2010 Annual Determination for Sea Turtle Observer Requirement, 59508-59519 [E9-27674]
Download as PDF
59508
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 221 / Wednesday, November 18, 2009 / Proposed Rules
that grant were to indicate that, in
operation, Texas alternate requirements
do not satisfy applicable standards.
Request for Comments
How Do I Prepare and Submit
Comments?
Your comments must be written and
in English. To ensure that your
comments are filed correctly in the
Docket, please include the docket
number of this document in your
comments.
Your comments must not be more
than 15 pages long (see 49 CFR 553.21).
We established this limit to encourage
you to write your primary comments in
a concise fashion. However, you may
attach necessary additional documents
to your comments. There is no limit on
the length of the attachments.
Please submit two copies of your
comments, including the attachments,
to Docket Management at the address
given under ADDRESSES.
You may also submit your comments
to the docket electronically by logging
onto the Dockets Management System
Web site at https://dms.dot.gov. Click on
‘‘Help & Information,’’ or ‘‘Help/Info’’ to
obtain instructions for filing the
document electronically.
How Can I Be Sure That My Comments
Were Received?
Will The Agency Consider Late
Comments?
We will consider all comments that
Docket Management receives before the
close of business on the comment
closing date indicated above under
DATES. To the extent possible, we also
will consider comments that Docket
Management receives after that date. If
Docket Management receives a comment
too late for us to consider it in
developing the final rule, we will
consider that comment as an informal
suggestion for future rulemaking action.
How Can I Read the Comments
Submitted by Other People?
You may read the comments received
by Docket Management at the address
given under ADDRESSES. The hours of
the Docket are indicated above in the
same location.
You also may see the comments on
the Internet. To read the comments on
the Internet, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, and follow the
instructions for accessing the Docket.
Please note that even after the
comment closing date, we will continue
to file relevant information in the
Docket as it becomes available. Further,
some people may submit late comments.
Accordingly, we recommend that you
periodically check the Docket for new
material.
Issued on: November 6, 2009.
O. Kevin Vincent,
Chief Counsel.
[FR Doc. E9–27157 Filed 11–17–09; 8:45 am]
How Do I Submit Confidential Business
Information?
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with PROPOSALS
If you wish Docket Management to
notify you upon its receipt of your
comments, enclose a self-addressed,
stamped postcard in the envelope
containing your comments. Upon
receiving your comments, Docket
Management will return the postcard by
mail.
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
If you wish to submit any information
under a claim of confidentiality, you
should submit three copies of your
complete submission, including the
information you claim to be confidential
business information, to the Chief
Counsel, NHTSA, at the address given
above under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT. In addition, you should
submit two copies, from which you
have deleted the claimed confidential
business information, to Docket
Management at the address given above
under ADDRESSES. When you send a
comment containing information
claimed to be confidential business
information, you should include a cover
letter setting forth the information
specified in our confidential business
information regulation (49 CFR Part
512).
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:35 Nov 17, 2009
Jkt 220001
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
50 CFR Part 222
[Docket No. 0906181067–91356–01]
RIN 0648–XP96
2010 Annual Determination for Sea
Turtle Observer Requirement
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
SUMMARY: The National Marine
Fisheries Service (NMFS) publishes its
proposed Annual Determination (AD)
for 2010, pursuant to its authority under
the Endangered Species Act (ESA).
Through this proposed AD, NMFS
would identify commercial fisheries
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
operating in state and Federal waters in
the Atlantic Ocean, Gulf of Mexico, and
Pacific Ocean that would be required to
take observers upon NMFS’ request. The
purpose of observing identified fisheries
is to learn more about sea turtle
interactions in a given fishery, evaluate
existing measures to reduce or prevent
sea turtle takes, and to determine
whether additional measures to address
prohibited sea turtle takes may be
necessary. Fisheries identified through
this process would remain on the AD,
and therefore required to carry observers
upon NMFS’ request, for 5 years.
DATES: Comments must be received by
December 18, 2009.
ADDRESSES: Send comments on the
proposed rule by any one of the
following methods.
(1) Electronic Submissions: Submit all
electronic comments through the
Federal eRulemaking portal: https://
www.regulations.gov (follow
instructions for submitting comments).
(2) Facsimile: (301) 713–0376,
Attention: 2010 Sea Turtle Annual
Determination.
(3) Mail: Chief, Marine Mammal and
Sea Turtle Conservation Division, Office
of Protected Resources, NMFS, 1315
East-West Highway, Silver Spring, MD
20910.
Instructions: All comments received
are a part of the public record and will
generally be posted to https://
www.regulations.gov without change.
All personal identifying information (for
example, name, address, etc.)
voluntarily submitted by the commenter
may be publicly accessible. Do not
submit confidential business
information or otherwise sensitive or
protected information. NMFS will
accept anonymous comments (enter
‘‘N/A’’ in the required fields, if you
wish to remain anonymous).
Attachments to electronic comments
will be accepted in Microsoft Word,
Excel, WordPerfect, or Adobe PDF file
formats only.
Send comments on the information
collection requirements or any other
aspects of the collection of information
to the Chief of the Marine Mammal and
Sea Turtle Conservation Division, Office
of Protected Resources, at the
ADDRESSES above, and e-mail to
David_Rostker@omb.eop.gov, or fax to
(202) 395–7285.
See SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION for a
listing of all Regional Offices.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kristy Long, Office of Protected
Resources, 301–713–2322; Ellen Keane,
Northeast Region, 978–282–8476;
Dennis Klemm, Southeast Region, 727–
824–5312; Elizabeth Petras, Southwest
E:\FR\FM\18NOP1.SGM
18NOP1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 221 / Wednesday, November 18, 2009 / Proposed Rules
Region, 562–980–3238; Kim Maison,
Pacific Islands Region, 808–944–2257.
Individuals who use a
telecommunications device for the
hearing impaired may call the Federal
Information Relay Service at 1–800–
877–8339 between 8 a.m. and 4 p.m.
Eastern time, Monday through Friday,
excluding Federal holidays.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with PROPOSALS
Availability of Published Materials
Information regarding the Marine
Mammal Protection Act (MMPA) List of
Fisheries (LOF) may be obtained at
https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/
interactions/lof/ and information
regarding Marine Mammal Stock
Assessment Reports may be obtained at
https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/sars/ or
from any NMFS Regional Office at the
addresses listed below:
NMFS, Northeast Region, 55 Great
Republic Drive, Gloucester, MA 01930–
2298;
NMFS, Southeast Region, 263 13th
Avenue South, St. Petersburg, FL 33701;
NMFS, Southwest Region, 501 W.
Ocean Blvd., Suite 4200, Long Beach,
CA 90802–4213; or
NMFS, Pacific Islands Region,
Protected Resources, 1601 Kapiolani
Boulevard, Suite 1100, Honolulu, HI
96814–4700.
Purpose of the Sea Turtle Observer
Requirement
Under the ESA, 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.,
NMFS has the responsibility to
implement programs to conserve marine
life listed as endangered or threatened.
All sea turtles found in U.S. waters are
listed as either endangered or
threatened under the ESA. Kemp’s
ridley (Lepidochelys kempii),
leatherback (Dermochelys coriacea), and
hawksbill (Eretmochelys imbricata) sea
turtles are listed as endangered.
Loggerhead (Caretta caretta), green
(Chelonia mydas), and olive ridley
(Lepidochelys olivacea) sea turtles are
listed as threatened, except for breeding
colony populations of green turtles in
Florida and on the Pacific coast of
Mexico and breeding colony
populations of olive ridleys on the
Pacific coast of Mexico, which are listed
as endangered. Due to the inability to
distinguish between populations of
green turtles away from the nesting
beach, NMFS considers green turtles
endangered wherever they occur in U.S.
waters. While some sea turtle
populations have shown signs of
recovery, many populations continue to
decline.
Incidental take, or bycatch, in fishing
gear is one of the main sources of sea
turtle injury and mortality nationwide.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:35 Nov 17, 2009
Jkt 220001
Section 9 of the ESA prohibits the take
(including harassing, harming,
pursuing, hunting, shooting, wounding,
killing, trapping, capturing, or collecting
or attempting to engage in any such
conduct), including incidental take, of
endangered sea turtles. Pursuant to
section 4(d) of the ESA, NMFS has
issued regulations extending the
prohibition of take, with exceptions, to
threatened sea turtles (50 CFR 223.205
and 223.206). Section 11 of the ESA
authorizes the issuance of regulations to
enforce the take prohibitions. NMFS
may grant exceptions to the take
prohibitions with an incidental take
statement or an incidental take permit
issued pursuant to ESA section 7 or 10,
respectively. To do so, NMFS must
determine that the activity that will
result in incidental take is not likely to
jeopardize the continued existence of
the affected listed species. In some
cases, NMFS has been able to make this
determination because the fishery is
conducted with modified gear or
modified fishing practices that NMFS
has been able to evaluate. However, for
some Federal fisheries and most state
fisheries, NMFS has not granted an
exception primarily because we lack
information about fishery-turtle
interactions. Therefore, any incidental
take of sea turtles in those fisheries is
unlawful as it has not been exempted
from the ESA prohibition on take.
The most effective way for NMFS to
learn more about sea turtle-fishery
interactions in order to minimize or
prevent take is to place observers aboard
fishing vessels. In 2007, NMFS issued a
regulation (50 CFR 222.402) to establish
procedures through which each year
NMFS will identify, pursuant to
specified criteria and after notice and
opportunity for comment, those
fisheries in which the agency intends to
place observers (72 FR 43176, August 3,
2007). These regulations specify that
NMFS may place observers on U.S.
fishing vessels, either recreational or
commercial, operating in U.S. territorial
waters, the U.S. exclusive economic
zone (EEZ), or on the high seas, or on
vessels that are otherwise subject to the
jurisdiction of the U.S.
NMFS and/or interested cooperating
entities will pay the direct costs for
vessels to carry observers. These include
observer salary and insurance costs.
NMFS may also evaluate other potential
direct costs, should they arise. Once
selected, a fishery will be eligible to be
observed for five years without further
action by NMFS. This will enable NMFS
to develop an appropriate sampling
protocol to investigate whether, how,
when, where, and under what
conditions incidental takes are
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
59509
occurring; to evaluate whether existing
measures are minimizing or preventing
takes; and to determine whether
additional measures are needed to
implement ESA take prohibitions and
conserve turtles.
Process for Developing an Annual
Determination
Pursuant to 50 CFR 222.402, the
Assistant Administrator for Fisheries,
NOAA (AA), in consultation with
Regional Administrators and Fisheries
Science Center Directors, develops a
proposed annual determination
identifying which fisheries are required
to carry observers, if requested, to
monitor potential interactions with sea
turtles. NMFS provides an opportunity
for public comment on any proposed
determination. The determination is
based on the best available scientific,
commercial, or other information
regarding sea turtle-fishery interactions;
sea turtle distribution; sea turtle
strandings; fishing techniques, gears
used, target species, seasons and areas
fished; or qualitative data from logbooks
or fisher reports. Specifically, this
determination is based on the extent to
which:
(1) The fishery operates in the same
waters and at the same time as sea
turtles are present;
(2) The fishery operates at the same
time or prior to elevated sea turtle
strandings; or
(3) The fishery uses a gear or
technique that is known or likely to
result in incidental take of sea turtles
based on documented or reported takes
in the same or similar fisheries; and
(4) NMFS intends to monitor the
fishery and anticipates that it will have
the funds to do so.
The AA uses the most recent version
of the annually published MMPA List of
Fisheries (LOF) as the comprehensive
list of commercial fisheries for
consideration. The LOF includes all
known state and Federal commercial
fisheries that occur in U.S. waters. The
classification scheme used for fisheries
on the LOF would not be relevant to this
process. Unlike the LOF process, an
annual determination may also include
recreational fisheries likely to interact
with sea turtles on the basis of the best
available information.
NMFS consulted with appropriate
state and Federal fisheries officials and
other entities to identify which
fisheries, both commercial and
recreational, should be considered in
the annual determination. Although the
comments and recommendations
provided to NMFS by states were based
upon the best available information on
their fisheries, NMFS received more
E:\FR\FM\18NOP1.SGM
18NOP1
59510
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 221 / Wednesday, November 18, 2009 / Proposed Rules
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with PROPOSALS
recommendations for fisheries to
include on the 2010 AD than is feasible
to propose at this time based on the four
previously noted criteria (50 CFR
222.402(a)).
The AD is not an exhaustive or
comprehensive list of all fisheries with
documented or suspected takes of sea
turtles; there are additional fisheries
that NMFS remains concerned about.
For these additional fisheries, NMFS
may already be addressing incidental
take through another mechanism (e.g.,
rulemaking to implement modifications
to fishing gear and/or practices) or will
consider adding them to future annual
determinations based on the four
previously noted criteria (50 CFR
222.402(a)).
Notice of the final determination will
be published in the Federal Register
and made in writing to individuals
permitted for each fishery identified for
monitoring. NMFS will also notify state
agencies and provide notification
through publication in local
newspapers, radio broadcasts, and other
means, as appropriate. Once included in
the final determination, a fishery will
remain eligible for observer coverage for
five years to enable the design of an
appropriate sampling program and to
ensure collection of sufficient scientific
data for analysis. If NMFS determines
that more than five years are needed to
obtain sufficient scientific data, NMFS
will include the fishery in the proposed
AD again prior to the end of the fifth
year. As part of the 2010 AD, NMFS has
included, to the extent practicable,
information on the fisheries or gear
types to be sampled, geographic and
seasonal scope of coverage, and any
other relevant information. After
publication of a final AD, a 30–day
delay in effective date for implementing
observer coverage will follow, except for
those fisheries where the AA has
determined that there is good cause
pursuant to the Administrative
Procedure Act to make the rule effective
without a 30–day delay.
Implementation of Observer Coverage
in a Fishery Listed on the 2010 Annual
Determination
The design of any observer program
for fisheries identified through the AD
process, including how observers would
be allocated to individual vessels,
would vary among fisheries, fishing
sectors, gear types, and geographic
regions and would ultimately be
determined by the individual NMFS
Regional Office, Science Center, and/or
observer program. During the program
design, NMFS would be guided by the
following standards for distributing and
placing observers among fisheries
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:35 Nov 17, 2009
Jkt 220001
identified in the AD and vessels in those
particular fisheries:
(1) The requirements to obtain the
best available scientific information;
(2) The requirement that observers be
assigned fairly and equitably among
fisheries and among vessels in a fishery;
(3) The requirement that no
individual person or vessel, or group of
persons or vessels, be subject to
inappropriate, excessive observer
coverage; and
(4) The need to minimize costs and
avoid duplication, where practicable.
Vessels where the facilities for
accommodating an observer or carrying
out observer functions are so inadequate
or unsafe (due to size or quality of
equipment, for example) that the health
or safety of the observer or the safe
operation of the vessel would be
jeopardized, would not be required to
take observers under this proposed rule.
Nonetheless, per Magnuson-Stevens
Fishery Conservation and Management
Act (MSA) regulations for observers (50
CFR 600.746), a vessel that would
otherwise be required to carry an
observer, but is inadequate or unsafe for
purposes of carrying an observer and for
allowing operation of normal observer
functions, is prohibited from fishing
without observer coverage. However,
observation techniques using alternative
platforms apart from the fishing vessel,
but still requiring the cooperation of
fishermen, may be employed in such
instances as appropriate. Failure to
comply with the requirements under
this rule may result in civil or criminal
penalties under the ESA.
Observer programs designed or
carried out in accordance with 50 CFR
222.404 would be required to be
consistent with existing observer-related
NOAA policies and regulations, such as
those under the Fair Labor and
Standards Act (29 U.S.C. 201 et seq.),
the Service Contract Act (41 U.S.C. 351
et seq.), Observer Health and Safety
regulations (50 CFR 600), and other
relevant policies.
Fisheries not included on the 2010
AD may still be observed under a
different authority than the ESA (e.g.,
MMPA, MSA).
Additional information on observer
programs in commercial fisheries can be
found on the NMFS National Observer
Program’s website: https://
www.st.nmfs.gov/st4/nop/; links to
individual regional observer programs
may also be found on this website.
Sea Turtle Distribution
Atlantic Ocean and Gulf of Mexico
Sea turtle species found in waters of
the Atlantic Ocean and Gulf of Mexico
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
include green, hawksbill, Kemp’s ridley,
leatherback, and loggerhead turtles. The
waters off the U.S. East Coast represent
important residential, migrating, and
foraging habitat for several of these
species. Further, the Southeastern U.S.
is a major sea turtle nesting area for
loggerheads and, to a lesser extent,
green and leatherback turtles.
Four species, green, Kemp’s ridley,
leatherback, and loggerhead turtles,
occur seasonally in southern New
England and mid-Atlantic continental
shelf waters north of Cape Hatteras,
North Carolina. The occurrence of these
species in these waters is temperature
dependent. In general, turtles move up
the coast from southern wintering areas
as water temperatures warm in the
spring. The trend is reversed in the fall
as water temperatures decrease. By
December, turtles have passed Cape
Hatteras, returning to more southern
waters for the winter. Hard-shelled
species are typically observed as far
north as Cape Cod, Massachusetts,
whereas more cold-tolerant leatherbacks
are observed farther north in northern
Gulf of Maine waters in the summer and
fall.
Green turtles are found in inshore and
nearshore waters from Texas to
Massachusetts, the U.S. Virgin Islands,
and Puerto Rico. While foraging and
developmental habitats also occur in the
wider Caribbean, important feeding
areas in Florida include the Indian River
Lagoon, the Florida Keys, Florida Bay,
Homosassa, Crystal River, Cedar Key,
and St. Joseph Bay. The bays and
sounds of North Carolina also provide
important foraging habitat for green
turtles, which can occur in those areas
in relatively high densities.
In the Atlantic, hawksbills are most
common in Puerto Rico and its
associated islands and in the U.S. Virgin
Islands. In the continental U.S., the
species is recorded from all the Gulf
States and along the east coast as far
north as Massachusetts, but sightings
north of Florida are rare. Hawksbills are
observed in Florida on the reefs off Palm
Beach, Broward, Miami-Dade, and
Monroe Counties. Texas is the only
other U.S. state where hawksbills are
sighted with any regularity.
Kemp’s ridleys are distributed
throughout waters of the Gulf of Mexico
and U.S. Atlantic coast, from Florida to
New England. The major nesting area
for Kemp’s ridleys is in Tamaulipas,
Mexico, but some nesting also occurs
along the Texas coast.
The second largest nesting aggregation
of loggerheads in the world occurs in
the southeastern U.S. Loggerheads occur
throughout the Atlantic and Gulf of
E:\FR\FM\18NOP1.SGM
18NOP1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 221 / Wednesday, November 18, 2009 / Proposed Rules
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with PROPOSALS
Mexico, spending significant time in
coastal areas.
Adult leatherbacks are capable of
tolerating a wide range of water
temperatures, and have been sighted
along the entire continental coast of the
United States as far north as the Gulf of
Maine and south to Puerto Rico, the
U.S. Virgin Islands, and into the Gulf of
Mexico. The central east coast of Florida
represents a small, but growing, nesting
area for leatherbacks in the western
North Atlantic.
U.S. Pacific Ocean
Leatherback sea turtles are found
consistently off the U.S. west coast,
usually north of Point Conception,
California. Green turtles, loggerhead,
and olive ridley sea turtles are rarely
observed in the west coast EEZ, but
records show that all species have
stranded in California and the Pacific
Northwest. Leatherbacks are known to
migrate to central and northern
California from their natal beaches in
the Western Pacific to feed on jellyfish.
During aerial surveys conducted since
the early 1990s, leatherbacks were most
often spotted off Point Reyes, south of
Point Arena, in the Gulf of the
Farallons, and in Monterey Bay.
Leatherback turtles usually appear in
Monterey Bay and California coastal
waters during August and September
and move offshore in October and
November. Other observed areas of
summer leatherback concentration
include northern California and the
waters off Washington through northern
Oregon, offshore from the Columbia
River plume.
Green, loggerhead, and olive ridley
sea turtles are generally found in waters
temperatures above 18 C, which is
warmer than the waters off most of
California, Oregon, and Washington.
Two small populations of green turtles
occur in the southern California Bight
utilizing the warm water outflows from
power plants in San Diego Bay and
Alamitos Bay in Long Beach, California.
In the eastern Pacific, loggerheads have
been reported as far north as Alaska,
and as far south as Chile. Occasional
sightings are reported from the coasts of
Washington and Oregon, but most
records are of juveniles off the coast of
California. Based upon limited observer
records, loggerheads travel into the
southern California Bight during El
Nino events (or warm water conditions
similar to an El Nino). The majority of
fishery interactions with loggerheads
during El Nino conditions have
occurred during the summer. Olive
ridleys have been recorded stranded all
along the U.S. west coast. Olive ridleys
are believed to use warm water currents
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:35 Nov 17, 2009
Jkt 220001
along the west coast for foraging. The
general distribution of olive ridleys
along the U.S. west coast is unknown at
this time.
Sea turtles occur throughout the
Pacific Islands Region including the
State of Hawaii and the U.S. territories
of Guam, American Samoa, and the
Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana
Islands (CNMI). Green and hawksbill
turtles are most common in nearshore
waters while leatherbacks, loggerheads,
and olive ridleys occur in offshore
pelagic waters. Stock structure and
population dynamics for some species
in this region are poorly understood.
Sea Turtle Strandings
NMFS reviewed data collected by the
Sea Turtle Stranding and Salvage
Network (STSSN) between 2003 and
2007 to identify stranding trends and
inform development of this proposed
rule. Cold stunned, captive-reared, and
post-hatchling turtles were not included
in the data reviewed.
Between 2003 and 2007, the STSSN
along the U.S. Atlantic and Gulf coasts
collectively documented strandings of
six species: loggerhead, Kemp’s ridley,
green, leatherback, hawksbill, and olive
ridley turtles, with loggerheads
consistently representing the highest
number of strandings. For the purposes
of this review, the U.S. Atlantic and
Gulf of Mexico coastline is divided into
three regions: (1) Gulf, including all
Gulf of Mexico waters from TX through
the FL gulf coast, (2) Southeast Atlantic,
including U.S. Atlantic waters from FL
east coast through NC, and (3) Northeast
Atlantic, including all U.S. Atlantic
waters from VA through ME. Of the
three regions, the Southeast Atlantic
consistently records the highest level of
strandings during any given month,
each year. In each region, as well as
collectively, loggerhead sea turtles
represent the highest number of annual
strandings, followed by Kemp’s ridley
and leatherback turtles in the Atlantic
and green turtles in the Gulf.
Based on the data reviewed,
strandings have occurred in each month
of the year, in all three regions;
however, distinct trends are notable
within each region. In the Gulf and
Southeast Atlantic regions, strandings
consistently occur in every month of the
year. In the Gulf region, the highest
concentration of strandings occurs from
March to August, with a notable peak in
April and May. In the Southeast
Atlantic region, the highest
concentration of strandings occurs from
March to November, with a notable peak
in May and June. In the Northeast
Atlantic region, strandings
predominately occur between May and
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
59511
November of each year, with the highest
concentration of strandings between
June and September; strandings are not
regularly observed in the winter and
early spring.
On the U.S. West Coast, strandings are
infrequent compared to the Atlantic and
Gulf of Mexico coasts predominantly
due to oceanographic features (e.g.,
currents) and species abundance and
distribution. Between 2003 and 2007,
the STSSN in California documented
strandings of three species: green,
leatherback, and olive ridley turtles.
Green turtles represent the highest
number of strandings. Strandings were
documented in all months except April;
data indicate a peak in strandings
between July and October.
In Oregon and Washington, very few
strandings were recorded between 2003
and 2007. Green, loggerhead, and olive
ridley turtle strandings were recorded
from December to March, with no
strandings documented from April
through November. Prior to 2003,
stranded leatherback turtles were
recorded in Oregon and Washington.
In the Pacific Islands region,
strandings occur throughout the year,
primarily green turtles and secondarily
hawksbills in Hawaii, Guam, American
Samoa, and CNMI.
Addition of Fisheries on the 2010
Annual Determination
NMFS is proposing to include 19
fisheries (17 in the Atlantic Ocean and
Gulf of Mexico and 2 in the Pacific
Ocean) on the 2010 AD. These 19
fisheries, described below and listed in
Table 1, represent several gear types,
including trawl, gillnet, trap/pot, and
pound net/weir/seine.
As described above, the most recent
LOF is used as the universe of
commercial fisheries included on the
AD. The fishery name, definition, and
number of vessels/persons specified on
the AD are taken from the most recent
final LOF. Additionally, the fishery
descriptions below include a particular
fishery’s current classification on the
MMPA LOF (i.e., Category I, II, or III);
Category I and II fisheries are required
to carry observers if requested by NMFS.
As noted previously, NMFS also has
authority to observe fisheries in Federal
waters under the MSA, under which
NMFS has collected sea turtle bycatch
information.
Trawl Fisheries
Interactions with trawl fisheries are of
a particular concern for sea turtles, since
forced submergence in any type of
restrictive gear could lead to lack of
oxygen and subsequent death by
drowning. Metabolic changes that can
E:\FR\FM\18NOP1.SGM
18NOP1
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with PROPOSALS
59512
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 221 / Wednesday, November 18, 2009 / Proposed Rules
impair a sea turtle’s ability to function
can occur within minutes of a forced
submergence (Lutcavage et al., 1997).
Trawls that are not outfitted with
turtle excluder devices (TEDs) may
result in forced submergence. Currently,
only trawl fisheries capable of catching
shrimp and operating south of Cape
Charles, VA, and in the Gulf of Mexico
as well as trawl fisheries targeting
summer flounder south of Cape Charles,
VA, are required to use TEDs.
NMFS’ Strategy for Sea Turtle
Conservation and Recovery in Relation
to Atlantic Ocean and Gulf of Mexico
Fisheries (‘‘Strategy’’), a gear-based
approach to addressing sea turtle
bycatch, has identified trawl gear as a
priority given our knowledge of the
level of bycatch in this gear and the
availability of technology that allows
sea turtles to escape the trawl net,
minimizing injury and mortality. The
Strategy is currently evaluating
mitigation measures for trawl fisheries
that overlap with sea turtles. Several
fisheries that NMFS proposes to include
on the 2010 AD may be considered for
sea turtle conservation measures under
the Strategy in a future rulemaking to
implement the prohibition of take and
to help conserve and recover sea turtles.
Several states included trawl fisheries
in their responses to NMFS’ request for
information and recommendations for
the 2010 AD. Massachusetts noted that
summer flounder trawlers are known to
interact with sea turtles. New York
recommended considering bottom otter
trawl fisheries given that this is one of
the top gear types in terms of pounds
landed in Long Island Sound, Peconic
Bay, and along the South Shore. New
Jersey suggested focusing observer
coverage in areas where trawl gear
overlaps with sea turtle observations.
Maryland reported that interactions
between bottom otter trawl gear as well
as beam trawl gear and sea turtles are
possible in the Atlantic Ocean (0–3
miles (0–4.8 km)) and there have been
reports of sea turtles captured in trawl
gear. North Carolina ranked trawls
operating in ocean waters as their top
priority based on NMFS’ four criteria.
South Carolina noted that both trynets
and whelk trawls are of concern.
Georgia, Florida, and Alabama all noted
trawl fisheries as well. Mississippi
highlighted skimmer trawls in their
response to NMFS’ request for
recommendations. Therefore, based on
the information provided by states and
the best available scientific information,
NMFS proposes to include the following
trawl fisheries on the 2010 AD.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:35 Nov 17, 2009
Jkt 220001
Atlantic Shellfish Bottom Trawl Fishery
The Atlantic shellfish bottom trawl
fishery (estimated 972 vessels/persons)
encompasses the calico scallop trawl,
crab trawl, Georgia/South Carolina/
Maryland whelk trawl, Gulf of Maine/
Mid-Atlantic sea scallop trawl, and Gulf
of Maine northern shrimp trawl (71 FR
2006, January 4, 2006). This fishery
extends from Maine through Florida.
The fishery is managed through Federal
and interstate fishery management plans
(FMPs).
This fishery is classified as Category
III on the MMPA LOF; however,
portions of the fishery have been
observed at low levels under MSA
authority and by the Georgia
Department of Natural Resources (GA
DNR).
Since 2004, 16 sea turtle takes were
reported by NMFS trained observers in
the Atlantic sea scallop trawl fishery.
Takes of sea turtles in scallop trawl gear
have been observed during the months
from June through October. One of the
16 sea turtles captured in scallop trawl
gear was decomposed indicating it was
not killed as a result of the scallop trawl
gear in which it was observed. Fourteen
of the non-decomposed turtles were
loggerhead sea turtles, while one was
not identified to species.
In addition, loggerhead sea turtle
bycatch in the mid-Atlantic sea scallop
trawl fishery, one component of the
Atlantic shellfish bottom trawl fishery,
was estimated for 2004 and 2005. The
average annual bycatch estimates of
loggerhead sea turtles in 2004 and 2005
in mid-Atlantic sea scallop trawl gear
ranged from 81 to 191 turtles,
depending on the estimation
methodology used (Murray 2007). GA
DNR conducted a limited observer
program in the trawl fishery targeting
whelk in the late 1990s; 7 turtles (3
Kemp’s ridleys, 2 greens, and 2
loggerheads) were taken in 28 observed
tows. NMFS is particularly interested in
observing this fishery in waters off of
Massachusetts and south as sea turtles
more commonly occur in this area.
NMFS proposes to include this
fishery on the 2010 AD based on
documented interactions with sea
turtles in this and other bottom trawl
fisheries and the need to obtain more
information on the interactions in this
fishery.
Mid-Atlantic Bottom Trawl Fishery
Bottom otter trawl nets include a
variety of net types, including flynets,
which are high profile trawls. The
‘‘Mid-Atlantic bottom trawl fishery’’ as
described in this proposed AD includes
both the mid-Atlantic bottom trawl
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
fishery and the mid-Atlantic flynet
fishery as defined on the LOF.
The Mid-Atlantic bottom trawl fishery
(estimated ≤1,000 vessels/persons), as
defined on the LOF, uses bottom trawl
gear to target species including, but not
limited to, bluefish, croaker, monkfish,
summer flounder (fluke), winter
flounder, silver hake (whiting), spiny
dogfish, smooth dogfish, scup, and
black sea bass. The fishery occurs yearround from Cape Cod, MA, to Cape
Hatteras, NC, in waters west of 72 30’
W. long. and north of a line extending
due east from the North Carolina/South
Carolina border. The gear is managed by
several state and Federal FMPs.
The Mid-Atlantic flynet fishery
(estimated 21 vessels/persons), as
defined on the LOF, is a multi-species
fishery composed of nearshore and
offshore components that operate along
the east coast of the mid-Atlantic United
States. Flynets typically range from 80–
120 ft (24–36.6 m) in headrope length,
with wing mesh sizes of 16–64 in (41–
163 cm), following a slow 3:1 taper to
smaller mesh sizes in the body,
extension, and codend sections of the
net. The nearshore fishery operates from
October to April inside of 30 fathoms
(180 ft; 55 m) from New Jersey to North
Carolina. This nearshore fishery targets
Atlantic croaker, weakfish, butterfish,
harvestfish, bluefish, menhaden, striped
bass, kingfish species, and other finfish
species. Flynet fishing is no longer
permitted in Federal waters south of
Cape Hatteras to a line extending from
the NC/SC border in order to protect
weakfish stocks. The offshore
component operates from November to
April outside of 30 fathoms (180 ft; 55
m) from the Hudson Canyon off New
York, south to Hatteras Canyon off
North Carolina. These deeper water
fisheries target bluefish, Atlantic
mackerel, Loligo squid, black sea bass,
and scup (72 FR 7382, February 15,
2007). Illex squid are also targeted
offshore (70–200 fathoms [420–1,200 ft;
128–366 m]) during summer months
from May to September.
The Mid-Atlantic bottom trawl fishery
and the Mid-Atlantic flynet fishery are
currently classified as Category II on the
MMPA LOF, which authorizes NMFS to
observe these fisheries for marine
mammal interactions, and to collect
information on sea turtles should a take
occur on an observed trip. Between
2003 and 2007, observer coverage as
reported in the Marine Mammal Stock
Assessment Report (SAR) ranged from a
low of 1% to a high of 18.61%
depending on target species; see
Appendix III of the draft 2009 SAR for
additional details (NMFS, 2009). It
should be noted that the mid-Atlantic
E:\FR\FM\18NOP1.SGM
18NOP1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 221 / Wednesday, November 18, 2009 / Proposed Rules
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with PROPOSALS
bottom trawl fishery is defined slightly
differently in the SARs (which use 70°
W as a boundary) than it is defined here
and in the LOF. NMFS will consider
changing this definition in a future LOF.
Since 2003, NMFS has documented
50 sea turtle takes (excluding severely
decomposed animals) in bottom otter
trawl gear in the mid-Atlantic. These
takes occurred primarily between
October and February, but takes were
also reported May through September.
In 2007, the observer program created
new codes to document the different net
types used, including flynets. Seven of
the takes were recorded on trips where
flynets were indicated as the specific
net type used. Loggerhead turtles were
the predominant species observed
taken, but leatherback turtles were also
documented. An estimate of the average
annual bycatch of loggerhead sea turtles
in mid-Atlantic bottom otter trawl gear
during 1996–2004 was completed in
2006. The analysis defined the midAtlantic as the region from the shoreline
below 41° 30’ N./66° W. to the southern
extent of the NEFSC observer data
collection, around 35° 00’ N. lat. and 75°
30’ W. long. Estimated average annual
bycatch of loggerhead turtles in midAtlantic bottom otter trawl gear during
1996–2004 was 616 animals (Murray,
2008).
NMFS proposes to include this
fishery on the 2010 AD to more
adequately observe this gear type where
and when it overlaps with sea turtle
distribution.
Mid-Atlantic Mid-water Trawl
(including pair trawl) Fishery
The Mid-Atlantic mid-water trawl
fishery (estimated 620 vessels/persons)
primarily targets Atlantic mackerel,
chub mackerel, and miscellaneous other
pelagic species. This fishery consists of
both single and pair trawls, which are
designed, capable, or used to fish for
pelagic species with no portion of the
gear designed to be operated in contact
with the bottom. The fishery for Atlantic
mackerel occurs primarily from
southern New England through the midAtlantic from January to March and in
the Gulf of Maine during the summer
and fall (May to December).
The Mid-Atlantic mid-water trawl
fishery is currently classified as
Category II on the MMPA LOF, which
authorizes NMFS to observe this fishery
for marine mammal interactions, and to
collect information on sea turtles should
a take occur on an observed trip. During
2003–2007, estimated observer coverage
year-round in this fishery was 3.5%,
12.16%, 8.4%, 8.9%, and 3.85%,
respectively (NMFS 2009); no sea turtle
takes were observed.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:35 Nov 17, 2009
Jkt 220001
NMFS proposes to include this
fishery on the 2010 AD to more
adequately observe this gear type in
areas and during times where it overlaps
with sea turtle distribution.
Southeastern U.S. Atlantic, Gulf of
Mexico Shrimp Trawl Fishery
The Southeastern U.S. Atlantic, Gulf
of Mexico shrimp trawl fishery
(estimated ≤18,000 vessels/persons)
targets shrimp using various types of
trawls; NMFS would focus on the
component of the fishery that uses
skimmer trawls for the 2010 AD.
Skimmer trawls are used primarily in
inshore/inland shallow waters (typically
less than 20 ft (6.1 m)) to target shrimp.
The skimmer trawl has a rigid ‘‘L’’shaped or triangular metal frame with
the inboard portion of the frame
attached to the vessel and the outboard
portion attached to a skid that runs
along the seabed.
Skimmer trawl use increased in
response to TED requirements for
shrimp bottom otter trawls. Skimmer
trawls currently have no TED
requirement but are subject to tow time
limits of 55 minutes from April 1 to
October 31 and 75 minutes from
November 1 to March 31. Skimmer
trawls are used in North Carolina,
Florida (Gulf Coast), Mississippi, and
Louisiana. There are documented takes
of sea turtles in skimmer trawls in North
Carolina, and anecdotal reports
elsewhere. In North Carolina, there were
150–200+ active vessels per year from
2000–2002 and in Louisiana, skimmer
trawls accounted for 37% of the shrimp
catch and 63% of the total shrimp
trawling effort from 1999–2004.
Louisiana skimmer trawl effort averaged
about 60,750 trips per year over that
period, ranging from about 81,700 trips
in year 2000 to 49,000 trips in year
2004. No effort information is available
for Mississippi and Florida.
Skimmer trawl effort overlaps with
sea turtle distribution, and as noted
above, takes have been reported.
Although subject to tow times, the
magnitude and impact of turtle takes in
this fishery are not understood, and no
observer program currently exists for
this portion of the shrimp fishery. Given
the extent this gear is used, NMFS
thinks it is important to better
understand these interactions.
NMFS is considering including
skimmer trawls under the Atlantic
Ocean and Gulf of Mexico Sea Turtle
Strategy, which may result in a
regulation to require TEDs or other
protections for sea turtles for all trawl
gears as appropriate. Observer coverage
to understand the scope and impact of
turtle takes by this gear will also be
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
59513
needed to make well informed
management decision on what actions
may be necessary to manage this fishery
to minimize and prevent sea turtle takes
and further sea turtle conservation and
recovery.
The Southeastern U.S. Atlantic, Gulf
of Mexico shrimp trawl fishery is
classified as Category III on the MMPA
LOF, but mandatory observer coverage
under MSA authority began in 2007.
The fishery is currently observed at
approximately 1% of total fishery effort.
NMFS is proposing to include the
Southeastern U.S. Atlantic, Gulf of
Mexico shrimp trawl fishery, to focus
observer coverage in the component of
the fishery that uses skimmer trawls, on
the 2010 AD.
Gillnet Fisheries
Sea turtles are vulnerable to
entanglement and drowning in gillnets,
especially when the gear is left
untended. The main risk to sea turtles
from capture in gillnet is forced
submergence. Entanglement in gillnets
can also result in severe abrasions on
entangled turtles. Large mesh gillnets
(e.g., 10–12 in. (25.4–30.5 cm) stretched
mesh) have been documented as
effective at capturing sea turtles.
Additionally, sea turtles have been
documented as entangled in smaller
mesh gillnets.
Several states (i.e., CA, NY, NJ, DE,
MD, VA, NC, AL) recommended
including gillnet fisheries on the 2010
AD. California recommended two small
mesh gillnet fisheries. New York
recommended considering sink gillnets
and runaround gillnets, particularly
those operating off the South Shore and
Peconic Bay. During the time sea turtles
are present in New York waters, gillnets
are one of the top gear types in terms of
pounds landed along the South Shore.
New Jersey recommended observing
gillnet fisheries operating in areas that
overlap with sea turtle sightings.
Delaware identified gillnet gear as a
concern based on the potential for
interactions. Maryland noted that
potential for sea turtle takes exists in
gillnet fisheries operating within coastal
bays and tidal tributaries, but no takes
have been documented. Virginia noted
that there are state regulations for
gillnets in an effort to conserve and
protect sea turtles in their waters. North
Carolina ranked large mesh commercial
gillnets operating in estuarine waters as
a top concern. Alabama noted gillnets in
their response to NMFS’ request for
recommendations. In addition, NMFS’
Strategy for Sea Turtle Conservation and
Recovery in Relation to Atlantic Ocean
and Gulf of Mexico Fisheries has
identified gillnet gear as a high priority.
E:\FR\FM\18NOP1.SGM
18NOP1
59514
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 221 / Wednesday, November 18, 2009 / Proposed Rules
Therefore, based on the information
provided by states and the best available
scientific information, NMFS proposes
to include the following gillnet fisheries
on the 2010 AD.
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with PROPOSALS
CA Halibut, White Seabass and Other
Species Set Gillnet Fishery (>3.5 in
mesh)
The CA halibut, white seabass, and
other species set gillnet fishery
(estimated 58 vessels/persons) targets
halibut, white seabass, and other species
from the U.S.-Mexico border north to
Monterey Bay using 200 fathom (1,200
ft; 366 m) gillnet with a stretch mesh
size of 8.5 in (31.6 cm). Net soak
duration is typically 8–10, 19–24, or 44–
49 hours at a depth ranging from 15–50
fathoms (90–300 ft; 27–91 m) with most
sets from 15–35 fathoms (90–210 ft; 27–
64 m). No more than 1500 fathoms
(9,000 ft; 2,743 m) of gill or trammel net
may be fished in combination for CA
halibut and angel shark. Fishing occurs
year-round, with effort generally
increasing during summer months and
declining during last the 3 months of
the year. The central CA portion of the
fishery from Point Arguello to Point
Reyes has been closed since September,
2002, following a ban on gillnets
inshore of 60 fathoms (360 ft; 110 m).
Set gill nets have been prohibited in
state waters south of Point Arguello and
within 70 fathoms (420 ft; 128 m) or one
mile (1.6 km), whichever is less, around
the Channel Islands since 1990. The
California Department of Fish and Game
(CDFG) manages the fishery as a limited
entry fishery with gear restrictions and
area closures.
This fishery is classified as Category
II on the MMPA LOF, which authorizes
NMFS to observe this fishery in state
waters for marine mammal interactions,
and to collect information on sea turtles
should a take occur on an observed trip.
This fishery was observed at about
17.8% in 2007 and 5% in 2008. No sea
turtle takes were observed during 2007
or 2008. NMFS proposes to include this
fishery on the 2010 AD because it
operates in the same waters that turtles
are known to occur and this gear type
is known to result in the incidental take
of sea turtles based on documented
takes in similar fisheries.
CA Yellowtail, Barracuda, and White
Seabass Drift Gillnet Fishery (mesh size
>3.5 in. and <14 in.)
The CA yellowtail, barracuda, and
white seabass drift gillnet fishery (24
vessels/persons) targets primarily
yellowtail and white seabass, and
secondarily barracuda, with target
species typically determined by market
demand on a short-term basis. Drift
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:35 Nov 17, 2009
Jkt 220001
gillnets are up to 6,000 ft (1,829 m) long
and are set at the surface. The mesh size
depends on target species and is
typically 6.0–6.5 in (15–16.5 cm). When
targeting yellowtail and barracuda, the
mesh size must be ≥3.5 in (9 cm); when
targeting white seabass, the mesh size
must be ≥6 in (15.2 cm). From June 16
to March 14 not more than 20 percent,
by number, of a load of fish may be
white seabass with a total length of 28
in (71 cm). A maximum of ten white
seabass per load may be taken, if taken
in gillnet or trammel nets with meshes
from 3.5–6.0 in (9–15 cm) in length. The
fishery operates year-round, primarily
south of Point Conception with some
effort around San Clemente Island and
San Nicolas Island. This fishery is a
limited entry fishery with various gear
restrictions and area closures managed
by the California Department of Fish
and Game (CDFG).
This fishery is classified as Category
II on the MMPA LOF, which authorizes
NMFS to observe this fishery for marine
mammal interactions, and to collect
information on sea turtles should a take
occur on an observed trip. This fishery
was observed in 2003 and 2004, with
10.4% and 11.0% coverage,
respectively. No sea turtle takes were
observed during 2003 or 2004. NMFS
proposes to include this fishery on the
2010 AD because it operates in the same
waters that turtles are known to occur
and this gear type is known to result in
the incidental take of sea turtles based
on documented takes in similar
fisheries.
Chesapeake Bay Inshore Gillnet Fishery
The Chesapeake Bay inshore gillnet
fishery (estimated 45 vessels/persons)
targets menhaden and croaker using
gillnet gear with mesh sizes ranging
from 2.75–5 in (7–12.7 cm), depending
on the target species. The fishery
operates between the Chesapeake Bay/
Bridge Tunnel and the mainland. The
fishery is managed under the Interstate
FMPs for Atlantic Menhaden and
Atlantic Croaker.
This fishery is classified as Category
II on the MMPA LOF, which authorizes
NMFS to observe this fishery in state
waters for marine mammal interactions,
and to collect information on sea turtles
should a take occur on an observed trip.
NMFS has previously observed this
fishery at extremely low levels. NMFS
proposes to include this fishery on the
2010 AD because sea turtles are known
to occur in the same areas where the
fishery operates, takes have been
previously documented in similar gear,
and the fishery operates during a period
of high sea turtle strandings.
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Long Island Inshore Gillnet Fishery
The Long Island Sound inshore gillnet
fishery (estimated 20 vessels/persons)
includes all gillnet fisheries setting nets
west of a line from the north fork of the
eastern end of Long Island, NY (Orient
Point to Plum Island to Fishers Island)
to Watch Hill, RI (59 FR 43703, August
25, 1994). Target species include, but
are not limited to bluefish, striped bass,
weakfish, and summer flounder.
This fishery is classified as Category
III on the MMPA LOF and NMFS has
not previously required vessels
operating in this fishery to carry an
observer. NMFS has previously
observed this fishery at extremely low
levels; no sea turtle takes were observed.
NMFS proposes to include this fishery
in the 2010 AD because sea turtles are
known to occur in the same areas where
the fishery operates and takes have been
documented in similar gear types.
Mid-Atlantic Gillnet Fishery
The Mid-Atlantic gillnet fishery
(estimated 7,596 vessels/persons) targets
monkfish, spiny dogfish, smooth
dogfish, bluefish, weakfish, menhaden,
spot, croaker, striped bass, large and
small coastal sharks, Spanish mackerel,
king mackerel, American shad, black
drum, skate spp., yellow perch, white
perch, herring, scup, kingfish, spotted
seatrout, and butterfish. The fishery
uses drift and sink gillnets, including
nets set in a sink, stab, set, strike, or
drift fashion, with some unanchored
drift or sink nets used to target specific
species. The dominant material is
monofilament twine with stretched
mesh sizes from 2.5–12 in (6.4–30.5
cm), and string lengths from 150–8,400
ft. (46–2,560 m). This fishery operates
year-round west of a line drawn at 72°
30’ W. long. south to 36° 33.03’ N. lat.
and east to the eastern edge of the EEZ
and north of the North Carolina/South
Carolina border, not including waters
where inshore gillnet fisheries (i.e.,
Chesapeake Bay, North Carolina, Long
Island Sound inshore gillnet fisheries)
operate in bays, estuaries, and rivers.
This fishery includes any residual large
pelagic driftnet effort in the midAtlantic and any shark and dogfish
gillnet effort in the mid-Atlantic zone
described. The fishing effort is
prosecuted right off the beach (6 ft [1.8
m]) or in nearshore coastal waters to
offshore waters (250 ft [76 m]).
Gear in this fishery is managed by
several Federal FMPs and Interstate
FMPs managed by the Atlantic States
Marine Fisheries Commission (ASMFC).
Fisheries are primarily managed by
TACs; individual trip limits (quotas);
effort caps (limited number of days at
E:\FR\FM\18NOP1.SGM
18NOP1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 221 / Wednesday, November 18, 2009 / Proposed Rules
sea per vessel); time and area closures;
and gear restrictions and modifications.
This fishery is classified as Category
I on the MMPA LOF, which authorizes
NMFS to observe this fishery in state
and federal waters for marine mammal
interactions, and to collect information
on sea turtles should a take occur on an
observed trip. During 2003–2007,
estimated observer coverage year-round
in this fishery was 1%, 2%, 3%, 4%,
and 6%, respectively (NMFS, 2009).
Since 2003, 12 takes (excluding severely
decomposed animals) of loggerhead,
leatherback, green, and Kemp’s ridley
turtles were documented by observers
between May and December. From
1995–2006, the average annual bycatch
estimate of loggerheads in U.S. midAtlantic sink gillnet gear was 350 turtles
(Murray 2009). The mid-Atlantic was
defined in this analysis as west of 70°
W. long. from the shoreline of Cape Cod
southward to the southern limit of the
observer data collection program
(approximately 33° N. lat.), extending
westward to the coastline (Murray,
2009). NMFS proposes to include this
fishery on the 2010 AD to focus observer
coverage during times and in areas
where sea turtles are known to occur.
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with PROPOSALS
Northeast Sink Gillnet Fishery
The Northeast sink gillnet fishery
(estimated ≤6,455 vessels/persons)
targets Atlantic cod, haddock, pollock,
yellowtail flounder, winter flounder,
witch flounder, American plaice,
windowpane flounder, spiny dogfish,
monkfish, silver hake, red hake, white
hake, ocean pout, skate spp, mackerel,
redfish, and shad. This fishery uses sink
gillnet gear, which is anchored gillnet
(bottom-tending net) gear fished in the
lower one-third of the water column.
The dominant material is monofilament
twine with stretched mesh sizes from 6–
12 in (15–30.5 cm) and string lengths
from 600–10,500 ft (183–3,200 m),
depending on the target species. Large
mesh (10–14 in [25–35.6 cm]) sink
gillnets, either tied down or set upright
without floats using a polyfoam core
floatline, are used when targeting
monkfish. The fishery operates from the
U.S.-Canada border to Long Island, NY,
at 72° 30’ W. long. south to 36° 33.03’
N. lat. (corresponding with the Virginia/
North Carolina border) and east to the
eastern edge of the EEZ, including the
Gulf of Maine, Georges Bank, and
Southern New England, and excluding
Long Island Sound or other waters
where gillnet fisheries are classified as
Category III on the MMPA LOF. Fishing
effort occurs year-round, peaking from
May to July primarily on continental
shelf regions in depths from 30–750 ft
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:35 Nov 17, 2009
Jkt 220001
(9–228.6 m), with some nets deeper than
800 ft (244 m).
This fishery is managed by the
Northeast Multispecies (Groundfish)
FMP. This fishery is also managed by
the Atlantic Large Whale Take
Reduction Plan (ALWTRP) and the
Harbor Porpoise Take Reduction Plan
(HPTRP) to reduce the risk of
entanglement of right, humpback, and
fin whales, and harbor porpoises,
respectively. The fishery is primarily
managed through TAC limits;
individual trip limits (quotas); effort
caps (limited number of days at sea per
vessel); time and area closures; and gear
restrictions.
This fishery is classified as Category
I on the MMPA LOF, which authorizes
NMFS to observe this fishery in state
and Federal waters for marine mammal
interactions and to collect information
on sea turtles should a take occur on an
observed trip. During 2003–2007,
estimated observer coverage year-round
in this fishery was 3%, 6%, 7%, 4%,
7%, respectively (NMFS, 2009). Five sea
turtle takes were observed during this
time. NMFS proposes to include this
fishery on the 2010 AD to focus observer
coverage during times and in areas
where sea turtles are known to occur,
particularly in waters off Massachusetts
and waters south of this area.
North Carolina Inshore Gillnet Fishery
The NC inshore gillnet fishery (94
vessels/persons) targets species
including, but not limited to, southern
flounder, weakfish, bluefish, Atlantic
croaker, striped mullet, spotted seatrout,
Spanish mackerel, striped bass, spot,
red drum, black drum, and shad. This
fishery includes any fishing effort using
any type of gillnet gear, including set
(float and sink), drift, and runaround
gillnet for any target species inshore of
the COLREGS lines in North Carolina.
This fishery is managed under state and
ASMFC interstate FMPs, applying net
and mesh size regulations, and seasonal
area closures in the Pamlico Sound
Gillnet Restricted Area (PSGNRA).
Gillnet fisheries operating in inshore
and inland waters of North Carolina are
currently not observed except in a
limited area. An ESA section 10(a)(1)(B)
permit requires monitoring the Pamlico
Sound summer flounder gillnet fishery.
However, extensive gillnet activity
occurs throughout the inshore and
inland waters of North Carolina (e.g.,
Core Sound/Cape Fear area, Roanoke
and Albemarle Sounds); effort in some
areas has never been observed, but other
areas have had limited coverage, which
was authorized under the MMPA (this
fishery is listed as Category II on the
MMPA LOF). Gillnet activity overlaps
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
59515
spatially with areas utilized by sea
turtles, often at relatively high densities.
Additionally, the likelihood of
significant injury or mortality to sea
turtles when taken by this gear is high.
NMFS recently conducted a limited
observer program in the southern
flounder gillnet fishery in Core Sound,
which was previously unobserved.
Several sea turtles (green, Kemp’s
ridley, and loggerhead) were observed
taken in the fishery. Take levels were
highly variable, but generally high, with
many observed trips taking no sea
turtles, and other trips having as many
as five takes. A more extensive, longerterm observer program is needed to
adequately assess the extent and impact
of the all components of the inshore
North Carolina gillnet fishery on sea
turtles. Therefore, NMFS is proposing to
include this fishery on the 2010 AD.
Southeast Atlantic Gillnet Fishery
The Southeast Atlantic gillnet fishery
(779 estimated vessels/persons) targets
finfish including, but not limited to,
king mackerel, Spanish mackerel,
whiting, bluefish, pompano, spot,
croaker, little tunny, bonita, jack
crevalle, cobia, and striped mullet. This
fishery does not include gillnet effort
targeting sharks as part of the
Southeastern U.S. Atlantic shark gillnet
fishery. This fishery uses gillnets set in
sink, stab, set, or strike fashion. The
fishery operates in waters south of a line
extending due east from the North
Carolina-South Carolina border and
south and east of the fishery
management council demarcation line
between the Atlantic Ocean and the
Gulf of Mexico. The majority of fishing
effort occurs in Federal waters since
South Carolina, Georgia, and Florida
prohibit the use of gillnets, with limited
exceptions, in state waters.
Fishing for king mackerel, Spanish
mackerel, cobia, cero, and little tunny in
Federal waters is managed under the
Coastal Migratory Pelagic Resources
FMP. None of the other target species
are Federally-managed under the MSA.
In state waters, state and ASMFC
Interstate FMPs apply.
This fishery is classified as Category
II on the MMPA LOF, which authorizes
NMFS to observe this fishery in state
and federal waters for marine mammal
interactions, and to collect information
on sea turtles should a take occur on an
observed trip. NMFS has previously
observed this fishery at moderate levels,
primarily focused on target catch and
bycatch species other than sea turtles.
NMFS proposes to include this fishery
on the 2010 to focus observer coverage
during times and in areas where sea
turtles are known to occur.
E:\FR\FM\18NOP1.SGM
18NOP1
59516
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 221 / Wednesday, November 18, 2009 / Proposed Rules
Trap/Pot Fisheries
Turtles are known to become
entangled in the end lines (also called
vertical lines) of trap/pot gear and there
have been anecdotal reports that sea
turtles may interact with the trap/pot
itself. Turtles entangled in trap/pot gear
may drown or suffer injuries (and
potential subsequent mortality) due to
constriction by the rope or line. Takes
of both leatherback and hard-shelled sea
turtles have been documented in this
gear type. NMFS Northeast Region
established the Northeast Atlantic Sea
Turtle Disentanglement Network
(STDN) in 2002 to respond to
entanglements in vertical lines
associated with trap/pot gear.
Several states included trap/pot
fisheries in their responses to NMFS’
request for information and
recommendations for the 2010 AD.
Massachusetts listed pots (lobster, fish,
whelk) as a gear type known to interact
with sea turtles. New York
recommended that fish, lobster, and
crab pots be considered. Maryland
ranked the commercial crab pot fishery
that operates April through December as
having a high possibility for interacting
with sea turtles and a greater possibility
for injury compared to other gear types
in Maryland state waters. Maryland also
ranked several other commercial pot
fisheries (e.g., conch and fish) with a
lower potential to interact with sea
turtles. Maryland noted reports of sea
turtles getting their heads caught in the
gear while eating bait out of the trap/
pot. Delaware included conch and blue
crab trap/pot fisheries as having
potential interactions with sea turtles
where effort overlaps with sea turtle
distribution. Both South Carolina and
Florida included trap/pot fisheries in
their recommendations and noted the
potential for using an alternative
platform program to observe this gear
type.
Therefore, NMFS proposes to include
the following four trap/pot fisheries,
focusing on those fisheries or
components of fisheries operating south
of Massachusetts, as sea turtles more
commonly occur in this area, on the
2010 AD.
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with PROPOSALS
Atlantic Blue Crab Trap/Pot Fishery
The Atlantic blue crab trap/pot
fishery (estimated ≤16,000 vessels/
persons) targets blue crab using pots
baited with fish or poultry typically set
in rows in shallow water. The pot
position is marked by either a floating
or sinking buoy line attached to a
surface buoy. The fishery occurs yearround from the south shore of Long
Island at 72 30’ W. long. in the Atlantic
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:35 Nov 17, 2009
Jkt 220001
and east of the fishery management
demarcation line between the Atlantic
Ocean and the Gulf of Mexico (50 CFR
600.105), including state waters. The
fishery is managed under state FMPs.
This fishery is classified as Category
II on the MMPA LOF, which authorizes
NMFS to observe this fishery for marine
mammal interactions, and to collect
information on sea turtles should a take
occur on an observed trip. NMFS has
not observed this fishery, but has
documented 3 sea turtle takes in blue
crab trap/pot gear in Virginia during the
months of May and June. One of the
events involved a leatherback and two
involved loggerheads (STDN,
unpublished data). NMFS proposes to
include this fishery on the 2010 AD to
target observer coverage more
specifically to obtain information on sea
turtle bycatch and how sea turtles may
be interacting with trap/pot gear.
Atlantic Mixed Species Trap/Pot Fishery
The Atlantic mixed species trap/pot
fishery (unknown number of vessels/
persons) targets species including, but
not limited to, hagfish, shrimp, conch/
whelk, red crab, Jonah crab, rock crab,
black sea bass, scup, tautog, cod,
haddock, pollock, redfish (ocean perch),
white hake, spot, skate, catfish, and
stone crab. This fishery as defined on
the MMPA LOF also includes American
eel as a target species; however, there is
also a Category III American eel trap/pot
fishery listed on the LOF. Therefore,
NMFS does not consider American eel
to be a target species in the Atlantic
mixed species trap/pot fishery and will
correct this oversight in a future LOF.
The fishery includes all trap/pot
operations from the Maine-Canada
border south through the waters east of
the fishery management demarcation
line between the Atlantic Ocean and the
Gulf of Mexico (50 CFR 600.105), but
does not include the following trap/pot
fisheries (as defined on the MMPA
LOF): Northeast/Mid-Atlantic American
lobster trap/pot; Atlantic blue crab trap/
pot; Florida spiny lobster trap/pot;
Southeastern U.S. Atlantic, Gulf of
Mexico stone crab trap/pot; U.S. MidAtlantic eel trap/pot fisheries; and the
Southeastern U.S. Atlantic, Gulf of
Mexico golden crab fishery (68 FR 1421,
January 10, 2003). The fishery is
managed under various Interstate and
Federal FMPs.
This fishery is classified as Category
II on the MMPA LOF, which authorizes
NMFS to observe this fishery in state
and Federal waters for marine mammal
interactions, and to collect information
on sea turtles should a take occur on an
observed trip. NMFS has previously
observed this fishery at extremely low
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
levels; no sea turtle takes have been
documented by fishery observers.
However, the NMFS STDN has
documented 9 leatherback
entanglements in trap/pot gear targeting
sea bass in Massachusetts during the
month of August from 2003 to 2008
(STDN, unpublished data). From 2003–
2008, the STDN documented 1 green, 4
loggerhead, and 8 leatherback turtle
takes in trap/pot gear targeting whelk in
MA, VA, and NJ during May, June, July,
August, and October.
NMFS is proposing to include this
fishery in the 2010 AD to target observer
coverage more specifically to obtain
information on sea turtle interactions
and how sea turtles may be interacting
with trap/pot gear, particularly in
waters off of Massachusetts and waters
south of this area, as sea turtles more
commonly occur in these areas.
Northeast/Mid-Atlantic American
Lobster Trap/Pot Fishery
The Northeast/Mid-Atlantic American
lobster trap/pot fishery (estimated
13,000 vessels/persons) targets
American lobster primarily with traps,
while 2–3 percent of the target species
is taken by mobile gear (trawls and
dredges). The fishery operates in
inshore and offshore waters from Maine
to New Jersey and may extend as far
south as Cape Hatteras, NC.
Approximately 80 percent of American
lobster is harvested from state waters;
therefore, the ASMFC has the primary
regulatory role. The fishery is managed
in state waters under the ASMFC
Interstate FMP and in Federal waters
under the Atlantic Coastal Fisheries
Cooperative Management Act.
This fishery is classified as Category
I on the MMPA LOF, which authorizes
NMFS to observe this fishery in state
and Federal waters for marine mammal
interactions, and to collect information
on sea turtles should a take occur on an
observed trip. NMFS has previously
observed this fishery at extremely low
levels; no sea turtle takes have been
observed. However, NMFS STDN has
documented 27 leatherback turtle
entanglements in this fishery operating
in ME, MA, and RI. These
entanglements have occurred between
June and October (STDN, unpublished
data).
NMFS is proposing to include this
fishery in the 2010 AD to target observer
coverage more specifically to obtain
information on sea turtle bycatch and
how sea turtles may be interacting with
trap/pot gear, particularly in waters off
of Massachusetts and waters south of
this area, as sea turtles more commonly
occur in these areas.
E:\FR\FM\18NOP1.SGM
18NOP1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 221 / Wednesday, November 18, 2009 / Proposed Rules
Pound Net/Weir/Seine Fisheries
Pound net, weir, and seine fisheries
may use mesh similar to that used in
gillnets, but the gear is prosecuted
differently from traditional gillnets. For
example, pound net leaders have a mesh
component similar to a gillnet; sea
turtles have been documented entangled
in pound net leaders. Pound net leaders
in the Virginia portion of the
Chesapeake Bay are subject to
requirements designed to reduce sea
turtle bycatch. Purse seines and weirs
also have the potential to entangle and
drown sea turtles.
Several states included pound net/
weir/seine fisheries in their responses to
NMFS’ request for information and
recommendations for the 2010 AD.
Massachusetts listed pound nets/weirs
as a gear type known to interact with sea
turtles. Maryland noted that sea turtles
have been documented alive and
uninjured in the pounds, but none have
been documented in pound net leaders.
Virginia recognized both historical
observations of interactions in this
fishery as well as current regulations in
the fishery (69 FR 24997, May 5, 2004;
71 FR 36024, June 23, 2006). North
Carolina noted pound nets operating in
estuarine waters in their
recommendations.
Therefore, based on the information
provided by states and the best available
scientific information, NMFS proposes
to include the following four pound net/
weir/seine fisheries on the 2010 AD.
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with PROPOSALS
Mid-Atlantic Haul/Beach Seine Fishery
The Mid-Atlantic haul/beach seine
fishery (estimated ≤221 vessels/persons)
targets striped bass, mullet, spot,
weakfish, sea trout, bluefish, kingfish,
and harvest fish using seines with one
end secured (e.g., swipe nets and long
seines) and seines secured at both ends
or those anchored to the beach and
hauled up on the beach. The beach
seine system also uses a bunt and a
wash net that are attached to the beach
and extend into the surf. The beach
seines soak for less than 2 hours. The
fishery occurs in waters west of 72° 30’
W. long. and north of a line extending
due east from the North Carolina-South
Carolina border. Fishing on the Outer
Banks, NC, occurs primarily in the
spring (April to June) and fall (October
to December). In the Chesapeake Bay,
this gear has been historically fished in
the southwest portion of the Bay with
some effort in the northwest portion.
Effort begins to increase in early May,
peaks in early/mid-June, and continues
into July. During this time, based on
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:35 Nov 17, 2009
Jkt 220001
historical data from Virginia,
approximately 100 haul seine trips
occur.
The fishery is managed under the
Interstate FMPs for Bluefish and for
Atlantic Striped Bass of the Atlantic
Coast from Maine through North
Carolina, and is subject to Bottlenose
Dolphin Take Reduction Plan
implementing regulations.
This fishery is classified as Category
II on the MMPA LOF, which authorizes
NMFS to observe this fishery for marine
mammal interactions, and to collect
information on sea turtles should a take
occur on an observed trip. NMFS has
previously observed this fishery at low
levels; no sea turtle takes have been
observed. NMFS proposes to include
this fishery on the 2010 AD based on
suspected interactions with sea turtles
given the nature of the gear and fishing
methodology in addition to effort
overlapping with sea turtle distribution.
In the Chesapeake Bay, the fishery
operates at the same time as historically
elevated sea turtle strandings.
Mid-Atlantic Menhaden Purse Seine
Fishery
The Mid-Atlantic menhaden purse
seine fishery (22 estimated vessels/
persons) targets menhaden and thread
herring using purse seine gear. Most sets
occur within 3 mi (4.8 km) of shore with
the majority of the effort occurring off
North Carolina from November to
January, and moving northward during
warmer months to southern New
England. The fishery is managed under
the Interstate FMP for Atlantic
Menhaden. In the Chesapeake Bay, this
fishery operates to a limited extent
during a period of high sea turtle
strandings (May and June).
This fishery is classified as Category
II on the MMPA LOF, which authorizes
NMFS to observe this fishery for marine
mammal interactions, and to collect
information on sea turtles should a take
occur on an observed trip. NMFS
recently began observing the fishery at
low levels. NMFS proposes to include
this fishery on the 2010 AD to focus
observer coverage in times and areas of
sea turtle distribution and learn more
about the interactions between this
fishery and sea turtles.
Virginia Pound Net Fishery
The Virginia pound net fishery
(estimated 41 vessels/persons) targets
species including, but not limited to,
croaker, menhaden, mackerel, weakfish,
and spot, using stationary gear in
nearshore Virginia waters, primarily in
the Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries.
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
59517
Pound net gear includes a leader posted
perpendicular to the shoreline and
extending outward to the ‘‘heart,’’
which funnels the fish into the pound,
where the catch accumulates. This
fishery includes all pound net effort in
Virginia State waters, including waters
inside the Chesapeake Bay. The fishery
is managed under Interstate FMPs for
Atlantic Croaker and Spot.
The Virginia pound net fishery is
currently classified as Category II on the
MMPA LOF, which authorizes NMFS to
observe this fishery for marine mammal
interactions, and to collect information
on sea turtles should a take occur on an
observed trip. Loggerhead, Kemp’s
ridley, leatherback, and green turtles
have been observed taken in this
fishery. Between 2002 and 2004,
approximately 2,650 surveys of leaders
were completed in the Virginia pound
net fishery; 27 takes of sea turtles were
recorded during the survey.
NMFS currently requires the use of a
modified pound net leader in certain
areas of the VA Chesapeake Bay to
reduce entanglements of sea turtles in
this gear type (71 FR 36024, June 23,
2006). This fishery operates at the same
time as historically elevated sea turtle
strandings. NMFS proposes to include
this fishery on the 2010 AD to assess
interactions between pound net gear
and sea turtles and to evaluate the
effectiveness of the modified gear.
Because some vessels in this fishery
may be too small to carry observers,
NMFS would consider observing the
fishery using both traditional methods
as well as an alternative platform.
U.S. Mid-Atlantic Mixed Species Stop
Seine/Weir/Pound Net (except the NC
roe mullet stop net) Fishery
The Mid-Atlantic mixed species stop
seine/weir/pound net fishery (estimated
751 vessels/persons) targets several
species, including, but not limited to,
weakfish, striped bass, shark, catfish,
menhaden, flounder, gizzard shad, and
white perch. The fishery uses fixed or
staked net gear (pound net, weir, staked
trap) from Nantucket Sound to
Chesapeake Bay (60 FR 31681, June 16,
1995); the Virginia pound net and the
NC roe mullet stop net fisheries are not
included as part of this fishery.
This fishery is classified as Category
III on the MMPA LOF and has never
been observed. However, sea turtle takes
have been documented in pound net
gear in NY, MD, VA, and NC by NMFS,
STSSN, and other researchers. NMFS
proposes to include this fishery on the
2010 to better understand the nature
E:\FR\FM\18NOP1.SGM
18NOP1
59518
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 221 / Wednesday, November 18, 2009 / Proposed Rules
and extent of these interactions in the
mid-Atlantic.
Table 1 – State and Federal Commercial
Fisheries included on the 2010 Annual
Determination
Fishery
Years Eligible to Carry Observers
Trawl Fisheries
Atlantic shellfish bottom trawl
Mid-Atlantic bottom trawl
Mid-Atlantic mid-water trawl (including pair trawl)
Southeastern U.S. Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico shrimp trawl
Gillnet Fisheries
CA halibut, white seabass and other species set gillnet (>3.5 in mesh)
CA yellowtail, barracuda, and white seabass drift gillnet (mesh size >3.5 in. and <14 in.)
Chesapeake Bay inshore gillnet
Long Island inshore gillnet
Mid-Atlantic gillnet
North Carolina inshore gillnet
Northeast sink gillnet
Southeast Atlantic gillnet
Trap/pot Fisheries
Atlantic blue crab trap/pot
Atlantic mixed species trap/pot
Northeast/mid-Atlantic American lobster trap/pot
Pound Net/Weir/Seine Fisheries
Mid-Atlantic haul/beach seine
Mid-Atlantic menhaden purse seine
U.S. mid-Atlantic mixed species stop seine/weir/pound net (except the NC roe mullet stop net)
Virginia pound net
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with PROPOSALS
Classification
The Chief Counsel for Regulation of
the Department of Commerce certified
to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the
Small Business Administration that this
rule would not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. The factual
basis leading to the certification is set
forth below.
NMFS has estimated that
approximately 65,940 vessels
participating in 19 fisheries listed in
Table 1 would be eligible to carry an
observer if requested. However, NMFS
would only request a fraction of the
total number of participants to carry an
observer based on the sampling protocol
identified for each fishery by regional
observer programs. As noted throughout
this proposed rule, NMFS would select
vessels and focus coverage in times and
areas where fishing effort overlaps with
sea turtle distribution. Due to the
unpredictability of fishing effort, NMFS
cannot determine the specific number of
vessels that would be requested to carry
an observer.
If a vessel is requested to carry an
observer, fishers will not incur any
direct economic costs associated with
carrying that observer. Potential indirect
costs to individual fishers required to
take observers may include: lost space
on deck for catch, lost bunk space, and
lost fishing time due to time needed to
process bycatch data. For effective
monitoring, however, observers will
rotate among a limited number of
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:35 Nov 17, 2009
Jkt 220001
vessels in a fishery at any given time
and each vessel within an observed
fishery has an equal probability of being
requested to accommodate an observer.
Therefore, the potential indirect costs to
individual fishers are expected to be
minimal because observer coverage
would only be required for a small
percentage of an individual’s total
annual fishing time. In addition, 50 CFR
222.404(b) states that an observer will
not be placed on a vessel if the facilities
for quartering an observer or performing
observer functions are inadequate or
unsafe, thereby exempting vessels too
small to accommodate an observer from
this requirement. As a result of this
certification, an initial regulatory
flexibility analysis is not required and
was not prepared.
This proposed rule would amend an
existing collection-of-information that
was approved by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) under
OMB control number 0648–0593. This
requirement will be submitted to OMB
for approval. This proposed rule would
add an estimated 853 participants and
an estimated maximum 60 burden hours
to the associated information collection.
Public comment is sought regarding:
whether this proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether the
information shall have practical utility;
the accuracy of the burden estimate;
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and ways to minimize the
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
2010–2014
2010–2014
2010–2014
2010–2014
2010–2014
2010–2014
2010–2014
2010–2014
2010–2014
2010–2014
2010–2014
2010–2014
2010–2014
2010–2014
2010–2014
2010–2014
2010–2014
2010–2014
2010–2014
burden of the collection of information,
including through the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology. Send comments
on these or any other aspects of the
collection of information to (enter office
name) at the ADDRESSES above, and email to David_Rostker@omb.eop.gov, or
fax to (202) 395–7285.
Notwithstanding any other provision
of the law, no person is required to
respond to, nor shall any person be
subject to a penalty for failure to comply
with, a collection of information subject
to the requirements of the Paperwork
Reduction Act, unless that collection of
information displays a currently valid
OMB Control Number.
This proposed rule has been
determined to be not significant for the
purposes of Executive Order 12866.
An environmental assessment (EA)
was prepared under the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) for
regulations to implement this observer
requirement in 50 CFR part 222, subpart
D. The EA concluded that implementing
these regulations would not have a
significant impact on the human
environment. This proposed rule would
not make any significant change in the
management of fisheries included on
the AD, and therefore, this proposed
rule would not change the analysis or
conclusion of the EA. If NMFS takes a
management action, for example,
requiring fishing gear modifications
such as TEDs, NMFS would first
prepare an environmental document as
E:\FR\FM\18NOP1.SGM
18NOP1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 221 / Wednesday, November 18, 2009 / Proposed Rules
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with PROPOSALS
required under NEPA and specific to
that action.
This proposed rule would not affect
species listed as threatened or
endangered under the Endangered
Species Act (ESA) or their associated
critical habitat. The impacts of
numerous fisheries have been analyzed
in various biological opinions, and this
proposed rule would not affect the
conclusions of those opinions. The
inclusion of fisheries on the AD is not
considered to be a management action
that would adversely affect threatened
or endangered species. If NMFS takes a
management action, for example,
requiring modifications to fishing gear
and/or practices, NMFS would review
the action for potential adverse affects to
listed species under the ESA.
This proposed rule would have no
adverse impacts on sea turtles and may
have a positive impact on sea turtles by
improving knowledge of sea turtles and
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:35 Nov 17, 2009
Jkt 220001
the fisheries interacting with sea turtles
through information collected from
observer programs.
This proposed rule would not affect
the land or water uses or natural
resources of the coastal zone, as
specified under section 307 of the
Coastal Zone Management Act.
Literature Cited
Lutcavage, M. E. and P.L. Lutz. 1997.
Diving Physiology. In: P.L. Lutz and J.
Musick (eds.) The Biology of Sea
Turtles. ERC Press, Boca Raton, F.L. 432
pp.
Murray K.T. 2008. Estimated average
annual bycatch of loggerhead sea turtles
(Caretta caretta) in U.S. Mid-Atlantic
bottom otter trawl gear, 1996–2004
(Second Edition). US Dept Commer,
Northeast Fish Sci Cent Ref Doc. 08–20;
32 p.
Murray K.T. 2007. Estimated bycatch
of loggerhead sea turtles (Caretta
caretta) in U.S. Mid-Atlantic scallop
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
59519
trawl gear, 2004–2005, and in sea
scallop dredge gear, 2005. U.S. Dep.
Commer., Northeast Fish. Sci. Cent. Ref.
Doc. 07–04; 30 p. Available from:
National Marine Fisheries Service, 166
Water Street, Woods Hole, MA 02543–
1026.
Murray, K.T. 2009. Characteristics
and magnitude of sea turtle bycatch in
US mid-Atlantic gillnet gear.
Endangered Species Research 8:211–
224.
National Marine Fisheries Service.
2009. Draft 2009 Marine Mammal Stock
Assessment Reports for the Atlantic
Ocean and Gulf of Mexico. https://
www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/pdfs/sars/
ao2009_draft_appendices.pdf
Dated: November 13, 2009.
Janes W. Balsiger,
Acting Assistant Administrator for Fisheries,
National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. E9–27674 Filed 11–16–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–S
E:\FR\FM\18NOP1.SGM
18NOP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 221 (Wednesday, November 18, 2009)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 59508-59519]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-27674]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Part 222
[Docket No. 0906181067-91356-01]
RIN 0648-XP96
2010 Annual Determination for Sea Turtle Observer Requirement
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) publishes its
proposed Annual Determination (AD) for 2010, pursuant to its authority
under the Endangered Species Act (ESA). Through this proposed AD, NMFS
would identify commercial fisheries operating in state and Federal
waters in the Atlantic Ocean, Gulf of Mexico, and Pacific Ocean that
would be required to take observers upon NMFS' request. The purpose of
observing identified fisheries is to learn more about sea turtle
interactions in a given fishery, evaluate existing measures to reduce
or prevent sea turtle takes, and to determine whether additional
measures to address prohibited sea turtle takes may be necessary.
Fisheries identified through this process would remain on the AD, and
therefore required to carry observers upon NMFS' request, for 5 years.
DATES: Comments must be received by December 18, 2009.
ADDRESSES: Send comments on the proposed rule by any one of the
following methods.
(1) Electronic Submissions: Submit all electronic comments through
the Federal eRulemaking portal: https://www.regulations.gov (follow
instructions for submitting comments).
(2) Facsimile: (301) 713-0376, Attention: 2010 Sea Turtle Annual
Determination.
(3) Mail: Chief, Marine Mammal and Sea Turtle Conservation
Division, Office of Protected Resources, NMFS, 1315 East-West Highway,
Silver Spring, MD 20910.
Instructions: All comments received are a part of the public record
and will generally be posted to https://www.regulations.gov without
change. All personal identifying information (for example, name,
address, etc.) voluntarily submitted by the commenter may be publicly
accessible. Do not submit confidential business information or
otherwise sensitive or protected information. NMFS will accept
anonymous comments (enter ``N/A'' in the required fields, if you wish
to remain anonymous). Attachments to electronic comments will be
accepted in Microsoft Word, Excel, WordPerfect, or Adobe PDF file
formats only.
Send comments on the information collection requirements or any
other aspects of the collection of information to the Chief of the
Marine Mammal and Sea Turtle Conservation Division, Office of Protected
Resources, at the ADDRESSES above, and e-mail to David_Rostker@omb.eop.gov, or fax to (202) 395-7285.
See SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION for a listing of all Regional
Offices.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kristy Long, Office of Protected
Resources, 301-713-2322; Ellen Keane, Northeast Region, 978-282-8476;
Dennis Klemm, Southeast Region, 727-824-5312; Elizabeth Petras,
Southwest
[[Page 59509]]
Region, 562-980-3238; Kim Maison, Pacific Islands Region, 808-944-2257.
Individuals who use a telecommunications device for the hearing
impaired may call the Federal Information Relay Service at 1-800-877-
8339 between 8 a.m. and 4 p.m. Eastern time, Monday through Friday,
excluding Federal holidays.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Availability of Published Materials
Information regarding the Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA) List
of Fisheries (LOF) may be obtained at https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/interactions/lof/ and information regarding Marine Mammal Stock
Assessment Reports may be obtained at https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/sars/
or from any NMFS Regional Office at the addresses listed below:
NMFS, Northeast Region, 55 Great Republic Drive, Gloucester, MA
01930-2298;
NMFS, Southeast Region, 263 13th Avenue South, St. Petersburg, FL
33701;
NMFS, Southwest Region, 501 W. Ocean Blvd., Suite 4200, Long Beach,
CA 90802-4213; or
NMFS, Pacific Islands Region, Protected Resources, 1601 Kapiolani
Boulevard, Suite 1100, Honolulu, HI 96814-4700.
Purpose of the Sea Turtle Observer Requirement
Under the ESA, 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq., NMFS has the responsibility
to implement programs to conserve marine life listed as endangered or
threatened. All sea turtles found in U.S. waters are listed as either
endangered or threatened under the ESA. Kemp's ridley (Lepidochelys
kempii), leatherback (Dermochelys coriacea), and hawksbill
(Eretmochelys imbricata) sea turtles are listed as endangered.
Loggerhead (Caretta caretta), green (Chelonia mydas), and olive ridley
(Lepidochelys olivacea) sea turtles are listed as threatened, except
for breeding colony populations of green turtles in Florida and on the
Pacific coast of Mexico and breeding colony populations of olive
ridleys on the Pacific coast of Mexico, which are listed as endangered.
Due to the inability to distinguish between populations of green
turtles away from the nesting beach, NMFS considers green turtles
endangered wherever they occur in U.S. waters. While some sea turtle
populations have shown signs of recovery, many populations continue to
decline.
Incidental take, or bycatch, in fishing gear is one of the main
sources of sea turtle injury and mortality nationwide. Section 9 of the
ESA prohibits the take (including harassing, harming, pursuing,
hunting, shooting, wounding, killing, trapping, capturing, or
collecting or attempting to engage in any such conduct), including
incidental take, of endangered sea turtles. Pursuant to section 4(d) of
the ESA, NMFS has issued regulations extending the prohibition of take,
with exceptions, to threatened sea turtles (50 CFR 223.205 and
223.206). Section 11 of the ESA authorizes the issuance of regulations
to enforce the take prohibitions. NMFS may grant exceptions to the take
prohibitions with an incidental take statement or an incidental take
permit issued pursuant to ESA section 7 or 10, respectively. To do so,
NMFS must determine that the activity that will result in incidental
take is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of the
affected listed species. In some cases, NMFS has been able to make this
determination because the fishery is conducted with modified gear or
modified fishing practices that NMFS has been able to evaluate.
However, for some Federal fisheries and most state fisheries, NMFS has
not granted an exception primarily because we lack information about
fishery-turtle interactions. Therefore, any incidental take of sea
turtles in those fisheries is unlawful as it has not been exempted from
the ESA prohibition on take.
The most effective way for NMFS to learn more about sea turtle-
fishery interactions in order to minimize or prevent take is to place
observers aboard fishing vessels. In 2007, NMFS issued a regulation (50
CFR 222.402) to establish procedures through which each year NMFS will
identify, pursuant to specified criteria and after notice and
opportunity for comment, those fisheries in which the agency intends to
place observers (72 FR 43176, August 3, 2007). These regulations
specify that NMFS may place observers on U.S. fishing vessels, either
recreational or commercial, operating in U.S. territorial waters, the
U.S. exclusive economic zone (EEZ), or on the high seas, or on vessels
that are otherwise subject to the jurisdiction of the U.S.
NMFS and/or interested cooperating entities will pay the direct
costs for vessels to carry observers. These include observer salary and
insurance costs. NMFS may also evaluate other potential direct costs,
should they arise. Once selected, a fishery will be eligible to be
observed for five years without further action by NMFS. This will
enable NMFS to develop an appropriate sampling protocol to investigate
whether, how, when, where, and under what conditions incidental takes
are occurring; to evaluate whether existing measures are minimizing or
preventing takes; and to determine whether additional measures are
needed to implement ESA take prohibitions and conserve turtles.
Process for Developing an Annual Determination
Pursuant to 50 CFR 222.402, the Assistant Administrator for
Fisheries, NOAA (AA), in consultation with Regional Administrators and
Fisheries Science Center Directors, develops a proposed annual
determination identifying which fisheries are required to carry
observers, if requested, to monitor potential interactions with sea
turtles. NMFS provides an opportunity for public comment on any
proposed determination. The determination is based on the best
available scientific, commercial, or other information regarding sea
turtle-fishery interactions; sea turtle distribution; sea turtle
strandings; fishing techniques, gears used, target species, seasons and
areas fished; or qualitative data from logbooks or fisher reports.
Specifically, this determination is based on the extent to which:
(1) The fishery operates in the same waters and at the same time as
sea turtles are present;
(2) The fishery operates at the same time or prior to elevated sea
turtle strandings; or
(3) The fishery uses a gear or technique that is known or likely to
result in incidental take of sea turtles based on documented or
reported takes in the same or similar fisheries; and
(4) NMFS intends to monitor the fishery and anticipates that it
will have the funds to do so.
The AA uses the most recent version of the annually published MMPA
List of Fisheries (LOF) as the comprehensive list of commercial
fisheries for consideration. The LOF includes all known state and
Federal commercial fisheries that occur in U.S. waters. The
classification scheme used for fisheries on the LOF would not be
relevant to this process. Unlike the LOF process, an annual
determination may also include recreational fisheries likely to
interact with sea turtles on the basis of the best available
information.
NMFS consulted with appropriate state and Federal fisheries
officials and other entities to identify which fisheries, both
commercial and recreational, should be considered in the annual
determination. Although the comments and recommendations provided to
NMFS by states were based upon the best available information on their
fisheries, NMFS received more
[[Page 59510]]
recommendations for fisheries to include on the 2010 AD than is
feasible to propose at this time based on the four previously noted
criteria (50 CFR 222.402(a)).
The AD is not an exhaustive or comprehensive list of all fisheries
with documented or suspected takes of sea turtles; there are additional
fisheries that NMFS remains concerned about. For these additional
fisheries, NMFS may already be addressing incidental take through
another mechanism (e.g., rulemaking to implement modifications to
fishing gear and/or practices) or will consider adding them to future
annual determinations based on the four previously noted criteria (50
CFR 222.402(a)).
Notice of the final determination will be published in the Federal
Register and made in writing to individuals permitted for each fishery
identified for monitoring. NMFS will also notify state agencies and
provide notification through publication in local newspapers, radio
broadcasts, and other means, as appropriate. Once included in the final
determination, a fishery will remain eligible for observer coverage for
five years to enable the design of an appropriate sampling program and
to ensure collection of sufficient scientific data for analysis. If
NMFS determines that more than five years are needed to obtain
sufficient scientific data, NMFS will include the fishery in the
proposed AD again prior to the end of the fifth year. As part of the
2010 AD, NMFS has included, to the extent practicable, information on
the fisheries or gear types to be sampled, geographic and seasonal
scope of coverage, and any other relevant information. After
publication of a final AD, a 30-day delay in effective date for
implementing observer coverage will follow, except for those fisheries
where the AA has determined that there is good cause pursuant to the
Administrative Procedure Act to make the rule effective without a 30-
day delay.
Implementation of Observer Coverage in a Fishery Listed on the 2010
Annual Determination
The design of any observer program for fisheries identified through
the AD process, including how observers would be allocated to
individual vessels, would vary among fisheries, fishing sectors, gear
types, and geographic regions and would ultimately be determined by the
individual NMFS Regional Office, Science Center, and/or observer
program. During the program design, NMFS would be guided by the
following standards for distributing and placing observers among
fisheries identified in the AD and vessels in those particular
fisheries:
(1) The requirements to obtain the best available scientific
information;
(2) The requirement that observers be assigned fairly and equitably
among fisheries and among vessels in a fishery;
(3) The requirement that no individual person or vessel, or group
of persons or vessels, be subject to inappropriate, excessive observer
coverage; and
(4) The need to minimize costs and avoid duplication, where
practicable.
Vessels where the facilities for accommodating an observer or
carrying out observer functions are so inadequate or unsafe (due to
size or quality of equipment, for example) that the health or safety of
the observer or the safe operation of the vessel would be jeopardized,
would not be required to take observers under this proposed rule.
Nonetheless, per Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management
Act (MSA) regulations for observers (50 CFR 600.746), a vessel that
would otherwise be required to carry an observer, but is inadequate or
unsafe for purposes of carrying an observer and for allowing operation
of normal observer functions, is prohibited from fishing without
observer coverage. However, observation techniques using alternative
platforms apart from the fishing vessel, but still requiring the
cooperation of fishermen, may be employed in such instances as
appropriate. Failure to comply with the requirements under this rule
may result in civil or criminal penalties under the ESA.
Observer programs designed or carried out in accordance with 50 CFR
222.404 would be required to be consistent with existing observer-
related NOAA policies and regulations, such as those under the Fair
Labor and Standards Act (29 U.S.C. 201 et seq.), the Service Contract
Act (41 U.S.C. 351 et seq.), Observer Health and Safety regulations (50
CFR 600), and other relevant policies.
Fisheries not included on the 2010 AD may still be observed under a
different authority than the ESA (e.g., MMPA, MSA).
Additional information on observer programs in commercial fisheries
can be found on the NMFS National Observer Program's website: https://www.st.nmfs.gov/st4/nop/; links to individual regional observer
programs may also be found on this website.
Sea Turtle Distribution
Atlantic Ocean and Gulf of Mexico
Sea turtle species found in waters of the Atlantic Ocean and Gulf
of Mexico include green, hawksbill, Kemp's ridley, leatherback, and
loggerhead turtles. The waters off the U.S. East Coast represent
important residential, migrating, and foraging habitat for several of
these species. Further, the Southeastern U.S. is a major sea turtle
nesting area for loggerheads and, to a lesser extent, green and
leatherback turtles.
Four species, green, Kemp's ridley, leatherback, and loggerhead
turtles, occur seasonally in southern New England and mid-Atlantic
continental shelf waters north of Cape Hatteras, North Carolina. The
occurrence of these species in these waters is temperature dependent.
In general, turtles move up the coast from southern wintering areas as
water temperatures warm in the spring. The trend is reversed in the
fall as water temperatures decrease. By December, turtles have passed
Cape Hatteras, returning to more southern waters for the winter. Hard-
shelled species are typically observed as far north as Cape Cod,
Massachusetts, whereas more cold-tolerant leatherbacks are observed
farther north in northern Gulf of Maine waters in the summer and fall.
Green turtles are found in inshore and nearshore waters from Texas
to Massachusetts, the U.S. Virgin Islands, and Puerto Rico. While
foraging and developmental habitats also occur in the wider Caribbean,
important feeding areas in Florida include the Indian River Lagoon, the
Florida Keys, Florida Bay, Homosassa, Crystal River, Cedar Key, and St.
Joseph Bay. The bays and sounds of North Carolina also provide
important foraging habitat for green turtles, which can occur in those
areas in relatively high densities.
In the Atlantic, hawksbills are most common in Puerto Rico and its
associated islands and in the U.S. Virgin Islands. In the continental
U.S., the species is recorded from all the Gulf States and along the
east coast as far north as Massachusetts, but sightings north of
Florida are rare. Hawksbills are observed in Florida on the reefs off
Palm Beach, Broward, Miami-Dade, and Monroe Counties. Texas is the only
other U.S. state where hawksbills are sighted with any regularity.
Kemp's ridleys are distributed throughout waters of the Gulf of
Mexico and U.S. Atlantic coast, from Florida to New England. The major
nesting area for Kemp's ridleys is in Tamaulipas, Mexico, but some
nesting also occurs along the Texas coast.
The second largest nesting aggregation of loggerheads in the world
occurs in the southeastern U.S. Loggerheads occur throughout the
Atlantic and Gulf of
[[Page 59511]]
Mexico, spending significant time in coastal areas.
Adult leatherbacks are capable of tolerating a wide range of water
temperatures, and have been sighted along the entire continental coast
of the United States as far north as the Gulf of Maine and south to
Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands, and into the Gulf of Mexico. The
central east coast of Florida represents a small, but growing, nesting
area for leatherbacks in the western North Atlantic.
U.S. Pacific Ocean
Leatherback sea turtles are found consistently off the U.S. west
coast, usually north of Point Conception, California. Green turtles,
loggerhead, and olive ridley sea turtles are rarely observed in the
west coast EEZ, but records show that all species have stranded in
California and the Pacific Northwest. Leatherbacks are known to migrate
to central and northern California from their natal beaches in the
Western Pacific to feed on jellyfish. During aerial surveys conducted
since the early 1990s, leatherbacks were most often spotted off Point
Reyes, south of Point Arena, in the Gulf of the Farallons, and in
Monterey Bay. Leatherback turtles usually appear in Monterey Bay and
California coastal waters during August and September and move offshore
in October and November. Other observed areas of summer leatherback
concentration include northern California and the waters off Washington
through northern Oregon, offshore from the Columbia River plume.
Green, loggerhead, and olive ridley sea turtles are generally found
in waters temperatures above 18 C, which is warmer than the waters off
most of California, Oregon, and Washington. Two small populations of
green turtles occur in the southern California Bight utilizing the warm
water outflows from power plants in San Diego Bay and Alamitos Bay in
Long Beach, California. In the eastern Pacific, loggerheads have been
reported as far north as Alaska, and as far south as Chile. Occasional
sightings are reported from the coasts of Washington and Oregon, but
most records are of juveniles off the coast of California. Based upon
limited observer records, loggerheads travel into the southern
California Bight during El Nino events (or warm water conditions
similar to an El Nino). The majority of fishery interactions with
loggerheads during El Nino conditions have occurred during the summer.
Olive ridleys have been recorded stranded all along the U.S. west
coast. Olive ridleys are believed to use warm water currents along the
west coast for foraging. The general distribution of olive ridleys
along the U.S. west coast is unknown at this time.
Sea turtles occur throughout the Pacific Islands Region including
the State of Hawaii and the U.S. territories of Guam, American Samoa,
and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands (CNMI). Green and
hawksbill turtles are most common in nearshore waters while
leatherbacks, loggerheads, and olive ridleys occur in offshore pelagic
waters. Stock structure and population dynamics for some species in
this region are poorly understood.
Sea Turtle Strandings
NMFS reviewed data collected by the Sea Turtle Stranding and
Salvage Network (STSSN) between 2003 and 2007 to identify stranding
trends and inform development of this proposed rule. Cold stunned,
captive-reared, and post-hatchling turtles were not included in the
data reviewed.
Between 2003 and 2007, the STSSN along the U.S. Atlantic and Gulf
coasts collectively documented strandings of six species: loggerhead,
Kemp's ridley, green, leatherback, hawksbill, and olive ridley turtles,
with loggerheads consistently representing the highest number of
strandings. For the purposes of this review, the U.S. Atlantic and Gulf
of Mexico coastline is divided into three regions: (1) Gulf, including
all Gulf of Mexico waters from TX through the FL gulf coast, (2)
Southeast Atlantic, including U.S. Atlantic waters from FL east coast
through NC, and (3) Northeast Atlantic, including all U.S. Atlantic
waters from VA through ME. Of the three regions, the Southeast Atlantic
consistently records the highest level of strandings during any given
month, each year. In each region, as well as collectively, loggerhead
sea turtles represent the highest number of annual strandings, followed
by Kemp's ridley and leatherback turtles in the Atlantic and green
turtles in the Gulf.
Based on the data reviewed, strandings have occurred in each month
of the year, in all three regions; however, distinct trends are notable
within each region. In the Gulf and Southeast Atlantic regions,
strandings consistently occur in every month of the year. In the Gulf
region, the highest concentration of strandings occurs from March to
August, with a notable peak in April and May. In the Southeast Atlantic
region, the highest concentration of strandings occurs from March to
November, with a notable peak in May and June. In the Northeast
Atlantic region, strandings predominately occur between May and
November of each year, with the highest concentration of strandings
between June and September; strandings are not regularly observed in
the winter and early spring.
On the U.S. West Coast, strandings are infrequent compared to the
Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico coasts predominantly due to oceanographic
features (e.g., currents) and species abundance and distribution.
Between 2003 and 2007, the STSSN in California documented strandings of
three species: green, leatherback, and olive ridley turtles. Green
turtles represent the highest number of strandings. Strandings were
documented in all months except April; data indicate a peak in
strandings between July and October.
In Oregon and Washington, very few strandings were recorded between
2003 and 2007. Green, loggerhead, and olive ridley turtle strandings
were recorded from December to March, with no strandings documented
from April through November. Prior to 2003, stranded leatherback
turtles were recorded in Oregon and Washington.
In the Pacific Islands region, strandings occur throughout the
year, primarily green turtles and secondarily hawksbills in Hawaii,
Guam, American Samoa, and CNMI.
Addition of Fisheries on the 2010 Annual Determination
NMFS is proposing to include 19 fisheries (17 in the Atlantic Ocean
and Gulf of Mexico and 2 in the Pacific Ocean) on the 2010 AD. These 19
fisheries, described below and listed in Table 1, represent several
gear types, including trawl, gillnet, trap/pot, and pound net/weir/
seine.
As described above, the most recent LOF is used as the universe of
commercial fisheries included on the AD. The fishery name, definition,
and number of vessels/persons specified on the AD are taken from the
most recent final LOF. Additionally, the fishery descriptions below
include a particular fishery's current classification on the MMPA LOF
(i.e., Category I, II, or III); Category I and II fisheries are
required to carry observers if requested by NMFS. As noted previously,
NMFS also has authority to observe fisheries in Federal waters under
the MSA, under which NMFS has collected sea turtle bycatch information.
Trawl Fisheries
Interactions with trawl fisheries are of a particular concern for
sea turtles, since forced submergence in any type of restrictive gear
could lead to lack of oxygen and subsequent death by drowning.
Metabolic changes that can
[[Page 59512]]
impair a sea turtle's ability to function can occur within minutes of a
forced submergence (Lutcavage et al., 1997).
Trawls that are not outfitted with turtle excluder devices (TEDs)
may result in forced submergence. Currently, only trawl fisheries
capable of catching shrimp and operating south of Cape Charles, VA, and
in the Gulf of Mexico as well as trawl fisheries targeting summer
flounder south of Cape Charles, VA, are required to use TEDs.
NMFS' Strategy for Sea Turtle Conservation and Recovery in Relation
to Atlantic Ocean and Gulf of Mexico Fisheries (``Strategy''), a gear-
based approach to addressing sea turtle bycatch, has identified trawl
gear as a priority given our knowledge of the level of bycatch in this
gear and the availability of technology that allows sea turtles to
escape the trawl net, minimizing injury and mortality. The Strategy is
currently evaluating mitigation measures for trawl fisheries that
overlap with sea turtles. Several fisheries that NMFS proposes to
include on the 2010 AD may be considered for sea turtle conservation
measures under the Strategy in a future rulemaking to implement the
prohibition of take and to help conserve and recover sea turtles.
Several states included trawl fisheries in their responses to NMFS'
request for information and recommendations for the 2010 AD.
Massachusetts noted that summer flounder trawlers are known to interact
with sea turtles. New York recommended considering bottom otter trawl
fisheries given that this is one of the top gear types in terms of
pounds landed in Long Island Sound, Peconic Bay, and along the South
Shore. New Jersey suggested focusing observer coverage in areas where
trawl gear overlaps with sea turtle observations. Maryland reported
that interactions between bottom otter trawl gear as well as beam trawl
gear and sea turtles are possible in the Atlantic Ocean (0-3 miles (0-
4.8 km)) and there have been reports of sea turtles captured in trawl
gear. North Carolina ranked trawls operating in ocean waters as their
top priority based on NMFS' four criteria. South Carolina noted that
both trynets and whelk trawls are of concern. Georgia, Florida, and
Alabama all noted trawl fisheries as well. Mississippi highlighted
skimmer trawls in their response to NMFS' request for recommendations.
Therefore, based on the information provided by states and the best
available scientific information, NMFS proposes to include the
following trawl fisheries on the 2010 AD.
Atlantic Shellfish Bottom Trawl Fishery
The Atlantic shellfish bottom trawl fishery (estimated 972 vessels/
persons) encompasses the calico scallop trawl, crab trawl, Georgia/
South Carolina/Maryland whelk trawl, Gulf of Maine/Mid-Atlantic sea
scallop trawl, and Gulf of Maine northern shrimp trawl (71 FR 2006,
January 4, 2006). This fishery extends from Maine through Florida. The
fishery is managed through Federal and interstate fishery management
plans (FMPs).
This fishery is classified as Category III on the MMPA LOF;
however, portions of the fishery have been observed at low levels under
MSA authority and by the Georgia Department of Natural Resources (GA
DNR).
Since 2004, 16 sea turtle takes were reported by NMFS trained
observers in the Atlantic sea scallop trawl fishery. Takes of sea
turtles in scallop trawl gear have been observed during the months from
June through October. One of the 16 sea turtles captured in scallop
trawl gear was decomposed indicating it was not killed as a result of
the scallop trawl gear in which it was observed. Fourteen of the non-
decomposed turtles were loggerhead sea turtles, while one was not
identified to species.
In addition, loggerhead sea turtle bycatch in the mid-Atlantic sea
scallop trawl fishery, one component of the Atlantic shellfish bottom
trawl fishery, was estimated for 2004 and 2005. The average annual
bycatch estimates of loggerhead sea turtles in 2004 and 2005 in mid-
Atlantic sea scallop trawl gear ranged from 81 to 191 turtles,
depending on the estimation methodology used (Murray 2007). GA DNR
conducted a limited observer program in the trawl fishery targeting
whelk in the late 1990s; 7 turtles (3 Kemp's ridleys, 2 greens, and 2
loggerheads) were taken in 28 observed tows. NMFS is particularly
interested in observing this fishery in waters off of Massachusetts and
south as sea turtles more commonly occur in this area.
NMFS proposes to include this fishery on the 2010 AD based on
documented interactions with sea turtles in this and other bottom trawl
fisheries and the need to obtain more information on the interactions
in this fishery.
Mid-Atlantic Bottom Trawl Fishery
Bottom otter trawl nets include a variety of net types, including
flynets, which are high profile trawls. The ``Mid-Atlantic bottom trawl
fishery'' as described in this proposed AD includes both the mid-
Atlantic bottom trawl fishery and the mid-Atlantic flynet fishery as
defined on the LOF.
The Mid-Atlantic bottom trawl fishery (estimated >1,000 vessels/
persons), as defined on the LOF, uses bottom trawl gear to target
species including, but not limited to, bluefish, croaker, monkfish,
summer flounder (fluke), winter flounder, silver hake (whiting), spiny
dogfish, smooth dogfish, scup, and black sea bass. The fishery occurs
year-round from Cape Cod, MA, to Cape Hatteras, NC, in waters west of
72 30' W. long. and north of a line extending due east from the North
Carolina/South Carolina border. The gear is managed by several state
and Federal FMPs.
The Mid-Atlantic flynet fishery (estimated 21 vessels/persons), as
defined on the LOF, is a multi-species fishery composed of nearshore
and offshore components that operate along the east coast of the mid-
Atlantic United States. Flynets typically range from 80-120 ft (24-36.6
m) in headrope length, with wing mesh sizes of 16-64 in (41-163 cm),
following a slow 3:1 taper to smaller mesh sizes in the body,
extension, and codend sections of the net. The nearshore fishery
operates from October to April inside of 30 fathoms (180 ft; 55 m) from
New Jersey to North Carolina. This nearshore fishery targets Atlantic
croaker, weakfish, butterfish, harvestfish, bluefish, menhaden, striped
bass, kingfish species, and other finfish species. Flynet fishing is no
longer permitted in Federal waters south of Cape Hatteras to a line
extending from the NC/SC border in order to protect weakfish stocks.
The offshore component operates from November to April outside of 30
fathoms (180 ft; 55 m) from the Hudson Canyon off New York, south to
Hatteras Canyon off North Carolina. These deeper water fisheries target
bluefish, Atlantic mackerel, Loligo squid, black sea bass, and scup (72
FR 7382, February 15, 2007). Illex squid are also targeted offshore
(70-200 fathoms [420-1,200 ft; 128-366 m]) during summer months from
May to September.
The Mid-Atlantic bottom trawl fishery and the Mid-Atlantic flynet
fishery are currently classified as Category II on the MMPA LOF, which
authorizes NMFS to observe these fisheries for marine mammal
interactions, and to collect information on sea turtles should a take
occur on an observed trip. Between 2003 and 2007, observer coverage as
reported in the Marine Mammal Stock Assessment Report (SAR) ranged from
a low of 1% to a high of 18.61% depending on target species; see
Appendix III of the draft 2009 SAR for additional details (NMFS, 2009).
It should be noted that the mid-Atlantic
[[Page 59513]]
bottom trawl fishery is defined slightly differently in the SARs (which
use 70[deg] W as a boundary) than it is defined here and in the LOF.
NMFS will consider changing this definition in a future LOF.
Since 2003, NMFS has documented 50 sea turtle takes (excluding
severely decomposed animals) in bottom otter trawl gear in the mid-
Atlantic. These takes occurred primarily between October and February,
but takes were also reported May through September. In 2007, the
observer program created new codes to document the different net types
used, including flynets. Seven of the takes were recorded on trips
where flynets were indicated as the specific net type used. Loggerhead
turtles were the predominant species observed taken, but leatherback
turtles were also documented. An estimate of the average annual bycatch
of loggerhead sea turtles in mid-Atlantic bottom otter trawl gear
during 1996-2004 was completed in 2006. The analysis defined the mid-
Atlantic as the region from the shoreline below 41[deg] 30' N./66[deg]
W. to the southern extent of the NEFSC observer data collection, around
35[deg] 00' N. lat. and 75[deg] 30' W. long. Estimated average annual
bycatch of loggerhead turtles in mid-Atlantic bottom otter trawl gear
during 1996-2004 was 616 animals (Murray, 2008).
NMFS proposes to include this fishery on the 2010 AD to more
adequately observe this gear type where and when it overlaps with sea
turtle distribution.
Mid-Atlantic Mid-water Trawl (including pair trawl) Fishery
The Mid-Atlantic mid-water trawl fishery (estimated 620 vessels/
persons) primarily targets Atlantic mackerel, chub mackerel, and
miscellaneous other pelagic species. This fishery consists of both
single and pair trawls, which are designed, capable, or used to fish
for pelagic species with no portion of the gear designed to be operated
in contact with the bottom. The fishery for Atlantic mackerel occurs
primarily from southern New England through the mid-Atlantic from
January to March and in the Gulf of Maine during the summer and fall
(May to December).
The Mid-Atlantic mid-water trawl fishery is currently classified as
Category II on the MMPA LOF, which authorizes NMFS to observe this
fishery for marine mammal interactions, and to collect information on
sea turtles should a take occur on an observed trip. During 2003-2007,
estimated observer coverage year-round in this fishery was 3.5%,
12.16%, 8.4%, 8.9%, and 3.85%, respectively (NMFS 2009); no sea turtle
takes were observed.
NMFS proposes to include this fishery on the 2010 AD to more
adequately observe this gear type in areas and during times where it
overlaps with sea turtle distribution.
Southeastern U.S. Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico Shrimp Trawl Fishery
The Southeastern U.S. Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico shrimp trawl fishery
(estimated >18,000 vessels/persons) targets shrimp using various types
of trawls; NMFS would focus on the component of the fishery that uses
skimmer trawls for the 2010 AD. Skimmer trawls are used primarily in
inshore/inland shallow waters (typically less than 20 ft (6.1 m)) to
target shrimp. The skimmer trawl has a rigid ``L''-shaped or triangular
metal frame with the inboard portion of the frame attached to the
vessel and the outboard portion attached to a skid that runs along the
seabed.
Skimmer trawl use increased in response to TED requirements for
shrimp bottom otter trawls. Skimmer trawls currently have no TED
requirement but are subject to tow time limits of 55 minutes from April
1 to October 31 and 75 minutes from November 1 to March 31. Skimmer
trawls are used in North Carolina, Florida (Gulf Coast), Mississippi,
and Louisiana. There are documented takes of sea turtles in skimmer
trawls in North Carolina, and anecdotal reports elsewhere. In North
Carolina, there were 150-200+ active vessels per year from 2000-2002
and in Louisiana, skimmer trawls accounted for 37% of the shrimp catch
and 63% of the total shrimp trawling effort from 1999-2004. Louisiana
skimmer trawl effort averaged about 60,750 trips per year over that
period, ranging from about 81,700 trips in year 2000 to 49,000 trips in
year 2004. No effort information is available for Mississippi and
Florida.
Skimmer trawl effort overlaps with sea turtle distribution, and as
noted above, takes have been reported. Although subject to tow times,
the magnitude and impact of turtle takes in this fishery are not
understood, and no observer program currently exists for this portion
of the shrimp fishery. Given the extent this gear is used, NMFS thinks
it is important to better understand these interactions.
NMFS is considering including skimmer trawls under the Atlantic
Ocean and Gulf of Mexico Sea Turtle Strategy, which may result in a
regulation to require TEDs or other protections for sea turtles for all
trawl gears as appropriate. Observer coverage to understand the scope
and impact of turtle takes by this gear will also be needed to make
well informed management decision on what actions may be necessary to
manage this fishery to minimize and prevent sea turtle takes and
further sea turtle conservation and recovery.
The Southeastern U.S. Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico shrimp trawl fishery
is classified as Category III on the MMPA LOF, but mandatory observer
coverage under MSA authority began in 2007. The fishery is currently
observed at approximately 1% of total fishery effort. NMFS is proposing
to include the Southeastern U.S. Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico shrimp trawl
fishery, to focus observer coverage in the component of the fishery
that uses skimmer trawls, on the 2010 AD.
Gillnet Fisheries
Sea turtles are vulnerable to entanglement and drowning in
gillnets, especially when the gear is left untended. The main risk to
sea turtles from capture in gillnet is forced submergence. Entanglement
in gillnets can also result in severe abrasions on entangled turtles.
Large mesh gillnets (e.g., 10-12 in. (25.4-30.5 cm) stretched mesh)
have been documented as effective at capturing sea turtles.
Additionally, sea turtles have been documented as entangled in smaller
mesh gillnets.
Several states (i.e., CA, NY, NJ, DE, MD, VA, NC, AL) recommended
including gillnet fisheries on the 2010 AD. California recommended two
small mesh gillnet fisheries. New York recommended considering sink
gillnets and runaround gillnets, particularly those operating off the
South Shore and Peconic Bay. During the time sea turtles are present in
New York waters, gillnets are one of the top gear types in terms of
pounds landed along the South Shore. New Jersey recommended observing
gillnet fisheries operating in areas that overlap with sea turtle
sightings. Delaware identified gillnet gear as a concern based on the
potential for interactions. Maryland noted that potential for sea
turtle takes exists in gillnet fisheries operating within coastal bays
and tidal tributaries, but no takes have been documented. Virginia
noted that there are state regulations for gillnets in an effort to
conserve and protect sea turtles in their waters. North Carolina ranked
large mesh commercial gillnets operating in estuarine waters as a top
concern. Alabama noted gillnets in their response to NMFS' request for
recommendations. In addition, NMFS' Strategy for Sea Turtle
Conservation and Recovery in Relation to Atlantic Ocean and Gulf of
Mexico Fisheries has identified gillnet gear as a high priority.
[[Page 59514]]
Therefore, based on the information provided by states and the best
available scientific information, NMFS proposes to include the
following gillnet fisheries on the 2010 AD.
CA Halibut, White Seabass and Other Species Set Gillnet Fishery (>3.5
in mesh)
The CA halibut, white seabass, and other species set gillnet
fishery (estimated 58 vessels/persons) targets halibut, white seabass,
and other species from the U.S.-Mexico border north to Monterey Bay
using 200 fathom (1,200 ft; 366 m) gillnet with a stretch mesh size of
8.5 in (31.6 cm). Net soak duration is typically 8-10, 19-24, or 44-49
hours at a depth ranging from 15-50 fathoms (90-300 ft; 27-91 m) with
most sets from 15-35 fathoms (90-210 ft; 27-64 m). No more than 1500
fathoms (9,000 ft; 2,743 m) of gill or trammel net may be fished in
combination for CA halibut and angel shark. Fishing occurs year-round,
with effort generally increasing during summer months and declining
during last the 3 months of the year. The central CA portion of the
fishery from Point Arguello to Point Reyes has been closed since
September, 2002, following a ban on gillnets inshore of 60 fathoms (360
ft; 110 m). Set gill nets have been prohibited in state waters south of
Point Arguello and within 70 fathoms (420 ft; 128 m) or one mile (1.6
km), whichever is less, around the Channel Islands since 1990. The
California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG) manages the fishery as a
limited entry fishery with gear restrictions and area closures.
This fishery is classified as Category II on the MMPA LOF, which
authorizes NMFS to observe this fishery in state waters for marine
mammal interactions, and to collect information on sea turtles should a
take occur on an observed trip. This fishery was observed at about
17.8% in 2007 and 5% in 2008. No sea turtle takes were observed during
2007 or 2008. NMFS proposes to include this fishery on the 2010 AD
because it operates in the same waters that turtles are known to occur
and this gear type is known to result in the incidental take of sea
turtles based on documented takes in similar fisheries.
CA Yellowtail, Barracuda, and White Seabass Drift Gillnet Fishery (mesh
size >3.5 in. and <14 in.)
The CA yellowtail, barracuda, and white seabass drift gillnet
fishery (24 vessels/persons) targets primarily yellowtail and white
seabass, and secondarily barracuda, with target species typically
determined by market demand on a short-term basis. Drift gillnets are
up to 6,000 ft (1,829 m) long and are set at the surface. The mesh size
depends on target species and is typically 6.0-6.5 in (15-16.5 cm).
When targeting yellowtail and barracuda, the mesh size must be
[gteqt]3.5 in (9 cm); when targeting white seabass, the mesh size must
be [gteqt]6 in (15.2 cm). From June 16 to March 14 not more than 20
percent, by number, of a load of fish may be white seabass with a total
length of 28 in (71 cm). A maximum of ten white seabass per load may be
taken, if taken in gillnet or trammel nets with meshes from 3.5-6.0 in
(9-15 cm) in length. The fishery operates year-round, primarily south
of Point Conception with some effort around San Clemente Island and San
Nicolas Island. This fishery is a limited entry fishery with various
gear restrictions and area closures managed by the California
Department of Fish and Game (CDFG).
This fishery is classified as Category II on the MMPA LOF, which
authorizes NMFS to observe this fishery for marine mammal interactions,
and to collect information on sea turtles should a take occur on an
observed trip. This fishery was observed in 2003 and 2004, with 10.4%
and 11.0% coverage, respectively. No sea turtle takes were observed
during 2003 or 2004. NMFS proposes to include this fishery on the 2010
AD because it operates in the same waters that turtles are known to
occur and this gear type is known to result in the incidental take of
sea turtles based on documented takes in similar fisheries.
Chesapeake Bay Inshore Gillnet Fishery
The Chesapeake Bay inshore gillnet fishery (estimated 45 vessels/
persons) targets menhaden and croaker using gillnet gear with mesh
sizes ranging from 2.75-5 in (7-12.7 cm), depending on the target
species. The fishery operates between the Chesapeake Bay/Bridge Tunnel
and the mainland. The fishery is managed under the Interstate FMPs for
Atlantic Menhaden and Atlantic Croaker.
This fishery is classified as Category II on the MMPA LOF, which
authorizes NMFS to observe this fishery in state waters for marine
mammal interactions, and to collect information on sea turtles should a
take occur on an observed trip. NMFS has previously observed this
fishery at extremely low levels. NMFS proposes to include this fishery
on the 2010 AD because sea turtles are known to occur in the same areas
where the fishery operates, takes have been previously documented in
similar gear, and the fishery operates during a period of high sea
turtle strandings.
Long Island Inshore Gillnet Fishery
The Long Island Sound inshore gillnet fishery (estimated 20
vessels/persons) includes all gillnet fisheries setting nets west of a
line from the north fork of the eastern end of Long Island, NY (Orient
Point to Plum Island to Fishers Island) to Watch Hill, RI (59 FR 43703,
August 25, 1994). Target species include, but are not limited to
bluefish, striped bass, weakfish, and summer flounder.
This fishery is classified as Category III on the MMPA LOF and NMFS
has not previously required vessels operating in this fishery to carry
an observer. NMFS has previously observed this fishery at extremely low
levels; no sea turtle takes were observed. NMFS proposes to include
this fishery in the 2010 AD because sea turtles are known to occur in
the same areas where the fishery operates and takes have been
documented in similar gear types.
Mid-Atlantic Gillnet Fishery
The Mid-Atlantic gillnet fishery (estimated 7,596 vessels/persons)
targets monkfish, spiny dogfish, smooth dogfish, bluefish, weakfish,
menhaden, spot, croaker, striped bass, large and small coastal sharks,
Spanish mackerel, king mackerel, American shad, black drum, skate spp.,
yellow perch, white perch, herring, scup, kingfish, spotted seatrout,
and butterfish. The fishery uses drift and sink gillnets, including
nets set in a sink, stab, set, strike, or drift fashion, with some
unanchored drift or sink nets used to target specific species. The
dominant material is monofilament twine with stretched mesh sizes from
2.5-12 in (6.4-30.5 cm), and string lengths from 150-8,400 ft. (46-
2,560 m). This fishery operates year-round west of a line drawn at
72[deg] 30' W. long. south to 36[deg] 33.03' N. lat. and east to the
eastern edge of the EEZ and north of the North Carolina/South Carolina
border, not including waters where inshore gillnet fisheries (i.e.,
Chesapeake Bay, North Carolina, Long Island Sound inshore gillnet
fisheries) operate in bays, estuaries, and rivers. This fishery
includes any residual large pelagic driftnet effort in the mid-Atlantic
and any shark and dogfish gillnet effort in the mid-Atlantic zone
described. The fishing effort is prosecuted right off the beach (6 ft
[1.8 m]) or in nearshore coastal waters to offshore waters (250 ft [76
m]).
Gear in this fishery is managed by several Federal FMPs and
Interstate FMPs managed by the Atlantic States Marine Fisheries
Commission (ASMFC). Fisheries are primarily managed by TACs; individual
trip limits (quotas); effort caps (limited number of days at
[[Page 59515]]
sea per vessel); time and area closures; and gear restrictions and
modifications.
This fishery is classified as Category I on the MMPA LOF, which
authorizes NMFS to observe this fishery in state and federal waters for
marine mammal interactions, and to collect information on sea turtles
should a take occur on an observed trip. During 2003-2007, estimated
observer coverage year-round in this fishery was 1%, 2%, 3%, 4%, and
6%, respectively (NMFS, 2009). Since 2003, 12 takes (excluding severely
decomposed animals) of loggerhead, leatherback, green, and Kemp's
ridley turtles were documented by observers between May and December.
From 1995-2006, the average annual bycatch estimate of loggerheads in
U.S. mid-Atlantic sink gillnet gear was 350 turtles (Murray 2009). The
mid-Atlantic was defined in this analysis as west of 70[deg] W. long.
from the shoreline of Cape Cod southward to the southern limit of the
observer data collection program (approximately 33[deg] N. lat.),
extending westward to the coastline (Murray, 2009). NMFS proposes to
include this fishery on the 2010 AD to focus observer coverage during
times and in areas where sea turtles are known to occur.
Northeast Sink Gillnet Fishery
The Northeast sink gillnet fishery (estimated >6,455 vessels/
persons) targets Atlantic cod, haddock, pollock, yellowtail flounder,
winter flounder, witch flounder, American plaice, windowpane flounder,
spiny dogfish, monkfish, silver hake, red hake, white hake, ocean pout,
skate spp, mackerel, redfish, and shad. This fishery uses sink gillnet
gear, which is anchored gillnet (bottom-tending net) gear fished in the
lower one-third of the water column. The dominant material is
monofilament twine with stretched mesh sizes from 6-12 in (15-30.5 cm)
and string lengths from 600-10,500 ft (183-3,200 m), depending on the
target species. Large mesh (10-14 in [25-35.6 cm]) sink gillnets,
either tied down or set upright without floats using a polyfoam core
floatline, are used when targeting monkfish. The fishery operates from
the U.S.-Canada border to Long Island, NY, at 72[deg] 30' W. long.
south to 36[deg] 33.03' N. lat. (corresponding with the Virginia/North
Carolina border) and east to the eastern edge of the EEZ, including the
Gulf of Maine, Georges Bank, and Southern New England, and excluding
Long Island Sound or other waters where gillnet fisheries are
classified as Category III on the MMPA LOF. Fishing effort occurs year-
round, peaking from May to July primarily on continental shelf regions
in depths from 30-750 ft (9-228.6 m), with some nets deeper than 800 ft
(244 m).
This fishery is managed by the Northeast Multispecies (Groundfish)
FMP. This fishery is also managed by the Atlantic Large Whale Take
Reduction Plan (ALWTRP) and the Harbor Porpoise Take Reduction Plan
(HPTRP) to reduce the risk of entanglement of right, humpback, and fin
whales, and harbor porpoises, respectively. The fishery is primarily
managed through TAC limits; individual trip limits (quotas); effort
caps (limited number of days at sea per vessel); time and area
closures; and gear restrictions.
This fishery is classified as Category I on the MMPA LOF, which
authorizes NMFS to observe this fishery in state and Federal waters for
marine mammal interactions and to collect information on sea turtles
should a take occur on an observed trip. During 2003-2007, estimated
observer coverage year-round in this fishery was 3%, 6%, 7%, 4%, 7%,
respectively (NMFS, 2009). Five sea turtle takes were observed during
this time. NMFS proposes to include this fishery on the 2010 AD to
focus observer coverage during times and in areas where sea turtles are
known to occur, particularly in waters off Massachusetts and waters
south of this area.
North Carolina Inshore Gillnet Fishery
The NC inshore gillnet fishery (94 vessels/persons) targets species
including, but not limited to, southern flounder, weakfish, bluefish,
Atlantic croaker, striped mullet, spotted seatrout, Spanish mackerel,
striped bass, spot, red drum, black drum, and shad. This fishery
includes any fishing effort using any type of gillnet gear, including
set (float and sink), drift, and runaround gillnet for any target
species inshore of the COLREGS lines in North Carolina. This fishery is
managed under state and ASMFC interstate FMPs, applying net and mesh
size regulations, and seasonal area closures in the Pamlico Sound
Gillnet Restricted Area (PSGNRA).
Gillnet fisheries operating in inshore and inland waters of North
Carolina are currently not observed except in a limited area. An ESA
section 10(a)(1)(B) permit requires monitoring the Pamlico Sound summer
flounder gillnet fishery. However, extensive gillnet activity occurs
throughout the inshore and inland waters of North Carolina (e.g., Core
Sound/Cape Fear area, Roanoke and Albemarle Sounds); effort in some
areas has never been observed, but other areas have had limited
coverage, which was authorized under the MMPA (this fishery is listed
as Category II on the MMPA LOF). Gillnet activity overlaps spatially
with areas utilized by sea turtles, often at relatively high densities.
Additionally, the likelihood of significant injury or mortality to sea
turtles when taken by this gear is high. NMFS recently conducted a
limited observer program in the southern flounder gillnet fishery in
Core Sound, which was previously unobserved. Several sea turtles
(green, Kemp's ridley, and loggerhead) were observed taken in the
fishery. Take levels were highly variable, but generally high, with
many observed trips taking no sea turtles, and other trips having as
many as five takes. A more extensive, longer-term observer program is
needed to adequately assess the extent and impact of the all components
of the inshore North Carolina gillnet fishery on sea turtles.
Therefore, NMFS is proposing to include this fishery on the 2010 AD.
Southeast Atlantic Gillnet Fishery
The Southeast Atlantic gillnet fishery (779 estimated vessels/
persons) targets finfish including, but not limited to, king mackerel,
Spanish mackerel, whiting, bluefish, pompano, spot, croaker, little
tunny, bonita, jack crevalle, cobia, and striped mullet. This fishery
does not include gillnet effort targeting sharks as part of the
Southeastern U.S. Atlantic shark gillnet fishery. This fishery uses
gillnets set in sink, stab, set, or strike fashion. The fishery
operates in waters south of a line extending due east from the North
Carolina-South Carolina border and south and east of the fishery
management council demarcation line between the Atlantic Ocean and the
Gulf of Mexico. The majority of fishing effort occurs in Federal waters
since South Carolina, Georgia, and Florida prohibit the use of
gillnets, with limited exceptions, in state waters.
Fishing for king mackerel, Spanish mackerel, cobia, cero, and
little tunny in Federal waters is managed under the Coastal Migratory
Pelagic Resources FMP. None of the other target species are Federally-
managed under the MSA. In state waters, state and ASMFC Interstate FMPs
apply.
This fishery is classified as Category II on the MMPA LOF, which
authorizes NMFS to observe this fishery in state and federal waters for
marine mammal interactions, and to collect information on sea turtles
should a take occur on an observed trip. NMFS has previously observed
this fishery at moderate levels, primarily focused on target catch and
bycatch species other than sea turtles. NMFS proposes to include this
fishery on the 2010 to focus observer coverage during times and in
areas where sea turtles are known to occur.
[[Page 59516]]
Trap/Pot Fisheries
Turtles are known to become entangled in the end lines (also called
vertical lines) of trap/pot gear and there have been anecdotal reports
that sea turtles may interact with the trap/pot itself. Turtles
entangled in trap/pot gear may drown or suffer injuries (and potential
subsequent mortality) due to constriction by the rope or line. Takes of
both leatherback and hard-shelled sea turtles have been documented in
this gear type. NMFS Northeast Region established the Northeast
Atlantic Sea Turtle Disentanglement Network (STDN) in 2002 to respond
to entanglements in vertical lines associated with trap/pot gear.
Several states included trap/pot fisheries in their responses to
NMFS' request for information and recommendations for the 2010 AD.
Massachusetts listed pots (lobster, fish, whelk) as a gear type known
to interact with sea turtles. New York recommended that fish, lobster,
and crab pots be considered. Maryland ranked the commercial crab pot
fishery that operates April through December as having a high
possibility for interacting with sea turtles and a greater possibility
for injury compared to other gear types in Maryland state waters.
Maryland also ranked several other commercial pot fisheries (e.g.,
conch and fish) with a lower potential to interact with sea turtles.
Maryland noted reports of sea turtles getting their heads caught in the
gear while eating bait out of the trap/pot. Delaware included conch and
blue crab trap/pot fisheries as having potential interactions with sea
turtles where effort overlaps with sea turtle distribution. Both South
Carolina and Florida included trap/pot fisheries in their
recommendations and noted the potential for using an alternative
platform program to observe this gear type.
Therefore, NMFS proposes to include the following four trap/pot
fisheries, focusing on those fisheries or components of fisheries
operating south of Massachusetts, as sea turtles more commonly occur in
this area, on the 2010 AD.
Atlantic Blue Crab Trap/Pot Fishery
The Atlantic blue crab trap/pot fishery (estimated >16,000 vessels/
persons) targets blue crab using pots baited with fish or poultry
typically set in rows in shallow water. The pot position is marked by
either a floating or sinking buoy line attached to a surface buoy. The
fishery occurs year-round from the south shore of Long Island at 72 30'
W. long. in the Atlantic and east of the fishery management demarcation
line between the Atlantic Ocean and the Gulf of Mexico (50 CFR
600.105), including state waters. The fishery is managed under state
FMPs.
This fishery is classified as Category II on the MMPA LOF, which
authorizes NMFS to observe this fishery for marine mammal interactions,
and to collect information on sea turtles should a take occur on an
observed trip. NMFS has not observed this fishery, but has documented 3
sea turtle takes in blue crab trap/pot gear in Virginia during the
months of May and June. One of the events involved a leatherback and
two involved loggerheads (STDN, unpublished data). NMFS proposes to
include this fishery on the 2010 AD to target observer coverage more
specifically to obtain information on sea turtle bycatch and how sea
turtles may be interacting with trap/pot gear.
Atlantic Mixed Species Trap/Pot Fishery
The Atlantic mixed species trap/pot fishery (unknown number of
vessels/persons) targets species including, but not limited to,
hagfish, shrimp, conch/whelk, red crab, Jonah crab, rock crab, black
sea bass, scup, tautog, cod, haddock, pollock, redfish (ocean perch),
white hake, spot, skate, catfish, and stone crab. This fishery as
defined on the MMPA LOF also includes American eel as a target species;
however, there is also a Category III American eel trap/pot fishery
listed on the LOF. Therefore, NMFS does not consider American eel to be
a target species in the Atlantic mixed species trap/pot fishery and
will correct this oversight in a future LOF. The fishery includes all
trap/pot operations from the Maine-Canada border south through the
waters east of the fishery management demarcation line between the
Atlantic Ocean and the Gulf of Mexico (50 CFR 600.105), but does not
include the following trap/pot fisheries (as defined on the MMPA LOF):
Northeast/Mid-Atlantic American lobster trap/pot; Atlantic blue crab
trap/pot; Florida spiny lobster trap/pot; Southeastern U.S. Atlantic,
Gulf of Mexico stone crab trap/pot; U.S. Mid-Atlantic eel trap/pot
fisheries; and the Southeastern U.S. Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico golden
crab fishery (68 FR 1421, January 10, 2003). The fishery is managed
under various Interstate and Federal FMPs.
This fishery is classified as Category II on the MMPA LOF, which
authorizes NMFS to observe this fishery in state and Federal waters for
marine mammal interactions, and to collect information on sea turtles
should a take occur on an observed trip. NMFS has previously observed
this fishery at extremely low levels; no sea turtle takes have been
documented by fishery observers. However, the NMFS STDN has documented
9 leatherback entanglements in trap/pot gear targeting sea bass in
Massachusetts during the month of August from 2003 to 2008 (STDN,
unpublished data). From 2003-2008, the STDN documented 1 green, 4
loggerhead, and 8 leatherback turtle takes in trap/pot gear targeting
whelk in MA, VA, and NJ during May, June, July, August, and October.
NMFS is proposing to include this fishery in the 2010 AD to target
observer coverage more specifically to obtain information on sea turtle
interactions and how sea turtles may be interacting with trap/pot gear,
particularly in waters off of Massachusetts and waters south of this
area, as sea turtles more commonly occur in these areas.
Northeast/Mid-Atlantic American Lobster Trap/Pot Fishery
The Northeast/Mid-Atlantic American lobster trap/pot fishery
(estimated 13,000 vessels/persons) targets American lobster primarily
with traps, while 2-3 percent of the target species is taken by mobile
gear (trawls and dredges). The fishery operates in inshore and offshore
waters from Maine to New Jersey and may extend as far south as Cape
Hatteras, NC. Approximately 80 percent of American lobster is harvested
from state waters; therefore, the ASMFC has the primary regulatory
role. The fishery is managed in state waters under the ASMFC Interstate
FMP and in Federal waters under the Atlantic Coastal Fisheries
Cooperative Management Act.
This fishery is classified as Category I on the MMPA LOF, which
authorizes NMFS to observe this fishery in state and Federal waters for
marine mammal interactions, and to collect information on sea turtles
should a take occur on an observed trip. NMFS has previously observed
this fishery at extremely low levels; no sea turtle takes have been
observed. However, NMFS STDN has documented 27 leatherback turtle
entanglements in this fishery operating in ME, MA, and RI. These
entanglements have occurred between June and October (STDN, unpublished
data).
NMFS is proposing to include this fishery in the 2010 AD to target
observer coverage more specifically to obtain information on sea turtle
bycatch and how sea turtles may be interacting with trap/pot gear,
particularly in waters off of Massachusetts and waters south of this
area, as sea turtles more commonly occur in these areas.
[[Page 59517]]
Pound Net/Weir/Seine Fisheries
Pound net, weir, and seine fisheries may use mesh similar to that
used in gillnets, but the gear is prosecuted differently from
traditional gillnets. For example, pound net leaders have a mesh
component similar to a gillnet; sea turtles have been documented
entangled in pound net leaders. Pound net leaders in the Virginia
portion of the Chesapeake Bay are subject to requirements designed to
reduce sea turtle bycatch. Purse seines and weirs also have the
potential to entangle and drown sea turtles.
Several states included pound net/weir/seine fisheries in their
responses to NMFS' request for information and recommendations for the
2010 AD. Massachusetts listed pound nets/weirs as a gear type known to
interact with sea turtles. Maryland noted that sea turtles have been
documented alive and uninjured in the pounds, but none have been
documented in pound net leaders. Virginia recognized both historical
observations of interactions in this fishery as well as current
regulations in the fishery (69 FR 24997, May 5, 2004; 71 FR 36024, June
23, 2006). North Carolina noted pound nets operating in estuarine
waters in their recommendations.
Therefore, based on the information provided by states and the best
available scientific information, NMFS proposes to include the
following four pound net/weir/seine fis