Issuance of Electronic Document and Related Recordkeeping Requirements, 63685-63688 [E9-28982]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 232 / Friday, December 4, 2009 / Proposed Rules
The Proposed Amendment
In consideration of the foregoing, the
Federal Aviation Administration
proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as
follows:
PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A,
B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND
REPORTING POINTS
1. The authority citation for part 71
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g); 40103, 40113,
40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959–
1963 Comp., p. 389.
§ 71.1
[Amended]
2. The incorporation by reference in
14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order 7400.9T,
Airspace Designations and Reporting
Points, signed August 27, 2009, and
effective September 15, 2009, is
amended as follows:
Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace areas
extending upward from 700 feet or more
above the surface of the earth.
*
*
*
*
*
AGL ND E5 Langdon, ND [New]
Robertson Field Airport, ND
(Lat. 48°45′11″ N., long. 98°23′37″ W.)
That airspace extending upward from 700
feet above the surface within a 6.3-mile
radius of Robertson Field Airport.
*
*
*
*
*
Issued in Fort Worth, TX, on November 16,
2009.
Anthony D. Roetzel,
Manager, Operations Support Group, ATO
Central Service Center.
[FR Doc. E9–28895 Filed 12–3–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4901–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of Industry and Security
15 CFR Parts 740, 748, 750 and 762
[Docket No. 0907201151–91153–01]
RIN 0694–AE66
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS
Issuance of Electronic Document and
Related Recordkeeping Requirements
AGENCY: Bureau of Industry and
Security, Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
SUMMARY: The Bureau of Industry and
Security (BIS) is proposing to eliminate
the use of most paper documents that it
sends to parties having business before
the agency. The documents that would
be affected by this proposed rule are:
Export and reexport licenses, notices of
denial of license applications, notices of
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:55 Dec 03, 2009
Jkt 220001
return of a license application without
action, classification results, License
Exception AGR notification results and
encryption review request results. This
proposed rule would modify the Export
Administration Regulations (EAR) to
implement those changes. This
proposed rule also would make changes
to the recordkeeping requirements
associated with the elimination of paper
documents. BIS is proposing to make
these changes to reduce mailing costs
and to free up staff time currently
devoted to mailing these documents for
use in other tasks.
DATES: Comments must be received by
BIS no later than February 2, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Thomas Andrukonis, Office of Exporter
Services, Bureau of Industry and
Security, U.S. Department of Commerce
at 202 482 6393 or e-mail
tandrukoi@bis.doc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Bureau of Industry and Security
administers an export licensing program
pursuant to the Export Administration
Regulations. As part of this program,
BIS issues various documents in
response to applications and
notifications submitted to BIS by the
public. Those documents include export
licenses, reexport licenses, notice that
an export or reexport license
applications has been denied, notice
that an export or reexport license
application is being returned to the
applicant without action, responses to
License Exception AGR notifications,
and notice of the results of a
classification request. Collectively, these
documents are referred to in this
preamble as license related documents.
Currently, BIS issues the license
related documents in two ways:
Electronically in BIS’s Simplified
Network Application Processing
Redesign system (SNAP–R) and on
paper. Most license related documents
are issued in both electronic and paper
form. However, a few documents are
issued only on paper. BIS now proposes
to eliminate the paper version of the
license related documents that it
currently issues both electronically in
SNAP–R and on paper.
The EAR require that export license
applications, reexport license
applications and License Exception
AGR notifications, encryption review
requests and classification requests be
submitted to BIS electronically using
SNAP–R unless BIS authorizes a paper
submission. The license related
documents associated with a SNAP–R
submission are issued on line in SNAP–
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
63685
R where the submitter may view, save
or print a copy. In addition, a paper
version of each of those documents is
mailed to the party. BIS does not issue
electronic license related documents in
situations in which BIS authorized a
paper submission and in situations in
which BIS must reissue the license
related documents because it reopened
a matter previously considered to be
completed. BIS is not proposing to stop
issuing paper license related documents
in these two situations in which it
currently issues only paper documents.
BIS also is not proposing to change its
practices regarding issuance of Special
Comprehensive Licenses or Special Iraq
Reconstruction Licenses. BIS is
proposing to discontinue issuing paper
documents in the situations where it
currently issues both paper and
electronic versions of the license related
documents. BIS is also proposing to
make certain changes to the
recordkeeping requirements in
connection with this change.
Specific Proposed Changes
Clarification that Electronic Notification
in SNAP–R is Considered, for Purposes
of the EAR, Written Notification of the
Results of a License Exception AGR
Request
This proposed rule would revise
§ 740.18(c)(5) to state that BIS will issue
confirmation in SNAP–R or by other
written notification of the decision that
no agency has objected to a party’s
proposed use of License Exception AGR.
Currently, that section merely states that
BIS will issue written confirmation.
Removal of Requirement to Maintain a
Log of Electronic Submissions
This proposed rule would remove the
requirement currently found in
§ 748.7(c) that companies maintain a log
of electronic submissions. The
requirement was established in
connection with BIS’ initial electronic
application process, which was
instituted in the 1980s. At that time,
electronic submissions were facilitated
by a number of private sector vendors
and the logs may have been necessary
for auditing purposes. However,
currently, the information required to be
kept in the log duplicates information
that parties are required to include in
their SNAP–R submissions or that is
automatically recorded by SNAP–R. BIS
is proposing to discontinue the log
keeping requirement because it is
redundant of information available to
BIS in SNAP–R. The proposed rule
would accomplish this change by
removing paragraph (c) of § 748.7 and
E:\FR\FM\04DEP1.SGM
04DEP1
63686
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 232 / Friday, December 4, 2009 / Proposed Rules
redesignating existing paragraph (d) as
paragraph (c).
Removal of Language Relating to
‘‘Computer Generated’’ Licenses, the
Department of Commerce Seal and
Attachments to Licenses
The proposed rule would revise
§ 750.7(b) to state merely that BIS may
issue export and reexport licenses either
electronically or on paper and that each
license will bear a license number.
Existing language regarding ‘‘computer
generated’’ licenses, the Department of
Commerce seal and attachments to
licenses would be removed as would an
explicit requirement that exporters use
the license number when
communicating with BIS about the
license. The proposed language would
allow BIS to exercise discretion in
deciding whether to issue a license
electronically in SNAP–R or on paper.
However, BIS expects that it will issue
nearly all licenses electronically. Unless
some exceptional circumstances exist,
only licenses for which the applicant
was authorized to file on paper and
licenses that BIS cannot issue
electronically (currently, only reopened
licenses) will be issued on paper. BIS is
proposing this change to reduce the
costs of generating and mailing paper
copies of licenses and to be able to
assign to other tasks staff currently
assigned to handling paper licenses.
Because no EAR provision currently
addresses issuance of the other license
related documents with the specificity
that § 750.7(b) addresses licenses, only
§ 750.7(b) need be modified to
implement this change. However, BIS’s
intent is to issue only the electronic
version of all license related documents
unless BIS authorized paper submission
of the original application, notice or
request, or BIS cannot issue an
electronic version of the applicable
license related documents.
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS
Removal of Requirement To Attach a
Replacement License to the Original
This proposed rule would revise
§ 750.7(h)(4) to remove a requirement
that the license holder attach a
replacement license issued by BIS to the
original license that it replaces. That
requirement dates to an era in which
electronic licenses did not exist and is
impractical with electronic licenses
issued in SNAP–R. The proposed rule
would retain the requirement that the
license holder keep both the original
license and the replacement license.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:55 Dec 03, 2009
Jkt 220001
Removal of Requirement To Retain
Copies of Documents Submitted to BIS
Via the SNAP–R System
This proposed rule would exempt
parties who submit documents to BIS
via BIS’s SNAP–R system from
requirements to retain copies of
documents so submitted even though
those documents are ‘‘export control
documents’’ as defined in part 772 of
the EAR. BIS believes the reliability of
the SNAP–R system provides adequate
assurance that the documents received
by BIS were submitted and that all
submitted documents are received by
BIS. This proposed change would not
preclude parties from storing copies of
these documents.
entirely duplicative of information that
BIS sends to the same parties
electronically. BIS is proposing these
changes to reduce its operating costs
and to free the staff time currently
devoted to mailing paper documents for
other purposes. BIS estimates that it
currently spends approximately $25,000
annually in direct mailing costs
(envelopes, supplies and postage) to
send out paper copies of the licenses,
and responses to classification requests,
encryption review requests and License
Exception AGR notifications. BIS also
estimates that about 1.5 hours of staff
time is expended each day in
connection with mailing these
documents.
Addition of Certain Documents to
Recordkeeping Requirements in Part
762
This proposed rule would add the
following documents to the list of
documents required to be kept found in
§ 762.2(a)(10): Notification from BIS that
an application is being returned without
action; Notification from BIS that an
application is being denied; Notification
from BIS of the results of a commodity
classification or encryption review
request conducted by BIS. BIS believes
that requiring recipients of these
documents to retain them is needed to
confirm receipt and to verify that the
recipient received notice of the terms of
the document. BIS is not proposing to
require parties to retain requests for
additional information concerning
active matters that they receive from
BIS.
Rulemaking Requirements
1. This rule has been determined to be
not significant for purposes of E.O.
12866.
2. Notwithstanding any other
provision of law, no person is required
to respond to, nor is subject to a penalty
for failure to comply with, a collection
of information, subject to the
requirements of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.) (PRA), unless that collection of
information displays a currently valid
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) Control Number. This regulation
contains a collection previously
approved by OMB under control
number 0694–0096.
3. This rule does not contain policies
with Federalism implications as that
term is defined under E.O. 13132.
4. The Chief Counsel for Regulations
of the Department of Commerce has
certified to the Chief Counsel for
Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration that this proposed rule,
if adopted in final form, would not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
Application of Original Document
Retention Requirement to Documents
Issued in SNAP–R
This proposed rule would state that
parties who receive documents issued
by BIS in SNAP–R may store the
documents in one of two ways and that
either way would meet the requirement
of § 762.5 that original documents be
retained. The two methods are: Storage
of complete documents issued by BIS in
SNAP–R electronically in a format
readable by software possessed by the
recipient party; or printing out and
storing a complete paper copy of the
document. BIS believes that either
method that would be authorized by the
proposed changes to § 762.5 would
provide an accurate representation of
the contents of the record and, therefore,
either method should be treated as the
equivalent of an original document.
Reasons for the Proposed Changes
Under its current procedure, BIS is
expending funds and staff time to mail
information to certain parties that is
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Economic Impact
BIS implemented a revised version of
its Simplified Network Applications
Processing System (SNAP–R) in October
2006. The SNAP–R system provides a
Web based mechanism for parties to
submit license applications,
classification requests, License
Exception AGR notifications and
encryption review requests
electronically and for BIS to respond
electronically to each matter. In October
2008, BIS made use of the SNAP–R
system mandatory except in five
specified circumstances. SNAP–R is the
vehicle through which BIS receives
most of the submissions for which
SNAP–R is available.
During the period from January 1,
2009 through May 31, 2009, BIS
E:\FR\FM\04DEP1.SGM
04DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 232 / Friday, December 4, 2009 / Proposed Rules
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS
received 11,580 submissions via SNAP–
R and 36 submissions via the paper
application forms. Under existing
procedures BIS would send the final
results for the 11,580 SNAP–R
submissions to the submitting party
both electronically in SNAP–R and on
paper. Under this proposed rule, BIS
would send those final results via
SNAP–R only. Final responses in the 36
instances in which BIS accepted a paper
submission would continue to receive
paper responses under this proposed
rule. In addition, during the period from
January 1, 2009 through May 31, 2009,
BIS reopened 246 matters relating to
submissions affected by this rule that
previously had been considered to be
closed. BIS would continue to issue the
documents announcing the decision in
these reopened matters on paper
because the SNAP–R system currently is
incapable of issuing such documents.
The parties who currently receive
both a SNAP–R and a paper response
may fulfill the EAR recordkeeping
requirement for these documents by
either storing the electronic version in
appropriate media or by storing the
paper copy. Under the proposed rule
parties who store the electronic
document could continue doing so
without any change. Parties who
currently store only the paper copy
would have to convert to electronic
storage or would have to print out a
paper copy of the electronic document
and store that copy.
BIS believes that the burden on
parties that would have to change their
procedures would be negligible. Only
parties who submitted an application,
notification or request electronically are
affected by this rule. The fact that a
party makes an electronic submission is
a good indication that the party is
equipped to store incoming documents
electronically. In addition, BIS believes
that the burden of printing out a paper
copy of a document and filing it is not
substantially greater than the burden of
routing a paper envelope to the proper
person, opening the envelope and filing
the contents.
Number of Small Entities
In fiscal year 2008, BIS processed
nearly 30,000 transactions that would be
subject to this rule. BIS does not know
the number of small entities that would
be affected by this rule. BIS does not
know the size of all of the entities that
submit the applications, notifications
and requests to which this rule applies
nor does BIS know which such entities
currently utilize paper recordkeeping.
However, two of the criteria under
which BIS authorizes paper submissions
(lack of access to the Internet and no
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:55 Dec 03, 2009
Jkt 220001
more than one submission in the
previous twelve months) are likely to
remove the smallest of businesses from
the impact of this rule.
Conclusion
Regardless of the number of entities
affected, the burden that would be
imposed by the rule is negligible.
List of Subjects
15 CFR Parts 740, 748 and 750
Administrative practice and
procedure, Exports, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Administrative practice and
procedure, Business and industry,
Confidential business information,
Exports, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Accordingly, the Export
Administration Regulations (15 CFR
Parts 730–774) are proposed to be
amended as follows:
PART 740—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 740
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 50 U.S.C. app. 2401 et seq.; 50
U.S.C. 1701 et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 7201 et seq.;
E.O. 13026, 61 FR 58767, 3 CFR, 1996 Comp.,
p. 228; E.O. 13222, 66 FR 44025, 3 CFR, 2001
Comp., p. 783; Notice of August 13, 2009, 74
FR 41325 (August 14, 2009).
2. Section 740.18 is amended by
revising the sixth sentence of paragraph
(c)(5) to read as follows:
Agricultural commodities.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(5) * * * BIS will issue written
confirmation electronically in SNAP–R
or via paper. * * *
*
*
*
*
*
PART 748—[AMENDED]
3. The authority citation for part 748
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 50 U.S.C. app. 2401 et seq.; 50
U.S.C. 1701 et seq.; E.O. 13026, 61 FR 58767,
3 CFR, 1996 Comp., p. 228; E.O. 13222, 66
FR 44025, 3 CFR, 2001 Comp., p. 783; Notice
of August 13, 2009, 74 FR 41325 (August 14,
2009).
§ 748.7
[Amended]
4. Section 748.7 is amended by
removing paragraph (c) and
redesignating paragraph (d) as
paragraph (c).
PART 750—[AMENDED]
5. The authority citation for part 750
continues to read as follows:
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Authority: 50 U.S.C. app. 2401 et seq.; 50
U.S.C. 1701 et seq.; Sec. 1503, Pub. L. 108–
11, 117 Stat. 559; E.O. 13026, 61 FR 58767,
3 CFR, 1996 Comp., p. 228; E.O. 13222, 66
FR 44025, 3 CFR, 2001 Comp., p. 783;
Presidential Determination 2003–23 of May
7, 2003, 68 FR 26459, May 16, 2003; Notice
of August 13, 2009, 74 FR 41325 (August 14,
2009).
6. Section 750.7 is amended by
removing the final sentence from
paragraph (a) and by revising paragraph
(b) and paragraph (h)(4) to read as
follows:
§ 750.7
Issuance of licenses
*
15 CFR Part 762
§ 740.18
63687
Sfmt 4702
*
*
*
*
(b) Issuance of a license. BIS may
issue a license electronically via its
Simplified Network Application
Processing (SNAP–R) system or via
paper or both electronically and via
paper. Each license has a license
number that will be shown on the
license.
*
*
*
*
*
(h) * * *
(4) Replacement license. If you have
been issued a ‘‘replacement license’’ (for
changes to your original license not
covered in paragraph (c) of this section),
you must retain both the original and
the replacement license.
*
*
*
*
*
PART 762—[AMENDED]
7. The authority citation for part 762
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 50 U.S.C. app. 2401 et seq.; 50
U.S.C. 1701 et seq.; E.O. 13222, 66 FR 44025,
3 CFR, 2001 Comp., p. 783; Notice of August
13, 2009, 74 FR 41325 (August 14, 2009).
8. Section 762.2 is amended by:
a. Revising paragraph (a)(1),
b. Removing the comma and the word
‘‘and’’ from the end of paragraph (a)(9),
c. Inserting a semicolon at the end of
paragraph (a)(9),
d. Redesignating paragraph (a)(10) as
paragraph (a)(11), and
e. Adding a new paragraph (a)(10) to
read as follows:
§ 762.2
Records to be retained.
(a) * * *
(1) Export control documents as
defined in part 772 of the EAR, except
parties submitting documents
electronically to BIS via the SNAP–R
system are not required to retain copies
of documents so submitted;
* * *
(10) Notification from BIS of an
application being returned without
action; Notification by BIS of an
application being denied; Notification
by BIS of the results of a commodity
E:\FR\FM\04DEP1.SGM
04DEP1
63688
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 232 / Friday, December 4, 2009 / Proposed Rules
classification or encryption review
request conducted by BIS; and,
*
*
*
*
*
9. Section 762.4 is amended by
adding a sentence at the end of the
section to read as follows:
§ 762.4
Original records required.
* * * With respect to documents that
BIS issues to a party in SNAP–R, either
an electronically stored copy in a format
that makes the document readable with
software possessed by that party or a
paper print out of the complete
document is deemed to be an original
record for purposes of this paragraph.
Dated: November 30, 2009.
Matthew S. Borman,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Export
Administration.
[FR Doc. E9–28982 Filed 12–3–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–33–P
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
20 CFR Parts 404, 405, 416, and 422
[Docket No. SSA–2008–0015]
RIN 0960–AG80
Reestablishing Uniform National
Disability Adjudication Provisions
Social Security Administration.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS
ACTION:
SUMMARY: We propose to eliminate the
remaining portions of part 405 of our
rules, which we now use for initial
disability claims in our Boston region.
We propose to use the same rules for
disability claims in the Boston region
that we use for disability adjudications
in the rest of the country, including
those rules that apply to the
administrative law judge (ALJ) and
Appeals Council (AC) levels of our
administrative review process in parts
404 and 416 of our rules.
DATES: To be sure that we consider your
comments, we must receive them no
later than February 2, 2010.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
by any one of three methods—Internet,
fax, or mail. Do not submit the same
comments multiple times or by more
than one method. Regardless of which
method you choose, please state that
your comments refer to Docket No.
SSA–2008–0015 so that we may
associate your comments with the
correct regulation.
Caution: You should be careful to
include in your comments only
information that you wish to make
publicly available. We strongly urge you
not to include in your comments any
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:55 Dec 03, 2009
Jkt 220001
personal information, such as Social
Security numbers or medical
information.
1. Internet: We strongly recommend
that you submit your comments via the
Internet. Please visit the Federal
eRulemaking portal at https://
www.regulations.gov. Use the Search
function to find docket number SSA–
2008–0015. The system will issue a
tracking number to confirm your
submission. You will not be able to
view your comment immediately
because we must post each comment
manually. It may take up to a week for
your comment to be viewable.
2. Fax: Fax comments to (410) 966–
2830.
3. Mail: Mail your comments to the
Office of Regulations, Social Security
Administration, 137 Altmeyer Building,
6401 Security Boulevard, Baltimore,
Maryland 21235–6401.
Comments are available for public
viewing on the Federal eRulemaking
portal at https://www.regulations.gov or
in person, during regular business
hours, by arranging with the contact
person identified below.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Dean Landis, Social Security
Administration, 6401 Security
Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21235–6401,
(410) 965–0520 for information about
this notice. For information on
eligibility or filing for benefits, call our
national toll-free number, 1–800–772–
1213 or TTY 1–800–325–0778, or visit
our Internet site, Social Security Online,
at https://www.socialsecurity.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Electronic Version
The electronic file of this document is
available on the date of publication in
the Federal Register at https://
www.gpoaccess.gov/fr/.
Background
On March 31, 2006, we published
final rules in the Federal Register that
implemented a number of changes in
the process for handling initial
disability claims. 71 FR 16424. We
referred to those regulations, found
primarily in 20 CFR part 405,
collectively as the Disability Service
Improvement process, or DSI. We
intended DSI to improve the way we
handle initial disability claims. DSI
added rules that implemented a Quick
Disability Determination (QDD) process
at the initial step of our disability
determination process. It also replaced
the reconsideration step of the
administrative review process with
review by a Federal Reviewing Official
(FedRO), established a Medical and
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Vocational Expert System, commonly
known as the Office of Medical and
Vocational Expertise (OMVE), and made
changes to some of the procedures in
our hearings process. DSI also
eliminated the final step in our
administrative review process for initial
disability claims, under which a
claimant could request review by the
Appeals Council. We replaced the
Appeals Council with the Decision
Review Board (DRB). The DRB, which is
composed of selected ALJs and
administrative appeals judges (AAJs),
reviews certain decisions made by ALJs
before those decisions become final. If
the DRB does not review an ALJ’s
decision, the ALJ’s decision becomes
our final decision. On August 1, 2006,
we implemented the DSI rules in our
Boston region, which consists of the
States of Connecticut, Maine,
Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode
Island, and Vermont. We planned to
implement them in our remaining
regions over a period of years.
As part of our efforts to improve our
administrative review process, we have
continually monitored the DSI process
and made appropriate changes when
necessary. For example, we published
final rules on September 6, 2007, that
implemented the QDD process
nationally. 72 FR 51173. In other final
rules, we suspended new claims
processing through the Office of the
Federal Reviewing Official (OFedRO)
and the OMVE as of March 23, 2008, so
that we could reallocate those resources
to reduce the backlog at the hearing
level. 73 FR 2411, corrected at 73 FR
10381. In November 2008, the OFedRO
issued a decision on the last of the
claims it had accepted for review. Thus,
in accordance with our final rules,
subpart C of part 405 is no longer in
effect, and the States in the Boston
region have returned to the process they
were following before August 2006,
whether that process was
reconsideration of an initial
determination under §§ 404.907 and
416.1407 or the testing procedures
found in §§ 404.906 and 416.1406. 73
FR at 2412.
In addition, on October 29, 2007, we
published a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) that would have
implemented nationally a number of
changes to the hearings and appeals
processes. 72 FR 61218. We made those
proposals against the backdrop of
increasing workloads, lengthening
hearing backlogs, and diminishing
resources. While we continue to believe
that many of the provisions contained in
the October 29, 2007, NPRM would
have both protected claimants’ rights
and made the disability process more
E:\FR\FM\04DEP1.SGM
04DEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 232 (Friday, December 4, 2009)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 63685-63688]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-28982]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of Industry and Security
15 CFR Parts 740, 748, 750 and 762
[Docket No. 0907201151-91153-01]
RIN 0694-AE66
Issuance of Electronic Document and Related Recordkeeping
Requirements
AGENCY: Bureau of Industry and Security, Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) is proposing to
eliminate the use of most paper documents that it sends to parties
having business before the agency. The documents that would be affected
by this proposed rule are: Export and reexport licenses, notices of
denial of license applications, notices of return of a license
application without action, classification results, License Exception
AGR notification results and encryption review request results. This
proposed rule would modify the Export Administration Regulations (EAR)
to implement those changes. This proposed rule also would make changes
to the recordkeeping requirements associated with the elimination of
paper documents. BIS is proposing to make these changes to reduce
mailing costs and to free up staff time currently devoted to mailing
these documents for use in other tasks.
DATES: Comments must be received by BIS no later than February 2, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Thomas Andrukonis, Office of Exporter
Services, Bureau of Industry and Security, U.S. Department of Commerce
at 202 482 6393 or e-mail tandrukoi@bis.doc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Bureau of Industry and Security administers an export licensing
program pursuant to the Export Administration Regulations. As part of
this program, BIS issues various documents in response to applications
and notifications submitted to BIS by the public. Those documents
include export licenses, reexport licenses, notice that an export or
reexport license applications has been denied, notice that an export or
reexport license application is being returned to the applicant without
action, responses to License Exception AGR notifications, and notice of
the results of a classification request. Collectively, these documents
are referred to in this preamble as license related documents.
Currently, BIS issues the license related documents in two ways:
Electronically in BIS's Simplified Network Application Processing
Redesign system (SNAP-R) and on paper. Most license related documents
are issued in both electronic and paper form. However, a few documents
are issued only on paper. BIS now proposes to eliminate the paper
version of the license related documents that it currently issues both
electronically in SNAP-R and on paper.
The EAR require that export license applications, reexport license
applications and License Exception AGR notifications, encryption review
requests and classification requests be submitted to BIS electronically
using SNAP-R unless BIS authorizes a paper submission. The license
related documents associated with a SNAP-R submission are issued on
line in SNAP-R where the submitter may view, save or print a copy. In
addition, a paper version of each of those documents is mailed to the
party. BIS does not issue electronic license related documents in
situations in which BIS authorized a paper submission and in situations
in which BIS must reissue the license related documents because it
reopened a matter previously considered to be completed. BIS is not
proposing to stop issuing paper license related documents in these two
situations in which it currently issues only paper documents. BIS also
is not proposing to change its practices regarding issuance of Special
Comprehensive Licenses or Special Iraq Reconstruction Licenses. BIS is
proposing to discontinue issuing paper documents in the situations
where it currently issues both paper and electronic versions of the
license related documents. BIS is also proposing to make certain
changes to the recordkeeping requirements in connection with this
change.
Specific Proposed Changes
Clarification that Electronic Notification in SNAP-R is Considered, for
Purposes of the EAR, Written Notification of the Results of a License
Exception AGR Request
This proposed rule would revise Sec. 740.18(c)(5) to state that
BIS will issue confirmation in SNAP-R or by other written notification
of the decision that no agency has objected to a party's proposed use
of License Exception AGR. Currently, that section merely states that
BIS will issue written confirmation.
Removal of Requirement to Maintain a Log of Electronic Submissions
This proposed rule would remove the requirement currently found in
Sec. 748.7(c) that companies maintain a log of electronic submissions.
The requirement was established in connection with BIS' initial
electronic application process, which was instituted in the 1980s. At
that time, electronic submissions were facilitated by a number of
private sector vendors and the logs may have been necessary for
auditing purposes. However, currently, the information required to be
kept in the log duplicates information that parties are required to
include in their SNAP-R submissions or that is automatically recorded
by SNAP-R. BIS is proposing to discontinue the log keeping requirement
because it is redundant of information available to BIS in SNAP-R. The
proposed rule would accomplish this change by removing paragraph (c) of
Sec. 748.7 and
[[Page 63686]]
redesignating existing paragraph (d) as paragraph (c).
Removal of Language Relating to ``Computer Generated'' Licenses, the
Department of Commerce Seal and Attachments to Licenses
The proposed rule would revise Sec. 750.7(b) to state merely that
BIS may issue export and reexport licenses either electronically or on
paper and that each license will bear a license number. Existing
language regarding ``computer generated'' licenses, the Department of
Commerce seal and attachments to licenses would be removed as would an
explicit requirement that exporters use the license number when
communicating with BIS about the license. The proposed language would
allow BIS to exercise discretion in deciding whether to issue a license
electronically in SNAP-R or on paper. However, BIS expects that it will
issue nearly all licenses electronically. Unless some exceptional
circumstances exist, only licenses for which the applicant was
authorized to file on paper and licenses that BIS cannot issue
electronically (currently, only reopened licenses) will be issued on
paper. BIS is proposing this change to reduce the costs of generating
and mailing paper copies of licenses and to be able to assign to other
tasks staff currently assigned to handling paper licenses. Because no
EAR provision currently addresses issuance of the other license related
documents with the specificity that Sec. 750.7(b) addresses licenses,
only Sec. 750.7(b) need be modified to implement this change. However,
BIS's intent is to issue only the electronic version of all license
related documents unless BIS authorized paper submission of the
original application, notice or request, or BIS cannot issue an
electronic version of the applicable license related documents.
Removal of Requirement To Attach a Replacement License to the Original
This proposed rule would revise Sec. 750.7(h)(4) to remove a
requirement that the license holder attach a replacement license issued
by BIS to the original license that it replaces. That requirement dates
to an era in which electronic licenses did not exist and is impractical
with electronic licenses issued in SNAP-R. The proposed rule would
retain the requirement that the license holder keep both the original
license and the replacement license.
Removal of Requirement To Retain Copies of Documents Submitted to BIS
Via the SNAP-R System
This proposed rule would exempt parties who submit documents to BIS
via BIS's SNAP-R system from requirements to retain copies of documents
so submitted even though those documents are ``export control
documents'' as defined in part 772 of the EAR. BIS believes the
reliability of the SNAP-R system provides adequate assurance that the
documents received by BIS were submitted and that all submitted
documents are received by BIS. This proposed change would not preclude
parties from storing copies of these documents.
Addition of Certain Documents to Recordkeeping Requirements in Part 762
This proposed rule would add the following documents to the list of
documents required to be kept found in Sec. 762.2(a)(10): Notification
from BIS that an application is being returned without action;
Notification from BIS that an application is being denied; Notification
from BIS of the results of a commodity classification or encryption
review request conducted by BIS. BIS believes that requiring recipients
of these documents to retain them is needed to confirm receipt and to
verify that the recipient received notice of the terms of the document.
BIS is not proposing to require parties to retain requests for
additional information concerning active matters that they receive from
BIS.
Application of Original Document Retention Requirement to Documents
Issued in SNAP-R
This proposed rule would state that parties who receive documents
issued by BIS in SNAP-R may store the documents in one of two ways and
that either way would meet the requirement of Sec. 762.5 that original
documents be retained. The two methods are: Storage of complete
documents issued by BIS in SNAP-R electronically in a format readable
by software possessed by the recipient party; or printing out and
storing a complete paper copy of the document. BIS believes that either
method that would be authorized by the proposed changes to Sec. 762.5
would provide an accurate representation of the contents of the record
and, therefore, either method should be treated as the equivalent of an
original document.
Reasons for the Proposed Changes
Under its current procedure, BIS is expending funds and staff time
to mail information to certain parties that is entirely duplicative of
information that BIS sends to the same parties electronically. BIS is
proposing these changes to reduce its operating costs and to free the
staff time currently devoted to mailing paper documents for other
purposes. BIS estimates that it currently spends approximately $25,000
annually in direct mailing costs (envelopes, supplies and postage) to
send out paper copies of the licenses, and responses to classification
requests, encryption review requests and License Exception AGR
notifications. BIS also estimates that about 1.5 hours of staff time is
expended each day in connection with mailing these documents.
Rulemaking Requirements
1. This rule has been determined to be not significant for purposes
of E.O. 12866.
2. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person is
required to respond to, nor is subject to a penalty for failure to
comply with, a collection of information, subject to the requirements
of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) (PRA),
unless that collection of information displays a currently valid Office
of Management and Budget (OMB) Control Number. This regulation contains
a collection previously approved by OMB under control number 0694-0096.
3. This rule does not contain policies with Federalism implications
as that term is defined under E.O. 13132.
4. The Chief Counsel for Regulations of the Department of Commerce
has certified to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration that this proposed rule, if adopted in final form, would
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
Economic Impact
BIS implemented a revised version of its Simplified Network
Applications Processing System (SNAP-R) in October 2006. The SNAP-R
system provides a Web based mechanism for parties to submit license
applications, classification requests, License Exception AGR
notifications and encryption review requests electronically and for BIS
to respond electronically to each matter. In October 2008, BIS made use
of the SNAP-R system mandatory except in five specified circumstances.
SNAP-R is the vehicle through which BIS receives most of the
submissions for which SNAP-R is available.
During the period from January 1, 2009 through May 31, 2009, BIS
[[Page 63687]]
received 11,580 submissions via SNAP-R and 36 submissions via the paper
application forms. Under existing procedures BIS would send the final
results for the 11,580 SNAP-R submissions to the submitting party both
electronically in SNAP-R and on paper. Under this proposed rule, BIS
would send those final results via SNAP-R only. Final responses in the
36 instances in which BIS accepted a paper submission would continue to
receive paper responses under this proposed rule. In addition, during
the period from January 1, 2009 through May 31, 2009, BIS reopened 246
matters relating to submissions affected by this rule that previously
had been considered to be closed. BIS would continue to issue the
documents announcing the decision in these reopened matters on paper
because the SNAP-R system currently is incapable of issuing such
documents.
The parties who currently receive both a SNAP-R and a paper
response may fulfill the EAR recordkeeping requirement for these
documents by either storing the electronic version in appropriate media
or by storing the paper copy. Under the proposed rule parties who store
the electronic document could continue doing so without any change.
Parties who currently store only the paper copy would have to convert
to electronic storage or would have to print out a paper copy of the
electronic document and store that copy.
BIS believes that the burden on parties that would have to change
their procedures would be negligible. Only parties who submitted an
application, notification or request electronically are affected by
this rule. The fact that a party makes an electronic submission is a
good indication that the party is equipped to store incoming documents
electronically. In addition, BIS believes that the burden of printing
out a paper copy of a document and filing it is not substantially
greater than the burden of routing a paper envelope to the proper
person, opening the envelope and filing the contents.
Number of Small Entities
In fiscal year 2008, BIS processed nearly 30,000 transactions that
would be subject to this rule. BIS does not know the number of small
entities that would be affected by this rule. BIS does not know the
size of all of the entities that submit the applications, notifications
and requests to which this rule applies nor does BIS know which such
entities currently utilize paper recordkeeping. However, two of the
criteria under which BIS authorizes paper submissions (lack of access
to the Internet and no more than one submission in the previous twelve
months) are likely to remove the smallest of businesses from the impact
of this rule.
Conclusion
Regardless of the number of entities affected, the burden that
would be imposed by the rule is negligible.
List of Subjects
15 CFR Parts 740, 748 and 750
Administrative practice and procedure, Exports, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
15 CFR Part 762
Administrative practice and procedure, Business and industry,
Confidential business information, Exports, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Accordingly, the Export Administration Regulations (15 CFR Parts
730-774) are proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 740--[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 740 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 50 U.S.C. app. 2401 et seq.; 50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.;
22 U.S.C. 7201 et seq.; E.O. 13026, 61 FR 58767, 3 CFR, 1996 Comp.,
p. 228; E.O. 13222, 66 FR 44025, 3 CFR, 2001 Comp., p. 783; Notice
of August 13, 2009, 74 FR 41325 (August 14, 2009).
2. Section 740.18 is amended by revising the sixth sentence of
paragraph (c)(5) to read as follows:
Sec. 740.18 Agricultural commodities.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(5) * * * BIS will issue written confirmation electronically in
SNAP-R or via paper. * * *
* * * * *
PART 748--[AMENDED]
3. The authority citation for part 748 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 50 U.S.C. app. 2401 et seq.; 50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.;
E.O. 13026, 61 FR 58767, 3 CFR, 1996 Comp., p. 228; E.O. 13222, 66
FR 44025, 3 CFR, 2001 Comp., p. 783; Notice of August 13, 2009, 74
FR 41325 (August 14, 2009).
Sec. 748.7 [Amended]
4. Section 748.7 is amended by removing paragraph (c) and
redesignating paragraph (d) as paragraph (c).
PART 750--[AMENDED]
5. The authority citation for part 750 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 50 U.S.C. app. 2401 et seq.; 50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.;
Sec. 1503, Pub. L. 108-11, 117 Stat. 559; E.O. 13026, 61 FR 58767, 3
CFR, 1996 Comp., p. 228; E.O. 13222, 66 FR 44025, 3 CFR, 2001 Comp.,
p. 783; Presidential Determination 2003-23 of May 7, 2003, 68 FR
26459, May 16, 2003; Notice of August 13, 2009, 74 FR 41325 (August
14, 2009).
6. Section 750.7 is amended by removing the final sentence from
paragraph (a) and by revising paragraph (b) and paragraph (h)(4) to
read as follows:
Sec. 750.7 Issuance of licenses
* * * * *
(b) Issuance of a license. BIS may issue a license electronically
via its Simplified Network Application Processing (SNAP-R) system or
via paper or both electronically and via paper. Each license has a
license number that will be shown on the license.
* * * * *
(h) * * *
(4) Replacement license. If you have been issued a ``replacement
license'' (for changes to your original license not covered in
paragraph (c) of this section), you must retain both the original and
the replacement license.
* * * * *
PART 762--[AMENDED]
7. The authority citation for part 762 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 50 U.S.C. app. 2401 et seq.; 50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.;
E.O. 13222, 66 FR 44025, 3 CFR, 2001 Comp., p. 783; Notice of August
13, 2009, 74 FR 41325 (August 14, 2009).
8. Section 762.2 is amended by:
a. Revising paragraph (a)(1),
b. Removing the comma and the word ``and'' from the end of
paragraph (a)(9),
c. Inserting a semicolon at the end of paragraph (a)(9),
d. Redesignating paragraph (a)(10) as paragraph (a)(11), and
e. Adding a new paragraph (a)(10) to read as follows:
Sec. 762.2 Records to be retained.
(a) * * *
(1) Export control documents as defined in part 772 of the EAR,
except parties submitting documents electronically to BIS via the SNAP-
R system are not required to retain copies of documents so submitted;
* * *
(10) Notification from BIS of an application being returned without
action; Notification by BIS of an application being denied;
Notification by BIS of the results of a commodity
[[Page 63688]]
classification or encryption review request conducted by BIS; and,
* * * * *
9. Section 762.4 is amended by adding a sentence at the end of the
section to read as follows:
Sec. 762.4 Original records required.
* * * With respect to documents that BIS issues to a party in SNAP-
R, either an electronically stored copy in a format that makes the
document readable with software possessed by that party or a paper
print out of the complete document is deemed to be an original record
for purposes of this paragraph.
Dated: November 30, 2009.
Matthew S. Borman,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Export Administration.
[FR Doc. E9-28982 Filed 12-3-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-33-P