Fisheries of the Exclusive Economic Zone Off Alaska; Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands; Proposed 2010 and 2011 Harvest Specifications for Groundfish, 63100-63115 [E9-28831]
Download as PDF
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
63100
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 230 / Wednesday, December 2, 2009 / Proposed Rules
of this section. BFT quotas are specified
in whole weight.
(1) * * *
(i) Catches from vessels for which
General category Atlantic Tunas permits
have been issued and certain catches
from vessels for which an HMS Charter/
Headboat permit has been issued are
counted against the General category
quota in accordance with § 635.23(c)(3).
The amount of large medium and giant
BFT that may be caught, retained,
possessed, landed, or sold under the
General category quota is 47.1 percent
(448.6 mt) of the baseline annual U.S.
BFT quota, and is apportioned as
follows:
(A) January 1 through January 31° 5.3 percent (23.8 mt);
(B) June 1 through August 31° - 50
percent (224.3 mt);
(C) September 1 through September
30 - 26.5 percent (118.9 mt);
(D) October 1 through November 30 13 percent (58.3 mt); and
(E) December 1 through December 31°
- 5.2 percent (23.3 mt).
*
*
*
*
*
(2) Angling category quota. In
accordance with the framework
procedures of the Consolidated HMS
FMP, prior to each fishing year, or as
early as feasible, NMFS will establish
the Angling category daily retention
limits. The total amount of BFT that
may be caught, retained, possessed, and
landed by anglers aboard vessels for
which an HMS Angling permit or an
HMS Charter/Headboat permit has been
issued is 19.7 percent (187.6 mt) of the
baseline annual U.S. BFT quota. No
more than 2.3 percent (4.3 mt) of the
annual Angling category quota may be
large medium or giant BFT. In addition,
over each 2 consecutive-year period
(starting in 2009, inclusive), no more
than 10 percent of the annual U.S. BFT
quota, inclusive of the allocation
specified in paragraph (a)(3) of this
section, may be school BFT. The
Angling category quota includes the
amount of school BFT held in reserve
under paragraph (a)(7)(ii) of this section.
The size class subquotas for BFT are
further subdivided as follows:
(i) After adjustment for the school
BFT quota held in reserve (under
paragraph (a)(7)(ii) of this section), 52.8
percent (42.1 mt) of the school BFT
Angling category quota may be caught,
retained, possessed, or landed south of
39° 18’ N. lat. The remaining school
BFT Angling category quota (37.6 mt)
may be caught, retained, possessed or
landed north of 39° 18’ N. lat.
(ii) An amount equal to 52.8 percent
(45.2 mt) of the large school/small
medium BFT Angling category quota
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:37 Dec 01, 2009
Jkt 220001
may be caught, retained, possessed, or
landed south of 39° 18’ N. lat. The
remaining large school/small medium
BFT Angling category quota (40.4 mt)
may be caught, retained, possessed or
landed north of 39° 18’ N. lat.
(iii) An amount equal to 66.7 percent
(2.9 mt) of the large medium and giant
BFT Angling category quota may be
caught, retained, possessed, or landed
south of 39° 18’ N. lat. The remaining
large medium and giant BFT Angling
category quota (1.4 mt) may be caught,
retained, possessed or landed north of
39° 18’ N. lat.
(3) Longline category quota. The total
amount of large medium and giant BFT
that may be caught incidentally and
retained, possessed, or landed by
vessels that possess Longline category
Atlantic Tunas permits is 8.1 percent
(77.1 mt) of the baseline annual U.S.
BFT quota. No more than 60.0 percent
(46.3 mt) of the Longline category quota
may be allocated for landing in the area
south of 31° 00’ N. lat. In addition, 25
mt shall be allocated for incidental
catch by pelagic longline vessels fishing
in the Northeast Distant gear restricted
area as specified at § 635.23(f)(3).
(4) * * *
(i) The total amount of large medium
and giant BFT that may be caught,
retained, possessed, or landed by
vessels that possess Purse Seine
category Atlantic Tunas permits is 18.6
percent (177.2 mt) of the baseline
annual U.S. BFT quota. The directed
purse seine fishery for BFT commences
on July 15 of each year unless NMFS
takes action to delay the season start
date. Based on cumulative and projected
landings in other commercial fishing
categories, and the potential for gear
conflicts on the fishing grounds or
market impacts due to oversupply,
NMFS may delay the BFT purse seine
season start date from July 15 to no later
than August 15 by filing an adjustment
with the Office of the Federal Register
prior to July 1.
*
*
*
*
*
(5) Harpoon category quota. The total
amount of large medium and giant BFT
that may be caught, retained, possessed,
landed, or sold by vessels that possess
Harpoon category Atlantic Tunas
permits is 3.9 percent (37.1 mt) of the
baseline annual U.S. BFT quota. The
Harpoon category fishery closes on
November 15 each year.
*
*
*
*
*
(7) * * *
(i) The total amount of BFT that is
held in reserve for inseason or annual
adjustments and fishery-independent
research using quotas or subquotas is
2.5 percent (23.8 mt) of the baseline
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
annual U.S. BFT quota. Consistent with
paragraph (a)(8) of this section, NMFS
may allocate any portion of this reserve
for inseason or annual adjustments to
any category quota in the fishery.
(ii) The total amount of school BFT
that is held in reserve for inseason or
annual adjustments and fisheryindependent research is 18.5 percent
(18.1 mt) of the total school BFT
Angling category quota as described
under paragraph (a)(2) of this section.
This amount is in addition to the
amounts specified in paragraph (a)(7)(i)
of this section. Consistent with
paragraph (a)(8) of this section, NMFS
may allocate any portion of the school
BFT Angling category quota held in
reserve for inseason or annual
adjustments to the Angling category.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. E9–28832 Filed 12–1–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 679
[Docket No. 0910131363–91412–01]
RIN 0648–XS44
Fisheries of the Exclusive Economic
Zone Off Alaska; Bering Sea and
Aleutian Islands; Proposed 2010 and
2011 Harvest Specifications for
Groundfish
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for
comments.
SUMMARY: NMFS proposes 2010 and
2011 harvest specifications and
prohibited species catch allowances for
the groundfish fisheries of the Bering
Sea and Aleutian Islands (BSAI)
management area. This action is
necessary to establish harvest limits for
groundfish during the 2010 and 2011
fishing years and to accomplish the
goals and objectives of the Fishery
Management Plan for Groundfish of the
Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands
Management Area. The intended effect
of this action is to conserve and manage
the groundfish resources in the BSAI in
accordance with the Magnuson-Stevens
Fishery Conservation and Management
Act.
DATES: Comments must be received by
January 4, 2010.
E:\FR\FM\02DEP1.SGM
02DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 230 / Wednesday, December 2, 2009 / Proposed Rules
Send comment to Sue
Salveson, Assistant Regional
Administrator, Sustainable Fisheries
Division, Alaska Region, NMFS, Attn:
Ellen Sebastian. You may submit
comments, identified by RIN 0648–
XS44, by any one of the following
methods:
• Electronic Submissions: Submit all
electronic public comments via the
Federal eRulemaking Portal https://
www.regulations.gov.
• Mail: P.O. Box 21668, Juneau, AK
99802.
• Fax: (907) 586–7557.
• Hand delivery to the Federal
Building: 709 West 9th Street, Room
420A, Juneau, AK.
All comments received are a part of
the public record. No comments will be
posted to https://www.regulations.gov for
public viewing until after the comment
period has closed. Comments will
generally be posted without change. All
Personal Identifying Information (for
example, name, address, etc.)
voluntarily submitted by the commenter
may be publicly accessible. Do not
submit Confidential Business
Information or otherwise sensitive or
protected information.
NMFS will accept anonymous
comments (enter N/A in the required
fields, if you wish to remain
anonymous). You may submit
attachments to electronic comments in
Microsoft Word, Excel, WordPerfect, or
Adobe PDF file formats only.
Electronic copies of the Alaska
Groundfish Harvest Specifications Final
Environmental Impact Statement (Final
EIS) and the Initial Regulatory
Flexibility Analysis (IRFA) prepared for
this action may be obtained from
https://www.regulations.gov or from the
Alaska Region Web site at https://
alaskafisheries.noaa.gov. Copies of the
final 2008 Stock Assessment and
Fishery Evaluation (SAFE) report for the
groundfish resources of the Bering Sea
and Aleutian Islands, dated November
2008, are available from the North
Pacific Fishery Management Council
(Council) at 605 West 4th Avenue, Suite
306, Anchorage, AK 99510–2252, phone
907–271–2809, or from the Council’s
Web site at https://
alaskafisheries.noaa.gov/npfmc.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Steve Whitney, 907–586–7269.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Federal
regulations at 50 CFR part 679
implement the Fishery Management
Plan for Groundfish of the Bering Sea
and Aleutian Islands Management Area
(FMP) and govern the groundfish
fisheries in the BSAI. The Council
prepared the FMP and NMFS approved
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
ADDRESSES:
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:37 Dec 01, 2009
Jkt 220001
it under the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act
(Magnuson-Stevens Act). General
regulations governing U.S. fisheries also
appear at 50 CFR part 600.
The FMP and its implementing
regulations require NMFS, after
consultation with the Council, to
specify annually the total allowable
catch (TAC) for each target species and
the ‘‘other species’’ category, the sum of
which must be within the optimum
yield range of 1.4 million to 2.0 million
metric tons (mt) (see § 679.20(a)(1)(i)).
Section 679.20(c)(1) further requires
NMFS to publish proposed harvest
specifications in the Federal Register
and solicit public comments on
proposed annual TACs and
apportionments thereof, prohibited
species catch (PSC) allowances, and
prohibited species quota (PSQ) reserves
established by § 679.21, seasonal
allowances of pollock, Pacific cod, and
Atka mackerel TAC, American Fisheries
Act allocations, Amendment 80
allocations, and Community
Development Quota (CDQ) reserve
amounts established by
§ 679.20(b)(1)(ii). The proposed harvest
specifications set forth in Tables 1
through 12 of this action satisfy these
requirements.
Under § 679.20(c)(3), NMFS will
publish the final harvest specifications
for 2010 and 2011 after (1) considering
comments received within the comment
period (see DATES), (2) consulting with
the Council at its December 2009
meeting, and (3) considering new
information presented in the final 2009
SAFE reports prepared for the 2010 and
2011 groundfish fisheries.
Other Actions Potentially Affecting the
2010 and 2011 Harvest Specifications
The Council is developing an
amendment to the FMP to comply with
Magnuson-Stevens Act requirements
associated with annual catch limits and
accountability measures. That
amendment may result in revisions to
how total annual groundfish mortality is
estimated and accounted for in the
annual SAFE reports, which in turn may
affect the OFL, ABC, and TAC for
certain groundfish species. NMFS will
attempt to identify additional sources of
mortality to groundfish stocks not
currently reported or considered by the
groundfish stock assessments in
recommending OFL, ABC, and TAC for
certain groundfish species. These
additional sources of mortality may
include recreational fishing, subsistence
fishing, catch of groundfish during the
NMFS trawl and hook-and-line surveys,
catch taken under experimental fishing
permits issued by NMFS, discarded
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
63101
catch of groundfish in the commercial
halibut fisheries, use of groundfish as
bait in the crab fisheries, or other
sources of mortality not yet identified.
At its October 2009 meeting the
Council approved Amendment 95 to the
FMP. This amendment would separate
skates from the ‘‘other species’’ category
so that individual OFLs, ABCs, and
TACs may be established for skates. If
the Secretary of Commerce approves the
amendment, the change would be in
effect for the 2011 fishing year.
At its April 2009 meeting the Council
adopted Amendment 91 to the FMP.
This amendment would establish new
measures to minimize Chinook salmon
bycatch in the Bering Sea pollock
fisheries, including new Chinook
salmon PSC limits that when reached
would prohibit directed fishing for
pollock. If approved, Amendment 91
could be effective by 2011.
Proposed ABC and TAC Harvest
Specifications
The proposed ABC levels are based on
the best available biological
information, including projected
biomass trends, information on assumed
distribution of stock biomass, and
revised technical methods used to
calculate stock biomass. In general, the
development of ABCs and OFLs
involves sophisticated statistical
analyses of fish populations. The FMP
specifies a series of six tiers based on
the level of reliable information
available to fishery scientists. Tier one
represents the highest level of
information quality available while tier
six represents the lowest level of
information quality available.
Appendix A to the final 2008 SAFE
report dated November 2008 (see
ADDRESSES) sets forth the best
information currently available.
Information on the status of stocks,
including the 2009 survey results, will
be updated and considered by the
Council’s Groundfish Plan Team (Plan
Team) in November 2009 for the 2009
SAFE report. The final 2010 and 2011
harvest specifications will be based on
the 2009 SAFE report.
In October 2009, the Scientific and
Statistical Committee (SSC), Advisory
Panel, and the Council reviewed the
Plan Team’s recommended proposed
2010 and 2011 OFL and ABC amounts.
The SSC concurred with the Plan
Team’s recommendations. The
recommendations are based on rollovers
of the current 2010 amounts, except for
Bering Sea pollock. The Bering Sea
pollock OFL and ABC amounts are
based on 2009 amounts that are lower
than the 2010 amounts. This
recommendation uses the best
E:\FR\FM\02DEP1.SGM
02DEP1
63102
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 230 / Wednesday, December 2, 2009 / Proposed Rules
information available from the 2008
stock assessments.
The Council adopted the OFL and
ABC amounts recommended by the SSC
(Table 1). The Council recommended
that all the proposed 2010 and 2011
TAC amounts be set equal to the 2010
TAC amounts except for Bering Sea
pollock that was set equal to the 2009
TAC amount. The Plan Team
recommended and the SSC, AP, and
Council approved the use of the lower
amount used in 2009 as a notice to the
public that the 2010 Bering Sea pollock
spawning biomass is not expected to be
as high as projected in 2008.
As in previous years, the Plan Team,
Advisory Panel, SSC, and Council
recommended that total removals of
Pacific cod from the BSAI not exceed
ABC recommendations. Accordingly,
the Council recommended that the
proposed 2010 and 2011 Pacific cod
TACs be adjusted downward from the
ABCs by amounts equal to 3 percent of
the ABC. This adjustment is necessary
to account for the guideline harvest
level established for Pacific cod by the
State of Alaska (State) for a Statemanaged fishery that occurs in State
waters in the AI subarea.
Finally, the Council recommended
using the 2010 PSC allowances for the
proposed 2010 and 2011 PSC
allowances. The Council will reconsider
the OFL, ABC, TAC, and PSC amounts
in December 2009 after the Plan Team
incorporates new status of groundfish
stocks information into a final 2009
SAFE report for the 2010 and 2011 BSAI
groundfish fisheries. None of the
Council’s recommended proposed TACs
for 2010 or 2011 exceeds the
recommended 2010 or 2011 proposed
ABCs for any species category. NMFS
finds the Council’s recommended
proposed 2010 and 2011 OFL, ABC, and
TAC amounts consistent with the best
available information on the biological
condition of the groundfish stocks.
The proposed amounts are subject to
change pending the completion of the
2009 SAFE report and the Council’s
recommendations for final 2010 and
2011 harvest specifications during its
December 2009 meeting. Table 1 lists
the proposed 2010 and 2011 OFL, ABC,
TAC, initial TAC (ITAC), and CDQ
amounts for groundfish for the BSAI.
The proposed apportionment of TAC
amounts among fisheries and seasons is
discussed below.
TABLE 1—PROPOSED 2010 AND 2011 OVERFISHING LEVEL (OFL), ACCEPTABLE BIOLOGICAL CATCH (ABC), TOTAL
ALLOWABLE CATCH (TAC), INITIAL TAC (ITAC), AND CDQ RESERVE ALLOCATION OF GROUNDFISH IN THE BSAI 1
(Amounts are in metric tons)
Proposed 2010 and 2011
Species
Area
OFL
Pollock .....................................................................
ABC
TAC
ITAC 2
CDQ 3,4,5
Squid .......................................................................
Other species 8 ........................................................
BS ......................
AI ........................
Bogoslof .............
BSAI ...................
BS ......................
AI ........................
BSAI ...................
EAI/BS ................
CAI .....................
WAI ....................
BSAI ...................
BSAI ...................
BSAI ...................
BS ......................
AI ........................
BSAI ...................
BSAI ...................
BSAI ...................
BSAI ...................
BSAI ...................
BS ......................
EAI .....................
CAI .....................
WAI ....................
BSAI ...................
BSAI ...................
BSAI ...................
BSAI ...................
BS ......................
AI ........................
BSAI ...................
BSAI ...................
977,000
36,800
58,400
235,000
2,980
2,410
84,400
....................
....................
....................
210,000
314,000
14,400
....................
....................
196,000
81,800
23,100
354,000
22,100
....................
....................
....................
....................
8,580
516
640
1,380
....................
....................
2,620
80,700
815,000
30,400
7,970
199,000
2,520
2,040
71,100
22,900
28,500
19,700
198,000
310,000
7,130
4,920
2,210
161,000
69,800
17,400
275,000
18,600
3,780
4,160
4,210
6,450
7,190
387
552
1,040
485
555
1,970
63,680
815,000
19,000
10
193,030
2,520
2,040
71,100
22,900
28,500
19,700
180,000
75,000
7,130
4,920
2,210
60,000
50,000
17,400
30,000
18,600
3,780
4,160
4,210
6,450
6,000
387
552
1,040
485
555
1,970
34,221
733,500
17,100
10
172,376
1,109
474
63,492
20,450
25,451
17,592
160,740
66,975
6,061
4,182
1,879
51,000
44,650
14,790
25,500
16,447
3,213
3,715
3,760
5,760
5,100
329
469
884
412
472
1,675
29,088
81,500
1,900
....................
20,654
98
41
7,608
2,450
3,050
2,108
19,260
8,025
n/a
526
....................
6,420
5,350
....................
....................
n/a
....................
445
450
690
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
Total .................................................................
............................
2,706,826
2,259,779
1,585,000
1,411,768
152,968
Pacific cod 4 .............................................................
Sablefish 5 ................................................................
Atka mackerel .........................................................
Yellowfin sole ..........................................................
Rock sole ................................................................
Greenland tubot ......................................................
Arrowtooth flounder .................................................
Flathead sole ...........................................................
Other flatfish 6 ..........................................................
Alaska plaice ...........................................................
Pacific ocean perch .................................................
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
Northern rockfish .....................................................
Shortraker rockfish ..................................................
Rougheye rockfish ...................................................
Other rockfish 7 ........................................................
1 These amounts apply to the entire BSAI management area unless otherwise specified. With the exception of pollock, and for the purpose of
these harvest specifications, the Bering Sea (BS) subarea includes the Bogoslof District.
2 Except for pollock, the portion of the sablefish TAC allocated to hook-and-line and pot gear, and Amendment 80 species, 15 percent of each
TAC is put into a reserve. The ITAC for these species is the remainder of the TAC after the subtraction of these reserves.
3 Under § 679.20(a)(5)(i)(A)(1), the annual Bering Sea subarea pollock TAC, after subtracting first for the CDQ directed fishing allowance (10
percent) and second for the incidental catch allowance (4 percent), is further allocated by sector for a directed pollock fishery as follows:
inshore—50 percent; catcher/processor—40 percent; and motherships—10 percent. Under § 679.20(a)(5)(iii)(B)(2)(i) and (ii), the annual Aleutian
Islands subarea pollock TAC, after subtracting first for the CDQ directed fishing allowance (10 percent) and second for the incidental catch allowance (1,600 mt), is allocated to the Aleut Corporation for a directed pollock fishery.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:37 Dec 01, 2009
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\02DEP1.SGM
02DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 230 / Wednesday, December 2, 2009 / Proposed Rules
63103
4 The Pacific cod TAC is reduced by three percent from the ABC to account for the State of Alaska’s (State) guideline harvest level in State
waters of the Aleutian Islands subarea.
5 For the Amendment 80 species (Atka mackerel, Aleutian Islands Pacific ocean perch, yellowfin sole, rock sole, flathead sole, and Pacific
cod), 10.7 percent of the TAC is reserved for use by CDQ participants (see §§ 679.20(b)(1)(ii)(C) and 679.31). Twenty percent of the sablefish
TAC allocated to hook-and-line gear or pot gear, 7.5 percent of the sablefish TAC allocated to trawl gear, and 10.7 percent of the TACs for Bering Sea Greenland turbot and arrowtooth flounder are reserved for use by CDQ participants (see § 679.20(b)(1)(ii)(B) and (D)). Aleutian Islands
Greenland turbot, ‘‘other flatfish,’’ Alaska plaice, Bering Sea Pacific ocean perch, northern rockfish, shortraker rockfish, rougheye rockfish, ‘‘other
rockfish,’’ squid, and ‘‘other species’’ are not allocated to the CDQ program.
6 ‘‘Other flatfish’’ includes all flatfish species, except for halibut (a prohibited species), flathead sole, Greenland turbot, rock sole, yellowfin sole,
arrowtooth flounder, and Alaska plaice.
7 ‘‘Other rockfish’’ includes all Sebastes and Sebastolobus species except for Pacific ocean perch, northern, shortraker, and rougheye rockfish.
8 ‘‘Other species’’ includes sculpins, sharks, skates, and octopus. Forage fish, as defined at § 679.2, are not included in the ‘‘other species’’
category. Pending approval of amendment 95 from the Secretary, skates will be broken out from the ‘‘other species’’ category in the 2011 fishing
year. The OFL, ABC, and TAC for ‘‘other species’’ will be 42,507, 31,680, and 31,680 mt, respectively. The OFL, ABC, and TAC for skates will
be 38,200, 32,000, and 30,000 mt, respectively.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
Reserves and the Incidental Catch
Allowance (ICA) for Pollock, Atka
Mackerel, Flathead Sole, Rock Sole,
Yellowfin Sole, and Aleutian Islands
Pacific Ocean Perch
Section 679.20(b)(1)(i) requires the
placement of 15 percent of the TAC for
each target species or ‘‘other species’’
category, except for pollock, the hookand-line and pot gear allocation of
sablefish, and the Amendment 80
species, in a non-specified reserve.
Section 679.20(b)(1)(ii)(B) requires that
20 percent of the hook-and-line and pot
gear allocation of sablefish be allocated
to the fixed gear sablefish CDQ reserve.
Section 679.20(b)(1)(ii)(D) requires that
7.5 percent of the trawl gear allocations
of sablefish and 10.7 percent of Bering
Sea Greenland turbot and arrowtooth
flounder be allocated to the respective
CDQ reserves. Section 679.20(b)(1)(ii)(C)
requires that 10.7 percent of the TACs
for Atka mackerel, Aleutian Islands
Pacific ocean perch, yellowfin sole, rock
sole, flathead sole, and Pacific cod be
allocated to the CDQ reserves. Sections
679.20(a)(5)(i)(A) and 679.31(a) also
require the allocation of 10 percent of
the BSAI pollock TACs to the pollock
CDQ directed fishing allowance (DFA).
The entire Bogoslof District pollock
TAC is allocated as an ICA (see
§ 679.20(a)(5)(ii)). With the exception of
the hook-and-line and pot gear sablefish
CDQ reserve, the regulations do not
further apportion the CDQ reserves by
gear. Section 679.21(e)(3)(i)(A) requires
withholding 7.5 percent of the Chinook
salmon PSC limit, 10.7 percent of the
crab and non-Chinook salmon PSC
limits, and 343 mt of halibut PSC as
PSQ reserves for the CDQ fisheries.
Sections 679.30 and 679.31 set forth
regulations governing the management
of the CDQ and PSQ reserves.
Pursuant to § 679.20(a)(5)(i)(A)(1),
NMFS proposes a pollock ICA of 4
percent of the Bering Sea subarea
pollock TAC after subtraction of the 10
percent CDQ reserve. This allowance is
based on NMFS’s examination of the
pollock incidental catch, including the
incidental catch by CDQ vessels, in
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:37 Dec 01, 2009
Jkt 220001
target fisheries other than pollock from
1999 through 2009. During this 11-year
period, the pollock incidental catch
ranged from a low of 2.4 percent in 2006
to a high of 5 percent in 1999, with an
11-year average of 3.2 percent. Pursuant
to § 679.20(a)(5)(iii)(B)(2)(i) and (ii),
NMFS proposes a pollock ICA of 1,600
mt for the AI subarea after subtraction
of the 10 percent CDQ DFA. This
allowance is based on NMFS’s
examination of the pollock incidental
catch, including the incidental catch by
CDQ vessels, in target fisheries other
than pollock from 2003 through 2009.
During this 7-year period, the incidental
catch of pollock ranged from a low of 5
percent in 2006 to a high of 10 percent
in 2003, with a 7-year average of 7
percent.
Pursuant to § 679.20(a)(8) and (10),
NMFS proposes ICAs of 5,500 mt of
flathead sole, 10,000 mt of rock sole,
2,000 mt of yellowfin sole, 50 mt each
of Western and Central Aleutian District
Pacific ocean perch, 100 mt of Eastern
Aleutian District Pacific ocean perch, 50
mt for Western Aleutian District Atka
mackerel, 75 mt for Central Aleutian
District Atka mackerel, and 75 mt of
Eastern Aleutian District and Bering Sea
subarea Atka mackerel after subtraction
of the 10.7 percent CDQ reserve. These
allowances are based on NMFS’s
examination of the incidental catch in
other target fisheries from 2003 through
2009.
The regulations do not designate the
remainder of the non-specified reserve
by species or species group. Any
amount of the reserve may be
apportioned to a target species that
contributed to the non-specified reserve
and the ‘‘other species’’ category during
the year, provided that such
apportionments do not result in
overfishing (see § 679.20(b)(1)(i)).
Allocations of Pollock TAC Under the
American Fisheries Act (AFA)
Section 679.20(a)(5)(i)(A) requires that
the pollock TAC apportioned to the
Bering Sea subarea, after subtraction of
10 percent for the CDQ program and 4
percent for the ICA, be allocated as a
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
DFA as follows: 50 percent to the
inshore sector, 40 percent to the
catcher/processor sector, and 10 percent
to the mothership sector. In the Bering
Sea subarea, 40 percent of the DFA is
allocated to the A season (January 20 to
June 10) and 60 percent of the DFA is
allocated to the B season (June 10 to
November 1) § 679.20(a)(5)(i)(B). The AI
directed pollock fishery allocation to the
Aleut Corporation is the amount of
pollock remaining in the AI subarea
after subtracting 1,900 mt for the CDQ
DFA (10 percent) and 1,600 mt for the
ICA § 679.20(a)(5)(iii)(B)(2)(ii). In the AI
subarea, 40 percent of the ABC is
allocated to the A season and the
remainder of the directed pollock
fishery is allocated to the B season.
Table 2 lists these proposed 2010 and
2011 amounts.
Section 679.20(a)(5)(i)(A)(4) also
includes several specific requirements
regarding Bering Sea subarea pollock
allocations. First, 8.5 percent of the
pollock allocated to the catcher/
processor sector will be available for
harvest by AFA catcher vessels with
catcher/processor sector endorsements,
unless the Regional Administrator
receives a cooperative contract that
provides for the distribution of harvest
among AFA catcher/processors and
AFA catcher vessels in a manner agreed
to by all members. Second, AFA
catcher/processors not listed in the AFA
are limited to harvesting not more than
0.5 percent of the pollock allocated to
the catcher/processor sector. Table 2
lists the proposed 2010 and 2011
allocations of pollock TAC. Tables 9
through 12 list the AFA catcher/
processor and catcher vessel harvesting
sideboard limits. In past years, the
proposed harvest specifications
included text and tables describing
pollock allocations to the Bering Sea
subarea inshore pollock cooperatives
and open access sector. These
allocations are based on the submission
of AFA inshore cooperative applications
due to NMFS on December 1 of each
calendar year. Because AFA inshore
cooperative applications for 2010 have
not been submitted to NMFS, thereby
E:\FR\FM\02DEP1.SGM
02DEP1
63104
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 230 / Wednesday, December 2, 2009 / Proposed Rules
preventing NMFS from calculating 2010
allocations, NMFS has not included
inshore cooperative text and tables in
these proposed harvest specifications.
NMFS will post 2010 AFA inshore
cooperative allocations on the Alaska
Region Web site at https://
www.alaskafisheries.noaa.gov when
they become available in December
2009.
Table 2 also lists proposed seasonal
apportionments of pollock and harvest
limits within the Steller Sea Lion
Conservation Area (SCA). The harvest of
pollock within the SCA, as defined at
§ 679.22(a)(7)(vii), is limited to 28
percent of the DFA until April 1
§ 679.20(a)(5)(i)(C) . The remaining 12
percent of the 40 percent annual DFA
allocated to the A season may be taken
outside the SCA before April 1 or inside
the SCA after April 1. If less than 28
percent of the annual DFA is taken
inside the SCA before April 1, the
remainder will be available to be taken
inside the SCA after April 1. The A
season pollock SCA harvest limit will be
apportioned to each sector in proportion
to each sector’s allocated percentage of
the DFA. Table 2 lists by sector these
proposed 2010 and 2011 amounts.
TABLE 2—PROPOSED 2010 AND 2011 ALLOCATIONS OF POLLOCK TACS TO THE DIRECTED POLLOCK FISHERIES AND TO
THE CDQ DIRECTED FISHING ALLOWANCES (DFA) 1
[Amounts are in metric tons]
2010 and 2011 A season
2010 and
2011
allocations
Area and sector
A season DFA
SCA harvest
limit 2
2010 and
2011 B season 1
B season DFA
Bering Sea subarea TAC ................................................................................
CDQ DFA .........................................................................................................
ICA 1 .................................................................................................................
AFA Inshore .....................................................................................................
AFA Catcher/Processors 3 ...............................................................................
Catch by C/Ps ..........................................................................................
Catch by C/Vs 3 ........................................................................................
Unlisted C/P Limit 4 ............................................................................
AFA Motherships .............................................................................................
Excessive Harvesting Limit 5 ............................................................................
Excessive Processing Limit 6 ...........................................................................
Total Bering Sea DFA (non-CDQ) ...................................................................
815,000
81,500
29,340
352,080
281,664
257,723
23,941
1,408
70,416
123,228
211,248
704,160
n/a
32,600
n/a
140,832
112,666
103,089
9,577
563
28,166
n/a
n/a
281,664
n/a
22,820
n/a
98,582
78,866
n/a
n/a
n/a
19,716
n/a
n/a
197,165
n/a
48,900
n/a
211,248
168,998
154,634
14,365
845
42,250
n/a
n/a
422,496
Aleutian Islands subarea 1 ...............................................................................
CDQ DFA .........................................................................................................
ICA ...................................................................................................................
Aleut Corporation .............................................................................................
19,000
1,900
1,600
15,500
n/a
760
800
10,600
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
1,140
800
4,900
Bogoslof District ICA7 ......................................................................................
10
n/a
n/a
n/a
1 Pursuant to § 679.20(a)(5)(i)(A), the annual Bering Sea subarea pollock TAC, after subtraction for the CDQ DFA (10 percent) and the ICA (4
percent), is allocated as a DFA as follows: inshore sector 50 percent, catcher/processor sector 40 percent, and mothership sector 10 percent. In
the Bering Sea subarea, 40 percent of the DFA is allocated to the A season (January 20 to June 10) and 60 percent of the DFA is allocated to
the B season (June 10 to November 1). Pursuant to § 679.20(a)(5)(iii)(B)(2)(i) and (ii), the annual AI pollock TAC, after subtracting first for the
CDQ DFA (10 percent) and second the ICA (1,600 mt), is allocated to the Aleut Corporation for a directed pollock fishery. In the AI subarea, the
A season is allocated 40 percent of the ABC and the B season is allocated the remainder of the directed pollock fishery.
2 In the Bering Sea subarea, no more than 28 percent of each sector’s annual DFA may be taken from the SCA before April 1. The remaining
12 percent of the annual DFA allocated to the A season may be taken outside of the SCA before April 1 or inside the SCA after April 1. If 28
percent of the annual DFA is not taken inside the SCA before April 1, the remainder is available to be taken inside the SCA after April 1.
3 Pursuant to § 679.20(a)(5)(i)(A)(4), not less than 8.5 percent of the DFA allocated to listed catcher/processors (C/Ps) shall be available for
harvest only by eligible catcher vessels (CVs) delivering to listed catcher/processors.
4 Pursuant to § 679.20(a)(5)(i)(A)(4)(iii), the AFA unlisted catcher/processors are limited to harvesting not more than 0.5 percent of the catcher/
processors sector’s allocation of pollock.
5 Pursuant to § 679.20(a)(5)(i)(A)(6) NMFS establishes an excessive harvesting share limit equal to 17.5 percent of the sum of the pollock
DFAs not including CDQ.
6 Pursuant to § 679.20(a)(5)(i)(A)(7) NMFS establishes an excessive processing share limit equal to 30.0 percent of the sum of the pollock
DFAs not including CDQ.
7 The Regional Administrator proposes closing the Bogoslof pollock fishery for directed fishing under the final 2010 and 2011 harvest specifications for the BSAI. The amounts specified are for incidental catch only and are not apportioned by season or sector.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
Allocation of the Atka Mackerel TACs
Section 679.20(a)(8)(ii) allocates the
Atka mackerel TACs to the Amendment
80 and BSAI trawl limited access
sectors, after subtraction of the CDQ
reserves, jig gear allocation, and ICAs
for the BSAI trawl limited access sector
and non-trawl gear (Table 3). The
allocation of the ITAC for Atka mackerel
to the Amendment 80 and BSAI trawl
limited access sectors is established in
Table 33 to part 679 and § 679.91. The
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:37 Dec 01, 2009
Jkt 220001
2011 allocations for Amendment 80
species between Amendment 80
cooperatives and the Amendment 80
limited access sector will not be known
until November 1, 2010, when eligible
participants apply for participation in
the program.
Pursuant to § 679.20(a)(8)(i), up to 2
percent of the Eastern Aleutian District
and Bering Sea subarea Atka mackerel
ITAC may be allocated to jig gear. The
amount of this allocation is determined
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
annually by the Council based on
several criteria, including the
anticipated harvest capacity of the jig
gear fleet. The Council recommended
and NMFS proposes a 0.5 percent
allocation of the Atka mackerel ITAC in
the Eastern Aleutian District and Bering
Sea subarea to jig gear in 2010 and 2011.
Based on the proposed 2010 and 2011
TAC of 20,250 mt after subtractions of
the CDQ reserve and ICA, the jig gear
E:\FR\FM\02DEP1.SGM
02DEP1
63105
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 230 / Wednesday, December 2, 2009 / Proposed Rules
allocation would be 102 mt for 2010 and
2011.
Section 679.20(a)(8)(iv) apportions the
Atka mackerel ITAC into two equal
seasonal allowances. The first seasonal
allowance is made available for directed
fishing from January 1 (January 20 for
trawl gear) to April 15 (A season), and
the second seasonal allowance is made
available from September 1 to
November 1 (B season). The jig gear
allocation is not apportioned by season.
Pursuant to § 679.20(a)(8)(ii), the
Regional Administrator will establish a
harvest limit area (HLA) limit of no
more than 60 percent of the seasonal
TAC for the Western and Central
Aleutian Districts.
NMFS will establish HLA limits for
the CDQ reserve and each of the three
non-CDQ fishery categories: the BSAI
trawl limited access sector, the
Amendment 80 limited access fishery,
and an aggregate HLA limit applicable
to all Amendment 80 cooperatives.
NMFS will assign vessels in each of the
three non-CDQ fishery categories that
apply to fish for Atka mackerel in the
HLA to an HLA fishery based on a
random lottery of the vessels that apply
(see § 679.20(a)(8)(iii)). There is no
allocation of Atka mackerel to the BSAI
trawl limited access sector in the
Western Aleutian District. Therefore, no
vessels in the BSAI trawl limited access
sector will be assigned to the Western
Aleutian District HLA fishery.
Each trawl sector will have a separate
lottery. A maximum of two HLA
fisheries will be established in Area 542
for the BSAI trawl limited access sector.
A maximum of four HLA fisheries will
be established for vessels assigned to
Amendment 80 cooperatives: a first and
second HLA fishery in Area 542, and a
first and second HLA fishery in Area
543. A maximum of four HLA fisheries
will be established for vessels assigned
to the Amendment 80 limited access
fishery: A first and second HLA fishery
in Area 542, and a first and second HLA
fishery in Area 543. NMFS will initially
open fishing for the first HLA fishery in
all three fishery categories at the same
time. The initial opening of fishing in
the HLA will be based on the first
directed fishing closure of Atka
mackerel for the Eastern Aleutian
District and Bering Sea subarea
allocation for any one of the three nonCDQ fishery categories allocated Atka
mackerel TAC.
TABLE 3—PROPOSED 2010 AND 2011 SEASONAL AND SPATIAL ALLOWANCES, GEAR SHARES, CDQ RESERVE,
INCIDENTAL CATCH ALLOWANCE, AND AMENDMENT 80 ALLOCATIONS OF THE BSAI ATKA MACKEREL TAC
[Amounts are in metric tons]
2010 allocation by area
Eastern
Aleutian
District/Bering Sea
Sector 2
Season 1 3 4
TAC .................................................
CDQ reserve ...................................
n/a .......................
Total ....................
HLA 5 ..................
Total ....................
Total ....................
Total ....................
A .........................
HLA .....................
B .........................
HLA .....................
Total ....................
A .........................
HLA .....................
B .........................
HLA .....................
Total ....................
A .........................
HLA .....................
B .........................
HLA .....................
ICA ..................................................
Jig 6 .................................................
BSAI trawl limited access ...............
Amendment 80 limited access .......
Amendment 80 cooperatives ..........
22,900
2,450
n/a
75
102
1,216
608
n/a
608
n/a
10,129
5,065
n/a
5,065
n/a
8,927
4,464
n/a
4,464
n/a
Central
Aleutian
District
2011 allocation by area
Western
Aleutian
District
28,500
3,050
1,830
75
0
1,523
761
457
761
457
14,358
7,179
4,308
7,179
4,308
9,495
4,747
2,848
4,747
2,848
Eastern
Aleutian
District/Bering Sea
19,700
2,108
1,265
50
0
0
0
0
0
0
10,814
5,407
3,244
5,407
3,244
6,728
3,364
2,018
3,364
2,018
22,900
2,450
n/a
75
102
1,622
811
n/a
811
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
1 Regulations
Central
Aleutian
District
28,500
3,050
1,830
75
0
2,030
1,015
609
1,015
609
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
Western
Aleutian
District
19,700
2,108
1,265
50
0
0
0
0
0
0
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
at §§ 679.20(a)(8)(ii)(A) and 679.22(a) establish temporal and spatial limitations for the Atka mackerel fishery.
679.20(a)(8)(ii) allocates the Atka mackerel TACs, after subtraction of the CDQ reserves, ICAs, and the jig gear allocation, to the
Amendment 80 and BSAI trawl limited access sectors. The allocation of the ITAC for Atka mackerel to the Amendment 80 and BSAI trawl limited
access sectors is established in Table 33 to part 679 and § 679.91. The CDQ reserve is 10.7 percent of the TAC for use by CDQ participants
(see §§ 679.20(b)(1)(ii)(C) and 679.31).
3 The seasonal allowances of Atka mackerel are 50 percent in the A season and 50 percent in the B season.
4 The A season is January 1 (January 20 for trawl gear) to April 15, and the B season is September 1 to November 1.
5 Harvest Limit Area (HLA) limit refers to the amount of each seasonal allowance that is available for fishing inside the HLA (see § 679.2). In
2010 and 2011, 60 percent of each seasonal allowance is available for fishing inside the HLA in the Western and Central Aleutian Districts.
6 Section 679.20(a)(8)(i) requires that up to 2 percent of the Eastern Aleutian District and Bering Sea subarea TAC be allocated to jig gear
after subtraction of the CDQ reserve and ICA. The amount of this allocation is 0.5 percent. The jig gear allocation is not apportioned by season.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
2 Section
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:37 Dec 01, 2009
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\02DEP1.SGM
02DEP1
63106
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 230 / Wednesday, December 2, 2009 / Proposed Rules
Allocation of the Pacific Cod TAC
Sections 679.20(a)(7)(i) and (ii)
require that the Pacific cod TAC in the
BSAI, after subtraction of 10.7 percent
for the CDQ program, be allocated as
follows: 1.4 percent to vessels using jig
gear, 2.0 percent to hook-and-line and
pot catcher vessels less than 60 ft (18.3
m) length overall (LOA), 0.2 percent to
hook-and-line catcher vessels greater
than or equal to 60 ft (18.3 m) LOA, 48.7
percent to hook-and-line catcher/
processors, 8.4 percent to pot catcher
vessels greater than or equal to 60 ft
(18.3 m) LOA, 1.5 percent to pot
catcher/processors, 2.3 percent to AFA
trawl catcher/processors, 13.4 percent to
non-AFA trawl catcher/processors, and
22.1 percent to trawl catcher vessels.
The ICA for the hook-and-line and pot
sectors will be deducted from the
aggregate portion of Pacific cod TAC
allocated to the hook-and-line and pot
sectors. For 2010 and 2011 the Regional
Administrator proposes an ICA of 500
mt based on anticipated incidental catch
in these fisheries. The allocation of the
ITAC for Pacific cod to the Amendment
80 sector is established in Table 33 to
part 679 and § 679.91.
The Pacific cod ITAC is apportioned
into seasonal allowances to disperse the
Pacific cod fisheries over the fishing
year (see §§ 679.20(a)(7) and
679.23(e)(5)). In accordance with
§ 679.20(a)(7)(iv)(B) and (C), any unused
portion of a seasonal Pacific cod
allowance will become available at the
beginning of the next seasonal
allowance.
The CDQ and non-CDQ season
allowances by gear based on the
proposed 2010 and 2011 Pacific cod
TACs are listed in Table 4 based on the
sector allocation percentages of Pacific
cod set forth at §§ 679.20(a)(7)(i)(B) and
679.20(a)(7)(iv)(A); and the seasonal
allowances of Pacific cod set forth at
§ 679.23(e)(5).
TABLE 4—PROPOSED 2010 AND 2011 GEAR SHARES AND SEASONAL ALLOWANCES OF THE BSAI PACIFIC COD TAC
[Amounts are in metric tons]
Gear sector
2010 and
2011 share
of gear sector total
Percent
2010 and
2011 share
of sector
total
Total TAC ........................................................................
CDQ ................................................................................
Total hook-and-line/pot gear ...........................................
Hook-and-line/pot ICA 1 ...................................................
Hook-and-line/pot sub-total .............................................
Hook-and-line catcher/processors ..................................
100
10.7
60.8
n/a
n/a
48.7
193,030
20,654
104,804
n/a
104,304
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
500
n/a
83,547
Hook-and-line catcher vessels ≥ 60 ft LOA ....................
0.2
n/a
343
Pot catcher/processors ...................................................
1.5
n/a
2,573
Pot catcher vessels≥ 60 ft LOA ......................................
8.4
n/a
14,410
Catcher vessels < 60 ft LOA using hook-and-line or pot
gear.
Trawl catcher vessels .....................................................
2
n/a
3,431
22.1
38,095
n/a
AFA trawl catcher processors .........................................
2.3
3,965
n/a
Amendment 80 ................................................................
13.4
23,098
n/a
Amendment 80 limited access for 2010 only 2 ...............
n/a
3,795
n/a
Amendment 80 cooperative for 2010 only 2 ...................
n/a
19,303
n/a
Jig ....................................................................................
1.4
2,413
n/a
2010 and 2011 seasonal apportionment
Season
Amount
n/a ......................................
See § 679.20(a)(7)(i)(B) .....
n/a ......................................
n/a ......................................
n/a ......................................
Jan 1–Jun 10 .....................
Jun 10–Dec 31 ...................
Jan 1–Jun 10 .....................
Jun 10–Dec 31 ...................
Jan 1–Jun 10 .....................
Sept 1–Dec 31 ...................
Jan 1–Jun 10 .....................
Sept-1–Dec 31 ...................
n/a ......................................
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
42,609
40,938
175
168
1,312
1,261
7,349
7,061
n/a
Jan 20–Apr 1 .....................
Apr 1–Jun 10 .....................
Jun 10–Nov 1 .....................
Jan 20–Apr 1 .....................
Apr 1–Jun 10 .....................
Jun 10–Nov 1 .....................
Jan 20–Apr 1 .....................
Apr 1–Jun 10 .....................
Jun 10–Nov 1 .....................
Jan 20–Apr 1 .....................
Apr 1–Jun 10 .....................
Jun 10–Nov 1 .....................
Jan 20–Apr 1 .....................
Apr 1–Jun 10 .....................
Jun 10–Nov 1 .....................
Jan 1–Apr 30 .....................
Apr 30–Aug 31 ...................
Aug 31–Dec 31 ..................
28,190
4,190
5,714
2,973
991
0
17,324
5,775
0
2,847
949
0
14,477
4,826
0
1,448
483
483
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
1 The ICA for the hook-and-line and pot sectors will be deducted from the aggregate portion of Pacific cod TAC allocated to the hook-and-line
and pot sectors. The Regional Administrator proposes an ICA of 500 mt for 2010 and 2011 based on anticipated incidental catch in these fisheries.
2 The 2011 allocations for Amendment 80 species between Amendment 80 cooperatives and the Amendment 80 limited access sector will not
be known until eligible participants apply for participation in the program by November 1, 2010.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:37 Dec 01, 2009
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\02DEP1.SGM
02DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 230 / Wednesday, December 2, 2009 / Proposed Rules
Sablefish Gear Allocation
Section 679.20(a)(4)(iii) and (iv)
requires the allocation of sablefish TACs
for the Bering Sea and AI subareas
between trawl gear and hook-and-line or
pot gear. Gear allocations of the TACs
for the Bering Sea subarea are 50
percent for trawl gear and 50 percent for
hook-and-line or pot gear and for the AI
subarea are 25 percent for trawl gear and
75 percent for hook-and-line or pot gear.
Section 679.20(b)(1)(ii)(B) requires
apportionment of 20 percent of the
hook-and-line and pot gear allocation of
sablefish to the CDQ reserve.
Additionally, § 679.20(b)(1)(ii)(D)
requires apportionment of 7.5 percent of
the trawl gear allocation of sablefish to
the CDQ reserve. The Council
recommended that only trawl sablefish
TAC be established biennially. The
harvest specifications for the hook-andline gear and pot gear sablefish
Individual Fishing Quota (IFQ) fisheries
will be limited to the 2010 fishing year
to ensure those fisheries are conducted
63107
concurrently with the halibut IFQ
fishery. Concurrent sablefish and
halibut IFQ fisheries would reduce the
potential for discards of halibut and
sablefish in those fisheries. The
sablefish IFQ fisheries would remain
closed at the beginning of each fishing
year until the final harvest
specifications for the sablefish IFQ
fisheries are in effect. Table 5 lists the
proposed 2010 and 2011 gear
allocations of the sablefish TAC and
CDQ reserve amounts.
TABLE 5—PROPOSED 2010 AND 2011 GEAR SHARES AND CDQ RESERVE OF BSAI SABLEFISH TACS
[Amounts are in metric tons]
Percent of
TAC
2010 Share
of TAC
2010 ITAC 1
50
50
1,260
1,260
1,071
n/a
95
252
1,260
n/a
1,071
n/a
95
n/a
Total ...........................................
Aleutian Islands:
Trawl .................................................
Hook-and-line gear 2 .........................
100
2,520
1,071
347
2,520
1,071
95
25
75
510
1,530
434
n/a
38
306
510
n/a
434
n/a
38
n/a
Total ...........................................
100
2,040
434
344
2,040
434
38
Subarea and gear
Bering Sea:
Trawl .................................................
Hook-and-line gear 2 .........................
2010 CDQ
reserve
2011 Share
of TAC
2011 ITAC
2011 CDQ
reserve
1 Except for the sablefish hook-and-line or pot gear allocation, 15 percent of TAC is apportioned to the reserve. The ITAC is the remainder of
the TAC after the subtraction of these reserves.
2 For the portion of the sablefish TAC allocated to vessels using hook-and-line or pot gear, 20 percent of the allocated TAC is reserved for use
by CDQ participants. Section 679.20(b)(1) does not provide for the establishment of an ITAC for sablefish allocated to hook-and-line or pot gear.
Allocation of the Aleutian Islands
Pacific Ocean Perch, Flathead Sole,
Rock Sole, and Yellowfin Sole TACs
Sections 679.20(a)(10)(i) and (ii)
require the allocation between the
Amendment 80 and BSAI trawl limited
access sectors for Aleutian Islands
Pacific ocean perch, flathead sole, rock
sole, and yellowfin sole TACs in the
BSAI, after subtraction of 10.7 percent
for the CDQ reserve and an ICA for the
BSAI trawl limited access sector and
vessels using non-trawl gear. The
allocation of the ITAC for Aleutian
Islands Pacific ocean perch, flathead
sole, rock sole, and yellowfin sole to the
Amendment 80 sector is established in
Tables 33 and 34 to part 679 and
§ 679.91. The 2011 allocations for
Amendment 80 species between
Amendment 80 cooperatives and the
Amendment 80 limited access sector
will not be known until November 1,
2010, when eligible participants apply
for participation in the program. Table
6 lists the proposed 2010 and 2011
allocations and seasonal
apportionments of the Aleutian Islands
Pacific ocean perch, flathead sole, rock
sole, and yellowfin sole TACs.
TABLE 6—PROPOSED 2010 AND 2011 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT QUOTA (CDQ) RESERVES, INCIDENTAL CATCH
AMOUNTS (ICAS), AND AMENDMENT 80 ALLOCATIONS OF THE ALEUTIAN ISLANDS PACIFIC OCEAN PERCH, FLATHEAD
SOLE, ROCK SOLE, AND YELLOWFIN SOLE TACS
[Amounts are in metric tons]
2010 and 2011 allocations
Pacific ocean perch
Sector
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
Eastern
Aleutian
District
TAC ..................................................................................
CDQ .................................................................................
ICA ...................................................................................
BSAI trawl limited access ................................................
Amendment 80 .................................................................
Amendment 80 limited access for 2010 only1 .................
Amendment 80 cooperatives for 2010 only 1 ..................
4,160
445
100
361
3,253
1,725
1,528
Central
Aleutian
District
Western
Aleutian
District
4,210
450
50
371
3,339
1,770
1,568
6,450
690
50
114
5,596
2,967
2,629
Flathead
sole
Rock sole
Yellowfin
sole
BSAI
BSAI
BSAI
50,000
5,350
5,000
0
39,650
4,658
34,992
75,000
8,025
10,000
0
56,975
14,174
42,801
180,000
19,260
2,000
28,438
130,302
52,109
78,193
1 The 2011 allocations for Amendment 80 species between Amendment 80 cooperatives and the Amendment 80 limited access sector will not
be known until eligible participants apply for participation in the program by November 1, 2010.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:37 Dec 01, 2009
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\02DEP1.SGM
02DEP1
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
63108
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 230 / Wednesday, December 2, 2009 / Proposed Rules
Allocation of PSC Limits for Halibut,
Salmon, Crab, and Herring
Section 679.21(e) sets forth the BSAI
PSC limits. Pursuant to § 679.21(e)(1)(iv)
and (e)(2), the 2010 and 2011 BSAI
halibut mortality limits are 3,675 mt for
trawl fisheries and 900 mt for the nontrawl fisheries. Sections
679.21(e)(3)(i)(A)(2) and (e)(4)(i)(A)
allocate 326 mt of the trawl halibut
mortality limit and 7.5 percent, or 67
mt, of the non-trawl halibut mortality
limit as the prohibited species quota
(PSQ) reserve for use by the groundfish
CDQ program. Section 679.21(e)(1)(vi)
specifies 29,000 fish as the 2010 and
2011 Chinook salmon PSC limit for the
Bering Sea subarea pollock fishery.
Section 679.21(e)(3)(i)(A)(3)(i) allocates
7.5 percent, or 2,175 Chinook salmon, as
the PSQ reserve for the CDQ program
and allocates the remaining 26,825
Chinook salmon to the non-CDQ
fisheries. Section 679.21(e)(1)(viii)
specifies 700 fish as the 2010 and 2011
Chinook salmon PSC limit for the AI
subarea pollock fishery. Section
679.21(e)(3)(i)(A)(3)(i) allocates 7.5
percent, or 53 Chinook salmon, as the
AI subarea PSQ for the CDQ program
and allocates the remaining 647
Chinook salmon to the non-CDQ
fisheries. Section 679.21(e)(1)(vii)
specifies 42,000 fish as the 2010 and
2011 non-Chinook salmon PSC limit.
Section 679.21(e)(3)(i)(A)(3)(ii) allocates
10.7 percent, or 4,494 non-Chinook
salmon, as the PSQ for the CDQ program
and allocates the remaining 37,506 nonChinook salmon to the non-CDQ
fisheries. The regulations and
allocations of Chinook salmon are
subject to change in 2011 pending
approval of amendment 91 to the FMP.
PSC limits for crab and herring are
specified annually based on abundance
and spawning biomass. Due to the lack
of new information as of October 2009
regarding PSC limits and
apportionments, the Council
recommended and NMFS proposes
using the crab and herring 2010 and
2011 PSC limits and apportionments for
the proposed 2010 and 2011 limits and
apportionments. The Council will
reconsider these amounts in December
2009. Pursuant to § 679.21(e)(3)(i)(A)(1),
10.7 percent of each PSC limit specified
for crab is allocated as a PSQ reserve for
use by the groundfish CDQ program.
The red king crab mature female
abundance is estimated from the 2008
survey data at 35 million red king crabs,
and the effective spawning biomass is
estimated at 75 million lb (34,020 mt).
Based on the criteria set out at
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:37 Dec 01, 2009
Jkt 220001
§ 679.21(e)(1)(i), the proposed 2010 and
2011 PSC limit of red king crab in Zone
1 for trawl gear is 197,000 animals. This
limit derives from the mature female
abundance estimate of more than 8.4
million king crab and the effective
spawning biomass estimate of more than
55 million lbs (24,948 mt).
Section 679.21(e)(3)(ii)(B)(2)
establishes criteria under which NMFS
must specify an annual red king crab
bycatch limit for the Red King Crab
Savings Subarea (RKCSS). The
regulations limit the RKCSS to up to 25
percent of the red king crab PSC
allowance based on the need to
optimize the groundfish harvest relative
to red king crab bycatch. NMFS
proposes the Council’s recommendation
that the red king crab bycatch limit be
equal to 25 percent of the red king crab
PSC allowance within the RKCSS (Table
7b).
Based on 2008 survey data, Tanner
crab (Chionoecetes bairdi) abundance is
estimated at 435 million animals. Given
the criteria set out at § 679.21(e)(1)(ii),
the calculated 2010 and 2011 C. bairdi
crab PSC limit for trawl gear is 980,000
animals in Zone 1 and 2,970,000
animals in Zone 2. These limits derive
from the C. bairdi crab abundance
estimate being in excess of the 400
million animal threshold specified in
§ 679.21(e)(1)(ii).
Pursuant to § 679.21(e)(1)(iii), the PSC
limit for snow crab (C. opilio) is based
on total abundance as indicated by the
NMFS annual bottom trawl survey. The
C. opilio crab PSC limit is set at 0.1133
percent of the Bering Sea abundance
index. Based on the 2008 survey
estimate of 2.6 billion animals, the
calculated limit is 4,350,000 animals.
Pursuant to § 679.21(e)(1)(v), the PSC
limit of Pacific herring caught while
conducting any trawl operation for BSAI
groundfish is 1 percent of the annual
eastern Bering Sea herring biomass. The
best estimate of 2010 and 2011 herring
biomass is 169,675 mt. This amount was
derived using 2008 survey data and an
age-structured biomass projection model
developed by the Alaska Department of
Fish and Game. Therefore, the herring
PSC limit proposed for 2010 and 2011
is 1,697 mt for all trawl gear as
presented in Tables 7a and 7b.
Section 679.21(e)(3) requires, after
subtraction of PSQ reserves, that crab
and halibut trawl PSC be apportioned
between the BSAI trawl limited access
and Amendment 80 sectors as presented
in Table 7a. The amount of the 2010
PSC limits assigned to the Amendment
80 sector is specified in Table 35 to part
679. Pursuant to § 679.21(e)(1)(iv) and
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
§ 679.91(d) through (f), crab and halibut
trawl PSC assigned to the Amendment
80 sector is then sub-allocated to
Amendment 80 cooperatives as PSC
cooperative quota and to the
Amendment 80 limited access fishery as
presented in Tables 7d and e. PSC
cooperative quota assigned to
Amendment 80 cooperatives is not
allocated to specific fishery categories.
The 2011 PSC allocations between
Amendment 80 cooperatives and the
Amendment 80 limited access sector
will not be known until November 1,
2010, when eligible participants apply
to participate in the program. Section
679.21(e)(3)(i)(B) requires
apportionment of each trawl PSC limit
not assigned to Amendment 80
cooperatives into PSC bycatch
allowances for seven specified fishery
categories.
Section 679.21(e)(4)(i) authorizes the
apportionment of the non-trawl halibut
PSC limits into PSC bycatch allowances
among six fishery categories. Table 7c
lists the fishery bycatch allowances for
the trawl and non-trawl fisheries.
Section 679.21(e)(4)(ii) authorizes the
exemption of specified non-trawl
fisheries from the halibut PSC limit. As
in past years after consultation with the
Council, NMFS proposes to exempt pot
gear, jig gear, and the sablefish IFQ
hook-and-line gear fishery categories
from halibut bycatch restrictions
because (1) The pot gear fisheries have
low halibut bycatch mortality, (2)
halibut mortality for the jig gear fleet is
assumed to be negligible, and (3) the
sablefish and halibut IFQ fisheries have
low halibut bycatch mortality because
the IFQ program requires legal-size
halibut to be retained by vessels using
hook-and-line gear if a halibut IFQ
permit holder or a hired master is
aboard and is holding unused halibut
IFQ (subpart D of 50 CFR part 679). In
2009, total groundfish catch for the pot
gear fishery in the BSAI was
approximately 15,000 mt, with an
associated halibut bycatch mortality of
about 1 mt. The 2009 jig gear fishery
harvested about 33 mt of groundfish.
Most vessels in the jig gear fleet are less
than 60 ft (18.3 m) LOA and thus are
exempt from observer coverage
requirements. As a result, observer data
are not available on halibut bycatch in
the jig gear fishery. However, a
negligible amount of halibut bycatch
mortality is assumed because of the
selective nature of jig gear and the low
mortality rate of halibut caught with jig
gear and released.
E:\FR\FM\02DEP1.SGM
02DEP1
63109
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 230 / Wednesday, December 2, 2009 / Proposed Rules
Section 679.21(e)(5) authorizes
NMFS, after consultation with the
Council, to establish seasonal
apportionments of PSC amounts for the
BSAI trawl limited access and
Amendment 80 limited access sectors in
order to maximize the ability of the fleet
to harvest the available groundfish TAC
and to minimize bycatch. The factors
considered are (1) Seasonal distribution
of prohibited species, (2) seasonal
distribution of target groundfish species,
(3) PSC bycatch needs on a seasonal
basis relevant to prohibited species
biomass, (4) expected variations in
bycatch rates throughout the year, (5)
expected start of fishing effort, and (6)
economic effects of seasonal PSC
apportionments on industry sectors.
NMFS proposes the Council’s
recommendation of the seasonal PSC
apportionments in Tables 7c and 7e to
maximize harvest among gear types,
fisheries, and seasons while minimizing
bycatch of PSC based on the above
criteria.
TABLE 7a—PROPOSED 2010 AND 2011 APPORTIONMENT OF PROHIBITED SPECIES CATCH (PSC) ALLOWANCES TO NONTRAWL GEAR, THE CDQ PROGRAM, AMENDMENT 80, AND THE BSAI TRAWL LIMITED ACCESS SECTORS
PSC species and area
Total nontrawl PSC
Halibut mortality (mt)
BSAI .............................
Herring (mt) BSAI ............
Red king crab (animals)
Zone 1 1 ........................
C. opilio (animals)
COBLZ 2 .......................
C. bairdi crab (animals)
Zone 1 2 ........................
C. bairdi crab (animals)
Zone 2 ..........................
Non-trawl
PSC
remaining
after CDQ
PSQ 1
Total trawl
PSC
Trawl PSC
remaining
after CDQ
PSQ 1
Amendment 80 sector
CDQ PSQ
reserve 1
2010
BSAI trawl
limited access fishery
2011
900
n/a
832
n/a
3,675
1,697
3,349
n/a
393
n/a
2,425
n/a
2,375
n/a
875
n/a
n/a
n/a
197,000
175,921
21,079
98,920
93,432
53,797
n/a
n/a
4,350,000
3,884,550
465,450
2,148,156
2,028,512
1,248,494
n/a
n/a
980,000
875,140
104,860
414,641
391,538
411,228
n/a
n/a
2,970,000
2,652,210
317,790
706,284
667,031
1,241,500
1 Section
679.21(e)(3)(i)(A)(2) allocates 326 mt of the trawl halibut mortality limit and § 679.21(e)(4)(i)(A) allocates 7.5 percent, or 67 mt, of the
non-trawl halibut mortality limit as the PSQ reserve for use by the groundfish CDQ program. The PSQ reserve for crab species is 10.7 percent of
each crab PSC limit.
2 Refer to § 679.2 for definitions of zones.
TABLE 7b—PROPOSED 2010 AND 2011 HERRING AND RED KING CRAB SAVINGS SUBAREA PROHIBITED SPECIES CATCH
(PSC) ALLOWANCES FOR ALL TRAWL SECTORS
Herring (mt)
BSAI
Fishery categories
Red king crab
(animals)
Zone 1
Yellowfin sole .......................................................................................................................................................
Rock sole/flathead sole/other flatfish 1 ................................................................................................................
Greenland turbot/arrowtooth flounder/sablefish ..................................................................................................
Rockfish ...............................................................................................................................................................
Pacific cod ...........................................................................................................................................................
Midwater trawl pollock .........................................................................................................................................
Pollock/Atka mackerel/other species 2 .................................................................................................................
Red king crab savings subarea non-pelagic trawl gear 3 ....................................................................................
146
25
12
9
25
1,296
184
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
49,250
Total trawl PSC ............................................................................................................................................
1,697
197,000
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
1 ‘‘Other flatfish’’ for PSC monitoring includes all flatfish species, except for halibut (a prohibited species), flathead sole, Greenland turbot, rock
sole, yellowfin sole, and arrowtooth flounder.
2 Pollock other than pelagic trawl pollock, Atka mackerel, and ‘‘other species’’ fishery category.
3 In October 2009 the Council recommended that the red king crab bycatch limit for non-pelagic trawl fisheries within the RKCSS be limited to
25 percent of the red king crab PSC allowance (see § 679.21(e)(3)(ii)(B)(2)).
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:37 Dec 01, 2009
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\02DEP1.SGM
02DEP1
63110
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 230 / Wednesday, December 2, 2009 / Proposed Rules
TABLE 7c—PROPOSED 2010 AND 2011 PROHIBITED SPECIES BYCATCH ALLOWANCES FOR THE BSAI TRAWL LIMITED
ACCESS SECTOR AND NON-TRAWL FISHERIES
Prohibited species and area 1
BSAI trawl limited access fisheries
Halibut mortality (mt)
BSAI
Red king
crab
(animals)
Zone 1
C. opilio
(animals)
COBLZ
C. bairdi (animals)
Zone 1
Zone 2
Yellowfin sole ...........................................................................
Rock sole/flathead sole/other flatfish2 .....................................
Turbot/arrowtooth/sablefish 3 ...................................................
Rockfish, April 15 .....................................................................
Pacific cod ...............................................................................
Pollock/Atka mackerel/other species .......................................
162
0
0
3
585
125
47,397
0
0
0
6,000
400
1,176,494
0
0
2,000
50,000
20,000
346,228
0
0
0
60,000
5,000
1,185,500
0
0
1,000
50,000
5,000
Total BSAI trawl limited access PSC ...............................
875
53,797
1,248,494
411,228
1,241,500
Non-trawl fisheries
Catcher
processor
Pacific cod-Total .......................................................................
January 1–June 10 ...................................................................
June 10–August 15 ..................................................................
August 15–December 31 .........................................................
Catcher
vessel
760
314
0
446
15
10
3
2
Other non-trawl-Total ...............................................................
May 1–December 31 ................................................................
Groundfish pot and jig ..............................................................
Sablefish hook-and-line ............................................................
58
58
Exempt
Exempt
Total non-trawl PSC ..........................................................
833
1 Refer
to § 679.2 for definitions of areas.
2 ‘‘Other flatfish’’ for PSC monitoring includes all flatfish species, except for halibut (a prohibited species), flathead sole, Greenland turbot, rock
sole, yellowfin sole, and arrowtooth flounder.
3 Greenland turbot, arrowtooth flounder, and sablefish fishery category.
TABLE 7d—PROPOSED 2010 PROHIBITED SPECIES BYCATCH ALLOWANCE FOR THE BSAI AMENDMENT 80 COOPERATIVES
Prohibited species and zones 1
Halibut
mortality
(mt) BSAI
Year
2010 .........................................................................................................
1 Refer
Red king
crab
(animals)
Zone 1
C. opilio
(animals)
COBLZ
Zone 1
Zone 2
1754
70,237
1,461,309
304,290
518,898
C. bairdi (animals)
to § 679.2 for definitions of zones.
TABLE 7e—PROPOSED 2010 PROHIBITED SPECIES BYCATCH ALLOWANCES FOR THE BSAI AMENDMENT 80 LIMITED
ACCESS FISHERIES
Prohibited species and zone 1
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
Amendment 80 trawl limited access fisheries
Halibut mortality (mt)
BSAI
Red king
crab
(animals)
Zone 1
C. opilio
(animals)
COBLZ
C. bairdi (animals)
Zone 1
Zone 2
Yellowfin sole ...........................................................................................
Jan 20–Jul 1 .....................................................................................
Jul 1–Dec 31 .....................................................................................
Rock sole/other flat/flathead sole 2 ..........................................................
Jan 20–Apr 1 ....................................................................................
Apr 1–Jul 1 .......................................................................................
Jul 1–Dec 31 .....................................................................................
Turbot/arrowtooth/ ....................................................................................
sablefish 3 .................................................................................................
Rockfish ...................................................................................................
Pacific cod ...............................................................................................
Pollock/Atka mackerel/other species 4 .....................................................
353
208
146
218
174
20
24
5,594
5,410
184
22,921
22,585
168
168
601,032
591,926
9,106
85,051
82,173
1,511
1,366
58,002
53,727
4,274
52,053
45,921
3,214
2,918
142,335
114,843
27,492
44,231
38,635
2,798
2,798
n/a
49
1
49
n/a
n/a
168
0
n/a
n/a
765
0
n/a
n/a
297
0
n/a
n/a
819
0
Total Amendment 80 trawl limited access PSC ...............................
671
28,683
686,848
110,351
187,385
1 Refer
to § 679.2 for definitions of zones.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:37 Dec 01, 2009
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\02DEP1.SGM
02DEP1
63111
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 230 / Wednesday, December 2, 2009 / Proposed Rules
2 ‘‘Other flatfish’’ for PSC monitoring includes all flatfish species, except for halibut (a prohibited species), flathead sole, Greenland turbot, rock
sole, yellowfin sole, and arrowtooth flounder.
3 Greenland turbot, arrowtooth flounder, and sablefish fishery category.
4 Pollock other than pelagic trawl pollock, Atka mackerel, and ‘‘other species’’ fishery category.
Halibut Discard Mortality Rates
To monitor halibut bycatch mortality
allowances and apportionments, the
Regional Administrator uses observed
halibut bycatch rates, discard mortality
rates (DMR), and estimates of
groundfish catch to project when a
fishery’s halibut bycatch mortality
allowance or seasonal apportionment is
reached. The DMRs are based on the
best information available, including
information included in the annual
SAFE report. NMFS proposes the
Council’s recommendation that the
halibut DMRs developed and
recommended by the International
Pacific Halibut Commission (IPHC) for
the 2009 BSAI groundfish fisheries be
used for monitoring the proposed 2010
and 2011 halibut bycatch allowances
(see Tables 7a–e). The IPHC developed
the DMRs for the 2009 BSAI non-CDQ
groundfish fisheries using the 10-year
mean DMRs for those fisheries. The
IPHC developed the DMRs for the 2009
BSAI CDQ groundfish fisheries using
the 1998 to 2006 DMRs for those
fisheries. The IPHC will analyze
observer data annually and recommend
changes to the DMRs when a fishery
DMR shows large variation from the
mean. A copy of the document
justifying these DMRs is available from
the Council (see ADDRESSES) and the
DMRs are discussed in the Economic
Status Report of the final 2008 SAFE
report dated November 2008. Table 8
lists the proposed 2010 and 2011 DMRs.
The proposed DMRs listed in Table 8
are subject to change pending the results
of an updated analysis on halibut DMRs
in the groundfish fisheries that IPHC
staff is scheduled to present to the
Council at its December 2009 meeting.
TABLE 8—PROPOSED 2010 AND 2011 ASSUMED PACIFIC HALIBUT DISCARD MORTALITY RATES FOR THE BSAI
Halibut discard
mortality rate
(percent)
Gear
Fishery
Non-CDQ hook-and-line ..........
Greenland turbot ...........................................................................................................................
Other species ................................................................................................................................
Pacific cod .....................................................................................................................................
Rockfish ........................................................................................................................................
Arrowtooth flounder .......................................................................................................................
Atka mackerel ...............................................................................................................................
Flathead sole ................................................................................................................................
Greenland turbot ...........................................................................................................................
Non-pelagic pollock .......................................................................................................................
Pelagic pollock ..............................................................................................................................
Other flatfish ..................................................................................................................................
Other species ................................................................................................................................
Pacific cod .....................................................................................................................................
Rockfish ........................................................................................................................................
Rock sole ......................................................................................................................................
Sablefish .......................................................................................................................................
Yellowfin sole ................................................................................................................................
Other species ................................................................................................................................
Pacific cod .....................................................................................................................................
Atka mackerel ...............................................................................................................................
Flathead sole ................................................................................................................................
Non-pelagic pollock .......................................................................................................................
Pelagic pollock ..............................................................................................................................
Rockfish ........................................................................................................................................
Rock sole ......................................................................................................................................
Yellowfin sole ................................................................................................................................
Greenland turbot ...........................................................................................................................
Pacific cod .....................................................................................................................................
Pacific cod .....................................................................................................................................
Sablefish .......................................................................................................................................
Non-CDQ trawl .........................
Non-CDQ pot ...........................
CDQ trawl ................................
CDQ hook-and-line ..................
CDQ pot ...................................
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
Central Gulf of Alaska Rockfish Pilot
Program (Rockfish Program)
On June 6, 2005, the Council adopted
the Rockfish Program to meet the
requirements of Section 802 of the
Consolidated Appropriations Act of
2004 (Pub. L. 108–199). The basis for
the BSAI fishing prohibitions and the
catcher vessel BSAI Pacific cod
sideboard limits of the Rockfish
Program are discussed in detail in the
final rule for Amendment 68 to the FMP
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:37 Dec 01, 2009
Jkt 220001
for Groundfish of the GOA (71 FR
67210, November 20, 2006). Pursuant to
§ 679.82(d)(6)(i), the catcher vessel BSAI
Pacific cod sideboard limit is 0.0 mt and
in the final 2010 and 2011 harvest
specifications this would effectively
close directed fishing for BSAI Pacific
cod in July for catcher vessels under the
Rockfish Program sideboard limitations.
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
13
11
11
17
75
76
70
70
74
88
74
70
70
76
80
75
80
7
7
85
84
85
90
82
88
84
4
10
7
34
Listed AFA Catcher/Processor
Sideboard Limits
Pursuant to § 679.64(a), the Regional
Administrator is responsible for
restricting the ability of listed AFA
catcher/processors to engage in directed
fishing for groundfish species other than
pollock to protect participants in other
groundfish fisheries from adverse effects
resulting from the AFA and from fishery
cooperatives in the directed pollock
fishery. Table 9 lists the proposed 2010
E:\FR\FM\02DEP1.SGM
02DEP1
63112
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 230 / Wednesday, December 2, 2009 / Proposed Rules
and 2011 catcher/processor sideboard
limits. The basis for these proposed
sideboard limits is described in detail in
the final rules implementing the major
provisions of the AFA (67 FR 79692,
December 30, 2002) and Amendment 80
(72 FR 52668, September 14, 2007).
All harvests of groundfish sideboard
species by listed AFA catcher/
processors, whether as targeted catch or
incidental catch, will be deducted from
the proposed sideboard limits in Table
9. However, groundfish sideboard
species that are delivered to listed AFA
catcher/processors by catcher vessels
will not be deducted from the proposed
2010 and 2011 sideboard limits for the
listed AFA catcher/processors.
TABLE 9—PROPOSED 2010 AND 2011 BSAI GROUNDFISH SIDEBOARD LIMITS FOR LISTED AMERICAN FISHERIES ACT
CATCHER/PROCESSORS (C/PS)
[Amounts are in metric tons]
1995–1997
Target species
Area
Sablefish trawl ........................................
Atka mackerel .........................................
Yellowfin sole 4 ........................................
Rock sole ................................................
Greenland turbot .....................................
Arrowtooth flounder ................................
Flathead sole ..........................................
Alaska plaice ...........................................
Other flatfish ...........................................
Pacific ocean perch ................................
Northern rockfish ....................................
Shortraker rockfish ..................................
Rougheye rockfish ..................................
Other rockfish .........................................
Squid .......................................................
Other species ..........................................
Total catch
Ratio of retained catch
of total catch
8
0
497
145
0.016
0
1,071
474
17
0
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
0.115
n/a
0.115
n/a
12,688
7,613
12,688
7,613
1,459
875
1,459
875
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
100,192
6,317
121
23
76
1,925
14
3,058
12
125
3
54
91
50
50
18
22
73
553
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
435,788
169,362
17,305
4,987
33,987
52,755
9,438
52,298
4,879
6,179
5,698
13,598
13,040
2,811
2,811
621
806
3,328
68,672
0.2
n/a
0.2
n/a
0.23
0.037
0.007
0.005
0.002
0.036
0.001
0.058
0.002
0.02
0.001
0.004
0.007
0.018
0.018
0.029
0.027
0.022
0.008
8,771
5,263
8,771
5,263
160,740
66,975
4,182
1879
51,000
44,650
25,500
14,790
3,213
3,715
3,760
5,760
5,100
329
469
412
472
1,675
29,088
1,754
1,053
1,754
1,053
36,970
2,478
29
9
102
1,607
26
858
6
74
4
23
36
6
8
12
13
37
233
Retained
catch
BS .....................................
AI ......................................
Central AI
A season 2 ........................
HLA limit ...........................
B season 2 ........................
HLA limit 3 .........................
Western AI
A season 2 ........................
HLA limit ...........................
B season 2 ........................
HLA limit 3 .........................
BSAI .................................
BSAI .................................
BS .....................................
AI ......................................
BSAI .................................
BSAI .................................
BSAI .................................
BSAI .................................
BS .....................................
Eastern AI .........................
Central AI .........................
Western AI ........................
BSAI .................................
BSAI .................................
BSAI .................................
BS .....................................
AI ......................................
BSAI .................................
BSAI .................................
2010 and
2011 AFA
C/P
sideboard
limit
2010 and
2011 ITAC
available to
all trawl C/
Ps 1
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
1 Aleutians Islands Pacific ocean perch, Atka mackerel, flathead sole, rock sole, and yellowfin sole are multiplied by the remainder of the TAC
of that species after the subtraction of the CDQ reserve under § 679.20(b)(1)(ii)(C).
2 The seasonal apportionment of Atka mackerel in the open access fishery is 50 percent in the A season and 50 percent in the B season. Listed AFA catcher/processors are limited to harvesting no more than zero in the Eastern Aleutian District and Bering Sea subarea, 20 percent of
the annual ITAC specified for the Western Aleutian District, and 11.5 percent of the annual ITAC specified for the Central Aleutian District.
3 Harvest Limit Area (HLA) limit refers to the amount of each seasonal allowance that is available for fishing inside the HLA (see § 679.2). In
2010 and 2011, 60 percent of each seasonal allowance is available for fishing inside the HLA in the Western and Central Aleutian Districts.
4 Section 679.64(a)(1)(v) exempts AFA catcher/processors from a yellowfin sole sideboard limit because the 2010 and 2011 aggregate ITAC of
yellowfin sole assigned to the Amendment 80 sector and BSAI trawl limited access sector (158,740 mt) is greater than 125,000 mt.
Section 679.64(a)(2) and Tables 40
and 41 to part 679 establish a formula
for PSC sideboard limits for listed AFA
catcher/processors. The basis for these
sideboard limits is described in detail in
the final rules implementing the major
provisions of the AFA (67 FR 79692,
December 30, 2002) and Amendment 80
(72 FR 52668, September 14, 2007).
PSC species listed in Table 10 that are
caught by listed AFA catcher/processors
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:37 Dec 01, 2009
Jkt 220001
participating in any groundfish fishery
other than pollock will accrue against
the proposed 2010 and 2011 PSC
sideboard limits for the listed AFA
catcher/processors. Section
679.21(e)(3)(v) authorizes NMFS to
close directed fishing for groundfish
other than pollock for listed AFA
catcher/processors once a proposed
2010 or 2011 PSC sideboard limit listed
in Table 10 is reached.
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Crab or halibut PSC caught by listed
AFA catcher/processors while fishing
for pollock will accrue against the
bycatch allowances annually specified
for either the midwater pollock or the
pollock/Atka mackerel/’’other species’’
fishery categories according to
regulations at § 679.21(e)(3)(iv).
E:\FR\FM\02DEP1.SGM
02DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 230 / Wednesday, December 2, 2009 / Proposed Rules
63113
TABLE 10—PROPOSED 2010 AND 2011 BSAI PROHIBITED SPECIES SIDEBOARD LIMITS FOR AMERICAN FISHERIES ACT
LISTED CATCHER/PROCESSORS
Ratio of
PSC catch
to total PSC
PSC species and area
Proposed
2010 and
2011 PSC
available to
trawl vessels after
subtraction
of PSQ1
n/a
0.007
0.153
n/a
0.14
0.05
n/a
175,921
3,884,550
n/a
875,140
2,652,210
Halibut mortality .......................................................................................................................................
Red king crab Zone 1 2 ............................................................................................................................
C. opilio (COBLZ) 2 ..................................................................................................................................
C. bairdi ...................................................................................................................................................
Zone 1 2 ...................................................................................................................................................
Zone 2 2 ...................................................................................................................................................
Proposed
2010 and
2011 C/P
sideboard
limit1
286
1,231
594,336
n/a
122,520
132,611
1 Halibut
2 Refer
amounts are in metric tons of halibut mortality. Crab amounts are in numbers of animals.
to § 679.2 for definitions of areas.
AFA Catcher Vessel Sideboard Limits
Pursuant to § 679.64(b), the Regional
Administrator is responsible for
restricting the ability of AFA catcher
vessels to engage in directed fishing for
groundfish species other than pollock to
protect participants in other groundfish
fisheries from adverse effects resulting
from the AFA and from fishery
cooperatives in the directed pollock
fishery. Section 679.64(b) establishes
formulas for setting AFA catcher vessel
groundfish and PSC sideboard limits for
the BSAI. The basis for these sideboard
limits is described in detail in the final
rules implementing the major
provisions of the AFA (67 FR 79692,
December 30, 2002) and Amendment 80
(72 FR 52668, September 14, 2007).
Tables 11 and 12 list the proposed 2010
and 2011 AFA catcher vessel sideboard
limits.
All catch of groundfish sideboard
species made by non-exempt AFA
catcher vessels, whether as targeted
catch or as incidental catch, will be
deducted from the proposed 2010 and
2011 sideboard limits listed in Table 11.
TABLE 11—PROPOSED 2010 AND 2011 BSAI GROUNDFISH SIDEBOARD LIMITS FOR AMERICAN FISHERIES ACT CATCHER
VESSELS (CVS)
[Amounts are in metric tons]
Species
Fishery by area/gear/season
Pacific cod ...........................................................
BSAI
Jig gear ................................................................
Hook-and-line CV
Jan 1–Jun 10 .......................................................
Jun 10–Dec 31 ....................................................
Pot gear CV
Jan 1–Jun 10 .......................................................
Sept 1–Dec 31 .....................................................
CV< 60 ft LOA using hook-and-line or pot gear
Trawl gear CV
Jan 20–Apr 1 .......................................................
Apr 1–Jun 10 .......................................................
Jun 10–Nov 1 ......................................................
BS trawl gear .......................................................
AI trawl gear ........................................................
Eastern AI/BS
Jan 1–Apr 15 .......................................................
Sept 1–Nov 1 .......................................................
Central AI
Jan–Apr 15 ..........................................................
HLA limit ..............................................................
Sept 1–Nov 1 .......................................................
HLA limit ..............................................................
Western AI
Jan–Apr 15 ..........................................................
HLA limit ..............................................................
Sept 1–Nov 1 .......................................................
HLA limit ..............................................................
BSAI .....................................................................
BSAI .....................................................................
BS ........................................................................
Sablefish ..............................................................
Atka mackerel ......................................................
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
Ratio of
1995–1997
AFA CV
catch to
1995–1997
TAC
Yellowfin sole 2 ....................................................
Rock sole .............................................................
Greenland turbot ..................................................
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:37 Dec 01, 2009
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\02DEP1.SGM
0
2010–2011
initial TAC 1
2010 and
2011 AFA
catcher
vessel
sideboard
limits
2,413
0
0.0006
0.0006
175
168
0
0
0.0006
0.0006
0.0006
7,349
7,061
3,431
4
4
2
0.8609
0.8609
0.8609
0.0906
0.0645
28,190
4,190
5,714
1,071
474
24,269
3,608
4,919
97
31
0.0032
0.0032
10,187
10,187
33
33
0.0001
0.0001
0.0001
0.0001
12,688
7,613
12,688
7,613
1
1
1
1
0
n/a
0
n/a
0.0647
0.0341
0.0645
8,771
5,263
8,771
5,263
160,740
66,975
4,182
0
0
0
0
n/a
2,284
270
02DEP1
63114
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 230 / Wednesday, December 2, 2009 / Proposed Rules
TABLE 11—PROPOSED 2010 AND 2011 BSAI GROUNDFISH SIDEBOARD LIMITS FOR AMERICAN FISHERIES ACT CATCHER
VESSELS (CVS)—Continued
[Amounts are in metric tons]
Species
Ratio of
1995–1997
AFA CV
catch to
1995–1997
TAC
Fishery by area/gear/season
Arrowtooth flounder .............................................
Alaska plaice .......................................................
Other flatfish ........................................................
Pacific ocean perch .............................................
Northern rockfish .................................................
Shortraker rockfish ..............................................
Rougheye rockfish ...............................................
Other rockfish ......................................................
Squid ....................................................................
Other species ......................................................
Flathead sole .......................................................
AI .........................................................................
BSAI .....................................................................
BSAI .....................................................................
BSAI .....................................................................
BS ........................................................................
Eastern AI ............................................................
Central AI .............................................................
Western AI ...........................................................
BSAI .....................................................................
BSAI .....................................................................
BSAI .....................................................................
BS ........................................................................
AI .........................................................................
BSAI .....................................................................
BSAI .....................................................................
BS trawl gear .......................................................
0.0205
0.069
0.0441
0.0441
0.1
0.0077
0.0025
0
0.0084
0.0037
0.0037
0.0048
0.0095
0.3827
0.0541
0.0505
2010–2011
initial TAC 1
1,879
51,000
25,500
14,790
3,213
3,715
3,760
5,760
5,100
329
469
412
472
1,675
29,880
44,650
2010 and
2011 AFA
catcher
vessel
sideboard
limits
39
3,519
1,125
652
321
29
9
0
43
1
2
2
4
641
1,617
2,255
1 Aleutians Islands Pacific ocean perch, Atka mackerel, flathead sole, rock sole, and yellowfin sole are multiplied by the remainder of the TAC
of that species after the subtraction of the CDQ reserve under § 679.20(b)(1)(ii)(C).
2 Section 679.64(b)(6) exempts AFA catcher vessels from a yellowfin sole sideboard limit because the 2010 and 2011 aggregate ITAC of yellowfin sole assigned to the Amendment 80 sector and BSAI trawl limited access sector (158,740 mt) is greater than 125,000 mt.
Halibut and crab PSC limits listed in
Table 12 that are caught by AFA catcher
vessels participating in any groundfish
fishery other than pollock will accrue
against the proposed 2010 and 2011 PSC
sideboard limits for the AFA catcher
vessels. Section 679.21(d)(8) and
(e)(3)(v) authorizes NMFS to close
directed fishing for groundfish other
than pollock for AFA catcher vessels
once a proposed 2010 and 2011 PSC
sideboard limit listed in Table 12 is
reached. The PSC caught by AFA
catcher vessels while fishing for pollock
in the BSAI will accrue against the
bycatch allowances annually specified
for either the midwater pollock or the
pollock/Atka mackerel/‘‘other species’’
fishery categories under regulations at
§ 679.21(e)(3)(iv).
TABLE 12—PROPOSED 2010 AND 2011 AMERICAN FISHERIES ACT CATCHER VESSEL PROHIBITED SPECIES CATCH
SIDEBOARD (PSC) LIMITS FOR THE BSAI
[Amounts are in metric tons]
AFA catcher
vessel PSC
sideboard
limit ratio
PSC species
Target fishery category 1
Halibut ..................................................
Proposed
2010 and
2011 AFA
catcher vessel PSC
sideboard
limit 2
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
0.299
0.168
0.33
0.186
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
175,921
3,884,550
875,140
2,652,210
887
2
101
228
0
2
5
52,600
652,604
288,796
493,311
Pacific cod trawl ..................................................................
Pacific cod hook-and-line or pot .........................................
Yellowfin sole total ..............................................................
Rock sole/flathead sole/other flatfish 3 ................................
Turbot/arrowtooth/sablefish .................................................
Rockfish ..............................................................................
Pollock/Atka mackerel/other species ..................................
n/a .......................................................................................
n/a .......................................................................................
n/a .......................................................................................
n/a .......................................................................................
Red king crab Zone 1 ..........................
C. opilio COBLZ 4 .................................
C. bairdi Zone 1 4 .................................
C. bairdi Zone 2 4 .................................
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
Proposed
2010 and
2011 PSC
limit after
subtraction
of PSQ reserves 2
1 Target
fishery categories are defined in regulation at § 679.21(e)(3)(iv).
amounts are in metric tons of halibut mortality. Crab amounts are in numbers of animals.
3 ‘‘Other flatfish’’ for PSC monitoring includes all flatfish species, except for halibut (a prohibited species), flathead sole, Greenland turbot, rock
sole, yellowfin sole, and arrowtooth flounder.
4 Refer to § 679.2 for definitions of areas.
2 Halibut
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:37 Dec 01, 2009
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\02DEP1.SGM
02DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 230 / Wednesday, December 2, 2009 / Proposed Rules
Classification
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
NMFS has determined that the
proposed specifications are consistent
with the FMP and preliminarily
determined that the proposed
specifications are consistent with the
Magnuson-Stevens Act and other
applicable laws.
This action is authorized under 50
CFR 679.20 and is exempt from review
under Executive Order 12866.
NMFS prepared a Final EIS for this
action and made it available to the
public on January 12, 2007 (72 FR
1512). On February 13, 2007, NMFS
issued the Record of Decision for the
Final EIS. Copies of the Final EIS and
Record of Decision for this action are
available from NMFS (see ADDRESSES).
The Final EIS analyzes the
environmental consequences of the
proposed groundfish harvest
specifications and its alternatives on
resources in the action area. The Final
EIS found no significant environmental
consequences from the proposed action
or its alternatives.
NMFS also prepared an Initial
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA)
as required by section 603 of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act. The IRFA
evaluates the impacts on small entities
of alternative harvest strategies for the
groundfish fisheries in the exclusive
economic zone off of Alaska. While the
specification numbers may change from
year to year, the harvest strategy for
establishing those numbers remains the
same. NMFS therefore is using the same
IRFA prepared in connection with the
Final EIS. NMFS published notice of the
availability of the IRFA and its summary
in the classification section of the
proposed harvest specifications for the
groundfish fisheries in the BSAI in the
Federal Register on December 15, 2006
(71 FR 75460). The comment period on
the BSAI proposed harvest
specifications and IRFA ended on
January 16, 2007. NMFS did not receive
any comments on the IRFA or the
economic impacts of the rule generally.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:37 Dec 01, 2009
Jkt 220001
A description of the action, why it is
being considered, and the legal basis for
this action are contained in the
preamble above. This IRFA meets the
statutory requirements of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act of 1980, as amended by
the Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (5
U.S.C. 601–612). A copy of this analysis
is available from NMFS (see
ADDRESSES). A summary of the IRFA
follows.
The action under consideration is a
harvest strategy to govern the catch of
groundfish in the BSAI. The preferred
alternative is the status quo harvest
strategy in which TACs fall within the
range of ABCs recommended by the
Council’s harvest specification process
and TACs recommended by the Council.
This action is taken in accordance with
the FMP prepared by the Council
pursuant to the Magnuson-Stevens Act.
The directly regulated small entities
include approximately 810 small
catcher vessels, fewer than 20 small
catcher/processors, and six CDQ groups.
The entities directly regulated by this
action are those that harvest groundfish
in the exclusive economic zone of the
BSAI and in parallel fisheries within
State of Alaska waters. These include
entities operating catcher vessels and
catcher/processor vessels within the
action area, and entities receiving direct
allocations of groundfish. Catcher
vessels and catcher/processors were
considered to be small entities if their
annual gross receipts from all economic
activities, including the revenue of their
affiliated operations, totaled $4 million
per year or less. Data from 2005 were
the most recent available to determine
the number of small entities.
Estimates of first wholesale gross
revenues for the BSAI non-CDQ and
CDQ sectors were used as indices of the
potential impacts of the alternative
harvest strategies on small entities.
Revenues were projected to decline
from 2006 levels in 2007 and 2008
under the preferred alternative due to
declines in ABCs for economically key
groundfish species.
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
63115
The preferred alternative (Alternative
2) was compared to four other
alternatives. These included Alternative
1, which would have set TACs to
generate fishing rates equal to the
maximum permissible ABC (if the full
TAC were harvested), unless the sum of
TACs exceeded the BSAI optimum
yield, in which case TACs would have
been limited to the optimum yield.
Alternative 3 would have set TACs to
produce fishing rates equal to the most
recent five-year average fishing rates.
Alternative 4 would have set TACs
equal to the lower limit of the BSAI
optimum yield range. Alternative 5
would have set TACs equal to zero.
Alternative 5 is the ‘‘no action’’
alternative.
Alternatives 3, 4, and 5 produced
smaller first wholesale revenue indices
for both non-CDQ and CDQ sectors than
Alternative 2. Alternative 1 revenues
were the same as Alternative 2 revenues
in the BSAI for both sectors. Moreover,
higher Alternative 1 TACs are
associated with maximum permissible
ABCs, while Alternative 2 TACs are
associated with the ABCs that have been
recommended to the Council by the
Plan Team and the SSC, and more fully
consider other potential biological
issues. For these reasons, Alternative 2
is the preferred alternative.
This action does not modify
recordkeeping or reporting
requirements, or duplicate, overlap, or
conflict with any federal rules.
Adverse impacts on marine mammals
resulting from fishing activities
conducted under these harvest
specifications are discussed in the Final
EIS (see ADDRESSES).
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 773 et seq., 1801 et
seq., 3631 et seq.; Public Law 108–447.
Dated: November 25, 2009.
James W. Balsiger,
Acting Assistant Administrator for Fisheries,
National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. E9–28831 Filed 12–1–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
E:\FR\FM\02DEP1.SGM
02DEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 230 (Wednesday, December 2, 2009)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 63100-63115]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-28831]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Part 679
[Docket No. 0910131363-91412-01]
RIN 0648-XS44
Fisheries of the Exclusive Economic Zone Off Alaska; Bering Sea
and Aleutian Islands; Proposed 2010 and 2011 Harvest Specifications for
Groundfish
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NMFS proposes 2010 and 2011 harvest specifications and
prohibited species catch allowances for the groundfish fisheries of the
Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands (BSAI) management area. This action is
necessary to establish harvest limits for groundfish during the 2010
and 2011 fishing years and to accomplish the goals and objectives of
the Fishery Management Plan for Groundfish of the Bering Sea and
Aleutian Islands Management Area. The intended effect of this action is
to conserve and manage the groundfish resources in the BSAI in
accordance with the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and
Management Act.
DATES: Comments must be received by January 4, 2010.
[[Page 63101]]
ADDRESSES: Send comment to Sue Salveson, Assistant Regional
Administrator, Sustainable Fisheries Division, Alaska Region, NMFS,
Attn: Ellen Sebastian. You may submit comments, identified by RIN 0648-
XS44, by any one of the following methods:
Electronic Submissions: Submit all electronic public
comments via the Federal eRulemaking Portal https://www.regulations.gov.
Mail: P.O. Box 21668, Juneau, AK 99802.
Fax: (907) 586-7557.
Hand delivery to the Federal Building: 709 West 9th
Street, Room 420A, Juneau, AK.
All comments received are a part of the public record. No comments
will be posted to https://www.regulations.gov for public viewing until
after the comment period has closed. Comments will generally be posted
without change. All Personal Identifying Information (for example,
name, address, etc.) voluntarily submitted by the commenter may be
publicly accessible. Do not submit Confidential Business Information or
otherwise sensitive or protected information.
NMFS will accept anonymous comments (enter N/A in the required
fields, if you wish to remain anonymous). You may submit attachments to
electronic comments in Microsoft Word, Excel, WordPerfect, or Adobe PDF
file formats only.
Electronic copies of the Alaska Groundfish Harvest Specifications
Final Environmental Impact Statement (Final EIS) and the Initial
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA) prepared for this action may be
obtained from https://www.regulations.gov or from the Alaska Region Web
site at https://alaskafisheries.noaa.gov. Copies of the final 2008 Stock
Assessment and Fishery Evaluation (SAFE) report for the groundfish
resources of the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands, dated November 2008,
are available from the North Pacific Fishery Management Council
(Council) at 605 West 4th Avenue, Suite 306, Anchorage, AK 99510-2252,
phone 907-271-2809, or from the Council's Web site at https://alaskafisheries.noaa.gov/npfmc.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Steve Whitney, 907-586-7269.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Federal regulations at 50 CFR part 679
implement the Fishery Management Plan for Groundfish of the Bering Sea
and Aleutian Islands Management Area (FMP) and govern the groundfish
fisheries in the BSAI. The Council prepared the FMP and NMFS approved
it under the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act
(Magnuson-Stevens Act). General regulations governing U.S. fisheries
also appear at 50 CFR part 600.
The FMP and its implementing regulations require NMFS, after
consultation with the Council, to specify annually the total allowable
catch (TAC) for each target species and the ``other species'' category,
the sum of which must be within the optimum yield range of 1.4 million
to 2.0 million metric tons (mt) (see Sec. 679.20(a)(1)(i)). Section
679.20(c)(1) further requires NMFS to publish proposed harvest
specifications in the Federal Register and solicit public comments on
proposed annual TACs and apportionments thereof, prohibited species
catch (PSC) allowances, and prohibited species quota (PSQ) reserves
established by Sec. 679.21, seasonal allowances of pollock, Pacific
cod, and Atka mackerel TAC, American Fisheries Act allocations,
Amendment 80 allocations, and Community Development Quota (CDQ) reserve
amounts established by Sec. 679.20(b)(1)(ii). The proposed harvest
specifications set forth in Tables 1 through 12 of this action satisfy
these requirements.
Under Sec. 679.20(c)(3), NMFS will publish the final harvest
specifications for 2010 and 2011 after (1) considering comments
received within the comment period (see DATES), (2) consulting with the
Council at its December 2009 meeting, and (3) considering new
information presented in the final 2009 SAFE reports prepared for the
2010 and 2011 groundfish fisheries.
Other Actions Potentially Affecting the 2010 and 2011 Harvest
Specifications
The Council is developing an amendment to the FMP to comply with
Magnuson-Stevens Act requirements associated with annual catch limits
and accountability measures. That amendment may result in revisions to
how total annual groundfish mortality is estimated and accounted for in
the annual SAFE reports, which in turn may affect the OFL, ABC, and TAC
for certain groundfish species. NMFS will attempt to identify
additional sources of mortality to groundfish stocks not currently
reported or considered by the groundfish stock assessments in
recommending OFL, ABC, and TAC for certain groundfish species. These
additional sources of mortality may include recreational fishing,
subsistence fishing, catch of groundfish during the NMFS trawl and
hook-and-line surveys, catch taken under experimental fishing permits
issued by NMFS, discarded catch of groundfish in the commercial halibut
fisheries, use of groundfish as bait in the crab fisheries, or other
sources of mortality not yet identified.
At its October 2009 meeting the Council approved Amendment 95 to
the FMP. This amendment would separate skates from the ``other
species'' category so that individual OFLs, ABCs, and TACs may be
established for skates. If the Secretary of Commerce approves the
amendment, the change would be in effect for the 2011 fishing year.
At its April 2009 meeting the Council adopted Amendment 91 to the
FMP. This amendment would establish new measures to minimize Chinook
salmon bycatch in the Bering Sea pollock fisheries, including new
Chinook salmon PSC limits that when reached would prohibit directed
fishing for pollock. If approved, Amendment 91 could be effective by
2011.
Proposed ABC and TAC Harvest Specifications
The proposed ABC levels are based on the best available biological
information, including projected biomass trends, information on assumed
distribution of stock biomass, and revised technical methods used to
calculate stock biomass. In general, the development of ABCs and OFLs
involves sophisticated statistical analyses of fish populations. The
FMP specifies a series of six tiers based on the level of reliable
information available to fishery scientists. Tier one represents the
highest level of information quality available while tier six
represents the lowest level of information quality available.
Appendix A to the final 2008 SAFE report dated November 2008 (see
ADDRESSES) sets forth the best information currently available.
Information on the status of stocks, including the 2009 survey results,
will be updated and considered by the Council's Groundfish Plan Team
(Plan Team) in November 2009 for the 2009 SAFE report. The final 2010
and 2011 harvest specifications will be based on the 2009 SAFE report.
In October 2009, the Scientific and Statistical Committee (SSC),
Advisory Panel, and the Council reviewed the Plan Team's recommended
proposed 2010 and 2011 OFL and ABC amounts. The SSC concurred with the
Plan Team's recommendations. The recommendations are based on rollovers
of the current 2010 amounts, except for Bering Sea pollock. The Bering
Sea pollock OFL and ABC amounts are based on 2009 amounts that are
lower than the 2010 amounts. This recommendation uses the best
[[Page 63102]]
information available from the 2008 stock assessments.
The Council adopted the OFL and ABC amounts recommended by the SSC
(Table 1). The Council recommended that all the proposed 2010 and 2011
TAC amounts be set equal to the 2010 TAC amounts except for Bering Sea
pollock that was set equal to the 2009 TAC amount. The Plan Team
recommended and the SSC, AP, and Council approved the use of the lower
amount used in 2009 as a notice to the public that the 2010 Bering Sea
pollock spawning biomass is not expected to be as high as projected in
2008.
As in previous years, the Plan Team, Advisory Panel, SSC, and
Council recommended that total removals of Pacific cod from the BSAI
not exceed ABC recommendations. Accordingly, the Council recommended
that the proposed 2010 and 2011 Pacific cod TACs be adjusted downward
from the ABCs by amounts equal to 3 percent of the ABC. This adjustment
is necessary to account for the guideline harvest level established for
Pacific cod by the State of Alaska (State) for a State-managed fishery
that occurs in State waters in the AI subarea.
Finally, the Council recommended using the 2010 PSC allowances for
the proposed 2010 and 2011 PSC allowances. The Council will reconsider
the OFL, ABC, TAC, and PSC amounts in December 2009 after the Plan Team
incorporates new status of groundfish stocks information into a final
2009 SAFE report for the 2010 and 2011 BSAI groundfish fisheries. None
of the Council's recommended proposed TACs for 2010 or 2011 exceeds the
recommended 2010 or 2011 proposed ABCs for any species category. NMFS
finds the Council's recommended proposed 2010 and 2011 OFL, ABC, and
TAC amounts consistent with the best available information on the
biological condition of the groundfish stocks.
The proposed amounts are subject to change pending the completion
of the 2009 SAFE report and the Council's recommendations for final
2010 and 2011 harvest specifications during its December 2009 meeting.
Table 1 lists the proposed 2010 and 2011 OFL, ABC, TAC, initial TAC
(ITAC), and CDQ amounts for groundfish for the BSAI. The proposed
apportionment of TAC amounts among fisheries and seasons is discussed
below.
Table 1--Proposed 2010 and 2011 Overfishing Level (OFL), Acceptable Biological Catch (ABC), Total Allowable
Catch (TAC), Initial TAC (ITAC), and CDQ Reserve Allocation of Groundfish in the BSAI \1\
(Amounts are in metric tons)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Proposed 2010 and 2011
Species Area ----------------------------------------------------------------
OFL ABC TAC ITAC \2\ CDQ \3,4,5\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pollock...................... BS.............. 977,000 815,000 815,000 733,500 81,500
AI.............. 36,800 30,400 19,000 17,100 1,900
Bogoslof........ 58,400 7,970 10 10 ...........
Pacific cod \4\.............. BSAI............ 235,000 199,000 193,030 172,376 20,654
Sablefish \5\................ BS.............. 2,980 2,520 2,520 1,109 98
AI.............. 2,410 2,040 2,040 474 41
Atka mackerel................ BSAI............ 84,400 71,100 71,100 63,492 7,608
EAI/BS.......... ........... 22,900 22,900 20,450 2,450
CAI............. ........... 28,500 28,500 25,451 3,050
WAI............. ........... 19,700 19,700 17,592 2,108
Yellowfin sole............... BSAI............ 210,000 198,000 180,000 160,740 19,260
Rock sole.................... BSAI............ 314,000 310,000 75,000 66,975 8,025
Greenland tubot.............. BSAI............ 14,400 7,130 7,130 6,061 n/a
BS.............. ........... 4,920 4,920 4,182 526
AI.............. ........... 2,210 2,210 1,879 ...........
Arrowtooth flounder.......... BSAI............ 196,000 161,000 60,000 51,000 6,420
Flathead sole................ BSAI............ 81,800 69,800 50,000 44,650 5,350
Other flatfish \6\........... BSAI............ 23,100 17,400 17,400 14,790 ...........
Alaska plaice................ BSAI............ 354,000 275,000 30,000 25,500 ...........
Pacific ocean perch.......... BSAI............ 22,100 18,600 18,600 16,447 n/a
BS.............. ........... 3,780 3,780 3,213 ...........
EAI............. ........... 4,160 4,160 3,715 445
CAI............. ........... 4,210 4,210 3,760 450
WAI............. ........... 6,450 6,450 5,760 690
Northern rockfish............ BSAI............ 8,580 7,190 6,000 5,100 ...........
Shortraker rockfish.......... BSAI............ 516 387 387 329 ...........
Rougheye rockfish............ BSAI............ 640 552 552 469 ...........
Other rockfish \7\........... BSAI............ 1,380 1,040 1,040 884 ...........
BS.............. ........... 485 485 412 ...........
AI.............. ........... 555 555 472 ...........
Squid........................ BSAI............ 2,620 1,970 1,970 1,675 ...........
Other species \8\............ BSAI............ 80,700 63,680 34,221 29,088 ...........
----------------------------------------------------------------
Total.................... ................ 2,706,826 2,259,779 1,585,000 1,411,768 152,968
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ These amounts apply to the entire BSAI management area unless otherwise specified. With the exception of
pollock, and for the purpose of these harvest specifications, the Bering Sea (BS) subarea includes the
Bogoslof District.
\2\ Except for pollock, the portion of the sablefish TAC allocated to hook-and-line and pot gear, and Amendment
80 species, 15 percent of each TAC is put into a reserve. The ITAC for these species is the remainder of the
TAC after the subtraction of these reserves.
\3\ Under Sec. 679.20(a)(5)(i)(A)(1), the annual Bering Sea subarea pollock TAC, after subtracting first for
the CDQ directed fishing allowance (10 percent) and second for the incidental catch allowance (4 percent), is
further allocated by sector for a directed pollock fishery as follows: inshore--50 percent; catcher/processor--
40 percent; and motherships--10 percent. Under Sec. 679.20(a)(5)(iii)(B)(2)(i) and (ii), the annual Aleutian
Islands subarea pollock TAC, after subtracting first for the CDQ directed fishing allowance (10 percent) and
second for the incidental catch allowance (1,600 mt), is allocated to the Aleut Corporation for a directed
pollock fishery.
[[Page 63103]]
\4\ The Pacific cod TAC is reduced by three percent from the ABC to account for the State of Alaska's (State)
guideline harvest level in State waters of the Aleutian Islands subarea.
\5\ For the Amendment 80 species (Atka mackerel, Aleutian Islands Pacific ocean perch, yellowfin sole, rock
sole, flathead sole, and Pacific cod), 10.7 percent of the TAC is reserved for use by CDQ participants (see
Sec. Sec. 679.20(b)(1)(ii)(C) and 679.31). Twenty percent of the sablefish TAC allocated to hook-and-line
gear or pot gear, 7.5 percent of the sablefish TAC allocated to trawl gear, and 10.7 percent of the TACs for
Bering Sea Greenland turbot and arrowtooth flounder are reserved for use by CDQ participants (see Sec.
679.20(b)(1)(ii)(B) and (D)). Aleutian Islands Greenland turbot, ``other flatfish,'' Alaska plaice, Bering Sea
Pacific ocean perch, northern rockfish, shortraker rockfish, rougheye rockfish, ``other rockfish,'' squid, and
``other species'' are not allocated to the CDQ program.
\6\ ``Other flatfish'' includes all flatfish species, except for halibut (a prohibited species), flathead sole,
Greenland turbot, rock sole, yellowfin sole, arrowtooth flounder, and Alaska plaice.
\7\ ``Other rockfish'' includes all Sebastes and Sebastolobus species except for Pacific ocean perch, northern,
shortraker, and rougheye rockfish.
\8\ ``Other species'' includes sculpins, sharks, skates, and octopus. Forage fish, as defined at Sec. 679.2,
are not included in the ``other species'' category. Pending approval of amendment 95 from the Secretary,
skates will be broken out from the ``other species'' category in the 2011 fishing year. The OFL, ABC, and TAC
for ``other species'' will be 42,507, 31,680, and 31,680 mt, respectively. The OFL, ABC, and TAC for skates
will be 38,200, 32,000, and 30,000 mt, respectively.
Reserves and the Incidental Catch Allowance (ICA) for Pollock, Atka
Mackerel, Flathead Sole, Rock Sole, Yellowfin Sole, and Aleutian
Islands Pacific Ocean Perch
Section 679.20(b)(1)(i) requires the placement of 15 percent of the
TAC for each target species or ``other species'' category, except for
pollock, the hook-and-line and pot gear allocation of sablefish, and
the Amendment 80 species, in a non-specified reserve. Section
679.20(b)(1)(ii)(B) requires that 20 percent of the hook-and-line and
pot gear allocation of sablefish be allocated to the fixed gear
sablefish CDQ reserve. Section 679.20(b)(1)(ii)(D) requires that 7.5
percent of the trawl gear allocations of sablefish and 10.7 percent of
Bering Sea Greenland turbot and arrowtooth flounder be allocated to the
respective CDQ reserves. Section 679.20(b)(1)(ii)(C) requires that 10.7
percent of the TACs for Atka mackerel, Aleutian Islands Pacific ocean
perch, yellowfin sole, rock sole, flathead sole, and Pacific cod be
allocated to the CDQ reserves. Sections 679.20(a)(5)(i)(A) and
679.31(a) also require the allocation of 10 percent of the BSAI pollock
TACs to the pollock CDQ directed fishing allowance (DFA). The entire
Bogoslof District pollock TAC is allocated as an ICA (see Sec.
679.20(a)(5)(ii)). With the exception of the hook-and-line and pot gear
sablefish CDQ reserve, the regulations do not further apportion the CDQ
reserves by gear. Section 679.21(e)(3)(i)(A) requires withholding 7.5
percent of the Chinook salmon PSC limit, 10.7 percent of the crab and
non-Chinook salmon PSC limits, and 343 mt of halibut PSC as PSQ
reserves for the CDQ fisheries. Sections 679.30 and 679.31 set forth
regulations governing the management of the CDQ and PSQ reserves.
Pursuant to Sec. 679.20(a)(5)(i)(A)(1), NMFS proposes a pollock
ICA of 4 percent of the Bering Sea subarea pollock TAC after
subtraction of the 10 percent CDQ reserve. This allowance is based on
NMFS's examination of the pollock incidental catch, including the
incidental catch by CDQ vessels, in target fisheries other than pollock
from 1999 through 2009. During this 11-year period, the pollock
incidental catch ranged from a low of 2.4 percent in 2006 to a high of
5 percent in 1999, with an 11-year average of 3.2 percent. Pursuant to
Sec. 679.20(a)(5)(iii)(B)(2)(i) and (ii), NMFS proposes a pollock ICA
of 1,600 mt for the AI subarea after subtraction of the 10 percent CDQ
DFA. This allowance is based on NMFS's examination of the pollock
incidental catch, including the incidental catch by CDQ vessels, in
target fisheries other than pollock from 2003 through 2009. During this
7-year period, the incidental catch of pollock ranged from a low of 5
percent in 2006 to a high of 10 percent in 2003, with a 7-year average
of 7 percent.
Pursuant to Sec. 679.20(a)(8) and (10), NMFS proposes ICAs of
5,500 mt of flathead sole, 10,000 mt of rock sole, 2,000 mt of
yellowfin sole, 50 mt each of Western and Central Aleutian District
Pacific ocean perch, 100 mt of Eastern Aleutian District Pacific ocean
perch, 50 mt for Western Aleutian District Atka mackerel, 75 mt for
Central Aleutian District Atka mackerel, and 75 mt of Eastern Aleutian
District and Bering Sea subarea Atka mackerel after subtraction of the
10.7 percent CDQ reserve. These allowances are based on NMFS's
examination of the incidental catch in other target fisheries from 2003
through 2009.
The regulations do not designate the remainder of the non-specified
reserve by species or species group. Any amount of the reserve may be
apportioned to a target species that contributed to the non-specified
reserve and the ``other species'' category during the year, provided
that such apportionments do not result in overfishing (see Sec.
679.20(b)(1)(i)).
Allocations of Pollock TAC Under the American Fisheries Act (AFA)
Section 679.20(a)(5)(i)(A) requires that the pollock TAC
apportioned to the Bering Sea subarea, after subtraction of 10 percent
for the CDQ program and 4 percent for the ICA, be allocated as a DFA as
follows: 50 percent to the inshore sector, 40 percent to the catcher/
processor sector, and 10 percent to the mothership sector. In the
Bering Sea subarea, 40 percent of the DFA is allocated to the A season
(January 20 to June 10) and 60 percent of the DFA is allocated to the B
season (June 10 to November 1) Sec. 679.20(a)(5)(i)(B). The AI
directed pollock fishery allocation to the Aleut Corporation is the
amount of pollock remaining in the AI subarea after subtracting 1,900
mt for the CDQ DFA (10 percent) and 1,600 mt for the ICA Sec.
679.20(a)(5)(iii)(B)(2)(ii). In the AI subarea, 40 percent of the ABC
is allocated to the A season and the remainder of the directed pollock
fishery is allocated to the B season. Table 2 lists these proposed 2010
and 2011 amounts.
Section 679.20(a)(5)(i)(A)(4) also includes several specific
requirements regarding Bering Sea subarea pollock allocations. First,
8.5 percent of the pollock allocated to the catcher/processor sector
will be available for harvest by AFA catcher vessels with catcher/
processor sector endorsements, unless the Regional Administrator
receives a cooperative contract that provides for the distribution of
harvest among AFA catcher/processors and AFA catcher vessels in a
manner agreed to by all members. Second, AFA catcher/processors not
listed in the AFA are limited to harvesting not more than 0.5 percent
of the pollock allocated to the catcher/processor sector. Table 2 lists
the proposed 2010 and 2011 allocations of pollock TAC. Tables 9 through
12 list the AFA catcher/processor and catcher vessel harvesting
sideboard limits. In past years, the proposed harvest specifications
included text and tables describing pollock allocations to the Bering
Sea subarea inshore pollock cooperatives and open access sector. These
allocations are based on the submission of AFA inshore cooperative
applications due to NMFS on December 1 of each calendar year. Because
AFA inshore cooperative applications for 2010 have not been submitted
to NMFS, thereby
[[Page 63104]]
preventing NMFS from calculating 2010 allocations, NMFS has not
included inshore cooperative text and tables in these proposed harvest
specifications. NMFS will post 2010 AFA inshore cooperative allocations
on the Alaska Region Web site at https://www.alaskafisheries.noaa.gov
when they become available in December 2009.
Table 2 also lists proposed seasonal apportionments of pollock and
harvest limits within the Steller Sea Lion Conservation Area (SCA). The
harvest of pollock within the SCA, as defined at Sec.
679.22(a)(7)(vii), is limited to 28 percent of the DFA until April 1
Sec. 679.20(a)(5)(i)(C) . The remaining 12 percent of the 40 percent
annual DFA allocated to the A season may be taken outside the SCA
before April 1 or inside the SCA after April 1. If less than 28 percent
of the annual DFA is taken inside the SCA before April 1, the remainder
will be available to be taken inside the SCA after April 1. The A
season pollock SCA harvest limit will be apportioned to each sector in
proportion to each sector's allocated percentage of the DFA. Table 2
lists by sector these proposed 2010 and 2011 amounts.
Table 2--Proposed 2010 and 2011 Allocations of Pollock TACS to the Directed Pollock Fisheries and to the CDQ
Directed Fishing Allowances (DFA) \1\
[Amounts are in metric tons]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2010 and 2011 A season 2010 and 2011
2010 and 2011 -------------------------------- B season \1\
Area and sector allocations SCA harvest ---------------
A season DFA limit \2\ B season DFA
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bering Sea subarea TAC.......................... 815,000 n/a n/a n/a
CDQ DFA......................................... 81,500 32,600 22,820 48,900
ICA \1\......................................... 29,340 n/a n/a n/a
AFA Inshore..................................... 352,080 140,832 98,582 211,248
AFA Catcher/Processors \3\...................... 281,664 112,666 78,866 168,998
Catch by C/Ps............................... 257,723 103,089 n/a 154,634
Catch by C/Vs \3\........................... 23,941 9,577 n/a 14,365
Unlisted C/P Limit \4\.................. 1,408 563 n/a 845
AFA Motherships................................. 70,416 28,166 19,716 42,250
Excessive Harvesting Limit \5\.................. 123,228 n/a n/a n/a
Excessive Processing Limit \6\.................. 211,248 n/a n/a n/a
Total Bering Sea DFA (non-CDQ).................. 704,160 281,664 197,165 422,496
---------------------------------------------------------------
Aleutian Islands subarea \1\.................... 19,000 n/a n/a n/a
CDQ DFA......................................... 1,900 760 n/a 1,140
ICA............................................. 1,600 800 n/a 800
Aleut Corporation............................... 15,500 10,600 n/a 4,900
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bogoslof District ICA\7\........................ 10 n/a n/a n/a
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Pursuant to Sec. 679.20(a)(5)(i)(A), the annual Bering Sea subarea pollock TAC, after subtraction for the
CDQ DFA (10 percent) and the ICA (4 percent), is allocated as a DFA as follows: inshore sector 50 percent,
catcher/processor sector 40 percent, and mothership sector 10 percent. In the Bering Sea subarea, 40 percent
of the DFA is allocated to the A season (January 20 to June 10) and 60 percent of the DFA is allocated to the
B season (June 10 to November 1). Pursuant to Sec. 679.20(a)(5)(iii)(B)(2)(i) and (ii), the annual AI
pollock TAC, after subtracting first for the CDQ DFA (10 percent) and second the ICA (1,600 mt), is allocated
to the Aleut Corporation for a directed pollock fishery. In the AI subarea, the A season is allocated 40
percent of the ABC and the B season is allocated the remainder of the directed pollock fishery.
\2\ In the Bering Sea subarea, no more than 28 percent of each sector's annual DFA may be taken from the SCA
before April 1. The remaining 12 percent of the annual DFA allocated to the A season may be taken outside of
the SCA before April 1 or inside the SCA after April 1. If 28 percent of the annual DFA is not taken inside
the SCA before April 1, the remainder is available to be taken inside the SCA after April 1.
\3\ Pursuant to Sec. 679.20(a)(5)(i)(A)(4), not less than 8.5 percent of the DFA allocated to listed catcher/
processors (C/Ps) shall be available for harvest only by eligible catcher vessels (CVs) delivering to listed
catcher/processors.
\4\ Pursuant to Sec. 679.20(a)(5)(i)(A)(4)(iii), the AFA unlisted catcher/processors are limited to harvesting
not more than 0.5 percent of the catcher/processors sector's allocation of pollock.
\5\ Pursuant to Sec. 679.20(a)(5)(i)(A)(6) NMFS establishes an excessive harvesting share limit equal to 17.5
percent of the sum of the pollock DFAs not including CDQ.
\6\ Pursuant to Sec. 679.20(a)(5)(i)(A)(7) NMFS establishes an excessive processing share limit equal to 30.0
percent of the sum of the pollock DFAs not including CDQ.
\7\ The Regional Administrator proposes closing the Bogoslof pollock fishery for directed fishing under the
final 2010 and 2011 harvest specifications for the BSAI. The amounts specified are for incidental catch only
and are not apportioned by season or sector.
Allocation of the Atka Mackerel TACs
Section 679.20(a)(8)(ii) allocates the Atka mackerel TACs to the
Amendment 80 and BSAI trawl limited access sectors, after subtraction
of the CDQ reserves, jig gear allocation, and ICAs for the BSAI trawl
limited access sector and non-trawl gear (Table 3). The allocation of
the ITAC for Atka mackerel to the Amendment 80 and BSAI trawl limited
access sectors is established in Table 33 to part 679 and Sec. 679.91.
The 2011 allocations for Amendment 80 species between Amendment 80
cooperatives and the Amendment 80 limited access sector will not be
known until November 1, 2010, when eligible participants apply for
participation in the program.
Pursuant to Sec. 679.20(a)(8)(i), up to 2 percent of the Eastern
Aleutian District and Bering Sea subarea Atka mackerel ITAC may be
allocated to jig gear. The amount of this allocation is determined
annually by the Council based on several criteria, including the
anticipated harvest capacity of the jig gear fleet. The Council
recommended and NMFS proposes a 0.5 percent allocation of the Atka
mackerel ITAC in the Eastern Aleutian District and Bering Sea subarea
to jig gear in 2010 and 2011. Based on the proposed 2010 and 2011 TAC
of 20,250 mt after subtractions of the CDQ reserve and ICA, the jig
gear
[[Page 63105]]
allocation would be 102 mt for 2010 and 2011.
Section 679.20(a)(8)(iv) apportions the Atka mackerel ITAC into two
equal seasonal allowances. The first seasonal allowance is made
available for directed fishing from January 1 (January 20 for trawl
gear) to April 15 (A season), and the second seasonal allowance is made
available from September 1 to November 1 (B season). The jig gear
allocation is not apportioned by season.
Pursuant to Sec. 679.20(a)(8)(ii), the Regional Administrator will
establish a harvest limit area (HLA) limit of no more than 60 percent
of the seasonal TAC for the Western and Central Aleutian Districts.
NMFS will establish HLA limits for the CDQ reserve and each of the
three non-CDQ fishery categories: the BSAI trawl limited access sector,
the Amendment 80 limited access fishery, and an aggregate HLA limit
applicable to all Amendment 80 cooperatives. NMFS will assign vessels
in each of the three non-CDQ fishery categories that apply to fish for
Atka mackerel in the HLA to an HLA fishery based on a random lottery of
the vessels that apply (see Sec. 679.20(a)(8)(iii)). There is no
allocation of Atka mackerel to the BSAI trawl limited access sector in
the Western Aleutian District. Therefore, no vessels in the BSAI trawl
limited access sector will be assigned to the Western Aleutian District
HLA fishery.
Each trawl sector will have a separate lottery. A maximum of two
HLA fisheries will be established in Area 542 for the BSAI trawl
limited access sector. A maximum of four HLA fisheries will be
established for vessels assigned to Amendment 80 cooperatives: a first
and second HLA fishery in Area 542, and a first and second HLA fishery
in Area 543. A maximum of four HLA fisheries will be established for
vessels assigned to the Amendment 80 limited access fishery: A first
and second HLA fishery in Area 542, and a first and second HLA fishery
in Area 543. NMFS will initially open fishing for the first HLA fishery
in all three fishery categories at the same time. The initial opening
of fishing in the HLA will be based on the first directed fishing
closure of Atka mackerel for the Eastern Aleutian District and Bering
Sea subarea allocation for any one of the three non-CDQ fishery
categories allocated Atka mackerel TAC.
Table 3--Proposed 2010 and 2011 Seasonal and Spatial Allowances, Gear Shares, CDQ Reserve, Incidental Catch Allowance, and Amendment 80 Allocations of
the BSAI ATKA Mackerel TAC
[Amounts are in metric tons]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2010 allocation by area 2011 allocation by area
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eastern Eastern
Sector \2\ Season 1 3 4 Aleutian Central Western Aleutian Central Western
District/ Aleutian Aleutian District/ Aleutian Aleutian
Bering Sea District District Bering Sea District District
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TAC........................................ n/a.......................... 22,900 28,500 19,700 22,900 28,500 19,700
CDQ reserve................................ Total........................ 2,450 3,050 2,108 2,450 3,050 2,108
HLA \5\...................... n/a 1,830 1,265 n/a 1,830 1,265
ICA........................................ Total........................ 75 75 50 75 75 50
Jig \6\.................................... Total........................ 102 0 0 102 0 0
BSAI trawl limited access.................. Total........................ 1,216 1,523 0 1,622 2,030 0
A............................ 608 761 0 811 1,015 0
HLA.......................... n/a 457 0 n/a 609 0
B............................ 608 761 0 811 1,015 0
HLA.......................... n/a 457 0 n/a 609 0
Amendment 80 limited access................ Total........................ 10,129 14,358 10,814 n/a n/a n/a
A............................ 5,065 7,179 5,407 n/a n/a n/a
HLA.......................... n/a 4,308 3,244 n/a n/a n/a
B............................ 5,065 7,179 5,407 n/a n/a n/a
HLA.......................... n/a 4,308 3,244 n/a n/a n/a
Amendment 80 cooperatives.................. Total........................ 8,927 9,495 6,728 n/a n/a n/a
A............................ 4,464 4,747 3,364 n/a n/a n/a
HLA.......................... n/a 2,848 2,018 n/a n/a n/a
B............................ 4,464 4,747 3,364 n/a n/a n/a
HLA.......................... n/a 2,848 2,018 n/a n/a n/a
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Regulations at Sec. Sec. 679.20(a)(8)(ii)(A) and 679.22(a) establish temporal and spatial limitations for the Atka mackerel fishery.
\2\ Section 679.20(a)(8)(ii) allocates the Atka mackerel TACs, after subtraction of the CDQ reserves, ICAs, and the jig gear allocation, to the
Amendment 80 and BSAI trawl limited access sectors. The allocation of the ITAC for Atka mackerel to the Amendment 80 and BSAI trawl limited access
sectors is established in Table 33 to part 679 and Sec. 679.91. The CDQ reserve is 10.7 percent of the TAC for use by CDQ participants (see Sec.
Sec. 679.20(b)(1)(ii)(C) and 679.31).
\3\ The seasonal allowances of Atka mackerel are 50 percent in the A season and 50 percent in the B season.
\4\ The A season is January 1 (January 20 for trawl gear) to April 15, and the B season is September 1 to November 1.
\5\ Harvest Limit Area (HLA) limit refers to the amount of each seasonal allowance that is available for fishing inside the HLA (see Sec. 679.2). In
2010 and 2011, 60 percent of each seasonal allowance is available for fishing inside the HLA in the Western and Central Aleutian Districts.
\6\ Section 679.20(a)(8)(i) requires that up to 2 percent of the Eastern Aleutian District and Bering Sea subarea TAC be allocated to jig gear after
subtraction of the CDQ reserve and ICA. The amount of this allocation is 0.5 percent. The jig gear allocation is not apportioned by season.
[[Page 63106]]
Allocation of the Pacific Cod TAC
Sections 679.20(a)(7)(i) and (ii) require that the Pacific cod TAC
in the BSAI, after subtraction of 10.7 percent for the CDQ program, be
allocated as follows: 1.4 percent to vessels using jig gear, 2.0
percent to hook-and-line and pot catcher vessels less than 60 ft (18.3
m) length overall (LOA), 0.2 percent to hook-and-line catcher vessels
greater than or equal to 60 ft (18.3 m) LOA, 48.7 percent to hook-and-
line catcher/processors, 8.4 percent to pot catcher vessels greater
than or equal to 60 ft (18.3 m) LOA, 1.5 percent to pot catcher/
processors, 2.3 percent to AFA trawl catcher/processors, 13.4 percent
to non-AFA trawl catcher/processors, and 22.1 percent to trawl catcher
vessels. The ICA for the hook-and-line and pot sectors will be deducted
from the aggregate portion of Pacific cod TAC allocated to the hook-
and-line and pot sectors. For 2010 and 2011 the Regional Administrator
proposes an ICA of 500 mt based on anticipated incidental catch in
these fisheries. The allocation of the ITAC for Pacific cod to the
Amendment 80 sector is established in Table 33 to part 679 and Sec.
679.91.
The Pacific cod ITAC is apportioned into seasonal allowances to
disperse the Pacific cod fisheries over the fishing year (see
Sec. Sec. 679.20(a)(7) and 679.23(e)(5)). In accordance with Sec.
679.20(a)(7)(iv)(B) and (C), any unused portion of a seasonal Pacific
cod allowance will become available at the beginning of the next
seasonal allowance.
The CDQ and non-CDQ season allowances by gear based on the proposed
2010 and 2011 Pacific cod TACs are listed in Table 4 based on the
sector allocation percentages of Pacific cod set forth at Sec. Sec.
679.20(a)(7)(i)(B) and 679.20(a)(7)(iv)(A); and the seasonal allowances
of Pacific cod set forth at Sec. 679.23(e)(5).
Table 4--Proposed 2010 and 2011 Gear Shares and Seasonal Allowances of the BSAI Pacific Cod TAC
[Amounts are in metric tons]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2010 and 2010 and 2011 seasonal
2011 share 2010 and apportionment
Gear sector Percent of gear 2011 share ------------------------------------
sector of sector
total total Season Amount
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total TAC........................... 100 193,030 n/a n/a................... n/a
CDQ................................. 10.7 20,654 n/a See Sec. n/a
679.20(a)(7)(i)(B).
Total hook-and-line/pot gear........ 60.8 104,804 n/a n/a................... n/a
Hook-and-line/pot ICA \1\........... n/a n/a 500 n/a................... n/a
Hook-and-line/pot sub-total......... n/a 104,304 n/a n/a................... n/a
Hook-and-line catcher/processors.... 48.7 n/a 83,547 Jan 1-Jun 10.......... 42,609
Jun 10-Dec 31......... 40,938
Hook-and-line catcher vessels >= 60 0.2 n/a 343 Jan 1-Jun 10.......... 175
ft LOA. Jun 10-Dec 31......... 168
Pot catcher/processors.............. 1.5 n/a 2,573 Jan 1-Jun 10.......... 1,312
Sept 1-Dec 31......... 1,261
Pot catcher vessels= 60 8.4 n/a 14,410 Jan 1-Jun 10.......... 7,349
ft LOA. Sept-1-Dec 31......... 7,061
Catcher vessels < 60 ft LOA using 2 n/a 3,431 n/a................... n/a
hook-and-line or pot gear.
Trawl catcher vessels............... 22.1 38,095 n/a Jan 20-Apr 1.......... 28,190
Apr 1-Jun 10.......... 4,190
Jun 10-Nov 1.......... 5,714
AFA trawl catcher processors........ 2.3 3,965 n/a Jan 20-Apr 1.......... 2,973
Apr 1-Jun 10.......... 991
Jun 10-Nov 1.......... 0
Amendment 80........................ 13.4 23,098 n/a Jan 20-Apr 1.......... 17,324
Apr 1-Jun 10.......... 5,775
Jun 10-Nov 1.......... 0
Amendment 80 limited access for 2010 n/a 3,795 n/a Jan 20-Apr 1.......... 2,847
only \2\. Apr 1-Jun 10.......... 949
Jun 10-Nov 1.......... 0
Amendment 80 cooperative for 2010 n/a 19,303 n/a Jan 20-Apr 1.......... 14,477
only \2\. Apr 1-Jun 10.......... 4,826
Jun 10-Nov 1.......... 0
Jig................................. 1.4 2,413 n/a Jan 1-Apr 30.......... 1,448
Apr 30-Aug 31......... 483
Aug 31-Dec 31......... 483
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The ICA for the hook-and-line and pot sectors will be deducted from the aggregate portion of Pacific cod TAC
allocated to the hook-and-line and pot sectors. The Regional Administrator proposes an ICA of 500 mt for 2010
and 2011 based on anticipated incidental catch in these fisheries.
\2\ The 2011 allocations for Amendment 80 species between Amendment 80 cooperatives and the Amendment 80 limited
access sector will not be known until eligible participants apply for participation in the program by November
1, 2010.
[[Page 63107]]
Sablefish Gear Allocation
Section 679.20(a)(4)(iii) and (iv) requires the allocation of
sablefish TACs for the Bering Sea and AI subareas between trawl gear
and hook-and-line or pot gear. Gear allocations of the TACs for the
Bering Sea subarea are 50 percent for trawl gear and 50 percent for
hook-and-line or pot gear and for the AI subarea are 25 percent for
trawl gear and 75 percent for hook-and-line or pot gear. Section
679.20(b)(1)(ii)(B) requires apportionment of 20 percent of the hook-
and-line and pot gear allocation of sablefish to the CDQ reserve.
Additionally, Sec. 679.20(b)(1)(ii)(D) requires apportionment of 7.5
percent of the trawl gear allocation of sablefish to the CDQ reserve.
The Council recommended that only trawl sablefish TAC be established
biennially. The harvest specifications for the hook-and-line gear and
pot gear sablefish Individual Fishing Quota (IFQ) fisheries will be
limited to the 2010 fishing year to ensure those fisheries are
conducted concurrently with the halibut IFQ fishery. Concurrent
sablefish and halibut IFQ fisheries would reduce the potential for
discards of halibut and sablefish in those fisheries. The sablefish IFQ
fisheries would remain closed at the beginning of each fishing year
until the final harvest specifications for the sablefish IFQ fisheries
are in effect. Table 5 lists the proposed 2010 and 2011 gear
allocations of the sablefish TAC and CDQ reserve amounts.
Table 5--Proposed 2010 and 2011 Gear Shares and CDQ Reserve of BSAI Sablefish TACS
[Amounts are in metric tons]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Percent of 2010 Share 2010 ITAC 2010 CDQ 2011 Share 2011 CDQ
Subarea and gear TAC of TAC \1\ reserve of TAC 2011 ITAC reserve
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bering Sea:
Trawl.................................................... 50 1,260 1,071 95 1,260 1,071 95
Hook-and-line gear \2\................................... 50 1,260 n/a 252 n/a n/a n/a
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total................................................ 100 2,520 1,071 347 2,520 1,071 95
Aleutian Islands:
Trawl.................................................... 25 510 434 38 510 434 38
Hook-and-line gear \2\................................... 75 1,530 n/a 306 n/a n/a n/a
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total................................................ 100 2,040 434 344 2,040 434 38
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Except for the sablefish hook-and-line or pot gear allocation, 15 percent of TAC is apportioned to the reserve. The ITAC is the remainder of the TAC
after the subtraction of these reserves.
\2\ For the portion of the sablefish TAC allocated to vessels using hook-and-line or pot gear, 20 percent of the allocated TAC is reserved for use by
CDQ participants. Section 679.20(b)(1) does not provide for the establishment of an ITAC for sablefish allocated to hook-and-line or pot gear.
Allocation of the Aleutian Islands Pacific Ocean Perch, Flathead Sole,
Rock Sole, and Yellowfin Sole TACs
Sections 679.20(a)(10)(i) and (ii) require the allocation between
the Amendment 80 and BSAI trawl limited access sectors for Aleutian
Islands Pacific ocean perch, flathead sole, rock sole, and yellowfin
sole TACs in the BSAI, after subtraction of 10.7 percent for the CDQ
reserve and an ICA for the BSAI trawl limited access sector and vessels
using non-trawl gear. The allocation of the ITAC for Aleutian Islands
Pacific ocean perch, flathead sole, rock sole, and yellowfin sole to
the Amendment 80 sector is established in Tables 33 and 34 to part 679
and Sec. 679.91. The 2011 allocations for Amendment 80 species between
Amendment 80 cooperatives and the Amendment 80 limited access sector
will not be known until November 1, 2010, when eligible participants
apply for participation in the program. Table 6 lists the proposed 2010
and 2011 allocations and seasonal apportionments of the Aleutian
Islands Pacific ocean perch, flathead sole, rock sole, and yellowfin
sole TACs.
Table 6--Proposed 2010 and 2011 Community Development Quota (CDQ) Reserves, Incidental Catch Amounts (ICAS), and
Amendment 80 Allocations of the Aleutian Islands Pacific Ocean Perch, Flathead Sole, Rock Sole, and Yellowfin
Sole TACS
[Amounts are in metric tons]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2010 and 2011 allocations
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pacific ocean perch Flathead Rock sole Yellowfin
Sector --------------------------------------- sole ------------- sole
Eastern Central Western ------------- ------------
Aleutian Aleutian Aleutian BSAI
District District District BSAI BSAI
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TAC............................... 4,160 4,210 6,450 50,000 75,000 180,000
CDQ............................... 445 450 690 5,350 8,025 19,260
ICA............................... 100 50 50 5,000 10,000 2,000
BSAI trawl limited access......... 361 371 114 0 0 28,438
Amendment 80...................... 3,253 3,339 5,596 39,650 56,975 130,302
Amendment 80 limited access for 1,725 1,770 2,967 4,658 14,174 52,109
2010 only\1\.....................
Amendment 80 cooperatives for 2010 1,528 1,568 2,629 34,992 42,801 78,193
only \1\.........................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The 2011 allocations for Amendment 80 species between Amendment 80 cooperatives and the Amendment 80 limited
access sector will not be known until eligible participants apply for participation in the program by November
1, 2010.
[[Page 63108]]
Allocation of PSC Limits for Halibut, Salmon, Crab, and Herring
Section 679.21(e) sets forth the BSAI PSC limits. Pursuant to Sec.
679.21(e)(1)(iv) and (e)(2), the 2010 and 2011 BSAI halibut mortality
limits are 3,675 mt for trawl fisheries and 900 mt for the non-trawl
fisheries. Sections 679.21(e)(3)(i)(A)(2) and (e)(4)(i)(A) allocate 326
mt of the trawl halibut mortality limit and 7.5 percent, or 67 mt, of
the non-trawl halibut mortality limit as the prohibited species quota
(PSQ) reserve for use by the groundfish CDQ program. Section
679.21(e)(1)(vi) specifies 29,000 fish as the 2010 and 2011 Chinook
salmon PSC limit for the Bering Sea subarea pollock fishery. Section
679.21(e)(3)(i)(A)(3)(i) allocates 7.5 percent, or 2,175 Chinook
salmon, as the PSQ reserve for the CDQ program and allocates the
remaining 26,825 Chinook salmon to the non-CDQ fisheries. Section
679.21(e)(1)(viii) specifies 700 fish as the 2010 and 2011 Chinook
salmon PSC limit for the AI subarea pollock fishery. Section
679.21(e)(3)(i)(A)(3)(i) allocates 7.5 percent, or 53 Chinook salmon,
as the AI subarea PSQ for the CDQ program and allocates the remaining
647 Chinook salmon to the non-CDQ fisheries. Section 679.21(e)(1)(vii)
specifies 42,000 fish as the 2010 and 2011 non-Chinook salmon PSC
limit. Section 679.21(e)(3)(i)(A)(3)(ii) allocates 10.7 percent, or
4,494 non-Chinook salmon, as the PSQ for the CDQ program and allocates
the remaining 37,506 non-Chinook salmon to the non-CDQ fisheries. The
regulations and allocations of Chinook salmon are subject to change in
2011 pending approval of amendment 91 to the FMP.
PSC limits for crab and herring are specified annually based on
abundance and spawning biomass. Due to the lack of new information as
of October 2009 regarding PSC limits and apportionments, the Council
recommended and NMFS proposes using the crab and herring 2010 and 2011
PSC limits and apportionments for the proposed 2010 and 2011 limits and
apportionments. The Council will reconsider these amounts in December
2009. Pursuant to Sec. 679.21(e)(3)(i)(A)(1), 10.7 percent of each PSC
limit specified for crab is allocated as a PSQ reserve for use by the
groundfish CDQ program.
The red king crab mature female abundance is estimated from the
2008 survey data at 35 million red king crabs, and the effective
spawning biomass is estimated at 75 million lb (34,020 mt). Based on
the criteria set out at Sec. 679.21(e)(1)(i), the proposed 2010 and
2011 PSC limit of red king crab in Zone 1 for trawl gear is 197,000
animals. This limit derives from the mature female abundance estimate
of more than 8.4 million king crab and the effective spawning biomass
estimate of more than 55 million lbs (24,948 mt).
Section 679.21(e)(3)(ii)(B)(2) establishes criteria under which
NMFS must specify an annual red king crab bycatch limit for the Red
King Crab Savings Subarea (RKCSS). The regulations limit the RKCSS to
up to 25 percent of the red king crab PSC allowance based on the need
to optimize the groundfish harvest relative to red king crab bycatch.
NMFS proposes the Council's recommendation that the red king crab
bycatch limit be equal to 25 percent of the red king crab PSC allowance
within the RKCSS (Table 7b).
Based on 2008 survey data, Tanner crab (Chionoecetes bairdi)
abundance is estimated at 435 million animals. Given the criteria set
out at Sec. 679.21(e)(1)(ii), the calculated 2010 and 2011 C. bairdi
crab PSC limit for trawl gear is 980,000 animals in Zone 1 and
2,970,000 animals in Zone 2. These limits derive from the C. bairdi
crab abundance estimate being in excess of the 400 million animal
threshold specified in Sec. 679.21(e)(1)(ii).
Pursuant to Sec. 679.21(e)(1)(iii), the PSC limit for snow crab
(C. opilio) is based on total abundance as indicated by the NMFS annual
bottom trawl survey. The C. opilio crab PSC limit is set at 0.1133
percent of the Bering Sea abundance index. Based on the 2008 survey
estimate of 2.6 billion animals, the calculated limit is 4,350,000
animals.
Pursuant to Sec. 679.21(e)(1)(v), the PSC limit of Pacific herring
caught while conducting any trawl operation for BSAI groundfish is 1
percent of the annual eastern Bering Sea herring biomass. The best
estimate of 2010 and 2011 herring biomass is 169,675 mt. This amount
was derived using 2008 survey data and an age-structured biomass
projection model developed by the Alaska Department of Fish and Game.
Therefore, the herring PSC limit proposed for 2010 and 2011 is 1,697 mt
for all trawl gear as presented in Tables 7a and 7b.
Section 679.21(e)(3) requires, after subtraction of PSQ reserves,
that crab and halibut trawl PSC be apportioned between the BSAI trawl
limited access and Amendment 80 sectors as presented in Table 7a. The
amount of the 2010 PSC limits assigned to the Amendment 80 sector is
specified in Table 35 to part 679. Pursuant to Sec. 679.21(e)(1)(iv)
and Sec. 679.91(d) through (f), crab and halibut trawl PSC assigned to
the Amendment 80 sector is then sub-allocated to Amendment 80
cooperatives as PSC cooperative quota and to the Amendment 80 limited
access fishery as presented in Tables 7d and e. PSC cooperative quota
assigned to Amendment 80 cooperatives is not allocated to specific
fishery categories. The 2011 PSC allocations between Amendment 80
cooperatives and the Amendment 80 limited access sector will not be
known until November 1, 2010, when eligible participants apply to
participate in the program. Section 679.21(e)(3)(i)(B) requires
apportionment of each trawl PSC limit not assigned to Amendment 80
cooperatives into PSC bycatch allowances for seven specified fishery
categories.
Section 679.21(e)(4)(i) authorizes the apportionment of the non-
trawl halibut PSC limits into PSC bycatch allowances among six fishery
categories. Table 7c lists the fishery bycatch allowances for the trawl
and non-trawl fisheries.
Section 679.21(e)(4)(ii) authorizes the exemption of specified non-
trawl fisheries from the halibut PSC limit. As in past years after
consultation with the Council, NMFS proposes to exempt pot gear, jig
gear, and the sablefish IFQ hook-and-line gear fishery categories from
halibut bycatch restrictions because (1) The pot gear fisheries have
low halibut bycatch mortality, (2) halibut mortality for the jig gear
fleet is assumed to be negligible, and (3) the sablefish and halibut
IFQ fisheries have low halibut bycatch mortality because the IFQ
program requires legal-size halibut to be retained by vessels using
hook-and-line gear if a halibut IFQ permit holder or a hired master is
aboard and is holding unused halibut IFQ (subpart D of 50 CFR part
679). In 2009, total groundfish catch for the pot gear fishery in the
BSAI was approximately 15,000 mt, with an associated halibut bycatch
mortality of about 1 mt. The 2009 jig gear fishery harvested about 33
mt of groundfish. Most vessels in the jig gear fleet are less than 60
ft (18.3 m) LOA and thus are exempt from observer coverage
requirements. As a result, observer data are not available on halibut
bycatch in the jig gear fishery. However, a negligible amount of
halibut bycatch mortality is assumed because of the selective nature of
jig gear and the low mortality rate of halibut caught with jig gear and
released.
[[Page 63109]]
Section 679.21(e)(5) authorizes NMFS, after consultation with the
Council, to establish seasonal apportionments of PSC amounts for the
BSAI trawl limited access and Amendment 80 limited access sectors in
order to maximize the ability of the fleet to harvest the available
groundfish TAC and to minimize bycatch. The factors considered are (1)
Seasonal distribution of prohibited species, (2) seasonal distribution
of target groundfish species, (3) PSC bycatch needs on a seasonal basis
relevant to prohibited species biomass, (4) expected variations in
bycatch rates throughout the year, (5) expected start of fishing
effort, and (6) economic effects of seasonal PSC apportionments on
industry sectors. NMFS proposes the Council's recommendation of the
seasonal PSC apportionments in Tables 7c and 7e to maximize harvest
among gear types, fisheries, and seasons while minimizing bycatch of
PSC based on the above criteria.
Table 7a--Proposed 2010 and 2011 Apportionment of Prohibited Species Catch (PSC) Allowances to Non-Trawl Gear, the CDQ Program, Amendment 80, and the