Agreements for Payment of Tax Liabilities in Installments, 61525-61531 [E9-28330]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 226 / Wednesday, November 25, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
PART 20—ESTATE TAX; ESTATES OF
DECENDENTS DYING AFTER AUGUST
16, 1954
Paragraph 1. The authority citation
for part 20 continues to read in part as
follows:
■
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *
Par. 2. Section 20.2053–1 is amended
by revising the third sentence of
paragraph (d)(7) Example 3 to read as
follows:
■
§ 20.2053–1 Deduction for expenses,
indebtedness, and taxes; in general.
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(7) * * *
*
*
Example 3. * * * Instead, pursuant to the
protective claim for refund filed by E, the
marital deduction will be reduced by the
claim once a final judgment is entered in the
case. * * *
*
*
*
*
*
Par. 3. Section 20.2053–4 is amended
by revising the last sentence of
paragraph (d)(3) to read as follows.
■
§ 20.2053–4
the estate.
*
*
(d) * *
(3) * *
1(d)(3).
*
*
Deduction for claims against
*
*
*
*
* See further § 20.2053–
*
*
*
LaNita VanDyke,
Chief, Publications and Regulations Branch,
Legal Processing Division, Associate Chief
Counsel (Procedure and Administration)
[FR Doc. E9–28332 Filed 11–24–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 301
[TD 9473]
RIN 1545–AU97
Agreements for Payment of Tax
Liabilities in Installments
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with RULES
AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS),
Treasury.
ACTION: Final regulations.
SUMMARY: This document contains final
regulations relating to the payment of
tax liabilities in installments. The
regulations reflect changes to the law
made by the Taxpayer Bill of Rights II,
the Internal Revenue Service
Restructuring and Reform Act of 1998,
and the American Jobs Creation Act of
2004. The regulations will affect
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:27 Nov 24, 2009
Jkt 220001
taxpayers submitting installment
agreements to the IRS.
DATES: Effective Date: These regulations
are effective on November 25, 2009.
Applicability Date: For the date of
applicability, see § 301.6159(k).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Walter Ryan, (202) 622–3620 (not a tollfree number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
This document contains amendments
to the Procedure and Administration
Regulations (26 CFR part 301) under
section 6159 of the Internal Revenue
Code (Code). Section 6159 allows the
IRS to enter into agreements for the
payment of any unpaid tax in
installments. Taxpayers may request
administrative review of IRS decisions
to terminate installment agreements
pursuant to section 6159(e), added to
the Code by section 202 of the Taxpayer
Bill of Rights II, Public Law 104–168
(110 Stat. 1452, 1457 (1996)). Taxpayers
may appeal rejections of proposed
installment agreements under section
7122(e), added to the Code by section
3462 of Internal Revenue Service
Restructuring and Reform Act of 1998
(RRA 98), Public Law 105–206 (112 Stat.
685, 764 (1998)). Section 6159(c), added
to the Code by section 3467 of RRA
1998, requires the IRS to accept a
proposed installment agreement for
income taxes under certain
circumstances. Section 3506 of RRA
1998 requires the IRS to send each
taxpayer with an installment agreement
an annual statement showing the
balance due at the beginning of the year,
the payments made during the year, and
the remaining balance due at the end of
the year.
Section 843 of the American Jobs
Creation Act of 2004 (AJCA), Public Law
108–357 (118 Stat. 1418, 1600 (2004)),
amended section 6159(a) to allow the
IRS to enter into installment agreements
that provide for partial (as well as full)
payment of a tax liability, but excludes
partial payment installment agreements
from the scope of installment
agreements that must be accepted by the
IRS. Section 843 of the AJCA also added
new section 6159(d), requiring the IRS
to review partial payment installment
agreements every two years. The
primary purpose of the review is to
determine whether the financial
condition of the taxpayer has
significantly changed so as to warrant
an increase in the value of the payments
being made. See H. Rep. No. 108–755,
108th Cong., 2d Sess., 2005
U.S.C.C.A.N. 1341 (October 7, 2004).
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
61525
On March 5, 2007, a notice of
proposed rulemaking (REG–100841–97;
72 FR 9712) was published in the
Federal Register. The proposed
regulations reflected the changes made
to section 6159 by the Taxpayer Bill of
Rights II, the RRA 98, and the AJCA.
The proposed regulations reflected
current IRS administrative practice. The
IRS received one set of written
comments with numerous
recommendations. No public hearing
was requested or held. After
consideration of the comments, the
proposed regulations are adopted as
revised by this Treasury decision.
Summary of Comments and
Explanation of Revisions
The final regulations adopt certain
recommendations contained in the
comments by clarifying two provisions
of the proposed regulations. As
explained in this preamble, § 301.6159–
1(e)(3) was amended to clarify that the
taxpayer may submit a request to
modify or terminate the installment
agreement. Section 301.6159–1(e)(3)
further clarifies that such a request will
not suspend the statute of limitations on
collection and the taxpayer must
comply with the existing installment
agreement while the request is being
considered. As also explained in this
preamble, § 301.6159–1(e)(1)(i) clarifies
that the IRS may terminate an
installment agreement if the taxpayer
provides materially incomplete or
inaccurate information in response to an
IRS request for a financial update.
The following is a section-by-section
analysis of the comments.
Section 301.6159–1(b): Procedures for
Submission and Consideration of
Proposed Installment Agreements
Section 301.6159–1(b) of the proposed
regulations provided that an installment
agreement request must be submitted
according to procedures prescribed by
the IRS. It did not require the IRS to
accept or reject the request within a
specific time frame. The commenter
proposed to limit the IRS’s time to
consider an installment agreement to 90
days; if the IRS fails to act in that time,
the agreement would be granted
automatically. The commenter reasoned
that the limited time frame would
benefit the IRS because more
installments agreements would be
automatically allowed, thereby
increasing revenues, and would benefit
the taxpayer by allowing payments to
begin quickly and efficiently. The
recommendation was not adopted for
two reasons. First, the IRS already
grants installment agreements quickly
and automatically in the vast majority of
E:\FR\FM\25NOR1.SGM
25NOR1
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with RULES
61526
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 226 / Wednesday, November 25, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
cases. If the taxpayer owes less than
$25,000 and offers to pay the liabilities
in full within 5 years, the agreement can
be granted automatically under the IRS’s
‘‘streamlined’’ installment agreement
procedures. See Internal Revenue
Manual 5.14.5.2 at https://www.irs.gov/
irm/part5/irm_05-014-005.html. The IRS
granted over 2.62 million installment
agreements in fiscal year 2008, of which
over 2.51 million were granted through
the IRS’s streamlined procedures. In
cases that do not meet the streamlined
criteria, the IRS has determined that a
more detailed review of the taxpayer’s
financial situation is warranted. Second,
the IRS generally responds to nonstreamlined installment agreement
requests in a timely manner. During the
filing season, however, inventory
fluctuations may cause delays. The
automatic allowance of installment
agreements in such cases would not be
appropriate.
Proposed § 301.6159–1(b)(2) provided
that an installment agreement request
becomes pending when it is accepted
for processing. The commenter
recommended that the IRS send an
automatically-generated response
acknowledging the date of acceptance
for processing to the taxpayer and the
taxpayer’s representative. This
recommendation was not adopted. The
vast majority of installment agreements
are streamlined agreements, which the
IRS accepts very quickly. The IRS will,
however, consider adopting an
administrative procedure for the
minority of cases where it anticipates a
time lag between acceptance for
processing and the acceptance or
rejection of the installment agreement.
Proposed § 301.6159–1(b)(2) also
provided that if an installment
agreement request does not contain
sufficient information to permit the IRS
to evaluate whether the request should
be accepted, the IRS will request the
needed information. The commenter
recommended that all requests for
additional information should be
reasonably necessary. The proposed
regulations already address this
recommendation by directing that
requests be for ‘‘needed’’ information.
Proposed § 301.6159–1(b)(3) allowed
a taxpayer to submit a good faith
revision of a rejected installment
agreement request within 30 days of
rejection. The commenter recommended
that the time for taxpayers to submit a
good faith revision should be extended
to 60 days because taxpayers often have
difficulty obtaining the necessary
documents within 30 days. This
recommendation was not adopted. The
recommendation would apply to a small
number of installment agreement
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:27 Nov 24, 2009
Jkt 220001
requests that are not accepted under the
IRS’s streamlined procedures. In these
cases, the IRS requests the information
necessary for a financial analysis before
rejecting the installment agreement
request. See Internal Revenue Manual
5.15.1.6 at https://www.irs.gov/irm/
part5/irm_05-015-001.html. Allowing
60 days following the rejection would
encourage untimely responses and delay
case resolution.
Section 301.6159–1(c): Acceptance,
Form, and Terms of Installment
Agreements
Section 301.6159–1(c)(1) of the
proposed regulations provided that an
installment agreement request has not
been accepted until the IRS notifies the
taxpayer or the taxpayer’s representative
of the acceptance. Section 6159(a)
requires that an installment agreement
be in writing, and proposed § 301.6159–
1(c)(2) provided that the writing may
take the form of a document signed by
the taxpayer and the IRS or the written
confirmation of an agreement entered
into by the taxpayer and the IRS that is
mailed or personally delivered to the
taxpayer. The commenter recommended
that the IRS’s notification of the
acceptance or rejection of a proposed
installment agreement also be directed
to the taxpayer’s representative and
include the terms of the agreement and
payment submission information. These
recommendations were not adopted in
the regulations because they are more
appropriately addressed in the IRS’s
procedures. The IRS currently does,
however, provide written notification to
the taxpayer and the taxpayer’s
representative of the acceptance or
rejection of an installment agreement
and the suggested information.
The commenter was concerned that
the IRS intended to change its
streamlined procedures and
recommended that the procedures be
retained. The commenter was also
concerned that proposed § 301.6159–
1(c)(3)(iii)(A) may represent a departure
from the IRS’s current policy that limits
the acceptance of extensions of the
collection statute of limitations in
connection with installment agreements
to the narrow subset of partial payment
installment agreements in which the
liability will not be paid in full under
the agreement before the collection
statute expires. As stated in the
preamble to the notice of proposed
rulemaking, the regulations were
intended to reflect existing practices.
The regulations will have no effect on
the IRS’s streamlined procedures or its
policy with regard to waivers of the
collection statute.
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
The commenter stated that the
proposed regulations did not explain
the inclusion of § 301.6159–1(c)(3)(ii),
which provided that an installment
agreement may, by its terms, end upon
the expiration of the period of
limitations on collection, or at some
prior date. As explained in the preamble
to the proposed regulations, this
provision clarifies that the IRS may
enter into partial payment installment
agreements that end upon the running
of the collection statute, or that end
prior to that time so that the IRS may
collect the balance of the tax liability
against any property belonging to the
taxpayer before the collection period
expires. The IRS does not currently
enter into partial payment installment
agreements that expire before the end of
the collection statute and has no plans
to do so routinely in the future.
Proposed § 301.6159–1(c)(3)(v)
provided that while an installment
agreement is in effect, the IRS may
request a financial condition update
from the taxpayer at any time. The
commenter recommended that the IRS
be permitted to request only one
financial condition update per year.
This recommendation was not adopted.
The IRS very rarely requests updates
more than once a year. In certain rare
circumstances, more frequent updates
may be appropriate, such as when the
IRS has reason to believe that the
taxpayer’s financial condition has
improved.
Section 301.6159–1(d): Rejection of a
Proposed Installment Agreement
Section 301.6159–1(d)(2) of the
proposed regulations provided that the
IRS may not notify a taxpayer or the
taxpayer’s representative of the rejection
of an installment agreement until an
independent review of proposed
rejection is completed. The commenter
was concerned that the proposed
regulations did not provide any
guidance as to how the independent
administrative review will be assured.
The commenter recommended that the
review be undertaken by an IRS office
located in a different territory. The
recommendation was not adopted.
Managers in the IRS offices in San Jose,
California, and Jacksonville, Florida,
supervise employees throughout the
United States who review rejected
installment agreements. An
independent review is assured by
assigning these cases to an employee
who has no prior involvement in the
case and who reports to a supervisor in
either of these two offices.
The commenter recommended that
the determination that the taxpayer did
not submit a good faith revision be
E:\FR\FM\25NOR1.SGM
25NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 226 / Wednesday, November 25, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with RULES
subject to independent administrative
review. This recommendation was not
adopted because it would delay case
resolution and would, in effect, treat
requests that were not made in good
faith as valid requests. The commenter
also recommended that the rejection of
revisions that were made in good faith
receive independent review. The
proposed regulation already provided
for this review. Proposed § 301.6159–
1(b) stated that if the IRS determines
that the taxpayer made a good faith
revision within 30 days of the rejection,
the provisions of § 301.6159–1 apply to
the revised proposal.
Proposed § 301.6159–1(d)(3) provided
that a taxpayer may appeal the rejection
of an installment agreement request
within 30 days of the rejection. The
commenter recommended that the 30day period be tolled while a revised
proposal of a rejected request is being
evaluated so that the taxpayer would
not have to file an appeal while the
revision is under consideration. This
recommendation was not adopted. The
IRS’s procedures are designed to allow
a quick resolution of the taxpayer’s
request; tolling the appeal period would
add an unneeded layer of complexity to
the process and delay case resolution.
The commenter also recommended that
the IRS provide more definitive
guidance as to what qualifies as a good
faith revision. This recommendation
was not adopted because this guidance
is more appropriately left to the IRS
procedures.
Section 301.6159–1(e): Modification or
Termination of Installment Agreements
by the Internal Revenue Service
Proposed § 301.6159–1(e)(2)(i)
provided that the IRS may modify or
terminate an installment agreement if
the IRS determines that the financial
condition of the taxpayer has
significantly changed. Proposed
§ 301.6159–1(c)(3)(vi) provided that the
IRS and the taxpayer may agree to
modify or terminate an installment
agreement or may agree to a new
installment agreement that supersedes
the existing agreement. The commenter
recommended that the regulations
explicitly allow taxpayers to request a
modification or termination of an
existing installment agreement, as was
stated in existing § 301.6159–1(c)(3).
This clarification was adopted in
§ 301.6159–1(e)(3).
The commenter recommended that
the regulations require the taxpayer to
comply with the terms of an installment
agreement while a request for
modification is being considered and
that a proposed modification will not
result in a suspension of the statute of
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:27 Nov 24, 2009
Jkt 220001
limitations on collection. These
clarifications were also adopted in
§ 301.6159–1(e)(3).
The commenter recommended that a
taxpayer’s request to modify an existing
installment agreement should be exempt
from user fees under regulations
§§ 300.1 and 300.2. This
recommendation was not adopted
because user fees are outside the scope
of this regulation project.
Proposed § 301.6159–1(e)(2)(ii)(C)
provided that the IRS may modify or
terminate an installment agreement if
the taxpayer fails to provide a financial
condition update requested by the IRS.
The commenter recommended that the
regulations provide explicitly whether
the IRS may terminate an installment
agreement if the taxpayer provided
materially inaccurate or incomplete
information. This recommendation was
adopted. Section 301.6159–1(e)(1)(i)
was revised to clarify that the IRS may
terminate an installment agreement if
the taxpayer provided materially
inaccurate or incomplete information in
connection with a requested financial
update.
Proposed § 301.6159–1(e)(3) provided
that the IRS will generally notify the
taxpayer in writing at least 30 days prior
to terminating an installment agreement
and describe the reason for the
termination, after which the taxpayer
may provide information showing that
the IRS’s reason is incorrect. Proposed
§ 301.6159–1(e)(4) provided for the
administrative appeal of the
modification or termination of an
installment agreement to the Office of
Appeals if the request is properly made
within 30 days after the termination or
modification is to take effect. The
commenter recommended that the
regulations clarify that an appeal should
be made to the Office of Appeals within
30 days after the modification or
termination will take effect, regardless
of whether the taxpayer submits
additional information under
§ 301.6159–1(e)(3), has filled out Form
9423, ‘‘Collection Appeal Request,’’ or
has requested a meeting with a
Collection Manager. This
recommendation was not adopted in the
regulations because it is more
appropriately addressed in IRS forms
and procedures.
Proposed § 301.6159–1(e)(4) provided,
in part, that the taxpayer may
administratively appeal the
modification or termination of an
installment agreement to the Office of
Appeals. The commenter recommended
that the taxpayer be allowed to appeal
the IRS’s determination not to modify
an installment agreement. This
recommendation was not adopted. The
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
61527
IRS routinely grants taxpayer
modification requests that result in
agreements within the streamlined
criteria. See Internal Revenue Manual
5.19.1.5.4.24 at https://www.irs.gov/irm/
part5/irm_05-019-001.html. Taxpayers
do not have a statutory right to appeal
rejected modification requests, and the
IRS has not determined there is a need
for additional administrative review of
the denial of a modification request.
Section 301.6159–1(f): Effect of
Installment Agreement or Pending
Installment Agreement on Collection
Activity
Section 301.6159–1(f)(1) of the
proposed regulations stated that the IRS
may not levy during the time an
installment agreement is pending.
Proposed § 301.6159–1(f)(2) stated that
levy is not prohibited if an installment
agreement request was made solely to
delay collection. The commenter
recommended that the solely to delay
collection standard in the proposed
regulations be replaced with language
that references the ‘‘frivolous
submission’’ standard in section 6702(b)
of the Code. This recommendation was
not adopted. Under existing IRS
procedures, an installment agreement is
returned as made solely to delay
collection when there is no economic
reality to the request, the request fails to
address changes previously requested
by the IRS in response to a prior request,
the request ignores direction provided
by revenue officers, the request is made
by a taxpayer that has defaulted prior
installment agreements, or the request is
made at a time that causes it to be
classified as a request made to delay
enforcement action. See Internal
Revenue Manual 5.14.3.2 at https://
www.irs.gov/irm/part5/irm_05-014003.html. Section 6702(b) imposes a
$5,000 penalty for installment
agreement requests that reflect a desire
to delay or impede the administration of
the Federal tax laws, and the IRS has
not yet developed procedures defining
the kinds of installment agreements that
constitute frivolous submissions. The
standard in section 6702(b) therefore
may not be an appropriate standard for
identifying those installment
agreements that fail to qualify for the
prohibition against levy.
In the alternative, the commenter
recommended that the regulations state
that a taxpayer may appeal the IRS’s
levy action when the IRS determines
that an installment agreement request
was made solely to delay collection, and
that damages may be appropriate under
section 7433 of the Code. These
recommendations were not adopted.
Taxpayers’ rights to appeal proposed
E:\FR\FM\25NOR1.SGM
25NOR1
61528
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 226 / Wednesday, November 25, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
levies and seek damages are provided
for in the regulations under sections
6330 and 7433 of the Code, respectively.
Section 301.6159–1(g): Suspension of
the Statute of Limitations on Collection
Section 301.6159–1(g) of the proposed
regulations provided that the statute of
limitations on collection under section
6502 of the Code is suspended for the
period that a proposed installment
agreement is pending, plus 30 days
following a rejection, and during any
appeal. The commenter recommended
that the regulations clearly define when
an installment agreement is pending.
This recommendation is already
addressed by proposed § 301.6159–
1(b)(2), which provides a detailed
explanation of when an installment
agreement is pending.
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with RULES
Section 301.6159–1(h): Annual
Statement
Section 301.6159–1(h) of the
proposed regulations requires the IRS to
provide taxpayers with an annual
statement setting forth the balance owed
at the beginning of the year, the
payments made during the year, and the
remaining balance at the end of the year.
The commenter recommends that the
annual statement be as clear as possible
and that the IRS provide the taxpayer
with a single annual statement
describing all tax liabilities covered by
the agreement. Currently, the IRS sends
an annual statement for each separate
liability covered by an installment
agreement. No change was made to the
final regulations because this
recommendation is more appropriately
addressed when the IRS updates the
forms used for the annual statements.
Section 301.6159–1(i): Biennial Review
of Partial Payment Installment
Agreements
Section 301.6159–1(i) of the proposed
regulations required the IRS to perform
a review of the taxpayer’s financial
condition at least once every two years
in cases of partial payment installment
agreements. The proposed regulations
also stated that the purpose of the
review was to determine whether an
increase in payments is warranted. The
commenter recommended that
§ 301.6159–1(i) be rephrased to provide
that the biennial review of a taxpayer’s
financial condition may result in a
decrease, as well as an increase, in the
amount of payments being made. This
recommendation was not adopted.
While taxpayers may request a decrease
in the amount of payments due under
an installment agreement, the IRS does
not have the information to unilaterally
make that determination. The automatic
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:27 Nov 24, 2009
Jkt 220001
biennial review done by the IRS does
not, in every case, result in a request for
updated financial information. As
explained above, taxpayers may request
that their payments be lowered if their
financial condition has worsened.
■
Section 301.6159–1(k): Effective/
Applicability Date
■
Section 301.6159–1(k) of the proposed
regulations provided that the effective
date of the final regulations would be
the date the final regulations are
published in the Federal Register. The
commenter was concerned about how
previously proposed or accepted
installment agreements will be affected
by the regulations and recommended
that the effective date of paragraphs (b),
(c), and (d) apply prospectively. This
recommendation was not adopted. As
explained earlier and in the preamble to
the proposed regulations, the
regulations substantially reflect existing
practices. The regulations will therefore
have no effect on previously proposed
or accepted installment agreements.
Special Analyses
It has been determined that this
Treasury decision is not a significant
regulatory action as defined in
Executive Order 12866. Therefore, a
regulatory assessment is not required. It
also has been determined that section
553(b) of the Administrative Procedure
Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 5) does not apply
to these regulations, and because the
regulations do not impose a collection
of information on small entities, the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C.
chapter 6) does not apply. Pursuant to
section 7805(f) of the Code, the
proposed regulations preceding these
regulations were submitted to the Chief
Counsel for Advocacy of the Small
Business Administration for comment
on its impact on small business.
Drafting Information
The principal author of these
regulations is Walter Ryan, Office of
Associate Chief Counsel (Procedure and
Administration).
List of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 301
Employment taxes, Estate taxes,
Excise taxes, Gift taxes, Income taxes,
Penalties, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Adoption of Amendments to the
Regulations
Accordingly, 26 CFR part 301 is
amended as follows:
■
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
PART 301—PROCEDURE AND
ADMINISTRATION
Paragraph 1. The authority citation
for part 301 continues to read in part as
follows:
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *
Par. 2. Section 301.6159–0 is added to
read as follows:
§ 301.6159–0
Table of contents.
This section lists the major captions
that appear in the regulations under
§ 301.6159–1.
§ 301.6159–1 Agreements for the payment
of tax liabilities in installments.
(a) Authority.
(b) Procedures for submission and
consideration of proposed installment
agreements.
(c) Acceptance, form, and terms of
installment agreements.
(d) Rejection of a proposed
installment agreement.
(e) Modification or termination of
installment agreements by the Internal
Revenue Service.
(f) Effect of installment agreement or
pending installment agreement on
collection activity.
(g) Suspension of the statute of
limitations on collection.
(h) Annual statement.
(i) Biennial review of partial payment
installment agreements.
(j) Cross reference.
(k) Effective/applicability date.
■ Par. 3. Section 301.6159–1 is revised
to read as follows:
§ 301.6159–1 Agreements for payment of
tax liabilities in installments.
(a) Authority. The Commissioner may
enter into a written agreement with a
taxpayer that allows the taxpayer to
make scheduled periodic payments of
any tax liability if the Commissioner
determines that such agreement will
facilitate full or partial collection of the
tax liability.
(b) Procedures for submission and
consideration of proposed installment
agreements—(1) In general. A proposed
installment agreement must be
submitted according to the procedures,
and in the form and manner, prescribed
by the Commissioner.
(2) When a proposed installment
agreement becomes pending. A
proposed installment agreement
becomes pending when it is accepted
for processing. The Internal Revenue
Service (IRS) may not accept a proposed
installment agreement for processing
following reference of a case involving
the liability that is the subject of the
proposed installment agreement to the
Department of Justice for prosecution or
E:\FR\FM\25NOR1.SGM
25NOR1
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 226 / Wednesday, November 25, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
defense. The proposed installment
agreement remains pending until the
IRS accepts the proposal, the IRS
notifies the taxpayer that the proposal
has been rejected, or the proposal is
withdrawn by the taxpayer. If a
proposed installment agreement that has
been accepted for processing does not
contain sufficient information to permit
the IRS to evaluate whether the proposal
should be accepted, the IRS will request
the taxpayer to provide the needed
additional information. If the taxpayer
does not submit the additional
information that the IRS has requested
within a reasonable time period after
such a request, the IRS may reject the
proposed installment agreement.
(3) Revised proposals of installment
agreements submitted following
rejection. If, following the rejection of a
proposed installment agreement, the IRS
determines that the taxpayer made a
good faith revision of the proposal and
submitted the revision within 30 days of
the date of rejection, the provisions of
this section shall apply to that revised
proposal. If, however, the IRS
determines that a revision was not made
in good faith, the provisions of this
section do not apply to the revision and
the appeal period in paragraph (d)(3) of
this section continues to run from the
date of the original rejection.
(c) Acceptance, form, and terms of
installment agreements—(1) Acceptance
of an installment agreement—(i) In
general. A proposed installment
agreement has not been accepted until
the IRS notifies the taxpayer or the
taxpayer’s representative of the
acceptance. Except as provided in
paragraph (c)(1)(iii) of this section, the
Commissioner has the discretion to
accept or reject any proposed
installment agreement.
(ii) Acceptance does not reduce
liabilities. The acceptance of an
installment agreement by the IRS does
not reduce the amount of taxes, interest,
or penalties owed. (However, penalties
may continue to accrue at a reduced rate
pursuant to section 6651(h).)
(iii) Guaranteed installment
agreements. In the case of a liability of
an individual for income tax, the
Commissioner shall accept a proposed
installment agreement if, as of the date
the individual proposes the installment
agreement—
(A) The aggregate amount of the
liability (not including interest,
penalties, additions to tax, and
additional amounts) does not exceed
$10,000;
(B) The taxpayer (and, if the liability
relates to a joint return, the taxpayer’s
spouse) has not, during any of the
preceding five taxable years—
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:27 Nov 24, 2009
Jkt 220001
(1) Failed to file any income tax
return;
(2) Failed to pay any required income
tax; or
(3) Entered into an installment
agreement for the payment of any
income tax;
(C) The Commissioner determines
that the taxpayer is financially unable to
pay the liability in full when due (and
the taxpayer submits any information
the Commissioner requires to make that
determination);
(D) The installment agreement
requires full payment of the liability
within three years; and
(E) The taxpayer agrees to comply
with the provisions of the Internal
Revenue Code for the period the
agreement is in effect.
(2) Form of installment agreements.
An installment agreement must be in
writing. A written installment
agreement may take the form of a
document signed by the taxpayer and
the Commissioner or a written
confirmation of an agreement entered
into by the taxpayer and the
Commissioner that is mailed or
personally delivered to the taxpayer.
(3) Terms of installment agreements.
(i) Except as otherwise provided in this
section, an installment agreement is
effective from the date the IRS notifies
the taxpayer or the taxpayer’s
representative of its acceptance until the
date the agreement ends by its terms or
until it is superseded by a new
installment agreement.
(ii) By its terms, an installment
agreement may end upon the expiration
of the period of limitations on collection
in section 6502 and § 301.6502–1, or at
some prior date.
(iii) As a condition to entering into an
installment agreement with a taxpayer,
the Commissioner may require that—
(A) The taxpayer agree to a reasonable
extension of the period of limitations on
collection; and
(B) The agreement contain terms that
protect the interests of the Government.
(iv) Except as otherwise provided in
an installment agreement, all payments
made under the installment agreement
will be applied in the best interests of
the Government.
(v) While an installment agreement is
in effect, the Commissioner may
request, and the taxpayer must provide,
a financial condition update at any time.
(vi) At any time after entering into an
installment agreement, the
Commissioner and the taxpayer may
agree to modify or terminate an
installment agreement or may agree to a
new installment agreement that
supersedes the existing agreement.
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
61529
(d) Rejection of a proposed
installment agreement—(1) When a
proposed installment agreement
becomes rejected. A proposed
installment agreement has not been
rejected until the IRS notifies the
taxpayer or the taxpayer’s representative
of the rejection, the reason(s) for
rejection, and the right to an appeal.
(2) Independent administrative
review. The IRS may not notify a
taxpayer or taxpayer’s representative of
the rejection of an installment
agreement until an independent
administrative review of the proposed
rejection is completed.
(3) Appeal of rejection of a proposed
installment agreement. The taxpayer
may administratively appeal a rejection
of a proposed installment agreement to
the IRS Office of Appeals (Appeals) if,
within the 30-day period commencing
the day after the taxpayer is notified of
the rejection, the taxpayer requests an
appeal in the manner provided by the
Commissioner.
(e) Modification or termination of
installment agreements by the Internal
Revenue Service—(1) Inadequate
information or jeopardy. The
Commissioner may terminate an
installment agreement if the
Commissioner determines that—
(i) Information which was provided to
the IRS by the taxpayer or the taxpayer’s
representative in connection with either
the granting of the installment
agreement or a request for a financial
update was inaccurate or incomplete in
any material respect; or
(ii) Collection of any liability to which
the installment agreement applies is in
jeopardy.
(2) Change in financial condition,
failure to timely pay an installment or
another Federal tax liability, or failure
to provide requested financial
information. The Commissioner may
modify or terminate an installment
agreement if—
(i) The Commissioner determines that
the financial condition of a taxpayer
that is party to the agreement has
significantly changed; or
(ii) A taxpayer that is party to the
installment agreement fails to—
(A) Timely pay an installment in
accordance with the terms of the
installment agreement;
(B) Pay any other Federal tax liability
when the liability becomes due; or
(C) Provide a financial condition
update requested by the Commissioner.
(3) Request by taxpayer. Upon request
by a taxpayer that is a party to the
installment agreement, the
Commissioner may terminate or modify
the terms of an installment agreement if
the Commissioner determines that the
E:\FR\FM\25NOR1.SGM
25NOR1
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with RULES
61530
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 226 / Wednesday, November 25, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
financial condition of the taxpayer has
significantly changed. The taxpayer’s
request will not suspend the statute of
limitations under section 6502 for
collection of any liability. While the
Commissioner is considering the
request, the taxpayer shall comply with
the terms of the existing installment
agreement.
(4) Notice. Unless the Commissioner
determines that collection of the tax is
in jeopardy, the Commissioner will
notify the taxpayer in writing at least 30
days prior to modifying or terminating
an installment agreement pursuant to
paragraph (e)(1) or (2) of this section.
The notice provided pursuant to this
section must briefly describe the reason
for the intended modification or
termination. Upon receiving notice, the
taxpayer may provide information
showing that the reason for the
proposed modification or termination is
incorrect.
(5) Appeal of modification or
termination of an installment
agreement. The taxpayer may
administratively appeal the
modification or termination of an
installment agreement to Appeals if,
following issuance of the notice
required by paragraph (e)(4) of this
section and prior to the expiration of the
30-day period commencing the day after
the modification or termination is to
take effect, the taxpayer requests an
appeal in the manner provided by the
Commissioner.
(f) Effect of installment agreement or
pending installment agreement on
collection activity—(1) In general. No
levy may be made to collect a tax
liability that is the subject of an
installment agreement during the period
that a proposed installment agreement is
pending with the IRS, for 30 days
immediately following the rejection of a
proposed installment agreement, during
the period that an installment agreement
is in effect, and for 30 days immediately
following the termination of an
installment agreement. If, prior to the
expiration of the 30-day period
following the rejection or termination of
an installment agreement, the taxpayer
appeals the rejection or termination
decision, no levy may be made while
the rejection or termination is being
considered by Appeals. This section
will not prohibit levy to collect the
liability of any person other than the
person or persons named in the
installment agreement.
(2) Exceptions. Paragraph (f)(1) of this
section shall not prohibit levy if the
taxpayer files a written notice with the
IRS that waives the restriction on levy
imposed by this section, the IRS
determines that the proposed
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:27 Nov 24, 2009
Jkt 220001
installment agreement was submitted
solely to delay collection, or the IRS
determines that collection of the tax to
which the installment agreement or
proposed installment agreement relates
is in jeopardy.
(3) Other actions by the IRS while levy
is prohibited—(i) In general. The IRS
may take actions other than levy to
protect the interests of the Government
with regard to the liability identified in
an installment agreement or proposed
installment agreement. Those actions
include, for example—
(A) Crediting an overpayment against
the liability pursuant to section 6402;
(B) Filing or refiling notices of Federal
tax lien; and
(C) Taking action to collect from any
person who is not named in the
installment agreement or proposed
installment agreement but who is liable
for the tax to which the installment
agreement relates.
(ii) Proceedings in court. Except as
otherwise provided in this paragraph
(f)(3)(ii), the IRS will not refer a case to
the Department of Justice for the
commencement of a proceeding in
court, against a person named in an
installment agreement or proposed
installment agreement, if levy to collect
the liability is prohibited by paragraph
(f)(1) of this section. Without regard to
whether a person is named in an
installment agreement or proposed
installment agreement, however, the IRS
may authorize the Department of Justice
to file a counterclaim or third-party
complaint in a refund action or to join
that person in any other proceeding in
which liability for the tax that is the
subject of the installment agreement or
proposed installment agreement may be
established or disputed, including a suit
against the United States under 28
U.S.C. 2410. In addition, the United
States may file a claim in any
bankruptcy proceeding or insolvency
action brought by or against such
person. If a person named in an
installment agreement is joined in a
proceeding, the United States obtains a
judgment against that person, and the
case is referred back to the IRS for
collection, collection will continue to
occur pursuant to the terms of the
installment agreement. Notwithstanding
the installment agreement, any claim or
suit permitted will be for the full
amount of the liabilities owed.
(g) Suspension of the statute of
limitations on collection. The statute of
limitations under section 6502 for
collection of any liability shall be
suspended during the period that a
proposed installment agreement relating
to that liability is pending with the IRS,
for 30 days immediately following the
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
rejection of a proposed installment
agreement, and for 30 days immediately
following the termination of an
installment agreement. If, within the 30
days following the rejection or
termination of an installment
agreement, the taxpayer files an appeal
with Appeals, the statute of limitations
for collection shall be suspended while
the rejection or termination is being
considered by Appeals. The statute of
limitations for collection shall continue
to run if an exception under paragraph
(f)(2) of this section applies and levy is
not prohibited with respect to the
taxpayer.
(h) Annual statement. The
Commissioner shall provide each
taxpayer who is party to an installment
agreement under this section with an
annual statement setting forth the initial
balance owed at the beginning of the
year, the payments made during the
year, and the remaining balance as of
the end of the year.
(i) Biennial review of partial payment
installment agreements. The
Commissioner shall perform a review of
the taxpayer’s financial condition in the
case of a partial payment installment
agreement at least once every two years.
The purpose of this review is to
determine whether the taxpayer’s
financial condition has significantly
changed so as to warrant an increase in
the value of the payments being made
or termination of the agreement.
(j) Cross reference. Pursuant to section
6601(b)(1), the last day prescribed for
payment is determined without regard
to any installment agreement, including
for purposes of computing penalties and
interest provided by the Internal
Revenue Code. For special rules
regarding the computation of the failure
to pay penalty while certain installment
agreements are in effect, see section
6651(h) and § 301.6651–1(a)(4).
(k) Effective/applicability date. This
section is applicable on November 25,
2009.
■ Par. 4. Section 301.6331–4, paragraph
(d) is revised and paragraph (e) is added
to read as follows:
§ 301.6331–4 Restrictions on levy while
installment agreements are pending or in
effect.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) Cross-reference. For provisions
relating to the making of levies while an
installment agreement is pending or in
effect, see § 301.6159–1.
(e) Effective/applicability date.
Paragraphs (a), (b), and (c) are
applicable beginning December 18,
2002. Paragraph (d) is applicable
beginning November 25, 2009.
E:\FR\FM\25NOR1.SGM
25NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 226 / Wednesday, November 25, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
Approved: November 11, 2009.
Steven T. Miller,
Deputy Commissioner of Services and
Enforcement.
Approved: November 11, 2009.
Michael F. Mundaca,
Acting Assistant Secretary of the Treasury
(Tax Policy).
[FR Doc. E9–28330 Filed 11–24–09; 8:45 am]
AGENCY: Mine Safety and Health
Administration (MSHA), Labor.
ACTION: Final rule; correction.
States and with a sufficient legal basis
for preemption. The Memorandum
directs executive departments and
agencies to ‘‘review regulations issued
within the past 10 years that contain
statements in regulatory preambles or
codified provisions intended by the
department or agency to preempt State
law, in order to decide whether such
statements or provisions are justified
under applicable legal principles
governing preemption.’’ In addition, the
memorandum states that ‘‘where the
head of a department or agency
determines that a regulatory statement
of preemption or codified regulatory
provision cannot be so justified, the
head of that department or agency
should initiate appropriate action,
which may include amendment of the
relevant regulation.’’
Section 506(b) of the Federal Mine
Safety and Health Act of 1977 (Mine
Act), concerning ‘‘Effect on State Laws,’’
specifically addresses preemption of
state law as follows:
SUMMARY: This rule informs the mining
community that MSHA rescinds the
Agency’s intent stated in the preamble
to the final rule on Refuge Alternatives
for Underground Coal Mines,
concerning preemption of private tort
litigation with respect to the Agency’s
approval of specifications for a refuge
alternative.
The provisions of any State law or
regulation in effect upon the operative date
of this Act, or which may become effective
thereafter, which provide for more stringent
health and safety standards applicable to coal
or other mines than do the provisions of this
Act or any order issued or any mandatory
health or safety standard shall not thereby be
construed or held to be in conflict with this
Act. 30 U.S.C. 955.
BILLING CODE 4830–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Mine Safety and Health Administration
30 CFR Parts 7 and 75
RIN 1219–AB58
Refuge Alternatives for Underground
Coal Mines
DATES:
Effective Date: November 25,
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with RULES
2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Patricia W. Silvey, Director, Office of
Standards, Regulations, and Variances,
MSHA, 1100 Wilson Boulevard, Room
2350, Arlington, Virginia 22209–3939.
Ms. Silvey can be reached at 202–693–
9440 (voice), 202–693–9441 (facsimile),
or silvey.patricia@dol.gov (Internet
e-mail).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
December 31, 2008, MSHA published a
final rule on Refuge Alternatives for
Underground Coal Mines. (73 FR
80656). The preamble includes a
discussion on preemption, and states
that ‘‘it is MSHA’s intent that its
approval of specifications for a refuge
alternative preempts private tort
litigation questioning the propriety of
those specifications.’’ (73 FR 80658).
On May 20, 2009, the President issued
a Memorandum for the Heads of
Executive Departments and Agencies on
Preemption. The purpose of the
Memorandum is to state the general
policy of the Administration that
preemption of State law by executive
departments and agencies should be
undertaken only with full consideration
of the legitimate prerogatives of the
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:27 Nov 24, 2009
Jkt 220001
In addition, the House Report to the
Mine Act, states that ‘‘Federal law
would supersede any State law in
conflict with it,’’ but that ‘‘State laws
providing more stringent standards than
exist under the Federal law, however,
would not be held in conflict with the
[Mine] act.’’ H. Rep. No. 95–312, 95th
Cong., 1st Sess., at 55 (1977).
In accordance with the Presidential
Memorandum on Preemption, MSHA
has reviewed the Agency’s standards
and regulations issued within the past
10 years. MSHA’s review found that a
statement in the preamble to the Refuge
Alternatives final rule is the only rule
issued in the past 10 years to contain a
preemption statement.
MSHA has determined that the Mine
Act does not show any basis, or
Congressional intent, for inferring any
attempt to preempt state tort law
regarding MSHA’s approval
specifications for refuge alternatives. As
stated earlier, the Mine Act provides, for
example, that State laws or regulations
that provide more stringent
requirements than those imposed under
the Mine Act, are not construed or held
to be in conflict with the Mine Act.
MSHA’s determination to rescind the
preemption statement in the preamble
to the Refuge Alternatives rule is
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
61531
consistent with the intent of the Mine
Act and is consistent with the
Presidential Memorandum. The
preemption statement in the preamble
was, at best, interpretive guidance
purporting to interpret statutory
language in the Mine Act, which was
included in the preamble of the final
rule without seeking prior public
comment. It did not create any new law
or substantive rule, but simply stated
what the agency thought the statute
meant. Further, this interpretation was
published only recently, making it
unlikely that any member of MSHA’s
regulated community has relied to their
detriment on the interpretation. Under
these circumstances, notice and
comment also are not required in
withdrawing this interpretation. See
Warshauer v. Solis, 577 F.3d 1330 (11th
Cir. 2009); MetWest, Inc. v. Sec’y of
Labor, 560 F.3d 506, 509–511 (DC Cir.
2009).
Accordingly, MSHA rescinds the last
paragraph of the section-by-section
discussion of ‘‘Section 7.501 Purpose
and Scope,’’ starting on line 51 of the
center column and ending on line 24 of
the third column, 73 FR 80658, for the
reason that this statement is not justified
under the Mine Act principles
governing preemption, and there was no
intent by Congress, under the Mine Act,
to supersede state action in this regard.
Dated: November 19, 2009.
Joseph A. Main,
Assistant Secretary for Mine Safety and
Health.
[FR Doc. E9–28214 Filed 11–24–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–43–P
POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION
39 CFR Part 3020
[Docket Nos. MC2010–2 and CP2010–2;
Order No. 324]
New Postal Product
Postal Regulatory Commission.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Commission is adding
the Priority Mail Contract 20 to the
Competitive Product List. This action is
consistent with changes in a recent law
governing postal operations.
Republication of the lists of market
dominant and competitive products is
also consistent with new requirements
in the law.
DATES: Effective November 25, 2009 and
is applicable beginning October 28,
2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Stephen L. Sharfman, General Counsel,
E:\FR\FM\25NOR1.SGM
25NOR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 226 (Wednesday, November 25, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 61525-61531]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-28330]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 301
[TD 9473]
RIN 1545-AU97
Agreements for Payment of Tax Liabilities in Installments
AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.
ACTION: Final regulations.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document contains final regulations relating to the
payment of tax liabilities in installments. The regulations reflect
changes to the law made by the Taxpayer Bill of Rights II, the Internal
Revenue Service Restructuring and Reform Act of 1998, and the American
Jobs Creation Act of 2004. The regulations will affect taxpayers
submitting installment agreements to the IRS.
DATES: Effective Date: These regulations are effective on November 25,
2009.
Applicability Date: For the date of applicability, see Sec.
301.6159(k).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Walter Ryan, (202) 622-3620 (not a
toll-free number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
This document contains amendments to the Procedure and
Administration Regulations (26 CFR part 301) under section 6159 of the
Internal Revenue Code (Code). Section 6159 allows the IRS to enter into
agreements for the payment of any unpaid tax in installments. Taxpayers
may request administrative review of IRS decisions to terminate
installment agreements pursuant to section 6159(e), added to the Code
by section 202 of the Taxpayer Bill of Rights II, Public Law 104-168
(110 Stat. 1452, 1457 (1996)). Taxpayers may appeal rejections of
proposed installment agreements under section 7122(e), added to the
Code by section 3462 of Internal Revenue Service Restructuring and
Reform Act of 1998 (RRA 98), Public Law 105-206 (112 Stat. 685, 764
(1998)). Section 6159(c), added to the Code by section 3467 of RRA
1998, requires the IRS to accept a proposed installment agreement for
income taxes under certain circumstances. Section 3506 of RRA 1998
requires the IRS to send each taxpayer with an installment agreement an
annual statement showing the balance due at the beginning of the year,
the payments made during the year, and the remaining balance due at the
end of the year.
Section 843 of the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 (AJCA),
Public Law 108-357 (118 Stat. 1418, 1600 (2004)), amended section
6159(a) to allow the IRS to enter into installment agreements that
provide for partial (as well as full) payment of a tax liability, but
excludes partial payment installment agreements from the scope of
installment agreements that must be accepted by the IRS. Section 843 of
the AJCA also added new section 6159(d), requiring the IRS to review
partial payment installment agreements every two years. The primary
purpose of the review is to determine whether the financial condition
of the taxpayer has significantly changed so as to warrant an increase
in the value of the payments being made. See H. Rep. No. 108-755, 108th
Cong., 2d Sess., 2005 U.S.C.C.A.N. 1341 (October 7, 2004).
On March 5, 2007, a notice of proposed rulemaking (REG-100841-97;
72 FR 9712) was published in the Federal Register. The proposed
regulations reflected the changes made to section 6159 by the Taxpayer
Bill of Rights II, the RRA 98, and the AJCA. The proposed regulations
reflected current IRS administrative practice. The IRS received one set
of written comments with numerous recommendations. No public hearing
was requested or held. After consideration of the comments, the
proposed regulations are adopted as revised by this Treasury decision.
Summary of Comments and Explanation of Revisions
The final regulations adopt certain recommendations contained in
the comments by clarifying two provisions of the proposed regulations.
As explained in this preamble, Sec. 301.6159-1(e)(3) was amended to
clarify that the taxpayer may submit a request to modify or terminate
the installment agreement. Section 301.6159-1(e)(3) further clarifies
that such a request will not suspend the statute of limitations on
collection and the taxpayer must comply with the existing installment
agreement while the request is being considered. As also explained in
this preamble, Sec. 301.6159-1(e)(1)(i) clarifies that the IRS may
terminate an installment agreement if the taxpayer provides materially
incomplete or inaccurate information in response to an IRS request for
a financial update.
The following is a section-by-section analysis of the comments.
Section 301.6159-1(b): Procedures for Submission and Consideration of
Proposed Installment Agreements
Section 301.6159-1(b) of the proposed regulations provided that an
installment agreement request must be submitted according to procedures
prescribed by the IRS. It did not require the IRS to accept or reject
the request within a specific time frame. The commenter proposed to
limit the IRS's time to consider an installment agreement to 90 days;
if the IRS fails to act in that time, the agreement would be granted
automatically. The commenter reasoned that the limited time frame would
benefit the IRS because more installments agreements would be
automatically allowed, thereby increasing revenues, and would benefit
the taxpayer by allowing payments to begin quickly and efficiently. The
recommendation was not adopted for two reasons. First, the IRS already
grants installment agreements quickly and automatically in the vast
majority of
[[Page 61526]]
cases. If the taxpayer owes less than $25,000 and offers to pay the
liabilities in full within 5 years, the agreement can be granted
automatically under the IRS's ``streamlined'' installment agreement
procedures. See Internal Revenue Manual 5.14.5.2 at https://www.irs.gov/irm/part5/irm_05-014-005.html. The IRS granted over 2.62 million
installment agreements in fiscal year 2008, of which over 2.51 million
were granted through the IRS's streamlined procedures. In cases that do
not meet the streamlined criteria, the IRS has determined that a more
detailed review of the taxpayer's financial situation is warranted.
Second, the IRS generally responds to non-streamlined installment
agreement requests in a timely manner. During the filing season,
however, inventory fluctuations may cause delays. The automatic
allowance of installment agreements in such cases would not be
appropriate.
Proposed Sec. 301.6159-1(b)(2) provided that an installment
agreement request becomes pending when it is accepted for processing.
The commenter recommended that the IRS send an automatically-generated
response acknowledging the date of acceptance for processing to the
taxpayer and the taxpayer's representative. This recommendation was not
adopted. The vast majority of installment agreements are streamlined
agreements, which the IRS accepts very quickly. The IRS will, however,
consider adopting an administrative procedure for the minority of cases
where it anticipates a time lag between acceptance for processing and
the acceptance or rejection of the installment agreement.
Proposed Sec. 301.6159-1(b)(2) also provided that if an
installment agreement request does not contain sufficient information
to permit the IRS to evaluate whether the request should be accepted,
the IRS will request the needed information. The commenter recommended
that all requests for additional information should be reasonably
necessary. The proposed regulations already address this recommendation
by directing that requests be for ``needed'' information.
Proposed Sec. 301.6159-1(b)(3) allowed a taxpayer to submit a good
faith revision of a rejected installment agreement request within 30
days of rejection. The commenter recommended that the time for
taxpayers to submit a good faith revision should be extended to 60 days
because taxpayers often have difficulty obtaining the necessary
documents within 30 days. This recommendation was not adopted. The
recommendation would apply to a small number of installment agreement
requests that are not accepted under the IRS's streamlined procedures.
In these cases, the IRS requests the information necessary for a
financial analysis before rejecting the installment agreement request.
See Internal Revenue Manual 5.15.1.6 at https://www.irs.gov/irm/part5/irm_05-015-001.html. Allowing 60 days following the rejection would
encourage untimely responses and delay case resolution.
Section 301.6159-1(c): Acceptance, Form, and Terms of Installment
Agreements
Section 301.6159-1(c)(1) of the proposed regulations provided that
an installment agreement request has not been accepted until the IRS
notifies the taxpayer or the taxpayer's representative of the
acceptance. Section 6159(a) requires that an installment agreement be
in writing, and proposed Sec. 301.6159-1(c)(2) provided that the
writing may take the form of a document signed by the taxpayer and the
IRS or the written confirmation of an agreement entered into by the
taxpayer and the IRS that is mailed or personally delivered to the
taxpayer. The commenter recommended that the IRS's notification of the
acceptance or rejection of a proposed installment agreement also be
directed to the taxpayer's representative and include the terms of the
agreement and payment submission information. These recommendations
were not adopted in the regulations because they are more appropriately
addressed in the IRS's procedures. The IRS currently does, however,
provide written notification to the taxpayer and the taxpayer's
representative of the acceptance or rejection of an installment
agreement and the suggested information.
The commenter was concerned that the IRS intended to change its
streamlined procedures and recommended that the procedures be retained.
The commenter was also concerned that proposed Sec. 301.6159-
1(c)(3)(iii)(A) may represent a departure from the IRS's current policy
that limits the acceptance of extensions of the collection statute of
limitations in connection with installment agreements to the narrow
subset of partial payment installment agreements in which the liability
will not be paid in full under the agreement before the collection
statute expires. As stated in the preamble to the notice of proposed
rulemaking, the regulations were intended to reflect existing
practices. The regulations will have no effect on the IRS's streamlined
procedures or its policy with regard to waivers of the collection
statute.
The commenter stated that the proposed regulations did not explain
the inclusion of Sec. 301.6159-1(c)(3)(ii), which provided that an
installment agreement may, by its terms, end upon the expiration of the
period of limitations on collection, or at some prior date. As
explained in the preamble to the proposed regulations, this provision
clarifies that the IRS may enter into partial payment installment
agreements that end upon the running of the collection statute, or that
end prior to that time so that the IRS may collect the balance of the
tax liability against any property belonging to the taxpayer before the
collection period expires. The IRS does not currently enter into
partial payment installment agreements that expire before the end of
the collection statute and has no plans to do so routinely in the
future.
Proposed Sec. 301.6159-1(c)(3)(v) provided that while an
installment agreement is in effect, the IRS may request a financial
condition update from the taxpayer at any time. The commenter
recommended that the IRS be permitted to request only one financial
condition update per year. This recommendation was not adopted. The IRS
very rarely requests updates more than once a year. In certain rare
circumstances, more frequent updates may be appropriate, such as when
the IRS has reason to believe that the taxpayer's financial condition
has improved.
Section 301.6159-1(d): Rejection of a Proposed Installment Agreement
Section 301.6159-1(d)(2) of the proposed regulations provided that
the IRS may not notify a taxpayer or the taxpayer's representative of
the rejection of an installment agreement until an independent review
of proposed rejection is completed. The commenter was concerned that
the proposed regulations did not provide any guidance as to how the
independent administrative review will be assured. The commenter
recommended that the review be undertaken by an IRS office located in a
different territory. The recommendation was not adopted. Managers in
the IRS offices in San Jose, California, and Jacksonville, Florida,
supervise employees throughout the United States who review rejected
installment agreements. An independent review is assured by assigning
these cases to an employee who has no prior involvement in the case and
who reports to a supervisor in either of these two offices.
The commenter recommended that the determination that the taxpayer
did not submit a good faith revision be
[[Page 61527]]
subject to independent administrative review. This recommendation was
not adopted because it would delay case resolution and would, in
effect, treat requests that were not made in good faith as valid
requests. The commenter also recommended that the rejection of
revisions that were made in good faith receive independent review. The
proposed regulation already provided for this review. Proposed Sec.
301.6159-1(b) stated that if the IRS determines that the taxpayer made
a good faith revision within 30 days of the rejection, the provisions
of Sec. 301.6159-1 apply to the revised proposal.
Proposed Sec. 301.6159-1(d)(3) provided that a taxpayer may appeal
the rejection of an installment agreement request within 30 days of the
rejection. The commenter recommended that the 30-day period be tolled
while a revised proposal of a rejected request is being evaluated so
that the taxpayer would not have to file an appeal while the revision
is under consideration. This recommendation was not adopted. The IRS's
procedures are designed to allow a quick resolution of the taxpayer's
request; tolling the appeal period would add an unneeded layer of
complexity to the process and delay case resolution. The commenter also
recommended that the IRS provide more definitive guidance as to what
qualifies as a good faith revision. This recommendation was not adopted
because this guidance is more appropriately left to the IRS procedures.
Section 301.6159-1(e): Modification or Termination of Installment
Agreements by the Internal Revenue Service
Proposed Sec. 301.6159-1(e)(2)(i) provided that the IRS may modify
or terminate an installment agreement if the IRS determines that the
financial condition of the taxpayer has significantly changed. Proposed
Sec. 301.6159-1(c)(3)(vi) provided that the IRS and the taxpayer may
agree to modify or terminate an installment agreement or may agree to a
new installment agreement that supersedes the existing agreement. The
commenter recommended that the regulations explicitly allow taxpayers
to request a modification or termination of an existing installment
agreement, as was stated in existing Sec. 301.6159-1(c)(3). This
clarification was adopted in Sec. 301.6159-1(e)(3).
The commenter recommended that the regulations require the taxpayer
to comply with the terms of an installment agreement while a request
for modification is being considered and that a proposed modification
will not result in a suspension of the statute of limitations on
collection. These clarifications were also adopted in Sec. 301.6159-
1(e)(3).
The commenter recommended that a taxpayer's request to modify an
existing installment agreement should be exempt from user fees under
regulations Sec. Sec. 300.1 and 300.2. This recommendation was not
adopted because user fees are outside the scope of this regulation
project.
Proposed Sec. 301.6159-1(e)(2)(ii)(C) provided that the IRS may
modify or terminate an installment agreement if the taxpayer fails to
provide a financial condition update requested by the IRS. The
commenter recommended that the regulations provide explicitly whether
the IRS may terminate an installment agreement if the taxpayer provided
materially inaccurate or incomplete information. This recommendation
was adopted. Section 301.6159-1(e)(1)(i) was revised to clarify that
the IRS may terminate an installment agreement if the taxpayer provided
materially inaccurate or incomplete information in connection with a
requested financial update.
Proposed Sec. 301.6159-1(e)(3) provided that the IRS will
generally notify the taxpayer in writing at least 30 days prior to
terminating an installment agreement and describe the reason for the
termination, after which the taxpayer may provide information showing
that the IRS's reason is incorrect. Proposed Sec. 301.6159-1(e)(4)
provided for the administrative appeal of the modification or
termination of an installment agreement to the Office of Appeals if the
request is properly made within 30 days after the termination or
modification is to take effect. The commenter recommended that the
regulations clarify that an appeal should be made to the Office of
Appeals within 30 days after the modification or termination will take
effect, regardless of whether the taxpayer submits additional
information under Sec. 301.6159-1(e)(3), has filled out Form 9423,
``Collection Appeal Request,'' or has requested a meeting with a
Collection Manager. This recommendation was not adopted in the
regulations because it is more appropriately addressed in IRS forms and
procedures.
Proposed Sec. 301.6159-1(e)(4) provided, in part, that the
taxpayer may administratively appeal the modification or termination of
an installment agreement to the Office of Appeals. The commenter
recommended that the taxpayer be allowed to appeal the IRS's
determination not to modify an installment agreement. This
recommendation was not adopted. The IRS routinely grants taxpayer
modification requests that result in agreements within the streamlined
criteria. See Internal Revenue Manual 5.19.1.5.4.24 at https://www.irs.gov/irm/part5/irm_05-019-001.html. Taxpayers do not have a
statutory right to appeal rejected modification requests, and the IRS
has not determined there is a need for additional administrative review
of the denial of a modification request.
Section 301.6159-1(f): Effect of Installment Agreement or Pending
Installment Agreement on Collection Activity
Section 301.6159-1(f)(1) of the proposed regulations stated that
the IRS may not levy during the time an installment agreement is
pending. Proposed Sec. 301.6159-1(f)(2) stated that levy is not
prohibited if an installment agreement request was made solely to delay
collection. The commenter recommended that the solely to delay
collection standard in the proposed regulations be replaced with
language that references the ``frivolous submission'' standard in
section 6702(b) of the Code. This recommendation was not adopted. Under
existing IRS procedures, an installment agreement is returned as made
solely to delay collection when there is no economic reality to the
request, the request fails to address changes previously requested by
the IRS in response to a prior request, the request ignores direction
provided by revenue officers, the request is made by a taxpayer that
has defaulted prior installment agreements, or the request is made at a
time that causes it to be classified as a request made to delay
enforcement action. See Internal Revenue Manual 5.14.3.2 at https://www.irs.gov/irm/part5/irm_05-014-003.html. Section 6702(b) imposes a
$5,000 penalty for installment agreement requests that reflect a desire
to delay or impede the administration of the Federal tax laws, and the
IRS has not yet developed procedures defining the kinds of installment
agreements that constitute frivolous submissions. The standard in
section 6702(b) therefore may not be an appropriate standard for
identifying those installment agreements that fail to qualify for the
prohibition against levy.
In the alternative, the commenter recommended that the regulations
state that a taxpayer may appeal the IRS's levy action when the IRS
determines that an installment agreement request was made solely to
delay collection, and that damages may be appropriate under section
7433 of the Code. These recommendations were not adopted. Taxpayers'
rights to appeal proposed
[[Page 61528]]
levies and seek damages are provided for in the regulations under
sections 6330 and 7433 of the Code, respectively.
Section 301.6159-1(g): Suspension of the Statute of Limitations on
Collection
Section 301.6159-1(g) of the proposed regulations provided that the
statute of limitations on collection under section 6502 of the Code is
suspended for the period that a proposed installment agreement is
pending, plus 30 days following a rejection, and during any appeal. The
commenter recommended that the regulations clearly define when an
installment agreement is pending. This recommendation is already
addressed by proposed Sec. 301.6159-1(b)(2), which provides a detailed
explanation of when an installment agreement is pending.
Section 301.6159-1(h): Annual Statement
Section 301.6159-1(h) of the proposed regulations requires the IRS
to provide taxpayers with an annual statement setting forth the balance
owed at the beginning of the year, the payments made during the year,
and the remaining balance at the end of the year. The commenter
recommends that the annual statement be as clear as possible and that
the IRS provide the taxpayer with a single annual statement describing
all tax liabilities covered by the agreement. Currently, the IRS sends
an annual statement for each separate liability covered by an
installment agreement. No change was made to the final regulations
because this recommendation is more appropriately addressed when the
IRS updates the forms used for the annual statements.
Section 301.6159-1(i): Biennial Review of Partial Payment Installment
Agreements
Section 301.6159-1(i) of the proposed regulations required the IRS
to perform a review of the taxpayer's financial condition at least once
every two years in cases of partial payment installment agreements. The
proposed regulations also stated that the purpose of the review was to
determine whether an increase in payments is warranted. The commenter
recommended that Sec. 301.6159-1(i) be rephrased to provide that the
biennial review of a taxpayer's financial condition may result in a
decrease, as well as an increase, in the amount of payments being made.
This recommendation was not adopted. While taxpayers may request a
decrease in the amount of payments due under an installment agreement,
the IRS does not have the information to unilaterally make that
determination. The automatic biennial review done by the IRS does not,
in every case, result in a request for updated financial information.
As explained above, taxpayers may request that their payments be
lowered if their financial condition has worsened.
Section 301.6159-1(k): Effective/Applicability Date
Section 301.6159-1(k) of the proposed regulations provided that the
effective date of the final regulations would be the date the final
regulations are published in the Federal Register. The commenter was
concerned about how previously proposed or accepted installment
agreements will be affected by the regulations and recommended that the
effective date of paragraphs (b), (c), and (d) apply prospectively.
This recommendation was not adopted. As explained earlier and in the
preamble to the proposed regulations, the regulations substantially
reflect existing practices. The regulations will therefore have no
effect on previously proposed or accepted installment agreements.
Special Analyses
It has been determined that this Treasury decision is not a
significant regulatory action as defined in Executive Order 12866.
Therefore, a regulatory assessment is not required. It also has been
determined that section 553(b) of the Administrative Procedure Act (5
U.S.C. chapter 5) does not apply to these regulations, and because the
regulations do not impose a collection of information on small
entities, the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 6) does not
apply. Pursuant to section 7805(f) of the Code, the proposed
regulations preceding these regulations were submitted to the Chief
Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration for comment
on its impact on small business.
Drafting Information
The principal author of these regulations is Walter Ryan, Office of
Associate Chief Counsel (Procedure and Administration).
List of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 301
Employment taxes, Estate taxes, Excise taxes, Gift taxes, Income
taxes, Penalties, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Adoption of Amendments to the Regulations
0
Accordingly, 26 CFR part 301 is amended as follows:
PART 301--PROCEDURE AND ADMINISTRATION
0
Paragraph 1. The authority citation for part 301 continues to read in
part as follows:
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *
0
Par. 2. Section 301.6159-0 is added to read as follows:
Sec. 301.6159-0 Table of contents.
This section lists the major captions that appear in the
regulations under Sec. 301.6159-1.
Sec. 301.6159-1 Agreements for the payment of tax liabilities in
installments.
(a) Authority.
(b) Procedures for submission and consideration of proposed
installment agreements.
(c) Acceptance, form, and terms of installment agreements.
(d) Rejection of a proposed installment agreement.
(e) Modification or termination of installment agreements by the
Internal Revenue Service.
(f) Effect of installment agreement or pending installment
agreement on collection activity.
(g) Suspension of the statute of limitations on collection.
(h) Annual statement.
(i) Biennial review of partial payment installment agreements.
(j) Cross reference.
(k) Effective/applicability date.
0
Par. 3. Section 301.6159-1 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 301.6159-1 Agreements for payment of tax liabilities in
installments.
(a) Authority. The Commissioner may enter into a written agreement
with a taxpayer that allows the taxpayer to make scheduled periodic
payments of any tax liability if the Commissioner determines that such
agreement will facilitate full or partial collection of the tax
liability.
(b) Procedures for submission and consideration of proposed
installment agreements--(1) In general. A proposed installment
agreement must be submitted according to the procedures, and in the
form and manner, prescribed by the Commissioner.
(2) When a proposed installment agreement becomes pending. A
proposed installment agreement becomes pending when it is accepted for
processing. The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) may not accept a
proposed installment agreement for processing following reference of a
case involving the liability that is the subject of the proposed
installment agreement to the Department of Justice for prosecution or
[[Page 61529]]
defense. The proposed installment agreement remains pending until the
IRS accepts the proposal, the IRS notifies the taxpayer that the
proposal has been rejected, or the proposal is withdrawn by the
taxpayer. If a proposed installment agreement that has been accepted
for processing does not contain sufficient information to permit the
IRS to evaluate whether the proposal should be accepted, the IRS will
request the taxpayer to provide the needed additional information. If
the taxpayer does not submit the additional information that the IRS
has requested within a reasonable time period after such a request, the
IRS may reject the proposed installment agreement.
(3) Revised proposals of installment agreements submitted following
rejection. If, following the rejection of a proposed installment
agreement, the IRS determines that the taxpayer made a good faith
revision of the proposal and submitted the revision within 30 days of
the date of rejection, the provisions of this section shall apply to
that revised proposal. If, however, the IRS determines that a revision
was not made in good faith, the provisions of this section do not apply
to the revision and the appeal period in paragraph (d)(3) of this
section continues to run from the date of the original rejection.
(c) Acceptance, form, and terms of installment agreements--(1)
Acceptance of an installment agreement--(i) In general. A proposed
installment agreement has not been accepted until the IRS notifies the
taxpayer or the taxpayer's representative of the acceptance. Except as
provided in paragraph (c)(1)(iii) of this section, the Commissioner has
the discretion to accept or reject any proposed installment agreement.
(ii) Acceptance does not reduce liabilities. The acceptance of an
installment agreement by the IRS does not reduce the amount of taxes,
interest, or penalties owed. (However, penalties may continue to accrue
at a reduced rate pursuant to section 6651(h).)
(iii) Guaranteed installment agreements. In the case of a liability
of an individual for income tax, the Commissioner shall accept a
proposed installment agreement if, as of the date the individual
proposes the installment agreement--
(A) The aggregate amount of the liability (not including interest,
penalties, additions to tax, and additional amounts) does not exceed
$10,000;
(B) The taxpayer (and, if the liability relates to a joint return,
the taxpayer's spouse) has not, during any of the preceding five
taxable years--
(1) Failed to file any income tax return;
(2) Failed to pay any required income tax; or
(3) Entered into an installment agreement for the payment of any
income tax;
(C) The Commissioner determines that the taxpayer is financially
unable to pay the liability in full when due (and the taxpayer submits
any information the Commissioner requires to make that determination);
(D) The installment agreement requires full payment of the
liability within three years; and
(E) The taxpayer agrees to comply with the provisions of the
Internal Revenue Code for the period the agreement is in effect.
(2) Form of installment agreements. An installment agreement must
be in writing. A written installment agreement may take the form of a
document signed by the taxpayer and the Commissioner or a written
confirmation of an agreement entered into by the taxpayer and the
Commissioner that is mailed or personally delivered to the taxpayer.
(3) Terms of installment agreements. (i) Except as otherwise
provided in this section, an installment agreement is effective from
the date the IRS notifies the taxpayer or the taxpayer's representative
of its acceptance until the date the agreement ends by its terms or
until it is superseded by a new installment agreement.
(ii) By its terms, an installment agreement may end upon the
expiration of the period of limitations on collection in section 6502
and Sec. 301.6502-1, or at some prior date.
(iii) As a condition to entering into an installment agreement with
a taxpayer, the Commissioner may require that--
(A) The taxpayer agree to a reasonable extension of the period of
limitations on collection; and
(B) The agreement contain terms that protect the interests of the
Government.
(iv) Except as otherwise provided in an installment agreement, all
payments made under the installment agreement will be applied in the
best interests of the Government.
(v) While an installment agreement is in effect, the Commissioner
may request, and the taxpayer must provide, a financial condition
update at any time.
(vi) At any time after entering into an installment agreement, the
Commissioner and the taxpayer may agree to modify or terminate an
installment agreement or may agree to a new installment agreement that
supersedes the existing agreement.
(d) Rejection of a proposed installment agreement--(1) When a
proposed installment agreement becomes rejected. A proposed installment
agreement has not been rejected until the IRS notifies the taxpayer or
the taxpayer's representative of the rejection, the reason(s) for
rejection, and the right to an appeal.
(2) Independent administrative review. The IRS may not notify a
taxpayer or taxpayer's representative of the rejection of an
installment agreement until an independent administrative review of the
proposed rejection is completed.
(3) Appeal of rejection of a proposed installment agreement. The
taxpayer may administratively appeal a rejection of a proposed
installment agreement to the IRS Office of Appeals (Appeals) if, within
the 30-day period commencing the day after the taxpayer is notified of
the rejection, the taxpayer requests an appeal in the manner provided
by the Commissioner.
(e) Modification or termination of installment agreements by the
Internal Revenue Service--(1) Inadequate information or jeopardy. The
Commissioner may terminate an installment agreement if the Commissioner
determines that--
(i) Information which was provided to the IRS by the taxpayer or
the taxpayer's representative in connection with either the granting of
the installment agreement or a request for a financial update was
inaccurate or incomplete in any material respect; or
(ii) Collection of any liability to which the installment agreement
applies is in jeopardy.
(2) Change in financial condition, failure to timely pay an
installment or another Federal tax liability, or failure to provide
requested financial information. The Commissioner may modify or
terminate an installment agreement if--
(i) The Commissioner determines that the financial condition of a
taxpayer that is party to the agreement has significantly changed; or
(ii) A taxpayer that is party to the installment agreement fails
to--
(A) Timely pay an installment in accordance with the terms of the
installment agreement;
(B) Pay any other Federal tax liability when the liability becomes
due; or
(C) Provide a financial condition update requested by the
Commissioner.
(3) Request by taxpayer. Upon request by a taxpayer that is a party
to the installment agreement, the Commissioner may terminate or modify
the terms of an installment agreement if the Commissioner determines
that the
[[Page 61530]]
financial condition of the taxpayer has significantly changed. The
taxpayer's request will not suspend the statute of limitations under
section 6502 for collection of any liability. While the Commissioner is
considering the request, the taxpayer shall comply with the terms of
the existing installment agreement.
(4) Notice. Unless the Commissioner determines that collection of
the tax is in jeopardy, the Commissioner will notify the taxpayer in
writing at least 30 days prior to modifying or terminating an
installment agreement pursuant to paragraph (e)(1) or (2) of this
section. The notice provided pursuant to this section must briefly
describe the reason for the intended modification or termination. Upon
receiving notice, the taxpayer may provide information showing that the
reason for the proposed modification or termination is incorrect.
(5) Appeal of modification or termination of an installment
agreement. The taxpayer may administratively appeal the modification or
termination of an installment agreement to Appeals if, following
issuance of the notice required by paragraph (e)(4) of this section and
prior to the expiration of the 30-day period commencing the day after
the modification or termination is to take effect, the taxpayer
requests an appeal in the manner provided by the Commissioner.
(f) Effect of installment agreement or pending installment
agreement on collection activity--(1) In general. No levy may be made
to collect a tax liability that is the subject of an installment
agreement during the period that a proposed installment agreement is
pending with the IRS, for 30 days immediately following the rejection
of a proposed installment agreement, during the period that an
installment agreement is in effect, and for 30 days immediately
following the termination of an installment agreement. If, prior to the
expiration of the 30-day period following the rejection or termination
of an installment agreement, the taxpayer appeals the rejection or
termination decision, no levy may be made while the rejection or
termination is being considered by Appeals. This section will not
prohibit levy to collect the liability of any person other than the
person or persons named in the installment agreement.
(2) Exceptions. Paragraph (f)(1) of this section shall not prohibit
levy if the taxpayer files a written notice with the IRS that waives
the restriction on levy imposed by this section, the IRS determines
that the proposed installment agreement was submitted solely to delay
collection, or the IRS determines that collection of the tax to which
the installment agreement or proposed installment agreement relates is
in jeopardy.
(3) Other actions by the IRS while levy is prohibited--(i) In
general. The IRS may take actions other than levy to protect the
interests of the Government with regard to the liability identified in
an installment agreement or proposed installment agreement. Those
actions include, for example--
(A) Crediting an overpayment against the liability pursuant to
section 6402;
(B) Filing or refiling notices of Federal tax lien; and
(C) Taking action to collect from any person who is not named in
the installment agreement or proposed installment agreement but who is
liable for the tax to which the installment agreement relates.
(ii) Proceedings in court. Except as otherwise provided in this
paragraph (f)(3)(ii), the IRS will not refer a case to the Department
of Justice for the commencement of a proceeding in court, against a
person named in an installment agreement or proposed installment
agreement, if levy to collect the liability is prohibited by paragraph
(f)(1) of this section. Without regard to whether a person is named in
an installment agreement or proposed installment agreement, however,
the IRS may authorize the Department of Justice to file a counterclaim
or third-party complaint in a refund action or to join that person in
any other proceeding in which liability for the tax that is the subject
of the installment agreement or proposed installment agreement may be
established or disputed, including a suit against the United States
under 28 U.S.C. 2410. In addition, the United States may file a claim
in any bankruptcy proceeding or insolvency action brought by or against
such person. If a person named in an installment agreement is joined in
a proceeding, the United States obtains a judgment against that person,
and the case is referred back to the IRS for collection, collection
will continue to occur pursuant to the terms of the installment
agreement. Notwithstanding the installment agreement, any claim or suit
permitted will be for the full amount of the liabilities owed.
(g) Suspension of the statute of limitations on collection. The
statute of limitations under section 6502 for collection of any
liability shall be suspended during the period that a proposed
installment agreement relating to that liability is pending with the
IRS, for 30 days immediately following the rejection of a proposed
installment agreement, and for 30 days immediately following the
termination of an installment agreement. If, within the 30 days
following the rejection or termination of an installment agreement, the
taxpayer files an appeal with Appeals, the statute of limitations for
collection shall be suspended while the rejection or termination is
being considered by Appeals. The statute of limitations for collection
shall continue to run if an exception under paragraph (f)(2) of this
section applies and levy is not prohibited with respect to the
taxpayer.
(h) Annual statement. The Commissioner shall provide each taxpayer
who is party to an installment agreement under this section with an
annual statement setting forth the initial balance owed at the
beginning of the year, the payments made during the year, and the
remaining balance as of the end of the year.
(i) Biennial review of partial payment installment agreements. The
Commissioner shall perform a review of the taxpayer's financial
condition in the case of a partial payment installment agreement at
least once every two years. The purpose of this review is to determine
whether the taxpayer's financial condition has significantly changed so
as to warrant an increase in the value of the payments being made or
termination of the agreement.
(j) Cross reference. Pursuant to section 6601(b)(1), the last day
prescribed for payment is determined without regard to any installment
agreement, including for purposes of computing penalties and interest
provided by the Internal Revenue Code. For special rules regarding the
computation of the failure to pay penalty while certain installment
agreements are in effect, see section 6651(h) and Sec. 301.6651-
1(a)(4).
(k) Effective/applicability date. This section is applicable on
November 25, 2009.r
0
Par. 4. Section 301.6331-4, paragraph (d) is revised and paragraph (e)
is added to read as follows:
Sec. 301.6331-4 Restrictions on levy while installment agreements are
pending or in effect.
* * * * *
(d) Cross-reference. For provisions relating to the making of
levies while an installment agreement is pending or in effect, see
Sec. 301.6159-1.
(e) Effective/applicability date. Paragraphs (a), (b), and (c) are
applicable beginning December 18, 2002. Paragraph (d) is applicable
beginning November 25, 2009.
[[Page 61531]]
Approved: November 11, 2009.
Steven T. Miller,
Deputy Commissioner of Services and Enforcement.
Approved: November 11, 2009.
Michael F. Mundaca,
Acting Assistant Secretary of the Treasury (Tax Policy).
[FR Doc. E9-28330 Filed 11-24-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P