In the Matter of Certain R-134a Coolant (Otherwise Known as 1,1,1,2-Tetrafluoroethane) Enforcement Proceeding; Notice of Commission Determination Not To Review An Enforcement Initial Determination Finding No Violation of a Consent Order; Termination of the Enforcement Proceeding, 62592 [E9-28466]

Download as PDF 62592 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 228 / Monday, November 30, 2009 / Notices submissions will be available for public inspection at the Office of the Secretary. The authority for the Commission’s determination is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in sections 210.42–46 and 210.50 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 210.42–46 and 210.50). Issued: November 23, 2009. By order of the Commission. William R. Bishop, Acting Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. E9–28464 Filed 11–27–09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [ Investigation No. 337–TA–623] In the Matter of Certain R–134a Coolant (Otherwise Known as 1,1,1,2Tetrafluoroethane) Enforcement Proceeding; Notice of Commission Determination Not To Review An Enforcement Initial Determination Finding No Violation of a Consent Order; Termination of the Enforcement Proceeding WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined not to review the enforcement initial determination (‘‘EID’’) issued by the presiding administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’) on September 21, 2009 in the above-captioned investigation, finding no violation of a September 11, 2008 consent order. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michelle Walters Klancnik, Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 708–5468. Copies of non-confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at http://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at http:// edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on VerDate Nov<24>2008 14:58 Nov 27, 2009 Jkt 220001 this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 205–1810. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this enforcement proceeding, based on a complaint filed by INEOS Fluor Holdings Ltd., INEOS Fluor Ltd., and INEOS Fluor Americas LLC (‘‘INEOS’’). The complaint alleged that respondent Sinochem Environmental Protection Chemicals (Taicang) Co. Ltd. (‘‘Sinochem (Taicang)’’) violated the Commission’s September 11, 2008 Consent Order. The Commission referred the proceeding to the Chief ALJ, who held a prehearing conference and evidentiary hearing on June 22, 2009 with all parties participating. On September 21, 2009, the ALJ issued the subject EID, finding that respondent Sinochem (Taicang) did not violate the Consent Order. On October 6, 2009, INEOS filed a petition for review challenging the ALJ’s conclusion. On October 13, 2009, respondent Sinochem (Taicang) and the Commission investigative attorney each filed oppositions to INEOS’s petition. The Commission has determined not to review the EID. The authority for the Commission’s determination is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in sections 210.42–46 and 210.75 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 210.42–46 & 210.75). By order of the Commission. Issued November 23, 2009. William R. Bishop, Acting Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. E9–28466 Filed 11–27–09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 337–TA–648] In the Matter of Certain Semiconductor Integration Circuits Using Tungsten Metallization and Products Containing Same; Notice of Commission Determination To Review-In-Part A Final Initial Determination Finding No Violation of Section 337 and To Remand A Portion of the Investigation; Schedule for Written Submissions Relating To Remand, and To Remedy, the Public Interest, and Bonding AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade PO 00000 Frm 00041 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Commission has determined to reviewin-part a final initial determination (‘‘ID’’) of the presiding administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’) finding no violation of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1337) in the above-captioned investigation, and has determined to remand a portion of the investigation to the ALJ. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Clint Gerdine, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 708–2310. Copies of non-confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at http://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at http:// edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 205–1810. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation on May 21, 2008 based on a complaint filed on April 18, 2008, by LSI Corporation of Milpitas, California and Agere Systems Inc. of Allentown, Pennsylvania (collectively ‘‘complainants’’). The complaint, as amended, alleged violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain semiconductor integrated circuits using tungsten metallization and products containing same by reason of infringement of one or more of claims 1, 3, and 4 of U.S. Patent No. 5,227,335. The amended complaint named numerous respondents. Several respondents have been terminated from the investigation due to settlement. The following seven respondents remain in the investigation: Tower Semiconductor, Ltd. (‘‘Tower’’) of Israel; Jazz Semiconductor (‘‘Jazz’’) of Newport Beach, California; Powerchip Semiconductor Corporation (‘‘Powerchip’’) of Taiwan; Grace Semiconductor Manufacturing Corporation (‘‘Grace’’) of China; Integrated Device Technology, Inc. (‘‘IDT’’) of San Jose, California; E:\FR\FM\30NON1.SGM 30NON1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 228 (Monday, November 30, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 62592]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-28466]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[ Investigation No. 337-TA-623]


 In the Matter of Certain R-134a Coolant (Otherwise Known as 
1,1,1,2-Tetrafluoroethane) Enforcement Proceeding; Notice of Commission 
Determination Not To Review An Enforcement Initial Determination 
Finding No Violation of a Consent Order; Termination of the Enforcement 
Proceeding

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade 
Commission has determined not to review the enforcement initial 
determination (``EID'') issued by the presiding administrative law 
judge (``ALJ'') on September 21, 2009 in the above-captioned 
investigation, finding no violation of a September 11, 2008 consent 
order.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michelle Walters Klancnik, Office of 
the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, 
SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 708-5468. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are 
or will be available for inspection during official business hours 
(8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 
20436, telephone (202) 205-2000. General information concerning the 
Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at 
http://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be 
viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at http://edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information 
on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD 
terminal on (202) 205-1810.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this enforcement 
proceeding, based on a complaint filed by INEOS Fluor Holdings Ltd., 
INEOS Fluor Ltd., and INEOS Fluor Americas LLC (``INEOS''). The 
complaint alleged that respondent Sinochem Environmental Protection 
Chemicals (Taicang) Co. Ltd. (``Sinochem (Taicang)'') violated the 
Commission's September 11, 2008 Consent Order. The Commission referred 
the proceeding to the Chief ALJ, who held a prehearing conference and 
evidentiary hearing on June 22, 2009 with all parties participating.
    On September 21, 2009, the ALJ issued the subject EID, finding that 
respondent Sinochem (Taicang) did not violate the Consent Order. On 
October 6, 2009, INEOS filed a petition for review challenging the 
ALJ's conclusion. On October 13, 2009, respondent Sinochem (Taicang) 
and the Commission investigative attorney each filed oppositions to 
INEOS's petition.
    The Commission has determined not to review the EID.
    The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in 
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and 
in sections 210.42-46 and 210.75 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (19 CFR 210.42-46 & 210.75).

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued November 23, 2009.
William R. Bishop,
Acting Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E9-28466 Filed 11-27-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P