Further Consolidation of CBP Drawback Centers, 62715-62716 [E9-28674]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 229 / Tuesday, December 1, 2009 / Proposed Rules
Mandatory Service Bulletin A340–21–4147,
dated January 30, 2009 (for Model A340–211,
–212, and –213 series airplanes; and Model
A340–311, –312, and –313 series airplanes);
as applicable.
FAA AD Differences
[Docket No. USCBP–2009–0035]
RIN 1651–AA79
Other FAA AD Provisions
(g) The following provisions also apply to
this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, International
Branch, ANM–116, Transport Airplane
Directorate, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
Send information to Attn: Vladimir Ulyanov,
Aerospace Engineer, International Branch,
ANM–116, Transport Airplane Directorate,
FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057–3356; telephone (425)
227–1138; fax (425) 227–1149. Before using
any approved AMOC on any airplane to
which the AMOC applies, notify your
principal maintenance inspector (PMI) or
principal avionics inspector (PAI), as
appropriate, or lacking a principal inspector,
your local Flight Standards District Office.
The AMOC approval letter must specifically
reference this AD.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement
in this AD to obtain corrective actions from
a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective
actions are considered FAA-approved if they
are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required
to assure the product is airworthy before it
is returned to service.
(3) Reporting Requirements: For any
reporting requirement in this AD, under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) has
approved the information collection
requirements and has assigned OMB Control
Number 2120–0056.
Related Information
pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES
(h) Refer to MCAI EASA Airworthiness
Directive 2009–0150, dated July 9, 2009;
Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A330–21–
3148, dated January 30, 2009; and Airbus
Mandatory Service Bulletin A340–21–4147,
dated January 30, 2009; for related
information.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on
November 19, 2009.
Stephen P. Boyd,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E9–28800 Filed 11–30–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
17:13 Nov 30, 2009
Bureau of Customs and Border
Protection
19 CFR Part 101
Note 1: This AD differs from the MCAI
and/or service information as follows: No
differences.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Jkt 220001
Further Consolidation of CBP
Drawback Centers
AGENCY:
Customs and Border Protection,
DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking;
solicitation of comments.
SUMMARY: This document proposes to
amend the U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (CBP) regulations to reflect a
planned closing of the CBP drawback
center at the Port of Los Angeles-Long
Beach (‘‘Los Angeles’’), California. CBP
believes that the further consolidation
in the number of drawback processing
centers from five to four is necessary
because of decreases in claim filings and
drawback claim values at the Los
Angeles center. This proposed closure
of this drawback center is intended to
conserve resources, increase efficiency,
exercise fiscal responsibility, and
promote greater uniformity in the
processing of drawback claims.
DATES: Written comments must be
received on or before December 31,
2009.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by docket number, by one of
the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments
via Docket No. USCBP 2009–0035.
• Mail: Trade and Commercial
Regulations Branch, Regulations and
Rulings, U.S. Customs and Border
Protection, 799 9th Street, NW. (Mint
Annex), Washington, DC 20229–1179.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name and
docket number for this rulemaking. All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided. For
detailed instructions on submitting
comments and additional information
on the rulemaking process, see the
‘‘Public Participation’’ heading of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
this document.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
comments received, go to https://
www.regulations.gov. Submitted
comments may also be inspected during
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
62715
regular business days between the hours
of 9 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. at the Trade and
Commercial Regulations Branch,
Regulations and Rulings, Office of
International Trade, U.S. Customs and
Border Protection, 799 9th Street, NW.,
5th Floor, Washington, DC
Arrangements to inspect submitted
comments should be made in advance
by calling Joseph Clark at (202) 325–
0118.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Christine Kegley, Import Operations
Branch, Office of Field Operations,
Customs and Border Protection, (202)
344–2319.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Public Participation
Interested persons are invited to
participate in this rulemaking by
submitting written data, views, or
arguments on all aspects of this
proposed rule. U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (CBP) also invites comments
that relate to the economic,
environmental, or federalism effects that
might result from this proposed rule.
Comments that will provide the most
assistance to CBP in developing these
procedures will reference a specific
portion of the proposed rule, explain the
reason for any recommended change,
and include data, information, or
authority that supports such
recommended change. See ADDRESSES
above for information on how to submit
comments.
Background
To conserve resources, increase
efficiency, exercise fiscal responsibility,
and promote greater uniformity in the
processing of drawback claims, U.S.
Customs Service (now CBP) published
on January 24, 2003, Treasury Decision
(T.D.) 03–05 in the Federal Register (68
FR 3381), which consolidated the
drawback centers from eight to the
current five by closing the centers
located in Miami, Florida; New Orleans,
Louisiana; and Boston, Massachusetts
and redirecting that all claims be filed
in the remaining five centers located in
Chicago, Illinois; Houston, Texas; New
York, New York; Los Angeles-Long
Beach (‘‘Los Angeles’’), California; and
San Francisco, California. Additionally,
T.D. 03–05 noted that the agency would
re-evaluate further consolidations as
needed. In 2008, CBP further evaluated
the number of drawback claims
processed at its remaining drawback
centers. Based on this evaluation, CBP
proposes to further consolidate the
drawback centers by closing the Los
Angeles, California Drawback Center to
achieve its goal of four drawback centers
E:\FR\FM\01DEP1.SGM
01DEP1
pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES
62716
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 229 / Tuesday, December 1, 2009 / Proposed Rules
to cover its key geographical areas of
North, South, East, and West.
On May 27, 2008 and April 29, 2009,
in accordance with 19 U.S.C.
2075(g)(2)(C), the Homeland Security
Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 217(b)(2)), and the
SAFE Port Act of 2006 (6 U.S.C. 115(D)),
CBP notified the House Committee on
Ways & Means, the Senate Committee
on Finance, and House Committee on
Homeland Security of its intent to close
the Los Angeles Drawback Center. The
Congressional notification period
expired July 27, 2009, and CBP did not
receive from Congress any objections to
the proposed closing of the Los Angeles
Drawback Center. Out of the remaining
five drawback centers, Los Angeles
receives and processes the fewest
claims. Drawback statistics from fiscal
years 2006, 2007, and 2008 reveal that
only 8.4, 9.01, and 7.49 percent of all
claims were filed in Los Angeles.
Moreover, the claims paid out by the
Los Angeles center during those years
represented only 2.6, 2.42, and 3.15
percent of all drawback claims paid
nationally. Because of the decrease in
the number of drawback claims filed
and processed at the Los Angeles
Drawback Center since 2003 and the
small number of claims filed overall in
the Los Angeles center, CBP is
proposing to close this drawback center,
thus leaving four centers located in its
key geographical areas of Chicago,
Houston, New York, and San Francisco.
CBP believes that closing the Los
Angeles Drawback Center is required in
order to attain CBP’s original goals of
conserving resources, increasing
efficiency, exercising fiscal
responsibility, and promoting greater
uniformity in the processing of
drawback claims.
If this proposal is adopted, then future
claims will be required to be sent to one
of the four remaining drawback centers
located in Chicago, Houston, New York,
or San Francisco. All remaining claims
that were filed at the Los Angeles
Drawback Center prior to closure that
have not been liquidated and still
require CBP review will be forwarded to
the San Francisco Drawback Center for
final processing.
In order to file a drawback claim at
one of the four remaining centers,
persons must ensure that all license/
permit and bond requirements are met
in accordance with the regulations. See
19 CFR Parts 111 and 113 of the CBP
regulations.
Explanation of Amendment
Section 101.3(b)(1) of the CBP
regulations lists all the CBP ports of
entry. Five ports are denoted with a
‘‘plus’’ sign that designates their status
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:13 Nov 30, 2009
Jkt 220001
as a ‘‘Drawback unit/office.’’ This
document proposes to amend
§ 101.3(b)(1) to remove the ‘‘plus’’ sign
in § 101.3(b)(1) next to the port listing
for Los Angeles-Long Beach.
Inapplicability of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.) requires federal
agencies to examine the impact a rule
would have on small entities. A small
entity may be a small business (defined
as any independently owned and
operated business not dominant in its
field that qualifies as a small business
per the Small Business Act); a small notfor-profit organization; or a small
governmental jurisdiction (locality with
fewer than 50,000 people).
Although this document is being
issued with notice for public comment,
it is noted that this proposal, which
relates to agency management and
organization, does not directly regulate
small entities and is not subject to the
notice and public procedure
requirements of 5 U.S.C. 553. The
proposed change is part of CBP’s
continuing program to conserve
resources, increase efficiency, and
exercise fiscal responsibility, and to
provide better service to importers and
the general public.
Because this proposal does not
directly regulate small entities and
because CBP estimates that virtually all
transactions are accomplished through
either electronic or mailed submissions,
and any follow-up is handled by
telephone, fax and/or email, the
physical location of a drawback center
is largely irrelevant to the process.
Accordingly, CBP does not believe that
this rule will have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. However, CBP
welcomes comments on this
assumption. If we do not receive any
comments to the contrary, we may
certify in the final rule that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small
entities.
Executive Order 12866
This proposed rule does not meet the
criteria to be considered an
economically ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866
because it will not result in the
expenditure of over $100 million in any
one year. The Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) has not reviewed this
proposed rule under that Order.
As stated previously, CBP estimates
that virtually all of follow-up
transactions are through fax, email, or
telephone; it is a very rare occasion for
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
any member of the public to visit a
drawback center. Thus, CBP anticipates
that this rule will have de minimus
costs to the public as a result of the
further consolidation of drawback
centers.
Signing Authority
This document is being issued in
accordance with 19 CFR 0.2(a), which
provides that the authority of the
Secretary of the Treasury with respect to
CBP regulations that are not related to
customs revenue functions was
transferred to the Secretary of Homeland
Security pursuant to § 403(l) of the
Homeland Security Act of 2002.
Accordingly, this notice of proposed
rulemaking to amend such regulations
may be signed by the Secretary of
Homeland Security (or her delegate).
List of Subjects in 19 CFR Part 101
Customs duties and inspection,
Customs ports of entry.
Proposed Amendment to the
Regulations
For the reasons set forth above, CBP
proposes to amend part 101 of the CBP
regulations (19 CFR Part 101) as follows:
PART 101—GENERAL PROVISIONS
1. The general authority citation for
part 101 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 19 U.S.C. 2, 66,
1202 (General Note 3(i), Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States), 1623, 1624,
1646a.
Section 101.3 and 101.4 also issued under
19 U.S.C. 1 and 58b.
*
*
*
*
*
§ 101.3—[Amended].
2. In § 101.3, the table in paragraph
(b)(1) is amended by removing the plus
sign in the ‘‘Ports of entry’’ column
before the column listing for ‘‘Los
Angeles-Long Beach’’ under the state of
California.
Dated: November 25, 2009.
Jayson P. Ahern,
Acting Commissioner, U.S. Customs and
Border Protection.
[FR Doc. E9–28674 Filed 11–30–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111–14–P
E:\FR\FM\01DEP1.SGM
01DEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 229 (Tuesday, December 1, 2009)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 62715-62716]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-28674]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Bureau of Customs and Border Protection
19 CFR Part 101
[Docket No. USCBP-2009-0035]
RIN 1651-AA79
Further Consolidation of CBP Drawback Centers
AGENCY: Customs and Border Protection, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking; solicitation of comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document proposes to amend the U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (CBP) regulations to reflect a planned closing of the CBP
drawback center at the Port of Los Angeles-Long Beach (``Los
Angeles''), California. CBP believes that the further consolidation in
the number of drawback processing centers from five to four is
necessary because of decreases in claim filings and drawback claim
values at the Los Angeles center. This proposed closure of this
drawback center is intended to conserve resources, increase efficiency,
exercise fiscal responsibility, and promote greater uniformity in the
processing of drawback claims.
DATES: Written comments must be received on or before December 31,
2009.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by docket number, by one
of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments via Docket No. USCBP
2009-0035.
Mail: Trade and Commercial Regulations Branch, Regulations
and Rulings, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, 799 9th Street, NW.
(Mint Annex), Washington, DC 20229-1179.
Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name
and docket number for this rulemaking. All comments received will be
posted without change to https://www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided. For detailed instructions on submitting
comments and additional information on the rulemaking process, see the
``Public Participation'' heading of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
section of this document.
Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
comments received, go to https://www.regulations.gov. Submitted comments
may also be inspected during regular business days between the hours of
9 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. at the Trade and Commercial Regulations Branch,
Regulations and Rulings, Office of International Trade, U.S. Customs
and Border Protection, 799 9th Street, NW., 5th Floor, Washington, DC
Arrangements to inspect submitted comments should be made in advance by
calling Joseph Clark at (202) 325-0118.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christine Kegley, Import Operations
Branch, Office of Field Operations, Customs and Border Protection,
(202) 344-2319.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Public Participation
Interested persons are invited to participate in this rulemaking by
submitting written data, views, or arguments on all aspects of this
proposed rule. U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) also invites
comments that relate to the economic, environmental, or federalism
effects that might result from this proposed rule. Comments that will
provide the most assistance to CBP in developing these procedures will
reference a specific portion of the proposed rule, explain the reason
for any recommended change, and include data, information, or authority
that supports such recommended change. See ADDRESSES above for
information on how to submit comments.
Background
To conserve resources, increase efficiency, exercise fiscal
responsibility, and promote greater uniformity in the processing of
drawback claims, U.S. Customs Service (now CBP) published on January
24, 2003, Treasury Decision (T.D.) 03-05 in the Federal Register (68 FR
3381), which consolidated the drawback centers from eight to the
current five by closing the centers located in Miami, Florida; New
Orleans, Louisiana; and Boston, Massachusetts and redirecting that all
claims be filed in the remaining five centers located in Chicago,
Illinois; Houston, Texas; New York, New York; Los Angeles-Long Beach
(``Los Angeles''), California; and San Francisco, California.
Additionally, T.D. 03-05 noted that the agency would re-evaluate
further consolidations as needed. In 2008, CBP further evaluated the
number of drawback claims processed at its remaining drawback centers.
Based on this evaluation, CBP proposes to further consolidate the
drawback centers by closing the Los Angeles, California Drawback Center
to achieve its goal of four drawback centers
[[Page 62716]]
to cover its key geographical areas of North, South, East, and West.
On May 27, 2008 and April 29, 2009, in accordance with 19 U.S.C.
2075(g)(2)(C), the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 217(b)(2)),
and the SAFE Port Act of 2006 (6 U.S.C. 115(D)), CBP notified the House
Committee on Ways & Means, the Senate Committee on Finance, and House
Committee on Homeland Security of its intent to close the Los Angeles
Drawback Center. The Congressional notification period expired July 27,
2009, and CBP did not receive from Congress any objections to the
proposed closing of the Los Angeles Drawback Center. Out of the
remaining five drawback centers, Los Angeles receives and processes the
fewest claims. Drawback statistics from fiscal years 2006, 2007, and
2008 reveal that only 8.4, 9.01, and 7.49 percent of all claims were
filed in Los Angeles. Moreover, the claims paid out by the Los Angeles
center during those years represented only 2.6, 2.42, and 3.15 percent
of all drawback claims paid nationally. Because of the decrease in the
number of drawback claims filed and processed at the Los Angeles
Drawback Center since 2003 and the small number of claims filed overall
in the Los Angeles center, CBP is proposing to close this drawback
center, thus leaving four centers located in its key geographical areas
of Chicago, Houston, New York, and San Francisco. CBP believes that
closing the Los Angeles Drawback Center is required in order to attain
CBP's original goals of conserving resources, increasing efficiency,
exercising fiscal responsibility, and promoting greater uniformity in
the processing of drawback claims.
If this proposal is adopted, then future claims will be required to
be sent to one of the four remaining drawback centers located in
Chicago, Houston, New York, or San Francisco. All remaining claims that
were filed at the Los Angeles Drawback Center prior to closure that
have not been liquidated and still require CBP review will be forwarded
to the San Francisco Drawback Center for final processing.
In order to file a drawback claim at one of the four remaining
centers, persons must ensure that all license/permit and bond
requirements are met in accordance with the regulations. See 19 CFR
Parts 111 and 113 of the CBP regulations.
Explanation of Amendment
Section 101.3(b)(1) of the CBP regulations lists all the CBP ports
of entry. Five ports are denoted with a ``plus'' sign that designates
their status as a ``Drawback unit/office.'' This document proposes to
amend Sec. 101.3(b)(1) to remove the ``plus'' sign in Sec.
101.3(b)(1) next to the port listing for Los Angeles-Long Beach.
Inapplicability of the Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) requires
federal agencies to examine the impact a rule would have on small
entities. A small entity may be a small business (defined as any
independently owned and operated business not dominant in its field
that qualifies as a small business per the Small Business Act); a small
not-for-profit organization; or a small governmental jurisdiction
(locality with fewer than 50,000 people).
Although this document is being issued with notice for public
comment, it is noted that this proposal, which relates to agency
management and organization, does not directly regulate small entities
and is not subject to the notice and public procedure requirements of 5
U.S.C. 553. The proposed change is part of CBP's continuing program to
conserve resources, increase efficiency, and exercise fiscal
responsibility, and to provide better service to importers and the
general public.
Because this proposal does not directly regulate small entities and
because CBP estimates that virtually all transactions are accomplished
through either electronic or mailed submissions, and any follow-up is
handled by telephone, fax and/or email, the physical location of a
drawback center is largely irrelevant to the process. Accordingly, CBP
does not believe that this rule will have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. However, CBP welcomes
comments on this assumption. If we do not receive any comments to the
contrary, we may certify in the final rule that this rule will not have
a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
Executive Order 12866
This proposed rule does not meet the criteria to be considered an
economically ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866 because it will not result in the expenditure of over $100
million in any one year. The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has
not reviewed this proposed rule under that Order.
As stated previously, CBP estimates that virtually all of follow-up
transactions are through fax, email, or telephone; it is a very rare
occasion for any member of the public to visit a drawback center. Thus,
CBP anticipates that this rule will have de minimus costs to the public
as a result of the further consolidation of drawback centers.
Signing Authority
This document is being issued in accordance with 19 CFR 0.2(a),
which provides that the authority of the Secretary of the Treasury with
respect to CBP regulations that are not related to customs revenue
functions was transferred to the Secretary of Homeland Security
pursuant to Sec. 403(l) of the Homeland Security Act of 2002.
Accordingly, this notice of proposed rulemaking to amend such
regulations may be signed by the Secretary of Homeland Security (or her
delegate).
List of Subjects in 19 CFR Part 101
Customs duties and inspection, Customs ports of entry.
Proposed Amendment to the Regulations
For the reasons set forth above, CBP proposes to amend part 101 of
the CBP regulations (19 CFR Part 101) as follows:
PART 101--GENERAL PROVISIONS
1. The general authority citation for part 101 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 19 U.S.C. 2, 66, 1202 (General Note
3(i), Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States), 1623, 1624,
1646a.
Section 101.3 and 101.4 also issued under 19 U.S.C. 1 and 58b.
* * * * *
Sec. 101.3--[Amended].
2. In Sec. 101.3, the table in paragraph (b)(1) is amended by
removing the plus sign in the ``Ports of entry'' column before the
column listing for ``Los Angeles-Long Beach'' under the state of
California.
Dated: November 25, 2009.
Jayson P. Ahern,
Acting Commissioner, U.S. Customs and Border Protection.
[FR Doc. E9-28674 Filed 11-30-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-14-P