Intent To Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement for Proposed Intermodal Transit Improvements in Hercules, CA, 60307-60310 [E9-27896]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 223 / Friday, November 20, 2009 / Notices
benefits and costs of these technologies
compared to conventional vehicle
technologies.
Respondents: State and local
government and public transportation
authorities located in areas designated
as non-attainment or maintenance for
ozone or carbon monoxide.
Estimated Annual Burden on
Respondents: 32 hours for each
respondent.
Estimated Total Annual Burden: 512.
Frequency: Semi-annual.
Issued: November 16, 2009.
Ann M. Linnertz,
Associate Administrator for Administration.
[FR Doc. E9–27897 Filed 11–19–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–57–P
City of Davenport, IA—Construction
and Operation Exemption—in Scott
County, IA
Surface Transportation Board,
DOT.
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
ACTION: Correction to Notice of
Availability of the Environmental
Assessment.
SUMMARY: This document contains a
correction to the title of the Notice of
Availability of the Environmental
Assessment served and published in the
Federal Register on Monday, October
26, 2009 (74 FR 55085) by the Board’s
Section of Environmental Analysis. That
notice, published in this docket, was
titled ‘‘Eastern Iowa Industrial Center
Rail Project—Construction and
Operation Exemption—City of
Davenport, Iowa.’’ The correct title
should read, ‘‘City of Davenport, IA—
Construction and Operation
Exemption—in Scott County, IA.’’
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Christa Dean, (202) 245–0299.
[Assistance for the hearing impaired is
available through the Federal
Information Relay Service (FIRS) at:
(800) 877–8339.]
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
October 26, 2009, the Board served a
Notice of Availability of the
Environmental Assessment in this
docket. The notice is related to a
petition filed on July 21, 2009, by the
City of Davenport, IA, seeking an
exemption under 49 U.S.C. 10502 from
the prior approval requirements 1 of 49
1 In an amendment filed on September 8, 2009,
the City clarified that it also seeks operation
authority.
Jkt 220001
Surface Transportation Board
Bi-State Development Agency of the
Missouri-Illinois Metropolitan District—
Discontinuance of Service
Exemption—in the City of St. Louis,
MO
[STB Finance Docket No. 35237]
17:03 Nov 19, 2009
BILLING CODE 4915–01–P
[STB Docket No. AB–331 (Sub-No. 1X]
Surface Transportation Board
VerDate Nov<24>2008
Decided: November 16, 2009.
By the Board, Rachel D. Campbell,
Director, Office of Proceedings.
Kulunie L. Cannon,
Clearance Clerk.
[FR Doc. E9–27884 Filed 11–19–09; 8:45 am]
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
AGENCY:
U.S.C. 10901 to construct approximately
2.8 miles of rail line in Scott County, IA.
The Board instituted a proceeding in
this matter under 49 U.S.C. 10502(b) by
decision served October 19, 2009. This
notice corrects the title of the Notice of
Availability of the Environmental
Assessment.
On November 2, 2009, Bi-State
Development Agency of the MissouriIllinois Metropolitan District (Bi-State)
filed with the Surface Transportation
Board a petition under 49 U.S.C. 10502
for exemption from the provisions of 49
U.S.C. 10903 to discontinue service over
a 1.43-mile line of railroad extending
from milepost 1.8 in St. Louis, MO, to
milepost 3.23 in St. Louis, MO. The line
traverses U.S. Postal Service Zip Codes
63110 and 63108.1
According to Bi-State, the line does
not contain federally granted rights-ofway. Any documentation in Bi-State’s
possession will be made available
promptly to those requesting it.
The interest of railroad employees
will be protected by the conditions set
forth in Oregon Short Line R. Co.—
Abandonment—Goshen, 360 I.C.C. 91
(1979).
By issuance of this notice, the Board
is instituting an exemption proceeding
pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 10502(b). A final
decision will be issued by February 19,
2010.
1 Bi-State initially filed this petition for
exemption on October 1, 2009, but supplemented
it on November 2, 2009, to comply with the
newspaper publication requirements of 49 CFR
1105.12. Under that provision, a petitioner must
notify the public by publishing a notice of the
proposed action in a newspaper of general
circulation in each county that the line traverses
and must certify to the Board that it has done so
by the date its petition is filed. On November 2,
2009, Bi-State certified to the Board that it has
satisfied the newspaper publication requirement.
Therefore, November 2, 2009, will be considered
the official filing date of the petition for exemption.
PO 00000
Frm 00073
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
60307
Any offer of financial assistance
(OFA) under 49 CFR 1152.27(b)(2) to
subsidize continued rail service will be
due no later than 10 days after service
of a decision granting the petition for
exemption. Each offer must be
accompanied by a $1,500 filing fee. See
49 CFR 1002.2(f)(25).2
All filings in response to this notice
must refer to STB Docket No. AB–331
(Sub-No. 1X), and must be sent to: (1)
Surface Transportation Board, 395 E
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20423–
0001; and (2) Theodore J. Williams, Jr.,
Williams Venker & Sanders LLC, 100
North Broadway, Suite 2100, St. Louis,
MO 63102. Replies to the Bi-State
petition are due on or before December
10, 2009.
Persons seeking further information
concerning discontinuance procedures
may contact the Board’s Office of Public
Assistance, Governmental Affairs, and
Compliance at (202) 245–0230 or refer
to the full abandonment and
discontinuance regulations at 49 CFR
part 1152. Questions concerning
environmental issues may be directed to
the Board’s Section of Environmental
Analysis (SEA) at (202) 245–0305.
Assistance for the hearing impaired is
available through the Federal
Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–
800–877–8339.
Board decisions and notices are
available on our Web site at: https://
www.stb.dot.gov.
Decided: November 13, 2009.
By the Board, Rachel D. Campbell,
Director, Office of Proceedings.
Anne K. Quinlan,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9–27794 Filed 11–19–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Transit Administration
Intent To Prepare an Environmental
Impact Statement for Proposed
Intermodal Transit Improvements in
Hercules, CA
AGENCY: Federal Transit Administration
(FTA), U.S. Department of
Transportation.
ACTION: Notice of Intent (NOI) to prepare
an Environmental Impact Statement
(EIS).
2 Because this is a discontinuance proceeding and
not an abandonment, trail use/rail banking and
public use conditions are not appropriate.
Similarly, no environmental or historic
documentation is required under 49
CFR1105.6(c)(2) and 1105.8.
E:\FR\FM\20NON1.SGM
20NON1
60308
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 223 / Friday, November 20, 2009 / Notices
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY: The Federal Transit
Administration (FTA) in cooperation
with the City of Hercules, CA (City) is
planning to prepare a joint
Environmental Impact Statement/
Environmental Impact Report (EIS/EIR)
for the construction of a proposed
intermodal transit center project which
includes a new passenger train station
on the existing Capitol Corridor line, a
transit bus terminal, access roadways,
and parking facilities, located in
Hercules, California. The project would
serve commuters, visitors and
recreational users who desire an
alternative way to travel to and from the
City of Hercules and the San Francisco
Bay area and the Sacramento area to
access employment, entertainment, and
recreational destinations. This EIS/EIR
will not study a ferry terminal as part of
the proposed project. Any future ferry
terminal will be evaluated under a
separate environmental document.
However, the potential for a future ferry
terminal will be considered in the
cumulative impact analysis for this
project. The purpose of this Notice of
Intent (NOI) is to alert interested parties
on the preparation of an EIS/EIR, to
provide information on the proposed
transit project, to invite participation in
the EIS/EIR process, including
comments on the scope of the EIS/EIR,
and to announce the public scoping
meeting that will be conducted.
DATES: The City of Hercules has already
initiated coordination with Federal,
State and local agencies. On November
18th, 2009, the City of Hercules
participated in an interagency meeting
hosted at the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers office in San Francisco,
California and presented an overview of
the project and invited agency comment
on the proposed project. Through the
development of a public and agency
coordination plan, coordination with
responsible and cooperating agencies
will continue throughout the review of
the EIR/EIS and through permit
coordination.
A scoping meeting will be held on
December 8th, 2009 at 5:30 p.m. at the
Hercules Library, Large Conference
Room, 109 Civic Drive, Hercules, CA.
Written comments on the scope of the
EIS/EIR including the project’s purpose
and need, the alternatives to be
considered, the impacts to be evaluated,
and the methodologies to be used in the
evaluations should be sent to Lisa
Hammon, Assistant City Manager, City
of Hercules, 111 Civic Drive, Hercules
CA 94547 by December 23, 2009.
Comments may also be offered at the
scoping meeting.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:03 Nov 19, 2009
Jkt 220001
The general public and agency
representatives with an interest in the
proposed project are encouraged to
attend this public meeting. The project’s
purpose and need and the description of
alternatives for the proposed project
will be presented at this meeting.
Representatives of Native American
Tribal governments and all Federal,
State, regional and local agencies that
may have an interest in any aspect of
the project will be invited to be
participating or cooperating agencies, as
appropriate.
The scoping meeting will be
held on December 8th, 2009 at 5:30 p.m.
at the Hercules Library, Large
Conference Room, 109 Civic Drive,
Hercules, CA. The meeting facilities will
be accessible to persons with
disabilities. If special translation or
signing services or other special
accommodations are needed, please
contact Lisa Hammon, Assistant City
Manager, at (510) 799–8251, or by email at: LHammon@ci.hercules.ca.us at
least 48 hours before the scoping
meeting. Paper copies of scoping
materials may be obtained from Lisa
Hammon. Also, scoping materials will
be available at the meetings and on the
City of Hercules Web site [https://
www.ci.hercules.ca.us].
Written comments on proposed
project should be sent to Lisa Hammon,
Assistant City Manager, City of
Hercules, 111 Civic Drive, Hercules, CA
94547 by December 23, 2009.
Further Information: For further
information contact Paul Page, Federal
Transit Administration, San Francisco
Regional Office at (415) 744–3133.
ADDRESSES:
Scoping:
The FTA and the City of Hercules invite
all interested individuals, and
organizations, public agencies and
Native American Tribes to comment on
the scope of the EIS, including the
project’s purpose and need, the
alternatives to be studied, the impacts to
be evaluated and the evaluation
methods to be used. Comments should
focus on: alternatives that may be less
costly or have fewer environmental or
community impacts while achieving
similar transportation objectives, and
the identification of any significant
social, economic or environmental
issues related to alternatives. This is not
considered a transit project of unusual
complexity. Therefore, in line with CEQ
1502.7 (page limits) FTA is setting a
limit of 250 pages (exclusive of
technical appendices) for this EIS. The
document should emphasize graphics,
maps and visual simulations, minimize
technical jargon and be accessible to
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00074
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
members of the public with limited
technical expertise.
Description of Study Area and
Proposed Project: The project site is
located in Hercules, California, on the
shoreline of San Pablo Bay (a part of San
Francisco Bay), approximately 1 mile
northwest of Interstate 80 (I–80). This is
the City’s Waterfront District which has
been planned for transit oriented
development. Project components
would include: (1) Grade separation and
realignment of a portion of the existing
Union Pacific railroad tracks, including
the construction of a rail platform,
retaining walls and the replacement of
a bridge crossing Refugio Creek; (2)
construction of a station building; (3)
extension of John Muir Parkway,
including the construction of Bayfront
Boulevard over Refugio Creek, a new
Transit Loop Drive, Civic Plaza and
surface parking; (4) realignment and
restoration of a portion of Refugio Creek
from San Pablo Bay upstream
approximately 1000 feet to the existing
restored segment; (5) construction of
segments of the East Bay Park Regional
District’s recreational trail along the
shoreline from Pinole trail to Victoria by
the Bay; and, (6) a pedestrian walkway
over the railroad tracks to provide a
connection to the Hercules Point open
space area. The project will also require
the relocation of existing utility and gas
lines and an outfall to Refugio Creek.
Purpose and Need for the Project:
Residents of the San Francisco Bay Area
depend heavily on region wide and
transbay commuting. Despite the use of
existing public transit services,
particularly rail and buses, traffic
congestion continues to increase,
affecting hundreds of thousands of Bay
Area residents and creating both
economic and environmental costs. The
severity of congestion will increase in
the future as population and
employment in the Bay Area increase.
The purpose of the proposed project is
to increase local and regional mobility
and transportation options by providing
new and expanded transit services with
intermodal connections that will
encourage use of public transit. The
project would provide bus-to-train
connections, in addition to providing
car commuters with access to new
transit options that would divert traffic
from I–80, the most congested corridor
in the Bay Area for the past six years.
An expanded and more convenient
transit system with new train
connections to existing bus services
would provide commuters with more
options and would primarily decrease
car usage and its associated impacts,
rather than divert riders from existing
E:\FR\FM\20NON1.SGM
20NON1
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 223 / Friday, November 20, 2009 / Notices
buses, BART, or Capitol Corridor. Key
project objectives are to:
1. Reduce vehicle trips on Interstate
80, the most congested freeway in the
Bay Area, by providing alternatives to
commuting in single occupant vehicles.
2. Provide coordinated, intermodal
transit connections by bus, train, and a
potential future ferry and humanpowered connections by bicycling and
walking for transport to/from jobs,
recreational uses, educational
opportunities, etc.
3. Improve emergency response by
having rail and (ultimately) ferry service
available in case of a natural or manmade disaster that disables the Bay
Bridge or other highways/roadways.
Ferry and rail service could also deliver
goods and services in an emergency.
4. Support transit-oriented
development and ‘‘new urbanist’’
standards by providing the
transportation links within the 43-acre
waterfront development which also
includes housing (including affordable
housing), retail, office, and commercial
space.
5. Improve safety along the railroad
corridor by providing completely gradeseparated access to the railroad tracks
from the adjacent development by
constructing a series of retaining walls
and fences for approximately one mile
along the waterfront and by constructing
over-crossings to Hercules Point and the
future ferry terminal.
6. Implement the Goals, Policies and
Programs in the City of Hercules
General Plan to:
• Develop transportation facilities to
provide access to the region,
particularly public transit systems
(buses, ridesharing, rail transit, as well
as potential over-water transit) (Land
Use Policy 3A, Circulation Policy e).
• Establish trail linkage between
Pinole and Rodeo as part of the regional
bay access trail system (Land Use
Program 14A.2 and Open Space/
Conservation Policy 1b) and continue to
improve and protect Refugio Creek as a
major environmental amenity (Program
14.A.3).
7. Improve Refugio Creek to allow
adequate flows into the Bay without
resulting in flooding.
8. Implement the City of Hercules
Waterfront Master Plan Initiative and its
directive to construct an intermodal
transit center on Block I.
Alternatives: The EIS/EIR will include
a Build alternative. Included in the
Build analysis will be design
alternatives to the proposed project that
will meet both NEPA and CEQA
requirements and are intended to reduce
potential environmental effects,
including impacts to sensitive biological
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:03 Nov 19, 2009
Jkt 220001
habitat. A No Action (No Build)
alternative will also be evaluated in the
EIS/EIR which would continue with the
existing bus services without the
construction of a train station and a new
bus terminal at the same location. This
alternative serves as the baseline against
which the environmental effects of the
proposed project and other alternatives
will be evaluated.
Traffic congestion is an ongoing and
steadily increasing problem in the Bay
Area, regardless of economic conditions.
Alternatives to reduce traffic congestion
have been explored in numerous
previous studies. According to the
Metropolitan Transportation
Commission (MTC), the Bay Bridge
approach corridor along Interstate 80 (I–
80) from State Route 4 (SR–4) in
Hercules to the Bay Bridge experiences
the worst congestion in the Bay Area.
Caltrans’ Bay Area monitoring program
found that between 1992 and 2005,
traffic delay in the region as a whole
more than doubled from 64,100 hours to
135,700 hours. According to Caltrans’
2006 report, between 2001 and 2005,
traffic delay on the I–80 segment from
SR–4 to the Bay Bridge metering lights
increased by 16 percent, from 9,410
hours to 10,930 hours (MTC 2007). This
segment includes the stretch of I–80 that
passes near the proposed HITC project.
MTC projects that traffic congestion will
continue to worsen; by 2020, MTC
expects that Bay Bridge traffic will
increase by 50 percent and be ‘‘at
capacity’’ for nearly five hours a day
during the morning and afternoon peak
hours. MTC also predicts that many
more Bay Area workers, due to high
housing costs, will be living far from
their jobs, demanding that they spend
more time commuting and polluting on
roadways. Even during an economic
downturn, BART runs at capacity
through the Transbay Tube during peak
hours. Improvements in commuter bus
service are dependent upon traffic flow,
and are limited by the need for more
road capacity and more dedicated High
Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) lanes for
significant expansion. Increased train
and transit services would provide
expanded commute capacity while
avoiding corresponding increases in
traffic congestion.
Additionally, the San Francisco Bay
Area Water Transit Authority (WTA),
now the Water Emergency
Transportation Authority (WETA), is a
regional agency authorized by the State
of California to operate a comprehensive
San Francisco Bay Area public water
transit system. In 2003, the WTA’s plan,
‘‘A Strategy to Improve Public Transit
with an Environmentally Friendly Ferry
System’’ (the Plan) was approved by
PO 00000
Frm 00075
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
60309
statute (Senate Bill 915, Ch. 714, stats of
2003). The Plan drew on extensive
technical studies that examined
ridership demand, cost effectiveness,
vessel design, environmental impacts,
safety, and operations. A Hercules-San
Francisco route was identified in the
Plan as a potential future ferry route.
The potential environmental effects of
proposed new ferry service on San
Francisco Bay under the WTA Plan
were studied at a program planning
level in the Program Environmental
Impact Report (Program EIR) prepared
in 2003. The 2003 Program EIR included
analysis of a Hercules/Rodeo location
and seven other potential new ferry
service locations around the Bay and
Delta. While ferry service is anticipated
for the city of Hercules, current
planning for the ferry is still in
development and is considered a future
project. The current project proposes
only to construct a rail and bus transit
facility.
As part of the General Plan for the
City of Hercules, the proposed project is
intended to be the central element of a
transit-oriented development (TOD)
project that will include residential and
commercial development clustered
around transit facilities to enable local
residents to use public transit and
reduce the need for automobile use. The
planned TOD, known as Hercules
Bayfront, is not part of the project
considered in this EIR/EIS, and will be
the subject of a separate environmental
review.
Probable Effects/Potential Impacts for
Analysis: The purpose of the EIS
process is to explore in a public setting
potentially significant effects of
implementing the proposed project and
alternatives on the physical, human,
and natural environment.
Implementation of the project
components will result in direct effects
to the physical environment and may
include the loss of special aquatic sites
such as tidal wetlands, mudflats, and
riparian areas. Mitigation will be
incorporated into the project design by
first avoiding and minimizing impacts
to resources. Compensatory mitigation
will be provided for unavoidable
impacts. Based on preliminary
investigations for special status species
the project may affect, but is unlikely to
adversely affect, any species listed as
threatened or endangered under the
State or Federal endangered species
acts.
The proposed project would extend
the John Muir Parkway, provide parking
for short-term and long-term parking,
and develop a new access point to
commuter rail. Each of these activities
may encourage automobile traffic in the
E:\FR\FM\20NON1.SGM
20NON1
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
60310
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 223 / Friday, November 20, 2009 / Notices
area that could adversely affect levels of
service at nearby intersections.
FTA Procedures: Regulations
implementing NEPA, as well as
provisions of SAFETEA–LU, call for
public involvement in the EIS process.
Section 6002 of SAFETEA–LU requires
that FTA do the following: (1) Extend an
invitation to other Federal and nonFederal agencies and Indian Tribes that
may have an interest in the proposed
project to become participating
agencies; (2) provide an opportunity for
involvement by participating agencies
and the public in helping to define the
purpose and need for a proposed
project, as well as the range of
alternatives for consideration; and (3)
establish a plan for coordinating public
and agency participation in and
comment on the environmental review
process. An invitation to become a
participating agency will be extended to
other Federal and non-Federal agencies
and Indian Tribes that may have an
interest in the proposed project. It is
possible that we may not be able to
identify all Federal and non-Federal
agencies and Indian Tribes that may
have such an interest. Any Federal or
non-Federal agency or Indian Tribe
interested in the proposed project that
does not receive an invitation to become
a participating agency should notify, at
the earliest opportunity, the City at the
ADDRESSES or phone number above.
A comprehensive public involvement
program has been developed. A
technical advisory committee called the
Project Development Team, consisting
of representatives of State, regional and
local agencies, is in place. The program
also includes a public scoping process,
a public review/comment period and
public hearing on the Draft
Environmental Impact Statement,
development and distribution of project
newsletters and posting of information
on the project Web site. The purposes of
and need for the proposed project have
been preliminarily identified in this
notice. We invite the public and
participating agencies to consider the
preliminary statement of purposes of
and need for the proposed project, as
well as potential alternatives, and the
public is welcome to use the public
scoping process to further define the
issues of concern among all parties
interested in the project. Comments on
potential significant environmental
impacts that may be associated with the
proposed project are also welcomed. All
comments and suggestions will be given
serious consideration. Comments on
potentially significant environmental
impacts that may be associated with the
proposed project are also welcomed.
There will be additional opportunities
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:03 Nov 19, 2009
Jkt 220001
to participate in the scoping process at
the public meetings announced in this
notice. In accordance with 23 CFR
771.105(a) and 771.133, FTA will
comply with all Federal environmental
laws, regulations and executive orders
applicable to the proposed project
during the environmental review
process to the maximum extent
practicable. These requirements
include, but are not limited to, the
regulations of the Council on
Environmental Quality implementing
NEPA (40 CFR parts 1500–1508 and 23
CFR part 771), the project-level air
quality conformity regulation of the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
(40 CFR part 93), section 404(b)(1)
guidelines of EPA (40 CFR part 230),
Executive Orders 11988, 11990 and
12898 regarding floodplains, wetlands,
and environmental justice, respectively;
Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act (36 CFR Part 800);
Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act
(50 CFR part 402); and Section 4(f) of
the Department of Transportation Act
(23 CFR 774). The EIR portion of the
document will be prepared in
accordance with the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and
the California Code of Regulations, Title
14, section 15000 et seq.
Dated: November 13, 2009.
Leslie T. Rogers,
Federal Transit Administration.
[FR Doc. E9–27896 Filed 11–19–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–57–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Maritime Administration
[USCG–2006–24644]
TORP Terminal LP, Bienville Offshore
Energy Terminal Liquefied Natural Gas
Deepwater Port License Application;
Preparation of Supplemental
Environmental Impact Statement
Maritime Administration, DOT.
Notice of availability; Notice of
public meeting; Request for comments.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Maritime Administration,
in cooperation with the U.S. Coast
Guard announces the availability of the
Draft Supplemental Environmental
Impact Statement (DSEIS) for the TORP
Terminal LP, Bienville Offshore Energy
Terminal (BOET) Liquefied Natural Gas
(LNG) Deepwater Port license amended
application. The amended application
describes a project that would be
located in the Gulf of Mexico, in Main
Pass block MP 258, approximately 63
miles south of Mobile Point, Alabama.
PO 00000
Frm 00076
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Publication of this notice begins a 45
day comment period and provides
information on how to participate in the
process.
DATES: The public meeting will be held
in Mobile, Alabama on December 9,
2009, from 6 p.m. to 8 p.m., and will be
preceded by an open house from 5 p.m.
to 6 p.m. The public meeting may end
later than the stated time, depending on
the number of persons wishing to speak.
Material submitted in response to this
request for comments must reach the
Docket Management Facility by January
4, 2010.
ADDRESSES: The open house and public
meeting will be held at the: Mobile
Convention Center, One South Water
Street, Mobile, Alabama 36602;
telephone: 251–208–2100.
The amended application, comments
and associated documentation are
available for viewing at the Federal
Docket Management System (FDMS)
Web site: https://www.regulations.gov
under docket number USCG–2006–
24644.
Docket submissions for USCG–2006–
24644 should be addressed to:
Department of Transportation, Docket
Management Facility, West Building,
Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington,
DC 20590–0001.
The Docket Management Facility
accepts hand-delivered submissions,
and makes docket contents available for
public inspection and copying at the
above address between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. The Facility telephone
number is 202–366–9329, the fax
number is 202–493–2251, and the Web
site for electronic submissions or for
electronic access to docket contents is
https://www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Patrick Marchman, Maritime
Administration, telephone: 202–366–
8805, e-mail:
Patrick.Marchman@dot.gov; or Mr.
Linden Houston, Maritime
Administration, telephone: 202–366–
4839, e-mail: Linden.Houston@dot.gov.
If you have questions on viewing the
docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program
Manager, Docket Operations, telephone
202–493–0402.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Public Meeting and Open House
We invite you to learn about the
proposed deepwater port at an
informational open house and to
comment at a public meeting
immediately afterwards on the proposed
action and the evaluation contained in
the DSEIS. In order to allow everyone a
E:\FR\FM\20NON1.SGM
20NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 223 (Friday, November 20, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 60307-60310]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-27896]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Transit Administration
Intent To Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement for Proposed
Intermodal Transit Improvements in Hercules, CA
AGENCY: Federal Transit Administration (FTA), U.S. Department of
Transportation.
ACTION: Notice of Intent (NOI) to prepare an Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 60308]]
SUMMARY: The Federal Transit Administration (FTA) in cooperation with
the City of Hercules, CA (City) is planning to prepare a joint
Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report (EIS/EIR)
for the construction of a proposed intermodal transit center project
which includes a new passenger train station on the existing Capitol
Corridor line, a transit bus terminal, access roadways, and parking
facilities, located in Hercules, California. The project would serve
commuters, visitors and recreational users who desire an alternative
way to travel to and from the City of Hercules and the San Francisco
Bay area and the Sacramento area to access employment, entertainment,
and recreational destinations. This EIS/EIR will not study a ferry
terminal as part of the proposed project. Any future ferry terminal
will be evaluated under a separate environmental document. However, the
potential for a future ferry terminal will be considered in the
cumulative impact analysis for this project. The purpose of this Notice
of Intent (NOI) is to alert interested parties on the preparation of an
EIS/EIR, to provide information on the proposed transit project, to
invite participation in the EIS/EIR process, including comments on the
scope of the EIS/EIR, and to announce the public scoping meeting that
will be conducted.
DATES: The City of Hercules has already initiated coordination with
Federal, State and local agencies. On November 18th, 2009, the City of
Hercules participated in an interagency meeting hosted at the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers office in San Francisco, California and presented an
overview of the project and invited agency comment on the proposed
project. Through the development of a public and agency coordination
plan, coordination with responsible and cooperating agencies will
continue throughout the review of the EIR/EIS and through permit
coordination.
A scoping meeting will be held on December 8th, 2009 at 5:30 p.m.
at the Hercules Library, Large Conference Room, 109 Civic Drive,
Hercules, CA. Written comments on the scope of the EIS/EIR including
the project's purpose and need, the alternatives to be considered, the
impacts to be evaluated, and the methodologies to be used in the
evaluations should be sent to Lisa Hammon, Assistant City Manager, City
of Hercules, 111 Civic Drive, Hercules CA 94547 by December 23, 2009.
Comments may also be offered at the scoping meeting.
The general public and agency representatives with an interest in
the proposed project are encouraged to attend this public meeting. The
project's purpose and need and the description of alternatives for the
proposed project will be presented at this meeting. Representatives of
Native American Tribal governments and all Federal, State, regional and
local agencies that may have an interest in any aspect of the project
will be invited to be participating or cooperating agencies, as
appropriate.
ADDRESSES: The scoping meeting will be held on December 8th, 2009 at
5:30 p.m. at the Hercules Library, Large Conference Room, 109 Civic
Drive, Hercules, CA. The meeting facilities will be accessible to
persons with disabilities. If special translation or signing services
or other special accommodations are needed, please contact Lisa Hammon,
Assistant City Manager, at (510) 799-8251, or by e-mail at:
LHammon@ci.hercules.ca.us at least 48 hours before the scoping meeting.
Paper copies of scoping materials may be obtained from Lisa Hammon.
Also, scoping materials will be available at the meetings and on the
City of Hercules Web site [https://www.ci.hercules.ca.us].
Written comments on proposed project should be sent to Lisa Hammon,
Assistant City Manager, City of Hercules, 111 Civic Drive, Hercules, CA
94547 by December 23, 2009.
Further Information: For further information contact Paul Page,
Federal Transit Administration, San Francisco Regional Office at (415)
744-3133.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Scoping: The FTA and the City of Hercules
invite all interested individuals, and organizations, public agencies
and Native American Tribes to comment on the scope of the EIS,
including the project's purpose and need, the alternatives to be
studied, the impacts to be evaluated and the evaluation methods to be
used. Comments should focus on: alternatives that may be less costly or
have fewer environmental or community impacts while achieving similar
transportation objectives, and the identification of any significant
social, economic or environmental issues related to alternatives. This
is not considered a transit project of unusual complexity. Therefore,
in line with CEQ 1502.7 (page limits) FTA is setting a limit of 250
pages (exclusive of technical appendices) for this EIS. The document
should emphasize graphics, maps and visual simulations, minimize
technical jargon and be accessible to members of the public with
limited technical expertise.
Description of Study Area and Proposed Project: The project site is
located in Hercules, California, on the shoreline of San Pablo Bay (a
part of San Francisco Bay), approximately 1 mile northwest of
Interstate 80 (I-80). This is the City's Waterfront District which has
been planned for transit oriented development. Project components would
include: (1) Grade separation and realignment of a portion of the
existing Union Pacific railroad tracks, including the construction of a
rail platform, retaining walls and the replacement of a bridge crossing
Refugio Creek; (2) construction of a station building; (3) extension of
John Muir Parkway, including the construction of Bayfront Boulevard
over Refugio Creek, a new Transit Loop Drive, Civic Plaza and surface
parking; (4) realignment and restoration of a portion of Refugio Creek
from San Pablo Bay upstream approximately 1000 feet to the existing
restored segment; (5) construction of segments of the East Bay Park
Regional District's recreational trail along the shoreline from Pinole
trail to Victoria by the Bay; and, (6) a pedestrian walkway over the
railroad tracks to provide a connection to the Hercules Point open
space area. The project will also require the relocation of existing
utility and gas lines and an outfall to Refugio Creek.
Purpose and Need for the Project: Residents of the San Francisco
Bay Area depend heavily on region wide and transbay commuting. Despite
the use of existing public transit services, particularly rail and
buses, traffic congestion continues to increase, affecting hundreds of
thousands of Bay Area residents and creating both economic and
environmental costs. The severity of congestion will increase in the
future as population and employment in the Bay Area increase. The
purpose of the proposed project is to increase local and regional
mobility and transportation options by providing new and expanded
transit services with intermodal connections that will encourage use of
public transit. The project would provide bus-to-train connections, in
addition to providing car commuters with access to new transit options
that would divert traffic from I-80, the most congested corridor in the
Bay Area for the past six years. An expanded and more convenient
transit system with new train connections to existing bus services
would provide commuters with more options and would primarily decrease
car usage and its associated impacts, rather than divert riders from
existing
[[Page 60309]]
buses, BART, or Capitol Corridor. Key project objectives are to:
1. Reduce vehicle trips on Interstate 80, the most congested
freeway in the Bay Area, by providing alternatives to commuting in
single occupant vehicles.
2. Provide coordinated, intermodal transit connections by bus,
train, and a potential future ferry and human-powered connections by
bicycling and walking for transport to/from jobs, recreational uses,
educational opportunities, etc.
3. Improve emergency response by having rail and (ultimately) ferry
service available in case of a natural or man-made disaster that
disables the Bay Bridge or other highways/roadways. Ferry and rail
service could also deliver goods and services in an emergency.
4. Support transit-oriented development and ``new urbanist''
standards by providing the transportation links within the 43-acre
waterfront development which also includes housing (including
affordable housing), retail, office, and commercial space.
5. Improve safety along the railroad corridor by providing
completely grade-separated access to the railroad tracks from the
adjacent development by constructing a series of retaining walls and
fences for approximately one mile along the waterfront and by
constructing over-crossings to Hercules Point and the future ferry
terminal.
6. Implement the Goals, Policies and Programs in the City of
Hercules General Plan to:
Develop transportation facilities to provide access to the
region, particularly public transit systems (buses, ridesharing, rail
transit, as well as potential over-water transit) (Land Use Policy 3A,
Circulation Policy e).
Establish trail linkage between Pinole and Rodeo as part
of the regional bay access trail system (Land Use Program 14A.2 and
Open Space/Conservation Policy 1b) and continue to improve and protect
Refugio Creek as a major environmental amenity (Program 14.A.3).
7. Improve Refugio Creek to allow adequate flows into the Bay
without resulting in flooding.
8. Implement the City of Hercules Waterfront Master Plan Initiative
and its directive to construct an intermodal transit center on Block I.
Alternatives: The EIS/EIR will include a Build alternative.
Included in the Build analysis will be design alternatives to the
proposed project that will meet both NEPA and CEQA requirements and are
intended to reduce potential environmental effects, including impacts
to sensitive biological habitat. A No Action (No Build) alternative
will also be evaluated in the EIS/EIR which would continue with the
existing bus services without the construction of a train station and a
new bus terminal at the same location. This alternative serves as the
baseline against which the environmental effects of the proposed
project and other alternatives will be evaluated.
Traffic congestion is an ongoing and steadily increasing problem in
the Bay Area, regardless of economic conditions. Alternatives to reduce
traffic congestion have been explored in numerous previous studies.
According to the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC), the Bay
Bridge approach corridor along Interstate 80 (I-80) from State Route 4
(SR-4) in Hercules to the Bay Bridge experiences the worst congestion
in the Bay Area. Caltrans' Bay Area monitoring program found that
between 1992 and 2005, traffic delay in the region as a whole more than
doubled from 64,100 hours to 135,700 hours. According to Caltrans' 2006
report, between 2001 and 2005, traffic delay on the I-80 segment from
SR-4 to the Bay Bridge metering lights increased by 16 percent, from
9,410 hours to 10,930 hours (MTC 2007). This segment includes the
stretch of I-80 that passes near the proposed HITC project. MTC
projects that traffic congestion will continue to worsen; by 2020, MTC
expects that Bay Bridge traffic will increase by 50 percent and be ``at
capacity'' for nearly five hours a day during the morning and afternoon
peak hours. MTC also predicts that many more Bay Area workers, due to
high housing costs, will be living far from their jobs, demanding that
they spend more time commuting and polluting on roadways. Even during
an economic downturn, BART runs at capacity through the Transbay Tube
during peak hours. Improvements in commuter bus service are dependent
upon traffic flow, and are limited by the need for more road capacity
and more dedicated High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) lanes for significant
expansion. Increased train and transit services would provide expanded
commute capacity while avoiding corresponding increases in traffic
congestion.
Additionally, the San Francisco Bay Area Water Transit Authority
(WTA), now the Water Emergency Transportation Authority (WETA), is a
regional agency authorized by the State of California to operate a
comprehensive San Francisco Bay Area public water transit system. In
2003, the WTA's plan, ``A Strategy to Improve Public Transit with an
Environmentally Friendly Ferry System'' (the Plan) was approved by
statute (Senate Bill 915, Ch. 714, stats of 2003). The Plan drew on
extensive technical studies that examined ridership demand, cost
effectiveness, vessel design, environmental impacts, safety, and
operations. A Hercules-San Francisco route was identified in the Plan
as a potential future ferry route. The potential environmental effects
of proposed new ferry service on San Francisco Bay under the WTA Plan
were studied at a program planning level in the Program Environmental
Impact Report (Program EIR) prepared in 2003. The 2003 Program EIR
included analysis of a Hercules/Rodeo location and seven other
potential new ferry service locations around the Bay and Delta. While
ferry service is anticipated for the city of Hercules, current planning
for the ferry is still in development and is considered a future
project. The current project proposes only to construct a rail and bus
transit facility.
As part of the General Plan for the City of Hercules, the proposed
project is intended to be the central element of a transit-oriented
development (TOD) project that will include residential and commercial
development clustered around transit facilities to enable local
residents to use public transit and reduce the need for automobile use.
The planned TOD, known as Hercules Bayfront, is not part of the project
considered in this EIR/EIS, and will be the subject of a separate
environmental review.
Probable Effects/Potential Impacts for Analysis: The purpose of the
EIS process is to explore in a public setting potentially significant
effects of implementing the proposed project and alternatives on the
physical, human, and natural environment.
Implementation of the project components will result in direct
effects to the physical environment and may include the loss of special
aquatic sites such as tidal wetlands, mudflats, and riparian areas.
Mitigation will be incorporated into the project design by first
avoiding and minimizing impacts to resources. Compensatory mitigation
will be provided for unavoidable impacts. Based on preliminary
investigations for special status species the project may affect, but
is unlikely to adversely affect, any species listed as threatened or
endangered under the State or Federal endangered species acts.
The proposed project would extend the John Muir Parkway, provide
parking for short-term and long-term parking, and develop a new access
point to commuter rail. Each of these activities may encourage
automobile traffic in the
[[Page 60310]]
area that could adversely affect levels of service at nearby
intersections.
FTA Procedures: Regulations implementing NEPA, as well as
provisions of SAFETEA-LU, call for public involvement in the EIS
process. Section 6002 of SAFETEA-LU requires that FTA do the following:
(1) Extend an invitation to other Federal and non-Federal agencies and
Indian Tribes that may have an interest in the proposed project to
become participating agencies; (2) provide an opportunity for
involvement by participating agencies and the public in helping to
define the purpose and need for a proposed project, as well as the
range of alternatives for consideration; and (3) establish a plan for
coordinating public and agency participation in and comment on the
environmental review process. An invitation to become a participating
agency will be extended to other Federal and non-Federal agencies and
Indian Tribes that may have an interest in the proposed project. It is
possible that we may not be able to identify all Federal and non-
Federal agencies and Indian Tribes that may have such an interest. Any
Federal or non-Federal agency or Indian Tribe interested in the
proposed project that does not receive an invitation to become a
participating agency should notify, at the earliest opportunity, the
City at the ADDRESSES or phone number above.
A comprehensive public involvement program has been developed. A
technical advisory committee called the Project Development Team,
consisting of representatives of State, regional and local agencies, is
in place. The program also includes a public scoping process, a public
review/comment period and public hearing on the Draft Environmental
Impact Statement, development and distribution of project newsletters
and posting of information on the project Web site. The purposes of and
need for the proposed project have been preliminarily identified in
this notice. We invite the public and participating agencies to
consider the preliminary statement of purposes of and need for the
proposed project, as well as potential alternatives, and the public is
welcome to use the public scoping process to further define the issues
of concern among all parties interested in the project. Comments on
potential significant environmental impacts that may be associated with
the proposed project are also welcomed. All comments and suggestions
will be given serious consideration. Comments on potentially
significant environmental impacts that may be associated with the
proposed project are also welcomed. There will be additional
opportunities to participate in the scoping process at the public
meetings announced in this notice. In accordance with 23 CFR 771.105(a)
and 771.133, FTA will comply with all Federal environmental laws,
regulations and executive orders applicable to the proposed project
during the environmental review process to the maximum extent
practicable. These requirements include, but are not limited to, the
regulations of the Council on Environmental Quality implementing NEPA
(40 CFR parts 1500-1508 and 23 CFR part 771), the project-level air
quality conformity regulation of the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) (40 CFR part 93), section 404(b)(1) guidelines of EPA (40
CFR part 230), Executive Orders 11988, 11990 and 12898 regarding
floodplains, wetlands, and environmental justice, respectively; Section
106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (36 CFR Part 800);
Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act (50 CFR part 402); and Section
4(f) of the Department of Transportation Act (23 CFR 774). The EIR
portion of the document will be prepared in accordance with the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the California Code of
Regulations, Title 14, section 15000 et seq.
Dated: November 13, 2009.
Leslie T. Rogers,
Federal Transit Administration.
[FR Doc. E9-27896 Filed 11-19-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-57-P