TARP Standards for Compensation and Corporate Governance; Correction, 63991-63993 [E9-29027]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 233 / Monday, December 7, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
the current fiscal year based on their
compensation during the prior fiscal
year;’’ is corrected to read ‘‘(15) an
accurate list of the employees who are
the SEOs and most highly compensated
employees for the current fiscal year has
been provided to the Treasury;’’.
Dated: November 30, 2009.
Herbert M. Allison, Jr.,
Assistant Secretary for Financial Stability.
[FR Doc. E9–29026 Filed 12–4–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810–25–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
31 CFR Part 30
RIN 1505–AC09
TARP Standards for Compensation
and Corporate Governance; Correction
Domestic Finance, Treasury.
Correcting amendments.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: This document contains
corrections to an interim final rule that
was published in the Federal Register
on Monday, June 15, 2009. The rule
relates to certain standards for
compensation and corporate governance
applicable to financial institutions
receiving funds under the Troubled
Asset Relief Program (TARP).
DATES: Effective date: December 7, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Office of Domestic Finance, Treasury
(202) 927–6618 (not a toll-free number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On June 15, 2009, Treasury published
an interim final rule (74 FR 29394)
entitled TARP Standards for
Compensation and Corporate
Governance. The interim final rule
implemented certain provisions of
section 111 of the Emergency Economic
Stabilization Act of 2008, as amended
(12 U.S.C. 5221) (EESA), which directs
Treasury to establish executive
compensation and corporate governance
standards for entities receiving financial
assistance under the TARP. This
document makes several technical
amendments to that interim final rule.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
Need for Correction
As published, the interim final rule
contains errors that may prove to be
misleading and are in need of
correction. Section 30.1 of the interim
final rule contained definitions
applicable for purposes of the interim
final rule. The definition of ‘‘most
highly compensated employee’’ had
provided that, for purposes of
identifying a most highly compensated
VerDate Nov<24>2008
12:44 Dec 04, 2009
Jkt 220001
employee, senior executive officers
(SEOs) were excluded. If this definition
were applied literally with respect to
Sections 30.10(b)(1)(i) and (ii), the
definition would have the effect of
exempting SEOs from the bonus
limitations applicable to certain most
highly compensated employees. Such a
result would be contrary to the intent of
the regulation and the language of
EESA. Accordingly, this provision is
corrected to provide that the terms
‘‘most highly compensated employee’’
or ‘‘most highly compensated
employees’’ mean the employee or
employees of the TARP recipient whose
annual compensation is determined to
be the highest among all employees of
the TARP recipient, provided that,
solely for purposes of identifying the
employees who are subject to any rule
applicable to both the SEOs and one or
more of the most highly compensated
employees of the TARP recipient, SEOs
of the TARP recipient are excluded
when identifying the most highly
compensated employee(s). So, for
instance, if a provision is applicable
only to the most highly compensated
employee of the TARP recipient, the
most highly compensated employee of
the TARP recipient is subject to the
provision regardless of whether the
employee is also a SEO. In contrast, if
a provision is applicable to the SEOs
and a certain number of the most highly
compensated employees of the TARP
recipient, the SEOs (because they are
already subject to the provision) are
excluded for purposes of determining
the most highly compensated employees
that are also subject to the provision.
Section 30.2 of the interim final rule
provides that the requirements of
section 111(c) (generally relating to the
establishment and maintenance of an
independent compensation committee
and that committee’s review of
employee compensation plans, as well
as the establishment of a company-wide
excessive and luxury expenditures
policy) apply through the last day of the
TARP period for recipients with an
obligation, and through the last day of
the recipient’s fiscal year including the
sunset date (which is the date on which
the authorities provided under EESA
section 101 and 102 terminate, pursuant
to EESA section 120, taking into account
any extensions pursuant to EESA
section 120(b)) for recipients that never
had an obligation. However, the interim
final rule erroneously stated that the
requirements apply through the later of
these dates. Because only one of these
dates is potentially applicable to any
specific TARP recipient, the ‘‘later of’’
language is inoperative, but may render
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
63991
the provision confusing. Accordingly,
Section 30.2 is revised to more clearly
state the applicable time periods.
Section 30.13 of the interim final rule,
relating to the requirement to permit a
shareholder vote to approve certain
executive compensation, is clarified to
provide that TARP recipients must
comply with the rules and regulations
promulgated by the Securities and
Exchange Commission (SEC) with
respect to that requirement, but only to
the extent the rules and regulations are
applicable to the TARP recipient.
Accordingly, a TARP recipient that is
not subject to those rules because, for
example, the TARP recipient is not
required to register any securities with
the SEC, is not required to permit such
a vote.
Section 30.15 of the interim final rule,
relating to certain certifications that the
principal executive officer and the
principal financial officer must provide,
is revised to provide that the
certification must state that the TARP
recipient has provided the Treasury
Department a complete and accurate list
of the SEOs and the twenty next most
highly compensated employees for the
current fiscal year, with the non-SEOs
ranked in descending order of level of
annual compensation. Accordingly, a
list of the names of the SEOs and the
twenty next most highly compensated
employees is not required to be
provided in the certification, but may be
provided separately. Section 30.15 is
also corrected so that the model
certification language reflects the
deadlines set forth elsewhere in the
regulation, and to correct certain crossreferences.
Procedural Matters
The June 15, 2009 interim final rule
was promulgated pursuant to EESA, as
amended, which provides for authority
and facilities that the Secretary of the
Treasury can use immediately to restore
liquidity and stability to the financial
system of the United States. Because of
exigencies in the financial markets and
to encourage entities to choose or
continue to participate in the TARP,
Treasury issued the interim final rule
without prior notice and comment and
without a delayed effective date
pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B) and
(d)(3). Treasury invited interested
members of the public to submit
comments on the rule and will carefully
consider all comments in developing a
final rule. The comment period for the
interim final rule closed on August 14,
2009.
This document makes technical
amendments to the Code of Federal
Regulations that do not otherwise
E:\FR\FM\07DER1.SGM
07DER1
63992
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 233 / Monday, December 7, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
impose or amend any requirements.
Accordingly, Treasury finds that it
would be contrary to the public interest,
pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), to delay
the issuance of these technical
amendments pending an opportunity for
public comment and good cause exists
to dispense with this requirement. For
the same reasons, pursuant to 5 U.S.C.
553(d)(3), Treasury has determined that
there is good cause for the amendments
to become effective immediately upon
publication.
This document is not a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ subject to review by
the Office of Management and Budget
under Executive Order 12866, entitled
Regulatory Planning and Review.
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
(5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) generally requires
an agency to prepare a regulatory
flexibility analysis of any rule subject to
notice and comment rulemaking
requirements under the Administrative
Procedure Act or any other statute
unless the agency certifies that the rule
will not have a significant impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
Because no notice of proposed
rulemaking is required, the provisions
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act do not
apply.
List of Subjects in 31 CFR Part 30
Executive compensation, Troubled
assets.
■ Accordingly, 31 CFR part 30 is
corrected by making the following
correcting amendments:
PART 30—TARP STANDARDS FOR
COMPENSATION AND CORPORATE
GOVERNANCE
Authority: 12 U.S.C. 5221; 31 U.S.C. 321.
2. In § 30.1, revise paragraph (1) of the
definition of ‘‘most highly compensated
employee’’ to read as follows:
■
Q–1: What definitions apply in this
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
*
*
*
*
Most highly compensated employee.
(1) In general. The terms ‘‘most highly
compensated employee’’ or ‘‘most
highly compensated employees’’ mean
the employee or employees of the TARP
recipient whose annual compensation is
determined to be the highest among all
employees of the TARP recipient,
provided that, solely for purposes of
identifying the employees who are
subject to any rule applicable to both
the SEOs and one or more of the most
highly compensated employees of the
TARP recipient, SEOs of the TARP
recipient are excluded when identifying
VerDate Nov<24>2008
12:44 Dec 04, 2009
Jkt 220001
§ 30.2 Q–2: To what entities does this part
apply?
* * * For a TARP recipient that has
had an obligation to the Federal
government arising from financial
assistance provided under the TARP,
and no further financial assistance
under the TARP, the requirements of
section 111(c) (including portions of
§ 30.4 (Q–4), § 30.5 (Q–5) and § 30.7 (Q–
7), as applicable) and section 111(d)
(§ 30.12 (Q–12)) apply through the last
day of the period during which that
obligation remains outstanding; for a
TARP recipient that has never had an
obligation to the Federal government
arising from financial assistance
provided under the TARP, the
requirements of section 111(c)
(including portions of § 30.4 (Q–4),
§ 30.5 (Q–5) and § 30.7 (Q–7), as
applicable) and section 111(d) (§ 30.12
(Q–12)) apply through the last day of the
TARP recipient’s fiscal year including
the sunset date. * * *
4. Revise § 30.13 to read as follows:
§ 30.13 Q–13: What actions are necessary
for a TARP recipient to comply with section
111(e) of EESA (the shareholder resolution
on executive compensation requirement)?
1. The authority citation for part 30
continues to read as follows:
*
3. In § 30.2, revise the second sentence
to read as follows:
■
■
■
§ 30.1
part?
the most highly compensated
employee(s). For this purpose, a former
employee who is no longer employed as
of the first date of the relevant fiscal
year of the TARP recipient is not a most
highly compensated employee unless it
is reasonably anticipated that such
employee will return to employment
with the TARP recipient during such
fiscal year.
*
*
*
*
*
As provided in section 111(e) of
EESA, any proxy or consent or
authorization for an annual or other
meeting of the shareholders of any
TARP recipient that occurs during the
TARP period must permit a separate
shareholder vote to approve the
compensation of executives, as required
to be disclosed pursuant to the Federal
securities laws (including the
compensation discussion and analysis,
the compensation tables, and any
related material). To meet this standard,
a TARP recipient must comply with any
rules, regulations, or guidance
promulgated by the SEC that are
applicable to the TARP recipient.
5. In § 30.15, revise the first sentence
of paragraph (a)(5), Appendix A,
paragraphs (i), (ii), (iii), (ix), (xi) and
(xv) and Appendix B, paragraphs (ii),
(iii), (ix), (xi) and (xv) to read as follows:
■
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
§ 30.15 Q–15: What actions are necessary
for a TARP recipient to comply with the
certification requirements of section
111(b)(4) of EESA?
*
*
*
*
*
(a) * * *
(5) Application to private TARP
recipients. The rules provided in this
section are also applicable to TARP
recipients that do not have securities
registered with the SEC pursuant to the
Federal securities laws, except that the
certifications under Appendix A,
paragraph (x) and Appendix B,
paragraph (x) of this section are not
required for such TARP recipients.
* * *
*
*
*
*
*
Appendix A to § 30.15—Model
Certification for First Fiscal Year
Certification
*
*
*
*
*
(i) The compensation committee of
[identify TARP recipient] has discussed,
reviewed, and evaluated with senior risk
officers at least every six months during the
period beginning on the later of September
14, 2009, or ninety days after the closing date
of the agreement between the TARP recipient
and Treasury and ending with the last day of
the TARP recipient’s fiscal year containing
that date (the applicable period), the senior
executive officer (SEO) compensation plans
and the employee compensation plans and
the risks these plans pose to [identify TARP
recipient];
(ii) The compensation committee of
[identify TARP recipient] has identified and
limited during the applicable period any
features of the SEO compensation plans that
could lead SEOs to take unnecessary and
excessive risks that could threaten the value
of [identify TARP recipient], and during that
same applicable period has identified any
features of the employee compensation plans
that pose risks to [identify TARP recipient]
and has limited those features to ensure that
[identify TARP recipient] is not
unnecessarily exposed to risks;
(iii) The compensation committee has
reviewed, at least every six months during
the applicable period, the terms of each
employee compensation plan and identified
any features of the plan that could encourage
the manipulation of reported earnings of
[identify TARP recipient] to enhance the
compensation of an employee, and has
limited any such features;
*
*
*
*
*
(ix) The board of directors of [identify
TARP recipient] has established an excessive
or luxury expenditures policy, as defined in
the regulations and guidance established
under section 111 of EESA, by the later of
September 14, 2009, or ninety days after the
closing date of the agreement between the
TARP recipient and Treasury; this policy has
been provided to Treasury and its primary
regulatory agency; [identify TARP recipient]
and its employees have complied with this
policy during the applicable period; and any
expenses that, pursuant to this policy,
E:\FR\FM\07DER1.SGM
07DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 233 / Monday, December 7, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
required approval of the board of directors,
a committee of the board of directors, an
SEO, or an executive officer with a similar
level of responsibility were properly
approved;
*
*
*
*
*
(xi) [Identify TARP recipient] will disclose
the amount, nature, and justification for the
offering during the period beginning on the
later of the closing date of the agreement
between the TARP recipient and Treasury or
June 15, 2009 and ending with the last day
of the TARP recipient’s fiscal year containing
that date of any perquisites, as defined in the
regulations and guidance established under
section 111 of EESA, whose total value
exceeds $25,000 for any employee who is
subject to the bonus payment limitations
identified in paragraph (viii);
*
*
*
*
*
(xv) [Identify TARP recipient] has
submitted to Treasury a complete and
accurate list of the SEOs and the twenty next
most highly compensated employees for the
current fiscal year and the most recently
completed fiscal year, with the non-SEOs
ranked in descending order of level of annual
compensation, and with the name, title, and
employer of each SEO and most highly
compensated employee identified; and[.]
*
*
*
*
*
Appendix B to § 30.15—Model
Certification for Years Following First
Fiscal Year Certification
*
*
*
*
*
(ii) The compensation committee of
[identify TARP recipient] has identified and
limited during any part of the most recently
completed fiscal year that was a TARP period
any features of the SEO compensation plans
that could lead SEOs to take unnecessary and
excessive risks that could threaten the value
of [identify TARP recipient] and has
identified any features of the employee
compensation plans that pose risks to
[identify TARP recipient] and has limited
those features to ensure that [identify TARP
recipient] is not unnecessarily exposed to
risks;
(iii) The compensation committee has
reviewed, at least every six months during
any part of the most recently completed fiscal
year that was a TARP period, the terms of
each employee compensation plan and
identified any features of the plan that could
encourage the manipulation of reported
earnings of [identify TARP recipient] to
enhance the compensation of an employee,
and has limited any such features;
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
*
*
*
*
*
(ix) [Identify TARP recipient] and its
employees have complied with the excessive
or luxury expenditures policy, as defined in
the regulations and guidance established
under section 111 of EESA, during any part
of the most recently completed fiscal year
that was a TARP period; and any expenses
that, pursuant to the policy, required
approval of the board of directors, a
committee of the board of directors, an SEO,
or an executive officer with a similar level of
responsibility were properly approved;
*
*
*
VerDate Nov<24>2008
*
*
12:44 Dec 04, 2009
Jkt 220001
(xi) [Identify TARP recipient] will disclose
the amount, nature, and justification for the
offering, during any part of the most recently
completed fiscal year that was a TARP
period, of any perquisites, as defined in the
regulations and guidance established under
section 111 of EESA, whose total value
exceeds $25,000 for any employee who is
subject to the bonus payment limitations
identified in paragraph (viii);
*
*
*
*
*
(xv) [Identify TARP recipient] has
submitted to Treasury a complete and
accurate list of the SEOs and the twenty next
most highly compensated employees for the
current fiscal year, with the non-SEOs ranked
in descending order of level of annual
compensation, and with the name, title, and
employer of each SEO and most highly
compensated employee identified; and’’.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: November 30, 2009.
Herbert M. Allison, Jr.,
Assistant Secretary for Financial Stability.
[FR Doc. E9–29027 Filed 12–4–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810–25–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R02–OAR–2009–0638; FRL–9088–8]
Determinations of Attainment of the
One-Hour and Eight-Hour Ozone
Standards for Various Ozone
Nonattainment Areas in New Jersey
and Upstate New York
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
SUMMARY: The EPA is determining that
various ozone nonattainment areas in
New York and New Jersey have attained
the one-hour and eight-hour National
Ambient Air Quality Standards
(NAAQS) for ozone. For the one-hour
standard, the areas are the Atlantic City
and Warren County areas in New Jersey
and the Albany-Schenectady-Troy,
Buffalo-Niagara Falls, Essex County,
Jefferson County, and Poughkeepsie
areas in New York. For the 1997 eighthour standard, the areas are BuffaloNiagara Falls, Jamestown, Poughkeepsie
and Essex County in New York. These
determinations are based upon certified
ambient air monitoring data that show
each area has monitored attainment of
ozone NAAQS based on complete,
quality-assured ambient air monitoring
data for the three-year period ending in
2008. These data demonstrate that the
one-hour and eight-hour ozone
standards have been attained in these
areas. These areas that have attained the
one-hour standard have completed their
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
63993
progress toward achieving the one-hour
health standard. For the areas that have
attained the eight-hour standard, the
requirements for the State to submit
certain reasonable further progress
plans, attainment demonstrations,
contingency measures and any other
planning requirements of the Clean Air
Act related to attainment of the ozone
standards are suspended for as long as
the areas continue to attain the eighthour ozone standard. These
determinations of attainment are not
redesignations of these areas to
attainment. Redesignations must meet
additional requirements, including an
approved plan to maintain compliance
with the air quality standard for ten
years after redesignation. In addition,
preliminary data for 2009 show that
these areas continue to attain the
standard.
DATES: Effective Date: This rule is
effective on January 6, 2010.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket
Identification No. EPA–R02–OAR–
2008–0638. All documents in the docket
are listed on the https://
www.regulations.gov Web site. Although
listed in the index, some information is
not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy
form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either
electronically through https://
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the Air Programs Branch, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 2, 290 Broadway, 25th Floor,
New York, New York 10007–1866. To
make your visit as productive as
possible, contact the person listed in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section to schedule your inspection. The
Regional Office’s official hours of
business are Monday through Friday,
8:30 to 4:30, excluding legal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Robert F. Kelly, Air Programs Branch,
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 2, 290 Broadway, 25th Floor,
New York, New York 10007–1866,
telephone number (212) 637–4249, fax
number (212) 637–3901, e-mail
kelly.bob@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. EPA’s Action
II. The Effect of EPA’s Action
III. Final Action
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
E:\FR\FM\07DER1.SGM
07DER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 233 (Monday, December 7, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 63991-63993]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-29027]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
31 CFR Part 30
RIN 1505-AC09
TARP Standards for Compensation and Corporate Governance;
Correction
AGENCY: Domestic Finance, Treasury.
ACTION: Correcting amendments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document contains corrections to an interim final rule
that was published in the Federal Register on Monday, June 15, 2009.
The rule relates to certain standards for compensation and corporate
governance applicable to financial institutions receiving funds under
the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP).
DATES: Effective date: December 7, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Office of Domestic Finance, Treasury
(202) 927-6618 (not a toll-free number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On June 15, 2009, Treasury published an interim final rule (74 FR
29394) entitled TARP Standards for Compensation and Corporate
Governance. The interim final rule implemented certain provisions of
section 111 of the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008, as
amended (12 U.S.C. 5221) (EESA), which directs Treasury to establish
executive compensation and corporate governance standards for entities
receiving financial assistance under the TARP. This document makes
several technical amendments to that interim final rule.
Need for Correction
As published, the interim final rule contains errors that may prove
to be misleading and are in need of correction. Section 30.1 of the
interim final rule contained definitions applicable for purposes of the
interim final rule. The definition of ``most highly compensated
employee'' had provided that, for purposes of identifying a most highly
compensated employee, senior executive officers (SEOs) were excluded.
If this definition were applied literally with respect to Sections
30.10(b)(1)(i) and (ii), the definition would have the effect of
exempting SEOs from the bonus limitations applicable to certain most
highly compensated employees. Such a result would be contrary to the
intent of the regulation and the language of EESA. Accordingly, this
provision is corrected to provide that the terms ``most highly
compensated employee'' or ``most highly compensated employees'' mean
the employee or employees of the TARP recipient whose annual
compensation is determined to be the highest among all employees of the
TARP recipient, provided that, solely for purposes of identifying the
employees who are subject to any rule applicable to both the SEOs and
one or more of the most highly compensated employees of the TARP
recipient, SEOs of the TARP recipient are excluded when identifying the
most highly compensated employee(s). So, for instance, if a provision
is applicable only to the most highly compensated employee of the TARP
recipient, the most highly compensated employee of the TARP recipient
is subject to the provision regardless of whether the employee is also
a SEO. In contrast, if a provision is applicable to the SEOs and a
certain number of the most highly compensated employees of the TARP
recipient, the SEOs (because they are already subject to the provision)
are excluded for purposes of determining the most highly compensated
employees that are also subject to the provision.
Section 30.2 of the interim final rule provides that the
requirements of section 111(c) (generally relating to the establishment
and maintenance of an independent compensation committee and that
committee's review of employee compensation plans, as well as the
establishment of a company-wide excessive and luxury expenditures
policy) apply through the last day of the TARP period for recipients
with an obligation, and through the last day of the recipient's fiscal
year including the sunset date (which is the date on which the
authorities provided under EESA section 101 and 102 terminate, pursuant
to EESA section 120, taking into account any extensions pursuant to
EESA section 120(b)) for recipients that never had an obligation.
However, the interim final rule erroneously stated that the
requirements apply through the later of these dates. Because only one
of these dates is potentially applicable to any specific TARP
recipient, the ``later of'' language is inoperative, but may render the
provision confusing. Accordingly, Section 30.2 is revised to more
clearly state the applicable time periods.
Section 30.13 of the interim final rule, relating to the
requirement to permit a shareholder vote to approve certain executive
compensation, is clarified to provide that TARP recipients must comply
with the rules and regulations promulgated by the Securities and
Exchange Commission (SEC) with respect to that requirement, but only to
the extent the rules and regulations are applicable to the TARP
recipient. Accordingly, a TARP recipient that is not subject to those
rules because, for example, the TARP recipient is not required to
register any securities with the SEC, is not required to permit such a
vote.
Section 30.15 of the interim final rule, relating to certain
certifications that the principal executive officer and the principal
financial officer must provide, is revised to provide that the
certification must state that the TARP recipient has provided the
Treasury Department a complete and accurate list of the SEOs and the
twenty next most highly compensated employees for the current fiscal
year, with the non-SEOs ranked in descending order of level of annual
compensation. Accordingly, a list of the names of the SEOs and the
twenty next most highly compensated employees is not required to be
provided in the certification, but may be provided separately. Section
30.15 is also corrected so that the model certification language
reflects the deadlines set forth elsewhere in the regulation, and to
correct certain cross-references.
Procedural Matters
The June 15, 2009 interim final rule was promulgated pursuant to
EESA, as amended, which provides for authority and facilities that the
Secretary of the Treasury can use immediately to restore liquidity and
stability to the financial system of the United States. Because of
exigencies in the financial markets and to encourage entities to choose
or continue to participate in the TARP, Treasury issued the interim
final rule without prior notice and comment and without a delayed
effective date pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B) and (d)(3). Treasury
invited interested members of the public to submit comments on the rule
and will carefully consider all comments in developing a final rule.
The comment period for the interim final rule closed on August 14,
2009.
This document makes technical amendments to the Code of Federal
Regulations that do not otherwise
[[Page 63992]]
impose or amend any requirements. Accordingly, Treasury finds that it
would be contrary to the public interest, pursuant to 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B), to delay the issuance of these technical amendments pending
an opportunity for public comment and good cause exists to dispense
with this requirement. For the same reasons, pursuant to 5 U.S.C.
553(d)(3), Treasury has determined that there is good cause for the
amendments to become effective immediately upon publication.
This document is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order
12866, entitled Regulatory Planning and Review.
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.)
generally requires an agency to prepare a regulatory flexibility
analysis of any rule subject to notice and comment rulemaking
requirements under the Administrative Procedure Act or any other
statute unless the agency certifies that the rule will not have a
significant impact on a substantial number of small entities. Because
no notice of proposed rulemaking is required, the provisions of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act do not apply.
List of Subjects in 31 CFR Part 30
Executive compensation, Troubled assets.
0
Accordingly, 31 CFR part 30 is corrected by making the following
correcting amendments:
PART 30--TARP STANDARDS FOR COMPENSATION AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
0
1. The authority citation for part 30 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 12 U.S.C. 5221; 31 U.S.C. 321.
0
2. In Sec. 30.1, revise paragraph (1) of the definition of ``most
highly compensated employee'' to read as follows:
Sec. 30.1 Q-1: What definitions apply in this part?
* * * * *
Most highly compensated employee. (1) In general. The terms ``most
highly compensated employee'' or ``most highly compensated employees''
mean the employee or employees of the TARP recipient whose annual
compensation is determined to be the highest among all employees of the
TARP recipient, provided that, solely for purposes of identifying the
employees who are subject to any rule applicable to both the SEOs and
one or more of the most highly compensated employees of the TARP
recipient, SEOs of the TARP recipient are excluded when identifying the
most highly compensated employee(s). For this purpose, a former
employee who is no longer employed as of the first date of the relevant
fiscal year of the TARP recipient is not a most highly compensated
employee unless it is reasonably anticipated that such employee will
return to employment with the TARP recipient during such fiscal year.
* * * * *
0
3. In Sec. 30.2, revise the second sentence to read as follows:
Sec. 30.2 Q-2: To what entities does this part apply?
* * * For a TARP recipient that has had an obligation to the
Federal government arising from financial assistance provided under the
TARP, and no further financial assistance under the TARP, the
requirements of section 111(c) (including portions of Sec. 30.4 (Q-4),
Sec. 30.5 (Q-5) and Sec. 30.7 (Q-7), as applicable) and section
111(d) (Sec. 30.12 (Q-12)) apply through the last day of the period
during which that obligation remains outstanding; for a TARP recipient
that has never had an obligation to the Federal government arising from
financial assistance provided under the TARP, the requirements of
section 111(c) (including portions of Sec. 30.4 (Q-4), Sec. 30.5 (Q-
5) and Sec. 30.7 (Q-7), as applicable) and section 111(d) (Sec. 30.12
(Q-12)) apply through the last day of the TARP recipient's fiscal year
including the sunset date. * * *
0
4. Revise Sec. 30.13 to read as follows:
Sec. 30.13 Q-13: What actions are necessary for a TARP recipient to
comply with section 111(e) of EESA (the shareholder resolution on
executive compensation requirement)?
As provided in section 111(e) of EESA, any proxy or consent or
authorization for an annual or other meeting of the shareholders of any
TARP recipient that occurs during the TARP period must permit a
separate shareholder vote to approve the compensation of executives, as
required to be disclosed pursuant to the Federal securities laws
(including the compensation discussion and analysis, the compensation
tables, and any related material). To meet this standard, a TARP
recipient must comply with any rules, regulations, or guidance
promulgated by the SEC that are applicable to the TARP recipient.
0
5. In Sec. 30.15, revise the first sentence of paragraph (a)(5),
Appendix A, paragraphs (i), (ii), (iii), (ix), (xi) and (xv) and
Appendix B, paragraphs (ii), (iii), (ix), (xi) and (xv) to read as
follows:
Sec. 30.15 Q-15: What actions are necessary for a TARP recipient to
comply with the certification requirements of section 111(b)(4) of
EESA?
* * * * *
(a) * * *
(5) Application to private TARP recipients. The rules provided in
this section are also applicable to TARP recipients that do not have
securities registered with the SEC pursuant to the Federal securities
laws, except that the certifications under Appendix A, paragraph (x)
and Appendix B, paragraph (x) of this section are not required for such
TARP recipients. * * *
* * * * *
Appendix A to Sec. 30.15--Model Certification for First Fiscal Year
Certification
* * * * *
(i) The compensation committee of [identify TARP recipient] has
discussed, reviewed, and evaluated with senior risk officers at
least every six months during the period beginning on the later of
September 14, 2009, or ninety days after the closing date of the
agreement between the TARP recipient and Treasury and ending with
the last day of the TARP recipient's fiscal year containing that
date (the applicable period), the senior executive officer (SEO)
compensation plans and the employee compensation plans and the risks
these plans pose to [identify TARP recipient];
(ii) The compensation committee of [identify TARP recipient] has
identified and limited during the applicable period any features of
the SEO compensation plans that could lead SEOs to take unnecessary
and excessive risks that could threaten the value of [identify TARP
recipient], and during that same applicable period has identified
any features of the employee compensation plans that pose risks to
[identify TARP recipient] and has limited those features to ensure
that [identify TARP recipient] is not unnecessarily exposed to
risks;
(iii) The compensation committee has reviewed, at least every
six months during the applicable period, the terms of each employee
compensation plan and identified any features of the plan that could
encourage the manipulation of reported earnings of [identify TARP
recipient] to enhance the compensation of an employee, and has
limited any such features;
* * * * *
(ix) The board of directors of [identify TARP recipient] has
established an excessive or luxury expenditures policy, as defined
in the regulations and guidance established under section 111 of
EESA, by the later of September 14, 2009, or ninety days after the
closing date of the agreement between the TARP recipient and
Treasury; this policy has been provided to Treasury and its primary
regulatory agency; [identify TARP recipient] and its employees have
complied with this policy during the applicable period; and any
expenses that, pursuant to this policy,
[[Page 63993]]
required approval of the board of directors, a committee of the
board of directors, an SEO, or an executive officer with a similar
level of responsibility were properly approved;
* * * * *
(xi) [Identify TARP recipient] will disclose the amount, nature,
and justification for the offering during the period beginning on
the later of the closing date of the agreement between the TARP
recipient and Treasury or June 15, 2009 and ending with the last day
of the TARP recipient's fiscal year containing that date of any
perquisites, as defined in the regulations and guidance established
under section 111 of EESA, whose total value exceeds $25,000 for any
employee who is subject to the bonus payment limitations identified
in paragraph (viii);
* * * * *
(xv) [Identify TARP recipient] has submitted to Treasury a
complete and accurate list of the SEOs and the twenty next most
highly compensated employees for the current fiscal year and the
most recently completed fiscal year, with the non-SEOs ranked in
descending order of level of annual compensation, and with the name,
title, and employer of each SEO and most highly compensated employee
identified; and[.]
* * * * *
Appendix B to Sec. 30.15--Model Certification for Years Following
First Fiscal Year Certification
* * * * *
(ii) The compensation committee of [identify TARP recipient] has
identified and limited during any part of the most recently
completed fiscal year that was a TARP period any features of the SEO
compensation plans that could lead SEOs to take unnecessary and
excessive risks that could threaten the value of [identify TARP
recipient] and has identified any features of the employee
compensation plans that pose risks to [identify TARP recipient] and
has limited those features to ensure that [identify TARP recipient]
is not unnecessarily exposed to risks;
(iii) The compensation committee has reviewed, at least every
six months during any part of the most recently completed fiscal
year that was a TARP period, the terms of each employee compensation
plan and identified any features of the plan that could encourage
the manipulation of reported earnings of [identify TARP recipient]
to enhance the compensation of an employee, and has limited any such
features;
* * * * *
(ix) [Identify TARP recipient] and its employees have complied
with the excessive or luxury expenditures policy, as defined in the
regulations and guidance established under section 111 of EESA,
during any part of the most recently completed fiscal year that was
a TARP period; and any expenses that, pursuant to the policy,
required approval of the board of directors, a committee of the
board of directors, an SEO, or an executive officer with a similar
level of responsibility were properly approved;
* * * * *
(xi) [Identify TARP recipient] will disclose the amount, nature,
and justification for the offering, during any part of the most
recently completed fiscal year that was a TARP period, of any
perquisites, as defined in the regulations and guidance established
under section 111 of EESA, whose total value exceeds $25,000 for any
employee who is subject to the bonus payment limitations identified
in paragraph (viii);
* * * * *
(xv) [Identify TARP recipient] has submitted to Treasury a
complete and accurate list of the SEOs and the twenty next most
highly compensated employees for the current fiscal year, with the
non-SEOs ranked in descending order of level of annual compensation,
and with the name, title, and employer of each SEO and most highly
compensated employee identified; and''.
* * * * *
Dated: November 30, 2009.
Herbert M. Allison, Jr.,
Assistant Secretary for Financial Stability.
[FR Doc. E9-29027 Filed 12-4-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-25-P