Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A330-200, A330-300, and A340-300 Series Airplanes, 62711-62713 [E9-28799]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 229 / Tuesday, December 1, 2009 / Proposed Rules
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section of
this notice.
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 632, 634(b)(6), 636(b),
637(a), 644, and 662(5); and Pub. L. 105–135,
sec. 401 et seq., 111 Stat. 2592.
Dated: November 24, 2009.
Joseph Jordan,
Associate Administrator for Government
Contracting and Business Development.
[FR Doc. E9–28664 Filed 11–25–09; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 8025–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2009–1108; Directorate
Identifier 2009–NM–131–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model
A330–200, A330–300, and A340–300
Series Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This proposed
AD results from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI)
originated by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct
an unsafe condition on an aviation
product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as:
It was noticed in production that in the
area between frame (FR) C53.9 and FR C55
RH [right-hand], the distance between the
route 9R of the In-Flight Entertainment
system and the wire harness for the Lower
Deck-Mobile Crew Rest system provisions is
too small.
This limited distance may cause chafing
between the affected electrical harness
6581VB and the harness 5495VB or 6938VB.
This condition, if not corrected, could lead
to the short circuit of wires dedicated to
oxygen, which, in case of emergency, could
result in a large number of passenger oxygen
masks not being supplied with oxygen,
possibly causing personal injuries.
pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES
*
*
*
*
*
The proposed AD would require actions
that are intended to address the unsafe
condition described in the MCAI.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by January 15, 2010.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:13 Nov 30, 2009
Jkt 220001
62711
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–40, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this proposed AD, contact Airbus SAS—
Airworthiness Office—EAL, 1 Rond
Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac
Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36
96; fax +33 5 61 93 45 80, e-mail
airworthiness.A330-A340@airbus.com;
Internet https://www.airbus.com. You
may review copies of the referenced
service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601
Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington.
For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call 425–227–
1221 or 425–227–1152.
We have lengthened the 30-day
comment period for proposed ADs that
address MCAI originated by aviation
authorities of other countries to provide
adequate time for interested parties to
submit comments. The comment period
for these proposed ADs is now typically
45 days, which is consistent with the
comment period for domestic transport
ADs.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact we receive
about this proposed AD.
Examining the AD Docket
It was noticed in production that in the
area between frame (FR) C53.9 and FR C55
RH [right-hand], the distance between the
route 9R of the In-Flight Entertainment
system and the wire harness for the Lower
Deck-Mobile Crew Rest system provisions is
too small.
This limited distance may cause chafing
between the affected electrical harness
6581VB and the harness 5495VB or 6938VB.
This condition, if not corrected, could lead
to the short circuit of wires dedicated to
oxygen, which, in case of emergency, could
result in a large number of passenger oxygen
masks not being supplied with oxygen,
possibly causing personal injuries.
For the reasons described above, this AD
requires the installation of a stirrup on the
terminal block 5507VT between FR53.9 and
FR54, and the re-routing of the wiring route
9R.
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Operations office between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Operations
office (telephone (800) 647–5527) is in
the ADDRESSES section. Comments will
be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Vladimir Ulyanov, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057–3356; telephone
(425) 227–1138; fax (425) 227–1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposed AD. Send your comments
to an address listed under the
ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No.
FAA–2009–1108; Directorate Identifier
2009–NM–131–AD’’ at the beginning of
your comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend this
proposed AD based on those comments.
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Discussion
The European Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA), which is the Technical Agent
for the Member States of the European
Community, has issued EASA
Airworthiness Directive 2009–0076,
dated April 6, 2009 (referred to after this
as ‘‘the MCAI’’), to correct an unsafe
condition for the specified products.
The MCAI states:
You may obtain further information by
examining the MCAI in the AD docket.
Relevant Service Information
Airbus has issued Mandatory Service
Bulletin A330–92–3080, dated
November 12, 2008; and Mandatory
Service Bulletin A340–92–4080, dated
November 12, 2008. The actions
described in this service information are
intended to correct the unsafe condition
identified in the MCAI.
FAA’s Determination and Requirements
of This Proposed AD
This product has been approved by
the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation
in the United States. Pursuant to our
bilateral agreement with the State of
Design Authority, we have been notified
E:\FR\FM\01DEP1.SGM
01DEP1
62712
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 229 / Tuesday, December 1, 2009 / Proposed Rules
of the unsafe condition described in the
MCAI and service information
referenced above. We are proposing this
AD because we evaluated all pertinent
information and determined an unsafe
condition exists and is likely to exist or
develop on other products of the same
type design.
Differences Between This AD and the
MCAI or Service Information
We have reviewed the MCAI and
related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But
we might have found it necessary to use
different words from those in the MCAI
to ensure the AD is clear for U.S.
operators and is enforceable. In making
these changes, we do not intend to differ
substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related
service information.
We might also have proposed
different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow FAA
policies. Any such differences are
highlighted in a Note within the
proposed AD.
pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES
Costs of Compliance
Based on the service information, we
estimate that this proposed AD would
affect about 43 products of U.S. registry.
We also estimate that it would take
about 3 work-hours per product to
comply with the basic requirements of
this proposed AD. The average labor
rate is $80 per work-hour. Required
parts would cost about $66 per product.
Where the service information lists
required parts costs that are covered
under warranty, we have assumed that
there will be no charge for these costs.
As we do not control warranty coverage
for affected parties, some parties may
incur costs higher than estimated here.
Based on these figures, we estimate the
cost of the proposed AD on U.S.
operators to be $13,158, or $306 per
product.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:13 Nov 30, 2009
Jkt 220001
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD
would not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This
proposed AD would not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify this proposed regulation:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation
of the estimated costs to comply with
this proposed AD and placed it in the
AD docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new AD:
Airbus: Docket No. FAA–2009–1108;
Directorate Identifier 2009–NM–131–AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) We must receive comments by January
15, 2010.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Airbus Model A330–
201, –202, –203, –223, –243, –301, –302,
–303, –321, –322, –323, –341, –342, –343
series airplanes; and Airbus Model A340–
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
311, –312, and –313 series airplanes,
certificated in any category; all manufacturer
serial numbers; modified in production by
modifications identified in both paragraphs
(c)(1)(i) and (c)(1)(ii) of this AD; excluding
those on which Airbus modification 57744
has been embodied in production.
(i) Airbus modification 40379; and
(ii) One of the following Airbus
modifications, as applicable:
(A) For all models except Model A340–
311, A340–312, and A340–313 airplanes:
Modification 49894, 51304, 52048, 52712,
53559, 53732, 54115, 55632, or 55722.
(B) For Model A340–311, A340–312, and
A340–313 series airplanes: Modification
51603, 53400, or 55024.
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 92.
Reason
(e) The mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI) states:
It was noticed in production that in the
area between frame (FR) C53.9 and FR C55
RH [right-hand], the distance between the
route 9R of the In-Flight Entertainment
system and the wire harness for the Lower
Deck-Mobile Crew Rest system provisions is
too small.
This limited distance may cause chafing
between the affected electrical harness
6581VB and the harness 5495VB or 6938VB.
This condition, if not corrected, could lead
to the short circuit of wires dedicated to
oxygen, which, in case of emergency, could
result in a large number of passenger oxygen
masks not being supplied with oxygen,
possibly causing personal injuries.
For the reasons described above, this AD
requires the installation of a stirrup on the
terminal block 5507VT between FR53.9 and
FR54, and the re-routing of the wiring route
9R.
Actions and Compliance
(f) Within 24 months after the effective
date of this AD, unless already done: Install
a stirrup on the terminal block 5507VT
between FR53.9 and FR54 and modify the
wiring route 9R in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus
Mandatory Service Bulletin A330–92–3080,
dated November 12, 2008; or Airbus
Mandatory Service Bulletin A340–92–4080,
dated November 12, 2008; as applicable.
FAA AD Differences
Note 1: No differences.
Other FAA AD Provisions
(g) The following provisions also apply to
this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, International
Branch, FAA, has the authority to approve
AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send
information to ATTN: Vladimir Ulyanov,
Aerospace Engineer, International Branch,
ANM–116, Transport Airplane Directorate,
FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057–3356; telephone (425)
227–1138; fax (425) 227–1149. Before using
E:\FR\FM\01DEP1.SGM
01DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 229 / Tuesday, December 1, 2009 / Proposed Rules
any approved AMOC on any airplane to
which the AMOC applies, notify your
principal maintenance inspector (PMI) or
principal avionics inspector (PAI), as
appropriate, or lacking a principal inspector,
your local Flight Standards District Office.
The AMOC approval letter must specifically
reference this AD.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement
in this AD to obtain corrective actions from
a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective
actions are considered FAA-approved if they
are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required
to assure the product is airworthy before it
is returned to service.
(3) Reporting Requirements: For any
reporting requirement in this AD, under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) has
approved the information collection
requirements and has assigned OMB Control
Number 2120–0056.
Related Information
(h) Refer to MCAI EASA Airworthiness
Directive 2009–0076, dated April 6, 2009;
Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A330–92–
3080, dated November 12, 2008; and Airbus
Mandatory Service Bulletin A340–92–4080,
dated November 12, 2008; for related
information.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on
November 19, 2009.
Stephen P. Boyd,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E9–28799 Filed 11–30–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2009–1107; Directorate
Identifier 2009–NM–138–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model
A330–200 Series Airplanes and Model
A340–200 and –300 Series Airplanes
pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES
AGENCY: Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This proposed
AD results from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI)
originated by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct
an unsafe condition on an aviation
product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as:
*
*
*
VerDate Nov<24>2008
*
*
17:13 Nov 30, 2009
Jkt 220001
[European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA)]
AD 2006–0191 [which corresponds to FAA
AD 2006–21–08] required the installation of
new heat shield panels with drainage over
the air conditioning packs in order to avoid
an undetected fire in this zone following a
fuel leak from the centre tank.
These new heat shield panels have holes.
In case of fuel leaking through these holes
from the centre tank, any fuel vapour may
develop into a potential source of ignition,
possibly resulting in a fuel tank explosion
and consequent loss of the aeroplane.* * *
*
*
*
*
*
The proposed AD would require actions
that are intended to address the unsafe
condition described in the MCAI.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by January 15, 2010.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–40, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this proposed AD, contact Airbus SAS—
Airworthiness Office—EAL, 1 Rond
Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac
Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36
96; fax +33 5 61 93 45 80, e-mail
airworthiness.A330–A340@airbus.com;
Internet https://www.airbus.com. You
may review copies of the referenced
service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601
Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington.
For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call 425–227–
1221 or 425–227–1152.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Operations office between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Operations
office (telephone (800) 647–5527) is in
the ADDRESSES section. Comments will
be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
62713
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Vladimir Ulyanov, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
Washington 98057–3356; telephone
(425) 227–1138; fax (425) 227–1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposed AD. Send your comments
to an address listed under the
ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No.
FAA–2009–1107; Directorate Identifier
2009–NM–138–AD’’ at the beginning of
your comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend this
proposed AD based on those comments.
We have lengthened the 30-day
comment period for proposed ADs that
address MCAI originated by aviation
authorities of other countries to provide
adequate time for interested parties to
submit comments. The comment period
for these proposed ADs is now typically
45 days, which is consistent with the
comment period for domestic transport
ADs.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact we receive
about this proposed AD.
Discussion
The European Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA), which is the Technical Agent
for the Member States of the European
Community, has issued EASA
Airworthiness Directive 2009–0150,
dated July 9, 2009 (referred to after this
as ‘‘the MCAI’’), to correct an unsafe
condition for the specified products.
The MCAI states:
* * * EASA AD 2006–0191 [which
corresponds to FAA AD 2006–21–08]
required the installation of new heat shield
panels with drainage over the air
conditioning packs in order to avoid an
undetected fire in this zone following a fuel
leak from the centre tank.
These new heat shield panels have holes.
In case of fuel leaking through these holes
from the centre tank, any fuel vapour may
develop into a potential source of ignition,
possibly resulting in a fuel tank explosion
and consequent loss of the aeroplane. Airbus
has developed a repair solution for these
holes to prevent a fuel vapour ignition source
in this area and improve the protection of the
hot air equipment.
E:\FR\FM\01DEP1.SGM
01DEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 229 (Tuesday, December 1, 2009)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 62711-62713]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-28799]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2009-1108; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-131-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A330-200, A330-300, and
A340-300 Series Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This proposed AD results from mandatory
continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation
authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe
condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as:
It was noticed in production that in the area between frame (FR)
C53.9 and FR C55 RH [right-hand], the distance between the route 9R
of the In-Flight Entertainment system and the wire harness for the
Lower Deck-Mobile Crew Rest system provisions is too small.
This limited distance may cause chafing between the affected
electrical harness 6581VB and the harness 5495VB or 6938VB.
This condition, if not corrected, could lead to the short
circuit of wires dedicated to oxygen, which, in case of emergency,
could result in a large number of passenger oxygen masks not being
supplied with oxygen, possibly causing personal injuries.
* * * * *
The proposed AD would require actions that are intended to address the
unsafe condition described in the MCAI.
DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by January 15,
2010.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: (202) 493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-40, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact
Airbus SAS--Airworthiness Office--EAL, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte,
31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5 61
93 45 80, e-mail airworthiness.A330-A340@airbus.com; Internet https://www.airbus.com. You may review copies of the referenced service
information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind
Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington. For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call 425-227-1221 or 425-227-1152.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Operations office (telephone (800) 647-5527) is
in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket
shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Vladimir Ulyanov, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425)
227-1138; fax (425) 227-1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2009-1108;
Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-131-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD based on those comments.
We have lengthened the 30-day comment period for proposed ADs that
address MCAI originated by aviation authorities of other countries to
provide adequate time for interested parties to submit comments. The
comment period for these proposed ADs is now typically 45 days, which
is consistent with the comment period for domestic transport ADs.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.
Discussion
The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical
Agent for the Member States of the European Community, has issued EASA
Airworthiness Directive 2009-0076, dated April 6, 2009 (referred to
after this as ``the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe condition for the
specified products. The MCAI states:
It was noticed in production that in the area between frame (FR)
C53.9 and FR C55 RH [right-hand], the distance between the route 9R
of the In-Flight Entertainment system and the wire harness for the
Lower Deck-Mobile Crew Rest system provisions is too small.
This limited distance may cause chafing between the affected
electrical harness 6581VB and the harness 5495VB or 6938VB.
This condition, if not corrected, could lead to the short
circuit of wires dedicated to oxygen, which, in case of emergency,
could result in a large number of passenger oxygen masks not being
supplied with oxygen, possibly causing personal injuries.
For the reasons described above, this AD requires the
installation of a stirrup on the terminal block 5507VT between
FR53.9 and FR54, and the re-routing of the wiring route 9R.
You may obtain further information by examining the MCAI in the AD
docket.
Relevant Service Information
Airbus has issued Mandatory Service Bulletin A330-92-3080, dated
November 12, 2008; and Mandatory Service Bulletin A340-92-4080, dated
November 12, 2008. The actions described in this service information
are intended to correct the unsafe condition identified in the MCAI.
FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD
This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, we have
been notified
[[Page 62712]]
of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service information
referenced above. We are proposing this AD because we evaluated all
pertinent information and determined an unsafe condition exists and is
likely to exist or develop on other products of the same type design.
Differences Between This AD and the MCAI or Service Information
We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it
necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the
AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these
changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related service information.
We might also have proposed different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow FAA policies. Any such differences are
highlighted in a Note within the proposed AD.
Costs of Compliance
Based on the service information, we estimate that this proposed AD
would affect about 43 products of U.S. registry. We also estimate that
it would take about 3 work-hours per product to comply with the basic
requirements of this proposed AD. The average labor rate is $80 per
work-hour. Required parts would cost about $66 per product. Where the
service information lists required parts costs that are covered under
warranty, we have assumed that there will be no charge for these costs.
As we do not control warranty coverage for affected parties, some
parties may incur costs higher than estimated here. Based on these
figures, we estimate the cost of the proposed AD on U.S. operators to
be $13,158, or $306 per product.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new AD:
Airbus: Docket No. FAA-2009-1108; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-
131-AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) We must receive comments by January 15, 2010.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Airbus Model A330-201, -202, -203, -223,
-243, -301, -302, -303, -321, -322, -323, -341, -342, -343 series
airplanes; and Airbus Model A340-311, -312, and -313 series
airplanes, certificated in any category; all manufacturer serial
numbers; modified in production by modifications identified in both
paragraphs (c)(1)(i) and (c)(1)(ii) of this AD; excluding those on
which Airbus modification 57744 has been embodied in production.
(i) Airbus modification 40379; and
(ii) One of the following Airbus modifications, as applicable:
(A) For all models except Model A340-311, A340-312, and A340-313
airplanes: Modification 49894, 51304, 52048, 52712, 53559, 53732,
54115, 55632, or 55722.
(B) For Model A340-311, A340-312, and A340-313 series airplanes:
Modification 51603, 53400, or 55024.
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 92.
Reason
(e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
states:
It was noticed in production that in the area between frame (FR)
C53.9 and FR C55 RH [right-hand], the distance between the route 9R
of the In-Flight Entertainment system and the wire harness for the
Lower Deck-Mobile Crew Rest system provisions is too small.
This limited distance may cause chafing between the affected
electrical harness 6581VB and the harness 5495VB or 6938VB.
This condition, if not corrected, could lead to the short
circuit of wires dedicated to oxygen, which, in case of emergency,
could result in a large number of passenger oxygen masks not being
supplied with oxygen, possibly causing personal injuries.
For the reasons described above, this AD requires the
installation of a stirrup on the terminal block 5507VT between
FR53.9 and FR54, and the re-routing of the wiring route 9R.
Actions and Compliance
(f) Within 24 months after the effective date of this AD, unless
already done: Install a stirrup on the terminal block 5507VT between
FR53.9 and FR54 and modify the wiring route 9R in accordance with
the Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin
A330-92-3080, dated November 12, 2008; or Airbus Mandatory Service
Bulletin A340-92-4080, dated November 12, 2008; as applicable.
FAA AD Differences
Note 1: No differences.
Other FAA AD Provisions
(g) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Branch, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for
this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
Send information to ATTN: Vladimir Ulyanov, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone
(425) 227-1138; fax (425) 227-1149. Before using
[[Page 62713]]
any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify
your principal maintenance inspector (PMI) or principal avionics
inspector (PAI), as appropriate, or lacking a principal inspector,
your local Flight Standards District Office. The AMOC approval
letter must specifically reference this AD.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
(3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in
this AD, under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has
approved the information collection requirements and has assigned
OMB Control Number 2120-0056.
Related Information
(h) Refer to MCAI EASA Airworthiness Directive 2009-0076, dated
April 6, 2009; Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A330-92-3080, dated
November 12, 2008; and Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A340-92-
4080, dated November 12, 2008; for related information.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on November 19, 2009.
Stephen P. Boyd,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. E9-28799 Filed 11-30-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P