Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs (ECA) Request for Grant Proposals: The Future Leaders Exchange (FLEX) Program: Host Family and School Placement, 62872-62877 [E9-28761]
Download as PDF
62872
Federal Register / Vol. 229, No. 74 / Tuesday, December 1, 2009 / Notices
person must be on the telephone with
the requesting person and with us in the
same phone call. We will establish the
subject person’s identity (his or her
name, SSN, address, date of birth, and
place of birth, along with one other
piece of information such as mother’s
maiden name), and ask for his or her
consent to provide information to the
requesting person. These procedures are
in accordance with our regulations at 20
CFR 401.40 and 401.45.
RECORD ACCESS PROCEDURES:
Same as notification procedures.
Persons must also reasonably specify
the record contents they are seeking.
These procedures are in accordance
with our regulations at 20 CFR
401.40(c).
CONTESTING RECORD PROCEDURES:
Same as notification procedures.
Persons must also reasonably identify
the record, specify the information they
are contesting, and state the corrective
action sought, and the reasons for the
correction with supporting justification
showing how the record is incomplete,
untimely, inaccurate, or irrelevant.
These procedures are in accordance
with our regulations at 20 CFR
401.65(a).
RECORD SOURCE CATEGORIES:
We obtain information in this system
from SSN applicants (or persons acting
on their behalf) and generate it
internally. We assign the SSN to persons
as a result of the system’s internal
process.
EXEMPTIONS CLAIMED FOR THE SYSTEM:
None.
[FR Doc. E9–28579 Filed 11–30–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice 6823]
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
Bureau of Educational and Cultural
Affairs (ECA) Request for Grant
Proposals: The Future Leaders
Exchange (FLEX) Program: Host
Family and School Placement
Announcement Type: New Grant.
Funding Opportunity Number: ECA/
PE/C/PY–10–02.
Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance Number: 19.415.
Key Dates:
Application Deadline: January 19,
2010.
Executive Summary: The Future
Leaders Exchange (FLEX) program seeks
to promote mutual understanding
between the United States and the
VerDate Nov<24>2008
20:14 Nov 30, 2009
Jkt 220001
countries of Eurasia by providing
secondary school students from the
region the opportunity to live in
American society for an academic year.
In turn, these students will expose U.S.
citizens to the culture, traditions, and
lifestyles of people in Eurasia.
Organizations are invited to submit
proposals to identify host schools; vet,
select, and monitor host families; and
place and monitor a portion of the
students participating in the FLEX
program during the 2010–11 academic
year. Pending availability of funds, an
FY–2010 grant will provide the monies
required to recruit and screen host
families; secure school placements;
conduct student and host family
orientations; provide cultural and
educational enrichment activities;
handle all counseling and programmatic
issues; and evaluate program
implementation.
I. Funding Opportunity Description
Authority: Overall grant making
authority for this program is contained
in the Mutual Educational and Cultural
Exchange Act of 1961, Public Law 87–
256, as amended, also known as the
Fulbright-Hays Act. The purpose of the
Act is ‘‘to enable the Government of the
United States to increase mutual
understanding between the people of
the United States and the people of
other countries * * *; to strengthen the
ties which unite us with other nations
by demonstrating the educational and
cultural interests, developments, and
achievements of the people of the
United States and other nations * * *
and thus to assist in the development of
friendly, sympathetic and peaceful
relations between the United States and
the other countries of the world.’’ The
funding authority for the program above
is provided through legislation.
Purpose: The FLEX Program seeks to
provide approximately 1,000 high
school students from Eurasia with an
opportunity to live in the United States
for the purpose of promoting mutual
understanding between our countries.
Participants will reside with American
host families and attend high school
during the 2010–11 academic year.
Public and private non-profit
organizations meeting the provisions
described in Internal Revenue Code
section 26 U.S.C. 501(c)(3) may submit
proposals to recruit and select host
families and schools for high school
students between the ages of 15 and 17
from Eurasia. This solicitation refers
only to FLEX students from the
following Eurasian countries: Armenia,
Azerbaijan, Georgia, Kazakhstan,
Kyrgyzstan, Moldova, Russia, Tajikistan,
Turkmenistan, and Ukraine.
PO 00000
Frm 00139
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
In addition to identifying schools and
screening families, organizations will be
responsible for: (1) Providing English
language enhancement activities for
approximately 10% of their students
who are specially identified; (2)
orienting all students to local
conditions, resources and opportunities;
(3) providing support services for
students; (4) arranging enhancement
activities and skill-building
opportunities; (5) monitoring student,
family and coordinator performance and
progress; (6) providing mid-year
programming and re-entry training; and
(7) evaluating project success.
Preference will be given to those
organizations that offer participants
opportunities to develop leadership
skills and raise their awareness of
tolerance and civic responsibility
through community activities and
networks. The number of students who
will participate is subject to the
availability of funding in fiscal year
2010.
During the year, FLEX participants
will be engaged in a variety of activities,
such as community and school-based
programs, skill-building workshops, and
cultural events. Academic year 2010/
2011 will be the 18th year of the FLEX
program, with more than 19,000
students having been awarded
scholarships.
Goal: The goal of the program is to
promote mutual understanding and
foster relationships between the people
of Eurasia and the United States by:
• Gaining an understanding of
American culture and diversity;
• Teaching Americans about their
home countries and cultures;
• Interacting with Americans and
generating enduring ties;
• Exploring and acquiring an
understanding of the key elements of
U.S. civil society; and
• Motivating students to share and
apply experiences and knowledge in
their home communities as FLEX
alumni.
Considering the specific focus of the
FLEX program, the following outcomes
will indicate a successful project:
1. Participants will develop an
appreciation for American culture, an
understanding of the diversity of
American society, and increased
tolerance and respect for others with
differing views and beliefs.
2. Participants will teach Americans
about the cultures of their home
countries.
3. Participants will interact with
Americans and generate enduring ties.
4. Participants will acquire an
understanding of important elements of
a civil society. This includes concepts
E:\FR\FM\01DEN1.SGM
01DEN1
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 229, No. 74 / Tuesday, December 1, 2009 / Notices
such as volunteerism, the idea that
American citizens can and do act at the
grassroots level to deal with societal
problems, and an awareness of and
respect for the Rule of Law.
5. Participants will gain leadership
capacity that will enable them, as FLEX
alumni, to initiate activities in their
home countries that focus on
development and community service.
Objectives: The objectives of the FLEX
program are:
• To place approximately 1,000 preselected high school students from 10
Eurasian countries in safe, qualified,
well-suited host families;
• To place students in accredited
schools.
• To expose program participants to
American culture and enable them to
obtain a broad view of U.S. society and
history;
• To provide appropriate venues for
program participants to share their
culture, lifestyles, and traditions with
U.S. citizens;
• To provide participants with
development opportunities that foster
skills they can take back with them and
use in their home countries; and
• To provide activities that will
increase and enhance students’
leadership capacity, enabling them—as
FLEX alumni—to initiate activities in
their home countries that focus on
development and community service.
Other Components: One organization
already has been awarded a grant to
administer the ‘‘Organizational
Components’’ of the FLEX program, and
performs the following functions:
Recruitment and selection of Eurasian
students; assistance in documentation
and preparation of DS–2019 visa forms;
preparation of cross-cultural materials;
pre-departure orientation; international
travel from home to host community
and return; facilitation of ongoing
communication between the natural
parents and the placement organization,
as needed; maintenance of a student
database and provision of data to the
U.S. Department of State; and ongoing
follow-up with alumni after their return
to Eurasia.
Another organization is currently
responsible for supporting students with
disabilities. This involves a pre-program
orientation and a year-end reentry
training, as well as ongoing support
throughout the year in order to help
them cope with challenges specific to
their circumstances. Placement
organizations will be in direct
communication with both organizations.
Some students with disabilities may
need supplementary independence
skills training early on in the program.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
20:14 Nov 30, 2009
Jkt 220001
Guidelines: Applicants are requested
to submit a narrative outlining a
comprehensive strategy for the
administration and implementation of
the placement component of the FLEX
program that includes the following
responsibilities:
(1) Recruitment, screening, selection,
and FLEX-specific orientation of local
coordinators and host families;
(2) Enrollment in an accredited
school;
(3) Post-arrival orientation for
participants;
(4) Placement of a small number of
students with disabilities;
(5) Pre-program specialized English
language programming for pre-selected
students who require focused
preparation for their academic year;
(6) Preparation and dissemination of
placement organization materials to the
organization administering the
‘‘Organizational Components’’ by May
1, 2010 (these materials will be
distributed to the students at the PreDeparture Orientation);
(7) Troubleshooting;
(8) Monitoring of students, host
families and local coordinators;
(9) Quarterly evaluation of the
organization’s success in achieving
program goals;
(10) Mid-year orientations to assess
progress; and
(11) Re-entry training to prepare
students for readjustment to their home
environments.
Applicants must request a grant for
placement and monitoring of at least 30
students; there is no maximum number
of students that may be placed by one
organization. Placements may be in any
region of the United States. Strong
preference will be given to organizations
that choose to place participants in
clusters of at least three students (these
students should be from different
countries) in a particular Local
Coordinator’s area of responsibility.
Please refer to the Solicitation Package
for details on essential program
elements, permissible costs, and criteria
used to select and place students. We
anticipate grants beginning no later than
April 2010, subject to the availability of
funds.
Participants begin to arrive in their
host communities in late July 2010 and
remain for 10 or 11 months until their
departure mid-May to late June 2011.
Students with disabilities and students
requiring supplementary English
language instruction may arrive earlier.
Administration of the program must be
in compliance with reporting and
withholding regulations for federal,
state, and local taxes as applicable.
Recipient organizations should
PO 00000
Frm 00140
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
62873
demonstrate regulation adherence in the
proposal narrative and budget.
Applicants should submit the health
and accident insurance plans they
intend to use for students on this
program. If use of a private plan is
proposed, the State Department will
compare that plan with the Bureau plan
and make a determination as to which
will be applicable.
II. Award Information
Type of Award: New Grant
Agreement.
Fiscal Year Funds: FY 2010.
Approximate Total Funding:
$7,000,000 pending availability of
funds.
Approximate Number of Awards: 10–
15 grants.
Approximate Average Award:
Funding level is dependent on the
number of proposed students,
monitoring, the quality of support, and
volume of activities.
Anticipated Award Date: Pending
availability of funds, April 2010.
Anticipated Project Completion Date:
August 2011.
Additional Information: Contingent
upon the availability of funds in
subsequent fiscal years; awardees’
ability to comply with Federal
Regulations and ECA guidelines; and
the otherwise successful
implementation of this program; it is
ECA’s intent to renew grants awarded
under this competition for up to two
additional fiscal years, before openly
competing it again.
III. Eligibility Information
III.1. Eligible applicants: Applications
may be submitted by public and private
non-profit organizations meeting the
provisions described in Internal
Revenue Code section 26 U.S.C.
501(c)(3).
III.2. Cost Sharing or Matching Funds:
There is no minimum or maximum
percentage required for this
competition. However, the Bureau
encourages applicants to provide
maximum levels of cost sharing and
funding in support of its programs.
When cost sharing is offered, it is
understood and agreed that the
applicant must provide the amount of
cost sharing as stipulated in its proposal
and later included in an approved
agreement. Cost sharing may be in the
form of allowable direct or indirect
costs. For accountability, you must
maintain written records to support all
costs which are claimed as your
contribution, as well as costs to be paid
by the Federal government. Such
records are subject to audit. The basis
for determining the value of cash and
E:\FR\FM\01DEN1.SGM
01DEN1
62874
Federal Register / Vol. 229, No. 74 / Tuesday, December 1, 2009 / Notices
in-kind contributions must be in
accordance with OMB Circular A–110,
(Revised), Subpart C.23—Cost Sharing
and Matching. In the event you do not
provide the minimum amount of cost
sharing as stipulated in the approved
budget, ECA’s contribution will be
reduced in like proportion.
III.3. Other Eligibility Requirements:
Bureau grant guidelines require that
organizations with fewer than four
years’ experience in conducting
international exchanges be limited to
$60,000 in Bureau funding. Since an
award to support program and
administrative costs required to
implement this exchange program for a
minimum of 30 students will exceed
$60,000, organizations with less than
four years’ experience in conducting
international exchanges are ineligible to
apply under this competition. The
Bureau encourages applicants to
provide maximum levels of cost sharing
and funding in support of its programs.
IV. Application and Submission
Information
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
Note: Please read the complete
announcement before sending inquiries or
submitting proposals. Once the RFGP
deadline has passed, Bureau staff may not
discuss this competition with applicants
until the proposal review process has been
completed.
IV.1. Contact Information to Request
an Application Package: Please contact
The Office of Youth Programs, ECA/PE/
C/PY, SA–5, Floor 3, U.S. Department of
State, Washington, DC 20522–0503,
telephone (202) 632–6416, and fax (202)
632–9355, e-mail Amrote Molla at
MollaAB@state.gov to request a
Solicitation Package. Please refer to the
Funding Opportunity Number ECA/PE/
C/PY–10–02 located at the top of this
announcement when making your
request.
Alternatively, an electronic
application package may be obtained
from Grants.gov. Please see section IV.3f
for further information.
The Solicitation Package contains the
Proposal Submission Instruction (PSI)
document, which consists of required
application forms and standard
guidelines for proposal preparation.
It also contains the Project Objectives,
Goals and Implementation (POGI)
document, which provides specific
information, award criteria and budget
instructions tailored to this competition.
Please specify the Funding
Opportunity Number (ECA/PE/C/PY–
10–02) at the top of this announcement
on all inquiries and correspondence.
IV.2. To Download a Solicitation
Package Via the Internet: The entire
Solicitation Package may be
VerDate Nov<24>2008
20:14 Nov 30, 2009
Jkt 220001
downloaded from the Bureau’s Web site
at https://exchanges.state.gov/grants/
open2.html or from the Grants.gov
website at https://www.grants.gov.
Please read all information before
downloading.
IV.3. Content and Form of
Submission: Applicants must follow all
instructions in the Solicitation Package.
The application should be submitted
per the instructions under IV.3f.
‘‘Application Deadline and Methods of
Submission’’ section below.
IV.3a. You are required to have a Dun
and Bradstreet Data Universal
Numbering System (DUNS) number to
apply for a grant or cooperative
agreement from the U.S. Government.
This number is a nine-digit
identification number, which uniquely
identifies business entities. Obtaining a
DUNS number is easy and there is no
charge. To obtain a DUNS number,
access https://
www.dunandbradstreet.com or call
1–866–705–5711. Please ensure that
your DUNS number is included in the
appropriate box of the SF–424 which is
part of the formal application package.
IV.3b. All proposals must contain an
executive summary, proposal narrative
and budget.
Please Refer to the Solicitation
Package. It contains the mandatory
Proposal Submission Instructions (PSI)
document and the Project Objectives,
Goals and Implementation (POGI)
document for additional formatting and
technical requirements.
IV.3c. You must have nonprofit status
with the IRS at the time of application.
Please note: Effective January 7, 2009,
all applicants for ECA federal assistance
awards must include in their
application the names of directors and/
or senior executives (current officers,
trustees, and key employees, regardless
of amount of compensation). In
fulfilling this requirement, applicants
must submit information in one of the
following ways:
(1) Those who file Internal Revenue
Service Form 990, ‘‘Return of
Organization Exempt From Income
Tax,’’ must include a copy of relevant
portions of this form.
(2) Those who do not file IRS Form
990 must submit information above in
the format of their choice.
In addition to final program reporting
requirements, award recipients will be
required to submit a one-page
document, derived from their program
reports, listing and describing their
grant activities. For award recipients,
the names of directors and/or senior
executives (current officers, trustees,
and key employees), as well as the onepage description of grant activities, will
PO 00000
Frm 00141
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
be transmitted by the State Department
to OMB, along with other information
required by the Federal Funding
Accountability and Transparency Act
(FFATA), and will be made available to
the public by the Office of Management
and Budget on its USASpending.gov
website as part of ECA’s FFATA
reporting requirements.
If your organization is a private
nonprofit which has not received a grant
or cooperative agreement from ECA in
the past three years, or if your
organization received nonprofit status
from the IRS within the past four years,
you must submit the necessary
documentation to verify nonprofit status
as directed in the PSI document. Failure
to do so will cause your proposal to be
declared technically ineligible.
IV.3d. Please take into consideration
the following information when
preparing your proposal narrative:
IV.3d.1 Adherence To All Regulations
Governing The J-Visa
The Office of Citizen Exchanges of the
Bureau of Educational and Cultural
Affairs is the official program sponsor of
the exchange program covered by this
RFGP, and an employee of the Bureau
will be the ‘‘Responsible Officer’’ for the
program under the terms of 22 CFR 62,
which covers the administration of the
Exchange Visitor Program (J-visa
program). Under the terms of 22 CFR 62,
organizations receiving awards (either a
grant or cooperative agreement) under
this RFGP will be third parties
‘‘cooperating with or assisting the
sponsor in the conduct of the sponsor’s
program.’’ The actions of recipient
organizations shall be ‘‘imputed to the
sponsor in evaluating the sponsor’s
compliance with’’ 22 CFR 62. Therefore,
the Bureau expects that any
organization receiving an award under
this competition will render all
assistance necessary to enable the
Bureau to fully comply with 22 CFR 62
et seq.
The Bureau of Educational and
Cultural Affairs places critically
important emphases on the secure and
proper administration of Exchange
Visitor (J-visa) Programs and adherence
by recipient organizations and program
participants to all regulations governing
the J-visa program status. Therefore,
proposals should explicitly state in
writing that the applicant is prepared to
assist the Bureau in meeting all
requirements governing the
administration of Exchange Visitor
Programs as set forth in 22 CFR 62. If
your organization has experience as a
designated Exchange Visitor Program
Sponsor, the applicant should discuss
their record of compliance with 22 CFR
E:\FR\FM\01DEN1.SGM
01DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 229, No. 74 / Tuesday, December 1, 2009 / Notices
62 et seq., including the oversight of
their Responsible Officers and Alternate
Responsible Officers, screening and
selection of program participants,
provision of pre-arrival information and
orientation to participants, monitoring
of participants, proper maintenance and
security of forms, record-keeping,
reporting and other requirements.
The Office of Citizen Exchanges of
ECA will be responsible for issuing DS–
2019 forms to participants in this
program.
A copy of the complete regulations
governing the administration of
Exchange Visitor (J) programs is
available at https://exchanges.state.gov
or from: Office of Designation, ECA/EC/
D, SA–5, Floor C2, Department of State,
Washington, DC 20522–0582.
IV.3d.2 Diversity, Freedom and
Democracy Guidelines
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
Pursuant to the Bureau’s authorizing
legislation, programs must maintain a
non-political character and should be
balanced and representative of the
diversity of American political, social,
and cultural life. ‘‘Diversity’’ should be
interpreted in the broadest sense and
encompass differences including, but
not limited to ethnicity, race, gender,
religion, geographic location, socioeconomic status, and disabilities.
Applicants are strongly encouraged to
adhere to the advancement of this
principle both in program
administration and in program content.
Please refer to the review criteria under
the ‘‘Support for Diversity’’ section for
specific suggestions on incorporating
diversity into your proposal. Public Law
104–319 provides that ‘‘in carrying out
programs of educational and cultural
exchange in countries whose people do
not fully enjoy freedom and
democracy,’’ the Bureau ‘‘shall take
appropriate steps to provide
opportunities for participation in such
programs to human rights and
democracy leaders of such countries.’’
Public Law 106–113 requires that the
governments of the countries described
above do not have inappropriate
influence in the selection process.
Proposals should reflect advancement of
these goals in their program contents, to
the full extent deemed feasible.
IV.3d.3 Program Monitoring and
Evaluation
Program Monitoring includes
Participant Monitoring, which focuses
specifically on ensuring students’ safety
and well-being throughout the year; see
page 31 for details and instructions.
This section focuses on other aspects of
Program Monitoring.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
20:14 Nov 30, 2009
Jkt 220001
Program Monitoring: Proposals must
include a plan to monitor and report on
the project’s success, both as the
activities unfold and at the end of the
program. The Bureau recommends that
your proposal include a draft survey
questionnaire or other technique, plus a
description of a methodology that will
be used to link outcomes to original
project objectives. The Bureau expects
that the grantee will track participants
and be able to respond to key
monitoring questions throughout the
year, particularly on effects of the
program on program participants, their
host families and communities.
Successful monitoring depends
heavily on setting clear goals and
outcomes at the outset of a program.
Your monitoring plan should include a
description of your project’s objectives
and how and when you intend to
measure these outcomes. You should
also show how your project objectives
link to the goals of the program
described in this RFGP.
Overall, the quality of your
monitoring plan will be judged on how
well it specifies successes and
challenges. Grantees will be required to
provide reports analyzing their
monitoring findings to the Bureau in
their regular program reports. All data
collected, including survey responses
and contact information, must be
maintained for a minimum of three
years and provided to the Bureau upon
request.
Evaluation: The Bureau’s Office of
Policy and Evaluation will conduct
evaluations of the FLEX program
through E-GOALS, its online system for
surveying program participants and
collecting data about program
performance. These evaluations assist
ECA and its program grantees in
meeting the requirements of the
Government Performance Results Act
(GPRA) of 1993. This Act requires
federal agencies to measure the results
of their programs in meeting predetermined performance goals and
objectives.
Please see specific responsibilities in
the accompanying POGI document.
IV.3e. Please take the following
information into consideration when
preparing your budget:
IV.3e.1. Applicants must submit SF–
424A—‘‘Budget Information—NonConstruction Programs’’ along with a
comprehensive budget for the entire
program. The budget must reflect costs
for a minimum of 30 participants. Please
indicate clearly the number of students
funded. There must be a summary
budget as well as breakdowns reflecting
both administrative and program
budgets. Applicants may provide
PO 00000
Frm 00142
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
62875
separate sub-budgets for each program
component, phase, location, or activity
to provide clarification.
Please refer to the Solicitation
Package for complete budget guidelines
and formatting instructions.
IV.3f. Application Deadline and
Methods of Submission:
Application Deadline Date: January
19, 2010.
Reference Number: ECA/PE/C/PY–
10–02.
Methods of Submission:
Applications may be submitted in one
of two ways:
(1) In hard-copy, via a nationally
recognized overnight delivery service
(i.e., Federal Express, UPS, Airborne
Express, or U.S. Postal Service Express
Overnight Mail, etc.), or
(2) Electronically through https://
www.grants.gov.
Along with the Project Title, all
applicants must enter the above
Reference Number in Box 11 on the SF–
424 contained in the mandatory
Proposal Submission Instructions (PSI)
of the solicitation document.
IV.3f.1—Submitting Printed
Applications:
Applications must be shipped no later
than the above deadline. Delivery
services used by applicants must have
in-place, centralized shipping
identification and tracking systems that
may be accessed via the Internet and
delivery people who are identifiable by
commonly recognized uniforms and
delivery vehicles. Proposals shipped on
or before the above deadline but
received at ECA more than seven days
after the deadline will be ineligible for
further consideration under this
competition. Proposals shipped after the
established deadlines are ineligible for
consideration under this competition.
ECA will not notify you upon receipt of
application. It is each applicant’s
responsibility to ensure that each
package is marked with a legible
tracking number and to monitor/confirm
delivery to ECA via the Internet.
Delivery of proposal packages may not
be made via local courier service or in
person for this competition. Faxed
documents will not be accepted at any
time. Only proposals submitted as
stated above will be considered.
Important Note: When preparing your
submission please make sure to include one
extra copy of the completed SF–424 form and
place it in an envelope addressed to ‘‘ECA/
EX/PM.’’
The original and eight (8) copies of
the application should be sent to:
Program Management Division (ECA–
IIP/EX/PM), Ref.: ECA/PE/C/PY–10–02,
SA–5, Floor 4, Department of State,
E:\FR\FM\01DEN1.SGM
01DEN1
62876
Federal Register / Vol. 229, No. 74 / Tuesday, December 1, 2009 / Notices
2200 C Street, NW., Washington, DC
20522–0504.
IV.3f.2—Submitting Electronic
Applications:
Applicants have the option of
submitting proposals electronically
through Grants.gov (https://
www.grants.gov). Complete solicitation
packages are available at Grants.gov in
the ‘‘Find’’ portion of the system.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
Please Note: Due to Recovery Act related
opportunities, there has been a higher than
usual volume of grant proposals submitted
through Grants.gov. Potential applicants are
advised that the increased volume may affect
the Grants.gov proposal submission process.
As stated in this RFGP, ECA bears no
responsibility for applicant timeliness of
submission or data errors resulting from
transmission or conversion processes for
proposals submitted via Grants.gov. Please
follow the instructions available in the ‘Get
Started’ portion of the site (https://
www.grants.gov/GetStarted).
Several of the steps in the Grants.gov
registration process could take several
weeks. Therefore, applicants should
check with appropriate staff within their
organizations immediately after
reviewing this RFGP to confirm or
determine their registration status with
Grants.gov. Once registered, the amount
of time it can take to upload an
application will vary depending on a
variety of factors including the size of
the application and the speed of your
Internet connection. In addition,
validation of an electronic submission
via Grants.gov can take up to two
business days.
Therefore, we strongly recommend
that you not wait until the application
deadline to begin the submission
process through Grants.gov.
The Grants.gov Web site includes
extensive information on all phases/
aspects of the Grants.gov process,
including an extensive section on
frequently asked questions, located
under the ‘‘For Applicants’’ section of
the Web site. ECA strongly recommends
that all potential applicants review
thoroughly the Grants.gov Web site,
well in advance of submitting a
proposal through the Grants.gov system.
ECA bears no responsibility for data
errors resulting from transmission or
conversion processes.
Direct all questions regarding
Grants.gov registration and submission
to: Grants.gov Customer Support;
Contact Center Phone: 800–518–4726;
Business Hours: Monday–Friday, 7
a.m.–9 p.m. Eastern Time; E-mail:
support@grants.gov.
Applicants have until midnight (12
a.m.), Washington, DC time of the
closing date to ensure that their entire
application has been uploaded to the
VerDate Nov<24>2008
20:14 Nov 30, 2009
Jkt 220001
Grants.gov site. There are no exceptions
to the above deadline. Applications
uploaded to the site after midnight of
the application deadline date will be
automatically rejected by the Grants.gov
system, and will be technically
ineligible.
Please refer to the Grants.gov Web site
for definitions of various ‘‘application
statuses’’ and the difference between a
submission receipt and a submission
validation. Applicants will receive a
validation e-mail from Grants.gov upon
the successful submission of an
application. Again, validation of an
electronic submission via Grants.gov
can take up to two business days.
Therefore, we strongly recommend that
you not wait until the application
deadline to begin the submission
process through Grants.gov. ECA will
not notify you upon receipt of electronic
applications.
It is the responsibility of all applicants
submitting proposals via the Grants.gov
web portal to ensure that proposals have
been received by Grants.gov in their
entirety, and ECA bears no
responsibility for data errors resulting
from transmission or conversion
processes.
IV.3g. Intergovernmental Review of
Applications: Executive Order 12372
does not apply to this program.
V. Application Review Information
V.1. Review Process
The Bureau will review all proposals
for technical eligibility. Proposals will
be deemed ineligible if they do not fully
adhere to the guidelines stated herein
and in the Solicitation Package. All
eligible proposals will be reviewed by
the program office, as well as the Public
Diplomacy section overseas, where
appropriate. Eligible proposals will be
subject to compliance with Federal and
Bureau regulations and guidelines and
forwarded to Bureau grant panels for
advisory review. Proposals may also be
reviewed by the Office of the Legal
Adviser or by other Department
elements. Final funding decisions are at
the discretion of the Department of
State’s Assistant Secretary for
Educational and Cultural Affairs. Final
technical authority for assistance
awards (grants) resides with the
Bureau’s Grants Officer.
Review Criteria
Technically eligible applications will
be competitively reviewed according to
the criteria stated below. These criteria
are not rank ordered and all carry equal
weight in the proposal evaluation:
1. Program Planning/Ability to
Achieve Program Objectives: Your
PO 00000
Frm 00143
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
proposal narrative should exhibit
originality, substance, and relevance to
the Bureau’s mission. Reviewers will
assess the degree to which proposals
engage participants in community
activities that involve skills
development and leadership training. A
detailed agenda and work plan should
adhere to the program overview and
guidelines described in the solicitation
package. Reviewers will also assess the
degree to which the proposed outcomes
of the project are realistic and
measurable. Strategies should creatively
utilize resources at the local level to
ensure an efficient use of program
funds.
2. Support of Diversity: Proposals
should demonstrate substantive support
of the Bureau’s policy on diversity.
Achievable and relevant features
should be cited in both program
administration (selection of
participants, host families, schools,
program venue and program evaluation)
and program content (orientations,
program meetings, resource materials
and follow-up activities).
3. Organization’s Record/Institutional
Capacity: Proposed personnel and
institutional resources should be
adequate and appropriate to achieve the
program or project’s goals. Reviewers
will assess the applicant and its partners
to determine if they offer adequate
resources, expertise, and experience to
fulfill program objectives. Partner
activities should be clearly defined.
Proposals should demonstrate an
institutional record of successful
exchange programs, including
responsible fiscal management and full
compliance with all reporting and J–1
Visa requirements for past Bureau grants
as determined by Bureau Grant Staff.
The Bureau will consider the past
performance of prior recipients and the
demonstrated potential of new
applicants.
4. Multiplier Effect: Proposed
programs should strengthen long-term
mutual understanding, including
maximum sharing of information and
establishment of long-term institutional
and individual linkages. Reviewers will
assess ways in which proposals include
innovative ideas to expose U.S.
communities to FLEX-related goals and
activities that involve students, host
families and schools. This includes
media outreach, visits to local and
national government representatives,
Internet-based applications and other
interactions. Reviewers will also
evaluate substantive plans to prepare
FLEX students for their role as active,
effective FLEX alumni.
5. Participant Monitoring: Proposals
must include a detailed monitoring
E:\FR\FM\01DEN1.SGM
01DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 229, No. 74 / Tuesday, December 1, 2009 / Notices
plan, which addresses Student, Local
Coordinator (LC) and Host Family (HF)
monitoring. Given the importance the
Department places on this criterion, you
should dedicate a significant percentage
of the narrative to explaining how you
will achieve the Department’s goals in
regard to monitoring. You may use the
appendices to house additional details
and supporting documentation. Please
see the Project Objectives, Goals, and
Implementation (POGI) for additional
details regarding this review criterion.
6. Project Evaluation: Proposals
should include a plan to monitor and
evaluate the activity’s success, both as
the activities unfold and at the end of
the program. Reviewers will assess your
plans to monitor student progress and
program activities, particularly in regard
to intended outcomes indicated in your
proposal. Grantees will be expected to
submit quarterly reports, which should
be included as an inherent component
of the work plan. Your primary method
of evaluation is E–GOALS; other
organization-specific instruments are
encouraged. Proposals should also
specify ways in which students will be
encouraged to complete the mandatory
end-of-the-year surveys administered
through the E–GOALS system.
7. Cost-effectiveness/Cost Sharing:
Reviewers will analyze the budget for
clarity and cost-effectiveness. They will
also assess the rationale of the proposed
budget and whether the allocation of
funds is appropriate to complete tasks
outlined in the project narrative. The
overhead and administrative
components of the proposal, including
salaries and honoraria, should be kept
as low as possible. All other items
should be necessary and appropriate.
Proposals should maximize cost-sharing
through other
private sector support as well as
institutional direct funding
contributions. Preference will be given
to organizations whose proposals
demonstrate a quality, cost-effective
program.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
VI. Award Administration Information
VI.1. Award Notices
Final awards cannot be made until
funds have been appropriated by
Congress, allocated and committed
through internal Bureau procedures.
Successful applicants will receive a
Federal Assistance Award (FAA) from
the Bureau’s Grants Office. The FAA
and the original proposal with
subsequent modifications (if applicable)
shall be the only binding authorizing
document between the recipient and the
U.S. Government. The FAA will be
signed by an authorized Grants Officer,
VerDate Nov<24>2008
20:14 Nov 30, 2009
Jkt 220001
and mailed to the recipient’s
responsible officer identified in the
application.
Unsuccessful applicants will receive
notification of the results of the
application review from the ECA
program office coordinating this
competition.
VI.2. Administrative and National
Policy Requirements
Terms and Conditions for the
Administration of ECA agreements
include the following:
Office of Management and Budget
Circular A–122, ‘‘Cost Principles for
Nonprofit Organizations.’’
Office of Management and Budget
Circular A–21, ‘‘Cost Principles for
Educational Institutions.’’
OMB Circular A–87, ‘‘Cost Principles
for State, Local and Indian
Governments.’’
OMB Circular No. A–110 (Revised),
Uniform Administrative Requirements
for Grants and Agreements with
Institutions of Higher Education,
Hospitals, and other Nonprofit
Organizations.
OMB Circular No. A–102, Uniform
Administrative Requirements for
Grants-in-Aid to State and Local
Governments.
OMB Circular No. A–133, Audits of
States, Local Government, and Nonprofit Organizations
Please reference the following Web
sites for additional information: https://
www.whitehouse.gov/omb/grants;
https://fa.statebuy.state.gov.
VI.3. Reporting Requirements
You must provide ECA with a hard
copy original plus one copy of the
following reports:
(1) A final program and financial
report no more than 90 days after the
expiration of the award.
(2) A concise, one-page final program
report summarizing program outcomes
no more than 90 days after the
expiration of the award. This one-page
report will be transmitted to OMB, and
be made available to the public via
OMB’s USAspending.gov Web site—as
part of ECA’s Federal Funding
Accountability and Transparency Act
(FFATA) reporting requirements.
(3) A SF–PPR, ‘‘Performance Progress
Report’’ Cover Sheet with all program
reports.
(4) Quarterly program and financial
reports which should include both
quantitative and qualitative data you
have available.
Award recipients will be required to
provide reports analyzing their
evaluation findings to the Bureau in
their regular program reports. (Please
PO 00000
Frm 00144
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
62877
refer to IV. Application and Submission
Instructions (IV.3.d.3) above for Program
Monitoring and Evaluation information.
All data collected, including survey
responses and contact information, must
be maintained for a minimum of three
years and provided to the Bureau upon
request.
All reports must be sent to the ECA
Grants Officer and ECA Program Officer
listed in the final assistance award
document.
VII. Agency Contacts
For questions about this
announcement, contact: Jon Crocitto
(crocittoja@state.gov; 202–632–6426) or
Callie Ward (wardca@state.gov; 202–
632–6431), Office of Citizen Exchanges,
ECA/PE/C/PY, SA–5, Floor 3,
Department of State, Washington, DC
20522–0503. All correspondence with
the Bureau concerning this RFGP
should reference the above contacts and
ECA/PE/C/PY–10–02.
Please read the complete
announcement before sending inquiries
or submitting proposals. Once the RFGP
deadline has passed, Bureau staff may
not discuss this competition with
applicants until the proposal review
process has been completed.
Notice
The terms and conditions published
in this RFGP are binding and may not
be modified by any Bureau
representative. Explanatory information
provided by the Bureau that contradicts
published language will not be binding.
Issuance of the RFGP does not
constitute an award commitment on the
part of the Government. The Bureau
reserves the right to reduce, revise, or
increase proposal budgets in accordance
with the needs of the program and the
availability of funds. Awards made will
be subject to periodic reporting and
evaluation requirements per section VI.3
above.
Dated: November 24, 2009.
Maura M. Pally,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Educational
and Cultural Affairs, U.S. Department of
State.
[FR Doc. E9–28761 Filed 11–30–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–05–P
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice 6822]
U.S. National Commission for UNESCO
Notice of Meeting
The U.S. National Commission for
UNESCO will host its Annual Meeting
on Thursday, December 17, 2009, from
E:\FR\FM\01DEN1.SGM
01DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 229 (Tuesday, December 1, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 62872-62877]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-28761]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice 6823]
Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs (ECA) Request for
Grant Proposals: The Future Leaders Exchange (FLEX) Program: Host
Family and School Placement
Announcement Type: New Grant.
Funding Opportunity Number: ECA/PE/C/PY-10-02.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number: 19.415.
Key Dates:
Application Deadline: January 19, 2010.
Executive Summary: The Future Leaders Exchange (FLEX) program seeks
to promote mutual understanding between the United States and the
countries of Eurasia by providing secondary school students from the
region the opportunity to live in American society for an academic
year. In turn, these students will expose U.S. citizens to the culture,
traditions, and lifestyles of people in Eurasia. Organizations are
invited to submit proposals to identify host schools; vet, select, and
monitor host families; and place and monitor a portion of the students
participating in the FLEX program during the 2010-11 academic year.
Pending availability of funds, an FY-2010 grant will provide the monies
required to recruit and screen host families; secure school placements;
conduct student and host family orientations; provide cultural and
educational enrichment activities; handle all counseling and
programmatic issues; and evaluate program implementation.
I. Funding Opportunity Description
Authority: Overall grant making authority for this program is
contained in the Mutual Educational and Cultural Exchange Act of 1961,
Public Law 87-256, as amended, also known as the Fulbright-Hays Act.
The purpose of the Act is ``to enable the Government of the United
States to increase mutual understanding between the people of the
United States and the people of other countries * * *; to strengthen
the ties which unite us with other nations by demonstrating the
educational and cultural interests, developments, and achievements of
the people of the United States and other nations * * * and thus to
assist in the development of friendly, sympathetic and peaceful
relations between the United States and the other countries of the
world.'' The funding authority for the program above is provided
through legislation.
Purpose: The FLEX Program seeks to provide approximately 1,000 high
school students from Eurasia with an opportunity to live in the United
States for the purpose of promoting mutual understanding between our
countries. Participants will reside with American host families and
attend high school during the 2010-11 academic year. Public and private
non-profit organizations meeting the provisions described in Internal
Revenue Code section 26 U.S.C. 501(c)(3) may submit proposals to
recruit and select host families and schools for high school students
between the ages of 15 and 17 from Eurasia. This solicitation refers
only to FLEX students from the following Eurasian countries: Armenia,
Azerbaijan, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Moldova, Russia,
Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, and Ukraine.
In addition to identifying schools and screening families,
organizations will be responsible for: (1) Providing English language
enhancement activities for approximately 10% of their students who are
specially identified; (2) orienting all students to local conditions,
resources and opportunities; (3) providing support services for
students; (4) arranging enhancement activities and skill-building
opportunities; (5) monitoring student, family and coordinator
performance and progress; (6) providing mid-year programming and re-
entry training; and (7) evaluating project success. Preference will be
given to those organizations that offer participants opportunities to
develop leadership skills and raise their awareness of tolerance and
civic responsibility through community activities and networks. The
number of students who will participate is subject to the availability
of funding in fiscal year 2010.
During the year, FLEX participants will be engaged in a variety of
activities, such as community and school-based programs, skill-building
workshops, and cultural events. Academic year 2010/2011 will be the
18th year of the FLEX program, with more than 19,000 students having
been awarded scholarships.
Goal: The goal of the program is to promote mutual understanding
and foster relationships between the people of Eurasia and the United
States by:
Gaining an understanding of American culture and
diversity;
Teaching Americans about their home countries and
cultures;
Interacting with Americans and generating enduring ties;
Exploring and acquiring an understanding of the key
elements of U.S. civil society; and
Motivating students to share and apply experiences and
knowledge in their home communities as FLEX alumni.
Considering the specific focus of the FLEX program, the following
outcomes will indicate a successful project:
1. Participants will develop an appreciation for American culture,
an understanding of the diversity of American society, and increased
tolerance and respect for others with differing views and beliefs.
2. Participants will teach Americans about the cultures of their
home countries.
3. Participants will interact with Americans and generate enduring
ties.
4. Participants will acquire an understanding of important elements
of a civil society. This includes concepts
[[Page 62873]]
such as volunteerism, the idea that American citizens can and do act at
the grassroots level to deal with societal problems, and an awareness
of and respect for the Rule of Law.
5. Participants will gain leadership capacity that will enable
them, as FLEX alumni, to initiate activities in their home countries
that focus on development and community service.
Objectives: The objectives of the FLEX program are:
To place approximately 1,000 pre-selected high school
students from 10 Eurasian countries in safe, qualified, well-suited
host families;
To place students in accredited schools.
To expose program participants to American culture and
enable them to obtain a broad view of U.S. society and history;
To provide appropriate venues for program participants to
share their culture, lifestyles, and traditions with U.S. citizens;
To provide participants with development opportunities
that foster skills they can take back with them and use in their home
countries; and
To provide activities that will increase and enhance
students' leadership capacity, enabling them--as FLEX alumni--to
initiate activities in their home countries that focus on development
and community service.
Other Components: One organization already has been awarded a grant
to administer the ``Organizational Components'' of the FLEX program,
and performs the following functions: Recruitment and selection of
Eurasian students; assistance in documentation and preparation of DS-
2019 visa forms; preparation of cross-cultural materials; pre-departure
orientation; international travel from home to host community and
return; facilitation of ongoing communication between the natural
parents and the placement organization, as needed; maintenance of a
student database and provision of data to the U.S. Department of State;
and ongoing follow-up with alumni after their return to Eurasia.
Another organization is currently responsible for supporting
students with disabilities. This involves a pre-program orientation and
a year-end reentry training, as well as ongoing support throughout the
year in order to help them cope with challenges specific to their
circumstances. Placement organizations will be in direct communication
with both organizations. Some students with disabilities may need
supplementary independence skills training early on in the program.
Guidelines: Applicants are requested to submit a narrative
outlining a comprehensive strategy for the administration and
implementation of the placement component of the FLEX program that
includes the following responsibilities:
(1) Recruitment, screening, selection, and FLEX-specific
orientation of local coordinators and host families;
(2) Enrollment in an accredited school;
(3) Post-arrival orientation for participants;
(4) Placement of a small number of students with disabilities;
(5) Pre-program specialized English language programming for pre-
selected students who require focused preparation for their academic
year;
(6) Preparation and dissemination of placement organization
materials to the organization administering the ``Organizational
Components'' by May 1, 2010 (these materials will be distributed to the
students at the Pre-Departure Orientation);
(7) Troubleshooting;
(8) Monitoring of students, host families and local coordinators;
(9) Quarterly evaluation of the organization's success in achieving
program goals;
(10) Mid-year orientations to assess progress; and
(11) Re-entry training to prepare students for readjustment to
their home environments.
Applicants must request a grant for placement and monitoring of at
least 30 students; there is no maximum number of students that may be
placed by one organization. Placements may be in any region of the
United States. Strong preference will be given to organizations that
choose to place participants in clusters of at least three students
(these students should be from different countries) in a particular
Local Coordinator's area of responsibility. Please refer to the
Solicitation Package for details on essential program elements,
permissible costs, and criteria used to select and place students. We
anticipate grants beginning no later than April 2010, subject to the
availability of funds.
Participants begin to arrive in their host communities in late July
2010 and remain for 10 or 11 months until their departure mid-May to
late June 2011. Students with disabilities and students requiring
supplementary English language instruction may arrive earlier.
Administration of the program must be in compliance with reporting and
withholding regulations for federal, state, and local taxes as
applicable. Recipient organizations should demonstrate regulation
adherence in the proposal narrative and budget.
Applicants should submit the health and accident insurance plans
they intend to use for students on this program. If use of a private
plan is proposed, the State Department will compare that plan with the
Bureau plan and make a determination as to which will be applicable.
II. Award Information
Type of Award: New Grant Agreement.
Fiscal Year Funds: FY 2010.
Approximate Total Funding: $7,000,000 pending availability of
funds.
Approximate Number of Awards: 10-15 grants.
Approximate Average Award: Funding level is dependent on the number
of proposed students, monitoring, the quality of support, and volume of
activities.
Anticipated Award Date: Pending availability of funds, April 2010.
Anticipated Project Completion Date: August 2011.
Additional Information: Contingent upon the availability of funds
in subsequent fiscal years; awardees' ability to comply with Federal
Regulations and ECA guidelines; and the otherwise successful
implementation of this program; it is ECA's intent to renew grants
awarded under this competition for up to two additional fiscal years,
before openly competing it again.
III. Eligibility Information
III.1. Eligible applicants: Applications may be submitted by public
and private non-profit organizations meeting the provisions described
in Internal Revenue Code section 26 U.S.C. 501(c)(3).
III.2. Cost Sharing or Matching Funds: There is no minimum or
maximum percentage required for this competition. However, the Bureau
encourages applicants to provide maximum levels of cost sharing and
funding in support of its programs.
When cost sharing is offered, it is understood and agreed that the
applicant must provide the amount of cost sharing as stipulated in its
proposal and later included in an approved agreement. Cost sharing may
be in the form of allowable direct or indirect costs. For
accountability, you must maintain written records to support all costs
which are claimed as your contribution, as well as costs to be paid by
the Federal government. Such records are subject to audit. The basis
for determining the value of cash and
[[Page 62874]]
in-kind contributions must be in accordance with OMB Circular A-110,
(Revised), Subpart C.23--Cost Sharing and Matching. In the event you do
not provide the minimum amount of cost sharing as stipulated in the
approved budget, ECA's contribution will be reduced in like proportion.
III.3. Other Eligibility Requirements: Bureau grant guidelines
require that organizations with fewer than four years' experience in
conducting international exchanges be limited to $60,000 in Bureau
funding. Since an award to support program and administrative costs
required to implement this exchange program for a minimum of 30
students will exceed $60,000, organizations with less than four years'
experience in conducting international exchanges are ineligible to
apply under this competition. The Bureau encourages applicants to
provide maximum levels of cost sharing and funding in support of its
programs.
IV. Application and Submission Information
Note: Please read the complete announcement before sending
inquiries or submitting proposals. Once the RFGP deadline has
passed, Bureau staff may not discuss this competition with
applicants until the proposal review process has been completed.
IV.1. Contact Information to Request an Application Package: Please
contact The Office of Youth Programs, ECA/PE/C/PY, SA-5, Floor 3, U.S.
Department of State, Washington, DC 20522-0503, telephone (202) 632-
6416, and fax (202) 632-9355, e-mail Amrote Molla at MollaAB@state.gov
to request a Solicitation Package. Please refer to the Funding
Opportunity Number ECA/PE/C/PY-10-02 located at the top of this
announcement when making your request.
Alternatively, an electronic application package may be obtained
from Grants.gov. Please see section IV.3f for further information.
The Solicitation Package contains the Proposal Submission
Instruction (PSI) document, which consists of required application
forms and standard guidelines for proposal preparation.
It also contains the Project Objectives, Goals and Implementation
(POGI) document, which provides specific information, award criteria
and budget instructions tailored to this competition.
Please specify the Funding Opportunity Number (ECA/PE/C/PY-10-02)
at the top of this announcement on all inquiries and correspondence.
IV.2. To Download a Solicitation Package Via the Internet: The
entire Solicitation Package may be downloaded from the Bureau's Web
site at https://exchanges.state.gov/grants/open2.html or from the
Grants.gov website at https://www.grants.gov.
Please read all information before downloading.
IV.3. Content and Form of Submission: Applicants must follow all
instructions in the Solicitation Package. The application should be
submitted per the instructions under IV.3f. ``Application Deadline and
Methods of Submission'' section below.
IV.3a. You are required to have a Dun and Bradstreet Data Universal
Numbering System (DUNS) number to apply for a grant or cooperative
agreement from the U.S. Government. This number is a nine-digit
identification number, which uniquely identifies business entities.
Obtaining a DUNS number is easy and there is no charge. To obtain a
DUNS number, access https://www.dunandbradstreet.com or call 1-866-705-
5711. Please ensure that your DUNS number is included in the
appropriate box of the SF-424 which is part of the formal application
package.
IV.3b. All proposals must contain an executive summary, proposal
narrative and budget.
Please Refer to the Solicitation Package. It contains the mandatory
Proposal Submission Instructions (PSI) document and the Project
Objectives, Goals and Implementation (POGI) document for additional
formatting and technical requirements.
IV.3c. You must have nonprofit status with the IRS at the time of
application. Please note: Effective January 7, 2009, all applicants for
ECA federal assistance awards must include in their application the
names of directors and/or senior executives (current officers,
trustees, and key employees, regardless of amount of compensation). In
fulfilling this requirement, applicants must submit information in one
of the following ways:
(1) Those who file Internal Revenue Service Form 990, ``Return of
Organization Exempt From Income Tax,'' must include a copy of relevant
portions of this form.
(2) Those who do not file IRS Form 990 must submit information
above in the format of their choice.
In addition to final program reporting requirements, award
recipients will be required to submit a one-page document, derived from
their program reports, listing and describing their grant activities.
For award recipients, the names of directors and/or senior executives
(current officers, trustees, and key employees), as well as the one-
page description of grant activities, will be transmitted by the State
Department to OMB, along with other information required by the Federal
Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA), and will be made
available to the public by the Office of Management and Budget on its
USASpending.gov website as part of ECA's FFATA reporting requirements.
If your organization is a private nonprofit which has not received
a grant or cooperative agreement from ECA in the past three years, or
if your organization received nonprofit status from the IRS within the
past four years, you must submit the necessary documentation to verify
nonprofit status as directed in the PSI document. Failure to do so will
cause your proposal to be declared technically ineligible.
IV.3d. Please take into consideration the following information
when preparing your proposal narrative:
IV.3d.1 Adherence To All Regulations Governing The J-Visa
The Office of Citizen Exchanges of the Bureau of Educational and
Cultural Affairs is the official program sponsor of the exchange
program covered by this RFGP, and an employee of the Bureau will be the
``Responsible Officer'' for the program under the terms of 22 CFR 62,
which covers the administration of the Exchange Visitor Program (J-visa
program). Under the terms of 22 CFR 62, organizations receiving awards
(either a grant or cooperative agreement) under this RFGP will be third
parties ``cooperating with or assisting the sponsor in the conduct of
the sponsor's program.'' The actions of recipient organizations shall
be ``imputed to the sponsor in evaluating the sponsor's compliance
with'' 22 CFR 62. Therefore, the Bureau expects that any organization
receiving an award under this competition will render all assistance
necessary to enable the Bureau to fully comply with 22 CFR 62 et seq.
The Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs places critically
important emphases on the secure and proper administration of Exchange
Visitor (J-visa) Programs and adherence by recipient organizations and
program participants to all regulations governing the J-visa program
status. Therefore, proposals should explicitly state in writing that
the applicant is prepared to assist the Bureau in meeting all
requirements governing the administration of Exchange Visitor Programs
as set forth in 22 CFR 62. If your organization has experience as a
designated Exchange Visitor Program Sponsor, the applicant should
discuss their record of compliance with 22 CFR
[[Page 62875]]
62 et seq., including the oversight of their Responsible Officers and
Alternate Responsible Officers, screening and selection of program
participants, provision of pre-arrival information and orientation to
participants, monitoring of participants, proper maintenance and
security of forms, record-keeping, reporting and other requirements.
The Office of Citizen Exchanges of ECA will be responsible for
issuing DS-2019 forms to participants in this program.
A copy of the complete regulations governing the administration of
Exchange Visitor (J) programs is available at https://exchanges.state.gov or from: Office of Designation, ECA/EC/D, SA-5,
Floor C2, Department of State, Washington, DC 20522-0582.
IV.3d.2 Diversity, Freedom and Democracy Guidelines
Pursuant to the Bureau's authorizing legislation, programs must
maintain a non-political character and should be balanced and
representative of the diversity of American political, social, and
cultural life. ``Diversity'' should be interpreted in the broadest
sense and encompass differences including, but not limited to
ethnicity, race, gender, religion, geographic location, socio-economic
status, and disabilities. Applicants are strongly encouraged to adhere
to the advancement of this principle both in program administration and
in program content. Please refer to the review criteria under the
``Support for Diversity'' section for specific suggestions on
incorporating diversity into your proposal. Public Law 104-319 provides
that ``in carrying out programs of educational and cultural exchange in
countries whose people do not fully enjoy freedom and democracy,'' the
Bureau ``shall take appropriate steps to provide opportunities for
participation in such programs to human rights and democracy leaders of
such countries.'' Public Law 106-113 requires that the governments of
the countries described above do not have inappropriate influence in
the selection process. Proposals should reflect advancement of these
goals in their program contents, to the full extent deemed feasible.
IV.3d.3 Program Monitoring and Evaluation
Program Monitoring includes Participant Monitoring, which focuses
specifically on ensuring students' safety and well-being throughout the
year; see page 31 for details and instructions. This section focuses on
other aspects of Program Monitoring.
Program Monitoring: Proposals must include a plan to monitor and
report on the project's success, both as the activities unfold and at
the end of the program. The Bureau recommends that your proposal
include a draft survey questionnaire or other technique, plus a
description of a methodology that will be used to link outcomes to
original project objectives. The Bureau expects that the grantee will
track participants and be able to respond to key monitoring questions
throughout the year, particularly on effects of the program on program
participants, their host families and communities.
Successful monitoring depends heavily on setting clear goals and
outcomes at the outset of a program. Your monitoring plan should
include a description of your project's objectives and how and when you
intend to measure these outcomes. You should also show how your project
objectives link to the goals of the program described in this RFGP.
Overall, the quality of your monitoring plan will be judged on how
well it specifies successes and challenges. Grantees will be required
to provide reports analyzing their monitoring findings to the Bureau in
their regular program reports. All data collected, including survey
responses and contact information, must be maintained for a minimum of
three years and provided to the Bureau upon request.
Evaluation: The Bureau's Office of Policy and Evaluation will
conduct evaluations of the FLEX program through E-GOALS, its online
system for surveying program participants and collecting data about
program performance. These evaluations assist ECA and its program
grantees in meeting the requirements of the Government Performance
Results Act (GPRA) of 1993. This Act requires federal agencies to
measure the results of their programs in meeting pre-determined
performance goals and objectives.
Please see specific responsibilities in the accompanying POGI
document.
IV.3e. Please take the following information into consideration
when preparing your budget:
IV.3e.1. Applicants must submit SF-424A--``Budget Information--Non-
Construction Programs'' along with a comprehensive budget for the
entire program. The budget must reflect costs for a minimum of 30
participants. Please indicate clearly the number of students funded.
There must be a summary budget as well as breakdowns reflecting both
administrative and program budgets. Applicants may provide separate
sub-budgets for each program component, phase, location, or activity to
provide clarification.
Please refer to the Solicitation Package for complete budget
guidelines and formatting instructions.
IV.3f. Application Deadline and Methods of Submission:
Application Deadline Date: January 19, 2010.
Reference Number: ECA/PE/C/PY-10-02.
Methods of Submission:
Applications may be submitted in one of two ways:
(1) In hard-copy, via a nationally recognized overnight delivery
service (i.e., Federal Express, UPS, Airborne Express, or U.S. Postal
Service Express Overnight Mail, etc.), or
(2) Electronically through https://www.grants.gov.
Along with the Project Title, all applicants must enter the above
Reference Number in Box 11 on the SF-424 contained in the mandatory
Proposal Submission Instructions (PSI) of the solicitation document.
IV.3f.1--Submitting Printed Applications:
Applications must be shipped no later than the above deadline.
Delivery services used by applicants must have in-place, centralized
shipping identification and tracking systems that may be accessed via
the Internet and delivery people who are identifiable by commonly
recognized uniforms and delivery vehicles. Proposals shipped on or
before the above deadline but received at ECA more than seven days
after the deadline will be ineligible for further consideration under
this competition. Proposals shipped after the established deadlines are
ineligible for consideration under this competition. ECA will not
notify you upon receipt of application. It is each applicant's
responsibility to ensure that each package is marked with a legible
tracking number and to monitor/confirm delivery to ECA via the
Internet. Delivery of proposal packages may not be made via local
courier service or in person for this competition. Faxed documents will
not be accepted at any time. Only proposals submitted as stated above
will be considered.
Important Note: When preparing your submission please make sure
to include one extra copy of the completed SF-424 form and place it
in an envelope addressed to ``ECA/EX/PM.''
The original and eight (8) copies of the application should be sent
to: Program Management Division (ECA-IIP/EX/PM), Ref.: ECA/PE/C/PY-10-
02, SA-5, Floor 4, Department of State,
[[Page 62876]]
2200 C Street, NW., Washington, DC 20522-0504.
IV.3f.2--Submitting Electronic Applications:
Applicants have the option of submitting proposals electronically
through Grants.gov (https://www.grants.gov). Complete solicitation
packages are available at Grants.gov in the ``Find'' portion of the
system.
Please Note: Due to Recovery Act related opportunities, there
has been a higher than usual volume of grant proposals submitted
through Grants.gov. Potential applicants are advised that the
increased volume may affect the Grants.gov proposal submission
process. As stated in this RFGP, ECA bears no responsibility for
applicant timeliness of submission or data errors resulting from
transmission or conversion processes for proposals submitted via
Grants.gov. Please follow the instructions available in the `Get
Started' portion of the site (https://www.grants.gov/GetStarted).
Several of the steps in the Grants.gov registration process could
take several weeks. Therefore, applicants should check with appropriate
staff within their organizations immediately after reviewing this RFGP
to confirm or determine their registration status with Grants.gov. Once
registered, the amount of time it can take to upload an application
will vary depending on a variety of factors including the size of the
application and the speed of your Internet connection. In addition,
validation of an electronic submission via Grants.gov can take up to
two business days.
Therefore, we strongly recommend that you not wait until the
application deadline to begin the submission process through
Grants.gov.
The Grants.gov Web site includes extensive information on all
phases/aspects of the Grants.gov process, including an extensive
section on frequently asked questions, located under the ``For
Applicants'' section of the Web site. ECA strongly recommends that all
potential applicants review thoroughly the Grants.gov Web site, well in
advance of submitting a proposal through the Grants.gov system. ECA
bears no responsibility for data errors resulting from transmission or
conversion processes.
Direct all questions regarding Grants.gov registration and
submission to: Grants.gov Customer Support; Contact Center Phone: 800-
518-4726; Business Hours: Monday-Friday, 7 a.m.-9 p.m. Eastern Time; E-
mail: support@grants.gov.
Applicants have until midnight (12 a.m.), Washington, DC time of
the closing date to ensure that their entire application has been
uploaded to the Grants.gov site. There are no exceptions to the above
deadline. Applications uploaded to the site after midnight of the
application deadline date will be automatically rejected by the
Grants.gov system, and will be technically ineligible.
Please refer to the Grants.gov Web site for definitions of various
``application statuses'' and the difference between a submission
receipt and a submission validation. Applicants will receive a
validation e-mail from Grants.gov upon the successful submission of an
application. Again, validation of an electronic submission via
Grants.gov can take up to two business days. Therefore, we strongly
recommend that you not wait until the application deadline to begin the
submission process through Grants.gov. ECA will not notify you upon
receipt of electronic applications.
It is the responsibility of all applicants submitting proposals via
the Grants.gov web portal to ensure that proposals have been received
by Grants.gov in their entirety, and ECA bears no responsibility for
data errors resulting from transmission or conversion processes.
IV.3g. Intergovernmental Review of Applications: Executive Order
12372 does not apply to this program.
V. Application Review Information
V.1. Review Process
The Bureau will review all proposals for technical eligibility.
Proposals will be deemed ineligible if they do not fully adhere to the
guidelines stated herein and in the Solicitation Package. All eligible
proposals will be reviewed by the program office, as well as the Public
Diplomacy section overseas, where appropriate. Eligible proposals will
be subject to compliance with Federal and Bureau regulations and
guidelines and forwarded to Bureau grant panels for advisory review.
Proposals may also be reviewed by the Office of the Legal Adviser or by
other Department elements. Final funding decisions are at the
discretion of the Department of State's Assistant Secretary for
Educational and Cultural Affairs. Final technical authority for
assistance awards (grants) resides with the Bureau's Grants Officer.
Review Criteria
Technically eligible applications will be competitively reviewed
according to the criteria stated below. These criteria are not rank
ordered and all carry equal weight in the proposal evaluation:
1. Program Planning/Ability to Achieve Program Objectives: Your
proposal narrative should exhibit originality, substance, and relevance
to the Bureau's mission. Reviewers will assess the degree to which
proposals engage participants in community activities that involve
skills development and leadership training. A detailed agenda and work
plan should adhere to the program overview and guidelines described in
the solicitation package. Reviewers will also assess the degree to
which the proposed outcomes of the project are realistic and
measurable. Strategies should creatively utilize resources at the local
level to ensure an efficient use of program funds.
2. Support of Diversity: Proposals should demonstrate substantive
support of the Bureau's policy on diversity.
Achievable and relevant features should be cited in both program
administration (selection of participants, host families, schools,
program venue and program evaluation) and program content
(orientations, program meetings, resource materials and follow-up
activities).
3. Organization's Record/Institutional Capacity: Proposed personnel
and institutional resources should be adequate and appropriate to
achieve the program or project's goals. Reviewers will assess the
applicant and its partners to determine if they offer adequate
resources, expertise, and experience to fulfill program objectives.
Partner activities should be clearly defined. Proposals should
demonstrate an institutional record of successful exchange programs,
including responsible fiscal management and full compliance with all
reporting and J-1 Visa requirements for past Bureau grants as
determined by Bureau Grant Staff. The Bureau will consider the past
performance of prior recipients and the demonstrated potential of new
applicants.
4. Multiplier Effect: Proposed programs should strengthen long-term
mutual understanding, including maximum sharing of information and
establishment of long-term institutional and individual linkages.
Reviewers will assess ways in which proposals include innovative ideas
to expose U.S. communities to FLEX-related goals and activities that
involve students, host families and schools. This includes media
outreach, visits to local and national government representatives,
Internet-based applications and other interactions. Reviewers will also
evaluate substantive plans to prepare FLEX students for their role as
active, effective FLEX alumni.
5. Participant Monitoring: Proposals must include a detailed
monitoring
[[Page 62877]]
plan, which addresses Student, Local Coordinator (LC) and Host Family
(HF) monitoring. Given the importance the Department places on this
criterion, you should dedicate a significant percentage of the
narrative to explaining how you will achieve the Department's goals in
regard to monitoring. You may use the appendices to house additional
details and supporting documentation. Please see the Project
Objectives, Goals, and Implementation (POGI) for additional details
regarding this review criterion.
6. Project Evaluation: Proposals should include a plan to monitor
and evaluate the activity's success, both as the activities unfold and
at the end of the program. Reviewers will assess your plans to monitor
student progress and program activities, particularly in regard to
intended outcomes indicated in your proposal. Grantees will be expected
to submit quarterly reports, which should be included as an inherent
component of the work plan. Your primary method of evaluation is E-
GOALS; other organization-specific instruments are encouraged.
Proposals should also specify ways in which students will be encouraged
to complete the mandatory end-of-the-year surveys administered through
the E-GOALS system.
7. Cost-effectiveness/Cost Sharing: Reviewers will analyze the
budget for clarity and cost-effectiveness. They will also assess the
rationale of the proposed budget and whether the allocation of funds is
appropriate to complete tasks outlined in the project narrative. The
overhead and administrative components of the proposal, including
salaries and honoraria, should be kept as low as possible. All other
items should be necessary and appropriate. Proposals should maximize
cost-sharing through other
private sector support as well as institutional direct funding
contributions. Preference will be given to organizations whose
proposals demonstrate a quality, cost-effective program.
VI. Award Administration Information
VI.1. Award Notices
Final awards cannot be made until funds have been appropriated by
Congress, allocated and committed through internal Bureau procedures.
Successful applicants will receive a Federal Assistance Award (FAA)
from the Bureau's Grants Office. The FAA and the original proposal with
subsequent modifications (if applicable) shall be the only binding
authorizing document between the recipient and the U.S. Government. The
FAA will be signed by an authorized Grants Officer, and mailed to the
recipient's responsible officer identified in the application.
Unsuccessful applicants will receive notification of the results of
the application review from the ECA program office coordinating this
competition.
VI.2. Administrative and National Policy Requirements
Terms and Conditions for the Administration of ECA agreements
include the following:
Office of Management and Budget Circular A-122, ``Cost Principles
for Nonprofit Organizations.''
Office of Management and Budget Circular A-21, ``Cost Principles
for Educational Institutions.''
OMB Circular A-87, ``Cost Principles for State, Local and Indian
Governments.''
OMB Circular No. A-110 (Revised), Uniform Administrative
Requirements for Grants and Agreements with Institutions of Higher
Education, Hospitals, and other Nonprofit Organizations.
OMB Circular No. A-102, Uniform Administrative Requirements for
Grants-in-Aid to State and Local Governments.
OMB Circular No. A-133, Audits of States, Local Government, and
Non-profit Organizations
Please reference the following Web sites for additional
information: https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/grants; https://fa.statebuy.state.gov.
VI.3. Reporting Requirements
You must provide ECA with a hard copy original plus one copy of the
following reports:
(1) A final program and financial report no more than 90 days after
the expiration of the award.
(2) A concise, one-page final program report summarizing program
outcomes no more than 90 days after the expiration of the award. This
one-page report will be transmitted to OMB, and be made available to
the public via OMB's USAspending.gov Web site--as part of ECA's Federal
Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) reporting
requirements.
(3) A SF-PPR, ``Performance Progress Report'' Cover Sheet with all
program reports.
(4) Quarterly program and financial reports which should include
both quantitative and qualitative data you have available.
Award recipients will be required to provide reports analyzing
their evaluation findings to the Bureau in their regular program
reports. (Please refer to IV. Application and Submission Instructions
(IV.3.d.3) above for Program Monitoring and Evaluation information.
All data collected, including survey responses and contact
information, must be maintained for a minimum of three years and
provided to the Bureau upon request.
All reports must be sent to the ECA Grants Officer and ECA Program
Officer listed in the final assistance award document.
VII. Agency Contacts
For questions about this announcement, contact: Jon Crocitto
(crocittoja@state.gov; 202-632-6426) or Callie Ward (wardca@state.gov;
202-632-6431), Office of Citizen Exchanges, ECA/PE/C/PY, SA-5, Floor 3,
Department of State, Washington, DC 20522-0503. All correspondence with
the Bureau concerning this RFGP should reference the above contacts and
ECA/PE/C/PY-10-02.
Please read the complete announcement before sending inquiries or
submitting proposals. Once the RFGP deadline has passed, Bureau staff
may not discuss this competition with applicants until the proposal
review process has been completed.
Notice
The terms and conditions published in this RFGP are binding and may
not be modified by any Bureau representative. Explanatory information
provided by the Bureau that contradicts published language will not be
binding. Issuance of the RFGP does not constitute an award commitment
on the part of the Government. The Bureau reserves the right to reduce,
revise, or increase proposal budgets in accordance with the needs of
the program and the availability of funds. Awards made will be subject
to periodic reporting and evaluation requirements per section VI.3
above.
Dated: November 24, 2009.
Maura M. Pally,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs, U.S.
Department of State.
[FR Doc. E9-28761 Filed 11-30-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P