Issuance of Electronic Document and Related Recordkeeping Requirements, 63685-63688 [E9-28982]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 232 / Friday, December 4, 2009 / Proposed Rules The Proposed Amendment In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation Administration proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as follows: PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS 1. The authority citation for part 71 continues to read as follows: Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g); 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959– 1963 Comp., p. 389. § 71.1 [Amended] 2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order 7400.9T, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, signed August 27, 2009, and effective September 15, 2009, is amended as follows: Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace areas extending upward from 700 feet or more above the surface of the earth. * * * * * AGL ND E5 Langdon, ND [New] Robertson Field Airport, ND (Lat. 48°45′11″ N., long. 98°23′37″ W.) That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface within a 6.3-mile radius of Robertson Field Airport. * * * * * Issued in Fort Worth, TX, on November 16, 2009. Anthony D. Roetzel, Manager, Operations Support Group, ATO Central Service Center. [FR Doc. E9–28895 Filed 12–3–09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4901–13–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Bureau of Industry and Security 15 CFR Parts 740, 748, 750 and 762 [Docket No. 0907201151–91153–01] RIN 0694–AE66 srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS Issuance of Electronic Document and Related Recordkeeping Requirements AGENCY: Bureau of Industry and Security, Commerce. ACTION: Proposed rule. SUMMARY: The Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) is proposing to eliminate the use of most paper documents that it sends to parties having business before the agency. The documents that would be affected by this proposed rule are: Export and reexport licenses, notices of denial of license applications, notices of VerDate Nov<24>2008 16:55 Dec 03, 2009 Jkt 220001 return of a license application without action, classification results, License Exception AGR notification results and encryption review request results. This proposed rule would modify the Export Administration Regulations (EAR) to implement those changes. This proposed rule also would make changes to the recordkeeping requirements associated with the elimination of paper documents. BIS is proposing to make these changes to reduce mailing costs and to free up staff time currently devoted to mailing these documents for use in other tasks. DATES: Comments must be received by BIS no later than February 2, 2010. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Thomas Andrukonis, Office of Exporter Services, Bureau of Industry and Security, U.S. Department of Commerce at 202 482 6393 or e-mail tandrukoi@bis.doc.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background The Bureau of Industry and Security administers an export licensing program pursuant to the Export Administration Regulations. As part of this program, BIS issues various documents in response to applications and notifications submitted to BIS by the public. Those documents include export licenses, reexport licenses, notice that an export or reexport license applications has been denied, notice that an export or reexport license application is being returned to the applicant without action, responses to License Exception AGR notifications, and notice of the results of a classification request. Collectively, these documents are referred to in this preamble as license related documents. Currently, BIS issues the license related documents in two ways: Electronically in BIS’s Simplified Network Application Processing Redesign system (SNAP–R) and on paper. Most license related documents are issued in both electronic and paper form. However, a few documents are issued only on paper. BIS now proposes to eliminate the paper version of the license related documents that it currently issues both electronically in SNAP–R and on paper. The EAR require that export license applications, reexport license applications and License Exception AGR notifications, encryption review requests and classification requests be submitted to BIS electronically using SNAP–R unless BIS authorizes a paper submission. The license related documents associated with a SNAP–R submission are issued on line in SNAP– PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 63685 R where the submitter may view, save or print a copy. In addition, a paper version of each of those documents is mailed to the party. BIS does not issue electronic license related documents in situations in which BIS authorized a paper submission and in situations in which BIS must reissue the license related documents because it reopened a matter previously considered to be completed. BIS is not proposing to stop issuing paper license related documents in these two situations in which it currently issues only paper documents. BIS also is not proposing to change its practices regarding issuance of Special Comprehensive Licenses or Special Iraq Reconstruction Licenses. BIS is proposing to discontinue issuing paper documents in the situations where it currently issues both paper and electronic versions of the license related documents. BIS is also proposing to make certain changes to the recordkeeping requirements in connection with this change. Specific Proposed Changes Clarification that Electronic Notification in SNAP–R is Considered, for Purposes of the EAR, Written Notification of the Results of a License Exception AGR Request This proposed rule would revise § 740.18(c)(5) to state that BIS will issue confirmation in SNAP–R or by other written notification of the decision that no agency has objected to a party’s proposed use of License Exception AGR. Currently, that section merely states that BIS will issue written confirmation. Removal of Requirement to Maintain a Log of Electronic Submissions This proposed rule would remove the requirement currently found in § 748.7(c) that companies maintain a log of electronic submissions. The requirement was established in connection with BIS’ initial electronic application process, which was instituted in the 1980s. At that time, electronic submissions were facilitated by a number of private sector vendors and the logs may have been necessary for auditing purposes. However, currently, the information required to be kept in the log duplicates information that parties are required to include in their SNAP–R submissions or that is automatically recorded by SNAP–R. BIS is proposing to discontinue the log keeping requirement because it is redundant of information available to BIS in SNAP–R. The proposed rule would accomplish this change by removing paragraph (c) of § 748.7 and E:\FR\FM\04DEP1.SGM 04DEP1 63686 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 232 / Friday, December 4, 2009 / Proposed Rules redesignating existing paragraph (d) as paragraph (c). Removal of Language Relating to ‘‘Computer Generated’’ Licenses, the Department of Commerce Seal and Attachments to Licenses The proposed rule would revise § 750.7(b) to state merely that BIS may issue export and reexport licenses either electronically or on paper and that each license will bear a license number. Existing language regarding ‘‘computer generated’’ licenses, the Department of Commerce seal and attachments to licenses would be removed as would an explicit requirement that exporters use the license number when communicating with BIS about the license. The proposed language would allow BIS to exercise discretion in deciding whether to issue a license electronically in SNAP–R or on paper. However, BIS expects that it will issue nearly all licenses electronically. Unless some exceptional circumstances exist, only licenses for which the applicant was authorized to file on paper and licenses that BIS cannot issue electronically (currently, only reopened licenses) will be issued on paper. BIS is proposing this change to reduce the costs of generating and mailing paper copies of licenses and to be able to assign to other tasks staff currently assigned to handling paper licenses. Because no EAR provision currently addresses issuance of the other license related documents with the specificity that § 750.7(b) addresses licenses, only § 750.7(b) need be modified to implement this change. However, BIS’s intent is to issue only the electronic version of all license related documents unless BIS authorized paper submission of the original application, notice or request, or BIS cannot issue an electronic version of the applicable license related documents. srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS Removal of Requirement To Attach a Replacement License to the Original This proposed rule would revise § 750.7(h)(4) to remove a requirement that the license holder attach a replacement license issued by BIS to the original license that it replaces. That requirement dates to an era in which electronic licenses did not exist and is impractical with electronic licenses issued in SNAP–R. The proposed rule would retain the requirement that the license holder keep both the original license and the replacement license. VerDate Nov<24>2008 16:55 Dec 03, 2009 Jkt 220001 Removal of Requirement To Retain Copies of Documents Submitted to BIS Via the SNAP–R System This proposed rule would exempt parties who submit documents to BIS via BIS’s SNAP–R system from requirements to retain copies of documents so submitted even though those documents are ‘‘export control documents’’ as defined in part 772 of the EAR. BIS believes the reliability of the SNAP–R system provides adequate assurance that the documents received by BIS were submitted and that all submitted documents are received by BIS. This proposed change would not preclude parties from storing copies of these documents. entirely duplicative of information that BIS sends to the same parties electronically. BIS is proposing these changes to reduce its operating costs and to free the staff time currently devoted to mailing paper documents for other purposes. BIS estimates that it currently spends approximately $25,000 annually in direct mailing costs (envelopes, supplies and postage) to send out paper copies of the licenses, and responses to classification requests, encryption review requests and License Exception AGR notifications. BIS also estimates that about 1.5 hours of staff time is expended each day in connection with mailing these documents. Addition of Certain Documents to Recordkeeping Requirements in Part 762 This proposed rule would add the following documents to the list of documents required to be kept found in § 762.2(a)(10): Notification from BIS that an application is being returned without action; Notification from BIS that an application is being denied; Notification from BIS of the results of a commodity classification or encryption review request conducted by BIS. BIS believes that requiring recipients of these documents to retain them is needed to confirm receipt and to verify that the recipient received notice of the terms of the document. BIS is not proposing to require parties to retain requests for additional information concerning active matters that they receive from BIS. Rulemaking Requirements 1. This rule has been determined to be not significant for purposes of E.O. 12866. 2. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person is required to respond to, nor is subject to a penalty for failure to comply with, a collection of information, subject to the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) (PRA), unless that collection of information displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Control Number. This regulation contains a collection previously approved by OMB under control number 0694–0096. 3. This rule does not contain policies with Federalism implications as that term is defined under E.O. 13132. 4. The Chief Counsel for Regulations of the Department of Commerce has certified to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration that this proposed rule, if adopted in final form, would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. Application of Original Document Retention Requirement to Documents Issued in SNAP–R This proposed rule would state that parties who receive documents issued by BIS in SNAP–R may store the documents in one of two ways and that either way would meet the requirement of § 762.5 that original documents be retained. The two methods are: Storage of complete documents issued by BIS in SNAP–R electronically in a format readable by software possessed by the recipient party; or printing out and storing a complete paper copy of the document. BIS believes that either method that would be authorized by the proposed changes to § 762.5 would provide an accurate representation of the contents of the record and, therefore, either method should be treated as the equivalent of an original document. Reasons for the Proposed Changes Under its current procedure, BIS is expending funds and staff time to mail information to certain parties that is PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 Economic Impact BIS implemented a revised version of its Simplified Network Applications Processing System (SNAP–R) in October 2006. The SNAP–R system provides a Web based mechanism for parties to submit license applications, classification requests, License Exception AGR notifications and encryption review requests electronically and for BIS to respond electronically to each matter. In October 2008, BIS made use of the SNAP–R system mandatory except in five specified circumstances. SNAP–R is the vehicle through which BIS receives most of the submissions for which SNAP–R is available. During the period from January 1, 2009 through May 31, 2009, BIS E:\FR\FM\04DEP1.SGM 04DEP1 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 232 / Friday, December 4, 2009 / Proposed Rules srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS received 11,580 submissions via SNAP– R and 36 submissions via the paper application forms. Under existing procedures BIS would send the final results for the 11,580 SNAP–R submissions to the submitting party both electronically in SNAP–R and on paper. Under this proposed rule, BIS would send those final results via SNAP–R only. Final responses in the 36 instances in which BIS accepted a paper submission would continue to receive paper responses under this proposed rule. In addition, during the period from January 1, 2009 through May 31, 2009, BIS reopened 246 matters relating to submissions affected by this rule that previously had been considered to be closed. BIS would continue to issue the documents announcing the decision in these reopened matters on paper because the SNAP–R system currently is incapable of issuing such documents. The parties who currently receive both a SNAP–R and a paper response may fulfill the EAR recordkeeping requirement for these documents by either storing the electronic version in appropriate media or by storing the paper copy. Under the proposed rule parties who store the electronic document could continue doing so without any change. Parties who currently store only the paper copy would have to convert to electronic storage or would have to print out a paper copy of the electronic document and store that copy. BIS believes that the burden on parties that would have to change their procedures would be negligible. Only parties who submitted an application, notification or request electronically are affected by this rule. The fact that a party makes an electronic submission is a good indication that the party is equipped to store incoming documents electronically. In addition, BIS believes that the burden of printing out a paper copy of a document and filing it is not substantially greater than the burden of routing a paper envelope to the proper person, opening the envelope and filing the contents. Number of Small Entities In fiscal year 2008, BIS processed nearly 30,000 transactions that would be subject to this rule. BIS does not know the number of small entities that would be affected by this rule. BIS does not know the size of all of the entities that submit the applications, notifications and requests to which this rule applies nor does BIS know which such entities currently utilize paper recordkeeping. However, two of the criteria under which BIS authorizes paper submissions (lack of access to the Internet and no VerDate Nov<24>2008 16:55 Dec 03, 2009 Jkt 220001 more than one submission in the previous twelve months) are likely to remove the smallest of businesses from the impact of this rule. Conclusion Regardless of the number of entities affected, the burden that would be imposed by the rule is negligible. List of Subjects 15 CFR Parts 740, 748 and 750 Administrative practice and procedure, Exports, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. Administrative practice and procedure, Business and industry, Confidential business information, Exports, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. Accordingly, the Export Administration Regulations (15 CFR Parts 730–774) are proposed to be amended as follows: PART 740—[AMENDED] 1. The authority citation for part 740 continues to read as follows: Authority: 50 U.S.C. app. 2401 et seq.; 50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 7201 et seq.; E.O. 13026, 61 FR 58767, 3 CFR, 1996 Comp., p. 228; E.O. 13222, 66 FR 44025, 3 CFR, 2001 Comp., p. 783; Notice of August 13, 2009, 74 FR 41325 (August 14, 2009). 2. Section 740.18 is amended by revising the sixth sentence of paragraph (c)(5) to read as follows: Agricultural commodities. * * * * * (c) * * * (5) * * * BIS will issue written confirmation electronically in SNAP–R or via paper. * * * * * * * * PART 748—[AMENDED] 3. The authority citation for part 748 continues to read as follows: Authority: 50 U.S.C. app. 2401 et seq.; 50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.; E.O. 13026, 61 FR 58767, 3 CFR, 1996 Comp., p. 228; E.O. 13222, 66 FR 44025, 3 CFR, 2001 Comp., p. 783; Notice of August 13, 2009, 74 FR 41325 (August 14, 2009). § 748.7 [Amended] 4. Section 748.7 is amended by removing paragraph (c) and redesignating paragraph (d) as paragraph (c). PART 750—[AMENDED] 5. The authority citation for part 750 continues to read as follows: PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 4702 Authority: 50 U.S.C. app. 2401 et seq.; 50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.; Sec. 1503, Pub. L. 108– 11, 117 Stat. 559; E.O. 13026, 61 FR 58767, 3 CFR, 1996 Comp., p. 228; E.O. 13222, 66 FR 44025, 3 CFR, 2001 Comp., p. 783; Presidential Determination 2003–23 of May 7, 2003, 68 FR 26459, May 16, 2003; Notice of August 13, 2009, 74 FR 41325 (August 14, 2009). 6. Section 750.7 is amended by removing the final sentence from paragraph (a) and by revising paragraph (b) and paragraph (h)(4) to read as follows: § 750.7 Issuance of licenses * 15 CFR Part 762 § 740.18 63687 Sfmt 4702 * * * * (b) Issuance of a license. BIS may issue a license electronically via its Simplified Network Application Processing (SNAP–R) system or via paper or both electronically and via paper. Each license has a license number that will be shown on the license. * * * * * (h) * * * (4) Replacement license. If you have been issued a ‘‘replacement license’’ (for changes to your original license not covered in paragraph (c) of this section), you must retain both the original and the replacement license. * * * * * PART 762—[AMENDED] 7. The authority citation for part 762 continues to read as follows: Authority: 50 U.S.C. app. 2401 et seq.; 50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.; E.O. 13222, 66 FR 44025, 3 CFR, 2001 Comp., p. 783; Notice of August 13, 2009, 74 FR 41325 (August 14, 2009). 8. Section 762.2 is amended by: a. Revising paragraph (a)(1), b. Removing the comma and the word ‘‘and’’ from the end of paragraph (a)(9), c. Inserting a semicolon at the end of paragraph (a)(9), d. Redesignating paragraph (a)(10) as paragraph (a)(11), and e. Adding a new paragraph (a)(10) to read as follows: § 762.2 Records to be retained. (a) * * * (1) Export control documents as defined in part 772 of the EAR, except parties submitting documents electronically to BIS via the SNAP–R system are not required to retain copies of documents so submitted; * * * (10) Notification from BIS of an application being returned without action; Notification by BIS of an application being denied; Notification by BIS of the results of a commodity E:\FR\FM\04DEP1.SGM 04DEP1 63688 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 232 / Friday, December 4, 2009 / Proposed Rules classification or encryption review request conducted by BIS; and, * * * * * 9. Section 762.4 is amended by adding a sentence at the end of the section to read as follows: § 762.4 Original records required. * * * With respect to documents that BIS issues to a party in SNAP–R, either an electronically stored copy in a format that makes the document readable with software possessed by that party or a paper print out of the complete document is deemed to be an original record for purposes of this paragraph. Dated: November 30, 2009. Matthew S. Borman, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Export Administration. [FR Doc. E9–28982 Filed 12–3–09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–33–P SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION 20 CFR Parts 404, 405, 416, and 422 [Docket No. SSA–2008–0015] RIN 0960–AG80 Reestablishing Uniform National Disability Adjudication Provisions Social Security Administration. Notice of proposed rulemaking. AGENCY: srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS ACTION: SUMMARY: We propose to eliminate the remaining portions of part 405 of our rules, which we now use for initial disability claims in our Boston region. We propose to use the same rules for disability claims in the Boston region that we use for disability adjudications in the rest of the country, including those rules that apply to the administrative law judge (ALJ) and Appeals Council (AC) levels of our administrative review process in parts 404 and 416 of our rules. DATES: To be sure that we consider your comments, we must receive them no later than February 2, 2010. ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by any one of three methods—Internet, fax, or mail. Do not submit the same comments multiple times or by more than one method. Regardless of which method you choose, please state that your comments refer to Docket No. SSA–2008–0015 so that we may associate your comments with the correct regulation. Caution: You should be careful to include in your comments only information that you wish to make publicly available. We strongly urge you not to include in your comments any VerDate Nov<24>2008 16:55 Dec 03, 2009 Jkt 220001 personal information, such as Social Security numbers or medical information. 1. Internet: We strongly recommend that you submit your comments via the Internet. Please visit the Federal eRulemaking portal at https:// www.regulations.gov. Use the Search function to find docket number SSA– 2008–0015. The system will issue a tracking number to confirm your submission. You will not be able to view your comment immediately because we must post each comment manually. It may take up to a week for your comment to be viewable. 2. Fax: Fax comments to (410) 966– 2830. 3. Mail: Mail your comments to the Office of Regulations, Social Security Administration, 137 Altmeyer Building, 6401 Security Boulevard, Baltimore, Maryland 21235–6401. Comments are available for public viewing on the Federal eRulemaking portal at https://www.regulations.gov or in person, during regular business hours, by arranging with the contact person identified below. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Landis, Social Security Administration, 6401 Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21235–6401, (410) 965–0520 for information about this notice. For information on eligibility or filing for benefits, call our national toll-free number, 1–800–772– 1213 or TTY 1–800–325–0778, or visit our Internet site, Social Security Online, at https://www.socialsecurity.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Electronic Version The electronic file of this document is available on the date of publication in the Federal Register at https:// www.gpoaccess.gov/fr/. Background On March 31, 2006, we published final rules in the Federal Register that implemented a number of changes in the process for handling initial disability claims. 71 FR 16424. We referred to those regulations, found primarily in 20 CFR part 405, collectively as the Disability Service Improvement process, or DSI. We intended DSI to improve the way we handle initial disability claims. DSI added rules that implemented a Quick Disability Determination (QDD) process at the initial step of our disability determination process. It also replaced the reconsideration step of the administrative review process with review by a Federal Reviewing Official (FedRO), established a Medical and PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 Vocational Expert System, commonly known as the Office of Medical and Vocational Expertise (OMVE), and made changes to some of the procedures in our hearings process. DSI also eliminated the final step in our administrative review process for initial disability claims, under which a claimant could request review by the Appeals Council. We replaced the Appeals Council with the Decision Review Board (DRB). The DRB, which is composed of selected ALJs and administrative appeals judges (AAJs), reviews certain decisions made by ALJs before those decisions become final. If the DRB does not review an ALJ’s decision, the ALJ’s decision becomes our final decision. On August 1, 2006, we implemented the DSI rules in our Boston region, which consists of the States of Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, and Vermont. We planned to implement them in our remaining regions over a period of years. As part of our efforts to improve our administrative review process, we have continually monitored the DSI process and made appropriate changes when necessary. For example, we published final rules on September 6, 2007, that implemented the QDD process nationally. 72 FR 51173. In other final rules, we suspended new claims processing through the Office of the Federal Reviewing Official (OFedRO) and the OMVE as of March 23, 2008, so that we could reallocate those resources to reduce the backlog at the hearing level. 73 FR 2411, corrected at 73 FR 10381. In November 2008, the OFedRO issued a decision on the last of the claims it had accepted for review. Thus, in accordance with our final rules, subpart C of part 405 is no longer in effect, and the States in the Boston region have returned to the process they were following before August 2006, whether that process was reconsideration of an initial determination under §§ 404.907 and 416.1407 or the testing procedures found in §§ 404.906 and 416.1406. 73 FR at 2412. In addition, on October 29, 2007, we published a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) that would have implemented nationally a number of changes to the hearings and appeals processes. 72 FR 61218. We made those proposals against the backdrop of increasing workloads, lengthening hearing backlogs, and diminishing resources. While we continue to believe that many of the provisions contained in the October 29, 2007, NPRM would have both protected claimants’ rights and made the disability process more E:\FR\FM\04DEP1.SGM 04DEP1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 232 (Friday, December 4, 2009)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 63685-63688]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-28982]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Bureau of Industry and Security

15 CFR Parts 740, 748, 750 and 762

[Docket No. 0907201151-91153-01]
RIN 0694-AE66


Issuance of Electronic Document and Related Recordkeeping 
Requirements

AGENCY: Bureau of Industry and Security, Commerce.

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) is proposing to 
eliminate the use of most paper documents that it sends to parties 
having business before the agency. The documents that would be affected 
by this proposed rule are: Export and reexport licenses, notices of 
denial of license applications, notices of return of a license 
application without action, classification results, License Exception 
AGR notification results and encryption review request results. This 
proposed rule would modify the Export Administration Regulations (EAR) 
to implement those changes. This proposed rule also would make changes 
to the recordkeeping requirements associated with the elimination of 
paper documents. BIS is proposing to make these changes to reduce 
mailing costs and to free up staff time currently devoted to mailing 
these documents for use in other tasks.

DATES: Comments must be received by BIS no later than February 2, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Thomas Andrukonis, Office of Exporter 
Services, Bureau of Industry and Security, U.S. Department of Commerce 
at 202 482 6393 or e-mail tandrukoi@bis.doc.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background

    The Bureau of Industry and Security administers an export licensing 
program pursuant to the Export Administration Regulations. As part of 
this program, BIS issues various documents in response to applications 
and notifications submitted to BIS by the public. Those documents 
include export licenses, reexport licenses, notice that an export or 
reexport license applications has been denied, notice that an export or 
reexport license application is being returned to the applicant without 
action, responses to License Exception AGR notifications, and notice of 
the results of a classification request. Collectively, these documents 
are referred to in this preamble as license related documents.
    Currently, BIS issues the license related documents in two ways: 
Electronically in BIS's Simplified Network Application Processing 
Redesign system (SNAP-R) and on paper. Most license related documents 
are issued in both electronic and paper form. However, a few documents 
are issued only on paper. BIS now proposes to eliminate the paper 
version of the license related documents that it currently issues both 
electronically in SNAP-R and on paper.
    The EAR require that export license applications, reexport license 
applications and License Exception AGR notifications, encryption review 
requests and classification requests be submitted to BIS electronically 
using SNAP-R unless BIS authorizes a paper submission. The license 
related documents associated with a SNAP-R submission are issued on 
line in SNAP-R where the submitter may view, save or print a copy. In 
addition, a paper version of each of those documents is mailed to the 
party. BIS does not issue electronic license related documents in 
situations in which BIS authorized a paper submission and in situations 
in which BIS must reissue the license related documents because it 
reopened a matter previously considered to be completed. BIS is not 
proposing to stop issuing paper license related documents in these two 
situations in which it currently issues only paper documents. BIS also 
is not proposing to change its practices regarding issuance of Special 
Comprehensive Licenses or Special Iraq Reconstruction Licenses. BIS is 
proposing to discontinue issuing paper documents in the situations 
where it currently issues both paper and electronic versions of the 
license related documents. BIS is also proposing to make certain 
changes to the recordkeeping requirements in connection with this 
change.

Specific Proposed Changes

Clarification that Electronic Notification in SNAP-R is Considered, for 
Purposes of the EAR, Written Notification of the Results of a License 
Exception AGR Request
    This proposed rule would revise Sec.  740.18(c)(5) to state that 
BIS will issue confirmation in SNAP-R or by other written notification 
of the decision that no agency has objected to a party's proposed use 
of License Exception AGR. Currently, that section merely states that 
BIS will issue written confirmation.
Removal of Requirement to Maintain a Log of Electronic Submissions
    This proposed rule would remove the requirement currently found in 
Sec.  748.7(c) that companies maintain a log of electronic submissions. 
The requirement was established in connection with BIS' initial 
electronic application process, which was instituted in the 1980s. At 
that time, electronic submissions were facilitated by a number of 
private sector vendors and the logs may have been necessary for 
auditing purposes. However, currently, the information required to be 
kept in the log duplicates information that parties are required to 
include in their SNAP-R submissions or that is automatically recorded 
by SNAP-R. BIS is proposing to discontinue the log keeping requirement 
because it is redundant of information available to BIS in SNAP-R. The 
proposed rule would accomplish this change by removing paragraph (c) of 
Sec.  748.7 and

[[Page 63686]]

redesignating existing paragraph (d) as paragraph (c).
Removal of Language Relating to ``Computer Generated'' Licenses, the 
Department of Commerce Seal and Attachments to Licenses
    The proposed rule would revise Sec.  750.7(b) to state merely that 
BIS may issue export and reexport licenses either electronically or on 
paper and that each license will bear a license number. Existing 
language regarding ``computer generated'' licenses, the Department of 
Commerce seal and attachments to licenses would be removed as would an 
explicit requirement that exporters use the license number when 
communicating with BIS about the license. The proposed language would 
allow BIS to exercise discretion in deciding whether to issue a license 
electronically in SNAP-R or on paper. However, BIS expects that it will 
issue nearly all licenses electronically. Unless some exceptional 
circumstances exist, only licenses for which the applicant was 
authorized to file on paper and licenses that BIS cannot issue 
electronically (currently, only reopened licenses) will be issued on 
paper. BIS is proposing this change to reduce the costs of generating 
and mailing paper copies of licenses and to be able to assign to other 
tasks staff currently assigned to handling paper licenses. Because no 
EAR provision currently addresses issuance of the other license related 
documents with the specificity that Sec.  750.7(b) addresses licenses, 
only Sec.  750.7(b) need be modified to implement this change. However, 
BIS's intent is to issue only the electronic version of all license 
related documents unless BIS authorized paper submission of the 
original application, notice or request, or BIS cannot issue an 
electronic version of the applicable license related documents.
Removal of Requirement To Attach a Replacement License to the Original
    This proposed rule would revise Sec.  750.7(h)(4) to remove a 
requirement that the license holder attach a replacement license issued 
by BIS to the original license that it replaces. That requirement dates 
to an era in which electronic licenses did not exist and is impractical 
with electronic licenses issued in SNAP-R. The proposed rule would 
retain the requirement that the license holder keep both the original 
license and the replacement license.
Removal of Requirement To Retain Copies of Documents Submitted to BIS 
Via the SNAP-R System
    This proposed rule would exempt parties who submit documents to BIS 
via BIS's SNAP-R system from requirements to retain copies of documents 
so submitted even though those documents are ``export control 
documents'' as defined in part 772 of the EAR. BIS believes the 
reliability of the SNAP-R system provides adequate assurance that the 
documents received by BIS were submitted and that all submitted 
documents are received by BIS. This proposed change would not preclude 
parties from storing copies of these documents.
Addition of Certain Documents to Recordkeeping Requirements in Part 762
    This proposed rule would add the following documents to the list of 
documents required to be kept found in Sec.  762.2(a)(10): Notification 
from BIS that an application is being returned without action; 
Notification from BIS that an application is being denied; Notification 
from BIS of the results of a commodity classification or encryption 
review request conducted by BIS. BIS believes that requiring recipients 
of these documents to retain them is needed to confirm receipt and to 
verify that the recipient received notice of the terms of the document. 
BIS is not proposing to require parties to retain requests for 
additional information concerning active matters that they receive from 
BIS.
Application of Original Document Retention Requirement to Documents 
Issued in SNAP-R
    This proposed rule would state that parties who receive documents 
issued by BIS in SNAP-R may store the documents in one of two ways and 
that either way would meet the requirement of Sec.  762.5 that original 
documents be retained. The two methods are: Storage of complete 
documents issued by BIS in SNAP-R electronically in a format readable 
by software possessed by the recipient party; or printing out and 
storing a complete paper copy of the document. BIS believes that either 
method that would be authorized by the proposed changes to Sec.  762.5 
would provide an accurate representation of the contents of the record 
and, therefore, either method should be treated as the equivalent of an 
original document.

Reasons for the Proposed Changes

    Under its current procedure, BIS is expending funds and staff time 
to mail information to certain parties that is entirely duplicative of 
information that BIS sends to the same parties electronically. BIS is 
proposing these changes to reduce its operating costs and to free the 
staff time currently devoted to mailing paper documents for other 
purposes. BIS estimates that it currently spends approximately $25,000 
annually in direct mailing costs (envelopes, supplies and postage) to 
send out paper copies of the licenses, and responses to classification 
requests, encryption review requests and License Exception AGR 
notifications. BIS also estimates that about 1.5 hours of staff time is 
expended each day in connection with mailing these documents.

Rulemaking Requirements

    1. This rule has been determined to be not significant for purposes 
of E.O. 12866.
    2. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person is 
required to respond to, nor is subject to a penalty for failure to 
comply with, a collection of information, subject to the requirements 
of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) (PRA), 
unless that collection of information displays a currently valid Office 
of Management and Budget (OMB) Control Number. This regulation contains 
a collection previously approved by OMB under control number 0694-0096.
    3. This rule does not contain policies with Federalism implications 
as that term is defined under E.O. 13132.
    4. The Chief Counsel for Regulations of the Department of Commerce 
has certified to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business 
Administration that this proposed rule, if adopted in final form, would 
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small 
entities.

Economic Impact

    BIS implemented a revised version of its Simplified Network 
Applications Processing System (SNAP-R) in October 2006. The SNAP-R 
system provides a Web based mechanism for parties to submit license 
applications, classification requests, License Exception AGR 
notifications and encryption review requests electronically and for BIS 
to respond electronically to each matter. In October 2008, BIS made use 
of the SNAP-R system mandatory except in five specified circumstances. 
SNAP-R is the vehicle through which BIS receives most of the 
submissions for which SNAP-R is available.
    During the period from January 1, 2009 through May 31, 2009, BIS

[[Page 63687]]

received 11,580 submissions via SNAP-R and 36 submissions via the paper 
application forms. Under existing procedures BIS would send the final 
results for the 11,580 SNAP-R submissions to the submitting party both 
electronically in SNAP-R and on paper. Under this proposed rule, BIS 
would send those final results via SNAP-R only. Final responses in the 
36 instances in which BIS accepted a paper submission would continue to 
receive paper responses under this proposed rule. In addition, during 
the period from January 1, 2009 through May 31, 2009, BIS reopened 246 
matters relating to submissions affected by this rule that previously 
had been considered to be closed. BIS would continue to issue the 
documents announcing the decision in these reopened matters on paper 
because the SNAP-R system currently is incapable of issuing such 
documents.
    The parties who currently receive both a SNAP-R and a paper 
response may fulfill the EAR recordkeeping requirement for these 
documents by either storing the electronic version in appropriate media 
or by storing the paper copy. Under the proposed rule parties who store 
the electronic document could continue doing so without any change. 
Parties who currently store only the paper copy would have to convert 
to electronic storage or would have to print out a paper copy of the 
electronic document and store that copy.
    BIS believes that the burden on parties that would have to change 
their procedures would be negligible. Only parties who submitted an 
application, notification or request electronically are affected by 
this rule. The fact that a party makes an electronic submission is a 
good indication that the party is equipped to store incoming documents 
electronically. In addition, BIS believes that the burden of printing 
out a paper copy of a document and filing it is not substantially 
greater than the burden of routing a paper envelope to the proper 
person, opening the envelope and filing the contents.

Number of Small Entities

    In fiscal year 2008, BIS processed nearly 30,000 transactions that 
would be subject to this rule. BIS does not know the number of small 
entities that would be affected by this rule. BIS does not know the 
size of all of the entities that submit the applications, notifications 
and requests to which this rule applies nor does BIS know which such 
entities currently utilize paper recordkeeping. However, two of the 
criteria under which BIS authorizes paper submissions (lack of access 
to the Internet and no more than one submission in the previous twelve 
months) are likely to remove the smallest of businesses from the impact 
of this rule.

Conclusion

    Regardless of the number of entities affected, the burden that 
would be imposed by the rule is negligible.

List of Subjects

15 CFR Parts 740, 748 and 750

    Administrative practice and procedure, Exports, Reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements.

15 CFR Part 762

    Administrative practice and procedure, Business and industry, 
Confidential business information, Exports, Reporting and recordkeeping 
requirements.

    Accordingly, the Export Administration Regulations (15 CFR Parts 
730-774) are proposed to be amended as follows:

PART 740--[AMENDED]

    1. The authority citation for part 740 continues to read as 
follows:

    Authority:  50 U.S.C. app. 2401 et seq.; 50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.; 
22 U.S.C. 7201 et seq.; E.O. 13026, 61 FR 58767, 3 CFR, 1996 Comp., 
p. 228; E.O. 13222, 66 FR 44025, 3 CFR, 2001 Comp., p. 783; Notice 
of August 13, 2009, 74 FR 41325 (August 14, 2009).

    2. Section 740.18 is amended by revising the sixth sentence of 
paragraph (c)(5) to read as follows:


Sec.  740.18  Agricultural commodities.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *
    (5) * * * BIS will issue written confirmation electronically in 
SNAP-R or via paper. * * *
* * * * *

PART 748--[AMENDED]

    3. The authority citation for part 748 continues to read as 
follows:

    Authority:  50 U.S.C. app. 2401 et seq.; 50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.; 
E.O. 13026, 61 FR 58767, 3 CFR, 1996 Comp., p. 228; E.O. 13222, 66 
FR 44025, 3 CFR, 2001 Comp., p. 783; Notice of August 13, 2009, 74 
FR 41325 (August 14, 2009).


Sec.  748.7  [Amended]

    4. Section 748.7 is amended by removing paragraph (c) and 
redesignating paragraph (d) as paragraph (c).

PART 750--[AMENDED]

    5. The authority citation for part 750 continues to read as 
follows:

    Authority:  50 U.S.C. app. 2401 et seq.; 50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.; 
Sec. 1503, Pub. L. 108-11, 117 Stat. 559; E.O. 13026, 61 FR 58767, 3 
CFR, 1996 Comp., p. 228; E.O. 13222, 66 FR 44025, 3 CFR, 2001 Comp., 
p. 783; Presidential Determination 2003-23 of May 7, 2003, 68 FR 
26459, May 16, 2003; Notice of August 13, 2009, 74 FR 41325 (August 
14, 2009).

    6. Section 750.7 is amended by removing the final sentence from 
paragraph (a) and by revising paragraph (b) and paragraph (h)(4) to 
read as follows:


Sec.  750.7  Issuance of licenses

* * * * *
    (b) Issuance of a license. BIS may issue a license electronically 
via its Simplified Network Application Processing (SNAP-R) system or 
via paper or both electronically and via paper. Each license has a 
license number that will be shown on the license.
* * * * *
    (h) * * *
    (4) Replacement license. If you have been issued a ``replacement 
license'' (for changes to your original license not covered in 
paragraph (c) of this section), you must retain both the original and 
the replacement license.
* * * * *

PART 762--[AMENDED]

    7. The authority citation for part 762 continues to read as 
follows:

    Authority:  50 U.S.C. app. 2401 et seq.; 50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.; 
E.O. 13222, 66 FR 44025, 3 CFR, 2001 Comp., p. 783; Notice of August 
13, 2009, 74 FR 41325 (August 14, 2009).

    8. Section 762.2 is amended by:
    a. Revising paragraph (a)(1),
    b. Removing the comma and the word ``and'' from the end of 
paragraph (a)(9),
    c. Inserting a semicolon at the end of paragraph (a)(9),
    d. Redesignating paragraph (a)(10) as paragraph (a)(11), and
    e. Adding a new paragraph (a)(10) to read as follows:


Sec.  762.2  Records to be retained.

    (a) * * *
    (1) Export control documents as defined in part 772 of the EAR, 
except parties submitting documents electronically to BIS via the SNAP-
R system are not required to retain copies of documents so submitted;
    * * *
    (10) Notification from BIS of an application being returned without 
action; Notification by BIS of an application being denied; 
Notification by BIS of the results of a commodity

[[Page 63688]]

classification or encryption review request conducted by BIS; and,
* * * * *
    9. Section 762.4 is amended by adding a sentence at the end of the 
section to read as follows:


Sec.  762.4  Original records required.

    * * * With respect to documents that BIS issues to a party in SNAP-
R, either an electronically stored copy in a format that makes the 
document readable with software possessed by that party or a paper 
print out of the complete document is deemed to be an original record 
for purposes of this paragraph.

    Dated: November 30, 2009.
Matthew S. Borman,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Export Administration.
[FR Doc. E9-28982 Filed 12-3-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-33-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.