Health and Human Services Acquisition Regulation, 62396-62472 [E9-26948]
Download as PDF
62396
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 227 / Friday, November 27, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
48 CFR Chapter 3
Health and Human Services
Acquisition Regulation
AGENCY: Department of Health and
Human Services.
ACTION: Issuance of direct final rule and
opportunity for comment.
The Department of Health and
Human Services (HHS) is revising its
Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR)
Supplement—the HHS Acquisition
Regulation (HHSAR) in its entirety to
reflect statutory, FAR, and governmentwide and HHS policy changes since the
last revision to the HHSAR in December
2006.
DATES: Comments are due on or before
December 28, 2009. If HHS does not
receive adverse comments, this direct
final rule will be effective on January
26, 2010.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by docket number or RIN
number and title, by any of the
following four methods:
• Access the Federal eRulemaking
Portal: [https://www.regulations.gov],
and follow the instructions;
• Mail them to: Cheryl Howe,
Procurement Analyst, U.S. Department
of Health and Human Services, Office of
the Assistant Secretary for Financial
Resources, Office of Grants and
Acquisition Policy and Accountability,
Division of Acquisition, Room 336–E,
Hubert Humphrey Building, 200
Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20201;
• E-mail them to
cheryl.howe@hhs.gov; or
• Via facsimile to 202–690–8772.
Due to potential delays in receipt and
processing of mail sent through the U.S.
Postal Service, respondents are
encouraged to submit comments
electronically to ensure timely receipt.
HHS cannot guarantee that comments
mailed will be received before the
comment closing date.
If providing comments via e-mail,
please include ‘‘HHS Acquisition
Regulation’’ in the subject line of your
e-mail message. Also, please include the
full body of your comments in the text
of the electronic message, as well as in
an attachment, and include your name,
title, organization, postal address,
telephone number, and e-mail address
in the text of the message.
Instructions: All comments or
submissions must include the agency
name and docket number or Regulatory
Information Number (RIN) for this
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES_2
SUMMARY:
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:07 Nov 25, 2009
Jkt 220001
Federal Register document. The policy
is to make comments and other
submissions available for public
viewing on the Internet at https://
regulations.gov. These submissions are
published just as they are received
without changes or deletions of
information, including any personal
identifiers or contact information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Cheryl Howe, Procurement Analyst,
U.S. Department of Health and Human
Services, Office of the Assistant
Secretary for Financial Resources, Office
of Grants and Acquisition Policy and
Accountability, Division of Acquisition,
telephone (202) 690–5552.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The Department of Health and Human
Services (HHS) is revising the entire
HHSAR (48 CFR chapter 3, parts 301
through 370) to reflect changes since the
last revision was published in the
Federal Register in December 2006. The
decision to revise the document in its
entirety is based on the number of
changes rather than their collective
substance.
The amendments generally fall into
several categories: (1) Changes to make
the document easier to read; (2) changes
to reflect internal procedural matters
which are administrative in nature and
which will not have a major effect on
the general public or on contractors or
offerors supporting HHS acquisition
programs; (3) changes which HHS
previously issued on an interim basis
(and posted on its publicly available
Web site), following coordination with
the HHS Operating Divisions’ (OPDIVs)
Heads of Contracting Activity; (4)
changes that involve implementation of
statutes or government-wide mandates
enacted or issued since December 2006;
(5) necessary conforming changes, such
as addition of new or revised
definitions; and (6) deletion of outdated
material.
The majority of the HHSAR revisions
fall into the first category, i.e., they are
editorial and include (1) using plain
English, such as using active rather than
passive voice; (2) standardizing
terminology usage and formatting; (3)
making minor adjustments to reflect
current internal coordination
procedures among departmental
organizations; (4) citing current titles for
various acquisition officials and
organizations; and (5) providing a table
that specifies the abbreviations and
acronyms commonly used throughout
the HHSAR.
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
II. Summary of Key Changes
The following summarizes changes
that involve implementation of statutes
or government-wide mandates enacted
or issued since December 2006. The
editorial changes are not individually
summarized.
A. Federal-Wide and HHS Acquisition
Certification Programs
The HHSAR coverage in Subpart
301.6 of requirements for training and
certification of acquisition officials, as
well appointment of Contracting
Officers, has been rewritten to reflect
the HHS implementation of the Federal
Acquisition Certification Programs for
contracting staff (FAC–C) (based on
guidance provided by the Office of
Federal Procurement Policy (OFPP) in
April, 2005); Contracting Officer’s
Technical Representatives (FAC–COTR)
(based on the government-wide COTR
certification standards established by
OFPP in November, 2007), and
Program/Project Managers (FAC–P/PM)
(in response to the Services Acquisition
Reform Act of 2003 (SARA), Public Law
108–136, and the requirements
established by OFPP in April, 2007).
Implementation of the FAC–COTR
program also has resulted in HHS
changing the terminology it uses to
describe the official who represents the
requiring office after award. Where
previously, HHS used only one term—
Project Officer—to signify the person
responsible for the pre-award and postaward responsibilities of the requiring
office, the HHSAR now distinguishes
between the pre-award responsibilities
of the Project Officer and the post-award
responsibilities of the COTR, even if the
same individual performs both sets of
responsibilities.
These certification programs establish
prerequisites for those who seek
certification, as well as for others
involved in the acquisition process. For
example, HHS added a new section
301.605, Contracting Officer designation
of Contracting Officer Technical
Representative, to specify Contracting
Officer responsibilities for designation
of a COTR, including documenting that
a proposed COTR meets certification
requirements.
Subpart 301 also addresses the HHSunique simplified acquisition
certification program (SAC–C); HHSspecific training requirements,
including those for purchase card
holders; and prerequisites and
authorities for issuance of Contracting
Officer warrants.
E:\FR\FM\27NOR2.SGM
27NOR2
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 227 / Friday, November 27, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
B. Improvements in the Quality of
Contract Data
Consistent with the statutory
requirements of the Federal Funding
and Transparency Act of 2006 (Pub. L.
109–282) and the American Recovery
and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Pub. L.
111–5) and OFPP’s initiative to improve
the quality and timeliness of the award
information stored in the Federal
Procurement Data System—Next
Generation, HHS is making efforts to
improve the quality and timeliness of its
contract data as reported in FPDS–NG,
USA.Spending.gov, and Recovery.gov.
To accomplish this, in Subpart 304.6,
HHS has established clear lines of
responsibility and accountability for the
quality and timeliness of contract data.
C. Internal Initiatives To Provide
Common Formats and Templates
A new HHSAR Subpart—302.71—
lists the areas where HHS has developed
standards for documentation or
approaches that provide consistency
across the HHS OPDIVs. These internal
business standards encompass:
Acquisition planning, competition
reporting, the organization and content
of contract files, and market research
notices.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES_2
D. Homeland Security Presidential
Directive-12 (HSPD–12)
A new Subpart 304.13, Personal
Identity Verification, and section
304.1300, Policy, have been added to
implement HSPD–12 in HHS. The HHS
implementation includes applicable
solicitation provisions and contract
clauses and (1) reflects the
implementing guidance established by
Office of Management and Budget
Memoranda M–05–24 and M–06–18,
Federal Information Processing
Standard (FIPS) Publication 201, and
Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR)
4.13; and (2) provides a consistent and
systematic approach to ensure the
security of HHS facilities and
information systems.
E. Competition and Acquisition
Planning
Consistent with government-wide
efforts to increase competition, in Parts
306, 307, and 308, as applicable, HHS
included HHSAR coverage concerning
(1) appropriate use of sources sought
notices (Research and development
(R&D) and non-R&D and small
businesses) and requests for information
(2) content requirements for
Justifications for Other Than Full and
Open Competition (JOFOCs) and
Limited Source Justifications (LSJs), (3)
the requirement to use a standard
JOFOC and LSJ format, and (4) the
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:54 Nov 25, 2009
Jkt 220001
Contracting Officer’s approval authority
for JOFOCs and LSJs for acquisitions
exceeding $100,000.
HHS also—
—Specified that each HHS OPDIV
competition advocate must prepare an
annual Competition Advocate Report;
and provided a standard format for
the report’s preparation.
—Updated the requirements for
preparing an Annual Acquisition Plan
and provided a standard template for
the plan’s preparation.
—Established a standard format for
development of an Acquisition Plan;
and provided procedures for the
plan’s review, coordination, and
approval.
—Addressed preparation and approval
of a LSJ for acquisitions awarded
under the General Services
Administration multiple award
schedule program; and provided a
standard format for preparing an LSJ.
—Addressed preparation and approval
of an acquisition strategy for major
information technology capital
investments and, as applicable, other
major investments.
F. Section 508 Electronic Information
Technology Accessibility Standards
In a new Subpart 315.70, HHS added
coverage for acquisition of electronic
information technology (EIT) products
and services to implement the
requirements of Section 508 of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973 [29 U.S.C.
794(d)], as amended by the Workforce
Investment Act of 1998. In that subpart
and, as a result of conforming changes
in other parts of the HHSAR, HHS
established a policy preference for
commercially available products;
indicated what must be addressed in
solicitations, contracts, and orders, and
added documentation and contract
administration requirements that relate
to the Section 508 accessibility
standards and requirements.
G. Multi-Year Contracting and Awards
Made During a Continuing Resolution
HHS added a new Subpart 317.1 to
address its policy on multi-year
contracting and amended Subpart 332.7
to provide coverage regarding awards
made during a continuing resolution.
H. Multi-Agency and Intra-Agency
Contracts
HHS added a new subpart 317.70 to
address its expectations regarding the
use of intra-agency and multi-agency
contracts. Such contracting has been the
subject of audit scrutiny and has been
addressed by OFPP. As a result, to avoid
possible misuse, HHS is stating the
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
62397
conditions for use of such vehicles
within HHS.
I. Green Purchasing Requirements
HHS added a new subpart 323.71 to
establish its requirements for green
purchasing.
J. Earned Value Management
HHS added a new Subpart 334.2 to
implement the FAR coverage of earned
value management (EVM), including:
Use of full and partial EVM; use of
solicitation provisions and contract
clauses addressing documentation
offerors must provide to demonstrate
compliance with EVM system
requirements; and criteria for use of preaward or post-award integrated baseline
reviews.
K. Other Changes
Under section 331.101–70, Salary
Rate Limitation, HHS provided a revised
prescription for use of, and made minor
revisions to, the Salary Rate Limitation
clause in 352.231–70.
HHS added the following coverage in
Part 339 for information technologyrelated acquisition:
—A new subpart, 339.70, to address the
use of General Services
Administration Blanket Purchase
Agreements for the acquisition of
independent risk analysis services,
and
—A new subpart 339.1 that provides
standards for security configuration,
encryption, and information security.
HHS revised the coverage in Part 333
related to internal handling of protests
to specify revised legal review,
concurrence, and approval procedures
related to protests to HHS and the
Government Accountability Office
before and after award.
HHS added language in section
319.270–1 concerning use of the
mentor-protege program in HHS.
HHS added a new subpart 322.8 to
provide a contract clause regarding
contractor cooperation in equal
employment opportunity investigations.
HHS added a new subpart 370.6 to
provide guidance, including a contract
clause, concerning conference funding,
sponsorship, and disclaimers.
HHS added a new subpart 370.7 to
provide a solicitation provision and a
contract clause to be used (i) in
connection with the implementation of
HIV/AIDS programs under the
President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS
Relief; or (ii) when the contractor will
receive funding under the United States
Leadership Against HIV/AIDS,
Tuberculosis and Malaria Act of 2003.
E:\FR\FM\27NOR2.SGM
27NOR2
62398
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 227 / Friday, November 27, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
III. Procedural Review Requirements
A. Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review
It has been determined that this
revision of the HHSAR is not a
significant regulatory action. The rule
does not—
(1) Have an annual effect on the
economy of $100 million or more or
adversely affect, in a material way, the
economy; a section of the economy;
productivity; competition; jobs; the
environment; public health or safety; or
State, local, or Tribal governments or
communities;
(2) Create a serious inconsistency or
otherwise interfere with an action taken
or planned by another Agency;
(3) Raise novel legal or policy issues
arising out of legal mandates, the
President’s priorities, or the principles
set forth in Executive Order 12866.
F. Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform
Each agency promulgating new
regulations shall adhere to the following
requirements: The agency’s proposed
regulations shall (1) be reviewed by the
agency to eliminate drafting errors and
ambiguity; (2) be written to minimize
litigation; (3) provide a clear legal
standard for affected conduct rather
than a general standard, and (4) promote
simplification and burden reduction.
HHS determined that this rule meets
these standards.
PART 322—APPLICATION OF LABOR
LAWS TO GOVERNMENT
ACQUISITIONS
PART 323—ENVIRONMENT, ENERGY
AND WATER EFFICIENCY,
RENEWABLE ENERGY
TECHNOLOGIES,
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY, AND
DRUG–FREE WORKPLACE
PART 324—PROTECTION OF PRIVACY
AND FREEDOM OF
INFORMATION
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Chapter 3,
Parts 301–370
Government procurement.
■ For the reasons stated in the preamble,
HHS revises 48 CFR Chapter 3, parts
301 through 370, to read as follows:
PART 327—PATENTS, DATA, AND
COPYRIGHTS
PART 328—BONDS AND INSURANCE
PART 330—COST ACCOUNTING
STANDARDS
PART 331—CONTRACT COST
PRINCIPLES AND PROCEDURES
PART 332—CONTRACT FINANCING
PART 333—PROTESTS, DISPUTES,
AND APPEALS
Title 48—Federal Acquisition
Regulations System
B. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act [2
U.S.C. 1501(7)]
CHAPTER 3—HEALTH AND HUMAN
SERVICES
It has been certified that this revision
of the HHSAR does not contain a
Federal mandate that may result in the
expenditure by State, local, and Tribal
governments, in aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more
in any one year.
SUBCHAPTER A—GENERAL
PART 301—HHS ACQUISITION
REGULATION SYSTEM
PART 302—DEFINITIONS OF WORDS
AND TERMS
PART 303—IMPROPER BUSINESS
PRACTICES AND PERSONAL
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
PART 304—ADMINISTRATIVE
MATTERS
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C.
601)
The Regulatory Flexibility Act
requires that a Federal agency prepare a
regulatory flexibility analysis for any
rule for which the agency is required to
publish a general notice of rulemaking.
This rule consists of a general statement
of policies and procedures and amends
HHS regulations for contracts. Each part
of today’s direct final rule is exempt
from the requirement to publish a
general notice of proposed rulemaking
under the Administrative Procedure
Act, 5 U.S.C. 553(a)(2). Therefore, the
Regulatory Flexibility Act does not
apply to this rulemaking.
D. Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
35)
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES_2
It has been determined that this rule
does not impose any reporting or
recordkeeping requirements under the
Paperwork Reduction Act beyond those
provided in the FAR.
E. Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act
As required by the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act, 5
U.S.C. 801, HHS has determined that
this rule is not a major rule under 5
U.S.C. 801(2).
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:54 Nov 25, 2009
Jkt 220001
SUBCHAPTER E—GENERAL
CONTRACTING REQUIREMENTS
SUBCHAPTER F—SPECIAL
CATEGORIES OF CONTRACTING
PART 334—MAJOR SYSTEM
ACQUISITION
PART 335—RESEARCH AND
DEVELOPMENT CONTRACTING
PART 337—SERVICE CONTRACTING—
GENERAL
PART 339—ACQUISITION OF
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
SUBCHAPTER B—COMPETITION AND
ACQUISITION PLANNING
PART 305—PUBLICIZING CONTRACT
ACTIONS
PART 306—COMPETITION
REQUIREMENTS
PART 307—ACQUISITION PLANNING
PART 308—REQUIRED SOURCES OF
SUPPLIES AND SERVICES
PART 309—CONTRACTOR
QUALIFICATIONS
PART 310—MARKET RESEARCH
PART 311—DESCRIBING AGENCY
NEEDS
PART 312—ACQUISITION OF
COMMERCIAL ITEMS
SUBCHAPTER G—CONTRACT
MANAGEMENT
SUBCHAPTER C—CONTRACTING
METHODS AND CONTRACT TYPES
PART 313—SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION
PROCEDURES
PART 314—SEALED BIDDING
PART 315—CONTRACTING BY
NEGOTIATION
PART 316—TYPES OF CONTRACTS
PART 317—SPECIAL CONTRACTING
METHODS
PART 370—SPECIAL PROGRAMS
AFFECTING ACQUISITION
SUBCHAPTER D—SOCIOECONOMIC
PROGRAMS
PART 319—SMALL BUSINESS
PROGRAMS
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
PART 342—CONTRACT
ADMINISTRATION
SUBCHAPTER H—CLAUSES AND
FORMS
PART 352—SOLICITATION
PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT
CLAUSES
PART 353—FORMS
SUBCHAPTERS I, J, K AND L ARE
RESERVED
SUBCHAPTER M—HHS
SUPPLEMENTATIONS
SUBCHAPTER A—GENERAL
PART 301—HHS ACQUISITION
REGULATION SYSTEM
Subpart 301.1—Purpose, Authority, and
Issuance
Sec.
301.101 Purpose.
301.103 Authority.
301.106 Office of Management and Budget
Approval under the Paperwork
Reduction Act.
E:\FR\FM\27NOR2.SGM
27NOR2
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 227 / Friday, November 27, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
62399
Subpart 301.1—Purpose, Authority,
and Issuance
requirement to collect the same
information from 10 or more persons.
Subpart 301.4—Deviations From the FAR
301.403 Individual deviations.
301.404 Class deviations.
301.470 Procedure.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES_2
Subpart 301.2—Administration
301.270 Executive Committee for
Acquisition.
301.101
Subpart 301.2—Administration
(a) The Department of Health and
Human Services (HHS) Acquisition
Regulation (HHSAR) establishes
uniform HHS acquisition policies and
procedures that conform to the Federal
Acquisition Regulation (FAR) System.
(b) The HHSAR implements FAR
policies and procedures and provides
additional policies and procedures that
supplement the FAR.
(c) The HHSAR contains HHS policies
and procedures that govern the
acquisition process or otherwise control
acquisition relationships between HHS’
contracting activities and contractors.
Subpart 301.6—Career Development,
Contracting Authority, and Responsibilities
301.602 Contracting Officers.
301.602–3 Ratification of unauthorized
commitments.
301.603 Selection, appointment, and
termination of appointment of
Contracting Officers.
301.603–1 General.
301.603–2 Selection and appointment.
301.603–3 Interim appointments.
301.603–4 Termination of appointments.
301.603–70 Delegation of Contracting
Officer responsibilities.
301.603–71 Waivers to warrant standards.
301.603–72 FAC–C and HHS SAC
certification requirements.
301.603–73 Additional HHS training
requirements.
301.603–74 Requirement for retention of
FAC–C and HHS SAC certification.
301.604 Training and certification of
Contracting Officers’ Technical
Representatives.
301.604–70 General.
301.604–71 HCA authorities and
responsibilities.
301.604–72 Requirements for certification
maintenance.
301.604–73 Certification policy exception.
301.604–74 Additional COTR training
requirements.
301.605 Contracting Officer designation of
Contracting Officer Technical
Representative.
301.606 Training requirements for Project
Officers.
301.606–70 General.
301.606–71 Project Officer training.
301.606–72 Delegation of authority to
HCAs.
301.606–73 Training policy exception.
301.606–74 Additional Project Officer
training requirements.
301.607 Certification of Program and
Project Managers.
301.607–70 General.
301.607–71 FAC–P/PM levels and
requirements.
301.607–72 Applicability.
301.607–73 Certification waivers.
301.607–74 Certification transfers.
301.607–75 Maintenance of FAC–P/PM
certification.
301.607–76 FAC–P/PM application process.
301.607–77 Input and maintenance of FAC–
P/PM information.
301.607–78 Governance.
301.607–79 Contracting Officer designation
of a Program/Project Manager as the
Contracting Officer’s Technical
Representative.
301.608 Training Requirements for
Purchase Cardholders, Approving
Officials, and Agency/Organization
Program Coordinators.
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 40 U.S.C. 486(c).
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:54 Nov 25, 2009
Jkt 220001
301.103
Purpose.
Authority.
(b) The Assistant Secretary for
Financial Resources (ASFR) prescribes
the HHSAR under the authority of 5
U.S.C. 301 and section 205(c) of the
Federal Property and Administrative
Services Act of 1949, as amended (40
U.S.C. 486(c), as delegated by the
Secretary.
(c) The HHSAR is issued in the Code
of Federal Regulations (CFR) as Chapter
3 of Title 48, Department of Health and
Human Services Acquisition Regulation.
It may be referenced as ‘‘48 CFR Chapter
3.’’
301.106 Office of Management and Budget
approval under the Paperwork Reduction
Act.
(a) The Paperwork Reduction Act of
1980 (44 U.S.C 3501 et seq.) imposes a
requirement on Federal agencies to
obtain approval from the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) before
collecting the same information from 10
or more members of the public.
(b) The following OMB control
numbers apply to the information
collection and recordkeeping
requirements contained in this chapter:
HHSAR segment No.
OMB control
No.
315.4 .........................................
342.7101 ...................................
352.233–70 ...............................
352.270–1 .................................
352.270–2 .................................
352.270–3 .................................
352.270–5 .................................
352.270–8 .................................
352.270–9 .................................
370.1 .........................................
370.2 .........................................
0990–0139
0990–0131
0990–0133
0990–0129
0990–0129
0990–0129
0990–0130
0990–0128
0990–0128
0990–0129
0990–0129
(c) The Contracting Officer shall insert
the clause in 352.201–70, Paperwork
Reduction Act, in solicitations,
contracts, and orders that include a
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
301.270 Executive Committee for
Acquisition.
(a) The Associate Deputy Assistant
Secretary for Acquisition (Associate
DAS for Acquisition) has established the
Executive Committee for Acquisition
(ECA) to facilitate the planning,
development, and implementation of
HHS acquisition policies and
procedures and to share successful
acquisition practices.
(b) The ECA consists of members and
alternates from the following
organizations:
(1) ASFR/Office of Grants and
Acquisition Policy and Accountability
(OGAPA)/Division of Acquisition
(DA).
(2) Agency for Healthcare Research
and Quality (AHRQ).
(3) Biomedical Advanced Research
and Development Authority (BARDA).
(4) Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC).
(5) Centers for Medicare and Medicaid
Services (CMS).
(6) Food and Drug Administration
(FDA).
(7) Health Resources and Services
Administration (HRSA).
(8) Indian Health Service (IHS).
(9) National Institutes of Health (NIH).
(10) Program Support Center (PSC).
(11) Substance Abuse and Mental
Health Services Administration
(SAMHSA).
(c) The Associate DAS for Acquisition
is the Chair of the ECA. The Chair will
call all meetings and direct all ECA
activities.
Subpart 301.4—Deviations From the
FAR
301.403
Individual deviations.
Contracting activities shall prepare
requests for individual deviations to
either the FAR or HHSAR in accordance
with 301.470.
301.404
Class deviations.
Contracting activities shall prepare
requests for class deviations to either
the FAR or HHSAR in accordance with
301.470.
301.470
Procedure.
(a) Contracting activities shall prepare
deviation requests in memorandum
form and forward them through the
Head of the Contracting Activity (HCA)
to the Associate DAS for Acquisition.
The Associate DAS for Acquisition
(non-delegable) is the official authorized
to approve all deviation requests.
E:\FR\FM\27NOR2.SGM
27NOR2
62400
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 227 / Friday, November 27, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
Contracting activities may request a
deviation telephonically or by e-mail in
an exigent situation, but shall confirm
the request by memorandum as soon as
possible.
(b) A deviation request shall clearly
set forth the—
(1) Nature of the deviation, including
what contract(s)/contractor(s) is
involved;
(2) Identification of the FAR or
HHSAR citation from which the
deviation is needed;
(3) Circumstances under which the
deviation will be used;
(4) Intended effect of the deviation;
(5) Period of applicability;
(6) Rationale for the deviation (NOTE:
The Contracting Officer shall include a
copy of pertinent background papers,
such as a contractor’s request, as part of
the deviation request.); and
(7) Suggested wording for the
deviation, if applicable.
Subpart 301.6—Career Development,
Contracting Authority, and
Responsibilities
301.602
Contracting Officers.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES_2
301.602–3 Ratification of unauthorized
commitments.
(b) Policy.
(1) The Government is not bound by
agreements with, or contractual
commitments made to, prospective
contractors by individuals who do not
have delegated contracting authority.
However, an authorized official may
later ratify and execute otherwise proper
contracts that were made by individuals
without contracting authority or by
Contracting Officers in excess of their
delegated authority. The ratification
shall be in the form of a written
document that clearly states that
ratification of a previously unauthorized
act is intended.
(2) The HCA is the official authorized
to ratify an unauthorized commitment—
but see paragraph (b)(3) of this section.
(3) The HCA may redelegate
ratification authority for actions up to
$100,000 to the Chief of the Contracting
Office (CCO). No other redelegations are
authorized.
(c) Limitations.
(5) The concurrence of legal counsel
concerning an unauthorized
commitment is optional. If a contracting
activity determines that a legal review is
necessary, the HCA or CCO shall
coordinate the request for ratification
with the Office of General Counsel
(OGC), General Law Division (GLD).
(e) Procedures.
(1) The individual who is responsible
for the unauthorized commitment shall
provide the reviewing Contracting
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:54 Nov 25, 2009
Jkt 220001
Officer all records and documents
concerning the commitment and a
complete written statement of facts,
including a description of the
requirement; the estimated or agreed
upon price; the funds citation; an
explanation of why the contracting
office was not used and why the
proposed contractor was selected; a list
of other sources considered; and a
statement as to whether the contractor
has commenced work or an item has
been delivered.
(2) The Contracting Officer shall
review the submitted material and, if
the Contracting Officer determines that
the ratification request has merit,
prepare it for ratification. The
Contracting Officer shall forward the
ratification document and related
materials to the HCA or CCO, as
appropriate, with any comments or
information which the approving
official should consider in evaluating
the ratification request.
(3) If the HCA or CCO approves the
ratification request, the Contracting
Officer shall issue a purchase order or
contract, as appropriate, upon return of
the approved ratification document and
file.
301.603 Selection, appointment, and
termination of appointment of Contracting
Officers.
301.603–1
General.
(a) The HCA (non-delegable) shall
select, appoint, and terminate the
appointment of Contracting Officers—
i.e., those individuals who are
authorized to obligate the Government
to the expenditure of funds for contracts
and orders with dollar values that
exceed (or are expected to exceed) the
micro-purchase threshold. The
procedures for selecting and appointing
Contracting Officers apply to HHS
employees. HCAs may not issue HHS
Contracting Officer warrants to
contractor personnel. OPDIVs shall
follow local procedures in the event that
the signature of another authorized
official, in addition to that of the HCA,
is required to appoint or terminate the
appointment of Contracting Officers.
(b) The HCA shall use Standard Form
(SF) 1402, ‘‘Certificate of Appointment,’’
(also known as a warrant) to appoint
personnel, whether in the General
Schedule (GS) 1102 series or other
series, as Contracting Officers. The SF
1402 shall indicate the Contracting
Officer’s warrant level—i.e., maximum
dollar signature authority (e.g., $1
million or ‘‘unlimited’’) and any other
limitations or restrictions. The HCA
shall make changes to a Contracting
Officer appointment (other than a
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
termination of an appointment as
provided in 301.603–4) by issuing a
revised SF 1402. FAR 1.603–1 prescribes
the requirements for preparing and
maintaining Contracting Officer
warrants.
(c) Before an HCA may appoint an
individual as a Contracting Officer, the
individual must be certified in
accordance with either the Federal
Acquisition Certification in Contracting
(FAC–C) program or the HHS Simplified
Acquisition Certification (SAC)
program, as appropriate, at the level
required for the warrant authority
requested. See 301.603–72 and the HHS
Contracting Workforce Training and
Certification Handbook.
(d) The dollar amount of an
individual transaction determines
whether a Contracting Officer has the
authority to sign it in accordance with
the delegated authority specified on the
SF 1402. For new or follow-on awards,
the dollar amount of an individual
transaction is the amount obligated at
the time of contract or order award plus
any potential option amounts or future
funding amounts established by the
transaction. However, under an existing
contract or order, when an option is
subsequently exercised or a contact or
order is otherwise modified to add
funding, the dollar amount of the
modification (individual transaction)
determines whether a Contracting
Officer has the necessary delegated
authority to sign it.
(e) For individuals that will exercise
acquisition authorities (other than solely
purchase card authorities) at or below
the micro-purchase threshold, the HCA
may—
(1) Use a document other than the SF
1402, such as a memorandum, that
indicates a maximum dollar signature
authority for individual transactions;
and
(2) Determine training requirements
for individuals who will exercise
acquisition authorities at dollar levels
below the micro-purchase threshold
level.
301.603–2
Selection and appointment.
Contracting activities shall provide
nominations for appointment of
Contracting Officers through
appropriate acquisition channels to the
HCA for review. The HCA shall appoint
an individual as a Contracting Officer
only when a valid organizational need
is demonstrated and after considering
such factors as volume of actions,
complexity of work, and structure of the
requesting organization. The HCA shall
also ensure that a Contracting Officer
candidate meets the FAC–C or HHS
SAC certification requirements, as
E:\FR\FM\27NOR2.SGM
27NOR2
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 227 / Friday, November 27, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
appropriate. Consistent with FAR 1.603–
2, the HCA shall determine the
documentation required when the
requested appointment and authority
will not exceed the micro-purchase
threshold.
301.603–3
Interim appointments.
If it is essential to appoint an
individual as a Contracting Officer who
does not yet fully meet the FAC–C or
HHS SAC certification requirements for
the signature authority sought, the HCA
(non-delegable) may make an interim
appointment for up to 2 years. If an
extension of time has been granted, but
the individual does not complete the
certification requirements by the
extended date, the HCA’s approval for
the interim appointment will
automatically terminate on that date.
301.603–4
Termination of appointments.
The HCA shall terminate or revoke
Contracting Officer appointments in
accordance with FAR 1.603–4.
301.603–70 Delegation of Contracting
Officer responsibilities.
(a) Contracting Officers may redelegate their acquisition
responsibilities that do not involve the
obligation or deobligation of funds, but
involve the expenditure of previously
obligated funds (such as approval of
contractor scientific meeting travel and
subcontract consent) to acquisition staff
(for example, those in the GS–1100
series) by means of a written
memorandum that clearly delineates the
delegation and its limits. See 301.604
for responsibilities that Contracting
Officers may delegate to technical
personnel.
(b) Contracting Officers may designate
individuals as ordering or approving
officials to make purchases or place/
approve orders under blanket purchase
agreements (BPAs), indefinite-delivery,
indefinite quantity (IDIQ) contracts, or
other pre-established mechanisms.
Ordering officials are not Contracting
Officers.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES_2
301.603–71
Waivers to warrant standards.
There may be an unusual
circumstance that requires issuance of a
warrant to an individual who does not
fully meet the FAC–C or HHS SAC
certification program requirements.
Contracting activities shall provide any
request for a waiver of the FAC–C
program requirements and policies in
writing to the Senior Procurement
Executive (SPE), through the HCA, for
review and approval. The SPE (nondelegable) will either approve or
disapprove in writing the request for
waiver. The HCA (non-delegable) may
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:54 Nov 25, 2009
Jkt 220001
approve or disapprove a waiver of the
HHS SAC program requirements.
301.603–72 FAC–C and HHS SAC
certification requirements.
(a) The FAC–C certification program
is available to all acquisition staff who
are/will be involved as Contracting
Officers or Contract Specialists in
acquisitions exceeding the simplified
acquisition threshold. Personnel who, as
part of prior certification programs, have
completed some or all of the required
training or have attained certification
thereunder are not required to re-take
training courses, but shall follow FAC–
C training requirements when
considering additional or required core
training, if needed. See 301.603–74 for
information regarding retention of
certification, including the requirement
to earn continuous learning points
(CLPs). FAC–C certification also does
not apply to—
(1) The SPE;
(2) Senior level officials responsible
for delegating acquisition authority;
(3) Personnel who are not in the GS–
1102 series whose warrants are used to
acquire emergency goods and services;
or
(4) Personnel who are not in the GS–
1102 series whose warrants are so
limited as to be outside the scope of this
program, as determined by the Chief
Acquisition Officer (CAO). (Note: The
HHS CAO has determined that
individuals with warrants which are
limited to simplified acquisitions are
deemed to be outside the scope of the
FAC–C program.)
(b) HHS does not require personnel
with Contracting Officer warrants issued
prior to January 1, 2007 to be FAC–C
certified unless they are seeking a
change in authority on or after that date.
Individuals applying for a new
Contracting Officer warrant or an
increase in warrant authority on or after
January 1, 2007, regardless of GS series,
must be FAC–C certified at the level
appropriate for the warrant authority
sought. To obtain an unlimited warrant,
FAC–C Level III certification is required.
(Note: New Contracting Officer warrants
are defined in the Office of Federal
Procurement Policy’s (OFPP’s) FAC–C
memorandum, dated January 20, 2006,
as warrants issued to employees for the
first time at a department or agency.)
(c) The FAC–C certification is based
on three sets of requirements:
Education, training, and experience, and
the requirements are cumulative—i.e.,
an individual must meet the
requirements of each previous
certification level before attaining a
higher level certification. The FAC–C
certification requirements, including
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
62401
additional HHS-specific training
requirements for certain types of
acquisitions, are specified in the HHS
Contracting Workforce Training and
Certification Handbook.
(d) HHS SAC certification is based on
three sets of requirements: Training,
experience, and satisfactory
performance rating. Personnel who are
involved in the award of simplified
acquisitions must meet the appropriate
HHS SAC certification requirements.
(Note: While personnel who are FAC–C
certified are not required to obtain HHS
SAC certification in order to award
simplified acquisitions, they should
obtain appropriate training before doing
so.) The HHS SAC certification
requirements, including additional
HHS-specific training requirements for
certain types of acquisitions, are
specified in the HHS Contracting
Workforce Training and Certification
Handbook.
301.603–73 Additional HHS training
requirements.
HHS acquisition personnel are
required to complete, as applicable, the
additional training requirements
specified below. These courses may be
used as electives for the purpose of
satisfying FAC–C requirements or as
continuous learning for maintenance of
FAC–C or SAC certifications.
(a) Earned value management
training. Effective January 1, 2010, all
personnel in the GS–1102 series who
are responsible for, or may become
responsible for, the award or
administration of any contract to which
earned value management (EVM) is
applied pursuant to 334.201(a) or (b)
must successfully complete an EVM
training course before they commence
administration of the contract or are
authorized to award the contract. After
completion of the initial course, a
refresher course is required every 2
years. This course is in addition to the
training requirements for FAC–C
certification at the specified levels.
Determination of course suitability shall
be made by the Operating Division
(OPDIV) HCA, in conjunction with
HHS’ Office of the Chief Information
Officer (OCIO) or Office of Facilities
Management and Policy (OFMP), as
appropriate. To be eligible, the basic
and refresher courses must each be 8
hours or more in length.
(b) Performance based acquisition
training. Effective January 1, 2010, all
GS–1102s, who award or administer
service contracts, are required to
complete a Performance-Based
Acquisition (PBA) course prior to
assuming such responsibilities.
Refresher training in PBA is required
E:\FR\FM\27NOR2.SGM
27NOR2
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES_2
62402
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 227 / Friday, November 27, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
every 4 years. To be eligible, a course
must be 8 hours or more in length.
Determination of course suitability shall
be made by the HCA.
(c) Federal appropriations law
training. Effective January 1, 2010, all
GS–1102s and GS–1105s are required to
complete both HHS University’s
classroom-based and on-line Federal
appropriations law course, by January 1,
2011 (for current employees) and within
1 year of entering on duty (for new
employees). Employees are required to
take the HHS University on-line course
as refresher training every year.
Determination of course equivalency
shall be made by the HCA.
(d) Green purchasing training.
Effective January 1, 2010, all GS–1102s
and GS–1105s are required to complete
green purchasing training by January 1,
2011 (for current employees) and within
1 year of entering on duty (for new
employees). Refresher training is
required every 2 years. To be eligible, a
course must be 4 hours or more in
length. Determination of course
suitability shall be made by the HCA.
(e) Section 508 training. Effective
January 1, 2010 (or when the HHS
Office on Disability so requires), all GS–
1102s, GS–1105s, and GS–1106s who
award or administer acquisitions that
exceed the micro-purchase threshold
and involve electronic information
technology (EIT) products or services
(subject to Section 508 of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973 and pertinent
HHSAR provisions), must complete all
applicable training courses sponsored
by the HHS Office on Disability. For
information on frequency, timing, and
duration of the training requirement,
personnel shall consult with the HHS
Office on Disability.
(f) Training policy exceptions.
(1) EVM training. In the event that
there is an urgent requirement for a
Contracting Officer/Contract Specialist
to award or administer a project to
which EVM will be applied, and the
individual has not yet met the EVM
training requirement, the HCA (nondelegable) may authorize the individual
to perform the position duties, provided
that the individual meets the training
requirement within 9 months from the
date of assignment to the contract. If the
individual does not complete the
training requirement within 9 months,
the HCA’s approval for the individual’s
assignment to the contract will
automatically terminate on that date.
The Contract Specialist is not required
to take the class as long as the Contract
Specialist is working under the
direction of a Contracting Officer who
has taken an EVM course.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:54 Nov 25, 2009
Jkt 220001
(2) Other additional HHS training.
The HCA (non-delegable) may grant a
time extension of up to 9 months to an
individual to complete the PBA, Federal
appropriations law, green purchasing,
and Section 508 training requirements,
including completion of refresher
training. If the individual does not
complete the training requirement
within the extension period, the HCA’s
approval will automatically terminate
on that date.
301.603–74 Requirement for retention of
FAC–C and HHS SAC certification.
To maintain FAC–C certification, all
warranted Contracting Officers,
regardless of series, as well as Contract
Specialists, must earn 80 CLPs every 2
years. To maintain HHS SAC
certification, all individuals with
delegated Contracting Officer authority,
including those in the GS–1102, GS–
1105, GS–1106, and non-1100 series,
must earn a minimum of 40 hours
(CLPs) every 2 years after completing all
mandatory training requirements. FAC–
C and HHS SAC certification will expire
if the CLPs are not earned every 2 years
(from the date of initial certification or
re-certification) and, if applicable, may
result in a loss of warrant authority.
(Note: The certification programs’
continuous learning requirement
applies to all applicable personnel,
including those who were certified
under prior certification programs.)
301.604 Training and certification of
Contracting Officers’ Technical
Representatives.
301.604–70
General.
In accordance with the Federal
Acquisition Certification for Contracting
Officers’ Technical Representatives
(FAC–COTR) program, HHS has
established a training program for
certification and designation of
personnel as COTRs—see HHS’ Federal
Acquisition Certification for Contracting
Officers’ Technical Representative
Program Handbook, dated January 2009,
for information on the methods for
earning FAC–COTR certification. See
also 302.101(c) for further information
regarding the definition of a COTR and
when designation of a COTR is
appropriate. All references to COTRs
also apply to their alternates.
301.604–71 HCA authorities and
responsibilities.
(a) HCAs are authorized to determine
(1) equivalencies for the Basic
Contracting Officer’s Technical
Representative Course; (2) course
prerequisites; and (3) approve
completion of CLP continuous learning
activities, education, and training for
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
maintenance of COTR certification. This
authority does not apply to EVM
training—see 301.603–73. Course
equivalencies must meet the Federal
Acquisition Institute’s (FAI’s) required
COTR competencies. HCAs may redelegate the authorities in (1) and (2) to
OPDIV Acquisition Career Managers
(ACMs) or other comparable officials.
(b) In addition to the authorities
specified in 301.604–71(a), HCAs or
their designees (except where the
authority is shown as non-delegable) are
responsible for—
(1) Reviewing a candidate’s
qualifications to be a COTR;
(2) Granting, suspending, denying,
and revoking COTR certifications and
their continuance;
(3) Authorizing (non-delegable) an
individual to perform COTR duties on
an interim basis for up to 90 days—see
301.604–73; and
(4) Determining (non-delegable) on a
case-by-case basis whether to postpone
(for up to 90 days) withdrawal of any
interim COTR delegation for failure of a
candidate to qualify for certification—
see 301.604–73.
301.604–72 Requirements for certification
maintenance.
Maintaining HHS FAC–COTR
certification requires at least 40 relevant
CLPs every 2 years. See Appendix A of
OFPP’s FAC–COTR memorandum,
dated November 26, 2007, and HHS’
Federal Acquisition Certification for
Contracting Officers’ Technical
Representative Program Handbook,
dated January 2009, for information on
CLPs.
301.604–73
Certification policy exception.
(a) In the event that an individual
who is not currently certified under
HHS’ FAC–COTR program is urgently
required to serve as a COTR, the head
of the sponsoring program office
(Program Manager) or designee (e.g., the
immediate supervisor) may request, and
the HCA (non-delegable) may authorize,
the individual to perform the designated
duties on an interim basis for up to 6
months, provided that—
(1) The individual agrees to become
certified during that period and
provides evidence of training course
registration; and
(2) Prior to assignment to the contract,
the individual meets with the cognizant
Contracting Officer to discuss the role
and specific responsibilities of a COTR
and the interrelationships, as
applicable, among the Project Officer,
Contracting Officer, Program/Project
Manager, and COTR functions.
(b) If an extension has been granted,
but the individual does not complete
E:\FR\FM\27NOR2.SGM
27NOR2
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 227 / Friday, November 27, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
the training by the extended date, the
HCA’s approval for the individual’s
assignment to the contract will
automatically terminate on that date.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES_2
301.604–74 Additional COTR training
requirements.
HHS COTRs are required to complete,
as applicable, the training requirements
specified below.
(a) Earned value management
training. Effective January 1, 2010, all
COTRs assigned to any contract to
which EVM is applied pursuant to
334.201(a) or (b) must successfully
complete an EVM training course before
assuming their COTR duties. In
conjunction with ASFR/OGAPA/DA,
HHS’ OCIO [for information technology
(IT)] and OFMP (for construction/
facilities), are authorized to designate
appropriate EVM courses. At least 8
hours of EVM training is required every
2 years.
(b) Performance-based acquisition
training. Effective January 1, 2010, all
COTRs assigned to a service contract are
required to successfully complete a PBA
course. To be eligible, a course must be
8 hours or more in length.
Determination of course suitability shall
be made by the HCA or designee. At
least 8 hours of refresher training in
PBA is required every 4 years.
(c) Federal appropriations law
training. Effective January 1, 2010, all
COTRs are required to successfully
complete HHS University’s classroombased or on-line Federal appropriations
law course within 3 years after an initial
certification is issued. COTRs are
required to take the HHS University online appropriations law course as
refresher training every 4 years.
(d) Green purchasing training.
Effective January 1, 2010, all COTRs are
required to complete green purchasing
training within the first certification
period. The individual’s immediate
supervisor shall make the determination
of course suitability. At least 4 hours of
refresher training is required every 4
years.
(e) Training policy exceptions.
(1) EVM training. In the event that
there is an urgent requirement for a
COTR to administer a contract to which
EVM will be applied, and the individual
has not yet met the EVM training
requirement, the HCA (non-delegable)
may authorize the individual to perform
the position duties, provided that the
individual meets the training
requirement within 9 months from the
date of assignment to the contract. If the
individual does not complete the
training requirement within 9 months,
the HCA’s approval for the individual’s
assignment to the contract will
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:54 Nov 25, 2009
Jkt 220001
62403
automatically terminate on that date. In
addition, during any extension period,
the COTR must work under the
direction of a COTR, or Program/Project
Manager who has taken an EVM course.
(2) Other additional HHS training.
The HCA (non-delegable) may grant a
time extension of up to 9 months to a
COTR to complete the PBA, Federal
appropriations law, and green
purchasing training requirements,
including completion of refresher
training. If the individual does not
complete the training requirement
within the extension period, the HCA’s
approval will automatically terminate
on that date.
individual as a Project Officer in writing
by means of a memorandum to the
Project Officer candidate with a copy to
the cognizant Contracting Officer. A
Project Officer must successfully
complete HHS University’s Basic
Contracting Officer’s Technical
Representative Course or equivalent and
any OPDIV-specific course
prerequisites. The Project Officer must
provide a course completion certificate
to the Contracting Officer with any AP
or other acquisition request
documentation submitted. See HHS
guidance on the training requirement for
technical proposal evaluators in
315.305(a)(3)(ii).
301.605 Contracting Officer designation of
Contracting Officer Technical
Representative.
301.606–72
HCAs.
The Contracting Officer shall ensure
that a COTR candidate is currently
certified under HHS’ FAC–COTR
program before delegating authority to
that individual to act as a COTR. Even
if an individual is FAC–COTR-certified,
a candidate becomes a COTR only when
a Contracting Officer provides in writing
the authorities the individual may
exercise for a specified contract or
order. Authority for such designations
rests solely with the Contracting Officer.
The Contracting Officer shall retain in
the contract or order file the
individual’s active FAC–COTR
certificate. In the event that the HCA has
granted an exception—see 301.604–73,
the Contracting Officer shall include the
HCA’s approval in the file.
301.606 Training requirements for Project
Officers.
301.606–70
General.
HHS has established a program for
training personnel for certification and
designation as Project Officers. See
302.101(g) for further information
regarding the definition of a Project
Officer and when designation of a
Project Officer is appropriate. All
references to Project Officers also apply
to their alternates. Program Managers or
their designees are authorized to
designate individuals to serve as Project
Officers. (Note: If an individual will also
serve as the COTR for a proposed
project, the individual shall comply
with the training certification
requirements for COTRs—see 301.604.)
301.606–71
Project Officer training.
Before an individual may perform the
duties of a Project Officer, including
development of an Acquisition Plan
(AP) or other acquisition request
documentation—see 307.71, for a
proposed project, the Program Manager
or designee shall designate an
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
Delegation of authority to
HCAs are authorized to determine
equivalencies for the Basic Contracting
Officer’s Technical Representative
Course and any OPDIV-specific course
prerequisites. This authority may be redelegated to OPDIV acquisition ACMs
or other comparable officials.
301.606–73
Training policy exception.
(a) In the event that an individual
who has not successfully completed the
required training course is urgently
required to serve as a Project Officer, the
Program Manager or designee may
authorize the individual to perform the
designated duties on an interim basis for
up to 6 months, provided that—
(1) The individual agrees to take the
Basic Contracting Officer’s Technical
Representative course during that
period and provides evidence of course
registration; and
(2) The individual meets, prior to
assignment to the project, with the
cognizant Contracting Officer to discuss
the specific role and responsibilities of
a Project Officer and the
interrelationships, as applicable, among
the Project Officer, Contracting Officer,
Program/Project Manager, and COTR
functions.
(b) If an extension of time has been
granted, but the individual fails to
complete the training by the extended
date, the Program Manager’s or
designee’s approval for the individual’s
assignment to the project will
automatically terminate on that date.
301.606–74 Additional Project Officer
training requirements.
HHS Project Officers are required to
complete, as applicable, the training
requirements specified below.
(a) Earned value management
training. All Project Officers assigned to
any contract project to which EVM is
applied pursuant to 334.201(a) or (b)
must successfully complete an EVM
E:\FR\FM\27NOR2.SGM
27NOR2
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES_2
62404
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 227 / Friday, November 27, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
training course before assuming their
Project Officer duties. In conjunction
with ASFR/OGAPA/DA, HHS’ OCIO
(for IT) and OFMP (for construction/
facilities) are authorized to designate
appropriate EVM courses.
(b) Performance-based acquisition
training. Effective January 1, 2010, all
Project Officers assigned to a service
contract are required to successfully
complete a PBA course. To be eligible,
a course must be 8 hours or more in
length. Determination of course
suitability shall be made by the HCA or
designee. At least 8 hours of refresher
training in PBA is required every 4
years.
(c) Federal appropriations law
training. Effective January 1, 2010, all
Project Officers are required to
successfully complete HHS University’s
classroom-based or on-line Federal
appropriations law course. Project
Officers are required to take the HHS
University on-line appropriations law
course as refresher training every 4
years.
(d) Green purchasing training.
Effective January 1, 2010, all Project
Officers are required to complete green
purchasing training. The individual’s
immediate supervisor shall make the
determination of course suitability. At
least 4 hours of refresher training is
required every 4 years.
(e) Training policy exceptions.
(1) EVM training. In the event that
there is an urgent requirement to assign
a Project Officer to a contract project to
which EVM will be applied, and the
individual has not yet met the EVM
training requirement, the HCA (nondelegable) may authorize the individual
to perform the position duties, provided
that the individual meets the training
requirement within 3 months from the
date of submission of the AP or other
acquisition request documentation to
the contracting office. If the individual
does not complete the training
requirement within the extension
period, the HCA’s approval for the
individual’s assignment to the project
will automatically terminate on that
date. In addition, during any extension
period, the Project Officer must work
under the direction of a Project Officer,
COTR, or Program/Project Manager who
has taken an EVM course.
(2) Other additional HHS training.
The HCA (non-delegable) may grant a
time extension of up to 9 months to a
Project Officer to complete the PBA,
Federal appropriations law, and green
purchasing training requirements,
including completion of refresher
training. If the individual does not
complete the training requirement
within the extension period, the HCA’s
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:54 Nov 25, 2009
Jkt 220001
approval will automatically terminate
on that date.
301.607 Certification of Program and
Project Managers.
301.607–70
General.
In accordance with the Federal
Acquisition Certification—Program and
Project Managers (FAC–P/PM) program,
HHS has established a certification
program for Program or Project
Managers. See HHS’ Federal Acquisition
Certification—Program and Project
Managers Handbook (P/PM Handbook)
for information on the methods for
earning FAC–P/PM certification.
301.607–71 FAC–P/PM levels and
requirements.
(a)(1) The FAC–P/PM certification
program specifies three different levels
of certification, depending on the core
competency, training, and experience
required to manage different types of
acquisitions—
(i) Entry/Apprentice—Level I;
(ii) Mid-level/Journeyman—Level II;
and
(iii) Senior/Expert—Level III.
(2) Each FAC–P/PM certification level
is independent of the others—i.e.,
applicants for the Senior/Expert level
need not have been certified at the Midlevel/Journeyman or Entry/Apprentice
levels. General and specific core
competencies, training, and required
experience vary by certification level.
(Note: Individuals certified under the
FAC–P/PM program meet the general
competency and experience standards
for P/PM certification. However, IT
Program and Project Managers should
attain/demonstrate IT-specific P/PM
requirements. See Appendix C, Federal
Acquisition Certification—Program and
Project Managers—Information
Technology Technical Competencies, in
the P/PM Handbook for additional
information.
(b)(1) Competencies. An applicant can
satisfy the competency requirements
through:
(i) Successful completion of training;
(ii) Completion of comparable
education or certification programs;
(iii) Demonstration of knowledge,
skills, and abilities; or
(iv) Any combination of these three.
(2) The FAI describes the following
three sets of general core competencies
on its Web site:
(3) General Business Competencies:
Includes decision-making, interpersonal
skills, oral communication, teambuilding, and writing.
(4) Technical Competencies: Includes
contracting, financial management,
quality assurance, and risk management.
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
(5) Essential Competencies and
Proficiencies: Includes management
processes, systems engineering, test and
evaluation, contracting, and business.
(6) Specific core competencies also
apply to the three certification levels.
See Chapter 2, Federal Acquisition
Certification—Program and Project
Managers—Requirements and
Performance Accountability, in the P/
PM Handbook for additional
information.
(c) Training. (1) Suggested training
includes coursework, varying from
16–24 hours in duration, in:
(i) Acquisition;
(ii) Project management;
(iii) leadership and interpersonal
skills;
(iv) Government-specific training; and
(v) Earned value management and
cost estimating.
(2) The depth of the training for each
course required may vary by
certification level.
(d) Experience. Experience
requirements vary by certification level.
For example, for certification at the
Entry/Apprentice—Level I, at least 1
year of project management experience
within the last 5 years is required. The
Mid-level/Journeyman—Level II
requires at least 2 years of program or
project management experience within
the last 5 years. The Senior/Expert—
Level III requires at least 4 years of
program and project management
experience on Federal projects within
the last 5 years.
(e) Additional OPDIV guidance.
OPDIVs may issue supplemental
guidance and requirements for selection
and assignment of Program and Project
Managers and require additional skills
and competencies to meet
organizational or mission needs.
However, OPDIVs may not reduce the
requirements specified in the P/PM
Handbook.
301.607–72
Applicability.
(a) The FAC–P/PM certification
prerequisites and continuous learning
requirements apply to all HHS
employees who seek to obtain a FAC–
P/PM certification. Although obtaining a
FAC–P/PM certification qualifies
employees to serve as a Program or
Project Manager, it does not ensure their
selection or designation as such. (Note:
Contractors and their employees are not
eligible to be certified or to serve as
Program or Project Managers.)
(b) Mandatory certification is limited
to major and non-major IT and
construction capital investment
acquisitions. Consistent with OFPP
guidance, HHS requires FAC–P/PM
Level III certification for Program and
E:\FR\FM\27NOR2.SGM
27NOR2
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 227 / Friday, November 27, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
Project Managers responsible for major
IT and construction capital
investments—i.e., those requiring
preparation of an OMB Exhibit 300,
HHS Form 300, or equivalent. An
individual must obtain FAC–P/PM
Level III certification within 1 year from
the date of being assigned to such a
major capital investment. Also, HHS
requires that an individual obtain FAC–
P/PM Level II or I certification for nonmajor IT and construction—i.e., tactical
or supporting, capital investments,
respectively, within 2 years from the
date of being assigned to such a nonmajor capital investment. See Appendix
A, Federal Acquisition Certification—
Program and Project Managers—HHS
Projects and Programs with Associated
Certification Levels, in the P/PM
Handbook for additional information
regarding major and non-major IT and
construction capital investments. FAC–
P/PM certification for other types of
investments [e.g., advanced research
and development (R & D)] is
encouraged, but is not mandatory.
301.607–73
Certification waivers.
(a) Waivers to certification
requirements may be approved in
certain situations. Waivers for
additional time to complete certification
requirements are not necessary for the
first year following an assignment to a
major IT or construction capital
investment and for 2 years following an
assignment to a non-major capital
investment. For waivers beyond those
periods (for up to 1 additional year), the
HHS Chief Information Officer (CIO) (for
IT programs and projects) and the
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Facilities
Management and Policy (DASFMP) (for
construction programs and projects) are
delegated authority to approve waiver
requests. The HHS CAO is the only
individual authorized to approve waiver
requests for additional time beyond the
initial 1-year waiver period.
(b) Approval of a waiver request does
not relieve an individual from meeting
the certification requirements. Also,
unlike FAC–P/PM certifications,
waivers issued by other Federal
departments and agencies do not
transfer to HHS, since a waiver is
agency-specific.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES_2
301.607–74
Certification transfers.
(a) HHS recognizes and accepts FAC–
P/PM certifications issued by other
Federal departments and agencies. In
addition, HHS complies with FAI
determinations as to which
certifications by organizations outside
the Federal government are eligible for
full or partial consideration under FAC–
P/PM. See FAI’s Web site, and Chapter
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:54 Nov 25, 2009
Jkt 220001
3, Federal Acquisition Certification—
Program and Project Managers—
Application and Certification
Procedures, in the P/PM Handbook for
additional information.
(b) A certification transfer should not
be initiated when an individual, who
holds a current FAC–P/PM certification
from another Federal department or
agency, becomes an HHS employee.
Instead, the individual must apply for
recertification (which will result in
issuance of an HHS certification) at the
time the candidate’s immediate
supervisor performs the bi-annual
assessment to determine whether the
individual has met the HHS FAC–P/PM
CLP requirements.
301.607–75 Maintenance of FAC–P/PM
certification.
(a) FAC–P/PM certification lasts for 2
years. To maintain FAC–P/PM
certification, HHS Program and Project
Managers are required to earn 80 CLPs
of skills currency every 2 years, starting
from the date of their initial certification
or recertification, and document
completion of all training. If the
required CLPs are not earned within
each 2-year period, a FAC–P/PM
certification will lapse. Lapsed
certifications may be reinstated when 80
CLPs have been accumulated.
(b) Continuous learning activities
related to FAC–P/PM include, but are
not limited to—
(1) Training activities, such as
teaching, self-directed study, and
mentoring;
(2) Courses completed to achieve
certification at the next higher level;
(3) Professional activities, such as
attending/speaking/presenting at
professional seminars/symposia/
conferences, publishing papers, and
attending workshops;
(4) Educational activities, such as
formal training and formal academic
programs; and
(5) Experience, such as developmental
or rotational assignments.
See Appendix F, Federal Acquisition
Certification—Program and Project
Managers—Guidance on Meeting
Requirements for Continuous Learning
Points, in the P/PM Handbook for
additional information.
301.607–76
process.
FAC–P/PM application
The P/PM Handbook contains
application procedures and forms to be
completed for basic certification;
certification transfer; certification
through fulfillment; recertification; and
certification waiver. Applicants for HHS
FAC–P/PM certification actions shall
comply with the requirements and
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
62405
procedures specified in the P/PM
Handbook and refer any questions to
their OPDIV ACM for resolution.
301.607–77 Input and maintenance of
FAC–P/PM information.
FAI’s Acquisition Career Management
Information System (ACMIS) is HHS’
system of record for the FAC–P/PM
program. Program and Project Manager
candidates and certified Program and
Project Managers are responsible for
entering, maintaining, and updating
their FAC–P/PM training and CLP data
in ACMIS. OPDIV ACMs shall
periodically review ACMIS records for
quality assurance purposes.
301.607–78
Governance.
The Departmental ACM, in ASFR/
OGAPA/DA, serves as the Departmental
FAC–P/PM Program Manager and is
responsible for administering the
program. To support the overall
management of the FAC–P/PM
certification program at the OPDIV
level, Executive Officers and their HCAs
may either use their existing ACM or
designate an additional ACM, whose
professional background includes
program and project management. See
Appendix B, Federal Acquisition
Certification—Program and Project
Managers—Roles and Responsibilities,
in the P/PM Handbook for additional
information.
301.607–79 Contracting Officer
designation of a Program/Project Manager
as the Contracting Officer’s Technical
Representative.
Personnel who are FAC–P/PM
certified, at any level, meet the
requirements for FAC–COTR
certification and are, therefore, not
required to obtain FAC–COTR
certification to serve as a COTR for an
HHS acquisition. However, for those
individuals serving as a Program or
Project Manager under a FAC–P/PM
certification waiver—see 301.607–73,
the Contracting Officer shall ensure that
the individual meets the requirements
of HHS’ FAC–COTR program before
delegating authority to that individual
to act as a COTR. See 301.605 for
additional information regarding the
Contracting Officer’s designation of a
COTR.
301.608 Training Requirements for
Purchase Cardholders, Approving Officials,
and Agency/Organization Program
Coordinators.
Training requirements for purchase
cardholders, Approving Officials, and
Agency/Organization Program
Coordinators are listed in the following
table:
E:\FR\FM\27NOR2.SGM
27NOR2
62406
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 227 / Friday, November 27, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
HHS PURCHASE CARD TRAINING PROGRAM, BY AUTHORITY LEVEL
Authority a
Program participant
Required training b
Up to $3,000 ........................
Prospective/newly appointed purchase cardholders and
Approving Officials.
Purchase card holders and Approving Officials .............
Prospective/newly appointed purchase cardholders and
Approving Officials.
Basic purchase card training (HHS University course or
an OPDIV equivalent course).
Yearly refresher purchase card training.
• Basic purchase card training (HHS University course
or an equivalent).
• Basic simplified acquisition procedures (e.g., DAU’s
CON 237).
• Advanced simplified acquisition procedures or Appropriations law.
Yearly refresher purchase card training.
• Basic purchase card training (HHS University course
or an OPDIV equivalent course).
• Basic simplified acquisition procedures (e.g., DAU’s
CON 237).
• Advanced simplified acquisition procedures or Appropriations law.
• CON 100 (Shaping Smart Business Arrangements).
• CON 110 (Mission Support Planning).
Yearly refresher purchase card training.
• Basic purchase card training (HHS University course
or an OPDIV equivalent course).
• Basic simplified acquisition procedures or DAU’s
CON 237.
• Advanced simplified acquisition procedures or appropriations law.
• CON 100 (Shaping Smart Business Arrangements).
• CON 110 (Mission Support Planning).
Yearly refresher purchase card training (attendance at
GSA’s annual training conference satisfies refresher
training).
$3,001 to $25,000 ................
$25,001 to $100,000 ............
Purchase card holders and Approving Officials .............
Prospective/newly appointed purchase cardholders and
Approving Officials.
Not applicable ......................
Purchase cardholders and Approving Officials ...............
Prospective/newly appointed Agency/Organization Program Coordinators.
Agency/Organization Program Coordinators ..................
a Cardholders and Approving Officials with authorized increases in delegation of procurement authority (DPA) have up to 3 months to complete
the training requirements for the new DPA.
b CON 237, CON 100, and CON 110 are available at the DAU Web site at https://www.dau.mil/registrar/enroll.asp. CON 100 is also offered
through HHS University (see Web site at: https://learning.hhs.gov).
PART 302—DEFINITIONS OF WORDS
AND TERMS
Subpart 302.1—Definitions
Sec.
302.101 Definitions.
Subpart 302.2—Definitions Clause
302.201 Contract clause.
Subpart 302.70—Common HHSAR
Acronyms and Abbreviations
302.7000 Common HHSAR acronyms and
abbreviations.
Subpart 302.71—HHS Standard Templates
and Formats
302.7100 HHS standard templates and
formats.
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 40 U.S.C. 486(c).
Subpart 302.1—Definitions
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES_2
302.101
Definitions.
(a) Agency head or head of the
Agency, unless otherwise stated, means
the head of the OPDIV for: AHRQ; CDC;
CMS; FDA; HRSA; IHS; NIH; SAMHSA;
and ASFR for the Office of the Secretary
(OS), including PSC. The Assistant
Secretary for Preparedness and
Response (ASPR) is the head of the
agency for BARDA contracting
functions.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:54 Nov 25, 2009
Jkt 220001
(b) Chief of the Contracting Office is
typically a mid-level management
official, usually an office director,
division director, or branch chief, who
manages and monitors the daily contract
operations of an OPDIV or major
component of an OPDIV. The CCO is
subordinate to the HCA, except where
the same individual is the HCA and
CCO.
(c) Contracting Officer’s Technical
Representative is a Federal employee
whom a Contracting Officer has
designated in writing to act as the
Contracting Officer’s representative in
monitoring and administering specified
aspects of contractor performance after
award of a contract or order that exceeds
the simplified acquisition threshold.
(Note: In accordance with local
procedures, OPDIVs may designate
COTRs for contracts or orders estimated
to be less than the simplified acquisition
threshold.) These activities may include
verifying that:
(1) The contractor’s performance
meets the standards set forth in the
contract;
(2) The contractor meets the contract/
order’s technical requirements by the
specified delivery date(s) or within the
period of performance; and
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
(3) The contractor performs within the
fixed price or cost ceiling stated in the
contract or order. COTRs must meet the
training and certification requirements
specified in 301.604.
(d) Head of the contracting activity is
an official who has overall
responsibility for managing a
contracting activity—i.e., the
organization within an OPDIV or other
HHS organization which has been
delegated broad authority regarding the
conduct of acquisition functions.
(1) The HHS HCAs are as follows:
AHRQ: Director, Division of Contracts
Management
BARDA: Director, Acquisition Management
System
CDC: Director, Procurement and Grants
Office
CMS: Director, Office of Acquisition and
Grants Management
FDA: Director, Office of Acquisitions and
Grant Services
HRSA: Director, Office of Acquisition
Management and Policy
IHS: Director, Division of Acquisition Policy
NIH: Director, Office of Acquisition and
Logistics Management
PSC: Director, Strategic Acquisition Service
SAMHSA: Director, Division of Contracts
Management
E:\FR\FM\27NOR2.SGM
27NOR2
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 227 / Friday, November 27, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
(2) Each HCA shall conduct an
effective and efficient acquisition
program; establish adequate controls to
ensure compliance with applicable
laws, regulations, procedures, and the
dictates of good management practices;
and conduct periodic reviews to
evaluate and determine the extent of
adherence to prescribed policies and
regulations and the need for guidance
and training.
(3) HCAs may redelegate their
authorities to the extent that
redelegation is not prohibited by the
terms of their respective delegations of
authority, by law, by the FAR, by the
HHSAR, or by other regulations. To
ensure proper control of redelegated
acquisition authorities, HCAs shall
maintain a file containing successive
delegations of HCA authority through
the Contracting Officer level.
(e) Program Manager is a Federal
employee whom an OPDIV official or
designee one level above the head of the
sponsoring program office has
designated in writing to act as a Program
Manager for a group of related major or
non-major IT or construction capital
investments—see HHS FAC–P/PM
Program Handbook. See also Appendix
D, Relationship between Program
Management and Project Management,
of OFFP memorandum entitled ‘‘The
Federal Acquisition Certification for
Program and Project Managers,’’ dated
April 25, 2007. Program Managers must
meet the FAC–P/PM certification
requirements in 301.607. A Program
Manager may also be delegated
authority to act as the COTR for a major
or non-major IT or construction capital
investment—see 301.604.
(f) Project Manager is a Federal
employee whom a head of the
sponsoring program office (Program
Manager) or designee has designated in
writing to act as a Project Manager for
a major or non-major IT or construction
capital investment—see HHS FAC–P/
PM Program Handbook. See also
Appendix D, Relationship between
Program Management and Project
Management, of OFFP memorandum
entitled ‘‘The Federal Acquisition
Certification for Program and Project
Managers,’’ dated April 25, 2007. Project
Managers must meet the FAC–P/PM
certification requirements in 301.607. A
Project Manager may also be delegated
authority to act as the COTR for a major
or non-major IT or construction capital
investment—see 301.604.
(g) Project Officer is a Federal
employee whom a head of the
sponsoring program office (Program
Manager) or designee has designated in
writing to act as a Project Officer and
provide guidance, information, and
assistance to the Contracting Officer for
all technical aspects of a proposed
project before award of a contract or
order that is estimated to exceed the
simplified acquisition threshold. (Note:
In accordance with local procedures,
OPDIVs may designate Project Officers
for contracts or orders estimated to be
less than the simplified acquisition
threshold.) Project Officers must meet
the training requirements in 301.606.
Project Officers are often delegated
authority to also act as the COTR on a
contract or order—see 301.604.
Subpart 302.2—Definitions Clause
302.201
Contract clause.
The Contracting Officer shall insert
the clause in FAR 52.202–1, Definitions,
in solicitations and contracts, except as
cited below. This is an authorized FAR
deviation.
(a) In accordance with FAR 52.202–
1(a)(1), the Contracting Officer shall
insert paragraph (a) in 352.202–1 in
place of paragraph (a) of the FAR clause.
(b) In accordance with FAR 52.202–
1(a)(1), the Contracting Officer shall
insert paragraph (b), or its alternate in
352.202–1, to the end of the FAR clause.
The Contracting Officer shall insert
paragraph (b) when a fixed-priced
contract is contemplated and the
alternate to paragraph (b) when a costreimbursement contract is
contemplated.
Subpart 302.70—Common HHSAR
Acronyms and Abbreviations
302.7000 Common HHSAR acronyms and
abbreviations.
(a) The HHSAR cites numerous
acquisition-related and organizational
acronyms and abbreviations. Each of
these is established where first cited in
the text, following the use of the
unabbreviated term, and are used in
subsequent subparts of that part or any
other part of the HHSAR.
(b) The table below cites, for reference
purposes, the most commonly used
acronyms and abbreviations—i.e., those
that have applicability to multiple parts
of the HHSAR, and where they are first
cited. They are listed alphabetically.
The HHSAR also contains other
acronyms and abbreviations, which
because they are cited only in one
HHSAR part, subpart, section, or in
reference to a particular topic, are not
listed in the table. An example is DCIS
(Departmental Contracts Information
System) cited in subpart 304.602.
Where first cited in
the HHSAR
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES_2
Acronym/abbreviation
Term
A & E ......................................................
AHRQ .....................................................
AP ...........................................................
ASFR ......................................................
Associate DAS for Acquisition ...............
BARDA ...................................................
BPA or BPAs ..........................................
CA ...........................................................
CAO ........................................................
CCO ........................................................
CDC ........................................................
CFR ........................................................
CIO .........................................................
CMS ........................................................
COTR .....................................................
D&F ........................................................
DA ...........................................................
DASFMP .................................................
DAS/GAPA .............................................
Architect and engineer (contracts) ........................................................................
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality ......................................................
Acquisition Plan ....................................................................................................
Assistant Secretary for Financial Resources (in OS) ...........................................
Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary for Acquisition (in OS/ASFR/OGAPA/DA)
Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority ..............................
Blanket Purchase Agreement(s) ...........................................................................
Competition Advocate ...........................................................................................
Chief Acquisition Officer (for HHS) .......................................................................
Chief of the Contracting Office .............................................................................
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention ........................................................
Code of Federal Regulations ................................................................................
Chief Information Officer (for HHS) ......................................................................
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services ......................................................
Contracting Officer’s Technical Representative ...................................................
Determination and Findings ..................................................................................
Division of Acquisition (in ASFR) in OS ...............................................................
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Facilities Management and Policy ......................
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Grants and Acquisition Policy and Accountability.
Electronic information technology .........................................................................
Earned value management ...................................................................................
EIT ..........................................................
EVM ........................................................
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:54 Nov 25, 2009
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
62407
E:\FR\FM\27NOR2.SGM
27NOR2
304.803–70(b).
301.270(b).
301.606–71.
301.103(b).
301.270(a).
301.270(b).
301.603–70(b).
306.202(a).
301.603–72(a)(4).
301.602–3(b)(3).
301.270(b).
301.103(c).
301.607–73(a).
301.270(b).
301.604–70.
306.202(b)(1).
301.270(b).
301.607–73(a).
309.403.
301.603–73(e).
301.603–73(a).
62408
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 227 / Friday, November 27, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
Where first cited in
the HHSAR
Acronym/abbreviation
Term
FAR ........................................................
FDA ........................................................
FedBizOpps ............................................
FSS .........................................................
GLD ........................................................
GSA ........................................................
GWAC ....................................................
HCA ........................................................
HHS ........................................................
HHSAR ...................................................
HRSA ......................................................
HUBZone ................................................
IDIQ ........................................................
IHS ..........................................................
IT ............................................................
JOFOC ...................................................
NIH .........................................................
OCIO ......................................................
OFMP .....................................................
OGAPA ...................................................
OGC .......................................................
OIG .........................................................
OMB .......................................................
OPDIV ....................................................
OS ..........................................................
OSDBU ...................................................
Pub. L. ....................................................
PWS .......................................................
PSC ........................................................
R&D ........................................................
RFI ..........................................................
SAMHSA ................................................
SBS ........................................................
SF ...........................................................
SOW .......................................................
SPE ........................................................
STAFFDIV ..............................................
Federal Acquisition Regulation .............................................................................
Food and Drug Administration ..............................................................................
Federal Business Opportunities ............................................................................
Federal Supply Schedule ......................................................................................
General Law Division (typically referred to with ‘‘OGC’’) .....................................
General Services Administration ..........................................................................
Government-wide acquisition contract ..................................................................
Head of the Contracting Activity ...........................................................................
(Department of) Health and Human Services ......................................................
Health and Human Services Acquisition Regulation ............................................
Health Resources and Services Administration ...................................................
Historically Underutilized Business Zone .............................................................
indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity (contract type) ...........................................
Indian Health Service ............................................................................................
information technology ..........................................................................................
Justification for Other than Full and Open Competition .......................................
National Institutes of Health ..................................................................................
Office of the Chief Information Officer (for HHS) .................................................
Office of Facilities Management and Policy (for HHS) .........................................
Office of Grants and Acquisition Policy and Accountability .................................
Office of the General Counsel ..............................................................................
Office of the Inspector General ............................................................................
Office of Management and Budget .......................................................................
Operating Division .................................................................................................
Office of the Secretary ..........................................................................................
Office of Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization (in OS) .........................
Public Law .............................................................................................................
performance work statement (typically cited with SOW) ......................................
Program Support Center (in OS) ..........................................................................
research and development ...................................................................................
Request for Information ........................................................................................
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration ............................
Small Business Specialist (in OSDBU) ................................................................
Standard Form ......................................................................................................
statement of work [inclusive of specification(s)] and typically cited with PWS ....
Senior Procurement Executive—i.e., Associate DAS for Acquisition ..................
Staff Division (in OS) ............................................................................................
Subpart 302.71—HHS Standard
Templates and Formats
302.7100
formats.
HHS standard templates and
HHS has developed standard
templates and formats for preparation of
various acquisition documents, reports,
and plans. The templates and formats,
which contain instructions for their
completion, may be accessed on the
ASFR/OGAPA/DA Internet Web site. A
complete listing of the standard
templates and formats and where they
are referenced in the text are cited in the
table below:
Title of template/format
HHSAR reference
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES_2
Acquisition Plan .........................................................................................................................................................................
Acquisition Plan Waiver Request ..............................................................................................................................................
Acquisition Strategy ...................................................................................................................................................................
Annual Acquisition Plan .............................................................................................................................................................
Competition Advocate Report ....................................................................................................................................................
Contract File Checklists .............................................................................................................................................................
FedBizOpps R & D Sources Sought Notice ..............................................................................................................................
FedBizOpps Request for Information ........................................................................................................................................
FedBizOpps Small Business Sources Sought Notice ...............................................................................................................
FedBizOpps Sources Sought Notice .........................................................................................................................................
Justification for Other than Full and Open Competition ............................................................................................................
Limited Source Justification .......................................................................................................................................................
Request for Information .............................................................................................................................................................
PART 303—IMPROPER BUSINESS
PRACTICES AND PERSONAL
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
Subpart 303.1—Safeguards
Sec.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:54 Nov 25, 2009
Jkt 220001
303.101 Standards of conduct.
303.101–3 Agency regulations.
303.1047–7 Violations or possible
violations of the Procurement Integrity
Act.
303.1003 Requirements.
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4701
301.101(a).
301.270(b).
305.205(a).
304.803–70(b).
301.602–3(c)(5).
304.803–70(b).
304.803–70(b).
301.470(a).
301.101(a).
301.101(a).
301.270(b).
305.205(a)(2).
301.603–70(b).
301.270(b).
301.604–74(a).
306.303–1(b)(1).
301.270(b).
301.603–73(a).
301.603–73(a).
301.270(b).
301.602–3(c)(5).
303.104–7(a)(2)(i).
301.106.
301.603–73(a).
302.101(a).
307.104(a)(4).
304.604.
304.1300(c).
301.270(b).
301.607–72(b).
305.205(a).
301.270(b).
307.104(a)(4).
301.603–1(b).
304.1300(c).
301.603–71.
311.7001(b).
Sfmt 4700
307.7103.
307.7101(b)(2).
307.104–70.
307.104(a)(5).
306.502(b).
304.803–70.
305.205(a)(3).
315.201(e)(4).
319.202–2(a)(3).
310.001(a)(3)(iv).
306.303–1(b)(1).
308.405–6(g)(1)(i).
315.201(e)(4).
Subpart 303.2—Contractor Gratuities to
Government Personnel
303.203 Reporting suspected violations of
the Gratuities clause.
E:\FR\FM\27NOR2.SGM
27NOR2
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 227 / Friday, November 27, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
Subpart 303.3—Reports of Suspected
Antitrust Violations
303.303 Reporting suspected antitrust
violations.
303.1003
Subpart 303.4—Contingent Fees
303.405 Misrepresentations or violations of
the Covenant Against Contingent Fees
clause.
Subpart 303.6—Contracts With Government
Employees or Organizations Owned or
Controlled by Them
303.602 Exceptions.
Subpart 303.7—Voiding and Rescinding
Contracts
303.704 Policy.
Subpart 303.8—Limitation on the Payment
of Funds to Influence Federal Transactions
303.808–70 Solicitation provision and
contract clause.
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 40 U.S.C. 486(c).
Subpart 303.1—Safeguards
303.101
Subpart 303.2—Contractor Gratuities
to Government Personnel
Standards of conduct.
303.101–3
Agency regulations.
(a)(3) The HHS Standards of Conduct
are prescribed in 45 CFR part 73.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES_2
303.104–7 Violations or possible
violations of the Procurement Integrity Act.
(a)(1) The Contracting Officer shall
submit to the HCA for review and
approval the determination (along with
supporting documentation) that a
reported violation or possible violation
of the statutory prohibitions has no
impact on the pending award or
selection of a contractor for award.
(2) The Contracting Officer shall refer
the determination that a reported
violation or possible violation of the
statutory prohibitions has an impact on
the pending award or selection of a
contractor, along with all related
information available, to the HCA, if the
HCA is in the Senior Executive Service
(SES), or to another SES official
designated by the OPDIV. That
individual shall—
(i) Refer the matter immediately to the
Associate DAS for Acquisition for
review, who may consult with OGC–
GLD and the Office of the Inspector
General (OIG), as appropriate; and
(ii) Determine the necessary action in
accordance with FAR 3.104–7(c) and
(d). The HCA shall obtain the approval
or concurrence of the Associate DAS for
Acquisition before proceeding with an
action.
(b) The HCA (non-delegable) shall act
with respect to actions taken under the
FAR clause 52.203–10, Price or Fee
Adjustment for Illegal or Improper
Authority.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:54 Nov 25, 2009
Jkt 220001
Requirements.
(b) The Contracting Officer, when
notified of a possible contractor
violation of Federal criminal law, in
accordance with FAR 3.1003(b), shall—
(1) Notify the OIG at https://
www.oig.hhs.gov/fraud/hotline, 1–800–
HHS–TIPS (1–800–447–8477), or
HHSTips@oig.hhs.gov;
(2) Notify the HCA; and
(3) Cooperate with any investigation
by the OIG; and in coordination with
the HCA, OIG, OGC and the affected
program office, pursue appropriate
remedies.
(c)(2) The Contracting Officer shall
specify the title of HHS’ hotline poster
(‘‘Report Fraud’’) and the Web site
where the poster can be obtained
(https://oig.hhs.gov/fraud/hotline/
OIG_Hotline_Poster.pdf) in
subparagraph (b)(3) of the clause at FAR
52.203–14.
303.203 Reporting suspected violations of
the Gratuities clause.
HHS personnel shall report suspected
violations of the Gratuities clause to the
Contracting Officer, who will in turn
report the matter to the OGC Ethics
Division for disposition. The OGC
Ethics Division shall identify, and notify
the Contracting Officer of, the form and
content of the required report.
Subpart 303.3—Reports of Suspected
Antitrust Violations
303.303 Reporting suspected antitrust
violations.
(h) The HCA shall provide a copy of
the draft OPDIV report of suspected
antitrust violations to the SPE. If the
SPE concurs with the draft report, the
SPE will provide it to the OGC–GLD for
its review. If the OGD–GLD concurs
with the draft report, the SPE will
provide the signed OGC-approved
report to the Attorney General.
Subpart 303.4—Contingent Fees
303.405 Misrepresentations or violations
of the Covenant Against Contingent Fees
clause.
(a) HHS personnel shall promptly
report suspected misrepresentations or
violations of the Covenant Against
Contingent Fees clause to the
Contracting Officer.
(b)(4) The HCA shall provide a copy
of the draft OPDIV report of suspected
covenant against contingency fees
misrepresentations or violations to the
SPE. If the SPE concurs with the draft
report, the SPE will provide it to the
OGC–GLD for its review. If the OGD–
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
62409
GLD concurs with the draft report, the
SPE will provide the signed OGCapproved report to the Attorney
General.
Subpart 303.6—Contracts With
Government Employees or
Organizations Owned or Controlled by
Them
303.602
Exceptions.
The HCA (non-delegable) is the
official authorized to approve an
exception to the policy stated in FAR
3.601.
Subpart 303.7—Voiding and
Rescinding Contracts
303.704
Policy.
(a) For purposes of implementing FAR
subpart 3.7, the HCA (non-delegable)
shall exercise the authorities granted to
the ‘‘agency head or designee.’’
Subpart 303.8—Limitation on the
Payment of Funds to Influence Federal
Transactions
303.808–70 Solicitation provision and
contract clause.
The Contracting Officer shall insert
the clause in 352.203–70, Anti-lobbying,
in solicitations and contracts that
exceed the simplified acquisition
threshold.
PART 304—ADMINISTRATIVE
MATTERS
Subpart 304.6—Contracting Reporting
Subpart 304.8—Government Contract Files
Sec.
304.602 General.
304.604 Responsibilities.
304.803–70 Contract/order file organization
and use of checklists.
304.804–70 Contract closeout audits.
Subpart 304.13—Personal Identity
Verification
304.1300 Policy.
Subpart 304.70—Acquisition Instrument
Identification Numbering System
304.7000 Scope of subpart.
304.7001 Numbering acquisitions.
Subpart 304.71—Review and Approval of
Proposed Contract Awards
304.7100 Policy.
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 40 U.S.C. 486(c).
Subpart 304.6—Contract Reporting
304.602
General.
HHS’ Departmental Contracts
Information System (DCIS) captures and
stores HHS’ Individual Contract Award
Reports (ICARs) and forwards copies of
them to the Federal Procurement Data
System—Next Generation (FPDS–NG).
E:\FR\FM\27NOR2.SGM
27NOR2
62410
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 227 / Friday, November 27, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
All HHS contracting activities shall use
the DCIS, in accordance with the most
current version of the ‘‘User Manual for
the Enhanced Departmental Contracts
Information System,’’ (DCIS Users’
Manual) available at https://dcis.hhs.gov.
For the purposes of this policy,
reporting shall include inputting and
submitting report data through DCIS
into FPDS–NG.
304.604
Responsibilities.
In order for HHS to meet its reporting
requirements and ensure compliance
with the Federal Funding
Accountability and Transparency Act
(Transparency Act), Public Law (Pub.
L.) 109–282, HHS acquisition officials
and staff must report their contract
information accurately and timely.
Ensuring accuracy and timeliness also
requires effective and efficient data
verification and validation at the time of
and following reporting.
Following are descriptions of the
organizational roles and responsibilities
associated with contract reporting,
including data input, oversight, and
quality control; training of acquisition
staff on reporting responsibilities; and
operating, managing, and maintaining
DCIS.
(a) ASFR/OGAPA/DA. The ASFR/
OGAPA/DA shall do the following:
(1) Oversee and provide policy
guidance for OPDIV contract reporting
by—
(i) Establishing and implementing an
effective HHS-wide ICAR data
verification and validation program; and
(ii) Identifying cross-cutting trends
through periodic testing of selected
ICAR data, including Transparency Act
data fields.
(2) Ensure that DCIS is properly
managed and maintained, including—
(i) Verifying that data included
therein meets FPDS–NG and
Transparency Act accuracy and
timeliness standards;
(ii) Updating the DCIS Users’ Manual
periodically; and
(iii) Prescribing standard HHS-wide
DCIS training.
(3) Certify annually that HHS ICAR
information is complete and accurate.
(b) HCA. Each HCA (non-delegable)
shall—
(1) Ensure that all reportable ICAR
information is collected, submitted, and
received within the time frames and
under the circumstances specified in
FAR Subpart 4.6.
304.803–70 Contract/order file
organization and use of checklists.
(2) Provide continuing oversight,
including implementing an OPDIV-level
data verification and validation
program, to ensure ICAR data quality
and timeliness;
(3) Establish a continuous training
program for acquisition staff to ensure
the quality and timeliness of ICAR data;
and
(4) Certify annually to HHS’ SPE that
OPDIV ICAR information is complete
and accurate.
(c) Contracting Officer. As part of a
normal file review, required under
304.7101, the Contracting Officer
shall—
(1) Ensure that all reportable contracts
and orders, including BPA orders and
modifications thereto, are reported;
(2) Review and approve proposed
ICAR data for completeness and
accuracy prior to signing contracts/
orders and modifications; and
(3) Correct all DCIS data discrepancies
before signing the associated contract,
order, or modification.
(d) OPDIV DCIS coordinator/focal
point. The OPDIV DCIS coordinator/
focal point shall—
(1) Identify data errors and ensure
their timely correction as part of the
DCIS quality control process;
(2) Conduct remedial staff training, as
appropriate, to improve data accuracy
and timeliness; and
(3) Represent the OPDIV as a member
of the DCIS Configuration Committee.
(e) DCIS Configuration Committee.
The DCIS Configuration Committee is
composed of the HHS DCIS manager,
other ASFR/OGAPA/DA acquisition
management staff, as required; and each
(a) To provide a consistent approach
to the organization and content of HHS
contract and order files, OPDIVs shall
use the folder filing system and
accompanying file checklists specified
in 304.803–70(b), in accordance with
the guidance therein and the
instructions specified as ‘‘Contract and
Order File Folders, Checklists, and
Instructions. The checklists are
available on the ASFR/OGAPA/DA
Internet.
(b) The checklist requirements apply
to files for (i) negotiated, sealed-bid, and
Architect-Engineer (A & E) acquisitions;
(ii) orders awarded and BPAs
established under General Services
Administration (GSA) Federal Supply
Schedule (FSS) contracts; (iii) orders
placed under all types of indefinitedelivery contracts, including task orders
under Government-wide Acquisition
Contracts (GWACs); and (iv)
modifications under the types of
acquisitions specified in (i), (ii), and
(iii). Simplified acquisitions, including
those for commercial items, are exempt
from these checklist requirements.
However, HHS contracting activities
shall adhere to the simplified
acquisition file documentation and
retention requirements of FAR 13.106–
3(b). For commercial item acquisitions
using the negotiated or sealed bid
methods, HHS contracting activities
shall use the applicable checklist.
(1) A complete contract or order file
may consist of the following folders that
are titled as indicated below for the
specified acquisition methods:
Folder title
Negotiated .........................
Presolicitation to Award ....
Unsuccessful Proposals ....
Sealed-bid .........................
Presolicitation to Award ....
Unsuccessful Bids .............
A & E .................................
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES_2
Folder title
Task orders .......................
Preannouncement to
Award.
Presolicitation to Award ....
Unsuccessful Qualifications Statements.
Unsuccessful Proposals ....
GSA FSS ...........................
Presolicitation to Award ....
Unsuccessful Quotations/
Oral Presentations.
13:54 Nov 25, 2009
Jkt 220001
Subpart 304.8—Government Contract
Files
Note: Each CCO shall prepare and submit
accurate ICAR data in accordance with HCA
guidance.;
Acquisition method
VerDate Nov<24>2008
OPDIV’s DCIS coordinator/focal point.
The Committee shall ensure that the
DCIS is properly maintained and shall
evaluate and recommend changes to
DCIS to improve its functionality,
features, and quality control, as
appropriate.
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
Folder title
Administration
out.
Administration
out.
Administration
out.
Administration
out.
Administration
out.
Folder title
and Close-
Reports and Deliverables.
and Close-
N/A.
and Close-
Reports and Deliverables.
and Close-
Reports and Deliverables.
and Close-
N/A.
E:\FR\FM\27NOR2.SGM
27NOR2
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 227 / Friday, November 27, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
(2) Although the use of the checklists
is mandatory, each OPDIV contracting
office is permitted to make certain
checklist changes or additions as
specified in ‘‘Use and modification of
checklists’’ under ‘‘File checklists and
tab dividers’’ in the instructions.
(3) OPDIVs using or planning to use
electronic filing capabilities shall
adhere to the folder and tab
nomenclature requirements identified
herein to the maximum extent
practicable.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES_2
304.804–70
Contract closeout audits.
(a) Contracting Officers shall rely, to
the maximum extent possible, on single
audits to close physically completed
cost-reimbursement contracts with
colleges and universities, hospitals,
non-profit organizations, and State and
local governments. In addition, where
appropriate, a sample of these contracts
or an individual contract may be
selected for audit, in accordance with
paragraph (b) of this section.
(b) Contracting Officers shall request
contract closeout audits on physically
completed, cost-reimbursement,
contracts with for-profit organizations in
accordance with the following:
(1) The OIG and the Associate DAS
for Acquisition, in conjunction with the
OPDIV’s cost advisory/audit focal point,
determine which contracts or
contractors will be audited, which audit
agency will perform the audit, and the
type and scope of closeout audit to be
performed. These decisions are based on
the needs of the customer, risk analysis,
return on investment, and the
availability of audit resources. When an
audit is warranted prior to closing a
contract, the Contracting Officer shall
submit the audit request to the OIG’s
Office of Audit Services, through the
OPDIV’s cost advisory/audit focal point.
(2) Except where a Contracting Officer
suspects misrepresentation or fraud, the
Contracting Officer shall not request
contract closeout field audits, if the cost
of performance is likely to exceed the
potential cost recovery. Contracting
Officers may close contracts that are not
selected for a field audit on the basis of
a desk review, subject to any later onsite audit findings. In those situations,
the release executed by the contractor
shall contain the following statement:
‘‘The Contractor agrees, pursuant to the
clause in this contract entitled
‘‘Allowable Cost’’ or ‘‘Allowable Cost
and Fixed Fee,’’ as appropriate, that it
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:54 Nov 25, 2009
Jkt 220001
will refund to the Government the
amount of any sustained audit
exceptions resulting from any audit
made after final payment.’’
Subpart 304.13—Personal Identity
Verification
304.1300
Policy.
(a) Definitions. The following
definitions apply to this subpart:
(1) Access: ‘‘Physical’’ entry to and/or
exit from a facility/area of a facility
(such as a building or room in a
building) or ‘‘logical’’ entry into an
information system, such as a researcher
up-loading data/information through a
secure Web site or a contractor
accessing an HHS-controlled
information system from its own
facility. It does not include access to a
public Web site, whether by an HHS
contractor or member of the public,
because such Web sites do not require
permission to access. In the case of
sensitive data/information that exists in
hard copy, ‘‘access’’ means providing a
contractor the right to view or use
written/typed data or information for
the purpose described in a contract.
(2) Long-term: Greater than 6 months
in duration.
(3) Routine: On a regular, nonintermittent basis, which is at least once
per week during the contract or order
period of performance.
(4) Sensitive data/information: As
defined by the Computer Security Act of
1987, any data/information, ‘‘the loss,
misuse, or unauthorized access to or
modification of which, could adversely
affect the national interest or the
conduct of Federal programs, or the
privacy to which individuals are
entitled under section 552a of the Title
5 of U.S.C. (the Privacy Act), but which
has not been specifically authorized
under criteria established by an
Executive order or an act of Congress to
be kept secret in the interest of national
defense or foreign policy.’’ Examples
include individuals’ social security
numbers; other personal identification
information, such as individuals’ health,
medical, or psychological information;
proprietary research data; and
confidential legal data.
(5) Short-term: Six (6) months or less
in duration.
(b) Homeland Security Presidential
Directive (HSPD–12), entitled, ‘‘Policy
for a Common Identification Standard
for Federal Employees and Contractors,’’
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
62411
was issued on August 27, 2004, to
enhance security and reduce identity
fraud related to contractor physical
access to Federally-controlled facilities
and/or logical access to Federallycontrolled information systems.
(1) The HSPD–12 requirements
related to routine, long-term physical
access to HHS-controlled facilities and
logical access to HHS-controlled
information systems, including
contractor personnel background
checks/investigations (termed herein as
‘‘more stringent’’ access procedures),
apply to all solicitations and new
contracts or orders for services,
including services incidental to supply
contracts/orders, regardless of dollar
amount, where the contractor will
require such access (FAR 4.1303). In
addition, HHS has determined that,
when a contractor has routine, longterm access to sensitive data/
information, whether it exists in an
HHS-controlled information system or
in hard copy, that data/information
must also be protected and controlled in
accordance with HSPD–12’s more
stringent access procedures—see
304.1300(e).
(2) When a contractor’s access to
HHS-controlled facilities, information
systems, and/or sensitive data/
information is of routine but short-term
duration, an OPDIV shall use the
applicable guidance cited in OMB
memorandum M–05–24 related to
‘‘short-term’’ access to determine
appropriate protections and limit/
control contractor access—see
304.1300(f)]. However, if the Project
Officer determines greater access
controls are necessary, an OPDIV may
protect and control facilities,
information systems, and/or sensitive
data information in accordance with
HSPD–12’s more stringent access
procedures.
(3) When a contractor’s access to
HHS-controlled facilities, information
systems, and/or sensitive data/
information is not routine, regardless of
duration, HHS has determined that
OPDIVs shall use the applicable
guidance cited in OMB memorandum
M–05–24 related to ‘‘occasional
visitors’’ to determine appropriate
protections and limit/control contractor
access—see 304.1300(g).
(4) Summary table of contractor
access circumstances and HSPD–12
requirements.
E:\FR\FM\27NOR2.SGM
27NOR2
62412
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 227 / Friday, November 27, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
HSPD–12 security notice required in solicitation/contract SOW/PWS?
[see 304.1300(e)]
HSPD–12 access procedures required
Routine, long-term, physical access to HHScontrolled facilities.
Routine, long-term logical access to an HHScontrolled information system that does not
contain sensitive HHS data/information.
Routine, long-term access to sensitive HHS
data/information, whether it exists in an
HHS-controlled information system (logical
access) or in hard copy.
Routine, short-term access to HHS-controlled
facilities, information systems, and/or sensitive HHS data/information.
If greater access controls are not deemed necessary, applicable guidance cited in OMB
memorandum M–05–24 related to ‘‘shortterm’’ access to determine appropriate protections and limit/control contractor access.
Non-routine access, regardless of duration, to
HHS-controlled facilities, information systems, and/or sensitive HHS data/information.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES_2
Type of access
More stringent access procedures apply .........
YES.
More stringent access procedures apply .........
YES.
More stringent access procedures apply .........
YES.
If greater access controls are deemed necessary, more stringent access procedures
apply.
NO, but contractor staff must be provided with
the OPDIV documentation on the rules of
behavior and consequences for violation
[see 304.1300(f)].
YES.
Applicable guidance cited in OMB memorandum M–05–24 related to ‘‘occasional
visitors’’ to determine appropriate protections and limit/control contractor access.
NO, but contractor staff must be provided with
the OPDIV ‘‘occasional visitor’’ policy and
procedures [see 304.1300(g)].
(c) As part of the acquisition planning
process, the Project Officer shall
determine whether, based on the nature
of the requirement, contractor personnel
may require access to HHS-controlled
facilities and/or information systems,
including sensitive data/information, in
order to perform the contract/order
Statement of Work (SOW)/Performance
Work Statement (PWS). If contractor
access is required, the Project Officer
must assess, based on information
available at that point in the process, the
type, frequency, and duration of such
access. Following that determination,
the Project Officer shall consult with
OPDIV and/or local building and IT
security officials/staff, and officials/staff
involved with personnel security,
including the designated personnel
security representative, to determine
appropriate security requirements and,
as necessary, adjust project
requirements to minimize security and
access issues. The Project Officer shall
comply with HSPD–12 and the
following implementing guidance in
making these judgments and
determinations:
(1) OMB memorandum M–05–24,
Implementation of Homeland Security
Presidential Directive (HSPD) 12—
Policy for a Common Identification
Standard for Federal Employees and
Contractors, dated August 5, 2005.
(2) National Institutes of Standards
and Technology Federal Information
Processing Standard Publication (FIPS
PUB) 201), dated February 25, 2005,
which can be accessed at: https://
csrc.nist.gov/publications/.
(3) FAR (FAR 4.13 and 52.204–9).
(4) Any HHS and OPDIV
implementation thereof.
(d) If, as part of the acquisition
planning process, the Project Officer
determines that contractor access will
not be required, the Project Officer
should so state in the AP (or other
acquisition request document)—see
307.7101. If an AP does not address
access issues or indicates contractor
access is not required, and it appears an
acquisition may involve access
requirements, the Contracting Officer
shall request that the Project Officer
address or reconsider the initial access
determination. The Project Officer’s
determination shall be final.
(e) If HSPD–12’s more stringent access
procedures are expected to apply,
because access will be routine and of
long-term duration, or is routine and of
short-term duration, but greater access
controls are deemed necessary, the
Project Officer shall include the
following ‘‘HHS-Controlled Facilities
and Information Systems Security’’
notice in a separate, clearly designated
‘‘Security’’ section of the SOW/PWS.
(Note: The Contracting Officer is
responsible for tailoring the language in
the solicitation and contract/order in
accordance with the instructions
provided below.)
facility, logical access to an HHS-controlled
information system, and/or access to
sensitive data or information, the Contractor
and its employees shall comply with
Homeland Security Presidential Directive
(HSPD)-12, Policy for a Common
Identification Standard for Federal
Employees and Contractors; Office of
Management and Budget memorandum (M–
05–24); and Federal Information Processing
Standards Publication (FIPS PUB) Number
201; and with the personal identity
verification and investigation procedures
contained in the following documents:
(1) HHS Information Security Program
Policy.
(2) HHS Office of Security and Drug
Testing, Personnel Security/Suitability
Handbook, dated February 1, 2005.
(3) HHS HSPD–12 Policy Document, v. 2.0.
(4)
Note: Based upon information provided by
the Project Officer, the Contracting Officer
shall insert references to OPDIV and/or local
procedural guideline(s), if any; indicate if
they are readily accessible to the public; and,
if so, specify where they may be found. If
they are not readily accessible, the
Contracting Officer shall attach a copy to the
solicitation and contract and reference the
guideline(s) here.
(c) This contract/order will entail the
following position sensitivity level(s):
llllllllll.
Note: At the time of solicitation, based
upon information provided by the Project
Officer, the Contracting Officer shall specify
all known levels. If the position sensitivity
levels are not known at that time, the
Contracting Officer shall insert the words
‘‘To Be Determined at the Time of Award.’’
However, the Contracting Officer must
include the definitive position sensitivity
levels in the awarded contract/order.
(d) The personnel investigation procedures
for Contractor personnel require that the
Contractor prepare and submit background
check/investigation forms based on the type
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:54 Nov 25, 2009
Jkt 220001
‘‘XXX Security.
HHS-Controlled Facilities and Information
Systems Security
(a) To perform the work specified herein,
Contractor personnel are expected to have
routine (1) physical access to an HHScontrolled facility; (2) logical access to an
HHS-controlled information system; (3)
access to sensitive HHS data or information,
whether in an HHS-controlled information
system or in hard copy; or (4) any
combination of circumstances (1) through (3).
(b) To gain routine physical access to an HHS
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\27NOR2.SGM
27NOR2
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES_2
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 227 / Friday, November 27, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
of investigation required. The minimum
Government investigation for a non-sensitive
position is a National Agency Check and
Inquiries (NACI) with fingerprinting. More
restricted positions—i.e., those above nonsensitive, require more extensive
documentation and investigation.
Note: The Contracting Officer shall include
the following sentence in each solicitation as
the concluding sentence in paragraph (d)):
‘‘As part of its proposal, and if the
anticipated position sensitivity levels are
specified in paragraph (c) above, the Offeror
shall notify the Contracting Officer of (1) its
proposed personnel who will be subject to a
background check/investigation and (2)
whether any of its proposed personnel who
will work under the contract have previously
been the subject of national agency checks or
background investigations.’’
(The Contracting Officer shall include the
following sentence in each contract/order as
the concluding sentence in paragraph (d) in
lieu of the solicitation language: ‘‘The
Contractor shall notify the Contracting
Officer in advance when any new personnel,
who are subject to a background check/
investigation, will work under the contract
and if they have previously been the subject
of national agency checks or background
investigations.’’)
(e) Investigations are expensive and may
delay performance, regardless of the outcome
of the investigation. Delays associated with
rejections and consequent re-investigations
may not be excusable in accordance with the
FAR clause, Excusable Delays—see FAR
52.249–14.
Note: The Contracting Officer shall include
the following sentence in each solicitation as
the concluding sentence in paragraph (e):
‘‘Accordingly, if position sensitivity levels
are specified in paragraph (c), the Offeror
shall ensure that the employees it proposes
for work under this contract have a
reasonable chance for approval.’’ The
Contracting Officer shall include the
following sentence in each contract/order as
the concluding sentence in paragraph (e) in
lieu of the solicitation language:
‘‘Accordingly, the Contractor shall ensure
that any additional employees whose names
it submits for work under this contract have
a reasonable chance for approval.’’
(f) Typically, the Government investigates
personnel at no cost to the Contractor.
However, multiple investigations for the
same position may, at the Contracting
Officer’s discretion, justify reduction(s) in the
contract price of no more than the cost of the
additional investigation(s).
(g) The Contractor shall include language
similar to this ‘‘HHS-Controlled Facilities
and Information Systems Security’’ language
in all subcontracts that require subcontractor
personnel to have the same frequency and
duration of (1) physical access to an HHScontrolled facility; (2) logical access to an
HHS-controlled information system; (3)
access to sensitive HHS data/information,
whether in an HHS-controlled information
system or in hard copy; or (4) any
combination of circumstances (1) through (3).
(h) The Contractor shall direct inquiries,
including requests for forms and assistance,
to the Contracting Officer or designee.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:54 Nov 25, 2009
Jkt 220001
(i) Within 7 calendar days after the
Government’s final acceptance of the work
under this contract, or upon termination of
the contract, the Contractor shall return all
identification badges to the Contracting
Officer or designee.’’
(f) When a contractor’s access to HHScontrolled facilities, information
systems, and/or sensitive data/
information is of routine, but short-term
duration, and greater access controls are
not deemed necessary, the Contracting
Officer and Project Officer shall use the
applicable guidance cited in OMB
memorandum M–05–24, dated August
5, 2005, specifically Attachment A,
‘‘HSPD–12 Implementation Guidance
for Federal Departments and Agencies,’’
to ensure that—
(1) Adequate OPDIV access controls
are applied, and a contractor is granted
only limited/controlled access to
facilities, systems, and/or sensitive data/
information, consistent with the
requirements of the acquisition;
(2) Contractor staff are provided with
clear OPDIV documentation on the rules
of behavior and consequences of their
violation before being granted access to
facilities, systems, and/or sensitive data/
information;
(3) Contractor security violations are
documented and reported to the
appropriate OPDIV authority within 24
hours of their occurrence; and
(4) Identity credentials issued to
contractor staff are visually and
electronically distinguishable from
credentials issued to individuals to
whom the more stringent HSPD–12
access procedures apply.
Note to paragraph (f): However, as
indicated in 304.1300(e), if the Project Officer
determines greater access controls are
necessary, an OPDIV may protect and control
facilities, information systems, and/or
sensitive data information in accordance
with HSPD–12’s more stringent access
procedures.
(g) When a contractor’s access to
HHS-controlled facilities, information
systems, and/or sensitive data/
information is not routine, regardless of
duration, the Contracting Officer and
Project Officer shall use the applicable
guidance cited in OMB memorandum
M–05–24, dated August 5, 2005,
specifically Attachment A, ‘‘HSPD–12
Implementation Guidance for Federal
Departments and Agencies,’’ related to
‘‘occasional visitors’’ to determine
appropriate protections and limit/
control contractor access to ensure
that—
(1) Adequate OPDIV access controls
are applied, and the contractor is
granted only limited/controlled access
to facilities, systems, and/or sensitive
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
62413
data/information, consistent with the
requirements of the acquisition; and
(2) OPDIV visitor policies, including
contractor personnel identity badging
requirements, are enforced and are
provided to the contractor.
Subpart 304.70—Acquisition
Instrument Identification Numbering
System
304.7000
Scope of subpart.
This subpart prescribes policy and
procedures for assigning identification
numbers to contracts and related
instruments, including solicitation
documents, purchase orders, and
delivery orders. The HCA (nondelegable) shall establish a numbering
system within an OPDIV.
304.7001
Numbering acquisitions.
(a) Acquisitions which require
numbering. Contracting activities shall
number the following acquisitions and
related instruments in accordance with
the system prescribed in paragraphs (b),
(c) and (d) of this section:
(1) Contracts, including letter
contracts, that exceed the micropurchase threshold or the acquisition of
personal property or nonpersonal
services. (Note: The Contracting Officer
shall also assign the letter contract
number to the superseding definitized
contract.)
(2) Basic ordering agreements (BOAs)
and BPAs.
(3) Requests for proposals and
invitations for bids.
(4) Requests for quotations.
(b) Numbering system for contracts.
The Contracting Officer shall assign a
number consisting of the following to all
contracts which require numbering
(paragraph (a)(1) of this section):
(1) The three-digit identification code
(HHS) of the Department.
(2) A one-digit alphabetic
identification code of the servicing
agency.
AHRQ: A
BARDA: O
CDC: D
CMS: M
FDA: F
HRSA: H
IHS: I
NIH: N
PSC: P
SAMHSA: S
(3) The three-digit numeric
identification code assigned by ASFR/
OGAPA/DA to the contracting office
within the servicing agency.
(4) A four-digit fiscal year designation
(e.g., 2009, 2010).
(5) A five-digit alphanumeric tracking
number, the content of which is
E:\FR\FM\27NOR2.SGM
27NOR2
62414
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 227 / Friday, November 27, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
determined by the contracting office
within the servicing agency.
(6) A one-digit code describing the
type of contract action. For example, the
National Cancer Institute, NIH, may
number its first contract for fiscal year
2009 as HHSN261200900001C. (Note:
When more than one code may apply in
a specific situation, or for additional
codes, refer to the DCIS Users’ Manual
or consult with the cognizant DCIS
coordinator/focal point for guidance on
which code governs.):
A
Commercial Item Acquisitions (including
purchases using simplified acquisition
procedures in accordance with the FAR
subpart 13.5 Test program)
C New Definitive Contract
P Purchases using simplified acquisition
procedures (other than commercial items)
I IDC
O BOA
B BPA
F Facilities Contract
U Contracts placed with or through other
Government departments, GSA contracts,
or against mandatory source contracts such
as AbilityOne and Federal Prison
Industries (UNICOR)
L Lease Agreement
W Government-wide Acquisition Contract
(GWAC)
E Letter Contract
G Federal Supply Schedule
M Micro-purchase
Q Multi-agency contract
(c) Numbering system for orders. The
Contracting Officer shall assign order
numbers (e.g., task order numbers) to
orders issued under contracts. The order
number shall be up to a seventeen-digit
number consisting of the following:
(1) The three-digit identification code
(HHS) of the Department.
(2) A one-digit numeric identification
code of the servicing agency:
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES_2
AHRQ: A
BARDA: O
CDC: D
CMS: M
FDA: F
HRSA: H
IHS: I
NIH: N
PSC: P
SAMHSA: S
Subpart 304.71—Review and Approval
of Proposed Contract Actions
304.7100
Policy.
(a) The HCA (non-delegable) shall
establish review and approval
procedures for proposed contract
actions to ensure that—
(1) Contractual documents are in
conformance with law, established
policies and procedures, and sound
business practices;
(2) Contract awards properly reflect
the mutual understanding of the parties;
and
(3) The Contracting Officer is
informed of deficiencies and items of
questionable acceptability, and takes
corrective action.
(b) The HCA shall designate
acquisition officials to serve as
reviewers. Each HCA shall establish the
criteria for determining which contracts
to review.
(c) Officials assigned responsibility
for review and approval of contract
actions shall possess qualifications in
the field of acquisition commensurate
with the level of review performed.
However, if an official is to serve as the
Contracting Officer and sign the
contractual document, an appropriate
official at least one level above the
Contracting Officer shall perform the
review and approval function.
(d) The Contracting Officer shall
review all contractual documents,
regardless of dollar value, prior to award
to ensure the requirements of paragraph
(a) of this section are met.
SUBCHAPTER B—COMPETITION AND
ACQUISITION PLANNING
(3) The three-digit numeric
identification code assigned by ASFR/
OGAPA/DA to the contracting office
within the servicing agency.
(4) An alphanumeric tracking number,
up to ten characters, the content of
which is determined by the contracting
office within the servicing agency.
(d) Numbering system for
solicitations. The HCA is responsible for
developing a numbering system for
solicitations listed in paragraphs (a)(3)
and (a)(4) of this section.
(e) Assignment of identification codes.
ASFR/OGAPA/DA shall assign each
VerDate Nov<24>2008
contracting office a three-digit
identification code. HCAs shall request
from ASFR/OGAPA/DA the assignment
of codes for newly established
contracting offices. A listing of the
contracting office identification codes
currently in use is contained in the
DCIS Users’ Manual, available at
https://dcis.hhs.gov.
13:54 Nov 25, 2009
Jkt 220001
PART 305—PUBLICIZING CONTRACT
ACTIONS
Subpart 305.2—Synopsis of Proposed
Contract Actions
Sec.
305.202 Exceptions.
305.205 Special situations.
Subpart 305.3—Synopses of Contract
Awards
305.303 Announcement of contract awards.
Subpart 305.5—Paid Advertisements
305.502 Authority.
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 40 U.S.C. 486(c).
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
Subpart 305.2—Synopsis of Proposed
Contract Actions
305.202
Exceptions.
(b) When the Contracting Officer
deems an advance notice is not
appropriate or reasonable, the
Contracting Officer shall prepare a
memorandum citing all pertinent facts
and details and send it through
appropriate acquisition channels,
including the HCA, to Associate DAS
for Acquisition requesting an exception
to synopsizing. The Associate DAS for
Acquisition shall review the request and
decide whether an exception is
appropriate and reasonable. If it is, the
Associate DAS for Acquisition shall take
the necessary coordinating actions
required by FAR 5.202(b). ASFR/
OGAPA/DA shall promptly notify the
contracting office of the Associate DAS
for Acquisition’s determination on the
request.
305.205
Special situations.
(a) An OPDIV may issue an advance
notice, entitled ‘‘Research and
Development Sources Sought,’’ in
Federal Business Opportunities
(FedBizOpps), in accordance with the
requirements of FAR 5.205(a). The
primary purpose of an R & D Sources
Sought notice is to identify all potential
sources, regardless of organizational
type and size classification, and
determine their capabilities to fulfill a
potential Government requirement. The
notice is not intended to solicit
technical, scientific, or business
information for project planning
purposes regarding existing or possible
solutions. In the latter instance, a
Request for Information (RFI) may be
used—see FAR 15.201(e) and
315.201(e).
(1) When using an R & D Sources
Sought notice, an OPDIV shall not
request that potential sources provide
more than the minimum information
necessary—see FAR 10.001(b), to
determine whether they have the
apparent capability to perform a
requirement and, therefore, whether
they should be included in any future
competition. The notice and the
information received shall not be used
to determine how well respondents can
perform a requirement, which can only
be evaluated in response to a
solicitation. Accordingly, the notice
shall not be used to—
(i) Obtain capability statements that
are evaluated and determined
acceptable or unacceptable;
(ii) Require cost/price proposals or
detailed technical solutions;
(iii) Identify a prospective sole source;
or
E:\FR\FM\27NOR2.SGM
27NOR2
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 227 / Friday, November 27, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES_2
(iv) Exclude small business concerns.
(2) While not the primary intent of an
R & D Sources Sought notice, in
addition to seeking information
regarding all potential qualified R & D
sources, the notice may request that
respondents provide information
regarding their organizational size
classification. For example, the notice
may ask respondents to identify
whether they are small businesses;
Historically Underutilized Business
(HUB) Zone small businesses; servicedisabled, veteran-owned small
businesses; 8(a) small businesses;
veteran-owned small businesses;
woman-owned small businesses; or
small disadvantaged businesses in order
to determine the appropriate acquisition
method, including whether a set-aside is
possible. However, such a notice shall
not be used solely to determine the size
classification of respondents for a
proposed R & D acquisition. In such
instances, a ‘‘Small Business Sources
Sought’’ notice may be used (see
319.202–2), in lieu of the procedures in
this section.
(3) OPDIVs shall follow the standard
HHS instructions for completing an R &
D Sources Sought notice. The template
for the notice is available on the ASFR/
OGAPA/DA Internet Web site. The
Contracting Officer shall post the notice
in FedBizOpps by selecting and
completing a Sources Sought notice,
accessible on the FedBizOpps ‘‘Notices’’
page at: https://www.fedbizopps.gov.
Additional information may be included
in the notice in accordance with OPDIV
procedures. The Contracting Officer
shall document, in the form of a
memorandum to the file, the results of
the review by technical personnel of
information submitted in response to
the notice, including whether each
respondent appears to be capable of
performing the requirement. The
Contracting Officer shall attach a copy
of the analysis provided by the technical
personnel to the memorandum.
(4) In instances where a sufficient
number of sources has not been
identified to compete for a non-R & D
project, an OPDIV may use the
procedures specified in 310.001,
including the issuance of a ‘‘Sources
Sought’’ notice, as appropriate, in lieu
of the procedures in this section.
Subpart 305.3—Synopses of Contract
Awards
305.303 Announcement of contract
awards.
Assistant Secretary for Legislation
(OASL) (Congressional Liaison). The
Contracting Officer shall provide a copy
of the contract or award document face
page to the referenced office prior to the
day of award or in sufficient time to
allow OASL to make an announcement
by 5 p.m. Washington, DC time on the
day of award. The Contracting Officer
may also provide notification by e-mail
or facsimile.
Subpart 305.5—Paid Advertisements
305.502
Authority.
The Contracting Officer may advertise
or place notices in newspapers and
periodicals to announce that the
contracting office is seeking proposals,
quotations, or bids, as appropriate.
PART 306—COMPETITION
REQUIREMENTS
Subpart 306.2—Full and Open Competition
after Exclusion of Sources
Sec.
306.202 Establishing or maintaining
alternative sources.
Subpart 306.3—Other Than Full and Open
Competition
306.302 Circumstances permitting other
than full and open competition.
306.302–1 Only one responsible source and
no other supplies or services will satisfy
agency requirements.
306.302–7 Public interest.
306.303 Justifications.
306.303–1 Requirements.
306.304 Approval of the justification.
Subpart 306.5—Competition Advocates
306.501
306.502
Requirement.
Duties and responsibilities.
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 40 U.S.C. 486(c).
Subpart 306.2—Full and Open
Competition after Exclusion of
Sources
306.202 Establishing or maintaining
alternative sources.
(a) The reference to the agency head
in FAR 6.202 (a) shall mean the
appropriate Competition Advocate (CA)
cited in 306.501.
(b)(1) The Contracting Officer shall
prepare the required determination and
findings (D & F) based on the data
provided by program personnel. The
appropriate CA (non-delegable) shall
sign the D & F.
(a) Public Announcement. The
Contracting Officer shall report awards
over $3.5 million, not otherwise exempt
under FAR 5.303, to the Office of the
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:54 Nov 25, 2009
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
62415
Subpart 306.3—Other Than Full and
Open Competition
306.302 Circumstances permitting other
than full and open competition.
306.302–1 Only one responsible source
and no other supplies or services will
satisfy agency requirements.
(a)(2)(iv) Follow-on contracts for the
continuation of R & D studies on longterm social and health programs,
research studies, or clinical trials may
be deemed to be available only from the
original source when it is likely that
award to any other source would result
in unacceptable delays in fulfilling
HHS’ or the OPDIV’s requirements.
(b) Application.
(5) when the head of the sponsoring
program office has determined that the
activity must acquire only specified
makes or models of technical equipment
or parts to meet the activity’s program
responsibility to test and evaluate
certain kinds and types of products, and
only one source is available. (Note: This
criterion is limited to testing and
evaluation purposes only and not for
initial outfitting or repetitive
acquisitions. Project Officers shall
support the use of this criterion with
citations from their agency’s legislation
and the technical rationale for the item
of equipment required.)
306.302–7
Public interest.
(a) Authority.
(2) Agency head, in this instance,
means the Secretary.
(c) Limitations. The Contracting
Officer shall prepare a written request
for approval and provide it through
appropriate acquisition channels,
including the HCA and Associate DAS
for Acquisition, to the Secretary. The
request shall include a D & F for the
Secretary’s signature that contains all
pertinent information to support the
justification for exercising the
exemption to competition and a letter
for the Secretary’s signature notifying
Congress of the determination to award
a contract under the authority of 41
U.S.C. 253(c)(7).
306.303
Justifications.
306.303–1
Requirements.
(b) The responsible Program Office
must provide a written justification
whenever it requests that goods or
services be acquired without obtaining
full and open competition. The
justification must be submitted with the
AP or other acquisition request
document—see Subpart 307.71. The
Project Officer has responsibility for
preparing the justification with
E:\FR\FM\27NOR2.SGM
27NOR2
62416
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 227 / Friday, November 27, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
assistance, as necessary, from the
Contracting Officer.
(1) Justifications for acquisitions at or
below the simplified acquisition
threshold may be in the form of a
paragraph or paragraphs contained in
the requisition or other acquisition
request document. Justifications for
acquisitions in excess of the simplified
acquisition threshold shall be in the
form of a separate, self-contained
document, prepared in accordance with
FAR 6.303 and 306.303, and titled
‘‘Justification for Other Than Full and
Open Competition’’ (JOFOC). HHS
requires use of a standard format for a
JOFOC. The template for the
justification is available on the ASFR/
OGAPA/DA Internet Web site.
Additional information may be included
in the JOFOC template in accordance
with OPDIV procedures.
(2) Regardless of the dollar amount of
the acquisition, justifications shall—
(i) Fully describe what is to be
acquired;
(ii) Provide a specific explanation of
why it is not feasible to obtain full and
open competition;
(iii) Be supported by verifiable facts,
rather than untested or unsubstantiated
opinions or conclusions; and
(iv) Be written in a manner to permit
an individual without technical
knowledge of the requirement to
understand the supporting rationale.
(3) Preliminary arrangements with, or
verbal or written commitments to, a
proposed sole-source contractor shall be
avoided given the statutory requirement
to obtain full and open competition to
the maximum extent practicable.
(4) Justifications for orders to be
placed under FSS contracts that limit
consideration of contractors shall
comply with FAR 8.405–6 and 308.405–
6.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES_2
306.304
Approval of the justification.
Certification, concurrence, and
approval requirements. The Project
Officer, the Project Officer’s immediate
supervisor, the head of the sponsoring
program office, and the Contracting
Officer shall certify that the justification
is accurate and complete by signing the
JOFOC. For acquisitions in the dollar
amount cited in FAR 6.304(a)(2) through
(a)(4), the CCO, if applicable, and the
HCA shall indicate their review of, and
concurrence with, the justification by
signing the JOFOC.
(a) The approving officials for JOFOCs
are as follows:
(1) The Contracting Officer shall
exercise this approval authority unless a
higher approval level is required by
OPDIV procedures.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:54 Nov 25, 2009
Jkt 220001
(2) The CAs are listed in 306.501. This
approval authority is not delegable.
(3) The CA shall exercise this
approval authority, except where the
individual designated as the CA does
not meet the requirements of FAR 6.304
(a)(3)(ii). This approval authority is not
delegable.
(4) HHS’ SPE is the Associate DAS for
Acquisition.
(c) A class justification shall be
processed in the same manner as an
individual justification. A class
justification may consist of contracts/
orders for the same or related supplies
and services or other contract/order
actions that require essentially identical
justifications.
Subpart 306.5—Competition
Advocates
306.501
PART 307—ACQUISITION PLANNING
Requirement.
The HHS CA is the Director, Strategic
Acquisition Service, PSC. The CAs for
each of HHS’ contracting activities are
as follows:
AHRQ: Director, Office of Performance
Accountability, Resources and Technology
BARDA: Chief of Mission Support and
Acquisition Policy
CDC: Chief Information Officer
CMS: Chief Operating Officer
FDA: Deputy Commissioner for
Administration
HRSA: Associate Administrator, Office of
Operations
IHS: Director, Office of Management Services
NIH: Senior Scientific Advisor for Extramural
Research, Office of Extramural Research
(R&D) and Senior Advisor to the Director
(other than R&D)
PSC: Director, Strategic Acquisition
Service
SAMHSA: Executive Officer
306.502
Duties and responsibilities.
(a) Each OPDIV CA shall prepare an
annual Competition Advocate Report
(CAR), covering the prior fiscal year, in
accordance with the requirements of
FAR 6.502(b)(2) and 306.502(b), and
provide it to the HHS CA not later than
November 16 of each year or the next
business day, if the due date falls on a
non-business day. NIH’s two CAs shall
prepare and sign a joint report covering
their respective areas of responsibility.
(b) HHS requires that each CAR be
prepared in a standard format. The
template for the report is available on
the ASFR/OGAPA/DA Internet Web
site. As long as the standard headings
are included and required information
is addressed, the OPDIV may include
additional information in accordance
with OPDIV procedures.
(1) The CAR shall be based on
information and data for all acquisitions
that exceed the micro-purchase
threshold for the applicable fiscal year,
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4701
unless otherwise noted in the standard
format.
(2) Each OPDIV CA shall obtain the
information and data needed for
preparation of the CAR from the
responsible HCA and/or the CCO, as
appropriate, who shall assist the CA in
preparing the CAR.
(3) Prior to forwarding the CAR to the
HHS CA, each OPDIV CA shall provide
the CAR to the responsible HCA, who
shall review and approve it for accuracy
and completeness.
(c) The HHS CA shall consolidate all
OPDIV CARs and provide an HHS-wide
CAR that addresses all requirements of
FAR 6.502(b) to the HHS SPE and the
CAO by December 20 of each year or the
next business day, if the due date falls
on a non-business day.
Sfmt 4700
Subpart 307.1—Acquisition Planning
Sec.
307.104 General procedures.
307.104–70 Acquisition strategy.
307.104–71 Purpose and timing.
307.105 Contents of written acquisition
plans.
307.108–70 Telecommuting of contractor
employees.
Subpart 307.70—Considerations in
Selecting an Award Instrument.
307.7000 Scope of subpart.
307.7001 Distinction between acquisition
and assistance.
307.7002 Procedures.
Subpart 307.71—Acquisition Plan.
307.7100 Scope of subpart.
307.7101 Policy.
307.7102 Content.
307.7103 Format.
307.7104 Review and certification.
307.7105 Transmittal.
307.7106 Acquisition milestones.
307.7107 Responsibilities.
307.7108 Statement of work.
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 40 U.S.C. 486(c).
Subpart 307.1—Acquisition Planning
307.104
General procedures.
(a) Each contracting activity shall
prepare an Annual Acquisition Plan
(AAP) as far in advance of each fiscal
year as possible, in accordance with the
following:
(1) The AAP shall contain all
anticipated acquisition actions for the
coming fiscal year that exceed the
simplified acquisition threshold,
including new acquisitions and
contract/order modifications. The AAP
must include—
(i) The aggregate dollars planned for
simplified acquisitions by quarter;
(ii) Any long lead-time acquisitions
that will be awarded in future fiscal
years (see paragraph (c) below); and
E:\FR\FM\27NOR2.SGM
27NOR2
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES_2
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 227 / Friday, November 27, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
(iii) Proposed multi-agency and intraagency contracts—see 317.70.
(2) The HCA or the CCO, as
appropriate, shall prepare the AAP and
obtain the information needed for its
preparation from the responsible
program planning/budget office and/or
the program offices.
(3) Contracting activities shall use the
AAP for reporting purposes and
workload scheduling and monitoring.
(4) The HCA/CCO and Small Business
Specialist (SBS) in the Office of Small
and Disadvantaged Business Utilization
(OSDBU) shall review the AAP at least
quarterly, with input from the cognizant
program office, and modify it, as
appropriate, during the fiscal year, with
updated information, particularly
regarding the specific acquisition
method the contracting activity plans to
use.
(5) HHS requires use of a standard
format for an AAP. The template for the
plan is available on the ASFR/OGAPA/
DA Internet Web site. For the data
elements specified in the AAP format,
the HCA/CCO may include information
in addition to that required by the
standard instructions accompanying the
format.
(b) As early as possible following
completion of the AAP, the Contracting
Officer shall initiate discussions with
the assigned Project Officer, in
consultation with the OSDBU SBS, for
each action that exceeds the simplified
acquisition threshold. As appropriate,
the discussions shall include—
(1) Determining the intended
acquisition strategy and contract/order
type, including the use of options;
(2) Reviewing the SOW, if available,
for adequacy and ensuring that a PWS
is used for services, where practicable;
(3) Evaluating the potential for, and
maximizing the use of, competitive
procedures;
(4) Performing market research,
identifying potential sources, and
determining set-aside potential and
small business subcontracting
opportunities;
(5) Assessing the availability of
commercial items;
(6) Determining required clearances/
approvals and supporting
documentation; and
(7) Preparing an acquisition milestone
schedule;
(8) Determining the best multi- or
intra-agency contracting activity to
assist in awarding a contract on the
requiring organization’s behalf, if
applicable; and
(9) Determining in the case of direct
ordering that the chosen acquisition
vehicle is the best way to obtain the
required product or service, if a vehicle
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:54 Nov 25, 2009
Jkt 220001
other than those listed in 317.7002(b) is
proposed.
(c) The HCA or designee (not lower
than the CCO) shall establish standard
lead-times for processing various types
of acquisitions and applicable fiscal
year deadlines for receipt of
requirements to allow for well-planned
and timely awards. The Project Officer
shall initiate planning, to the extent
possible, for certain requirements, such
as major capital IT investments, major
capital construction investments, and R
& D projects that require peer review, at
least 24 months before planned award,
given the clearance/approval
requirements and lead-time required for
such complex acquisitions.
(d) The outcome of the discussions
referenced in paragraph (b) above shall
be an agreement concerning the
acquisition approach and
documentation required. For those
actions that require development of a
written AP—see 307.7101, for which the
Project Officer has ultimate
responsibility, these discussions shall
also result in an agreement
concerning—
(1) Which elements of the AP the
Contracting Officer will assist the
Project Officer in preparing; and
(2) The date (as specified in the
milestone schedule) the Project Officer
will provide the AP to the CCO or
designee.
307.104–70
Acquisition strategy.
Program and Project Managers
responsible for major IT capital
investments (and for any other
investments designated by the HHS CIO,
DASFMP, the CAO, or the cognizant
HCA) shall prepare an acquisition
strategy using the HHS acquisition
strategy template. The template for the
acquisition strategy is available on the
ASFR/OGAPA/DA Internet Web site.
Program and Project Managers must
initiate the acquisition strategy for major
IT capital investments as part of the
planned investment’s business case,
usually during the Enterprise
Performance Life Cycle concept phase.
307.104–71
Purpose and timing.
(a) The purpose of an acquisition
strategy is to describe the overall
approach for acquiring capabilities
needed to fulfill investment/
programmatic objectives. Acquisition
strategy development requires
identification of issues and risks that
might impact an acquisition(s) to allow
early action to eliminate or mitigate the
issues and risks.
(b) An acquisition strategy differs
from an AP with respect to the timing
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
62417
of its development and the level of
detail required.
(1) An acquisition strategy is
established at the inception (concept
phase) of an investment/acquisition to
support the business case, identify and
mitigate risks, and begin the acquisition
planning process. An acquisition
strategy addresses the major issues
surrounding business objectives,
competitive forces, and various risks
that need to be considered.
(2) An acquisition strategy is a living
document used throughout the
investment’s life-cycle. It should be
continuously updated with the active
involvement of the Program or Project
Manager and the Contracting Officer at
appropriate points, as plans for the
investment/acquisition mature. An
acquisition strategy ultimately will
result in an AP—see 307.71.
(3) An AP, which is required to
support proposed acquisitions expected
to exceed $500,000 (inclusive of
options, with certain exceptions)—see
307.7101, is developed closer to the
time of solicitation. The AP addresses
not only those issues in the acquisition
strategy, but also the tactical details of
how the acquisition will be executed.
307.105
plans.
Contents of written acquisition
FAR 7.105 specifies the content
requirements of a written AP. Subpart
307.71 incorporates and supplements
those requirements.
307.108–70 Telecommuting of contractor
employees.
(a) SOWs/PWSs shall permit offerors
or contractors to specify their own
place(s) of performance (hence
authorize their employees to
telecommute), except as follows:
(1) The Project Officer may restrict
place of performance (hence restrict an
offeror’s or contractor’s telecommuting)
for any part of an SOW/PWS, after
determining that the work or any
portion thereof must be performed at a
specified place of performance; or
security would be compromised. The
Project Officer must document this
determination in writing and send a
copy of the determination, along with
the SOW/PWS, to the Contracting
Officer. The Project Officer must also
address in an HHS AP (or other
acquisition request document) any
performance requirements or security
considerations that restrict place of
performance—see 307.71.
(2) In accordance with FAR 7.108(a),
if the Contracting Officer concurs with
the Project Officer’s determination in
(a)(1) above, then the Contracting
Officer must sign the Project Officer’s
E:\FR\FM\27NOR2.SGM
27NOR2
62418
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 227 / Friday, November 27, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
determination; include it in the official
contract file; and specify any
prohibition against telecommuting in
the solicitation and resultant contract.
(3) In accordance with FAR 7.108(a),
if the Contracting Officer decides to
restrict a place of performance that the
Project Officer did not restrict, then the
Contracting Officer must document in
writing the determination to preclude
telecommuting in part or in whole;
include the determination in the official
contract file; and specify any
prohibition against telecommuting in
the solicitation and resultant contract.
(b) If the Contracting Officer disagrees
with the Project Officer’s determination
in (a)(1) above, then the Contracting
Officer shall return both the SOW/PWS
and determination to the Project Officer
for further consideration.
(c) The Contracting Officer shall
ensure that authorized telecommuting of
contractor employees does not result in
increased cost or price to the
Government.
Subpart 307.70—Considerations in
Selecting an Award Instrument
307.7000
Scope of subpart.
This subpart provides guidance on the
appropriate selection of award
instruments to fulfill program needs
consistent with 31 U.S.C. 6301–6308.
This subpart explains the use of the
contract as the award instrument for
acquisition relationships and a grant or
cooperative agreement as instruments
for financial assistance relationships.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES_2
307.7001 Distinction between acquisition
and assistance.
(a) 31 U.S.C. 6301–6308 requires the
use of contracts to acquire property or
services for the direct benefit or use of
the Government and grants or
cooperative agreements to transfer
money, property, services, or anything
of value to eligible entities to
accomplish a public purpose of support
or stimulation authorized by Federal
statute.
(b) OPDIVs shall use a contract as the
legal instrument to reflect a relationship
between the Government and an entity
whenever the—
(1) Principal purpose of the
instrument is the acquisition, by
purchase, lease, or barter, of property or
services for the direct benefit or use of
the Government; or
(2) Government determines in a
certain situation that specific needs can
be satisfied best by using the acquisition
process. However, this authority does
not permit circumventing the criteria for
use of acquisition or assistance
instruments. Use of this authority is
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:54 Nov 25, 2009
Jkt 220001
restricted to extraordinary
circumstances and requires the
Associate DAS for Acquisition’s prior
approval.
(c) OPDIVs shall use a grant or
cooperative agreement as the legal
instrument to reflect a relationship
between the Government and an entity
whenever the principal purpose of the
relationship is the transfer of money,
property, services, or anything of value
to accomplish a public purpose of
support or stimulation authorized by
Federal statute.
(1) OPDIVs shall use a grant when no
substantial programmatic involvement
is anticipated between the Government
and the recipient during performance of
the contemplated activity.
(2) OPDIVs shall use a cooperative
agreement when substantial
programmatic involvement is
anticipated between the Government
and the recipient during performance of
the contemplated activity.
(d) As a general rule, OPDIVs shall
use contracts for the following purposes:
(1) Evaluation (including research of
an evaluative nature) of the performance
of Government programs or projects or
grantee activity initiated by the funding
agency for its direct benefit or use.
(2) Technical assistance rendered to
the Government, or on behalf of the
Government, to any third party,
including those receiving grants or
cooperative agreements.
(3) Surveys, studies, and research
which provide specific information
desired by the Government for its direct
activities, or for dissemination to the
public.
(4) Consulting services or professional
services of all kinds if provided to the
Government or, on behalf of the
Government, to any third party.
(5) Training projects where the
Government selects the individuals or
specific groups whose members are to
be trained or specifies the content of the
curriculum (not applicable to fellowship
awards).
(6) Production of publications or
audiovisual materials the Government
requires primarily for the conduct of its
direct operations.
(7) Design or development of items for
Government use or pursuant to agency
definition or specifications.
(8) Conferences conducted on the
Government’s behalf.
(9) Generation of management
information or other data for
Government use.
307.7002
Procedures.
(a) OPDIV program officials shall use
existing budget and program planning
procedures to propose new activities
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
and major changes in ongoing programs.
OPDIV program officials shall meet with
the HCA and the Chief Grants
Management Officer, or their designees,
as necessary, to determine whether
award is to be made through the
acquisition or assistance process. This
determination shall normally occur
prior to the time when the AAP is
reviewed and approved so that the AAP
will reflect all known proposed contract
actions. The HCA shall fully document
a shift from one award instrument to
another in the appropriate files to show
a fundamental change in program
purpose that unequivocally justifies the
rationale for the shift.
(b) The Contracting Officer shall
confirm the appropriateness of the use
of the contract instrument when
reviewing the AP or other acquisition
request document.
(c) OPDIVs shall ensure that the
choice of instrument is in accordance
with 31 U.S.C. 6301–6308 and
applicable HHS policies. If, however,
there are major individual transactions
or programs which contain elements of
both acquisition and assistance in such
a way that they cannot be characterized
as having a principal purpose of one or
the other instrument, OPDIVs shall
obtain guidance from ASFR/OGAPA/
DA, through appropriate acquisition
channels, including the HCA, before
proceeding with a determination.
(d) Any public notice, program
announcement, solicitation, or request
for applications or proposals, or request
for quotations shall indicate whether the
intended relationship will be one of
acquisition or financial assistance and
specify the award instrument the OPDIV
will use.
Subpart 307.71—Acquisition Plan
307.7100
Scope of subpart.
FAR 7.102 requires acquisition
planning for all acquisitions. This
subpart establishes: (a) when a written
AP is required; (b) its contents and
format; and (c) the need for review of
the AP to certify that it is accurate,
complete, and in the proper format. This
subpart also establishes the
documentation requirements for those
acquisitions not requiring an AP.
307.7101
Policy.
(a) An AP is required for all
acquisitions, to be placed by an HHS
contracting office, expected to exceed
$500,000 (inclusive of options) with the
following exceptions:
(1) Letter contracts.
(2) Unsolicited proposals.
(3) Regulated utility services available
from only one source.
E:\FR\FM\27NOR2.SGM
27NOR2
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES_2
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 227 / Friday, November 27, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
(4) Proposals under the Small
Business Innovative Research (SBIR)
and Small Business Technology
Transfer (STTR) programs.
(5) Acquisition of commercial items/
services—see FAR 2.101, including
orders placed under FSS contracts
meeting the definition of a commercial
item/service, and not exceeding $5.5
million [$11 million for acquisitions as
described in FAR 13.500(e)].
(6) Task orders or delivery orders of
any dollar amount placed under—
(i) An IDIQ contract, other than a
GWAC; or
(ii) A BPA, provided there is an
approved acquisition planning
document for the original action, and
there is no significant deviation from
that plan.
(7) Orders of any dollar amount
placed under HHS-wide strategic
sourcing vehicles.
(8) Contract/order modifications
that—
(i) Exercise options;
(ii) Only provide additional funding;
or
(iii) Make changes authorized by the
Changes clause.
(9) Assisted acquisitions processed
pursuant to an interagency agreement.
However, the OPDIV must comply with
the requirements specified in 317.5
Interagency Agreements under the
Economy Act and 317.70, Multi-agency
and Intra-agency Contracts.
(b) In urgent or other justifiable cases,
such as an emergency acquisition—see
FAR Part 18, the HCA may waive, in
writing, the requirement for completion
of an AP. An HCA shall not approve a
waiver request based on the lack of
advance planning.
(1) The Project Officer, the Project
Officer’s immediate supervisor, the head
of the sponsoring program office, the
Contracting Officer, and other
signatories shall sign the waiver request
in accordance with OPDIV policies. In
OPDIVs where a CCO(s) is designated,
as defined in 302.101, the cognizant
CCO also shall sign the waiver request.
(2) HHS has established a standard
format for preparing an AP waiver
request. The template for the waiver
request is available on the ASFR/
OGAPA/DA Internet Web site.
Contracting activities shall use this
format when requesting a waiver.
(3) The OPDIV shall provide ASFR/
OGAPA/DA a copy of any approved
waiver request within 5 business days
after HCA approval.
(c) For those acquisitions not
requiring an AP, other than assisted
acquisitions processed pursuant to an
interagency agreement—see 317.5 and
317.70, the Project Officer shall provide
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:54 Nov 25, 2009
Jkt 220001
an acquisition request document (e.g.,
memorandum, requisition, or other form
of transmittal) to the CCO or designee,
requesting completion of the required
action. The request must include, as
applicable: a SOW/PWS (including
deliverables and reporting
requirements); a certified funding
document; source selection strategy and
criteria; necessary clearances, approvals,
and justifications (e.g., a JOFOC); a
milestone schedule; and an independent
Government cost estimate.) In addition,
OPDIVs shall use the content
requirements of the AP as a reference in
determining what other information and
documentation is necessary to support
the intended acquisition. Alternatively,
OPDIVs may prescribe use of an AP for
acquisitions excepted under
307.7101(a)(i) through (a)(viii).
307.7102
Content.
In accordance with 307.105, the FAR,
HHSAR, and other Federal requirements
that OPDIVs must consider in
developing an AP, as well as its format,
are stipulated in 307.7103. An AP shall
address each applicable element. As
indicated in the instructions, elements
that are not applicable to an individual
acquisition shall be marked ‘‘N/A.’’ The
scope and depth of an AP may vary
depending on the nature, complexity,
and estimated cost of the proposed
acquisition. As a result of new or
revised FAR requirements or other
Federal directives, the—
(a) HCA or designee may make any
needed interim changes to the AP;
(b) HCA or designee shall notify
ASFR/OGAPA/DA of the need for
revision(s) to the acquisition; and
(c) ASFR/OGAPA/DA shall update
the AP, which would supersede any
interim HCA (or designee) changes
made to the acquisition plan for future
acquisitions.
307.7103
Format.
(a) HHS has established a standard
format for preparing an AP. The
template for the AP is available on the
ASFR/OGAPA/DA Internet Web site.
(b) OPDIVs may use the prescribed
format without modification or use it as
a guideline, as long as the format used
by the OPDIV complies with the
requirements specified in subparagraphs
(c) and (d) below.
(c) An AP must consist of seven (7)
parts with standard headings, as
follows:
Part I Transmittal and Approval Form.
Part II Summary Sheet.
Part III Project Considerations and
Information.
Part IV Clearance/Approval Checklist.
Part V Acquisition Milestone Schedule.
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
62419
Part VI Independent Government Cost
Estimate.
Part VII Attachments.
(d) Within each of the seven parts,
there are required components that an
OPDIV cannot modify and specific areas
where OPDIVs can make changes. The
table in the Requirements and
Responsibilities section of the AP cites
the titles, paragraph/subparagraph
headings, narrative, and other
requirements that must appear in each
part of an AP in the specified format, as
well as permissible modifications.
307.7104
Review and certification.
Before the Project Officer transmits
the AP to the CCO or designee—see
307.7105, the head of the sponsoring
program office (typically a Division
Director or equivalent), Project Officer,
Funds Certification Official, Contracting
Officer, and other signatories in
accordance with OPDIV policies, shall
review the AP and certify that it
provides all required information in the
prescribed format and the following:
(a) Vague and ambiguous language
has been eliminated.
(b) A thorough technical review of the
SOW/PWS has been completed.
(c) The project is structured by phases
or tasks, as appropriate.
(d) Methods are available to assess the
contractor’s performance.
(e) The acquisition mechanism is
appropriate—i.e., the principal purpose
of the project is to acquire supplies or
services for the direct benefit or use of
the Government.
(f) The planned obligation of
appropriated funds for the project
satisfies a bona fide need of the
requiring office arising in the fiscal year
for which the appropriation was made.
307.7105
Transmittal.
The Project Officer shall convey the
signed AP to the CCO or designee by
providing a completed Part I—
Transmittal and Approval Form, with
other parts of the AP attached, no later
than the date agreed to in the
acquisition milestone schedule, unless
the officials establish a different date by
mutual agreement.
307.7106
Acquisition milestones.
The Contracting Officer shall retain
the acquisition milestone schedule in
the contract file and update/revise it to
track progress of the acquisition. The
milestone schedule signatories (see the
Requirements and Responsibilities
section of the AP—Part V of the table)
shall mutually agree to any revisions to
the milestone dates that will impact
meeting the scheduled award date.
Milestone schedule signatories shall
E:\FR\FM\27NOR2.SGM
27NOR2
62420
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 227 / Friday, November 27, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
307.7107
report a failure to meet established
milestones to a higher level official in
accordance with OPDIV procedures.
Responsibilities.
The following table summarizes the
responsibilities of the various
organizations and officials for
acquisition planning:
Acquisition planning
Responsible organization/official
Make necessary interim changes to the AP and notify ASFR/OGAPA/DA of changes needed.
Update the AP to reflect new or revised FAR and
other Federal directives.
Prepare the AAP and update it quarterly, as appropriate.
Establish standard acquisition lead-times and deadlines for receipt of requirements for award in an
applicable fiscal year.
Identify and plan requirements, particularly complex, long lead-time acquisitions, well in advance
of the fiscal year in which they are to be awarded.
(i) Participate in acquisition planning; (ii) prepare
the AP; and (iii) provide the AP to the Contracting Officer.
(i) Participate in acquisition planning; and (ii) assist
the Project Officer in AP preparation.
Waive requirement for development of an AP when
justified.
Review and certify that an AP is complete, accurate, and in the proper format.
OPDIV HCA or designee ........................................
307.7102.
ASFR/OGAPA/DA ...................................................
307.7102.
OPDIV–HCA/CCO ...................................................
307.104, subparagraph (a).
OPDIV–HCA/CCO ...................................................
307.104, subparagraph (d).
OPDIV–Project Officer ............................................
307.104, subparagraph (d).
OPDIV–Project Officer ............................................
(i) 307.104, subparagraph (c);
(ii) 307.104, subparagraph (e); and
(iii) 307.7105.
(i) 307.104, subparagraph (c);
(ii) 307.104, subparagraph (e).
307.7101, subparagraph (b).
Meet established acquisition milestone dates ..........
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES_2
307.7108
Statement of work.
(a) General. An SOW describes the
work or services a contractor is to
perform in reaching an end result
without describing the method that the
contractor shall use, unless the method
of performance is critical or required in
order to obtain successful performance.
An SOW shall be clear and concise;
completely define the responsibilities of
both the contractor and the Government;
and be worded to make
misinterpretation virtually impossible.
(b) Term (level of effort)form and
completion form SOWs. Term-form
(level of effort) SOWs essentially require
the furnishing of technical effort, which
may include a report thereof, while
completion-form SOWs require
development of tangible items designed
to meet specific performance and/or
design characteristics—see FAR
16.306(d) for this distinction.
(1) Term (or level of effort). A term or
level of effort-form SOW is appropriate
for research where the objective is to
discover the feasibility of later
development or to gather general
information. A term or level of effortform SOW specifies that some number
of labor hours be expended on a
particular course of research or that a
certain number of tests be run, without
reference to any intended conclusion.
(2) Completion. A completion-form
SOW is appropriate for development
work where the feasibility of producing
an end item is already known. A
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:54 Nov 25, 2009
Jkt 220001
OPDIV–Contracting Officer .....................................
OPDIV–HCA ............................................................
OPDIV–Head of the Sponsoring Program Office,
Project Officer, Funds Certification Official, Contracting Officer, and other signatories in accordance with OPDIV policies.
OPDIV–Project Officer and Contracting Officer ......
completion-form SOW may describe
what is to be achieved through the
contracted effort, such as development
of new methods, new end items, or
other tangible results.
(c) Phasing. Individual research,
development, or demonstration projects
frequently lie well beyond the present
state of the art and entail procedures
and techniques of great complexity and
difficulty. Under these circumstances, a
contractor, no matter how carefully
selected, may be unable to deliver the
desired result. Moreover, the job of
evaluating the contractor’s progress is
often difficult. Such a contract is
frequently phased and often divided
into stages of accomplishment, each of
which the contractor must complete and
the Contracting Officer approve before
the contractor may proceed to the next
phase or stage. Phasing makes it
necessary to develop methods and
controls, including reporting
requirements for each phase of the
contract and criteria for evaluation of
the report submitted, that will provide,
at the earliest possible time, appropriate
data for making decisions relative to
future phases. A phased contract, such
as one for an R & D or demonstration
project, may include stages of
accomplishment. Within each phase,
there may be a number of tasks that the
SOW should include. When phases of
work can be identified, the SOW shall
provide for phasing and the solicitation
shall require offerors to submit
PO 00000
HHSAR reference
Frm 00026
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
307.7104
307.7106.
proposed costs by phases. The resultant
contract shall reflect costs by phases,
require the contractor to identify
incurred costs by phases, establish
delivery schedules by phase, and
require the written acceptance of each
phase. The Contracting Officer shall not
allow contractors to incur costs for
phases that are dependent upon
successful completion of earlier phases
until the Contracting Officer provides
written acceptance of the prior work.
(d) Elements of the SOW. The
elements of the SOW may vary with the
objective, complexity, size, and nature
of the acquisition. In general, the SOW
shall include the following:
(1) Purpose of the project. This
includes a general description of the
objectives of the project and the desired
results.
(2) Background information. This
includes a brief history of the project
and the importance of the project to the
overall program objectives.
(3) A detailed description of the
technical requirements. The SOW shall
provide sufficient detail to accurately
reflect the Government’s requirement. It
shall state what is to be accomplished
without prescribing the method the
contractor is to use and shall include
performance standards, if applicable.
See 307.104(b)(2) and FAR 37.602 for
guidance on preparation of a PWS. An
SOW may include tasks and subtasks.
The degree of breakout depends on the
size and complexity of the project. An
E:\FR\FM\27NOR2.SGM
27NOR2
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 227 / Friday, November 27, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
SOW shall indicate whether the tasks
are sequential or concurrent.
(4) Reference material. This includes
an explanation of all reference material
a contractor needs to carry out the
project; the applicability of the reference
material; and a statement as to where
potential offerors can obtain the
material.
(5) Level of effort. When a level of
effort is necessary, the SOW shall
specify the number and type of
personnel required, if known, and the
type and degree of expertise.
(6) Special requirements (as
applicable). This includes providing, in
a separate section, any unusual or
special contractual requirements that
may affect performance. For example,
the SOW shall specify separately the
work requirements to implement
information security management
requirements—see 339.71 for additional
information.
(7) Deliverables and reporting
requirements. This includes clearly and
completely describing all deliverables
and reports, including the time frame
for completion, the format, and the
required number of copies.
PART 308—REQUIRED SOURCES OF
SUPPLIES AND SERVICES
Subpart 308.4—Federal Supply Schedules
Sec.
308.404 Use of Federal Supply Schedules.
308.405–6 Limited source justification and
approval.
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 40 U.S.C. 486(c).
Subpart 308.4—Federal Supply
Schedules
308.404
Use of Federal Supply Schedule.
(f) Technical Evaluation. When
conducting a technical evaluation of
quotations or proposals received under
FAR Part 8, the provisions of
315.305(a)(3) apply.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES_2
308.405–6
approval.
Limited source justification and
(g) (1) As required by FAR 8.405–1 or
8.405–2, the responsible program office
must provide a written justification
whenever it requests an acquisition
under the FSS program that restricts
consideration of the number of schedule
contractors or to an item peculiar to one
manufacturer. The justification must be
submitted with the AP or other
acquisition request document—see
307.71. The Project Officer has
responsibility for preparing the
justification with assistance, as
necessary, from the Contracting Officer.
(i) Justifications for orders at or below
the simplified acquisition threshold
may be in the form of a paragraph or
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:54 Nov 25, 2009
Jkt 220001
paragraphs contained in the requisition
or other acquisition request document.
Justifications for orders in excess of the
simplified acquisition threshold shall be
in the form of a separate, self-contained
document, prepared in accordance with
FAR 8.405–6(g) and 308.405–6(g), and
titled ‘‘Limited Source Justification’’
(LSJ). HHS requires use of a standard
format for an LSJ. The template for the
justification is available on the ASFR/
OGAPA/DA Internet Web site.
Additional information may be included
in the LSJ template in accordance with
OPDIV procedures.
(ii) Regardless of dollar amount of the
acquisition, justifications shall—
(A) Fully describe what is to be
acquired;
(B) Cite specific reasons that explain
why it is necessary to restrict
consideration of sources;
(C) Be supported by verifiable facts
rather than untested or unsubstantiated
opinions or conclusions; and
(D) Be written in a manner to permit
an individual without technical
knowledge of the requirement to
understand the supporting rationale.
(iii) Preliminary arrangements with,
or verbal or written commitments to, a
proposed contractor shall be avoided
given the requirement to obtain
competition for FSS orders using the
procedures in FAR Subpart 8.4—see
also FAR 6.102(d)(3).
(iv) Justifications for non-FSS orders
to be awarded without full and open
competition shall comply with FAR
6.303 and 306.303.
(h) Justification approvals.
Certification, concurrence, and
approval requirements. The Project
Officer, the Project Officer’s immediate
supervisor, the head of the sponsoring
program office, and the Contracting
Officer shall certify that the justification
is accurate and complete by signing the
LSJ. For acquisitions in the dollar
amount cited in FAR 8.405–6(h)(2)
through (h)(4), the CCO, if applicable,
and the HCA shall indicate their review
of, and concurrence with, the
justification by signing the LSJ. The
approving officials for LSJs are as
follows:
(1) The Contracting Officer shall
exercise this approval authority unless a
higher approval level is required by
OPDIV procedures.
(2) The CAs are listed in 306.501. This
approval authority is not delegable.
(3) The CA shall exercise this
approval authority, except where the
individual designated as the
competition advocate does not meet the
requirements of FAR 8.405–6(h)(3)(ii).
This approval authority is not delegable.
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
62421
(4) The HHS SPE is the Associate DAS
for Acquisition.
PART 309—CONTRACTOR
QUALIFICATIONS
Subpart 309.4—Debarment, Suspension,
and Ineligibility
Sec.
309.403 Definitions.
309.404 List of parties excluded from
Federal procurement and nonprocurement programs.
309.405 Effect of listing.
309.406 Debarment.
309.406–3 Procedures.
309.407 Suspension.
309.407–3 Procedures.
309.470 Reporting of suspected causes for
debarment or suspension or the taking of
evasive actions.
309.470–1 Situations where reports are
required.
309.470–2 Contents of reports.
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 40 U.S.C. 486(c).
Subpart 309.4—Debarment,
Suspension, and Ineligibility
309.403
Definitions.
Acquiring agency’s head or designee,
as used in the FAR, means, unless
otherwise stated in this subpart, the
HCA. The HCA may make the required
justifications or determinations and take
the necessary actions specified in FAR
9.405, 9.406 and 9.407, only after
obtaining the written approval of the
debarring or suspending official, as
appropriate.
Debarring official means the Deputy
Assistant Secretary for Grants and
Acquisition Policy and Accountability
(DAS/GAPA).
Initiating official means the
Contracting Officer, the HCA, the
Associate DAS for Acquisition, or the
Inspector General (IG).
Suspending official means the DAS/
GAPA.
309.404 List of parties excluded from
Federal procurement and non-procurement
programs.
(c) The ASFR/OGAPA/DA shall
perform the actions required by FAR
9.404(c).
(4) The ASFR/OGAPA/DA shall
maintain all documentation the
initiating official submits to recommend
the debarment or suspension action and
all correspondence and other pertinent
documentation generated during the
review.
309.405
Effect of listing.
(a) The HCA (non-delegable) may,
with the written concurrence of the
debarring or suspending official, make
the determinations referenced in FAR
9.405(a) regarding contracts.
E:\FR\FM\27NOR2.SGM
27NOR2
62422
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 227 / Friday, November 27, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
(1) If a Contracting Officer considers
it necessary to award a contract, or
consent to a subcontract with a debarred
or suspended contractor, the
Contracting Officer shall prepare a
determination, including all pertinent
documentation, and submit it through
appropriate acquisition channels to the
HCA. The documentation shall include
the date by which approval is required
and a compelling reason for the
proposed action. Compelling reasons for
award of a contract or consent to a
subcontract with a debarred or
suspended contractor include the
following:
(i) Only the cited contractor can
provide the property or services.
(ii) The urgency of the requirement
dictates that HHS conduct business with
the cited contractor.
(2) If the HCA decides to approve the
requested action, the HCA shall request
the concurrence of the debarring or
suspending official and, if given, shall
inform the Contracting Officer in
writing of the decision within the
required time period.
309.406
Debarment.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES_2
309.406–3
Procedures.
(a) Investigation and referral. When
an apparent cause for debarment
becomes known, the initiating official
shall prepare a report containing the
information required by 309.470–2,
along with a written recommendation,
and forward it through appropriate
acquisition channels, including the
HCA, to the Associate DAS for
Acquisition in accordance with
309.470–1. The debarring official shall
initiate an investigation.
(b) Decision making process. The
debarring official shall review the
results of the investigation, if any, and
make a written determination whether
or not debarment procedures shall
commence. The ASFR/OGAPA/DA shall
promptly send a copy of the
determination through appropriate
acquisition channels to the initiating
official and the Contracting Officer. If
the debarring official determines that
debarment procedures shall commence,
the debarring official shall consult with
OGC–GLD and then notify the
contractor in accordance with FAR
9.406–3(c). If the proposed action is not
based on a conviction or judgment and
the contractor’s submission in response
to the notice raises a genuine dispute
over facts material to the proposed
debarment, the debarring official shall
arrange for fact-finding hearings and
take the necessary action specified in
FAR 9.406–3(b)(2). The debarring
official shall also ensure that written
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:54 Nov 25, 2009
Jkt 220001
findings of facts are prepared and shall
base the debarment decisions on the
facts as found, after considering
information and argument submitted by
the contractor and any other
information in the administrative
record. The OGC–GLD shall represent
HHS at any fact-finding hearing and
may present witnesses for HHS and
question any witnesses presented by the
contractor.
309.407
Suspension.
309.407–3
Procedures.
(a) Investigation and referral. When
an apparent cause for suspension
becomes known, the initiating official
shall prepare a report containing the
information required by 309.470–2
along with a written recommendation
and forward it through appropriate
acquisition channels, including the
HCA, to the suspending official in
accordance with 309.470–1. The
suspending official shall initiate an
investigation.
(b) Decision making process. The
suspending official shall review the
results of the investigation, if any, and
make a written determination whether
or not suspension shall occur. ASFR/
OGAPA/DA shall send a copy of the
determination through appropriate
acquisition channels to the initiating
official and the Contracting Officer. If
the suspending official determines that
suspension is necessary, the suspending
official shall consult with OGC–GLD
and then notify the contractor in
accordance with FAR 9.407–3(c). If the
action is not based on an indictment,
and, subject to the provisions of FAR
9.407–3(b) (2), the contractor’s
submission in response to the notice
raises a genuine dispute over facts
material to the suspension, the
suspending official shall, after imposing
the suspension, arrange for fact-finding
hearings and take the necessary actions
specified in FAR 9.407–3(b)(2).
309.470 Reporting of suspected causes
for debarment or suspension or the taking
of evasive actions.
309.470–1
required.
Situations where reports are
The Contracting Officer shall forward
a report, incorporating the information
required by 309.470–2, through
appropriate acquisition channels,
including the HCA, to the Associate
DAS for Acquisition whenever a
contractor—
(a) Has committed, or is suspected of
having committed, any of the acts
described in FAR 9.406–2 or FAR 9.407–
2; or
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
(b) Is suspected of attempting to evade
the prohibitions of debarment or
suspension imposed under this subject,
or any other comparable regulation, by
changes of address, multiple addresses,
formation of new companies, or by other
devices.
309.470–2
Contents of reports.
The Contracting Officer shall
coordinate each report prepared under
309.470–1 with OGC–GLD and include
the following information, when
available:
(a) Contractor name and address.
(b) Name of the principal officers,
partners, owners, or managers.
(c) All known affiliates, subsidiaries,
or parent firms, and the nature of the
affiliation.
(d) Description of the contract or
contracts concerned, including the
contract number and office identifying
numbers or symbols; the amount of each
contract; the amount paid to the
contractor and the amount still due; and
the percentage of work completed and
to be completed.
(e) The status of vouchers.
(f) Whether contract funds have been
assigned pursuant to the Assignment of
Claims Act, as amended, (31 U.S.C.
3727, 41 U.S.C. 15), and, if so assigned,
the name and address of the assignee
and a copy of the assignment.
(g) Whether any other contracts are
outstanding with the contractor or any
affiliates, and, if so, the amount of the
contracts, whether these funds have
been assigned pursuant to the
Assignment of Claims Act, as amended,
(31 U.S.C. 3727, 41 U.S.C. 15), and the
amounts paid or due on the contracts.
(h) A complete summary of all
available pertinent evidence.
(i) A recommendation as to the
continuation of current contracts.
(j) An estimate of damages, if any,
sustained by the Government as a result
of the contractor’s action, including an
explanation of the method used in
making the estimate.
(k) The comments and
recommendations of the Contracting
Officer and statements indicating
whether the contractor should be
suspended or debarred, whether any
limitations are necessary, and the period
of any proposed debarment.
(l) As an enclosure, a copy of the
contract(s) or pertinent excerpts
therefrom, appropriate exhibits,
testimony or statements of witnesses,
copies of assignments, and other
relevant documentation or a written
summary of any information for which
documentation is not available.
E:\FR\FM\27NOR2.SGM
27NOR2
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 227 / Friday, November 27, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
PART 310—MARKET RESEARCH
Sec.
310.001
Policy.
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 40 U.S.C. 486(c).
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES_2
310.001
Policy.
(a) OPDIVs are encouraged to conduct
market research, to the maximum extent
practicable, consistent with the urgency,
complexity, and dollar value of a
proposed acquisition, as well as their
past experience with the same or similar
requirements.
(3) (i) An OPDIV may issue an
advance notice, entitled ‘‘Sources
Sought’’ in FedBizOpps in accordance
with the requirements of FAR Part 5,
whenever a sufficient number of sources
has not been identified to obtain
adequate competition for a non-R & D
project. The primary purpose of a
Sources Sought notice is to identify all
potential sources, regardless of
organizational type and size
classification, and determine their
capabilities to fulfill a potential
Government requirement. The notice is
not intended to solicit technical,
scientific, or business information for
project planning purposes regarding
existing or potential solutions. In the
latter instance, an RFI may be used—see
FAR 15.201(e) and 315.201(e).
(ii) When using a Sources Sought
notice, an OPDIV shall not request that
potential sources provide more than the
minimum information necessary—see
FAR 10.001(b), to determine whether
they have the apparent capability to
perform a requirement and, therefore,
whether they should be included in any
future competition. The notice and the
information received shall not be used
to determine how well respondents can
perform a requirement, which can only
be evaluated in response to a
solicitation. Accordingly, the notice
shall not be used to—
(A) Obtain capability statements that
are evaluated and determined
acceptable or unacceptable;
(B) Require cost/price proposals or
detailed technical solutions;
(C) Identify a prospective sole source;
or
(D) Exclude small business concerns.
(iii) While not the primary intent of a
Sources Sought notice, in addition to
seeking information regarding all
potential qualified sources, the notice
may request that respondents provide
information regarding their
organizational size classification. For
example, the notice may ask
respondents to identify whether they are
small businesses; HUBZone small
businesses; service-disabled, veteran-
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:54 Nov 25, 2009
Jkt 220001
owned small businesses; 8(a) small
businesses; veteran-owned small
businesses; woman-owned small
businesses; or small disadvantaged
businesses in order to determine the
appropriate acquisition method,
including whether a set-aside is
possible. However, such a notice shall
not be used solely to determine the size
classification of respondents for a
proposed non-R & D acquisition. In such
instances, a ‘‘Small Business Sources
Sought’’ notice may be used—see
319.202–2, in lieu of the procedures in
this section.
(iv) OPDIVs shall follow the standard
HHS instructions for completing a
Sources Sought notice. The Contracting
Officer shall post the notice in
FedBizOpps by selecting and
completing a Sources Sought notice.
The template for the notice is available
on the ASFR/OGAPA/DA Internet Web
site. Additional information may be
included in the notice in accordance
with OPDIV procedures. The
Contracting Officer shall document, in
the form of a memorandum to the file,
the results of the review by technical
personnel of information submitted in
response to the notice, including
whether each respondent appears to be
capable of performing the requirement.
The Contracting Officer shall attach a
copy of the analysis provided by the
technical personnel to the
memorandum.
(v) In instances where a sufficient
number of sources has not been
identified to compete for an R & D
project, OPDIVs may use the procedures
specified in 305.205, including the
issuance of an ‘‘R & D Sources Sought’’
notice, as appropriate, in lieu of the
procedures in this section.
PART 311—DESCRIBING AGENCY
NEEDS
Subpart 311.70—Section 508 Accessibility
Standards
Sec.
311.7000 Defining electronic information
technology requirements.
311.7001 Section 508 accessibility
standards for HHS Web site content and
communication materials.
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 40 U.S.C. 486(c).
Subpart 311.70—Section 508
Accessibility Standards
311.7000 Defining electronic information
technology requirements.
HHS staff that define agency needs for
EIT products and services, including
EIT deliverables such as electronic
documents and reports, and perform
market research to meet those needs,
shall document EIT requirements,
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
62423
identify the applicable Section 508
accessibility standards, and document
the market research. OPDIVs may
develop procedures for these activities,
based on the level of agency investment
and risk, and shall ensure any
procedures developed are in
conformance with FAR Part 10.
Procedures for defining EIT
requirements may, but are not required
to, include the use of the Buy Accessible
Wizard (https://www.buyaccessible.gov),
managed by GSA, or other Federal
agency tools.
311.7001 Section 508 accessibility
standards for HHS Web site content and
communications materials.
(a) Section 508 of the Rehabilitation
Act of 1973 [29 U.S.C. 794(d)], as
amended by the Workforce Investment
Act of 1998, (Section 508) specifies the
accessibility standards that apply to all
new solicitations and new or existing
contracts or orders, regardless of dollar
amount, for communications products
and services that require a contractor or
consultant to produce content in any
format that is specifically intended for
publication on, or delivery via, an HHSowned or -funded Web site.
(b) Accordingly, before forwarding a
request to the contracting/ordering
office for the acquisition of
communications products and services,
including content in any format, such as
reports, documents, charts, posters,
presentations (such as Microsoft
PowerPoint), or video material that is
specifically intended for publication on,
or delivery via, an HHS-owned or
-funded Web site, the Project Officer
shall consult with the OPDIV/STAFF
Division (DIV) Section 508 Official or
Coordinator, as necessary, to determine
the applicability of Section 508, identify
applicable Section 508 accessibility
standards, and resolve any related
issues.
(c) Based on those discussions, the
Project Officer shall provide a statement
in the AP (or other acquisition request
document)—see 307.7101, as to the
applicability of Section 508. If Section
508 applies to an acquisition, the Project
Officer shall include the following
‘‘HHS Section 508 Accessibility
Standards Notice’’ language in a
separate, clearly designated section of
the SOW/PWS, and any additional
information applicable to the
acquisition’s Section 508 accessibility
standards [e.g., the list of applicable
accessibility standards of the
Architectural and Transportation
Barriers Compliance Board (Access
Board) Final Rule (36 CFR Part 1194)].
If an AP does not address these issues,
and it appears an acquisition involves
E:\FR\FM\27NOR2.SGM
27NOR2
62424
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 227 / Friday, November 27, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
Section 508, or if the discussion of
Section 508 applicability to the
acquisition is inadequate or incomplete,
the Contracting Officer shall request that
the Project Officer modify the AP
accordingly.
HHS Section 508 Accessibility
Standards Notice (September 2009)
This contract is subject to Section 508
of the Rehabilitation Act (the Act) of
1973 (29 U.S.C. 794d), as amended by
the Workforce Investment Act of 1998,
and the Architectural and
Transportation Barriers Compliance
Board (Access Board) Electronic and
Information Accessibility Provisions (36
CFR Part 1194). Section 508 of the Act
requires that, unless an exception
applies, all communications products
and services that require a contractor or
consultant to produce content in any
format that is specifically intended for
publication on, or delivery via, a
Federally owned or Federally funded
Web site permit the following:
(1) Federal employees with
disabilities to have access to and use
information and data that is comparable
to the access and use of information and
data by Federal employees who are not
individuals with disabilities.
(2) Members of the public with
disabilities seeking information or
services from a Federal agency to have
access to and use of information and
data that is comparable to the access
and use of information and data by
members of the public who are not
individuals with disabilities.
Note: Information about Section 508 of the
Act is available at https://
www.section508.gov/. The complete text of
Section 508 can be accessed at https://www.
access-board.gov/sec508/provisions.htm.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES_2
Accordingly, regardless of format, all
Web content or communications
materials specifically produced for
publication on, or delivery via, HHS
Web sites, including text, audio, or
video, under this contract shall conform
to applicable Section 508 accessibility
standards. Remediation of any materials
that do not comply with the applicable
accessibility standards of 36 CFR Part
1194 as set forth herein shall be the
responsibility of the Contractor.
The following Section 508
accessibility standards apply to the
content or communications material
identified in this SOW or PWS:
Note: The Project Officer shall list the
applicable accessibility standards of the
Access Board Final Rule (36 CFR Part 1194)
(e.g., ‘‘36 CFR 1194.21(a)–(j).’’ Most Webbased text and communication must meet the
accessibility standards in 36 CFR 1194.22,
‘‘Web-based intranet and Internet
information and applications.’’ Additionally,
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:54 Nov 25, 2009
Jkt 220001
36 CFR 1194.41, ‘‘Information,
documentation and support,’’ and 36 CFR
1194.24 ‘‘Video and multimedia products’’
apply to all written, graphical, or broadcast
video materials or products produced for
HHS, including training. 36 CFR 1194.41(c)
specifies that support services for products
shall accommodate the communication needs
of end-users with disabilities.
SUBCHAPTER C—CONTRACTING
METHODS AND CONTRACT TYPES
PART 312—ACQUISITION OF
COMMERCIAL ITEMS
Subpart 312.1—Acquisition of Commercial
Items—General
Sec.
312.101 Policy
Subpart 312.2—Special Requirements for
the Acquisition of Commercial Items.
312.202(d) Market research and description
of agency need.
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 40 U.S.C. 486(c).
Subpart 312.1—Acquisition of
Commercial Items—General
312.101
Policy.
(a) It is HHS policy to leverage its
buying power, reduce acquisition
administrative costs, and develop longterm, mutually beneficial partnerships
with best-in-class providers of products
and services. Accordingly, HHS has
implemented a Strategic Sourcing
Program through which it awards BPAs
or other contract vehicles to achieve
savings for commercial items and
services across HHS and make the
acquisition process more efficient.
OPDIVs shall use HHS’ strategic
sourcing vehicles to the maximum
extent possible—see the HHS strategic
sourcing portion of the ASFR/OGAPA/
DA intranet site for further information.
Subpart 312.2—Special Requirements
for the Acquisition of Commercial
Items
312.202(d) Market research and
description of agency need.
Whenever an OPDIV/STAFFDIV
requires EIT products and services
subject to Section 508 of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended,
commercially available products and
services shall be acquired to the
maximum extent possible while
ensuring Section 508 compliance.
Consistent with paragraph 4.3.1 of the
HHS Section 508 policy—see Section
508 policy on the HHS Office on
Disability Web site, if products and
services are commercially available that
meet some but not all of the applicable
Section 508 accessibility standards, and
no commercially available products or
services meet all of the applicable
Section 508 accessibility standards, an
OPDIV/STAFFDIV shall acquire the
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
products and services that best meet the
applicable Section 508 accessibility
standards. Commercial nonavailability
exception determinations for EIT
products and services that do not meet
some or all of the applicable Section 508
accessibility standards shall be
processed in accordance with 339.203.
PART 313—SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION
PROCEDURES
Sec.
313.003
Policy.
Subpart 313.1—Procedures.
313.106–2 Evaluation of quotations or
offers.
Subpart 313.3—Simplified Acquisition
Methods
313.301 Government-wide commercial
purchase card.
313.303 Blanket purchase agreements.
313.303–5 Purchases under blanket
purchase agreements.
Subpart 313.5—Test Program for Certain
Commercial Items
313.501 Special documentation
requirements.
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 40 U.S.C. 486(c).
313.003
Policy.
EIT products and services, including
EIT deliverables such as electronic
documents and reports, acquired
pursuant to FAR Part 13 shall comply
with Section 508 of the Rehabilitation
Act of 1973, as amended. Consistent
with paragraph 4.3.1 of the HHS Section
508 policy—see Section 508 policy on
HHS Office on Disability Web site, if
products and services, including
commercially available items, meet
some but not all of the applicable
Section 508 accessibility standards, and
no commercially available products or
services meet all of the applicable
Section 508 accessibility standards, an
OPDIV/STAFFDIV shall acquire the
products and services that best meet the
applicable Section 508 accessibility
standards. Commercial nonavailability
exception determinations for EIT
products and services that do not meet
some or all of the applicable Section 508
accessibility standards shall be
processed in accordance with 339.203.
Subpart 313.1—Procedures
313.106–2
offers.
Evaluation of quotations or
(b)(5) Technical Evaluation. When
conducting a technical evaluation of
quotations or proposals received under
FAR Part 13, the provisions of
315.305(a)(3) apply.
E:\FR\FM\27NOR2.SGM
27NOR2
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 227 / Friday, November 27, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
Subpart 313.3—Simplified Acquisition
Methods
313.301 Government-wide commercial
purchase card.
(b) HHS’ procedures for the use and
control of the Government-wide
commercial purchase card may be found
in the HHS Purchase Card Program
Guide, available on the ASFR/OGAPA/
DA Web site.
(1) ASFR/OGAPA/DA has overall
responsibility for monitoring the
OPDIVs’ implementation of the HHS
purchase card program to foster
compliance with FAR 13.301; OMB
Circular A–123, Appendix B,
‘‘Improving the Management of
Government Charge Card Programs;’’
GSA’s SmartPay Program guidance; and
HHS Purchase Card program standards.
(2) The OPDIVs, through their
designated Agency/Organization
Program Coordinators, are responsible
for establishing the necessary local
procedures and appropriate training
requirements to ensure effective
implementation of the HHS purchase
card program.
(3) OPDIVs shall refer to 313.003 and
the HHS Purchase Card Program Guide
for information regarding acquiring EIT
products and services subject to Section
508 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as
amended.
313.303
Blanket purchase agreements.
313.303–5 Purchases under blanket
purchase agreements.
(e)(5) HHS personnel that sign
delivery documents, invoices, etc.,
verifying the receipt of an item or
service shall forward such documents to
the fiscal office or other paying office
that the OPDIV designates. The fiscal or
other paying officer shall use the signed
document, invoice, etc., as the basis for
payment. Alternatively, OPDIVs may
use electronic methods to document,
and transmit to the paying office, the
receipt, inspection, and acceptance of
items or services for payment purposes,
provided such methods are authorized
in local fiscal procedures. Contracting
offices shall establish procedures to
ensure that funds are available prior to
placement of orders.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES_2
Subpart 313.5—Test Program for
Certain Commercial Items
313.501 Special documentation
requirements.
(a) (1)
(i) The justification requirements of
306.303–1(b) and 306.303–1(b)(1)
through (b)(4) apply to proposed
noncompetitive acquisitions placed
under FAR Subpart 13.5.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:54 Nov 25, 2009
Jkt 220001
(ii) The HHS standard format for
JOFOCs cited in 306.303–1(b)(1) shall be
used to support noncompetitive
acquisitions in excess of the simplified
acquisition threshold placed under FAR
Subpart 13.5.
(iii) The certification, concurrence,
and approval requirements cited in
306.304 for JOFOCs apply to applicable
noncompetitive acquisitions placed
under FAR Subpart 13.5.
(2)
(i) The Contracting Officer shall
exercise this approval authority unless a
higher approval level is required by
OPDIV procedures.
(ii) The CAs are listed in 306.501.
This approval authority is not delegable.
(iii) The CA shall exercise this
approval authority, except where the
individual designated as the
competition advocate does not meet the
requirements of FAR 6.304(a)(3)(ii). This
approval authority is not delegable.
(iv) The HHS SPE is the Associate
DAS for Acquisition.
PART 314—SEALED BIDDING
Subpart 314.1—Use of Sealed Bidding
Sec.
314.103 Policy.
Subpart 314.2—Solicitation of Bids
314.202 General rules for solicitation of
bids.
314.202–7 Facsimile bids.
Subpart 314.4—Opening of Bids and Award
of Contract
314.404 Rejection of bids.
314.404–1 Cancellation of invitations after
opening.
314.407 Mistakes in bids.
314.407–3 Other mistakes disclosed before
award.
314.407–4 Mistakes after award.
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 40 U.S.C. 486(c).
standards. Commercial nonavailability
exception determinations for EIT
products and services that do not meet
some or all of the applicable Section 508
accessibility standards shall be
processed in accordance with 339.203.
Subpart 314.2—Solicitation of Bids
314.202
bids.
General rules for solicitation of
314.202–7
314.103
Policy.
EIT products and services, including
EIT deliverables such as electronic
documents and reports, acquired using
sealed-bid procedures shall comply
with Section 508 of the Rehabilitation
Act of 1973, as amended. Consistent
with paragraph 4.3.1 of the HHS Section
508 policy—see Section 508 policy on
HHS Office of Disability Web site, if
products and services, including
commercially available items, meet
some but not all of the applicable
Section 508 accessibility standards, and
no commercially available products or
services meet all of the applicable
Section 508 accessibility standards, an
OPDIV/STAFFDIV shall acquire the
products and services that best meet the
applicable Section 508 accessibility
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
Facsimile bids.
(c) If the HCA (non-delegable)
determines that the contracting activity
will allow use of facsimile bids and
proposals, the HCA shall prescribe
internal procedures, in accordance with
the FAR 14.202–7, to ensure uniform
processing and control.
Subpart 314.4—Opening of Bids and
Award of Contract
314.404
Rejection of bids.
314.404–1
opening.
Cancellation of invitations after
(c) The HCA or CCO (non-delegable)
shall make the agency head
determinations specified in FAR
14.404–1.
314.407
Mistakes in bids.
314.407–3 Other mistakes disclosed
before award.
(e) The CCO (non-delegable) has the
authority to make determinations under
paragraphs (a), (b), (c), and (d) of FAR
14.407–3.
(f) OGC–GLD shall concur in each
proposed determination.
(i) The CCO shall submit directly to
OGC–GLD cases in which the evidence
is not clear and convincing or is
otherwise doubtful.
314.407–4
Subpart 314.1—Use of Sealed Bidding
62425
Mistakes after award.
(c) The HCA or the CCO (nondelegable), in consultation with OGC–
GLD, has the authority to make
administrative determinations in
connection with mistakes in bid alleged
after award.
(d) OGC–GLD shall concur in each
proposed determination.
PART 315—CONTRACTING BY
NEGOTIATION
Subpart 315.2—Solicitation and Receipt of
Proposals and Information
Sec.
315.201 Exchanges with industry before
receipt of proposals.
315.204–5 Part IV—Representations and
instructions.
315.208 Submission, modification, revision,
and withdrawal of proposals.
315.209 Solicitation provisions and
contract clauses.
E:\FR\FM\27NOR2.SGM
27NOR2
62426
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 227 / Friday, November 27, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
Subpart 315.3—Source Selection.
315.303–70 Policy.
315.304 Evaluation factors and significant
subfactors.
315.305 Proposal evaluation.
315.306 Exchanges with offerors after
receipt of proposals.
315.307 Proposal revisions.
315.370 Finalization of details with the
selected source.
315.371 Contract preparation and award.
315.372 Preparation of negotiation
memorandum.
Subpart 315.4—Contract Pricing
315.404 Proposal analysis.
315.404–2 Information to support proposal
analysis.
315.404–4 Profit.
Subpart 315.6—Unsolicited Proposals
315.605 Content of unsolicited proposals.
315.606 Agency procedures.
315.606–1 Receipt and initial review.
315.609 Limited use of data.
Subpart 315.70—Acquisition of Electronic
Information Technology
315.7000 Section 508 accessibility
standards.
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 40 U.S.C. 486(c).
Subpart 315.2—Solicitation and
Receipt of Proposals and Information
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES_2
315.201 Exchanges with industry before
receipt of proposals.
(e)(1) An OPDIV may issue an
advance notice, entitled ‘‘Request for
Information,’’ in accordance with the
requirements of FAR 15.201(e),
whenever it requires technical,
scientific, and/or business information
and input from the marketplace for
project planning purposes regarding the
availability of existing or potential
solutions. An RFI may be used for any
type of requirement, but is particularly
appropriate for complex projects
involving R & D, IT, construction, and
other highly technical requirements. An
RFI may also be issued to identify issues
about the Government’s requirements
and the planned acquisition strategy.
Use of an RFI generally is appropriate
under the following conditions:
(i) It is not clear whether the purpose
and performance requirements of a
potential or planned project are feasible,
achievable, and complete.
(ii) It is not certain that a solution,
technical approach, or product needed
to accomplish a potential or planned
project exists or can be developed,
particularly in the case of a new, highly
specialized/unique Government
program mandate.
(iii) It is necessary to test the
marketplace to determine if there are
questions or concerns regarding the use
of a new or innovative acquisition
strategy or instrument previously
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:54 Nov 25, 2009
Jkt 220001
untried to accomplish a potential or
planned project.
(iv) It is necessary to determine the
general effort or time (estimate or rough
order of magnitude) that may be
required to accomplish a potential or
planned project.
Note: This type of information may be
requested, only if it is necessary, broad in
scope, and required for planning purposes.
Detailed estimates must not be requested.
(v) It is necessary to ensure that
unduly restrictive technical or business/
acquisition requirements are not made
part of any resultant solicitation so that
maximum competition is generated.
(2) When using an RFI, an OPDIV
shall not request that potential sources
provide more than the minimum
information necessary—see FAR
10.001(b), to obtain the input required.
The notice and the information received
shall not be used to determine how well
respondents can perform a requirement,
which can only be evaluated in
response to a solicitation. Accordingly,
the notice shall not be used to—
(i) Obtain capability statements that
are evaluated and determined
acceptable or unacceptable;
(ii) Require cost/price proposals or
detailed technical solutions;
(iii) Identify a prospective sole source;
or
(iv) Exclude small business concerns.
(3) While not the primary intent of an
RFI, an OPDIV may additionally request
that respondents provide information
regarding their organizational size
classification and capabilities when the
OPDIV is uncertain whether any
organization, acting individually or in
partnership with others, can satisfy the
requirement. For example, the notice
may ask respondents to identify
whether they are small businesses;
HUBZone small businesses; servicedisabled, veteran-owned small
businesses; 8(a) small businesses;
veteran-owned small businesses;
woman-owned small businesses; or a
small disadvantaged businesses.
However, an RFI shall not be used
solely to determine the availability of
qualified sources for a proposed project
or to determine their size classification.
In such instances, as applicable, an R &
D Sources Sought notice, Sources
Sought notice, or Small Business
Sources Sought notice may be used—see
HHSAR 305.205, 310.001, and 319.202–
2.
(4) OPDIVs shall follow the standard
HHS instructions for completing an RFI.
The template for an RFI is available on
the ASFR/OGAPA/DA Internet Web
site. The Contracting Officer shall post
the notice in FedBizOpps by selecting
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
and completing a Special Notice,
accessible on the FedBizOpps ‘‘Notices’’
page at: https://www.fedbizopps.gov.
RFIs must be published, at a minimum,
in FedBizOpps—see FAR
10.002(b)(2)(iii) and 15.201(d).
Additional information may be included
in an RFI in accordance with OPDIV
procedures. The Contracting Officer
shall document, in the form of a
memorandum to the file, the results of
the review by technical personnel of
information submitted in response to
the notice, including whether each
respondent appears to be capable of
performing the requirement. The
Contracting Officer shall attach a copy
of the analysis provided by the technical
personnel to the memorandum.
315.204–5 Part IV—Representations and
instructions.
(c) Section M, Evaluation factors for
award.
(1) General.
(i) The Project Officer shall develop
technical evaluation factors and submit
them to the Contracting Officer as part
of the acquisition plan or other
acquisition request documentation for
inclusion in a solicitation. The Project
Officer shall indicate the relative
importance or weight of the evaluation
factors based on the requirements of an
individual acquisition. Since the
evaluation factors will serve as the
standard for proposal evaluation, they
require careful selection.
(ii) Only a formal amendment to a
solicitation can change the evaluation
factors. Evaluation of proposals shall
include only those factors set forth in a
solicitation.
(2) Review of evaluation factors.
(i) The Contracting Officer shall
review evaluation factors to ensure they
are consistent with the SOW/PWS. This
review is not intended to dictate
technical requirements to the program
office or Project Officer, but rather to
ensure that the evaluation factors are
clear, concise, and fair, so that all
potential offerors are fully aware of the
bases for proposal evaluation and are
given an equal opportunity to compete.
(ii) The Project Officer and the
Contracting Officer shall review the
evaluation factors to ascertain the
following:
(A) The factors address the key
programmatic concerns which the
offerors must be aware of in preparing
proposals.
(B) The factors are specifically
applicable to the current acquisition and
are not restatements of factors from
previous acquisitions which are not
relevant.
E:\FR\FM\27NOR2.SGM
27NOR2
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES_2
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 227 / Friday, November 27, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
(C) The factors represent only the
significant areas of importance, rather
than a multitude of factors. (Note: All
factors tend to lose importance, if too
many are included; and using too many
factors may prove as detrimental as
using too few.)
(3) Examples of topics that form a
basis for evaluation factors. Typical
examples of topics that form a basis for
the development of evaluation factors
are listed in the following paragraphs.
These examples may assist in the
development of actual evaluation factors
for a specific acquisition, as appropriate.
(i) Understanding of the SOW/PWS.
(ii) Method of accomplishing the
objectives and intent of the SOW/PWS.
(iii) Soundness of the scientific or
technical approach for executing the
requirements of the SOW/PWS,
including, when applicable, preliminary
layouts, sketches, diagrams, other
graphic representations, calculations,
curves, and other data necessary for
presentation, substantiation,
justification, or understanding of the
approach.
(iv) Special technical factors, such as
experience or pertinent novel ideas in
the specific branch of science or
technology involved.
(v) Feasibility or practicality of
successfully accomplishing the
requirements (including a statement and
discussion of anticipated major
difficulties and problem areas, and
recommended approaches for their
resolution).
(vi) Availability of required special
research, test, and other equipment or
facilities.
(vii) Managerial capability (ability to
achieve delivery or performance
requirements as demonstrated by the
proposed use of management and other
personnel resources, and to successfully
manage the project, including
subcontractor and/or consultant efforts,
if applicable, as evidenced by the
management plan and demonstrated by
previous experience).
(viii) Availability, qualifications,
experience, education, and competence
of professional, technical, and other
personnel, including proposed
subcontractors and consultants (as
evidenced by resumes, endorsements,
and explanations of previous efforts).
(ix) Soundness of the proposed staff
time or labor hours, propriety of
personnel classifications (professional,
technical, others), necessity for type and
quantity of material and facilities
proposed, validity of proposed
subcontracting, and necessity of
proposed travel.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:54 Nov 25, 2009
Jkt 220001
(x) Quality of offeror’s past
performance on recent projects of
similar size and scope.
(xi) Extent of proposed participation
of small disadvantaged business
concerns in performance of the contract.
62427
Subpart 315.3—Source Selection
reports, shall include a separate
technical evaluation factor (which may
be in the form of a technical evaluation
criterion or a mandatory qualification
criterion, as appropriate) developed by
the Contracting Officer, Project Officer,
and the OPDIV Section 508 Coordinator
to determine vendor compliance with
applicable Section 508 accessibility
standards. The technical evaluation
panel’s assessment of Section 508
accessibility standards conformance
shall be based on the Section 508
Product Assessment Template—see
Section 508 policy on Office of
Disability Web site for the template, and
on any other pertinent information that
offerors provide in response to a
solicitation. The HHS Office on
Disability is responsible for providing
technical assistance in Section 508
evaluation factor development.
(b) Before conducting negotiations or
making an award, the Contracting
Officer shall provide a summary of the
technical evaluation panel’s assessment
of vendor responses to the solicitation’s
Section 508 evaluation factor for review
by the Section 508 Official or designee.
The Section 508 Official or designee
shall indicate approval/disapproval of
the evaluation panel’s assessment. The
Contracting Officer shall coordinate the
resolution of any issues raised by the
Section 508 Official or designee with
the chair of the technical evaluation
panel or Project Officer, as appropriate.
The acquisition process shall not
proceed unless and until the Section
508 Official or designee has approved
the technical evaluation panel’s
assessment. The Contracting Officer
shall include the assessment in the
official contract file. See 339.203
regarding processing exception
determination requests.
315.303–70
315.305
315.208 Submission, modification,
revision, and withdrawal of proposals.
(b) In addition to the provision in FAR
52.215–1, Instructions to Offerors—
Competitive Acquisition, if an HCA
determines that certain classes of
biomedical or behavioral R & D
acquisitions are subject to conditions
other than those specified in FAR
52.215–1(c)(3), the HCA may authorize
for use in competitive solicitations for R
& D, valued at more than the simplified
acquisition threshold, the use of the
provision in 352.215–70, Late Proposals
and Revisions. This is an authorized
FAR deviation.
(2) When the provision at 352.215–70
is included in the solicitation and a
proposal is received after the exact time
specified for receipt, the Contracting
Officer, with the assistance of cost and
technical personnel, shall make a
written determination as to whether the
proposal meets the requirements of the
provision at 352.215–70 and, therefore,
can be considered.
315.209 Solicitation provisions and
contract clauses.
(a) The Contracting Officer shall insert
paragraph (e) in 352.215–1 in place of
paragraph (e) in the provision in FAR
52.215–1, Instructions to Offerors—
Competitive Acquisition, in solicitations
for competitive, negotiated acquisitions
valued at more than the simplified
acquisition threshold. This is an
authorized FAR deviation.
Policy.
(a) If an OPDIV is required by statute
to use peer review for technical review
of specified contracts, the requirements
of those statutes, any implementing
regulatory requirements, the Federal
Advisory Committee Act, and as
applicable, any approved HHSAR
deviation(s) from this subpart take
precedence over the otherwise
applicable requirements of this subpart.
(1) The statutes that require such
review and implementing regulations
are as follows: NIH—42 U.S.C. 289a and
42 CFR Part 52h; SAMHSA—42 U.S.C.
290aa–3, and AHRQ—42 U.S.C. 299c–1.
315.304 Evaluation factors and significant
subfactors.
(a) A solicitation for EIT products and
services, including EIT deliverables
such as electronic documents and
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
Proposal evaluation.
(a)(1) Cost or price evaluation.
(i) The Contracting Officer shall
evaluate proposals in accordance with
the FAR 15.404. The extent of cost or
price analysis in each case depends on
the availability of competition, contract
type, the proposed amount, and
technical complexity.
(A) For competitive firm-fixed-price
and fixed price with economic price
adjustment contracts, price analysis
should be sufficient to determine price
fairness and reasonableness.
(B) When competition is not adequate
for the above contract types, and for
cost-reimbursement and time and
materials contracts, cost analysis may be
required. In such cases, the Contracting
Officer shall request the Project Officer’s
assistance in analyzing the following
cost elements, if applicable, to
E:\FR\FM\27NOR2.SGM
27NOR2
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES_2
62428
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 227 / Friday, November 27, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
determine if the proposed amounts are
necessary and reasonable for efficient
contract performance:
(1) The number and mix of proposed
labor hours relative to the technical
requirements.
(2) Types, numbers and hours/days of
proposed consultants.
(3) The kinds and quantities of
material, equipment, supplies, and
services.
(4) Kinds and quantities of IT.
(5) Logic of proposed subcontracting.
(6) Travel proposed, including
number of trips, locations, purpose, and
travelers.
(7) Other direct costs not specified
above.
(ii) The Project Officer shall provide
written comments, including the
rationale for any exceptions to the cost
elements. The Contracting Officer shall
consider the Project Officer’s comments
for negotiations or to support award
without discussions. The Contracting
Officer shall also request assistance of a
cost/price analyst, when necessary.
(2) Past performance evaluation.
When evaluating past performance, the
Contracting Officer shall check
references to obtain information
concerning the performance history of
offerors in compliance with FAR
42.1502. The Contracting Officer may
require the assistance of the Project
Officer as well as other Government
technical personnel in performing this
function.
(3) Technical evaluation.
(i) Technical evaluation plan.
(A) The Contracting Officer shall
require a technical evaluation plan if the
proposed acquisition either requires
preparation of an AP—see 307.71 or is
otherwise sufficiently complex.
(B) The technical evaluation plan
shall include, at a minimum, the
following elements:
(1) A list of recommended technical
evaluation panel members, their
organizations, a list of their major
consulting clients (if applicable), their
qualifications, and curricula vitae (if
applicable).
(2) A statement that the technical
evaluation panel will include nonFederal technical proposal evaluators, if
applicable, and a determination that
sufficient Federal technical proposal
evaluators are unavailable—see FAR
37.204. A determination to use nonFederal proposal evaluators shall be
signed at a level no lower than the HCA.
A determination is not required,
however, if non-Federal evaluators will
be used in accordance with 315.303–
70(a).
(3) A statement that there is no
apparent or actual conflict of interest
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:54 Nov 25, 2009
Jkt 220001
regarding any recommended panel
member.
(4) A copy of each rating sheet,
approved by the Contracting Officer, to
ensure consistency with the evaluation
criteria.
(5) A brief description of the general
evaluation approach.
(6) A description of the methodology
for evaluating key elements in the
technical evaluation plan, including any
solicitation evaluation factor involving
the acquisition of EIT products and
services subject to Section 508.
(C) Except as provided in OPDIV
procedures, a program office official at
least one level above the Project Officer
shall approve the technical evaluation
plan.
(D) The Project Officer shall provide
the technical evaluation plan to the
Contracting Officer for review and
approval before the solicitation is
issued. The Contracting Officer shall
ensure that the evaluation criteria reflect
the significant factors and subfactors
relating to the evaluation when
conducting the review of the plan.
(ii) Technical evaluation panel.
(A) General.
(1) A technical evaluation panel is
required for all acquisitions subject to
this subpart that require preparation of
an AP. The Contracting Officer may
require a technical evaluation panel for
acquisitions that do not require
preparation of an AP, based on the
complexity of the acquisition and the
role that the technical evaluation will
have in the award decision.
(2) The technical evaluation process
requires careful consideration regarding
the size, composition, expertise, and
function of the technical evaluation
panel. The panel’s efforts will influence
the success or failure of the acquisition.
(3) At least 50 percent of the HHS
personnel on a technical evaluation
panel shall have successfully completed
HHS University’s ‘‘Basic Contracting
Officer’s Technical Representative’’
course or an equivalent course before
assuming their designated role. This
training requirement applies to
evaluators performing the initial
technical evaluation and any
subsequent technical evaluations.
However, this training requirement does
not apply to peer review panel
members.
(B) Role of the Project Officer.
(1) The Project Officer provides
guidance, information, and assistance to
the Contracting Officer on all technical
aspects of a proposed acquisition—see
302.101. The Project Officer may be a
voting member of the technical
evaluation panel and may serve as the
chairperson of the panel unless
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
prohibited by law or contracting activity
procedures.
(2) The Project Officer shall
recommend panel members who have
sufficient expertise in the technical
aspects of the acquisition to be able to
evaluate strengths and weaknesses in
proposals.
(3) The Project Officer shall ensure
that persons possessing expertise and
experience in addressing issues relative
to sex, race, national origin, and
disability are included as panel
members for acquisitions to which such
issues apply.
(4) The Project Officer shall submit a
list of recommended panel members to
a program office official at least one
level higher than him/herself. This
official shall review the list and select
the chairperson.
(5) The Project Officer shall arrange
for adequate and secure working space
for the panel.
(C) Role of the Contracting Officer.
(1) The term ‘‘Contracting Officer,’’ as
used in this subpart, may be the
Contracting Officer or a Contract
Specialist possessing an appropriate
FAC–C certification.
(2) The Contracting Officer shall not
serve as a member of the technical
evaluation panel, but shall—
(i) Address the initial meeting of the
technical evaluation panel;
(ii) Provide assistance to the
evaluators as required; and
(iii) Ensure that the scores adequately
reflect the written technical report
comments.
(D) Conflict of interest.
(1) If a panel member has an actual or
apparent conflict of interest related to a
proposal under evaluation, the
individual cannot serve on the panel. If
a suitable replacement is not available,
the panel shall perform the review
without a replacement.
(2) For the purposes of this subpart,
conflicts of interest are defined in the
Standards of Ethical Conduct for
Employees of the Executive Branch (5
CFR part 2635), Supplemental
Standards of Ethical Conduct for
Employees of the Department of Health
and Human Services (5 CFR part 5501),
and the Procurement Integrity Act. For
outside evaluators serving on the
technical evaluation panel, see
paragraph (a)(3)(ii)(F) of this section.
(E) Continuity of evaluation process.
(1) The technical evaluation panel
shall evaluate all original proposals;
make recommendations to the
chairperson regarding strengths and
weaknesses of proposals; if required by
the Contracting Officer, assist the
Contracting Officer during
communications and discussions; and
E:\FR\FM\27NOR2.SGM
27NOR2
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES_2
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 227 / Friday, November 27, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
review supplemental, revised or final
proposal revisions. To the extent
possible, the same evaluators shall be
available throughout the entire
evaluation and selection process to
ensure continuity and consistency in
the treatment of proposals. The
following are examples of circumstances
when it would not be necessary for the
technical evaluation panel to evaluate
revised proposals submitted during the
acquisition:
(i) The answers to questions do not
have a substantial impact on the
proposal.
(ii) Final proposal revisions are not
materially different from the original
proposals.
(iii) Revisions to the proposals are
relatively minor and do not affect the
rankings of the offerors.
(2) The Contracting Officer, with the
written concurrence of the technical
evaluation panel chairperson, may
decide not to have the panel evaluate
the revised proposals. The Contracting
Officer shall fully document such a
decision in the contract file.
(3) When the Contracting Officer
considers technical evaluation panel
meetings necessary, the attendance of
evaluators is mandatory. When the
chairperson determines that an
evaluator’s failure to attend the
meetings is prejudicial to the
evaluation, the chairperson shall
remove or replace the individual after
discussing the situation with the
Contracting Officer and obtaining the
Contracting Officer’s concurrence and
the approval of the official responsible
for appointing the panel members.
(4) When continuity of the evaluation
process is not possible, and new
evaluators are selected or the size of the
evaluation panel is reduced, each panel
member shall review all proposals at the
current stage of the acquisition—i.e.,
initial proposal, final proposal
revisions, etc. Also, the Contracting
Officer shall provide guidance
concerning what steps to take if an
unusually large number of proposals is
received, including how to determine
what constitutes an unusually large
number of proposals.
(F) Use of outside evaluators.
(1) Except when peer review is
required by statute as provided in
315.303–70(a), decisions to disclose
proposals to evaluators outside of the
Government shall be made by the
official responsible for appointing panel
members in accordance with OPDIV
procedures. The avoidance of
organization conflict of interest and
competitive relationships must be taken
into consideration when making the
decision to use outside evaluators.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:54 Nov 25, 2009
Jkt 220001
(2) When a solicited proposal will be
disclosed outside the Government for
evaluation purposes, the following or
similar conditions shall be part of the
written agreement with the evaluator(s)
prior to disclosure:
Conditions for Evaluating Proposals
The evaluator agrees to use the data (trade
secrets, business data, and technical data)
contained in the proposal for evaluation
purposes only. The foregoing requirement
does not apply to data obtained from another
source without restriction. Any notice or
legend placed on the proposal by either HHS
or the submitter of the proposal shall be
applied to any reproduction or abstract
provided to the evaluator or made by the
evaluator. Upon completion of the
evaluation, the evaluator shall return to the
Government the furnished copy of the
proposal or abstract, and all copies thereof,
to the HHS office which initially furnished
the proposal for evaluation. Unless
authorized by the HHS initiating office, the
evaluator shall not contact the submitter of
the proposal concerning any aspects of its
contents. The evaluator’s employees and
subcontractors shall abide by these
conditions.
(iii) Receipt of proposals.
(A) After the closing date for the
receipt of proposals set in the
solicitation, the Contracting Officer
shall forward the technical proposals,
by memorandum, to the Project Officer
or chairperson for evaluation. The
Contracting Officer shall retain the
business proposals for evaluation.
(B) The transmittal memorandum
shall include at least the following
elements:
(1) A list of the names of the
organizations submitting proposals.
(2) A reference to the need to preserve
the integrity of the source selection
process.
(3) A statement that only the
Contracting Officer is authorized to
conduct discussions.
(4) A requirement for a technical
evaluation report in accordance with
paragraph (a)(3)(vi) of this section.
(5) The establishment of a date for
receipt of the technical evaluation
report.
(iv) Convening the technical
evaluation panel.
(A) Normally, the technical evaluation
panel convenes to evaluate proposals.
However, there may be situations when
the panel chairperson determines that it
is not feasible for the panel to convene.
Whenever the panel does not convene,
the panel chairperson shall closely
monitor the technical review to produce
acceptable results.
(B) When a panel convenes, the
chairperson shall control the technical
proposals provided by the Contracting
Officer for use during the evaluation
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
62429
process. The chairperson normally
distributes the technical proposals prior
to the initial panel meeting and
establishes procedures for securing the
proposals whenever they are not being
evaluated to ensure their
confidentiality. After an evaluation is
completed, the chairperson shall return
all proposals to the Contracting Officer.
(C) The Contracting Officer shall
address the initial meeting of the panel
and state the basic rules for conducting
the evaluation. The Contracting Officer
shall provide written guidance to the
panel, if the Contracting Officer cannot
attend the initial panel meeting. The
guidance shall include the following
elements:
(1) An explanation of the evaluation
process and the role of evaluators
throughout the process.
(2) The need for evaluators to read
and understand the solicitation,
especially the SOW/PWS and
evaluation criteria, prior to reading the
proposals.
(3) The need for evaluators to restrict
the review to only the SOW/PWS, the
evaluation criteria, and the contents of
the technical proposals.
(4) The need for each evaluator to
review all of the proposals.
(5) The need for evaluators to identify
ambiguities, inconsistencies, errors, and
deficiencies.
(6) The need for the evaluators to
provide complete written
documentation of the individual
strengths and weaknesses for each
proposal.
(7) An instruction specifying that,
until an award is made, they may not
disclose information concerning the
acquisition to any person not directly
involved in the evaluation process.
(8) An explanation of conflicts of
interest.
(v) Rating and ranking of proposals.
The evaluators shall individually read
each proposal, describe tentative
strengths and weaknesses, and
independently assign preliminary scores
in relation to each evaluation factor set
forth in the solicitation. The evaluators
may then discuss in detail the
individual strengths and weakness
described by each evaluator and, if
possible, arrive at a common
understanding of the major strengths
and weaknesses and the potential for
correcting each offeror’s weakness(es).
Each evaluator shall assign a final score
to each proposal, and the technical
evaluation panel shall collectively rank
the proposals. Normally, ranking is the
result of adding the numerical scores
assigned to the evaluation factors and
determining the average for each offeror.
The evaluators shall then identify
E:\FR\FM\27NOR2.SGM
27NOR2
62430
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 227 / Friday, November 27, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
whether each proposal is acceptable or
unacceptable. The technical evaluation
panel shall not employ predetermined
cutoff scores.
(vi) Technical evaluation report. The
chairperson shall prepare a technical
evaluation report and provide it to the
Contracting Officer, who shall maintain
it as a permanent record in the contract
file. The report shall reflect the ranking
of the proposals and identify each
proposal as acceptable or unacceptable.
The report shall also include a narrative
evaluation specifying the strengths and
weaknesses of each proposal, and any
reservations, qualifications, or areas to
be addressed that might bear upon the
selection of sources for negotiation and
award. The report shall include concrete
technical reasons supporting any
determination of unacceptability of a
proposal and, for acceptable proposals,
include specific points and questions
for discussions or negotiations. The
technical evaluation report shall also
include a copy of each signed rating
sheet, unless the Contracting Officer
determines, in accordance with FAR
15.305(a)(3)(ii), and 315.305(a)(3)(vi),
that the technical evaluation report
includes appropriate and sufficiently
detailed supporting narrative (with
specific references to particular portions
of offerors’ proposals) to (1) fully and
reasonably explain the basis for the
technical evaluation panel’s
assessments of each proposal, including
an evaluation rating of ‘‘acceptable’’ or
‘‘unacceptable; and (2) support any
recommendation to include or not
include a proposal in the competitive
range. However, when peer review of
proposals is required as provided in
315.303–70(a), OPDIVs shall follow
applicable peer review guidelines and
practices regarding the submission,
maintenance, and disposal of reviewer
rating sheets.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES_2
315.306 Exchanges with offerors after
receipt of proposals.
(d) Exchanges with offerors after
establishment of the competitive range.
The Project Officer or technical
evaluation panel shall develop technical
questions as part of the technical
evaluation report. The questions shall
disclose the ambiguities, weaknesses,
and deficiencies of offeror(s)’ proposals.
The Contracting Officer, with the
assistance of the Project Officer or panel
as required, shall prepare the
management, past performance, and
cost or price questions. The method of
requesting offerors in the competitive
range to submit additional information
may vary depending on the complexity
of the questions, the extent of additional
information necessary, the time needed
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:54 Nov 25, 2009
Jkt 220001
to analyze the responses, and the time
frame for making the award. However,
to the extent practicable, all questions
and answers shall be in writing. The
Contracting Officer shall give each
offeror in the competitive range an
equitable period of time for preparation
of responses to questions to the extent
practicable.
315.307
Proposal revisions.
(b) Final proposal revisions are
subject to—
(1) A final evaluation of price or cost
and other salient factors by the
Contracting Officer and Project Officer,
with assistance from a cost/price
analyst, as appropriate; and
(2) An evaluation of technical factors
by the technical evaluation panel, as
necessary.
The technical evaluation panel may
rescore and re-rank technical proposals
in the competitive range and prepare a
technical evaluation report. To the
extent practicable, the same evaluators
who reviewed the original proposals
shall perform the evaluation. The
Contracting Officer and Project Officer
shall conduct a final evaluation of past
performance. The technical evaluation
panel may be involved in the final
evaluation of past performance, if the
panel is comprised solely of
Government personnel.
315.370 Finalization of details with the
selected source.
(a) After selection of the successful
proposal, the Contracting Officer may
finalize details with the selected offeror,
if necessary. However, the Contracting
Officer shall not introduce any factor
that could have an effect on the
selection process after the common
cutoff date for receipt of final proposal
revisions, nor shall the finalization
process in any way prejudice the
competitive interest or rights of the
unsuccessful offerors. The Contracting
Officer shall restrict finalization of
details with the selected offeror to
definitizing the final agreement on
terms and conditions, assuming none of
these factors were involved in the
selection process.
(b) Whenever a change occurs in the
requirements, the Contracting Officer
shall reopen the competition, and
provide all offerors submitting final
proposal revisions an opportunity to
resubmit proposals based on the revised
requirements. If there is a question as to
whether a change is material and would
require the initiation of a new
competition, the Contracting Officer
shall obtain the advice of technical
personnel and OGC–GLD before
proceeding. Significant changes in the
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
offeror’s cost proposal may also
necessitate a reopening of a
competition, if the changes alter the
factors involved in the original selection
process.
(c) Upon finalization of details, the
Contracting Officer shall obtain a
confirmation letter from the successful
offeror which includes any revisions to
its technical proposal, the agreed upon
price or cost, and, as applicable, a
certificate of current cost or pricing
data.
315.371
Contract preparation and award.
(a) After completing any activities that
may be necessary to finalize details with
the selected offeror, the Contracting
Officer shall—
(1) Prepare the negotiation
memorandum in accordance with
315.372;
(2) Prepare the contract containing all
agreed to terms and conditions and
clauses required by law or regulation;
(3) Include in the contract file the
pertinent documents referenced in FAR
4.803; and
(4) Obtain the appropriate approval of
the proposed contract award(s) in
accordance with subpart 304.71 and
contracting activity procedures.
(b) After receiving the required
approvals, the Contracting Officer
shall—
(1) Transmit the contract to the
prospective contractor for signature; and
(2) Inform the prospective contractor
that the contract is not effective until
the Contracting Officer transmits the
fully executed contract to the contractor.
(c) The Contracting Officer shall not
sign or issue the contract until the
finance office certifies that the funds are
available for obligation.
315.372 Preparation of negotiation
memorandum.
The Contracting Officer shall prepare
a negotiation memorandum, or
summary of negotiations, to document
all actions leading to award of a contract
and support the source selection
decision discussed in FAR 15.308. The
memorandum also satisfies the
requirement for preparation of a ‘‘cost/
price negotiation memorandum’’
required by FAR 15.406–3. The
memorandum shall be in sufficient
detail to explain and support the
rationale, judgments, and authorities
upon which all actions were predicated.
The memorandum shall document the
negotiation process and reflect the
negotiator’s actions and judgments in
concluding a satisfactory agreement for
the Government. The memorandum
shall address each item listed below. If
an item is not applicable, the
E:\FR\FM\27NOR2.SGM
27NOR2
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES_2
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 227 / Friday, November 27, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
memorandum shall so state. The
Contracting Officer may reference
information already contained in the
contract file rather than reiterate it.
(a) Description of articles and services
and period of performance. Provide a
description of the articles or services,
quantity, unit price, total contract
amount, and period of contract
performance.
(b) Acquisition planning. Summarize
or reference any acquisition planning
activities that have taken place.
(c) Synopsis of acquisition. Provide a
statement as to whether the acquisition
has or has not been publicized in
accordance with FAR Subpart 5.2.
Include a brief statement referencing the
specific basis for exemption under the
FAR, if applicable.
(d) Contract type. Provide sufficient
detail to support the type of contractual
instrument recommended for the
acquisition. If the contract is a costsharing type, explain the essential costsharing features.
(e) Extent of competition. Discuss the
extent to which full and open
competition was solicited and obtained.
Include the date of solicitation, sources
solicited, and solicitation results. If a
late proposal was received, discuss
whether or not the late proposal was
evaluated and the rationale for the
decision.
(f) Technical evaluation. Summarize
or reference the results presented in the
technical evaluation report.
(g) Business evaluation. Summarize or
reference results presented in the
business report.
(h) Past performance. Summarize or
reference results of both the past
performance evaluation and reference
checks.
(i) Competitive range (if applicable).
Describe how the competitive range was
determined, and indicate the offerors
that were included in and excluded
from the competitive range.
(j) Cost breakdown and analysis.
Include a complete cost breakdown
together with the Contracting Officer’s
analysis of the estimated cost by
individual cost elements. The analysis
shall discuss the items specified in FAR
15.406–3 and other cost factors, such
as—
(1) A comparison of cost factors
proposed for the current requirement
with actual factors used in earlier
contracts, using the same cost centers of
the same supplier or cost centers of
other sources having recent contracts for
the same or similar item;
(2) Any pertinent Governmentconducted audit of the proposed
contractor’s record or any pertinent cost
advisory report;
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:54 Nov 25, 2009
Jkt 220001
(3) Any pertinent technical evaluation
inputs as to necessity, allocability and
reasonableness of labor, material and
other direct expenses;
(4) Any other pertinent information to
fully support the basis for the cost
analysis;
(5) If the contract is an incentive type,
a discussion of all elements of profit and
fee structure; and
(6) A justification of the
reasonableness of the contractor’s
proposed profit or fixed fee considering
the requirements of FAR 15.404–4 and
315.404–4.
(k) Cost realism. Describe the cost
realism analysis performed on
proposals.
(l) Government-furnished property
and facilities. With respect to
Government-furnished facilities,
equipment, tooling, or other property,
include the following:
(1) If the Government will not provide
property, a statement to that effect.
(2) If the Government will provide
property, a full description of it, its
estimated dollar value, the basis of price
comparison with competitors, and the
basis of rental charge, if rental is
involved.
(3) If a decision to furnish property
has not been made, a detailed
explanation.
(m) Negotiations. Include a statement
as to the date and place of negotiations,
and identify members of both the
Government and contractor negotiating
teams by area of responsibility. Include
negotiation details relative to the SOW/
PWS, terms and conditions, and special
provisions. The results of cost or price
negotiations shall include the
information required by FAR 31.109 and
15.406–3. In addition, if the potential
contractor provided cost or pricing data,
specify the extent to which the
Contracting Officer relied upon the
factual cost or pricing data submitted
and used it in negotiating the cost or
price.
(n) Other considerations. Include
coverage of areas such as the following:
(1) Financial data with respect to a
contractor’s capacity and stability.
(2) Determination of contractor
responsibility.
(3) Details as to why the method of
payment, such as progress payments,
advance payments, etc., is necessary
and cite any required D & F’s.
(4) Information with respect to
obtaining a certificate of current cost or
pricing data.
(5) Other required special approvals.
(6) If the contract represents an
extension of previous work, the status of
funds and performance under the prior
contract(s). Also, the Project Officer
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
62431
shall provide sufficient information for
the Contracting Officer to determine that
the Government has obtained enough
actual or potential value from the work
previously performed to warrant
continuation with the same contractor.
(7) A statement that the Contracting
Officer has explained the equal
opportunity provisions of the proposed
contract to the contractor, and the
contractor is aware of its
responsibilities. Also, state whether or
not an Equal Employment Opportunity
(EEO) clearance is required.
(8) If the contract is for services, a
statement, in accordance with FAR
37.103, that the services are
nonpersonal in nature.
(o) Terms and conditions. Identify the
general and special clauses and
conditions that are contained in the
contract, such as option arrangements,
multi-year contracting, anticipatory
costs, deviations from standard clauses,
etc. The Contracting Officer shall state
the rationale for inclusion of any special
terms and conditions and, where
applicable, identify the document
which granted approval for their use.
(p) Recommendation. Briefly state the
basis (or bases) for recommending
award.
(q) Signature. The Contracting Officer
and the individual who prepared the
negotiation memorandum must sign the
document.
Subpart 315.4—Contract Pricing
315.404
Proposal analysis.
315.404–2
analysis.
Information to support proposal
(a)(2) When some or all information
sufficient to determine the
reasonableness of the proposed cost or
price is already available or can be
obtained by phone from the cognizant
audit agency, the Contracting Officer
may request less-than-complete field
pricing support (specifying in the
request the information needed) or may
waive in writing the requirement for
audit and field pricing support by
documenting the file to indicate what
information will be used instead of the
audit report and the field pricing report.
(3) When initiating audit and field
pricing support, the Contracting Officer
shall do so by sending a request to the
cognizant Administrative Contracting
Officer, with an information copy to the
cognizant audit office. When field
pricing support is not available, the
Contracting Officer shall initiate an
audit by sending, in accordance with
agency procedures, two (2) copies of the
request to the OIG Office of Audit
Services, Regional Inspector General. In
E:\FR\FM\27NOR2.SGM
27NOR2
62432
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 227 / Friday, November 27, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
both cases, the Contracting Officer shall,
in the request—
(i) Prescribe the extent of the support
needed;
(ii) State the specific areas for which
input is required;
(iii) Include the information necessary
to perform the review, such as the
offeror’s proposal and the applicable
portions of the solicitation, particularly
those describing requirements and
delivery schedules;
(iv) Provide the complete address of
the location of the offeror’s financial
records that support the proposal;
(v) Identify the office having audit
responsibility, if other than the HHS
Regional Audit Office; and
(vi) Specify a due date for receipt of
a verbal report and the written audit
report. If the time available is not
adequate to permit satisfactory coverage
of the proposal, the auditor shall so
advise the Contracting Officer and
indicate the additional time needed.
The Contracting Officer shall submit
one copy of the audit request letter
provided to the Office of Audit Services,
Regional Inspector General and a
complete copy of the contract price
proposal to OIG Office of Audit
Services. Whenever the Office of Audit
Services has conducted an audit review,
the Contracting Officer shall forward
two (2) copies of the memorandum of
negotiation to OIG Office of Audit
Services.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES_2
315.404–4
Profit.
(b) Policy.
(1) The structured approach for
determining profit provides a technique
for establishing a profit objective for
negotiation. A profit objective is that
part of the estimated contract price
objective or value which, in the
judgment of the Contracting Officer,
constitutes an appropriate amount of
profit for the acquisition being
considered. This technique allows for
consideration of the profit factors
described in paragraph (d) of this
section. The Contracting Officer’s
analysis of these factors shall be based
on available information, such as
proposals, audit data, assessment
reports, and pre-award surveys. The
structured approach provides a basis for
documenting the profit objective. The
Contracting Officer shall explain any
significant departure from this objective.
The amount of documentation depends
on the dollar value and complexity of
the proposed acquisition. The profit
objective is a part of the overall
negotiation objective and is directly
related to the cost objective and any
proposed sharing arrangement. The
profit objective shall exclude factors
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:07 Nov 25, 2009
Jkt 220001
considered inapplicable to the
acquisition.
(ii) The Contracting Officer shall
negotiate the profit objective at the same
time as the other cost items and as a
whole rather than as individual profit
factors. The profit factor breakdown
shall be part of the documentation. The
Contracting Officer shall use the profit
analysis factors in FAR 15.404–4(d) in
lieu of the structured approach in the
following circumstances:
(A) Contracts not expected to exceed
$100,000.
(B) A & E contracts.
(C) Management contracts for
operations or maintenance of
Government facilities.
(D) Construction contracts.
(E) Contracts primarily requiring
delivery of material supplies by
subcontractors
(F) Termination settlements.
(G) Cost-plus-award-fee contracts.
However, the Contracting Officer may
perform a structured profit analysis as
an aid in arriving at an appropriate fee
arrangement. The Contracting Officer
may make other exceptions in the
negotiation of contracts having unusual
pricing situations, but shall justify in
writing those situations where the
structured approach is determined to be
unsuitable.
(c) Contracting Officer
responsibilities. The Contracting Officer
shall develop the profit objective, which
shall realistically reflect the total overall
effort of the contractor. The Contracting
Officer shall not begin to develop the
profit objective until he or she has
completed a thorough review of the
proposed contract work; conducted a
review of all available knowledge
regarding the contractor pursuant to
FAR subpart 9.1, including audit data,
pre-award survey reports and financial
statements, as appropriate; and
completed an analysis of the
contractor’s cost estimate and
comparison with the Government’s
estimate or projection of cost.
(d) Profit-analysis factors.
(1) Common factors. The Contracting
Officer shall consider the following
factors in all cases in which profit is
negotiated and shall use the weight
ranges listed after each factor in all
instances where the structured approach
is used.
Weight
ranges (%)
Profit factors
Contractor Effort:
Material acquisition ...........
Direct labor ...........................
Overhead ..............................
General & Administrative (G
& A).
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
1
4
4
4
to
to
to
to
5.
15.
9.
8.
Profit factors
Other costs ...........................
Other Factors:
Cost risk ................................
Investment ............................
Performance .........................
Socioeconomic programs .....
Special situations
Weight
ranges (%)
1 to 5.
0 to 7.
¥2 to +2.
¥1 to +1.
¥.5 to +.5.
(i) The Contracting Officer shall
measure ‘‘Contractor Effort’’ by
assigning a profit percentage within the
designated weight range to each element
of contract cost. The categories listed are
for reference purposes only, but are
broad and basic enough to provide
guidance for other elements of cost. The
Contracting Officer shall not include
facilities capital cost of money.
‘‘Contractor Effort’’ shall include a
computed total dollar profit.
(ii) The Contracting Officer shall use
the total dollar profit for the ‘‘Contractor
Effort’’ to calculate specific profit
dollars for ‘‘Other Factors’’—cost risk,
investment, performance,
socioeconomic programs, and special
situations. The Contracting Officer shall
multiply the total dollar profit for the
‘‘Contractor Effort’’ by the weight
assigned to each of the elements in the
‘‘Other Factors’’ category. Facilities
capital cost of money is not included.
Form HHS 674, Structured Approach
Profit/Fee Objective, shall be used.
(iii) In making a judgment of the value
of each factor, the Contracting Officer
shall consider the definition,
description, and purpose of the factors
together with considerations for
evaluating them.
(iv) The structured approach was
designed for arriving at profit objectives
for other than nonprofit organizations.
However, the Contracting Officer shall
use the modified structured approach in
paragraph (d)(1)(iv)(B) of this section to
establish fee objectives for nonprofit
organizations.
(A) For purposes of this section,
nonprofit organizations are defined as
those business entities organized and
operated exclusively for charitable,
scientific, or educational purposes, no
part of the net earnings of which inure
to the benefit of any private shareholder
or individual, and which are exempt
from Federal income taxation under
Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal
Revenue Code.
(B) For contracts with nonprofit
organizations where fee is involved, the
Contracting Officer shall subtract up to
three percentage points from the total
‘‘profit’’ objective percentage. In
determining the amount of this
adjustment, the Contracting Officer shall
consider the following factors:
E:\FR\FM\27NOR2.SGM
27NOR2
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES_2
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 227 / Friday, November 27, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
(1) Tax position benefits.
(2) Granting of financing through
advance payments.
(3) Other pertinent factors which may
work to either the advantage or
disadvantage of the contractor in its
position as a nonprofit organization.
(2) Contractor effort. Contractor effort
is a measure of how much the contractor
is expected to contribute to the overall
effort necessary to meet the contract
performance requirement in an efficient
manner. This factor, which is apart from
the contractor’s responsibility for
contract performance, takes into account
what resources are necessary and what
steps the contractor must take to
accomplish a conversion of ideas and
material into the final service or product
called for in the contract. This is a
recognition that within a given
performance output, or within a given
sales dollar figure, necessary efforts on
the part of individual contractors can
vary widely in both value and quantity,
and that the profit objective shall reflect
the extent and nature of the contractor’s
contribution to total performance. A
major consideration, particularly in
connection with experimental or R & D
work, is the difficulty or complexity of
the work to be performed, and the
unusual demands of the contract, such
as whether the project involves a new
approach unrelated to existing
technology or equipment or only
refinements to these items. The
evaluation of this factor requires an
analysis of the cost content of the
proposed contract as follows:
(i) Material acquisition (subcontracted
items, purchased parts, and other
material). Analysis of these cost items
shall include an evaluation of the
managerial and technical effort
necessary to obtain the required
subcontracted items, purchased parts,
material or services. The Contracting
Officer shall determine whether the
contractor will obtain the items or
services by routine order from readily
available sources or by detailed
subcontracts for which the prime
contractor must develop complex
specifications. The Contracting Officer
shall also consider the managerial and
technical efforts necessary for the prime
contractor to select subcontractors and
to perform subcontract administration
functions, which may be substantial.
Normally, the lowest unadjusted weight
for direct material is two percent. A
weighting of less than two percent may
be appropriate only in unusual
circumstances when there is a minimal
contribution by the contractor.
(ii) Direct labor (professional, service,
manufacturing and other labor).
Analysis of the various labor categories
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:54 Nov 25, 2009
Jkt 220001
of the cost content of the contract shall
include evaluation of the comparative
quality and quantity of professional and
semiprofessional talents, manufacturing
and service skills, and experience to be
employed. In evaluating professional
and semiprofessional labor for the
purpose of assigning profit dollars, the
Contracting Officer shall consider the
amount of notable scientific talent or
unusual or scarce talent needed in
contrast to nonprofessional effort,
including the contribution this talent
will provide toward the achievement of
contract objectives. Since
nonprofessional labor is relatively
plentiful and the contractor may easily
obtain it, it is less critical to the
successful performance of contract
objectives. Therefore, the Contracting
Officer cannot weight it nearly as high
as professional or semiprofessional
labor. The Contracting Officer shall
evaluate service contract labor in a like
manner by assigning higher weights to
engineering or professional type skills
required for contract performance and
considering the variety of
manufacturing and other categories of
labor skills required and the contractor’s
personnel resources for meeting those
requirements. For purposes of
evaluation, the Contracting Officer may
separately categorize, as appropriate,
certain types of labor (e.g., quality
control, receiving and inspection), that
do not fall within the definition of
professional, service or manufacturing
labor; but shall apply the same
evaluation considerations as outlined in
this paragraph.
(iii) Overhead and G & A expense.
(A) Analysis of these overhead items
of cost shall include the evaluation of
the makeup of these expenses and how
much they contribute to contract
performance. To the extent practicable,
analysis shall include a determination
of the amount of labor within these
overhead pools and how this labor
would be treated if it were considered
direct labor under the contract. The
Contracting Officer shall give the
allocable labor elements the same profit
considerations that they would receive
if they were treated as direct labor. The
other elements of these overhead pools
require analysis to determine whether
they are routine expenses, such as
utilities and maintenance, and hence
given lesser profit consideration, or
whether they are significant
contributing elements. The composite of
the individual determinations in
relation to the elements of the overhead
pools shall be the profit consideration
given the pools as a whole. The
procedure for assigning relative values
to these overhead expenses differs from
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
62433
the method used in assigning values of
the direct labor. The upper and lower
limits assignable to the direct labor are
absolute. In the case of overhead
expenses, individual expenses may be
assigned values outside the range as
long as the composite ratio is within the
range.
(B) It is not necessary that the
contractor’s accounting system break
down overhead expenses within the
classifications of research overhead,
other overhead pools, and general
administrative expenses, unless dictated
otherwise by Cost Accounting Standards
(CAS). The contractor whose accounting
system reflects only one overhead rate
on all direct labor need not change its
system, if CAS exempt, to correspond
with these classifications. The
Contracting Officer, in an evaluation of
such a contractor’s overhead rate, may
break out the applicable sections of the
composite rate which could be
classified as research overhead, other
overhead pools, and general and
administrative expenses, and follow the
appropriate evaluation technique.
(C) The Contracting Officer shall
consider management problems that
may surface in varying degrees and the
management expertise exercised to
solve them as an element of profit. For
example, a contract for a new R & D
program or an item which is on the
cutting edge may cause more problems
and require more managerial time and
abilities of a higher order than a followon contract. If new contracts create more
problems and require a higher profit
weight, the Contracting Officer shall
adjust follow-ons downward because
many of the problems should have been
solved. In any event, the evaluation
shall consider the underlying
managerial effort involved on a case-bycase basis.
(D) It may not be necessary for the
Contracting Officer to make a separate
profit evaluation of overhead expenses,
in connection with each acquisition
action for substantially the same project
with the same contractor. Where the
Contracting Officer has made an
analysis of the profit weight to be
assigned to the overhead pool, the
weight assigned may apply to future
acquisitions with the same contractor
unless there is a change in the cost
composition of the overhead pool or
contract circumstances, or unless the
factors discussed in paragraph
(d)(2)(iii)(C) of this section are involved.
(iv) Other costs. Analysis of this factor
shall include all other direct costs
associated with contractor performance
(e.g., travel and relocation, direct
support, and consultants). Analysis of
these items of cost shall include the
E:\FR\FM\27NOR2.SGM
27NOR2
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES_2
62434
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 227 / Friday, November 27, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
significance of the cost of contract
performance, nature of the cost, and
how much they contribute to contract
performance. Normally, travel costs
require minimal administrative effort by
the contractor and, therefore, usually
receive a weight no greater than one
percent. Also, the contractor may
designate individuals as ‘‘consultants,’’
but in reality the contractor may obtain
these individuals to supplement its
workforce in the performance of routine
duties required by contract. These costs
would normally receive a minimum
weight. However, there may be
instances when contract performance
may require the contractor to obtain the
services of consultants having expertise
in fields such as medicine or human
services. In these instances, the
contractor may expend greater
managerial and technical effort to obtain
these services and, consequently, the
costs shall receive a much greater
weight.
(3) Other factors:
(i) Contract cost risk. The contract
type employed basically determines the
degree of cost risk assumed by the
contractor. For example, where a
portion of the risk has been shifted to
the Government through costreimbursement provisions, unusual
contingency provisions, or other riskreducing measures, the amount of profit
shall be less than where the contractor
assumes all the risk.
(A) In developing the prenegotiation
profit objective, the Contracting Officer
shall consider the type of contract
anticipated and the contractor risk
associated therewith, when selecting the
position in the weight range for profit
that is appropriate for the risk the
contractor will bear. This factor is one
of the most important in arriving at the
prenegotiation profit objective.
Evaluation of this risk requires a
determination of: The degree of cost
responsibility assumed by the
contractor; the reliability of the cost
estimates in relation to the tasks
assumed by the contractor; and the
complexity of the tasks assumed by the
contractor. This factor is specifically
limited to the risk of contract costs.
Risks associated with a contractor’s
reputation, a contractor’s potential loss
of a commercial market, or a
contractor’s loss of potential profits in
other fields, are not within the scope of
this factor.
(B) The first and basic determination
of the degree of cost responsibility
assumed by the contractor is related to
the sharing of total risk of contract cost
by the Government and the contractor
through the selection of contract type.
The extremes are a cost-plus-fixed-fee
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:54 Nov 25, 2009
Jkt 220001
contract requiring the contractor to use
its best efforts to perform a task and a
firm fixed-price contract for a service or
a complex item. A cost-plus-fixed-fee
contract would reflect a minimum
assumption of cost responsibility,
whereas a firm-fixed-price contract
would reflect a complete assumption of
cost responsibility. The determination
of risk by contract type usually falls into
the following percentage ranges:
Percent
Cost-plus-fixed-fee ...................
Cost-plus-incentive-fee .............
Fixed-price incentive ................
Firm-fixed-price .........................
0
1
2
3
to
to
to
to
0.5.
2.
3.
4.
(F) These ranges may not be
appropriate for all acquisitions. For
instance, a fixed-price incentive
contract with a low ceiling price and
high incentive share may be tantamount
to a firm fixed-price contract. In this
Percent
situation, the Contracting Officer may
determine that a basis exists for high
Cost-reimbursement type contracts .....................................
0–3 confidence in the reasonableness of the
Fixed-price type contracts ........
2–7 estimate and that little opportunity
exists for cost reduction without
extraordinary efforts. On the other hand,
(C) The second determination is that
a contract with a high ceiling and low
of the reliability of the cost estimates.
incentive formula can be considered to
Sound price negotiation requires wellcontain cost-plus-incentive-fee contract
defined contract objectives and reliable
features. In this situation, the
cost estimates. Prior experience assists
Contracting Officer may determine that
the contractor in preparing reliable cost
the Government is retaining much of the
estimates on new acquisitions for
contract cost responsibility and that the
similar efforts. An excessive cost
risk the contractor assumes is minimal.
estimate reduces the likelihood that the
Similarly, if a cost-plus-incentive-fee
cost of performance will exceed the
contract includes an unlimited
contract price, thereby reducing the
contractor’s assumption of contract cost downward (negative) fee adjustment on
cost control, it could be comparable to
risk.
a fixed-price-incentive contract. In such
(D) The third determination is that of
a pricing environment, the Contracting
the difficulty of the contractor’s task.
Officer may determine that the
The contractor’s task can be difficult or
Government has transferred a greater
easy, regardless of the type of contract.
amount of cost responsibility to the
(E) Contractors are likely to assume
contractor than is typical under a
greater cost risk only if Contracting
normal cost-plus-incentive-fee contract.
Officers objectively analyze the risk
(G) The contractor’s subcontracting
associated with proposed contracts and
program may have a significant impact
are willing to compensate contractors
on the contractor’s acceptance of risk. It
for it. Generally, a cost-plus-fixed fee
contract will not justify a reward for risk could cause risk to increase or decrease
in terms of both cost and performance.
in excess of 0.5 percent, nor will a firm
This consideration shall be a part of the
fixed-price contract justify a reward of
less than the minimum in the structured Contracting Officer’s overall evaluation
in selecting a factor to apply to cost risk.
approach. The reward for risk, by
The Contracting Officer may determine,
contract type, will usually fall into the
for instance, that the prime contractor
following percentage ranges:
has effectively transferred real cost risk
(1) Type of contract and percentage
to a subcontractor and the contract cost
ranges for profit objectives based on
risk evaluation may, as a result, be
structured approach for R & D and
below the range which would otherwise
manufacturing contracts:
apply for the contract type being
proposed. However, without any
Percent
substantial transfer of cost risk from the
Cost-plus-fixed-fee ................... 0 to 0.5.
prime contractor to a subcontractor, the
Cost-plus-incentive-fee: With
1 to 2.
Contracting Officer shall not lower the
cost incentive only.
contract cost risk evaluation merely
With multiple incentives ............ 1.5 to 3.
because a substantial portion of the
Fixed-price-incentive: With cost 2 to 4.
contract costs represents subcontracts.
incentive only.
(H) In making a contract cost risk
With multiple incentives ............ 3 to 5.
evaluation for an acquisition that
Prospective price redetermina3 to 5.
involves definitization of a letter
tion.
Firm-fixed-price ......................... 5 to 7.
contract, unpriced change orders, and
unpriced orders under basic ordering
(2) Type of contract and percentage
agreements, the Contracting Officer
ranges for profit objectives based on the shall consider the effect on total
structured approach for service
contract cost risk of partial performance
contracts:
before definitization. Under some
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\27NOR2.SGM
27NOR2
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES_2
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 227 / Friday, November 27, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
circumstances, the total amount of cost
risk may have been effectively reduced.
Under other circumstances it may be
apparent that the contractor’s cost risk
remains substantially unchanged. To be
equitable, the Contracting Officer shall
make the determination of profit weight
for all recognized costs, both incurred
and yet to be expended, considering all
attendant circumstances—not merely
the portion of costs incurred or
percentage of work completed prior to
definitization.
(I) The Contracting Officer shall
consider time-and-materials and laborhour contracts to be cost-plus-fixed-fee
contracts for the purpose of establishing
profit weights in the evaluation of the
contractor’s assumption of contract cost
risk, unless otherwise exempt from use
of the structured approach under
paragraph (b)(1)(ii) of this section.
(ii) Investment. HHS encourages its
contractors to perform their contracts
with the minimum of financial,
facilities, or other assistance from the
Government. As such, it is the purpose
of this factor to encourage the contractor
to acquire and use its own resources to
the maximum extent possible. The
evaluation of this factor shall include an
analysis of the following:
(A) Facilities (including equipment).
Evaluating how this factor contributes to
the profit objective requires knowledge
of the level of facilities utilization
needed for contract performance, the
source and financing of the required
facilities, and the overall costeffectiveness of the facilities offered.
The Contracting Officer shall provide
contractors with additional profit, if
they furnish their own facilities and
such contractor-furnished facilities
contribute significantly to lower total
contract costs. On the other hand,
contractors that rely on the Government
to provide or finance needed facilities
shall receive a corresponding reduction
in profit. Between these extremes, the
Contracting Officer shall evaluate cases
on their merits and make positive or
negative adjustments in profit, as
appropriate. When applicable, the
contractor’s computation of facilities
capital cost of money under CAS 414
can help the Contracting Officer identify
the level of facilities investment the
contractor will employ in contract
performance.
(B) Payments. In analyzing this factor,
the Contracting Officer shall consider
the frequency of payments by the
Government to the contractor. The key
to this weighting is to give proper
consideration to the impact the contract
will have on the contractor’s cash flow.
Generally, negative consideration
applies to advance payments and
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:54 Nov 25, 2009
Jkt 220001
payments more frequent than monthly,
with the Contracting Officer making a
maximum reduction as the contractor’s
working capital approaches zero. The
Contracting Officer shall generally give
positive consideration for payments less
frequent than monthly and for a capital
turn-over rate on the contract less than
the contractor’s or the industry’s normal
capital turn-over rate.
(iii) Performance (cost control and
other past accomplishments). The
Contracting Officer shall evaluate the
contractor’s past performance in areas
such as: quality of services or products,
meeting performance schedules,
efficiency in cost control (including
need for and reasonableness of costs
incurred), accuracy and reliability of
previous cost estimates, degree of
cooperation (both business and
technical), compliance with previous
contract requirements, and management
of subcontract programs. Where a
contractor has consistently achieved
excellent results in these areas in
comparison with other contractors in
similar circumstances, this performance
merits a proportionately greater
opportunity for profit. Conversely, a
poor record in this regard warrants less
profit.
(iv) Federal socioeconomic programs.
This factor, which may apply to special
circumstances or particular acquisitions,
relates to the extent of a contractor’s
successful participation in Government
sponsored programs involving: Small
businesses; HUBZone small businesses;
service-disabled, veteran-owned small
businesses; 8(a) small businesses;
women-owned small businesses; small
disadvantaged businesses; sheltered
workshops for the disabled; mentor´ ´
protege; energy conservation, etc. The
Contracting Officer shall give positive
consideration for the contractor’s
policies and practices that support
Federal socioeconomic programs and
contribute to successful results.
Conversely, the Contracting Officer shall
view failure or unwillingness on the
part of the contractor to support Federal
socioeconomic programs as evidence of
poor performance for the purpose of
establishing a profit objective.
(v) Special situations.
(A) Inventive and developmental
contributions. The Contracting Officer
shall consider the extent and nature of
contractor-initiated and contractorfinanced independent development in
formulating the profit objective,
provided that the Contracting Officer
has made a determination that the effort
will benefit the contract. Examples of
profit weighting factors include
contribution of the independent
development to health and human
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
62435
service-related missions; the initiative
demonstrated by the contractor in
pursuing the independent development;
the extent of the contractor’s cost risk;
and whether the independent
development cost was recovered
directly or indirectly from Government
sources.
(B) Unusual pricing agreements.
Occasionally, unusual contract pricing
arrangements are made with the
contractor wherein it agrees to cost
ceilings (e.g., a ceiling on overhead rates
for conditions other than those
discussed at FAR 42.707). In these
circumstances, the Contracting Officer
shall give the contractor favorable
consideration in developing a profit
objective.
(C) Negative factors. Special
situations need not be limited to those
which only increase profit levels. A
negative consideration may be
appropriate when the contractor is
expected to obtain spin-off-benefits as a
direct result of the contract (e.g.,
products or services with commercial
application).
(4) Facilities capital cost of money.
When facilities capital cost of money
(cost of capital committed to facilities)
is included as an item of cost in the
contractor’s proposal, the Contracting
Officer shall reduce the profit objective
in an amount equal to the amount of
facilities capital cost of money allowed
in accordance with the Facilities Capital
Cost-of-Money cost principle. If the
contractor does not propose this cost,
the Contracting Officer shall insert a
provision in the contract that makes
facilities capital cost of money an
unallowable cost.
Subpart 315.6—Unsolicited Proposals
315.605
Content of unsolicited proposals.
(d) Certification by offeror. To ensure
against contacts between HHS personnel
and prospective offerors that would
exceed the limits of advance guidance
set forth in FAR 15.604 and potentially
result in an unfair advantage to an
offeror, the Contracting Officer shall:
Furnish the following certification
template to any prospective offeror of an
unsolicited proposal; and require that
the executed certification be included in
any resultant unsolicited proposal:
Unsolicited Proposal
Certification by Offeror
This is to certify, to the best of my
knowledge and belief, that—
(a) This proposal has not been prepared
under Government supervision;
(b) The methods and approaches stated in
the proposal were developed by this offeror;
E:\FR\FM\27NOR2.SGM
27NOR2
62436
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 227 / Friday, November 27, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
(c) Any contact with Department of Health
and Human Services (HHS) personnel has
been within the limits of appropriate advance
guidance set forth in FAR 15.604; and
(d) No prior commitments were received
from HHS personnel regarding acceptance of
this proposal.
Date: llllllllllllllllll
Organization llllllllllllll
Name llllllllllllllllll
Title llllllllllllllllll
(This certification shall be signed by
a responsible management official of the
proposing organization or by a person
authorized to contractually obligate the
organization.)
315.606
Agency procedures.
(a) The HCA is responsible for
establishing procedures to comply with
FAR 15.606(a).
(b) The HCA or designee shall be the
point of contact for coordinating the
receipt and processing of unsolicited
proposals.
315.606–1
Receipt and initial review.
(d) OPDIVs shall not refuse
consideration of an unsolicited proposal
because an organization initially
submitted it as a grant application.
However, OPDIVs shall not award
contracts based on unsolicited proposals
that have been rejected for grant awards
due to lack of scientific merit.
315.609
Limited use of data.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES_2
An offeror shall use the legend, Use
and Disclosure of Data, prescribed in
FAR 15.609(a), to restrict the use of data
for evaluation purposes only. However,
data contained within the unsolicited
proposal may need to be disclosed as a
result of a request submitted pursuant to
the Freedom of Information Act.
Because of this possibility, the
Contracting Officer shall provide the
following notice to all prospective
offerors of unsolicited proposals:
‘‘The Government will attempt to comply
with the ‘‘Use and Disclosure of Data’’
legend. However, the Government may not be
able to withhold a record (data, document,
etc.) or deny access to a record requested by
an individual (the public) when an obligation
is imposed on the Government under the
Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. 552, as
amended. The Government determination to
withhold or disclose a record will be based
upon the particular circumstances
surrounding the record and on whether the
record is exempt from disclosure under the
Freedom of Information Act. Per FAR
15.609(e), the offeror should identify any
records that it considers to be trade secrets,
commercial or financial information, and
privileged or confidential information.’’
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:54 Nov 25, 2009
Jkt 220001
Subpart 315.70—Acquisition of
Electronic Information Technology
contracts when a cost-reimbursement
contract is contemplated.
315.7000 Section 508 accessibility
standards.
Subpart 316.5—Indefinite-Delivery
Contracts
EIT products and services, including
EIT deliverables such as electronic
documents and reports, acquired using
negotiated procedures shall comply
with Section 508 of the Rehabilitation
Act of 1973, as amended. Consistent
with paragraph 4.3.1 of the HHS Section
508 policy—see Section 508 policy on
HHS Office on Disability Web site, if
products and services, including
commercially available items, meet
some but not all of the applicable
Section 508 accessibility standards, and
no commercially available products or
services meet all of the applicable
Section 508 accessibility standards, an
OPDIV/STAFFDIV shall acquire the
products and services that best meet the
applicable Section 508 accessibility
standards. Commercial nonavailability
exception determinations for EIT
products and services that do not meet
some or all of the applicable Section 508
accessibility standards shall be
processed in accordance with 339.203.
PART 316—TYPES OF CONTRACTS
Subpart 316.3—Cost-reimbursement
Contracts
Sec.
316.307 Contract clauses.
Subpart 316.5—Indefinite-Delivery
Contracts
316.505 Ordering.
Subpart 316.6—Time-and-Materials, LaborHour, and Letter Contracts
316.603 Letter contracts.
316.603–3 Limitations.
316.603–70 Procedure for requesting
authority to issue a letter contract.
316.603–71 Approval for modifications to
letter contracts.
Subpart 316.7—Agreements
316.770 Unauthorized types of agreements.
316.770–2 Memoranda of understanding.
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 40 U.S.C. 486(c).
Subpart 316.3—Cost-reimbursement
Contracts
316.307
Contract clauses.
(a) If a contract for R & D is with a
hospital (profit or nonprofit), the
Contracting Officer shall modify the
‘‘Allowable Cost and Payment’’ clause at
FAR 52.216–7 by deleting from
paragraph (a) the words ‘‘Subpart 31.2
of the Federal Acquisition Regulation
(FAR)’’ and substituting ‘‘45 CFR Part 74
Appendix E.’’
(j) The Contracting Officer shall insert
the clause in 352.216–70, Additional
Cost Principles, in solicitations and
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
316.505
Ordering.
(b)(5) The HHS task-order and
delivery-order ombudsman is the
Director, Strategic Acquisition Service,
PSC. The task-order and delivery-order
ombudsmen for each of the HHS
contracting activities are as follows:
AHRQ: Director, Office of Performance
Accountability, Resources and Technology
BARDA: Chief of Mission Support and
Acquisition Policy
CDC: Chief Information Officer
CMS: Chief Operating Officer
FDA: Director, Office of Acquisitions and
Grants Services
HRSA: Associate Administrator, Office of
Operations
IHS: Director, Office of Management Services
NIH: Senior Scientific Advisor for Extramural
Research, Office of Extramural Research (R
& D) and Senior Advisor to the Director
(Other than R & D)
PSC: Director, Strategic Acquisition Service
SAMHSA: Executive Officer
Subpart 316.6—Time-and-Materials,
Labor-Hour, and Letter Contracts
316.603
Letter contracts.
316.603–3
Limitations.
An official one level above the
Contracting Officer shall make the
written determination that no other
contract type is suitable.
316.603–70 Procedure for requesting
authority to issue a letter contract.
The Contracting Officer shall include
the following information in a
memorandum requesting approval to
award a letter contract:
(a) Name and address of proposed
contractor.
(b) Location where contract is to be
performed.
(c) Contract number, including
modification number, if possible.
(d) Brief description of work and
services to be performed.
(e) Proposed performance or delivery
schedule.
(f) Amount of letter contract.
(g) Estimated total amount of
definitized contract.
(h) Type of definitive contract to be
executed (fixed price, costreimbursement, etc.).
(i) Statement of the necessity and
advantage to the Government of the use
of the proposed letter contract.
(j) Statement of percentage of the
estimated cost that the obligation of
funds represents (in rare instances
where the obligation represents 50
E:\FR\FM\27NOR2.SGM
27NOR2
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 227 / Friday, November 27, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
percent or more of the proposed
estimated cost of the acquisition, the
Contracting Officer shall include a
justification for that obligation (e.g., the
contractor requires a large initial outlay
of funds for major subcontract awards or
an extensive purchase of materials to
meet an urgent delivery requirement)).
In every case, documentation shall
demonstrate that the amount to be
obligated is not in excess of an amount
reasonably required to perform the
work.
(k) Period of effectiveness of a
proposed letter contract. (If more than
180 days, the Contracting Officer shall
provide a detailed justification).
(l) A statement of any substantive
matters that need to be resolved.
316.603–71 Approval for modifications to
letter contracts.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES_2
An official one level above the
Contracting Officer shall approve all
letter contract modifications.
Contracting activities shall process
requests for authority to issue letter
contract modifications in the same
manner as requests for authority to issue
letter contracts. A request shall include
the following:
(a) Name and address of the
contractor.
(b) Description of work and services.
(c) Date original request was approved
and name/title of approving official.
(d) Letter contract number and date
issued.
(e) Detailed justification as to why the
letter contract cannot currently be
definitized.
(f) Detailed justification as to why the
level of funding must be increased.
(g) Detailed justification as to why the
period of effectiveness must be
increased beyond 180 days, if
applicable.
(h) If the funding of the letter contract
is to be increased to more than 50
percent of the estimated cost of the
acquisition, the Contracting Officer shall
include the information required by
316.603–70(j).
contract. The Contracting Officer shall
make a change in a solicitation or
contract only by amendment or
modification, respectively. When a
change to a prescribed contract clause is
considered necessary, the Contracting
Officer shall request a deviation.
PART 317—SPECIAL CONTRACTING
METHODS
Subpart 317.1—Multi-year Contracting
Sec.
317.104 General.
317.105 Policy.
317.105–1 Uses.
317.107 Options.
317.108 Congressional notification.
Subpart 317.2—Options
317.204 Contracts.
317.207 Exercise of options.
Subpart 317.5—Interagency Acquisitions
Under the Economy Act
317.503 Determination and findings
requirements.
Subpart 317.70—Multi-agency and Intraagency contracts
317.7000 Scope of subpart.
317.7001 Definitions.
317.7002 Potential multi-agency and intraagency sources.
317.7003 Documentation for multi-agency
contracts.
317.7004 Documentation for intra-agency
contracts.
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 40 U.S.C. 486(c).
Subpart 317.1—Multi-year Contracting
317.104
General.
(b) The Senior Procurement Executive
is the agency head for the purpose of
FAR 17.104(b).
317.105
Policy.
317.105–1
Uses.
(a) Each HCA determination to use
multi-year contracting, as defined in
FAR 17.103, is limited to individual
acquisitions where the cancellation
ceiling obligated in the first year does
not exceed 20 percent of the contract
value over the full multi-year term or
$11.5 million, whichever is less.
Subpart 316.7—Agreements
Cancellation ceiling provisions shall
conform to the requirements of FAR
316.770 Unauthorized types of
17.106–1(c). The determination is not
agreements.
delegable and shall address the issues in
316.770–2 Memorandum of understanding. FAR 17.105–1(a) and the following:
Use of a ‘‘memorandum of
(1) The amount of, and basis for, the
understanding,’’ which purports to
proposed cancellation ceiling.
modify mandatory FAR and HHSAR
(2) Identification and assignment of a
provisions to make them acceptable to
Contracting Officer holding a FAC–C
a prospective contractor, is not
Level III certification or, alternatively,
authorized because it may address
one familiar with the application of this
matters contrary to the language of the
contracting method.
(3) Availability of appropriations to
solicitation or prospective contract. A
fund the obligation of total contract
memorandum of understanding does
costs for the first year of performance
not bind the Government under the
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:54 Nov 25, 2009
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
62437
plus the estimated amount of the full
cancellation ceiling.
(4) Reasonable expectation that,
throughout the contemplated contract
performance period, the OPDIV, through
its annual budget request, will seek
funding for the contract at the level
necessary to avoid contract cancellation;
and
(5) Program requirements are
reasonably stable and the associated
technical risks are not excessive—i.e.,
not of the nature or level to jeopardize
contract completion or result in its
cancellation.
Upon SPE request, the HCA shall
provide a copy of each determination
(other than those specified in 317.105–
1(b) below).
(b) SPE approval is required for—
(1) Any individual determination to
use multi-year contracting with a
cancellation ceiling in excess of the
limits in 317.105–1(a); and
(2) Any class determination (see FAR
Subpart 1.7).
HCA determinations involving a
cancellation ceiling in excess of the
limits in 317.105–1(a) shall also include
a compelling rationale why this
approach is in the best interests of the
Government and a draft congressional
notification letter pursuant to FAR
17.108 and 317.108.
317.107
Options.
When used as part of a multi-year
contract, options shall not be used to
extend the performance of nonseverable services beyond 5 years.
Options may serve as a means to acquire
related severable services and, upon
being exercised, shall be funded from
the then-current fiscal year’s
appropriation.
317.108
Congressional notification.
(a) The SPE is the agency head for the
purposes of FAR 17.108(a). Upon SPE
approval of the determination required
by 317.105–1(b)(1), the SPE will finalize
and sign the congressional notification
letter and provide it to the appropriate
House and Senate committees.
Subpart 317.2—Options
317.204
Contracts.
(e) The total of the basic and option
periods shall not exceed 10 years in the
case of services and the total of the basic
and option quantities shall not exceed
the requirement for 5 years in the case
of supplies. These limitations do not
apply to IT and R & D contracts.
However, statutes applicable to various
classes of contracts may place
additional restrictions on the length of
contracts.
E:\FR\FM\27NOR2.SGM
27NOR2
62438
317.207
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 227 / Friday, November 27, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
Exercise of options.
(h) Before exercising an option for a
subsequent performance period/
additional quantity under a multipleyear contract/order—see 339.201–70(c),
which involves the acquisition of EIT
products and services, including EIT
deliverables such as electronic
documents and reports, subject to
Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act of
1973, as amended, the Contracting
Officer shall ensure that the contractor
has provided to the Contracting Officer
and Project Officer a properly
completed HHS Section 508 Annual
Report—see Section 508 policy on HHS
Office on Disability Web site. The
Contracting Officer shall request that the
contractor provide the report in
sufficient time for its review and
approval by the Contracting Officer,
Project Officer, and the Section 508
Official or designee, prior to exercise of
an option. The Contracting Officer shall
ensure that the report and all related
approvals are made a part of the official
contract/order file.
Subpart 317.5—Interagency
Acquisitions Under the Economy Act
317.503 Determination and findings
requirements.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES_2
(a) In addition to the D & F contents
specified in FAR 17.503(a)(1) and (2),
each Assisted Contracting D & F shall
address—
(3) The servicing organization(s)
contemplated (the assigned HHS
contracting office shall be one of the
servicing organizations contemplated);
(4) For each organization and
alternative approach contemplated, the
anticipated benefits to the OPDIV; the
anticipated costs, including associated
fees or other compensation; and the
contract/order placement timeframe;
(5) The tradeoffs (cost, schedule,
performance) among the approaches
considered;
(6) The recommended multi-agency or
intra-agency contracting approach; and
(7) The conclusion that the contract to
be awarded by the selected servicing
organization is the most advantageous
alternative to the Government,
notwithstanding fees and the increased
risk associated with assisted
contracting.
Subpart 317.70—Multi-agency and
Intra-agency Contracts
317.7000
Scope of subpart.
(a) This subpart prescribes policies for
HHS’ use of multi-agency and intraagency contracting under all authorities.
It does not apply when HHS transfers
funds to another agency under an
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:54 Nov 25, 2009
Jkt 220001
interagency agreement whose primary
purpose is other than contracting on
HHS’ behalf.
(b) For multi-agency contracts under
the authority of the Economy Act, see
FAR Subpart 17.5 and 317.503.
(c) Multi-agency contracting
authorities other than the Economy Act
include but are not limited to the
Clinger-Cohen Act [40 U.S.C. 11302(e)];
the Government Management Reform
Act (Pub. L. 103–356); Title III of the
Federal Property and Administrative
Services Act of 1949 (41 U.S.C. 251, et
seq.); and 40 U.S.C. 501, Services for
Executive Agencies.
317.7001
Definitions.
As used in this subpart:
Multi-agency contracting describes a
procedure in which a Federal agency
needing supplies or services obtains
them using another Federal agency’s
contract (direct ordering), the
contracting assistance of another
Federal agency (assisted contracting), or
both. In some cases, more than one
servicing organization may be involved
in assisted contracting.
Intra-agency contracting describes a
procedure in which an HHS OPDIV/
STAFFDIV needing supplies or services
obtains them by issuing an order under
another HHS OPDIV/STAFFDIV’s
contract or agreement (e.g., a BPA—
direct ordering); or using the contracting
assistance of another OPDIV/STAFFDIV
(assisted contracting); or both.
Assisted contracting is a subset of
multi-agency/intra-agency contracting
in which a servicing contracting office
other than the requesting organization’s
assigned contracting office contracts on
behalf of the requesting organization.
Direct ordering is a subset of multi-/
intra-agency contracting in which a
contracting or ordering officer issues an
order under another OPDIV’s or Federal
agency’s indefinite delivery vehicle
(e.g., a GSA FSS schedule or a GWAC).
Requesting organization refers to the
organization with the requirement for a
multi- or intra-agency contract.
Servicing organization refers to an
organization that assists a requesting
organization by awarding a contract or
order on its behalf. In the context of
multi-agency contracting, the servicing
organization and requesting
organization must be in different
Federal agencies. For intra-agency
contracting, the servicing and requesting
organizations must both be HHS
organizations.
317.7002 Potential multi-agency and intraagency sources.
(a) Prior to deciding to use multiagency or intra-agency contracting, the
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
requesting organization must perform
sufficient market research to consider
the relative merits and costs of available
contracts and contracting offices for
meeting the requesting organization’s
need.
(b) Direct ordering conducted by HHS
contracting officers using GSA vehicles,
GWACs, and vehicles established under
the Federal Strategic Sourcing Initiative
does not require justification. HHS
contracting officers should be cautious
about using unfamiliar contract
vehicles. When using vehicles other
than those listed above, the Contracting
Officer shall include in the contract file
a D & F, which is prepared in
consultation with the SBS, and which
concludes that the chosen vehicle is the
best way to obtain the required product
or service.
(c) With the exception of assisted
contracts and direct order acquisitions
to be placed pursuant to the authority of
the Economy Act, which always require
preparation of a supporting D & F—see
FAR 17.503, proposed assisted contracts
approved as part of an annual or
updated acquisition plan require no
additional documentation or approvals.
(d) For proposed assisted contracts
not approved as part of an annual or
update acquisition plan, the requiring
organization shall identify the potential
servicing organization(s); summarize the
services each source provides; and
describe the compensation
arrangement(s). The assigned
contracting office shall be one of the
alternatives considered. For multiagency contract actions, this
information shall be included in the
Assisted Contracting D & F required in
317.7003(b).
317.7003 Documentation for multi-agency
contracts.
(a) In the case of proposed direct
ordering using vehicles other than those
listed in 317.7002(b), the HHS
contracting officer shall comply with
the D & F requirement in 317.7003(b).
(b) If a proposed assisted contract,
using a servicing organization outside
HHS, was not approved during
preparation and review of the annual
acquisition plan, including updates,
then the program/project office or other
requiring activity shall prepare an
Assisted Contracting D & F, similar to
the D & F specified in FAR 17.503, but
augmented with the information
specified in 317.503. The Project Officer
or other requiring official shall be
responsible for preparing and staffing
this Assisted Contracting D & F.
(1) For assisted contracts greater than
or equal to $500,000 (including the
value of the base contract and all
E:\FR\FM\27NOR2.SGM
27NOR2
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 227 / Friday, November 27, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
options and, for indefinite delivery
vehicles, the value of the vehicle and all
potential orders), the assigned HHS
Contracting Officer shall review and
approve or reject the Assisted
Contracting D & F, annotated with the
SBS’ recommendation. The Contracting
Officer’s signature on the Assisted
Contracting D&F signifies his/her
concurrence that assisted contracting
through the proposed servicing
contracting office is in the best interest
of the government. The Project Officer
must retain a copy of the approved
Assisted Contracting D & F.
(2) For assisted contracts less than
$500,000, the HCA may delegate
authority to the Project Officer or other
requiring official to approve the
required Assisted Contracting D & F.
The $500,000 threshold includes the
value of the base contract and all
options and, for indefinite delivery
vehicles, the value of the vehicle and all
potential orders.
(3) During a declared (Presidential or
HHS Secretarial) emergency, funding
and requirements documentation may
be transferred to a servicing
organization without an Assisted
Contracting D & F. The Project Officer
shall document his/her file, explaining
the exigent circumstances.
(c) Assisted contracts require
supporting interagency agreements, as
described in OFPP’s memorandum,
‘‘Interagency Acquisitions,’’ dated June
2008. Note that Part A of an interagency
agreement can support multiple assisted
contracts. Each interagency agreement
shall address all the elements identified
in OFPP’s model interagency agreement
(Appendix 2 of OFPP’s ‘‘Interagency
Acquisitions’’). The level of detail in
HHS interagency agreements should be
commensurate with the dollar value and
complexity of the assisted contract. HHS
requesting organizations shall not
forward funding or requirements
documentation outside HHS without a
properly executed interagency
agreement; and servicing activities
within HHS (e.g., PSC and the NIH
Information Technology Acquisition
and Assessment Center), shall not
contract on behalf of non-HHS
requesting organizations without
properly executed interagency
agreements.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES_2
317.7004 Documentation for intra-agency
contracts.
(a) In the case of proposed direct
ordering, using vehicles other than
those listed in 317.7002(b), the HHS
contracting officer shall comply with
the D & F requirement in 317.7003(b).
(b) With the exception of assisted
contracts and direct order acquisitions
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:54 Nov 25, 2009
Jkt 220001
to be placed pursuant to the authority of
the Economy Act, which always require
preparation of a supporting D & F—see
FAR 17.503, proposed assisted contracts
approved as part of an annual or
updated acquisition plan require no
additional documentation or approvals.
(c) For proposed assisted contracts not
approved as part of an annual or
updated acquisition plan, the requiring
organization shall identify the potential
servicing organization(s); summarize the
services the source(s) provide(s); and
describe the compensation
arrangement(s). The assigned
contracting office shall be one of the
alternatives considered.
(d) Assisted intra-agency contracts
may require supporting intra-agency
agreements or other documentation as
prescribed by OPDIV procedures.
SUBCHAPTER D—SOCIOECONOMIC
PROGRAMS
PART 319—SMALL BUSINESS
PROGRAMS
Subpart 319.2—Policies
Sec.
319.201 General policy.
319.202–2 Locating small business sources.
319.270–1 Solicitation provision and
contract clause.
Subpart 319.5—Set-Asides for Small
Business
319.501 General.
319.506 Withdrawing or modifying setasides.
Subpart 319.7—Subcontracting with Small
Business, Small Disadvantaged Business,
and Women-Owned Small Business
Concerns
319.705 Responsibilities of the Contracting
Officer under the subcontracting
assistance program.
319.705–5 Awards involving subcontracting
plans.
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 40 U.S.C. 486(c).
Subpart 319.2—Policies
319.201
General policy.
(d) The functional management
responsibilities for HHS’ small business
program (i.e., small businesses; veteranowned small businesses; servicedisabled, veteran-owned small
businesses; HUBZone small businesses;
small disadvantaged businesses; and
women-owned small businesses) are
delegated to the OSDBU Director. See
the HHS Small Business Program
manual for information on the HHS
small business program, including SBS
and Small Business Administration
(SBA) Procurement Center
Representative (PCR) acquisition review
timeframes.
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
62439
(e) (1) One or more qualified SBSs
will implement the HHS small business
program and shall be co-located within
the following OPDIVs: AHRQ; BARDA;
CDC; CMS; FDA; HRSA; IHS; NIH; PSC;
and SAMHSA. The OSDBU Director
shall exercise full management
authority over SBSs.
(2) Within IHS, the primary SBS will
be responsible for IHS’ overall
implementation of the HHS small
business program; however, each IHS
contracting office will have a small
business technical advisor (SBTA) to
carry out those functions and
responsibilities to implement the small
business program. The primary IHS SBS
shall assist and provide guidance to
respective SBTAs.
319.202–2
sources.
Locating small business
(a) OPDIVs shall foster, to the extent
practicable, maximum participation by
small businesses in HHS acquisitions.
Prior to issuing a solicitation, the
Contracting Officer shall make every
reasonable effort to find small business
concerns that can compete for the
proposed requirement—see FAR 19.202,
10.001(2)(v), and 10.002(b)(1)(vii).
(1) If it cannot be determined in
advance (through market research under
FAR Part 10, discussions between the
Contracting Officer and the SBS, or
other means—see FAR 15.201, whether
a solicitation in excess of the simplified
acquisition threshold can be set aside
exclusively for small business
participation [whether for small
businesses; HUBZone small businesses;
service-disabled, veteran-owned small
businesses; or 8(a) small business(es)],
the Contracting Officer may publish a
notice entitled ‘‘Small Business Sources
Sought’’ in FedBizOpps. The purpose of
a Small Business Sources Sought notice
is to identify the availability and
capability of qualified small business
sources; and their size classification
relative to the appropriate North
American Industry Classification
System (NAICs) code. This will assist
the Government in determining the
appropriate acquisition method,
including whether a set-aside is
possible. However, to solicit technical,
scientific, or business information for
project planning purposes, an RFI may
be used—see 315.201(e).
(2) When using a Small Business
Sought notice, an OPDIV shall not
request that potential sources provide
more than the minimum information
necessary—see FAR 10.001(b), to
determine whether they have the
apparent capability to perform a
requirement and, therefore, whether
they should be included in any future
E:\FR\FM\27NOR2.SGM
27NOR2
62440
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 227 / Friday, November 27, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
competition. The notice and the
information received shall not be used
to determine how well respondents can
perform a requirement, which can only
be evaluated in response to a
solicitation. Accordingly, the notice
shall not be used to—
(i) Obtain capability statements that
are evaluated and determined
acceptable or unacceptable;
(ii) Require cost/price proposals or
detailed technical solutions;
(iii) Identify a prospective sole source;
or
(iv) Exclude small business concerns.
(3) OPDIVs shall follow the standard
HHS instructions for completing a
‘‘Small Business Sources Sought’’
notice.’’ The template for the notice is
available on the ASFR/OGAPA/DA
Internet Web site. The Contracting
Officer shall post the notice in
FedBizOpps by selecting and
completing a Sources Sought notice,
accessible on the FedBizOpps ‘‘Notices’’
page at: https://www.fedbizopps.gov.
Additional information may be included
in the notice in accordance with OPDIV
procedures. The Contracting Officer
shall document, in the form of a
memorandum to the file, the results of
the review by technical personnel of
information submitted in response to
the notice, including whether each
respondent appears to be capable of
performing the requirement. The
Contracting Officer shall attach a copy
of the analysis provided by the technical
personnel to the memorandum.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES_2
319.270–1 Solicitation provision and
contract clause.
(a) The Contacting Officer shall insert
the provision in 352.219–70, Mentor´ ´
Protege Program, in solicitations that
include the clause in FAR 52.219–9,
Small Business Subcontracting Plan.
The provision requires that offerors
provide the Contracting Officer a copy
of their HHS Office of Small and
Disadvantaged Business Utilization
´ ´
(OSDBU)-approved mentor-protege
agreement in response to a solicitation.
(b) The Contacting Officer shall insert
the clause in 352.219–71, Mentor´ ´
Protege Program Reporting
Requirements, in contracts that include
the clause in FAR 52.219–9, Small
Business Subcontracting Plan, and
which are awarded to a contractor with
an HHS OSDBU-approved mentor´ ´
protege agreement.
Subpart 319.5—Set-Asides for Small
Business
319.501
General.
(e) Subsequent to the Contracting
Officer’s recommendation on Form HHS
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:54 Nov 25, 2009
Jkt 220001
653, HHS Small Business Review Form,
the SBS shall review each proposed
acquisition strategy and either concur or
not concur with the Contracting
Officer’s recommendation. The PCR
shall also review the acquisition strategy
and either concur or not concur with the
Contracting Officer’s recommendation.
If the Contracting Officer disapproves
the SBS’s or the PCR’s set-aside
recommendation, the Contracting
Officer shall document the reasons on
Form HHS 653 and place the form in the
contract file. The Contracting Officer
shall make the final determination as to
whether the proposed acquisition will
be set-aside or not.
PART 323—ENVIRONMENT, ENERGY
AND WATER EFFICIENCY,
RENEWABLE ENERGY
TECHNOLOGIES, OCCUPATIONAL
SAFETY, AND DRUG-FREE
WORKPLACE
Subpart 323.70—Safety and Health
Sec.
323.7000 Scope of subpart.
323.7001 Policy.
323.7002 Actions required.
Subpart 323.71—Green Purchasing
Requirements
323.7100 Policy.
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 40 U.S.C. 486(c).
Subpart 323.70—Safety and Health
319.506
asides.
Withdrawing or modifying set323.7000
Scope of subpart.
(d) Immediately upon notice from the
Contracting Officer, the SBS shall
provide notification of all set-aside
withdrawals to the OSDBU Director by
both telephone and e-mail.
This subpart prescribes the use of a
safety and health clause in contracts
involving hazardous materials or
operations, and provides procedures for
administering safety and health
provisions.
Subpart 319.7—Subcontracting With
Small Business, Small Disadvantaged
Business, and Women-Owned Small
Business Concerns
323.7001
319.705 Responsibilities of the
Contracting Officer under the
subcontracting assistance program.
319.705–5 Awards involving
subcontracting plans.
(a) (3) The Contracting Officer shall
provide the PCR a period of 1 to 5
working days to review the contract
award package, depending upon the
circumstances and complexity of the
individual acquisition.
PART 322—APPLICATION OF LABOR
LAWS TO GOVERNMENT
ACQUISITIONS
Subpart 322.8—Equal Employment
Opportunity
Sec.
322.810 Solicitation provisions and
contract clauses.
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 40 U.S.C. 486(c).
Subpart 322.8—Equal Employment
Opportunity
322.810 Solicitation provisions and
contract clauses.
(h) The Contracting Officer shall
insert the clause in 352.222–70,
Contractor Cooperation in Equal
Employment Opportunity
Investigations, in solicitations,
contracts, and orders that include the
clause in FAR 52.222–26, Equal
Opportunity.
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
Policy.
Various statutes and regulations (e.g.,
the Walsh-Healy Act and Service
Contract Act), require adherence to
minimum safety and health standards
by contractors engaged in potentially
hazardous work. FAR subpart 23.3
serves as the primary reference
regarding hazardous materials. The
Contracting Officer shall follow the
guidance in this subpart when the
guidance in the FAR is not sufficient or
does not meet the safety and health
situation for an acquisition.
323.7002
Actions required.
(a) Contracting activities. The
Contracting Officer shall insert the
clause in 352.223–70, Safety and Health,
or a clause substantially the same, in
solicitations and contracts that involve
hazardous materials or operations for
the following types of requirements:
(1) Services or products.
(2) Research, development, or test
projects.
(3) Transportation of hazardous
materials.
(4) Construction, including
construction of facilities on the
contractor’s premises.
(b) Safety officers. OPDIV safety
officers shall advise and assist initiators
of acquisition requests and Contracting
Officers in—
(1) Determining whether safety and
health provisions shall be part of a
prospective contract;
(2) Evaluating a prospective
contractor’s safety and health programs;
and
E:\FR\FM\27NOR2.SGM
27NOR2
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 227 / Friday, November 27, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
(3) Conducting post-award reviews
and surveillance to the extent deemed
necessary.
(c) Initiators. Initiators of acquisition
requests for items described in
paragraph (a) of this section shall—
(1) During the preparation of an
acquisition plan or other acquisition
request documentation, and in the
solicitation, ensure that hazardous
materials and operations to be used in
the performance of the contract are
clearly identified; and
(2) During the period of
performance—
(i) Apprise the Contracting Officer of
any noncompliance with safety and
health provisions identified in the
contract; and
(ii) Cooperate with the safety officer
in conducting review and surveillance
activities.
PART 324—PROTECTION OF PRIVACY
AND FREEDOM OF INFORMATION
Subpart 324.1—Protection of Individual
Privacy
Sec.
324.000 Scope of subpart.
324.102 General.
324.103 Procedures.
Subpart 324.2—Freedom of Information Act
324.203 Policy.
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 40 U.S.C. 486(c).
Subpart 324.1—Protection of Individual
Privacy
324.000
324.102
Subpart 323.71—Green Purchasing
Requirements
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES_2
323.7100
Policy.
(a) The HHS guidelines and
procedures for ‘‘green purchasing’’ may
be found in the HHS Affirmative
Procurement Plan (APP), ‘‘Purchasing
Environmentally Preferable Products
and Services at the U.S. Department of
Health and Human Services.’’ The APP
encompasses the acquisition and use of
designated recycled content, and Energy
Star®, Electronic Product Environmental
Assessment Tool (EPEAT)-registered,
energy-efficient, bio-based, and
environmentally preferable products.
(1) ASFR/OGAPA/DA has overall
responsibility for monitoring the
OPDIVs’ implementation of HHS’ APP
to ensure compliance with Executive
Order 13423, ‘‘Strengthening Federal
Environmental, Energy, and
Transportation Management;’’ the White
House Council on Environmental
Quality’s Implementing Instructions for
Executive Order 13423; Section 6002 of
the Resource Conservation and
Recovery Act of 1976; Section 104 of the
Energy Policy Act of 2005; Section 9002
of the Farm Security and Rural
Investment Act of 2002; Section 612 of
the Clean Air Act of 1990; and FAR Part
23.
(2) The OPDIVs, through their
designated APP Program Managers, are
responsible for establishing the
necessary local procedures and
appropriate training requirements to
ensure effective implementation of the
HHS APP.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:54 Nov 25, 2009
Jkt 220001
Scope of subpart.
This part prescribes policies and
procedures that apply requirements of
the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a)
and OMB Circular A–130, Revised,
November 30, 2000, to HHS contracts
and cites the Freedom of Information
Act (5 U.S.C. 552, as amended).
General.
(a) It is HHS policy to protect the
privacy of individuals to the maximum
possible extent, while permitting the
exchange of records required to fulfill
HHS administrative and program
responsibilities and its responsibilities
for disclosing records to which the
general public is entitled under the
Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C.
552). The Privacy Act of 1974 and the
HHS implementation under 45 CFR Part
5b apply ‘‘when an agency provides by
a contract for the operation by or on
behalf of the agency of a system of
records to accomplish any agency
function * * *.’’ The key factor is
whether an HHS function is involved.
Therefore, the Privacy Act requirements
apply to an HHS contract when, under
the contract, the contractor must
maintain or operate a system of records
to accomplish an HHS function.
(e) The Project Officer, and, as
necessary, the official designated as the
OPDIV’s Privacy Act Coordinator and
OGC–GLD, shall determine the
applicability of the Privacy Act to each
proposed acquisition. The Project
Officer is required to include a
statement in the AP or other acquisition
request document indicating whether
the Privacy Act is or is not applicable
to a proposed acquisition.
(f) Whenever a Contracting Officer is
informed that the Privacy Act is not
applicable, but the resultant contract
will involve the collection of
individually identifiable personal data
by the contractor, the Contracting
Officer shall include provisions to
protect the confidentiality of the records
and the privacy of individuals identified
in the records—see 324.70.
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
324.103
62441
Procedures.
(a) The Contracting Officer shall
review all acquisition request
documentation to determine whether
the Privacy Act requirements are
applicable. The Privacy Act
requirements apply when a contract or
order will require the contractor to
design, develop, or operate any Privacy
Act system of records on individuals to
accomplish an agency function. When
applicable, the Contracting Officer shall
include the two Privacy Act clauses
required by FAR 24.104 in the
solicitation and contract or order. In
addition, the Contracting Officer shall
include the two FAR Privacy Act
clauses, and other pertinent information
specified in this subpart, in any
modification which results in the
Privacy Act requirements becoming
applicable to a contract or order.
(b)(1) The Contracting Officer shall
identify in the SOW/PWS the system(s)
of records to which the Privacy Act and
the implementing regulations are
applicable.
(2) The Contracting Officer shall
include the clause specified in 352.224–
70, Privacy Act, in solicitations,
contracts, and orders that involve
Privacy Act requirements to notify the
contractor that it and its employees are
subject to criminal penalties for
violations of the Privacy Act (5 U.S.C.
552a(i)) to the same extent as HHS
employees. The clause also requires the
contractor to ensure that each of its
employees knows the prescribed rules
of conduct and each contractor
employee is aware that he/she is subject
to criminal penalties for violations of
the Privacy Act. These requirements
also apply to all subcontracts awarded
under the contract or order that require
the design, development, or operation of
a system of records. The Contracting
Officer shall send the contractor a copy
of 45 CFR Part 5b, which includes the
rules of conduct and other Privacy Act
requirements.
(c) The Contracting Officer shall
specify in the contract SOW/PWS the
disposition to be made of the system(s)
of records upon completion of contract
performance. The contract SOW/PWS
may require the contractor to destroy
the records, remove personal identifiers,
or turn the records over to the
Contracting Officer. If there is a
legitimate need for a contractor to keep
copies of the records after completion of
a contract, the contractor must take
measures, as approved by the
Contracting Officer, to keep the records
confidential and protect the individuals’
privacy.
(d) For any acquisition subject to
Privacy Act requirements, the Project
E:\FR\FM\27NOR2.SGM
27NOR2
62442
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 227 / Friday, November 27, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
Officer, prior to award, or the COTR,
after award, shall prepare and have
published in the Federal Register a
‘‘system notice,’’ describing HHS’ intent
to establish a new system of records on
individuals, to make modifications to an
existing system, or to disclose
information in regard to an existing
system. The Project Officer shall attach
a copy of the system notice to the
acquisition plan or other acquisition
request documentation. If a system
notice is not attached, the Contracting
Officer shall inquire about its status and
shall obtain a copy from the Project
Officer for inclusion in the contract file.
If a system notice has not been
published in the Federal Register, the
Contracting Officer may proceed with
the acquisition but shall not award the
contract until the system notice is
published and the Contracting Officer
verifies its publication.
Subpart 324.2—Freedom of
Information Act
324.203
Policy.
(a) The HHS regulation implementing
the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA),
5 U.S.C. 552, as amended, is set forth in
45 CFR Part 5.
(b) The Contracting Officer, upon
receiving a FOIA request, shall follow
HHS and OPDIV procedures. As
necessary, the Contracting Officer shall
coordinate all actions with the
cognizant Freedom of Information (FOI)
Officer and the OGC–GLD. Only the FOI
Officer is authorized to release or deny
release of records. The Contracting
Officer shall be familiar with the entire
FOIA regulation in 45 CFR Part 5.
Sec.
327.404–70 Solicitation provision and
contract clause.
Subpart 328.3—Insurance
328.301
Policy.
It is HHS policy to limit the
Government’s reimbursement, of its
contractors’ liability to third persons for
claims not covered by insurance in costreimbursement contracts, to the
Limitation of Funds or Limitation of
Cost clause of the contract. In addition,
the amount of the Government’s
reimbursement cannot exceed the final
judgments or settlements approved in
writing by the Government.
328.311 Solicitation provision and
contract clause on liability insurance under
cost-reimbursement contracts.
328.311–2 Agency solicitation provisions
and contract clauses.
The Contracting Officer shall insert
the clause in 352.228–7, Insurance—
Liability to Third Persons, in lieu of the
clause in FAR 52.228–7, Insurance—
Liability to Third Persons, in
solicitations and contracts when a costreimbursement contract is
contemplated. The Contracting Officer
shall insert Alternate I or II based on the
conditions specified therein. This is an
authorized FAR deviation.
Sec.
331.101–70
331.102–70
Salary rate limitation.
Pricing of adjustments.
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 40 U.S.C. 486(c).
Subpart 331.1—Applicability
331.101–70
Salary rate limitation.
(a) Beginning in fiscal year 1990,
Congress has stipulated in HHS
appropriations acts and continuing
resolutions that, under applicable NIH,
SAMHSA, and AHRQ contracts,
appropriated funds cannot be used to
pay the direct salary of an individual at
a rate in excess of the Federal Executive
Schedule Level I.
(b) The Contracting Officer shall
insert the clause in 352.231–70, Salary
Rate Limitation, in NIH, SAMHSA, and
AHRQ solicitations and contracts that
exceed the simplified acquisition
threshold when a cost-reimbursement,
fixed-price level-of-effort, time-andmaterials, or labor-hour contract is
contemplated, including modifications
of contracts of those types for projects
that support extramural program
activities. For purposes of this clause,
for NIH: Projects that support
extramural program activities are basic
and applied research projects; and for
SAMHSA and AHRQ: Projects that
support extramural program activities
are mission-related projects, exclusive
of contracts for general support services.
331.102–70
Pricing of adjustments.
The Contracting Officer shall insert
the clause in 352.231–71, Pricing of
Adjustments, in solicitations and
contracts when a fixed-price contract is
contemplated.
PART 332—CONTRACT FINANCING
Subpart 332.4—Advance Payments for NonCommercial Items
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 40 U.S.C. 486(c).
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 40 U.S.C. 486(c).
Subpart 327.4—Rights in Data and
Copyrights
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES_2
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 40 U.S.C. 486(c).
Subpart 331.1—Applicability
Sec.
330.201 Contract requirements.
330.201–5 Waiver.
Subpart 327.4—Rights in Data and
Copyrights
Subpart 330.2—CAS Program
Requirements
330.201
Contract requirements.
330.201–5
327.404–70 Solicitation provision and
contract clause.
The Contracting Officer shall insert
the clause in 352.227–70, Publications
and Publicity, in solicitations, contracts,
and orders that involve requirements
which could lead to the contractor’s
publishing the results of the award.
Jkt 220001
Sec.
328.301 Policy.
328.311 Solicitation provision and contract
clause on liability insurance under costreimbursement contracts.
328.311–2 Agency solicitation provisions
and contract clauses.
Subpart 330.2—CAS Program Requirements
PART 327—PATENTS, DATA, AND
COPYRIGHTS
13:54 Nov 25, 2009
Subpart 328.3—Insurance
PART 331—CONTRACT COST
PRINCIPLES AND PROCEDURES
PART 330—COST ACCOUNTING
STANDARDS
SUBCHAPTER E—GENERAL
CONTRACTING REQUIREMENTS
VerDate Nov<24>2008
PART 328—BONDS AND INSURANCE
Subpart 332.5—Progress Payments Based
on Cost
Waiver.
(a) OPDIVs shall forward waiver
requests through appropriate acquisition
channels, including the HCA, to the
Associate DAS for Acquisition (nondelegable) for review. Associate DAS for
Acquisition shall exercise the waiver
authority under FAR 30.201–5(a)(2).
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
Sec.
332.402 General.
332.403 Applicability.
332.407 Interest.
332.409 Contracting Officer action.
332.409–1 Recommendation for approval.
332.501 General.
332.501–2 Unusual progress payments.
Subpart 332.7—Contract Funding
332.703–70 Funding contracts during a
continuing resolution.
332.704 Limitation of cost or funds.
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 40 U.S.C. 486(c).
E:\FR\FM\27NOR2.SGM
27NOR2
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 227 / Friday, November 27, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
Subpart 332.4—Advance Payments for
Non-Commercial Items
Subpart 332.5—Progress Payments
Based on Cost
332.402
332.501
General.
(e) The HCA (non-delegable) shall
determine whether an advance payment
is in the public interest in accordance
with FAR 32.402(c)(1)(iii)(A).
332.403
Interest.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES_2
(d) The HCA (non-delegable) shall
make the determinations in FAR
32.407(d). The HCA may also approve
interest-free advance payments for
educational institutions and other
nonprofit organizations, whether public
or private, performing work under
nonprofit contracts (without fee)
involving health services, educational
programs, or social service programs,
such as the following:
(1) Community health representative
services for an Indian Tribe.
(2) Narcotic addict rehabilitative
services.
(3) Comprehensive health care
services for Model Neighborhood
programs.
(4) Planning and development of
health maintenance organizations.
(5) Dissemination of information
derived from educational research.
(6) Surveys or demonstrations in the
field of education.
(7) Producing or distributing
educational media for disabled persons
including captioned films for the
hearing impaired.
(8) Operation of language or area
centers.
(9) Biomedical research and support
services.
(10) Research surveys or
demonstrations involving the training
and placement of health personnel and
health professionals, and dissemination
of related information.
(11) Surveys or demonstrations in the
field of social service.
332.409
Contracting Officer action.
332.409–1
Recommendation for approval.
The Contracting Officer shall transmit
the information in FAR 32.409–1 (or
FAR 32.409–2) to the HCA by
memorandum.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:54 Nov 25, 2009
332.501–2
(a)(3) The HCA (non-delegable) shall
approve an unusual progress payment.
Jkt 220001
332.703–70 Funding contracts during a
continuing resolution.
(a) Continuing resolutions. A
continuing resolution (CR) is a
legislative measure enacted to keep
existing Federal programs functioning,
generally at minimal levels, after the
expiration of prior fiscal year budget
authority and until passage of regular
appropriation acts by Congress.
(b) Operating guidance. Because the
terms of CRs may vary, for each CR,
specific operating guidance will be
issued by the Office of the Assistant
Secretary for Resources and Technology
(ASRT). This guidance will—
(1) Establish the availability of funds
for existing and new projects or
activities (consistent with the language
of the CR);
(2) Identify any specific limits or
constraints imposed; and
(3) Establish the authorized level and
timing of obligations permitted.
(c) Contracting activities, in concert
with program, budget and finance
personnel, must carefully assess
contract funding decisions to—
(1) Ensure compliance with HHS
guidance regarding the specific terms of
a CR;
(2) Maintain essential operations and
activities; and
(3) Guard against violations of the
Anti-Deficiency Act—see FAR 32.702.
332.704
Limitation of cost or funds.
See subpart 342.71, ‘‘Administrative
Actions for Cost Overruns,’’ for
procedures for handling anticipated cost
overruns.
PART 333—PROTESTS, DISPUTES,
AND APPEALS
Subpart 333.1—Protests
Sec.
333.102 General.
333.103 Protests to the agency.
333.104 Protests to GAO.
Subpart 333.2—Disputes and Appeals
333.203 Applicability.
333.209 Suspected fraudulent claims.
333.211 Contracting Officer’s decision.
333.212 Contracting Officer’s duties upon
appeal.
333.212–70 Formats.
333.213 Obligation to continue
performance.
333.215–70 Contract clauses.
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 4701
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 40 U.S.C. 486(c).
Subpart 333.1—Protests
333.102
Unusual progress payments.
Subpart 332.7—Contract Funding
Applicability.
All R&D contracts with educational
institutions located in the United States
shall provide for financing by use of
advance payments, in reasonable
amounts, unless otherwise prohibited
by law.
332.407
General.
Sfmt 4700
62443
General.
(g)(1) The OGC–GLD serves as the
liaison for protests lodged with the
Government Accountability Office
(GAO); is designated as the office
responsible for all protests within HHS;
and serves as the notification point with
GAO for all protests.
(2) Each contracting activity shall
designate a protest control officer to
serve as an advisor to the Contracting
Officer and to monitor protests from the
time of initial notification until the
protest has been resolved. Contracting
activities shall forward a copy of each
appointment and termination of
appointment of protest control officers
through appropriate acquisition
channels, including the HCA, to ASFR/
OGAPA/DA and the Deputy Associate
General Counsel, OGC–GLD.
333.103
Protests to the agency.
(f)(1) The Contracting Officer is
authorized to make the determination,
using the criteria in FAR 33.104(b), to
award a contract notwithstanding the
protest after obtaining the concurrence
of the contracting activity’s protest
control officer and the OGC–GLD. If a
protest has been lodged with the
Secretary, is addressed to the Secretary,
or requests referral to the Secretary, the
Contracting Officer shall also obtain
approval from Associate DAS for
Acquisition and OGC–GLD before
making the award.
(2) The Contracting Officer shall
require written confirmation of any oral
protest. To be considered timely, the
protester must file a written
confirmation in accordance with the
applicable provisions in FAR
33.102(d)(2) and (e). In the following
cases, the Contracting Officer shall
forward written protests received before
award through appropriate acquisition
channels, including the HCA, to OGC–
GLD for processing:
(i) The protester requests referral to
the Secretary of HHS.
(ii) The protest is known to have been
lodged with GAO or the Secretary or is
addressed to either.
(iii) The Contracting Officer entertains
some doubt as to the proper action
regarding the protest or believes it to be
in the best interest of the Government
that the Secretary or GAO consider the
protest. Otherwise, the Contracting
Officer may answer protests addressed
to the Contracting Officer with the
concurrence of the contracting activity’s
protest control officer and OGC–GLD.
The Contracting Officer shall submit
files concerning these protests in
E:\FR\FM\27NOR2.SGM
27NOR2
62444
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 227 / Friday, November 27, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
duplicate, or as otherwise specified by
OGC–GLD, within 5 calendar days after
protest receipt; mark the files
‘‘IMMEDIATE ACTION—PROTEST
BEFORE AWARD;’’ and include any
documents relevant to issues raised in
the protest.
(3) The Contracting Officer shall treat
protests received after award as
indicated in FAR 33.103(f)(3).
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES_2
333.104
Protests to GAO.
(a) General procedures.
(3)(ii) OGC–GLD shall process
protests filed with GAO, whether pre- or
post- award. The Contracting Officer
shall prepare protest files as follows:
assemble them in a secure binder,
fastened at the left side with a fastener
that will permit the full page to be read;
include a numerical document index,
with the first two positions reserved for
the Contracting Officer’s Statement of
Facts and Circumstances and the second
for OGC–GLD’s Memorandum of Law,
that is paginated and, as necessary for
sizable files, divided into two or more
volumes; and the cover of the report
shall identify it as the protest file and
include the solicitation number and the
GAO Bid Protest file number—i.e., ‘‘Bnumber.’’ In addition, the Contracting
Officer shall fold drawings and place
them in an envelope in the binder and
the solicitation/contract shall constitute
a separate exhibit, if it is voluminous in
size. The Contracting Officer shall
distribute protest files as follows: four
copies to OGC–GLD and one copy to the
contracting activity’s protest control
officer. In addition to the items listed in
FAR 33.104(a)(3)(ii)(A) through (G), the
protest file shall include the following
documents:
(H) The current status of award. (Note:
When award has been made, this shall
include whether performance has
commenced, shipment or delivery has
been made, or a stop work order has
been issued.)
(I) A copy of any mutual agreement to
suspend work on a no-cost basis, when
appropriate—see FAR 33.104(c)(4).
(J) Copies of the notice of protest
given offerors and other parties when
the notice is appropriate—see FAR
33.104(a)(2).
(K) A copy of the negotiation
memorandum, when applicable.
(L) The name and telephone number
of the person in the contracting office
who may be contacted for information
relevant to the protest.
(M) A copy of the competitive range
determination.
(N) The acquisition plan, source
selection plan, and the source selection
decision document.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:54 Nov 25, 2009
Jkt 220001
(O) The Contracting Officer’s
statement of facts and circumstances,
including numbered findings of fact
prepared with complete documentation,
and all the facts and rationale, both
favorable and unfavorable, to the
Contracting Officer’s position.
(4) OGC–GLD shall make the
necessary distributions referenced in
FAR 33.104(a)(4).
(5) Unless an alternative arrangement
is reached with OGC–GLD, the
Contracting Officer shall furnish one
copy of the protest file containing the
documentation specified in paragraph
(a)(3)(ii) of this section (with the
exception of the Contracting Officer
statement of facts and circumstances)
and FAR 33.104(a)(3)(ii)(A) through (G)
to OGC–GLD within 5 calendar days
from receipt of the protest. In addition,
the Contracting Officer shall also
accommodate any other OGC–GLD
requests for documents which may be
needed prior to the aforementioned 5day time period. The Contracting Officer
shall submit the Contracting Officer’s
statement of facts and circumstances
and the additional copies of
documentation within 14 calendar days
from receipt of the protest. Since the
statute allows only a short time period
in which to respond to protests lodged
with GAO, the Contracting Officer shall
handle each protest on a priority basis.
OGC–GLD shall submit copies of the
protest file to GAO, the protestor, and
any intervenors in accordance with FAR
33.104(a)(4)(i).
(6) Since OGC–GLD will furnish the
protest file to GAO, the protestor, and
any intervenors, comments on the file
from the protestor and any intervenors
will be sent to OGC–GLD.
(7) OGC–GLD shall serve as the GAO
point of contact for protests lodged with
GAO.
(b) Protests before award.
(1) To make an award
notwithstanding a protest, the
Contracting Officer shall prepare a
finding using the criteria in FAR
33.104(b)(1), have it executed by the
HCA (non-delegable), and forward it,
along with a written request for
approval to make the award (addressed
to the Associate DAS for Acquisition
through OGC–GLD). Should OGC–GLD
concur, it shall forward the request to
the Associate DAS for Acquisition for
final approval. The written request for
approval shall contain all relevant
documentation as attachments to the
request, so that the information may be
considered by Associate DAS for
Acquisition.
(2) If the request to make an award
notwithstanding the protest is approved
by the Associate DAS for Acquisition,
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
OGC–GLD shall notify GAO. Whether
the request is approved or not, OGC–
GLD shall telephonically notify the
contracting activity’s protest control
officer of the Associate DAS for
Acquisition decision, and the
contracting activity’s protest control
officer shall immediately notify the
Contracting Officer. Should the
Associate DAS for Acquisition approve
the request, ASFR/OGAPA/DA shall
send a copy of that written approval to
the contracting activity’s protest control
officer.
(c) Protests after award.
(2) If the Contracting Officer believes
performance should be allowed to
continue notwithstanding a protest, the
Contracting Officer shall prepare a
written finding using the criteria in FAR
33.104(c)(2). The HCA (non-delegable)
shall execute the written finding, which
the contracting office shall forward
pursuant to the procedures described in
paragraph (b)(1) of this section. The
notification procedures stated in
paragraph (b)(2) of this section shall
apply to protests after award.
(d) Findings and notice. The
Contracting Officer shall prepare the
written notice required by FAR
33.104(d) and provide a copy to OGC–
GLD. OGC–GLD shall provide copies to
GAO, the protester, and any intervenors.
(g) Notice to GAO. FAR 33.104(g)
requires the agency to notify GAO, if the
agency has not followed any of GAO’s
recommendations (other than costs)
within 60 days after its decision. By the
end of the 60-day period, the
Contracting Officer shall notify OGC–
GLD of the status of implementing the
recommendations and reasons for any
non-compliance. OGC–GLD shall serve
as the designated official to comply with
the requirements of FAR 33.104(g).
(i) Express option. When GAO
invokes the express option, the
Contracting Officer shall prepare the
complete protest file as described in
paragraph (a)(3) of this section, to
include the item in paragraph (a)(3)(i),
and deliver it (hand-carry, if necessary)
to OGC–GLD in time to meet the
submittal date GAO established. OGC–
GLD shall notify the Contracting Officer
of the submittal date after GAO has
finalized its requirements. If the
Contracting Officer is not notified about
a changed schedule, the timelines for a
regular bid protest outlined in FAR
33.104(a)(3)(i) shall apply.
Subpart 333.2—Disputes and Appeals
333.203
Applicability.
(c) The Secretary has designated the
Civilian Board of Contract Appeals
(CBCA) as the authorized ‘‘Board’’ to
E:\FR\FM\27NOR2.SGM
27NOR2
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 227 / Friday, November 27, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
hear and determine disputes for the
Department.
333.209
Suspected fraudulent claims.
The Contracting Officer shall submit
any instance of a contractor’s suspected
fraudulent claim to the OIG for
investigation.
333.211
Contracting Officer’s decision.
(a)(2) The Contracting Officer shall
refer a proposed final decision to OGC–
GLD, for advice as to the legal
sufficiency and format before sending
the final decision to the contractor. The
Contracting Officer shall provide OGC–
GLD with the pertinent documents with
the submission of each proposed final
decision.
(4)(v) When using the paragraph in
FAR 33.211 (a)(4)(v), the Contracting
Officer shall insert the words ‘‘Civilian’’
before each mention of the term ‘‘Board
of Contract Appeals.’’
(h) At any time within the period of
appeal, the Contracting Officer may
modify or withdraw the final decision.
If a contractor has appealed the final
decision to the CBCA, the Contracting
Officer shall forward the recommended
action to OGC–GLD with a supplement
to the contract file that supports the
recommended correction or
amendment.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES_2
333.212
appeal.
Contracting Officer’s duties upon
(a) The rules set forth in the ‘‘Rules of
the Civilian Board of Contract Appeals,’’
or the rules established by the U.S.
Court of Federal Claims, as appropriate,
shall govern appeals.
(b) The OGC–GLD is designated as the
Government Trial Attorney to represent
the Government in the defense of
appeals before the CBCA. OGC–GLD
shall provide the decision by CBCA to
the appropriate Contracting Officer for
compliance in accordance with the
CBCA’s decision.
(c) If an appeal is filed with the
CBCA, the Contracting Officer shall
assemble a file, within 30 days of
receipt of an appeal or notification that
an appeal has been filed, that consists
of all documents pertinent to the appeal,
including the following:
(1) The decision and findings of fact
from which the appeal is taken.
(2) The contract, including
specifications and pertinent
modifications, plans and drawings.
(3) All correspondence between the
parties pertinent to the appeal,
including the letter or letters of claim in
response to which the decision was
issued.
(4) Transcripts of any testimony taken
during the course of proceedings, and
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:54 Nov 25, 2009
Jkt 220001
affidavits or statements of any witness
on the matter in dispute made prior to
the filing of the notice of appeal with
the CBCA.
(5) Any additional information
considered pertinent. The Contracting
Officer shall furnish the appeal file to
the Government Trial Attorney for
review and approval. After approval, the
Contracting Officer shall prepare four
copies of the file—i.e., one for the
CBCA, one for the appellant, one for the
Government Trial Attorney, and one for
the contracting office.
(d) At all times after the filing of an
appeal, the Contracting Officer shall
render whatever assistance is requested
by the Government Trial Attorney.
When an appeal is set for hearing, the
Contracting Officer shall provide
Government witnesses and specified
physical and documentary evidence to
the Trial Attorney. The Trial Attorney
shall ensure the presence of all
witnesses and documentary evidence at
both the prehearing conference and
hearing.
(e) If a contractor, which has filed an
appeal with the CBCA, elects to accept
fully the decision from which the
appeal was taken, or any modification to
it, and gives written notification of
acceptance to the Government Trial
Attorney or the concerned Contracting
Officer, the Government Trial Attorney
shall notify the CBCA of the disposition
of the dispute in accordance with Rule
27 of the CBCA.
(f) If the contractor has elected to
appeal to the U.S. Court of Federal
Claims, the U.S. Department of Justice
will represent HHS. However, the
Contracting Officer shall coordinate all
actions through OGC–GLD.
333.212–70
Formats.
(a) Contracting activities shall use the
following format in transmitting appeal
files to CBCA:
Your reference:
(Docket No.)
(insert name)
Clerk of the Board, Civilian Board of
Contract Appeals
1800 F. Street, Washington, DC 20405
(for regular mail delivery)
1800 M Street, 6th floor, Washington,
DC 20036 [for overnight and physical
(hand-carry) delivery]
Dear (insert name):
Transmitted herewith are documents
relative to the appeal under Contract
No. ll with the llllll (insert
name of contractor) in accordance
with the procedures under Rule 4.
The Government Trial Attorney for
this case is llllll (insert
General Law Division, Office of
PO 00000
Frm 00051
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
62445
General Counsel, Department of
Health and Human Services, 330
Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20201).
The request for payment of charges
resulting from the processing of this
appeal shall be addressed to:
llllll (insert name and
address of cognizant finance office.)
Sincerely yours,
Contracting Officer
Enclosures
(b) Contracting activities shall use the
following format in notifying the
appellant that the appeal file was
submitted to CBCA:
lllllllllllllllllllll
lllllllllllllllllllll
lllllllllllllllllllll
(insert contractor name and address)
Dear llllll: (insert name)
An appeal file has been compiled
relative to the appeal under Contract
No. lll (insert number), and has
been submitted to the Civilian Board
of Contract Appeals (CBCA). The
enclosed duplicate of the appeal file
is identical to that submitted to
CBCA, except for contract documents
which you already have been
provided. You may furnish or suggest
any additional information deemed
pertinent to the appeal to CBCA
according to their rules.
The CBCA will provide you with further
information concerning this appeal.
Sincerely yours,
Contracting Officer
Enclosure
333.213 Obligation to continue
performance.
(a) The Contracting Officer shall use
the Disputes clause at FAR 52.233–1
without the use of Alternate I. However,
if the Contracting Officer determines
that the Government’s interest would be
better served by use of paragraph (i) in
Alternate I, the HCA or CCO shall
approve its use.
333.215–70
Contract clauses.
(a) The Contracting Officer shall insert
the clause in 352.233–70, Choice of Law
(Overseas), in solicitations and contracts
when performance will be outside the
United States, its possessions, and
Puerto Rico, except as otherwise
provided in a government-togovernment agreement.
(b) The Contracting Officer shall
insert the clause in 352.233–71,
Litigation and Claims, in solicitations
and contracts when a costreimbursement, time-and-materials, or
labor-hour contract is contemplated
E:\FR\FM\27NOR2.SGM
27NOR2
62446
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 227 / Friday, November 27, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
(other than a contract for a commercial
item.)
SUBCHAPTER F—SPECIAL
CATEGORIES OF CONTRACTING
PART 334—MAJOR SYSTEM
ACQUISITION
Subpart 334.2—Earned Value Management
System
Sec.
334.200 Definitions.
334.201 Policy.
334.202 Integrated Baseline Reviews (IBRs).
334.203 Solicitation provisions and
contract clauses.
334.203–70 HHS solicitation provisions and
contract clauses.
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 40 U.S.C. 486(c).
Subpart 334.2—Earned Value
Management System
334.200
Definitions.
As used in this subpart, the following
definitions shall apply:
Full EVMS means tracking and
reporting of both the cost and schedule
aspects of a contract using the
principles and guidelines described in
ANSI/EIA Standard-748, Earned Value
Management Systems (using the version
of the Standard that is in effect at the
time of the solicitation).
Partial EVMS means tracking and
reporting of only the schedule aspects of
a contract using the principles and
guidelines described in ANSI/EIA
Standard-748, Earned Value
Management Systems (using the version
of the Standard that is in effect at the
time of the solicitation).
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES_2
334.201
Policy.
(a) For acquisitions for development
designated as major in accordance with
both OMB Circular A–11 and HHS
policy on major acquisitions; for
acquisitions that involve substantial
development, modification or
enhancement; or for acquisitions that
involve significant upgrade of
operational or steady state systems or
programs, use of an Earned Value
Management System (EVMS) is required
as follows:
(1) For individual cost-reimbursement
or fixed-price-incentive contracts (with
incentive based on cost) valued at $10
million to $25 million, including
options, full EVMS (as defined in
334.200) is required and the contractor’s
EVMS shall comply with the guidelines
in ANSI/EIA Standard-748.
(2) For individual firm-fixed-price,
term form (level-of-effort) of any type,
time-and-materials, or labor-hour
contracts valued at $10 million to $25
million, including options, partial
EVMS (as defined in 334.200) is
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:54 Nov 25, 2009
Jkt 220001
required and the contractor’s EVMS
shall comply with the guidelines in
ANSI/EIA Standard-748.
(3) For individual cost-reimbursement
or fixed-price-incentive contracts (with
incentive based on cost) valued at more
than $25 million, including options, full
EVMS (as defined in 334.200) is
required and the contractor’s EVMS
must be formally validated and accepted
by the Government—i.e., the
contractor’s Cognizant Federal Agency
(CFA), as defined in FAR 2.101 and
described in FAR 42.003).
(4) For individual firm-fixed-price,
term form (level-of-effort) of any type,
time-and-materials, or labor-hour
contracts valued at more than $25
million, including options, partial
EVMS (as defined in 334.200) is
required and the contractor’s EVMS
must be formally validated and accepted
by the Government—i.e., the
contractor’s CFA.
(5) For individual contracts of any
type valued at less than $10 million,
including options, full or partial EVM
application, as appropriate to the
contract type involved, is optional. The
recommendation to use EVM should be
based upon a risk analysis by the
Program Manager/Project Officer. A
decision to use EVM at this level
requires the prior approval of the
cognizant HCA.
(b) EVM is not required, but may be
applied with prior written approval of
the HCA, on contracts of any dollar
amount meeting either of the following
criteria:
(1) The acquisition is for nondevelopmental support services (e.g.,
program office support, Independent
Verification & Validation services),
steady state operations, basic and
applied research, and routine services
(e.g., building maintenance, help-desk
services, landscaping services).
(2) The contract is for a commercial
item(s) under FAR Part 12.
(c) When full EVM is required on a
prime contract, it applies to
subcontracts issued there under if those
subcontracts have a value and are of a
type and subject matter that would have
required the use of full EVM had they
been prime contracts. However, if the
prime contract requires the use of only
partial EVM, any subcontracts to which
EVM is made applicable, because of
dollar value, contract type or subject
matter, shall require only partial EVM.
(d) When offerors are required to
provide an EVMS plan as part of their
proposals, the Contracting Officer shall
request the assistance of the Project
Officer (and/or an appropriate HHSdesignated third party) in determining
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
the adequacy of such proposed EVMS
plans.
(e) The selection or use of a particular
contract type, if done only or primarily
to avoid the application of full EVM to
the acquisition is prohibited.
334.202
(IBRs).
Integrated Baseline Reviews
(a) An IBR normally should be
conducted as a post-award activity. A
pre-award IBR may be conducted only
if—
(1) The AP contains documentation
that demonstrates the need and
rationale for a pre-award IBR, including
an assessment of the impact on the
source selection schedule and the
expected benefits;
(2) The use of a pre-award IBR is
approved in writing by the HCA prior to
the issuance of the solicitation;
(3) The source selection plan
specifically addresses how the results of
a pre-award IBR will be used during
source selection, including any weight
to be given to it in source evaluation,
and that same or similar rationale is
clearly set forth in the solicitation; and,
(4) Specific arrangements are made,
and budget authority is provided, to
compensate all offerors who prepare for
or participate in a pre-award IBR; and
the solicitation informs prospective
offerors of the means for and conditions
of such compensation.
334.203 Solicitation provisions and
contract clauses.
The FAR EVMS solicitation
provisions and contract clause shall not
be used in HHS contracts. See 334.203–
70 for the HHS solicitation provisions
and contract clauses.
334.203–70 HHS solicitation provisions
and contract clauses.
As provided in 334.201(a) and
334.202, the Contracting Officer shall
insert the following:
(a) The provision in 352.234–1, Notice
of Earned Value Management System—
Pre-Award IBR, in solicitations that will
require the contractor to use an EVMS,
whether full or partial, when the
Government requires an IBR prior to
award.
(b) The provision in 352.234–2, Notice
of Earned Value Management System—
Post-Award IBR, in solicitations that
will require the contractor to use an
EVMS, whether full or partial, when the
Government requires an IBR after
contract award.
(c) The clause in 352.234–3, Full
Earned Value Management System, in
solicitations and contracts, valued at, or
greater than, $25 million, when a costreimbursement or fixed-price-incentive
contract (where the incentive is based
E:\FR\FM\27NOR2.SGM
27NOR2
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 227 / Friday, November 27, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
on cost) is contemplated, and which
require a contractor to use full EVMS.
The Contracting Officer shall use the
clause with its Alternate I when the
contract value is equal to or greater than
$10 million, but less than $25 million.
(d) The clause in 352.234–4, Partial
Earned Value Management System, in
solicitations and contracts, valued at, or
greater than, $25 million, when a firmfixed-price, time-and-materials, laborhour, or term-form cost-plus-fixed-fee
contract is contemplated, and which
require a contractor to use partial
EVMS. The Contracting Officer shall use
the clause with its Alternate I when the
contract value, is equal to or greater
than $10 million, but less than $25
million.
PART 335—RESEARCH AND
DEVELOPMENT CONTRACTING
Sec.
335.070 Cost sharing.
335.070–1 Policy.
335.070–2 Amount of cost sharing.
335.070–3 Method of cost sharing.
335.070–4 Contract award.
335.071 Special determinations and
findings affecting research and
development contracting.
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 40 U.S.C. 486(c).
335.070
Cost-sharing.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES_2
335.070–1
Policy.
(a) Contracting activities shall
encourage performing organizations to
contribute to the cost of performing R &
D, through the use of cost-sharing
contracts, where there is a probability
that the contractor will receive present
or future benefits from participation,
such as increased technical know-how,
training for employees, acquisition of
equipment, and use of background
knowledge in future contracts. Costsharing is intended to serve the mutual
interests of the Government and the
performing organization by helping to
ensure efficient utilization of the
resources available for the conduct of R
& D projects and by promoting sound
planning and prudent fiscal policies of
the performing organization. The
Contracting Officer shall use a costsharing contract, unless the Contracting
Officer determines that a request for
cost-sharing would not be appropriate
because of the following circumstances:
(1) The particular R & D objective or
scope of effort for the project is
specified by the Government rather than
proposed by the performing
organization. This would usually
include any formal Government
solicitation for a specific project.
(2) The R & D effort has only minor
relevance to the non-Federal activities
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:54 Nov 25, 2009
Jkt 220001
of the performing organization, and the
organization is proposing to undertake
the R & D primarily as a service to the
Government.
(3) The organization has little or no
non-Federal sources or funds from
which to make a cost contribution.
Organizations which are predominantly
engaged in R & D and have little or no
production or other service activities
may not be in a favorable position to
make a cost contribution. Accordingly,
the Contracting Officer shall normally
not request cost-sharing, if cost-sharing
would require the Government to
provide funds through some other
means (such as fees) to enable the
organization to cost-share.
(b) The Contracting Officer has the
responsibility for negotiating costsharing. Each R & D contract file shall
indicate whether the Contracting Officer
considered cost-sharing appropriate for
that particular contract and in what
amount. If cost sharing was not
appropriate, the file must include a
statement and factual basis for that
decision (e.g., ‘‘Because the contractor
will derive no benefits from this award
that can be applied to its commercial
activities, cost-sharing is not considered
appropriate.’’) The Contracting Officer
shall coordinate with the Project Officer
before documenting this decision.
(c) If the Contracting Officer considers
cost-sharing appropriate for an R & D
contract and the contractor refuses to
accept this type of contract, the
Contracting Officer may make an award
without cost-sharing, if the Contracting
Officer concludes that payment of the
full cost of the R & D effort is necessary
to obtain the services of that particular
contractor.
335.070–2
Amount of cost sharing.
When cost-sharing is appropriate, the
Contracting Officer shall use the
following guidelines to determine the
amount of cost participation by the
contractor:
(a) The amount of cost participation
depends on the extent to which the R &
D effort or results are likely to enhance
the performing organization’s capability,
expertise, or competitive position, and
the value of this enhancement to the
performing organization. Therefore,
contractor cost participation could
reasonably range from as little as one
percent or less of the total project cost
to more than 50 percent of the total
project cost. Ultimately, cost-sharing is
a negotiable item. As such, the amount
of cost-sharing shall be proportional to
the anticipated value of the contractor’s
gain.
(b) If the performing organization will
not acquire title to, or the right to use,
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
62447
inventions, patents, or technical
information resulting from the R & D
project, it is normally appropriate to
obtain less cost-sharing than in cases in
which the performer acquires these
rights.
(c) A fee or profit is not normally paid
to the performing organization, if the
organization is to contribute to the cost
of the R & D effort, but the amount of
cost-sharing may be reduced to reflect
the fact that the organization is
foregoing its normal fee or profit in the
research. However, if the R & D is
expected to be of only minor value to
the performing organization, and if a
statute does not require cost-sharing, it
may be appropriate for the performer to
make a contribution in the form of a
reduced fee or profit rather than sharing
costs of the project.
(d) The organization’s participation
may be considered over the total term of
the project, so that a relatively high
contribution in one year may be offset
by a relatively low contribution in
another.
(e) A relatively low degree of costsharing may be appropriate, if an area of
R & D requires special stimulus in the
national interest.
335.070–3
Method of cost sharing.
Cost-sharing on individual contracts
may be accomplished either by a
contribution of part or all of one or more
elements of allowable cost of the work
being performed or by a fixed amount or
stated percentage of the total allowable
costs of the project. Contractors shall
not charge costs contributed to the
Government under any other instrument
(e.g., grant or contract), including
allocations to other instruments as part
of any independent R & D program.
335.070–4
Contract award.
Consistent with HHS’ objectives of
competition and support of the small
business program, Contracting Officers
shall not award contracts solely on the
basis of an organization’s ability or
willingness to cost-share. Contracting
Officers shall make awards primarily on
the contractor’s competence and only
after adequate competition has been
obtained among large and small
business organizations, whenever
possible. An offeror’s willingness to
share costs is not a technical evaluation
consideration, but a business
consideration, which is secondary to
selecting the best qualified source.
335.071 Special determinations and
findings affecting research and
development contracting.
OPDIV heads shall sign individual
and class D & Fs for—
E:\FR\FM\27NOR2.SGM
27NOR2
62448
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 227 / Friday, November 27, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
(a) Acquisition or construction of
equipment or facilities on property not
owned by the United States pursuant to
42 U.S.C. 241(a)(7); and
(b) Use of an indemnification
provision in an R & D contract pursuant
to 42 U.S.C. 241(a)(7).
PART 337—SERVICE
CONTRACTING—GENERAL
Subpart 337.1—Service Contracts—General
Sec.
337.103–70 Solicitation provisions and
contract clauses.
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 40 U.S.C. 486(c).
Subpart 337.1—Service Contracts—
General
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES_2
337.103–70 Solicitation provisions and
contract clauses.
Subpart 339.1—General
Sec.
339.101
Policy.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:54 Nov 25, 2009
Jkt 220001
Subpart 339.70—Use of General Services
Administration Blanket Purchase
Agreements for Independent Risk Analysis
Services
339.7000 Policy.
339.7001 Request for approval to make an
award to other than a GSA BPA holder.
339.7002 Notice of intended award.
Subpart 339.71—Information Security
Management
339.7100 Definitions.
339.7101 Policy.
339.7102 Applicability.
339.7103 Solicitation and contract clause.
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 40 U.S.C. 486(c).
(a) The Contracting Officer shall insert
the clause in 352.237–70, Pro-Children
Act, in solicitations, contracts, and
orders that involve (a) kindergarten,
elementary, or secondary education or
library services or (b) health or daycare
services that are provided to children
under the age of 18 on a routine or
regular basis pursuant to the ProChildren Act of 1994.
(b) The Contracting Officer shall
insert the clause in 352.237–71, Crime
Control Act—Reporting of Child Abuse,
in solicitations, contracts, and orders
that require performance on Federal
land or in a Federally operated (or
contracted) facility and involve the
professions/activities performed by
persons specified in the Crime Control
Act of 1990, including, but not limited
to, physicians, nurses, dentists, health
care practitioners, optometrists,
psychologists, emergency medical
technicians, alcohol or drug treatment
personnel, child care workers and
administrators, emergency medical
technicians and ambulance drivers.
(c) The Contracting Officer shall insert
the clause in 352.237–72, Crime Control
Act—Requirement for Background
Checks, in solicitations, contracts, and
orders that involve providing child care
services to children under the age of 18,
including social services, health and
mental health care, child- (day) care,
education (whether or not directly
involved in teaching), and rehabilitative
programs covered under the Crime
Control Act of 1990 (Act).
PART 339—ACQUISITION OF
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
Subpart 339.2—Electronic and Information
Technology
339.201 Clarification.
339.201–70 Required provision and
contract clause.
339.203 Approval of exceptions.
Subpart 339.1—General
339.101
Policy.
(d)(1) The Contracting Officer shall
insert the clause in 352.239–70,
Standard for Security Configurations, in
solicitations, contracts, and orders that
involve the operation or acquisition of
an information technology system (for
definition of the latter term, see https://
www.hhs.gov/ocio/policy.)
An HHS information security policy
waiver, the template for which is
available at: https://intranet.hhs.gov/
infosec/policies_memos.html, must be
approved in order to deviate from HHS
OCIO Standard 2009–0001.001S, HHS
Standard for Security Configurations
Language in HHS Contracts, dated
January 30, 2009. A copy of the
approved waiver shall be forwarded to
the Contracting Officer who, in turn,
shall request a comparable deviation for
the clause in 352.239–70.
(2) The Contracting Officer shall
insert the clause in 352.239–71,
Standard for Encryption Language, in
solicitations, contracts, and orders that
involve the acquisition or lease of, or
the requirement to use, desktop or
laptop computers, mobile devices, or
portable media to store or process HHS
sensitive information that the Project
Officer categorizes as moderate or high
under Federal Information Processing
Standard (FIPS) 199, Standards for
Security Categorization of Federal
Information and Information Systems,
dated February 2004. An HHS
information security policy waiver, the
template for which is available at:
https://intranet.hhs.gov/infosec/
policies_memos.html, must be approved
in order to deviate from HHS OCIO
Standard 2009–0002.001S, HHS
Standard for Encryption Language in
HHS Contracts, dated January 30, 2009.
PO 00000
Frm 00054
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
A copy of the approved waiver shall be
forwarded to the Contracting Officer
who, in turn, shall request a comparable
deviation for the clause in 352.239–71.
Subpart 339.2—Electronic and
Information Technology
339.201
Clarification.
FAR Subpart 39.2, Electronic and
Information Technology, requires
Federal agencies to ensure that, when
acquiring EIT, Federal employees with
disabilities and members of the public
with disabilities have access to and use
of information and data that is
comparable to individuals without
disabilities. This EIT access requirement
does not apply to a contractor’s internal
workplaces. EIT that is neither used nor
accessed by Federal employees or
members of the public is not subject to
the Access Board accessibility
standards. Contractors in their
professional capacity are not members
of the public for purposes of Section
508.
339.201–70 Required provision and
contract clause.
(a) The Contracting Officer shall insert
the provision in 352.239–73(a),
Electronic and Information Technology
Accessibility, in solicitations valued at
more than the micro-purchase threshold
that involve the development,
acquisition, maintenance, or use of EIT
products and services subject to Section
508 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as
amended, including EIT deliverables
such as electronic documents and
reports. (Note: Exceptions to this
requirement can be found in FAR
39.204.) After approval of the Section
508 Official or designee, the Contracting
Officer may waive the requirement for
offerors to provide an HHS Section 508
Product Assessment Template, if
Section 508 EIT conformance can be
determined conclusively through other
less formal methods. The Contracting
Officer shall document in the award file
any waiver for submission of the
Product Assessment Template. The
approval of a waiver by the Section 508
Official does not, however, eliminate
the requirement for product assessment
against Section 508 accessibility
standards.
(b) The Contracting Officer shall
insert the clause in 352.239–73(b),
Electronic and Information Technology
Accessibility, in contracts and orders
that involve the development,
acquisition, maintenance, or use of EIT
products and services, including EIT
deliverables such as electronic
documents and reports, subject to
Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act of
E:\FR\FM\27NOR2.SGM
27NOR2
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES_2
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 227 / Friday, November 27, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
1973, as amended, unless the EIT
products and services are incidental to
the project. (Note: Other exceptions to
this requirement can be found at FAR
39.204.)
(c) When acquiring EIT products and
services subject to Section 508 of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended,
in the following circumstances, the
Contracting Officer shall insert the
paragraph in 352.239–73(c), Schedule
for Contractor Submission of Section
508 Annual Report, which requires a
contractor to provide an HHS Section
508 Annual Report, at the end of the
clause in 352.239–73(b) and cite the
schedule for report submission, where
indicated:
(1) New multiple-year contracts.
(2) Existing multiple-year contracts,
with a performance period of 1 year or
more remaining as of January 16, 2008
(the effective date of HHS’ interim
acquisition guidance).
(3) New multiple-year task and
delivery orders exceeding $100,000
awarded under IDIQ or FSS contracts.
(4) Existing multiple-year task and
delivery orders exceeding $100,000
awarded under IDIQ or FSS contracts,
with a task/delivery order performance
period of 1 year or more remaining as
of January 16, 2008.
(5) New multiple-year BPA orders that
exceed $100,000.
(6) Existing multiple-year BPA orders
with a performance period of 1 year or
more remaining as of January 16, 2008.
(7) New multiple-year contracts with
option periods/quantities.
(8) Existing multiple-year contracts
with option periods/quantities
remaining as of January 16, 2008.
(d) Before adding funds to a multipleyear contract or order—see 339.201–
70(c), that involves the acquisition of
EIT products and services, including
EIT deliverables such as electronic
documents and reports, subject to
Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act of
1973, as amended, the Contracting
Officer shall ensure that the contractor
has provided to the Contracting Officer
and COTR a properly completed HHS
Section 508 Annual Report—see Section
508 policy on HHS Office on Disability
Web site. The Contracting Officer shall
request that the contractor provide the
report in sufficient time for its review
and approval by the Contracting Officer,
COTR, and the Section 508 Official or
designee, prior to funding performance
beyond the currently funded contract
performance period. The Contracting
Officer shall ensure that the report and
all related approvals are made a part of
the official contract/order file. The
Section 508 Official or designee shall
monitor the Annual Reports, direct
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:54 Nov 25, 2009
Jkt 220001
corrective measures to improve their
submission and quality, and report
improvement actions taken to the HHS
Office on Disability.
339.203
Approval of exceptions.
(a) Procedures to document exception
and determination requests are set forth
in the OPDIV/STAFFDIV Section 508
Implementation Plans required by
paragraph 4.1 of the HHS Section 508
policy.
(b) In the development of an AP or
other acquisition request document, the
Contracting Officer shall ensure that all
Section 508 commercial non-availability
or undue burden exception
determination requests for applicable
EIT requirements are: (1) Documented
and certified in accordance with the
requirements of paragraph 4.3, Section
508 Compliance Exceptions, of the HHS
Section 508 policy; (2) signed by the
Project Officer; (3) approved by the
OPDIV Section 508 Official or designee;
and (4) included in the AP or other
acquisition request document provided
by the Project Officer to the contracting
office.
(c) In instances where a technical
evaluation has been performed, and no
organization’s proposed products or
services meet some or all of Section 508
accessibility standards, in order to
proceed with the acquisition, the
Contracting Officer shall provide an
exception determination request along
with the technical evaluation panel’s
assessment of the Section 508
evaluation factor to the designated
Section 508 Official or designee for
review and approval/disapproval. See
315.304 regarding obtaining approval of
technical evaluation panel assessments
by the Section 508 Official or designee.
The Contracting Officer shall include
the Section 508 Official’s or designee’s
approval/disapproval of the exception
determination request in the official
contract file and reference it, as
appropriate, in all source selection
documents. For further information, see
paragraphs 4.3, Section 508 Compliance
Exceptions, and paragraph 11,
Appendix A, of HHS Section 508
policy—see Section 508 policy on HHS
Office on Disability Web site.
Subpart 339.70—Use of General
Services Administration Blanket
Purchase Agreements for Independent
Risk Analysis Services
339.7000
Policy.
GSA has established governmentwide BPAs for independent risk
analysis services, including verification
and validation of in-house risk
assessments. For information on
PO 00000
Frm 00055
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
62449
ordering procedures, see the attachment
to OMB memorandum (M–08–10), Use
of Commercial Independent Risk
Analysis Services Blanket Purchase
Agreements (BPA), dated February 4,
2008, available on the OMB Web site.
HHS policy is for contracting activities
to use the GSA BPA sources to the
maximum practicable extent.
339.7001 Request for approval to make an
award to other than a GSA BPA holder.
The Contracting Officer, in
conjunction with the OPDIV/STAFFDIV
Chief Information Security Officer
(CISO), may determine, as part of
conducting market research for
independent risk analysis services
expected to exceed the micro-purchase
threshold, that obtaining the required
services from a source other than a GSA
BPA holder will result in the best value
to the Government. In that event, the
Contracting Officer shall prepare a
request for approval at least 15 business
days prior to the planned date of the
contract or order award and forward it
through the HCA and the OPDIV/
STAFFDIV CISO for concurrence, to the
SPE. The SPE shall coordinate the
processing of the request with the CAO
and the HHS CIO. The request for
approval shall briefly describe the
services required, indicate the intended
source’s pricing and other terms and
conditions, and provide the rationale for
award to the intended source rather
than the GSA BPA holders. The request
may include additional supporting
rationale to document the best value
decision, as appropriate.
339.7002
Notice of intended award.
The CAO, or designee, in conjunction
with the HHS CIO, will review the
Contracting Officer’s request for
approval to make an award to other than
a GSA BPA holder for independent risk
analysis services and either approve or
disapprove the request in writing. If the
CAO, or designee, approves the request,
upon approval, the CAO, or designee,
shall send a notice of intended award to
the designated GSA BPA Contracting
Officer, with a copy to OMB’s EGovernment and Information
Technology Administrator, at least 10
business days prior to the date of the
proposed award explaining how it
provides the best value to the
Government. In the event of unusual
and compelling urgency, the CAO, or
designee, shall provide the notice of
intended award to GSA as soon as
practicable.
E:\FR\FM\27NOR2.SGM
27NOR2
62450
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 227 / Friday, November 27, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
Subpart 339.71—Information Security
Management
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES_2
339.7100
Definitions.
As used in this subpart, the following
definitions shall apply:
Adequate security means, in
accordance with OMB Circular A–130,
Management of Federal Information
Resources, Appendix 3 (Security of
Federal Automated Information
Resources), security commensurate with
the risk and magnitude of harm
resulting from the loss, misuse, or
unauthorized access to or modification
of information.
Federal information means, in
accordance with OMB Circular A–130,
Management of Federal Information
Resources, Appendix 3 (Security of
Federal Automated Information
Resources), information created,
collected, processed, disseminated, or
disposed of by or for the Federal
Government.
Federal information system means an
information system used or operated by
an executive agency, by a contractor of
an executive agency, or by another
organization on behalf of an executive
agency.
Information means, in accordance
with OMB Circular A–130, Management
of Federal Information Resources,
Appendix 3 (Security of Federal
Automated Information Resources), any
communication or representation of
knowledge such as facts, data, or
opinions in any medium or form,
including textual, numerical, graphic,
cartographic, narrative, or audiovisual
forms.
Information infrastructure means the
underlying framework that information
systems and assets rely on in
processing, transmitting, receiving, or
storing information electronically.
Information security means protecting
information and information systems
from unauthorized access, use,
disclosure, disruption, modification or
destruction in order to provide—
(1) Integrity, which means guarding
against improper information
modification or destruction, and
includes ensuring information nonrepudiation and authenticity;
(2) Confidentiality, which means
preserving authorized restrictions on
access and disclosure, including means
of protecting personal privacy and
proprietary information;
(3) Availability, which means
ensuring timely and reliable access to
and use of information; and
(4) Privacy, which means regulating
the appropriate collection, maintenance,
use, and dissemination of personal
information by Federal executive branch
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:54 Nov 25, 2009
Jkt 220001
agencies. It essentially prohibits
disclosure without consent.
Information system means a discrete
set of information resources organized
for the collection, processing,
maintenance, transmission, and
dissemination of information, in
accordance with defined procedures,
whether automated or manual.
Information technology includes
computers, ancillary equipment
(including imaging peripherals, input,
output, and storage devices necessary
for security and surveillance),
peripheral equipment designed to be
controlled by the central processing unit
of a computer, software, firmware and
similar procedures, services (including
support services) and related resources.
Subpart 342.70—Contract Monitoring
342.7000 Purpose.
342.7001 Contract monitoring
responsibilities.
342.7002 Procedures to be followed when a
contractor fails to perform.
342.7003 Withholding of contract
payments.
342.7003–1 Solicitation provisions and
contract clauses.
342.7003–2 Procedures to be followed
when withholding payments.
339.7101
Subpart 342.3—Contract
Administration Office Functions
Policy.
HHS is responsible for implementing
an information security program to
ensure that its information systems and
associated facilities, as well as those of
its contractors, provide a level of
security commensurate with the risk
and magnitude of harm that could result
from the loss, misuse, disclosure, or
modification of the information
contained in those systems. Each
system’s level of security shall protect
the integrity, confidentiality, and
availability of the information and
comply with all security and privacyrelated laws and regulations.
339.7102
Applicability.
Contracting Officers are responsible
for ensuring that all information
technology acquisitions comply with
the Federal Information Security
Management Act (FISMA), the HHS–
OCIO Information Systems Security and
Privacy Policy, and FISMA-related FAR
and HHSAR requirements. This policy
does not apply to national security
systems as defined in FISMA.
339.7103
Solicitation and contract clause.
The Contracting Officer shall insert
the clause in 352.239–72, Security
Requirements for Federal Information
Technology Resources, in solicitations
and contracts that involve contractor
access to Federal information or Federal
information systems.
SUBCHAPTER G—CONTRACT
MANAGEMENT
PART 342—CONTRACT
ADMINISTRATION
Subpart 342.3—Contract Administration
Office Functions
Sec.
342.302 Contract administration functions.
Subpart 342.7—Indirect Cost Rates
342.705 Final indirect cost rates.
PO 00000
Frm 00056
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
Subpart 342.71—Administrative Actions for
Cost Overruns
342.7100 Scope of subpart.
342.7101 Contract administration.
342.7101–1 General.
342.7101–2 Procedures.
342.7102 Contract modifications.
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 40 U.S.C. 486(c).
342.302
Contract administration functions.
(c)
(1) In multiple-year contracts or
orders, the OPDIV’s Section 508 Official
or designee, as well as the Contracting
Officer and COTR, shall review and
approve all Section 508 Annual Reports
before the Contracting Officer makes
final payment or any option is exercised
under any applicable contract/order. In
contracts/orders of 1 year or less in
duration, the aforementioned officials
shall review and approve the Section
508 conformance certification before
final payment is made. The Contracting
Officer also shall ensure that the report
and all related approvals are made a
part of the official contract/order file.
(2) The Contracting Officer shall
insert the clause in 352.242–70, Key
Personnel, in solicitations and contracts
when the Contracting Officer will
designate contractor key personnel. See
FAR 35.015 for additional information
regarding key personnel when
contracting for R & D.
(3) The Contracting Officer shall
insert the clause in 352.242–71,
Tobacco-free Facilities, in solicitations,
contracts, and orders when some or all
of the contractor’s performance
(including construction services), will
take place on HHS-owned or controlled
properties. The clause shall not be
included if performance requires only
that contractor staff attend occasional
meetings on HHS properties. In that
case, contractor employees are
considered ‘‘visitors.’’ Further, for any
proposed or existing construction
contract or order, the Contracting
Officer shall coordinate any exceptions
to the policy, raised by an incumbent or
potential contractor based on union or
collective bargaining agreements, with
the designated OPDIV tobacco-free
E:\FR\FM\27NOR2.SGM
27NOR2
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 227 / Friday, November 27, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
policy contact point for final
disposition.
(4) The Contracting Officer shall
insert the clause in 352.242–72, Native
American Graves Protection and
Repatriation Act, in solicitations,
contracts, and orders that require
performance on Tribal lands or are for
construction on Federal or Tribal lands.
Subpart 342.7—Indirect Cost Rates
342.705
Final indirect cost rates.
(a) The Division of Cost Allocation,
PSC, shall establish indirect cost rates,
research patient care rates, and, as
necessary, fringe benefit, computer, and
other special costing rates for use in
contracts awarded to State and local
governments, colleges and universities,
hospitals, and other nonprofit
organizations.
(b) The Division of Financial
Advisory Services, NIH, shall establish
indirect cost rates, fringe benefit rates,
and similar rates for use in contracts
awarded to commercial organizations.
Subpart 342.70—Contract Monitoring
342.7000
Purpose.
Contract monitoring is an essential
element of contract administration that
the Contracting Officer and the COTR
perform jointly. This subpart describes
HHS’ operating concepts.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES_2
342.7001 Contract monitoring
responsibilities.
(a) The contract establishes the
obligations of both the Government and
the contractor. The Contracting Officer
is the only person authorized to modify
the contract and shall confirm all
modifications in writing.
(b) The Contracting Officer shall
ensure the contractor’s compliance with
all the terms and conditions of the
contract. The Contracting Officer shall
inform the contractor by letter (if not
already stipulated in the contract) of the
authorities and responsibilities of the
Government personnel involved with
the contract.
(c) The Contracting Officer shall use
program, technical, and other personnel
for assistance and advice in monitoring
the contractor’s performance and in
other areas of post-award
administration. The Contracting Officer
shall ensure that these individuals
understand and carry out their assigned
responsibilities. The individual roles
and corresponding responsibilities
typically involve, but are not limited to,
the following:
(1) The role of program and technical
personnel in monitoring the contract is
to assist and advise the Contracting
Officer, and act as the COTR when so
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:54 Nov 25, 2009
Jkt 220001
designated by the Contracting Officer.
COTR activities include—
(i) Providing technical monitoring
during contract performance and
advising the Contracting Officer relating
to delivery, acceptance, or rejection of
deliverables in accordance with the
terms of the contract;
(ii) Assessing contractor performance;
(iii) Recommending necessary
changes to the schedule of work and
period of performance to accomplish the
objectives of the contract (The COTR
shall provide the Contracting Officer a
written request along with an
appropriate justification and a funding
document, if additional funds are
needed.);
(iv) Reviewing invoices/vouchers and
recommending approval/disapproval by
the Contracting Officer, including
providing comments regarding anything
unusual discovered in the review (Note:
If a contract contains the Salary Rate
Limitation clause specified in 352.231–
70, the Contracting Officer, in
conjunction with the COTR, shall
monitor the contractor’s invoices to
ensure that the contractor is billing
salaries, including those of
subcontractors, at rates no higher than
the Federal Executive Schedule salary
rate limitation in effect on the date(s)
the expense(s) was/were incurred.);
(v) Reviewing and recommending
approval or disapproval of
subcontractors, overtime, travel, and key
personnel changes; and
(vi) Participating, as necessary, in
various phases of the contract closeout
process.
(2) The roles of the contract
administrator, auditor, cost analyst, and
property administrator are to assist or
advise the Contracting Officer in postaward administration. Such activities
include—
(i) Evaluating contractor systems and
procedures, including accounting
policies and procedures, purchasing
policies and practices, property
accounting and control, wage and salary
plans and rate structures, personnel
policies and practices, etc.;
(ii) Processing disputes under the
Disputes clause and any resultant
appeals;
(iii) Modifying or terminating the
contract; and
(iv) Determining the allowability of:
costs charged in incentive or costreimbursement type contracts, and
progress payments under fixed-price
contracts. This is important for awards
to new organizations or those with
financial weaknesses.
(d) The Contracting Officer shall
ensure that contractor performance and
contract monitoring conform with
PO 00000
Frm 00057
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
62451
contract terms and conditions. If
performance is not satisfactory or if
problems are anticipated, the
Contracting Officer shall take immediate
action to protect the Government’s
rights under the contract. The
Contracting Officer shall notify
appropriate officials of problems that
cannot be resolved within contract
limitations and whenever the contractor
is not meeting contract or program
objectives. The notification shall
include a statement of corrective actions
that the Contracting Officer is taking.
342.7002 Procedures to be followed when
a contractor fails to perform.
(a) The Contracting Officer shall
initiate immediate action to protect the
Government’s rights whenever the
contractor fails to comply with either
the delivery or reporting terms of the
contract. Compliance with the reporting
terms includes those reports the
contractor is required to submit directly
to the payment office. The payment
office shall notify the Contracting
Officer promptly when the contractor
does not submit such a report on time.
(b) When the contract contains a
termination for default clause, the
contractor’s failure to submit any report,
perform services, or deliver work when
required by the contract is considered a
default in performance. The Contracting
Officer shall immediately issue a formal
10-day cure notice pursuant to FAR
49.607. The notice shall include a
statement to the effect that payments
will be withheld if the default is not
cured within the time period specified
in the notice or if the default is not
determined to be excusable.
(1) If the default is cured or is
determined to be excusable, the
Contracting Officer shall not initiate the
withholding action.
(2) If the default is not determined to
be excusable or a response is not
received within the allotted time, the
Contracting Officer shall initiate
withholding action on all contract
payments and shall determine whether
termination for default or other action
would be in the best interest of the
Government.
(c) When the contract does not
contain a termination for default clause,
the Contracting Officer shall consider a
contractor’s failure to submit any
required report, perform services, or
deliver work when required by the
contract a failure to perform. The
Contracting Officer shall immediately
issue a written notice to the contractor
that: specifies the failure, and provides
a 10-day period (or longer period if the
Contracting Officer deems it necessary)
within which the contractor shall either
E:\FR\FM\27NOR2.SGM
27NOR2
62452
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 227 / Friday, November 27, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
cure the failure or provide reasons for
an excusable delay. The notice shall
include a statement to the effect that
payments will be withheld, if the
default is not cured within the time
period specified in the notice or if the
default is not determined to be
excusable.
(1) If the contractor cures the failure
or the Contracting Officer determines it
to be excusable, the Contracting Officer
shall not initiate the withholding action.
(2) If the Contracting Officer does not
determine the failure excusable or the
contractor does not provide a response
within the allotted time, the Contracting
Officer shall initiate withholding action
on all contract payments and shall
determine whether termination for
convenience or other action would be in
the best interest of the Government.
(d) The Contracting Officer shall
consult FAR subpart 49.4 for further
guidance before taking any of the
actions described in this section.
342.7003 Withholding of contract
payments.
342.7003–1 Solicitation provisions and
contract clauses.
(a) The Contracting Officer shall insert
the clause in 352.242–73, Withholding
of Contract Payments, and the clause in
FAR 52.249–14, Excusable Delays, in
solicitations and contracts when a costreimbursement, time-and-materials, or
labor-hour contract is contemplated.
(b) The Contracting Officer shall
insert the clause in 352.242–74, Final
Decisions on Audit Findings, in
solicitations and contracts when a costreimbursement contract is
contemplated, except for those contracts
with:
(1) A foreign government or agency of
that government; or
(2) An international organization or a
subsidiary body of that organization that
the HCA determines would not be
appropriate.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES_2
342.7003–2 Procedures to be followed
when withholding payments.
13:54 Nov 25, 2009
Jkt 220001
Subpart 342.71—Administrative
Actions for Cost Overruns
342.7100
Scope of subpart.
This subpart sets forth the procedures
to follow when a cost overrun is
anticipated. A cost overrun occurs when
the allowable actual cost of performing
a cost-reimbursement type contract
exceeds the total estimated cost
specified in the contract.
342.7101
Contract administration.
342.7101–1
General.
Upon receipt of information that a
contractor’s accumulated cost and
projected expenditures will exceed the
limit of funds obligated by the contract,
the Contracting Officer shall coordinate
immediately with the appropriate
program office to determine whether the
contract should be modified or
terminated. If the Contracting Officer
receives information from a source other
than the contractor that a cost overrun
is anticipated, the Contracting Officer
shall verify the information with the
contractor and remind the contractor of
the notification requirements of the
Limitation of Cost clause.
342.7101–2
(a) When appropriate, the Contracting
Officer shall withhold any contract
payment when a required report is
overdue or the contractor fails to
perform or deliver required work or
services. When making the
determination to withhold contract
payments in accordance with the
Withholding of Contract Payments
clause, the Contracting Officer shall
immediately notify the servicing finance
office in writing of the determination to
withhold payments. The notice of
suspension shall contain all information
necessary for the finance office to
identify the contract—i.e., contract
VerDate Nov<24>2008
number, task/delivery order number,
and contractor name and address.
(b) The Contracting Officer shall
immediately notify the contractor in
writing that payments have been
suspended until the default or failure is
cured.
(c) When the contractor cures the
default or failure, the Contracting
Officer shall immediately notify, in
writing, all recipients of the notice of
withholding that the withholding is to
be lifted and contract payments are to be
resumed.
(d) When taking any actions regarding
the withholding of payments, the
Contracting Officer shall not waive any
of the Government’s rights when
corresponding with the contractor.
Procedures.
(a) Upon notification that a cost
overrun is anticipated, the Contracting
Officer shall inform the contractor to
submit a request for additional funds,
which shall include the following:
(1) Name and address of contractor.
(2) Contract number and expiration
date.
(3) Contract item(s) and amount(s)
creating overrun.
(4) The elements of cost which
changed from the original estimate—i.e.,
labor, material, travel, and overhead, to
be furnished in the following format:
(i) Original estimate.
(ii) Costs incurred to date.
(iii) Estimated cost to completion.
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
(iv) Revised estimate.
(v) Amount of adjustment.
(5) The factors responsible for the
increase (e.g., error in estimate, changed
conditions).
(6) The latest date by which funds
must be available for commitment to
avoid contract slippage, work stoppage,
or other program impairment.
(b) When the contractor submits a
notice of a projected overrun, the
Contracting Officer shall—
(1) Immediately advise the
appropriate program office and furnish
the office a copy of the notice and any
other data received;
(2) Request audit or cost advisory
services, and technical support, as
necessary, for evaluation of information
and data received; and
(3) Maintain continuous
communications with the program
office to obtain: a timely written
decision and justification to continue
the contract with additional funds
(including verification of funds
availability); or a timely written
decision and request to terminate the
contract.
(c) After receiving the decision by the
program office, the Contracting Officer
shall promptly notify the contractor in
writing of the following:
(1) The specified amount of additional
funds allotted to the contract.
(2) Work shall be discontinued when
the allotted funds are exhausted, and
any work performed after that date is at
the contractor’s risk.
(3) The Government is considering
whether to allot additional funds to the
contract and will notify the contractor
as soon as possible, but that any work
performed after the currently allotted
funds are exhausted is at the
contractor’s risk. (Timely, formal
notification of the Government’s
intention is essential to preclude loss of
contractual rights in the event of
dispute, termination, or litigation.)
(d) If the program office permits, the
Contracting Officer shall refrain from
issuing any contractual documents that
require new work or an extension of
time, pending resolution of the
projected overrun.
342.7102
Contract modifications.
(a) Modifications to contracts
containing the Limitation of Cost clause
shall include either—
(1) A provision which: Increases the
estimated or ceiling amount in the
Limitation of Cost clause of the contract;
and states that such clause will
thereafter apply to the increased
amount; or
(2) A provision stating that the
estimated or ceiling amount in the
E:\FR\FM\27NOR2.SGM
27NOR2
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 227 / Friday, November 27, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
Limitation of Cost clause is not changed
by the modification.
(b) The Contracting Officer shall not
change a fixed-fee in a contract when
funding a cost overrun. The Contracting
Officer shall make changes in fixed-fee
only to reflect changes in the SOW/PWS
that justify an increase or decrease in
fee.
SUBCHAPTER H—CLAUSES AND
FORMS
PART 352—SOLICITATION
PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT
CLAUSES
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES_2
Subpart 352.1—Instructions for Using
Provisions and Clauses
Sec.
352.100 Scope of subpart.
352.101–70 Application of provisions and
clauses.
Subpart 352.2—Texts of Provisions and
Clauses
352.201–70 Paperwork Reduction Act.
352.202–1 Definitions.
352.203–70 Anti-lobbying.
352.215–1 Instructions to offerors—
competitive acquisition.
352.215–70 Late proposals and revisions.
352.216–70 Additional cost principles.
´ ´
352.219–70 Mentor-protege program.
´ ´
352.219–71 Mentor-protege program
reporting requirements.
352.222–70 Contractor cooperation in equal
employment opportunity investigations.
352.223–70 Safety and health.
352.224–70 Privacy Act.
352.227–70 Publications and publicity.
352.228–7 Insurance—liability to third
persons.
352.231–70 Salary rate limitation.
352.231–71 Pricing of adjustments.
352.233–70 Choice of law (overseas).
352.233–71 Litigation and claims.
352.234–1 Notice of earned value
management system—pre-award
Integrated Baseline Review.
352.234–2 Notice of earned value
management system—post-award
Integrated Baseline Review.
352.234–3 Full earned value management
system.
352.234–4 Partial earned value management
system.
352.237–70 Pro-Children Act.
352.237–71 Crime Control Act—reporting
of child abuse.
352.237–72 Crime Control Act—
requirement for background checks.
352.239–70 Standard for security
configurations.
352.239–71 Standard for encryption
language.
352.239–72 Security requirements for
Federal information technology
resources.
352.239–73 Electronic information and
technology accessibility.
352.242–70 Key personnel.
352.242–71 Tobacco-free facilities.
352.242–72 Native American Graves
Protections and Repatriation Act.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:54 Nov 25, 2009
Jkt 220001
352.242–73 Withholding of contract
payments.
352.242–74 Final decisions on audit
findings.
352.270–1 Accessibility of meetings,
conferences, and seminars to persons
with disabilities.
352.270–2 Indian preference.
352.270–3 Indian preference program.
352.270–4 Protection of human subjects.
352.270–5 Care of laboratory animals.
352.270–6 Restriction on use of human
subjects.
352.270–7 Conference sponsorship request
and conference materials disclaimer.
352.270–8 Prostitution and related
activities.
352.270–9 Non-discrimination for
conscience.
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 40 U.S.C. 486(c).
Subpart 352.1—Instructions for Using
Provisions and Clauses
352.100
Scope of subpart.
This subpart provides guidance for
applying HHS provisions and clauses in
solicitations, contracts, and orders.
352.101–70
clauses.
Application of provisions and
(a) Unless otherwise qualified (e.g., by
the type of contract contemplated, the
nature of the requirement, or dollar
amount) in a prescription for a
solicitation provision or contract clause
specified in Part 352 or elsewhere in the
HHSAR, the term ‘‘contract’’ means—
(1) An award, including modifications
thereunder, that exceeds the simplified
acquisition threshold, including a task
order or delivery order, whether placed
under a GSA FSS contract, an IDIQ
contract, a GWAC, or a BPA, and a
purchase order placed under the
authority of FAR subpart 13.5); and
(2) A bilateral award—i.e., when both
the Contracting Officer and the
contractor sign the award document,
that exceeds the micro-purchase
threshold but which does not exceed the
simplified acquisition threshold.
(b) When the term ‘‘order’’ is specified
in a prescription for a solicitation
provision or order clause, it means an
order that exceeds the micro-purchase
threshold but which does not exceed the
simplified acquisition threshold, except
those bilateral awards specified in (a)(2)
above.
(c) If a clause is included in the
master instrument (e.g., in an IDIQ
contract or a BPA), it is not necessary
to also include the clause in a task order
or delivery order thereunder.
(d) When a dollar amount or dollar
threshold is specified (e.g., $25 million
or simplified acquisition threshold), the
dollar amount of the award (contract or
order) includes any options thereunder.
PO 00000
Frm 00059
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
62453
Subpart 352.2—Texts of Provisions
and Clauses
352.201–70
Paperwork Reduction Act.
As prescribed in 301.106(b), the
Contracting Officer shall insert the
following clause:
Paperwork Reduction Act (January 2006)
(a) This contract involves a requirement to
collect or record information calling either
for answers to identical questions from 10 or
more persons other than Federal employees,
or information from Federal employees
which is outside the scope of their
employment, for use by the Federal
government or disclosure to third parties;
therefore, the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) shall apply to
this contract. No plan, questionnaire,
interview guide or other similar device for
collecting information (whether repetitive or
single time) may be used without the Office
of Management and Budget (OMB) first
providing clearance. Contractors and the
Contracting Officer’s Technical
Representative shall be guided by the
provisions of 5 CFR Part 1320, Controlling
Paperwork Burdens on the Public, and seek
the advice of the HHS operating division or
Office of the Secretary Reports Clearance
Officer to determine the procedures for
acquiring OMB clearance.
(b) The Contractor shall not expend any
funds or begin any data collection until OMB
Clearance is received. Once OMB Clearance
is received from the Contracting Officer’s
Technical Representative, the Contracting
Officer shall provide the Contractor with
written notification authorizing the
expenditure of funds and the collection of
data. The Contractor shall allow at least 120
days for OMB clearance. The Contracting
Officer will consider excessive delays caused
by the Government which arise out of causes
beyond the control and without the fault or
negligence of the Contractor in accordance
with the Excusable Delays or Default clause
of this contract.
(End of clause)
352.202–1
Definitions.
As prescribed in FAR 2.201, the
Contracting Officer shall insert the
clause in FAR 52.202–1, Definitions, as
revised by 302.201:
Definitions (January 2006)
(a) In accordance with 52.202–1(a)(1),
substitute the following as paragraph
(a):
‘‘(a) The term ‘‘Secretary’’ or ‘‘Head of the
Agency’’ (also called ‘‘Agency Head’’) means
the Secretary, Deputy Secretary, or any
Assistant Secretary, Administrator or
Commissioner of the Department of Health
and Human Services; and the term ‘‘his/her
duly authorized representative’’ means any
person, persons, or board authorized to act
for the Secretary.’’
(b) In accordance with 52.202–1(a)(1),
add the following paragraph (h):
‘‘(h) The term ‘‘Contracting Officer’s
Technical Representative’’ means the person
E:\FR\FM\27NOR2.SGM
27NOR2
62454
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 227 / Friday, November 27, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
who monitors the technical aspects of
contract performance. The Contracting
Officer’s Technical Representative is not
authorized to issue any instructions or
directions which cause any increase or
decrease in the Statement of Work/
Performance Work Statement/Specifications
which would result in the increase or
decrease in the price of this contract, or
changes in the delivery schedule or period of
performance of this contract. If applicable,
the Contracting Officer’s Technical
Representative is not authorized to receive or
act upon any notification or revised cost
estimate provided by the Contractor in
accordance with the Limitation of Cost or
Limitation of Funds clauses of this contract.’’
352.203–70
Anti-lobbying.
As prescribed in 303.808–70, the
Contracting Officer shall insert the
following clause:
Anti-Lobbying (January 2006)
Pursuant to the current HHS annual
appropriations act, except for normal and
recognized executive-legislative
relationships, the Contractor shall not use
any HHS contract funds for (i) publicity or
propaganda purposes; (ii) the preparation,
distribution, or use of any kit, pamphlet,
booklet, publication, radio, television or
video presentation designed to support or
defeat legislation pending before the
Congress or any State legislature, except in
presentation to the Congress or any State
legislature itself; or (iii) payment of salary or
expenses of the Contractor, or any agent
acting for the Contractor, related to any
activity designed to influence legislation or
appropriations pending before the Congress
or any State legislature.
(End of clause)
352.215–1 Instructions to offerors—
competitive acquisition.
352.215–70
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES_2
As prescribed in 315.209, the
Contracting Officer shall insert the
following paragraph (e) in the provision
in FAR 52.215–1, Instructions to
Offerors—Competitive Acquisition:
(e) Restriction on disclosure and use of
data.
(1) The proposal submitted in response to
this request may contain data (trade secrets;
business data (e.g., commercial information,
financial information, cost and pricing data);
and technical data) which the offeror,
including its prospective subcontractor(s),
does not want used or disclosed for any
purpose other than for evaluation of the
proposal. The use and disclosure of any data
may be so restricted; provided, that the
Government determines that the data is not
required to be disclosed under the Freedom
of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. 552, as amended,
and the offeror marks the cover sheet of the
proposal with the following statements,
specifying the particular portions of the
proposal which are to be restricted:
‘‘Unless disclosure is required by the
Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. 552, as
amended, (the Act) as determined by
Freedom of Information (FOI) officials of the
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:54 Nov 25, 2009
Jkt 220001
Department of Health and Human Services
(HHS), data contained in the portions of this
proposal which the offeror has specifically
identified by page number, paragraph, etc. as
containing restricted information shall not be
used or disclosed except for evaluation
purposes.
The offeror acknowledges that HHS may
not be able to withhold a record (e.g., data,
document, etc.) nor deny access to a record
requested pursuant to the Act and that the
HHS’ FOI officials must make that
determination. The offeror hereby agrees that
the Government is not liable for disclosure if
HHS has determined that disclosure is
required by the Act.
If a contract is awarded to the offeror as a
result of, or in connection with, the
submission of this proposal, the Government
shall have the right to use or disclose the data
to the extent provided in the contract.
Proposals not resulting in a contract remain
subject to the Act.
The offeror also agrees that the
Government is not liable for disclosure or use
of unmarked data and may use or disclose
the data for any purpose, including the
release of the information pursuant to
requests under the Act. The data subject to
this restriction are contained in pages (insert
page numbers, paragraph designations, etc. or
other identification).’’
(2) In addition, the offeror must mark each
page of data it wishes to restrict with the
following statement:
‘‘Use or disclosure of data contained on
this page is subject to the restriction on the
cover sheet of this proposal or quotation.’’
(3) Offerors are cautioned that proposals
submitted with restrictive statements or
statements differing in substance from those
cited above may not be considered for award.
The Government reserves the right to reject
any proposal submitted with nonconforming
statement(s).
Late proposals and revisions.
As prescribed in 315.208, the
Contracting Officer shall insert the
following provision:
Late Proposals and Revisions (January 2006)
Notwithstanding the procedures contained
in FAR 52.215–1(c)(3) of the provision of this
solicitation entitled Instructions to Offerors—
Competitive Acquisition, the Government
may consider a proposal received after the
date specified for receipt if it appears to offer
the best value to the Government and it was
received before proposals were distributed
for evaluation, or within 5 calendar days after
the exact time specified for receipt,
whichever is earlier.
(End of provision)
352.216–70
Additional cost principles.
As prescribed in 316.307(j), the
Contracting Officer shall insert the
following clause:
Additional Cost Principles (January 2006)
(a) Bid and proposal (B & P) costs.
(1) B & P costs are the immediate costs of
preparing bids, proposals, and applications
for potential Federal and non-Federal
contracts, grants, and agreements, including
PO 00000
Frm 00060
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
the development of scientific, cost, and other
data needed to support the bids, proposals,
and applications.
(2) B & P costs of the current accounting
period are allowable as indirect costs.
(3) B & P costs of past accounting periods
are unallowable in the current period.
However, if the organization’s established
practice is to treat these costs by some other
method, they may be accepted if they are
found to be reasonable and equitable.
(4) B & P costs do not include independent
research and development (IR & D) costs
covered by the following paragraph, or preaward costs covered by paragraph 36 of
Attachment B to OMB Circular A–122.
(b) IR & D costs.
(1) IR & D is research and development
conducted by an organization which is not
sponsored by Federal or non-Federal
contracts, grants, or other agreements.
(2) IR & D shall be allocated its
proportionate share of indirect costs on the
same basis as the allocation of indirect costs
to sponsored research and development.
(3) The cost of IR & D, including its
proportionate share of indirect costs, is
unallowable.
(End of clause)
352.219–70
´ ´
Mentor-protege program.
As prescribed in 319.270–1(a), the
Contracting Officer shall insert the
following provision:
´ ´
Mentor-Protege Program (October 2009)
(a) Large business prime contractors
serving as mentors in the HHS Mentor´ ´
Protege program are eligible for HHS
subcontracting plan credit, and shall submit
a copy of their HHS Office of Small and
Disadvantaged Business Utilization
´ ´
(OSDBU)-approved mentor protege
agreements as part of their offers. The
amount of credit provided by the Contracting
´ ´
Officer to a mentor firm for protege firm
developmental assistance costs shall be
calculated on a dollar for dollar basis and
reported by the mentor firm in the Summary
Subcontract Report via the Electronic
Subcontracting Reporting System (eSRS) at
https://www.esrs.gov. The mentor firm and
´ ´
protege firm shall submit to the Contracting
Officer a signed joint statement agreeing on
the dollar value of the developmental
assistance the mentor firm provided. (For
example, a mentor firm would report a
´ ´
$10,000 subcontract awarded to a protege
firm and provision of $5,000 of
developmental assistance as $15,000 of
developmental assistance.) The mentor firm
may use this additional credit towards
attaining its subcontracting plan
participation goal under this contract.
(b) The program consists of—
(1) Mentor firms—large businesses that: (i)
demonstrate the interest, commitment, and
capability to provide developmental
´ ´
assistance to small business protege firms;
´ ´
and (ii) have a Mentor-Protege agreement
approved by HHS’ OSDBU;
´ ´
(2) Protege firms—firms that: (i) seek
developmental assistance; (ii) qualify as
small businesses, veteran-owned small
businesses, service-disabled veteran-owned
small businesses, HUBZone small businesses,
E:\FR\FM\27NOR2.SGM
27NOR2
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 227 / Friday, November 27, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
small disadvantaged businesses, or womanowned businesses; and (iii) have a Mentor´ ´
Protege agreement approved by HHS’
OSDBU; and
´ ´
(3) Mentor-Protege agreements—joint
agreements, approved by HHS’ OSDBU,
which detail the specific terms, conditions,
´ ´
and responsibilities of the mentor-protege
relationship.
(End of provision)
´ ´
352.219–71 Mentor-protege program
reporting requirements.
As prescribed in 319.270–1(b), the
Contracting Officer shall insert the
following clause:
´ ´
Mentor-Protege Program Reporting
Requirements (October 2009)
The Contractor shall comply with all
reporting requirements specified in its
´ ´
Mentor-Protege agreement approved by HHS’
OSDBU.
(End of clause)
352.222–70 Contractor cooperation in
equal employment opportunity
investigations.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES_2
As prescribed in 322.810(h), the
Contracting Officer shall insert the
following clause:
Contractor Cooperation in Equal
Employment Opportunity Investigations
(October 2009)
(a) In addition to complying with the
clause in FAR 52.222–26, Equal Opportunity,
the Contractor shall, in good faith, cooperate
with the Department of Health and Human
Services (Agency) in investigations of Equal
Employment Opportunity (EEO) complaints
processed pursuant to 29 CFR Part 1614. For
purposes of this clause, the following
definitions apply:
(1) ‘‘Complaint’’ means a formal or
informal complaint that has been lodged with
Agency management, Agency EEO officials,
the Equal Employment Opportunity
Commission (EEOC), or a court of competent
jurisdiction.
(2) ‘‘Contractor employee’’ means all
current Contractor employees who work or
worked under this contract. The term also
includes current employees of subcontractors
who work or worked under this contract. In
the case of Contractor and subcontractor
employees, who worked under this contract,
but who are no longer employed by the
Contractor or subcontractor, or who have
been assigned to another entity within the
Contractor’s or subcontractor’s organization,
the Contractor shall provide the Agency with
that employee’s last known mailing address,
e-mail address, and telephone number, if that
employee has been identified as a witness in
an EEO complaint or investigation.
(3) ‘‘Good faith cooperation’’ cited in
paragraph (a) includes, but is not limited to,
making Contractor employees available for:
(i) Formal and informal interviews by EEO
counselors or other Agency officials
processing EEO complaints; (ii) formal or
informal interviews by EEO investigators
charged with investigating complaints of
unlawful discrimination filed by Federal
employees; (iii) reviewing and signing
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:54 Nov 25, 2009
Jkt 220001
appropriate affidavits or declarations
summarizing statements provided by such
Contractor employees during the course of
EEO investigations; (iv) producing
documents requested by EEO counselors,
EEO investigators, Agency employees, or the
EEOC in connection with a pending EEO
complaint; and (v) preparing for and
providing testimony in hearings before the
EEOC and U.S. District Court.
(b) The Contractor shall include the
provisions of this clause in all subcontract
solicitations and subcontracts awarded at any
tier under this contract.
(c) Failure on the part of the Contractor or
its subcontractors to comply with the terms
of this clause may be grounds for the
Contracting Officer to terminate this contract
for default.
(End of clause)
352.223–70
Safety and health.
As prescribed in 323.7002, the
Contracting Officer shall insert the
following clause:
Safety and Health (January 2006)
(a) To help ensure the protection of the life
and health of all persons, and to help prevent
damage to property, the Contractor shall
comply with all Federal, State, and local laws
and regulations applicable to the work being
performed under this contract. These laws
are implemented or enforced by the
Environmental Protection Agency,
Occupational Safety and Health
Administration (OSHA) and other regulatory/
enforcement agencies at the Federal, State,
and local levels.
(1) In addition, the Contractor shall comply
with the following regulations when
developing and implementing health and
safety operating procedures and practices for
both personnel and facilities involving the
use or handling of hazardous materials and
the conduct of research, development, or test
projects:
(i) 29 CFR 1910.1030, Bloodborne
pathogens; 29 CFR 1910.1450, Occupational
exposure to hazardous chemicals in
laboratories; and other applicable
occupational health and safety standards
issued by OSHA and included in 29 CFR Part
1910. These regulations are available at
https://www.osha.gov.
(ii) Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Standards and Regulations, pursuant to the
Energy Reorganization Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C.
5801 et seq.). The Contractor may obtain
copies from the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission, Washington, DC 20555–0001.
(2) The following Government guidelines
are recommended for developing and
implementing health and safety operating
procedures and practices for both personnel
and facilities:
(i) Biosafety in Microbiological and
Biomedical Laboratories, CDC. This
publication is available at https://
www.cdc.gov/OD/ohs/biosfty/bmbl4/
bmbl4toc.htm.
(ii) Prudent Practices for Safety in
Laboratories (1995), National Research
Council, National Academy Press, 500 Fifth
Street, NW., Lockbox 285, Washington, DC
20055 (ISBN 0–309–05229–7). This
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
62455
publication is available at https://
www.nap.edu/catalog/4911.html.
(b) Further, the Contractor shall take or
cause to be taken additional safety measures
as the Contracting Officer, in conjunction
with the Contracting Officer’s Technical
Representative or other appropriate officials,
determines to be reasonably necessary. If
compliance with these additional safety
measures results in an increase or decrease
in the cost or time required for performance
of any part of work under this contract, the
Contracting Officer will make an equitable
adjustment in accordance with the applicable
‘‘Changes’’ clause set forth in this contract.
(c) The Contractor shall maintain an
accurate record of, and promptly report to the
Contracting Officer, all accidents or incidents
resulting in the exposure of persons to toxic
substances, hazardous materials or hazardous
operations; the injury or death of any person;
or damage to property incidental to work
performed under the contract and all
violations for which the Contractor has been
cited by any Federal, State or local
regulatory/enforcement agency. The report
shall include a copy of the notice of violation
and the findings of any inquiry or inspection,
and an analysis addressing the impact these
violations may have on the work remaining
to be performed. The report shall also state
the required action(s), if any, to be taken to
correct any violation(s) noted by the Federal,
State or local regulatory/enforcement agency
and the time frame allowed by the agency to
accomplish the necessary corrective action.
(d) If the Contractor fails or refuses to
comply with the Federal, State or local
regulatory/enforcement agency’s directive(s)
regarding any violation(s) and prescribed
corrective action(s), the Contracting Officer
may issue an order stopping all or part of the
work until satisfactory corrective action (as
approved by the Federal, State or local
regulatory/enforcement agencies) has been
taken and documented to the Contracting
Officer. No part of the time lost due to any
stop work order shall be subject to a claim
for extension of time or costs or damages by
the Contractor.
(e) The Contractor shall insert the
substance of this clause in each subcontract
involving toxic substances, hazardous
materials, or hazardous operations. The
Contractor is responsible for the compliance
of its subcontractors with the provisions of
this clause.
(End of clause)
352.224–70
Privacy Act.
As prescribed in 324.103(b)(2), the
Contracting Officer shall insert the
following clause:
Privacy Act (January 2006)
This contract requires the Contractor to
perform one or more of the following: (a)
Design; (b) develop; or (c) operate a Federal
agency system of records to accomplish an
agency function in accordance with the
Privacy Act of 1974 (Act) (5 U.S.C.
552a(m)(1)) and applicable agency
regulations. The term ‘‘system of records’’
means a group of any records under the
control of any agency from which
information is retrieved by the name of the
E:\FR\FM\27NOR2.SGM
27NOR2
62456
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 227 / Friday, November 27, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
individual or by some identifying number,
symbol, or other identifying particular
assigned to the individual. Violations of the
Act by the Contractor and/or its employees
may result in the imposition of criminal
penalties (5 U.S.C. 552a(i)). The Contractor
shall ensure that each of its employees knows
the prescribed rules of conduct and that each
employee is aware that he/she is subject to
criminal penalties for violation of the Act to
the same extent as Department of Health and
Human Services employees. These
provisions also apply to all subcontracts the
Contractor awards under this contract which
require the design, development or operation
of the designated system(s) of records [5
U.S.C. 552a(m)(1)]. The contract work
statement: (a) identifies the system(s) of
records and the design, development, or
operation work the Contractor is to perform;
and (b) specifies the disposition to be made
of such records upon completion of contract
performance.
(End of clause)
352.227–70
Publications and publicity.
As prescribed in 327.404–70, the
Contracting Officer shall insert the
following clause:
Publications and Publicity (January 2006)
(a) Unless otherwise specified in this
contract, the Government encourages the
Contractor to publish the results of its work
under this contract. A copy of each article the
Contractor submits for publication shall be
promptly sent to the Contracting Officer’s
Technical Representative. The Contractor
shall also inform the Contracting Officer’s
Technical Representative when the article or
other publication is published, and furnish a
copy of it as finally published.
(b) Unless authorized by the Contracting
Officer’s Technical Representative, the
Contractor shall not display the HHS logo on
any publications.
(End of clause)
352.228–7
persons.
Insurance—liability to third
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES_2
As prescribed in 328.311–2, the
Contracting Officer shall insert the
following clause and either Alternate I
or II, as appropriate:
Insurance—Liability to Third Persons (Dec.
1991)
(a)(1) Except as provided in paragraph
(a)(2) immediately following, or in paragraph
(h) of this clause [if the clause has a
paragraph (h)], the Contractor shall provide
and maintain workers’ compensation,
employer’s liability, comprehensive general
liability (bodily injury), comprehensive
automobile liability (bodily injury and
property damage) insurance, and such other
insurance as the Contracting Officer may
require under this contract.
(2) The Contractor may, with the approval
of the Contracting Officer, maintain a selfinsurance program; provided that, with
respect to workers’ compensation, the
Contractor is qualified pursuant to statutory
authority.
(3) All insurance required by this
paragraph shall be in form and amount and
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:54 Nov 25, 2009
Jkt 220001
for those periods as the Contracting Officer
may require or approve and with insurers
approved by the Contracting Officer.
(b) The Contractor agrees to submit for the
Contracting Officer’s approval, to the extent
and in the manner required by the
Contracting Officer, any other insurance that
is maintained by the Contractor in
connection with performance of this contract
and for which the Contractor seeks
reimbursement.
(c) Except as provided in paragraph (h) of
this clause [if the clause has a paragraph (h)],
the Contractor shall be reimbursed—
(1) For that portion of the reasonable cost
of insurance allocable to this contract, and
required or approved under this clause; and
(2) For certain liabilities (and expenses
incidental to such liabilities) to third persons
not compensated by insurance or otherwise
within the funds available under the
Limitation of Cost or the Limitation of Funds
clause of this contract. These liabilities must
arise out of the performance of this contract,
whether or not caused by the negligence of
the Contractor or the Contractor’s agents,
servants, or employees, and must be
represented by final judgments or settlements
approved in writing by the Government.
These liabilities are for—
(i) Loss of or damage to property (other
than property owned, occupied, or used by
the Contractor, rented to the Contractor, or in
the care, custody, or control of the
Contractor); or
(ii) Death or bodily injury.
(d) The Government’s liability under
paragraph (c) of this clause is limited to the
amounts reflected in final judgments, or
settlements approved in writing by the
Government, but in no event to exceed the
funds available under the Limitation of Cost
or Limitation of Funds clause of this contract.
Nothing in this contract shall be construed as
implying that, at a later date, the Government
will request, or the Congress will
appropriate, funds sufficient to meet any
deficiencies.
(e) The Government shall not reimburse
the Contractor for liabilities (and expenses
incidental to such liabilities)—
(1) For which the Contractor is otherwise
responsible under the express terms of any
clause specified in the Schedule or elsewhere
in the contract;
(2) For which the Contractor has failed to
insure or to maintain insurance as required
by the Contracting Officer; or
(3) That result from willful misconduct or
lack of good faith on the part of the
Contractor’s directors, officers, managers,
superintendents, or other representatives
who have supervision or direction of —
(i) All or substantially all of the
Contractor’s business;
(ii) All or substantially all of the
Contractor’s operations at any one plant or
separate location in which this contract is
being performed; or
(iii) A separate and complete major
industrial operation in connection with the
performance of this contract.
(f) The provisions of paragraph (e) of this
clause shall not restrict the right of the
Contractor to be reimbursed for the cost of
insurance maintained by the Contractor in
PO 00000
Frm 00062
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
connection with the performance of this
contract, other than insurance required in
accordance with this clause; provided, that
such cost is allowable under the Allowable
Cost and Payment clause of this contract.
(g) If any suit or action is filed or any claim
is made against the Contractor, the cost and
expense of which may be reimbursable to the
Contractor under this contract, and the risk
of which is then uninsured or is insured for
less than the amount claimed, the Contractor
shall—
(1) Immediately notify the Contracting
Officer and promptly furnish copies of all
pertinent papers received;
(2) Authorize Government representatives
to collaborate with counsel for the insurance
carrier in settling or defending the claim
when the amount of the liability claimed
exceeds the amount of coverage; and
(3) Authorize Government representatives
to settle or defend the claim and to represent
the Contractor in or to take charge of any
litigation, if required by the Government,
when the liability is not insured or covered
by the bond. The Contractor may, at its own
expense, be associated with the Government
representatives in any such claim or
litigation.
(End of clause)
Alternate I (APR 1984). If the
successful offeror represents in its offer
that it is partially immune from tort
liability as a State agency, the
Contracting Officer shall add the
following paragraph (h) to the basic
clause:
(h) Notwithstanding paragraphs (a) and (c)
of this clause—
(1) The Government does not assume any
liability to third persons, nor will the
Government reimburse the Contractor for its
liability to third persons, with respect to loss
due to death, bodily injury, or damage to
property resulting in any way from the
performance of this contract or any
subcontract under this contract; and
(2) The Contractor need not provide or
maintain insurance coverage as required by
paragraph (a) of this clause; provided, that
the Contractor may obtain any insurance
coverage deemed necessary, subject to
approval by the Contracting Officer as to
form, amount, and duration. The Contractor
shall be reimbursed for the cost of such
insurance and, to the extent provided in
paragraph (c) of this clause, for liabilities to
third persons for which the Contractor has
obtained insurance coverage as provided in
this paragraph, but for which such coverage
is insufficient in amount.
(End of clause)
Alternate II (APR 1984). If the
successful offeror represents in its offer
that it is totally immune from tort
liability as a State agency, the
Contracting Officer shall substitute the
following paragraphs (a) and (b) for
paragraphs (a) and (b) of the basic
clause:
(a) The Government does not assume any
liability to third persons, nor will the
Government reimburse the Contractor for its
E:\FR\FM\27NOR2.SGM
27NOR2
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 227 / Friday, November 27, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
liability to third persons, with respect to loss
due to death, bodily injury, or damage to
property resulting in any way from the
performance of this contract or any
subcontract under this contract.
(b) If any suit or action is filed, or if any
claim is made against the Contractor, the cost
and expense of which may be reimbursable
to the Contractor under this contract, the
Contractor shall immediately notify the
Contracting Officer and promptly furnish
copies of all pertinent papers received by the
Contractor. The Contractor shall, if
Government requires, authorize Government
representatives to settle or defend the claim
and to represent the Contractor in or take
charge of any litigation. The Contractor may,
at its own expense, be associated with the
Government representatives in any such
claims or litigation.
(End of clause)
352.231–70
Salary rate limitation.
As prescribed in 331.101–70, the
Contracting Officer shall insert the
following clause:
Salary Rate Limitation (October 2009)
(a) Pursuant to the current and applicable
prior HHS appropriations acts, the Contractor
shall not use contract funds to pay the direct
salary of an individual at a rate in excess of
the Federal Executive Schedule Level I in
effect on the date an expense is incurred.
(b) For purposes of the salary rate
limitation, the terms ‘‘direct salary,’’
‘‘salary,’’ and ‘‘institutional base salary’’ have
the same meaning and are collectively
referred to as ‘‘direct salary’’ in this clause.
An individual’s direct salary is the annual
compensation that the Contractor pays for an
individual’s direct effort (costs) under the
contract. Direct salary excludes any income
that an individual may be permitted to earn
outside of duties to the Contractor. Direct
salary also excludes fringe benefits,
overhead, and general and administrative
expenses (also referred to as indirect costs or
facilities and administrative [F&A] costs).
Note: The salary rate limitation does not
restrict the salary that an organization may
pay an individual working under an HHS
contract or order; it merely limits the portion
of that salary that may be paid with Federal
funds.
(c) The salary rate limitation also applies
to individuals under subcontracts. If this is
a multiple-year contract or order, it may be
subject to unilateral modification by the
Principles
(d) 45 CFR Part 74 Appendix E ...............................................................
(e) Subpart 31.7 of the Federal Acquisition Regulation ...........................
(End of clause)
Choice of law (overseas).
As prescribed in 333.215–70(a), the
Contracting Officer shall insert the
following clause:
Choice of Law (Overseas) (October 2009)
This contract shall be construed in
accordance with the substantive laws of the
United States of America. By the execution
of this contract, the Contractor expressly
agrees to waive any rights to invoke the
jurisdiction of local national courts where
this contract is performed and agrees to
accept the exclusive jurisdiction of the
Civilian Board of Contract Appeals and the
United States Court of Federal Claims for
hearing and determination of any and all
disputes that may arise under the Disputes
clause of this contract.
(End of clause)
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES_2
352.233–71
Litigation and claims.
As prescribed in 333.215–70(b), the
Contracting Officer shall insert the
following clause:
Litigation and Claims (January 2006)
(a) The Contractor shall provide written
notification immediately to the Contracting
Officer of any action, including any
proceeding before an administrative agency,
filed against the Contractor arising out of the
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:54 Nov 25, 2009
Jkt 220001
Contracting Officer to ensure that an
individual is not paid at a rate that exceeds
the salary rate limitation provision
established in the HHS appropriations act in
effect when the expense is incurred
regardless of the rate initially used to
establish contract or order funding.
(d) See the salaries and wages pay tables
on the U.S. Office of Personnel Management
Web site for Federal Executive Schedule
salary levels that apply to the current and
prior periods.
(End of clause)
352.231–71
Pricing of adjustments.
As prescribed in 331.102–70, the
Contracting Officer shall insert the
following clause:
Pricing of Adjustments (January 2001)
When costs are a factor in determination of
a contract price adjustment pursuant to the
‘‘Changes’’ clause or any provision of this
contract, the applicable cost principles and
procedures set forth below shall form the
basis for determining such costs:
Types of organizations
(a) Subpart 31.2 of the Federal Acquisition Regulation ...........................
(b) Subpart 31.3 of the Federal Acquisition Regulation ...........................
(c) Subpart 31.6 of the Federal Acquisition Regulation ...........................
352.233–70
62457
Commercial.
Educational.
State, local, and Federally recognized
Indian Tribal governments.
Hospitals (performing research and development contracts only).
Other nonprofit organizations.
performance of this contract, including, but
not limited to the performance of any
subcontract hereunder; and any claim against
the Contractor the cost and expense of which
is allowable under the clause entitled
‘‘Allowable Cost and Payment.’’
(b) Except as otherwise directed by the
Contracting Officer, the Contractor shall
furnish immediately to the Contracting
Officer copies of all pertinent papers received
by the Contractor with respect to such action
or claim. To the extent not in conflict with
any applicable policy of insurance, the
Contractor may, with the Contracting
Officer’s approval, settle any such action or
claim. If required by the Contracting Officer,
the Contractor shall effect an assignment and
subrogation in favor of the Government of all
the Contractor’s rights and claims (except
those against the Government) arising out of
any such action or claim against the
Contractor; and authorize representatives of
the Government to settle or defend any such
action or claim and to represent the
Contractor in, or to take charge of, any action.
(c) If the Government undertakes a
settlement or defense of an action or claim,
the Contractor shall furnish all reasonable
assistance in effecting a settlement or
asserting a defense. Where an action against
the Contractor is not covered by a policy of
insurance, the Contractor shall, with the
approval of the Contracting Officer, proceed
with the defense of the action in good faith.
The Government shall not be liable for the
PO 00000
Frm 00063
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
expense of defending any action or for any
costs resulting from the loss thereof to the
extent that the Contractor would have been
compensated by insurance which was
required by law or regulation or by written
direction of the Contracting Officer, but
which the Contractor failed to secure through
its own fault or negligence. In any event,
unless otherwise expressly provided in this
contract, the Government shall not reimburse
or indemnify the Contractor for any liability
loss, cost, or expense, which the Contractor
may incur or be subject to by reason of any
loss, injury or damage, to the person or to
real or personal property of any third parties
as may accrue during, or arise from, the
performance of this contract.
(End of clause)
352.234–1 Notice of earned value
management system—pre-award Integrated
Baseline Review.
As prescribed in 334.203–70(a), the
Contracting Officer shall insert the
following provision:
Notice of Earned Value Management
System—Pre-Award Integrated Baseline
Review (October 2008)
The offeror shall provide documentation
that its proposed Earned Value Management
System (EVMS) complies with the EVMS
guidelines in ANSI/EIA Standard-748
(current version at time of solicitation).
E:\FR\FM\27NOR2.SGM
27NOR2
62458
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 227 / Friday, November 27, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
(a) If the offeror proposes to use a system
that currently does not meet the requirements
of paragraph (a) of this provision, the offeror
shall submit a comprehensive plan for
compliance with the guidelines.
(1) The plan shall—
(i) Describe the EVMS the offeror intends
to use in performance of the contract;
(ii) Distinguish between the offeror’s
existing management system and
modifications proposed to meet the
guidelines;
(iii) Describe the management system and
its application in terms of the EVMS
guidelines;
(iv) Describe the proposed procedure for
application of the EVMS requirements to
subcontractors;
(v) Provide documentation describing the
process and results, including Government
participation if applicable, of any third-party
evaluation or self-evaluation of the system’s
compliance with the EVMS guidelines; and
(vi) Provide a schedule of events leading
up to formal validation and Government
acceptance of the offeror’s EVMS, if the value
of the offeror’s proposal, including options,
is $25 million or more.
(2) The offeror shall provide information
and assistance, as required by the Contracting
Officer, to support review of the plan.
(3) The Contracting Officer will review the
offeror’s EVMS implementation plan prior to
contract award.
(4) The offeror’s EVMS plan must provide
milestones indicating when the offeror
anticipates that the EVMS will be compliant
with the ANSI/EIS Standard-748 guidelines.
(b) The offeror shall identify in its offer the
subcontractors, or subcontracted effort if
subcontractors have not been identified, to
which the requirements of EVMS will be
applied. Prior to contract award, the offeror
and HHS shall agree on the subcontractors,
or subcontracted effort, subject to the EVMS
requirement.
(c) HHS will conduct an Integrated
Baseline Review (IBR) prior to contract
award. The offeror shall be compensated as
set forth elsewhere in this solicitation for its
preparation for and participation in the IBR.
(End of provision)
352.234–2 Notice of earned value
management system—post-award
Integrated Baseline Review.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES_2
As prescribed in 334.203–70(b), the
Contracting Officer shall insert the
following provision:
Notice of Earned Value Management
System—Post-Award Integrated Baseline
Review (October 2008)
(a) The offeror shall provide
documentation that its proposed Earned
Value Management System (EVMS) complies
with the EVMS guidelines in ANSI/EIA
Standard-748 (current version in effect at
time of solicitation).
(b) If the offeror proposes to use a system
that currently does not meet the requirements
of paragraph (a) of this provision, the offeror
shall submit a comprehensive plan for
compliance with the guidelines.
(1) The plan shall—
(i) Describe the EVMS the offeror intends
to use in performance of the contract;
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:54 Nov 25, 2009
Jkt 220001
(ii) Distinguish between the offeror’s
existing management system and
modifications proposed to meet the
guidelines;
(iii) Describe the management system and
its application in terms of the EVMS
guidelines;
(iv) Describe the proposed procedure for
application of the EVMS requirements to
subcontractors;
(v) Provide documentation describing the
process and results, including Government
participation if applicable, of any third-party
evaluation or self-evaluation of the system’s
compliance with the EVMS guidelines; and
(vi) Provide a schedule of events leading
up to formal validation and Government
acceptance of the offeror’s EVMS, if the value
of the offeror’s proposal, including options,
is $25 million or more.
(2) The offeror shall provide information
and assistance, as required by the Contracting
Officer, to support review of the plan.
(3) The Contracting Officer will review the
offeror’s EVMS implementation plan prior to
contract award.
(4) The offeror’s EVMS plan must provide
milestones indicating when the offeror
anticipates that the EVM system will be
compliant with the ANSI/EIA Standard-748
guidelines.
(c) The offeror shall identify in its offer the
subcontractors, or subcontracted effort if
subcontractors have not been identified, to
which the requirements of EVMS will be
applied. Prior to contract award, the offeror
and HHS shall agree on the subcontractors,
or subcontracted effort, subject to the EVMS
requirement.
(d) HHS will conduct an Integrated
Baseline Review after contract award.
(End of provision)
352.234–3
system.
Full earned value management
As prescribed in 334.203–70(c), the
Contracting Officer shall insert the
following clause:
Full Earned Value Management System
(October 2008)
(a) The Contractor shall use an Earned
Value Management System (EVMS) that has
been validated and accepted by the
Cognizant Federal Agency (CFA) as being
compliant with the guidelines in ANSI/EIA
Standard-748 (current version at the time of
award) to manage this contract. If the
Contractor’s current EVMS has not been
validated and accepted by the CFA at the
time of award, see paragraph (b) of this
clause. The Contractor shall submit EVM
reports in accordance with the requirements
of this contract.
(b) If, at the time of award, the Contractor’s
EVM system has not been validated and
accepted by the CFA as complying with
EVMS guidelines in ANSI/EIA Standard-748
(current version at time of award), the
Contractor shall—
(1) Apply the current system to the
contract; and
(2) Take necessary and timely actions to
meet the milestones in the Contractor’s
EVMS plan approved by the Contracting
Officer.
PO 00000
Frm 00064
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
(c) HHS requires the Contractor to obtain
validation and acceptance of its EVM system
by the CFA during the base period of
performance of this contract. The Contracting
Officer or designee will conduct a
Compliance Review to assess the Contractor’s
compliance with its approved plan. If the
Contractor does not follow the approved
implementation schedule or correct all
resulting system deficiencies noted during
the Compliance Review within a reasonable
time, the Contracting Officer may take
remedial action, which may include, but is
not limited to, suspension of or reduction in
progress payments, or a reduction in fee.
(d) HHS will conduct an Integrated
Baseline Review (IBR). If a pre-award IBR has
not been conducted, a post-award IBR will be
conducted by HHS as early as practicable,
but no later than 90 days after contract
award. The Contracting Officer may also
require an IBR as part of the exercise of an
option or the incorporation of a major
modification.
(e) Unless a waiver is granted by the CFA,
Contractor-proposed EVMS changes require
approval of the CFA prior to implementation.
The CFA will advise the Contractor of the
acceptability of such changes within 30
calendar days after receipt of the notice of
proposed changes from the Contractor. If the
advance approval requirements are waived
by the CFA, the Contractor shall disclose
EVMS changes to the CFA at least 14
calendar days prior to the effective date of
implementation.
(f) The Contractor shall provide access to
all pertinent records and data requested by
the Contracting Officer or a duly authorized
representative as necessary to permit
Government surveillance to ensure that the
EVMS conforms, and continues to conform,
with the requirements referenced in
paragraph (a) of this clause.
(g) The Contractor shall require the
subcontractors specified below to comply
with the requirements of the clause: (Insert
list of applicable subcontractors.)
lllllllllllllllllllll
lllllllllllllllllllll
lllllllllllllllllllll
(End of clause)
(Alternate I) (October 2008)
As prescribed in 334.203–70(c), the
Contracting Officer shall substitute the
following paragraphs (a), (b), and (c) for
paragraphs (a), (b), and (c) of the basic
clause and delete paragraph (e) of the
basic clause:
(a) The Contractor shall use an Earned
Value Management System (EVMS) that is
compliant with the guidelines in ANSI/EIA
Standard-748 (current version at the time of
award) to manage this contract. If the
Contractor’s current EVMS is not compliant
at the time of award, see paragraph (b) of this
clause. The Contractor shall submit EVM
reports in accordance with the requirements
of this contract.
(b) If, at the time of award, the Contractor’s
EVM system is not in compliance with the
EVMS guidelines in ANSI/EIA Standard-748
(current version at time of award), the
Contractor shall—
E:\FR\FM\27NOR2.SGM
27NOR2
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 227 / Friday, November 27, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
(1) Apply the current system to the
contract; and
(2) Take necessary and timely actions to
meet the milestones in the Contractor’s
EVMS plan approved by the Contracting
Officer.
(c) HHS will not formally validate or
accept the Contractor’s EVMS with respect to
this contract. The use of the Contractor’s
EVMS for this contract does not imply HHS
acceptance of the Contractor’s EVMS for
application to future contracts. The
Contracting Officer or designee will conduct
a Compliance Review to assess the
Contractor’s compliance with its approved
plan. If the Contractor does not follow the
approved implementation schedule or correct
all resulting system deficiencies noted during
the Compliance Review within a reasonable
time, the Contracting Officer may take
remedial action that may include, but is not
limited to, suspension of or reduction in
progress payments, or a reduction in fee.
352.234–4 Partial earned value
management system.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES_2
As prescribed in 334.203–70(d), the
Contracting Officer shall insert the
following clause:
Partial Earned Value Management System
(October 2008)
(a) The Contractor shall use an Earned
Value Management System (EVMS) that has
been validated and accepted by the
Cognizant Federal Agency (CFA) as being
compliant with the schedule-related
guidelines in ANSI/EIA Standard-748
(current version at the time of award) to
manage this contract. If the Contractor’s
current EVMS has not been validated and
accepted by the CFA at the time of award, see
paragraph (b) of this clause. The Contractor
shall submit EVM reports in accordance with
the requirements of this contract.
(b) If, at the time of award, the Contractor’s
EVM system has not been validated and
accepted by the CFA as complying with the
schedule-related EVMS guidelines in ANSI/
EIA Standard-748 (current version at time of
award), the Contractor shall—
(1) Apply the current system to the
contract; and
(2) Take necessary and timely actions to
meet the milestones in the Contractor’s
EVMS plan approved by the Contracting
Officer.
(c) HHS requires the Contractor to obtain
validation and acceptance of the schedulerelated portions of its EVM system by the
CFA during the base period of performance
of this contract. The Contracting Officer or
designee will conduct a Compliance Review
to assess the Contractor’s compliance with its
approved plan. If the Contractor does not
follow the approved implementation
schedule or correct all resulting system
deficiencies noted during the Compliance
Review within a reasonable time, the
Contracting Officer may take remedial action,
which may include, but is not limited to,
suspension of or reduction in progress
payments, or a reduction in fee.
(d) HHS will conduct an Integrated
Baseline Review (IBR). If a pre-award IBR has
not been conducted, a post-award IBR will be
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:54 Nov 25, 2009
Jkt 220001
conducted by HHS as early as practicable,
but no later than 90 days after contract
award. The Contracting Officer may also
require an IBR as part of the exercise of an
option or the incorporation of a major
modification.
(e) Unless a waiver is granted by the CFA,
Contractor-proposed EVMS changes require
approval of the CFA prior to implementation.
The CFA will advise the Contractor of the
acceptability of such changes within 30
calendar days after receipt of the notice of
proposed changes from the Contractor. If the
advance approval requirements are waived
by the CFA, the Contractor shall disclose
EVMS changes to the CFA at least 14
calendar days prior to the effective date of
implementation.
(f) The Contractor shall provide access to
all pertinent records and data requested by
the Contracting Officer or a duly authorized
representative as necessary to permit
Government surveillance to ensure that the
EVMS conforms, and continues to conform,
with the requirements referenced in
paragraph (a) of this clause.
(g) The Contractor shall require the
subcontractors specified below to comply
with the requirements of the clause: (Insert
list of applicable subcontractors.)
lllllllllllllllllllll
lllllllllllllllllllll
lllllllllllllllllllll
(End of clause)
(Alternate I) (October 2008)
As prescribed in 334.203–70(d), the
Contracting Officer shall substitute the
following paragraphs (a), (b), and (c) for
paragraphs (a), (b), and (c) of the basic
clause and delete paragraph (e) of the
basic clause:
(a) The Contractor shall use an Earned
Value Management System (EVMS) that is
compliant with the schedule-related
guidelines in ANSI/EIA Standard-748
(current version at the time of award) to
manage this contract. If the Contractor’s
current EVMS is not compliant at the time of
award, see paragraph (b) of this clause. The
Contractor shall submit EVM reports in
accordance with the requirements of this
contract.
(b) If, at the time of award, the Contractor’s
schedule-related EVM system is not in
compliance with the schedule-related EVMS
guidelines in ANSI/EIA Standard-748
(current version at time of award), or the
Contractor does not have an existing
schedule control system that is compliant
with such guidelines, the Contractor shall—
(1) Apply the current system to the
contract; and
(2) Take necessary and timely actions to
meet the milestones in the Contractor’s
EVMS plan approved by the Contracting
Officer.
(c) HHS will not formally validate or
accept the Contractor’s schedule-related
EVMS with respect to this contract. The use
of the Contractor’s EVMS for this contract
does not imply HHS acceptance of the
Contractor’s EVMS for application to future
contracts. The Contracting Officer or
designee will conduct a Compliance Review
PO 00000
Frm 00065
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
62459
to assess the Contractor’s compliance with its
approved plan. If the Contractor does not
follow the approved implementation
schedule or correct all resulting system
deficiencies noted during the Compliance
Review within a reasonable time, the
Contracting Officer may take remedial action
that may include, but is not limited to,
suspension of or reduction in progress
payments, or a reduction in fee.
352.237–70
Pro-Children Act.
As prescribed in 337.103–70(a), the
Contracting Officer shall insert the
following clause:
Pro-Children Act (January 2006)
(a) Public Law 103–227, Title X, Part C,
also known as the Pro-Children Act of 1994
(Act), 20 U.S.C. 7183, imposes restrictions on
smoking in facilities where certain Federally
funded children’s services are provided. The
Act prohibits smoking within any indoor
facility (or portion thereof), whether owned,
leased, or contracted for, that is used for the
routine or regular provision of (i)
kindergarten, elementary, or secondary
education or library services or (ii) health or
day care services that are provided to
children under the age of 18. The statutory
prohibition also applies to indoor facilities
that are constructed, operated, or maintained
with Federal funds.
(b) By acceptance of this contract or order,
the Contractor agrees to comply with the
requirements of the Act. The Act also applies
to all subcontracts awarded under this
contract for the specified children’s services.
Accordingly, the Contractor shall ensure that
each of its employees, and any subcontractor
staff, is made aware of, understand, and
comply with the provisions of the Act.
Failure to comply with the Act may result in
the imposition of a civil monetary penalty in
an amount not to exceed $1,000 for each
violation and/or the imposition of an
administrative compliance order on the
responsible entity. Each day a violation
continues constitutes a separate violation.
(End of clause)
352.237–71 Crime Control Act—reporting
of child abuse.
As prescribed in 337.103–70(b), the
Contracting Officer shall insert the
following clause:
Crime Control Act of 1990—Reporting of
Child Abuse (January 2006)
(a) Public Law 101–647, also known as the
Crime Control Act of 1990 (Act), imposes
responsibilities on certain individuals who,
while engaged in a professional capacity or
activity, as defined in the Act, on Federal
land or in a Federally-operated (or
contracted) facility, learn of facts that give
the individual reason to suspect that a child
has suffered an incident of child abuse.
(b) The Act designates ‘‘covered
professionals’’ as those persons engaged in
professions and activities in eight different
categories including, but not limited to,
physicians, dentists, medical residents or
interns, hospital personnel and
administrators, nurses, health care
practitioners, chiropractors, osteopaths,
E:\FR\FM\27NOR2.SGM
27NOR2
62460
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 227 / Friday, November 27, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
pharmacists, optometrists, podiatrists,
emergency medical technicians, ambulance
drivers, alcohol or drug treatment personnel,
psychologists, psychiatrists, mental health
professionals, child care workers and
administrators, and commercial film and
photo processors. The Act defines the term
‘‘child abuse’’ as the physical or mental
injury, sexual abuse or exploitation, or
negligent treatment of a child.
(c) Accordingly, any person engaged in a
covered profession or activity under an HHS
contract or subcontract, regardless of the
purpose of the contract or subcontract, shall
immediately report a suspected child abuse
incident in accordance with the provisions of
the Act. If a child is suspected of being
harmed, the appropriate State Child Abuse
Hotline, local child protective services (CPS),
or law enforcement agency shall be
contacted. For more information about where
and how to file a report, the Childhelp USA,
National Child Abuse Hotline (1–800–4–A–
CHILD) shall be called. Any covered
professional failing to make a timely report
of such incident shall be guilty of a Class B
misdemeanor.
(d) By acceptance of this contract or order,
the Contractor agrees to comply with the
requirements of the Act. The Act also applies
to all applicable subcontracts awarded under
this contract. Accordingly, the Contractor
shall ensure that each of its employees, and
any subcontractor staff, is made aware of,
understand, and comply with the provisions
of the Act.
(End of clause)
352.237–72 Crime Control Act—
requirement for background checks.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES_2
As prescribed in 337.103–70(c), the
Contracting Officer shall insert the
following clause:
Crime Control Act of 1990—Requirement for
Background Checks (January 2006)
(a) Public Law 101–647, also known as the
Crime Control Act of 1990 (Act), requires that
all individuals involved with the provision of
child care services to children under the age
of 18 undergo a criminal background check.
‘‘Child care services’’ include, but are not
limited to, social services, health and mental
health care, child (day) care, education
(whether or not directly involved in
teaching), and rehabilitative programs. Any
conviction for a sex crime, an offense
involving a child victim, or a drug felony,
may be grounds for denying employment or
for dismissal of an employee providing any
of the services listed above.
(b) The Contracting Officer will provide the
necessary information to the Contractor
regarding the process for obtaining the
background check. The Contractor may hire
a staff person provisionally prior to the
completion of a background check, if at all
times prior to the receipt of the background
check during which children are in the care
of the newly-hired person, the person is
within the sight and under the supervision of
a previously investigated staff person.
(c) By acceptance of this contract or order,
the Contractor agrees to comply with the
requirements of the Act. The Act also applies
to all applicable subcontracts awarded under
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:54 Nov 25, 2009
Jkt 220001
this contract. Accordingly, the Contractor
shall ensure that each of its employees, and
any subcontractor staff, is made aware of,
understand, and comply with the provisions
of the Act.
(End of clause)
352.239–70 Standard for security
configurations.
As prescribed in 339.101(d)(1), the
Contracting Officer shall insert the
following clause:
Standard for Security Configurations
(October 2009)
(a) The Contractor shall configure its
computers that contain HHS data with the
applicable Federal Desktop Core
Configuration (FDCC) (see https://
nvd.nist.gov/fdcc/index.cfm) and ensure that
its computers have and maintain the latest
operating system patch level and anti-virus
software level.
Note: FDCC is applicable to all computing
systems using Windows XPTM and Windows
VistaTM, including desktops and laptops—
regardless of function—but not including
servers.
(b) The Contractor shall apply approved
security configurations to information
technology (IT) that is used to process
information on behalf of HHS. The following
security configuration requirements apply:
lllllllllllllllllllll
lllllllllllllllllllll
lllllllllllllllllllll
Note: The Contracting Officer shall specify
applicable security configuration
requirements in solicitations and contracts
based on information provided by the Project
Officer, who shall consult with the OPDIV/
STAFFDIV Chief Information Security
Officer.
(c) The Contractor shall ensure IT
applications operated on behalf of HHS are
fully functional and operate correctly on
systems configured in accordance with the
above configuration requirements. The
Contractor shall use Security Content
Automation Protocol (SCAP)-validated tools
with FDCC Scanner capability to ensure its
products operate correctly with FDCC
configurations and do not alter FDCC
settings—see https://nvd.nist.gov/
validation.cfm. The Contractor shall test
applicable product versions with all relevant
and current updates and patches installed.
The Contractor shall ensure currently
supported versions of information technology
products meet the latest FDCC major version
and subsequent major versions.
(d) The Contractor shall ensure IT
applications designed for end users run in
the standard user context without requiring
elevated administrative privileges.
(e) The Contractor shall ensure hardware
and software installation, operation,
maintenance, update, and patching will not
alter the configuration settings or
requirements specified above.
(f) The Contractor shall (1) include Federal
Information Processing Standard (FIPS) 201compliant (see https://csrc.nist.gov/
publications/fips/fips201-1/FIPS-201-1chng1.pdf), Homeland Security Presidential
PO 00000
Frm 00066
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
Directive 12 (HSPD–12) card readers with the
purchase of servers, desktops, and laptops;
and (2) comply with FAR Subpart 4.13,
Personal Identity Verification.
(g) The Contractor shall ensure that its
subcontractors (at all tiers) which perform
work under this contract comply with the
requirements contained in this clause.
(End of clause)
352.239–71
language.
Standard for encryption
As prescribed in 339.101(d)(2), the
Contracting Officer shall insert the
following clause:
Standard for Encryption Language (October
2009)
(a) The Contractor shall use Federal
Information Processing Standard (FIPS) 140–
2-compliant encryption (Security
Requirements for Cryptographic Module, as
amended) to protect all instances of HHS
sensitive information during storage and
transmission. (Note: The Government has
determined that HHS information under this
contract is considered ‘‘sensitive’’ in
accordance with FIPS 199, Standards for
Security Categorization of Federal
Information and Information Systems, dated
February 2004.)
(b) The Contractor shall verify that the
selected encryption product has been
validated under the Cryptographic Module
Validation Program (see https://csrc.nist.gov/
cryptval/) to confirm compliance with FIPS
140–2 (as amended). The Contractor shall
provide a written copy of the validation
documentation to the Contracting Officer and
the Contracting Officer’s Technical
Representative.
(c) The Contractor shall use the Key
Management Key (see FIPS 201, Chapter 4, as
amended) on the HHS personal identification
verification (PIV) card; or alternatively, the
Contractor shall establish and use a key
recovery mechanism to ensure the ability for
authorized personnel to decrypt and recover
all encrypted information (see https://
csrc.nist.gov/drivers/documents/
ombencryption-guidance.pdf). The
Contractor shall notify the Contracting
Officer and the Contracting Officer’s
Technical Representative of personnel
authorized to decrypt and recover all
encrypted information.
(d) The Contractor shall securely generate
and manage encryption keys to prevent
unauthorized decryption of information in
accordance with FIPS 140–2 (as amended).
(e) The Contractor shall ensure that this
standard is incorporated into the Contractor’s
property management/control system or
establish a separate procedure to account for
all laptop computers, desktop computers,
and other mobile devices and portable media
that store or process sensitive HHS
information.
(f) The Contractor shall ensure that its
subcontractors (at all tiers) which perform
work under this contract comply with the
requirements contained in this clause.
(End of clause)
E:\FR\FM\27NOR2.SGM
27NOR2
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 227 / Friday, November 27, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
352.239–72 Security requirements for
Federal information technology resources.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES_2
As prescribed in 339.7103, the
Contracting Officer shall insert the
following clause:
Security Requirements for Federal
Information Technology Resources (October
2009)
(a) Applicability. This clause applies
whether the entire contract or order
(hereafter ‘‘contract’’), or portion thereof,
includes information technology resources or
services in which the Contractor has physical
or logical (electronic) access to, or operates
a Department of Health and Human Services
(HHS) system containing, information that
directly supports HHS’ mission. The term
‘‘information technology (IT)’’, as used in this
clause, includes computers, ancillary
equipment (including imaging peripherals,
input, output, and storage devices necessary
for security and surveillance), peripheral
equipment designed to be controlled by the
central processing unit of a computer,
software, firmware and similar procedures,
services (including support services) and
related resources. This clause does not apply
to national security systems as defined in
FISMA.
(b) Contractor responsibilities. The
Contractor is responsible for the following:
(1) Protecting Federal information and
Federal information systems in order to
ensure their—
(i) Integrity, which means guarding against
improper information modification or
destruction, and includes ensuring
information non-repudiation and
authenticity;
(ii) Confidentiality, which means
preserving authorized restrictions on access
and disclosure, including means for
protecting personal privacy and proprietary
information; and.
(iii) Availability, which means ensuring
timely and reliable access to and use of
information.
(2) Providing security of any Contractor
systems, and information contained therein,
connected to an HHS network or operated by
the Contractor, regardless of location, on
behalf of HHS.
(3) Adopting, and implementing, at a
minimum, the policies, procedures, controls,
and standards of the HHS Information
Security Program to ensure the integrity,
confidentiality, and availability of Federal
information and Federal information systems
for which the Contractor is responsible under
this contract or to which it may otherwise
have access under this contract. The HHS
Information Security Program is outlined in
the HHS Information Security Program
Policy, which is available on the HHS Office
of the Chief Information Officer’s (OCIO)
Web site.
(c) Contractor security deliverables. In
accordance with the timeframes specified,
the Contractor shall prepare and submit the
following security documents to the
Contracting Officer for review, comment, and
acceptance:
(1) IT Security Plan (IT–SP)—due within 30
days after contract award. The IT–SP shall be
consistent with, and further detail the
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:54 Nov 25, 2009
Jkt 220001
approach to, IT security contained in the
Contractor’s bid or proposal that resulted in
the award of this contract. The IT–SP shall
describe the processes and procedures that
the Contractor will follow to ensure
appropriate security of IT resources that are
developed, processed, or used under this
contract. If the IT–SP only applies to a
portion of the contract, the Contractor shall
specify those parts of the contract to which
the IT–SP applies.
(i) The Contractor’s IT–SP shall comply
with applicable Federal laws that include,
but are not limited to, the Federal
Information Security Management Act
(FISMA) of 2002 (Title III of the EGovernment Act of 2002, Public Law 107–
347), and the following Federal and HHS
policies and procedures:
(A) Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) Circular A–130, Management of
Federal Information Resources, Appendix III,
Security of Federal Automated Information
Resources.
(B) National Institute of Standards and
Technology (NIST) Special Publication (SP)
800–18, Guide for Developing Security Plans
for Federal Information Systems, in form and
content, and with any pertinent contract
Statement of Work/Performance Work
Statement (SOW/PWS) requirements. The
IT–SP shall identify and document
appropriate IT security controls consistent
with the sensitivity of the information and
the requirements of Federal Information
Processing Standard (FIPS) 200,
Recommended Security Controls for Federal
Information Systems. The Contractor shall
review and update the IT–SP in accordance
with NIST SP 800–26, Security SelfAssessment Guide for Information
Technology Systems and FIPS 200, on an
annual basis.
(C) HHS–OCIO Information Systems
Security and Privacy Policy.
(ii) After resolution of any comments
provided by the Government on the draft IT–
SP, the Contracting Officer shall accept the
IT–SP and incorporate the Contractor’s final
version into the contract for Contractor
implementation and maintenance. On an
annual basis, the Contractor shall provide to
the Contracting Officer verification that the
IT–SP remains valid.
(2) IT Risk Assessment (IT–RA)—due
within 30 days after contract award. The IT–
RA shall be consistent, in form and content,
with NIST SP 800–30, Risk Management
Guide for Information Technology Systems,
and any additions or augmentations
described in the HHS–OCIO Information
Systems Security and Privacy Policy. After
resolution of any comments provided by the
Government on the draft IT–RA, the
Contracting Officer shall accept the IT–RA
and incorporate the Contractor’s final version
into the contract for Contractor
implementation and maintenance. The
Contractor shall update the IT–RA on an
annual basis.
(3) FIPS 199 Standards for Security
Categorization of Federal Information and
Information Systems Assessment (FIPS 199
Assessment)—due within 30 days after
contract award. The FIPS 199 Assessment
shall be consistent with the cited NIST
PO 00000
Frm 00067
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
62461
standard. After resolution of any comments
by the Government on the draft FIPS 199
Assessment, the Contracting Officer shall
accept the FIPS 199 Assessment and
incorporate the Contractor’s final version into
the contract.
(4) IT Security Certification and
Accreditation (IT–SC&A)—due within 3
months after contract award. The Contractor
shall submit written proof to the Contracting
Officer that an IT–SC&A was performed for
applicable information systems—see
paragraph (a) of this clause. The Contractor
shall perform the IT–SC&A in accordance
with the HHS Chief Information Security
Officer’s Certification and Accreditation
Checklist; NIST SP 800–37, Guide for the
Security Certification and Accreditation of
Federal Information Systems; and NIST SP
800–53, Recommended Security Controls for
Federal Information Systems. An authorized
senior management official shall sign the
draft IT–SC&A and provide it to the
Contracting Officer for review, comment, and
acceptance.
(i) After resolution of any comments
provided by the Government on the draft IT–
SC&A, the Contracting Officer shall accept
the IT–SC&A and incorporate the
Contractor’s final version into the contract as
a compliance requirement.
(ii) The Contractor shall also perform an
annual security control assessment and
provide to the Contracting Officer
verification that the IT–SC&A remains valid.
Evidence of a valid system accreditation
includes written results of:
(A) Annual testing of the system
contingency plan; and
(B) The performance of security control
testing and evaluation.
(d) Personal identity verification. The
Contractor shall identify its employees with
access to systems operated by the Contractor
for HHS or connected to HHS systems and
networks. The Contracting Officer’s
Technical Representative (COTR) shall
identify, for those identified employees,
position sensitivity levels that are
commensurate with the responsibilities and
risks associated with their assigned positions.
The Contractor shall comply with the HSPD–
12 requirements contained in ‘‘HHS–
Controlled Facilities and Information
Systems Security’’ requirements specified in
the SOW/PWS of this contract.
(e) Contractor and subcontractor employee
training. The Contractor shall ensure that its
employees, and those of its subcontractors,
performing under this contract complete
HHS-furnished initial and refresher security
and privacy education and awareness
training before being granted access to
systems operated by the Contractor on behalf
of HHS or access to HHS systems and
networks. The Contractor shall provide
documentation to the COTR evidencing that
Contractor employees have completed the
required training.
(f) Government access for IT inspection.
The Contractor shall afford the Government
access to the Contractor’s and subcontractors’
facilities, installations, operations,
documentation, databases, and personnel
used in performance of this contract to the
extent required to carry out a program of IT
E:\FR\FM\27NOR2.SGM
27NOR2
62462
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 227 / Friday, November 27, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
inspection (to include vulnerability testing),
investigation, and audit to safeguard against
threats and hazards to the integrity,
confidentiality, and availability, of HHS data
or to the protection of information systems
operated on behalf of HHS.
(g) Subcontracts. The Contractor shall
incorporate the substance of this clause in all
subcontracts that require protection of
Federal information and Federal information
systems as described in paragraph (a) of this
clause, including those subcontracts that—
(1) Have physical or electronic access to
HHS’ computer systems, networks, or IT
infrastructure; or
(2) Use information systems to generate,
store, process, or exchange data with HHS or
on behalf of HHS, regardless of whether the
data resides on a HHS or the Contractor’s
information system.
(h) Contractor employment notice. The
Contractor shall immediately notify the
Contracting Officer when an employee either
begins or terminates employment (or is no
longer assigned to the HHS project under this
contract), if that employee has, or had, access
to HHS information systems or data.
(i) Document information. The Contractor
shall contact the Contracting Officer for any
documents, information, or forms necessary
to comply with the requirements of this
clause.
(j) Contractor responsibilities upon
physical completion of the contract. The
Contractor shall return all HHS information
and IT resources provided to the Contractor
during contract performance and certify that
all HHS information has been purged from
Contractor-owned systems used in contract
performance.
(k) Failure to comply. Failure on the part
of the Contractor or its subcontractors to
comply with the terms of this clause shall be
grounds for the Contracting Officer to
terminate this contract.
(End of clause)
352.239–73 Electronic information and
technology accessibility.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES_2
(a) As prescribed in 339.201–70(a),
the Contracting Officer shall insert the
following provision:
Electronic and Information Technology
Accessibility (October 2009)
(a) Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act of
1973 (29 U.S.C. 794d), as amended by the
Workforce Investment Act of 1998, and the
Architectural and Transportation Barriers
Compliance Board Electronic and
Information (EIT) Accessibility Standards (36
CFR Part 1194), require that, unless an
exception applies, all EIT products and
services developed, acquired, maintained, or
used by any Federal department or agency
permit—
(1) Federal employees with disabilities to
have access to and use information and data
that is comparable to the access and use of
information and data by Federal employees
who are not individuals with disabilities; and
(2) Members of the public with disabilities
seeking information or services from a
Federal agency to have access to and use of
information and data that is comparable to
the access and use of information and data
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:54 Nov 25, 2009
Jkt 220001
by members of the public who are not
individuals with disabilities.
(b) Accordingly, any vendor submitting a
proposal/quotation/bid in response to this
solicitation must demonstrate compliance
with the established EIT accessibility
standards. Information about Section 508 is
available at https://www.section508.gov/. The
complete text of Section 508 Final Provisions
can be accessed at https://www.accessboard.gov/sec508/provisions.htm.
(c) The Section 508 accessibility standards
applicable to this solicitation are identified
in the Statement of Work/Specification/
Performance Work Statement. In order to
facilitate the Government’s evaluation to
determine whether EIT products and services
proposed meet applicable Section 508
accessibility standards, offerors must prepare
an HHS Section 508 Product Assessment
Template, in accordance with its completion
instructions, and provide a binding statement
of conformance. The purpose of the template
is to assist HHS acquisition and program
officials in determining that EIT products
and services proposed support applicable
Section 508 accessibility standards. The
template allows vendors or developers to
self-evaluate their products or services and
document in detail how they do or do not
conform to a specific Section 508
accessibility standard. Instructions for
preparing the HHS Section 508 Evaluation
Template may be found under Section 508
policy on the HHS Office on Disability Web
site (https://www.hhs.gov/od).
(d) Respondents to this solicitation must
also provide any additional detailed
information necessary for determining
applicable Section 508 accessibility
standards conformance, as well as for
documenting EIT products or services that
are incidental to the project, which would
constitute an exception to Section 508
requirements. If a vendor claims its products
or services, including EIT deliverables such
as electronic documents and reports, meet
applicable Section 508 accessibility
standards in its completed HHS Section 508
Product Assessment Template, and it is later
determined by the Government—i.e., after
award of a contract/order, that products or
services delivered do not conform to the
described accessibility standards in the
Product Assessment Template, remediation
of the products or services to the level of
conformance specified in the vendor’s
Product Assessment Template will be the
responsibility of the Contractor and at its
expense.
(End of provision)
(b) As prescribed in 339.201–70(b),
the Contracting Officer shall insert the
following clause:
Electronic and Information Technology
Accessibility (October 2009)
(a) Pursuant to Section 508 of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 794d),
as amended by the Workforce Investment Act
of 1998, all electronic and information
technology (EIT) products and services
developed, acquired, maintained, or used
under this contract/order must comply with
the ‘‘Electronic and Information Technology
Accessibility Provisions’’ set forth by the
PO 00000
Frm 00068
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
Architectural and Transportation Barriers
Compliance Board (also referred to as the
‘‘Access Board’’) in 36 CFR part 1194.
Information about Section 508 is available at
https://www.section508.gov/. The complete
text of Section 508 Final Provisions can be
accessed at https://www.access-board.gov/
sec508/provisions.htm.
(b) The Section 508 accessibility standards
applicable to this contract/order are
identified in the Statement of Work/
Specification/Performance Work Statement.
The Contractor must provide a written
Section 508 conformance certification due at
the end of each contract/order exceeding
$100,000 when the contract/order duration is
one year or less. If it is determined by the
Government that EIT products and services
provided by the Contractor do not conform
to the described accessibility standards in the
Product Assessment Template, remediation
of the products or services to the level of
conformance specified in the Contractor’s
Product Assessment Template will be the
responsibility of the Contractor at its own
expense.
(c) In the event of a modification(s) to this
contract/order, which adds new EIT products
or services or revises the type of, or
specifications for, products or services the
Contractor is to provide, including EIT
deliverables such as electronic documents
and reports, the Contracting Officer may
require that the contractor submit a
completed HHS Section 508 Product
Assessment Template to assist the
Government in determining that the EIT
products or services support Section 508
accessibility standards. Instructions for
documenting accessibility via the HHS
Section 508 Product Assessment Template
may be found under Section 508 policy on
the HHS Office on Disability Web site
(https://www.hhs.gov/od).
(c) As prescribed in 339.201–70(c), the
Contracting Officer shall add the
following paragraph to the end of clause
352.239–73(b):
Prior to the Contracting Officer exercising
an option for a subsequent performance
period/additional quantity or adding funding
for a subsequent performance period under
this contract, as applicable, the Contractor
must provide a Section 508 Annual Report to
the Contracting Officer and Project Officer.
Unless otherwise directed by the Contracting
Officer in writing, the Contractor shall
provide the cited report in accordance with
the following schedule. Instructions for
completing the report are available in the
Section 508 policy on the HHS Office on
Disability Web site under the heading Vendor
Information and Documents. The
Contractor’s failure to submit a timely and
properly completed report may jeopardize
the Contracting Officer’s exercising an option
or adding funding, as applicable.
Schedule for Contractor Submission of
Section 508 Annual Report
(To be completed by the Contracting
Officer at time of contract/order award.)
E:\FR\FM\27NOR2.SGM
27NOR2
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 227 / Friday, November 27, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
352.242–70
Key personnel.
As prescribed in 342.302(c)(2), the
Contracting Officer shall insert the
following clause:
Key Personnel (January 2006)
The key personnel specified in this
contract are considered to be essential to
work performance. At least 30 days prior to
diverting any of the specified individuals to
other programs or contracts (or as soon as
possible, if an individual must be replaced,
for example, as a result of leaving the employ
of the Contractor), the Contractor shall notify
the Contracting Officer and shall submit
comprehensive justification for the diversion
or replacement request (including proposed
substitutions for key personnel) to permit
evaluation by the Government of the impact
on performance under this contract. The
Contractor shall not divert or otherwise
replace any key personnel without the
written consent of the Contracting Officer.
The Government may modify the contract to
add or delete key personnel at the request of
the contractor or Government.
(End of clause)
352.242–71
Tobacco-free facilities.
As prescribed in 342.302(c)(3), the
Contracting Officer shall insert the
following clause:
352.242–73
payments.
Tobacco-free Facilities (January 2006)
In accordance with Department of Health
and Human Services (HHS) policy, the
Contractor and its staff are prohibited from
using tobacco products of any kind (e.g.,
cigarettes, cigars, pipes, and smokeless
tobacco) while on any HHS property,
including use in personal or company
vehicles operated by Contractor employees
while on an HHS property. This policy also
applies to all subcontracts awarded under the
contract or order. The term ‘‘HHS properties’’
includes all properties owned, controlled
and/or leased by HHS when totally occupied
by HHS, including all indoor and outdoor
areas of such properties. Where HHS only
partially occupies such properties, it
includes all HHS-occupied interior space.
Where HHS leases space in a multi-occupant
building or complex, the tobacco-free HHS
policy will apply to the maximum area
permitted by both law and current lease
agreements. The Contractor shall ensure that
each of its employees, and any subcontractor
staff, is made aware of, understand, and
comply with this policy.
(End of clause)
352.242–72 Native American Graves
Protection and Repatriation Act.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES_2
As prescribed in 342.302(c)(4), the
Contracting Officer shall insert the
following clause:
Native American Graves Protection and
Repatriation Act (January 2006)
(a) Public Law 101–601, dated November
16, 1990, also known as the Native American
Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (Act),
imposes certain responsibilities on
individuals and organizations when they
discover Native American cultural items
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:54 Nov 25, 2009
Jkt 220001
(including human remains) on Federal or
Tribal lands.
(b) In the event the Contractor discovers
Native American cultural items (including
human remains, associated funerary objects,
unassociated funerary objects, sacred objects
and cultural patrimony), as defined in the
Act during contract performance, the
Contractor shall—
(i) Immediately cease activity in the area of
the discovery;
(ii) Notify the Contracting Officer of the
discovery; and
(iii) Make a reasonable effort to protect the
items discovered before resuming such
activity. Upon receipt of the Contractor’s
discovery notice, the Contracting Officer will
notify the appropriate authorities as required
by the Act.
(c) Unless otherwise specified by the
Contracting Officer, the Contractor may
resume activity in the area on the 31st
calendar day following the date that the
appropriate authorities certify receipt of the
discovery notice. The Contracting Officer
shall provide to the Contractor the date that
the appropriate authorities certify receipt of
the discovery notice and the date on which
the Contractor may resume activities.
(End of clause)
Withholding of contract
As prescribed in 342.7003–1(a), the
Contracting Officer shall insert the
following clause:
Withholding of Contract Payments (January
2006)
Notwithstanding any other payment
provisions of this contract, failure of the
Contractor to submit required reports when
due or failure to perform or deliver required
work, supplies, or services, may result in the
withholding of payments under this contract
unless such failure arises out of causes
beyond the control, and without the fault or
negligence of the Contractor as defined by the
clause entitled ‘‘Excusable Delays’’ or
‘‘Default,’’ as applicable. The Government
will immediately notify the Contractor of its
intention to withhold payment of any invoice
or voucher submitted.
(End of clause)
352.242–74
findings.
Final decisions on audit
As prescribed in 342.7003–1(b), the
Contracting Officer shall insert the
following clause:
Final Decisions on Audit Findings (April
1984)
For the purpose of issuing final decisions
under the Disputes clause of this contract
concerning monetary audit findings, the
Contracting Officer is the individual
authorized to make such decisions.
(End of clause)
352.270–1 Accessibility of meetings,
conferences, and seminars to persons with
disabilities.
As prescribed in 370.102, the
Contracting Officer shall insert the
following clause:
PO 00000
Frm 00069
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
62463
Accessibility of Meetings, Conferences, and
Seminars to Persons With Disabilities
(January 2001)
The Contractor agrees as follows:
(a) Planning. The Contractor shall develop
a plan to assure that any meeting, conference,
or seminar held pursuant to this contract will
meet or exceed the minimum accessibility
standards set forth in 28 CFR 36.101–36.500
and Appendix A: ADA Accessibility
Guidelines (ADAAG). The Contractor shall
submit the plan to the Contracting Officer’s
Technical Representative for approval prior
to initiating action. (The Contractor may
submit a consolidated or master plan for
contracts requiring numerous meetings,
conferences, or seminars in lieu of separate
plans.)
(b) Facilities. Any facility the Contractor
intends to utilize for meetings, conferences,
or seminars in performance of this contract
shall be in compliance with 28 CFR 36.101–
36.500 and Appendix A. The Contractor shall
determine, by an on-site inspection, that the
facility meets these requirements. (1)
Parking. Parking shall be in compliance with
228 CFR 36.101–36.500 and Appendix A.
(2) Entrances. Entrances shall be in
compliance with 28 CFR 36.101–36.500 and
Appendix A.
(3) Meeting Rooms. Meeting rooms,
including seating arrangements, shall be in
compliance with 28 CFR 36.101–36.500 and
Appendix A. In addition, stages, speaker
platforms, etc. which are to be used by
persons in wheelchairs must be accessible by
ramps or lifts. When used, the ramp may not
necessarily be independently negotiable if
space does not permit. However, the
Contracting Officer’s Technical
Representative must approve any slope over
1:12, and the Contractor must provide
assistance to negotiate access to the stage or
platform.
(4) Restrooms. Restrooms shall be in
compliance with 28 CFR 36.101–36.500 and
Appendix A.
(5) Eating Facilities. Eating facilities in the
meeting facility must also comply with 28
CFR 36.101–36.500 and Appendix A.
(6) Overnight Facilities. If overnight
accommodations are required, the facility
providing the overnight accommodations
shall also comply with 28 CFR 36.101–36.500
and Appendix A.
(7) Water Fountains. Water fountains shall
comply with 28 CFR 36.101–36.500 and
Appendix A.
(8) Telephones. Public telephones shall
comply with 28 CFR 36.101–36.500 and
Appendix A.
(c) Provisions of Services for Attendees
with Sensory Impairments.
(1) The Contractor, in planning the
meeting, conference, or seminar, shall
include in all announcements and other
materials pertaining to the meeting,
conference, or seminar a notice indicating
that services will be made available to
persons with sensory impairments attending
the meeting, if requested within five (5) days
of the date of the meeting, conference, or
seminar. The announcement(s) and other
material(s) shall indicate that persons with
sensory impairments may contact a specific
person(s), at a specific address and phone
E:\FR\FM\27NOR2.SGM
27NOR2
62464
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 227 / Friday, November 27, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
number(s), to make their service
requirements known. The phone number(s)
shall include a telecommunication device for
the deaf (TDD).
(2) The Contractor shall provide, at no
additional cost to the individual, those
services required by persons with sensory
impairments to ensure their complete
participation in the meeting, conference, or
seminar.
(3) At a minimum, when requested in
advance, the Contractor shall provide the
following services:
(i) For persons with hearing impairments,
qualified interpreters. Also, the meeting
rooms shall be adequately illuminated so
signing by interpreters can be easily seen.
(ii) For persons with vision impairments,
readers and/or cassette materials, as
necessary, to enable full participation. Also,
meeting rooms shall be adequately
illuminated.
(iii) Agenda and other conference
material(s) shall be translated into a usable
form for persons with sensory impairments.
Readers, Braille translations, large print text,
and/or tape recordings are all acceptable.
These materials shall be available to
individuals with sensory impairments upon
their arrival.
(4) The Contractor shall make a reasonable
effort to ascertain the number of individuals
with sensory impairments who plan to attend
the meeting, conference, or seminar.
However, if the Contractor can determine
that there will be no person with sensory
impairment in attendance, the provision of
those services under paragraph (c) of this
clause for the non-represented group, or
groups, is not required.
(End of clause)
352.270–2
Indian preference.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES_2
As prescribed in 370.202(a), the
Contracting Officer shall insert the
following clause:
Indian Preference (April 1984)
(a) The Contractor agrees to give preference
in employment opportunities under this
contract to Indians who can perform required
work, regardless of age (subject to existing
laws and regulations), sex, religion, or Tribal
affiliation. To the extent feasible and
consistent with the efficient performance of
this contract, the Contractor further agrees to
give preference in employment and training
opportunities under this contract to Indians
who are not fully qualified to perform
regardless of age (subject to existing laws and
regulations), sex, religion, or Tribal
affiliation. The Contractor also agrees to give
preference to Indian organizations and
Indian-owned economic enterprises in the
awarding of any subcontracts to the extent
feasible and consistent with the efficient
performance of this contract. The Contractor
shall maintain statistical records as are
necessary to indicate compliance with this
paragraph.
(b) In connection with the Indian
employment preference requirements of this
clause, the Contractor shall provide
opportunities for training incident to such
employment. Such training shall include onthe-job, classroom or apprenticeship training
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:54 Nov 25, 2009
Jkt 220001
which is designed to increase the vocational
effectiveness of an Indian employee.
(c) If the Contractor is unable to fill its
employment and training opportunities after
giving full consideration to Indians as
required by this clause, the Contractor may
satisfy those needs by selecting persons other
than Indians in accordance with the clause
of this contract entitled ‘‘Equal Opportunity.’’
(d) If no Indian organizations or Indianowned economic enterprises are available
under reasonable terms and conditions,
including price, for awarding of subcontracts
in connection with the work performed
under this contract, the Contractor agrees to
comply with the provisions of this contract
involving utilization of small businesses;
HUBZone small businesses; service-disabled,
veteran-owned small businesses; 8(a) small
businesses; veteran-owned small businesses;
women-owned small businesses; or small
disadvantaged businesses.
(e) As used in this clause,
(1) ‘‘Indian’’ means a person who is a
member of an Indian Tribe. If the Contractor
has reason to doubt that a person seeking
employment preference is an Indian, the
Contractor shall grant the preference but
shall require the individual to provide
evidence within 30 days from the Tribe
concerned that the person is a member of the
Tribe.
(2) ‘‘Indian Tribe’’ means an Indian Tribe,
pueblo, band, nation, or other organized
group or community, including Alaska
Native village or regional or village
corporation as defined in or established
pursuant to the Alaska Native Claims
Settlement Act (85 Stat. 688; 43 U.S.C. 1601)
which is recognized as eligible for the special
programs and services provided by the
United States to Indians because of their
status as Indians.
(3) ‘‘Indian organization’’ means the
governing body of any Indian Tribe or entity
established or recognized by such governing
body in accordance with the Indian
Financing Act of 1974 (88 Stat. 77; 25 U.S.C.
1451).
(4) ‘‘Indian-owned economic enterprise’’
means any Indian-owned commercial,
industrial, or business activity established or
organized for the purpose of profit, provided
that such Indian ownership shall constitute
not less than 51 percent of the enterprise, and
that ownership shall encompass active
operation and control of the enterprise.
(f) The Contractor agrees to include the
provisions of this clause, including this
paragraph (f) of this clause, in each
subcontract awarded at any tier under this
contract.
(g) In the event of noncompliance with this
clause, the Contracting Officer may terminate
the contract in whole or in part or may
impose any other sanctions authorized by
law or by other provisions of the contract.
(End of clause)
352.270–3
Indian preference program.
As prescribed in 370.202(b), the
Contracting Officer shall insert the
following clause:
Indian Preference Program (January 2006)
(a) In addition to the requirements of the
clause of this contract entitled ‘‘Indian
PO 00000
Frm 00070
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
Preference,’’ the Contractor agrees to
establish and conduct an Indian preference
program which will expand opportunities for
Indians to receive preference for employment
and training in connection with the work to
be performed under this contract, and which
will expand the opportunities for Indian
organizations and Indian-owned economic
enterprises to receive a preference in the
awarding of subcontracts. In this connection,
the Contractor shall perform the following:
(1) Designate a liaison officer who will
maintain liaison with the Government and
the Tribe(s) on Indian preference matters;
supervise compliance with the provisions of
this clause; and administer the Contractor’s
Indian preference program.
(2) Advise its recruitment sources in
writing and include a statement in all
advertisements for employment that Indian
applicants will be given preference in
employment and training incident to such
employment.
(3) Not more than 20 calendar days after
award of the contract, post a written notice
in the Tribal office of any reservations on
which or near where the work under this
contract is to be performed that sets forth the
Contractor’s employment needs and related
training opportunities. The notice shall
include the approximate numbers and types
of employees needed; the approximate dates
of employment; the experience or special
skills required for employment, if any;
training opportunities available; and other
pertinent information necessary to advise
prospective employees of any other
employment requirements. The Contractor
shall also request the Tribe(s) on or near
whose reservation(s) the work is to be
performed to provide assistance to the
Contractor in filling its employment needs
and training opportunities. The Contracting
Officer will advise the Contractor of the
name, location, and phone number of the
Tribal officials to contact in regard to the
posting of notices and requests for Tribal
assistance.
(4) Establish and conduct a subcontracting
program which gives preference to Indian
organizations and Indian-owned economic
enterprises as subcontractors and suppliers
under this contract. The Contractor shall give
public notice of existing subcontracting
opportunities and, to the extent feasible and
consistent with the efficient performance of
this contract, shall solicit bids or proposals
only from Indian organizations or Indianowned economic enterprises. The Contractor
shall request assistance and information on
Indian firms qualified as suppliers or
subcontractors from the Tribe(s) on or near
whose reservation(s) the work under the
contract is to be performed. The Contracting
Officer will advise the Contractor of the
name, location, and phone number of the
Tribal officials to be contacted in regard to
the request for assistance and information.
Public notices and solicitations for existing
subcontracting opportunities shall provide an
equitable opportunity for Indian firms to
submit bids or proposals by including—
(i) A clear description of the supplies or
services required, including quantities,
specifications, and delivery schedules which
facilitate the participation of Indian firms;
E:\FR\FM\27NOR2.SGM
27NOR2
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES_2
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 227 / Friday, November 27, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
(ii) A statement indicating that preference
will be given to Indian organizations and
Indian-owned economic enterprises in
accordance with section 7(b) of Public Law
93–638 [88 Stat. 2205; 25 U.S.C. 450e(b)];
(iii) Definitions for the terms ‘‘Indian
organization’’ and ‘‘Indian-owned economic
enterprise’’ as prescribed under the ‘‘Indian
Preference’’ clause of this contract;
(iv) A statement to be completed by the
bidder or offeror that it is an Indian
organization or Indian-owned economic
enterprise; and
(v) A closing date for receipt of bids or
proposals which provides sufficient time for
preparation and submission of a bid or
proposal. If after soliciting bids or proposals
from Indian organizations and Indian-owned
economic enterprises, no responsive bid or
acceptable proposal is received, the
Contractor shall comply with the
requirements of paragraph (d) of the ‘‘Indian
Preference’’ clause of this contract. If one or
more responsible bids or acceptable
proposals are received, award shall be made
to the low responsible bidder or acceptable
offeror if the price is determined to be
reasonable. If the low responsive bid or
acceptable proposal is determined to be
unreasonable as to price, the Contractor shall
attempt to negotiate a reasonable price and
award a subcontract. If a reasonable price
cannot be agreed upon, the Contractor shall
comply with the requirements of paragraph
(d) of the ‘‘Indian Preference’’ clause of this
contract.
(5) Maintain written records under this
contract which indicate—
(i) The numbers of Indians seeking
employment for each employment position
available under this contract;
(ii) The number and types of positions
filled by Indians and non-Indians;
(iii) The total number of Indians employed
under this contract;
(iv) For those positions where there are
both Indian and non-Indian applicants, and
a non-Indian is selected for employment, the
reason(s) why the Indian applicant was not
selected;
(v) Actions taken to give preference to
Indian organizations and Indian-owned
economic enterprises for subcontracting
opportunities which exist under this
contract;
(vi) Reasons why preference was not given
to Indian firms as subcontractors or suppliers
for each requirement where it was
determined by the Contractor that such
preference would not be consistent with the
efficient performance of the contract; and
(vii) The number of Indian organizations
and Indian-owned economic enterprises
contacted, and the number receiving
subcontract awards under this contract.
(6) Submit to the Contracting Officer for
approval a quarterly report which
summarizes the Contractor’s Indian
preference program and indicates the number
and types of available positions filled by
Indians and non-Indians, and the dollar
amounts of all subcontracts awarded to
Indian organizations and Indian-owned
economic enterprises, and to all other firms.
(7) Maintain records pursuant to this
clause and keep them available for review by
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:54 Nov 25, 2009
Jkt 220001
the Government for one year after final
payment under this contract, or for such
longer period as may be required by any
other clause of this contract or by applicable
law or regulation.
(b) For purposes of this clause, the
following definitions of terms shall apply:
(1) The terms ‘‘Indian,’’ ‘‘Indian Tribe,’’
‘‘Indian Organization,’’ and ‘‘Indian-owned
economic enterprise’’ are defined in the
clause of this contract entitled ‘‘Indian
Preference.’’
(2) ‘‘Indian reservation’’ includes Indian
reservations, public domain Indian
Allotments, former Indian reservations in
Oklahoma, and land held by incorporated
Native groups, regional corporations, and
village corporations under the provisions of
the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (85
Stat. 688; 43 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.)
(3) ‘‘On or near an Indian Reservation’’
means on a reservation or reservations or
within that area surrounding an Indian
reservation(s) where a person seeking
employment could reasonably be expected to
commute to and from in the course of a work
day.
(c) Nothing in the requirements of this
clause shall be interpreted to preclude Indian
Tribes from independently developing and
enforcing their own Indian preference
requirements. Such requirements must not
conflict with any Federal statutory or
regulatory requirement dealing with the
award and administration of contracts.
(d) The Contractor agrees to include the
provisions of this clause, including this
paragraph (d), in each subcontract awarded at
any tier under this contract and to notify the
Contracting Officer of such subcontracts.
(e) In the event of noncompliance with this
clause, the Contracting Officer may terminate
the contract in whole or in part or may
impose any other sanctions authorized by
law or by other provisions of the contract.
(End of clause)
352.270–4
Protection of human subjects.
(a) As prescribed in 370.303(a), the
Contracting Officer shall insert the
following provision:
Notice to Offerors of Requirements of 45 CFR
Part 46, Protection of Human Subjects
(January 2006)
(a) Copies of the Department of Health and
Human Services (HHS) regulations for the
protection of human subjects, 45 CFR Part 46,
are available from the Office for Human
Research Protections (OHRP), Bethesda,
Maryland 20892. The regulations provide a
systematic means, based on established
ethical principles, to safeguard the rights and
welfare of individuals who participate as
subjects in research activities supported or
conducted by HHS.
(b) The regulations define a human subject
as a living individual about whom an
investigator (whether professional or student)
conducting research obtains data through
intervention or interaction with the
individual, or identifiable private
information. The regulations extend to the
use of human organs, tissue, and body fluids
from individually identifiable human
subjects as well as to graphic, written, or
PO 00000
Frm 00071
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
62465
recorded information derived from
individually identifiable human subjects.
The use of autopsy materials is governed by
applicable State and local law and is not
directly regulated by 45 CFR Part 46.
(c) Activities in which the only
involvement of human subjects will be in one
or more of the categories set forth in 45 CFR
46.101(b)(1–6) are exempt from coverage.
(d) Inappropriate designations of the
noninvolvement of human subjects or of
exempt categories of research in a project
may result in delays in the review of a
proposal. The Government’s Project Officer
will make a final determination of whether
the proposed activities are covered by the
regulations or are in an exempt category,
based on the information provided in the
proposal. In doubtful cases, the Project
Officer will consult with OHRP.
(e) In accordance with 45 CFR Part 46,
offerors being considered for award shall file
with OHRP an acceptable Assurance of
Compliance with the regulations, specifying
review procedures and assigning
responsibilities for the protection of human
subjects. The initial and continuing review of
a research project by an institutional review
board shall ensure that: the rights and
welfare of the human subjects involved are
adequately protected; the risks to the subjects
are reasonable in relation to both the
potential benefits, if any, to the subjects and
the importance of the knowledge to be
gained; and informed consent will be
obtained by methods that are adequate and
appropriate. HHS regulations for the
protection of human subjects (45 CFR Part
46), information regarding OHRP registration
and assurance requirements/processes, and
OHRP contact information can be accessed at
the OHRP Web site (at https://www.hhs.gov/
ohrp/).
(f) Offerors may consult with OHRP for
advice or guidance concerning either
regulatory requirements or ethical issues
pertaining to research involving human
subjects.
(End of provision)
(b) As prescribed in 370.304(a), the
Contracting Officer shall insert the
following clause:
Protection of Human Subjects (January 2006)
(a) The Contractor agrees that the rights
and welfare of human subjects involved in
research under this contract shall be
protected in accordance with 45 CFR Part 46
and with the Contractor’s current Assurance
of Compliance on file with the Office for
Human Research Protections (OHRP),
Department of Health and Human Services.
The Contractor further agrees to provide
certification at least annually that the
Institutional Review Board has reviewed and
approved the procedures, which involve
human subjects in accordance with 45 CFR
Part 46 and the Assurance of Compliance.
(b) The Contractor shall bear full
responsibility for the performance of all work
and services involving the use of human
subjects under this contract and shall ensure
that work is conducted in a proper manner
and as safely as is feasible. The parties hereto
agree that the Contractor retains the right to
control and direct the performance of all
E:\FR\FM\27NOR2.SGM
27NOR2
62466
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 227 / Friday, November 27, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
work under this contract. The Contractor
shall not deem anything in this contract to
constitute the Contractor or any
subcontractor, agent or employee of the
Contractor, or any other person, organization,
institution, or group of any kind whatsoever,
as the agent or employee of the Government.
The Contractor agrees that it has entered into
this contract and will discharge its
obligations, duties, and undertakings and the
work pursuant thereto, whether requiring
professional judgment or otherwise, as an
independent contractor without imputing
liability on the part of the Government for the
acts of the Contractor or its employees.
(c) If at any time during the performance
of this contract, the Contracting Officer
determines, in consultation with OHRP that
the Contractor is not in compliance with any
of the requirements and/or standards stated
in paragraphs (a) and (b) above, the
Contracting Officer may immediately
suspend, in whole or in part, work and
further payments under this contract until
the Contractor corrects the noncompliance.
The Contracting Officer may communicate
the notice of suspension by telephone with
confirmation in writing. If the Contractor
fails to complete corrective action within the
period of time designated in the Contracting
Officer’s written notice of suspension, the
Contracting Officer may, after consultation
with OHRP, terminate this contract in whole
or in part, and the Contractor’s name may be
removed from the list of those contractors
with approved Human Subject Assurances.
(End of clause)
352.270–5
Care of laboratory animals.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES_2
(a) As prescribed in 370.403(a), the
Contracting Officer shall insert the
following provision:
Notice to Offerors of Requirement for
Compliance With the Public Health Service
Policy on Humane Care and Use of
Laboratory Animals (January 2006)
The Public Health Service (PHS) Policy on
Humane Care and Use of Laboratory Animals
(PHS Policy) establishes a number of
requirements for research activities involving
animals. Before award may be made to an
applicant organization, the organization shall
file, with the Office of Laboratory Animal
Welfare (OLAW), National Institutes of
Health (NIH), a written Animal Welfare
Assurance (Assurance) which commits the
organization to comply with the provisions of
the PHS Policy, the Animal Welfare Act, and
the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory
Animals (National Academy Press,
Washington, DC). In accordance with the
PHS Policy, applicant organizations must
establish an Institutional Animal Care & Use
Committee (IACUC), qualified through the
experience and expertise of its members, to
oversee the institution’s animal program,
facilities and procedures. Applicant
organizations are required to provide
verification of IACUC approval prior to
release of an award involving live vertebrate
animals. No award involving the use of
animals shall be made unless OLAW
approves the Assurance and verification of
IACUC approval for the proposed animal
activities has been provided to the
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:54 Nov 25, 2009
Jkt 220001
Contracting Officer. Prior to award, the
Contracting Officer will notify Contractor(s)
selected for projects that involve live
vertebrate animals that an Assurance and
verification of IACUC approval are required.
The Contracting Officer will request that
OLAW negotiate an acceptable Assurance
with those Contractor(s) and request
verification of IACUC approval. For further
information, contact OLAW at NIH, 6705
Rockledge Drive, RKL1, Suite 360, MSC 7982
Bethesda, Maryland 20892–7982 (E-mail:
olaw@od.nih.gov; Phone: 301–496–7163).
(End of provision)
(b) As prescribed in 370.404, the
Contracting Officer shall insert the
following clause:
Care of Live Vertebrate Animals (October
2009)
(a) Before undertaking performance of any
contract involving animal-related activities
where the species is regulated by USDA, the
Contractor shall register with the Secretary of
Agriculture of the United States in
accordance with 7 U.S.C. 2136 and 9 CFR
sections 2.25 through 2.28. The Contractor
shall furnish evidence of the registration to
the Contracting Officer.
(b) The Contractor shall acquire vertebrate
animals used in research from a dealer
licensed by the Secretary of Agriculture
under 7 U.S.C. 2133 and 9 CFR Sections 2.1–
2.11, or from a source that is exempt from
licensing under those sections.
(c) The Contractor agrees that the care, use
and intended use of any live vertebrate
animals in the performance of this contract
shall conform with the Public Health Service
(PHS) Policy on Humane Care of Use of
Laboratory Animals (PHS Policy), the current
Animal Welfare Assurance (Assurance), the
Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory
Animals (National Academy Press,
Washington, DC) and the pertinent laws and
regulations of the United States Department
of Agriculture (see 7 U.S.C. 2131 et seq. and
9 CFR Subchapter A, Parts 1–4). In case of
conflict between standards, the more
stringent standard shall govern.
(d) If at any time during performance of
this contract, the Contracting Officer
determines, in consultation with the Office of
Laboratory Animal Welfare (OLAW),
National Institutes of Health (NIH), that the
Contractor is not in compliance with any of
the requirements and standards stated in
paragraphs (a) through (c) above, the
Contracting Officer may immediately
suspend, in whole or in part, work and
further payments under this contract until
the Contractor corrects the noncompliance.
Notice of the suspension may be
communicated by telephone and confirmed
in writing. If the Contractor fails to complete
corrective action within the period of time
designated in the Contracting Officer’s
written notice of suspension, the Contracting
Officer may, in consultation with OLAW,
NIH, terminate this contract in whole or in
part, and the Contractor’s name may be
removed from the list of those contractors
with approved Assurances.
Note: The Contractor may request
registration of its facility and a current listing
PO 00000
Frm 00072
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
of licensed dealers from the Regional Office
of the Animal and Plant Health Inspection
Service (APHIS), USDA, for the region in
which its research facility is located. The
location of the appropriate APHIS Regional
Office, as well as information concerning this
program may be obtained by contacting the
Animal Care Staff, USDA/APHIS, 4700 River
Road, Riverdale, Maryland 20737 (E-mail:
ace@aphis.usda.gov; Web site: (https://
www.aphis.usda.gov/animal_welfare).
(End of clause)
352.270–6
subjects.
Restriction on use of human
As prescribed in 370–304(b), the
Contracting Officer shall insert the
following clause:
Restriction on Use of Human Subjects
(January 2006)
Pursuant to 45 CFR part 46, Protection of
Human Research Subjects, the Contractor
shall not expend funds under this award for
research involving human subjects or engage
in any human subjects research activity prior
to the Contracting Officer’s receipt of a
certification that the research has been
reviewed and approved by the Institutional
Review Board (IRB) designated under the
Contractor’s Federal-wide assurance of
compliance. This restriction applies to all
collaborating sites, whether domestic or
foreign, and subcontractors. The Contractor
must ensure compliance by collaborators and
subcontractors.
(End of clause)
352.270–7 Conference sponsorship
request and conference materials
disclaimer.
As prescribed in 370.602, the
Contracting Officer shall insert the
following clause:
Conference Sponsorship Request and
Conference Materials Disclaimer (October
2009)
(a) If HHS is not the sole provider of
funding under this conference contract, then
prior to the Contractor claiming HHS
conference sponsorship, the Contractor shall
submit a written request (including rationale)
to the Contracting Officer for permission to
claim such HHS sponsorship.
(b) Whether or not HHS is the conference
sponsor, the Contractor shall include the
following statement on conference materials,
including promotional materials, agendas,
and Web sites:
‘‘This conference was funded, in whole or
in part, through a contract (insert contract
number) with the Department of Health and
Human Services (HHS) (insert name of
OPDIV/STAFFDIV). The views expressed in
written conference materials and by speakers
and moderators at this conference, do not
necessarily reflect the official policies of
HHS, nor does mention of trade names,
commercial practices, or organizations imply
endorsement by the U.S. Government.’’
(c) Unless authorized by the Contracting
Officer’s Technical Representative, the
Contractor shall not display the HHS logo on
any conference materials.
(End of clause)
E:\FR\FM\27NOR2.SGM
27NOR2
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 227 / Friday, November 27, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
352.270–8
activities.
Prostitution and related
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES_2
As prescribed in 370.701, the
Contracting Officer shall insert the
following clause:
Prostitution and Related Activities (October
2009)
(a) The U.S. Government is opposed to
prostitution and related activities, which are
inherently harmful and dehumanizing and
contribute to the phenomenon of trafficking
in persons.
(b) Neither the Contractor nor any
subcontractor(s) shall use Government funds
provided under this contract to promote or
advocate the legalization or practice of
prostitution or sex trafficking. (Note: The
term ‘‘contract’’ includes ‘‘order’’ wherever it
appears in this clause.) The Contractor shall
not construe anything in the preceding
sentence to preclude providing individuals
with palliative care, treatment, or postexposure pharmaceutical prophylaxis, and
necessary pharmaceuticals and commodities,
including test kits, condoms, and, when
proven effective, microbicides.
(c) The Government does not require the
Contractor to endorse or utilize a
multisectoral approach to combating HIV/
AIDS, or endorse, utilize, or participate in a
prevention method or treatment program to
which it has a religious or moral objection.
Any information the Contractor provides
about the use of condoms as part of projects
or activities that are funded in connection
with this contract shall be medically accurate
and shall include the public health benefits
and failure rates of such use.
(d) In addition, the Contractor shall have
a policy explicitly opposing prostitution and
sex trafficking. The preceding sentence shall
not apply to any ‘‘exempt organizations’’ (i.e.,
the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis
and Malaria; the World Health Organization;
the International AIDS Vaccine Initiative;
and any United Nations agency), or to any
contractors that are awarded ‘‘specified types
of commercial contracts’’ as set forth below.
(e) The following definitions apply for
purposes of this clause:
(1) ‘‘Commercial sex act’’ means any sex
act on account of which anything of value is
given to or received by any person.
(2) ‘‘Prostitution’’ means procuring or
providing any commercial sex act.
(3) ‘‘Sex trafficking’’ means the
recruitment, harboring, transportation,
provision, or obtaining of a person for the
purpose of a commercial sex act [22 U.S.C.
7102(9)].
(4) ‘‘Specified types of commercial
contracts’’ means contracts awarded for
commercial items and services as defined in
Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 2.101,
such as pharmaceuticals, medical supplies,
logistics support, data management, and
freight forwarding. Notwithstanding the
preceding definition of ‘‘specified types of
commercial contracts,’’ contracts for the
purposes specified in paragraphs (e)(4)(i)
through (iii) of this clause, that are awarded
to implement HIV/AIDS programs, require
that the Contractor have a policy explicitly
opposing prostitution and sex trafficking—
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:54 Nov 25, 2009
Jkt 220001
(i) Supplies or services provided directly to
the final populations receiving such supplies
or services in host countries;
(ii) Technical assistance and training
furnished directly to host country
individuals or entities for the provision of
supplies or services to the final populations
receiving such supplies and services; or
(iii) The types of services listed in FAR
37.203(b)(1)-(6) that involve giving advice
about substantive policies of a recipient,
giving advice regarding the activities
referenced in paragraphs (e)(4)(i) and (ii) of
this clause, or making decisions or
functioning in a recipient’s chain of
command (e.g., providing managerial or
supervisory services; approving financial
transactions, personnel actions, etc.).
(f) The Contractor must have and maintain
‘‘objective integrity and independence’’ from
any organization that engages in activities
inconsistent with a policy opposing
prostitution and sex trafficking. HHS will
consider the Contractor to have objective
integrity and independence from such an
organization if the—
(1) Organization is a legally separate entity;
(2) Organization receives no transfer of
Leadership Act funds, and Leadership Act
funds do not subsidize activities inconsistent
with a policy opposing prostitution and sex
trafficking; and
(3) Contractor is physically and financially
separate from the organization. Mere
bookkeeping separation of Leadership Act
funds from other funds is not sufficient. HHS
will determine, on a case-by-case basis, and
based on the totality of the facts, whether
sufficient physical and financial separation
exists. The presence or absence of any one
factor below will not be determinative.
Factors relevant to this determination shall
include, but not be limited to, the following:
(i) The existence of separate personnel,
management, and governance.
(ii) The existence of separate accounts,
accounting records, and timekeeping records.
(iii) The degree of separation from
facilities, equipment, and supplies used by
the organization to conduct activities
inconsistent with a policy opposing
prostitution and sex trafficking, and the
extent of such activities by the organization.
(iv) The extent to which—
(A) Signs and other forms of identification
that distinguish the Contractor from the
organization are present, and
(B) Signs and materials that could be
associated with the organization or activities
inconsistent with a policy opposing
prostitution and sex trafficking are absent.
(v) The extent to which the U.S.
Government, HHS, and the project name are
protected from public association with an
organization and its activities that are
inconsistent with a policy opposing
prostitution and sex trafficking in materials,
such as publications, conferences, and press
or public statements.
(g) The Contractor shall include, as express
terms and conditions, the applicable
provisions of this clause in all subcontract
solicitations and subcontracts awarded under
this contract. The Contractor agrees that HHS
may, at any reasonable time, inspect the
documents and materials the Contractor
PO 00000
Frm 00073
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
62467
maintains or prepares in the usual course of
its operations that relate to the Contractor’s
compliance with this clause.
(h) As a prerequisite to award and payment
of any Government funds under this contract,
the Contractor shall certify compliance with
this clause for the performance period
funded by the contract. The Contractor shall
provide the three following compliance
certifications in a written statement
addressed to the Contracting Officer:
(1) Organizational Integrity Certification:
‘‘I certify that (insert Contractor’s name),
which will be the recipient of Government
funds made available through this contract,
has objective integrity and independence
from any organization that engages in
activities inconsistent with a policy opposing
prostitution and sex trafficking.’’
(2) Subcontractor Compliance Certification:
‘‘I certify that (insert Contractor’s name)
will include the Organizational Integrity
certification in any subcontract awarded
under this contract and will require such
subcontractor to provide the same
certification that the Contractor provided.’’
(3) Acknowledgment Certification:
‘‘I certify that (insert Contractor’s name)
acknowledges that these certifications are a
prerequisite to receipt of Government funds
in connection with this contract, and that any
violation of these certifications by the
Contractor or subcontractor(s) at any level
shall be grounds for termination of the
contract by HHS in accordance with the
Federal Acquisition Regulation, Part 49, as
well as any other remedies provided by law.’’
Note: In the case of existing contracts, the
Contracting Officer shall add the certification
requirements whenever the contract is
modified to extend the period of performance
or add funds, including any options that may
be exercised. In so doing, the Contracting
Officer shall delete in paragraph (h) the
language ‘‘As a prerequisite to award and
payment of any Government funds under this
contract,’’ and replace it with: ‘‘As a
prerequisite to continuation of this contract
and payment of any Government funds under
it,’’.
(i) A person(s) authorized to bind the
Contractor and any subcontractor(s) shall
execute the certifications. The Contractor
shall provide its certifications to the
Contracting Officer. A subcontractor(s) shall
provide its certifications to the Contractor.
The Contracting Officer may request that the
Contractor provide any subcontractor
certifications. In addition, the Contractor and
any subcontractors shall provide renewed
certifications for any modification that
extends the contract period of performance or
adds funds to the contract, including any
options that may be exercised.
(j) This clause does not affect the
applicability of the FAR clause at 52.222–50
entitled, ‘‘Combating Trafficking in Persons.’’
(End of clause)
352.270–9 Non-discrimination for
conscience.
As prescribed in 370.702, the
Contracting Officer shall insert the
following provision:
E:\FR\FM\27NOR2.SGM
27NOR2
62468
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 227 / Friday, November 27, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
Non-discrimination for Conscience (October
2009)
(a) Section 301(d) of the United States
Leadership Against HIV/AIDS, Tuberculosis,
and Malaria Act, as amended, provides that
an organization, including a faith-based
organization, that is otherwise eligible to
receive assistance under section 104A of the
Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, under the
United States Leadership Against HIV/AIDS,
Tuberculosis, and Malaria Act of 2003, under
the Tom Lantos and Henry J. Hyde United
States Global Leadership Against HIV/AIDS,
Tuberculosis, and Malaria Reauthorization
Act of 2008, or under any amendment to the
foregoing Acts for HIV/AIDS prevention,
treatment, or care—
(1) Shall not be required, as a condition of
receiving such assistance, to—
(i) Endorse or utilize a multisectoral or
comprehensive approach to combating HIV/
AIDS; or
(ii) Endorse, utilize, make a referral to,
become integrated with, or otherwise
participate in any program or activity to
which the organization has a religious or
moral objection.
(2) Shall not be discriminated against
under the provisions of law in subparagraph
(a) for refusing to meet any requirement
described in paragraph (a)(1) in this
solicitation.
(b) Accordingly, an offeror who believes
this solicitation contains work requirements
that would require it to endorse or utilize a
multisectoral or comprehensive approach to
combating HIV/AIDS, or to endorse, utilize,
make referral to, become integrated with, or
otherwise participate in a program or activity
to which it has a religious or moral objection,
shall identify those work requirements it has
excluded in its technical proposal.
(c) The Government acknowledges that an
offeror has specific rights, as cited in
paragraph (b) of this provision, to exclude
certain work requirements in this solicitation
from its proposal. However, the Government
reserves the right to not make an award to an
offeror whose proposal does not comply with
the salient work requirements of the
solicitation. Any exercise of that Government
right will be made by the Head of the
Contracting Activity.
(End of provision)
PARTS 354 THROUGH 369
[RESERVED]
SUBCHAPTER M—HHS
SUPPLEMENTATIONS
PART 370—SPECIAL PROGRAMS
AFFECTING ACQUISITION
Subpart 370.1—Accessibility of Meetings,
Conferences, and Seminars to Persons
With Disabilities
Sec.
370.101 Policy.
370.102 Responsibilities.
Subpart 370.2—Indian Preference in
Employment, Training, and Subcontracting
Opportunities
370.201 Statutory requirements.
370.202 Applicability.
370.203 Definitions.
370.204 Compliance enforcement.
370.205 Tribal preference requirements.
Subpart 370.3—Acquisitions Involving
Human Subjects
370.300 Scope of subpart.
370.301 Policy.
370.302 Types of assurances.
370.303 Notice to offerors.
370.304 Contract clauses.
Subpart 370.4—Acquisitions Involving the
Use of Laboratory Animals
370.400 Scope of subpart.
370.401 Policy.
370.402 Assurances.
370.403 Notice to offerors.
370.404 Contract clause.
Subpart 370.5—Acquisitions Under the Buy
Indian Act
370.500 Scope of subpart.
370.501 Policy.
370.502 Definitions.
370.503 Requirements.
370.504 Competition.
370.505 Responsibility determinations.
Subpart 370.6—Conference Funding and
Sponsorship
370.600 Policy.
370.601 Funding and sponsorship.
370.602 Contract clause.
Subpart 370.7—Acquisitions under the
Leadership Act
370.700 Scope of subpart.
370.701 Contract clause.
370.702 Solicitation provision.
PART 353—FORMS
Subpart 353.3—Illustrations of Forms
Sec.
353.370–674 Form HHS 674, Structured
Approach Profit/Fee Objective.
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 40 U.S.C. 486(c).
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 40 U.S.C. 486(c).
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES_2
SUBCHAPTERS I THROUGH L
[RESERVED]
Subpart 353.3—Illustrations of Forms
Subpart 370.1—Accessibility of
Meetings, Conferences, and Seminars
to Persons With Disabilities
353.370–674 Form HHS 674, Structured
Approach Profit/Fee Objective.
370.101
This form is available from local cost
advisory personnel or PSC.
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 40 U.S.C. 486(c).
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:54 Nov 25, 2009
Jkt 220001
Policy.
(a) It is HHS policy that all meetings,
conferences, and seminars be accessible
to persons with disabilities. For the
purpose of this policy, accessibility is
PO 00000
Frm 00074
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
defined as both physical access to
meeting, conference, and seminar sites,
and aids and services to enable
individuals with sensory disabilities to
fully participate in meetings,
conferences, and seminars.
(b) In regard to acquisition, the policy
is applicable to all contracts where the
SOW/PWS requires the contractor to
conduct meetings, conferences, or
seminars that are open to the public or
involve HHS personnel, but not to ad
hoc meetings that may be necessary or
incidental to contract performance.
370.102
Responsibilities.
(a) The Contracting Officer shall insert
the clause in 352.270–1, Accessibility of
Meetings, Conferences, and Seminars to
Persons with Disabilities, in
solicitations, contracts, and orders when
the SOW/PWS requires the contractor to
conduct meetings, conferences, or
seminars in accordance with 370.101(b).
(b) The COTR shall obtain, review,
and approve the contractor’s plan,
which is to be submitted in response to
paragraph (a) of the contract clause in
352.270–1. A consolidated or master
plan for contracts requiring numerous
meetings, conferences, or seminars is
acceptable. The COTR, prior to
approving the plan, shall consult with
the OPDIV or other designated
organization responsible for monitoring
compliance with the Architectural
Barriers Act of 1968 and the Americans
with Disabilities Act of 1990, to ensure
that the contractor’s plan meets the
accessibility requirements of the
contract clause. The COTR shall request
the responsible organization to review,
and determine the adequacy of, the
contractor’s plan, and respond to the
COTR, in writing, within 10 working
days of receiving the request from the
COTR.
Subpart 370.2—Indian Preference in
Employment, Training, and
Subcontracting Opportunities
370.201
Statutory requirements.
Section 7(b) of the Indian SelfDetermination and Education
Assistance Act, Public Law 93–638, 88
Stat. 2205, 25 U.S.C. 450e(b), requires:
‘‘Any contract, subcontract, grant, or
subgrant pursuant to this Act, the Act of
April 16, 1934 (48 Stat. 596), as
amended, or any other Act authorizing
Federal contracts with or grants to
Indian organizations or for the benefit of
Indians, shall require that to the greatest
extent feasible:
(1) Preferences and opportunities for
training and employment in connection
with the administration of such
E:\FR\FM\27NOR2.SGM
27NOR2
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 227 / Friday, November 27, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
contracts or grants shall be given to
Indians; and
(2) Preference in the award of
subcontracts and subgrants in
connection with the administration of
such contracts or grants shall be given
to Indian organizations and to Indianowned economic enterprises as defined
in section 3 of the Indian Financing Act
of 1974 (88 Stat. 77).’’
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES_2
370.202
Applicability.
The Indian Preference clause set forth
in 352.270–2 and the Indian Preference
Program clause set forth in 352.270–3
implement section 7(b) of Public Law
93–638 for all HHS activities.
Contracting activities shall use the
clauses as follows, except that
solicitations issued and contracts
awarded pursuant to Title I of Public
Law 93–638 (25 U.S.C. 450 et seq.) are
exempted:
(a) The Contracting Officer shall insert
the clause in 352.270–2, Indian
Preference, in solicitations, contracts,
and orders when—
(1) The award is (or will be) made
pursuant to an act specifically
authorizing such awards with Indian
organizations; or
(2) The work to be performed is
specifically for the benefit of Indians
and is in addition to any incidental
benefits which might otherwise accrue
to the general public.
(b) The Contracting Officer shall
insert the clause in 352.270–3, Indian
Preference Program, in solicitations,
contracts, and orders when—
(1) The dollar amount of the
acquisition is expected to equal or
exceed $50,000 for nonconstruction
work or $100,000 for construction work;
(2) The Indian Preference clause is
included in the solicitation, contract, or
order; and
(3) The Contracting Officer makes the
determination, prior to solicitation, that
performance will take place in whole or
in substantial part on or near an Indian
reservation(s). In addition, the
Contracting Officer may insert the
Indian Preference Program clause in
solicitations, contracts, and orders
below the $50,000 or $100,000 level for
nonconstruction or construction
contracts, respectively, but which meet
the requirements of paragraphs (b)(2)
and (3) of this section 370.202, and, in
the opinion of the Contracting Officer,
offer substantial opportunities for
Indian employment, training, and
subcontracting.
370.203
Definitions.
For purposes of this Subpart 370.2,
the following definitions shall apply:
(a) Indian means a person who is a
member of an Indian Tribe. If the
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:54 Nov 25, 2009
Jkt 220001
contractor has reason to doubt that a
person seeking employment preference
is an Indian, the contractor shall grant
the preference but shall require the
individual to provide evidence within
30 days from the Tribe concerned that
the person is a member of the Tribe.
(b) Indian Tribe means an Indian
Tribe, pueblo, band, nation, or other
organized group or community,
including any Alaska Native Village or
regional or village corporation as
defined in or established pursuant to the
Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (85
Stat. 688, 43 U.S.C. 1601), which is
recognized as eligible for the special
programs and services provided by the
United States to Indians because of their
status as Indians.
(c) Indian organization means the
governing body of any Indian Tribe, or
entity established or recognized by such
governing body, in accordance with the
Indian Financing Act of 1974 (88 Stat.
77, 25 U.S.C. 1451).
(d) Indian-owned economic enterprise
means any Indian-owned commercial,
industrial, or business activity
established or organized for the purpose
of profit, provided that such Indian
ownership shall constitute not less than
51 percent of the enterprise, and the
ownership shall encompass active
operation and control of the enterprise.
(e) Indian reservation includes Indian
reservations, public domain Indian
allotments, former Indian reservations
in Oklahoma, and land held by
incorporated Native groups, regional
corporations, and village corporations
under the provisions of the Alaska
Native Claims Settlement Act (85 Stat.
688, 43 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.)
(f) On or near an Indian Reservation
means on a reservation or reservations
or within that area surrounding an
Indian reservation(s) where a person
seeking employment could reasonably
be expected to commute to and from in
the course of a work day.
370.204
Compliance enforcement.
(a) The contracting activity shall
conduct periodic reviews to ensure
contractor compliance with the
requirements of the clauses in 352.270–
2 and 352.270–3. The Indian Tribe(s)
concerned may assist in the conduct of
these reviews.
(b) The Contracting Officer shall
promptly investigate and resolve
complaints of noncompliance with the
requirements of the clauses in 352.270–
2 and 352.270–3 that are filed in writing
with the contracting activity.
370.205
Tribal preference requirements.
(a) When the contractor will perform
work under a contract on an Indian
PO 00000
Frm 00075
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
62469
reservation, the Contracting Officer may
supplement the clause in 352.270–3 by
adding specific Indian preference
requirements of the Tribe on whose
reservation the work is to be performed.
The contracting activity and the Tribe
shall jointly develop supplemental
requirements for the contract.
Supplemental preference requirements
shall represent a further implementation
of the requirements of section 7(b) of
Public Law 93–638 and require the
approval of the affected program
director and OGC–GLD, or a regional
attorney, before the Contracting Officer
adds them to a solicitation and resultant
contract. Any supplemental preference
requirements the Contracting Officer
adds to the clause in 352.270–3 shall
also be part of the solicitation and
clearly identified, to ensure uniform
understanding of the additional
requirements by all prospective bidders
or offerors.
(b) Nothing in this part shall preclude
tribes from independently developing
and enforcing their own Tribal
preference requirements. Such
independently developed Tribal
preference requirements shall not,
except as provided in paragraph (a) of
this section, become a requirement in
contracts covered under this 370.2, and
shall not conflict with any Federal
statutory or regulatory requirement
concerning the award and
administration of contracts.
Subpart 370.3—Acquisitions Involving
Human Subjects
370.300
Scope of subpart.
This subpart applies to all R & D
activities involving human subjects
conducted under contract—see 45 CFR
46.102(d) and (f).
370.301
Policy.
It is HHS policy that the Contracting
Officer shall not award a contract
involving human subjects until a
prospective contractor has provided
acceptable assurance that the activity
will be subject to initial and continuing
review by an appropriate Institutional
Review Board (IRB) as described in HHS
regulations at 45 CFR 46.103. The
Contracting Officer shall require an
applicable Federal-wide assurance
(FWA), approved by the HHS Office for
Human Research Protections (OHRP), of
each contractor, subcontractor, or
cooperating institution having
responsibility for human subjects
involved in performance of a contract.
OHRP is responsible for negotiating
assurances covering all HHS-supported
or HHS-conducted activities involving
human subjects. OHRP shall provide
E:\FR\FM\27NOR2.SGM
27NOR2
62470
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 227 / Friday, November 27, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
guidance to Contracting Officers
regarding non-award or termination of a
contract due to inadequate assurance or
breach of assurance for protection of
human subjects.
contract provides for additional years to
complete the project, the contractor
shall certify the noncompetitive renewal
proposal in the manner described in the
preceding paragraph.
370.302
370.304
Types of assurances.
Contract clauses.
(a) The Contracting Officer shall insert
the clause in 352.270–4(b), Protection of
Human Subjects, in solicitations,
contracts, and orders that involve
human subjects.
(b) The Contracting Officer shall
insert the clause in 352.270–6,
Restriction on Use of Human Subjects,
in contracts and orders if the contractor
has an approved Federal-wide assurance
of compliance in place, but cannot
certify prior to award that the research
has been reviewed and approved by the
IRB designated under the contractor’s
Federal-wide assurance of compliance,
because definite plans for involvement
of human subjects are not set forth in
the proposal (e.g., projects in which
human subjects’ involvement will
depend upon completion of
instruments, prior animal studies, or
purification of compounds). Under
these conditions, the Contracting Officer
may make the award without the
requisite certification, as long as the
Contracting Officer includes appropriate
conditions in the contract or order.
370.303
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES_2
(a) If an institution does not currently
hold an FWA, it should submit one. An
FWA listed in OHRP’s current ‘‘List of
Registered Institutional Review Boards
(IRBs)/Independent Ethics Committees
(IECs) and Approved Assurances’’ is
acceptable for the purposes of this
policy.
(b) The OHRP Web site includes links
to instructions and the forms for
submitting both a domestic and
international FWA at: https://
www.hhs.gov/ohrp/assurances/
assurances_index.html. To expedite
approval of a FWA, as well as any
update/renewal, the institution shall use
the OHRP Electronic Submission
System. Once the institution ‘‘submits’’
an electronic file to OHRP, the
institution must fax or mail (but not
both) a copy of the signature page to
initiate the review process. The
institution shall mail the FWA to the
OHRP, U.S. Department of Health and
Human Services, 1101 Wootton
Parkway, Suite 200, Rockville,
Maryland 20852, or fax it to OHRP at
240–453–8202 (but not both).
Subpart 370.4—Acquisitions Involving
the Use of Laboratory Animals
Notice to offerors.
(a) The Contracting Officer shall insert
the provision in 352.270–4(a), Notice to
Offerors of Requirements of 45 CFR Part
46, Protection of Human Subjects, in
solicitations that involve human
subjects.
(b) Institutions having an OHRPapproved FWA shall certify IRB
approval of submitted proposals in the
manner required by instructions for
completion of the contract proposal; by
completion of an OMB Form No. 0990–
0263, ‘‘Protection of Human Subjects
Assurance Identification/IRB
Certification/Declaration of Exemption
(Common Rule); or by letter indicating
the institution’s OHRP-assigned FWA
number, the date of IRB review and
approval, and the type of review
(convened or expedited). The date of
IRB approval must not be more than 12
months prior to the deadline for
proposal submission.
(c) The Contracting Officer generally
will not request FWAs for contractors,
subcontractors, or cooperating
institutions prior to determination that
a contract proposal has been selected for
negotiation. When a contractor submits
an FWA, it provides certification for the
initial contract period. No additional
documentation is required. If the
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:54 Nov 25, 2009
Jkt 220001
370.400
Scope of subpart.
This subpart applies to all R & D,
research training, and biological testing
activities involving live vertebrate
animals conducted under contract (see
Public Health Service Policy on Humane
Care and Use of Laboratory Animals
(PHS Policy), Rev. 1986, Repr. 1996).
370.401
Policy.
(a) It is HHS policy that contracting
activities shall not award a contract
involving live vertebrate animals until
the contractor has given acceptable
assurance that the work under the
contract will be subject to initial and
continuing review by an appropriate
Institutional Animal Care and Use
Committee (IACUC) as described in the
PHS Policy at IV.B.6. and 7. The
Contracting Officer shall require an
applicable Full Animal Welfare
Assurance or Inter-institutional
Agreement/Assurance, approved by the
Office of Laboratory Animal Welfare
(OLAW), NIH, of each contractor,
subcontractor, or cooperating institution
having responsibility for animal care
and use involved in performance of the
contract—see PHS Policy II., IV.A., and
V.B.
PO 00000
Frm 00076
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
(b) The OLAW, NIH, is responsible for
negotiating assurances covering all
HHS/PHS-supported or HHS/PHSconducted activities involving the care
and use of live vertebrate animals.
OLAW shall provide guidance to
Contracting Officers regarding adequate
animal care, and use, approval,
disapproval, restriction, or withdrawal
of approval of assurances—see PHS
Policy V.A.
370.402
Assurances.
(a) Assurances may be one of two
following types:
(1) Full Animal Welfare Assurance
(AWA). An AWA describes the
institution’s complete program for the
care and use of animals, including but
not limited to the facilities,
occupational health, training, veterinary
care, IACUC procedures and lines of
authority and responsibility. An AWA
listed in OLAW’s list of institutions
which have an approved full AWA is
acceptable for purposes of this policy.
(2) Inter-institutional Agreement/
Assurance (IAA). An IAA describes the
arrangements between an offeror and
usually a subcontractor where animal
activities will occur. An IAA is limited
to the specific award or single project.
(b) The Contracting Officer shall
forward copies of proposals selected for
negotiation and requiring an assurance
to the Assurance Branch, Office of
Laboratory Animal Welfare, NIH MSC
7507, 6100 Executive Blvd., Room 3B01,
Rockville, Maryland 20892, as early as
possible to secure the necessary
assurances.
(c) A contractor providing animal care
services at an assured entity, such as a
Government-owned, contractor-operated
(GOCO) site, does not need a separate
assurance. GOCO site assurances
normally cover such contractor services.
370.403
Notice to offerors.
(a) The Contracting Officer shall insert
the provision in 352.270–5(a), Notice to
Offerors of Requirement for Compliance
with the Public Health Service Policy on
Humane Care and Use of Laboratory
Animals, in solicitations that involve
vertebrate animals.
(b) Offerors having a full AWA on file
with OLAW shall submit IACUC
approval of the use of animals in the
manner required by instructions for
completion of the contract proposal, but
prior to the technical review of the
proposal. The date of IACUC approval
must not be more than 36 months prior
to the deadline for proposal submission.
(c) It is not necessary for non-assured
offerors to submit assurances or IACUC
approval with proposals. OLAW shall
contact contractors, subcontractors and
E:\FR\FM\27NOR2.SGM
27NOR2
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 227 / Friday, November 27, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
cooperating institutions to negotiate
necessary assurances and verify IACUC
approvals when requested by the
Contracting Officer.
370.404
Contract clause.
The Contracting Officer shall insert
the clause in 352.270–5(b), Care of Live
Vertebrate Animals, in solicitations,
contracts, and orders that involve
vertebrate animals.
Subpart 370.5—Acquisitions Under the
Buy Indian Act
370.500
Scope of subpart.
This subpart sets forth the policy on
preferential acquisition from Indians
under the negotiation authority of the
Buy Indian Act. This subpart applies
only to acquisitions made by or on
behalf of IHS.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES_2
370.501
Policy.
(a) The IHS shall utilize the
negotiation authority of the Buy Indian
Act to give preference to Indians
whenever the use of that authority is
authorized and is practicable. The Buy
Indian Act, 25 U.S.C. 47, prescribes the
application of the advertising
requirements of section 3709 of the
Revised Statutes to the acquisition of
Indian supplies. As specified in 25
U.S.C. 47, the Buy Indian Act provides
that, so far as may be practicable, Indian
labor shall be employed, and purchases
of the products (including, but not
limited to printing, notwithstanding any
other law) of Indian industry may be
made in open market in the discretion
of the Secretary of the Interior.
(b) Due to the transfer of authority
from the Department of the Interior to
HHS, the Secretary of HHS is authorized
to use the Buy Indian Act in the
acquisition of products of Indian
industry, in connection with the
maintenance and operation of hospital
and health facilities for Indians, and for
the conservation of the health of
Indians. This authority has been
delegated exclusively to IHS and is not
available for use by any other HHS
component (unless that component is
making an acquisition on behalf of IHS).
However, the Buy Indian Act itself does
not exempt IHS from meeting the
statutorily mandated small business
goals.
(c) Subsequent legislation,
particularly Public Law 94–437 and
Public Law 96–537, have emphasized
the use of the Buy Indian Act
negotiation authority.
370.502
Definitions.
(a) Buy Indian contract means any
contract involving activities covered by
the Buy Indian Act that is negotiated
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:54 Nov 25, 2009
Jkt 220001
under the provisions of 41 U.S.C. 252(c)
and 25 U.S.C. 47 between an Indian firm
and a Contracting Officer representing
IHS.
(b) Indian means a member of any
Tribe, pueblo, band, group, village or
community that is recognized by the
Secretary of the Interior as being Indian
or any individual or group of
individuals that is recognized by the
Secretary of the Interior or the Secretary
of HHS. The Secretary of HHS in
making determinations may take into
account the determination of the Tribe
with which affiliation is claimed.
(c) Indian firm means a sole
enterprise, partnership, corporation, or
other type of business organization
owned, controlled, and operated by one
or more Indians (including, for the
purpose of sections 301 and 302 of
Public Law 94–437, former or currently
Federally recognized Indian tribes in the
State of New York) or by an Indian firm;
or a nonprofit firm organized for the
benefit of Indians and controlled by
Indians (see 370.503(a)).
(d) Product of Indian industry means
anything produced by Indians through
either physical labor or intellectual
effort involving the use and application
of their skills.
370.503
Requirements.
(a) Indian ownership. The degree of
Indian ownership of an Indian firm
shall be at least 51 percent during the
period covered by a Buy Indian
contract.
(b) Joint ventures. An Indian firm may
enter into a joint venture with other
entities for specific projects as long as
the Indian firm is the managing partner.
However, the Contracting Officer shall
approve the joint venture prior to the
award of a contract under the Buy
Indian Act.
(c) Bonds. In the case of contracts for
the construction, alteration, or repair of
public buildings or public works, the
Miller Act (40 U.S.C. 270a–270f) and
FAR part 28 require performance and
payment bonds. Bonds are not required
in the case of contracts with Indian
tribes or public nonprofit organizations
serving as governmental
instrumentalities of an Indian Tribe.
However, bonds are required when
dealing with private business entities
that are owned by an Indian Tribe or
members of an Indian Tribe. The
Contracting Officer may require bonds
of private business entities that are joint
ventures with, or subcontractors of, an
Indian Tribe or a public nonprofit
organization serving as a governmental
instrumentality of an Indian Tribe. A
bid guarantee or bid bond is required
PO 00000
Frm 00077
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
62471
only when a performance or payment
bond is required.
(d) Indian preference in employment,
training and subcontracting. Contracts
awarded under the Buy Indian Act are
subject to the requirements of section
7(b) of the Indian Self-Determination
and Education Assistance Act 25 U.S.C.
450e, which requires that preference be
given to Indians in employment,
training, and subcontracting. The
Contracting Officer shall include the
Indian Preference clause specified in
352.270–2 in all Buy Indian solicitations
and resultant contracts. The Contracting
Officer shall use the Indian Preference
Program clause specified in 352.270–3
as prescribed in 370.202(b). The
Contracting Officer shall follow all
requirements specified in subpart 370.2
which are applicable to a Buy Indian
acquisition (e.g., sections 370.204 and
370.205).
(e) Subcontracting. A contractor shall
not subcontract to other than Indian
firms more than 50 percent of the work
under a prime contract awarded
pursuant to the Buy Indian Act. For this
purpose, work to be performed does not
include the provision of materials,
supplies, or equipment.
(f) Wage rates. The Contracting Officer
shall include a determination of the
minimum wage rates by the Secretary of
Labor as required by the Davis-Bacon
Act (40 U.S.C. 276a) in all contracts
awarded under the Buy Indian Act for
over $2,000 for construction, alteration,
or repair, including painting and
decorating, of public buildings and
public works, except contracts with
Indian tribes or public nonprofit
organizations serving as governmental
instrumentalities of an Indian Tribe.
The Contracting Officer shall include
the wage rate determination in contracts
with private business entities, even if
they are owned by an Indian Tribe or a
member of an Indian Tribe and in
connection with joint ventures with, or
subcontractors of, an Indian Tribe or a
public nonprofit organization serving as
a governmental instrumentality of an
Indian Tribe.
370.504
Competition.
(a) Contracts awarded under the Buy
Indian Act are subject to competition
among Indians or Indian concerns to the
maximum extent practicable. When the
Contracting Officer determines that
competition is not practicable, a JOFOC
is required in accordance with 306.303.
(b) The Contracting Officer shall:
synopsize and publicize solicitations in
FedBizOpps and provide copies of the
synopses to the Tribal office of the
Indian Tribal government directly
concerned with the proposed
E:\FR\FM\27NOR2.SGM
27NOR2
62472
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 227 / Friday, November 27, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
acquisition as well as to Indian concerns
and others having a legitimate interest.
The synopses shall state that the
acquisitions are restricted to Indian
firms under the Buy Indian Act.
370.505
Responsibility determinations.
(a) The Contracting Officer may award
a contract under the Buy Indian Act
only if the Contracting Officer
determines that the project or function
to be contracted is likely to be:
satisfactorily performed under that
contract; and properly completed or
maintained under that contract.
(b) The Contracting Officer shall make
the determination specified in
paragraph (a) of this section in writing
prior to the award of a contract. The
determination shall reflect an analysis
of the standards set forth in FAR
9.104–1.
Subpart 370.6—Conference Funding
and Sponsorship
370.600
Policy.
Funding and sponsorship.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES_2
Funding a conference through an HHS
contract does not automatically imply
HHS (OPDIV/STAFFDIV) conference
sponsorship, unless the conference is
funded entirely by HHS. Also, HHS staff
attendance or participation at a
conference does not imply HHS
conference sponsorship. Accordingly,
for other than conference contracts
funded entirely by HHS, prior to a
contractor claiming HHS conference
sponsorship, the contractor must
provide to the Contracting Officer a
written request for permission to claim
HHS as the conference sponsor—see
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:54 Nov 25, 2009
Jkt 220001
370.602
Contract clause.
To ensure that a contractor:
(a) Properly requests approval to
claim HHS as the conference sponsor,
where HHS is not the sole provider of
conference funding; and
(b) Includes an appropriate Federal
funding disclosure and content
disclaimer statement on conference
materials, the Contracting Officer shall
include the clause in 352.270–7,
Conference Sponsorship Request and
Conference Materials Disclaimer, in
solicitations, contracts, and orders that
provide funding, in whole or in part, to
support a conference.
Subpart 370.7—Acquisitions Under the
Leadership Act
370.700
It is HHS policy that the conferences
it funds or sponsors shall: be consistent
with HHS missions, objectives, and
policies; represent an efficient and
effective use of taxpayer funds; and be
able to withstand public scrutiny.
370.601
370.602. The OPDIV/STAFFDIV head,
or designee, shall approve such
requests.
Scope of subpart.
This subpart sets forth the acquisition
requirements regarding implementation
of HIV/AIDS programs under the
President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS
Relief under the Leadership Act of 2003,
and under the Tom Lantos and Henry J.
Hyde United States Global Leadership
Against HIV/AIDS, Tuberculosis, and
Malaria Reauthorization Act of 2008
(Emergency Plan reauthorization
legislation), which was signed by the
President on July 30, 2008.
370.701
Contract clause.
The Contracting Officer shall insert
the clause in 352.270–8, Prostitution
and Related Activities, in solicitations,
contracts, and orders, and in existing
contracts and orders (whenever they are
modified to extend the period of
performance or add funds, including
any options that may be exercised): in
connection with the implementation of
HIV/AIDS programs under the
President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS
Relief; or where the contractor will
PO 00000
Frm 00078
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
receive funding under the United States
Leadership Against HIV/AIDS,
Tuberculosis and Malaria Act of 2003.
(Note: See 370.702 and 352.270–9 for
the ‘‘Non-discrimination for
Conscience’’ provision that must also be
included in applicable solicitations.) In
resolving any issues/complaints that
offerors/contractors may raise about
meeting the requirements specified in
the clause, the Contracting Officer shall
consult with the Office of Global Health
Affairs, Office of the General Counsel,
the Project Officer, and other HHS
officials, as appropriate.
370.702
Solicitation provision.
The Contracting Officer shall insert
the provision in 352.270–9, Nondiscrimination for Conscience, in
solicitations valued at more than the
micro-purchase threshold: in
connection with the implementation of
HIV/AIDS programs under the
President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS
Relief; or where the contractor will
receive funding under the United States
Leadership Against HIV/AIDS,
Tuberculosis and Malaria Act of 2003.
(Note: See 370.701 and 352.270–8 for
the ‘‘Prostitution and Related
Activities’’ clause that must also be
included in applicable solicitations,
contracts, and orders.) In resolving any
issues/complaints that offerors may
raise about meeting the requirements
specified in the provision, the
Contracting Officer shall consult with
the Office of Global Health Affairs,
Office of the General Counsel, the
Project Officer, and other HHS officials,
as appropriate.
Dated: September 28, 2009.
E.J. Holland, Jr.
Assistant Secretary for Administration and
Management, Office of the Secretary, U.S.
Department of Health and Human Services.
[FR Doc. E9–26948 Filed 11–25–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4151–17–P
E:\FR\FM\27NOR2.SGM
27NOR2
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 227 (Friday, November 27, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 62396-62472]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-26948]
[[Page 62395]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Part II
Department of Health and Human Services
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
48 CFR Chapter 3
Health and Human Services Acquisition Regulation; Final Rule
Federal Register / Vol. 74 , No. 227 / Friday, November 27, 2009 /
Rules and Regulations
[[Page 62396]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
48 CFR Chapter 3
Health and Human Services Acquisition Regulation
AGENCY: Department of Health and Human Services.
ACTION: Issuance of direct final rule and opportunity for comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) is revising
its Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Supplement--the HHS
Acquisition Regulation (HHSAR) in its entirety to reflect statutory,
FAR, and government-wide and HHS policy changes since the last revision
to the HHSAR in December 2006.
DATES: Comments are due on or before December 28, 2009. If HHS does not
receive adverse comments, this direct final rule will be effective on
January 26, 2010.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by docket number or RIN
number and title, by any of the following four methods:
Access the Federal eRulemaking Portal: [https://www.regulations.gov], and follow the instructions;
Mail them to: Cheryl Howe, Procurement Analyst, U.S.
Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Assistant
Secretary for Financial Resources, Office of Grants and Acquisition
Policy and Accountability, Division of Acquisition, Room 336-E, Hubert
Humphrey Building, 200 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20201;
E-mail them to cheryl.howe@hhs.gov; or
Via facsimile to 202-690-8772.
Due to potential delays in receipt and processing of mail sent through
the U.S. Postal Service, respondents are encouraged to submit comments
electronically to ensure timely receipt. HHS cannot guarantee that
comments mailed will be received before the comment closing date.
If providing comments via e-mail, please include ``HHS Acquisition
Regulation'' in the subject line of your e-mail message. Also, please
include the full body of your comments in the text of the electronic
message, as well as in an attachment, and include your name, title,
organization, postal address, telephone number, and e-mail address in
the text of the message.
Instructions: All comments or submissions must include the agency
name and docket number or Regulatory Information Number (RIN) for this
Federal Register document. The policy is to make comments and other
submissions available for public viewing on the Internet at https://regulations.gov. These submissions are published just as they are
received without changes or deletions of information, including any
personal identifiers or contact information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cheryl Howe, Procurement Analyst, U.S.
Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Assistant
Secretary for Financial Resources, Office of Grants and Acquisition
Policy and Accountability, Division of Acquisition, telephone (202)
690-5552.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) is revising the
entire HHSAR (48 CFR chapter 3, parts 301 through 370) to reflect
changes since the last revision was published in the Federal Register
in December 2006. The decision to revise the document in its entirety
is based on the number of changes rather than their collective
substance.
The amendments generally fall into several categories: (1) Changes
to make the document easier to read; (2) changes to reflect internal
procedural matters which are administrative in nature and which will
not have a major effect on the general public or on contractors or
offerors supporting HHS acquisition programs; (3) changes which HHS
previously issued on an interim basis (and posted on its publicly
available Web site), following coordination with the HHS Operating
Divisions' (OPDIVs) Heads of Contracting Activity; (4) changes that
involve implementation of statutes or government-wide mandates enacted
or issued since December 2006; (5) necessary conforming changes, such
as addition of new or revised definitions; and (6) deletion of outdated
material.
The majority of the HHSAR revisions fall into the first category,
i.e., they are editorial and include (1) using plain English, such as
using active rather than passive voice; (2) standardizing terminology
usage and formatting; (3) making minor adjustments to reflect current
internal coordination procedures among departmental organizations; (4)
citing current titles for various acquisition officials and
organizations; and (5) providing a table that specifies the
abbreviations and acronyms commonly used throughout the HHSAR.
II. Summary of Key Changes
The following summarizes changes that involve implementation of
statutes or government-wide mandates enacted or issued since December
2006. The editorial changes are not individually summarized.
A. Federal-Wide and HHS Acquisition Certification Programs
The HHSAR coverage in Subpart 301.6 of requirements for training
and certification of acquisition officials, as well appointment of
Contracting Officers, has been rewritten to reflect the HHS
implementation of the Federal Acquisition Certification Programs for
contracting staff (FAC-C) (based on guidance provided by the Office of
Federal Procurement Policy (OFPP) in April, 2005); Contracting
Officer's Technical Representatives (FAC-COTR) (based on the
government-wide COTR certification standards established by OFPP in
November, 2007), and Program/Project Managers (FAC-P/PM) (in response
to the Services Acquisition Reform Act of 2003 (SARA), Public Law 108-
136, and the requirements established by OFPP in April, 2007).
Implementation of the FAC-COTR program also has resulted in HHS
changing the terminology it uses to describe the official who
represents the requiring office after award. Where previously, HHS used
only one term--Project Officer--to signify the person responsible for
the pre-award and post-award responsibilities of the requiring office,
the HHSAR now distinguishes between the pre-award responsibilities of
the Project Officer and the post-award responsibilities of the COTR,
even if the same individual performs both sets of responsibilities.
These certification programs establish prerequisites for those who
seek certification, as well as for others involved in the acquisition
process. For example, HHS added a new section 301.605, Contracting
Officer designation of Contracting Officer Technical Representative, to
specify Contracting Officer responsibilities for designation of a COTR,
including documenting that a proposed COTR meets certification
requirements.
Subpart 301 also addresses the HHS-unique simplified acquisition
certification program (SAC-C); HHS-specific training requirements,
including those for purchase card holders; and prerequisites and
authorities for issuance of Contracting Officer warrants.
[[Page 62397]]
B. Improvements in the Quality of Contract Data
Consistent with the statutory requirements of the Federal Funding
and Transparency Act of 2006 (Pub. L. 109-282) and the American
Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Pub. L. 111-5) and OFPP's
initiative to improve the quality and timeliness of the award
information stored in the Federal Procurement Data System--Next
Generation, HHS is making efforts to improve the quality and timeliness
of its contract data as reported in FPDS-NG, USA.Spending.gov, and
Recovery.gov. To accomplish this, in Subpart 304.6, HHS has established
clear lines of responsibility and accountability for the quality and
timeliness of contract data.
C. Internal Initiatives To Provide Common Formats and Templates
A new HHSAR Subpart--302.71--lists the areas where HHS has
developed standards for documentation or approaches that provide
consistency across the HHS OPDIVs. These internal business standards
encompass: Acquisition planning, competition reporting, the
organization and content of contract files, and market research
notices.
D. Homeland Security Presidential Directive-12 (HSPD-12)
A new Subpart 304.13, Personal Identity Verification, and section
304.1300, Policy, have been added to implement HSPD-12 in HHS. The HHS
implementation includes applicable solicitation provisions and contract
clauses and (1) reflects the implementing guidance established by
Office of Management and Budget Memoranda M-05-24 and M-06-18, Federal
Information Processing Standard (FIPS) Publication 201, and Federal
Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 4.13; and (2) provides a consistent and
systematic approach to ensure the security of HHS facilities and
information systems.
E. Competition and Acquisition Planning
Consistent with government-wide efforts to increase competition, in
Parts 306, 307, and 308, as applicable, HHS included HHSAR coverage
concerning (1) appropriate use of sources sought notices (Research and
development (R&D) and non-R&D and small businesses) and requests for
information (2) content requirements for Justifications for Other Than
Full and Open Competition (JOFOCs) and Limited Source Justifications
(LSJs), (3) the requirement to use a standard JOFOC and LSJ format, and
(4) the Contracting Officer's approval authority for JOFOCs and LSJs
for acquisitions exceeding $100,000.
HHS also--
--Specified that each HHS OPDIV competition advocate must prepare an
annual Competition Advocate Report; and provided a standard format for
the report's preparation.
--Updated the requirements for preparing an Annual Acquisition Plan and
provided a standard template for the plan's preparation.
--Established a standard format for development of an Acquisition Plan;
and provided procedures for the plan's review, coordination, and
approval.
--Addressed preparation and approval of a LSJ for acquisitions awarded
under the General Services Administration multiple award schedule
program; and provided a standard format for preparing an LSJ.
--Addressed preparation and approval of an acquisition strategy for
major information technology capital investments and, as applicable,
other major investments.
F. Section 508 Electronic Information Technology Accessibility
Standards
In a new Subpart 315.70, HHS added coverage for acquisition of
electronic information technology (EIT) products and services to
implement the requirements of Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act of
1973 [29 U.S.C. 794(d)], as amended by the Workforce Investment Act of
1998. In that subpart and, as a result of conforming changes in other
parts of the HHSAR, HHS established a policy preference for
commercially available products; indicated what must be addressed in
solicitations, contracts, and orders, and added documentation and
contract administration requirements that relate to the Section 508
accessibility standards and requirements.
G. Multi-Year Contracting and Awards Made During a Continuing
Resolution
HHS added a new Subpart 317.1 to address its policy on multi-year
contracting and amended Subpart 332.7 to provide coverage regarding
awards made during a continuing resolution.
H. Multi-Agency and Intra-Agency Contracts
HHS added a new subpart 317.70 to address its expectations
regarding the use of intra-agency and multi-agency contracts. Such
contracting has been the subject of audit scrutiny and has been
addressed by OFPP. As a result, to avoid possible misuse, HHS is
stating the conditions for use of such vehicles within HHS.
I. Green Purchasing Requirements
HHS added a new subpart 323.71 to establish its requirements for
green purchasing.
J. Earned Value Management
HHS added a new Subpart 334.2 to implement the FAR coverage of
earned value management (EVM), including: Use of full and partial EVM;
use of solicitation provisions and contract clauses addressing
documentation offerors must provide to demonstrate compliance with EVM
system requirements; and criteria for use of pre-award or post-award
integrated baseline reviews.
K. Other Changes
Under section 331.101-70, Salary Rate Limitation, HHS provided a
revised prescription for use of, and made minor revisions to, the
Salary Rate Limitation clause in 352.231-70.
HHS added the following coverage in Part 339 for information
technology-related acquisition:
--A new subpart, 339.70, to address the use of General Services
Administration Blanket Purchase Agreements for the acquisition of
independent risk analysis services, and
--A new subpart 339.1 that provides standards for security
configuration, encryption, and information security.
HHS revised the coverage in Part 333 related to internal handling of
protests to specify revised legal review, concurrence, and approval
procedures related to protests to HHS and the Government Accountability
Office before and after award.
HHS added language in section 319.270-1 concerning use of the
mentor-protege program in HHS.
HHS added a new subpart 322.8 to provide a contract clause
regarding contractor cooperation in equal employment opportunity
investigations.
HHS added a new subpart 370.6 to provide guidance, including a
contract clause, concerning conference funding, sponsorship, and
disclaimers.
HHS added a new subpart 370.7 to provide a solicitation provision
and a contract clause to be used (i) in connection with the
implementation of HIV/AIDS programs under the President's Emergency
Plan for AIDS Relief; or (ii) when the contractor will receive funding
under the United States Leadership Against HIV/AIDS, Tuberculosis and
Malaria Act of 2003.
[[Page 62398]]
III. Procedural Review Requirements
A. Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review
It has been determined that this revision of the HHSAR is not a
significant regulatory action. The rule does not--
(1) Have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more or
adversely affect, in a material way, the economy; a section of the
economy; productivity; competition; jobs; the environment; public
health or safety; or State, local, or Tribal governments or
communities;
(2) Create a serious inconsistency or otherwise interfere with an
action taken or planned by another Agency;
(3) Raise novel legal or policy issues arising out of legal
mandates, the President's priorities, or the principles set forth in
Executive Order 12866.
B. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act [2 U.S.C. 1501(7)]
It has been certified that this revision of the HHSAR does not
contain a Federal mandate that may result in the expenditure by State,
local, and Tribal governments, in aggregate, or by the private sector,
of $100 million or more in any one year.
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601)
The Regulatory Flexibility Act requires that a Federal agency
prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis for any rule for which the
agency is required to publish a general notice of rulemaking. This rule
consists of a general statement of policies and procedures and amends
HHS regulations for contracts. Each part of today's direct final rule
is exempt from the requirement to publish a general notice of proposed
rulemaking under the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 553(a)(2).
Therefore, the Regulatory Flexibility Act does not apply to this
rulemaking.
D. Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 35)
It has been determined that this rule does not impose any reporting
or recordkeeping requirements under the Paperwork Reduction Act beyond
those provided in the FAR.
E. Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act
As required by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness
Act, 5 U.S.C. 801, HHS has determined that this rule is not a major
rule under 5 U.S.C. 801(2).
F. Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform
Each agency promulgating new regulations shall adhere to the
following requirements: The agency's proposed regulations shall (1) be
reviewed by the agency to eliminate drafting errors and ambiguity; (2)
be written to minimize litigation; (3) provide a clear legal standard
for affected conduct rather than a general standard, and (4) promote
simplification and burden reduction. HHS determined that this rule
meets these standards.
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Chapter 3, Parts 301-370
Government procurement.
0
For the reasons stated in the preamble, HHS revises 48 CFR Chapter 3,
parts 301 through 370, to read as follows:
Title 48--Federal Acquisition Regulations System
CHAPTER 3--HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
SUBCHAPTER A--GENERAL
PART 301--HHS ACQUISITION REGULATION SYSTEM
PART 302--DEFINITIONS OF WORDS AND TERMS
PART 303--IMPROPER BUSINESS PRACTICES AND PERSONAL CONFLICTS OF
INTEREST
PART 304--ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS
SUBCHAPTER B--COMPETITION AND ACQUISITION PLANNING
PART 305--PUBLICIZING CONTRACT ACTIONS
PART 306--COMPETITION REQUIREMENTS
PART 307--ACQUISITION PLANNING
PART 308--REQUIRED SOURCES OF SUPPLIES AND SERVICES
PART 309--CONTRACTOR QUALIFICATIONS
PART 310--MARKET RESEARCH
PART 311--DESCRIBING AGENCY NEEDS
PART 312--ACQUISITION OF COMMERCIAL ITEMS
SUBCHAPTER C--CONTRACTING METHODS AND CONTRACT TYPES
PART 313--SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION PROCEDURES
PART 314--SEALED BIDDING
PART 315--CONTRACTING BY NEGOTIATION
PART 316--TYPES OF CONTRACTS
PART 317--SPECIAL CONTRACTING METHODS
SUBCHAPTER D--SOCIOECONOMIC PROGRAMS
PART 319--SMALL BUSINESS PROGRAMS
PART 322--APPLICATION OF LABOR LAWS TO GOVERNMENT ACQUISITIONS
PART 323--ENVIRONMENT, ENERGY AND WATER EFFICIENCY, RENEWABLE ENERGY
TECHNOLOGIES, OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY, AND DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE
PART 324--PROTECTION OF PRIVACY AND FREEDOM OF INFORMATION
SUBCHAPTER E--GENERAL CONTRACTING REQUIREMENTS
PART 327--PATENTS, DATA, AND COPYRIGHTS
PART 328--BONDS AND INSURANCE
PART 330--COST ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
PART 331--CONTRACT COST PRINCIPLES AND PROCEDURES
PART 332--CONTRACT FINANCING
PART 333--PROTESTS, DISPUTES, AND APPEALS
SUBCHAPTER F--SPECIAL CATEGORIES OF CONTRACTING
PART 334--MAJOR SYSTEM ACQUISITION
PART 335--RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CONTRACTING
PART 337--SERVICE CONTRACTING--GENERAL
PART 339--ACQUISITION OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
SUBCHAPTER G--CONTRACT MANAGEMENT
PART 342--CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION
SUBCHAPTER H--CLAUSES AND FORMS
PART 352--SOLICITATION PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT CLAUSES
PART 353--FORMS
SUBCHAPTERS I, J, K AND L ARE RESERVED
SUBCHAPTER M--HHS SUPPLEMENTATIONS
PART 370--SPECIAL PROGRAMS AFFECTING ACQUISITION
SUBCHAPTER A--GENERAL
PART 301--HHS ACQUISITION REGULATION SYSTEM
Subpart 301.1--Purpose, Authority, and Issuance
Sec.
301.101 Purpose.
301.103 Authority.
301.106 Office of Management and Budget Approval under the Paperwork
Reduction Act.
[[Page 62399]]
Subpart 301.2--Administration
301.270 Executive Committee for Acquisition.
Subpart 301.4--Deviations From the FAR
301.403 Individual deviations.
301.404 Class deviations.
301.470 Procedure.
Subpart 301.6--Career Development, Contracting Authority, and
Responsibilities
301.602 Contracting Officers.
301.602-3 Ratification of unauthorized commitments.
301.603 Selection, appointment, and termination of appointment of
Contracting Officers.
301.603-1 General.
301.603-2 Selection and appointment.
301.603-3 Interim appointments.
301.603-4 Termination of appointments.
301.603-70 Delegation of Contracting Officer responsibilities.
301.603-71 Waivers to warrant standards.
301.603-72 FAC-C and HHS SAC certification requirements.
301.603-73 Additional HHS training requirements.
301.603-74 Requirement for retention of FAC-C and HHS SAC
certification.
301.604 Training and certification of Contracting Officers'
Technical Representatives.
301.604-70 General.
301.604-71 HCA authorities and responsibilities.
301.604-72 Requirements for certification maintenance.
301.604-73 Certification policy exception.
301.604-74 Additional COTR training requirements.
301.605 Contracting Officer designation of Contracting Officer
Technical Representative.
301.606 Training requirements for Project Officers.
301.606-70 General.
301.606-71 Project Officer training.
301.606-72 Delegation of authority to HCAs.
301.606-73 Training policy exception.
301.606-74 Additional Project Officer training requirements.
301.607 Certification of Program and Project Managers.
301.607-70 General.
301.607-71 FAC-P/PM levels and requirements.
301.607-72 Applicability.
301.607-73 Certification waivers.
301.607-74 Certification transfers.
301.607-75 Maintenance of FAC-P/PM certification.
301.607-76 FAC-P/PM application process.
301.607-77 Input and maintenance of FAC-P/PM information.
301.607-78 Governance.
301.607-79 Contracting Officer designation of a Program/Project
Manager as the Contracting Officer's Technical Representative.
301.608 Training Requirements for Purchase Cardholders, Approving
Officials, and Agency/Organization Program Coordinators.
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 40 U.S.C. 486(c).
Subpart 301.1--Purpose, Authority, and Issuance
301.101 Purpose.
(a) The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Acquisition
Regulation (HHSAR) establishes uniform HHS acquisition policies and
procedures that conform to the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR)
System.
(b) The HHSAR implements FAR policies and procedures and provides
additional policies and procedures that supplement the FAR.
(c) The HHSAR contains HHS policies and procedures that govern the
acquisition process or otherwise control acquisition relationships
between HHS' contracting activities and contractors.
301.103 Authority.
(b) The Assistant Secretary for Financial Resources (ASFR)
prescribes the HHSAR under the authority of 5 U.S.C. 301 and section
205(c) of the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949,
as amended (40 U.S.C. 486(c), as delegated by the Secretary.
(c) The HHSAR is issued in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) as
Chapter 3 of Title 48, Department of Health and Human Services
Acquisition Regulation. It may be referenced as ``48 CFR Chapter 3.''
301.106 Office of Management and Budget approval under the Paperwork
Reduction Act.
(a) The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980 (44 U.S.C 3501 et seq.)
imposes a requirement on Federal agencies to obtain approval from the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) before collecting the same
information from 10 or more members of the public.
(b) The following OMB control numbers apply to the information
collection and recordkeeping requirements contained in this chapter:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
OMB control
HHSAR segment No. No.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
315.4...................................................... 0990-0139
342.7101................................................... 0990-0131
352.233-70................................................. 0990-0133
352.270-1.................................................. 0990-0129
352.270-2.................................................. 0990-0129
352.270-3.................................................. 0990-0129
352.270-5.................................................. 0990-0130
352.270-8.................................................. 0990-0128
352.270-9.................................................. 0990-0128
370.1...................................................... 0990-0129
370.2...................................................... 0990-0129
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(c) The Contracting Officer shall insert the clause in 352.201-70,
Paperwork Reduction Act, in solicitations, contracts, and orders that
include a requirement to collect the same information from 10 or more
persons.
Subpart 301.2--Administration
301.270 Executive Committee for Acquisition.
(a) The Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary for Acquisition
(Associate DAS for Acquisition) has established the Executive Committee
for Acquisition (ECA) to facilitate the planning, development, and
implementation of HHS acquisition policies and procedures and to share
successful acquisition practices.
(b) The ECA consists of members and alternates from the following
organizations:
(1) ASFR/Office of Grants and Acquisition Policy and Accountability
(OGAPA)/Division of Acquisition (DA).
(2) Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ).
(3) Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA).
(4) Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
(5) Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS).
(6) Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
(7) Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA).
(8) Indian Health Service (IHS).
(9) National Institutes of Health (NIH).
(10) Program Support Center (PSC).
(11) Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration
(SAMHSA).
(c) The Associate DAS for Acquisition is the Chair of the ECA. The
Chair will call all meetings and direct all ECA activities.
Subpart 301.4--Deviations From the FAR
301.403 Individual deviations.
Contracting activities shall prepare requests for individual
deviations to either the FAR or HHSAR in accordance with 301.470.
301.404 Class deviations.
Contracting activities shall prepare requests for class deviations
to either the FAR or HHSAR in accordance with 301.470.
301.470 Procedure.
(a) Contracting activities shall prepare deviation requests in
memorandum form and forward them through the Head of the Contracting
Activity (HCA) to the Associate DAS for Acquisition. The Associate DAS
for Acquisition (non-delegable) is the official authorized to approve
all deviation requests.
[[Page 62400]]
Contracting activities may request a deviation telephonically or by e-
mail in an exigent situation, but shall confirm the request by
memorandum as soon as possible.
(b) A deviation request shall clearly set forth the--
(1) Nature of the deviation, including what contract(s)/
contractor(s) is involved;
(2) Identification of the FAR or HHSAR citation from which the
deviation is needed;
(3) Circumstances under which the deviation will be used;
(4) Intended effect of the deviation;
(5) Period of applicability;
(6) Rationale for the deviation (Note: The Contracting Officer
shall include a copy of pertinent background papers, such as a
contractor's request, as part of the deviation request.); and
(7) Suggested wording for the deviation, if applicable.
Subpart 301.6--Career Development, Contracting Authority, and
Responsibilities
301.602 Contracting Officers.
301.602-3 Ratification of unauthorized commitments.
(b) Policy.
(1) The Government is not bound by agreements with, or contractual
commitments made to, prospective contractors by individuals who do not
have delegated contracting authority. However, an authorized official
may later ratify and execute otherwise proper contracts that were made
by individuals without contracting authority or by Contracting Officers
in excess of their delegated authority. The ratification shall be in
the form of a written document that clearly states that ratification of
a previously unauthorized act is intended.
(2) The HCA is the official authorized to ratify an unauthorized
commitment--but see paragraph (b)(3) of this section.
(3) The HCA may redelegate ratification authority for actions up to
$100,000 to the Chief of the Contracting Office (CCO). No other
redelegations are authorized.
(c) Limitations.
(5) The concurrence of legal counsel concerning an unauthorized
commitment is optional. If a contracting activity determines that a
legal review is necessary, the HCA or CCO shall coordinate the request
for ratification with the Office of General Counsel (OGC), General Law
Division (GLD).
(e) Procedures.
(1) The individual who is responsible for the unauthorized
commitment shall provide the reviewing Contracting Officer all records
and documents concerning the commitment and a complete written
statement of facts, including a description of the requirement; the
estimated or agreed upon price; the funds citation; an explanation of
why the contracting office was not used and why the proposed contractor
was selected; a list of other sources considered; and a statement as to
whether the contractor has commenced work or an item has been
delivered.
(2) The Contracting Officer shall review the submitted material
and, if the Contracting Officer determines that the ratification
request has merit, prepare it for ratification. The Contracting Officer
shall forward the ratification document and related materials to the
HCA or CCO, as appropriate, with any comments or information which the
approving official should consider in evaluating the ratification
request.
(3) If the HCA or CCO approves the ratification request, the
Contracting Officer shall issue a purchase order or contract, as
appropriate, upon return of the approved ratification document and
file.
301.603 Selection, appointment, and termination of appointment of
Contracting Officers.
301.603-1 General.
(a) The HCA (non-delegable) shall select, appoint, and terminate
the appointment of Contracting Officers--i.e., those individuals who
are authorized to obligate the Government to the expenditure of funds
for contracts and orders with dollar values that exceed (or are
expected to exceed) the micro-purchase threshold. The procedures for
selecting and appointing Contracting Officers apply to HHS employees.
HCAs may not issue HHS Contracting Officer warrants to contractor
personnel. OPDIVs shall follow local procedures in the event that the
signature of another authorized official, in addition to that of the
HCA, is required to appoint or terminate the appointment of Contracting
Officers.
(b) The HCA shall use Standard Form (SF) 1402, ``Certificate of
Appointment,'' (also known as a warrant) to appoint personnel, whether
in the General Schedule (GS) 1102 series or other series, as
Contracting Officers. The SF 1402 shall indicate the Contracting
Officer's warrant level--i.e., maximum dollar signature authority
(e.g., $1 million or ``unlimited'') and any other limitations or
restrictions. The HCA shall make changes to a Contracting Officer
appointment (other than a termination of an appointment as provided in
301.603-4) by issuing a revised SF 1402. FAR 1.603-1 prescribes the
requirements for preparing and maintaining Contracting Officer
warrants.
(c) Before an HCA may appoint an individual as a Contracting
Officer, the individual must be certified in accordance with either the
Federal Acquisition Certification in Contracting (FAC-C) program or the
HHS Simplified Acquisition Certification (SAC) program, as appropriate,
at the level required for the warrant authority requested. See 301.603-
72 and the HHS Contracting Workforce Training and Certification
Handbook.
(d) The dollar amount of an individual transaction determines
whether a Contracting Officer has the authority to sign it in
accordance with the delegated authority specified on the SF 1402. For
new or follow-on awards, the dollar amount of an individual transaction
is the amount obligated at the time of contract or order award plus any
potential option amounts or future funding amounts established by the
transaction. However, under an existing contract or order, when an
option is subsequently exercised or a contact or order is otherwise
modified to add funding, the dollar amount of the modification
(individual transaction) determines whether a Contracting Officer has
the necessary delegated authority to sign it.
(e) For individuals that will exercise acquisition authorities
(other than solely purchase card authorities) at or below the micro-
purchase threshold, the HCA may--
(1) Use a document other than the SF 1402, such as a memorandum,
that indicates a maximum dollar signature authority for individual
transactions; and
(2) Determine training requirements for individuals who will
exercise acquisition authorities at dollar levels below the micro-
purchase threshold level.
301.603-2 Selection and appointment.
Contracting activities shall provide nominations for appointment of
Contracting Officers through appropriate acquisition channels to the
HCA for review. The HCA shall appoint an individual as a Contracting
Officer only when a valid organizational need is demonstrated and after
considering such factors as volume of actions, complexity of work, and
structure of the requesting organization. The HCA shall also ensure
that a Contracting Officer candidate meets the FAC-C or HHS SAC
certification requirements, as
[[Page 62401]]
appropriate. Consistent with FAR 1.603-2, the HCA shall determine the
documentation required when the requested appointment and authority
will not exceed the micro-purchase threshold.
301.603-3 Interim appointments.
If it is essential to appoint an individual as a Contracting
Officer who does not yet fully meet the FAC-C or HHS SAC certification
requirements for the signature authority sought, the HCA (non-
delegable) may make an interim appointment for up to 2 years. If an
extension of time has been granted, but the individual does not
complete the certification requirements by the extended date, the HCA's
approval for the interim appointment will automatically terminate on
that date.
301.603-4 Termination of appointments.
The HCA shall terminate or revoke Contracting Officer appointments
in accordance with FAR 1.603-4.
301.603-70 Delegation of Contracting Officer responsibilities.
(a) Contracting Officers may re-delegate their acquisition
responsibilities that do not involve the obligation or deobligation of
funds, but involve the expenditure of previously obligated funds (such
as approval of contractor scientific meeting travel and subcontract
consent) to acquisition staff (for example, those in the GS-1100
series) by means of a written memorandum that clearly delineates the
delegation and its limits. See 301.604 for responsibilities that
Contracting Officers may delegate to technical personnel.
(b) Contracting Officers may designate individuals as ordering or
approving officials to make purchases or place/approve orders under
blanket purchase agreements (BPAs), indefinite-delivery, indefinite
quantity (IDIQ) contracts, or other pre-established mechanisms.
Ordering officials are not Contracting Officers.
301.603-71 Waivers to warrant standards.
There may be an unusual circumstance that requires issuance of a
warrant to an individual who does not fully meet the FAC-C or HHS SAC
certification program requirements. Contracting activities shall
provide any request for a waiver of the FAC-C program requirements and
policies in writing to the Senior Procurement Executive (SPE), through
the HCA, for review and approval. The SPE (non-delegable) will either
approve or disapprove in writing the request for waiver. The HCA (non-
delegable) may approve or disapprove a waiver of the HHS SAC program
requirements.
301.603-72 FAC-C and HHS SAC certification requirements.
(a) The FAC-C certification program is available to all acquisition
staff who are/will be involved as Contracting Officers or Contract
Specialists in acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition
threshold. Personnel who, as part of prior certification programs, have
completed some or all of the required training or have attained
certification thereunder are not required to re-take training courses,
but shall follow FAC-C training requirements when considering
additional or required core training, if needed. See 301.603-74 for
information regarding retention of certification, including the
requirement to earn continuous learning points (CLPs). FAC-C
certification also does not apply to--
(1) The SPE;
(2) Senior level officials responsible for delegating acquisition
authority;
(3) Personnel who are not in the GS-1102 series whose warrants are
used to acquire emergency goods and services; or
(4) Personnel who are not in the GS-1102 series whose warrants are
so limited as to be outside the scope of this program, as determined by
the Chief Acquisition Officer (CAO). (Note: The HHS CAO has determined
that individuals with warrants which are limited to simplified
acquisitions are deemed to be outside the scope of the FAC-C program.)
(b) HHS does not require personnel with Contracting Officer
warrants issued prior to January 1, 2007 to be FAC-C certified unless
they are seeking a change in authority on or after that date.
Individuals applying for a new Contracting Officer warrant or an
increase in warrant authority on or after January 1, 2007, regardless
of GS series, must be FAC-C certified at the level appropriate for the
warrant authority sought. To obtain an unlimited warrant, FAC-C Level
III certification is required. (Note: New Contracting Officer warrants
are defined in the Office of Federal Procurement Policy's (OFPP's) FAC-
C memorandum, dated January 20, 2006, as warrants issued to employees
for the first time at a department or agency.)
(c) The FAC-C certification is based on three sets of requirements:
Education, training, and experience, and the requirements are
cumulative--i.e., an individual must meet the requirements of each
previous certification level before attaining a higher level
certification. The FAC-C certification requirements, including
additional HHS-specific training requirements for certain types of
acquisitions, are specified in the HHS Contracting Workforce Training
and Certification Handbook.
(d) HHS SAC certification is based on three sets of requirements:
Training, experience, and satisfactory performance rating. Personnel
who are involved in the award of simplified acquisitions must meet the
appropriate HHS SAC certification requirements. (Note: While personnel
who are FAC-C certified are not required to obtain HHS SAC
certification in order to award simplified acquisitions, they should
obtain appropriate training before doing so.) The HHS SAC certification
requirements, including additional HHS-specific training requirements
for certain types of acquisitions, are specified in the HHS Contracting
Workforce Training and Certification Handbook.
301.603-73 Additional HHS training requirements.
HHS acquisition personnel are required to complete, as applicable,
the additional training requirements specified below. These courses may
be used as electives for the purpose of satisfying FAC-C requirements
or as continuous learning for maintenance of FAC-C or SAC
certifications.
(a) Earned value management training. Effective January 1, 2010,
all personnel in the GS-1102 series who are responsible for, or may
become responsible for, the award or administration of any contract to
which earned value management (EVM) is applied pursuant to 334.201(a)
or (b) must successfully complete an EVM training course before they
commence administration of the contract or are authorized to award the
contract. After completion of the initial course, a refresher course is
required every 2 years. This course is in addition to the training
requirements for FAC-C certification at the specified levels.
Determination of course suitability shall be made by the Operating
Division (OPDIV) HCA, in conjunction with HHS' Office of the Chief
Information Officer (OCIO) or Office of Facilities Management and
Policy (OFMP), as appropriate. To be eligible, the basic and refresher
courses must each be 8 hours or more in length.
(b) Performance based acquisition training. Effective January 1,
2010, all GS-1102s, who award or administer service contracts, are
required to complete a Performance-Based Acquisition (PBA) course prior
to assuming such responsibilities. Refresher training in PBA is
required
[[Page 62402]]
every 4 years. To be eligible, a course must be 8 hours or more in
length. Determination of course suitability shall be made by the HCA.
(c) Federal appropriations law training. Effective January 1, 2010,
all GS-1102s and GS-1105s are required to complete both HHS
University's classroom-based and on-line Federal appropriations law
course, by January 1, 2011 (for current employees) and within 1 year of
entering on duty (for new employees). Employees are required to take
the HHS University on-line course as refresher training every year.
Determination of course equivalency shall be made by the HCA.
(d) Green purchasing training. Effective January 1, 2010, all GS-
1102s and GS-1105s are required to complete green purchasing training
by January 1, 2011 (for current employees) and within 1 year of
entering on duty (for new employees). Refresher training is required
every 2 years. To be eligible, a course must be 4 hours or more in
length. Determination of course suitability shall be made by the HCA.
(e) Section 508 training. Effective January 1, 2010 (or when the
HHS Office on Disability so requires), all GS-1102s, GS-1105s, and GS-
1106s who award or administer acquisitions that exceed the micro-
purchase threshold and involve electronic information technology (EIT)
products or services (subject to Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act
of 1973 and pertinent HHSAR provisions), must complete all applicable
training courses sponsored by the HHS Office on Disability. For
information on frequency, timing, and duration of the training
requirement, personnel shall consult with the HHS Office on Disability.
(f) Training policy exceptions.
(1) EVM training. In the event that there is an urgent requirement
for a Contracting Officer/Contract Specialist to award or administer a
project to which EVM will be applied, and the individual has not yet
met the EVM training requirement, the HCA (non-delegable) may authorize
the individual to perform the position duties, provided that the
individual meets the training requirement within 9 months from the date
of assignment to the contract. If the individual does not complete the
training requirement within 9 months, the HCA's approval for the
individual's assignment to the contract will automatically terminate on
that date. The Contract Specialist is not required to take the class as
long as the Contract Specialist is working under the direction of a
Contracting Officer who has taken an EVM course.
(2) Other additional HHS training. The HCA (non-delegable) may
grant a time extension of up to 9 months to an individual to complete
the PBA, Federal appropriations law, green purchasing, and Section 508
training requirements, including completion of refresher training. If
the individual does not complete the training requirement within the
extension period, the HCA's approval will automatically terminate on
that date.
301.603-74 Requirement for retention of FAC-C and HHS SAC
certification.
To maintain FAC-C certification, all warranted Contracting
Officers, regardless of series, as well as Contract Specialists, must
earn 80 CLPs every 2 years. To maintain HHS SAC certification, all
individuals with delegated Contracting Officer authority, including
those in the GS-1102, GS-1105, GS-1106, and non-1100 series, must earn
a minimum of 40 hours (CLPs) every 2 years after completing all
mandatory training requirements. FAC-C and HHS SAC certification will
expire if the CLPs are not earned every 2 years (from the date of
initial certification or re-certification) and, if applicable, may
result in a loss of warrant authority. (Note: The certification
programs' continuous learning requirement applies to all applicable
personnel, including those who were certified under prior certification
programs.)
301.604 Training and certification of Contracting Officers' Technical
Representatives.
301.604-70 General.
In accordance with the Federal Acquisition Certification for
Contracting Officers' Technical Representatives (FAC-COTR) program, HHS
has established a training program for certification and designation of
personnel as COTRs--see HHS' Federal Acquisition Certification for
Contracting Officers' Technical Representative Program Handbook, dated
January 2009, for information on the methods for earning FAC-COTR
certification. See also 302.101(c) for further information regarding
the definition of a COTR and when designation of a COTR is appropriate.
All references to COTRs also apply to their alternates.
301.604-71 HCA authorities and responsibilities.
(a) HCAs are authorized to determine (1) equivalencies for the
Basic Contracting Officer's Technical Representative Course; (2) course
prerequisites; and (3) approve completion of CLP continuous learning
activities, education, and training for maintenance of COTR
certification. This authority does not apply to EVM training--see
301.603-73. Course equivalencies must meet the Federal Acquisition
Institute's (FAI's) required COTR competencies. HCAs may re-delegate
the authorities in (1) and (2) to OPDIV Acquisition Career Managers
(ACMs) or other comparable officials.
(b) In addition to the authorities specified in 301.604-71(a), HCAs
or their designees (except where the authority is shown as non-
delegable) are responsible for--
(1) Reviewing a candidate's qualifications to be a COTR;
(2) Granting, suspending, denying, and revoking COTR certifications
and their continuance;
(3) Authorizing (non-delegable) an individual to perform COTR
duties on an interim basis for up to 90 days--see 301.604-73; and
(4) Determining (non-delegable) on a case-by-case basis whether to
postpone (for up to 90 days) withdrawal of any interim COTR delegation
for failure of a candidate to qualify for certification--see 301.604-
73.
301.604-72 Requirements for certification maintenance.
Maintaining HHS FAC-COTR certification requires at least 40
relevant CLPs every 2 years. See Appendix A of OFPP's FAC-COTR
memorandum, dated November 26, 2007, and HHS' Federal Acquisition
Certification for Contracting Officers' Technical Representative
Program Handbook, dated January 2009, for information on CLPs.
301.604-73 Certification policy exception.
(a) In the event that an individual who is not currently certified
under HHS' FAC-COTR program is urgently required to serve as a COTR,
the head of the sponsoring program office (Program Manager) or designee
(e.g., the immediate supervisor) may request, and the HCA (non-
delegable) may authorize, the individual to perform the designated
duties on an interim basis for up to 6 months, provided that--
(1) The individual agrees to become certified during that period
and provides evidence of training course registration; and
(2) Prior to assignment to the contract, the individual meets with
the cognizant Contracting Officer to discuss the role and specific
responsibilities of a COTR and the interrelationships, as applicable,
among the Project Officer, Contracting Officer, Program/Project
Manager, and COTR functions.
(b) If an extension has been granted, but the individual does not
complete
[[Page 62403]]
the training by the extended date, the HCA's approval for the
individual's assignment to the contract will automatically terminate on
that date.
301.604-74 Additional COTR training requirements.
HHS COTRs are required to complete, as applicable, the training
requirements specified below.
(a) Earned value management training. Effective January 1, 2010,
all COTRs assigned to any contract to which EVM is applied pursuant to
334.201(a) or (b) must successfully complete an EVM training course
before assuming their COTR duties. In conjunction with ASFR/OGAPA/DA,
HHS' OCIO [for information technology (IT)] and OFMP (for construction/
facilities), are authorized to designate appropriate EVM courses. At
least 8 hours of EVM training is required every 2 years.
(b) Performance-based acquisition training. Effective January 1,
2010, all COTRs assigned to a service contract are required to
successfully complete a PBA course. To be eligible, a course must be 8
hours or more in length. Determination of course suitability shall be
made by the HCA or designee. At least 8 hours of refresher training in
PBA is required every 4 years.
(c) Federal appropriations law training. Effective January 1, 2010,
all COTRs are required to successfully complete HHS University's
classroom-based or on-line Federal appropriations law course within 3
years after an initial certification is issued. COTRs are required to
take the HHS University on-line appropriations law course as refresher
training every 4 years.
(d) Green purchasing training. Effective January 1, 2010, all COTRs
are required to complete green purchasing training within the first
certification period. The individual's immediate supervisor shall make
the determination of course suitability. At least 4 hours of refresher
training is required every 4 years.
(e) Training policy exceptions.
(1) EVM training. In the event that there is an urgent requirement
for a COTR to administer a contract to which EVM will be applied, and
the individual has not yet met the EVM training requirement, the HCA
(non-delegable) may authorize the individual to perform the position
duties, provided that the individual meets the training requirement
within 9 months from the date of assignment to the contract. If the
individual does not complete the training requirement within 9 months,
the HCA's approval for the individual's assignment to the contract will
automatically terminate on that date. In addition, during any extension
period, the COTR must work under the direction of a COTR, or Program/
Project Manager who has taken an EVM course.
(2) Other additional HHS training. The HCA (non-delegable) may
grant a time extension of up to 9 months to a COTR to complete the PBA,
Federal appropriations law, and green purchasing training requirements,
including completion of refresher training. If the individual does not
complete the training requirement within the extension period, the
HCA's approval will automatically terminate on that date.
301.605 Contracting Officer designation of Contracting Officer
Technical Representative.
The Contracting Officer shall ensure that a COTR candidate is
currently certified under HHS' FAC-COTR program before delegating
authority to that individual to act as a COTR. Even if an individual is
FAC-COTR-certified, a candidate becomes a COTR only when a Contracting
Officer provides in writing the authorities the individual may exercise
for a specified contract or order. Authority for such designations
rests solely with the Contracting Officer. The Contracting Officer
shall retain in the contract or order file the individual's active FAC-
COTR certificate. In the event that the HCA has granted an exception--
see 301.604-73, the Contracting Officer shall include the HCA's
approval in the file.
301.606 Training requirements for Project Officers.
301.606-70 General.
HHS has established a program for training personnel for
certification and designation as Project Officers. See 302.101(g) for
further information regarding the definition of a Project Officer and
when designation of a Project Officer is appropriate. All references to
Project Officers also apply to their alternates. Program Managers or
their designees are authorized to designate individuals to serve as
Project Officers. (Note: If an individual will also serve as the COTR
for a proposed project, the individual shall comply with the training
certification requirements for COTRs--see 301.604.)
301.606-71 Project Officer training.
Before an individual may perform the duties of a Project Officer,
including development of an Acquisition Plan (AP) or other acquisition
request documentation--see 307.71, for a proposed project, the Program
Manager or designee shall designate an individual as a Project Officer
in writing by means of a memorandum to the Project Officer candidate
with a copy to the cognizant Contracting Officer. A Project Officer
must successfully complete HHS University's Basic Contracting Officer's
Technical Representative Course or equivalent and any OPDIV-specific
course prerequisites. The Project Officer must provide a course
completion certificate to the Contracting Officer with any AP or other
acquisition request documentation submitted. See HHS guidance on the
training requirement for technical proposal evaluators in
315.305(a)(3)(ii).
301.606-72 Delegation of authority to HCAs.
HCAs are authorized to determine equivalencies for the Basic
Contracting Officer's Technical Representative Course and any OPDIV-
specific course prerequisites. This authority may be re-delegated to
OPDIV acquisition ACMs or other comparable officials.
301.606-73 Training policy exception.
(a) In the event that an individual who has not successfully
completed the required training course is urgently required to serve as
a Project Officer, the Program Manager or designee may authorize the
individual to perform the designated duties on an interim basis for up
to 6 months, provided that--
(1) The individual agrees to take the Basic Contracting Officer's
Technical Representative course during that period and provides
evidence of course registration; and
(2) The individual meets, prior to assignment to the project, with
the cognizant Contracting Officer to discuss the specific role and
responsibilities of a Project Officer and the interrelationships, as
applicable, among the Project Officer, Contracting Officer, Program/
Project Manager, and COTR functions.
(b) If an extension of time has been granted, but the individual
fails to complete the training by the extended date, the Program
Manager's or designee's approval for the individual's assignment to the
project will automatically terminate on that date.
301.606-74 Additional Project Officer training requirements.
HHS Project Officers are required to complete, as applicable, the
training requirements specified below.
(a) Earned value management training. All Project Officers assigned
to any contract project to which EVM is applied pursuant to 334.201(a)
or (b) must successfully complete an EVM
[[Page 62404]]
training course before assuming their Project Officer duties. In
conjunction with ASFR/OGAPA/DA, HHS' OCIO (for IT) and OFMP (for
construction/facilities) are authorized to designate appropriate EVM
courses.
(b) Performance-based acquisition training. Effective January 1,
2010, all Project Officers assigned to a service contract are required
to successfully complete a PBA course. To be eligible, a course must be
8 hours or more in length. Determination of course suitability shall be
made by the HCA or designee. At least 8 hours of refresher training in
PBA is required every 4 years.
(c) Federal appropriations law training. Effective January 1, 2010,
all Project Officers are required to successfully complete HHS
University's classroom-based or on-line Federal appropriations law
course. Project Officers are required to take the HHS University on-
line appropriations law course as refresher training every 4 years.
(d) Green purchasing training. Effective January 1, 2010, all
Project Officers are required to complete green purchasing training.
The individual's immediate supervisor shall make the determination of
course suitability. At least 4 hours of refresher training is required
every 4 years.
(e) Training policy exceptions.
(1) EVM training. In the event that there is an urgent requirement
to assign a Project Officer to a contract project to which EVM will be
applied, and the individual has not yet met the EVM training
requirement, the HCA (non-delegable) may authorize the individual to
perform the position duties, provided that the individual meets the
training requirement within 3 months from the date of submission of the
AP or other acquisition request documentation to the contracting
office. If the individual does not complete the training requirement
within the extension period, the HCA's approval for the individual's
assignment to the project will automatically terminate on that date. In
addition, during any extension period, the Project Officer must work
under the direction of a Project Officer, COTR, or Program/Project
Manager who has taken an EVM course.
(2) Other additional HHS training. The HCA (non-delegable) may
grant a time extension of up to 9 months to a Project Officer to
complete the PBA, Federal appropriations law, and green purchasing
training requirements, including completion of refresher training. If
the individual does not complete the training requirement within the
extension period, the HCA's approval will automatically terminate on
that date.
301.607 Certification of Program and Project Managers.
301.607-70 General.
In accordance with the Federal Acquisition Certification--Program
and Project Managers (FAC-P/PM) program, HHS has established a
certification program for Program or Project Managers. See HHS' Federal
Acquisition Certification--Program and Project Managers Handbook (P/PM
Handbook) for information on the methods for earning FAC-P/PM
certification.
301.607-71 FAC-P/PM levels and requirements.
(a)(1) The FAC-P/PM certification program specifies three different
levels of certification, depending on the core competency, training,
and experience required to manage different types of acquisitions--
(i) Entry/Apprentice--Level I;
(ii) Mid-level/Journeyman--Level II; and
(iii) Senior/Expert--Level III.
(2) Each FAC-P/PM certification level is independent of the
others--i.e., applicants for the Senior/Expert level need not have been
certified at the Mid-level/Journeyman or Entry/Apprentice levels.
General and specific core competencies, training, and required
experience vary by certification level. (Note: Individuals certified
under the FAC-P/PM program meet the general competency and experience
standards for P/PM certification. However, IT Program and Project
Managers should attain/demonstrate IT-specific P/PM requirements. See
Appendix C, Federal Acquisition Certification--Program and Project
Managers--Information Technology Technical Competencies, in the P/PM
Handbook for additional information.
(b)(1) Competencies. An applicant can satisfy the competency
requirements through:
(i) Successful completion of training;
(ii) Completion of comparable education or certification programs;
(iii) Demonstration of knowledge, skills, and abilities; or
(iv) Any combination of these three.
(2) The FAI describes the following three sets of general core
competencies on its Web site:
(3) General Business Competencies: Includes decision-making,
interpersonal skills, oral communication, team-building, and writing.
(4) Technical Competencies: Includes contracting, financial
management, quality assurance, and risk management.
(5) Essential Competencies and Proficiencies: Includes management
processes, systems engineering, test and evaluation, contracting, and
business.
(6) Specific core competencies also apply to the three
certification levels. See Chapter 2, Federal Acquisition
Certification--Program and Project Managers--Requirements and
Performance Accountability, in the P/PM Handbook for additional
information.
(c) Training. (1) Suggested training includes coursework, varying
from 16-24 hours in duration, in:
(i) Acquisition;
(ii) Project management;
(iii) leadership and interpersonal skills;
(iv) Government-specific training; and
(v) Earned value management and cost estimating.
(2) The depth of the training for each course required may vary by
certification level.
(d) Experience. Experience requirements vary by certification
level. For example, for certification at the Entry/Apprentice--Level I,
at least 1 year of project management experience within the last 5
years is required. The Mid-level/Journeyman--Level II requires at least
2 years of program or project management experience within the last 5
years. The Senior/Expert--Level III requires at least 4 years of
program and project management experience on Federal projects within
the last 5 years.
(e) Additional OPDIV guidance. OPDIVs may issue supplemental
guidance and requirements for selection and assignment of Program and
Project Managers and require additional skills and competencies to meet
organizational or mission needs. However, OPDIVs may not reduce the
requirements specified in the P/PM Handbook.
301.607-72 Applicability.
(a) The FAC-P/PM certification prerequisites and continuous
learning requirements apply to all HHS employees who seek to obtain a
FAC-P/PM certification. Although obtaining a FAC-P/PM certification
qualifies employees to serve as a Program or Project Manager, it does
not ensure their selection or designation as such. (Note: Contractors
and their employees are not eligible to be certified or to serve as
Program or Project Managers.)
(b) Mandatory certification is limited to major and non-major IT
and construction capital investment acquisitions. Consistent with OFPP
guidance, HHS requires FAC-P/PM Level III certification for Program and
[[Page 62405]]
Project Managers responsible for major IT and construction capital
investments--i.e., those requiring preparation of an OMB Exhibit 300,
HHS Form 300, or equivalent. An individual must obtain FAC-P/PM Level
III certification within 1 year from the date of being assigned to such
a major capital investment. Also, HHS requires that an individual
obtain FAC-P/PM Level II or I certification for non-major IT and
construction--i.e., tactical or supporting, capital investments,
respectively, within 2 years from the date of being assigned to such a
non-major capital investment. See Appendix A, Federal Acquisition
Certification--Program and Project Managers--HHS Projects and Programs
with Associated Certification Levels, in the P/PM Handbook for
additional information regarding major and non-major IT and
construction capital investments. FAC-P/PM certification for other
types of investments [e.g., advanced research and development (R & D)]
is encouraged, but is not mandatory.
301.607-73 Certification waivers.
(a) Waivers to certification requirements may be approved in
certain situations. Waivers for additional time to complete
certification requirements are not necessary for the first year
following an assignment to a major IT or construction capital
investment and for 2 years following an assignment to a non-major
capital investment. For waivers beyond those periods (for up to 1
additional year), the HHS Chief Information Officer (CIO) (for IT
programs and projects) and the Deputy Assistant Secretary for
Facilities Management and Policy (DASFMP) (for construction programs
and projects) are delegated authority to approve waiver requests. The
HHS CAO is the only individual authorized to approve waiver requests
for additional time beyond the initial 1-year waiver period.
(b) Approval of a waiver request does not relieve an individual
from meeting the certification requirements. Also, unlike FAC-P/PM
certifications, waivers issued by other Federal departments and
agencies do not transfer to HHS, since a waiver is agency-specific.
301.607-74 Certification transfers.
(a) HHS recognizes and accepts FAC-P/PM certifications issued by
other Federal departments and agencies. In addition, HHS complies with
FAI determinations as to which certifications by organizations outside
the Federal government are eligible for full or partial consideration
under FAC-P/PM. See FAI's Web site, and Chapter 3, Federal Acquisition
Certification--Program and Project Managers--Application and
Certification Procedures, in the P/PM Handbook for additional
information.
(b) A certification transfer should not be initiated w