Organ-Specific Warnings; Internal Analgesic, Antipyretic, and Antirheumatic Drug Products for Over-the-Counter Human Use; Final Monograph; Technical Amendment, 61512-61516 [E9-28296]
Download as PDF
61512
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 226 / Wednesday, November 25, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
undesignation by the seller is
eliminated. Duke requests clarification
that a slice of system undesignation by
the seller would be appropriate in such
circumstances.
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with RULES
Commission Determination
6. We confirm that, where an offsystem buyer is buying system power
from a seller that is a network customer
on an adjacent transmission system, the
buyer needs transmission service on
both the system on which the seller is
located and the system on which buyer
is located, but that it remains the
buyer’s choice as to whether to procure
network or point-to-point service. The
Commission’s reference in Order No.
890–C to the use of point-to-point
service to take delivery of system power
was not intended to restrict the buyer’s
choice to instead use network service.
As Duke notes, there may be a situation
in which a buyer and seller of capacity
from a network resource both take
network service on the same
transmission system and the power is
delivered under section 31.3 of the pro
forma OATT to another transmission
system on which the buyer’s network
load is located. In such a situation, both
the buyer and seller of power are
network customers of the transmission
system on which the sale of power takes
place. We clarify, to the extent
necessary, that the seller in such a
situation may support the transaction by
undesignating its resources on a system
basis.
7. In Order No. 890–C, the
Commission noted that the Reliability
Standards governing the calculation of
ATC were pending Commission review.
Concurrent with this order, the
Commission in Docket No. RM08–19–
000 is directing the North American
Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC)
to develop modifications to certain of
these Reliability Standards to address
the modeling of network resources and
its impact on the calculation of ATC. To
the extent Duke or other parties have
concerns regarding the appropriate
modeling of network resource
designations on the calculation of ATC,
the Commission encourages those
parties to raise their concerns in NERC’s
standards development process.
II. Information Collection Statement
8. The Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) regulations require that
OMB approve certain information
collection requirements imposed by an
agency.6 The revisions to the
information collection requirements for
transmission providers adopted in
65
Order No. 890 were approved under
OMB Control Nos. 1902–0233. This
order does not substantively alter those
requirements. OMB approval of this
order is therefore unnecessary.
However, the Commission will send a
copy of this order to OMB for
informational purposes only.
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
III. Document Availability
RIN 0910–AF36
9. In addition to publishing the full
text of this document in the Federal
Register, the Commission provides all
interested persons an opportunity to
view and/or print the contents of this
document via the Internet through
FERC’s Home Page (https://www.ferc.gov)
and in FERC’s Public Reference Room
during normal business hours (8:30 a.m.
to 5 p.m. Eastern time) at 888 First
Street, NE., Room 2A, Washington DC
20426.
10. From FERC’s Home Page on the
Internet, this information is available on
eLibrary. The full text of this document
is available on eLibrary in PDF and
Microsoft Word format for viewing,
printing, and/or downloading. To access
this document in eLibrary, type the
docket number excluding the last three
digits of this document in the docket
number field.
11. User assistance is available for
eLibrary and the FERC’s Web site during
normal business hours from FERC
Online Support at 202–502–6652 (toll
free at 1–866–208–3676) or e-mail at
ferconlinesupport@ferc.gov, or the
Public Reference Room at (202) 502–
8371, TTY (202) 502–8659. E-mail the
Public Reference Room at
public.referenceroom@ferc.gov.
Organ-Specific Warnings; Internal
Analgesic, Antipyretic, and
Antirheumatic Drug Products for Overthe-Counter Human Use; Final
Monograph; Technical Amendment
IV. Effective Date and Congressional
Notification
12. This order does not substantively
alter the requirements of Order Nos.
890, 890–A, 890–B or 890–C and,
therefore, will become effective as of the
date of publication in the Federal
Register.
By the Commission.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9–28216 Filed 11–24–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
15:27 Nov 24, 2009
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
21 CFR Part 201
[Docket No. FDA–1977–N–0013] (formerly
Docket No. 1977–N–0094L)
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION: Final rule; technical
amendment.
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is amending a
final rule that appeared in the Federal
Register of April 29, 2009 (74 FR 19385)
(as amended in the Federal Register of
June 30, 2009 (74 FR 31177). The final
rule requires important new organspecific warnings and related labeling
for over-the-counter (OTC) internal
analgesic, antipyretic, and
antirheumatic (IAAA) drug products.
The new labeling informs consumers
about the risk of liver injury when using
acetaminophen and the risk of stomach
bleeding when using nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). This
document is intended to clarify some
provisions in the final rule which may
be unclear. Specifically, this document
addresses how blister cards can be
labeled to comply with the new
required labeling, clarifies the length of
time that the ‘‘See new warnings’’ flag
is required to appear in the labeling, and
provides some optional wording to
clarify the liver injury warning on OTC
acetaminophen products containing
multiple active ingredients.
DATES: Effective Date: This final rule is
effective April 29, 2010.
Compliance Date: The compliance
date for all products subject to this final
rule, including products with annual
sales less than $25,000, is April 29,
2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Arlene Solbeck, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research, Food and
Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 22, rm. 5411,
Silver Spring, MD 20993–0002, 301–
796–2090.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
FDA is amending the final rule that
was published in the Federal Register of
CFR 1320 (2007).
VerDate Nov<24>2008
Food and Drug Administration
Frm 00012
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\25NOR1.SGM
25NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 226 / Wednesday, November 25, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
April 29, 2009, (the April 29, 2009, final
rule) which requires important new
organ-specific warnings and related
labeling for OTC IAAA drug products.
The new labeling informs consumers
about the risk of liver injury when using
acetaminophen and the risk of stomach
bleeding when using NSAIDs. After the
April 29, 2009, final rule was published,
we received feedback from
manufacturers stating that some of the
requirements in the final rule are
unclear (Refs. 1 and 2). We are
amending the final rule to address these
issues raised by the submissions (see
section II of this document). One issue
involves the liver injury and stomach
bleeding warnings that must appear on
immediate container labeling. Another
issue concerns the posting of a ‘‘See
new warnings’’ flag on the principal
display panel (PDP) of the retail
packaging. The third issue concerns the
wording of the first bulleted statement
in the liver injury warning.
Publication of this document
constitutes final action on the change
under the Administrative Procedures
Act (5 U.S.C. 553). This technical
amendment merely clarifies the intent
of the final rule with respect to the three
minor issues raised in the submissions.
FDA therefore, for good cause shown,
has determined that notice and public
comment are unnecessary under 5
U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B).
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with RULES
II. April 29, 2009, Final Rule
Requirements Being Addressed in This
Document
A. Immediate Container Labeling
In the final rule, we require that the
new liver injury and stomach bleeding
warnings appear on the outer and the
immediate container of the retail
packaging, where applicable
(§ 201.326(a)(1)(iii)(A), (a)(1)(iv)(A)(1),
(a)(1)(v)(A), (a)(2)(iii)(A), (a)(2)(iv)(A)(1),
and (a)(2)(v)(A) (21 CFR
201.326(a)(1)(iii)(A), (a)(1)(iv)(A)(1),
(a)(1)(v)(A), (a)(2)(iii)(A), (a)(2)(iv)(A)(1),
and (a)(2)(v)(A)). We received feedback
from manufacturers seeking clarification
of these final rule requirements for
blister card packaging (Ref. 1). We did
not intend for the final rule to require
liver injury or stomach bleeding
warnings to appear on each blister unit
on a blister card. Rather, we believe it
is acceptable that the appropriate
warning appear on the blister card in
one place, as long as the warning stays
intact and readable when drug product
is removed from the blister card.
Therefore, in this document, we are
stating explicitly that the liver injury
and stomach bleeding warnings are not
required to appear on each blister unit
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:27 Nov 24, 2009
Jkt 220001
of a blister card, as long as the
appropriate warning appears on the
blister card and remains intact and
readable when drug is removed from the
blister card. These modifications appear
in § 201.326(a)(1)(iii)(A), (a)(1)(iv)(A)(1),
(a)(1)(v)(A), (a)(2)(iii)(A), (a)(2)(iv)(A)(1),
and (a)(2)(v)(A) in the regulatory text of
this document.
We also received feedback that certain
immediate containers, such as stick
packs and sachets, also present space
limitations for labeling and that we
should not require the liver injury and
stomach bleeding warnings to appear on
these immediate container packages (Ref
1). We do not agree that these types of
immediate containers should be exempt
from the requirements in the final rule.
Although these packages have limited
labeling space, we believe that there is
adequate space to accommodate the
required warnings on these types of
packages. We are also concerned that
consumers may routinely remove these
packages from the outer carton and,
therefore, fail to see the liver injury and
stomach bleeding warnings if they are
only printed on the carton. For these
reasons, we are not exempting these
types of immediate containers from the
final rule requirements.
B. ‘‘See New Warnings’’ Flag
In the April 29, 2009, final rule, we
require a ‘‘See new warnings’’ flag on
the PDP of all OTC drug products
containing acetaminophen or NSAIDs to
advise consumers of the new required
warnings. In the final rule, we state that
‘‘we will require that the ‘See New
Warnings’ flag appear on the PDP for
one year after the final rule is published,
rather than for the 6 or 9 months
suggested by the submission’’ (74 FR
19385 at 19388). We explained that ‘‘we
continue to believe that educating
consumers about the risks associated
with OTC IAAA drug products is very
important and more likely to be
successful if the flag remains on
products for 1 year’’ (74 FR 19385 at
19388 through 19389). In § 201.326(b)
(21 CFR 201.326(b)), the final rule
states: ‘‘The labeling of any drug
product subject to this section that is
initially introduced or initially
delivered for introduction into interstate
commerce before the effective date and
within 12 months after the effective date
of the final rule must bear on its PDP,
as defined in § 201.60, the statement
‘See new warnings information.’’’
We intended this provision to require
that the ‘‘See new warnings’’ statement
appear on the PDPs of all OTC drug
products containing acetaminophen or
NSAIDs that are introduced into
interstate commerce by the effective
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
61513
date of the final rule (i.e., by April 29,
2010). We did not intend to require the
‘‘See new warnings’’ statement for those
products that are introduced into
interstate commerce after the final rule
effective date. We also intended the
provision to require that the statement
remain on the label for at least 1 year
from the time the product is introduced
into interstate commerce. We did not
intend to require that the statement
remain on the label for any longer than
the 1-year period from the time of
introduction into interstate commerce.
For example, if the ‘‘See new warnings’’
flag is included on the PDP of a product
introduced into interstate commerce 6
months after publication of the final
rule (i.e., October 29, 2009), then the
flag must remain on the PDP for a full
year (i.e., until October 29, 2010). To
make this requirement clear, we are
modifying § 201.326(b) in the regulatory
text of this document.
C. Liver Injury Warning for OTC
Acetaminophen Products Containing
Multiple Active Ingredients
In the April 29, 2009, final rule, we
require a liver injury warning for all
OTC drug products containing
acetaminophen. The introductory
sentence and first bulleted statement of
this warning state: ‘‘This product
contains acetaminophen. Severe liver
damage may occur if you take [bullet]
more than the [insert maximum number
of daily dosage units] in 24 hours,
which is the maximum daily amount
* * *’’. Our intention was that the
warning would prevent consumers from
taking more than 4 grams (g) of an OTC
acetaminophen product daily, the
proposed maximum safe daily dose for
OTC acetaminophen. After the final rule
was published, we received feedback
from manufacturers of OTC
acetaminophen products who were
concerned that consumers may be
confused about the warning on OTC
acetaminophen containing multiple
active ingredients (e.g., cold-cold/
analgesic combination products) (Refs. 1
and 2). For some combination products,
the maximum number of daily dosage
units may be limited by an active
ingredient other than acetaminophen in
the products. In such cases, the
maximum number of daily dosage units
result in a maximum daily dose of
acetaminophen which is significantly
below 4 g. To clarify that the maximum
number of daily dosage units may not be
the maximal daily dose of
acetaminophen, we are allowing the
optional statement ‘‘for this product’’ at
the end of the first bulleted statement:
‘‘more than [insert maximum number of
daily dosage units] in 24 hours, which
E:\FR\FM\25NOR1.SGM
25NOR1
61514
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 226 / Wednesday, November 25, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
is the maximum daily amount’’
[optional: ‘‘for this product’’]. We agree
with manufacturers that this revision
will clarify the warning for OTC
acetaminophen products containing
multiple active ingredients.
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with RULES
III. Request for Enforcement Discretion
We received feedback requesting that
we exercise enforcement discretion for
manufacturers of OTC combination
acetaminophen products so that they
could revise the first bulleted statement
of the liver injury warning to clarify that
the maximum number of daily dosage
units may not be the maximal daily dose
of acetaminophen for those products
(Ref. 2). As discussed in section II.C of
this document, we are allowing the
optional statement ‘‘for this product’’ at
the end of the first bulleted statement:
‘‘more than [insert maximum number of
daily dosage units] in 24 hours, which
is the maximum daily amount.’’ The
request asked us to exercise
enforcement discretion until we revise
this bulleted statement in the final rule.
Because we are amending this bulleted
statement in this document, the request
that we exercise enforcement discretion
is no longer applicable.
IV. Analysis of Impacts
We have examined the impacts of this
rule under Executive Order 12866 and
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C.
601–612), and the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (Public Law 104–4).
Executive Order 12866 directs agencies
to assess all costs and benefits of
available regulatory alternatives and,
when regulation is necessary, to select
regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential
economic, environmental, public health
and safety, and other advantages;
distributive impacts; and equity). We
believe that this rule is not a significant
regulatory action under the Executive
order.
The Regulatory Flexibility Act
requires agencies to analyze regulatory
options that would minimize any
significant impact of a rule on small
entities. Our April 29, 2009, final rule
requires important new organ-specific
warnings (i.e., liver injury and stomach
bleeding warnings) and related labeling
for OTC drug products containing
acetaminophen and NSAIDs to advise
consumers of potential risks and when
to consult a doctor (74 FR 19385). We
are amending the final rule in this
document to clarify some of the labeling
requirements specified in the final rule.
Three amendments are being made. One
amendment specifies that manufacturers
of OTC acetaminophen and NSAID drug
products are not required to put the
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:27 Nov 24, 2009
Jkt 220001
liver injury or stomach bleeding
warning on each blister unit of a blister
card as long as the appropriate warning
appears on the blister card and remains
intact and readable when drug is
removed from the blister card
(§ 201.326(a)(1)(iii)(A), (a)(1)(iv)(A)(1),
(a)(1)(v)(A), (a)(2)(iii)(A), (a)(2)(iv)(A)(1),
and (a)(2)(v)(A)). The second
amendment specifies that the ‘‘See new
warnings’’ flag (§ 201.326(b)) must
remain on the label for at least 1 year
from the time the manufacturer puts the
statement on the PDP. The third
amendment clarifies the liver injury
warning on OTC acetaminophen
products containing multiple active
ingredients. We examined the impacts
of the amended labeling requirements
described in this document when we
developed the April 29, 2009, final rule.
We determined that the final rule would
not have a significant impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
Because this amendment does not add
any new requirements that were not
considered in developing the final rule,
we do not believe this rule will have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
Section 202(a) of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 requires
that agencies prepare a written
statement, which includes an
assessment of anticipated costs and
benefits, before proposing ‘‘any rule that
includes any Federal mandate that may
result in the expenditure by State, local,
and tribal governments, in the aggregate,
or by the private sector, of $100,000,000
or more (adjusted annually for inflation)
in any one year.’’ The current threshold
after adjustment for inflation is $133
million, using the most current (2008)
Implicit Price Deflator for the Gross
Domestic Product. We do not expect the
final rule as amended to result in any 1year expenditure that would meet or
exceed this amount.
V. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
We conclude that the labeling
requirements in this document are not
subject to review by the Office of
Management and Budget because they
do not constitute a ‘‘collection of
information’’ under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.). Rather, the labeling statements
are a ‘‘public disclosure of information
originally supplied by the Federal
government to the recipient for the
purpose of disclosure to the public’’ (5
CFR 1320.3(c)(2)).
VI. Environmental Impact
We have determined under 21 CFR
25.31(a) that this action is of a type that
does not individually or cumulatively
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
have a significant effect on the human
environment. Therefore, neither an
environmental assessment nor an
environmental impact statement is
required.
VII. Federalism
FDA has analyzed this final rule in
accordance with the principles set forth
in Executive Order 13132. Section 4(a)
of the Executive order requires agencies
to ‘‘construe * * * a Federal statute to
preempt State law only where the
statute contains an express preemption
provision or there is some other clear
evidence that the Congress intended
preemption of State law, or where the
exercise of State authority conflicts with
the exercise of Federal authority under
the Federal statute.’’ The sole statutory
provision giving preemptive effect to the
final rule is section 751 of the Federal
Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C.
379r).
We believe that we have complied
with all of the applicable requirements
under the Executive order and have
determined that the preemptive effects
of this rule are consistent with
Executive Order 13132.
VIII. References
The following references have been
placed on display in the Division of
Dockets Management (HFA–305), Food
and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers
Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852
and may be seen by interested persons
between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday.
1. FDA–1977–N–0013–0039.
2. FDA–1977–N–0013–0040.
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 201
Drugs, Labeling, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
■ Therefore, under the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under
authority delegated to the Commissioner
of Food and Drugs, 21 CFR part 201, (as
added in the Federal Registers of April
29, 2009, and amended June 30, 2009),
is amended as follows:
PART 201—LABELING
1. The authority citation for 21 CFR
part 201 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321, 331, 351, 352,
353, 355, 358, 360, 360b, 360gg–360ss, 371,
374, 379e; 42 U.S.C. 216, 241, 262, 264.
2. Section 201.326, (as added at 74 FR
19385, April 29, 2009, and amended at
74 FR 31177, June 30, 2009) is further
amended by revising paragraphs
(a)(1)(iii)(A), (a)(1)(iv)(A)(1), (a)(1)(v)(A),
(a)(2)(iii)(A), (a)(2)(iv)(A)(1), (a)(2)(v)(A),
and (b) to read as follows:
■
E:\FR\FM\25NOR1.SGM
25NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 226 / Wednesday, November 25, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with RULES
§ 201.326 Over-the-counter drug products
containing internal analgesic/antipyretic
active ingredients; required warnings and
other labeling.
(a) * * *
(1) * * *
(iii) * * *
(A) The liver warning states ‘‘Liver
warning [heading in bold type]: This
product contains acetaminophen.
Severe liver damage may occur if you
take [bullet] more than [insert maximum
number of daily dosage units] in 24
hours, which is the maximum daily
amount [optional: ‘for this product’]
[bullet] with other drugs containing
acetaminophen [bullet] 3 or more
alcoholic drinks every day while using
this product’’. This ‘‘Liver’’ warning
must be the first warning under the
‘‘Warnings’’ heading. For products that
contain both acetaminophen and
aspirin, this ‘‘Liver’’ warning must
appear after the ‘‘Reye’s syndrome’’ and
‘‘Allergy alert’’ warnings in
§ 201.66(c)(5)(ii)(A) and (c)(5)(ii)(B) and
before the ‘‘Stomach bleeding’’ warning
in paragraph (a)(2)(iii)(A) of this section.
If there is an outer and immediate
container of a retail package, this
warning must appear on both the outer
and immediate containers. If the
immediate container is a blister card,
the warning must appear on the blister
card and remain intact and readable
when drug product is removed from the
blister card. The warning does not need
to be included on each blister unit.
*
*
*
*
*
(iv) * * *
(A) * * *
(1) The liver warning states ‘‘Liver
warning [heading in bold type]: This
product contains acetaminophen.
Severe liver damage may occur if your
child takes [bullet] more than 5 doses in
24 hours, which is the maximum daily
amount [optional: ‘for this product’]
[bullet] with other drugs containing
acetaminophen’’. This ‘‘Liver’’ warning
must be the first warning under the
‘‘Warnings’’ heading. If there is an outer
and immediate container of a retail
package, this warning must appear on
both the outer and immediate
containers. If the immediate container is
a blister card, the warning must appear
on the blister card and remain intact
and readable when drug product is
removed from the blister card. The
warning is not required to be included
on each blister unit.
*
*
*
*
*
(v) * * *
(A) The liver warning states ‘‘Liver
warning [heading in bold type]: This
product contains acetaminophen.
Severe liver damage may occur if
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:27 Nov 24, 2009
Jkt 220001
[bullet] adult takes more than [insert
maximum number of daily dosage units]
in 24 hours, which is the maximum
daily amount [optional: ‘for this
product’] [bullet] child takes more than
5 doses in 24 hours [bullet] taken with
other drugs containing acetaminophen
[bullet] adult has 3 or more alcoholic
drinks everyday while using this
product.’’ If there is an outer and
immediate container of a retail package,
this warning must appear on both the
outer and immediate containers. If the
immediate container is a blister card,
the warning must appear on the blister
card and remain intact and readable
when drug product is removed from the
blister card. The warning is not required
to be included on each blister unit.
*
*
*
*
*
(2) * * *
*
*
*
*
*
(iii) * * *
(A) The stomach bleeding warning
states ‘‘Stomach bleeding warning
[heading in bold type]: This product
contains an NSAID, which may cause
severe stomach bleeding. The chance is
higher if you [bullet] are age 60 or older
[bullet] have had stomach ulcers or
bleeding problems [bullet] take a blood
thinning (anticoagulant) or steroid drug
[bullet] take other drugs containing
prescription or nonprescription NSAIDs
(aspirin, ibuprofen, naproxen, or others)
[bullet] have 3 or more alcoholic drinks
every day while using this product
[bullet] take more or for a longer time
than directed’’. This ‘‘Stomach
bleeding’’ warning must appear after the
‘‘Reye’s syndrome’’ and ‘‘Allergy alert’’
warnings in § 201.66(c)(5)(ii)(A) and
(c)(5)(ii)(B). For products that contain
both acetaminophen and aspirin, the
acetaminophen ‘‘Liver’’ warning in
paragraph (a)(1)(iii) of this section must
appear before the ‘‘Stomach bleeding’’
warning in this paragraph. If there is an
outer and immediate container of a
retail package, this warning must appear
on both the outer and immediate
containers. If the immediate container is
a blister card, the warning must appear
on the blister card and remain intact
and readable when drug product is
removed from the blister card. The
warning is not required to be included
on each blister unit.
*
*
*
*
*
(iv) * * *
(A) * * *
(1) The stomach bleeding warning
states ‘‘Stomach bleeding warning
[heading in bold type]: This product
contains an NSAID, which may cause
severe stomach bleeding. The chance is
higher if your child [bullet] has had
stomach ulcers or bleeding problems
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
61515
[bullet] takes a blood thinning
(anticoagulant) or steroid drug [bullet]
takes other drugs containing
prescription or nonprescription NSAIDs
(aspirin, ibuprofen, naproxen, or others)
[bullet] takes more or for a longer time
than directed’’. The ‘‘Stomach bleeding’’
warning must appear after the ‘‘Reye’s
syndrome’’ and ‘‘Allergy alert’’
warnings in § 201.66(c)(5)(ii)(A) and
(c)(5)(ii)(B). If there is an outer and
immediate container of a retail package,
this warning must appear on both the
outer and immediate containers. If the
immediate container is a blister card,
the warning must appear on the blister
card and remain intact and readable
when drug product is removed from the
blister card. The warning is not required
to be included on each blister unit.
*
*
*
*
*
(v) * * *
(A) The Stomach bleeding warning
states ‘‘Stomach bleeding warning
[heading in bold type]: This product
contains an NSAID, which may cause
severe stomach bleeding. The chance is
higher if the user [bullet] has had
stomach ulcers or bleeding problems
[bullet] takes a blood thinning
(anticoagulant) or steroid drug [bullet]
takes other drugs containing
prescription or nonprescription NSAIDs
(aspirin, ibuprofen, naproxen, or others)
[bullet] takes more or for a longer time
than directed [bullet] is age 60 or older
[bullet] has 3 or more alcoholic drinks
everyday while using this product’’. The
‘‘Stomach bleeding’’ warning must
appear after the ‘‘Reye’s syndrome‘‘ and
‘‘Allergy alert’’ warnings in
§ 201.66(c)(5)(ii)(A) and (c)(5)(ii)(B). If
there is an outer and immediate
container of a retail package, this
warning must appear on both the outer
and immediate containers. If the
immediate container is a blister card,
the warning must appear on the blister
card and remain intact and readable
when drug product is removed from the
blister card. The warning is not required
to be included on each blister unit.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) New warnings information
statement. The labeling of any drug
product subject to this section that is
initially introduced or initially
delivered for introduction into interstate
commerce before or on April 29, 2010,
must bear on its PDP, as defined in
§ 201.60, the statement ‘‘See new
warnings information’’. This statement
must appear highlighted (e.g.,
fluorescent or color contrast) or in bold
type, be in lines generally parallel to the
base on which the package rests as it is
designed to be displayed, and be in one
E:\FR\FM\25NOR1.SGM
25NOR1
61516
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 226 / Wednesday, November 25, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
of the following sizes, whichever is
greater:
(1) At least one-quarter as large as the
size of the most prominent printed
matter on the PDP, or
(2) At least as large as the size of the
‘‘Drug Facts’’ title, as required in
§ 201.66(d)(2). The new warnings
information statement must remain on
the PDP of the drug product for at least
1 year from the date the product is
initially introduced into interstate
commerce.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: November 17, 2009.
David Horowitz,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. E9–28296 Filed 11–24–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–S
21 CFR Parts 510, 520, 522, and 558
[Docket No. FDA–2009–N–0665]
New Animal Drugs; Change of Sponsor
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
Final rule.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is amending the
animal drug regulations to reflect a
change of sponsor for 29 new animal
drug applications (NADAs) and 2
abbreviated new animal drug
applications (ANADAs) from Intervet,
Inc., to Schering-Plough Animal Health
Corp.
DATES: This rule is effective November
25, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David R. Newkirk, Center for Veterinary
Medicine (HFV–100), Food and Drug
Administration, 7500 Standish Pl.,
Rockville, MD 20855, 240–276–8307, email: david.newkirk@fda.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Intervet,
Inc., P.O. Box 318, 29160 Intervet Lane,
Millsboro, DE 19966, has informed FDA
that it has transferred ownership of, and
all rights and interest in, the following
29 approved NADAs and 2 approved
ANADAs to Schering-Plough Animal
Health Corp., 556 Morris Ave., Summit,
NJ 07901: NADA 034–478, 034–621,
045–188, 102–380, 104–494, 111–278,
120–648, 121–473, 128–620, 131–310,
131–675, 132–872, 137–600, 138–612,
139–189, 140–856, 140–897, 140–927,
140–954, 140–992, 141–222, 141–236,
141–258, 141–269, 141–276, 141–278,
141–280, 141–282, 141–286; ANADA
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:27 Nov 24, 2009
Jkt 220001
[Amended]
6. In paragraph (b) of § 520.905b,
remove ‘‘057926’’ and in its place add
‘‘000061’’.
■
§ 520.905c
[Amended]
7. In paragraph (b) of § 520.905c,
remove ‘‘057926’’ and in its place add
‘‘000061’’.
■
§ 520.905d
[Amended]
8. In paragraph (b)(1) of § 520.905d,
remove ‘‘057926’’ and in its place add
‘‘000061’’.
■
§ 520.905e
[Amended]
9. In paragraph (b) of § 520.905e,
remove ‘‘057926’’ and in its place add
‘‘No. 000061’’.
■
§ 520.1010
21 CFR Parts 520 and 522
Animal drugs.
Food and Drug Administration
ACTION:
List of Subjects
§ 520.905b
21 CFR Part 510
Administrative practice and
procedure, Animal drugs, Labeling,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
AGENCY:
200–134 and 200–239. Accordingly, the
agency is amending the regulations in
21 CFR parts 520, 522 (21 CFR part 522),
and 558 to reflect the transfer of
ownership. In addition, § 522.1081 is
being revised to reflect a current format.
Following these changes of
sponsorship, Intervet, Inc., is no longer
the sponsor of an approved application.
Accordingly, 21 CFR 510.600(c) is being
amended to remove the entries for
Intervet, Inc.
This rule does not meet the definition
of ‘‘rule’’ in 5 U.S.C. 804(3)(A) because
it is a rule of ‘‘particular applicability.’’
Therefore, it is not subject to the
congressional review requirements in 5
U.S.C. 801–808.
§ 520.1200
[Amended]
10. In paragraph (b)(2) of § 520.1010,
remove ‘‘057926’’ and in its place add
‘‘000061’’.
■
[Amended]
11. In paragraph (b) of § 520.1200,
remove ‘‘057926’’ and in its place add
‘‘000061’’.
■
21 CFR Part 558
Animal drugs, Animal feeds.
■ Therefore, under the Federal Food,
Drug and Cosmetic Act and under
authority delegated to the Commissioner
of Food and Drugs and redelegated to
the Center for Veterinary Medicine, 21
CFR parts 510, 520, 522, and 558 are
amended as follows:
PART 510—NEW ANIMAL DRUGS
1. The authority citation for 21 CFR
part 510 continues to read as follows:
■
PART 522—IMPLANTATION OR
INJECTABLE DOSAGE FORM NEW
ANIMAL DRUGS
12. The authority citation for 21 CFR
part 522 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 360b.
§ 522.246
[Amended]
13. In paragraph (b)(3) of § 522.246,
remove ‘‘057926’’ and in its place add
‘‘000061’’.
■
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321, 331, 351, 352,
353, 360b, 371, 379e.
§ 522.1010
§ 510.600
■
[Amended]
2. In § 510.600, in the table in
paragraph (c)(1), remove the entry for
‘‘Intervet, Inc.’’; and in the table in
paragraph (c)(2), remove the entry for
‘‘057926’’.
■
PART 520—ORAL DOSAGE FORM
NEW ANIMAL DRUGS
3. The authority citation for 21 CFR
part 520 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 360b.
§ 520.48
[Amended]
4. In paragraph (b) of § 520.48, remove
‘‘057926’’ and in its place add
‘‘000061’’.
■
§ 520.905a
[Amended]
5. In paragraph (b) of § 520.905a,
remove ‘‘057926’’ and in its place add
‘‘000061’’.
■
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
[Amended]
14. In paragraph (b)(4) of § 522.1010,
remove ‘‘057926’’ and in its place add
‘‘000061’’.
§ 522.1078
[Amended]
15. In paragraph (b) of § 522.1078,
remove ‘‘Nos. 050604, 057926, and
059130’’ and in its place add ‘‘Nos.
000061, 050604, and 059130’’.
■
§ 522.1079
[Amended]
16. In paragraph (b) of § 522.1079,
remove ‘‘057926’’ and in its place add
‘‘000061’’.
■ 17. Revise § 522.1081 to read as
follows:
■
§ 522.1081
Chorionic gonadotropin.
(a) Specifications. Each vial contains
5,000, 10,000 or 20,000 USP units of
lyophilized powder for constitution
with accompanying diluent to a 10milliliter solution.
E:\FR\FM\25NOR1.SGM
25NOR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 226 (Wednesday, November 25, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 61512-61516]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-28296]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Part 201
[Docket No. FDA-1977-N-0013] (formerly Docket No. 1977-N-0094L)
RIN 0910-AF36
Organ-Specific Warnings; Internal Analgesic, Antipyretic, and
Antirheumatic Drug Products for Over-the-Counter Human Use; Final
Monograph; Technical Amendment
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Final rule; technical amendment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is amending a final
rule that appeared in the Federal Register of April 29, 2009 (74 FR
19385) (as amended in the Federal Register of June 30, 2009 (74 FR
31177). The final rule requires important new organ-specific warnings
and related labeling for over-the-counter (OTC) internal analgesic,
antipyretic, and antirheumatic (IAAA) drug products. The new labeling
informs consumers about the risk of liver injury when using
acetaminophen and the risk of stomach bleeding when using nonsteroidal
anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). This document is intended to clarify
some provisions in the final rule which may be unclear. Specifically,
this document addresses how blister cards can be labeled to comply with
the new required labeling, clarifies the length of time that the ``See
new warnings'' flag is required to appear in the labeling, and provides
some optional wording to clarify the liver injury warning on OTC
acetaminophen products containing multiple active ingredients.
DATES: Effective Date: This final rule is effective April 29, 2010.
Compliance Date: The compliance date for all products subject to
this final rule, including products with annual sales less than
$25,000, is April 29, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Arlene Solbeck, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 22, rm. 5411, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 301-
796-2090.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
FDA is amending the final rule that was published in the Federal
Register of
[[Page 61513]]
April 29, 2009, (the April 29, 2009, final rule) which requires
important new organ-specific warnings and related labeling for OTC IAAA
drug products. The new labeling informs consumers about the risk of
liver injury when using acetaminophen and the risk of stomach bleeding
when using NSAIDs. After the April 29, 2009, final rule was published,
we received feedback from manufacturers stating that some of the
requirements in the final rule are unclear (Refs. 1 and 2). We are
amending the final rule to address these issues raised by the
submissions (see section II of this document). One issue involves the
liver injury and stomach bleeding warnings that must appear on
immediate container labeling. Another issue concerns the posting of a
``See new warnings'' flag on the principal display panel (PDP) of the
retail packaging. The third issue concerns the wording of the first
bulleted statement in the liver injury warning.
Publication of this document constitutes final action on the change
under the Administrative Procedures Act (5 U.S.C. 553). This technical
amendment merely clarifies the intent of the final rule with respect to
the three minor issues raised in the submissions. FDA therefore, for
good cause shown, has determined that notice and public comment are
unnecessary under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B).
II. April 29, 2009, Final Rule Requirements Being Addressed in This
Document
A. Immediate Container Labeling
In the final rule, we require that the new liver injury and stomach
bleeding warnings appear on the outer and the immediate container of
the retail packaging, where applicable (Sec. 201.326(a)(1)(iii)(A),
(a)(1)(iv)(A)(1), (a)(1)(v)(A), (a)(2)(iii)(A), (a)(2)(iv)(A)(1), and
(a)(2)(v)(A) (21 CFR 201.326(a)(1)(iii)(A), (a)(1)(iv)(A)(1),
(a)(1)(v)(A), (a)(2)(iii)(A), (a)(2)(iv)(A)(1), and (a)(2)(v)(A)). We
received feedback from manufacturers seeking clarification of these
final rule requirements for blister card packaging (Ref. 1). We did not
intend for the final rule to require liver injury or stomach bleeding
warnings to appear on each blister unit on a blister card. Rather, we
believe it is acceptable that the appropriate warning appear on the
blister card in one place, as long as the warning stays intact and
readable when drug product is removed from the blister card. Therefore,
in this document, we are stating explicitly that the liver injury and
stomach bleeding warnings are not required to appear on each blister
unit of a blister card, as long as the appropriate warning appears on
the blister card and remains intact and readable when drug is removed
from the blister card. These modifications appear in Sec.
201.326(a)(1)(iii)(A), (a)(1)(iv)(A)(1), (a)(1)(v)(A), (a)(2)(iii)(A),
(a)(2)(iv)(A)(1), and (a)(2)(v)(A) in the regulatory text of this
document.
We also received feedback that certain immediate containers, such
as stick packs and sachets, also present space limitations for labeling
and that we should not require the liver injury and stomach bleeding
warnings to appear on these immediate container packages (Ref 1). We do
not agree that these types of immediate containers should be exempt
from the requirements in the final rule. Although these packages have
limited labeling space, we believe that there is adequate space to
accommodate the required warnings on these types of packages. We are
also concerned that consumers may routinely remove these packages from
the outer carton and, therefore, fail to see the liver injury and
stomach bleeding warnings if they are only printed on the carton. For
these reasons, we are not exempting these types of immediate containers
from the final rule requirements.
B. ``See New Warnings'' Flag
In the April 29, 2009, final rule, we require a ``See new
warnings'' flag on the PDP of all OTC drug products containing
acetaminophen or NSAIDs to advise consumers of the new required
warnings. In the final rule, we state that ``we will require that the
`See New Warnings' flag appear on the PDP for one year after the final
rule is published, rather than for the 6 or 9 months suggested by the
submission'' (74 FR 19385 at 19388). We explained that ``we continue to
believe that educating consumers about the risks associated with OTC
IAAA drug products is very important and more likely to be successful
if the flag remains on products for 1 year'' (74 FR 19385 at 19388
through 19389). In Sec. 201.326(b) (21 CFR 201.326(b)), the final rule
states: ``The labeling of any drug product subject to this section that
is initially introduced or initially delivered for introduction into
interstate commerce before the effective date and within 12 months
after the effective date of the final rule must bear on its PDP, as
defined in Sec. 201.60, the statement `See new warnings
information.'''
We intended this provision to require that the ``See new warnings''
statement appear on the PDPs of all OTC drug products containing
acetaminophen or NSAIDs that are introduced into interstate commerce by
the effective date of the final rule (i.e., by April 29, 2010). We did
not intend to require the ``See new warnings'' statement for those
products that are introduced into interstate commerce after the final
rule effective date. We also intended the provision to require that the
statement remain on the label for at least 1 year from the time the
product is introduced into interstate commerce. We did not intend to
require that the statement remain on the label for any longer than the
1-year period from the time of introduction into interstate commerce.
For example, if the ``See new warnings'' flag is included on the PDP of
a product introduced into interstate commerce 6 months after
publication of the final rule (i.e., October 29, 2009), then the flag
must remain on the PDP for a full year (i.e., until October 29, 2010).
To make this requirement clear, we are modifying Sec. 201.326(b) in
the regulatory text of this document.
C. Liver Injury Warning for OTC Acetaminophen Products Containing
Multiple Active Ingredients
In the April 29, 2009, final rule, we require a liver injury
warning for all OTC drug products containing acetaminophen. The
introductory sentence and first bulleted statement of this warning
state: ``This product contains acetaminophen. Severe liver damage may
occur if you take [bullet] more than the [insert maximum number of
daily dosage units] in 24 hours, which is the maximum daily amount * *
*''. Our intention was that the warning would prevent consumers from
taking more than 4 grams (g) of an OTC acetaminophen product daily, the
proposed maximum safe daily dose for OTC acetaminophen. After the final
rule was published, we received feedback from manufacturers of OTC
acetaminophen products who were concerned that consumers may be
confused about the warning on OTC acetaminophen containing multiple
active ingredients (e.g., cold-cold/analgesic combination products)
(Refs. 1 and 2). For some combination products, the maximum number of
daily dosage units may be limited by an active ingredient other than
acetaminophen in the products. In such cases, the maximum number of
daily dosage units result in a maximum daily dose of acetaminophen
which is significantly below 4 g. To clarify that the maximum number of
daily dosage units may not be the maximal daily dose of acetaminophen,
we are allowing the optional statement ``for this product'' at the end
of the first bulleted statement: ``more than [insert maximum number of
daily dosage units] in 24 hours, which
[[Page 61514]]
is the maximum daily amount'' [optional: ``for this product'']. We
agree with manufacturers that this revision will clarify the warning
for OTC acetaminophen products containing multiple active ingredients.
III. Request for Enforcement Discretion
We received feedback requesting that we exercise enforcement
discretion for manufacturers of OTC combination acetaminophen products
so that they could revise the first bulleted statement of the liver
injury warning to clarify that the maximum number of daily dosage units
may not be the maximal daily dose of acetaminophen for those products
(Ref. 2). As discussed in section II.C of this document, we are
allowing the optional statement ``for this product'' at the end of the
first bulleted statement: ``more than [insert maximum number of daily
dosage units] in 24 hours, which is the maximum daily amount.'' The
request asked us to exercise enforcement discretion until we revise
this bulleted statement in the final rule. Because we are amending this
bulleted statement in this document, the request that we exercise
enforcement discretion is no longer applicable.
IV. Analysis of Impacts
We have examined the impacts of this rule under Executive Order
12866 and the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), and the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Public Law 104-4). Executive
Order 12866 directs agencies to assess all costs and benefits of
available regulatory alternatives and, when regulation is necessary, to
select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits (including
potential economic, environmental, public health and safety, and other
advantages; distributive impacts; and equity). We believe that this
rule is not a significant regulatory action under the Executive order.
The Regulatory Flexibility Act requires agencies to analyze
regulatory options that would minimize any significant impact of a rule
on small entities. Our April 29, 2009, final rule requires important
new organ-specific warnings (i.e., liver injury and stomach bleeding
warnings) and related labeling for OTC drug products containing
acetaminophen and NSAIDs to advise consumers of potential risks and
when to consult a doctor (74 FR 19385). We are amending the final rule
in this document to clarify some of the labeling requirements specified
in the final rule. Three amendments are being made. One amendment
specifies that manufacturers of OTC acetaminophen and NSAID drug
products are not required to put the liver injury or stomach bleeding
warning on each blister unit of a blister card as long as the
appropriate warning appears on the blister card and remains intact and
readable when drug is removed from the blister card (Sec.
201.326(a)(1)(iii)(A), (a)(1)(iv)(A)(1), (a)(1)(v)(A), (a)(2)(iii)(A),
(a)(2)(iv)(A)(1), and (a)(2)(v)(A)). The second amendment specifies
that the ``See new warnings'' flag (Sec. 201.326(b)) must remain on
the label for at least 1 year from the time the manufacturer puts the
statement on the PDP. The third amendment clarifies the liver injury
warning on OTC acetaminophen products containing multiple active
ingredients. We examined the impacts of the amended labeling
requirements described in this document when we developed the April 29,
2009, final rule. We determined that the final rule would not have a
significant impact on a substantial number of small entities. Because
this amendment does not add any new requirements that were not
considered in developing the final rule, we do not believe this rule
will have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities.
Section 202(a) of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 requires
that agencies prepare a written statement, which includes an assessment
of anticipated costs and benefits, before proposing ``any rule that
includes any Federal mandate that may result in the expenditure by
State, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100,000,000 or more (adjusted annually for
inflation) in any one year.'' The current threshold after adjustment
for inflation is $133 million, using the most current (2008) Implicit
Price Deflator for the Gross Domestic Product. We do not expect the
final rule as amended to result in any 1-year expenditure that would
meet or exceed this amount.
V. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
We conclude that the labeling requirements in this document are not
subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget because they
do not constitute a ``collection of information'' under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). Rather, the labeling
statements are a ``public disclosure of information originally supplied
by the Federal government to the recipient for the purpose of
disclosure to the public'' (5 CFR 1320.3(c)(2)).
VI. Environmental Impact
We have determined under 21 CFR 25.31(a) that this action is of a
type that does not individually or cumulatively have a significant
effect on the human environment. Therefore, neither an environmental
assessment nor an environmental impact statement is required.
VII. Federalism
FDA has analyzed this final rule in accordance with the principles
set forth in Executive Order 13132. Section 4(a) of the Executive order
requires agencies to ``construe * * * a Federal statute to preempt
State law only where the statute contains an express preemption
provision or there is some other clear evidence that the Congress
intended preemption of State law, or where the exercise of State
authority conflicts with the exercise of Federal authority under the
Federal statute.'' The sole statutory provision giving preemptive
effect to the final rule is section 751 of the Federal Food, Drug, and
Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 379r).
We believe that we have complied with all of the applicable
requirements under the Executive order and have determined that the
preemptive effects of this rule are consistent with Executive Order
13132.
VIII. References
The following references have been placed on display in the
Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration,
5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852 and may be seen by
interested persons between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
1. FDA-1977-N-0013-0039.
2. FDA-1977-N-0013-0040.
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 201
Drugs, Labeling, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
0
Therefore, under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under
authority delegated to the Commissioner of Food and Drugs, 21 CFR part
201, (as added in the Federal Registers of April 29, 2009, and amended
June 30, 2009), is amended as follows:
PART 201--LABELING
0
1. The authority citation for 21 CFR part 201 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321, 331, 351, 352, 353, 355, 358, 360,
360b, 360gg-360ss, 371, 374, 379e; 42 U.S.C. 216, 241, 262, 264.
0
2. Section 201.326, (as added at 74 FR 19385, April 29, 2009, and
amended at 74 FR 31177, June 30, 2009) is further amended by revising
paragraphs (a)(1)(iii)(A), (a)(1)(iv)(A)(1), (a)(1)(v)(A),
(a)(2)(iii)(A), (a)(2)(iv)(A)(1), (a)(2)(v)(A), and (b) to read as
follows:
[[Page 61515]]
Sec. 201.326 Over-the-counter drug products containing internal
analgesic/antipyretic active ingredients; required warnings and other
labeling.
(a) * * *
(1) * * *
(iii) * * *
(A) The liver warning states ``Liver warning [heading in bold
type]: This product contains acetaminophen. Severe liver damage may
occur if you take [bullet] more than [insert maximum number of daily
dosage units] in 24 hours, which is the maximum daily amount [optional:
`for this product'] [bullet] with other drugs containing acetaminophen
[bullet] 3 or more alcoholic drinks every day while using this
product''. This ``Liver'' warning must be the first warning under the
``Warnings'' heading. For products that contain both acetaminophen and
aspirin, this ``Liver'' warning must appear after the ``Reye's
syndrome'' and ``Allergy alert'' warnings in Sec. 201.66(c)(5)(ii)(A)
and (c)(5)(ii)(B) and before the ``Stomach bleeding'' warning in
paragraph (a)(2)(iii)(A) of this section. If there is an outer and
immediate container of a retail package, this warning must appear on
both the outer and immediate containers. If the immediate container is
a blister card, the warning must appear on the blister card and remain
intact and readable when drug product is removed from the blister card.
The warning does not need to be included on each blister unit.
* * * * *
(iv) * * *
(A) * * *
(1) The liver warning states ``Liver warning [heading in bold
type]: This product contains acetaminophen. Severe liver damage may
occur if your child takes [bullet] more than 5 doses in 24 hours, which
is the maximum daily amount [optional: `for this product'] [bullet]
with other drugs containing acetaminophen''. This ``Liver'' warning
must be the first warning under the ``Warnings'' heading. If there is
an outer and immediate container of a retail package, this warning must
appear on both the outer and immediate containers. If the immediate
container is a blister card, the warning must appear on the blister
card and remain intact and readable when drug product is removed from
the blister card. The warning is not required to be included on each
blister unit.
* * * * *
(v) * * *
(A) The liver warning states ``Liver warning [heading in bold
type]: This product contains acetaminophen. Severe liver damage may
occur if [bullet] adult takes more than [insert maximum number of daily
dosage units] in 24 hours, which is the maximum daily amount [optional:
`for this product'] [bullet] child takes more than 5 doses in 24 hours
[bullet] taken with other drugs containing acetaminophen [bullet] adult
has 3 or more alcoholic drinks everyday while using this product.'' If
there is an outer and immediate container of a retail package, this
warning must appear on both the outer and immediate containers. If the
immediate container is a blister card, the warning must appear on the
blister card and remain intact and readable when drug product is
removed from the blister card. The warning is not required to be
included on each blister unit.
* * * * *
(2) * * *
* * * * *
(iii) * * *
(A) The stomach bleeding warning states ``Stomach bleeding warning
[heading in bold type]: This product contains an NSAID, which may cause
severe stomach bleeding. The chance is higher if you [bullet] are age
60 or older [bullet] have had stomach ulcers or bleeding problems
[bullet] take a blood thinning (anticoagulant) or steroid drug [bullet]
take other drugs containing prescription or nonprescription NSAIDs
(aspirin, ibuprofen, naproxen, or others) [bullet] have 3 or more
alcoholic drinks every day while using this product [bullet] take more
or for a longer time than directed''. This ``Stomach bleeding'' warning
must appear after the ``Reye's syndrome'' and ``Allergy alert''
warnings in Sec. 201.66(c)(5)(ii)(A) and (c)(5)(ii)(B). For products
that contain both acetaminophen and aspirin, the acetaminophen
``Liver'' warning in paragraph (a)(1)(iii) of this section must appear
before the ``Stomach bleeding'' warning in this paragraph. If there is
an outer and immediate container of a retail package, this warning must
appear on both the outer and immediate containers. If the immediate
container is a blister card, the warning must appear on the blister
card and remain intact and readable when drug product is removed from
the blister card. The warning is not required to be included on each
blister unit.
* * * * *
(iv) * * *
(A) * * *
(1) The stomach bleeding warning states ``Stomach bleeding warning
[heading in bold type]: This product contains an NSAID, which may cause
severe stomach bleeding. The chance is higher if your child [bullet]
has had stomach ulcers or bleeding problems [bullet] takes a blood
thinning (anticoagulant) or steroid drug [bullet] takes other drugs
containing prescription or nonprescription NSAIDs (aspirin, ibuprofen,
naproxen, or others) [bullet] takes more or for a longer time than
directed''. The ``Stomach bleeding'' warning must appear after the
``Reye's syndrome'' and ``Allergy alert'' warnings in Sec.
201.66(c)(5)(ii)(A) and (c)(5)(ii)(B). If there is an outer and
immediate container of a retail package, this warning must appear on
both the outer and immediate containers. If the immediate container is
a blister card, the warning must appear on the blister card and remain
intact and readable when drug product is removed from the blister card.
The warning is not required to be included on each blister unit.
* * * * *
(v) * * *
(A) The Stomach bleeding warning states ``Stomach bleeding warning
[heading in bold type]: This product contains an NSAID, which may cause
severe stomach bleeding. The chance is higher if the user [bullet] has
had stomach ulcers or bleeding problems [bullet] takes a blood thinning
(anticoagulant) or steroid drug [bullet] takes other drugs containing
prescription or nonprescription NSAIDs (aspirin, ibuprofen, naproxen,
or others) [bullet] takes more or for a longer time than directed
[bullet] is age 60 or older [bullet] has 3 or more alcoholic drinks
everyday while using this product''. The ``Stomach bleeding'' warning
must appear after the ``Reye's syndrome`` and ``Allergy alert''
warnings in Sec. 201.66(c)(5)(ii)(A) and (c)(5)(ii)(B). If there is an
outer and immediate container of a retail package, this warning must
appear on both the outer and immediate containers. If the immediate
container is a blister card, the warning must appear on the blister
card and remain intact and readable when drug product is removed from
the blister card. The warning is not required to be included on each
blister unit.
* * * * *
(b) New warnings information statement. The labeling of any drug
product subject to this section that is initially introduced or
initially delivered for introduction into interstate commerce before or
on April 29, 2010, must bear on its PDP, as defined in Sec. 201.60,
the statement ``See new warnings information''. This statement must
appear highlighted (e.g., fluorescent or color contrast) or in bold
type, be in lines generally parallel to the base on which the package
rests as it is designed to be displayed, and be in one
[[Page 61516]]
of the following sizes, whichever is greater:
(1) At least one-quarter as large as the size of the most prominent
printed matter on the PDP, or
(2) At least as large as the size of the ``Drug Facts'' title, as
required in Sec. 201.66(d)(2). The new warnings information statement
must remain on the PDP of the drug product for at least 1 year from the
date the product is initially introduced into interstate commerce.
* * * * *
Dated: November 17, 2009.
David Horowitz,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. E9-28296 Filed 11-24-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S