Medicaid Program: State Flexibility for Medicaid Benefit Packages and Premiums and Cost Sharing, 62501-62503 [E9-28569]
Download as PDF
62501
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 228 / Monday, November 30, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Volatile organic compounds, Ozone,
Sulfur oxides, Nitrogen dioxide.
Dated: November 16, 2009.
J. Scott Jordon,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4.
■
Subpart S—Kentucky
2. Section 52.920(d), is amended by
adding a new entry at the end of the
table for ‘‘Source-Specific SIP Revision
for Avis Budget Car Rental Group,’’ to
read as follows:
■
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
§ 52.920
*
Authority: 42.U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Identification of plan.
*
*
(d) * * *
*
*
EPA-APPROVED KENTUCKY SOURCE-SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS
Name of source
State effective
date
EPA approval date
*
*
Permit No.
*
*
*
Source-Specific SIP Revision for
Avis Budget Car Rental Group.
N/A ...............................................
8/9/07
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
I. Background
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. E9–28421 Filed 11–27–09; 8:45 am]
A. State Flexibility for Medicaid Benefit
Packages
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services
42 CFR Parts 440, 447, and 457
[CMS–2232–F3; CMS–2244–F4]
RIN 0938–AP72 and 0938–AP73
Medicaid Program: State Flexibility for
Medicaid Benefit Packages and
Premiums and Cost Sharing
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with RULES
AGENCY: Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS.
ACTION: Final rule.
SUMMARY: This final rule temporarily
delays the effective date of the
November 25, 2008 final rule entitled,
‘‘Medicaid Program; Premiums and Cost
Sharing’’ and the December 3, 2008 final
rule entitled, ‘‘Medicaid Program; State
Flexibility for Medicaid Benefit
Packages’’ until July 1, 2010.
DATES: Effective Date: This action is
effective December 31, 2009. The
effective date of the rule amending 42
CFR part 440 published in the December
3, 2008 Federal Register (73 FR 73694)
is delayed until July 1, 2010. The
effective date of the rule amending 42
CFR parts 447 and 457 published in the
November 25, 2008 Federal Register (73
FR 71828) is delayed until July 1, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:56 Nov 27, 2009
Jkt 220001
On December 3, 2008, we published
a final rule in the Federal Register (73
FR 73694) entitled ‘‘Medicaid Program;
State Flexibility for Medicaid Benefit
Packages.’’ The December 3, 2008 final
rule implements provisions of section
6044 of the Deficit Reduction Act (DRA)
of 2005, (Pub. L. 109–171), enacted on
February 8, 2006, which amends the
Social Security Act (the Act) by adding
a new section 1937 related to the
coverage of medical assistance under
approved State plans. Section 1937
provides States increased flexibility
under an approved State plan to provide
covered medical assistance through
enrollment of certain Medicaid
recipients in benchmark or benchmarkequivalent benefit packages. The final
rule set forth the requirements and
limitations for this flexibility, after
consideration of public comments on
the February 22, 2008 proposed rule.
Subsequent to the publication of the
December 3, 2008 final rule, we
published an interim final rule with
comment period in the Federal Register
on February 2, 2009 (74 FR 5808) to
temporarily delay for 60 days the
effective date of the December 3, 2008
final rule entitled, ‘‘Medicaid Program;
State Flexibility for Medicaid Benefit
Packages.’’ The interim final rule also
reopened the comment period on the
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
*
11/30/09 ............................
[Insert citation of publication].
Frances Crystal, (410) 786–1195, for
State Flexibility for Medicaid Benefit
Packages.
Christine Gerhardt, (410) 786–0693, for
Premiums and Cost Sharing.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
*
Explanations
*
Removal of stage II requirements
policies set out in the December 3, 2008
final rule. We received 9 public
comments in response to the February 2,
2009 interim final rule.
On February 4, 2009, the Children’s
Health Insurance Program
Reauthorization Act (CHIPRA) of 2009
(Pub. L. 111–3) was enacted. Certain
provisions of CHIPRA affect current
regulations regarding State Flexibility
for Medicaid Benefit Packages,
including the December 3, 2008 final
rule. Specifically, section 611(a)(1)(C)
and section 611(a)(3) of CHIPRA amend
section 1937 of the Act, to require that
States provide the full range of the Early
Periodic Screening, Diagnosis, and
Treatment (EPSDT) coverage benefit to
children under the age of 21, rather than
those under 19 as specified in the DRA
of 2005, who are enrolled in benchmark
or benchmark-equivalent plans. EPSDT
services may be provided through a
benchmark or benchmark-equivalent
plan or as an additional benefit
supplementing coverage under the
benchmark or benchmark-equivalent
plan. Section 611(a)(1)(A)(i) of CHIPRA
amends section 1937 of the Act by
changing the language
‘‘Notwithstanding any other provision
of this title * * *’’ to read
‘‘Notwithstanding section 1902(a)(1)
(relating to statewideness), section
1902(a)(10)(B) (relating to
comparability), and any other provision
of this title which would be directly
contrary to the authority * * *’’ One
effect of this change is to clarify that the
requirement, under 42 CFR 431.53 and
section 1902(a)(4) of the Act, to assure
transportation for Medicaid
beneficiaries in order for them to have
access to covered State plan services, is
applicable to States electing to provide
E:\FR\FM\30NOR1.SGM
30NOR1
62502
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 228 / Monday, November 30, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with RULES
Medicaid through benchmark or
benchmark-equivalent plans.
On April 3, 2009, we published a
second final rule (74 FR 15221) in the
Federal Register further delaying
implementation of the December 3, 2008
rule until December 31, 2009 and
reopening the comment period to permit
additional comments on the policies set
forth in the December 3, 2008 final rule
and the statutory changes contained in
CHIPRA. This second delay specifically
requested comments on the provisions
of CHIPRA enacted on February 4, 2009,
which corrected language in the DRA as
if these amendments were included in
the DRA, and amended section 1937 of
the Act, ‘‘State Flexibility for Medicaid
Benefit Packages.’’ We received 7 timely
items of correspondence in response to
the April 3, 2009 interim final rule.
B. Premiums and Cost Sharing
On November 25, 2008, we published
a final rule entitled, ‘‘Medicaid Program;
Premiums and Cost Sharing’’ in the
Federal Register (73 FR 71828) to
implement and interpret sections 6041,
6042 and 6043 of the DRA, as amended
by section 405 of the Tax Relief and
Health Care Act of 2006 (TRHCA).
These provisions amended the Social
Security Act to add section 1916A
which provides State Medicaid agencies
with increased flexibility to impose
premium and cost sharing requirements
on certain Medicaid recipients. These
DRA provisions specifically addressed
cost sharing for non-preferred drugs and
non-emergency care furnished in a
hospital emergency department. The
DRA was amended by TRHCA to limit
cost sharing for individuals with family
incomes at or below 100 percent of the
Federal poverty line. The November 25,
2008 final rule integrated into CMS
regulations the statutory flexibility to
impose premiums and cost sharing that
was added by the DRA. In addition, in
the November 25, 2008 final rule, we
responded to public comments on the
February 22, 2008 proposed rule.
Subsequent to the publication of the
November 25, 2008 final rule, we
published a final rule in the Federal
Register on January 27, 2009 (74 FR
4888) that temporarily delayed for 60
days the effective date of the November
25, 2008 final rule. The final rule also
reopened the comment period on the
policies set out in the November 25,
2008 final rule.
On February 17, 2009, the American
Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009
(the Recovery Act) was enacted
subsequent to the publication of the
January 27, 2009 delay of effective date.
Certain provisions of the Recovery Act
amended the provisions of section
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:56 Nov 27, 2009
Jkt 220001
1916A of the Social Security Act that
were added by the DRA. As a result, the
regulations published on November 25,
2008 were not consistent with statutory
authority governing Medicaid and CHIP
premiums and cost sharing.
Specifically, under the Recovery Act,
effective July 1, 2009, Medicaid and
CHIP programs are prohibited from
imposing premiums or other cost
sharing payments on Indians who are
provided services or items covered
under the Medicaid State plan by Indian
Health providers or through referral
under contract health services.
Similarly, payments to Indian Health
providers or to a health care provider
through referral under contract health
services for Medicaid services or items
furnished to Indians cannot be reduced
by the amount of any enrollment fee,
premium, or cost sharing that otherwise
would be due from the Indians.
On March 27, 2009, we published a
second final rule in the Federal Register
(74 FR 13346) that further delayed the
effective date of the November 25, 2008
final rule until December 31, 2009. The
final rule reopened the comment period
to give the public an additional
opportunity to submit comments on the
policy set forth in the final rule as well
as the provisions of the Recovery Act.
Comments were specifically solicited on
the effect of certain provisions of the
Recovery Act related to the exclusion of
Indians from payments of premiums
and cost sharing.
II. Provisions of the Proposed Rule and
Response to Public Comments
On October 30, 2009, we published a
proposed rule in the Federal Register
(73 FR 71828) to solicit public
comments on further delaying the
effective date of the November 25, 2008
and the December 3, 2008 final rules
(collectively, ‘‘the 2008 final rules’’)
until July 1, 2010. We proposed to
further delay the effective date of the
2008 final rules from December 31, 2009
to July 1, 2010 to allow us sufficient
time to revise a substantial portion of
the final rules based on our review and
consideration of the new provision of
CHIPRA, the Recovery Act, and the
public comments received during the
reopened comment periods. To allow
time to make these revisions, the
Department determined that we need
several more months to fully consider
the changes needed to the rules. In the
proposed rule, we noted that the
comments received during the reopened
comment periods were complex and
presented numerous policy issues,
which require extensive consultation,
review, and analysis. Additionally,
because both CHIPRA and the Recovery
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Act contain provisions that impact the
American Indian and Alaska Native
community, we stated that the
development of the final rules requires
collaboration with other HHS agencies
and the Tribal governments.
We believed that this time period
would allow us sufficient time to further
consider public comments, analyze the
impact of the revisions on affected
stakeholders, and develop appropriate
revisions to the regulations.
We received 1 timely item of
correspondence in response to the
October 30, 2009 proposed rule. The
comment did not directly address our
proposal to delay the effective date of
the 2008 final rules until July 1, 2010.
The comment was limited to the
exemption of the benchmark and
benchmark-equivalent packages from
the assurance of transportation
requirements. Because the comment is
outside the scope of the proposed rule
on the delay of the effective dates of the
2008 final rules, but instead addresses
the issue of revisions that are needed to
comply with statutory changes, we will
address the comment when we issue
revisions to the final rule on State
flexibility for Medicaid benefit
packages. Because this comment
highlighted the need for such revisions,
we view this comment as indirectly
supporting our proposal to delay the
effective date of the 2008 final rules in
order to issue needed revisions.
III. Provisions of This Final Rule
This rule further delays the effective
date of the 2008 final rules until July 1,
2010. The provisions of the November
25, 2008 final rule and the December 3,
2008 final rule, which were to become
effective on December 31, 2009, will
now become effective July 1, 2010. We
note that, although we are finalizing the
delay in the effective date of the 2008
final rules jointly because it is more
efficient to do so, revisions to the 2008
final rules will be published as two
separate revised final rules.
IV. Collection of Information
Requirements
This document does not impose
information collection and
recordkeeping requirements.
Consequently, it need not be reviewed
by the Office of Management and
Budget under the authority of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Program No. 93.778, Medical Assistance
Program)
E:\FR\FM\30NOR1.SGM
30NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 228 / Monday, November 30, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
Dated: November 20, 2009.
Charlene Frizzera,
Acting Administrator, Centers for Medicare
& Medicaid Services.
Approved: November 23, 2009.
Kathleen Sebelius,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9–28569 Filed 11–27–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 2244–F4–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
49 CFR Parts 190, 192, 195 and 198
[Docket No. PHMSA–2009–0265; Amdt Nos.
190–15; 192–111; 195–92, 198–5)]
RIN 2137–AE51
Pipeline Safety: Editorial Amendments
to the Pipeline Safety Regulations.
AGENCY: Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety Administration
(PHMSA), Department of Transportation
(DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
SUMMARY: This final rule corrects
editorial errors, makes minor changes in
the regulatory text, reflects changes in
governing laws, and improves the
clarity of certain provisions in the
pipeline safety regulations. This rule is
intended to enhance the accuracy and
reduce misunderstandings of the
specified regulations. The amendments
contained in this rule are nonsubstantive changes.
DATES: Effective date: The effective date
of this final rule is January 29, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Dana Register at (202) 366–4046.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with RULES
I. Background
PHMSA regularly reviews the
Pipeline Safety Regulations (49 CFR
Parts 186–199) to identify typographical
errors, outdated contact information, or
similar errors. In this final rule, we are
correcting typographical errors;
incorrect CFR references and citations;
and clarifying certain regulatory
requirements. Because these
amendments do not impose new
requirements, notice and public
comment procedures are unnecessary.
II. Amendments Included in This Final
Rule
A. In 49 CFR 190.3, which contains
definitions, we are now updating the
location of the Eastern Regional Office
to reflect a recent location change.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:56 Nov 27, 2009
Jkt 220001
1. In § 190.3, under the definition of
‘‘Regional Director’’ we are correcting
the Eastern Regional Office location by
replacing the location ‘‘Washington,
DC’’ with ‘‘Trenton, NJ.’’
B. On October 17, 2008, PHMSA
issued a final rule, under Docket No.
PHMSA–2005–23447, that amended the
Pipeline Safety Regulations (49 CFR
Parts 186–199) to prescribe safety
requirements for the operation of certain
gas transmission pipelines at pressures
based on higher operating stress levels.
The rule allowed for an increase of
maximum allowable operating pressure
(MAOP) over that previously allowed in
the regulations for pipelines that could
meet certain criteria. On December 1,
2008, PHMSA stayed the effective date
of this final rule until December 22,
2008 (73 FR 72737).
We are now correcting several
editorial errors that we discovered after
this final rule was published.
Specifically:
2. In § 192.112, we are correcting
paragraph (c)(2)(i) by replacing the
phrase ‘‘[the effective date of the final
rule]’’ with ‘‘December 22, 2008.’’
3. In § 192.112, we are correcting
paragraph (e)(2) by replacing the phrase
‘‘November 17, 2008’’ with ‘‘December
22, 2008.’’
4. In § 192.620, we are correcting the
following paragraphs:
(a) In paragraph (a)(1)(i), we are
replacing the phrase ‘‘November 17,
2008’’ with ‘‘December 22, 2008’’;
(b) In footnote 1 of paragraph (a)(2)(ii),
we are replacing the phrase ‘‘November
17, 2008’’ with ‘‘December 22, 2008’’
(c) In paragraph (b)(3), we are adding
a reference to § 192.620(d)(3) to clarify
the intent with respect to remotely
operable valves;
(d) In paragraph (b)(7) we are
replacing the phrase ‘‘November 17,
2008’’ with ‘‘December 22, 2008’’;
(e) In paragraph (c)(4)(ii) we are
replacing the phrase ‘‘November 17,
2008’’ with ‘‘December 22, 2008’’;
(f) In paragraph (c)(6), we are
clarifying that the construction
requirements only apply to construction
that occurred after the effective date of
this rule, December 22, 2008;
(g) In paragraph (d)(3)(i), we are
correcting the reference from ‘‘(d)(1)(i)’’
to ‘‘(d)(2)(i)’’;
(h) In paragraph (d)(5)(iv), we are
clarifying the language to note that
sampling of accumulated liquids is
required whenever cleaning pigs are
used and corrosion inhibitors are
required if corrosive gas or liquids are
present;
(i) In paragraph (d)(7)(iii), we are
correcting the reference to ‘‘paragraph
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
62503
(8)’’ to ‘‘(d)(9)’’ and the reference from
‘‘(6)(i)’’ to ‘‘(d)(7)(i)’’;
(j) In paragraph (d)(7)(iv)(C), we are
correcting the reference from ‘‘(d)(8)’’
and ‘‘(d)(9)’’ to ‘‘(d)(9)’’ and ‘‘(d)(10)’’;
(k) In paragraph (d)(8)(ii), we are
clarifying that a close interval survey
must be used to confirm restoration of
cathodic protection unless the problem
is a rectifier connection or power input
remediation that can be verified by
other means.
(l) In the introductory text of (d)(9)(i),
we are correcting the reference from
‘‘(d)(8)(iii)’’ to ‘‘(d)(9)(iii)’’;
(m) In paragraph (d)(9)(ii), we are
correcting the reference from
‘‘(d)(8)(iii)’’ to ‘‘(d)(9)(iii)’’;
(n) In paragraph (d)(10)(ii), we are
correcting the reference from ‘‘(d)(9)(i)’’
to ‘‘(d)(10)(i)’’;
(o) In paragraph (d)(10)(iii), we are
correcting the reference from
‘‘(d)(8)(iii)’’ to ‘‘(d)(9)(iii)’’;
(p) In paragraph (d)(11)(ii)(A), we are
correcting the reference from ‘‘(d)(8)’’ to
‘‘(d)(9)’’;
(q) In the introductory text of
(d)(11)(iii), we are correcting the
reference from ‘‘(d)(10)(ii)’’ to
‘‘(d)(11)(ii)’’; and
(r) In paragraph (d)(11)(iv), we are
correcting the reference from ‘‘(d)(10)(ii)
or (iii)’’ to ‘‘(d)(11)(ii) or (iii).’’
C. On December 24, 2008, PHMSA
issued a final rule under Docket No.
PHMSA–2005–21305, that amended the
pipeline safety regulations to allow
operators to design pipelines made from
new Polyamide-11 (PA–11)
thermoplastic pipe using a higher
design factor and to raise the design
pressure limit for such pipelines.
PHMSA believes that the current
wording in 49 CFR 192.121 could be
incorrectly interpreted to mean that the
0.40 design factor is not limited only to
PA–11 pipe. Therefore, PHMSA has
concluded that the formula should be
clarified so that the 0.40 design factor
only applies to PA–11. Therefore, we
are making the following clarification:
‘‘= 0.40 for PA–11 pipe produced after
January 23, 2009 with a nominal pipe
size (IPS or CTS) 4-inch or less, SDR–
11 or greater (i.e. thicker pipe wall).’’
D. In section 195.12, we are
redesignating paragraph (d), entitled
Record Retention, as paragraph (e).
E. The laws governing pipeline safety
regulation provide the authority for
PHMSA to issue grants to states to carry
out pipeline safety programs under
certification or agreement. The Pipeline
Inspection, Protection, Enforcement,
and Safety Act of 2006 (Pub. L. 109–
468) modified 49 U.S.C. 60107 to
increase the maximum allowed amount
E:\FR\FM\30NOR1.SGM
30NOR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 228 (Monday, November 30, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 62501-62503]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-28569]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
42 CFR Parts 440, 447, and 457
[CMS-2232-F3; CMS-2244-F4]
RIN 0938-AP72 and 0938-AP73
Medicaid Program: State Flexibility for Medicaid Benefit Packages
and Premiums and Cost Sharing
AGENCY: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This final rule temporarily delays the effective date of the
November 25, 2008 final rule entitled, ``Medicaid Program; Premiums and
Cost Sharing'' and the December 3, 2008 final rule entitled, ``Medicaid
Program; State Flexibility for Medicaid Benefit Packages'' until July
1, 2010.
DATES: Effective Date: This action is effective December 31, 2009. The
effective date of the rule amending 42 CFR part 440 published in the
December 3, 2008 Federal Register (73 FR 73694) is delayed until July
1, 2010. The effective date of the rule amending 42 CFR parts 447 and
457 published in the November 25, 2008 Federal Register (73 FR 71828)
is delayed until July 1, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Frances Crystal, (410) 786-1195, for State Flexibility for Medicaid
Benefit Packages.
Christine Gerhardt, (410) 786-0693, for Premiums and Cost Sharing.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
A. State Flexibility for Medicaid Benefit Packages
On December 3, 2008, we published a final rule in the Federal
Register (73 FR 73694) entitled ``Medicaid Program; State Flexibility
for Medicaid Benefit Packages.'' The December 3, 2008 final rule
implements provisions of section 6044 of the Deficit Reduction Act
(DRA) of 2005, (Pub. L. 109-171), enacted on February 8, 2006, which
amends the Social Security Act (the Act) by adding a new section 1937
related to the coverage of medical assistance under approved State
plans. Section 1937 provides States increased flexibility under an
approved State plan to provide covered medical assistance through
enrollment of certain Medicaid recipients in benchmark or benchmark-
equivalent benefit packages. The final rule set forth the requirements
and limitations for this flexibility, after consideration of public
comments on the February 22, 2008 proposed rule.
Subsequent to the publication of the December 3, 2008 final rule,
we published an interim final rule with comment period in the Federal
Register on February 2, 2009 (74 FR 5808) to temporarily delay for 60
days the effective date of the December 3, 2008 final rule entitled,
``Medicaid Program; State Flexibility for Medicaid Benefit Packages.''
The interim final rule also reopened the comment period on the policies
set out in the December 3, 2008 final rule. We received 9 public
comments in response to the February 2, 2009 interim final rule.
On February 4, 2009, the Children's Health Insurance Program
Reauthorization Act (CHIPRA) of 2009 (Pub. L. 111-3) was enacted.
Certain provisions of CHIPRA affect current regulations regarding State
Flexibility for Medicaid Benefit Packages, including the December 3,
2008 final rule. Specifically, section 611(a)(1)(C) and section
611(a)(3) of CHIPRA amend section 1937 of the Act, to require that
States provide the full range of the Early Periodic Screening,
Diagnosis, and Treatment (EPSDT) coverage benefit to children under the
age of 21, rather than those under 19 as specified in the DRA of 2005,
who are enrolled in benchmark or benchmark-equivalent plans. EPSDT
services may be provided through a benchmark or benchmark-equivalent
plan or as an additional benefit supplementing coverage under the
benchmark or benchmark-equivalent plan. Section 611(a)(1)(A)(i) of
CHIPRA amends section 1937 of the Act by changing the language
``Notwithstanding any other provision of this title * * *'' to read
``Notwithstanding section 1902(a)(1) (relating to statewideness),
section 1902(a)(10)(B) (relating to comparability), and any other
provision of this title which would be directly contrary to the
authority * * *'' One effect of this change is to clarify that the
requirement, under 42 CFR 431.53 and section 1902(a)(4) of the Act, to
assure transportation for Medicaid beneficiaries in order for them to
have access to covered State plan services, is applicable to States
electing to provide
[[Page 62502]]
Medicaid through benchmark or benchmark-equivalent plans.
On April 3, 2009, we published a second final rule (74 FR 15221) in
the Federal Register further delaying implementation of the December 3,
2008 rule until December 31, 2009 and reopening the comment period to
permit additional comments on the policies set forth in the December 3,
2008 final rule and the statutory changes contained in CHIPRA. This
second delay specifically requested comments on the provisions of
CHIPRA enacted on February 4, 2009, which corrected language in the DRA
as if these amendments were included in the DRA, and amended section
1937 of the Act, ``State Flexibility for Medicaid Benefit Packages.''
We received 7 timely items of correspondence in response to the April
3, 2009 interim final rule.
B. Premiums and Cost Sharing
On November 25, 2008, we published a final rule entitled,
``Medicaid Program; Premiums and Cost Sharing'' in the Federal Register
(73 FR 71828) to implement and interpret sections 6041, 6042 and 6043
of the DRA, as amended by section 405 of the Tax Relief and Health Care
Act of 2006 (TRHCA). These provisions amended the Social Security Act
to add section 1916A which provides State Medicaid agencies with
increased flexibility to impose premium and cost sharing requirements
on certain Medicaid recipients. These DRA provisions specifically
addressed cost sharing for non-preferred drugs and non-emergency care
furnished in a hospital emergency department. The DRA was amended by
TRHCA to limit cost sharing for individuals with family incomes at or
below 100 percent of the Federal poverty line. The November 25, 2008
final rule integrated into CMS regulations the statutory flexibility to
impose premiums and cost sharing that was added by the DRA. In
addition, in the November 25, 2008 final rule, we responded to public
comments on the February 22, 2008 proposed rule.
Subsequent to the publication of the November 25, 2008 final rule,
we published a final rule in the Federal Register on January 27, 2009
(74 FR 4888) that temporarily delayed for 60 days the effective date of
the November 25, 2008 final rule. The final rule also reopened the
comment period on the policies set out in the November 25, 2008 final
rule.
On February 17, 2009, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of
2009 (the Recovery Act) was enacted subsequent to the publication of
the January 27, 2009 delay of effective date. Certain provisions of the
Recovery Act amended the provisions of section 1916A of the Social
Security Act that were added by the DRA. As a result, the regulations
published on November 25, 2008 were not consistent with statutory
authority governing Medicaid and CHIP premiums and cost sharing.
Specifically, under the Recovery Act, effective July 1, 2009, Medicaid
and CHIP programs are prohibited from imposing premiums or other cost
sharing payments on Indians who are provided services or items covered
under the Medicaid State plan by Indian Health providers or through
referral under contract health services. Similarly, payments to Indian
Health providers or to a health care provider through referral under
contract health services for Medicaid services or items furnished to
Indians cannot be reduced by the amount of any enrollment fee, premium,
or cost sharing that otherwise would be due from the Indians.
On March 27, 2009, we published a second final rule in the Federal
Register (74 FR 13346) that further delayed the effective date of the
November 25, 2008 final rule until December 31, 2009. The final rule
reopened the comment period to give the public an additional
opportunity to submit comments on the policy set forth in the final
rule as well as the provisions of the Recovery Act. Comments were
specifically solicited on the effect of certain provisions of the
Recovery Act related to the exclusion of Indians from payments of
premiums and cost sharing.
II. Provisions of the Proposed Rule and Response to Public Comments
On October 30, 2009, we published a proposed rule in the Federal
Register (73 FR 71828) to solicit public comments on further delaying
the effective date of the November 25, 2008 and the December 3, 2008
final rules (collectively, ``the 2008 final rules'') until July 1,
2010. We proposed to further delay the effective date of the 2008 final
rules from December 31, 2009 to July 1, 2010 to allow us sufficient
time to revise a substantial portion of the final rules based on our
review and consideration of the new provision of CHIPRA, the Recovery
Act, and the public comments received during the reopened comment
periods. To allow time to make these revisions, the Department
determined that we need several more months to fully consider the
changes needed to the rules. In the proposed rule, we noted that the
comments received during the reopened comment periods were complex and
presented numerous policy issues, which require extensive consultation,
review, and analysis. Additionally, because both CHIPRA and the
Recovery Act contain provisions that impact the American Indian and
Alaska Native community, we stated that the development of the final
rules requires collaboration with other HHS agencies and the Tribal
governments.
We believed that this time period would allow us sufficient time to
further consider public comments, analyze the impact of the revisions
on affected stakeholders, and develop appropriate revisions to the
regulations.
We received 1 timely item of correspondence in response to the
October 30, 2009 proposed rule. The comment did not directly address
our proposal to delay the effective date of the 2008 final rules until
July 1, 2010. The comment was limited to the exemption of the benchmark
and benchmark-equivalent packages from the assurance of transportation
requirements. Because the comment is outside the scope of the proposed
rule on the delay of the effective dates of the 2008 final rules, but
instead addresses the issue of revisions that are needed to comply with
statutory changes, we will address the comment when we issue revisions
to the final rule on State flexibility for Medicaid benefit packages.
Because this comment highlighted the need for such revisions, we view
this comment as indirectly supporting our proposal to delay the
effective date of the 2008 final rules in order to issue needed
revisions.
III. Provisions of This Final Rule
This rule further delays the effective date of the 2008 final rules
until July 1, 2010. The provisions of the November 25, 2008 final rule
and the December 3, 2008 final rule, which were to become effective on
December 31, 2009, will now become effective July 1, 2010. We note
that, although we are finalizing the delay in the effective date of the
2008 final rules jointly because it is more efficient to do so,
revisions to the 2008 final rules will be published as two separate
revised final rules.
IV. Collection of Information Requirements
This document does not impose information collection and
recordkeeping requirements. Consequently, it need not be reviewed by
the Office of Management and Budget under the authority of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.778, Medical
Assistance Program)
[[Page 62503]]
Dated: November 20, 2009.
Charlene Frizzera,
Acting Administrator, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.
Approved: November 23, 2009.
Kathleen Sebelius,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-28569 Filed 11-27-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 2244-F4-P