Environmental Impact Statements and Regulations; Availability of EPA Comments, 63751 [E9-28965]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 232 / Friday, December 4, 2009 / Notices Estimated Total Annual Cost: $36,952, includes $0 annualized capital or O&M costs. Changes in the Estimates: There is a decrease of 140 hours in the total estimated burden currently identified in the OMB Inventory of Approved ICR Burdens. This decrease is an adjustment due to the decrease in the number of applications the Agency expects to receive in the next 3 years. EPA expects to receive a projected 584 fewer annual responses, based on a year-over-year decrease in the number of responses received in the 2006–2008 fiscal years. The Agency estimates that it will receive an average of 1,895 supplemental registrations annually for the next three years. Dated: November 23, 2009. John Moses, Director, Collection Strategies Division. [FR Doc. E9–28973 Filed 12–3–09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY [ER–FRL–8986–3] Environmental Impact Statements and Regulations; Availability of EPA Comments mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES Availability of EPA comments prepared pursuant to the Environmental Review Process (ERP), under section 309 of the Clean Air Act and Section 102(2)(c) of the National Environmental Policy Act as amended. Requests for copies of EPA comments can be directed to the Office of Federal Activities at 202–564–7146 or https://www.epa.gov/ compliance/nepa/. An explanation of the ratings assigned to draft environmental impact statements (EISs) was published in FR dated July 17, 2009 (74 FR 34754). Draft EISs EIS No. 20080434, ERP No. D–FTA– G53011–TX, Southwest-to-Northeast Rail Corridor Project, Transportation Improvements in the Cities of Fort Worth, Haltom City, North Richland Hills, Colleyville, and Grapevine, Funding and U.S. Army COE Section 404 Permit, Tarrant County, TX. Summary: EPA does not object to the proposed action. Rating LO. EIS No. 20090249, ERP No. D–NOA– E91028–00, Amendment 3 to the 2006 Consolidated Atlantic Highly Migratory Species (HMS), Fishery Management Plan, To Implement Management Measures that Prevent Overfishing and Rebuild Overfished Stocks, Implementation. VerDate Nov<24>2008 17:26 Dec 03, 2009 Jkt 220001 Summary: EPA does not object to the proposed action. Rating LO. EIS No. 20090270, ERP No. D–NRC– A09837–00, GENERIC—License Renewal of Nuclear Plants (NUREG– 1437), Volumes 1 and 2, Revision 1, To Improve the Efficiency of the License Renewal Process, Implementation. Summary: EPA does not object to the proposed action. Rating LO. EIS No. 20090285, ERP No. D–NPS– K70010–CA, Warner Valley Comprehensive Site Plan, Addressing Natural and Cultural Resource Conflicts, Parking and Circulation Improvements in Warner Valley, Implementation, Lassen Volcanic National Park, Plumas County, CA. Summary: EPA does not object to the proposed action. Rating LO. EIS No. 20090323, ERP No. D–FHW– K40190–NV, I–15 Corridor Improvement and Local Arterial Improvements Project, Collectively Known as Project NEON, To Improve the Safety and Travel Efficiency in the I–15 Corridor, City of Las Vegas, Clark County, NV. Summary: EPA expressed environmental concerns about environmental justice impacts related to relocation, air quality, and noise issues. Rating EC2. EIS No. 20090325, ERP No. D–NHT– A86245–00, Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) Standards Passenger Car and Light Trucks Model Years 2012–2016, To Reduce National Energy Consumption by Increasing the Fuel Economy of Passenger Car and Light Trucks sold in the United States, Implementation. Summary: EPA does not object to the proposed action. Rating LO. EIS No. 20090346, ERP No. D–TVA– E65085–00, Northeastern Tributary Reservoirs Land Management Plan, Implementation, Beaver Creek, Clear Creek, Boone, Fort Patrick Henry, South Holston, Watauga, and Wilbur Reservoirs, Carter, Johnson, Sullivan, and Washington Counties, TN and Washington County, VA. Summary: EPA expressed environmental concerns about direct and indirect watershed impacts. Rating EC2. Final EISs EIS No. 20090353, ERP No. F–AFS– F65076–WI, Northwest Sands Restoration Project, Restoring the Pine Barren Ecosystem, Implementation, Washburn District Ranger, Chequamegon-Nicolet National Forest, Bayfield County, WI. PO 00000 Frm 00036 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 63751 Summary: EPA’s previous request for clarification about open barrens was addressed; therefore, EPA does not object to the proposed action. EIS No. 20090356, ERP No. F–AFS– F65075–MN, Border Project, Proposing Forest Vegetation Management and Related Transportation System Activities, LaCroix Ranger District, Superior National Forest, St. Louis County, MN. Summary: EPA does not object to the proposed project. EIS No. 20090364, ERP No. F–NPS– J65519–SD, Wind Cave National Park Project, Elk General Management Plan, Implementation, Custer County, SD. Summary: No formal comment letter was sent to the preparing agency. Dated: December 1, 2009. Robert W. Hargrove, Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal Activities. [FR Doc. E9–28965 Filed 12–3–09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY [ER–FRL–8986–2] Environmental Impacts Statements; Notice of Availability Responsible Agency: Office of Federal Activities, General Information (202) 564–1399 or https://www.epa.gov/ compliance/nepa/. Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact Statements Filed 11/23/2009 Through 11/27/2009 Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9. EIS No. 20090406, Final EIS, USFS, CA, Modoc National Forest Motorized Travel Management Plan, Implementation, National Forest Transportation System (NFTS), Modoc, Lassen and Siskiyou Counties, CA, Wait Period Ends: 01/04/2010, Contact: Kathleen Borovac 530–233–8754. EIS No. 20090407, Draft EIS, NOAA, 00, Rationalization of the Pacific Coast Groundfish Limited Entry Trawl Fishery, Amendment 20, Implementation, WA, OR and CA, Comment Period Ends: 01/19/2010, Contact: Barry A. Thom 206–526– 6150. EIS No. 20090408, Draft EIS, USFS, CO, Rio de los Pinos Vegetation Management Project, Proposes to Salvage Engelmann Spruce Trees that have been killed by, or are Infested with, Spruce Beetle, Conejos Peak E:\FR\FM\04DEN1.SGM 04DEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 232 (Friday, December 4, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 63751]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-28965]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[ER-FRL-8986-3]


Environmental Impact Statements and Regulations; Availability of 
EPA Comments

    Availability of EPA comments prepared pursuant to the Environmental 
Review Process (ERP), under section 309 of the Clean Air Act and 
Section 102(2)(c) of the National Environmental Policy Act as amended. 
Requests for copies of EPA comments can be directed to the Office of 
Federal Activities at 202-564-7146 or https://www.epa.gov/compliance/nepa/.
    An explanation of the ratings assigned to draft environmental 
impact statements (EISs) was published in FR dated July 17, 2009 (74 FR 
34754).

Draft EISs

EIS No. 20080434, ERP No. D-FTA-G53011-TX, Southwest-to-Northeast Rail 
Corridor Project, Transportation Improvements in the Cities of Fort 
Worth, Haltom City, North Richland Hills, Colleyville, and Grapevine, 
Funding and U.S. Army COE Section 404 Permit, Tarrant County, TX.

    Summary: EPA does not object to the proposed action. Rating LO.

EIS No. 20090249, ERP No. D-NOA-E91028-00, Amendment 3 to the 2006 
Consolidated Atlantic Highly Migratory Species (HMS), Fishery 
Management Plan, To Implement Management Measures that Prevent 
Overfishing and Rebuild Overfished Stocks, Implementation.

    Summary: EPA does not object to the proposed action. Rating LO.

EIS No. 20090270, ERP No. D-NRC-A09837-00, GENERIC--License Renewal of 
Nuclear Plants (NUREG-1437), Volumes 1 and 2, Revision 1, To Improve 
the Efficiency of the License Renewal Process, Implementation.

    Summary: EPA does not object to the proposed action. Rating LO.

EIS No. 20090285, ERP No. D-NPS-K70010-CA, Warner Valley Comprehensive 
Site Plan, Addressing Natural and Cultural Resource Conflicts, Parking 
and Circulation Improvements in Warner Valley, Implementation, Lassen 
Volcanic National Park, Plumas County, CA.

    Summary: EPA does not object to the proposed action. Rating LO.

EIS No. 20090323, ERP No. D-FHW-K40190-NV, I-15 Corridor Improvement 
and Local Arterial Improvements Project, Collectively Known as Project 
NEON, To Improve the Safety and Travel Efficiency in the I-15 Corridor, 
City of Las Vegas, Clark County, NV.

    Summary: EPA expressed environmental concerns about environmental 
justice impacts related to relocation, air quality, and noise issues. 
Rating EC2.

EIS No. 20090325, ERP No. D-NHT-A86245-00, Corporate Average Fuel 
Economy (CAFE) Standards Passenger Car and Light Trucks Model Years 
2012-2016, To Reduce National Energy Consumption by Increasing the Fuel 
Economy of Passenger Car and Light Trucks sold in the United States, 
Implementation.

    Summary: EPA does not object to the proposed action. Rating LO.

EIS No. 20090346, ERP No. D-TVA-E65085-00, Northeastern Tributary 
Reservoirs Land Management Plan, Implementation, Beaver Creek, Clear 
Creek, Boone, Fort Patrick Henry, South Holston, Watauga, and Wilbur 
Reservoirs, Carter, Johnson, Sullivan, and Washington Counties, TN and 
Washington County, VA.

    Summary: EPA expressed environmental concerns about direct and 
indirect watershed impacts. Rating EC2.

Final EISs

EIS No. 20090353, ERP No. F-AFS-F65076-WI, Northwest Sands Restoration 
Project, Restoring the Pine Barren Ecosystem, Implementation, Washburn 
District Ranger, Chequamegon-Nicolet National Forest, Bayfield County, 
WI.

    Summary: EPA's previous request for clarification about open 
barrens was addressed; therefore, EPA does not object to the proposed 
action.

EIS No. 20090356, ERP No. F-AFS-F65075-MN, Border Project, Proposing 
Forest Vegetation Management and Related Transportation System 
Activities, LaCroix Ranger District, Superior National Forest, St. 
Louis County, MN.

    Summary: EPA does not object to the proposed project.

EIS No. 20090364, ERP No. F-NPS-J65519-SD, Wind Cave National Park 
Project, Elk General Management Plan, Implementation, Custer County, 
SD.

    Summary: No formal comment letter was sent to the preparing agency.

    Dated: December 1, 2009.
Robert W. Hargrove,
Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal Activities.
[FR Doc. E9-28965 Filed 12-3-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.