Amendment to the International Arms Traffic in Arms Regulations: U.S. Government Transfer Programs and Foreign-Owned Military Aircraft and Naval Vessels, 61586-61589 [E9-27685]
Download as PDF
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS
61586
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 226 / Wednesday, November 25, 2009 / Proposed Rules
rulemaking to coincide with the
December 14, 2009 TTB comment
deadline was published in the Federal
Register (74 FR 57125) on November 4,
2009. In response to a request from the
public to provide additional time to
prepare comments on the proposed rule,
CBP is extending the comment period
for an additional 30 days to January 12,
2010.
DATES: Comments on the proposed rule
must be received on or before January
12, 2010.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by USCBP docket number, by
one of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments
via docket number USCBP–2009–0021.
• Mail: Trade and Commercial
Regulations Branch, Regulations and
Rulings, Office of International Trade,
U.S. Customs and Border Protection,
799 9th Street, NW. (Mint Annex),
Washington, DC 20229–1179.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name and
USCBP docket number for this proposed
rulemaking. All comments received will
be posted without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided. For
detailed instructions on submitting
comments and additional information
on the rulemaking process, see the
‘‘Public Participation’’ heading of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
this document.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
comments received, go to https://
www.regulations.gov. Submitted
comments may also be inspected during
regular business days between the hours
of 9 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. at the Trade and
Commercial Regulations Branch,
Regulations and Rulings, Office of
International Trade, U.S. Customs and
Border Protection, 799 9th Street, NW.,
5th Floor, Washington, DC.
Arrangements to inspect submitted
comments should be made in advance
by calling Joseph Clark at (202) 325–
0118.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
William Rosoff, Entry Process and Duty
Refunds, Regulations and Rulings,
Office of International Trade, (202) 325–
0047.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Public Participation
Interested persons are invited to
participate in this rulemaking by
submitting written data, views, or
arguments on all aspects of the
proposed rule. Customs and Border
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:54 Nov 24, 2009
Jkt 220001
Protection (CBP) also invites comments
that relate to the economic,
environmental, or federalism effects that
might result from this proposed rule. If
appropriate to a specific comment, the
commenter should reference the specific
portion of the proposed rule, explain the
reason for any recommended change,
and include data, information, or
authority that support such
recommended change.
Dated: November 20, 2009.
Sandra L. Bell,
Executive Director, Regulations and Rulings,
Office of International Trade, U.S. Customs
and Border Protection.
Approved: November 20, 2009.
Timothy E. Skud,
Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Treasury.
[FR Doc. E9–28285 Filed 11–24–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111–14–P
Background
Customs and Border Protection (CBP)
published a document in the Federal
Register (74 FR 52928) on October 15,
2009 proposing to amend title 19 of the
Code of Federal Regulations to preclude
the filing of substitution drawback
claims for internal revenue excise tax
paid on imported merchandise in
situations where no excise tax was paid
upon the substituted merchandise or
where the substituted merchandise is
the subject of a different claim for
refund or drawback of excise tax under
any provision of the Internal Revenue
Code. The document solicited public
comment on the proposed amendments,
and requested that submitted comments
be received by CBP on or before
November 16, 2009.
A related proposed rulemaking
prepared by the Alcohol and Tobacco
Tax and Trade Bureau (TTB) within the
Department of the Treasury was
published in the same edition of the
Federal Register (74 FR 52937, October
15, 2009). Comments on TTB’s proposed
rule are due on or before December 14,
2009.
A subsequent notice extending the
time within which the public may
submit comments on CBP’s proposed
rulemaking to coincide with the
December 14, 2009 TTB comment
deadline was published in the Federal
Register (74 FR 57125) on November 4,
2009.
Second Extension of Comment Period
CBP received a written submission
from the trade, dated November 2, 2009,
requesting that the comment period be
extended for an additional 30 days to
provide adequate time to prepare
comments on the proposed rule. Upon
review, a decision has been made to
grant the request. Accordingly, the
comment period is extended to January
12, 2010 and comments must be
received by CBP on or before that date.
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
22 CFR Part 126
[Public Notice: 6813]
RIN 1400–AC52
Amendment to the International Arms
Traffic in Arms Regulations: U.S.
Government Transfer Programs and
Foreign-Owned Military Aircraft and
Naval Vessels
Department of State.
Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Department of State is
proposing to amend Section 126.6 of the
International Traffic in Arms
Regulations (ITAR) pertaining to U.S.
Government transfer programs and
foreign-owned military aircraft and
naval vessels. Section 126.6 is being
amended to clarify the particular
circumstances when a license is not
required by the Directorate of Defense
Trade Controls.
DATES: The Department of State will
accept comments on this proposed rule
until January 25, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Interested parties may
submit comments within 60 days of the
date of the publication by any of the
following methods:
• E-mail:
DDTCResponseTeam@state.gov with an
appropriate subject line.
• Mail: Department of State,
Directorate of Defense Trade Controls,
Office of Defense Trade Controls Policy,
ATTN: Regulatory Change, 126.6, SA–1,
12th Floor, Washington, DC 20522–
0112.
Persons with access to the Internet
may also view this notice by going to
the U.S. Government regulations.gov
Web site at https://regulations.gov/
index.cfm.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Director Charles B. Shotwell, Office of
Defense Trade Controls Policy,
Department of State, Telephone (202)
663–2792 or Fax (202) 261–8199; E-mail
DDTCResponseTeam@state.gov. ATTN:
Regulatory Change, 126.6.
E:\FR\FM\25NOP1.SGM
25NOP1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 226 / Wednesday, November 25, 2009 / Proposed Rules
Section
126.6 of the ITAR specifies when a
license from the Directorate of Defense
Trade Controls is not required for
certain specified U.S. Government
transfer programs and exports involving
foreign-owned military aircraft and
naval vessels. The title of this particular
section has been changed from
‘‘Foreign-owned military aircraft and
naval vessels, and the Foreign Military
Sales program’’ to ‘‘U.S. Government
transfer programs and foreign-owned
military aircraft and naval vessels’’ to
more accurately describe its coverage.
Section 126.6 is being amended to
clarify the particular circumstances
when a license is not required by the
Directorate of Defense Trade Controls.
Current regulatory language was
implemented when the U.S.
Government executed these programs
with mostly U.S. Government
personnel. Over the years the U.S.
Government, especially the Department
of Defense, has expanded operations
and migrated to utilization of the
Defense Transportation System as well
as commercial carriers to, in some
instances, fully replace government
transportation systems and personnel.
As a result, U.S. Customs and Border
Protection was unclear as to which
programs were U.S. Government
programs and, therefore, which items
were qualified to be exported from the
United States without an associated
export license. The proposed changes
address this issue. Also, the proposed
amendment addresses in more detail the
export requirements involving the
Foreign Military Sales program and
extends the exemption to exports
pursuant to section 1206 of the National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal
Year 2006, as amended and extended, or
section 1206 of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008.
It further delineates requirements,
authorized periods for license
exemptions, documentary requirements,
and the applicable terms and conditions
relating to the U.S. Government’s
transfer and/or loan of defense articles
to foreign governments or international
organizations.
applicability of 5 U.S.C. 553, which will
be determined at a later time.
Regulatory Analysis and Notices
PART 126—GENERAL POLICIES AND
PROVISIONS
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Administrative Procedure Act and
Executive Order 12866
Applicability of 5 U.S.C. 553 and
Executive Order 12866 is under
discussion with the Office of
Management and Budget.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The applicability of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act is contingent on the
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:54 Nov 24, 2009
Jkt 220001
Unfunded Mandates Act of 1995
This proposed amendment does not
involve a mandate that will result in the
expenditure by State, local, and Tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more
in any year and it will not significantly
or uniquely affect small governments.
Therefore, no actions were deemed
necessary under the provisions of the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996
This proposed amendment has been
found not to be a major rule within the
meaning of the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of
1996.
Executive Orders 12372 and 13132
This proposed amendment will not
have substantial effects on the States, on
the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Therefore, in
accordance with Executive Order 13132,
it is determined that this amendment
does not have sufficient federalism
implications to require consultations or
warrant the preparation of a federalism
summary impact statement. The
regulations implementing Executive
Order 12372 regarding
intergovernmental consultation on
Federal programs and activities do not
apply to this proposed amendment.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This proposed rule would not impose
any new reporting or recordkeeping
requirements subject to the Paperwork
Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35.
List of Subjects in 22 CFR Part 126
Arms and munitions, Exports.
Accordingly, for the reasons set forth
above, Title 22, Chapter I, Subchapter
M, part 126 is proposed to be amended
as follows:
1. The authority citation for part 126
continues to read as follows:
Authority: Secs. 2, 38, 40, 42 and 71,
Public Law 90–629, 90 Stat. 744 (22 U.S.C.
2752, 2778, 2780, 2791 and 2797); E.O.
11958, 42 FR 4311; 3 CFR, 1977 Comp., p.
79; 22 U.S.C. 2651a; 22 U.S.C. 287c; E.O.
12918, 59 FR 28205; 3 CFR, 1994 Comp., p.
899; Sec. 1225, Public Law 108–375.
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
61587
2. Section 126.6 is amended by
revising paragraphs (a)(1), (a)(2), (a)(3),
(b), (c), and (d) to read as follows:
§ 126.6 U.S. Government transfer
programs and foreign-owned military
aircraft and naval vessels.
(a) * * *
(1) The defense article to be exported
was sold, granted, leased, or loaned by
the Department of Defense to the
government of a foreign country or to an
international organization pursuant to
the Arms Export Control Act, as
amended, (AECA) or the Foreign
Assistance Act of 1961, as amended;
(2) The defense article is exported to
representatives of the government of the
foreign country or international
organization in the United States;
(3) The defense article is to be
exported from the United States:
(i) On a military aircraft or naval
vessel of the government of the foreign
country or international organization.
The shippers export declaration (SED)
must be entered in the Automated
Export System (AES) by such
government or international
organization prior to export;
(ii) By the Department of Defense via
the Department of Defense
Transportation System (DTS) in
accordance with the vetting procedures
and the requirements in DoD 5105.38–
M, ‘‘Security Assistance Management
Manual’’ (SAMM), and DoD Regulations
4500.9E and 4500.9R, ‘‘Defense
Transportation Regulations’’ (DTR). The
SED must be entered in the AES by the
cognizant or responsible military service
or implementing agency; or
(iii) By a Department of Defense
contracted carrier via the DTS in
accordance with the vetting procedures
and the requirements in DoD 5105.38–
M, ‘‘Security Assistance Management
Manual’’ (SAMM), and DoD Regulations
4500.9E and 4500.9R, ‘‘Defense
Transportation Regulations’’ (DTR). The
SED must be entered in the AES by the
cognizant or responsible military service
or implementing agency; and
(4) In the event the defense article to
be exported is classified, the export is
made by a person having the
appropriate USG security clearance, in
compliance with the Department of
Defense National Industrial Security
Program Operating Manual (DoD
NISPOM), and pursuant to an approved
transportation plan.
(b) Foreign military aircraft and naval
vessels. A license is not required for the
entry into and subsequent exit from the
United States of military aircraft or
naval vessels of any foreign state if no
overhaul, repair, or modification of the
aircraft or naval vessel is to be
E:\FR\FM\25NOP1.SGM
25NOP1
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS
61588
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 226 / Wednesday, November 25, 2009 / Proposed Rules
performed. However, Department of
State approval for overflight (pursuant
to 49 U.S.C. 40103) and naval visits
must be obtained from the Department
of State, Bureau of Political-Military
Affairs, Office of International Security
Operations.
(c) Foreign Military Sales program. A
license from the Directorate of Defense
Trade Controls is not required if the
defense article or defense service is to
be exported to a foreign country or
international organization under the
Foreign Military Sales (FMS) program of
the AECA pursuant to a jointly-signed
Letter of Offer and Acceptance (LOA)
authorizing such export where such
export meets the criteria stated below:
(1) Exports of the defense article or
defense service using this exemption
may take place only during the period
in which the FMS Program LOA and
implementing USG FMS contracts and
subcontracts are in effect and serve as
authorization for the exports hereunder
in lieu of a license. The Department of
Defense shall ensure that defense
articles and defense services exported
are limited to those authorized under
the valid LOA, maintain the dollar value
balance shipped against the LOA, and
shall promptly notify U.S. Customs and
Border Protection (CBP) of any
amendments or modifications to the
LOA, including the remaining balance
when the LOA is completed, closed, or
is no longer valid as an authorization;
(2) The defense article or defense
service to be exported is specifically
identified in an executed LOA, in
furtherance of the FMS program, signed
by an authorized representative of the
Department of Defense and an
authorized representative of the foreign
government;
(3) The total value of the defense
articles and defense services exported
must not exceed that value authorized
by the relevant LOA and any relevant
contract and subcontract;
(4) The export is not to a country
proscribed in § 126.1 of this subchapter;
(5) The U.S. person responsible for
the transfer or the Department of
Defense (in the case of DTS shipments)
maintains records of all exports in
accordance with Part 122 of this
subchapter;
(6) For exports of defense articles:
(i) The shipment is made by the
relevant foreign diplomatic mission of
the purchasing country or its authorized
freight forwarder, provided that the
freight forwarder is so designated in
writing by the foreign government to,
and is registered with, the Directorate of
Defense Trade Controls pursuant to Part
122 of this subchapter;
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:54 Nov 24, 2009
Jkt 220001
(ii) Prior to shipment, the Department
of Defense shall lodge the LOA, and any
amendments or modifications thereto,
with the Port Director of U.S. Customs
and Border Protection of the primary
port;
(iii) The relevant foreign diplomatic
mission of the purchasing country, or its
authorized freight forwarder, prepares
and provides to the Port Director of U.S.
Customs and Border Protection a
properly executed DSP–94 that has been
countersigned by an authorized
representative of the Department of
Defense verifying that the export is in
accordance with the LOA. The exporter
must also provide any other documents
required by the Port Director of U.S.
Customs and Border Protection in
carrying out its responsibilities. The
AES SED or, if authorized, the outbound
manifest must be annotated as follows:
‘‘This shipment is being exported under
the authority of Department of State
Form DSP–94 pursuant to a current and
valid FMS Case [case identification],
implemented [implementation date]. 22
CFR 126.6(c) applicable. The U.S.
Government point of contact islll,
telephone number lll,’’; and
(iv) In the event the defense article to
be exported is classified, the export
must be made by a person having the
appropriate USG security clearance and
must be made in compliance with the
Department of Defense National
Industrial Security Program Operating
Manual (DoD NISPOM) and pursuant to
an approved transportation plan; and
(7) For exports of defense services:
(i) The U.S. exporter must have
entered into a contract with the
Department of Defense that:
(A) Specifically defines the scope of
the defense service to be exported;
(B) Cites the FMS case identifier;
(C) Identifies the foreign recipients of
the defense service;
(D) Identifies any other U.S. or foreign
parties that may be involved and their
roles/responsibilities to the extent
known when the contract is executed;
and
(E) Specifies the period during which
the defense service may be performed;
(ii) The U.S. person that is a party to
a contract with the Department of
Defense for the provision of defense
services pursuant to an FMS case must
maintain a valid registration with the
Directorate of Defense Trade Controls
for the entire time that the defense
service is being provided. In any
instance when that U.S. person employs
a U.S. subcontractor, that subcontractor
may only provide defense services
pursuant to this subsection when
registered with Directorate of Defense
Trade Controls, and when such
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
subcontract meets the requirements of
paragraphs (c)(7)(i)(A) thorugh (E) of
this section;
(iii) In instances when the defense
service involves the transfer of classified
technical data, the U.S. person
transferring the defense service must
have the appropriate USG security
clearance and a transportation plan, if
appropriate, in compliance with the
Department of Defense National
Industrial Security Program Operating
Manual (DoD NISPOM);
(iv) Where defense articles are
exported along with defense services,
the exporter must comply with
paragraph (c)(6) of this section; and
(v) The U.S. exporter reports its initial
export, citing this section of the
International Traffic in Arms
Regulations. The U.S. exporter must
maintain records of the export to
include the FMS case identifier, the
contract and subcontract number, the
foreign country, and the duration of the
service being provided. These records
must be kept in accordance with § 122.5
of this subchapter.
(d) Other USG Programs. A license
from the Directorate of Defense Trade
Controls is not required if:
(1) Defense articles to be exported
were sold, granted, leased or loaned by
the Department of Defense to a foreign
country or international organization
pursuant to section 1206 of the National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal
Year 2006, as amended and extended, or
section 1206 of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008;
(2) The defense article is to be
exported from the United States:
(i) By the Department of Defense via
the Department of Defense
Transportation System (DTS) in
accordance with the vetting procedures
and the requirements in DoD 5105.38–
M, ‘‘Security Assistance Management
Manual’’ (SAMM), and DoD Regulations
4500.9E and 4500.9R, ‘‘Defense
Transportation Regulations’’ (DTR). The
SED must be entered in the AES by the
cognizant or responsible military service
or implementing agency; or
(ii) By a Department of Defense
contracted carrier via the DTS in
accordance with the vetting procedures
and the requirements in DoD 5105.38–
M, ‘‘Security Assistance Management
Manual’’ (SAMM), and DoD Regulations
4500.9E and 4500.9R, ‘‘Defense
Transportation Regulations’’ (DTR). The
SED must be entered in the AES by the
cognizant or responsible military service
or implementing agency; and
(3) In the event the defense article to
be exported is classified, the export is
made by a person having the
appropriate USG security clearance, in
E:\FR\FM\25NOP1.SGM
25NOP1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 226 / Wednesday, November 25, 2009 / Proposed Rules
compliance with the Department of
Defense National Industrial Security
Program Operating Manual (DoD
NISPOM) and pursuant to an approved
transportation plan.
Dated: November 3, 2009.
Ellen O. Tauscher,
Under Secretary, Arms Control and
International Security, Department of State.
[FR Doc. E9–27685 Filed 11–24–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–25–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 301
[REG–111833–99]
RIN 1545–AX46
Regulations Under I.R.C. Section 7430
Relating to Awards of Administrative
Costs and Attorneys Fees
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS
AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS),
Treasury.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
and notice of public hearing.
SUMMARY: This document contains
proposed regulations relating to awards
of administrative costs and attorneys
fees under section 7430 to conform to
the amendments made in the Taxpayer
Relief Act of 1997 and the IRS
Restructuring and Reform Act of 1998.
The regulations affect taxpayers seeking
attorneys fees and costs. This document
also provides notice of a public hearing
on these proposed regulations.
DATES: Written or electronic comments
must be received by February 8, 2010.
Outlines of topics to be discussed at the
public hearing scheduled for 10 a.m. on
March 10, 2010 must be received by
February 10, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Send submissions to:
CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG–111833–99), room
5203, Internal Revenue Service, P.O.
Box 7604, Ben Franklin Station,
Washington, DC 20044. Submissions
may be hand-delivered Monday through
Friday between the hours of 8 a.m. and
4 p.m. to: CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG–111833–
99), Courier’s Desk, Internal Revenue
Service, 1111 Constitution Avenue,
NW., Washington, DC. Alternatively,
taxpayers may submit comments
electronically via the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov (IRS REG–111833–
99). The public hearing will be held in
the Internal Revenue Building, Room
2615, 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:54 Nov 24, 2009
Jkt 220001
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Concerning the hearing, submission of
written comments, and to be placed on
the building access list to attend the
hearing, contact Regina Johnson, (202)
622–7180; concerning the proposed
regulations, contact Ronald J. Goldstein
(202) 622–4910 (not toll-free numbers).
Background and Explanation of
Provisions
The proposed amendments to the
Treasury Regulations incorporate the
1997 and 1998 amendments to section
7430 of the Internal Revenue Code
relating to awards of attorneys fees.
These amendments were enacted as part
of the Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997,
Public Law 105–34, 111 Stat. 788, and
the IRS Restructuring and Reform Act of
1998, Public Law 105–206, 112 Stat.
685.
The Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997
(TRA) contained several amendments to
section 7430 that are addressed in the
proposed amendments to the
regulations. First, the TRA provided that
a taxpayer has ninety days after the date
the IRS mails to the taxpayer a final
decision determining tax, interest or
penalty, to file an application with the
IRS to recover administrative costs.
Second, a taxpayer has ninety days after
the date the IRS mails to the taxpayer,
by certified or registered mail, a final
adverse decision regarding an award of
administrative costs, to file a petition
with the Tax Court. Third, the TRA
clarified the application of the net worth
requirements by providing that
individuals filing joint returns should
be treated as separate taxpayers for
purposes of determining net worth. The
TRA added trusts to the list of taxpayers
subject to the net worth requirements
and also specified the date on which the
net worth determination should be
made.
The TRA also added section 7436 to
the Code, which gives the Tax Court
jurisdiction in certain employment tax
cases. Under section 7436, if the IRS
determines in connection with an audit
that (1) one or more individuals
performing services for the taxpayer are
employees of the taxpayer or (2) the
taxpayer is not entitled to relief from
employment taxes under section 530 of
the Revenue Act of 1978 with respect to
the individual(s), and the IRS sends a
Notice of Determination of Worker
Classification (NDWC) to the taxpayer
by certified or registered mail, the
taxpayer may petition the Tax Court to
determine (1) whether the IRS’s
determination, as set forth in the
NDWC, is correct and (2) the proper
amount of employment tax under the
determination. Various restrictions on
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
61589
assessment and collection in section
6213 apply to a section 7436 proceeding
in the same manner as if the NDWC
were a notice of deficiency. Section
7436(d)(2) provides that section 7430
applies to proceedings brought under
section 7436.
The proposed amendments reflect the
changes outlined in this preamble.
Additional clarifying changes address
the calculation of net worth. First, the
regulation specifies that net worth will
be calculated using the fair market value
of assets to provide a more accurate
assessment of a taxpayer’s actual and
current net worth as of the
administrative proceeding date. Second,
the regulation specifies which net worth
and size limitations apply when a
taxpayer is an owner of an
unincorporated business. Third, the
regulation has been amended to clarify
the net worth requirement in cases
involving partnerships subject to the
unified audit and litigation procedures
of sections 6221 through 6234 of the
Code (the TEFRA partnership
procedures).
The IRS Restructuring and Reform Act
of 1998 (RRA) also contained several
amendments affecting section 7430.
First, the RRA increased the hourly rate
limitation from $110 per hour to $125
per hour. Second, two special factors
were added that may be considered to
increase an attorney’s hourly rate:
Difficulty of the issues presented and
local availability of tax experts. Third,
the RRA added a provision that requires
a court to consider whether the IRS has
lost cases with substantially similar
issues in other circuit courts of appeal
in deciding whether the IRS’s position
was substantially justified. Fourth, the
RRA created an exception to the
requirement that to recover attorneys
fees, the taxpayer must have paid or
incurred the fees. The exception
provides that if an individual who is
authorized to practice before the Tax
Court or the IRS is representing the
taxpayer on a pro bono basis, then the
taxpayer may petition for an award of
reasonable attorneys fees in excess of
the amounts that the taxpayer paid or
incurred, as long as the fee award is
ultimately paid to the individual or the
individual’s employer. Fifth, the period
for recovery of reasonable
administrative costs was extended to
include costs incurred after the date on
which the first letter of proposed
deficiency, commonly known as a 30day letter, is mailed to the taxpayer. The
regulations clarify, however, that a
taxpayer may be eligible to recover
reasonable administrative costs from the
date of the 30-day letter only if at least
one issue (other than recovery of
E:\FR\FM\25NOP1.SGM
25NOP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 226 (Wednesday, November 25, 2009)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 61586-61589]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-27685]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
22 CFR Part 126
[Public Notice: 6813]
RIN 1400-AC52
Amendment to the International Arms Traffic in Arms Regulations:
U.S. Government Transfer Programs and Foreign-Owned Military Aircraft
and Naval Vessels
AGENCY: Department of State.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of State is proposing to amend Section 126.6 of
the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR) pertaining to U.S.
Government transfer programs and foreign-owned military aircraft and
naval vessels. Section 126.6 is being amended to clarify the particular
circumstances when a license is not required by the Directorate of
Defense Trade Controls.
DATES: The Department of State will accept comments on this proposed
rule until January 25, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Interested parties may submit comments within 60 days of the
date of the publication by any of the following methods:
E-mail: DDTCResponseTeam@state.gov with an appropriate
subject line.
Mail: Department of State, Directorate of Defense Trade
Controls, Office of Defense Trade Controls Policy, ATTN: Regulatory
Change, 126.6, SA-1, 12th Floor, Washington, DC 20522-0112.
Persons with access to the Internet may also view this notice by
going to the U.S. Government regulations.gov Web site at https://regulations.gov/index.cfm.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Director Charles B. Shotwell, Office
of Defense Trade Controls Policy, Department of State, Telephone (202)
663-2792 or Fax (202) 261-8199; E-mail DDTCResponseTeam@state.gov.
ATTN: Regulatory Change, 126.6.
[[Page 61587]]
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 126.6 of the ITAR specifies when a
license from the Directorate of Defense Trade Controls is not required
for certain specified U.S. Government transfer programs and exports
involving foreign-owned military aircraft and naval vessels. The title
of this particular section has been changed from ``Foreign-owned
military aircraft and naval vessels, and the Foreign Military Sales
program'' to ``U.S. Government transfer programs and foreign-owned
military aircraft and naval vessels'' to more accurately describe its
coverage. Section 126.6 is being amended to clarify the particular
circumstances when a license is not required by the Directorate of
Defense Trade Controls. Current regulatory language was implemented
when the U.S. Government executed these programs with mostly U.S.
Government personnel. Over the years the U.S. Government, especially
the Department of Defense, has expanded operations and migrated to
utilization of the Defense Transportation System as well as commercial
carriers to, in some instances, fully replace government transportation
systems and personnel. As a result, U.S. Customs and Border Protection
was unclear as to which programs were U.S. Government programs and,
therefore, which items were qualified to be exported from the United
States without an associated export license. The proposed changes
address this issue. Also, the proposed amendment addresses in more
detail the export requirements involving the Foreign Military Sales
program and extends the exemption to exports pursuant to section 1206
of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006, as
amended and extended, or section 1206 of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008. It further delineates
requirements, authorized periods for license exemptions, documentary
requirements, and the applicable terms and conditions relating to the
U.S. Government's transfer and/or loan of defense articles to foreign
governments or international organizations.
Regulatory Analysis and Notices
Administrative Procedure Act and Executive Order 12866
Applicability of 5 U.S.C. 553 and Executive Order 12866 is under
discussion with the Office of Management and Budget.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The applicability of the Regulatory Flexibility Act is contingent
on the applicability of 5 U.S.C. 553, which will be determined at a
later time.
Unfunded Mandates Act of 1995
This proposed amendment does not involve a mandate that will result
in the expenditure by State, local, and Tribal governments, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100 million or more in any
year and it will not significantly or uniquely affect small
governments. Therefore, no actions were deemed necessary under the
provisions of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996
This proposed amendment has been found not to be a major rule
within the meaning of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996.
Executive Orders 12372 and 13132
This proposed amendment will not have substantial effects on the
States, on the relationship between the national government and the
States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. Therefore, in accordance with Executive
Order 13132, it is determined that this amendment does not have
sufficient federalism implications to require consultations or warrant
the preparation of a federalism summary impact statement. The
regulations implementing Executive Order 12372 regarding
intergovernmental consultation on Federal programs and activities do
not apply to this proposed amendment.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This proposed rule would not impose any new reporting or
recordkeeping requirements subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44
U.S.C. Chapter 35.
List of Subjects in 22 CFR Part 126
Arms and munitions, Exports.
Accordingly, for the reasons set forth above, Title 22, Chapter I,
Subchapter M, part 126 is proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 126--GENERAL POLICIES AND PROVISIONS
1. The authority citation for part 126 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: Secs. 2, 38, 40, 42 and 71, Public Law 90-629, 90
Stat. 744 (22 U.S.C. 2752, 2778, 2780, 2791 and 2797); E.O. 11958,
42 FR 4311; 3 CFR, 1977 Comp., p. 79; 22 U.S.C. 2651a; 22 U.S.C.
287c; E.O. 12918, 59 FR 28205; 3 CFR, 1994 Comp., p. 899; Sec. 1225,
Public Law 108-375.
2. Section 126.6 is amended by revising paragraphs (a)(1), (a)(2),
(a)(3), (b), (c), and (d) to read as follows:
Sec. 126.6 U.S. Government transfer programs and foreign-owned
military aircraft and naval vessels.
(a) * * *
(1) The defense article to be exported was sold, granted, leased,
or loaned by the Department of Defense to the government of a foreign
country or to an international organization pursuant to the Arms Export
Control Act, as amended, (AECA) or the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961,
as amended;
(2) The defense article is exported to representatives of the
government of the foreign country or international organization in the
United States;
(3) The defense article is to be exported from the United States:
(i) On a military aircraft or naval vessel of the government of the
foreign country or international organization. The shippers export
declaration (SED) must be entered in the Automated Export System (AES)
by such government or international organization prior to export;
(ii) By the Department of Defense via the Department of Defense
Transportation System (DTS) in accordance with the vetting procedures
and the requirements in DoD 5105.38-M, ``Security Assistance Management
Manual'' (SAMM), and DoD Regulations 4500.9E and 4500.9R, ``Defense
Transportation Regulations'' (DTR). The SED must be entered in the AES
by the cognizant or responsible military service or implementing
agency; or
(iii) By a Department of Defense contracted carrier via the DTS in
accordance with the vetting procedures and the requirements in DoD
5105.38-M, ``Security Assistance Management Manual'' (SAMM), and DoD
Regulations 4500.9E and 4500.9R, ``Defense Transportation Regulations''
(DTR). The SED must be entered in the AES by the cognizant or
responsible military service or implementing agency; and
(4) In the event the defense article to be exported is classified,
the export is made by a person having the appropriate USG security
clearance, in compliance with the Department of Defense National
Industrial Security Program Operating Manual (DoD NISPOM), and pursuant
to an approved transportation plan.
(b) Foreign military aircraft and naval vessels. A license is not
required for the entry into and subsequent exit from the United States
of military aircraft or naval vessels of any foreign state if no
overhaul, repair, or modification of the aircraft or naval vessel is to
be
[[Page 61588]]
performed. However, Department of State approval for overflight
(pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 40103) and naval visits must be obtained from
the Department of State, Bureau of Political-Military Affairs, Office
of International Security Operations.
(c) Foreign Military Sales program. A license from the Directorate
of Defense Trade Controls is not required if the defense article or
defense service is to be exported to a foreign country or international
organization under the Foreign Military Sales (FMS) program of the AECA
pursuant to a jointly-signed Letter of Offer and Acceptance (LOA)
authorizing such export where such export meets the criteria stated
below:
(1) Exports of the defense article or defense service using this
exemption may take place only during the period in which the FMS
Program LOA and implementing USG FMS contracts and subcontracts are in
effect and serve as authorization for the exports hereunder in lieu of
a license. The Department of Defense shall ensure that defense articles
and defense services exported are limited to those authorized under the
valid LOA, maintain the dollar value balance shipped against the LOA,
and shall promptly notify U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) of
any amendments or modifications to the LOA, including the remaining
balance when the LOA is completed, closed, or is no longer valid as an
authorization;
(2) The defense article or defense service to be exported is
specifically identified in an executed LOA, in furtherance of the FMS
program, signed by an authorized representative of the Department of
Defense and an authorized representative of the foreign government;
(3) The total value of the defense articles and defense services
exported must not exceed that value authorized by the relevant LOA and
any relevant contract and subcontract;
(4) The export is not to a country proscribed in Sec. 126.1 of
this subchapter;
(5) The U.S. person responsible for the transfer or the Department
of Defense (in the case of DTS shipments) maintains records of all
exports in accordance with Part 122 of this subchapter;
(6) For exports of defense articles:
(i) The shipment is made by the relevant foreign diplomatic mission
of the purchasing country or its authorized freight forwarder, provided
that the freight forwarder is so designated in writing by the foreign
government to, and is registered with, the Directorate of Defense Trade
Controls pursuant to Part 122 of this subchapter;
(ii) Prior to shipment, the Department of Defense shall lodge the
LOA, and any amendments or modifications thereto, with the Port
Director of U.S. Customs and Border Protection of the primary port;
(iii) The relevant foreign diplomatic mission of the purchasing
country, or its authorized freight forwarder, prepares and provides to
the Port Director of U.S. Customs and Border Protection a properly
executed DSP-94 that has been countersigned by an authorized
representative of the Department of Defense verifying that the export
is in accordance with the LOA. The exporter must also provide any other
documents required by the Port Director of U.S. Customs and Border
Protection in carrying out its responsibilities. The AES SED or, if
authorized, the outbound manifest must be annotated as follows: ``This
shipment is being exported under the authority of Department of State
Form DSP-94 pursuant to a current and valid FMS Case [case
identification], implemented [implementation date]. 22 CFR 126.6(c)
applicable. The U.S. Government point of contact is------, telephone
number ------,''; and
(iv) In the event the defense article to be exported is classified,
the export must be made by a person having the appropriate USG security
clearance and must be made in compliance with the Department of Defense
National Industrial Security Program Operating Manual (DoD NISPOM) and
pursuant to an approved transportation plan; and
(7) For exports of defense services:
(i) The U.S. exporter must have entered into a contract with the
Department of Defense that:
(A) Specifically defines the scope of the defense service to be
exported;
(B) Cites the FMS case identifier;
(C) Identifies the foreign recipients of the defense service;
(D) Identifies any other U.S. or foreign parties that may be
involved and their roles/responsibilities to the extent known when the
contract is executed; and
(E) Specifies the period during which the defense service may be
performed;
(ii) The U.S. person that is a party to a contract with the
Department of Defense for the provision of defense services pursuant to
an FMS case must maintain a valid registration with the Directorate of
Defense Trade Controls for the entire time that the defense service is
being provided. In any instance when that U.S. person employs a U.S.
subcontractor, that subcontractor may only provide defense services
pursuant to this subsection when registered with Directorate of Defense
Trade Controls, and when such subcontract meets the requirements of
paragraphs (c)(7)(i)(A) thorugh (E) of this section;
(iii) In instances when the defense service involves the transfer
of classified technical data, the U.S. person transferring the defense
service must have the appropriate USG security clearance and a
transportation plan, if appropriate, in compliance with the Department
of Defense National Industrial Security Program Operating Manual (DoD
NISPOM);
(iv) Where defense articles are exported along with defense
services, the exporter must comply with paragraph (c)(6) of this
section; and
(v) The U.S. exporter reports its initial export, citing this
section of the International Traffic in Arms Regulations. The U.S.
exporter must maintain records of the export to include the FMS case
identifier, the contract and subcontract number, the foreign country,
and the duration of the service being provided. These records must be
kept in accordance with Sec. 122.5 of this subchapter.
(d) Other USG Programs. A license from the Directorate of Defense
Trade Controls is not required if:
(1) Defense articles to be exported were sold, granted, leased or
loaned by the Department of Defense to a foreign country or
international organization pursuant to section 1206 of the National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006, as amended and
extended, or section 1206 of the National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2008;
(2) The defense article is to be exported from the United States:
(i) By the Department of Defense via the Department of Defense
Transportation System (DTS) in accordance with the vetting procedures
and the requirements in DoD 5105.38-M, ``Security Assistance Management
Manual'' (SAMM), and DoD Regulations 4500.9E and 4500.9R, ``Defense
Transportation Regulations'' (DTR). The SED must be entered in the AES
by the cognizant or responsible military service or implementing
agency; or
(ii) By a Department of Defense contracted carrier via the DTS in
accordance with the vetting procedures and the requirements in DoD
5105.38-M, ``Security Assistance Management Manual'' (SAMM), and DoD
Regulations 4500.9E and 4500.9R, ``Defense Transportation Regulations''
(DTR). The SED must be entered in the AES by the cognizant or
responsible military service or implementing agency; and
(3) In the event the defense article to be exported is classified,
the export is made by a person having the appropriate USG security
clearance, in
[[Page 61589]]
compliance with the Department of Defense National Industrial Security
Program Operating Manual (DoD NISPOM) and pursuant to an approved
transportation plan.
Dated: November 3, 2009.
Ellen O. Tauscher,
Under Secretary, Arms Control and International Security, Department of
State.
[FR Doc. E9-27685 Filed 11-24-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-25-P