Domestic Dates Produced or Packed in Riverside County, CA; Changes to Nomination Procedures and a Reporting Date, 61265-61267 [E9-28153]
Download as PDF
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 225 / Tuesday, November 24, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
pound equivalent of onions. Therefore,
the estimated assessment revenue for
the 2009–10 fiscal period as a
percentage of total f.o.b. revenue could
range between 0.1 and 0.25 percent.
This rule continues in effect the
action that decreased the assessment
obligation imposed on handlers.
Assessments are applied uniformly on
all handlers, and some of the costs may
be passed on to producers. However,
decreasing the assessment rate reduces
the burden on handlers, and may reduce
the burden on producers. In addition,
the Committee’s meeting was widely
publicized throughout the South Texas
onion production area and all interested
persons were invited to attend the
meeting and participate in Committee
deliberations on all issues. Like all
Committee meetings, the June 9, 2009,
meeting was a public meeting and all
entities, both large and small, were able
to express views on this issue.
This action imposes no additional
reporting or recordkeeping requirements
on either small or large South Texas
onion handlers. As with all Federal
marketing order programs, reports and
forms are periodically reviewed to
reduce information requirements and
duplication by industry and public
sector agencies.
USDA has not identified any relevant
Federal rules that duplicate, overlap, or
conflict with this rule.
Comments on the interim final rule
were required to be received on or
before October 5, 2009. No comments
were received. Therefore, for the reasons
given in the interim final rule, we are
adopting the interim final rule as a final
rule, without change.
To view the interim final rule, go to
https://www.regulations.gov/search/
Regs/home.html#documentDetail?R=
0900006480a0086c.
This action also affirms information
contained in the interim final rule
concerning Executive Orders 12866 and
12988, the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. Chapter 35), and the E-Gov Act
(44 U.S.C. 101).
After consideration of all relevant
material presented, it is found that
finalizing the interim final rule, without
change, as published in the Federal
Register (74 FR 38505, August 4, 2009)
will tend to effectuate the declared
policy of the Act.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 959
Marketing agreements, Onions,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:13 Nov 23, 2009
Jkt 220001
PART 959—ONIONS GROWN IN
SOUTH TEXAS
Accordingly, the interim final rule
amending 7 CFR part 959, which was
published at 74 FR 38505 on August 4,
2009, is adopted as a final rule, without
change.
■
Dated: November 17, 2009.
Rayne Pegg,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. E9–28144 Filed 11–23–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 987
[Doc. No. AMS–FV–09–0035; FV09–987–1
FR]
Domestic Dates Produced or Packed in
Riverside County, CA; Changes to
Nomination Procedures and a
Reporting Date
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
SUMMARY: This rule revises the
nomination procedures and changes a
reporting date under the California date
marketing order (order). The order
regulates the handling of domestic dates
produced or packed in Riverside
County, California, and is administered
locally by the California Date
Administrative Committee (CDAC or
Committee). This rule changes the
method of polling for nominees to the
Committee and the date on which CDAC
Form 6 is due. These changes will assist
in the administration of the order by
updating and streamlining Committee
program operations.
DATES: Effective Date: November 25,
2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeff
Smutny, Marketing Specialist, or Kurt J.
Kimmel, Regional Manager, California
Marketing Field Office, Marketing Order
Administration Branch, Fruit and
Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA;
Telephone: (559) 487–5901, Fax: (559)
487–5906, or E-mail:
Jeffrey.Smutny@ams.usda.gov or
Kurt.Kimmel@ams.usda.gov.
Small businesses may request
information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Jay Guerber,
Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue, SW., STOP 0237, Washington,
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
61265
DC 20250–0237; Telephone: (202) 720–
2491, Fax: (202) 720–8938, or E-mail:
Jay.Guerber@ams.usda.gov.
This final
rule is issued under Marketing
Agreement and Order No. 987, both as
amended (7 CFR part 987), regulating
the handling of domestic dates
produced or packed in Riverside
County, California, hereinafter referred
to as the ‘‘order.’’ The order is effective
under the Agricultural Marketing
Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7
U.S.C. 601–674), hereinafter referred to
as the ‘‘Act.’’
The Department of Agriculture
(USDA) is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Order
12866.
This final rule has been reviewed
under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. This rule is not intended
to have retroactive effect.
The Act provides that administrative
proceedings must be exhausted before
parties may file suit in court. Under
section 608c(15)(A) of the Act, any
handler subject to an order may file
with USDA a petition stating that the
order, any provision of the order, or any
obligation imposed in connection with
the order is not in accordance with law
and request a modification of the order
or to be exempted therefrom. A handler
is afforded the opportunity for a hearing
on the petition. After the hearing, USDA
would rule on the petition. The Act
provides that the district court of the
United States in any district in which
the handler is an inhabitant, or has his
or her principal place of business, has
jurisdiction to review USDA’s ruling on
the petition, provided an action is filed
not later than 20 days after the date of
the entry of the ruling.
This rule revises the nomination
procedures and changes a reporting date
under the order. This rule changes the
method of polling for nominees to the
Committee and the date on which CDAC
Form 6 is due for the California Date
Administration Committee. These
changes will assist in the administration
of the order by updating and
streamlining Committee program
operations. This final rule permits the
Committee to conduct nominations for
member and alternate member positions
on the Committee through the mail or
equivalent electronic means (including,
but not limited to fax, or other
technology, as available) rather than
limit balloting to in-person polling on a
specific date or absentee balloting.
This final rule also changes the date
on which CDAC Form 6 is due to the
Committee. Currently, the form is due
by the 10th day of each month, but this
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\24NOR1.SGM
24NOR1
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with RULES
61266
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 225 / Tuesday, November 24, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
final rule relaxes the reporting
requirement by changing the due date to
the 16th day of each month or such
other date as the Committee may
prescribe. These changes were
recommended unanimously by the
Committee at a meeting on October 30,
2008. A meeting of the Marketing Order
Policy Review Subcommittee was held
on October 21, 2008. At that meeting,
the subcommittee discussed various
proposals for improving Committee
operations, including these two
changes.
Section 987.24 of the order specifies
that nominations shall be made no later
than June 15 of every other year, and
establishes procedures for nominations
for membership on the Committee by
requiring the Committee to establish a
polling day for receiving Committee
nominations, and procedures for
requesting and returning absentee
ballots. This section also provides
authority for the Committee, with the
approval of the Secretary, to recommend
rules and regulations on the manner in
which nominees may be obtained.
Section 987.124 of the order’s rules
and regulations further specifies the
date, time, and procedure for polling, as
well as for obtaining and casting
absentee ballots.
At its meeting on October 30, 2008,
the Committee recommended that
nominations be permitted through the
mail or by other electronic means
equivalent to the mail. When the order
was promulgated, there were a number
of absentee date garden owners, and the
advent of the polling day permitted the
owners to travel to the area to vote on
nominees to the Committee.
Section 987.62 of the date order
provides authority for the Committee to
require reports of dates shipped from
handlers. In § 987.162 of the order’s
rules and regulations, CDAC Form 6 is
specified as the handler acquisition and
disposition report, and is currently due
by the 10th day of each month.
There also is a California State
marketing program, administered by the
California Date Commission
(commission). Under that program, the
due date for the same type of
information is the 16th of each month.
Changing the due date of the CDAC
Form 6 will simplify reporting by
handlers as well as coordinate the
operations of the Committee and
commission, since the Committee staff
is also the commission staff.
Deliberations on the Changes
In its deliberations on mail balloting,
the Committee commented that the
current system is outmoded and
cumbersome. Authorizing the
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:13 Nov 23, 2009
Jkt 220001
Committee to conduct nominations via
mail or equivalent electronic means
could result in greater industry
participation in the nomination process,
with the possible result being greater
Committee outreach and diversity of
Committee representation.
In their deliberations regarding the
due date for CDAC Form 6, the
Committee discussed the confusion
created by the State and Federal
programs’ differing due dates. Handlers
report to the Committee on the 10th day
of the month and to the commission on
the 16th day of the month. By making
both reports due the same day, handlers
can report more conveniently, and
Committee and commission operations
will be coordinated and streamlined.
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5
U.S.C. 601–612), the Agricultural
Marketing Service (AMS) has
considered the economic impact of this
action on small entities. Accordingly,
AMS has prepared this final regulatory
flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit
regulatory actions to the scale of
business subject to such actions in order
that small businesses will not be unduly
or disproportionately burdened.
Marketing orders issued pursuant to the
Act, and rules issued thereunder, are
unique in that they are brought about
through group action of essentially
small entities acting on their own
behalf.
There are approximately 85 producers
of dates in the production area and 9
handlers subject to regulation under the
marketing order. The Small Business
Administration (13 CFR 121.201)
defines small agricultural producers as
those having annual receipts of less than
$750,000, and small agricultural service
firms are defined as those having annual
receipts of less than $7,000,000.
According to the National
Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS),
data for the most-recently revised crop
year, 2008, indicates that about 3.57
tons of dates were produced per acre.
The 2008 grower price published by
NASS was $1,580 per ton. Thus, the
value of date production in 2008
averaged about $5,640 per acre (3.57
tons per acre times $1,580 per ton). At
that average price, a producer would
have to have over 133 acres to receive
an annual income from dates of
$750,000 ($750,000 divided by $5,640
per acre equals 133 acres). According to
Committee staff, the majority of
California date producers farm fewer
than 133 acres. Thus, it can be
concluded that the majority of date
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
producers could be considered small
entities. According to data from the
Committee, the majority of handlers of
California dates may also be considered
small entities.
This final rule authorizes the
Committee to conduct nominations via
mail or equivalent electronic means,
and revises the due date for CDAC Form
6 from the 10th day each month to the
16th day of each month or such other
date as the Committee may prescribe.
The Committee unanimously
recommended these changes at their
meeting on October 30, 2008. At the
meeting, the Committee discussed the
impact of these changes on handlers and
producers in terms of cost. Handlers and
producers will be positively impacted
by mail balloting, as they will not have
to set aside time to drive to the
Committee offices to vote for Committee
members and alternate members, nor
will they have to plan ahead to request
absentee ballots.
Handlers will also be positively
impacted by the change in the due date
of the CDAC Form 6, since changing the
due date of the Committee form brings
the requirement into line with the due
date of the commission form, which
seeks identical information. Handlers
will simply be able to file the forms on
the same day. Committee and
commission operations will, thus, be
streamlined.
The benefits for this final rule are not
expected to be disproportionately
greater or less for small handlers or
producers than for larger entities.
The Committee discussed alternatives
to these changes, including not
conducting mail balloting or changing
the due date of the CDAC Form 6.
However, mail balloting provides the
industry with increased flexibility,
outreach, and convenience by offering
an opportunity for polling on more than
just one day. Changing the due date for
the CDAC Form 6 will also increase the
reporting handlers’ convenience. Both
changes improve the administration of
the program and keep informational
data filing uniform between the
Committee and the commission. For
those reasons, the changes are
advantageous to all entities, as well as
to the Committee staff. As a result, the
Committee members unanimously
agreed that these changes should be
recommended and should be in effect
for the 2009–10 crop year, beginning on
October 1, 2009.
A meeting of the Marketing Order
Policy Review Subcommittee was held
on October 21, 2008. At that meeting,
the subcommittee discussed various
proposals for improving Committee
E:\FR\FM\24NOR1.SGM
24NOR1
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 225 / Tuesday, November 24, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
operations, including these two
changes.
This final rule provides more
flexibility on Committee polling
procedures and changes the due date for
CDAC Form 6 under the date marketing
order. Accordingly, this action will not
impose any additional reporting or
recordkeeping requirements on either
small or large date handlers.
In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35), the information collection
requirements contained in this rule have
been previously approved by the Office
of Management and Budget (OMB) and
assigned OMB No. 0581–0178,
Vegetable and Specialty Crops. As with
all Federal marketing order programs,
reports and forms are periodically
reviewed to reduce information
requirements and duplication by
industry and public sector agencies. As
noted in the initial regulatory flexibility
analysis, USDA has not identified any
relevant Federal rules that duplicate,
overlap, or conflict with this rule.
AMS is committed to complying with
the E-Government Act, to promote the
use of the Internet and other
information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen
access to Government information and
services, and for other purposes.
In addition, the Committee’s meeting
was widely publicized throughout the
date industry, and all interested persons
were invited to attend the meeting and
encouraged to participate in Committee
deliberations on all issues. Like all
Committee meetings, the October 30,
2008, meeting was a public meeting and
all entities, both large and small, were
able to express views on this issue.
A proposed rule concerning this
action was published in the Federal
Register on September 15, 2009 (74 FR
47124). The proposed regulatory text
that was published in the Federal
Register contained incorrect references
that have been corrected in this final
rule. Copies of the rule were mailed or
sent via facsimile to all Committee
members and date handlers. Finally, the
rule was made available through the
Internet by USDA and the Office of the
Federal Register. A 30-day comment
period ending October 15, 2009, was
provided to allow interested persons to
respond to the proposal. No comments
were received.
A small business guide on complying
with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop
marketing agreements and orders may
be viewed at: https://www.ams.usda.gov/
AMSv1.0/ams.fetchTemplateData.do?
template=TemplateN&page=Marketing
OrdersSmallBusinessGuide. Any
questions about the compliance guide
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:13 Nov 23, 2009
Jkt 220001
should be sent to Jay Guerber at the
previously mentioned address in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
After consideration of all relevant
matters presented, including the
information and recommendation
submitted by the Committee and other
available information, it is hereby found
that this rule, as hereinafter set forth,
will tend to effectuate the declared
policy of the Act.
It is further found that good cause
exists for not postponing the effective
date of this rule until 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register (5
U.S.C. 553) because handlers are already
shipping dates for the 2009–2010 crop.
Therefore, this rule should be
implemented as soon as possible.
Further, handlers are aware of this rule,
which was recommended at a public
meeting. Also, a 30-day comment period
was provided for in the proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 987
Dates, Marketing agreements,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
■ For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, 7 CFR part 987 is amended as
follows:
PART 987—DOMESTIC DATES
PRODUCED OR PACKED IN
RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR
part 987 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674.
2. In § 987.124, paragraph (a) is
revised to read as follows:
■
§ 987.124
Nomination and polling.
(a) Date producers and producerhandlers shall be provided an
opportunity to nominate and vote for
individuals to serve on the Committee.
For this purpose, the Committee shall,
no later than June 15 of each evennumbered year, provide date producers
and producer-handlers nomination and
balloting material by mail or equivalent
electronic means, upon which
producers and producer-handlers may
nominate candidates and cast their
votes for members and alternate
members of the Committee in
accordance with the requirements in
paragraphs (b)(1) and (b)(2) of this
section, respectively. All ballots are
subject to verification. Balloting
material should be provided to voters at
least 2 weeks before the due date and
should contain, at least, the following
information:
(1) The names of incumbents who are
willing to continue to serve on the
committee;
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
61267
(2) The names of other persons
willing and eligible to serve;
(3) Instructions on how voters may
add write-in candidates;
(4) The date on which the ballot is
due to the committee or its agent; and
(5) How and where to return ballots.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 3. Section 987.162 is revised to read
as follows:
§ 987.162 Handler acquisition and
disposition.
(a) Handlers shall file CDAC Form No.
6 with the committee by the 16th of
each month or such other date as the
committee may prescribe, reporting at
least the following for the preceding
month:
(1) Their acquisitions of field run
dates;
(2) Their shipments of marketable
dates in each outlet category;
(3) Their shipments of free dates and
disposition of restricted dates, whenever
applicable; and
(4) Their purchases from other
handlers of DAC, export, product,
graded, and field run dates.
(b) In addition, this report shall
include the names and addresses of any
producers not previously identified
pursuant to § 987.38, the quantity of
dates acquired from each producer, the
location of such producer’s date garden,
the acreage of that garden, and the
estimated current season’s production
from that garden.
Dated: November 17, 2009.
Rayne Pegg,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. E9–28153 Filed 11–23–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Bureau of Customs and Border
Protection
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
19 CFR Part 24
[CBP Dec. 09–44; Docket No. USCBP 2007–
0111]
RIN 1505–AB97
Electronic Payment and Refund of
Quarterly Harbor Maintenance Fees
AGENCIES: Customs and Border
Protection, Department of Homeland
Security; Department of the Treasury.
ACTION: Final rule.
SUMMARY: This document amends title
19 of the Code of Federal Regulations by
E:\FR\FM\24NOR1.SGM
24NOR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 225 (Tuesday, November 24, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 61265-61267]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-28153]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 987
[Doc. No. AMS-FV-09-0035; FV09-987-1 FR]
Domestic Dates Produced or Packed in Riverside County, CA;
Changes to Nomination Procedures and a Reporting Date
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This rule revises the nomination procedures and changes a
reporting date under the California date marketing order (order). The
order regulates the handling of domestic dates produced or packed in
Riverside County, California, and is administered locally by the
California Date Administrative Committee (CDAC or Committee). This rule
changes the method of polling for nominees to the Committee and the
date on which CDAC Form 6 is due. These changes will assist in the
administration of the order by updating and streamlining Committee
program operations.
DATES: Effective Date: November 25, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeff Smutny, Marketing Specialist, or
Kurt J. Kimmel, Regional Manager, California Marketing Field Office,
Marketing Order Administration Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA; Telephone: (559) 487-5901, Fax: (559) 487-5906, or E-mail:
Jeffrey.Smutny@ams.usda.gov or Kurt.Kimmel@ams.usda.gov.
Small businesses may request information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Jay Guerber, Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue, SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237; Telephone: (202)
720-2491, Fax: (202) 720-8938, or E-mail: Jay.Guerber@ams.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This final rule is issued under Marketing
Agreement and Order No. 987, both as amended (7 CFR part 987),
regulating the handling of domestic dates produced or packed in
Riverside County, California, hereinafter referred to as the ``order.''
The order is effective under the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act
of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601-674), hereinafter referred to as the
``Act.''
The Department of Agriculture (USDA) is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Order 12866.
This final rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988,
Civil Justice Reform. This rule is not intended to have retroactive
effect.
The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted
before parties may file suit in court. Under section 608c(15)(A) of the
Act, any handler subject to an order may file with USDA a petition
stating that the order, any provision of the order, or any obligation
imposed in connection with the order is not in accordance with law and
request a modification of the order or to be exempted therefrom. A
handler is afforded the opportunity for a hearing on the petition.
After the hearing, USDA would rule on the petition. The Act provides
that the district court of the United States in any district in which
the handler is an inhabitant, or has his or her principal place of
business, has jurisdiction to review USDA's ruling on the petition,
provided an action is filed not later than 20 days after the date of
the entry of the ruling.
This rule revises the nomination procedures and changes a reporting
date under the order. This rule changes the method of polling for
nominees to the Committee and the date on which CDAC Form 6 is due for
the California Date Administration Committee. These changes will assist
in the administration of the order by updating and streamlining
Committee program operations. This final rule permits the Committee to
conduct nominations for member and alternate member positions on the
Committee through the mail or equivalent electronic means (including,
but not limited to fax, or other technology, as available) rather than
limit balloting to in-person polling on a specific date or absentee
balloting.
This final rule also changes the date on which CDAC Form 6 is due
to the Committee. Currently, the form is due by the 10th day of each
month, but this
[[Page 61266]]
final rule relaxes the reporting requirement by changing the due date
to the 16th day of each month or such other date as the Committee may
prescribe. These changes were recommended unanimously by the Committee
at a meeting on October 30, 2008. A meeting of the Marketing Order
Policy Review Subcommittee was held on October 21, 2008. At that
meeting, the subcommittee discussed various proposals for improving
Committee operations, including these two changes.
Section 987.24 of the order specifies that nominations shall be
made no later than June 15 of every other year, and establishes
procedures for nominations for membership on the Committee by requiring
the Committee to establish a polling day for receiving Committee
nominations, and procedures for requesting and returning absentee
ballots. This section also provides authority for the Committee, with
the approval of the Secretary, to recommend rules and regulations on
the manner in which nominees may be obtained.
Section 987.124 of the order's rules and regulations further
specifies the date, time, and procedure for polling, as well as for
obtaining and casting absentee ballots.
At its meeting on October 30, 2008, the Committee recommended that
nominations be permitted through the mail or by other electronic means
equivalent to the mail. When the order was promulgated, there were a
number of absentee date garden owners, and the advent of the polling
day permitted the owners to travel to the area to vote on nominees to
the Committee.
Section 987.62 of the date order provides authority for the
Committee to require reports of dates shipped from handlers. In Sec.
987.162 of the order's rules and regulations, CDAC Form 6 is specified
as the handler acquisition and disposition report, and is currently due
by the 10th day of each month.
There also is a California State marketing program, administered by
the California Date Commission (commission). Under that program, the
due date for the same type of information is the 16th of each month.
Changing the due date of the CDAC Form 6 will simplify reporting by
handlers as well as coordinate the operations of the Committee and
commission, since the Committee staff is also the commission staff.
Deliberations on the Changes
In its deliberations on mail balloting, the Committee commented
that the current system is outmoded and cumbersome. Authorizing the
Committee to conduct nominations via mail or equivalent electronic
means could result in greater industry participation in the nomination
process, with the possible result being greater Committee outreach and
diversity of Committee representation.
In their deliberations regarding the due date for CDAC Form 6, the
Committee discussed the confusion created by the State and Federal
programs' differing due dates. Handlers report to the Committee on the
10th day of the month and to the commission on the 16th day of the
month. By making both reports due the same day, handlers can report
more conveniently, and Committee and commission operations will be
coordinated and streamlined.
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601-612), the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS)
has considered the economic impact of this action on small entities.
Accordingly, AMS has prepared this final regulatory flexibility
analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of
business subject to such actions in order that small businesses will
not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued
pursuant to the Act, and rules issued thereunder, are unique in that
they are brought about through group action of essentially small
entities acting on their own behalf.
There are approximately 85 producers of dates in the production
area and 9 handlers subject to regulation under the marketing order.
The Small Business Administration (13 CFR 121.201) defines small
agricultural producers as those having annual receipts of less than
$750,000, and small agricultural service firms are defined as those
having annual receipts of less than $7,000,000.
According to the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS),
data for the most-recently revised crop year, 2008, indicates that
about 3.57 tons of dates were produced per acre. The 2008 grower price
published by NASS was $1,580 per ton. Thus, the value of date
production in 2008 averaged about $5,640 per acre (3.57 tons per acre
times $1,580 per ton). At that average price, a producer would have to
have over 133 acres to receive an annual income from dates of $750,000
($750,000 divided by $5,640 per acre equals 133 acres). According to
Committee staff, the majority of California date producers farm fewer
than 133 acres. Thus, it can be concluded that the majority of date
producers could be considered small entities. According to data from
the Committee, the majority of handlers of California dates may also be
considered small entities.
This final rule authorizes the Committee to conduct nominations via
mail or equivalent electronic means, and revises the due date for CDAC
Form 6 from the 10th day each month to the 16th day of each month or
such other date as the Committee may prescribe.
The Committee unanimously recommended these changes at their
meeting on October 30, 2008. At the meeting, the Committee discussed
the impact of these changes on handlers and producers in terms of cost.
Handlers and producers will be positively impacted by mail balloting,
as they will not have to set aside time to drive to the Committee
offices to vote for Committee members and alternate members, nor will
they have to plan ahead to request absentee ballots.
Handlers will also be positively impacted by the change in the due
date of the CDAC Form 6, since changing the due date of the Committee
form brings the requirement into line with the due date of the
commission form, which seeks identical information. Handlers will
simply be able to file the forms on the same day. Committee and
commission operations will, thus, be streamlined.
The benefits for this final rule are not expected to be
disproportionately greater or less for small handlers or producers than
for larger entities.
The Committee discussed alternatives to these changes, including
not conducting mail balloting or changing the due date of the CDAC Form
6. However, mail balloting provides the industry with increased
flexibility, outreach, and convenience by offering an opportunity for
polling on more than just one day. Changing the due date for the CDAC
Form 6 will also increase the reporting handlers' convenience. Both
changes improve the administration of the program and keep
informational data filing uniform between the Committee and the
commission. For those reasons, the changes are advantageous to all
entities, as well as to the Committee staff. As a result, the Committee
members unanimously agreed that these changes should be recommended and
should be in effect for the 2009-10 crop year, beginning on October 1,
2009.
A meeting of the Marketing Order Policy Review Subcommittee was
held on October 21, 2008. At that meeting, the subcommittee discussed
various proposals for improving Committee
[[Page 61267]]
operations, including these two changes.
This final rule provides more flexibility on Committee polling
procedures and changes the due date for CDAC Form 6 under the date
marketing order. Accordingly, this action will not impose any
additional reporting or recordkeeping requirements on either small or
large date handlers.
In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35), the information collection requirements contained in this
rule have been previously approved by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) and assigned OMB No. 0581-0178, Vegetable and Specialty
Crops. As with all Federal marketing order programs, reports and forms
are periodically reviewed to reduce information requirements and
duplication by industry and public sector agencies. As noted in the
initial regulatory flexibility analysis, USDA has not identified any
relevant Federal rules that duplicate, overlap, or conflict with this
rule.
AMS is committed to complying with the E-Government Act, to promote
the use of the Internet and other information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen access to Government information
and services, and for other purposes.
In addition, the Committee's meeting was widely publicized
throughout the date industry, and all interested persons were invited
to attend the meeting and encouraged to participate in Committee
deliberations on all issues. Like all Committee meetings, the October
30, 2008, meeting was a public meeting and all entities, both large and
small, were able to express views on this issue.
A proposed rule concerning this action was published in the Federal
Register on September 15, 2009 (74 FR 47124). The proposed regulatory
text that was published in the Federal Register contained incorrect
references that have been corrected in this final rule. Copies of the
rule were mailed or sent via facsimile to all Committee members and
date handlers. Finally, the rule was made available through the
Internet by USDA and the Office of the Federal Register. A 30-day
comment period ending October 15, 2009, was provided to allow
interested persons to respond to the proposal. No comments were
received.
A small business guide on complying with fruit, vegetable, and
specialty crop marketing agreements and orders may be viewed at: https://www.ams.usda.gov/AMSv1.0/ams.fetchTemplateData.do?template=TemplateN&page=MarketingOrdersSmallBusinessGuide. Any questions about the compliance guide should be sent to
Jay Guerber at the previously mentioned address in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section.
After consideration of all relevant matters presented, including
the information and recommendation submitted by the Committee and other
available information, it is hereby found that this rule, as
hereinafter set forth, will tend to effectuate the declared policy of
the Act.
It is further found that good cause exists for not postponing the
effective date of this rule until 30 days after publication in the
Federal Register (5 U.S.C. 553) because handlers are already shipping
dates for the 2009-2010 crop. Therefore, this rule should be
implemented as soon as possible. Further, handlers are aware of this
rule, which was recommended at a public meeting. Also, a 30-day comment
period was provided for in the proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 987
Dates, Marketing agreements, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
0
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 7 CFR part 987 is amended as
follows:
PART 987--DOMESTIC DATES PRODUCED OR PACKED IN RIVERSIDE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA
0
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 987 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601-674.
0
2. In Sec. 987.124, paragraph (a) is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 987.124 Nomination and polling.
(a) Date producers and producer-handlers shall be provided an
opportunity to nominate and vote for individuals to serve on the
Committee. For this purpose, the Committee shall, no later than June 15
of each even-numbered year, provide date producers and producer-
handlers nomination and balloting material by mail or equivalent
electronic means, upon which producers and producer-handlers may
nominate candidates and cast their votes for members and alternate
members of the Committee in accordance with the requirements in
paragraphs (b)(1) and (b)(2) of this section, respectively. All ballots
are subject to verification. Balloting material should be provided to
voters at least 2 weeks before the due date and should contain, at
least, the following information:
(1) The names of incumbents who are willing to continue to serve on
the committee;
(2) The names of other persons willing and eligible to serve;
(3) Instructions on how voters may add write-in candidates;
(4) The date on which the ballot is due to the committee or its
agent; and
(5) How and where to return ballots.
* * * * *
0
3. Section 987.162 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 987.162 Handler acquisition and disposition.
(a) Handlers shall file CDAC Form No. 6 with the committee by the
16th of each month or such other date as the committee may prescribe,
reporting at least the following for the preceding month:
(1) Their acquisitions of field run dates;
(2) Their shipments of marketable dates in each outlet category;
(3) Their shipments of free dates and disposition of restricted
dates, whenever applicable; and
(4) Their purchases from other handlers of DAC, export, product,
graded, and field run dates.
(b) In addition, this report shall include the names and addresses
of any producers not previously identified pursuant to Sec. 987.38,
the quantity of dates acquired from each producer, the location of such
producer's date garden, the acreage of that garden, and the estimated
current season's production from that garden.
Dated: November 17, 2009.
Rayne Pegg,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. E9-28153 Filed 11-23-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P