Inquiry Into Suspended Post Offices, 59997-59998 [E9-27778]
Download as PDF
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 222 / Thursday, November 19, 2009 / Notices
participants separately. Therefore, any
others who wish to participate in the
proceeding (or their counsel or
representative) must apply for and
receive a digital ID certificate before a
hearing request is filed so that they may
obtain access to the document via the EFiling system.
A person filing electronically using
the agency’s adjudicatory e-filing system
may seek assistance through the
‘‘Contact Us’’ link located on the NRC
Web site at https://www.nrc.gov/sitehelp/e-submittals.html or by calling the
NRC Meta-System Help Desk, which is
available between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m.,
Eastern Time, Monday through Friday,
excluding government holidays. The
Meta-System Help Desk can be
contacted by telephone at 1–866–672–
7640 or by e-mail at
MSHD.Resource@nrc.gov.
Participants who believe that they
have good cause for not submitting
documents electronically must file a
motion, in accordance with 10 CFR.
2.302(g), with their initial paper filing
requesting authorization to continue to
submit documents in paper format.
Such filings must be submitted by: (1)
First class mail addressed to the Office
of the Secretary of the Commission, U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Washington, DC 20555–0001, Attention:
Rulemaking and Adjudications Staff; or
(2) courier, express mail, or expedited
delivery service to the Office of the
Secretary, Sixteenth Floor, One White
Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike,
Rockville, Maryland 20852, Attention:
Rulemaking and Adjudications Staff.
Participants filing a document in this
manner are responsible for serving the
document on all other participants.
Filing is considered complete by firstclass mail as of the time of deposit in
the mail, or by courier, express mail, or
expedited delivery service upon
depositing the document with the
provider of the service.
Documents submitted in adjudicatory
proceedings will appear in NRC’s
electronic hearing docket which is
available to the public at https://
ehd.nrc.gov/EHD_Proceeding/home.asp,
unless excluded pursuant to an order of
the Commission, an Atomic Safety and
Licensing Board, or a Presiding Officer.
Participants are requested not to include
personal privacy information, such as
social security numbers, home
addresses, or home phone numbers in
their filings. With respect to copyrighted
works, except for limited excerpts that
serve the purpose of the adjudicatory
filings and would constitute a Fair Use
application, participants are requested
not to include copyrighted materials in
their works.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:22 Nov 18, 2009
Jkt 220001
If a person other than Entergy requests
a hearing, that person shall set forth
with particularity the manner in which
his interest is adversely affected by this
Order and shall address the criteria set
forth in 10 CFR 2.309(d) and (f).
If the hearing is requested by a person
whose interest is adversely affected, the
Commission will issue an Order
designating the time and place of any
hearing. If a hearing is held, the issue to
be considered at such hearing shall be
whether this Confirmatory Order should
be sustained.
In the absence of any request for
hearing, or written approval of an
extension of time in which to request a
hearing, the provisions specified in
Section V above shall be final 20 days
from the date this Order is published in
the Federal Register without further
order or proceedings. If an extension of
time for requesting a hearing has been
approved, the provisions specified in
Section V shall be final when the
extension expires, if a hearing request
has not been received.
A request for hearing shall not stay
the immediate effectiveness of this
order.
Dated this 10th day of November 2009.
For the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
Mark A. Satorius,
Regional Administrator, Region III.
[FR Doc. E9–27792 Filed 11–18–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket No. PI2010–1; Order No. 335]
Inquiry Into Suspended Post Offices
Postal Regulatory Commission.
Notice.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Commission is
establishing a docket to address Postal
Service practices related to suspension
of post offices. It invites comments from
the public on this topic.
DATES: 1. Comments are due: January
15, 2010. 2. Reply comments are due:
February 16, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments
electronically via the Commission’s
Filing Online system at https://
www.prc.gov. Commenters who cannot
submit their views electronically should
contact the person identified FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT by
telephone for advice on alternatives to
electronic filing.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Stephen L. Sharfman, General Counsel,
202–789–6820 or
stephen.sharfman@prc.gov.
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
59997
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
II. Public Representative
III. Ordering Paragraphs
I. Background
Order No. 319 concluded Docket No.
A2009–1, Appeal of the Hacker Valley,
West Virginia Post Office Closing.1
During that proceeding, information
came to light that convinced the
Commission that further inquiry and
analysis was necessary. On August 14,
2009, the Postal Service filed with the
Commission its response to Commission
Information Request No. 1, questions 1
through 13 (CIR No. 1).2 The
Commission concerns arose as a result
of the responses to questions 6 through
9. The Commission gathers from the
Postal Service’s responses that 97 post
offices have been suspended due to
lease expiration during the past 5 years
and most of them remain suspended.
Response to CIR No. 1 at 8. The
Commission initiates this public inquiry
to develop further information on the
status of these suspended offices and
the Postal Service practice of
suspending offices for extended periods
without affording the public the rights
guaranteed by 39 U.S.C. 404(d). The
Commission seeks input from the public
on this matter.
In CIR No. 1, questions 6 through 9,
the Commission sought information
pertaining to post offices suspended
during the last 5 years due to lease
expirations. The Postal Service’s
response to CIR No. 1, question 6,
informs the Commission that 97 offices
have been suspended from 2004 to
2009. Id. The response includes a list
naming each of the 97 offices, their ZIP
Codes, and date of suspension. In CIR
No. 1, question 7, the Commission asks
how many of the suspended post offices
were subsequently closed. The Postal
Service responds that 25 of the 97
offices were subsequently closed and
provides another list adding a column
providing the close date. Id. at 12. CIR
No. 1, question 8, seeks to know how
many of the suspended post offices were
reopened. The Postal Service states that
2 of the 97 offices have been reopened.
Id. at 14. CIR No. 1, question 9, asks
how many of the suspended offices are
pending closure. The Postal Service
reported that the closure process had
been initiated for five offices. Id. at 15.
Based on these responses, the
Commission establishes that 65 post
1 Docket No. A2009–1, Order on Appeal of Hacker
Valley, West Virginia Post Office Closing, October
19, 2009 (Order No. 319).
2 Response of the United States Postal Service to
Commission Information Request No. 1, August 14,
2009 (Response).
E:\FR\FM\19NON1.SGM
19NON1
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
59998
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 222 / Thursday, November 19, 2009 / Notices
offices suspended due to the expiration
of a facility lease during the previous 5
years remain suspended.
The Commission is concerned that
post office customers throughout the
nation do not have access to local post
offices and their services due to
suspensions. It is evident that several
post offices have been suspended for a
number of years, and the Postal Service
apparently has taken no effective action
to reopen or close such offices. Pursuant
to 39 U.S.C. 404(a)(3), the Postal Service
has the authority to determine the need
for post offices. Section 404 establishes
the process with which the Postal
Service must comply when closing or
consolidating post offices. This process
allows for public comment on the
proposed closure and the appeal of a
determination to close a post office. 39
U.S.C. 404(d). However, based on the
information gathered in Docket No.
A2009–1, it appears that the Postal
Service may be avoiding this process by
suspending post offices and allowing
them to simply remain suspended
without any action.
Pursuant to Handbook PO–101
section 617, the District Manager,
Customer Service and Sales, must
determine a plan of action to restore
service, secure suitable alternate
quarters, take other corrective action, or
initiate a discontinuance study within
90 days of the suspension. Docket No.
A2009–1, Commission Information
Request No. 2, September 29, 2009,
requests the Postal Service to provide a
copy of its plan of action regarding the
Hacker Valley post office. The Postal
Service submitted the plan of action and
indicated that it was studying the office
for discontinuance.3 However, in
Commission Information Request No. 3,
October 26, 2009, question 1, the
Commission lists several of the tasks
required for the Preparing for
Investigation phase of the
discontinuance study and asks which
tasks had been completed. The Postal
Service replied that though the study
had commenced, none of the listed tasks
had been completed.4
It is not sufficient to simply suspend
operations at a post office without
promptly developing a plan to reopen or
close the existing office. The
Commission initiates this public inquiry
to investigate this matter to better
understand the scope of this problem.
Interested persons, including members
of the public who are patrons of recently
suspended and not so recently
suspended post offices, are invited to
provide written comments.
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
II. Public Representative
[Release No. 34–60996; File No. PCAOB–
2009–03]
Section 505 of title 39 requires the
designation of an officer of the
Commission in all public proceedings to
represent the interests of the general
public. The Commission hereby
designates Richard A. Oliver as Public
Representative in this proceeding.
Pursuant to this designation, he will
direct the activities of Commission
personnel assigned to assist him and
will, upon request, provide their names
for the record. Neither he nor any of the
assigned personnel will participate in or
provide advice on any Commission
decision in this proceeding.
An aspect of the responsibilities of the
Public Representative will be to work
with the Postal Service to develop an
accurate representation of how written
procedures related to the emergency
suspension of post offices are being
adhered to in actual practice. In
addition, the Public Representative
should review subsequent Postal
Service action related to the relocation
or closing of post offices that were
suspended due to the expiration of the
lease for the facility.
III. Ordering Paragraphs
It is ordered:
1. Docket No. PI2010–1 is established
for the purpose of receiving comments
pertaining to the suspension of post
offices due to lease expirations.
2. Interested persons may submit
written comments by January 15, 2010.
3. Reply comments also may be filed
by February 16, 2010.
4. Richard A. Oliver is designated as
the Public Representative to represent
the interests of the general public in this
docket.
5. The Secretary shall arrange for
publication of this notice in the Federal
Register.
By the Commission.
Judith M. Grady,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9–27778 Filed 11–18–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710–FW–S
3 Response of United States Postal Service to
Commission Information Request No. 2, September
29, 2009.
4 Response of United States Postal Service to
Commission Information Request No. 3, October 26,
2009, at 1.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:22 Nov 18, 2009
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board; Notice of Filing and Immediate
Effectiveness of Proposed Rule
Change Postponing the Effective Date
of Rules and Forms Related to Annual
and Special Reporting by Registered
Firms and Succession to the
Registration Status of a Predecessor
Firm
November 13, 2009.
Pursuant to Section 107(b) of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the ‘‘Act’’),
notice is hereby given that on
September 30, 2009, the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board
(the ‘‘Board’’ or the ‘‘PCAOB’’) filed
with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the ‘‘SEC’’ or
‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
changes described in Items I, II, and III
below, which items have been prepared
by the Board. The PCAOB has
designated the proposed rule change as
‘‘constituting a stated policy, practice,
or interpretation with respect to the
meaning, administration, or
enforcement of an existing rule’’ under
Section 19(b)(3)(A)(i) of the Securities
Exchange of 1934 (as incorporated, by
reference, into Section 107(b)(4) of the
Act) and Rule 19b–4(f)(1), which
renders the proposal effective upon
receipt of this filing by the Commission.
The Commission is publishing this
notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule from interested persons.
I. Board’s Statement of the Terms of
Substance of the Proposed Rule Change
The Board is filing with the
Commission a rule change to postpone,
from October 12, 2009, to December 31,
2009, the effective date of PCAOB Rules
2200, Annual Report; 2201, Time for
Filing of Annual Report; 2202, Annual
Fee; 2203, Special Reports; 2204,
Signatures; 2205, Amendments; 2206
Date of Filing; 2207, Assertions of
Conflicts with Non-U.S. Laws; 2108,
Succeeding to the Registration Status of
a Predecessor; 2109, Procedure for
Succeeding to the Registration Status of
a Predecessor; instructions to PCAOB
Form 2, Annual Report Form; PCAOB
Form 3, Special Report Form; and
PCAOB Form 4, Succeeding to the
Registration Status of a Predecessor; and
related amendments to PCAOB Rules
1001(a)(vii), 1001(n)(ii), 1001(o)(i),
2107(c), 2107(f), 2300(a), 2300(b),
2300(c), 2300(f), 2300(g), 4000, and
4003(c).
E:\FR\FM\19NON1.SGM
19NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 222 (Thursday, November 19, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 59997-59998]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-27778]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket No. PI2010-1; Order No. 335]
Inquiry Into Suspended Post Offices
AGENCY: Postal Regulatory Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Commission is establishing a docket to address Postal
Service practices related to suspension of post offices. It invites
comments from the public on this topic.
DATES: 1. Comments are due: January 15, 2010. 2. Reply comments are
due: February 16, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments electronically via the Commission's Filing
Online system at https://www.prc.gov. Commenters who cannot submit their
views electronically should contact the person identified FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT by telephone for advice on alternatives to
electronic filing.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stephen L. Sharfman, General Counsel,
202-789-6820 or stephen.sharfman@prc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
II. Public Representative
III. Ordering Paragraphs
I. Background
Order No. 319 concluded Docket No. A2009-1, Appeal of the Hacker
Valley, West Virginia Post Office Closing.\1\ During that proceeding,
information came to light that convinced the Commission that further
inquiry and analysis was necessary. On August 14, 2009, the Postal
Service filed with the Commission its response to Commission
Information Request No. 1, questions 1 through 13 (CIR No. 1).\2\ The
Commission concerns arose as a result of the responses to questions 6
through 9. The Commission gathers from the Postal Service's responses
that 97 post offices have been suspended due to lease expiration during
the past 5 years and most of them remain suspended. Response to CIR No.
1 at 8. The Commission initiates this public inquiry to develop further
information on the status of these suspended offices and the Postal
Service practice of suspending offices for extended periods without
affording the public the rights guaranteed by 39 U.S.C. 404(d). The
Commission seeks input from the public on this matter.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Docket No. A2009-1, Order on Appeal of Hacker Valley, West
Virginia Post Office Closing, October 19, 2009 (Order No. 319).
\2\ Response of the United States Postal Service to Commission
Information Request No. 1, August 14, 2009 (Response).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In CIR No. 1, questions 6 through 9, the Commission sought
information pertaining to post offices suspended during the last 5
years due to lease expirations. The Postal Service's response to CIR
No. 1, question 6, informs the Commission that 97 offices have been
suspended from 2004 to 2009. Id. The response includes a list naming
each of the 97 offices, their ZIP Codes, and date of suspension. In CIR
No. 1, question 7, the Commission asks how many of the suspended post
offices were subsequently closed. The Postal Service responds that 25
of the 97 offices were subsequently closed and provides another list
adding a column providing the close date. Id. at 12. CIR No. 1,
question 8, seeks to know how many of the suspended post offices were
reopened. The Postal Service states that 2 of the 97 offices have been
reopened. Id. at 14. CIR No. 1, question 9, asks how many of the
suspended offices are pending closure. The Postal Service reported that
the closure process had been initiated for five offices. Id. at 15.
Based on these responses, the Commission establishes that 65 post
[[Page 59998]]
offices suspended due to the expiration of a facility lease during the
previous 5 years remain suspended.
The Commission is concerned that post office customers throughout
the nation do not have access to local post offices and their services
due to suspensions. It is evident that several post offices have been
suspended for a number of years, and the Postal Service apparently has
taken no effective action to reopen or close such offices. Pursuant to
39 U.S.C. 404(a)(3), the Postal Service has the authority to determine
the need for post offices. Section 404 establishes the process with
which the Postal Service must comply when closing or consolidating post
offices. This process allows for public comment on the proposed closure
and the appeal of a determination to close a post office. 39 U.S.C.
404(d). However, based on the information gathered in Docket No. A2009-
1, it appears that the Postal Service may be avoiding this process by
suspending post offices and allowing them to simply remain suspended
without any action.
Pursuant to Handbook PO-101 section 617, the District Manager,
Customer Service and Sales, must determine a plan of action to restore
service, secure suitable alternate quarters, take other corrective
action, or initiate a discontinuance study within 90 days of the
suspension. Docket No. A2009-1, Commission Information Request No. 2,
September 29, 2009, requests the Postal Service to provide a copy of
its plan of action regarding the Hacker Valley post office. The Postal
Service submitted the plan of action and indicated that it was studying
the office for discontinuance.\3\ However, in Commission Information
Request No. 3, October 26, 2009, question 1, the Commission lists
several of the tasks required for the Preparing for Investigation phase
of the discontinuance study and asks which tasks had been completed.
The Postal Service replied that though the study had commenced, none of
the listed tasks had been completed.\4\
It is not sufficient to simply suspend operations at a post office
without promptly developing a plan to reopen or close the existing
office. The Commission initiates this public inquiry to investigate
this matter to better understand the scope of this problem. Interested
persons, including members of the public who are patrons of recently
suspended and not so recently suspended post offices, are invited to
provide written comments.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ Response of United States Postal Service to Commission
Information Request No. 2, September 29, 2009.
\4\ Response of United States Postal Service to Commission
Information Request No. 3, October 26, 2009, at 1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Public Representative
Section 505 of title 39 requires the designation of an officer of
the Commission in all public proceedings to represent the interests of
the general public. The Commission hereby designates Richard A. Oliver
as Public Representative in this proceeding. Pursuant to this
designation, he will direct the activities of Commission personnel
assigned to assist him and will, upon request, provide their names for
the record. Neither he nor any of the assigned personnel will
participate in or provide advice on any Commission decision in this
proceeding.
An aspect of the responsibilities of the Public Representative will
be to work with the Postal Service to develop an accurate
representation of how written procedures related to the emergency
suspension of post offices are being adhered to in actual practice. In
addition, the Public Representative should review subsequent Postal
Service action related to the relocation or closing of post offices
that were suspended due to the expiration of the lease for the
facility.
III. Ordering Paragraphs
It is ordered:
1. Docket No. PI2010-1 is established for the purpose of receiving
comments pertaining to the suspension of post offices due to lease
expirations.
2. Interested persons may submit written comments by January 15,
2010.
3. Reply comments also may be filed by February 16, 2010.
4. Richard A. Oliver is designated as the Public Representative to
represent the interests of the general public in this docket.
5. The Secretary shall arrange for publication of this notice in
the Federal Register.
By the Commission.
Judith M. Grady,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-27778 Filed 11-18-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-FW-S