Energy Conservation Program for Consumer Products: Publication of the Petition for Waiver and Granting the Application for Interim Waiver of Hallowell International From the Department of Energy Residential Central Air Conditioner and Heat Pump Test Procedure, 63131-63142 [E9-28694]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 230 / Wednesday, December 2, 2009 / Notices
be addressed to U.S. Department of
Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW.,
LBJ, Washington, DC 20202–4537.
Requests may also be electronically
mailed to ICDocketMgr@ed.gov or faxed
to 202–401–0920. Please specify the
complete title of the information
collection when making your request.
Comments regarding burden and/or
the collection activity requirements
should be electronically mailed to
ICDocketMgr@ed.gov. Individuals who
use a telecommunications device for the
deaf (TDD) may call the Federal
Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–
800–877–8339.
[FR Doc. E9–28819 Filed 12–1–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Case No. CAC–022]
Energy Conservation Program for
Consumer Products: Publication of the
Petition for Waiver and Granting the
Application for Interim Waiver of
Hallowell International From the
Department of Energy Residential
Central Air Conditioner and Heat Pump
Test Procedure
AGENCY: Office of Energy Efficiency and
Renewable Energy, Department of
Energy.
ACTION: Notice of Petition for Waiver,
Granting an Application for Interim
Waiver, and request for public
comments.
This notice announces receipt
of and publishes the Hallowell
International (Hallowell) Petition for
Waiver (hereafter, ‘‘Petition’’) from the
U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) test
procedure for determining the energy
consumption of residential central air
conditioners and heat pumps for certain
specified equipment. The waiver
request pertains to Hallowell’s Boosted
Compression heat pumps, a product line
that uses three-stage technology to
enable efficient heating at very low
outdoor temperatures. The existing test
procedure accounts for two-capacity
compressors, but not three-capacity
operation. Therefore, Hallowell has
suggested an alternate test procedure to
calculate the heating performance of its
three-stage Boosted Compression
products. DOE is soliciting comments,
data, and information concerning
Hallowell’s Petition and the suggested
alternate test procedure. DOE is also
granting an interim waiver to Hallowell.
DATES: DOE will accept comments, data,
and information with respect to the
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:28 Dec 01, 2009
Jkt 220001
Hallowell Petition until, but no later
than January 4, 2010.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by case number [CAC–022],
by any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• E-mail:
AS_Waiver_Requests@ee.doe.gov.
Include either the case number [CAC–
022], and/or ‘‘Hallowell Petition’’ in the
subject line of the message.
• Mail: Ms. Brenda Edwards, U.S.
Department of Energy, Building
Technologies Program, Mailstop EE–2J,
Petition for Waiver Case No. RF–008,
1000 Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20585–0121.
Telephone: (202) 586–2945. Please
submit one signed original paper copy.
• Hand Delivery/Courier: Ms. Brenda
Edwards, U.S. Department of Energy,
Building Technologies Program, 950
L’Enfant Plaza, SW., Suite 600,
Washington, DC 20024. Please submit
one signed original paper copy.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name and case
number for this proceeding. Submit
electronic comments in WordPerfect,
Microsoft Word, Portable Document
Format (PDF), or text (American
Standard Code for Information
Interchange (ASCII)) file format, and
avoid the use of special characters or
any form of encryption. Wherever
possible, include the electronic
signature of the author. DOE does not
accept telefacsimiles (faxes).
Any person submitting written
comments must also send a copy of
such comments to the petitioner,
pursuant to 10 CFR 430.27(d). The
contact information for the petitioner is:
Mr. Joseph M. Gross, Design Engineer,
Hallowell International, 110 Hildreth
Street, Bangor, ME 04401. Telephone:
(207) 990–5600 x121. E-mail:
jgross@gotohallowell.com.
According to 10 CFR 1004.11, any
person submitting information that he
or she believes to be confidential and
exempt by law from public disclosure
should submit two copies: one copy of
the document including all the
information believed to be confidential,
and one copy of the document with the
information believed to be confidential
deleted. DOE will make its own
determination about the confidential
status of the information and treat it
according to its determination.
Docket: For access to the docket to
review the background documents
relevant to this matter, you may visit the
U.S. Department of Energy, 950 L’Enfant
Plaza, SW., (Resource Room of the
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
63131
Building Technologies Program),
Washington, DC 20024; (202) 586–2945,
between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Available documents include the
following items: (1) This notice; (2)
public comments received; (3) the
Petition for Waiver and Application for
Interim Waiver; and (4) prior DOE
rulemakings regarding similar central
air conditioning and heat pump
equipment. Please call Ms. Brenda
Edwards at the above telephone number
for additional information regarding
visiting the Resource Room.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr.
Michael G. Raymond, U.S. Department
of Energy, Building Technologies
Program, Mail Stop EE–2J, Forrestal
Building, 1000 Independence Avenue,
SW., Washington, DC 20585–0121.
Telephone: (202) 586–9611. E-mail:
Michael.Raymond@ee.doe.gov.
Francine Pinto or Eric Stas, U.S.
Department of Energy, Office of the
General Counsel, Mail Stop GC–72,
Forrestal Building, 1000 Independence
Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20585–
0103. Telephone: (202) 586–9507. Email: Francine.Pinto@hq.doe.gov or
Eric.Stas@hq.doe.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Background and Authority
II. Petition for Waiver
III. Application for Interim Waiver
IV. Alternate Test Procedure
V. Summary and Request for Comments
VI.
I. Background and Authority
Title III of the Energy Policy and
Conservation Act (EPCA) sets forth a
variety of provisions concerning energy
efficiency. Part A of Title III establishes
the Energy Conservation Program for
Consumer Products Other Than
Automobiles.1 (42 U.S.C. 6291–6309)
This notice involves residential
products under Part A, and EPCA
specifically includes definitions, test
procedures, labeling provisions, energy
conservation standards, and the
authority to require information and
reports from manufacturers.
With respect to test procedures, Part
A generally authorizes the Secretary of
Energy (the Secretary) to prescribe test
procedures that are reasonably designed
to produce results which reflect energy
efficiency, energy use, and estimated
annual operating costs, and that are not
unduly burdensome to conduct. (42
U.S.C. 6293(b)(3))
1 These two parts were originally titled Parts B
and C, but were redesignated as Parts A and A–1
in the United States Code for editorial reasons.
E:\FR\FM\02DEN1.SGM
02DEN1
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
63132
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 230 / Wednesday, December 2, 2009 / Notices
Relevant to the current Petition for
Waiver, the test procedures for
residential central air conditioners and
central air conditioning heat pumps are
set forth in 10 CFR Part 430, subpart B,
appendix M. Section 323 of EPCA
provides that the Secretary of Energy
may amend test procedures for
consumer products if the Secretary
determines that amended test
procedures would more accurately
reflect energy efficiency, energy use or
estimated annual operating costs, and
are not unduly burdensome to conduct.
(42 U.S.C. 6293(b)(1)(A) and (b)(3))
DOE’s regulations contain provisions
allowing a person to seek a waiver from
the test procedure requirements for
covered products, for which the
petitioner’s basic model contains one or
more design characteristics that prevent
testing according to the prescribed test
procedures, or when the prescribed test
procedures may evaluate the basic
model in a manner so unrepresentative
of its true energy consumption as to
provide materially inaccurate
comparative data. 10 CFR 430.27(a)(1).
Petitioners must include in their
petition any alternate test procedures
known to evaluate the basic model in a
manner representative of its energy
consumption. 10 CFR 430.27(b)(1)(iii).
The Assistant Secretary for Energy
Efficiency and Renewable Energy (the
Assistant Secretary) may grant the
waiver subject to conditions, including
adherence to alternate test procedures.
10 CFR 430.27(l). Within 1 year of
granting the waiver, DOE must publish
in the Federal Register a notice of
proposed rulemaking to amend its
regulations so as to eliminate any need
for the continuation of such waiver. As
soon thereafter as practicable, the
Department of Energy must publish in
the Federal Register a final rule. The
waiver will terminate on the effective
date of such final rule. 10 CFR
430.27(m).
The waiver process also permits
parties petitioning DOE for a waiver to
apply for an Interim Waiver from the
prescribed test procedure requirements.
10 CFR 430.27(a)(2). The Assistant
Secretary will grant an Interim Waiver
request if it is determined that the
applicant will experience economic
hardship if the Interim Waiver is
denied, if it appears likely that the
Petition for Waiver will be granted, and/
or the Assistant Secretary determines
that it would be desirable for public
policy reasons to grant immediate relief
pending a determination on the Petition
for Waiver. 10 CFR 430.27(g). An
Interim Waiver remains in effect for a
period of 180 days or until DOE issues
its determination on the Petition for
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:28 Dec 01, 2009
Jkt 220001
Waiver, whichever is sooner, and may
be extended for an additional 180 days,
if necessary. 10 CFR 430.27(h).
II. Petition for Waiver
On July 29, 2008, Hallowell filed a
Petition for Waiver from the test
procedures applicable to residential air
conditioning and heating equipment
and an Application for Interim Waiver.
The applicable test procedure for
Hallowell’s residential Boosted
Compression products is the DOE
residential test procedure found in 10
CFR Part 430, Subpart B, Appendix M.
Hallowell included an alternate test
procedure in its July 29, 2008,
submittal, but the alternate procedure
was incomplete. On April 25, 2009,
Hallowell submitted the revised petition
and alternate test procedure included in
this Federal Register notice.
Hallowell seeks a waiver from the
DOE test procedures on the grounds that
its Boosted Compression heat pump
systems contain design characteristics
that prevent testing according to the
current DOE test procedure. The DOE
test procedure covers systems with a
single speed, with two steps or stages of
modulation, and with continuous
modulation over a finite range through
the incorporation of a variable-speed or
digital compressor. Hallowell’s product
deviates from the anticipated form—a
system whose performance falls
between that of a two-capacity system
and a conventional variable-capacity
system—because the three-capacity
capability is limited to heating mode
operation. Moreover, the additional
stage of heating capacity is specifically
used at the lowest outdoor temperatures
with the aim of maximizing the total
heating contributed by the heat pump
relative to the total heating supplied by
the auxiliary heat source (usually
electric resistance). Another unique
feature of Hallowell’s low-temperature
heat pump system is that for any given
outdoor temperature, only two-stages of
heating are permitted; one stage is
always locked out.
Rating Hallowell’s Boosted
Compression products will require
modified calculation algorithms and
testing at an additional, lower
temperature to capture the effect on
both capacity and power of the
additional stage/level of heating
operation. The building load assigned
within
HSPF calculations requires evaluation
based on the case where high-stage
compressor capacity for heating exceeds
the high-stage compressor capacity for
cooling. Finally, the control feature that
limits the number of heating mode
capacity levels to two for any given
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
outdoor temperature must be accounted
for.
Accordingly, Hallowell requests that
DOE grant a test procedure waiver for its
Boosted Compression product designs,
until a suitable test method can be
prescribed. Furthermore, Hallowell
states that failure to grant the waiver
would result in economic hardship
because it would prevent the company
from marketing its Boosted Compression
products.
III. Application for Interim Waiver
In addition to its Petition for Waiver,
submitted on July 29, 2008 and revised
on April 25, 2009, Hallowell submitted
to DOE an Application for Interim
Waiver. On May 29, 2009, Hallowell
submitted a revised Petition for Waiver
and Application for Interim Waiver
containing information concerning the
financial hardship and competitive
disadvantage Hallowell is facing.
Hallowell states that it is difficult to
build sales volume and gain credibility
when there are no standards to provide
performance ratings for the equipment,
which would entitle its customers to
rebates, tax credits, and other
incentives. Since the release of the
Recovery Act with new criteria for
energy efficiency tax rebates, business
growth at Hallowell has diminished.
Many of Hallowell’s dealers and
distributors have submitted letters
concerning the lack of sales of the
Acadia system due lack of AHRI listing,
and therefore no rebates available.
Hallowell submitted an attachment of
many dealer/distributor letters claiming
these hardships. With sales down,
Hallowell International has cut back on
all research and development,
development of new products and new
manufacturing production that would
enable the company to grow.
In those instances where it appears
likely the Petition for Waiver will be
granted, based upon a product design
that has characteristics which prevent
testing according to the prescribed test
procedure, it is in the public interest to
allow products to be marketed that DOE
believes are exceptionally energyefficient. Hallowell’s three-speed
Boosted Compression heat pumps are
capable of efficient operation at much
lower temperatures than two-speed heat
pumps (Hallowell measured a
coefficient of performance of 2.1 at ¥15
°F), making them potentially very
desirable for heating in cold climates.
The alternate test procedure submitted
by Hallowell is not radically different
from the current DOE test procedure,
which has provisions for heat pumps
having a two-capacity compressor. The
Hallowell alternate test procedure is a
E:\FR\FM\02DEN1.SGM
02DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 230 / Wednesday, December 2, 2009 / Notices
63133
(3) Add section 3.6.6 to address the
heating mode tests conducted on units
having a triple-capacity compressor.
3.6.6 Tests for a heat pump having a
triple-capacity compressor. Test triplecapacity, northern heat pumps for the
heating mode as follows:
a. Conduct one Maximum
Temperature Test (H01), two High
Temperature Tests (H12 and H11), two
Frost Accumulation Tests (H22 and
H21), three Low Temperature Tests (H31,
H32, and H33), and one Minimum
Temperature Test (H43). An alternative
to conducting the H21 Frost
˙
Accumulation Test to determine Qhk=1
˙
(35) and Ehk=1 (35) is to use the
following equations to approximate this
capacity and electrical power:
logical extension of DOE’s two-capacity
test method to cover Hallowell’s threecapacity compressor. The two (of three
potential) active stages of heating
capacity available for each bin
temperature calculation will be based
on Hallowell’s control logic. The HSPF
algorithm will follow the algorithm in
the DOE test procedure used for twocapacity heat pumps. Thus, DOE has
determined that it is likely that
Hallowell’s Petition for Waiver will be
granted for its new Boosted
Compression three-speed models.
Therefore, DOE grants Hallowell’s
application for Interim Waiver from
testing of its Boosted Compression heat
pump models. This granting of Interim
Waiver may be modified at any time
upon a determination that the factual
basis underlying the application is
incorrect.
In evaluating the above equations,
˙
determine the quantities Qhk=1 (47) and
˙
Ehk=1 (47) from the H11 Test and
evaluate them according to Section 3.7.
˙
Determine the quantities Qhk=1 (17) and
˙
Ehk=1 (17) from the H31 Test and
evaluate them according to Section 3.10.
If the manufacturer conducts the H21
Test, the option of using the above
default equations is not forfeited. Use
˙
˙
the paired values of Qhk=1 (35) and Ehk=1
(35) derived from conducting the H21
Frost Accumulation Test and evaluated
as specified in section 3.9.1 or use the
paired values calculated using the above
default equations, whichever paired
values contribute to a higher Region IV
HSPF based on the DHRmin.
Conducting a Frost Accumulation
Test (H23) with the heat pump operating
at its booster capacity is optional. If this
optional test is not conducted,
˙
˙
determine Qhk=3 (35) and Ehk=3 (35) using
the following equations to approximate
this capacity and electrical power:
˙
determine the quantities Qhk=3 (17) and
˙
Ehk=3 (17) from the H33 Test, and
˙
determine the quantities Qhk=3 (2) and
˙
Ehk=3 (2) from the H43 Test. Evaluate all
six quantities according to Section 3.10.
If the manufacturer conducts the H23
Test, the option of using the above
default equations is not forfeited. Use
˙
˙
the paired values of Qhk=3 (35) and Ehk=3
(35) derived from conducting the H23
Frost Accumulation Test and calculated
as specified in section 3.9.1 or use the
paired values calculated using the above
default equations, whichever paired
values contribute to a higher Region IV
HSPF based on the DHRmin.
IV. Alternate Test Procedure
DOE plans to consider inclusion of
the following waiver language in the
Decision and Order for Hallowell’s
Boosted Compression central air
conditioning heat pumps models:
(1) The ‘‘Petition for Waiver’’ filed by
Hallowell is hereby granted as set forth
in the paragraphs below.
(2) Hallowell shall not be required to
test or rate its Boosted Compression
central air conditioning heat pumps
products listed above in section III, on
the basis of the currently applicable
DOE test procedure, but shall be
required to test and rate such products
according to the alternate test procedure
as set forth in paragraph (3).
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:28 Dec 01, 2009
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\02DEN1.SGM
02DEN1
EN02DE09.037
EN02DE09.036
˙
Determine the quantities Qhk=2 (47)
˙
and Ehk=2 (47) from the H12 Test and
evaluate them according to Section 3.7.
˙
Determine the quantities Qhk=2 (35) and
˙
Ehk=2 (35) from the H22 Test and
evaluate them according to Section
˙
3.9.1. Determine the quantities Qhk=2
˙
(17) and Ehk=2 (17) from the H32 Test,
EN02DE09.035
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
Where,
63134
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 230 / Wednesday, December 2, 2009 / Notices
Table A specifies test conditions for
all thirteen tests.
TABLE A—HEATING MODE TEST CONDITIONS FOR UNITS HAVING A TRIPLE-CAPACITY COMPRESSOR
Air entering indoor unit
temperature (°F)
Air entering outdoor unit
temperature (°F)
Test description
Dry bulb
H01 Test (required,
steady).
H12 Test (required,
steady).
H1C2 Test (optional,
cyclic).
H11 Test (required) ....
H1C1 Test (optional,
cyclic).
H23 Test (optional,
steady).
H22 Test (required) ....
H21 Test (5 6) (required).
H32 Test (required,
steady).
H3C3 Test (optional,
cyclic).
H32 Test (required,
steady).
H31 Test 5 (required,
steady).
H43 Test (required,
steady).
Wet bulb
(max)
Dry bulb
Compressor
capacity
Booster
Heating air volume
rate
Wet bulb
70
60
62
56.5
Low ....................
Off ......................
Heating Minimum 1
70
60
47
43
High ...................
Off ......................
Heating Full-Load 2
70
60
47
43
High ...................
Off ......................
(3)
70
70
60
60
47
47
43
43
Low ....................
Low ....................
Off ......................
Off ......................
Heating Minimum(1)
(4)
70
60
35
33
High ...................
On ......................
Heating Full-Load 2
70
70
60
60
35
35
33
33
High ...................
Low ....................
Off ......................
Off ......................
Heating Full-Load 2
Heating Minimum 1
70
60
17
15
High ...................
On ......................
Heating Full-Load 2
70
60
17
15
High ...................
On ......................
(7)
70
60
17
15
High ...................
Off ......................
Heating Full-Load 2
70
60
17
15
Low ....................
Off ......................
Heating Minimum 1
70
60
0
¥2
High ...................
On ......................
Heating Full-Load 2
1 Defined
in section 3.1.4.5.
in section 3.1.4.4.
the airflow nozzle(s) static pressure difference or velocity pressure during the ON period at the same pressure or velocity as measured during the H12 Test.
4 Maintain the airflow nozzle(s) static pressure difference or velocity pressure during the ON period at the same pressure or velocity as measured during the H11 Test.
5 Required only if the heat pump’s performance when operating at low compressor capacity and outdoor temperatures less than 37 °F is needed to complete the section 4.2.6 HSPF calculations.
6 If table note #5 applies, the section 3.6.3 equations for Q k=1 (35) and E k=1 (17) may be used in lieu of conducting the H2 Test.
˙h
˙h
1
7 Maintain the airflow nozzle(s) static pressure difference or velocity pressure during the ON period at the same pressure or velocity measured
during the H33 Test.
2 Defined
3 Maintain
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
Section 4.2.3 of Appendix M shall be
revised to read as follows:
4.2.3. Additional steps for calculating
the HSPF of a heat pump having a
triple-capacity compressor. * * *
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:28 Dec 01, 2009
Jkt 220001
a. Evaluate the space heating capacity
and electrical power consumption of the
heat pump at outdoor temperature Tj
and with a first stage call from the
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
thermostat (k=1), and with a second
stage call from the thermostat (k=2)
using:
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
E:\FR\FM\02DEN1.SGM
02DEN1
BILLING CODE 6450–01–C
V. Summary and Request for Comments
Through today’s notice, DOE grants
Hallowell’s Petition for Interim Waiver
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:28 Dec 01, 2009
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
63135
and announces receipt of Hallowell’s
Petition for Waiver from the test
procedures applicable to Hallowell’s
Boosted Compression there-speed heat
E:\FR\FM\02DEN1.SGM
02DEN1
EN02DE09.021
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 230 / Wednesday, December 2, 2009 / Notices
63136
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 230 / Wednesday, December 2, 2009 / Notices
pump products. As part of this notice,
DOE is publishing Hallowell’s Petition
for Waiver in its entirety. The Petition
includes a suggested alternate test
procedure and calculation methodology
to determine the energy consumption of
Hallowell’s specified heat pumps with
Boosted Compression technology. The
Petition contains no confidential
information.
DOE is interested in receiving
comments on the issues addressed in
this notice. Pursuant to 10 CFR
430.27(d), any person submitting
written comments must also send a
copy of such comments to the
petitioner, whose contact information is
included in the ADDRESSES section
above.
Issued in Washington, DC, on November
23, 2009.
Cathy Zoi,
Assistant Secretary, Energy Efficiency and
Renewable Energy.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
To: Michael Raymond, Department of Energy
From: Joseph M Gross, Hallowell
International
Subject: Petition to waive CFR (Code of
Federal Regulations) Part 430
performance ratings for ACADIA
Combined Heating and Cooling System.
Date: April 25, 2009
CC: American Heating and Refrigeration
Institute Assistant Secretary for Energy
Efficiency and Renewable Energy
To whom it may concern,
Hallowell International manufactures and
markets air source heat pump equipment
featuring a patented technology known as
Boosted Compression. This technology
greatly enhances the cold temperature
performance of an air source heat pump,
enabling the equipment to remain effective in
heating operation at temperatures as cold as
–30°F without the need for any form of
supplemental heat.
The physical nature of this technology, as
well as the control by which it is operated,
eliminates the possibility of testing under the
existing 210/240–2008 standard for unitary
air source heat pump equipment, following
Appendix M to Subpart B of CFR Part 430,
as has been confirmed by engineering at ETL
Semko, and engineering at AHRI. The current
standard covers 1 and 2 speed systems.
Boosted Compression effectively introduces 3
speed technologies to the marketplace, yet
operates similar to a 1 or 2 stage system at
any given temperature condition.
This letter will discuss the mechanical and
functional details of the equipment, define
how the normal operation makes testing
under current standards irrelevant, and
describe what operating specifics should be
validated to show the true operating benefits
of the equipment. A suggestion for
modifications to existing standards is also
included, as well as an interim request for a
temporary test waiver.
Because of the large amount of effort and
financial resources that have been expended
on testing under current standards, Hallowell
International requests to be considered in
two stages. The first and most immediate
stage is for consideration is to be given for
a waiver, declaring the equipment outside of
any test standard and relieving the
equipment temporarily from the requirement.
The second stage is to consider Hallowell
International’s suggestions for small
modifications to the existing CFR Part 430
standard, or for a waiver offering an alternate
test method to AHRI. The recommended test
method will define the addition of 3 speed
systems to the standard, and suggest how
these systems may be modeled similarly to 1
and 2 speed systems.
Affected Models
The Hallowell International model group
has seven specific models that are currently,
or were previously, available on the market:
1. ACADIA024
2. ACADIA036
3. ACADIA048
4. 36C35H
5. 42C46H
6. ACHP03642
7. ACHP02431
The model group is covered under the
following trade names:
1. All Climate Heat Pump
2. ACHP
3. Acadia Combined Heating and Cooling
System
4. Acadia System
5. Acadia Heat Pump
6. Acadia
7. Hallowell ACADIA
8. Hallowell All Climate Heat Pump
9. Hallowell ACHP
10. Hallowell Acadia Combined Heating and
Cooling System
11. Hallowell Heat Pump
12. Boosted Compression Heat Pump
13. Opti-Cycle Heat Pump
Mechanical and Functional Details of
Boosted Compression
The model group to be considered for a
Department of Energy waiver falls under the
system classification HRCU–A–CB, where a
heat pump system is comprised of two
primary components; the outdoor condensing
unit with an outdoor coil and compressors
which is mated to an indoor coil with a fan.
The model was designed as a ‘‘Two Speed’’
system whereby the definitions of ‘‘Two
Speed’’ systems from section 3.16 of the 210/
240–2008 Standard were considered within
the scope of the design.
Boosted Compression equipment is
comprised of two compressors paired in
series. The first compressor, the Primary
compressor, is able to modulate between half
capacity and full capacity by reversing
rotation of the crank shaft and mechanically
eliminating the motion of one of the two
internal pistons for half capacity operation.
The Primary compressor functions for
heating operation and for cooling operation.
A second compressor, the Booster
compressor, is a fixed speed, fixed capacity
compressor that is used at cold ambient
outdoor conditions to increase the mass flow
rate of refrigerant through the system and
increase the low temperature performance by
a process of supercharging the refrigeration
cycle. This compressor is used exclusively in
heating operation at and below 25 °F, and
does not operate during, or affect air
conditioning operation or performance.
The following covers the definition from
the 210/240–2008 Standard (CFR Part 430,
Appendix M, section 1.43), at a very basic
level, how this system was thought to be
acceptable for ‘‘Two Speed’’ testing.
3.16 Two-capacity (or Two-stage)
Compressor. An air conditioner or heat pump
that has one of the following:
c. Two compressors where one compressor
(Compressor #1) operates at low loads and
both compressors (Compressors #1 and #2)
operate at high loads but Compressor #2
never operates alone
For such systems, low capacity means:
c. Operating Compressor #1, or
d. Operating with the compressor
unloading (e.g., operating one piston of a
two-piston reciprocating compressor, using a
fixed fractional volume of the full scroll,
etc.).
For such systems, high capacity means:
c. Operating Compressors #1 and #2.
A Boosted Compression system stages
between a high and a low capacity
throughout the systems’ operating envelope
much like traditional 2 speed systems. The
system brings on higher capacities to satisfy
larger loads, typically as a function of a call
for higher capacity from a thermostat. In this
system there are 4 heating capacities and 2
cooling capacities. At any given temperature
point of operation, there are only 2 capacities
available from the system, which stage based
on outdoor air temperature and the heating
or cooling call from the thermostat. The table
below illustrates the algorithm of staging as
utilized in the control for Boosted
Compression equipment.
Heating call at thermostat
BIN A
ODT¥30
BIN B
¥30
≤ ODT < 15
BIN C
15 ≤ ODT
< 25
BIN D
25 ≤ ODT
< 34
BIN E
34 ≤ ODT
< 41
BIN F
41 ≤ ODT
< 62
Y1 ......................................................................
Y2 ......................................................................
W1 ...........
W1 ...........
M3 ............
M4 ............
M2 ...........
M3 ...........
M2 ...........
M2+W1 ....
M2 ............
M2 ...........
M1 ...........
M2 ............
Where:
W1: Auxiliary heat control output
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:28 Dec 01, 2009
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
BIN G
62 ≤ ODT
M1
M1
M1: Single cylinder operation, half capacity
E:\FR\FM\02DEN1.SGM
02DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 230 / Wednesday, December 2, 2009 / Notices
63137
As the table above illustrates, at any given
outdoor temperature condition, a Boosted
Compression system operates with a
maximum of two capacities, using 2 of the 3
modes of heating (4 modes including 1st
stage resistance) depending on what the
ambient temperature is at the current time of
operation. The graph below shows more
accurately how a Boosted Compression
system can be used as a two stage system, but
how the outdoor temperature conditions
affect which of the two out of four modes of
operation will make up the two capacities for
said condition. The graph only shows Modes
1–3, showing vapor cycle operation only.
The graph shows how at any given
temperature BIN, the Acadia only utilizes a
maximum of 2 out of its 3 stages of vapor
cycle. In fact, in BINs G (not shown), E, D,
and B, the Acadia acts like a single stage
system, utilizing only one mode in these
BINs.
A typical two speed heat pump would, if
using the Boosted Compression terminology
to define operation, only have M1, M2, and
M2 + W1 available for system operation.
Boosted Compression adds a 3rd stage of
compression to the vapor cycle with the
Booster Compressor and an Economizer. This
third stage effectively doubles the capacity of
the heat pump without a degradation of the
Coefficient of Performance at lower ambient
conditions. The System is further able to add
supplemental or auxiliary heat much like
conventional 1 and 2 speed systems for
occasions where the vapor cycle alone is
unable to maintain the conditioned space.
The following charts illustrate and provide
distinction for the differences in Boosted
Compression 3 speed systems and standard
two speed systems. The charts reflect vapor
cycle performance only. From these it is clear
that Boosted Compression is effectively a 3
speed, or 3 capacity system, and as such will
be the foundation for our recommendation to
create a standard for 3 speed equipment as
a modification to the existing 210/240–2008
Standard.
Important characteristics to note when
comparing the two systems:
1. Capacities at low ambient outdoor
conditions
2. Capacity as a function of outdoor
temperature
3. Coefficient of performance at low ambient
conditions
4. Coefficient of performance relative to
system capacity
5. Linear performance of standard systems
relative to outdoor temperature
6. Staged performance of 3 speed technology
relative to outdoor temperature
7. Charts reflect Maximum Vapor Cycle
Capacity and do not include lower speeds
at similar outdoor temperatures
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:28 Dec 01, 2009
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
E:\FR\FM\02DEN1.SGM
02DEN1
EN02DE09.022
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
of Primary Compressor, heating and
cooling
M2: Two cylinder operation, Full capacity of
Primary Compressor, heating and cooling
M3: M2 + Booster Compressor + Economizer
operation, heating only
M4: M3 + W1
63138
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
BILLING CODE 6450–01–C
Restrictions of Current 210/240–2008
Standard
The current 210/240 standard provides an
excellent template for the evolution of a 3
speed standard. The restrictions of 2 speed
testing for the 3 speed unit are comprised of
the following:
1. The expectation that the equipment will
follow a linear performance trend and as
such can be modeled linearly
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:28 Dec 01, 2009
Jkt 220001
2. Operating condition tests are restricted
to 62 °F, 47 °F, 35 °F, and 17 °F. This will
not collect enough operating characteristics
to create an accurate trend, and does not
consider advantages of 3 speed equipment at
cold temperatures.
3. If the 3 speed system provides 3 speeds
of heating, or cooling, how will equipment
with different numbers of speeds for both,
such as 3 for heating and 2 for cooling be
considered?
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
4. Heating Seasonal Performance Factor is
calculated from a linear interpolation of
system performance along with other factors
considering defrosts and cycling penalties. A
linear trend cannot be created based on
Boosted Compression performance
characteristics and erroneous HSPF numbers
result. This is easily identified as
interpolated capacities trend towards infinite
values as outdoor temperature bins get
colder, and moderate temperature operation
is very low where the two trends meet at an
E:\FR\FM\02DEN1.SGM
02DEN1
EN02DE09.023
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 230 / Wednesday, December 2, 2009 / Notices
63139
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 230 / Wednesday, December 2, 2009 / Notices
apex. Note the quotation from AHRI
representatives below:
Quote from an e-mail dated 7/18/08 from
Ms. Sarah Medepalli, the Certification
Engineer assigned to Hallowell International
at AHRI.
‘‘The main problem is that 210/240 linearly
interpolates to capture the effect of varying
outdoor temperature. As such, the lab testing
is set up so that the unit’s configuration is
exactly the same for multiple outdoor
conditions. The Hallowell unit, for example,
appears to use a different system
configuration for the high compressor
capacity tests at 47 °F and 17 °F (and maybe
35 °F too). The Hallowell unit would require
extra test points and the algorithm used to
calculate HSPF would have to be modified to
create a more accurate performance map as
opposed to the approach of just blindly
applying the current 210/240 algorithm for
two-capacity heat pumps.’’
The following graph illustrates how a
Boosted Compression system cannot be
modeled correctly using the 210/240 (CFR
Part 430, Appendix M) 2 speed standard for
calculating Qhk-1, Qhk-2, Ehk-1 and Ehk-2,
covered in section 4.2.3.a (Qhk-1, Qhk-2 and
the BL(Tj) are graphed on the chart below).
The graph shows a Boosted Compression
system’s Qhk-1, Qhk-2 and the load line for
Minimum HSPF in region IV, where QH1 =
Qhk-1 and QH2 = Qhk-2. As can be seen in this
Illustration, when a Boosted Compression
system’s heating capacities are interpolated
with the 210/240 (CFR Part 430, Appendix
M) algorithm, the stages do not represent
how any heat pump system can physically
operate, showing Qhk-2 increasing infinitely
as the outdoor temperature conditions drop.
The data taken to create this graph was taken
directly from ETL’s HSPF calculation tables
for our 3 Ton system, ARI document #
USHP–08315–Q–1.
The 210/240–2008 Standard currently
accurately covers the 2 speed air
conditioning performance of Boosted
Compression, since the Booster Compressor
is not allowed to operate in cooling mode,
effectively making the system a standard two
speed air conditioner.
1. Additional test points of heating
performance, in addition to 62 °F, 47 °F, 35
°F and 17 °F, should be added to account for
increased cold temperature performance. The
following table illustrates current tests and
new tests required to interpolate a 3 stage
heat pump under AHRI 210/240 2 speed
system standard, where the H62 test would be
a new test condition requirement.
Recommendations for Modification of
Current CFR Part 430 Standard, or Interim
Alternate Testing Method for Immediate
Consideration
The following recommendations for testing
of a ‘‘3 Speed Heat Pump’’ are hereby
submitted:
IDU entering
air °Fdb
Heating test
H01
H11
H21
H31
H32
H62
..........................................................................................
..........................................................................................
..........................................................................................
..........................................................................................
..........................................................................................
..........................................................................................
IDU entering
air °Fwb
70
70
70
70
70
70
ODU entering
air °Fdb
ODU entering
air °Fwb
62
47
35
17
17
0
56.5
43
33
15
15
¥2
60
60
60
60
60
60
System
speed
Low
Low
Low
Low
High
High
EN02DE09.025
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:28 Dec 01, 2009
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\02DEN1.SGM
02DEN1
EN02DE09.024
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
2. From the CFR Part 430 standard the
following equation is defined for HSPF,
63140
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 230 / Wednesday, December 2, 2009 / Notices
The following equations are compatible
with Boosted Compression and continue
with a similar methodology to the current
standards.
BILLING CODE 6450–01–C
consumption (Ehk), the following graph can
be achieved from entering data into the CFR
Part 430 standard for calculating HSPF on a
2 speed heat pump system, and plotting
With these algorithms used to interpolate
capacity (Qhk) and electrical energy
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:28 Dec 01, 2009
Jkt 220001
In section 4.2.3, the evaluation of heating
capacity (Qhk) and electrical energy
consumption (Ehk) could be defined by the
following performance slope equations:
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Qhk=1, Qhk=2 and the BL(Tj) vs. the
temperature BIN temperature (Tj), where
QH1 = Qhk-1 and QH2 = Qhk-2.
E:\FR\FM\02DEN1.SGM
02DEN1
EN02DE09.026
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
where the design heating requirement, DHR,
as defined in section 4.2, is calculated from
the 47° test point. This equation will
continue to hold true for 3 speed HSPF
calculation.
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 230 / Wednesday, December 2, 2009 / Notices
63141
The graph below highlights the modes of
operation from the graph above for clarity.
We, the representatives of Hallowell
International, wish to encourage the
Department of Energy to consider quick
action in amending the current CFR Part 430
testing specifications to include 3-speed
equipment. Hallowell, as a manufacturer,
relies on third party performance testing and
verification of performance from AHRI
against competitive equipment to gain
traction in the marketplace. Since AHRI
adopts their 210/240 standard from CFR Part
430, changes made to the CFR will carry
through to AHRI, allowing Hallowell systems
to be fairly listed on the directory with other
competitive heat pump systems.
We believe that our equipment brings great
advancement to the HVAC industry and
provides a unique alternative to fossil fuels
in today’s changing energy climate. It is
difficult to build sales volume and gain the
credibility, required as an OEM, when there
are no standards to provide performance
ratings for the equipment, which would
entitle our customers to rebates, tax credits,
or other incentives.
We hope that a temporary waiver will be
granted acknowledging that our three speed
product is not covered by a current standard.
We further hope that an amendment to the
existing standards will be considered, or an
alternate test procedure waiver will be
considered, as 3-speed equipment does not
need to have an entirely new process to be
considered and implemented.
If there are any questions or concerns about
the equipment please do not hesitate to
contact us directly. We will freely share
information about Boosted Compression such
that your requirements and due diligence
will be satisfied in this matter.
Please direct all correspondence with
Hallowell International to:
Joseph M Gross
Design Engineer
Hallowell International
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:28 Dec 01, 2009
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\02DEN1.SGM
02DEN1
EN02DE09.028
these new algorithms accurately portray a
Boosted Compression system’s vapor cycle.
EN02DE09.027
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
It can easily be seen, when comparing this
graph to the one outlining the modes of
operation in different temperature BINs that
63142
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 230 / Wednesday, December 2, 2009 / Notices
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
Phone: 207 990 5600 Extension 121
Fax: 207 990 5602
E-mail: JGross@gotohallowell.com
electronically or in paper format. Those
persons filing electronically do not need
to make a paper filing. Documents filed
electronically via the Internet must be
Signed,
prepared in an acceptable filing format
Duane A. Hallowell,
and in compliance with the Federal
President and CEO
Energy Regulatory Commission
Date:
lllllllllllllllllllll submission guidelines. Complete filing
instructions and acceptable filing
Joseph M Gross,
formats are available at https://
Design Engineer
www.ferc.gov/help/submission-guide/
Date:
lllllllllllllllllllll electronic-media.asp. To file the
document electronically, access the
[FR Doc. E9–28694 Filed 12–1–09; 8:45 am]
Commission’s Web site and click on
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
Documents & Filing, E–Filing (https://
www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling.asp),
and then follow the instructions for
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
each screen. First-time users will have
to establish a user name and password.
Federal Energy Regulatory
The Commission will send an automatic
Commission
acknowledgement to the sender’s e-mail
[Docket No. IC09–715–001]
address upon receipt of comments.
For paper filings, an original and 2
Commission Information Collection
copies of the comments should be
Activities (FERC–715); Comment
submitted to the Federal Energy
Request; Submitted for OMB Review
Regulatory Commission, Secretary of the
Commission, 888 First Street, NE.,
November 23, 2009.
Washington, DC 20426, and should refer
AGENCY: Federal Energy Regulatory
to Docket No. IC09–715–001.
Commission.
All comments may be viewed, printed
ACTION: Notice.
or downloaded remotely via the Internet
through FERC’s homepage using the
SUMMARY: In compliance with the
‘‘eLibrary’’ link. For user assistance,
requirements of section 3507 of the
contact fercolinesupport@ferc.gov or
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 44
toll-free at (866) 208–3676 or for TTY,
U.S.C. 3507, the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission (Commission or contact (202) 502–8659.
FERC) has submitted the information
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
collection described below to the Office Ellen Brown may be reached by
of Management and Budget (OMB) for
telephone at (202) 502–8663, by fax at
review of the information collection
(202) 273–0873, and by e-mail at
requirements. Any interested person
ellen.brown@ferc.gov.
may file comments directly with OMB
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
and should address a copy of those
FERC–715 (‘‘Annual Transmission
comments to the Commission as
Planning and Evaluation Report,’’ OMB
explained below. The Commission
Control No. 1902–0171) is a mandatory
received one comment in response to
filing described at 18 CFR 141.300. The
the Federal Register notice (74FR47566, FERC–715 must be submitted by each
9/16/2009). FERC has summarized and
transmitting utility that operates
addressed the commenter’s suggestions
integrated (that is, non-radial)
below and in its submission to OMB.
transmission facilities at or above 100
DATES: Comments on the collection of
kilovolts. [An overview and current
information are due by January 4, 2010.
instructions for filing the FERC–715 are
ADDRESSES: Address comments on the
posted on the FERC Web site at:
collection of information to the Office of https://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/eforms/
Management and Budget, Office of
form-715/instructions.asp.]
Section 213 (b) of the Federal Power
Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Act (FPA), as amended by the Energy
Attention: Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission Desk Officer. Comments to Policy Act of 1992, requires FERC to
collect, annually from transmitting
OMB should be filed electronically, c/o
utilities, sufficient information about
oira__submission@omb.eop.gov and
their transmission systems to inform
include OMB Control Number 1902–
potential transmission customers, state
0171 as a point of reference. The Desk
regulatory authorities, and the public, of
Officer may be reached by telephone at
202–395–4638. A copy of the comments available transmission capacity and
constraints. FERC–715 also supports the
should also be sent to the Federal
Commission’s expanded responsibilities
Energy Regulatory Commission and
under Sections 211, 212, 213(a), 304,
should refer to Docket No. IC09–715–
307(a), 309, and 311 of the FPA, as
001. Comments may be filed either
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:28 Dec 01, 2009
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
amended, for reviewing reliability
issues, market structure relationships,
and in rate and other regulatory
proceedings.
A summary of the comment filed,
FERC’s response, and proposed changes
to the requirements follow.
a. Comment: FERC Order No. 890 now
requires regional transmission planning
processes. We suggest that respondents
be allowed to refer to Attachment K
information already available on
Regional Planning Web sites.
FERC response: Respondents are
already encouraged to incorporate
references to readily available
information when preparing their
FERC–715 submissions. External
information is most often used in Part
IV, Transmission Planning Reliability
Criteria. However, Order No. 890 does
not require utilities to file power flow
data or maps with the Commission or
otherwise make this data available.
Therefore, FERC–715 is the only source
for these items.
b. Comment: The commenter suggests
FERC should allow filing via the
Internet, as well as on CDs, DVDs,
diskettes, or in hard copy.
FERC response: The Commission
agrees that Internet filing has the
potential to reduce the burden to
industry. Respondents are already given
the option of filing via the Internet
(through eFiling), if the submission can
be completed using acceptable file
formats. Filings may also be made on
CD or DVD. The option of using
diskettes is being eliminated, however,
due to advances in technology and file
sizes being too large for the medium.
c. Comment: The commenter suggests
that a list of changes be provided when
the FERC–715 instructions are updated.
FERC response: FERC agrees and will
provide this information to respondents
beginning with the 2010 filing.
d. Comment: Certain parts of FERC–
715 need only be updated when
information changes from previous
filings. The commenter suggests that
respondents be required to report the
last filing date of information that is
unchanged.
FERC response: FERC agrees and will
incorporate this requirement into the
FERC–715 instructions. To reduce the
burden on industry, if this date is prior
to the 2010 filing deadline, Respondents
need only state that the previous filing
was ‘‘prior to the 2010 filing.’’
e. Comment: FERC–715 responses are
considered Critical Energy
Infrastructure Information (CEII), and
parties requesting access to this data
must be vetted and approved by FERC.
These parties may also request CEII
directly from FERC–715 respondents.
E:\FR\FM\02DEN1.SGM
02DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 230 (Wednesday, December 2, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 63131-63142]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-28694]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Case No. CAC-022]
Energy Conservation Program for Consumer Products: Publication of
the Petition for Waiver and Granting the Application for Interim Waiver
of Hallowell International From the Department of Energy Residential
Central Air Conditioner and Heat Pump Test Procedure
AGENCY: Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Department of
Energy.
ACTION: Notice of Petition for Waiver, Granting an Application for
Interim Waiver, and request for public comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This notice announces receipt of and publishes the Hallowell
International (Hallowell) Petition for Waiver (hereafter, ``Petition'')
from the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) test procedure for determining
the energy consumption of residential central air conditioners and heat
pumps for certain specified equipment. The waiver request pertains to
Hallowell's Boosted Compression heat pumps, a product line that uses
three-stage technology to enable efficient heating at very low outdoor
temperatures. The existing test procedure accounts for two-capacity
compressors, but not three-capacity operation. Therefore, Hallowell has
suggested an alternate test procedure to calculate the heating
performance of its three-stage Boosted Compression products. DOE is
soliciting comments, data, and information concerning Hallowell's
Petition and the suggested alternate test procedure. DOE is also
granting an interim waiver to Hallowell.
DATES: DOE will accept comments, data, and information with respect to
the Hallowell Petition until, but no later than January 4, 2010.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by case number [CAC-
022], by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
E-mail: AS_Waiver_Requests@ee.doe.gov. Include either
the case number [CAC-022], and/or ``Hallowell Petition'' in the subject
line of the message.
Mail: Ms. Brenda Edwards, U.S. Department of Energy,
Building Technologies Program, Mailstop EE-2J, Petition for Waiver Case
No. RF-008, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20585-0121.
Telephone: (202) 586-2945. Please submit one signed original paper
copy.
Hand Delivery/Courier: Ms. Brenda Edwards, U.S. Department
of Energy, Building Technologies Program, 950 L'Enfant Plaza, SW.,
Suite 600, Washington, DC 20024. Please submit one signed original
paper copy.
Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name
and case number for this proceeding. Submit electronic comments in
WordPerfect, Microsoft Word, Portable Document Format (PDF), or text
(American Standard Code for Information Interchange (ASCII)) file
format, and avoid the use of special characters or any form of
encryption. Wherever possible, include the electronic signature of the
author. DOE does not accept telefacsimiles (faxes).
Any person submitting written comments must also send a copy of
such comments to the petitioner, pursuant to 10 CFR 430.27(d). The
contact information for the petitioner is: Mr. Joseph M. Gross, Design
Engineer, Hallowell International, 110 Hildreth Street, Bangor, ME
04401. Telephone: (207) 990-5600 x121. E-mail:
jgross@gotohallowell.com.
According to 10 CFR 1004.11, any person submitting information that
he or she believes to be confidential and exempt by law from public
disclosure should submit two copies: one copy of the document including
all the information believed to be confidential, and one copy of the
document with the information believed to be confidential deleted. DOE
will make its own determination about the confidential status of the
information and treat it according to its determination.
Docket: For access to the docket to review the background documents
relevant to this matter, you may visit the U.S. Department of Energy,
950 L'Enfant Plaza, SW., (Resource Room of the Building Technologies
Program), Washington, DC 20024; (202) 586-2945, between 9 a.m. and 4
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Available
documents include the following items: (1) This notice; (2) public
comments received; (3) the Petition for Waiver and Application for
Interim Waiver; and (4) prior DOE rulemakings regarding similar central
air conditioning and heat pump equipment. Please call Ms. Brenda
Edwards at the above telephone number for additional information
regarding visiting the Resource Room.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Michael G. Raymond, U.S.
Department of Energy, Building Technologies Program, Mail Stop EE-2J,
Forrestal Building, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC
20585-0121. Telephone: (202) 586-9611. E-mail:
Michael.Raymond@ee.doe.gov.
Francine Pinto or Eric Stas, U.S. Department of Energy, Office of
the General Counsel, Mail Stop GC-72, Forrestal Building, 1000
Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20585-0103. Telephone: (202)
586-9507. E-mail: Francine.Pinto@hq.doe.gov or Eric.Stas@hq.doe.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Background and Authority
II. Petition for Waiver
III. Application for Interim Waiver
IV. Alternate Test Procedure
V. Summary and Request for Comments
VI.
I. Background and Authority
Title III of the Energy Policy and Conservation Act (EPCA) sets
forth a variety of provisions concerning energy efficiency. Part A of
Title III establishes the Energy Conservation Program for Consumer
Products Other Than Automobiles.\1\ (42 U.S.C. 6291-6309) This notice
involves residential products under Part A, and EPCA specifically
includes definitions, test procedures, labeling provisions, energy
conservation standards, and the authority to require information and
reports from manufacturers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ These two parts were originally titled Parts B and C, but
were redesignated as Parts A and A-1 in the United States Code for
editorial reasons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
With respect to test procedures, Part A generally authorizes the
Secretary of Energy (the Secretary) to prescribe test procedures that
are reasonably designed to produce results which reflect energy
efficiency, energy use, and estimated annual operating costs, and that
are not unduly burdensome to conduct. (42 U.S.C. 6293(b)(3))
[[Page 63132]]
Relevant to the current Petition for Waiver, the test procedures
for residential central air conditioners and central air conditioning
heat pumps are set forth in 10 CFR Part 430, subpart B, appendix M.
Section 323 of EPCA provides that the Secretary of Energy may amend
test procedures for consumer products if the Secretary determines that
amended test procedures would more accurately reflect energy
efficiency, energy use or estimated annual operating costs, and are not
unduly burdensome to conduct. (42 U.S.C. 6293(b)(1)(A) and (b)(3))
DOE's regulations contain provisions allowing a person to seek a
waiver from the test procedure requirements for covered products, for
which the petitioner's basic model contains one or more design
characteristics that prevent testing according to the prescribed test
procedures, or when the prescribed test procedures may evaluate the
basic model in a manner so unrepresentative of its true energy
consumption as to provide materially inaccurate comparative data. 10
CFR 430.27(a)(1). Petitioners must include in their petition any
alternate test procedures known to evaluate the basic model in a manner
representative of its energy consumption. 10 CFR 430.27(b)(1)(iii). The
Assistant Secretary for Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (the
Assistant Secretary) may grant the waiver subject to conditions,
including adherence to alternate test procedures. 10 CFR 430.27(l).
Within 1 year of granting the waiver, DOE must publish in the Federal
Register a notice of proposed rulemaking to amend its regulations so as
to eliminate any need for the continuation of such waiver. As soon
thereafter as practicable, the Department of Energy must publish in the
Federal Register a final rule. The waiver will terminate on the
effective date of such final rule. 10 CFR 430.27(m).
The waiver process also permits parties petitioning DOE for a
waiver to apply for an Interim Waiver from the prescribed test
procedure requirements. 10 CFR 430.27(a)(2). The Assistant Secretary
will grant an Interim Waiver request if it is determined that the
applicant will experience economic hardship if the Interim Waiver is
denied, if it appears likely that the Petition for Waiver will be
granted, and/or the Assistant Secretary determines that it would be
desirable for public policy reasons to grant immediate relief pending a
determination on the Petition for Waiver. 10 CFR 430.27(g). An Interim
Waiver remains in effect for a period of 180 days or until DOE issues
its determination on the Petition for Waiver, whichever is sooner, and
may be extended for an additional 180 days, if necessary. 10 CFR
430.27(h).
II. Petition for Waiver
On July 29, 2008, Hallowell filed a Petition for Waiver from the
test procedures applicable to residential air conditioning and heating
equipment and an Application for Interim Waiver. The applicable test
procedure for Hallowell's residential Boosted Compression products is
the DOE residential test procedure found in 10 CFR Part 430, Subpart B,
Appendix M. Hallowell included an alternate test procedure in its July
29, 2008, submittal, but the alternate procedure was incomplete. On
April 25, 2009, Hallowell submitted the revised petition and alternate
test procedure included in this Federal Register notice.
Hallowell seeks a waiver from the DOE test procedures on the
grounds that its Boosted Compression heat pump systems contain design
characteristics that prevent testing according to the current DOE test
procedure. The DOE test procedure covers systems with a single speed,
with two steps or stages of modulation, and with continuous modulation
over a finite range through the incorporation of a variable-speed or
digital compressor. Hallowell's product deviates from the anticipated
form--a system whose performance falls between that of a two-capacity
system and a conventional variable-capacity system--because the three-
capacity capability is limited to heating mode operation. Moreover, the
additional stage of heating capacity is specifically used at the lowest
outdoor temperatures with the aim of maximizing the total heating
contributed by the heat pump relative to the total heating supplied by
the auxiliary heat source (usually electric resistance). Another unique
feature of Hallowell's low-temperature heat pump system is that for any
given outdoor temperature, only two-stages of heating are permitted;
one stage is always locked out.
Rating Hallowell's Boosted Compression products will require
modified calculation algorithms and testing at an additional, lower
temperature to capture the effect on both capacity and power of the
additional stage/level of heating operation. The building load assigned
within
HSPF calculations requires evaluation based on the case where high-
stage compressor capacity for heating exceeds the high-stage compressor
capacity for cooling. Finally, the control feature that limits the
number of heating mode capacity levels to two for any given outdoor
temperature must be accounted for.
Accordingly, Hallowell requests that DOE grant a test procedure
waiver for its Boosted Compression product designs, until a suitable
test method can be prescribed. Furthermore, Hallowell states that
failure to grant the waiver would result in economic hardship because
it would prevent the company from marketing its Boosted Compression
products.
III. Application for Interim Waiver
In addition to its Petition for Waiver, submitted on July 29, 2008
and revised on April 25, 2009, Hallowell submitted to DOE an
Application for Interim Waiver. On May 29, 2009, Hallowell submitted a
revised Petition for Waiver and Application for Interim Waiver
containing information concerning the financial hardship and
competitive disadvantage Hallowell is facing. Hallowell states that it
is difficult to build sales volume and gain credibility when there are
no standards to provide performance ratings for the equipment, which
would entitle its customers to rebates, tax credits, and other
incentives. Since the release of the Recovery Act with new criteria for
energy efficiency tax rebates, business growth at Hallowell has
diminished. Many of Hallowell's dealers and distributors have submitted
letters concerning the lack of sales of the Acadia system due lack of
AHRI listing, and therefore no rebates available. Hallowell submitted
an attachment of many dealer/distributor letters claiming these
hardships. With sales down, Hallowell International has cut back on all
research and development, development of new products and new
manufacturing production that would enable the company to grow.
In those instances where it appears likely the Petition for Waiver
will be granted, based upon a product design that has characteristics
which prevent testing according to the prescribed test procedure, it is
in the public interest to allow products to be marketed that DOE
believes are exceptionally energy-efficient. Hallowell's three-speed
Boosted Compression heat pumps are capable of efficient operation at
much lower temperatures than two-speed heat pumps (Hallowell measured a
coefficient of performance of 2.1 at -15 [deg]F), making them
potentially very desirable for heating in cold climates. The alternate
test procedure submitted by Hallowell is not radically different from
the current DOE test procedure, which has provisions for heat pumps
having a two-capacity compressor. The Hallowell alternate test
procedure is a
[[Page 63133]]
logical extension of DOE's two-capacity test method to cover
Hallowell's three-capacity compressor. The two (of three potential)
active stages of heating capacity available for each bin temperature
calculation will be based on Hallowell's control logic. The HSPF
algorithm will follow the algorithm in the DOE test procedure used for
two-capacity heat pumps. Thus, DOE has determined that it is likely
that Hallowell's Petition for Waiver will be granted for its new
Boosted Compression three-speed models.
Therefore, DOE grants Hallowell's application for Interim Waiver
from testing of its Boosted Compression heat pump models. This granting
of Interim Waiver may be modified at any time upon a determination that
the factual basis underlying the application is incorrect.
IV. Alternate Test Procedure
DOE plans to consider inclusion of the following waiver language in
the Decision and Order for Hallowell's Boosted Compression central air
conditioning heat pumps models:
(1) The ``Petition for Waiver'' filed by Hallowell is hereby
granted as set forth in the paragraphs below.
(2) Hallowell shall not be required to test or rate its Boosted
Compression central air conditioning heat pumps products listed above
in section III, on the basis of the currently applicable DOE test
procedure, but shall be required to test and rate such products
according to the alternate test procedure as set forth in paragraph
(3).
(3) Add section 3.6.6 to address the heating mode tests conducted
on units having a triple-capacity compressor.
3.6.6 Tests for a heat pump having a triple-capacity compressor.
Test triple-capacity, northern heat pumps for the heating mode as
follows:
a. Conduct one Maximum Temperature Test (H01), two High Temperature
Tests (H12 and H11), two Frost Accumulation Tests (H22 and H21), three
Low Temperature Tests (H31, H32, and H33), and one Minimum Temperature
Test (H43). An alternative to conducting the H21 Frost Accumulation
Test to determine Qhk=1 (35) and
Ehk=1 (35) is to use the following equations to
approximate this capacity and electrical power:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN02DE09.035
In evaluating the above equations, determine the quantities
Qhk=1 (47) and Ehk=1 (47)
from the H11 Test and evaluate them according to Section 3.7. Determine
the quantities Qhk=1 (17) and
Ehk=1 (17) from the H31 Test and evaluate them
according to Section 3.10. If the manufacturer conducts the H21 Test,
the option of using the above default equations is not forfeited. Use
the paired values of Qhk=1 (35) and
Ehk=1 (35) derived from conducting the H21 Frost
Accumulation Test and evaluated as specified in section 3.9.1 or use
the paired values calculated using the above default equations,
whichever paired values contribute to a higher Region IV HSPF based on
the DHRmin.
Conducting a Frost Accumulation Test (H23) with the heat pump
operating at its booster capacity is optional. If this optional test is
not conducted, determine Qhk=3 (35) and
Ehk=3 (35) using the following equations to
approximate this capacity and electrical power:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN02DE09.036
Where,
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN02DE09.037
Determine the quantities Qhk=2 (47) and
Ehk=2 (47) from the H12 Test and evaluate them
according to Section 3.7. Determine the quantities
Qhk=2 (35) and Ehk=2 (35)
from the H22 Test and evaluate them according to Section 3.9.1.
Determine the quantities Qhk=2 (17) and
Ehk=2 (17) from the H32 Test, determine the
quantities Qhk=3 (17) and
Ehk=3 (17) from the H33 Test, and determine the
quantities Qhk=3 (2) and
Ehk=3 (2) from the H43 Test. Evaluate all six
quantities according to Section 3.10. If the manufacturer conducts the
H23 Test, the option of using the above default equations is not
forfeited. Use the paired values of Qhk=3 (35)
and Ehk=3 (35) derived from conducting the H23
Frost Accumulation Test and calculated as specified in section 3.9.1 or
use the paired values calculated using the above default equations,
whichever paired values contribute to a higher Region IV HSPF based on
the DHRmin.
[[Page 63134]]
Table A specifies test conditions for all thirteen tests.
Table A--Heating Mode Test Conditions for Units Having a Triple-Capacity Compressor
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Air entering indoor unit Air entering outdoor unit
temperature ([deg]F) temperature ([deg]F)
Test description ----------------------------------------------------- Compressor Booster Heating air volume rate
Wet bulb capacity
Dry bulb (max) Dry bulb Wet bulb
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
H01 Test (required, steady).... 70 60 62 56.5 Low............... Off............... Heating Minimum \1\
H12 Test (required, steady).... 70 60 47 43 High.............. Off............... Heating Full-Load \2\
H1C2 Test (optional, cyclic)... 70 60 47 43 High.............. Off............... (\3\)
H11 Test (required)............ 70 60 47 43 Low............... Off............... Heating Minimum(\1\)
H1C1 Test (optional, cyclic)... 70 60 47 43 Low............... Off............... (\4\)
H23 Test (optional, steady).... 70 60 35 33 High.............. On................ Heating Full-Load \2\
H22 Test (required)............ 70 60 35 33 High.............. Off............... Heating Full-Load \2\
H21 Test (5 6) (required)...... 70 60 35 33 Low............... Off............... Heating Minimum \1\
H32 Test (required, steady).... 70 60 17 15 High.............. On................ Heating Full-Load \2\
H3C3 Test (optional, cyclic)... 70 60 17 15 High.............. On................ (\7\)
H32 Test (required, steady).... 70 60 17 15 High.............. Off............... Heating Full-Load \2\
H31 Test \5\ (required, steady) 70 60 17 15 Low............... Off............... Heating Minimum \1\
H43 Test (required, steady).... 70 60 0 -2 High.............. On................ Heating Full-Load \2\
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Defined in section 3.1.4.5.
\2\ Defined in section 3.1.4.4.
\3\ Maintain the airflow nozzle(s) static pressure difference or velocity pressure during the ON period at the same pressure or velocity as measured
during the H12 Test.
\4\ Maintain the airflow nozzle(s) static pressure difference or velocity pressure during the ON period at the same pressure or velocity as measured
during the H11 Test.
\5\ Required only if the heat pump's performance when operating at low compressor capacity and outdoor temperatures less than 37 [deg]F is needed to
complete the section 4.2.6 HSPF calculations.
\6\ If table note 5 applies, the section 3.6.3 equations for Qhk=1 (35) and Ehk=1 (17) may be used in lieu of conducting the H21 Test.
\7\ Maintain the airflow nozzle(s) static pressure difference or velocity pressure during the ON period at the same pressure or velocity measured during
the H33 Test.
Section 4.2.3 of Appendix M shall be revised to read as follows:
4.2.3. Additional steps for calculating the HSPF of a heat pump
having a triple-capacity compressor. * * *
a. Evaluate the space heating capacity and electrical power
consumption of the heat pump at outdoor temperature Tj and
with a first stage call from the thermostat (k=1), and with a second
stage call from the thermostat (k=2) using:
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
[[Page 63135]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN02DE09.021
BILLING CODE 6450-01-C
V. Summary and Request for Comments
Through today's notice, DOE grants Hallowell's Petition for Interim
Waiver and announces receipt of Hallowell's Petition for Waiver from
the test procedures applicable to Hallowell's Boosted Compression
there-speed heat
[[Page 63136]]
pump products. As part of this notice, DOE is publishing Hallowell's
Petition for Waiver in its entirety. The Petition includes a suggested
alternate test procedure and calculation methodology to determine the
energy consumption of Hallowell's specified heat pumps with Boosted
Compression technology. The Petition contains no confidential
information.
DOE is interested in receiving comments on the issues addressed in
this notice. Pursuant to 10 CFR 430.27(d), any person submitting
written comments must also send a copy of such comments to the
petitioner, whose contact information is included in the ADDRESSES
section above.
Issued in Washington, DC, on November 23, 2009.
Cathy Zoi,
Assistant Secretary, Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.
To: Michael Raymond, Department of Energy
From: Joseph M Gross, Hallowell International
Subject: Petition to waive CFR (Code of Federal Regulations) Part
430 performance ratings for ACADIA Combined Heating and Cooling
System.
Date: April 25, 2009
CC: American Heating and Refrigeration Institute Assistant Secretary
for Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy
To whom it may concern,
Hallowell International manufactures and markets air source heat
pump equipment featuring a patented technology known as Boosted
Compression. This technology greatly enhances the cold temperature
performance of an air source heat pump, enabling the equipment to
remain effective in heating operation at temperatures as cold as -
30[deg]F without the need for any form of supplemental heat.
The physical nature of this technology, as well as the control
by which it is operated, eliminates the possibility of testing under
the existing 210/240-2008 standard for unitary air source heat pump
equipment, following Appendix M to Subpart B of CFR Part 430, as has
been confirmed by engineering at ETL Semko, and engineering at AHRI.
The current standard covers 1 and 2 speed systems. Boosted
Compression effectively introduces 3 speed technologies to the
marketplace, yet operates similar to a 1 or 2 stage system at any
given temperature condition.
This letter will discuss the mechanical and functional details
of the equipment, define how the normal operation makes testing
under current standards irrelevant, and describe what operating
specifics should be validated to show the true operating benefits of
the equipment. A suggestion for modifications to existing standards
is also included, as well as an interim request for a temporary test
waiver.
Because of the large amount of effort and financial resources
that have been expended on testing under current standards,
Hallowell International requests to be considered in two stages. The
first and most immediate stage is for consideration is to be given
for a waiver, declaring the equipment outside of any test standard
and relieving the equipment temporarily from the requirement. The
second stage is to consider Hallowell International's suggestions
for small modifications to the existing CFR Part 430 standard, or
for a waiver offering an alternate test method to AHRI. The
recommended test method will define the addition of 3 speed systems
to the standard, and suggest how these systems may be modeled
similarly to 1 and 2 speed systems.
Affected Models
The Hallowell International model group has seven specific
models that are currently, or were previously, available on the
market:
1. ACADIA024
2. ACADIA036
3. ACADIA048
4. 36C35H
5. 42C46H
6. ACHP03642
7. ACHP02431
The model group is covered under the following trade names:
1. All Climate Heat Pump
2. ACHP
3. Acadia Combined Heating and Cooling System
4. Acadia System
5. Acadia Heat Pump
6. Acadia
7. Hallowell ACADIA
8. Hallowell All Climate Heat Pump
9. Hallowell ACHP
10. Hallowell Acadia Combined Heating and Cooling System
11. Hallowell Heat Pump
12. Boosted Compression Heat Pump
13. Opti-Cycle Heat Pump
Mechanical and Functional Details of Boosted Compression
The model group to be considered for a Department of Energy
waiver falls under the system classification HRCU-A-CB, where a heat
pump system is comprised of two primary components; the outdoor
condensing unit with an outdoor coil and compressors which is mated
to an indoor coil with a fan. The model was designed as a ``Two
Speed'' system whereby the definitions of ``Two Speed'' systems from
section 3.16 of the 210/240-2008 Standard were considered within the
scope of the design.
Boosted Compression equipment is comprised of two compressors
paired in series. The first compressor, the Primary compressor, is
able to modulate between half capacity and full capacity by
reversing rotation of the crank shaft and mechanically eliminating
the motion of one of the two internal pistons for half capacity
operation. The Primary compressor functions for heating operation
and for cooling operation. A second compressor, the Booster
compressor, is a fixed speed, fixed capacity compressor that is used
at cold ambient outdoor conditions to increase the mass flow rate of
refrigerant through the system and increase the low temperature
performance by a process of supercharging the refrigeration cycle.
This compressor is used exclusively in heating operation at and
below 25 [deg]F, and does not operate during, or affect air
conditioning operation or performance.
The following covers the definition from the 210/240-2008
Standard (CFR Part 430, Appendix M, section 1.43), at a very basic
level, how this system was thought to be acceptable for ``Two
Speed'' testing.
3.16 Two-capacity (or Two-stage) Compressor. An air conditioner
or heat pump that has one of the following:
c. Two compressors where one compressor (Compressor 1)
operates at low loads and both compressors (Compressors 1
and 2) operate at high loads but Compressor 2
never operates alone
For such systems, low capacity means:
c. Operating Compressor 1, or
d. Operating with the compressor unloading (e.g., operating one
piston of a two-piston reciprocating compressor, using a fixed
fractional volume of the full scroll, etc.).
For such systems, high capacity means:
c. Operating Compressors 1 and 2.
A Boosted Compression system stages between a high and a low
capacity throughout the systems' operating envelope much like
traditional 2 speed systems. The system brings on higher capacities
to satisfy larger loads, typically as a function of a call for
higher capacity from a thermostat. In this system there are 4
heating capacities and 2 cooling capacities. At any given
temperature point of operation, there are only 2 capacities
available from the system, which stage based on outdoor air
temperature and the heating or cooling call from the thermostat. The
table below illustrates the algorithm of staging as utilized in the
control for Boosted Compression equipment.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BIN B -30 <= BIN C 15 <= BIN D 25 <= BIN E 34 <= BIN F 41 <=
Heating call at thermostat BIN A ODT-30 ODT < 15 ODT < 25 ODT < 34 ODT < 41 ODT < 62 BIN G 62 <= ODT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Y1............................ W1............. M3............. M2............. M2............. M2............. M1............. M1
Y2............................ W1............. M4............. M3............. M2+W1.......... M2............. M2............. M1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Where:
W1: Auxiliary heat control output
M1: Single cylinder operation, half capacity
[[Page 63137]]
of Primary Compressor, heating and cooling
M2: Two cylinder operation, Full capacity of Primary Compressor,
heating and cooling
M3: M2 + Booster Compressor + Economizer operation, heating only
M4: M3 + W1
As the table above illustrates, at any given outdoor temperature
condition, a Boosted Compression system operates with a maximum of
two capacities, using 2 of the 3 modes of heating (4 modes including
1st stage resistance) depending on what the ambient temperature is
at the current time of operation. The graph below shows more
accurately how a Boosted Compression system can be used as a two
stage system, but how the outdoor temperature conditions affect
which of the two out of four modes of operation will make up the two
capacities for said condition. The graph only shows Modes 1-3,
showing vapor cycle operation only.
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN02DE09.022
The graph shows how at any given temperature BIN, the Acadia
only utilizes a maximum of 2 out of its 3 stages of vapor cycle. In
fact, in BINs G (not shown), E, D, and B, the Acadia acts like a
single stage system, utilizing only one mode in these BINs.
A typical two speed heat pump would, if using the Boosted
Compression terminology to define operation, only have M1, M2, and
M2 + W1 available for system operation. Boosted Compression adds a
3rd stage of compression to the vapor cycle with the Booster
Compressor and an Economizer. This third stage effectively doubles
the capacity of the heat pump without a degradation of the
Coefficient of Performance at lower ambient conditions. The System
is further able to add supplemental or auxiliary heat much like
conventional 1 and 2 speed systems for occasions where the vapor
cycle alone is unable to maintain the conditioned space.
The following charts illustrate and provide distinction for the
differences in Boosted Compression 3 speed systems and standard two
speed systems. The charts reflect vapor cycle performance only. From
these it is clear that Boosted Compression is effectively a 3 speed,
or 3 capacity system, and as such will be the foundation for our
recommendation to create a standard for 3 speed equipment as a
modification to the existing 210/240-2008 Standard.
Important characteristics to note when comparing the two
systems:
1. Capacities at low ambient outdoor conditions
2. Capacity as a function of outdoor temperature
3. Coefficient of performance at low ambient conditions
4. Coefficient of performance relative to system capacity
5. Linear performance of standard systems relative to outdoor
temperature
6. Staged performance of 3 speed technology relative to outdoor
temperature
7. Charts reflect Maximum Vapor Cycle Capacity and do not include
lower speeds at similar outdoor temperatures
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
[[Page 63138]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN02DE09.023
BILLING CODE 6450-01-C
Restrictions of Current 210/240-2008 Standard
The current 210/240 standard provides an excellent template for
the evolution of a 3 speed standard. The restrictions of 2 speed
testing for the 3 speed unit are comprised of the following:
1. The expectation that the equipment will follow a linear
performance trend and as such can be modeled linearly
2. Operating condition tests are restricted to 62 [deg]F, 47
[deg]F, 35 [deg]F, and 17 [deg]F. This will not collect enough
operating characteristics to create an accurate trend, and does not
consider advantages of 3 speed equipment at cold temperatures.
3. If the 3 speed system provides 3 speeds of heating, or
cooling, how will equipment with different numbers of speeds for
both, such as 3 for heating and 2 for cooling be considered?
4. Heating Seasonal Performance Factor is calculated from a
linear interpolation of system performance along with other factors
considering defrosts and cycling penalties. A linear trend cannot be
created based on Boosted Compression performance characteristics and
erroneous HSPF numbers result. This is easily identified as
interpolated capacities trend towards infinite values as outdoor
temperature bins get colder, and moderate temperature operation is
very low where the two trends meet at an
[[Page 63139]]
apex. Note the quotation from AHRI representatives below:
Quote from an e-mail dated 7/18/08 from Ms. Sarah Medepalli, the
Certification Engineer assigned to Hallowell International at AHRI.
``The main problem is that 210/240 linearly interpolates to
capture the effect of varying outdoor temperature. As such, the lab
testing is set up so that the unit's configuration is exactly the
same for multiple outdoor conditions. The Hallowell unit, for
example, appears to use a different system configuration for the
high compressor capacity tests at 47 [deg]F and 17 [deg]F (and maybe
35 [deg]F too). The Hallowell unit would require extra test points
and the algorithm used to calculate HSPF would have to be modified
to create a more accurate performance map as opposed to the approach
of just blindly applying the current 210/240 algorithm for two-
capacity heat pumps.''
The following graph illustrates how a Boosted Compression system
cannot be modeled correctly using the 210/240 (CFR Part 430,
Appendix M) 2 speed standard for calculating Qhk-1,
Qhk-2, Ehk-1 and Ehk-2, covered in
section 4.2.3.a (Qhk-1, Qhk-2 and the BL(Tj)
are graphed on the chart below).
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN02DE09.024
The graph shows a Boosted Compression system's Qhk-1,
Qhk-2 and the load line for Minimum HSPF in region IV,
where QH1 = Qhk-1 and QH2 = Qhk-2. As can be
seen in this Illustration, when a Boosted Compression system's
heating capacities are interpolated with the 210/240 (CFR Part 430,
Appendix M) algorithm, the stages do not represent how any heat pump
system can physically operate, showing Qhk-2 increasing
infinitely as the outdoor temperature conditions drop. The data
taken to create this graph was taken directly from ETL's HSPF
calculation tables for our 3 Ton system, ARI document
USHP-08315-Q-1.
The 210/240-2008 Standard currently accurately covers the 2
speed air conditioning performance of Boosted Compression, since the
Booster Compressor is not allowed to operate in cooling mode,
effectively making the system a standard two speed air conditioner.
Recommendations for Modification of Current CFR Part 430 Standard, or
Interim Alternate Testing Method for Immediate Consideration
The following recommendations for testing of a ``3 Speed Heat
Pump'' are hereby submitted:
1. Additional test points of heating performance, in addition to
62 [deg]F, 47 [deg]F, 35 [deg]F and 17 [deg]F, should be added to
account for increased cold temperature performance. The following
table illustrates current tests and new tests required to
interpolate a 3 stage heat pump under AHRI 210/240 2 speed system
standard, where the H62 test would be a new test
condition requirement.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
IDU entering IDU entering ODU entering ODU entering
Heating test air [deg]Fdb air [deg]Fwb air [deg]Fdb air [deg]Fwb System speed
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
H01.......................... 70 60 62 56.5 Low
H11.......................... 70 60 47 43 Low
H21.......................... 70 60 35 33 Low
H31.......................... 70 60 17 15 Low
H32.......................... 70 60 17 15 High
H62.......................... 70 60 0 -2 High
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. From the CFR Part 430 standard the following equation is
defined for HSPF,
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN02DE09.025
[[Page 63140]]
where the design heating requirement, DHR, as defined in section
4.2, is calculated from the 47[deg] test point. This equation will
continue to hold true for 3 speed HSPF calculation.
The following equations are compatible with Boosted Compression
and continue with a similar methodology to the current standards.
In section 4.2.3, the evaluation of heating capacity (Qh\k\) and
electrical energy consumption (Eh\k\) could be defined by the
following performance slope equations:
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN02DE09.026
BILLING CODE 6450-01-C
With these algorithms used to interpolate capacity (Qh\k\) and
electrical energy consumption (Eh\k\), the following graph can be
achieved from entering data into the CFR Part 430 standard for
calculating HSPF on a 2 speed heat pump system, and plotting
Qh\k=1\, Qh\k=2\ and the BL(Tj) vs. the temperature BIN temperature
(Tj), where QH1 = Qhk-1 and QH2 = Qhk-2.
[[Page 63141]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN02DE09.027
It can easily be seen, when comparing this graph to the one
outlining the modes of operation in different temperature BINs that
these new algorithms accurately portray a Boosted Compression
system's vapor cycle. The graph below highlights the modes of
operation from the graph above for clarity.
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN02DE09.028
We, the representatives of Hallowell International, wish to
encourage the Department of Energy to consider quick action in
amending the current CFR Part 430 testing specifications to include
3-speed equipment. Hallowell, as a manufacturer, relies on third
party performance testing and verification of performance from AHRI
against competitive equipment to gain traction in the marketplace.
Since AHRI adopts their 210/240 standard from CFR Part 430, changes
made to the CFR will carry through to AHRI, allowing Hallowell
systems to be fairly listed on the directory with other competitive
heat pump systems.
We believe that our equipment brings great advancement to the
HVAC industry and provides a unique alternative to fossil fuels in
today's changing energy climate. It is difficult to build sales
volume and gain the credibility, required as an OEM, when there are
no standards to provide performance ratings for the equipment, which
would entitle our customers to rebates, tax credits, or other
incentives.
We hope that a temporary waiver will be granted acknowledging
that our three speed product is not covered by a current standard.
We further hope that an amendment to the existing standards will be
considered, or an alternate test procedure waiver will be
considered, as 3-speed equipment does not need to have an entirely
new process to be considered and implemented.
If there are any questions or concerns about the equipment
please do not hesitate to contact us directly. We will freely share
information about Boosted Compression such that your requirements
and due diligence will be satisfied in this matter.
Please direct all correspondence with Hallowell International
to:
Joseph M Gross
Design Engineer
Hallowell International
[[Page 63142]]
Phone: 207 990 5600 Extension 121
Fax: 207 990 5602
E-mail: JGross@gotohallowell.com
Signed,
Duane A. Hallowell,
President and CEO
Date:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Joseph M Gross,
Design Engineer
Date:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
[FR Doc. E9-28694 Filed 12-1-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P