990 and 1996, 200 to
300 deaths per year are known to have
occurred where silicosis was identified
on death certificates as an underlying
or contributing cause of death. It is
likely that many more cases have
occurred where silicosis went
undetected. In addition, the
International Agency for Research on
Cancer (IARC) has designated
crystalline silica as a known human
carcinogen. Exposure to crystalline
silica has also been associated with an
increased risk of developing
tuberculosis and other nonmalignant
respiratory diseases, as well as renal
and autoimmune respiratory diseases.
Exposure studies and OSHA
enforcement data indicate that some
workers continue to be exposed to
levels of crystalline silica far in excess
of current exposure limits. Congress has
included compensation of silicosis
victims on Federal nuclear testing sites
in the Energy Employees’ Occupational
Illness Compensation Program Act of
2000. There is a particular need for the
Agency to modernize its exposure
limits for construction and maritime
workers, and to address some specific
issues that will need to be resolved to
propose a comprehensive standard.
Summary of Legal Basis:
The legal basis for the proposed rule
is a preliminary determination that
workers are exposed to a significant
risk of silicosis and other serious
disease and that rulemaking is needed
to substantially reduce the risk. In
addition, the proposed rule will
recognize that the PELs for construction
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:10 Dec 04, 2009
Jkt 220001
and maritime are outdated and need to
be revised to reflect current sampling
and analytical technologies.
DOL—OSHA
PROPOSED RULE STAGE
Alternatives:
Over the past several years, the Agency
has attempted to address this problem
through a variety of non-regulatory
approaches, including initiation of a
Special Emphasis Program on silica in
October 1997, sponsorship with NIOSH
and MSHA of the National Conference
to Eliminate Silicosis, and
dissemination of guidance information
on its Web site. The Agency is
currently evaluating several options for
the scope of the rulemaking.
Anticipated Cost and Benefits:
The scope of the proposed rulemaking
and estimates of the costs and benefits
are still under development.
Risks:
A detailed risk analysis is under way.
Timetable:
Action
Date
Completed SBREFA
Report
Initiate Peer Review
of Health Effects
and Risk
Assessment
Complete Peer
Review
NPRM
FR Cite
12/19/03
05/22/09
01/00/10
07/00/10
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required:
Yes
Small Entities Affected:
Businesses
Government Levels Affected:
Federal
Federalism:
This action may have federalism
implications as defined in EO 13132.
Agency Contact:
Dorothy Dougherty
Director, Directorate of Standards and
Guidance
Department of Labor
Occupational Safety and Health
Administration
200 Constitution Avenue NW.
FP Building
Room N–3718
Washington, DC 20210
Phone: 202 693–1950
Fax: 202 693–1678
Email: dougherty.dorothy@dol.gov
RIN: 1218–AB70
PO 00000
Frm 00140
Fmt 1260
Sfmt 1260
109. HAZARD COMMUNICATION
Priority:
Economically Significant. Major under
5 USC 801.
Unfunded Mandates:
This action may affect the private
sector under PL 104-4.
Legal Authority:
29 USC 655(b); 29 USC 657
CFR Citation:
29 CFR 1910.1200; 29 CFR 1915.1200;
29 CFR 1917.28; 29 CFR 1918.90; 29
CFR 1926.59; 29 CFR 1928.21
Legal Deadline:
None
Abstract:
OSHA’s Hazard Communication
Standard (HCS) requires chemical
manufacturers and importers to
evaluate the hazards of the chemicals
they produce or import, and prepare
labels and material safety data sheets
to convey the hazards and associated
protective measures to users of the
chemicals. All employers with
hazardous chemicals in their
workplaces are required to have a
hazard communication program,
including labels on containers, material
safety data sheets (MSDS), and training
for employees. Within the United States
(U.S.), there are other Federal agencies
that also have requirements for
classification and labeling of chemicals
at different stages of the life cycle.
Internationally, there are a number of
countries that have developed similar
laws that require information about
chemicals to be prepared and
transmitted to affected parties. These
laws vary with regard to the scope of
substances covered, definitions of
hazards, the specificity of requirements
(e.g., specification of a format for
MSDSs), and the use of symbols and
pictograms. The inconsistencies
between the various laws are
substantial enough that different labels
and safety data sheets must often be
used for the same product when it is
marketed in different nations.
The diverse and sometimes conflicting
national and international requirements
can create confusion among those who
seek to use hazard information. Labels
and safety data sheets may include
E:\FR\FM\07DER5.SGM
07DER5
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 233 / Monday, December 7, 2009 / The Regulatory Plan
symbols and hazard statements that are
unfamiliar to readers or not well
understood. Containers may be labeled
with such a large volume of
information that important statements
are not easily recognized. Development
of multiple sets of labels and safety
data sheets is a major compliance
burden for chemical manufacturers,
distributors, and transporters involved
in international trade. Small businesses
may have particular difficulty in coping
with the complexities and costs
involved.
As a result of this situation, and in
recognition of the extensive
international trade in chemicals, there
has been a long-standing effort to
harmonize these requirements and
develop a system that can be used
around the world. In 2003, the United
Nations adopted the Globally
Harmonized System of Classification
and Labeling of Chemicals (GHS).
Countries are now adopting the GHS
into their national regulatory systems.
OSHA is considering modifying its HCS
to make it consistent with the GHS.
This would involve changing the
criteria for classifying health and
physical hazards, adopting
standardized labeling requirements, and
requiring a standardized order of
information for safety data sheets.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
Statement of Need:
Multiple sets of requirements for labels
and safety data sheets present a
compliance burden for U.S.
manufacturers, distributors, and
transports involved in international
trade. Adoption of the GHS would
facilitate international trade in
chemicals, reduce the burdens caused
by having to comply with differing
requirements for the same product, and
allow companies that have not had the
resources to deal with those burdens
to be involved in international trade.
This is particularly important for small
producers who may be precluded
currently from international trade
because of the compliance resources
required to address the extensive
regulatory requirements for
classification and labeling of chemicals.
Thus every producer is likely to
experience some benefits from domestic
harmonization, in addition to the
benefits that will accrue to producers
involved in international trade.
Most importantly, comprehensibility of
hazard information and worker safety
will be enhanced as the GHS will: (1)
provide consistent information and
definitions for hazardous chemicals; (2)
address stakeholder concerns regarding
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:10 Dec 04, 2009
Jkt 220001
the need for a standardized format for
material safety data sheets; and (3)
increase understanding by using
standardized pictograms and
harmonized hazard statements. The
increase in comprehensibility and
consistency will reduce confusion and
thus improve worker safety and health.
Several nations, including the European
Union, have adopted the GHS with an
implementation schedule through 2015.
U.S. manufacturers, employers, and
employees will be at a disadvantage in
the event that our system of hazard
communication is not compliant with
the GHS.
64281
Agency Contact:
Dorothy Dougherty
Director, Directorate of Standards and
Guidance
Department of Labor
Occupational Safety and Health
Administration
200 Constitution Avenue NW.
FP Building
Room N–3718
Washington, DC 20210
Phone: 202 693–1950
Fax: 202 693–1678
Email: dougherty.dorothy@dol.gov
RIN: 1218–AC20
DOL—OSHA
Summary of Legal Basis:
The Occupational Safety and Health
Act of 1970 authorizes the Secretary of
Labor to set mandatory occupational
safety and health standards to assure
safe and healthful working conditions
for working men and women (29 U.S.C.
651).
Alternatives:
FINAL RULE STAGE
110. CRANES AND DERRICKS IN
CONSTRUCTION
Priority:
Economically Significant. Major under
5 USC 801.
The alternative to the proposed
rulemaking would be to take no
regulatory action.
Legal Authority:
29 USC 651(b); 29 USC 655(b); 40 USC
333
Anticipated Cost and Benefits:
CFR Citation:
29 CFR 1926
The estimates of the costs and benefits
are still under development.
Risks:
OSHA’s risk analysis is under
development.
Timetable:
Action
Date
ANPRM
ANPRM Comment
Period End
Complete Peer
Review of
Economic Analysis
NPRM
NPRM Comment
Period End
Hearing
FR Cite
09/12/06 71 FR 53617
11/13/06
11/19/07
09/30/09 74 FR 50279
12/29/09
02/00/10
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required:
No
Government Levels Affected:
Local, State
Federalism:
This action may have federalism
implications as defined in EO 13132.
PO 00000
Frm 00141
Fmt 1260
Sfmt 1260
Legal Deadline:
None
Abstract:
A number of industry stakeholders
asked OSHA to update the cranes and
derricks portion of subpart N (29 CFR
1926.550), specifically requesting that
negotiated rulemaking be used.
In 2002, OSHA published a notice of
intent to establish a negotiated
rulemaking committee. A year later, in
2003, committee members were
announced and the Cranes and Derricks
Negotiated Rulemaking Committee was
established and held its first meeting.
In July 2004, the committee reached
consensus on all issues resulting in a
final consensus document.
Statement of Need:
There have been considerable
technological changes since the
consensus standards upon which the
1971 OSHA standard is based were
developed. In addition, industry
consensus standards for derricks and
crawler, truck and locomotive cranes
were updated as recently as 2004.
The industry indicated that over the
past 30 years, considerable changes in
E:\FR\FM\07DER5.SGM
07DER5
64282
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 233 / Monday, December 7, 2009 / The Regulatory Plan
both work processes and crane
technology have occurred. There are
estimated to be 64 to 89 fatalities
associated with cranes each year in
construction, and a more up-to-date
standard would help prevent them.
Timetable:
Action
Summary of Legal Basis:
The Occupational Safety and Health
Act of 1970 authorizes the Secretary of
Labor to set mandatory occupational
safety and health standards to assure
safe and healthful working conditions
for working men and women (29 USC
651).
Alternatives:
The alternative to the proposed
rulemaking would be to take no
regulatory action and not update the
standards in 29 CFR 1926.550
pertaining to cranes and derricks.
Anticipated Cost and Benefits:
The estimates of the costs and benefits
are still under development.
Risks:
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
OSHA’s risk analysis is under
development.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:10 Dec 04, 2009
Jkt 220001
Date
Notice of Intent To
Establish
Negotiated
Rulemaking
Comment Period End
Request for
Comments on
Proposed
Committee
Members
Request for
Comments Period
End
Established
Negotiated
Rulemaking
Committee
Rulemaking
Negotiations
Completed
SBREFA Report
NPRM
NPRM Comment
Period Extended
NPRM Comment
Period End
Public Hearing
Close Record
Final Rule
PO 00000
Frm 00142
FR Cite
07/16/02 67 FR 46612
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required:
Yes
Small Entities Affected:
09/16/02
02/27/03 68 FR 9036
Businesses
Government Levels Affected:
Undetermined
03/31/03 68 FR 9036
06/12/03 68 FR 35172
07/30/04
10/17/06
10/09/08 73 FR 59714
12/02/08 73 FR 73197
01/22/09
03/20/09
06/18/09
07/00/10
Fmt 1260
Sfmt 1260
Agency Contact:
Noah Connell
Deputy Director, Directorate of
Construction
Department of Labor
Occupational Safety and Health
Administration
200 Constitution Avenue NW.
FP Building
Room N–3468
Washington, DC 20210
Phone: 202 693–2020
Fax: 202 693–1689
RIN: 1218–AC01
BILLING CODE 4510–23–S
E:\FR\FM\07DER5.SGM
07DER5
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 233 (Monday, December 7, 2009)]
[Unknown Section]
[Pages 64264-64282]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X09-141207]
[[Page 64264]]
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR (DOL)
Statement of Regulatory and Deregulatory Priorities
Executive Summary
The Department of Labor's (DOL) mission is to protect workers by
improving working conditions, advancing opportunities for employment,
protecting retirement and health care benefits, helping employers find
workers, and strengthening collective bargaining. Secretary of Labor
Hilda L. Solis' vision is that the work of the Labor Department will
ensure there are good jobs for everyone.
To achieve this broad vision, the Secretary has established a series of
12 specific strategic outcomes, which span across all of the
Department's agencies. These outcomes are:
Increasing workers' incomes and narrowing wage and income
inequality.
Securing safe and healthy workplaces, wages and overtime,
particularly in high-risk industries.
Assuring skills and knowledge that prepare workers to succeed
in a knowledge-based economy, including in high-growth and
emerging industry sectors like ``green'' jobs.
Breaking down barriers to fair and diverse work places so that
every worker's contribution is respected.
Improving health benefits and retirement security for all
workers.
Providing work place flexibility for family and personal care-
giving.
Facilitating return to work for workers experiencing work
place injuries or illnesses who are able to work and
sufficient income and medical care for those who are unable
to work.
Income support when work is impossible or unavailable.
Helping workers who are in low-wage jobs or out of the labor
market find a path into middle class jobs.
Ensuring workers have a voice in the work place.
Assuring that global markets are governed by fair market rules
that protect vulnerable people, including women and
children, and provide workers a fair share of their
productivity and voice in their work lives.
Helping middle-class families remain in the middle class.
Critical to this vision is ensuring these outcomes achieve good jobs
for everyone. This includes vulnerable workers, workers in
traditionally less safe industry sectors, farmworkers, health care
workers and seniors, and those facing barriers to good employment.
The Secretary has directed each agency to ensure that all priority
regulatory projects support achievement of one or more of the strategic
outcomes that support the good jobs for everyone vision. The DOL Fall
2009 Regulatory Plan reflects this direction.
Openness and Transparency
Using regulatory changes to produce greater openness and transparency
is an integral part of a Department-wide compliance strategy. These
efforts will not only enhance DOL agencies' enforcement tool set, but
will encourage greater levels of compliance by the regulated community
and enhance awareness among workers of their rights and benefits.
The Department's commitment to achieving greater openness and
transparency is exemplified in its Regulatory Plan and Agenda. Several
proposals from the Employee Benefits Security Administration expand
disclosure requirements, substantially enhancing the availability of
information to pension plan participants and beneficiaries and
employers, and strengthening the retirement security of America's
workers. These rulemakings are:
Fiduciary Requirements for Disclosure in Participant-Directed
Individual Account Plans, which would increase transparency
between individual account pension plans and their
participants and beneficiaries by ensuring that
participants and beneficiaries are provided the information
they need, including information about fees and expenses,
to make informed investment decisions.
Amendment of Standards Applicable to General Statutory
Exemption for Services, which would require service
providers to disclose to plan fiduciaries services, fees,
compensation and conflicts of interest information.
Annual Funding Notice for Defined Benefit Plans, which would
require defined benefit plan administrators to provide all
participants, beneficiaries and other parties with detailed
information regarding their plan's funding status.
Periodic Pension Benefits Statements, which would require
pension plans to provide participants and certain
beneficiaries with periodic benefit statements.
Multiemployer Plan Information Made Available on Request,
which would require pension plan administrators to provide
copies of financial and actuarial reports to participants
and beneficiaries, unions and contributing employers on
request.
Several other Labor Department agencies will also be proposing
regulatory projects that will foster greater openness and transparency.
These include:
The Mine Safety and Health Administration's proposed
regulation on Notification of Legal Identity, which aims to
require mine operators to provide increased identification
information, would allow the agency to better target the
most egregious and persistent violators and deter future
violations.
The Office of Labor-Management Standards' proposed regulations
on Notification of Employee Rights Under Federal Labor
Laws, which would implement Executive Order 13496 and
require all Government contracting agencies to include a
contract clause requiring contractors to inform workers of
their rights under Federal labor laws.
The Wage and Hour Division's rulemaking, Records to be Kept by
Employers Under the Fair Labor Standards Act, which would
update decades old recordkeeping regulations in order to
enhance the transparency and disclosure to workers as to
how their wages are computed and to allow for new workplace
practices such as telework and flexiplace arrangements.
The Occupational Safety and Health Administration's
modification of its Hazard Communication Standard, which
would adopt standardized labeling requirements and order of
information for safety data sheets.
The Occupational Safety and Health Administration's
Occupational Injury and Illness Recording and Reporting
Requirements rule, which would propose the collection of
additional data to help employers and workers track
injuries at individual workplaces, improve the Nation's
occupational injury and illness information data, and
assist the agency in its enforcement of the safety and
health workplace requirements.
[[Page 64265]]
The Department's Regulatory Priorities
The Department of Labor's (DOL) 2009 Regulatory Plan highlights the
most noteworthy and significant regulatory projects that will be
undertaken by its regulatory agencies: the Employment Standards
Administration (ESA), Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA),
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), Employee Benefits
Security Administration (EBSA), and Employment and Training
Administration (ETA). The initiatives and priorities in the regulatory
plan represent those that are essential to the fulfillment of the
Secretary's vision for the Department and America's workforce.
Employment and Training Administration
ETA is charged with assuring our Nation's workers have the skills and
knowledge that will prepare them to succeed in a knowledge-based
economy, including high-growth and emerging industry sectors such as
``green jobs.'' For those workers who are in low-wage jobs or out of
the labor market, ETA programs will help them find a path to self-
sufficiency and good, middle class jobs. And for those who are unable
to work, or for whom work is unavailable, ETA programs provide income
support and a path to self-sufficiency. ETA is playing a pivotal role
in the implementation of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of
2009 (Recovery Act) to jumpstart our economy, create or save millions
of jobs, and make a down payment on addressing long-neglected
challenges so our country can thrive. Through these efforts and others,
ETA is transforming the way it provides services to all workers.
ETA is highlighting four regulatory priorities that reflect the
Secretary's vision to advance good jobs for everyone with measurable
and substantial outcomes. These are:
The Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) for Workers Program
Regulations propose to implement changes to the TAA program
that arose when the program was re-authorized and expanded
in the Recovery Act. The Recovery Act amended the
certification criteria, expanded the types of workers who
may be certified, and expanded the available program
benefits. The TAA regulations will help provide
opportunities for participants to acquire skills and
knowledge needed to become, or remain, employable in the
middle-class jobs market. The TAA regulations will also
help provide guidance on supplying participants with income
support for times when work is impossible or unavailable.
The overarching outcomes for the completion of the TAA
regulations are to help middle-class families remain middle
class and help workers who are out of the labor market find
a path into the middle class.
The Trade Adjustment Assistance: Merit Staffing of State
Administration and Allocation of Training Funds to States
Regulation proposes that personnel carrying out the worker
adjustment assistance provisions of the TAA program must be
State employees covered by the merit system of personnel
administration and addresses how the Department distributes
TAA training funds to the States. It will be finalized
after the public comments on the regulation have been
analyzed and considered. The Allocation of Training Funds
portion of this regulation explains, for the first time,
the new formula that the Department uses to allocate
training funds to the States.
The Temporary Agricultural Employment of H-2A Aliens in the
United States regulatory revisions set forth the
requirements for using temporary foreign agricultural
workers and establish wages and working conditions to cover
both U.S. and foreign agricultural workers. The H-2A
program assists in achieving the Secretary's goal to
increase workers' incomes and narrow wage and income
inequality by protecting the wages and working conditions
of both American workers and foreign nationals working in
the United States.
The YouthBuild Program regulation proposes to implement the
YouthBuild Transfer Act of 2006, which transferred the
YouthBuild program from the Department of Housing and Urban
Development to DOL, and amended certain program features to
emphasize skill training and connections to the public
workforce system. The YouthBuild regulations will help
achieve the Secretary's goals by assuring participants gain
the skills and knowledge that will prepare them to succeed
in a knowledge-based economy, including in high-growth and
emerging industry sectors like ``green jobs.''
In addition, the proposed amendments to regulations for equal
employment opportunity (EEO) in apprenticeship and training are a
critical second phase of regulatory updates to modernize the National
Apprenticeship System. The first phase was completed in October 2008
with the publication of a final rule updating regulations for
Apprenticeship Programs and Labor Standards for Registration. The
existing companion EEO regulations for apprenticeship were promulgated
over 30 years ago. Proposed amendments to these regulations will help
achieve the Secretary's goal of a fair and diverse workplace free of
discrimination and harassment by reflecting current EEO law.
Finally, the Department proposes amendments to the temporary non-
agricultural foreign worker (H-2B Worker) regulations. As part of its
statutory responsibility as an advisor to the Department of Homeland
Security, the Department certifies that there is not sufficient U.S.
worker(s) able, available, willing and qualified at the time of an
application for a visa, and that the employment of the alien will not
adversely affect the wages and working conditions of similarly employed
U.S. workers. The Department currently administers such certification
through an attestation-based program. The regulatory review of the H-2B
program will assist in achieving the Secretary's goal to increase
workers' incomes and narrow wage and income inequality by protecting
the wages and working conditions of both American workers and foreign
nationals working in the United States.
Employee Benefits Security Administration
The Employee Benefits Security Administration is responsible for
administering and enforcing the fiduciary, reporting and disclosure,
and health coverage provisions of Title I of the Employee Retirement
Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA). This includes recent amendments
and additions to ERISA enacted in the Pension Protection Act of 2006,
as well as new COBRA Continuation Coverage Provisions under the
Recovery Act. EBSA's regulatory plan initiatives are intended to
improve health benefits and retirement security for workers in every
type of job at every income level.
Health Benefits for Workers
EBSA will issue guidance implementing the Genetic Information
Nondiscrimination Act of 2008 (GINA)
[[Page 64266]]
amendments to ERISA. Generally, GINA prohibits group health plans from
discriminating in health coverage based on genetic information and from
collecting genetic information. This rulemaking helps ensure that
workers will have access to high quality health coverage, free from
discrimination based on a genetic predisposition towards a disease.
This is a joint rulemaking with the Departments of Health and Human
Services and the Treasury.
EBSA also will be providing guidance regarding the Paul Wellstone and
Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008
(MHPAEA) amendments to ERISA. MHPAEA creates parity for mental health
and substance use disorder benefits under group health plans by
mandating that any financial requirements and treatment limitations
applicable to mental health and substance abuse disorder benefits to be
no more restrictive than predominant requirements or limitations
applied to substantially all medical and surgical benefits covered by a
plan. EBSA's MHPAEA guidance will help ensure the desired outcome of
affording workers access to reliable and high quality health benefits.
EBSA also will issue guidance clarifying the circumstances under which
health care arrangements established or maintained by state or local
governments for the benefit of non-governmental employees do not
constitute an employee welfare benefit plan for purposes of ERISA. Such
clarification is intended to remove perceived impediments to state and
local government efforts to improve access to and opportunities for
quality and affordable health care coverage for vulnerable, uninsured
populations. The clarifications provided by this regulation also will
reduce uncertainty and, therefore, potential regulatory and litigation
costs for both plan sponsors and state and local governments concerning
the scope of ERISA regulation.
Retirement Security for Workers
EBSA will propose amendments to its regulations to clarify the
circumstances under which a person will be considered a fiduciary when
providing investment advice to employee benefit plans and their
participants and beneficiaries of such plans. EBSA also will explore
steps it can take by regulation, or otherwise, to encourage the
offering of lifetime annuities or similar lifetime benefits
distribution options for participants and beneficiaries of defined
contribution plans. These initiatives are intended to assure retirement
security for workers in all jobs regardless of income level by ensuring
that financial advisers and similar persons are required to meet
ERISA's strict standards of fiduciary responsibility and helping to
ensure that participants and beneficiaries have the benefit of their
plan savings throughout retirement.
Occupational Safety and Health Administration
The Secretary's vision for workers requires securing a safe and healthy
workplace. OSHA's regulatory program is designed to help workers and
employers identify hazards in the workplace, prevent the occurrence of
injuries and adverse health effects, and communicate with the regulated
community regarding hazards and how to effectively control them.
Longstanding health hazards such as silica and beryllium and emerging
hazards such as food flavorings containing diacetyl and airborne
infectious diseases place American workers at risk of serious disease
and death and are initiatives on OSHA's regulatory agenda. OSHA's
regulatory program demonstrates a renewed commitment to worker health
by addressing health hazards and the prevention of construction
injuries and fatalities.
First, OSHA is proposing to address worker exposures to crystalline
silica through the promulgation and enforcement of a comprehensive
health standard. Exposure to silica causes silicosis, a debilitating
respiratory disease, and may cause cancer, other chronic respiratory
diseases, and renal and autoimmune disease as well. Over 2 million
workers are exposed to crystalline silica in general industry,
construction, and maritime industries and workers are often exposed to
levels that exceed current OSHA permissible limits, which is frequent
in the construction industry where workers are exposed at levels that
exceed current limits by several fold. It has been estimated that
between 3,500 and 7,000 new cases of silicosis arise each year in the
U.S., and that 1,746 workers died of silicosis between 1996 and 2005.
Reducing these hazardous exposures through promulgation and enforcement
of a comprehensive health standard supports both the Secretary's vision
and will contribute to OSHA's goal of reducing occupational fatalities
and illnesses. As a part of the Secretary's strategy for securing safe
and healthy workplaces, the Mine Safety and Health Administration will
also be undertaking regulatory action related to silica utilizing
information provided by OSHA.
OSHA's second health initiative would revise its Hazard Communication
Standard (HCS) to make it consistent with a globally harmonized
approach to hazard communication. The HCS covers over 945,000 hazardous
chemical products in seven million American workplaces and gives
workers the ``right to know'' about chemical hazards they are exposed
to. OSHA and other Federal agencies have participated in long-term
international negotiations to develop the Globally Harmonized System of
Classification and Labeling of Chemicals (GHS). Revising the HCS to be
consistent with the GHS is expected to significantly improve the
communication of hazards to workers in American workplaces, reducing
exposures to hazardous chemicals, and reducing occupational illnesses
and fatalities.
Workers in construction suffer the most fatalities of any industry. In
2008, OSHA estimated that crane-related accidents in construction cause
over 80 fatalities a year. Therefore, OSHA's major construction
initiative is an update of the 1971 Cranes and Derricks Standards.
Completion of this standard will contribute to a reduction in
occupational injuries and fatalities, which helps achieve the
Secretary's outcome goal of securing safe and healthy workplaces in
high-risk industries. The Agency is currently evaluating the public
comments and planning to issue a final rule in July 2010.
Mine Safety and Health Administration
MSHA's regulatory projects support the Secretary's vision by protecting
the health and safety of the Nation's miners. Despite the agency's past
efforts, miners face safety and health hazards daily at levels unknown
in most other occupations. While the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act
of 1977 (Mine Act) places primary responsibility for preventing unsafe
and unhealthful working conditions in mines on the operators, the
collective commitment of miners, mine operators, and government is
needed to ensure safe workplaces.
The agency's proposed regulatory actions exemplify a commitment to
protecting the most vulnerable populations while assuring broad-based
compliance. Health hazards are pervasive in both coal and metal/
nonmetal mines (including
[[Page 64267]]
surface and underground mines) and large and small mines.
Recent data from the National Institute for Occupational Safety and
Health indicate increased prevalence of coal workers pneumoconiosis
(CWP) ``clusters'' in several geographical areas, particularly in the
Southern Appalachian Region. MSHA plans to publish a notice of proposed
rulemaking to address continued risk to coal miners from exposure to
respirable coal mine dust.
On January 16, 2009, MSHA and NIOSH published a proposed rule that
would revise requirements for the approval of coal mine personal dust
sampling devices. The proposed rule would also establish performance-
based and other requirements for approval of the continuous personal
dust monitor (CPDM) and revise requirements for the existing sampler.
As a part of the agency's efforts in this area, MSHA plans to publish a
Request for Information on the use of the CPDM to measure a miner's
exposure to respirable coal mine dust. The CPDM represents advanced
technology and the RFI will solicit information from the public to help
the Agency determine how to best use the technology to assess coal
miners' dust exposures. MSHA is also considering a rulemaking to
address ways in which mine operators can improve protections in their
dust control plans, emphasizing that the burden of compliance is on the
mine operator, rather than relying exclusively on enforcement
interventions.
These regulatory actions are a part of MSHA's Comprehensive Black Lung
Reduction Strategy for reducing miners' exposure to respirable dust.
This strategy includes enhanced enforcement, education and training,
and health outreach and collaboration.
As a part of the Secretary's strategy for securing safe and healthy
workplaces, both MSHA and OSHA will be undertaking regulatory action
related to silica. Overexposure to crystalline silica can result in
some miners developing silicosis, an irreversible but preventable lung
disease which ultimately may be fatal. Both the coal mine and metal/
nonmetal formulas are designed to limit exposures to 0.1 mg/m\3\ (100
[micro]g) of silica. MSHA plans to follow the recommendation of the
Secretary of Labor's Advisory Committee on the Elimination of
Pneumoconiosis Among Coal Mine Workers, NIOSH, and other industry
groups by publishing a proposed rule to address the exposure limit for
respirable crystalline silica. To assure consistency within the
Department, MSHA intends to use OSHA's work on the health effects of
occupational exposure to silica and OSHA's risk assessment, adapting it
as necessary for the mining industry.
MSHA is placing an emphasis on routinely evaluating the success of
existing enforcement and regulatory strategies and plans to issue an
Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPRM) on dams in metal and
nonmetal mines. Mining operations regularly find it necessary to
construct dams to dispose of large volumes of mine waste from
processing operations, or to provide water supply, sediment control, or
water treatment. The failure of these structures can have a devastating
effect on both the mine and nearby communities. MSHA evaluated its
existing requirements for metal and nonmetal dams and has determined
that the current standards do not provide sufficient guidance to
determine what is needed to effectively design and construct dams with
high or significant hazard potential. The ANPRM will solicit
information on proper design, construction and other safety issues for
impoundments at metal and nonmetal mines whose failure could cause loss
of life or significant property damage.
Employment Standards Administration
ESA's Wage and Hour Division enforces several statutes that establish
minimum labor standards and protect the Nation's workers, including the
Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), the Migrant and Seasonal Agricultural
Worker Protection Act, the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA), the
Service Contract Act, the Davis-Bacon and Related Acts, the Employee
Polygraph Protection Act, and certain provisions of the Immigration and
Nationality Act. The regulatory initiatives required to implement these
statutory workplace protections represent an important aspect of the
Division's work and affect over 130 million workers across all sectors
of the economy.
Updating the child labor regulations issued under the FLSA will help
meet the challenge of ensuring good jobs for the Nation's working
youth, by balancing their educational needs with job-related
experiences that are safe, healthy, and fair. This will enhance young
workers' opportunities to gain the skills to find and hold good jobs
with the potential to increase their earnings over time.
The Wage and Hour Division will review the implementation of the new
military family leave amendments to the Family and Medical Leave Act
that were included in the National Defense Authorization Act for FY
2008, as well as other provisions of the FMLA regulations that were
revised and implemented in January 2009. This regulatory initiative
assists in achieving the Secretary's goal of workplace flexibility for
family and personal care-giving and, particularly through the job
protection and the maintenance of health benefits provisions, helps
middle-class families remain in the middle class.
The Wage and Hour Division also intends to initiate rulemaking to
update the recordkeeping regulation issued under the Fair Labor
Standards Act. Consistent with the Secretary's strategic vision, this
proposal will foster more openness and transparency by demonstrating
employers' compliance with minimum wage and overtime requirements to
workers. In turn, this will better ensure compliance by regulated
entities and assist the Department with its enforcement efforts.
ESA's Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP) is charged
with assuring that the door to opportunity is open to every American
regardless of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, veteran
status, or disability. OFCCP enforces Executive Order 11246, as
amended, and selected provisions of the Vietnam Era Veterans'
Readjustment Assistance Act of 1974 (VEVRAA), and Section 503 of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended (Section 503). Regulations
issued under the Executive Order and the two acts govern the
nondiscrimination and affirmative action obligations for Federal
contractors and subcontractors. OFCCP's enforcement of these statutory
obligations contributes to achieving several of the Secretary's desired
outcomes, including increasing workers' incomes and narrowing wage and
income inequality, breaking down barriers to fair and diverse work
places so that every worker's contribution is respected and helping
workers who are in low-wage jobs or out of the labor market find a path
into middle-class jobs.
OFCCP is highlighting three regulatory initiatives that reflect the
Secretary's vision of good jobs for everyone. The Evaluation of
Recruitment and Placement Results under Section 503 ANPRM will invite
the public to provide input on how the Department can strengthen
affirmative action requirements by requiring Federal contractors and
subcontractors to conduct more substantive analyses and monitoring of
their recruitment and
[[Page 64268]]
placement efforts targeted to individuals with disabilities.
The Evaluation of Recruitment and Placement Results under VEVRRA NPRM
will propose to revise provisions in the regulations to strengthen
compliance with affirmative action requirements, including the
establishment of outreach, recruitment, and placement goals for the
employment and advancement of covered veterans. This effort will help
support the creation of good jobs for veterans, especially those
returning from recent service in Iraq and Afghanistan. Through this
initiative, OFCCP will help servicemen and women successfully
transition into civilian life.
The Construction Contractor Affirmative Action Requirements proposed
rule would revise the regulations implementing the affirmative action
requirements of Executive Order 11246 that are applicable to federal
and federally-assisted construction contractors. The initiative would
update regulatory provisions that set forth the actions construction
contractors are required to take to implement their affirmative action
obligations.
ESA's Office of Labor-Management Standards (OLMS) administers and
enforces most provisions of the Labor-Management Reporting and
Disclosure Act of 1959 (LMRDA). The LMRDA requires unions, employers,
labor-relations consultants, and others to file financial disclosure
reports, which are publicly available. The LMRDA includes provisions
protecting union member rights to participate in their union's
governance, to run for office and fully exercise their union
citizenship, as well as procedural safeguards to ensure free and fair
union elections.
OLMS intends to publish a Request for Information regarding the use of
Internet voting in union officer elections conducted under the LMRDA to
better inform the agency in administering its obligation under the
union democracy provisions of the Act to ensure that the voting right
of each union member is protected. OLMS also will propose a regulatory
initiative to better implement the public disclosure objectives of the
LMRDA regarding employer-consultant agreements to persuade employees
concerning their rights to organize and bargain collectively. Under
LMRDA section 203 an employer must report any agreement or arrangement
with a third party consultant to persuade employees as to their
collective bargaining rights or to obtain certain information
concerning the activities of employees or a labor organization in
connection with a labor dispute involving the employer. The consultant,
also, is required to report concerning such an agreement or arrangement
with an employer. An exemption to these reporting requirements is set
forth in LMRDA section 203(c), which provides, in part, that employers
and consultants are not required to file a report by reason of the
consultant's giving or agreeing to give ``advice'' to the employer. The
Department believes that current policy concerning the scope of the
``advice exemption'' is over-broad and that a narrower construction
would better allow for the employer and consultant reporting intended
by the LMRDA. Regulatory action is needed to provide workers with
information critical to their effective participation in the workplace.
When workers or union members have more information about what
arrangements have been made by their employer to persuade them whether
or not to join a union, this information helps them make more informed
choices and acts to level the labor-management relations playing field.
Both initiatives support the Secretary's vision of good jobs for
everyone by advancing the goal to ensure that workers and union members
have a voice in the workplace.
ESA's Office of Workers' Compensation Programs (OWCP) administers four
major disability compensation programs that provide wage replacement
benefits, medical treatment, vocational rehabilitation and other
benefits (such as survivors benefits) to certain workers who experience
work-related injury or occupational disease. The Federal Employees'
Compensation Act (FECA) provides workers' compensation benefits to
federal workers for employment related injuries and occupational
diseases as well as survivor benefits for a covered employee's
employment-related death. The Longshore and Harbor Workers'
Compensation Act (LHWCA) provides vocational rehabilitation, medical
benefits, and financial compensation to covered maritime workers who
incurred occupational injuries or illnesses as a result of exposure to
their employment. The LHWCA provides similar coverage for employees
covered by the Defense Base Act (DBA).
These programs serve to advance the Secretary's vision of good jobs for
everyone by securing the desired outcomes of facilitating return to
work for workers experiencing workplace injuries or illnesses who are
able to work and sufficient income and medical care for those who are
unable to work; providing income support when work is impossible or
unavailable; and providing compensation to eligible survivors after the
death of a covered worker, thereby helping middle class families remain
in the middle class.
OWCP plans to update its regulations governing administration of claims
under the FECA. The regulations will be revised to reflect changes
already in place since the regulations were comprehensively updated ten
years ago and to incorporate new procedures that will enhance OWCP's
ability to administer FECA. Among other benefits, changes to the
regulations will facilitate the return to work of injured workers who
are able to work, will enhance OWCP's ability to efficiently provide
sufficient income and medical care for those who are unable to work,
and will foster greater openness and transparency by better explaining
the increased automation of the medical billing process.
In addition, OWCP will modernize the provision of compensation for
employees situated overseas who are neither citizens nor residents of
the United States to reflect current realities in regard to such
employees. The regulations will also be revised to reflect a recent
statutory change to the FECA moving the three-day waiting period before
qualifying for wage-loss compensation for employees of the Postal
Service. These revisions will increase the transparency of program
operations and improve program implementation with efficiency providing
better service in a more timely fashion.
OWCP plans to issue regulations under the LHWCA to clarify the
application of the waiver provisions of the DBA, by explaining the DOL
procedures for reviewing and granting a waiver. These rules will
facilitate return to work for employees experiencing workplace injuries
or illnesses who are able to work and sufficient income and medical
care for those who are unable to work.
[[Page 64269]]
_______________________________________________________________________
DOL--Employment Standards Administration (ESA)
-----------
PROPOSED RULE STAGE
-----------
92. THE FAMILY AND MEDICAL LEAVE ACT OF 1993, AS AMENDED
Priority:
Economically Significant. Major status under 5 USC 801 is undetermined.
Legal Authority:
29 USC 2654
CFR Citation:
29 CFR 825
Legal Deadline:
None
Abstract:
The Department of Labor continues to review the implementation of the
new military family leave amendments to the Family and Medical Leave
Act included in the National Defense Authorization Act for FY 2008, and
other revisions of the current regulations implemented in January 2009.
Statement of Need:
The FMLA requires covered employers to grant eligible employees up to
12 workweeks of unpaid, job-protected leave a year for specified family
and medical reasons, and to maintain group health benefits during the
leave as if the employees continued to work instead of taking leave.
When an eligible employee returns from FMLA leave, the employer must
restore the employee to the same or an equivalent job with equivalent
pay, benefits, and other conditions of employment. FMLA makes it
unlawful for an employer to interfere with, restrain, or deny the
exercise of any right provided by the FMLA. In addition, section 585(a)
of the National Defense Authorization Act for FY 2008 (NDAA), Public
Law 110-181, amended the FMLA effective January 28, 2008, to permit an
eligible employee who is the ``spouse, son, daughter, parent, or next
of kin of a covered servicemember'' to take up to a total of 26
workweeks of leave during a single 12-month period to care for the
covered servicemember, defined as ``a member of the Armed Forces,
including a member of the National Guard or Reserves, who is undergoing
medical treatment, recuperation, or therapy, is otherwise in outpatient
status, or is otherwise on the temporary disability retired list, for a
serious injury or illness.'' The NDAA amendment to FMLA also permits an
eligible employee to take up to 12 workweeks of FMLA leave for ``any
qualifying exigency (as the Secretary [of Labor] shall, by regulation,
determine) arising out of the fact that the spouse, or a son, daughter,
or parent of the employee is on active duty (or has been notified of an
impending call or order to active duty) in the Armed Forces in support
of a contingency operation.'' Regulations implementing these amendments
were published November 17, 2008, and took effect January 16, 2009 (73
FR 67934). The Department is reviewing the implementation of these new
military family leave amendments and other revisions of the current
regulations.
Summary of Legal Basis:
These regulations are authorized by section 404 of the Family and
Medical Leave Act, 29 U.S.C. 2654.
Alternatives:
After completing a review of the implementation of the new military
family leave amendments and other revisions of the regulations
implemented in January 2009, regulatory alternatives will be developed
for notice-and-comment rulemaking.
Anticipated Cost and Benefits:
Preliminary estimates of the anticipated costs and benefits of this
initiative will be determined once regulatory alternatives are
developed.
Risks:
This rulemaking action does not directly affect risks to public health,
safety, or the environment.
Timetable:
_______________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
_______________________________________________________________________
NPRM 11/00/10
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required:
Undetermined
Government Levels Affected:
Local, State, Tribal
Federalism:
Undetermined
Agency Contact:
Richard M. Brennan
Director, Division of Interpretations and Regulatory Analysis, Wage and
Hour Division
Department of Labor
200 Constitution Avenue NW.
FP Building
Room S-3502
Washington, DC 20210
Phone: 202 693-0051
Fax: 202 693-1387
RIN: 1215-AB76
_______________________________________________________________________
DOL--ESA
93. RECORDS TO BE KEPT BY EMPLOYERS UNDER THE FAIR LABOR
STANDARDS ACT
Priority:
Other Significant. Major status under 5 USC 801 is undetermined.
Legal Authority:
29 USC 211(c)
CFR Citation:
29 CFR 516
Legal Deadline:
None
Abstract:
The Department of Labor proposes to update the recordkeeping
regulations under the Fair Labor Standards Act in order to enhance the
transparency and disclosure to workers of how their pay is computed,
and to modernize other recordkeeping requirements for employees under
``telework'' and ``flexiplace'' arrangements.
Statement of Need:
The recordkeeping regulation issued under the Fair Labor Standards Act
(FLSA), 29 CFR part 516, specifies the scope and manner of records
covered employers must keep that demonstrate compliance with minimum
wage, overtime, and child labor requirements under the FLSA, or the
records to be kept that confirm particular exemptions from some of the
Act's requirements may apply. This proposal intends to update the
recordkeeping requirements to foster more openness and transparency in
demonstrating employers' compliance with applicable requirements to
their workers, to better ensure compliance by regulated entities and to
assist in enforcement. In addition, the proposal intends to modernize
the requirements, consistent with the increasing emphasis on flexi-
place and telecommuting, to allow for
[[Page 64270]]
automated or electronic recordkeeping systems instead of the mandatory
manual preparation of ``homeworker'' handbooks currently required for
all work that an employee may perform in the home.
Summary of Legal Basis:
These regulations are authorized by section 11 of the Fair Labor
Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. 211.
Alternatives:
Alternatives will be developed in considering proposed revisions to the
current recordkeeping requirements. The public will be invited to
provide comments on the proposed revisions and possible alternatives.
Anticipated Cost and Benefits:
Preliminary estimates of anticipated costs and benefits of this
regulatory initiative have not been determined at this time and will be
determined at a later date as appropriate.
Risks:
This action does not affect public health, safety, or the environment.
Timetable:
_______________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
_______________________________________________________________________
NPRM 08/00/10
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required:
Undetermined
Government Levels Affected:
Local, State, Tribal
Federalism:
Undetermined
Agency Contact:
Richard M. Brennan
Director, Division of Interpretations and Regulatory Analysis, Wage and
Hour Division
Department of Labor
200 Constitution Avenue NW.
FP Building
Room S-3502
Washington, DC 20210
Phone: 202 693-0051
Fax: 202 693-1387
RIN: 1215-AB78
_______________________________________________________________________
DOL--ESA
94. INTERPRETATION OF THE ``ADVICE'' EXEMPTION OF SECTION
203(C) OF THE LABOR-MANAGEMENT REPORTING AND DISCLOSURE ACT
Priority:
Other Significant. Major status under 5 USC 801 is undetermined.
Legal Authority:
29 USC 433; 29 USC 438
CFR Citation:
29 CFR 405; 29 CFR 406
Legal Deadline:
None
Abstract:
The Department intends to publish notice and comment rulemaking seeking
consideration of a revised interpretation of Section 203(c) of the
Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act (LMRDA). That statutory
provision creates an ``advice'' exemption from reporting requirements
that apply to employers and other persons in connection with persuading
employees about the right to organize and bargain collectively. A
proposed revised interpretation would narrow the scope of the advice
exemption.
Statement of Need:
The Department of Labor is proposing a regulatory initiative to better
implement the public disclosure objectives of the Labor-Management
Reporting and Disclosure Act (LMRDA) regarding employer-consultant
agreements to persuade employees concerning their rights to organize
and bargain collectively. Under LMRDA section 203 an employer must
report any agreement or arrangement with a third party consultant to
persuade employees as to their collective bargaining rights or to
obtain certain information concerning the activities of employees or a
labor organization in connection with a labor dispute involving the
employer. The consultant, also, is required to report concerning such
an agreement or arrangement with an employer. Statutory exceptions to
these reporting requirements are set forth in LMRDA section 203(c),
which provides, in part, that employers and consultants are not
required to file a report by reason of the consultant's giving or
agreeing to give ``advice'' to the employer. The Department believes
that its current policy concerning the scope of the ``advice
exception'' is over-broad and that a narrower construction would better
allow for the employer and consultant reporting intended by the LMRDA.
Regulatory action is needed to provide workers with information
critical to their effective participation in the workplace.
Summary of Legal Basis:
This proposed rulemaking is authorized under U.S.C. Sec. Sec. 433 and
438 and applies to regulations at 29 CFR Part 405 and 29 CFR Part 406.
Alternatives:
Alternatives will be developed and considered in the course of notice
and comment rulemaking.
Anticipated Cost and Benefits:
Anticipated costs and benefits of this proposed regulatory initiative
have not been assessed and will be determined at a later date, as
appropriate.
Risks:
This action does not affect public health, safety, or the environment.
Timetable:
_______________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
_______________________________________________________________________
NPRM 11/00/10
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required:
Yes
Small Entities Affected:
Businesses
Government Levels Affected:
None
URL For More Information:
www.olms.dol.gov
URL For Public Comments:
www.regulations.gov
Agency Contact:
Andrew R. Davis
Chief, Division of Interpretations and Standards, Office of Labor-
Management Standards
Department of Labor
Employment Standards Administration
200 Constitution Avenue NW.
FP Building
Room N-5609
Washington, DC 20210
Phone: 202 693-0123
Fax: 202 693-1340
Email: davis.andrew@dol.gov
RIN: 1215-AB79
[[Page 64271]]
_______________________________________________________________________
DOL--ESA
-----------
FINAL RULE STAGE
-----------
95. CHILD LABOR REGULATIONS, ORDERS, AND STATEMENTS OF INTERPRETATION
Priority:
Other Significant
Legal Authority:
29 USC 203(l); 29 USC 212; 29 USC 213(c)
CFR Citation:
29 CFR 570
Legal Deadline:
None
Abstract:
The Department of Labor continues to review the Fair Labor Standards
Act child labor provisions to ensure that the implementing regulations
provide job opportunities for working youth that are healthy and safe
and not detrimental to their education, as required by the statute (29
U.S.C. sections 203(l), 212(c), 213(c), and 216(e)). This proposed rule
will update the regulations to reflect statutory amendments enacted in
2004, and will propose, among other updates, revisions to address
several recommendations of the National Institute for Occupational
Safety and Health (NIOSH) in its 2002 report to the Department of Labor
on the child labor Hazardous Occupations Orders (HOs) (available at
https://www.youthrules.dol.gov/resources.htm).
Statement of Need:
The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) requires the Secretary of Labor to
issue regulations on the employment of minors between 14 and 16 years
of age, ensuring that the periods and conditions of their employment do
not interfere with their schooling, health, or well-being, and to
designate occupations that are particularly hazardous for minors 16 and
17 years of age. Child Labor Regulation No. 3 sets forth the
permissible industries and occupations in which 14- and 15-year-olds
may be employed, specifies the number of hours in a day and in a week,
and time periods within a day, that such minors may be employed.
Updating the child labor regulations issued under the FLSA will help
meet the challenge of ensuring good jobs that are safe, healthy, and
fair for the Nation's working youth, while balancing their educational
needs with job-related experiences that are safe. Updated child labor
regulations that better address the safety needs of today's workplaces
will ensure our young workers have permissible job opportunities that
are safe, enhancing their opportunity to gain the skills to find and
hold good jobs with the potential to increase their earnings over time.
Ensuring safe and reasonable work hours for working youth will also
ensure that top priority is given to their education, consistent with
the purposes of the statute.
Summary of Legal Basis:
These regulations are issued pursuant to sections 3(1), 11, 12, and 13
of the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. 203(1), 211, 121, and 213.
Alternatives:
When developing regulatory alternatives in the analysis of
recommendations of the National Institute for Occupational Safety and
Health in its 2002 report to the Department on the child labor
hazardous occupations orders and other proposals, the Department has
focused on assuring healthy, safe, and fair workplaces for young
workers that are not detrimental to their education, as required by the
statute. Some of the regulatory alternatives were developed based on
recent legislative amendments.
Anticipated Cost and Benefits:
Preliminary estimates of the anticipated costs and benefits of this
rulemaking initiative indicated it was not economically significant.
Benefits to the public, including employers and workers, will include
safer working conditions and the avoidance of injuries and lost
productivity involving young workers.
Risks:
The Department's child labor regulations, by ensuring that permissible
job opportunities for working youth are safe and healthy and not
detrimental to their education, produce positive benefits by reducing
health-related and lost-productivity costs employers might otherwise
incur from higher accident and injury rates to young and inexperienced
workers. Because of the limited nature of the regulatory revisions
contemplated under this initiative, a detailed assessment of the
magnitude of risk was not prepared.
Timetable:
_______________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
_______________________________________________________________________
NPRM 04/17/07 72 FR 19337
NPRM Comment Period End 07/16/07
Final Action 04/00/10
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required:
Undetermined
Small Entities Affected:
Businesses, Governmental Jurisdictions
Government Levels Affected:
Local, State
Agency Contact:
Richard M. Brennan
Director, Division of Interpretations and Regulatory Analysis, Wage and
Hour Division
Department of Labor
200 Constitution Avenue NW.
FP Building
Room S-3502
Washington, DC 20210
Phone: 202 693-0051
Fax: 202 693-1387
RIN: 1215-AB57
_______________________________________________________________________
DOL--Employment and Training Administration (ETA)
-----------
PROPOSED RULE STAGE
-----------
96. YOUTHBUILD PROGRAM REGULATION
Priority:
Other Significant
Legal Authority:
PL 109-281
CFR Citation:
Not Yet Determined
Legal Deadline:
None
Abstract:
The YouthBuild Transfer Act of 2006, Public Law 109-281, enacted on
September 22, 2006, transfers oversight and administration of the
YouthBuild program from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban
Development (HUD) to the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL). The YouthBuild
program model targets are high school dropouts, adjudicated youth,
youth aging out of foster care, and other at-risk youth populations.
The program model
[[Page 64272]]
balances in-school learning, geared toward a high school diploma or
GED, and construction skills training, geared toward a career placement
for the youth. DOL intends to develop regulations in response to the
legislation and to guide the program implementation and management.
Statement of Need:
The YouthBuild Transfer Act of 2006 (Transfer Act), PL 109-281,
transfers the YouthBuild program from the HUD to the DOL. The transfer
incorporates technical modifications and amends certain program
features. The Employment and Training Administration is proposing new
regulations which will govern its administration of the YouthBuild
program.
The Transfer Act maintains all the goals of the YouthBuild program as
originally developed under HUD, including supporting the development of
affordable housing, but shifts the emphasis to skills training for
youth participants. The Transfer Act makes the YouthBuild program
consistent with the job training, education, and employment goals under
the Workforce Investment Act, PL 105-220, as amended. This includes
authorizing DOL to apply the common performance measures developed for
Federal youth activities employment and training programs. The Transfer
Act authorizes education and workforce investment, such as occupational
skills training, internships, and job shadowing, as well as community
service and peer-centered activities. In addition, the Transfer Act
allows for greater coordination of the YouthBuild program with the
workforce investment system, including local workforce investment
boards, and One-Stop Career Centers, and their partner programs. These
strengthened connections will enhance the job training and employment
opportunities available to participating at-risk youth.
Summary of Legal Basis:
These regulations are authorized by Public Law 109-281, The YouthBuild
Transfer Act of 2006, to implement changes to the amendments to
subtitle D of Title I of the Workfoce Investment Act of 1998 as amended
(WIA).
Alternatives:
The public will be afforded an opportunity to provide comments on the
YouthBuild program changes when the Department publishes the NPRM in
the Federal Register. A Final Rule will be issued after analysis and
incorporation of public comments to the NPRM.
Anticipated Cost and Benefits:
Preliminary estimates of the anticipated costs of this regulatory
action have not been determined at this time and will be determined at
a later date.
Risks:
This action does not affect public health, safety, or the environment.
Timetable:
_______________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
_______________________________________________________________________
NPRM 06/00/10
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required:
No
Government Levels Affected:
None
Agency Contact:
Grace A. Kilbane
Administrator, Office of Workforce Investment
Department of Labor
Employment and Training Administration
200 Constitution Avenue NW.
FP Building, Room S-4231
Washington, DC 20210
Phone: 202 693-3980
Email: kilbane.grace@dol.gov
RIN: 1205-AB49
_______________________________________________________________________
DOL--ETA
97. TRADE ADJUSTMENT ASSISTANCE FOR WORKERS PROGRAM; REGULATIONS
Priority:
Other Significant
Legal Authority:
19 USC 2320; Secretary's Order 3-2007, 72 FR 15907
CFR Citation:
20 CFR 617, 618, 665, 671; 29 CFR 90
Legal Deadline:
None
Abstract:
The Trade and Globalization Assistance Act of 2009 (Act), Div. B, Title
I, Subtitle I of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009,
reauthorizes the Trade Adjustment Assistance for Workers program. More
specifically, the law amends the criteria for certification of worker
groups as eligible to apply for benefits and services and substantially
expands those benefits and services. It also requires reports on the
program's effectiveness. The Act amends section 248 of the Trade Act of
1974 (19 U.S.C. 2320) and requires that the Secretary issue regulations
to carry out these provisions.
Statement of Need:
The Trade and Globalization Adjustment Assistance Act of 2009 (TGAAA)
is the portion of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009
(Recovery Act) (Pub. L. No. 111-5, Div. B, Title I, Subtitle I) that
reauthorized and substantially amended the Trade Adjustment Assistance
for Workers (TAA) program. Significant program changes enacted in the
TGAAA include amending the certification criteria to expand the types
of workers who may be certified and expanding the available program
benefits. This proposed rule is important because it will update the
program's regulations to be in concert with the notable program changes
wrought by the TGAAA.
Summary of Legal Basis:
These regulations are authorized by sections 248 of the Trade Act (19
U.S.C. 2320), as amended by the TGAAA.
Alternatives:
The public will be afforded an opportunity to provide comments on the
proposed regulatory changes when the Department publishes the NPRM in
the Federal Register. A final rule will be issued after analysis of,
and response to, public comments.
Anticipated Cost and Benefits:
Preliminary estimates of the anticipated costs of this regulatory
action have not been determined at this time and will be determined at
a later date.
Timetable:
_______________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
_______________________________________________________________________
NPRM 12/00/10
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required:
No
Small Entities Affected:
No
Government Levels Affected:
Federal
[[Page 64273]]
Agency Contact:
Erin Fitzgerald
Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance
Department of Labor
Employment and Training Administration
200 Constitution Avenue NW.
Room C-5311, FP Building
Washingon, DC 20210
Phone: 202 693-3500
Fax: 202 693-3149
Email: fitzgerald.erin@dol.gov
RIN: 1205-AB57
_______________________________________________________________________
DOL--ETA
98. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY IN APPRENTICESHIP AND
TRAINING, AMENDMENT OF REGULATIONS
Priority:
Other Significant
Legal Authority:
Sec. 1, 50 Stat. 664, as amended (29 USC 50; 40 USC 276c; 5 USC 301);
Reorganization Plan No. 14 of 1950, 64 Stat. 1267 (5 USC App. P. 534)
CFR Citation:
29 CFR 30 (Revision)
Legal Deadline:
None
Abstract:
Revisions to the equal opportunity regulatory framework for the
National Apprenticeship Act are a critical element in the Department's
vision to promote and expand registered apprenticeship opportunities in
the 21st century while continuing to safeguard the welfare and safety
of apprentices. In October 2008, the Agency issued a Final rule
updating regulations for Apprenticeship Programs and Labor Standards
for Registration. These regulations, codified at Title 29 Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR) part 29, had not been updated since first
promulgated in 1977. The companion regulations, 29 CFR part 30, Equal
Employment Opportunity (EEO) in Apprenticeship and Training, have not
been amended since first promulgated in 1978.
The Agency now proposes to update 29 CFR part 30 to ensure that the
National Registered Apprenticeship System is consistent and in
alignment with changes in Affirmative Action regulations and EEO laws
and court cases that have occurred over the past three decades [e.g.
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and the Age Discrimination in
Employment Act (ADEA)], and recent revisions to Title 29 CFR part 29.
This second phase of regulatory updates will ensure that Registered
Apprenticeship is positioned to continue to provide economic
opportunity for millions of Americans while keeping pace with these new
requirements.
Statement of Need:
Federal regulations for Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) in
Apprenticeship and Training have not been updated since first
promulgated in 1978. Updates to these regulations are necessary to
ensure that DOL regulatory requirements governing the National
Registered Apprenticeship System are consistent with the current state
of EEO law, including affirmative action, the passage of, for example,
the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and the Age Discrimination in
Employment Act (ADEA), and recent revisions to Title 29 CFR part 29,
regulations for Apprenticeship Programs and Labor Standards for
Registration.
Summary of Legal Basis:
These regulations are authorized by the National Apprenticeship Act of
1937 (29 U.S.C. 50) and the Copeland Act (40 U.S.C. 276c). These
regulations will set forth policies and procedures to promote equality
of opportunity in apprenticeship programs registered with the U.S.
Department of Labor or in State Apprenticeship Agencies recognized by
the U.S. Department of Labor.
Alternatives:
The public will be afforded an opportunity to provide comments on the
proposed amendment to Apprenticeship EEO regulations when the
Department publishes a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) in the
Federal Register. A Final Rule will be issued after analysis and
incorporation of public comments to the NRPM.
Anticipated Cost and Benefits:
Preliminary estimates of anticipated costs and benefits of this
regulatory action have not been determined at this time. The Department
will explore options for conducting a cost-benefit analysis for this
regulatory action, if necessary.
Timetable:
_______________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
_______________________________________________________________________
NPRM 01/00/11
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required:
No
Small Entities Affected:
No
Government Levels Affected:
Federal, State, Tribal
Federalism:
This action may have federalism implications as defined in EO 13132.
Agency Contact:
John V. Ladd
Office of Apprenticeship
Department of Labor
Employment and Training Administration
200 Constitution Avenue NW
Room N5311
FP Building
Washington, DC 20210
Phone: 202 693-2796
Fax: 202 693-3799
Email: ladd.john@dol.gov
RIN: 1205-AB59
_______________________________________________________________________
DOL--ETA
-----------
FINAL RULE STAGE
-----------
99. TEMPORARY AGRICULTURAL EMPLOYMENT OF H-2A ALIENS IN THE UNITED
STATES
Priority:
Other Significant
Legal Authority:
8 USC 1101(a)(15)(H)(ii)(a); 8 USC 1188
CFR Citation:
20 CFR 655
Legal Deadline:
None
Abstract:
The Department of Labor (the Department of DOL) proposes to amend its
regulations governing the certification of temporary employment of
nonimmigrant workers in temporary or seasonal agricultural employment
and the enforcement of the contractual obligations applicable to
employers of such nonimmigrant workers. This Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking would reexamine the process by which employers obtain a
temporary labor certification from the Department for use in
petitioning the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to employ a
nonimmigrant worker in H-2A status.
Statement of Need:
The Department has determined for a variety of reasons that a new
[[Page 64274]]
rulemaking effort is necessary for the H-2A program. The Department
believes that the policy underpinnings of the 2008 Final Rule, e.g.,
streamlining the H-2A regulatory process to defer many determinations
of program compliance until after an application has been fully
adjudicated, do not provide an adequate level of protection for either
U.S. or foreign workers.
In addition, the Department's experience under the program since
January 2009 demonstrates that the policy goals of the 2008 Final Rule
have not been met. One of the clear goals of the 2008 Final Rule was to
increase the use of the H-2A program and to make the program easier and
more affordable to use for the average employer. However, applications
have actually decreased since the implementation of the new program.
Not only has usage not increased under the program revisions, there has
actually been a reversal of an existing multi-year trend toward
increased program use. While factors other than the regulatory changes
may play a role in this decrease, the Department can not justify the
significant decrease in worker protections if the prior rules' goal of
increasing program use is not being a